alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I John Moore certify that:

1.   I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K of Sync2 Networks Corp.

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to a state material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and financial information
     included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
     financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
     as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintain disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for
     the registrant and have:

     a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared.
     b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
     c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant's fourth quarter in the case
          of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
          likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
          financial reporting; and

5.   I have disclosed, based on my recent evaluation of internal control over
     financial reporting, to registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
     registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
     functions):

     a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record,process,summarize and report financial information;and
     b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's control over
          financial reporting

September 26, 2011
                                            /s/ John Moore
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            CEO/CFO/DIRECTOR
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION IX 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

July 10, 2012

Memorandum

Subject: Number of Clark County Minor Sources

From: Laura Yannayon, EPA Region 9, Air Division, Permits Office (AIR-3)

To: Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR-2012-0566, Clark County NSR Programs

Clarks submittal entitled “Proposed Revision To The Clark County Part Of The Nevada State 

Implementation Plan: Minor Source New Source Review Program Rule Adoptions And Revisions,” 

January 29, 2009, includes the following sentence: “The actual number of sources that currently hold 

permits and that would not need individual permits under the new rule is less than one percent of total 

sources and these are extremely small sources with very little or no impact on ambient air quality.”

On May 23, 2012, I spoke with Mr. Richard Beckstead with regards to the number of sources currently 

holding permits. He stated that in 2009, at that time they evaluated the effects, there were approximately 

1881 permitted sources. Therefore, I have estimated that approximately 190 sources equate to the 1% of 

sources referenced by Clark County in the above document.
Exhibit 99.1

CONSENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to
the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.333-162381 on Form
F-3 of our reports dated February 29, 2012, relating to the consolidated
financial statements of Safe Bulkers Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company), and
the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting,
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31,
2011.

|                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Deloitte
 Hadjipavlou, Sofianos & Cambanis S.A.
|Athens,
 Greece                                    
|February 29,
 2012                                 

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO

CONTINUE DISCOVERY, DISPOSITIVE MOTION,

AND JOINT STATUS REPORT DEADLINES 

(NO. C05-5731RJB)

1 ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON

Criminal Justice Division

PO Box 40116

Olympia, WA 98504-0116

(360) 586-1445

DISTRICT JUDGE ROBERT J. BRYAN

MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAREN L. STROMBOM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT TACOMA

MATTHEW G. SILVA,

Plaintiff,

v.

CHRISTINE GREGOIRE, et al.,

Defendants.

NO. C05-5731RJB

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED

MOTION TO CONTINUE DISCOVERY, DISPOSITIVE MOTION, AND JOINT

STATUS REPORT DEADLINES

Plaintiff and Defendants, having filed a Stipulated Motion to Continue Discovery,

Dispositive Motion and Joint Status Report deadlines in this matter, and the Court being fully

advised and having examined the records and files herein, does hereby find and ORDER:

1. Plaintiff and Defendants’ Stipulated Motion to Continue Discovery,

Dispositive Motion and Joint Status Report deadlines is GRANTED;

2. Discovery deadline is now October 27, 2006;

3. Dispositive motion deadline is now November 17, 2006;

3. Joint Status Report will be due on February 28, 2007; and

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case 3:05-cv-05731-RJB Document 63 Filed 08/25/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO

CONTINUE DISCOVERY, DISPOSITIVE MOTION,

AND JOINT STATUS REPORT DEADLINES 

(NO. C05-5731RJB)

2 ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON

Criminal Justice Division

PO Box 40116

Olympia, WA 98504-0116

(360) 586-1445

4. The Clerk is directed to send uncertified copies of this Order to Plaintiff and

to counsel for Defendants.

DATED 25th day of August, 2006.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Submitted by:

ROB MCKENNA

Attorney General

/s/Sara J. Olson

SARA J. OLSON, WSBA #33003

Assistant Attorney General

Attorney for Defendant

Approved telephonically

/s/ MATTHEW SILVA

Plaintiff

Case 3:05-cv-05731-RJB Document 63 Filed 08/25/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO

CONTINUE DISCOVERY, DISPOSITIVE MOTION,

AND JOINT STATUS REPORT DEADLINES 

(NO. C05-5731RJB)

3 ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON

Criminal Justice Division

PO Box 40116

Olympia, WA 98504-0116

(360) 586-1445

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on August 25, 2006, I caused to be electronically filed the foregoing

document with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system. I certify that I mailed by

United States Postal Service the document to the following non CM/ECF participants: 

MATTHEW G. SILVA #957176

FLORENCE CORRECTIONS CENTER

PO BOX 6900

FLORENCE AZ 85232

I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

EXECUTED this 24th day of August, 2006, at Olympia, Washington.

/s/Cherrie Kollmer

CHERRIE KOLLMER

Case 3:05-cv-05731-RJB Document 63 Filed 08/25/06 Page 3 of 3
No. 57417.

Suit 4723.

#### Border Brokerage Company *v.*United States.

C. D. 1375 affirmed March 11, 1953. C A. D. 515.
Exhibit 32.2CERTIFICATION Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350The undersigned officer of ALLIED HEALTHCARE PRODUCTS, INC. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, tosuch officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Company’s fiscalquarter ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.              /s/ Daniel C. Dunn   Daniel C. Dunn   Vice President, Chief Financial Officer & Secretary  February 7, 2007
22
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order Continuing Trial/Murray 

CR05-417RSM –1 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

Judge Ricardo S. Martinez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

) NO. CR05-418RSM

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

) ORDER CONTINUING

DAVID MURRAY, ) TRIAL DATE

)

Defendant. )

_______________________________________)

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on a stipulated motion of the government

and defendant to continue the trial date. Having considered the entirety of the record and

files herein, the Court finds that failure to grant a continuance would likely result in a

miscarriage of justice. The case is complex involving over three thousand pages of

discovery, over one thousand intercepted audio recordings and hundreds of exhibits. 

Defendant has provided the government with discovery that includes the defendant’s

financial data for the last eight years. It is unreasonable to expect adequate preparation

for trial before the current trial date of April 3, 2006. The Court further finds that the

interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial in this case are outweighed by

the ends of justice. 

IT IS NOW, THEREFORE, ORDERED that trial of defendant DAVID MURRAY

be continued to April 17, 2006, and that the time between the date of this Order and the 

Case 2:05-cr-00418-RSM Document 11 Filed 03/31/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order Continuing Trial/Murray 

CR05-417RSM –2 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

new trial date be excludable time under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to Title 18, United

States Code, Sections 3161(h)(8)(A), 3161(h)(8)(B)(i), and 3161(h)(8)(B)(ii). 

 Dated this 31st day of March, 2006

A

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Presented by:

s/Douglas B. Whalley 

DOUGLAS B. WHALLEY

Assistant United States Attorney

United States Attorney's Office 

601 Union Street, Suite 5100 

Seattle, WA 98101-3903

(206) 553-4882, Fax: (206) 553-4440

E-mail: douglas.whalley@usdoj.gov

Washington State Bar #4625

s/ Lisca Borichewski 

LISCA BORICHEWSKI

Assistant United States Attorney

(206) 553-2266, Fax: (206) 553-4440

E-mail: lisca.borichewski@usdoj.gov

Washington State Bar #24300

s/ James Frush 

James Frush

Cable Langenbach Kinerk & Bauer 

1000 2nd Ave, Ste. 2500

Seattle, WA 98104 

206-292-8800 

Email: jfrush@cablelang.com 

Case 2:05-cr-00418-RSM Document 11 Filed 03/31/06 Page 2 of 2
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 543 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United States 

Postal Service should issue a semipostal stamp to support medical research relating to Alzheimer’s disease. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 12, 2007 

Mr. MARKEY (for himself and Mr. SMITH of New Jersey) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 

Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

the United States Postal Service should issue a 

semipostal stamp to support medical research relating 

to Alzheimer’s disease. 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the United States Postal Service should, 

3 in accordance with section 416 of title 39, United States 

4 Code— 

5 (1) issue a semipostal stamp to support medical 

6 research relating to Alzheimer’s disease; and 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 543 IH 

1 (2) transfer to the National Institutes of Health 

2 for that purpose any amounts becoming available 

3 from the sale of such stamp. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Exhibit 99.1

Statement





Pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of Luxemburg Bancshares, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that:



(1)

the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2)

the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  November 13, 2002





/s/ John A. Slatky

John A. Slatky

Chief Executive Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 ORDER

Page - 1

HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff,

v.

CHRISTINA FRIEDLANDER,

Respondent.

Case No. C05-5714 RBL

ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO

RESPOND TO ADMINISTRATIVE

SUMMONS ISSUED BY THE UNITED

STATES INTERNAL REVENUE

SERVICE

THIS MATTER comes on before the above-entitled Court upon the Petition of the Internal Revenue

Service for an order enforcing an Internal Revenue Service administrative summons served on respondent

July 7, 2005.

Having considered all materials submitted in support of and in response to said petition, as well as the

files and records herein, including but not limited to the Report and Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge J. Kelly Arnold, and having considered that this Order was prematurely entered prior to the

date set for hearing, and the Court has now considered Respondent’s Objections [Dkt. #25], it is hereby

ORDERED as follows:

1. The court has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this proceeding.

2. Respondent be, and she is hereby ordered to fully obey the administrative summons served on

respondent July 7, 2005, by attending, testifying, and producing all documentation required by

the terms of the summons before Internal Revenue Service Agent Paul Shipley, or any other

proper officer or employee of the Internal Revenue Service, at such time and place as may be

Case 3:05-cv-05714-RBL Document 26 Filed 02/09/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 ORDER

Page - 2

set by Revenue Agent Shipley or any other proper officer or employee of the Internal Revenue

Service.

3. Failure to comply with the terms of this order may result in a finding of civil contempt

punishable by fine or imprisonment pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §401. 

The Clerk shall send uncertified copies of this order to all counsel of record, and to any party appearing

pro se.

Dated this 8th day of February, 2006.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-05714-RBL Document 26 Filed 02/09/06 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                            5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  ITEC
ATTRACTIONS,  INC.,  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  AND IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                            9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                        SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                  180,801
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            90,002
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                             225,511
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        739,203
<PP&E>                                                8,120,426
<DEPRECIATION>                                        2,140,370
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        7,573,048
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   854,519
<BONDS>                                               3,920,161
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                  7,938
<OTHER-SE>                                            2,790,430
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          7,573,048
<SALES>                                               4,613,978
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      4,619,739
<CGS>                                                 3,365,807
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         4,905,537
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      229,144
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (514,942)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    (514,942)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (514,942)
<EPS-BASIC>                                               (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             (0.06)


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

CHRIS M. DAVIES,

Plaintiff,

v.

STATE OF WASHINGTON; DEPARTMENT

OF LABOR & INDUSTRIES; GARY

WEEKS, in his individual capacity; PAUL

TRAUSE, in his individual capacity; PATRICK

WOODS, in his individual capacity; and

ROBERT “ROBB” MARVIN, in his individual

capacity,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5587FDB

ORDER RE WITHDRAWAL OF

COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT

ROBERT ”ROBB” MARVIN

Counsel for Defendants moves pursuant to GR 2(f)(4) for an order allowing defense counsel

to withdraw as counsel for Defendant Robert “Robb” Marvin for the reason that after her entry of

appearance, the State received results of an independent investigation indicating that Defendant

Marvin is not entitled to state defense pursuant to RCW 4.92.070. (See Decl. of Suzanne Parisien.)

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED: 

1. Defendant Robert “Robb” Marvin shall advise the Court by no later than 

Wednesday, November 30, 2005 whether he will proceed pro se or with new

Case 3:05-cv-05587-FDB Document 11 Filed 11/02/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 2

counsel, who should make an appearance by November 30, 2005, or as soon

thereafter as possible. 

2. After the Court is advised by Mr. Marvin of how he will proceed, the Court will

address the motion of his present counsel to withdraw. 

DATED this 2nd day of November, 2005.

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-05587-FDB Document 11 Filed 11/02/05 Page 2 of 2
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 559 

Providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 479) to amend the 

Rules of the House of Representatives to provide for enforcement of 

clause 9 of rule XXI of the Rules of the House of Representatives. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 19, 2007 

Mr. BOEHNER submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 479) 

to amend the Rules of the House of Representatives 

to provide for enforcement of clause 9 of rule XXI of 

the Rules of the House of Representatives. 

1 Resolved, That immediately upon the adoption of this 

2 resolution the House shall, without intervention of any 

3 point of order, consider the resolution (H. Res. 479) to 

4 amend the Rules of the House of Representatives to pro5 vide for enforcement of clause 9 of rule XXI of the Rules 

6 of the House of Representatives. The resolution shall be 

7 considered as read. The previous question shall be consid8 ered as ordered on the resolution to final adoption without 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HRES 559 IH 

1 intervening motion or demand for division of the question 

2 except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and con3 trolled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 

4 the Committee on Rules; and (2) one motion to recommit 

5 to be offered by the majority leader or his designee which 

6 may not contain instructions. 

Æ 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
From: maryswierenga@juno.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:02:10 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mary Swierenga

Grand Rapids, MI 49506