alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[114th Congress Public Law 39]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 129 STAT. 440]]

Public Law 114-39
114th Congress

                                 An Act

 
   To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for an 
 increase in the limit on the length of an agreement under the Medicare 
          independence at home medical practice demonstration 
              program. <<NOTE: July 30, 2015 -  [S. 971]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Medicare 
Independence at Home Medical Practice Demonstration Improvement Act of 
2015.>> 
SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 42 USC 1305 note.>>  SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Independence at Home Medical 
Practice Demonstration Improvement Act of 2015''.
SEC. 2. INCREASE IN THE LIMIT ON THE LENGTH OF AN AGREEMENT UNDER 
                    THE MEDICARE INDEPENDENCE AT HOME MEDICAL 
                    PRACTICE DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM.

    Section 1866E(e)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395cc-
5(e)(1)) is amended by striking ``3-year'' and inserting ``5-year''.

    Approved July 30, 2015.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 971:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 114-172, Pt. 1 (Comm. on Ways and Means).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 161 (2015):
            Apr. 22, considered and passed Senate.
            July 15, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
No. 65204.

#### J. Einstein, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 232472-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation qf counsel that the merchandise consists of nylon fabrics similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
THE HONORABLE FRANKLIN D. BURGESS 

ORDER 

 (CASE NO. CR05-5704-FDB)-1 

HWB - ESQ. PLLC PO BOX 13085 

Mill Creek, WA 98082 

TELEPHONE: 206.774.0845

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT TACOMA 

 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

 

ZACHARY MIRABACK 

Defendant. 

No. CR05-5704FDB 

ORDER ALLOWING 

WITHDRAWAL AND 

SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL 

ORDER

 This matter having come before the Court on Counsels', Phil Brennan 

and Hugh Berry, request for withdrawal and substitution of counsel, and a 

Notices of Appearance having been filed in this matter on September 27, 2005 

(Dkt. No. 15), and again on September 29, 2005 (Dkt. No. 12) by Hugh Berry. 

Having considered the papers filed by the parties, the records and files herein, 

and the request of the defendant's counsels, Hugh Berry and Phil Brennan, in 

this matter, the Court hereby grants the request to substitute counsel in this 

matter. 
ORDER 

 (CASE NO. 05-5704-FDB)-2 

HWB - ESQ. PLLC 

PO BOX 13085 

Mill Creek, WA 98082 

TELEPHONE: 206.774.0845

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 

1. That Phil Brennan is allowed to withdraw as counsel of record 

for Defendant, Zachary Miraback, and the entry of appearance of Hugh Berry is 

recognized. 

2. That this order shall be effective, nunc pro tunc, as of 

September 27, 2005. 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 25th day of October, 2005. 

_/s/ Franklin D Burgess __________ 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Respectfully submitted, 

s/ Hugh W. Berry s/ Phil I. Brennan

Hugh W. Berry, WSBA # 23509 (authorization for electronic signature received)

HWB - ESQ. PLLC Phil I. Brennan

P.O. BOX 13085 P.O. BOX 22837 

Mill Creek, WA 98082 Seattle, WA 98122 

Phone Number: 206.774.0845 

Email: hwberry.esq@verizon.net
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAY-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                         3,284
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,483
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    47,447
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               56,939
<PP&E>                                         39,509
<DEPRECIATION>                                 17,178
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 82,354
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          24,933
<BONDS>                                        4,450
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       85
<OTHER-SE>                                     51,081
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   82,354
<SALES>                                        76,329
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               76,329
<CGS>                                          43,612
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  43,612
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               29,657
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,278
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,782
<INCOME-TAX>                                   320
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,462
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,462
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.17
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 4.1(c)


 


MARCH 2018 AMENDMENT TO CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY
NOTE


 


THIS MARCH 2018 AMENDMENT
TO CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE SERIES 2016 (the “March 2018 Amendment”) is made effective as of March 23, 2018 (the
“Effective Date”) by and between Drone Aviation Holding Corp., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) and
_____________ (the “Holder”) (collectively the “Parties”).


 


BACKGROUND


 


A. The
Company and Holder are the parties to that certain Convertible Promissory Note Series 2016, originally issued by the Company to
the Holder on September 29, 2016, in the original principal amount of $1,500,000.00 (the “Note”);


 


B. The
Parties amended the Note on August 3, 2017 pursuant to the terms of an Amendment to Convertible Promissory Note (the “August
2017 Amendment”);


 


C. The
Parties amended the Note on November 9, 2017 pursuant to the terms of an Amendment to Convertible Promissory Note (the “November
2017 Amendment”);


 


D. The
Parties desire to further amend the Note as amended by the August 2017 and November 2017 Amendments, as set forth below.


 


NOW THEREFORE, in consideration
of the execution and delivery of the March 2018 Amendment and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency
of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:


 


1.
 Extension of Maturity Date. The Maturity Date of the Note shall be extended to October 1, 2020.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties
hereto have executed this November 2017 Amendment as of the date first above written.


 


	DRONE AVIATION HOLDING CORP.	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	 	 	By:	 
	 	Kendall W. Carpenter	 	 	 
	 	Chief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DETENTION ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W. D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff,

v.

THOMAS EVANS DUNIGAN,

 Defendant.

Case No. 05-5202M

DETENTION ORDER

THE COURT, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3142, finds that no condition or combination

of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and/or the safety of any

other person and the community.

This finding is based on 1) the nature and circumstances of the offense(s) charged, including whether the offense is a

crime of violence or involves a narcotic drug; 2) the weight of the evidence against the person; 3) the history and characteristics of

the person including those set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)(3)(A)(B); and 4) the nature and seriousness of the danger release would

impose to any person or the community.

Findings of Fact/ Statement of Reasons for Detention

Presumptive Reasons/Unrebutted:

 (X) Conviction of a Federal offense involving a crime of violence. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(A)

 (X) Potential maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(B)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of 10+ years as prescribed in the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C.§801 et seq.), the

Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C.§951 et seq.) Or the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (46

U.S.C. App. 1901 et seq.)

 ( ) Convictions of two or more offenses described in subparagraphs (A) through (C) of 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(1) of two or more

State or local offenses that would have been offenses described in said subparagraphs if a circumstance giving rise to

Federal jurisdiction had existed, or a combination of such offenses.

Safety Reasons:

 (X) Defendant is currently on probation/supervision resulting from a prior offense.

 ( ) Defendant was on bond on other charges at time of alleged occurrences herein.

 (X) Defendant’s prior criminal history.

Flight Risk/Appearance Reasons:

 ( ) Defendant’s lack of sufficient ties to the community.

 ( ) Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainer.

 ( ) Detainer(s)/Warrant(s) from other jurisdictions.

 ( ) Failures to appear for past court proceedings.

 ( ) Past conviction for escape.

Other:

 (/) Defendant stipulated to detention without prejudice

 

Order of Detention

< The defendant shall be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal.

< The defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel.

< The defendant shall on order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the Government, be delivered

to a United States marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.

 October 31, 2005.

___s/ Karen L. Strombom 

Karen L Strombom, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cr-05823-RJB Document 7 Filed 10/31/05 Page 1 of 1
From: ajampt@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:19:52 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Alma Ampt

Aurora, IN 47001
Hummingbird

Springs Wilderness

Big Horn

Mountains

Wilderness

Harquahala

Mountains

Wilderness

Hells Canyon

Wilderness

Hassayampa

River Canyon

Wilderness

Castle Creek

Wilderness

Mohave County

Yavapai County

Yavapai

Marico

County

pa County

La Paz County

Maricopa County

White Tank

Mountains

Regional Park

Lake

Pleasant

Regional

Park

Prescott

Prescott

Valley

Cordes

Junction

Yarnell

BLACK

CANYON

CITY

NEW

RIVER

WICKENBURG

PEORIA

SURPRISE

BUCKEYE

GOODYEAR

PHOENIX

GLENDALE

Bureau of Land Management

Phoenix District Office

Phoenix, AZ

October 2009

Note: Land Status legend located on Map 1

Map 11

Bradshaw-Harquahala

Planning Area

Closed to Saleable Minerals

0 5 10 15

Miles

BLM Wilderness

USFS Wilderness

Interstate

Major Road

Major River, Streams or Wash

Highway

Agua Fria National

Monument Planning Area

Bradshaw Harquahala

Planning Area

Management Unit

Closed to Saleable Minerals

Note: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM)

conducts land use planning only in the areas administered

by BLM. BLM has no planning authority under the

municipal or county planning legislation of the State

of Arizona.

No warranty is made by BLM for the use of this map

for purposes not intended by BLM, or to the accuracy,

reliability or completeness of the information shown.

Spatial information may not meet National Map Accuracy

standards. This information may be updated without

notification.
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

REGINALD PURDOM,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 05-479M

DETENTION ORDER 

Offense charged: 

Count 1. Conspiracy to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), and

841(b)(1)(A), and 846.

Count 2: Conspiracy to distribute ecstacy in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and

841(b)(1)(C).

Date of Detention Hearing: October 12, 2005.

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds

the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) Defendant is a native and a citizen of British Columbia, Canada.

(2) Defendant has stipulated to detention, but reserves the right to contest his

continued detention if there is a change in circumstances.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

Case 2:05-cr-00396-JCC Document 23 Filed 10/12/05 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with

counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant

is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose

of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States

Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 14th day of October, 2005.AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:05-cr-00396-JCC Document 23 Filed 10/12/05 Page 2 of 2
March 12, 1956

No. 59771.—Suit 4834.

#### United States *v.*E. B. Miller Associates, Inc., and J. M. Rodgers Co.

C. A. D. 603.
September 5, 1961

No. 66037.

#### Balfour Guthrie *& Co.,*Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 58/16320, etc.

Plaintiffs’ application for rehearing granted.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 TAXATION OF COSTS – 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

BARBARA MAY,

Plaintiff,

v.

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC.; and

METLIFE, INC., dba and/or aka

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE

COMPANY, a foreign corporation,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-1957RSM

TAXATION OF COSTS

Having considered briefs in support of, and in opposition to, the cost bill herein, costs in the cause

indicated above are hereby taxed against PLAINTIFF BARBARA MAY , and on behalf of

DEFENDANTS in the amount of $4,514.95 as follows:

Requested Disallowed Allowed

I. LONG DISTANCE CALLS $22.03 $22.03 0

Costs incurred for long distance calls are not taxable expenses.

II. DOCUMENTS & RECORDS $2,499.20 $1,999.20 $500.00

Only costs associated with obtaining documents and medical records that were actually used in the

case are taxable. For the purpose of assessing costs the clerk will allow 20% of the requested amount.

This represents the portion of costs incurred for documents and records actually used by counsel.

III. MESSENGER SERVICE $218.80 $218.80 0

Costs for messenger services are not taxable.

Case 2:05-cv-01957-RSM Document 99 Filed 09/12/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Requested Disallowed Allowed

TAXATION OF COSTS – 2

IV. COMPUTERIZED LEGAL

RESEARCH

$290.58 $290.58 0

Costs for computerized legal research are not taxable.

V. STATUTORY FEES $200.00 0 $200.00

VI. DEPOSITION/MEDIATION

COSTS

$6,841.97 $3,067.02 $3,774.95

Clerk allowed costs incurred for depositions actually used by either party in support of or in opposition

to the summary judgment motion. Full costs for obtaining the deposition materials were allowed. Costs

for attorney travel and expenses to attend depositions and cost for mediator are not taxable.

VII WITNESS FEES $630.00 $590.00 $40.00

Expert witness fee was not taxable.

Dated this 12th day of SEPTEMBER, 2007 .

A

Bruce Rifkin

Clerk, U.S. District Court

Case 2:05-cv-01957-RSM Document 99 Filed 09/12/07 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1331 Broadway, Ste. 400

Tacoma, Washington 98402

(253) 593-6710

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION

TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE 1

MAGISTRATE JUDGE THEILER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

KRISTOPHER REECK,

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. CR05-5837

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED

MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL

DATE 

Upon the stipulation of the parties to continue the trial date in the abovecaptioned case, the Court finds that such a continuance would serve the ends of justice

and outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant; therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the trial date be continued to July 31, 2006. The

resulting period of delay from June 26, 2006, to July 31, 2006, is hereby excluded for

speedy trial purposes under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) and (B).

DONE this 23rd day of June, 2006.

 s/ Karen L. Strombom for 

MARY ALICE THEILER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Presented By:

/s/________________________________ /s/_____________________________

Case 3:05-cr-05837-JKA Document 12 Filed 06/23/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1331 Broadway, Ste. 400

Tacoma, Washington 98402

(253) 593-6710

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION

TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE 2

Jerome Kuh Captain Kenneth Tyndal 

Attorney for Defendant Special Assistant United States Attorney

Case 3:05-cr-05837-JKA Document 12 Filed 06/23/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 4.2

 

FORM OF GUARANTEED SUBORDINATED TERM NOTES CERTIFICATE

 

Certificate No

 

Nominal Amount of Notes $

 

FIRSTCARIBBEAN INTERNATIONAL BANKING & FINANCIAL
 CORPORATION LIMITED
  (A company incorporated under the laws of Trinidad and Tobago)

 

Guaranteed Subordinated Terms Notes 2007 – 2017
 (in denominations of $10,000.00 or multiples of $10,000.00)

 

THIS IS TO CERTIFY that                      is/are the registered holder(s) of the above mentioned Guaranteed Subordinated Term Notes in the principal amount of $                             which are constituted and secured by a Trust Deed dated the 23rd day of March, 2007 (the “Trust Deed”) and made between FirstCaribbean International Banking & Financial Corporation Limited (the “Company”) of the One Part and Polanc Trusts Limited of the Other Part as Trustee for the Noteholders. The Notes are issued with the benefit of and subject to the provisions contained in the Trust Deed and the Conditions endorsed hereon.

 

Principal and interest are payable on the Notes represented by this Certificate in accordance with the Conditions endorsed hereon.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Seal of the Company was affixed in accordance with a Resolution of the Company and in conformity with its Articles and by-laws and has been signed on behalf of the Company by the Director and the Secretary thereof.

 

DATED this                  day of                              2007

 

	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
DIRECTOR
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
SECRETARY
    


 

Countersigned for the purpose of authentication only:

 

	
 
    	
 
    
	
as   Paying Agent
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Registered
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Dated
    	
 
    	
 
    


 

NOTE:                               This Certificate must be surrendered before any transfer of the whole or any portion of the Note to which it relates can be registered or a new Certificate issued in exchange. No fraction of $10,000.00 of Notes can be transferred.