alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: wstawitz65@me.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:35:07 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

william stawitz

Camp Hill, PA 17011
From: wahbjh@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:14:35 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Bernice Holley

Lakeland, FL 33801
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-24-00207-CR

IN RE Christopher-Jarvis PAYNE

Original Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Delivered and Filed: May 29, 2024

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On March 22, 2024, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After considering the 

petition, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition 

for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2021CR3349, 2022CR6932, styled State of Texas v. Christopher Payne, 

pending in the Criminal District Court, Magistrate Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Andrew Carruthers

presiding.
No. 62273.

#### Aluminum Import Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 253344-K, etc. (St. Albans).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of aluminum alloys similar in all material respects to those the subject of *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(45 C. C. P. A. 43, C. A. D. 670), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 ORDER

Page - 1

HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff,

v.

ERIC MICHAEL MILTON, 

Defendant.

Case No. CR04-5265 RBL

Case No. C05-5756 RBL

ORDER

THIS MATTER comes on before the above-entitled Court upon Defendant’s “Motion/Evidence for

Quo Warranto and/or 60B (sic) Motion” [Dkt. #70, CR04-5265RBL] and “Actual and Constructive Notice

and Request for Fiduciary Tax Return” [Dkt. #71, CR04-5265RBL].

Having considered the entirety of the records and file herein, the Court finds and rules as follows:

Defendant, acting pro se, has again filed frivolous documents with this Court [see Dkt. #69, CR04-

5265RBL] after having filed a Notice of Appeal of this Court’s Order Denying § 2255 Motion [Dkt. #3, C05-

5765RBL] and after this Court denied a Certificate of Appealability [Dkt. #9, C05-5756RBL]. The Notice

of Appeal divests this Court of jurisdiction to consider plaintiff’s frivolous requests, and, as such, the “Motion”

and “Notice” are hereby STRICKEN from this Court’s motions calendar. The Court will not respond to any

further frivolous filings by the defendant.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Case 3:05-cv-05756-RBL Document 12 Filed 02/27/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 ORDER

Page - 2

The Clerk shall send uncertified copies of this order to all counsel of record, and to any party appearing

pro se.

Dated this 27th day of February, 2006.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-05756-RBL Document 12 Filed 02/27/06 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|               | (1)                                  | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|          |        |                                                                           |
|          | (2)                                  | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |

|  Date:                 November 9, 2005                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |                      |                     | /s/                A. William Allen, III |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                                                              |                      |      | A.                William Allen, III     |
|                                                         |                      |      | Chief                Executive Officer   |
TIME LIMITS/MAINTENANCE CHECKS

PSP 605

TEMPORARY REVISION NO. 5−151

INSERT IN SECTION 5−10−30

FACING PAGE 12

REASON FOR ISSUE: To introduce a visual check of the torque box.ACTION: Add the task that follows to the list of Chapter 53 checks:

NOTE: Record the incorporation of this Temporary Revision on the yellow RECORD OF TEMPORARY 

and the LIST OF EFFECTIVE TEMPORARY REVISIONS sheets at the front of this publication
TIME LIMITS/MAINTENANCE CHECKS

PSP 605

MAINTENANCE

MANUAL − CH. 5

REFERENCE

ZONE A

CHECK INTERVAL CHAPTER 53 CHECKS DESCRIPTION

53−10−00−198* Torque Box.

Visual Check. 7800 T

(Ref. PSP 612, Part 9, VC−53−10−81) LANDINGS

1100 R

LANDINGS

PHASE-IN: For aircraft with 7300 Landings or less at the date

of TR 5-151 (May 31/2011), do this check no laterthan 7800 Landings.For aircraft with more than 7300 Landings butless than 8550 landings at the date of TR 5-151(May 31/2011), do this check within 500 Landingsor by Dec 31/2013 whichever occurs first.For aircraft with 8550 Landings or more at thedate of TR 5-151 (dated May 31/2011), do thischeck within 250 Landings or by Dec 31/2013whichever occurs first.

310311312

311−B
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 (b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting
to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding
the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals;
 (c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
 (d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: March 29, 2010
    
    /s/ A. Peyton Bush, IIIA. Peyton Bush, IIIPresident and Chief Executive Officer
MIDLAND LOAN
SERVICES, INC. Logo




Report on
Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria
   Midland
Loan Services, Inc. ("Midland"), an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc., is responsible for assessing compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB of the
Securities and Exchange Commission ("Regulation AB") relating to its role in the
servicing of commercial mortgage-backed securities transactions.
  Midland
has assessed its compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of and for
the year ended December 31, 2008. In making this assessment, Midland used the
criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") in Item
1122(d) of Regulation AB. The transactions covered by this report include
commercial mortgage-backed securities that were issued on or after January 1,
2006 and that were registered with the SEC pursuant to the Securities Act of
1933 (the "Platform").
  Based on
such assessment, Midland believes that, as of and for the year ended December
31, 2008, Midland has complied in all material respects with the servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB relating to its role in the
servicing of commercial mortgage-backed securities transactions, except for
servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)(B), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C),
1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and
1122(d)(4)(xv), which Midland has determined as being inapplicable to the
activities it performs with respect to the commercial mortgage-backed securities
transactions being serviced (the "applicable servicing criteria").
  Deloitte
& Touche LLP, anindependent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation
report on Midland's assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing
criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008.
   MIDLAND
LOAN SERVICES, INC.
    /s/
      Steven W. Smith
              /s/
      Vincent E. Beckett
              /s/
      Bradley J. HaugerSteven W.
      Smith
              Vincent E.
      Beckett
              Bradley J.
      HaugerPresident
      and
              Executive Vice
      President
              Senior Vice
      PresidentChief Operating
      Officer
              Chief Administrative
      Officer
              Servicing
      Operations
   Date:
February 20, 2009
    A
      Member of the PNC Financial Services Group10851 Mastin P.O. Box
      25965 Shawnee Mission Kansas 66225-5965www.midlandls.com 
      913 253 9000 T   913 253 9709
F
Case 2:05-cv-01575-RSL Document 14-6 Filed 02/22/2007 Page 1 of 34
Case 2:05-cv-01575-RSL Document 14-6 Filed 02/22/2007 Page 2 of 34
Case 2:05-cv-01575-RSL Document 14-6 Filed 02/22/2007 Page 3 of 34
Case 2:05-cv-01575-RSL Document 14-6 Filed 02/22/2007 Page 4 of 34
Case 2:05-cv-01575-RSL Document 14-6 Filed 02/22/2007 Page 5 of 34
Case 2:05-cv-01575-RSL Document 14-6 Filed 02/22/2007 Page 6 of 34
Case 2:05-cv-01575-RSL Document 14-6 Filed 02/22/2007 Page 7 of 34
Case 2:05-cv-01575-RSL Document 14-6 Filed 02/22/2007 Page 8 of 34
Case 2:05-cv-01575-RSL Document 14-6 Filed 02/22/2007 Page 9 of 34
Case 2:05-cv-01575-RSL Document 14-6 Filed 02/22/2007 Page 10 of 34
Case 2:05-cv-01575-RSL Document 14-6 Filed 02/22/2007 Page 11 of 34
Case 2:05-cv-01575-RSL Document 14-6 Filed 02/22/2007 Page 12 of 34
Case 2:05-cv-01575-RSL Document 14-6 Filed 02/22/2007 Page 13 of 34
Case 2:05-cv-01575-RSL Document 14-6 Filed 02/22/2007 Page 14 of 34
Case 2:05-cv-01575-RSL Document 14-6 Filed 02/22/2007 Page 15 of 34
Case 2:05-cv-01575-RSL Document 14-6 Filed 02/22/2007 Page 16 of 34
Case 2:05-cv-01575-RSL Document 14-6 Filed 02/22/2007 Page 17 of 34
Case 2:05-cv-01575-RSL Document 14-6 Filed 02/22/2007 Page 18 of 34
Case 2:05-cv-01575-RSL Document 14-6 Filed 02/22/2007 Page 19 of 34
Case 2:05-cv-01575-RSL Document 14-6 Filed 02/22/2007 Page 20 of 34
Case 2:05-cv-01575-RSL Document 14-6 Filed 02/22/2007 Page 21 of 34
Case 2:05-cv-01575-RSL Document 14-6 Filed 02/22/2007 Page 22 of 34
Case 2:05-cv-01575-RSL Document 14-6 Filed 02/22/2007 Page 23 of 34
Case 2:05-cv-01575-RSL Document 14-6 Filed 02/22/2007 Page 24 of 34
Case 2:05-cv-01575-RSL Document 14-6 Filed 02/22/2007 Page 25 of 34
Case 2:05-cv-01575-RSL Document 14-6 Filed 02/22/2007 Page 26 of 34
Case 2:05-cv-01575-RSL Document 14-6 Filed 02/22/2007 Page 27 of 34
Case 2:05-cv-01575-RSL Document 14-6 Filed 02/22/2007 Page 28 of 34
Case 2:05-cv-01575-RSL Document 14-6 Filed 02/22/2007 Page 29 of 34
Case 2:05-cv-01575-RSL Document 14-6 Filed 02/22/2007 Page 30 of 34
Case 2:05-cv-01575-RSL Document 14-6 Filed 02/22/2007 Page 31 of 34
Case 2:05-cv-01575-RSL Document 14-6 Filed 02/22/2007 Page 32 of 34
Case 2:05-cv-01575-RSL Document 14-6 Filed 02/22/2007 Page 33 of 34
Case 2:05-cv-01575-RSL Document 14-6 Filed 02/22/2007 Page 34 of 34
1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required
to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Principal
Life Income Fundings Trust 2008-052 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, do
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information
required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is
included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;4.
    
    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this
report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act
periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing
agreement(s) in all material respects; and5.
    
    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of
compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included
in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.
   /s/ Dwight N. Soethout

Dwight N. SoethoutVice President  Principal Life Insurance Company
December 7, 1964

No. 68940.

#### Manufax, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 64/2350.

Protest dismissed October 20, 1964. (Not published.) Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: TheSalt Creek oil field, Wyoming**
 
Report | Plates: OneTwo
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:670
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000956218
 
July 18, 2018
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 602 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        August 2, 2007.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 2272) to invest in 
innovation through research and development, and to improve the competitiveness 
of the United States. All points of order against the conference report and 
against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered 
as read.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT
32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the annual report of Cemtrex, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September
30, 2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Saagar Govil,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | the
    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                            
| | (2) | the
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
    of the Company.



|Dated:
    January 28, 2019 | /s/
    Saagar Govil                                   
|--------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|                            | Saagar
    Govil,                                      
|                            | Chairman
    of the Board, CEO,                        
|                            | President
    & Secretary (Principal Executive Officer)



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.