alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 187 (Thursday, September 28, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 66896]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21534]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-23-048]


Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:  United States International Trade 
Commission.

TIME AND DATE: October 12, 2023 at 9:30 a.m.

PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

STATUS: Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
    1. Agendas for future meetings: none.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Commission vote on Inv. No. 731-TA-891 (Fourth Review) (Foundry 
Coke from China). The Commission currently is scheduled to complete and 
file its determinations and views of the Commission on October 20, 
2023.
    5. Outstanding action jackets: none.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sharon Bellamy, Supervisory 
Hearings and Information Officer, 202-205-2000.
    The Commission is holding the meeting under the Government in the 
Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(b). In accordance with Commission policy, 
subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, 
may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: September 26, 2023.
Sharon Bellamy,
Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2023-21534 Filed 9-26-23; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
No. 62785.

#### Air Clearance Assn., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 58/4586 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
BEFORE THE SECOND DIVISION,

December 4, 1963

No. 68147.

#### E. B. Samsey & Company *v.*United States,

protests 61/6231, etc. (Cleveland).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of steel bandsaws in coils similar in all material respects to those the subject of *J. E. Bernard & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(50 Cust. Ct. 41, C.D. 2386), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 10.5


 


终止协议


Termination Agreement


 


本终止协议(下称“本协议”)由下列各方于2018年3月20日在中华人民共和国(下称“中国”)
杭州签订:


This Termination Agreement (this “Agreement”)
has been executed by and among the following parties on March 20, 2018 in Hangzhou, the People’s Republic of China (“China”or
the “PRC”):


 


甲方:韩昱,为中国境内自然人,杭州龙运网络科技有限公司(“公司”)的股东,持有公司85%的股权(“股权”);


Party A: Han Yu, a natural person
in China and one of the shareholders of Hangzhou Longyun Network Technology Co., Ltd. ("Company"), holding 85% of equity
interest of the Company ("Shareholding");


 


乙方:杭州昱曜网络科技有限公司,一家于中国杭州市注册成立的外商独资有限公司,其注册地址位于杭州市萧山经济技术开发区启迪路198号B1-901-11室;


Party B: Hangzhou Yuyao Network Technology
Co., Ltd., a wholly foreign owned enterprise with limited liability which is incorporated and established in Hangzhou City,
China, with its registered address at Room B1-901-11, 198 Qidi Road, Xiaoshan Economic and Technological Development Zone, Hangzhou
City;


 


在本协议中,甲方和乙方以下各称“一方”,合称“双方”。


In this Agreement, each of Party A and
Party B shall be referred to as a "Party" respectively, and they shall be collectively referred to as the "Parties".


 


鉴于:甲方于2016年8月19日作出《授权委托书》,授权乙方在《授权委托书》的有效期内就其股权行使若干权利;


Whereas,
Party A issued a Power of Attorney authorizing Party B to exercise certain rights relating to Party A’s Shareholding during
the term of the Power of Attorney, dated as of August 19, 2016;


 


据此,双方经协商一致,达成如下协议:


Now, therefore, through mutual discussion,
the Parties have reached the following agreements:


 


		1.	双方特此同意终止《授权委托书》。自本协议生效之日起,《授权委托书》终止且不具有进一步的效力。



The Parties
hereby agree to terminate the Power of Attorney. Effective as of the date hereof, the Power of Attorney shall terminate and be
of no further force and effect.


 


		2.	本协议以中文和英文书就,一式两份,甲乙双方各持一份,具有同等效力;中英文版本如有冲突,应以中文版为准。



This Agreement
is written in both Chinese and English language in two copies, each Party having one copy with equal legal validity; in case there
is any conflict between the Chinese version and the English version, the Chinese version shall prevail.


 


本页其余部分刻意留为空白


The Remainder of this page is intentionally
left blank


 




     


     


    

 


有鉴于此,双方已使得经其授权的代表于文首所述日期签署了本终止协议并即生效,以昭信守。


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused
their authorized representatives to execute this Termination Agreement as of the date first above written.


 


	甲方:	韩昱	 
	Party A:	Han Yu	 
	签字:	 	 
	By:	/s/ Han Yu	 
	 	 	 
	乙方:	杭州昱曜网络科技有限公司	 
	Party B:	Hangzhou Yuyao Network Technology Co., Ltd.	 
	签字:	 	 
	By:	/s/ Han Yu 	 
	姓名:	韩昱	 
	Name:	Han Yu	 
	职位:	法定代表人	 
	Title:	Legal Representative
Exhibit
32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection
with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Sunrise Energy Resources,  Inc. (the Company)
for the period ended March 31, 2005, as  filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the  Report), I, Konstantin Tsirulnikov, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company,  certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1)
The  Report fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2)     The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,  the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 10,
2005

| | By:
 /s/ Konstantin Tsirulnikov
      Konstantin Tsirulnikov
      Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 619 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require that whenever 

a bill or joint resolution is introduced that amends existing law, the 

sponsor provide to the Clerk an electronic version of a comparative 

print, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 3, 2007 

Mr. SALI (for himself, Mr. GARRETT of New Jersey, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, 

Mr. GOODE, Mr. GINGREY, Mr. BISHOP of Utah, Mr. FORTUN ̃O, Mr. 

BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr. PITTS, Mr. PAUL, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, 

Mr. WESTMORELAND, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr. CONAWAY, and Mr. 

MACK) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to 

require that whenever a bill or joint resolution is introduced that amends existing law, the sponsor provide 

to the Clerk an electronic version of a comparative print, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That rule XII of the House of Representa2 tives is amended by adding at the end the following new 

3 clause: 


cnoel on PRODPC75 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 619 IH 

1 ‘‘Comparative print 

2 ‘‘9. (a) A bill or joint resolution that amends existing 

3 law may not be received or considered in the House unless 

4 the Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner pre5 senting such measure also presents an electronic version 

6 of a comparative print of any part of the bill or joint reso7 lution proposing to amend any statute and of the statute 

8 or part thereof proposing to be amended, showing by ap9 propriate typographical devices the omissions and inser10 tions proposed. 

11 ‘‘(b) The Clerk shall post on his Internet website the 

12 electronic version of each comparative print presented 

13 under paragraph (a) as soon as practicable after it is pre14 sented.’’. 

15 SEC. 2. The amendment made by the first section of 

16 this resolution shall take effect immediately before noon 

17 January 3, 2009. 

Æ 


cnoel on PRODPC75 with BILLS
No. 68466.

protests 315550-K, etc. (New York).

#### Langfelder, Homma & Carroll, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

*324Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of nylon butterflies and angelfish similar in use to manufactures of silk and following the principles set forth in *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 OCPA 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/els/00221139/1999/00000095/00000001/art00297

Hydrofluoropolyethers 

Authors: Marchionni G.1; Silvani R.; Fontana G.; Malinverno G.; Visca M.

Source: Journal of Fluorine Chemistry, Volume 95, Number 1, 4 June 1999 , pp. 41-50(10)

Publisher: Elsevier

Abstract:

, -Dihydrofluoropolyethers (HFPEs) have been synthesized by a novel process consisting of radical-initiated 

oxypolymerization of tetrafluoroethylene, chemical cleavage of peroxy groups, and chemical modification of the resulting 

difunctional fluoropolyethers. The physicochemical properties of the HFPEs depend upon the molecular weight, and are 

influenced by their hydrogen atoms. The effect of terminal hydrogens is however reduced with increasing molecular weight. 

The HFPE molecules show a certain degree of polarity, which allows miscibility with polar solvents. The hydrogen abstraction 

reaction is a limiting factor in the atmospheric lifetime of this class of products, thus reducing their environmental impact.The 

preliminary toxicological tests indicate the products to be substantially nontoxic.

Keywords: Hydrofluoropolyethers; Fluorinated fluids; Physicochemical properties; Environmental impact

Language: English 

Document Type: Research article 

DOI: 10.1016/S0022-1139(98)00297-8

Affiliations: 1: Ausimont SpA, R & D Centre, Via S. Pietro, 50, 20021, Bollate, Italy 

Publication date: 1999-06-04
EXHIBIT
32.1






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






Inconnection with the
Annual Report of GMS Capital Corp., (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George Metrakos, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, That to the best of my knowledge:


(1)           
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.






GMS
CAPITAL CORP.


By:
      /s/ George MetrakosGeorge
      MetrakosChief
      Executive OfficerFebruary
      8, 2010
No. 59763.

#### Inter-Maritime Forwarding Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 205095-K and 208507-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beaded bags the same in all material respects as those passed upon in Abstract 56124, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Sun
Television and Appliances, Inc.'s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended May 31, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000874690
<NAME> SUN TELEVISION AND APPLIANCES, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-02-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,708
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,168<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    102,872
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               130,891
<PP&E>                                          96,205
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 244,640
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           74,480
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           174
<OTHER-SE>                                      97,759
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   244,640
<SALES>                                        104,995
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               104,995
<CGS>                                           81,914
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   81,914
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,026
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,128
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (10,154)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (10,154)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.58)
<FN>
<F1>Trade accounts receivable net allowance for doubtful accounts of $475,000.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
No. 66053.

#### Border Brokerage Co. *v.*United States,

protests 58/10103 and 58/10104 (Seattle).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of paper toweling similar in all material respects to that the *309subject of *United States*v. *Border Brokerage Company*(48 C.C.P.A. 38, C.A.D. 760), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
## MA**TERIA LS NOT INCLUDED IN** 

**AI RWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (A**  **D) DOCKET**

**FAA -**  **2013 -**  **0479** Docket Number

**2011 -**  **SW -**  **070 -** **AD** Directorate Identifier

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket Eurocopter Em ergency Alert Service Bulletin (EASB) No. 53.01.47, EASB No. 53.00.48, and EASB No. 53A001 , all revision 4, dated September 27, 2011.



### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region Rules Docket 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663 Fort W orth, Texas 76137
**DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

DANNY HAWKINS,

Plaintiff,

v.

AMY CALDERWOOD, et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C05-1586-JCC-MAT

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff has submitted a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, along with

a corrected application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner (“IFP application”).

Plaintiff alleges in his proposed complaint that officials at the King County Jail were negligent in

maintaining the showers at the Jail and this negligence led to plaintiff slipping, falling and injuring

his back. (Dkt. #4, Proposed Complaint at 3). Plaintiff alleges that after he became injured, he

brought the condition of the showers to the attention of the Jail but the Jail either lost or did not

respond to his grievances. Plaintiff then notified the Ombudsman for King County and received

a letter in response advising him that the Jail had been informed of the situation and was taking

steps to correct the problem. (Dkt. #4, Exhibit attached to proposed complaint).

Case 2:05-cv-01586-JCC Document 5 Filed 10/14/05 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

PAGE -2

In order to state a cause of action under § 1983, plaintiff must allege that Jail officials

demonstrated “deliberate indifference” to plaintiff’s safety. Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 833

(1994). In order to be liable, the officials must “both be aware of facts from which the inference

could be drawn that a substantial risk of serious harm exists, and must also draw the inference.”

Id.

Here, however, plaintiff does not allege that Jail officials were aware of the condition

before plaintiff injured himself – he merely alleges that he informed officials after he fell and

injured his back. Therefore, plaintiff does not allege that officials acted with deliberate indifference

to his safety. Cf. Frost v. Agnos , 152 F.3d 1124, 1129 (9th Cir. 1998) (finding deliberate

indifference when prison officials ignored request for transfer by inmate who (1) was using

crutches in a unit with non-accessible showers, (2) had submitted several grievance forms to advise

jail officials of the risk he faced, and (3) had his request supported by a prison doctor who stated

that inmate should be placed in the disabled unit).

Therefore, plaintiff’s complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, and

should be dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff’s IFP application may be denied as moot. A

proposed Order accompanies this recommendation.

DATED this 13th day of October , 2005.

A

Mary Alice Theiler

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:05-cv-01586-JCC Document 5 Filed 10/14/05 Page 2 of 2
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 6, 2010 

0929 

Order 

 

October 6, 2010 

141153 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141153 

 COA: 285666 

Wayne CC: 05-009901-FC 

JAMES CHRISTOPHER SCHNEIDER, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 6, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the WESTERN DISTRICT of WASHINGTON

THOMAS A. WEBER,

 

 Plaintiff, 

 

 vs. 

TIME WARNER, INC. Et al.,

 Defendant.

 C05-1706 RSL

 MINUTE ORDER

 REASSIGNING CASE

Pursuant to the Amended General Order entered by the Chief Judge on

November 3, 2004, this action has been reassigned to the Honorable Robert L. Lasnik, United

States District Judge. 

All future documents filed in this case must bear the cause number C05-1706 RSL and

bear the Judge’s name in the upper right hand corner of the document.

Dated this 7th day of November, 2005

BRUCE RIFKIN

Clerk of Court

by: /s/ PETER H. VOELKER

 Peter H. Voelker, Deputy Clerk

Case 2:05-cv-01706-RSL Document 7 Filed 11/07/05 Page 1 of 1
From: carlaugustruppsr@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:01:04 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Carl Rupp

Rockaway, NJ 07866
```

[Federal Register: March 29, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 59)]
[Notices]               
[Page 15484]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr29mr10-111]                         


[[Page 15484]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6934]

 
Waiver of Restriction on Assistance to the Central Government of 
Uzbekistan Related to Budget Transparency

    Pursuant to section 7086(c)(2) of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2010 (Division F, 
Pub. L. 111-117) (``the Act''), and Department of State Delegation of 
Authority Number 245-1, I hereby determine that it is important to the 
national interest of the United States to waive the requirements of 
section 7086(c)(1) of the Act with respect to the Government of 
Uzbekistan, and I hereby waive such restriction.
    This determination shall be reported to the Congress, and published 
in the Federal Register.

    Dated: March 22, 2010.
 Jacob J. Lew,
Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources.
[FR Doc. 2010-6910 Filed 3-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-46-P
```
A

g

u

a

F r i a

R i v

e r

Tonto National Forest

Bradshaw-Harquahala

Planning Area

Black Canyon City

Cordes

Junction

Bureau of Land Management

Phoenix District Office

Phoenix, AZ

October 2009

Note: Land Status legend located

on Map 1-1

Note: The Bureau of Land Management

(BLM) conducts land use planning only

in the areas administered by BLM. BLM

has no planning authority under the

municipal or county planning legislation

of the State of Arizona.

No warranty is made by BLM for the use

of this map for purposes not intended by

BLM, or to the accuracy, reliability or

completeness of the information shown.

Spatial information may not meet National

Map Accuracy Standards. This information

may be updated without notification.

Map 7

Agua Fria

National Monument

Resource Management Zones

& Wilderness Characteristics

0 1 2

Miles

Interstate

Highway

Agua Fria

National Monument

Planning Area

Major Road

Minor Road

Major River, Streams or

Wash

Resource Allocations

Passage RMZ

All Areas within the

Monument except for the

Front Country RMZ and the

Passage RMZ are Back

Country RMZ

Wilderness Characteristics

Front Country RMZ

Powerlines