alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: mfelbush@tctelco.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:54:05 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Donneta Felbush

Abilene, KS 67410
Order entered December 1 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 15
- 01229
- CV IAN ACREY, PETROLIA GROUP, LLC, PETROLIA WEST I, LLC AND QUAN AH ACME, LLC, Appellant s

V. KILGORE & KILGORE, P LLC, Appellee On Appeal from t he 193rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 15
- 03110



### O RDER
The Court has reviewed the clerk’s record in this case and has determined that the record
doe s not include the trial court’s July 14, 2015 order granting summar y judgment, which is the order from which appellant appeals. So that the Court can determine whether it has jurisdiction over this appeal, the Court ORDERS Felicia Pitre, Dallas County District Clerk, to file within five (5) days of the date of this order a supplemental clerk’s record including the July 14, 2015 order granting summary judgment

.
/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
EXHIBIT
32.2
   CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In
connection with the Annual Report of GMS Capital Corp., (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George
Metrakos, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, That to the best of my knowledge:
  (1)           
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)           
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
   GMS
CAPITAL CORP.
 By:
      /s/ George MetrakosGeorge
      MetrakosPrincipal
      Financial OfficerMarch 18,
      2009
Aug 12 2010 

Mr. Santi Lombardo 

Vice President of Flight Operations 

Pinnacle Airlines, Inc. 

1689 Nonconnah Boulevard 

Memphis, TN 38132 

Dear Mr. Lombardo: 

We have received your August 3, 2010, correspondence withdrawing your July 16, 2010, 

petition for exemption. 

Your letter has been placed in the public docket (No. FAA-2010-0730). No further action 

will be taken on your petition. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Ida M. Klepper 

Manager, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Page 1 PROPOSED ORDER - [C05-5771-FDB]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

PAUL SORNBERGER,

Plaintiff,

vs.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant

Civil No. C05-5771-FDB

ORDER

Based on the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that this case is

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 

§ 405(g). On remand, an administrative law judge (ALJ) will:

• hold a de novo hearing;

• explicitly reopen Plaintiff's 1996 Title II and Title XVI applications and determine his

disability status from 1995 through May 2002;

Case 3:05-cv-05771-FDB Document 15 Filed 04/19/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Page 2 PROPOSED ORDER - [C05-5771-FDB]

• re-evaluate Plaintiff's subjective complaints, the lay evidence (and explain weight given to

it), and the severity of Plaintiff's impairments (including mental impairments and multiple

sclerosis);

• obtain additional evidence regarding these impairments and proceed with the sequential

evaluation process;

• further evaluate Plaintiff's residual functional capacity and the physical and mental

demands of his past relevant work;

• determine whether he could perform this work or other work; and

• obtain vocational expert testimony, if necessary.

Pursuant to 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.983, 416.1483, Plaintiff may submit new evidence and raise

any issue on remand whether or not raised previously. Further, the parties agree Plaintiff may be

awarded costs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1920 and reasonable attorney fees and expenses pursuant

to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412.

///

///

///

Case 3:05-cv-05771-FDB Document 15 Filed 04/19/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Page 3 PROPOSED ORDER - [C05-5771-FDB]

DATED this _____ day of April 2006.

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Recommend for Entry:

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Presented by:

s/ David M. Blume 

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Office of the General Counsel

701 Fifth Ave, Ste 2900

Seattle, WA 98104

Phone: (206) 615-2212

Fax: (206)615-2531

david.blume@ssa.gov

Case 3:05-cv-05771-FDB Document 15 Filed 04/19/06 Page 3 of 3
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 32.1


                 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                             Chief Executive Officer

         The undersigned, as the chief executive officer of Allied Healthcare
         Products, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify for purposes of 18
         U.S.C. Section 1350 that (i) the Company's Quarterly Report on Form
         10-Q for the Company's fiscal quarter ending September 30 2003 (the
         "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
         November 14, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii)
         information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.

                                   /s/ Earl R. Refsland
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                       Earl R. Refsland, Chief Executive Officer



                                November 12, 2003



                                       22
Before the First Division,

April 3, 1963

No. 67560.

#### James G. Wiley Co., a/c Burn-Strauss, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 59/10253 (Los Angeles).

*254Opinion by

Oliveb, O.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cast-iron trivets with ceramic tile centers, which are permanently joined, in chief value of the metal portion, and used chiefly in the household for utilitarian purposes, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

STEVEN MILLER,

Petitioner,

v.

GARY FLEMING,

Respondent.

Case No. C05-5661FDB

ORDER GRANTING I.F.P.

 APPLICATION

Petitioner's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Petitioner does not

appear to have funds available to afford the $5.00 filing fee.

The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this Order to petitioner.

DATED this 3rd day of January, 2006.

_/s/ J. Kelley Arnold_______ J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:05-cv-05661-FDB Document 4 Filed 01/03/06 Page 1 of 1
No. 59724.

#### L. Barbier *v.*United States,

protest 255991-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

An examination of the record showing that the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, same was dismissed as untimely. Following *Sucrest Corporation*v. *United States*(31 C. C. P. A. 220, C. A. D. 275), it was further held that payment of duties is a condition precedent to the right to file a protest.
No. 60224.

protests 266533-K, etc. (New York).

#### Colonial Bead Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 59105, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked with the letter “A” at 10 percent under the provision in paragraph 1528, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52739), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52836), for imitation semiprecious stones, faceted, and (2) the items marked with the letter “B” at 30 percent under the provision in said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 51802, supplemented by T. D. 51898, for imitation semiprecious stones, not faceted.
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 21 ,

2020

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 19

- 00280

- CR

ORLANDO MARTINEZ , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 212th District Court Galveston County, T exa s Trial Court Cause No. 17

- CR

- 2251

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant Orlando Martinez and his attorney have signed and filed a written
amended mo t ion to withdraw his notice of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2 (a)

. Because this court has not deliver ed an opi nio n, we grant appellant’s motion

.2

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal

. We direct the clerk of the court to issue mandate immediately. See Tex. R . App. P. 2.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Sp ain.

Do Not Publ ish

– Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b )
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Business Marketing Services, Inc. on Form 10-K for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Majken Hummel-Gumaelius, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company and also acting in the capacity as the Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Majken Hummel-GumaeliusMajken Hummel-GumaeliusChief Executive Officer and PresidentNovember 21, 2013/s/ Majken Hummel-GumaeliusMajken Hummel-GumaeliusPrincipal Financial OfficerNovember 21, 2013
| **Derivative Financial Instruments and Risk Management (Details 3) - USD ($) $ in Millions** | Jun. 30, 2016 | Dec. 31, 2015 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|---------------|
| **Derivative**                                                                               |          |          |
| Derivative instruments, notional amount                                                      | $ 4,220       | $ 3,540       |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Aggregate notional amount specified by the derivative(s). Expressed as an absolute value.
+ References
Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Regulation S-X (SX) -Number 210 -Article 12 -Section 13 -Sentence Column B
+ Details**Name:**invest_DerivativeNotionalAmount**Namespace Prefix:**invest_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**instant |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Line items represent financial concepts included in a table. These concepts are used to disclose reportable information associated with domain members defined in one or many axes to the table.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_DerivativeLineItems**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MARVEL
ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000874808
<NAME> MARVEL ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                              24
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      114
<ALLOWANCES>                                        21
<INVENTORY>                                         35
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   196
<PP&E>                                              69
<DEPRECIATION>                                      21
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     467
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              470
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                       (533)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       467
<SALES>                                             97
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    97
<CGS>                                               73
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       73
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    25
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   7
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (19)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (19)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (19)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.19)
        


</TABLE>
Before the First Division,

March 8, 1966

No. 69823.

protests 62/5680, etc. (Galveston).

#### Weather-Rite Sportswear Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Nichols, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of articles of synthetic rubber similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Weather-Rite Sportswear*Co., *Inc.*(52 CCPA 7, C.A.D. 848), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 60530.

#### A. F. Jabara *v.*United States,

protest 291355-K (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

It appeared that only 16 packages were withdrawn for consumption and that the balance, 10 packages, were withdrawn for non-dutiable export. At the trial, the defendant moved in evidence a supplemental memorandum of the collector, together with a letter from the importer and attached worksheets. The supplemental memorandum indicated that an error was made in the computation of the duty and that the proper amount assessable should have been $2,321.10, as claimed. On the record presented, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: boxdorfabc@cableone.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:11:05 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Bruce Cooper

Boise, ID 83709
----

**EXHIBIT      32.1**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                Mediware. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  Dated:                May 8, 2007          | /s/                  James                F. Burgess   |
|--------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                             | James                F. Burgess                                  |
|                                             | Chief                Executive Officer                           |
|                                             |                                                             |
|  Dated:  May              8, 2007 |  /s/                Mark              B. Williams |
|                                             |  Mark                B. Williams                            |
|                                             |  Chief                Financial Officer                     |

----