alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ORDER ALLOWING THE PARTIES STIPULATED MOTION TO 

EXTEND SCHEDULING ORDER DEADLINES 1 

Case No. CV05-1898-JPD

DAVENPORT & HASSON, LLP 

Attorneys at Law 

12707 NE. Halsey Street 

Portland, OR 97230 

Telephone No. (503) 255-5352 

Facsimile No. (503) 255-6124 

s:\donohue\proposed orders received\sprinkle p-extend deadlines order.doc 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

 Honorable James P. Donohue 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 

JOE SPRINKLE AND LAURA SPRINKLE, 

HUSBAND AND WIFE, AND THE 

MARITAL COMMUNITY COMPOSED 

THEREOF, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

SB&C, LTD aka SKAGIT BONDED 

COLLECTORS and CRAIG CAMMOCK & 

JANE DOE CAMMOCK, husband and wife 

and the marital community composed thereof, 

 Defendants. 

Case No. CV05-1898-JPD 

ORDER AMENDING 

PRETRIAL SCHEDULE 

 This matter coming before the Court on the Stipulated Motion to Extend Scheduling Order 

Deadlines before the honorable James P. Donohue, Magistrate Judge, and the court being fully 

advised: 

 IT IS ORDERED that the Court Extends the deadlines in the scheduling order [Document 

13] as follows: 

1. From September 11, 2006 to September 18, 2006 

a. Trial Briefs, proposed voir dire questions, proposed jury instructions, and trial 

exhibits due 

Case 2:05-cv-01898-JPD Document 40 Filed 09/06/06 Page 1 of 2
ORDER ALLOWING THE PARTIES STIPULATED MOTION TO 

EXTEND SCHEDULING ORDER DEADLINES 2 

Case No. CV05-1898-JPD

DAVENPORT & HASSON, LLP 

Attorneys at Law 

12707 NE. Halsey Street 

Portland, OR 97230 

Telephone No. (503) 255-5352 

Facsimile No. (503) 255-6124 

s:\donohue\proposed orders received\sprinkle p-extend deadlines order.doc 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

2. From September 14, 2006 to September 18, 2006 

b. Agreed pretrial order due 

3. From September 11, 2006 to September 14, 2006 

c. Motions in Limine 

4. From September 14, 2006 to September 15, 2006 

d. Responses to Motions in Limine 

5. From September 15, 2006 to September 18, 2006 

e. Reply to Responses to Motions in Limine 

 DATED: September 6, 2006. 

 /s/ JAMES P. DONOHUE 

 United States Magistrate Judge 

Presented by: 

s/ Jeffrey I. Hasson 

Jeffrey I. Hasson, WSBA No. 23741 

Davenport & Hasson, LLP 

12707 NE Halsey St. 

Portland, OR 97230 

Telephone: (503) 255-5352 

Fax: (503) 255-6124 

E-Mail: hasson@dhlaw.biz 

Attorney for Defendants 

Case 2:05-cv-01898-JPD Document 40 Filed 09/06/06 Page 2 of 2
No. P67/99.

No. P67/100.

#### Buckley Mfg. Co. and Harper, Robinson & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/19645, etc. (San Francisco).

#### The Luro Products Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 63/22604 (New York).

Oliver, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of electric motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of *James G. Wiley Co., a/c Ungar Electric Tools, Inc.*v. *United States*(49 Cust. Ct. 199, Abstract 66961), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
ORDER APPOINTING

INDEPENDENT GUARDIAN AD LITEM - 1

NO. C05-5725 KLS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

TERRY WELLS and DANA WELLS, )

Individually and as Natural Guardians and )

Next Friends of EDEN WELLS, their )

minor child, ) NO: C05-5725 KLS

Plaintiffs, )

vs. )

THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR ) ORDER APPOINTING

CORPORATION, THYSSENKRUPP ) INDEPENDENT GUARDIAN 

ELEVATOR MANUFACTURING, INC., ) AD LITEM

HARBORSIDE INN, DON D. ROBERTS, )

GALE STUDER, SCOTT STUDER, LYNN)

STUDER, L. GEHRKE and P. GEHRKE, )

)

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

Based upon the foregoing Stipulation and Declaration of Jo-Hanna Read in support

thereof, the Court orders as follows: 

1. Jo-Hanna Read is a person found by the Court to be a suitable, disinterested

person having the requisite knowledge, training and expertise to perform the duties of

Independent Guardian ad Litem as required by CR 17(c), and is hereby appointed to represent

the interests of the named minor plaintiff;

Case 3:05-cv-05725-KLS Document 43 Filed 08/07/07 Page 1 of 2
ORDER APPOINTING

INDEPENDENT GUARDIAN AD LITEM - 2

NO. C05-5725 KLS

2. The Independent Guardian ad Litem is authorized to review any proposed

settlement of the minor plaintiff’s claims, and report to the Court whether the proposed

settlement amount for the minor is adequate.

DATED this 7th day of August, 2007.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Presented by:

MacDONALD HOAGUE & BAYLESS

By_/s/ Jay S. Brown____________

 Timothy K. Ford, WSBA #5986

 Jay S. Brown, WSBA #19835

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Case 3:05-cv-05725-KLS Document 43 Filed 08/07/07 Page 2 of 2
No. 62774.

#### We Moderns, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 58/6419 (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of chairs similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Davies Turner & Co.*v. *United States*(45 C.C.P.A. 39, C.A.D. 669), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
(R.D. 11541)

#### J. C. Penney Purchasing Corp. *v.*United States

Entry No. CE-8951.

(Decided June 6, 1968)

*Sharretts, Paley, Garter & Blauvelt*for the plaintiff.

*Edwin L. Weisl, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Chief Judge:

The instant appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the plaintiff and Assistant Attorney General for the United States, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise covered by the instant appeal consists of ladies car coats, style #325, exported from Germany on or about June 10, 1966, and that said merchandise is not on the list of products published in T.D. 54521 from which the application of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (PL. 927,84th Congress, Second Session), is withheld.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the price at the time of exportation to the United States of the instant merchandise at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold, or in the absence of sales, offered for sale in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities, and_ in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, was $12.50 each.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the instant appeal is submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

Upon the agreed facts and the cited authority, I find export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the ladies car coats, covered by this appeal for reappraisement, and that such value is $12.50 each.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

December 16, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00549

- CR

David Michael ESPIRITU, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR9243 Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R
Attorney Debra L. Parker is the c ourt

- appointed a ppell ate counsel for A ppellant David Michael Espiritu. On December 9, 2019, c ounsel filed an Anders brief

. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967) ; see also Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 319

– 20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014)

. The next day, counsel filed a motion to withdraw. On December 11, 2019, we advised counsel that t he December 9, 2019 Anders brief and the December 10, 2019 motion to withd raw d id not comply with the requisite procedures. See Kelly , 436 S.W.3d at 319

– 20. We identified the defects in the documents and ordered counsel to file an amended brief and correcting documents. The same day, counsel refiled the original brief and motion to withdraw. Counsel added a copy of counsel’s December 11, 2019 letter to Appell ant that corrected all but one of the defects in counsel’s previous documents. Counsel advised Appellant that he may request a free copy of the appellate record, but counsel did not provide Appellant with a completed pro se motion
, addressed to this court
, for a free copy of the record. See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d at 319

– 20 (requiring counsel to “include in [counsel’s] letter to the appellant a form motion .

. . lacking only the appellant’s signature and the date”). Our December 11, 2019 order is SAT ISFIED IN PART pending counsel’s providing written proof to this court that counsel has sent Appellant a form motion as required. S ee Kelly
, 436 S.W.3d at 319

– 20

.We ORDER Debra L. Parker to provide written proof to this court within TEN DAYS of

the dat e of this order that counsel has sent Appellant a motion for a free copy of the appellate record as required by Kelly

. See id. If Appellant wishes to file a pro se brief, he must file it with this court within THIRTY DAYS after counsel sends Appellant the motion for a free copy of the appellate record. Although the State filed its brief waiver based on Appellant’s initial brief
, which we struck
, because Appellant’s December 11, 2019 brief i s identical to the original brief, we will accept the State’s brief waiver as effective unless the State notifies this court to the contrary within TEN DAYS of the date of this order.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 16th day of December, 2019

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ
, Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32. 1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Element92 Resources Corp. (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 /s/ Daniel S. Mckinney
 Daniel S. Mckinney,
 President, Chief Executive Officer, Director
 
 Dated: June 22, 2010
 
 
 
 /s/ Mervyn Cragg
 Mervyn Cragg
 Chief Financial Officer
 
 Dated: June 22, 2010
Exhibit
12.1




CERTIFICATIONS




I, Kerry
S. Propper, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Chardan 2008 China Acquisition
Corp.;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;




4. The
company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the issuer is made known to me by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;




(b)
[Intentionally Omitted];




(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and




(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter
(the issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s
internal control over financial reporting; and




5. The
company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on my most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer’s
auditors and the audit committee of the issuer’s board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):




(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and




(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the issuer’s internal control over financial
reporting.




Date:
      April 8, 2009
            
            
            
            /s/
      Kerry
      S. PropperName:
            
            Kerry
      S. PropperTitle:
            
            Chief
      Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer)
No. 63851.

protest 266801-K (New York).

#### Camera Specialty Co., Inc., and Rohner, Gehrig & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of parts of photographic cameras similar in all material respects to the merchandise involved in *Manca, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust Ct. 271, C.D. 1874), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Before the Second Division,

December 23, 1964

No. 68970.

#### Fox Custom House Brokers, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 61/22460, 61/22463, and 61/22464 (Cleveland).

*337Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel (wbicb is limited to rolled copper engravers’ plates and does not include plates of matte or gravure quality) that the merchandise consists of copper engravers’ plates, not ground, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, Arthur Bertagnolli, the Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Treasurer of SAVOY ENERGY CORPORATION (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:





1.  The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement this 11th day of April, 2011.





/s/ Arthur BertagnolliArthur BertagnolliChief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SAVOY ENERGY CORPORATION and will be retained by SAVOY ENERGY CORPORATION and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 62806.

#### Lang *&*Marshall Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 58/5648 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
No. 58690.

protests 220390-K and 225280-K (Seattle).

#### Clarence S. Holmes *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of “fillets of fish other than cod, cusk, haddock, hake, pollock and rosefish,” the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: Higgins, Cortney [mailto:Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov]

Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 9:11 AM

To: Wayland, Robertj

Subject: FW: E.O. 12866 Meeting on Carbon Pollution Guidelines for Existing Power Plants: Emission Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Existing Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units

Hi,

Attached are handouts from this meeting.

Regards, Cortney

<< 2060AR33_2014_04_29_GHGExisitng_CEA_Handout1.pdf >> << 2060AR33_2014_04_29_GHGExisitng_CEA_Handout2.pdf >>

-----Original Appointment-----

From: Echols, Mabel E. Subject: E.O. 12866 Meeting on Carbon Pollution Guide lines for Existing Power Plants: Emission Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas Emissions From Existing Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units

When: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 1:00 PM-1:30 PM (U TC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).

Where: Room 472 Eisenhower Executive Office Building

This meeting was requested by Bonnie Such man, Troutman Sanders LLP on behalf of the Canadian Electricity Association.
dg_Ex1036



		

			Exhibit 10.36

		





		
			Summary of
		

		
			Dollar General Corporation Life Insurance Program
		

		
			as Applicable to Executive Officers
		

		
			 
		

		
			Dollar General Corporation (the "Company") has established a life insurance program for salaried employees.  Currently, a death benefit equal to 2.5 times the employee’s annual base salary, up to a maximum of $4 million, is provided to a limited group of salaried employees, including the Company’s executive officers.  A lesser death benefit is provided to other groups of salaried employees.  
		

		
			 
		

		
			The life insurance coverage offered through the program may be provided through a variety of means, including individual (which may be owned by the individual or by the Company) or group policies with universal, whole or term insurance, or through payment out of the Company’s general assets, as determined by the Company in its sole discretion. In addition, certain of these policies may accumulate a cash value which may inure to the benefit of either the Company or the individual.
----

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Mediware. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  Dated:  November 2, 2010 | /s/ T. Kelly Mann                      |   |
|------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                                     | T. Kelly MannChief Executive Officer   |
|                                     |                                   |   |
| Dated:  November 2, 2010       | /s/ Michael Martens                    |   |
|                                     | Michael MartensChief Financial Officer |

----
Exhibit
10.2


 


Schedule of Purchasers


 



	Investor	
        # of

        Shares
	Aggregate 

Purchase Price
	Jeffrey L. Parker	60,241	$50,000.00
	Papken der Torossian	36,145	$30,000.00
	Paul A. Rosenbaum	120,482	$100,000.00
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-30-2000
<CASH>                                              11
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,615
<ALLOWANCES>                                       442
<INVENTORY>                                     20,562
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                56,545
<PP&E>                                         135,463
<DEPRECIATION>                                  44,518
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 157,601
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,766
<BONDS>                                        170,901
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        28,405
<OTHER-SE>                                    (90,802)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   157,601
<SALES>                                         38,831
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,831
<CGS>                                           31,817
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   36,181
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (218)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    90
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (5,047)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,615)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,046)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,650
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,569)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>