alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

CLARK L. STUHR,

Petitioner,

v.

JOSEPH LEHMAN,

Respondent.

Case No. C05-5728RBL

ORDER

The Court, having reviewed the petition, the Report and Recommendation of the Hon. J. Kelley

Arnold, United States Magistrate Judge, objections to the Report and Recommendation, if any, and the

remaining record, does hereby find and Order:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction;

(3) Petitioner’s pending motions are moot and/or inappropriate and therefore DENIED; and

(4) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to petitioner, to counsel for respondent,

and to the Hon. J. Kelley Arnold.

DATED this 10th day of April, 2006.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-05728-RBL Document 14 Filed 04/10/06 Page 1 of 1
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 278 

Recognizing the 125th anniversary of Payson, Arizona. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 27, 2007 

Mr. RENZI submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 125th anniversary of Payson, Arizona. 

Whereas in 2007 Payson, Arizona, will celebrate the 125th 

anniversary of its founding; 

Whereas in 1882 community leaders surveyed the town site 

of Payson; 

Whereas in 1884 Payson held its first rodeo, which has been 

held every year since to become the ‘‘World’s Oldest Continuous Rodeo’’; 

Whereas Payson and its surrounding area were written about 

by western author Zane Grey in books such as Code of 

the West, Under the Tonto Rim, and To the Last Man; 

Whereas Payson, incorporated in 1973, has grown to become 

a dynamic, thriving community that anchors an area 

known as Rim Country; and 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 278 IH 

Whereas on October 5–7, 2007, Payson will celebrate its 

achievements and history with a great celebration: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes the 125th anniversary of Payson, Arizona. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 566 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 25, 2007.
    Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is hereby, elected to the 
following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Homeland Security: Mr. Broun of Georgia.
    Committee on Science and Technology: Mr. Broun of Georgia.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
From: jannithash@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:05:52 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Clifford Ash

, 45122-9296
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of GigOptix, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify that to the undersigned’s knowledge: 

*1)*the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

*2)*the information contained inthe Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Dated: March 31, 2009
Exhibit 11


                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                   (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                           Three Months Ended December 31
                                                                                1999              1998
                                                                                ----              ----
<S>                                                                             <C>            <C>
Weighted average shares outstanding
         Common stock .....................................................     4,688,346      4,767,190
         Common stock equivalents                                                    -0 -          - 0 -
                                                                              -----------    -----------

Weighted average common shares and
     equivalents ..........................................................     4,688,346      4,767,190
                                                                              ===========    ===========


Net (loss)/income .........................................................   $  (748,000)   $   510,599
                                                                              ===========    ===========

Net (loss)/income per share:
         Basic ............................................................   $      (.16)   $      0.11
         Diluted ..........................................................   $      (.16)   $      0.11
</TABLE>
No. 66045.

#### Seymour Smith & Sons, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/3969 (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of grape shears similar in all material respects to those the subject of *John H. Graham & Co., Inc.*v. *Umted States*(41 Cust. Ct. 67, C.D. 2022), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 217 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 217

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        April 17, 2007.
Whereas Celilo Falls, located near The Dalles, Oregon, was a great fishing and 
        trading location for Indian tribes and has been called the ``Wall Street 
        of the West'' by historians;
Whereas artifacts suggest tribes as far as Alaska, the Great Plains and the 
        Southwest United States came to trade and fish at Celilo for over 10,000 
        years;
Whereas the Umatilla, Nez Perce, Yakama and Warm Springs tribes reserved their 
        fishing rights at their usual and accustomed places, including Celilo, 
        when they signed treaties with the United States;
Whereas on March 10, 1957, to provide hydroelectricity and irrigation, The 
        Dalles Dam was constructed;
Whereas the completion of the dam inundated Celilo in six hours, quickly 
        changing the way of life for tribes that fished at Celilo; and
Whereas tribes still live and fish along the river, exercising their treaty 
        rights agreed with the Congress of the United States: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives recognizes the 50th anniversary 
of the flooding of Celilo Falls and the change of life it imposed upon tribal 
peoples.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 05, 2021.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, February 05, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A21D0186. IN THE INTEREST OF P. A. B., A CHILD (MOTHER).

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2000182
EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Safe Bulkers, Inc. (the Company) for
the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officer
of the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for,
the periods presented in the report.

The foregoing
certification is provided solely for purposes of complying with the provisions
of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not intended to be used
or relied upon for any other purpose.

|                         |                                                                 | 
|------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Date:
 February 29, 2012 | /s/
 KONSTANTINOS ADAMOPOULOS                                  
|                         |                                                                
|                         | Konstantinos Adamopoulos 
 Chief Financial Officer and Director

---
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 1, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00021

- CV

Coll een T. BRADY

, Appellant

v.

COMPASS BANK d/b/a BBVA Compass,

Appellee s

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017

- CI

- 10192

Honorable Cathleen M. Stryker, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s Emergency Motion to Stay Foreclosure Sale is DENIED, without prejudice

to appellant taking action to supersede the judgment pursuant to T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 24.

It is so ORDERED on February 1, 2019

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO :

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
ex_107977.htm


Exhibit 10.1.2


 


GEOVAX, INC.


SALARY DEFERRAL AGREEMENT


 


This Salary Deferral Agreement (the “Agreement”) is entered into as of April 25, 2016 by and between GeoVax, Inc., a Georgia Corporation (the “Company”), and Robert T. McNally (the “Employee”).


 


Whereas, the Company and Employee recognize that it is in the best interests of the Company, its shareholders, and its collective Employees to conserve the Company’s cash resources; and


 


Whereas, as part of its cash conservation measures, the Company is asking certain of its employees to accept salary reductions and/or deferrals; 


 


Whereas, Employee currently is currently earning an annualized gross salary of $275,000 (“Base Salary”), which has been previously reduced by 40% to $165,000, based on Employee’s reduction of his time devoted to the Company’s business; 


 


Now, therefore, the parties hereby agree as follows:


 


	
			1.

				
			Salary Deferral.

			
	 	Effective May 1, 2016, Employee agrees to accept a deferral of all but $25,000 of his Base Salary, which amount will be accrued and paid to Employee as described below.



 


	
			2.

				
			Discontinuance of Salary Reduction and/or Deferral

			
	 	Employee’s Salary Deferral pursuant to this Agreement shall end upon the earlier of (i) a significant event (to include financing, corporate partnership, etc., as determined by the Company), or (ii) December 31, 2016 (the “Discontinuance Date”).



 


	
			3.

				
			Payment of Accumulated Deferred Salary.

			
	 	At the Discontinuance Date, the Company in its sole discretion will determine the form of payment to be made to Employee for the accumulated Deferred Salary. Such payment may be made in cash, in the form of Company Stock, or in a combination of cash and stock.



  


ACCEPTANCE


	 	 	 	 
	Employee	 	 	Date	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Agreed:	 	 	 	 
	 	GeoVax, Inc.	 	 	 
	 	By:
No. 67130.

protests 61/3994 and 61/7092 (New York).

#### Paul E. Sernau, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of metal articles similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 65737, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: shareil@q.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:04:52 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sharon Rite

Montrose, CO 81401
1

Jim Staudt

From: Jennifer.Zagorski@potashcorp.com

Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 4:08 PM

To: Jim Staudt

Subject: RE: cost for anhydrous ammonia to Wyoming

Jim, 

It would be around $625 per short ton FOB at this time. As you know, this is continuously changing. 

Thanks, Jen 

Jennifer A Zagorski 

PCS Sales 

1101 Skokie Blvd 

Northbrook, IL 60062 

Phone: 847.849.4377 

Fax: 847.849.4489 

Cell: 847.612.5301 

Email: jennifer.zagorski@potashcorp.com

From: "Jim Staudt" <staudt@andovertechnology.com> To: <Jennifer.Zagorski@potashcorp.com>, 

Date: 09/27/2013 02:58 PM Subject: RE: cost for anhydrous ammonia to Wyoming 

If you can get it easily, that would be good.  Anhydrous ammonia FOB Wyoming. 

 

Jim 

 

From: Jennifer.Zagorski@potashcorp.com [mailto:Jennifer.Zagorski@potashcorp.com] 

Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 3:55 PM

To: Jim Staudt

Subject: Re: cost for anhydrous ammonia to Wyoming 

 

Hi Jim, 

I apologize that I couldn't get that answer to you last week. Would you still need something? 

Thanks,

Jen

Jennifer A Zagorski 

PCS Sales 

1101 Skokie Blvd 
2

Northbrook, IL 60062 

Phone: 847.849.4377 

Fax: 847.849.4489 

Cell: 847.612.5301 

Email: jennifer.zagorski@potashcorp.com

From: "Jim Staudt" <staudt@andovertechnology.com>

To: "'Jennifer A. Zagorski'" <jennifer.zagorski@potashcorp.com>, 

Date: 09/20/2013 01:08 PM

Subject: cost for anhydrous ammonia to Wyoming 

Jennifer, 

I am putting together a cost estimate that I have to get together today and 

need an estimate for anhydrous ammonia delivered to Wyoming. 

If you can't get it today, it's not the end of the world. I'll use the 

utility estimate. But, I'd like an independent estimate if possible. 

Best Regards, 

Jim Staudt, Ph.D., CFA 

Andover Technology Partners 

office: 978-683-9599 

mobile: 978- 884-5510 

[attachment "winmail.dat" deleted by Jennifer Zagorski/Sales/Northbrook/Inc/PCS]
From: rfpc@windstream.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:11:02 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

John Falcone

Bolivar, MO 65613
```

[114th Congress Public Law 36]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 129 STAT. 435]]

Public Law 114-36
114th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To amend the United States Cotton Futures Act to exclude certain cotton 
    futures contracts from coverage under such Act. <<NOTE: July 20, 
                         2015 -  [H.R. 2620]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. EXCLUDING CERTAIN COTTON FUTURES CONTRACTS FROM 
                              COVERAGE UNDER UNITED STATES COTTON 
                              FUTURES ACT.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (c)(1) of the United States Cotton 
Futures Act (7 U.S.C. 15B(c)(1)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``except that any cotton futures contract'' 
        and inserting the following: ``except that--
                    ``(A) any cotton futures contract'';
            (2) in subparagraph (A) (as designated by paragraph (1)), by 
        striking the period at the end and inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(B) any cotton futures contract that permits 
                tender of cotton grown outside of the United States is 
                excluded from the coverage of this paragraph and section 
                to the extent that the cotton grown outside of the 
                United States is tendered for delivery under the cotton 
                futures contract.''.

    (b) <<NOTE: 7 USC 15b note.>>  Application.--The amendments made by 
subsection (a) shall apply with respect to cotton futures contracts 
entered into on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

    Approved July 20, 2015.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2620:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 114-174 (Comm. on Agriculture).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 161 (2015):
            June 23, considered and passed House.
            July 9, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```