alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Ukiah

Dale

Monument

Kimberly

Hamilton

Long Creek

Fox

Beech Creek

MORROW COUNTY

GRANT COUNTY

MORROW COUNTYUMITILLA COUNTY

 UMATILLA

 NATIONAL

 FOREST

395

395

395

244

402

402

207

19

15

3 4

5

1

6

6

7

9

15

20

18

14A

36 19

19

Fork

Middle

North

Fork

John

Day

River

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

PRINEVILLE DISTRICT

John Day Basin

Resource Management Plan

Draft Environmental Impact Statement

2008

No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management as to the accuracy, 

reliability, or completeness of these data for individual or aggregate use with other 

data. Original data were compiled from various sources. This information may not 

meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was developed through digital 

means and may be updated without notification.

LEGEND

Planning Area Boundary

Administered Land

 Bureau of Land Management

 Forest Service

 John Day Fossil Beds

 National Monument

 State

 Private or Other

* Note: Access to some areas listed as open may require

 landowner permission to cross private lands

Transportation 

 Open Existing Road 

 Open Road Seasonally

 County Road - Open Seasonally

 Closed Road 

 U.S. Highway

 State Highway

 County Road

 Forest Service Primary Route

 Forest Service Secondary Route

 Private Road- Closed to public use or unknown

 Off Highway Vehicle Designation

 Open- Motorized Vehicle Use Permitted Off Road

 Limited- Motorized Vehicle Use Limited to Designated

 Roads and Trails, Seasonally, or by Type of Vehicle

 Seasonal Motor Vehicle Restrictions

15

402 19

395

3 0 3 6 Kilometers

3 0 3 6 Miles

W

N

E

S

OREGON

Prineville 

District John Day

Basin Planning

Area

Map Area

M07-09-01:9-5-08

T

4

S

T

5

S

T

6

S

T

7

S

T

8

S

T

9

S

T

10

S

T

11

S

T

4

S

T

5

S

T

6

S

T

7

S

T

8

S

T

9

S

T

10

S

T

11

S

R 26 E R 27 E R 28 E R 29 E R 30 E R 31 E

R 26 E R 27 E R 28 E R 29 E R 30 E R 31 E

Map 12F: Existing Travel Management and Off Highway Vehicle

Designations - North Fork John Day
No. 62268.

#### Sphinx Import Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 319355-K (New York).

*349Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Fund. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: | February      25, 2010 |   |   |   | RIDGEWOOD      ENERGY Y FUND, LLC                    |
|--------|------------------------|--------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                   | By:    |   | /s/    | ROBERT      E. SWANSON                                    |
|   |                   |   |   | Name:  | Robert      E. Swanson                                    |
|   |                   |   |   | Title: | Chief      Executive Officer                              |
|   |                   |   |   |   | (Principal      Executive Officer)                        |
|   |                   |   |   |   |                                                      |
| Dated: | February      25, 2010 |   |   |   |                                                      |
|   |                   | By:    |   | /s/    | KATHLEEN      P. MCSHERRY                                 |
|   |                   |   |   | Name:  | Kathleen      P. McSherry                                 |
|   |                   |   |   | Title: | Executive      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |                   |   |   |   | (Principal      Financial and Accounting Officer)         |
|   |                   |   |   |   |                                                      |
|   |                   |   |   |   |                                                      |

----
RlN 2120-AA64 [4910-13-PI

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT AnON Federal Aviation Administration 14CFR Part 39 

# 031/1 I [Docket No. FAA-2010-++++; Directorate Identifier 20l0-NM-003-AD] I Ain'vorthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Corporation Model DC-l 0-1O. DC-IO-IOF, DC-IO-15, DC-10-30, DC-IO-30F (KC-IOA and KDC-IO), DC-1O-40, DC-lO-40F, MD-IO-IOF, MD-IO-30F, MD-ll, andMD-lIF Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice ofproposed mlemaking (NPRM). SUMMARY: We propose to adopt anew airworthineSSldirective (AD) forcertain Mo DC-IO-IO, DC-IO-IOF, DC-IO-15, DC-IO-30, DC-lO-30F (KC-IOA and KDC-IO), DC-l0-40, DC-IO-40F, MD-IO-IOF, MD-lO-30F, MD-Il, and MD-IlF airplanes. Thi proposed AD would require installing an in-line fuse in certain float level switches and sleeving the wires between the fuel tank andthe in-line fuse. For certain airplanes this proposed AD would also require installing anin-line fuse incertain fuel pump pressure switches. This proposed AD results from fuel system re iews conducted by the manufacturer. We areproposing this AD toprevent fuel tank explosions andconseque loss ofthe airplane. DATES: We must receive comments onthis proposed AD by [INSERT DATE 45 DAYS AFTER DATE OFPUBLICATION INTHE FEDERAL REGISTER]. ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any ofthe following methods:

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go tohttp://\\'ww.regulations.gov.Fol1owthe instructions forsubmitting comments .

• Fax: 202-493-2251. 

# 'i I /0



## "

### 14910-13-P)

DEPARTMl<:NT OF TRANSPORT AnON Federal Aviation Administration 14CFH. Part 39 [Docket No. FAA-10lO-++++; Directorate ldentifier 2010-NM-003-AD) RIN 2120-,1.,1.64 Ainvorthiness Directives; McDOIlllell Douglas Corporation Model DC-l 0-10, DC-10-10F, DC-IO-15, DC-I 0-30, DC-IO-30F (KC-IOA and KDC-IO), DC-IO-40, DC-IO-40F, MD·IO-IOF, MD-IO-30F. MD-II, and MD-II FAirplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice ofproposed rulemaking (NPRM). SUMMARY: We propose to adopt anew airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Model DC-I 0-10, DC-IO-IOF, DC-IO-15, DC-IO-30, DC-10-30F (KC-IOA and KDC-IO), DC-I 0-40, DC-I 0-40F, MD·IO-I OF,MD-I 0-30F, I'vlD-II, and MD· IIF airplanes. This proposed AD would require insralling an in-line fuse in certain float level switches and sleeving the wires between the fuel tank and the in-line fuse. For cJrtain airphUles this p.-oposed AD would also «qui,e installing an in-line fuse ineertai1 fuel pump p"essuce switches. This proposed AD results from fuel system reviews conducted by the manufacturer. We are proposing this AD to prevent fuel tank explolions and consequent 10:;:; orthe airplane. DATES: We must receive comments onthis proposed AD by [TN"lERT DATE 45 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION TN THE FEDERAL RJEGlSTER]. ADURESSES, You may send comments by any ufthc fullowing +thOdS:

• Federal cRulcmaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.f!.ov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments .

• Fa.x:202-493-2251. ICOI<C~"'''''5 ''''Ul'''''S'''''ac,



### ]",,1. "7II

### T

/IO 

## ~=

1=>c;5naol 

# I -11-~-

•.%.i~ 

# 1">. ~r

01-.0=

# --.2;;~/0

FAA Form 1J6G-14., (6-89) OrrlCIAl FILECOPY
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

VINCENT DANIEL HOPPER, AKA

ANTOLIN MARKS

Plaintiff,

v.

JOHN DOE MYERS RECREATIONAL

COACH NORTHWEST DETENTION

CENTER et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5680RBL

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION REGARDING

DEFENDANTS MOTION TO

DISMISS

The Court, having reviewed, the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge J. Kelley

Arnold, objections to the report and recommendation, if any, and the remaining record, does hereby

find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts and amends the Report and Recommendation. The Report and

Recommendation is amended to the extent that defendant’s Motion for Summary

Judgment is also granted on the issue of the existence in the Law Library of the Ninth

Circuit Rules of Appellate Procedure. 

(2) Defendants motion for summary judgment is GRANTED consistent with the Report

and Recommendation. Defendants may file a second motion for summary judgment

addressing the remaining claims regarding telephone access. 

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff, counsel for defendants

who have appeared and to the Hon. J. Kelley Arnold.

DATED this 9th day of November, 2006.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-05680-RBL Document 129 Filed 11/09/06 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AMERISERVE FOOD DISTRIBUTION, INC. FOR THE
FIRST QUARTER ENDED MARCH 28, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>        0000875612
<NAME>       AMERISERVE FOOD DISTRIBUTION, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-26-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-28-1998
<CASH>                                         151,751
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,505
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,897
<INVENTORY>                                    152,542
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               483,882
<PP&E>                                         172,200
<DEPRECIATION>                                  41,912
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,350,238
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          355,586
<BONDS>                                        873,446
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                      83,654
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,350,238
<SALES>                                      1,123,938
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,123,938
<CGS>                                        1,013,010
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,013,010
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               104,336
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,327
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (14,171)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       224
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (14,395)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (14,395)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
No. 33, Misc.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Louis J. Lefkowitz,*Attorney General of New York, *Paxton Blair,*Solicitor General, and *Irving Calt,*Assistant Solicitor General, for respondents.

#### Kassim *v.*Wilkins, Warden, et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
##### 



Exhibit
32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods presented in the financial statements included in the report.
  /s/ David E. Schreiman
 -29-
No. 67569.

#### Zenith Novelty Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 58/9156, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of vinyl ornaments similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 67011, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of BioSpecifics Technologies Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Albert Horcher, Secretary, Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Albert Horcherr

Albert Horcher

Secretary, Treasurer and

Principal Accounting Officer

August 14, 2003
From: jackjohnson@embarqmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:57:03 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jack Johnson

Harrisonville, MO 64701
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with Amendment No. 2 (the “Amendment”) on Form 20-F/A to the Annual
Report of DJSP Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report,” and as amended by the Amendment, the “Amended
Report”), the undersigned, in his capacity and on the date indicated below,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his
knowledge:




1. The
Amended Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in the Amended Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.











Date:
June 24, 2010





/s/ David J. SternName:
      David J. SternTitle: President
      and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

CLYDE MCNIGHT,

Plaintiff,

v.

ALICE PAYNE,

Defendant.

Case No. C05-5254RJB

ORDER DENYING SERVICE OF

COMPLAINT BY UNITED

STATES MARSHALS

This matter comes before the court on plaintiff’s filing of an amended civil rights complaint pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Dkt. #5). Plaintiff has been granted in forma pauperis status in this case. (Dkt. #2). 

Because plaintiff has not provided the court with any forms for service or copies of the amended complaint for

service, however, the court will not order service of the complaint at this time. 

The clerk is directed to send two (2) service forms to plaintiff for him to fill out and return to the

court so that the court can attempt service by mail. Plaintiff also must provide two (2) copies of the complaint. 

Both the forms and the copies of the complaint must be returned on or before June 10, 2005, or the court will

recommend dismissal for failure to prosecute. 

Case 3:05-cv-05254-RJB Document 8 Filed 05/10/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to plaintiff. 

DATED this 10th day of May, 2005.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-05254-RJB Document 8 Filed 05/10/05 Page 2 of 2
From: hilton.sonnier@halliburton.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:03:17 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Hilton Sonnier

Lafayette, LA 70508
No. 67542.

#### Morris Friedman et al. *v.*United States,

protests 62/7974, etc. (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of glass balls similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Joseph Markovits, Inc.*v. *United States*(45 Cust. Ct. 151, C.D. 2216), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Before the Third Division,

August 1, 1967

No. P67/258.

#### B. Westergaard & Co., Inc. *v.*United States, protest 66/5460 (New York).

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of bread similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *Nordic Baking & Importing*Co., *Inc.*(47 CCPA 78, C.A.D. 733), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

RICHARD C. SPRUEL JR.,

Plaintiff,

v.

HAROLD CLARKE et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5021RJB

ORDER CALLING FOR A

RESPONSE

This action, brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 2000, has been referred to the undersigned

Magistrate Judge pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Before the court is defendant’s

motion for reconsideration of the order extending discovery and re-noting a motion to dismiss at the

Fed. R., Civ. P. 12 (c) stage (Dkt. # 49). The court is considering granting the motion to the extent

that the dispositive motion date and date for filing the Joint Status Report may be moved to a later

date.

Local Civil Rule 7 (h) (3) states that no request for reconsideration will be granted without

giving the opposing party the opportunity to file a response. It is therefore Ordered:

(1) Plaintiff may file a response to the motion for reconsideration on or before January 12,

Case 3:06-cv-05021-RJB Document 50 Filed 12/07/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER - 2

2007.

(2) The defendants motion for reconsideration is re-noted for January 12, 2007. 

The clerk’s office is directed to send copies of this order to plaintiff and counsel for

defendants. The Clerk’s office should re-note (Dkt. # 42) for January 12, 2007.

DATED this 7, day of December, 2006.

/S/ J. Kelley Arnold

J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:06-cv-05021-RJB Document 50 Filed 12/07/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 68144.

#### Rotel Corp. of America *v.*United States,

protest 62/1769 (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of food juicers similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 65798, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 10.42


 





Description of 2012 agreement between Christian Zugel and
other holders of equity interests in ZAIS Group, LLC


 


Under the terms of an agreement dated February 27, 2012 by and
between Christian Zugel, as managing member of ZAIS Group, LLC (“Mr. Zugel”), and holders of equity interests in ZAIS
Group, LLC as of such date, Mr. Zugel is entitled to receive 10% of the net incentive income with respect to a certain managed
account, after deducting certain employee compensation payments and payments made to external marketers.