alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
10.18






+41 21 641 56 51
              contact@swissinso.com
              www.swissinso.com







Contract
for Consultancy Services




between


MICHEL
GRUERING, Case postale 37, 1806 St Legier





And




SwissINSO
SA, in Lausanne, Switzerland




It is agreed between parties
above mentioned:




1.  START
DATE AND DURATION OF THE CONTRACT




1.1 The
contract of consultancy starts on October 1st, 2009 and will expire on March
31st, 2010. 1.2 It can be extended beyond expiry date when both parties agree to
it.




1.3
Causes of termination for fair reasons are reserved.




2.  MISSIONS
AND SCOPE OF WORK




The
Consultant has the following missions:




2.1.
STRATEGY: Elaboration of the strategic plan of the Company for 2010 in
collaboration with the CEO and the Marketing Manager. Presentation of said
strategic plan to the board of Directors in March 2010.




2.2.
RESEARCH OF PARTNERS: Collaboration with the CEO to identify opportunities of
joint ventures, mergers, partnerships, technology transfers, or acquisitions,
and supervision of the execution of the approved transactions.




2.3.
NETWORKING: Establish contacts with NGOs, promotion of the Company and its
products / solutions with these organizations with the aim of getting on the
accredited venders' list of their central purchasing agencies. Coordination of
contacts between the Company and NGOs at national and international
level.




3.  MONITORING
AND RESULTS:





3.1 The
Consultant will present to the directors an agenda of meetings to report on his
mission, and provide
at the end of March 2010 a report on the concrete results of his
mission.













4.  FEE




4.1 From
October 1st, 2009 till March 31st, 2010, the total contractual amount for the
services of consultancy will be CHF 108'000 net, payable in six installments of
18'000, the first one at the end of October 2009.




4.2
Expenses linked to the execution of the mandate are reimbursed against
respective invoices. Expenses for travel and lodging authorized before by the
general management will be reimbursed according to the policy of the Company.
Phone and car expenses incurred within the mandate will be reimbursed on a
monthly basis against invoices.




5.  CONFIDENTIALITY




5.1 The
Consultant agrees not to reveal or to disclose the Company's trade secrets
and/or intellectual property rights during the duration of his contract and 1
year after its termination.




5.2 The
Consultant agrees to keep strictly confidential the strategic information to
which he will have access in the course of his mandate.




6.  WARRANTIES




6.1 The
Consultant certifies that he acts in his own behalf only and is totally
independent, and that he is registered as an accredited consultant.




7.  ARBITRATION




7.1 In
case of litigation concerning any element of this contract, Swiss law prevails
and the legal jurisdiction is Lausanne, Switzerland.




Lausanne,
September 30th,
2009




The
      Consultant
              
              The
      Company/s/  Michael
      Gruering
              
              /s/  Yves
      DucommunMichael
      Gruering
              
              Yves
      Ducommun
Case 3:05-mc-05029-RSL Document 7 Filed 11/17/2005 Page 1 of 2

Case 3:05-cv-05760-RJB Document 3 Filed 11/17/05 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:05-mc-05029-RSL Document 7 Filed 11/17/2005 Page 2 of 2

Case 3:05-cv-05760-RJB Document 3 Filed 11/17/05 Page 2 of 2
| (1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Eternity Healthcare Inc. for the year ended April 30, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Eternity Healthcare Inc. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: September 21, 2011 |   |                                                                                           |
|---------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |   |                                                                                           |
|                      |   |                                                                                           |
|                      |   | /s/ Francine Salari                                                                            |
|                      |   | Francine Salari                                                                                |
|                      |   | President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and Director |
|                      |   | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)    |
|                      |   | Eternity Healthcare Inc.                                                                       |
(R.D. 11546)

#### Continental Lighters, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 1097580.

(Decided June 20, 1968)

*Samuel Franhel*for tlie plaintiff.

*Edwin L. Weisl, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Watson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation entered into between counsel for the parties herein:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties, subject to the approval of the Court, as follows:

> 1. The merchandise covered by this Stipulation consists of, and is limited to, the cigarette lighters imported under the entry covered by the above Appeal for Reappraisement.

> 2. The said merchandise was entered for consumption on or after February 27,1958 and does not appear on the Final List promulgated by the Secretary of the Treasury (T.D. 54521) pursuant to section 6 (a) of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956.

> 3. On or about the dates of exportation of said merchandise, the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold, or in the absence of sales, was freely offered for sale in the principal markets of Japan, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings and all other expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the ex-factory prices indicated on the invoices attached to the entry.

> 4. The appeal for reappraisement referred to may be submitted for decision on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold export value as that value is defined in section 402 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise herein involved and that such value for the merchandise covered by this appeal was the ex-factory price indicated on the invoice attached to the entry.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                             5
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     May-31-1997         
<PERIOD-START>                        Jun-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                          Nov-30-1996
<CASH>                                $727,000
<SECURITIES>                          $0
<RECEIVABLES>                         $6,714,000
<ALLOWANCES>                          $300,000
<INVENTORY>                           $12,713,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      $20,707,000
<PP&E>                                $9,823,000
<DEPRECIATION>                        $7,790,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        $24,215,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 $17,311,000
<BONDS>                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<COMMON>                              6,717,000
<OTHER-SE>                            0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          $24,215,000
<SALES>                               $25,481,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      $25,481,000
<CGS>                                 $15,599,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         $15,599,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      $9,839,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      $0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    $1,166,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       ($1,123,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                          $0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   ($1,123,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                        $0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       $0
<CHANGES>                             $0
<NET-INCOME>                          ($1,123,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         ($0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         ($0.17)
        


</TABLE>
H. Res. 606 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 5, 2007. 

Whereas the Interstate Route 35W Mississippi River Bridge 

located in Minneapolis, Minnesota, collapsed on August 

1, 2007, during the evening rush hour; 

Whereas Minneapolis police and fire officials have reported a 

rising number of fatalities and injuries resulting from the 

tragedy; 

Whereas because rescue and recovery efforts are ongoing, the 

effect of the tragedy on the community and on Minnesota 

families is still unfolding; 

Whereas the first emergency personnel on the scene responded to the tragedy without hesitation, risking their 

health and safety to rescue victims and to provide emergency care to the injured; 

Whereas as there are questions that remain unanswered 

about the tragedy, it is clear that the commitment and 

heroism exhibited by first responders in the minutes and 

hours following the tragedy saved countless lives; 

Whereas the people of Minnesota and the Nation recognize 

that the dedication of first responders will remain steadfast throughout the ongoing recovery, repair, and rebuilding efforts; 
2 

•HRES 606 EH 

Whereas scores of ordinary people became extraordinary citizens following the tragedy by rushing to the aid of their 

fellow Minnesotans; 

Whereas the residents of Minneapolis should be commended 

for their bravery and tireless efforts following the tragedy 

on behalf of their neighbors and their city; 

Whereas there was an immediate outpouring of support and 

assistance from surrounding communities following the 

tragedy, including over 50 organizations and local units 

of government; and 

Whereas the heartbreaking images coming out of Minneapolis 

have captured the attention and sympathy of the Nation: 

Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) honors the city of Minneapolis, first responders, 

and the citizens of the State of Minnesota for their valiant efforts in responding to the horrific collapse of the 

Interstate Route 35W Mississippi River Bridge; 

(2) praises the people of Minneapolis and Minnesota 

for their great courage in this time of crisis; 

(3) recognizes the leadership and passionate commitment of the elected officials representing the people 

of Minneapolis, Hennepin County, and the State of Minnesota; 

(4) honors the emergency responders, within and 

beyond Minneapolis, for their bravery and sacrifice following the tragedy; 
3 

•HRES 606 EH 

(5) extends its heartfelt sympathies to the families 

of all those lost in the tragedy; and 

(6) reaffirms its support and commitment to all of 

the Nation’s law enforcement officers, firefighters, and 

emergency medical technicians as they selflessly serve 

their communities, regardless of the peril or hazard to 

themselves. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
From: lapazdecristo@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:50:50 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Stephanie Ponticas

Andover, MN 55304
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 490 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 30, 2007.
Whereas on June 14, 2007, the San Antonio Spurs won the 2007 National Basketball 
        Association (NBA) Championship with a victory over the Cleveland 
        Cavaliers;
Whereas the Spurs' win results in their fourth NBA Championship in the last 9 
        years;
Whereas the Spurs, after sweeping the Cavaliers to decisively win the Finals 4-
        0, are widely recognized as a modern-day basketball dynasty;
Whereas San Antonio's four-game sweep was only the eighth sweep since the finals 
        began in 1947;
Whereas the Spurs' .727 winning percentage is the highest in finals history;
Whereas under the leadership and instruction of Coach Gregg Popovich, the Spurs' 
        Tony Parker, Tim Duncan, Manu Ginobili, Robert Horry, Bruce Bowen, 
        Michael Finley, Fabricio Oberto, Francisco Elson, Jacque Vaughn, and 
        Brent Barry played together as a team with determination and resolve to 
        bring the NBA trophy back home to the Alamo City;
Whereas Tony Parker was named the Finals Most Valuable Player after using his 
        speed and quickness to average 24.5 points and an amazing 57 percent 
        from the field during the Finals, becoming the first European-born 
        player to be honored as MVP;
Whereas Tim Duncan and Bruce Bowen anchored the Spurs with stifling defense 
        throughout the NBA Finals;
Whereas Manu Ginobili used his pinpoint three-point shooting and strong drives 
        to the basket to lead the Spurs to victory in Game 4 with 27 points;
Whereas Coach Gregg Popovich is recognized as one of the greatest coaches of all 
        time after winning his fourth NBA Championship; and
Whereas San Antonio has the best fans in the league and the Alamo City is the 
        perfect setting for a championship celebration: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives congratulates the San Antonio 
Spurs and Coach Gregg Popovich for winning the 2007 National Basketball 
Association Championship.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Before the First Division,

September 18, 1959

No. 63356.

protests 306840-K, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### Mattoon & Co., Inc., and Pacific Overseas, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of chairs similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Davies Turner & Co.*v. *United States*(45 C.C.P.A. 39, C.A.D. 669), the claim in protest 306840-K at 20 percent under paragraph 412, as modified by T.D. 51802, and by amendment of protests 329600-K and 58/308 at 19 percent under said paragraph, as modified by T.D. 54108, was sustained.
IV 

House Calendar No. 283 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1514 

[Report No. 110–897] 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 

consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 27, 2008 

Ms. SLAUGHTER, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with 

respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported 

from the Committee on Rules. 

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule 

2 XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the 

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to 

4 the House is waived with respect to any resolution re5 ported on the legislative day of September 28, 2008, or 

6 September 29, 2008. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 283 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1514 

[Report No. 110–897] 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII 

tions reported from the Committee on Rules. with respect to consideration of certain resoluSEPTEMBER 27, 2008 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
EPA Reg. No. 100-895

Vol. 1 part 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

THOMAS ALLEN CLARK,

Petitioner,

v.

ALICE PAYNE 

Respondent.

Case No. C06-5015RJB

 ORDER

This habeas corpus petition has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant

to Title 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(A) and 636 (b)(1)(B) and Local Magistrates' Rules MJR 3 and MJR

4. Petitioner seeks federal habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Dkt. # 8). 

Petitioner originally named the State of Washington and Clark County as respondents. (Dkt. # 8). 

On March 2nd, 2006 the court entered an order to amend and to show cause as the action appears

time barred. (Dkt. # 9). The order gave petitioner until April 7th, 2006 to comply.

On March 8th, 2006 the petitioner filed a motion asking for leave to amend. (Dkt. # 10 and

11). To the extent that the motion identifies the proper respondent as Alice Payne the motion is

GRANTED. 

The clerk is directed to change the case caption to reflect Alice Payne as the

Case 3:06-cv-05015-RJB Document 12 Filed 04/04/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER

respondent. 

To the extent that the motion asks for review of this case under state law, state rules

of criminal procedure, and state rules of appellate procedure, the motion is DENIED. This case has

been filed in federal court and the federal rules of procedure and federal law regarding habeas corpus

apply. The court extends the deadline for a response on the order to show cause until April 28th,

2006. In particular petitioner is directed to inform the court when he first filed for review in state

court. (Dkt. # 9).

The clerk is ordered to send copies of this order to the petitioner.

DATED this 3rd day of April, 2006.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05015-RJB Document 12 Filed 04/04/06 Page 2 of 2
Case No. 8,208.

#### In re LE FAVOUR.

[8 Ben. 43.] 1

District Court, E. D. New York.

Feb., 1875.

Bankruptcy — Opening Adjudication Made bt Default.

1. A motion was made on behalf of a bankrupt, against whom an adjudication had been made by default, to have the default opened and to be allowed to file an answer. The answer proposed did not deny the act of bankruptcy, but denied that the petitioners were creditors or constituted one-quarter in number and one-third in value of the creditors of the bankrupt.

2. The court ordered a reference to the register to examine witnesses on notice as to the fact whether the petitioners did constitute one-quarter in number and one-third in value, and the register reported that they did. *Bold,*that the court, *245being satisfied with the conclusion of the register. would not open the default' to allow the interposition of an answer without merit.

[In the matter of Israel Le Favour, a bankrupt.]

BENEDICT, District Judge.

This is a motion to set aside an adjudication of bankruptcy entered by default, and for leave to file an answer. The answer desired to be filed contains no denial of the act of bankruptcy, but is simply a denial that the petitioners are creditors of the bankrupt and that they constitute one-quarter in number and one-third in value of all the creditors of the bankrupt. Under a preliminary order of the court, a reference was ordered to the register to examine witnesses, on notice, as to the fact whether the petitioners do constitute one-quarter in number and one-third in value of the creditors of the bankrupt; the result of which reference is a report of the register that the petitioning creditors do constitute one-quarter in number and one-third in value of the creditors of the bankrupt. On this report the motion to open the default and to set aside the proceeding has been renewed. Upon the only issue sought to be raised by the answer, I am satisfied with the conclusion arrived at by the register. I see no reason for setting aside the adjudication, chiefly for the purpose of allowing the interposition of a defense which appears to have little merit. The motion to open the default and set aside the proceedings is therefore denied.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 17

- 00791

- CV

IN RE Glenn L . WILLIAMS

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 13, 2017

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On December 4, 2017, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for

emergency stay. The court has considered the petition and motion and is of the opinion relator is

not entitled t o the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition and motion are denied. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. CV

- 13

- 0000235, styled Williams v. Williams , pending in the 198th Judicial

District Court, Bandera County, Texas, the Honorable Stephen B. Ables presiding.