alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: mlklock@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:24:04 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mary Klock

Vancouver, WA 98664
Before the Second Division,

August 25, 1955

No. 59264.

protest 253264-K (New York).

#### Artmart Linen Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

*232Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of doilies similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 58520, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: amottervlahakos@homtail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:14:47 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Alicia Motter-Vlahakos

Houston, TX 77058
Dolat Ventures, Inc. -10-K/A




Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF


PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending February 28, 2010 (the “Report”) of Dolat Ventures, Inc. (the “Company”), the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacities as President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the undersigned’s knowledge:




1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.




Date: August 16 , 2011/s/ Shmuel Dovid HauckShmuel Dovid Hauck

President and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Executive and FinancialOfficer)




The foregoing certification is furnished as an exhibit to the Report and will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
From: samueljbell@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:00:55 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

muel Bell

Williamstown, NJ 08094
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, DANIEL C. DUNN, certify that:

1. I have reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ALLIED HEALTHCARE
PRODUCTS, INC.

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) omitted as not yet applicable;

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.

Date: February 6, 2006
                        /s/ DANIEL C. DUNN
                        -------------------
                            Daniel C. Dunn
                            Vice President, Chief Financial Officer & Secretary
From: bleeked@juno.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:17:01 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mary Beth Bleeker

Belmont, MI 49306
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

SHERRY A. STALEY,

Plaintiff,

v.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner of

Social Security Administration,

Defendant.

CASE NO. C05-5582FDB

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff objects to the Report and Recommendation arguing that the Administrative Law Judge

failed to give reasons for rejecting Dr. Eather’s more restrictive limitations, and consequently, there are no

reasons in the record to test under the substantial evidence standard. The ALJ provided a detailed review

of the depressive symptoms from 2001 through February 2004 that Dr. Eather opined would interfere with

Plaintiff’s performance of frequent complex work. Moreover, the ALJ incorporated the limitations found

by Dr. Eather in her hypothetical questions to the vocational expert. (Tr. 414.) The ALJ did apply the

proper standard and there is substantial evidence in the record to support the decision. 

The Court, having reviewed plaintiff's complaint, the Report and Recommendation of Judge J.

Kelley Arnold, United States Magistrate Judge, and objections to the report and recommendation, and the

remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) The administrative decision is AFFIRMED; and

Case 3:05-cv-05582-FDB Document 17 Filed 05/22/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff's counsel, defendant's counsel

and Magistrate Judge J. Kelley Arnold.

DATED this 22nd day of May 2006.

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-05582-FDB Document 17 Filed 05/22/06 Page 2 of 2
#### In the Matter of William Dezago, Petitioner, v New York State Thruway Authority, Respondent.

[632 NYS2d 30]

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a deter mi-*501nation of the Executive Director of the New York State Thruway Authority, dated January 10, 1994, which, after a hearing, found him guilty of misappropriating Authority property for personal use and driving an Authority vehicle off New York State Thruway premises for personal business, and dismissed him from his position as a construction equipment operator.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner, after having been found guilty by the New York State Thruway Authority of offenses relating to the theft of a spool of copper wire and the unauthorized use of an Authority vehicle (the latter offense was admitted by him), was terminated from his position with the respondent. Contrary to his assertions, this determination was supported by substantial evidence *(see, Matter of Lahey v Kelly,*71 NY2d 135). Further, in light of the current and past offenses committed by the petitioner, the penalty of dismissal was not so disproportionate as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness *(see, Matter of Pell v Board of Educ.,*34 NY2d 222). Balletta, J. P., Ritter, Pizzuto and Santucci, JJ., concur.
Terry Johnson/R6/USEPA/US

01/24/2012 10:47 AM

To a-and-r-docket@epa.gov

cc

bcc

Subject Attention Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2008–0476

6 attachments

Eagle12.zip Eagle12.zip NWHarris24.zip NWHarris24.zip Parker24.zip Parker24.zip Readme.docx Readme.docx Txcity24.zip Txcity24.zip Wallisville24.zip Wallisville24.zip

HYSPLIT data files used by EPA's Region 6 Office to develop wind back trajectories for the Dallas-Fort 

Worth and Houston areas.

Terry Johnson

U.S. EPA Region 6 Air Planning Section

214-665-2154
This media is not available in Regulations.gov. Contact the 

EPA Docket Center, Public Reading Room to view or receive a 

copy of this document. Requests for copies may be made as 

follows:

In person/writing: 

Environmental Protection Agency, Docket Center

1301 Constitution Ave NW, 2822T, Room 3334 

Washington, DC. 20004 

Telephone: 

202-566-1744

Fax:

202-566- 9744

Email: 

docket-customerservice@epa.gov
No. P66/253. —

#### Terra International Co., Ltd. *v.*United States, protest 65/15438 (New York).

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of battery-operated mixmasters similar in all material respects to those the subject of *F. B. Vandegrift & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(53 Cust. Ct. 231, Abstract 68674), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 64564.

#### American Commercial, Incorporated *v.*United States,

protest 59/30105 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Integrated Circuit Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 27, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Justine F. Lien, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|                                       
|/s/    JUSTINE F. LIEN                 
|                                       
|Justine F. Lien Chief Financial Officer



February 10, 2004



23
No. 66526.

#### C. H. Powell Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/22034, etc. (Boston).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of military visor insignia, in chief value of lame, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 63445, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exemption	Request	under	Section	333	of	the	FAA	Reform	Act	of	2012

I, Shay	Moody

, Licensed	A&P	Mechanic (certificate #2854461),	of 29	Ben	West Dr. Cedartown,	GA	30125 am	petitioning	the	Federal	Aviation	Administration	(FAA)	for an	exemption	from	part	21, subpart	H;	and	Sections	45.23(b),	91.9(b)(2),	91.119, 91.121,	91.151(a),	91.203(a)	and	(b),	91.405(a),	91.407(a)(1),	91.409(a)(2),	and 91.417(a)	and	(b)	of	Title	14,	Code	of	Federal Regulations	(14	CFR).	This	proposed exemption	would	allow	me	to	operate	a DJI Inspire	1	Quad	Copter	Unmanned	Aerial System	(UAS) and	a	Quanum	Nova	Quad	Copter	Unmanned	Aerial	System	(UAS) for the	purpose	of	aerial inspection,	videography	and	photography. This	proposed exemption	would	allow	me	to	operate	a	PrecisionHawk	Lancaster	Unmanned	Aerial System	(UAS)	and	a MicroPilot	CropCam	Unmanned	Aerial	System	(UAS)	for	the purpose	of	aerial	mapping	and	agricultural	assessment. The	use	of	a	UAS	for	these activities will bring an overhead perspective that was previously only possible
through the prohibitively expensive use of rotorcraft and fixed wing aircraft with expensive camera equipment. I would bring this service at an affordable price and due to the simple nature ofthe UAS, with substantial time savings	and	safety.

I will utilize my knowledge as a Licensed	A&P of	20	years and	my 25	years	of experience	as	an	R/C pilot to maintain the highest level of safety during the proposed use ofthe UAS. Flight would consist ofthree parts: preflight, flight and post flight. The preflight will consist of extensive inspections ofthe area, the UAS and the airspace in which it will be operating. A detailed inspection ofthe UAS will be conducted and all major systems will be examined, including power plant, airframe and controls. Any discrepancy will be noted and if the discrepancy affects the safety ofthe flight, the flight will not commence. Operations will only commence in reasonably safe environments that will be strictly controlled during the flight of the UAS. The area will be surveyed for obstacles	that	could affect the safety ofthe flight. There will be no flights within the proximity of active airports without first contacting the appropriate agencies or authorities to ensure the highest level of safety and compliance with all regulations. Operations will also not commence where there is a reasonable possibility of inadvertent physical contact with the populace. During the flight portion ofthe operation, safety will be the primary

concern. Given the size, weight, speed

, and limited operating area ofthe UAS; flight will be inherently safe. The UAS will not be operated above individuals not associated with its operation and care will be given to avoid property that was noted during the preflight inspection ofthe area. All flights will be conducted using VLOS under 400’ AGL. The UAS models Iwill use all have GPS guidance and “return to home” safety feature installed. All flights will be conducted with a pilot and a safety observer.
No. 67558.

#### United China & Glass Co. *v.*United States,

protest 62/12092 (Portland, Oreg.).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of decorated porcelain after-dinner cups and saucers the same in all material respects as those the subject of *United States*v. *The Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Company*(47 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 719), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.