alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32**Section 1350 Certification**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 (“Section 906”), John D. Kavazanjian and Robert W. Fishback, the President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer and Vice President — Finance and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of UltralifeBatteries, Inc., certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 29,2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of Ultralife Batteries, Inc.A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to UltralifeBatteries, Inc. and will be retained by Ultralife Batteries, Inc. and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.     Date: May 7, 2008 /s/ John D. Kavazanjian         John D. Kavazanjian    President and Chief Executive Officer       Date: May 7, 2008 /s/ Robert W. Fishback         Robert W. Fishback    Vice President – Finance and    Chief Financial Officer  
42
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 191 Filed 09/24/04 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 191 Filed 09/24/04 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                            76,166
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      9,120
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                       15,852
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 115,227
<PP&E>                                           703,327
<DEPRECIATION>                                   151,013
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   728,417
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             87,526
<BONDS>                                              844
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                             751
<OTHER-SE>                                       627,906
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     728,417
<SALES>                                          773,285
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 779,970
<CGS>                                            294,762
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    641,362
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     901
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   92,682
<INCOME-TAX>                                      33,829
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               58,853
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                      58,853
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.76


</TABLE>
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 119 Filed 03/10/04 Page 1 of 1
Case 3:05-cv-05740-RBL Document 7 Filed 11/15/2005 Page 1 of 5 Bay Bank v. Order of Magnitude et al Doc. 7

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 3:05-cv-05740-RBL Document 7 Filed 11/15/2005 Page 2 of 5
Case 3:05-cv-05740-RBL Document 7 Filed 11/15/2005 Page 3 of 5
Case 3:05-cv-05740-RBL Document 7 Filed 11/15/2005 Page 4 of 5
Case 3:05-cv-05740-RBL Document 7 Filed 11/15/2005 Page 5 of 5
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk June 13, 2011 

# Order

June 13, 2011

143001

ARTHUR LAUDERDALE,

Plaintiff,

SC: 143001

v AGC: 0179 / 08

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION,

Defendant.

____________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, it appearing that the Attorney Grievance

Commission has re

- opened the investigative file which is the subject of the complaint, the

complaint for superintending control is DISMISSED as moot.
No. 65172.

#### Reliance Merchandise *Co.,*Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/5548 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of earthenware ashtrays with metal or wire holders and that the issue is the same as that in *James Betesh Import Co.*v. *United States*(40 Cust. Ct. 186, C.D. 1981), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jose Luis RAMOS-ROSALES, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 03-10621.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*618Submitted Aug. 1, 2005.*

Decided Aug. 4, 2005.

David L. Gappa, Esq., USF — Office of the U.S. Attorney, Fresno, CA, for Plaintiff — Appellee.

Melody M. Walcott, Esq., FPDCA— Federal Public Defender’s Office, Fresno, CA, for Defendant — Appellant.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CALLAHAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Luis Ramos-Rosales appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Ramos-Rosales has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Ramos-Rosales has filed a pro se supplemental opening brief.

We have conducted an independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988). We affirm the conviction. Because the guidelines are now purely advisory, *see United States v. Booker,*— U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 764-67, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), we remand so the district court can determine if Ramos-Rosales should receive a different sentence under the advisory Guidelines system. *See United States v. Hermoso-Garcia,*413 F.3d 1085, 1089-90 (9th Cir.2005).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel on appeal is denied. Appellee’s request for summary affirmance is denied as moot.

The conviction is AFFIRMED, and the sentence is REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

      ( print page 67328)    
Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health Special Emphasis Panel; Exploratory Clinical Trials of Mind and Body Interventions (MB).                    

*Date:*                         November 2-3, 2023.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Center for Complementary and Integrative, Democracy II, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         BAILA SARA Hall, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review, Division of Extramural Activities, NCCIH/NIH, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Suite 401, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 443-9285,                         *baila.hall@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.213, Research and Training in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 25, 2023.

Victoria E. Townsend, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-21479 Filed 9-28-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
### Distribution of silica resources in eastern United States

By: Thomas Daniel Murphy

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1072L

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 30**                            (514 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 31**                            (729 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 32**                            (823 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 33**                            (816 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 34**                            (741 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 35**                            (543 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 36**                            (610 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 37**                            (301 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 38**                            (432 pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 188 (Friday, September 29, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67289-67290]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21715]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Thursday, October 5, 2023 at 10:30 a.m.

PLACE: Hybrid meeting: 1050 First Street NE Washington, DC (12th floor) 
and virtual. Note: For those attending the meeting in person, current 
COVID-19 safety protocols for visitors, which are based on the CDC 
COVID-19 hospital admission level in Washington, DC, will be updated on 
the Commission's contact page by the Monday before the meeting. See the 
contact page at https://www.fec.gov/contact/. If you would like to 
virtually access the meeting, see the instructions below.

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public, subject to the above-
referenced guidance regarding the COVID-19 hospital admission level and 
corresponding health and safety procedures. To access the meeting 
virtually, go to the commission's website www.fec.gov and click on the 
banner to be taken to the meeting page.

[[Page 67290]]


MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
Proposed Directive Regarding Investigations Conducted by the Office of 
General Counsel
Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on Citizens for Waters (A21-
01)
Management and Administrative Matters

    Additional Information:
    This meeting will be cancelled if the Commission is not open due to 
a funding lapse.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.
    Individuals who plan to attend in person and who require special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should contact Laura E. Sinram, Secretary and Clerk, at 
(202) 694-1040 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7704121405120316050e3711121459101801"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4635232534233227343f0620232568212930">[email protected]</span></a>, at least 72 hours prior to the 
meeting date.

(Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b)


Vicktoria J. Allen,
Deputy Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2023-21715 Filed 9-27-23; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 66052.

#### Border Brokerage Company v. United States,

protest 58/10102 (Seattle).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of paper toweling similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *Border Brokerage Company*(48 C.C.P.A. 38, C.A.D. 760), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant
To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant

To Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Intelsat Corporation (the Company) hereby
certifies that to such officers knowledge, the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |  |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 9, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ DAVID MCGLADE                    
|                       |  |  |  | David McGlade Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
No. P67/114.

#### Miya Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 64/21338, etc. (New York).

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of stone lanterns similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Otagiri Mercantile Co., Inc.,*and *Hoyt, Shepston & Sciaroni et al.*v. *United States*(44 Cust Ct. 184, C.D. 2173), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: joelwarkentin@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:23:57 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Joel Warkentin

Spring Valley, CA 91977
From: annamaven@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:29:57 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Anna Derry

Rockville, MD 20850
From: ejej4@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:04:52 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jeannette Fekkes

Thousand Oaks, CA 91360