alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|               | (1)                                  | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|          |        |                                                                           |
|          | (2)                                  | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |

|  Date:                  January                8, 2007                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |                      |                     | /s/                A. William Allen, III |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                                                              |                      |      | A.                William Allen, III     |
|                                                         |                      |      | Chief                Executive Officer   |
From: psbonadonna@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:18:17 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Penny Bonadonna

Shoreham, NY 11786
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

VINCENT DANIEL HOPPER,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOHN DOE MYERS RECREATIONAL

COACH NORTHWEST DETENTION

CENTER et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5680RBL

REPORT AND

 RECOMMENDATION

NOTED FOR:

DECEMBER 8TH, 2006

This Bivens action has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C.

§§ 636(b)(1)(A) and 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Magistrates' Rules MJR 1, MJR 3, and MJR 4. Before the court is

a motion to dismiss filed by defendants Myers, Wigen, “Moncivais”, “McHatton” and Cheek (Dkt. # 111). The

operative complaint listed defendant Moncivais as Montevise and defendant McHatton as McHampton. 

Plaintiff does not oppose dismissal of these defendants and has in fact filed a separate motion to dismiss them

(Dkt. # 126).

As both parties agree dismissal of these defendants is proper, the court recommends these defendants be

DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The court believes this leaves the sole remaining defendant as Michael

Case 3:05-cv-05680-RBL Document 130 Filed 11/16/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Page - 2

Melendez and the only remaining issue is the sufficiency of the telephone system. A proposed order

accompanies this Report and Recommendation. 

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal rules of Civil Procedure, the

parties shall have ten (10) days from service of this Report to file written objections. See also Fed. R. Civ.

P. 6. Failure to file objections will result in a waiver of those objections for purposes of appeal. Thomas v

Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Accommodating the time limit imposed by Rule 72(b), the clerk is directed to

set the matter for consideration on December 8th, 2006, as noted in the caption. 

DATED this 16th day of November, 2006.

/S/ J. Kelley Arnold

J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-05680-RBL Document 130 Filed 11/16/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 60217.

protest 216158-K (B) (New York).

#### Ben Jacobson *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items involved do not simulate any natural flower in their physical characteristics and appearances, that they are in chief value of compounds of cellulose, other than cellulose acetate, but not made in chief value of transparent bands, sheets, or strips, and that the issue herein is the same in all material respects as that in *De Waubert, Inc.*and *N. M. Albert Co., Inc.*(36 Cust. Ct. 12, C. D. 1747), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
## SERVED AUGUS T 26,201 0 U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C 

### ;A(^iSPpR]ATIO N -M: TOPERATION S nut) 

## mm2 1 A q:2 9 APPLICATIO NO F EMPIR EAIRWAY S Fo r fee s an dexpense s unde r

th e Equa l Acces s t o Justic e Ac t EAJA-EA-000 1 FA A DOCKE T NO . CP10EA000 8 FDM S NO . FAA-2010-078 7

NOTIC EO FASSIGNMEN T O FPROCEEDIN G Thi s proceedin g (arisin g fromcivi l penalty proceedin g FA A Docke t No . CP10EA0002 ) ha s bee nassigne dt o Administrativ e La w Judg e Isaa c D . Benkin . Al l future pleading s an dothe r communication s regardin g thi s proceedin g shal l b e serve do nth e Judge , th e FA A Hearin g Docket , an dth e othe r

person s o n th e attache dServic e List . S O ORDERED .

^onnie ^ Vode r Chie f AdminTOTativ

e L Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tFA A Docke t No . CP10EA000 8 (Equa l Acces s t o Justic e Act ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC^3 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON ECOP Y Gregor y S . Winton , Applicant' s Counse l On e Researc hCourt , Suit e 45 0 RockviUe,M D 2085 0 TEL : 301-294-855 0 FAX : 301-294-252 5 Zachary M . Berman , Agency' s Counse l Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counse l Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 1 Aviatio nPlaz a Jamaica , N Y 1143 4 TEL : 718-553-325 8 FAX : 718-995-569 9 Th e Honorabl e Isaa c D . Benkin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 1200 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : Attorne y 202-366-043 7 Legal Assistan t

202-366-213 2 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Service wa

s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r servic e i n person o r b y expeditedcourier , us e the followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio n Administration , 600 Independenc e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington , D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearing Docke t Clerk, AGC-430 .
BEFORE THE FlRST DIVISION,

April 25, 1967

No. P67/118.

No. P67/119.

No. P67/120.

No. P67/121.

No. P67/122.

#### Louis Marx & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 326711-K (New York).

#### Henry A. Wess, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 62/18615, etc. (Cleveland).

#### Craig Panorama, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 64/16799, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### L. E. McIntyre and Company *v.*United States,

protests 64/16812 and 64/16849 (Los Angeles).

#### Paul E. Sernau, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 66/2747 (New York).

Oliver, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of *James G. Wiley Co., a/c Ungar Electric*Tools, *Inc.*v. *United States*(49 Cust. Ct. 199, Abstract 66961), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 189 (Monday, October 2, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 67785]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21602]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Biological Chemistry and Macromolecular 
Biophysics Integrated Review Group; Macromolecular Structure and 
Function A Study Section.
    Date: October 3-4, 2023.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott, 5151 Pooks Hill Road, Bethesda, MD 
20814.
    Contact Person: Ian Frederick Thorpe, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 903K, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 
480-8662, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b8d1d9d696ccd0d7cac8ddf8d6d1d096dfd7ce"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a3cac2cd8dd7cbccd1d3c6e3cdcacb8dc4ccd5">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: Biobehavioral and Behavioral Processes 
Integrated Review Group; Language and Communication Study Section.
    Date: October 5-6, 2023.
    Time: 10 a.m. to 8 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Rochelle Francine Hentges, Ph.D., Scientific 
Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 1000C, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 
402-8720, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b1d9d4dfc5d6d4c2c3d7f1dcd0d8dd9fdfd8d99fd6dec7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5d353833293a382e2f3b1d303c343173333435733a322b">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 6, 2023.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-21602 Filed 9-29-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

G. MICHAEL STRAUSS,

Plaintiff,

v.

DONNA HAMILTON, et al,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5772FDB

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

This case has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local MJR 3 and 4. This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff’s filing of a

motion to proceed in forma pauperis and a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff is

currently detained at the Department of Social and Health Services’ (“DSHS”) Special Commitment

Center (“SCC”) on McNeil Island. To file a complaint and initiate legal proceedings, plaintiff must pay a

filing fee of $250.00 or file a proper application to proceed in forma pauperis.

On November 29, 2005, the Clerk received plaintiff’s complaint and motion to proceed in forma

pauperis. (Dkt. #1). Plaintiff states in his affidavit in support of his motion that he works approximately

twenty hours per week for less than the minimum wage. Without the exact amount that plaintiff earns per

week, however, the court is unable to determine plaintiff’s eligibility for in forma pauperis status. In

addition, plaintiff states he has an account at the SCC “with a current balance of $____.” It is not clear

Case 3:05-cv-05772-FDB Document 3 Filed 01/13/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

though whether plaintiff means he has no money in that account, or whether the space for the amount of

money he has in that account was left unintentionally blank. 

Accordingly, this Court orders the following:

(1) Plaintiff shall seek to cure this deficiency by filing no later than February 17, 2006, a

written response stating the dollar amount of earnings he is paid each week and the amount

of money, if any, he has in his SCC account. 

Failure to cure these deficiencies by the above date shall be deemed a failure to

properly prosecute this matter and the Court will recommend dismissal of this

matter.

(2) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to plaintiff.

DATED this 17th day of January, 2006.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-05772-FDB Document 3 Filed 01/13/06 Page 2 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Petitioner,

v.

DAVID GOULD,

Respondent.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C06-32

MINUTE ORDER

The following minute order is made at the direction of the Court, the Honorable James

P. Donohue, United States Magistrate Judge:

Respondent has submitted motions to dismiss and vacate the above-captioned case and

order to appear, Dkt. No. 8, and a motion for judge to recuse himself for prejudice. Dkt. No

9. To the extent these motions attempt to strike the hearing currently scheduled for Friday,

January 20, 2006, they are DENIED. 

DATED this 19th day of January, 2006.

Bruce Rifkin

Clerk of the Court

/s/ Peter H. Voelker 

Peter H. Voelker

Deputy Clerk

Case 2:06-cv-00032-RSL Document 10 Filed 01/19/06 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7455
CHARLES BENNIE HUNT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOE FREEMAN BRITT; J. TOWNSEND, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-562-5-CT-BO) Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 11, 1999 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Bennie Hunt, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Charles Bennie Hunt appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Hunt v. Britt , No. CA-98-562-5-CT-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 14 & Sept. 15, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 59193.

protest 252922-K (New York).

#### Roberts, Reilly & Sons *v.*United States,

Opinion by

WmsoN, J.

An examination of the papers in this case disclosing nothing that would tend in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the decision of the collector, the protest was overruled.
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2011 - 1163 Directorate Identifier: 2011NM022AD

94 -25 - 011, I2 --- 11/6/07 94 -25 - 012 --- 9/25/07

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
From: bobcouch@cableone.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:52:04 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Bob Couch

Choccolocco, AL 36254
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER – 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

ROBERT KESLING,

Defendant.

CASE NO. CR05-173JLR

ORDER

THIS MATTER HAVING COME on/or before the undersigned Judge, upon the

application of the Defendant in this matter for an order continuing the pretrial motions

deadline, and the court having considered the records and files herein.

THE COURT HAVING FOUND that requiring Defendant’s counsel to meet the

current motions cutoff date would deny counsel a reasonable time necessary for effective

preparation, taking into consideration the exercise of due diligence, and that continuing

the date for pretrial motions on the ground that the “ends of justice served by taking such

an action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial,” as

permitted by 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161 (h)(8)(A), (B)(ii) and (B)(iv). 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the pretrial motions deadline in this matter is

continued from May 31st, 2005, to June 30, 2005.

Case 2:05-cr-00173-RSM Document 15 Filed 06/02/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER – 2

Dated this 2nd day of June, 2005.

A JAMES L. ROBART

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cr-00173-RSM Document 15 Filed 06/02/05 Page 2 of 2
No. 59249.

protests 192101-K, etc. (New York).

#### Jay Dee Handkerchief Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

*228Opinion by

Fobd, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk scarves or squares the same in all material respects as those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NorthernTechnologies International Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ending November 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, G. Patrick Lynch,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

(1)                                                        The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                                        The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|                                       |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| G. Patrick. Lynch                     |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| (principal executive officer)         |   |
|                                  |   |
| Circle  Pines, Minnesota              |   |
| January 14, 2010                 |   |

 

----