alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.23







NOTICE OF TERMINATION
VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL


Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent
135 S LaSalle Street
Mail Code I L4-135-09-61
Chicago, IL 60603




January 3, 2018






TO: Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent




Re:         Notice of Loan Prepayment and Termination






Reference is made to that Credit Agreement, dated as of September 26, 2013 (as amended, modified, extended, restated, replaced, or supplemented prior to the date hereof, the "Existing Credit Agreement"), among comScore, Inc. a Delaware corporation (the "Borrower"), the Guarantors from time to time party thereto, the Lenders from time to time party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent for the Lenders (in such capacity, the "Administrative Agent"). Capitalized terms used herein without definition have the meanings given to them in the Existing Credit Agreement.


Pursuant to Section 2.06 of the Credit Agreement, Borrower hereby gives notice to the Administrative Agent that it will terminate the Credit Agreement and all Commitments thereunder and in connection therewith Cash Collateralize all outstanding Letters of Credit and repay in full Obligations outstanding under the Credit Agreement and the other Loan Documents on or about January 11, 2018, such termination to be conditioned upon the Borrower entering into a replacement credit facility between the Borrower and its new lender which is expected to close on or about such date.


The undersigned Borrower have caused this Notice of Termination to be duly executed and
delivered as of the date first above written.




COMSCORE, INC, a Delaware corporation


By: /S/ Gregory A. Fink
Name: Gregory A. Fink
Title: Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Mohave County

Yavapai County

Yavapai

Marico

County

pa County

La Paz County

Maricopa County

White Tank

Mountains

Regional Park

Lake

Pleasant

Regional

Park

Prescott

Prescott

Valley

Cordes

Junction

Yarnell

Black

Canyon

City

New

River

Wickenburg

Peoria

Surprise

Buckeye

Goodyear

Phoenix

Glendale

Bureau of Land Management

Phoenix District Office

Phoenix, AZ

October 2009

Note: Land Status legend located on Map 1

Map 5

Agua Fria National

Monument / BradshawHarquahala Planning Area

Fire Land Use Allocation

0 5 10 15

Miles

Interstate

Major Road

Major River, Streams or Wash

Highway

Agua Fria National

Monument Planning Area

Bradshaw Harquahala

Planning Area

Allocation

Fire Use

Non Fire Use

BLM Lands

Note: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM)

conducts land use planning only in the areas administered

by BLM. BLM has no planning authority under the

municipal or county planning legislation of the State

of Arizona.

No warranty is made by BLM for the use of this map

for purposes not intended by BLM, or to the accuracy,

reliability or completeness of the information shown.

Spatial information may not meet National Map Accuracy

standards. This information may be updated without

notification.
Before the Third Division,

September 14, 1959

No. 63333.

protests 242248-K, etc. (New York).

#### Murbas Trading Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that involved in *Dalton Cooper, Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(41 Cust. Ct. 271, C.D. 2051), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Donlon, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in her dissenting opinion in C.D. 2051, *supra.*
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

MINUTE ORDER

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

CHARLES O’CAIN,

Plaintiff,

v.

RENTON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al.,

Defendants. ____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C06-0035-RSL-JPD

MINUTE ORDER

The following minute order is made at the direction of the Court, the Honorable James

P. Donohue, United States Magistrate Judge:

The noting date for the motion for the summary judgment motion filed by defendants J.

Renggli and Paul F. Guest, (Dkt. No. 24), is STRICKEN. Their motion for summary

judgment shall be RE-NOTED and considered together with the motion for summary judgment

filed by defendants King County and T. Manning, (Dkt. No. 28), on June 30, 2006. Plaintiff’s

opposition, if any, shall address both of defendants’ motions for summary judgment and shall

be filed no later than June 27, 2006. Defendants may file replies no later than June 30, 2006. 

See Local Rule CR 7.

//

//

Case 2:06-cv-00035-RSL Document 31 Filed 06/05/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

MINUTE ORDER

PAGE -2

DATED this 5th day of June, 2006.

Bruce Rifkin

Clerk of the Court

/s/ Peter H. Voelker 

Peter H. Voelker

Deputy Clerk

Case 2:06-cv-00035-RSL Document 31 Filed 06/05/06 Page 2 of 2
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 22-10424

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Cardell Mimms, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:18-CR-59-1

Before Higginbotham, Graves, and Ho, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Cardell Mimms

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Mimms has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 22, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-10424 Document: 00516481604 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/22/2022
No. 22-10424

2

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to 

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 22-10424 Document: 00516481604 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/22/2022
No. 62253.

#### R. J. Saunders & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 310967-K (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel to the extent that the appraisement is claimed null and void and that the issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Bluefries New York, Inc.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 79, C. D. 1909), the protest was dismissed, and the matter was remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)). *United States*v. *William Heyer,*31 C. C. P. A. 111, C. A. D. 259, followed.
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

JUAN PAULO PALOMERA ALMEJO,

a/k/a “Alex,”

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 05-314M 

DETENTION ORDER 

Offenses charged:

1. Conspiracy to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1),

841(b)(1)(B), and 846; and 

2. Distribution of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(C),

and 18 U.S.C. § 2.

Date of Detention Hearing: June 28, 2005.

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds

that no condition or combination of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure

the appearance of defendant as required and the safety of other persons and the community.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) In the Pretrial Services Report of June 28, 2005, it is reported that there is an

Case 2:05-cr-00344-JCC Document 14 Filed 06/28/05 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

immigration detainer lodged against the defendant. 

(2) Defendant is viewed as a risk of nonappearance based on his close ties to Mexico.

(3) Defendant is viewed as a risk of danger due to the nature of the pending charges.

(4) There appear to be no conditions or combination of conditions that will reasonably

assure the defendant’s appearance at future Court hearings.

(5) Defendant has stipulated to detention and has reserved the right to contest his

continued detention if there is a change in circumstances.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with

counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant is

confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose of

an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States

Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 28th day of June, 2005.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:05-cr-00344-JCC Document 14 Filed 06/28/05 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 13.1**

 

**Section 906 Certification**

 

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

 

Víctor Grifols Roura, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Alfredo Arroyo Guerra, the Chief Financial Officer of Grifols, S.A., each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

1.                                      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

 

2.                                      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Grifols, S.A.

 

Date:  April 1, 2015

 
|   | /s/   Víctor Grifols Roura |
|--------|---------------------------------|
|   | Name:                           | Víctor   Grifols Roura |
|   | Title:                          | Chairman   of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                            |
|   |                            |
|   | /s/   Alfredo Arroyo Guerra     |
|   | Name:                           | Alfredo   Arroyo Guerra |
|   | Title:                          | Chief   Financial Officer |

 

----
From: stephensky@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Friday, September 09, 2011 9:52:47 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Stephen Skystimas

Waterbury, CT 06705
H. Res. 380 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 23, 2007. 

Whereas Special Olympics is an international nonprofit organization that promotes personal development through 

sports training and competition; 

Whereas Special Olympics advances the understanding of intellectual disabilities through participation and fellowship 

in the Nation and around the World; 

Whereas Special Olympics serves more than 2,500,000 individuals with intellectual disabilities around the globe; 

Whereas Special Olympics offers more than 205 programs in 

over 165 countries; 

Whereas Special Olympics offers 30 Olympic-type summer 

and winter sports to both children and adults with intellectual disabilities; 

Whereas Boise, Idaho won the International bid to host the 

2009 Special Olympics World Winter Games to be held 

during February 6–13, 2009; 

Whereas thousands of athletes are expected to compete in 7 

winter sports in the 2009 Special Olympics World Winter 

Games; and 
2 

•HRES 380 EH 

Whereas the 2009 Special Olympics World Winter Games will 

be the largest multi-sport event ever held in the State of 

Idaho: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) applauds the goals and principles of Special 

Olympics; 

(2) salutes the athletes, coaches, family members, 

friends, and volunteers that make Special Olympics 

World Winter Games possible; 

(3) congratulates the State of Idaho as the host for 

the 2009 Special Olympics World Winter Games; and 

(4) supports the 2009 Special Olympic World Winter Games and the goals of the Special Olympics to enrich the lives of people with intellectual disabilities 

through sports. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 580 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 30, 2007.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 986) to amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers 
Act to designate certain segments of the Eightmile River in the State of 
Connecticut as components of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, and for 
other purposes. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived 
except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The amendment in the 
nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Natural Resources now 
printed in the bill, modified by the amendment printed in the report of the 
Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, shall be considered as adopted. 
The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. All points of order against 
provisions of the bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, to final passage without 
intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled 
by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Natural 
Resources; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
    Sec. 2.  During consideration of H.R. 986 pursuant to this resolution, 
notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the Chair may postpone 
further consideration of the bill to such time as may be designated by the 
Speaker.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 565 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 565

   Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to provide for 
division of the question on the legislative proposals involved to allow 
                  separate votes on disparate matters.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 24, 2007

   Mr. Sali (for himself, Mr. Chabot, Mr. Garrett of New Jersey, Mr. 
   Pitts, Mr. Goode, Mr. Akin, Mr. Herger, Mr. Price of Georgia, Mr. 
   Linder, Mr. Hoekstra, Mr. Bartlett of Maryland, Mr. Shadegg, Mr. 
Lamborn, Mr. Doolittle, Mr. Bishop of Utah, Mr. Pearce, Mrs. Blackburn, 
Mr. Conaway, Mr. Paul, Mr. Weldon of Florida, Mr. Cole of Oklahoma, Mr. 
 Gingrey, Mr. Fortuno, Mr. Feeney, Mr. Pence, Mrs. Myrick, Mrs. Drake, 
 and Mr. Davis of Kentucky) submitted the following resolution; which 
                 was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to provide for 
division of the question on the legislative proposals involved to allow 
                  separate votes on disparate matters.

    Resolved, That clause 5(a) of rule XVI of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended by inserting ``(1)'' after ``(a)'' and by 
inserting at the end the following new subparagraph:
    ``(2) In deciding upon the question of division, the division shall 
depend on the legislative propositions involved and not upon 
grammatical structure.''.
    Sec. 2.  Clause 6(c) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended by striking the period at the end of 
subparagraph (2) and inserting ``; or'' and by adding at the end the 
following new subparagraph:
            ``(3) a rule or order that would waive clause 5 of rule 
        XVI.''.
                                 <all>
```
From: mollypops@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:45:06 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ernest Williams

, 93654-2282
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #18179 and #18180; Vermont Disaster Number VT-00049]

# AGENCY:

Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 1.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Administrative disaster declaration of a rural area for the State of Vermont dated 09/14/2023.

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms, Flooding, Landslides, and Mudslides.                    

*Incident Period:*                         07/07/2023 through 07/21/2023.                    

# DATES:

Issued on 09/25/2023.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         11/13/2023.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         06/14/2024.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the Administrator's disaster declaration of a rural area for the State of Vermont, dated 09/14/2023, is hereby amended to re-establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning 07/07/2023 and continuing through 07/21/2023.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Isabella Guzman,

Administrator.

[FR Doc. 2023-21569 Filed 9-29-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8026-09-P