alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order Continuing Trial and Motions 

Deadline/Cunningham, et al./CR05-417RSM –1 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

601 UNION STREET, SUITE 5100

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101-3903

(206) 553-7970

Judge Ricardo S. Martinez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

) NO. CR05-417RSM

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

JOHN JAY CUNNINGHAM, )

LISA LUERA, ) ORDER CONTINUING

JUSTIN BRICE WILLIAMS, ) TRIAL DATE AND

MUHAMMAD ALI ATKINS, ) PRETRIAL MOTIONS

JOSEPH TRAN, ) DEADLINE DATE

LUCUS JOHNNY QUILT, )

FAYVE ELI MARY QUILT, )

DIDE CRYSTAL QUILT )

JOANNE CHRISTIN ROSETTE, )

RANGER OPPENHEIM, )

ERIN CASPER, )

ABRAHAM CHARLES SHEENA, )

)

Defendants. )

 ______________________________________)

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on a stipulated motion of the government

and defendants CUNNINGHAM, LUERA, ATKINS, WILLIAMS and TRAN to continue

the trial date and the pretrial motions deadline date. Having considered the entirety of the

record and files herein, the Court finds that failure to grant a continuance would likely

result in a miscarriage of justice. The case is complex involving twelve defendants, over

three thousand pages of discovery, over one thousand intercepted telephone

conversations, and hundreds of exhibits. 

Case 2:05-cr-00417-RSM Document 122 Filed 01/18/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order Continuing Trial and Motions 

Deadline/Cunningham, et al./CR05-417RSM –2 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

601 UNION STREET, SUITE 5100

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101-3903

(206) 553-7970

It is unreasonable to expect adequate preparation for trial before the current trial

date of January 23, 2006. The Court further finds that the interests of the public and the

defendants in a speedy trial in this case are outweighed by the ends of justice. 

IT IS NOW, THEREFORE, ORDERED that trial of defendants CUNNINGHAM,

LUERA, ATKINS, WILLIAMS and TRAN be continued to May 8, 2006, and that the

time between the date of this Order and the new trial date be excludable time under the

Speedy Trial Act pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Sections 3161(h)(8)(A),

3161(h)(8)(B)(i), and 3161(h)(8)(B)(ii). 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pre-trial motions shall be filed on or before

April 3, 2006.

 Dated this 18th day of January, 2006

A

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Presented by:

s/Douglas B. Whalley 

DOUGLAS B. WHALLEY

Assistant United States Attorney

United States Attorney's Office 

601 Union Street, Suite 5100 

Seattle, WA 98101-3903

(206) 553-4882, Fax: (206) 553-4440

E-mail: douglas.whalley@usdoj.gov

Washington State Bar #4625

s/ Lisca Borichewski 

LISCA BORICHEWSKI

Assistant United States Attorney

(206) 553-2266, Fax: (206) 553-4440

E-mail: lisca.borichewski@usdoj.gov

Washington State Bar #24300

Case 2:05-cr-00417-RSM Document 122 Filed 01/18/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF


CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


OF MOGGLE, INC.


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350








Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Scott McPherson, Chief Financial Officer of Moggle, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that, to my knowledge, the accompanying Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  March 7, 2011
By:
/s/ Scott McPhersonScott McPhersonChief Financial Officer
From: msprissy0ne@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:51:14 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Lanetta Hoey

Gilbert, AZ 85299
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PAGE 1

ORDER GRANTING

EXTENSION OF TIME

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

MARK L. SOWERS,

Plaintiff,

vs.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

Civil No. C05-2141-MJP-JPD

ORDER GRANTING

EXTENSION OF TIME

This matter comes before the Court upon defendant’s motion for extension of time. Dkt.

No. 19. Defendant has indicated that plaintiff will not oppose the motion. Dkt. No. 20 at ¶ 4. 

Having carefully reviewed the motion, supporting declaration, and the record, the Court orders as

follows:

(1) Defendant’s motion for extension of time, (Dkt. No. 19), is GRANTED. Counsel

for defendant has indicated that he believes settlement is appropriate and that additional time will

enable him to coordinate settlement with his client and plaintiff. Dkt. No. 20 at ¶ 4. 

Case 2:05-cv-02141-MJP-JPD Document 21 Filed 06/16/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PAGE 2

ORDER GRANTING

EXTENSION OF TIME

(2) The Court further orders that the briefing schedule be STRICKEN. Defendant

shall have until July 5, 2006, to file a responsive brief. Plaintiff shall have until July 19, 2006, to

file an optional reply brief.

(3) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this order to the parties and to the

Honorable Marsha J. Pechman.

DATED this 16th day of June, 2006.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:05-cv-02141-MJP-JPD Document 21 Filed 06/16/06 Page 2 of 2
1 

United States Environmental Protection Agency 

Docket Index for Final Rulemaking – SJV Rule 2410 

[EPA-R09-OAR-2012-0408] 

Approval of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 

California; San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District; 

Prevention of Significant Deterioration 

Note: Only documents with an asterisk (*) are attached to this docket index. Unless otherwise 

stated, please see the docket for this rulemaking for all other documents listed. Most documents 

are attached to the Docket Index for the Proposed Rulemaking (Document ID: EPA-R09-OAR2012-0408-0002) or are directly posted in the docket (see 

http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=EPA-R09-OAR-2012-0408, the Document ID has 

been provided below for such documents). Additionally, the Federal Register (FR) notices listed 

in Section II are only attached if they are pre-1994 FR notices. Please visit 

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/collection.action?collectionCode=FR to view FR notices from 

1994 to the present. 

Docket Index 

Category/ Item Number

I. SIP Submittal Documents

§ SIP submittal letter from CARB dated August 23, 2011 I-A 

§ SJVUAPCD, Final Staff Report, New Draft Rule 2410 Prevention of 

Significant Deterioration, June 16, 2011 

I-B 

§ Rule 2410 - Prevention of Significant Deterioration - adopted June 16, 2011 I-C 

§ SIP Completeness Checklist I-D 

§ SIP Rule Evaluation Form I-E 

§ SJVUAPCD Board Resolution I-F 

§ Certification of Publication – Public Notice I-G 

§ SJVUAPCD submittal letter to CARB dated June 21, 2011 I-H 

II. Federal Register Notices

§ 61 FR 1880 and 1882 on January 24, 1996 II-A 

§ 72 FR 72617 and 72619 on December 21, 2007 II-B 

§ 75 FR 26102 on May 11, 2010 II-C 

n 67 FR 80186 on December 31, 2002 II-D 

III. Other Relevant Documents

§ Technical Support Document (TSD), EPA Region 9, dated May 2012 

§ TSD Attachment 1: Rule 2410 adopted on June 16, 2011 

III-A 

III-B 
2 

§ TSD Attachment 2: Letter from EPA to SJVUAPCD dated April 17, 2012 

§ TSD Attachment 3: Letter from SJVUAPCD to EPA dated May 18, 2012 

§ TSD Attachment 4: Evaluation of 40 CFR 51.166 and District Rule 2410, 

EPA Region 9, May 2012 

§ TSD Attachment 5: List of EPA-issued PSD Permits, EPA Region 9, May 

2012 

§ *List of proposed EPA PSD permits in SJV that are pending final agency 

action, August 30, 2012 

§ *NSR Improvements, Supplemental Analysis of the Environmental Impacts 

of the 2002 Final NSR Improvements Rule 

III-C 

III-D 

III-E 

III-F 

III-G 

III-H 

IV. EPA Rulemaking Documents

§ EPA’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking for Rule 2410, 77 FR 32495 

(Document ID: EPA-R09-OAR-2012-0408-0001) 

IV-1 

V. Comments on Proposed Action

§ Comments from Earthjustice (Document ID: EPA-R09-OAR-2012-0408-

0003) 

§ Comments from Western States Petroleum Association (Document ID: EPAR09-OAR-2012-0004) 

V-1 

V-2
From: newpatriot@cablespeed.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:52:04 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

This policy clearly violates the Free Exercise of religion clause found in the First Amendment. Any policy

which is unconstitutional should be blocked. It is because of policies like this that it becomes

increasingly clear to me that we need to do away with the Federal Department HHS! How's that for

backlash? This isn't a threat, it's a promise--I will do everything in my power to see the Departments of

Education, HHS, HUD, the EPA and the Department of Energy, all of which exceed the authorizations

outlined in Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution, to be abolished by the next federal administration

Sincerely,

Thomas P. Milley,

Founder, New Patriot Party

Sincerely,

Thomas Milley

, 21061-4807
No. 61520.

#### F. W. Import-Export *v.*United States,

protest 309799-K (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Since the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
Exhibit 23.1











INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM’S CONSENT



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of POET Technologies Inc.
on Form F-10 (File No. 333-213422) of our report dated April 29, 2020, except for the last paragraph of Note 26, as to which the
date is July 17, 2020, with respect to our audits of the consolidated financial statements of POET Technologies Inc. as of December
31, 2019, December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 and for the years ended December 31, 2019, December 31, 2018 and December 31,
2017, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of POET Technologies Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2019.











New Haven, CT

July 17, 2020
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-17-00228-CV

ULLJA KUNTZE,

Appellant

v.

SANDRA COWAN,

Appellee

From the 335th District Court

Burleson County, Texas

Trial Court No. 26,129

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Ullja Kuntze appeals the trial court’s granting of a summary judgment against 

Kuntze. Following our standard policies and procedures, the Clerk of this Court notified 

Kuntze by letter dated February 27, 2019, that her appellant’s brief had not been filed. In 

the same letter, the Clerk warned Kuntze that this appeal would be dismissed for want 

of prosecution unless, within 21 days from the date of the letter, a brief was filed. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3. 
Kuntze v. Cowan Page 2

More than 21 days have passed and no brief has been filed. Accordingly, this 

appeal is dismissed. Id.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Neill

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed April 3, 2019

[CV06]
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY WASHINGTON D.C., 20460

OFFICE OF
CHEMICAL SAFETY AND
POLLUTION PREVENTION

September 14, 2012

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Summary of Meeting With Alkylphenol s & Ethoxylates Research Council (APERC)

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2011-0516

FROM: Leslie Cronkhite, Chief Existing Chemical Branch (7405M)

On September 14, 2012, staff from the U.S. E nvironmental Protection Agency Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) met w ith members of the Alkylphenols & Ethoxylates Research Council (APERC) at APERC’s request concerning 4-tert-octylphenol (CASRN 140- 66-9), a TSCA Work Plan chemical slated for risk assessment during 2013-2014. APERC had

submitted comments and additional information to the Work Plan docket, EPA-HQ-OPPT-2011- 0516, on August 31, 2012, and requested the opportunity to presen t those comments and obtain
further clarification on the Work Plan risk assessment process.

OPPT clarified that informati on provided to the docket will be used in the upcoming risk assessment rather than in any reconsideration of the process used to identify the Work Plan chemicals. OPPT welcomed the submission of additional information, including use and exposure data, noting that such information woul d be particularly useful during the problem formulation and scoping phase of the risk as sessment process. OPPT emphasized that

information should be furnished to the docket as s oon as possible in order to inform that process, ideally within the next four to six weeks.

In response to questions about the risk assessment and peer review process, OPPT indicated that the peer review plans already posted on the first round of Work Plan chemicals being assessed in 2012 ( http://cfpub.epa.gov/si/s i_public_pr_agenda.cfm ) described in detail the process currently being followed, including defi ning the periods for public comment and the third-party process to be used in assembling the panels and co nducting the peer reviews. OPPT also noted that the plans specify that this pro cess will be reviewed after the completion of the initial round of assessments, and lessons learned will be applied to future rounds of Work Plan
assessment activities.

The agenda, sign-in sheet, and pre-mee ting list of APERC atte ndees are attached.

Attachments
Before the First Division,

February 27, 1962

No. 66501.

#### E. Dillingham, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 60/13805 and 60/16913 (Ogdensburg).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of “Diversol” similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 65455, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: ronkens1@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:30:52 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ron Shields

Pomona, CA 91766
No. P66/50.

protest 65/12902 (New York).

#### Arnart Imports, Inc. *v.*United States,

*904Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of plaques similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Arnart*Imports, *Inc.*v. *United States*(54 Cust. Ct. 187, C.D. 2531), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of Cemtrex, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K
for the year ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Renato Dela Rama, principal
financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Renato Dela RamaRenato
      Dela Ramaprincipal
      financial officerJanuary
      14, 2011





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

RENEE HATCH,

Plaintiff,

v.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner of

Social Security,

Defendant.

CASE NO. C05-5748KLS

ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. #1) is GRANTED. Plaintiff does not

appear to have funds available to afford the $250.00 filing fee.

The clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to counsel of record and to issue the Summonses.

DATED this 5th day of December, 2005.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-05748-KLS Document 2 Filed 12/05/05 Page 1 of 1
No. 57730.

protests 156388-K and 157114-K (San Francisco).

#### G. L. Mezzetta & Co. and P. W. Bellingall *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *E. J. Petrosemolo Co., Inc.,*and *Barian Shipping Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 159, C. D. 1461), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 188 (Friday, September 29, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 67301]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21460]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

[CMS-3383-N2]


Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 Exemption of 
Laboratories Licensed by the State of Washington; Exemption Period 
Extension

AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Department of 
Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice; exemption period extension.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) announce 
the extension of the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 
(CLIA) exemption period for the State of Washington. The exemption 
period is extended for 6 months, that is until April 2, 2024.

DATES: The exemption granted by this notice is effective from October 
2, 2023 to April 2, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Hasan, (410) 786-6480.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the ``Medicare, Medicaid, and CLIA 
Programs; Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 Exemption 
of Laboratories Licensed by the State of Washington'' notice that 
appeared in the September 30, 2019 Federal Register (84 FR 51591), we 
announced that laboratories located in and licensed by the State of 
Washington that possess a valid license under the Medical Test Site 
law, Chapter 70.42 of the Revised Code of Washington, are exempt from 
the requirements of the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 
1988 (CLIA) for a period of 4 years. This period expires on October 2, 
2023. Pending re-approval of Washington State's CLIA exemption period, 
we are extending Washington State's current CLIA exemption period for 6 
months, that is until April 2, 2024.
    The Administrator of CMS, Chiquita Brooks-LaSure, having reviewed 
and approved this document, authorizes Chyana Woodard, who is the 
Federal Register Liaison, to electronically sign this document for 
purposes of publication in the Federal Register.

Chyana Woodard,
Federal Register Liaison, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
[FR Doc. 2023-21460 Filed 9-28-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P