alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000874787
<NAME> PHYAMERICA PHYSICIAN GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1.0
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   49,542
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                56,004
<PP&E>                                           7,486
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  91,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           64,065
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           426

<OTHER-SE>                                   (107,804)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    91,300
<SALES>                                         78,655
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                78,655
<CGS>                                           85,728
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   85,728
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,880
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,064)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,064)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,064)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.26)


</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.2




Certification of Principal
Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
SK Shasta Acquisition Corp. 4 (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended April 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kurt Pichler, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Kurt PichlerKurt
      PichlerPrincipal
      Financial OfficerAugust
      12, 2010
From: omegachurch@ndwave.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:55:22 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Neal Brown

Lapel, IN 46051
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

NO. 00-2351

GARY P. GADASH, APPELLANT,

 V.

ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI,

SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE.

Before KRAMER, Chief Judge, and HOLDAWAY and GREENE, Judges.

O R D E R

On December 11, 2000, the appellant appealed through counsel an August 15, 2000, decision

of the Board of Veterans' Appeals that remanded a claim for service connection for post-traumatic

stress disorder. The Secretary filed a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, and the appellant

responded. On February 9, 2001, the Court in a single-judge order dismissed this appeal for lack of

jurisdiction. On February 26, 2001, the appellant filed a motion for reconsideration by a panel. In

an April 3, 2001, order, this Court construed that motion as one for a panel decision and denied that

construed motion.

On April 18, 2001, the appellant filed a motion for reconsideration of a panel decision

purportedly pursuant to Rule 35(b) and (c) of this Court's Rules of Practice and Procedure (Rules).

However, Rule 35(a) provides that "[a] party in a case decided by a panel may move for

reconsideration by the panel." U.S. VET. APP. R. 35(a). A panel denial of a motion for a panel

decision is not a "case decided by a panel." See U.S. VET. APP. R. 35(c) ("A party may move for

decision by the full Court . . . (2) after a panel has decided a case, or (3) after a panel has denied

a motion for panel decision . . . ."). Rule 35(a) does not contemplate a motion for reconsideration

by a panel after a panel has denied a motion for a panel decision. Nor do Rule 35 paragraphs

(b) or (c) contemplate such a motion. Accordingly, the Court will direct the Clerk of the Court

to return to the appellant his April 18, 2001, motion.

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the appellant's April 18, 2001, motion for reconsideration is not accepted

for filing. The Clerk of the Court is directed to return to the appellant his April 18, 2001, motion for

reconsideration of the April 3, 2001, denial of a panel decision.

DATED: May 31, 2001 PER CURIAM.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 28, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 130362 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, JOHN T. ANDERSON, AMY A. BAUR, Justices MELISSA K. GOOD NOE, BRET D. GOODNOE, ROLAND HARMES, JR., DANIEL J. JONES, ELEANOR V. LUECKE and THOMAS C. VOICE, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v SC: 130362 COA: 262168 Ingham CC: 04-001522-CH CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF MERIDIAN and MERIDIAN TO WNSHIP BOARD OF TRUSTEES, Defendants-Appellees, and

LOUIS J. EYDE LIMITED FAMILY PARTNERSHIP and GE ORGE F. EYDE LIMITED FAMILY PARTNERSHIP, Intervening Defenda nts-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to a ppeal the December 9, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d0424 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 28, 2006

Clerk
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

i
i
i
ir i
@ i
zi i
Wj i
z i
= i
Fd i
2 i
z j
8
ie
&
=
fe 1000
a ZINC, IN PARTS PER MILLION
3.54 500
ae
LEAD, IN PARTS PER MILLION
a
451

s
a

8

»
8

ie

ina en

No pure residuum,
collected here

BULLETIN 1000 PLATE 13

AVERAGE LEAD AND ZINC IN RESIDUUM,
IN PARTS PER MILLION

EXPLANATION
‘Zine
Lead
Zinc and lead
=
Component of slope

parallel to traverse

PERCENT OF RESIDUAL
‘MATERIAL IN SOIL

Less than 25 percent
25 to 50 percent

50 to 100 percent

Concentration of zinc and lead
was obtained using a 1:3 HNO,
digestion for 1 hour

8

90

DISTANCE ALONG TRAVERSE, IN FEET

ie T
120 130

e
<
5
%s
3
ee

Pe
Ns EXPLANATION
oS
‘Small prospect pit

50

.
Sample point and the
distance along traverse, in feet

a
Direction and estimated amount
of land slope

ce) 50 Feet

°

MAP SHOWING DISTRIBUTION OF PROSPECT PITS
AND LOCATION OF SAMPLE TRAVERSE

DISTRIBUTION OF LEAD AND ZINC IN SOIL NEAR POINT J IN THE POTOSI AREA

369614 O—56 (In pocket) No. 7
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Timothy Armes, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of The 4 Less Group, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2019 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of MedCareers Group, Inc.  By:/s/ Timothy Armes Timothy Armes Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial/Accounting Officer)  August 21, 2019
EX-4.1



 Exhibit 4.1 
  






 
 ARCADIA BIOSCIENCES, INC. CORPORATE DELAWARE CUSIP 039014 20 4 SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS
Countersigned: AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY, LLC 6201 15th Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11219 By Transfer Agent and Registrar Authorized Officer ARCADIA BIOSCIENCES, INC. INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE AUTHORIZED:
150,000,000 COMMON SHARES, $0.001 PAR VALUE PER SHARE This Certifies That is the owner of Fully Paid and Non-Assessable Common Stock, $0.001 Par Value of ARCADIA BIOSCIENCES, INC. transferable on the books of this Corporation in person or by
attorney upon surrender of this Certificate duly endorsed or assigned. This Certificate and the shares represented hereby are subject to the laws of the State of Delaware, and to the Articles of Incorporation and the Bylaws of the Corporation, as
now or hereafter amended. This Certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers and to be
sealed with the facsimile seal of the Corporation. Dated: SECRETARY 001
From: laeg@att.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:17:17 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Leslie Garza R.N.

Austin, TX 78717
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-23-047]

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

United States International Trade Commission.

# TIME AND DATE:

October 11, 2023 at 11:00 a.m.

# PLACE:

Room 101, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000.

# STATUS: 

Open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

                        1.                         *Agendas for future meetings:*                         none.                    

2. Minutes.

3. Ratification List.

4. Commission vote on Inv. Nos. 701-TA-585-586 and 731-TA-1383-1384 (Review) (Stainless Steel Flanges from China and India). The Commission currently is scheduled to complete and file its determinations and views of the Commission on October 19, 2023.

                        5.                         *Outstanding action jackets:*                         none.                    

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Sharon Bellamy, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer, 202-205-2000.

The Commission is holding the meeting under the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(b). In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting.

By order of the Commission.

Issued: September 26, 2023.

Sharon Bellamy,

Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.

[FR Doc. 2023-21561 Filed 9-26-23; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
American  Nortel  Communication, Inc. Form 10QSB Period Ending December 31, 1999
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      410306
<SECURITIES>                               3123069
<RECEIVABLES>                              3561597
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           7348034
<PP&E>                                       83325
<DEPRECIATION>                               39582
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             8964834
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      2181482
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                  21938202
<OTHER-SE>                                   50595
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               5571151
<SALES>                                    6021529
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           6021529
<CGS>                                      4746569
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            489029
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           23871
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             764266
<INCOME-TAX>                                 65000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         785929
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                699266
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .05


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northern Technologies International Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending May 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Matthew C. Wolsfeld, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                                                                                                                  |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                                                  |   |
| Matthew C. Wolsfeld, CPA                                                                                         |   |
| Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary (principal financial   officer and principal accounting officer) |   |
|                                                                                                             |   |
| Lino Lakes,   Minnesota                                                                                          |   |
| July 14, 2006                                                                                                    |   |
Before the Second Division,

March 3, 1959

No. 62796.

#### Lucas Electrical Services, Inc., and Frank J. Eberle et al. *v.*United States,

protests 324621-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of ammeters similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Lucas Electrical Services, Inc.,*and *Frank J. Eberle Co.*v. *United States*(36 Cust. Ct. 209, C.D. 1776), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit










EXHIBIT 5.1




March 23, 2018
 
Micron Technology, Inc. 
8000 South Federal Way 
Boise, ID 83707-0006 
 
Ladies and Gentlemen: 
 
We have examined the Registration Statement on Form S-8 to be filed by Micron Technology, Inc. (“you” or the “Company”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about March 23, 2018 (the “Registration Statement”) in connection with the registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, of 33,000,000 shares of your Common Stock, par value $0.10 per share (the “Shares”), reserved for issuance under the Micron Technology, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”). As your legal counsel, we have examined the proceedings taken and are familiar with the proceedings proposed to be taken by you in connection with the sale and issuance of the Shares under the ESPP. 
 
It is our opinion that upon completion of the proceedings to be taken, or contemplated by us as your counsel to be taken by you, prior to issuance of the Shares pursuant to the Registration Statement and the ESPP, and upon completion of the proceedings being taken in order to permit such transactions to be carried out in accordance with the securities laws of the various states where required, the Shares, when issued and sold in the manner referred to in the ESPP and the agreements which accompany the ESPP, and in accordance with the Company's Certificate of Incorporation, will be legally and validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable. 
 
We express no opinion as to any matter relating to laws of any jurisdiction other than the laws of the State of New York and the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, as such are in effect on the date hereof.


We consent to the use of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration Statement and further consent to the use of our name wherever appearing in the Registration Statement, including the Prospectus constituting a part thereof, and amendments thereto. 
 
Very truly yours, 
 
/s/ Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati 
 
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, 
Professional Corporation