alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

COREY P. CLAIRMONT,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 05-482 M

DETENTION ORDER 

Offense charged: 

Possession of an Unregistered Firearm, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5861 (d).

Date of Detention Hearing: October 18, 2005. 

The Court conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f). Based upon

the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, the Court finds that

no condition or combination of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure the

appearance of defendant as required.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) The defendant is a risk of flight. The defendant has 3 previous failures to appear.

In addition, the defendant was placed in escape status for a state violation. He has an unstable

employment status and substance abuse problems. 

Case 2:05-mj-00482-JPD Document 10 Filed 10/18/05 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

(2) Defendant also poses a risk of danger to the community. He was arrested for the

current firearms violation while on state supervision. In addition, he has substance abuse

problems. 

(3) No conditions or combination of conditions are apparent that will reasonably

assure the defendant’s appearance at future Court hearings or the safety of the community..

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with

counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant

is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose

of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States

Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 18th day of October, 2005.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:05-mj-00482-JPD Document 10 Filed 10/18/05 Page 2 of 2
Hummingbird

Springs Wilderness

Big Horn

Mountains

Wilderness

Harquahala

Mountains

Wilderness

Hells Canyon

Wilderness

Hassayampa

River Canyon

Wilderness

Castle Creek

Wilderness

Mohave County

Yavapai County

Yavapai

Marico

County

pa County

La Paz County

Maricopa County

White Tank

Mountains

Regional Park

Lake

Pleasant

Regional

Park

Prescott

Prescott

Valley

Cordes

Junction

Yarnell

Black

Canyon

City

New

River

Wickenberg

Peoria

Surprise

Buckeye

Goodyear

Phoenix

Glendale

Bureau of Land Management

Phoenix District Office

Phoenix, AZ

October 2009

Note: Land Status legend located on Map 1

Map 2

Agua Fria National

Monument / BradshawHarquahala Planning Area

Tortoise Habitat

0 5 10 15

Miles

BLM Wilderness

USFS Wilderness

Interstate

Major Road

Major River, Streams or Wash

Highway

Agua Fria National

Monument Planning Area

Bradshaw Harquahala

Planning Area

Tortoise Habitat

Category 1

Category 2

Category 3

Note: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM)

conducts land use planning only in the areas administered

by BLM. BLM has no planning authority under the

municipal or county planning legislation of the State

of Arizona.

No warranty is made by BLM for the use of this map

for purposes not intended by BLM, or to the accuracy,

reliability or completeness of the information shown.

Spatial information may not meet National Map Accuracy

standards. This information may be updated without

notification.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Theiron and associated industries of Lorraine, the Sarre district, Luxemburg, andBelgium**
 
Report | Plate
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:703
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000957644
 
July 25, 2018
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         108,500
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,619,100
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,484,300
<INVENTORY>                                     69,200
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,584,500
<PP&E>                                      11,732,600
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,298,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,968,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,722,900
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        82,800
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,621,100
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,968,800
<SALES>                                        300,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            78,476,100
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               76,705,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             719,800
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,050,500
<INCOME-TAX>                                   404,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            645,900
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   645,900
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .42
        

</TABLE>
From: drlsellis@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:11:37 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Luanne Ellis

Lewisville, TX 75057
AmericanAirlines' 

July 27, 2010 

Dennis DeVany 

Chief, Essential Air Service Program 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Docket DOT-OST-1996-n67, EAS at Ft. Leonard Wood, MO 

Dear Mr. DeVany, 

American Airlines, Inc. enthusiastically supports the proposal of llyannis Air Service, Inc. dba 

Cape Air to provide Essential Air Service for Ft. Leonard Wood, MO. If Cape Air is selected to 

serve Ft, Leonard Wood, American Airlines expects to expand our existing codeshare agreeitient 

with Cape Air into the Ft. Leonard Wood market, providing to the Ft. Leonard Wood community 

seamless booking and travel on American Airlines' worldwide network. 

American Airlines, American Eagle and AraericanConnection® serve 250 cities in 40 countries 

with, on average, more.than 3,400 daily flights. The combined network fleet numbers more than 

900 aircraft. American's award-winning Web site, AA.com®, provides users with easy access to 

check and book fares, plus personalized news, information and travel offers. American Airlines 

is a founding member of the oneworld® Alliance, which brings together some of the best and 

biggest names in the airline business, enabling them to offer their customers more services and 

benefits than any airline can provide on its own. Together, its members serve nearly 700 

destinations in more than 130 countries and territories. 

Thank you for your kind consideration. 

Sincerely, 

ry 

Vice President, Planning & Marketing 

AA Regional Network 

P O. BOX 619616, WD 5675. DALLAS/FORT WORTH AIRPORT, TEXAS 75261-9616
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 07-2489

___________ Charles Alexander/Ryahim, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Arkansas. Daryl Gardner, Sgt., Varner Super * Max, ADC; Corcolis, CO-1, Varner * [UNPUBLISHED] Super Max, ADC; Floyd Williams, * CO-1, Varner Super Max, ADC; * Michelle Rucker, CO-1, Varner * Super Max, ADC; Ransom Evans, * Lt., Varner Super Max, ADC; Tim * Moncrief, Assistant Warden, Varner * Super Max, ADC; Patricia Kelly, * Dr., Varner Super Max, ADC * (originally sued as Kelly); Tanyon * Norman, Nurse, Varner Super Max, * ADC (originally sued as Norman); * Jerry King, Nurse, Varner Super Max, * ADC (originally sued as King), * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: October 23, 2008 Filed: October 27, 2008

___________ Before MELLOY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________1 The Honorable H. David Young, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
-2- PER CURIAM. Arkansas inmate Charles Alexander/Ry ahim appeals the district court’s 1 adverse judgment entered upon a jury verdict in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. On appeal, Ryahim unsuccessfully requested pr eparation of a transcript at government expense, and he has provided no justification for reconsideration of that decision. We therefore cannot review most of the evidentiary matters about which Ryahim complains involving such things as admission or exclusion of evidence, judicial bias, or the jury’s verdict, seeFed. R. App. P. 10(b)(1) (dis cussing appellant’s duty to order transcript); Schmid v. United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners , 827 F.2d 384, 385-86 (8th Cir. 1987) (per curiam) (where pro se appellant did not order trial transcript, this court could not review claims of judicial bi as, evidentiary rulings, or sufficiency of evidence), and we find Ryahim’s remaining arguments to be raised for the first time on appeal or meritless.
Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and the pending motions are denied.

______________________________
** **

**Exhibit 32.1**

 

 

**CERTIFICATION OFPRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Timothy Armes, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Reportof MedCareers Group, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2016 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all materialrespects the financial condition and results of operations of MedCareers Group, Inc.

 

*By:/s/ Timothy Armes*

Timothy Armes

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer and PrincipalFinancial/Accounting Officer)

 

June 27, 2016
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                             Chief Executive Officer

The undersigned, as the chief executive officer of Allied Healthcare Products,
Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
that (i) the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Company's fiscal
quarter ending December 31, 2003 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on February 9, 2004, fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



                                   s/ Earl R. Refsland
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                      Earl R. Refsland, Chief Executive Officer



                                      February 9, 2004
No. 57427.

#### Asheville Mica Company et al. *v.*United States,

protests 182621-K, etc. (Norfolk).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain percentages of the merchandise consist of mica splittings not over twelve ten-thousandths of 1 inch in thickness, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained as to said items.
No. 68943.

#### Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 61/2459, etc. (Portland, Oreg.).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of electric motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 66961, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
September 8, 1961

No. 66064.

#### B. Altman & Co. and Bloomingdale Bros. (a div. of Fed. Dept. Stores, Inc.) *v.*United States,

protests 60/14449 and 60/12993.

Plaintiffs’application for rehearing granted.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of BioSpecifics Technologies Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edwin H. Wegman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Edwin H. Wegman

Edwin H. Wegman

President and Chief Executive Officer

August 14, 2003
Opinion issued October 18, 2012

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-12-00680-CV

———————————

DEBRA HUETT, Appellant

V.

PAUL CHENG, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2010-09881

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Debra Huett, has neither paid the required filing fee for this 

appeal nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 5 (“A party who is not excused by statute or these rules from paying costs must 

pay—at the time an item is presented for filing—whatever fees are required by 
2

statute or Supreme Court order.”), 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing 

indigence); see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 51.207 (Vernon Supp. 2011), § 

51.941(a) (Vernon 2005), § 101.041 (Vernon Supp. 2011) (listing fees in court of 

appeals); Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and 

the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 

Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. 

A § B(1) (listing fees in court of appeals). On September 7, 2012, appellant was 

ordered to pay the filing fee by September 19, 2012, or the appeal would be 

dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing 

involuntary dismissal of case). After being notified that this appeal was subject to 

dismissal, appellant responded, but the response did not demonstrate grounds for 

continuing the appeal, and the appellant has not paid the fee. See TEX. R. APP. P.

5; 42.3(c).

 We dismiss the appeal for failure to pay the filing fee. We dismiss any 

pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Massengale, and Brown.
No. 61009.

protest 258891-K/14279 (New Orleans).

#### United China & Glass Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, designated as items 2185 and 2191, consists of decorated earthenware, valued at over $2 per dozen pieces, that said items are tableware, and that, if presently before the examiner for examination, he would so advisorily classify them, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained as to said items.
From: lurliemh@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:16:05 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Lurline Hillbun

,
Exhibit 32.2











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Virtual Medical International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), I, David Hostelley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 15th day of April, 2011.








DAVID HOSTELLEYDavid HostelleyChief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NorthernTechnologies International Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB forthe period ending February 29, 2008 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, G. Patrick Lynch,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
|                                       |                       |
|---------------------------------------|----------------------------|
| G. Patrick. Lynch                     |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| (principal executive officer)         |
|                                  |
| Circle  Pines, Minnesota              |
|                                  |
|                                  | Date : April 14, 2008 |
|                                       |                            |  |

 

 

1

----