alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF VIROGROUP,  INC. FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 1997,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                              81
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,058
<ALLOWANCES>                                       449
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,982
<PP&E>                                           2,385
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,990
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,946
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,634
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             8
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,304
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,946
<SALES>                                          5,684
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,684
<CGS>                                            4,105
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,105
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,247
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 153
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,745)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        (1)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,746)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,746)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (2.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (2.20)

        

</TABLE>
To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:35:51 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mary Lang

New Smyrna Beach, FL 32169
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 246 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that States and units 

of local government should enact legislation to prohibit the issuance 

of business, professional, or occupational licenses to unauthorized aliens. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 14, 2007 

Mr. GOODE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

States and units of local government should enact legislation to prohibit the issuance of business, professional, 

or occupational licenses to unauthorized aliens. 

Whereas the Federal Government has failed to take adequate 

measures to curb illegal immigration; 

Whereas the failure by the Federal Government to curb illegal immigration has placed, and continues to place, a 

substantial burden on States and units of local government; 

Whereas many State and local governments have already 

worked actively to discourage illegal immigration and to 

assist in the enforcement of our Nation’s immigration 

laws; 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 246 IH 

Whereas many illegal aliens in this country obtain business, 

professional, or occupational (BPO) licenses to work as 

self-employed independent contractors, allowing them to 

avoid citizenship verification measures to which they 

would be subject if they were otherwise employed; 

Whereas permitting illegal aliens to obtain BPO licenses is a 

reward for illegal behavior conducted by these aliens; and 

Whereas many States and units of local government, such as 

the Commonwealth of Virginia, have considered or are 

considering measures to prohibit the issuance of BPO licenses: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that States and units of local government 

3 should enact legislation to prohibit the issuance of busi4 ness, professional, or occupational licenses to aliens who 

5 are not lawfully present in the United States, or are not 

6 authorized to be employed in the United States. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
From: jelsjg3@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:33:53 PM

To Whom It May Concern: This is nuts, so who is going to pay for this care? And how does the govt

think it has the right to mandate anything except for protection of this nation!~

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Gail Peirson

Sicklerville, NJ 08081
From: Jillsie2@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:57:31 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jill Hine

Fort Wayne, IN 46808
Opinion filed May 12, 2022

 

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

Nos. 11-21-00138-CR & 11-21-00143-CR

__________

HIGINIO LOMBRANO GARCIA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 70th District Court

Ector County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. A-18-1699-CR & A-18-1700-CR

 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The jury convicted Higinio Lombrano Garcia of two counts of aggravated 

assault with a deadly weapon. The jury found the enhancement allegations to be 

true and assessed Appellant’s punishment at imprisonment for sixty years in each 

count. The trial court sentenced Appellant accordingly and ordered that the 

sentences run concurrently. We affirm.
2

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed in this court a motion to 

withdraw. The motion is supported by a brief in which counsel professionally and 

conscientiously examines the record and applicable law and concludes that the 

appeal is without merit and frivolous. Counsel provided Appellant with a copy of 

the brief, a copy of the motion to withdraw, and a copy of both the clerk’s record 

and the reporter’srecord. Counsel advised Appellant of hisright to review the record 

and file a response to counsel’s brief. Counsel also advised Appellant of his right to

file a petition for discretionary review with the clerk of the Texas Court of Criminal 

Appeals seeking review by that court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68. Court-appointed 

counsel has complied with the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 

(1967); Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); In re Schulman, 252 

S.W.3d 403 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008); and Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 1991). 

Appellant subsequently filed a response to counsel’s Anders brief, and this 

court has considered Appellant’s contentions. In addressing an Anders brief and a 

pro se response, a court of appeals may only determine (1) that the appeal is wholly 

frivolous and issue an opinion explaining that it has reviewed the record and finds 

no reversible error or (2) that arguable grounds for appeal exist and remand the cause 

to the trial court so that new counsel may be appointed to brief the issues. Schulman, 

252 S.W.3d at 409; Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 

2005). Following the procedures outlined in Anders and Schulman, we have 

independently reviewed the record and have found no reversible error; therefore, we 

agree with counsel that no arguable grounds for appeal exist.

1

 

1

We note that Appellant has a right to file a petition for discretionary review pursuant to TEX. R.

APP. P. 68.
3

We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm the judgment of the 

trial court. 

PER CURIAM

May 12, 2022

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 607 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 607

Extending best wishes to the people of India as they celebrate the 60th 
      anniversary of India's independence from the British Empire.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 2, 2007

Mr. McDermott (for himself and Mr. Wilson of South Carolina) submitted 
   the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                            Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Extending best wishes to the people of India as they celebrate the 60th 
      anniversary of India's independence from the British Empire.

Whereas August 15th, India's Independence Day, is a national holiday in India;
Whereas on August 15, 1947, India officially became a sovereign nation;
Whereas August 15, 2007, will mark the 60th anniversary of the day India gained 
        its independence from the British Empire;
Whereas India has progressed as a secular, sovereign, and democratic republic, 
        and is continually making strides in gender, education, and social and 
        economic equality;
Whereas India has opened up its economy to trade and investment and the United 
        States is the largest trading partner of India;
Whereas India elected its first female President, The Honorable Pratibha Patil, 
        on July 25, 2007, 41 years after it elected its first female Prime 
        Minister, The Honorable Indira Gandhi;
Whereas India and the United States have a strong ongoing partnership regarding 
        the promotion of democratic values, cooperation on international 
        security, and collaboration on strategic initiatives;
Whereas Americans of Indian origin are the fastest growing and one of the 
        highest educated immigrant groups in the United States;
Whereas Americans of Indian origin have become important contributors in the 
        political, military, and economic sectors of the United States;
Whereas Americans of Indian origin are serving in all branches of the United 
        States Armed Forces, including in Afghanistan and Iraq; and
Whereas foreign direct investment by India continues to grow at record levels 
        and contributes significantly to the growth of the United States 
        economy: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes India as a long-term strategic partner of 
        the United States;
            (2) applauds the Indian-American community in the United 
        States for the important role it plays in the relationship 
        between the United States and India; and
            (3) extends best wishes to the people of India as they 
        celebrate the 60th anniversary of India's independence from the 
        British Empire.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
I, Mark Alsentzer, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pure Earth, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) **[intentionally omitted]**for theregistrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 (b) **[Intentionally omitted]**
 (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and;
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 30, 2009
By:**/**s/ Mark Alsentzer
Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)

     In connection with the Annual Report of Prepaid Card Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bruce
Berman, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350), that to my knowledge:

     1.   the Report  fully  complies  with  the  requirements  of Section 13(a)
          or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     2.   the information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
          of  the  Company.


                         /s/ Bruce Berman
                         ----------------
                         Bruce Berman
                         Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
                         March 26, 2009
#### Mircea Teban, Appellant, v Kingswood Management Corp., Respondent, et al., Defendant.

[633 NYS2d 6]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Jane Goodman, J.), entered on or about June 15, 1994, which, in an action seeking relief for an alleged employment discrimination, granted defendant employer’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

As the IAS Court correctly observed, the amendment to Executive Law § 297 (9), providing that a complaint filed by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) with the State Division of Human Rights was not to be deemed an election of an administrative remedy, applies only to complaints filed with the EEOC on or after July 15, 1991 (L 1991, ch 342, § 2). Since plaintiff filed with the EEOC before July 15, 1991, the amendment does not apply, and the filing was properly deemed to bar State court remedies *(Scott v Carter-Wallace,*
      *317
      *Inc.,*147 AD2d 33, 38, *Iv dismissed*75 NY2d 764). Concur— Rosenberger, J. P., Rubin, Ross, Nardelli and Mazzarelli, JJ.
- 1 -

Alexander Van der Bellen

Managing Director and

Associate General Counsel

Delta Air Lines, Inc.

1212 New York Avenue NW

Washington, DC 20005

202.842.4184

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

April 8, 2013

via email and regulations.gov

Esta Rosenberg

Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division

Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Joint Application of Delta Air Lines, Inc., KLM Royal Dutch Airlines and GoJet 

Airlines, LLC

For A Statement of Authorization Allowing Blanket Codesharing 

Docket DOT-OST-2004-19214

Dear Ms. Rosenberg:

This letter is to confirm that Delta has polled all of the carriers on the service list to the above 

referenced application and there are no objections. In these circumstances, we urge that the 

application be granted as soon as possible.

Respectfully submitted,

Alexander Van der Bellen

cc: info@airlineinfo.com
H. Res. 475 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 18, 2007. 

Whereas, on June 6, 2007, the University of Arizona Wildcats defeated the University of Tennessee Lady Volunteers to win the 2007 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I Women’s College World Series Softball 

Championship, their eighth such title since 1991; 

Whereas Wildcats pitcher Taryne Mowatt set a College World 

Series record for most innings pitched, and was named 

the Most Valuable Player of the qualifying tournament; 

Whereas Wildcats players Kristie Fox, Jenae Leles, and 

Caitlin Lowe were selected for the all-tournament team; 

Whereas the Wildcats, after beginning the 2007 season with 

a losing record, completed the season with a 50–14–1 

record; and 

Whereas Wildcats coach Mike Candrea has taken the Wildcats to the College World Series 19 times in the last 20 

years, winning eight College World Series titles: Now, 

therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) congratulates the University of Arizona Wildcats on their victory in the National Collegiate Athletic 
2 

•HRES 475 EH 

Association 2007 Division I Women’s College World Series Softball Championship; and 

(2) recognizes and commends the efforts of the University of Arizona Wildcats players, coaches, and support 

staff in achieving their victory. 

Attest: 

Clerk.