## 6560-50-S

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Ch. I

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0313

EPA-HQ-OW-2012-0813

EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0642; FRL 9900-64-OP]

Fall 2013 Regulatory Agenda

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Semiannual regulatory flexibility agenda and semiannual regulatory agenda.

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) publishes the semiannual regulatory agenda

online (the e-Agenda) at http://www.reginfo.gov and at www.regulations.gov to update the public about:

• Regulations and major policies currently under development,

• Reviews of existing regulations and major policies, and

• Rules and major policymakings completed or canceled since the last agenda.

Definitions:

‘‘E-Agenda,’’ ‘‘online regulatory agenda,’’ and ‘‘semiannual regulatory agenda’’ all refer to the same

comprehensive collection of information that, until 2007, was published in the Federal Register but now

is only available through an online database.

‘‘Regulatory Flexibility Agenda’’ refers to a document that contains information about regulations that

may have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. We continue to publish it in the

Federal Register because it is required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980.

### ‘‘Unified Regulatory Agenda’’ refers to the collection of all agencies’ agendas with an introduction

p r e p ared by the Regulatory Information Service Center facilitated by the General Service Administration.

‘‘Regulatory Agenda Preamble’’ refers to the document you are reading now. It appears as part of the

Regulatory Flexibility Agenda and introduces both the Regulatory Flexibility Agenda and the e-Agenda.

“Regulatory Development and Retrospective Review Tracker” refers to an online portal to EPA’s

priority rules and retrospective reviews of existing regulations. More information about the Regulatory

Development and Retrospective Review Tracker appears in section H of this preamble.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions or comments about a particular

action, please get in touch with the agency contact listed in each agenda entry. If you have general

questions about the semiannual regulatory agenda, please contact: Caryn Muellerleile

(muellerleile.caryn@epa.gov; 202-564-2855).

Table of Contents

A. Links to EPA’s Regulatory Information

B. What Key Statutes and Executive Orders Guide EPA’s Rule and Policymaking Process?

C. How Can You Be Involved in EPA’s Rule and Policymaking Process?

D. What Actions Are Included in the E-Agenda and the Regulatory Agenda?

E. How Is the E-Agenda Organized?

F. What Information Is in the Regulatory Flexibility Agenda and the E-Agenda?

G. How Can You Find Out About Rulemakings That Start Up After the Regulatory Agenda Is Signed?

H. What Tools Are Available for Mining Regulatory Agenda Data and for Finding More About EPA Rules

and Policies?

I. Reviews of Rules with Significant Impacts on a Substantial Number of Small Entities

J. What Other Special Attention Does EPA Give to the Impacts of Rules on Small Businesses, Small

Governments, and Small Nonprofit Organizations?

K. Thank You for Collaborating With Us

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

### A. Links To EPA’s Regulatory Information

• S e m iannual Regulatory Agenda: www.reginfo.gov/ and www.regulations.gov

• Semiannual Regulatory Flexibility Agenda: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/search/home.action

• Regulatory Development and Retrospective Review Tracker: www.epa.gov/regdarrt/

B. What Key Statutes and Executive Orders Guide EPA’s Rule and Policymaking Process?

A number of environmental laws authorize EPA’s actions, including but not limited to:

• Clean Air Act (CAA),

• Clean Water Act (CWA),

• Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA, or Superfund),

• Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA),

• Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA),

• Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA),

• Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), and

• Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA).

Not only must EPA comply with environmental laws, but also administrative legal requirements that

apply to the issuance of regulations, such as: the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), the Regulatory

Flexibility Act (RFA) as amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA),

the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA), the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), the National

Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA), and the Congressional Review Act (CRA).

EPA also meets a number of requirements contained in numerous Executive Orders: 12866,

“Regulatory Planning and Review” (58 FR 51735, Oct. 4, 1993), as supplemented by Executive Order

13563, “Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review” (76 FR 3821, Jan. 21, 2011); 12898,

“Environmental Justice” (59 FR 7629, Feb. 16, 1994); 13045, “Children’s Health Protection” (62 FR

19885, Apr. 23, 1997); 13132, “Federalism” (64 FR 43255, Aug. 10, 1999); 13175, “Consultation and

Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments” (65 FR 67249, Nov. 9, 2000); 13211, “Actions Concerning

Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use” (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001).

In addition to meeting its mission goals and priorities as described above, EPA has begun reviewing

its existing regulations under Executive Order (EO) 13563, “Improving Regulation and Regulatory

### Rev iew

. ” This EO provides for periodic retrospective review of existing significant regulations and is

i n t ended to determine whether any such regulations should be modified, streamlined, expanded, or

repealed, so as to make the Agency's regulatory program more effective or less burdensome in achieving

the regulatory objectives. More information about this review is described in EPA’s Statement of Priorities

in the Regulatory Plan.

C. How Can You Be Involved in EPA’s Rule and Policymaking Process?

You can make your voice heard by getting in touch with the contact person provided in each agenda

entry. EPA encourages you to participate as early in the process as possible. You may also participate by

commenting on proposed rules published in the Federal Register (FR).

Instructions on how to submit your comments are provided in each Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

(NPRM). To be most effective, comments should contain information and data that support your position

and you also should explain why EPA should incorporate your suggestion in the rule or other type of

action. You can be particularly helpful and persuasive if you provide examples to illustrate your concerns

and offer specific alternatives.

EPA believes its actions will be more cost effective and protective if the development process includes

stakeholders working with us to help identify the most practical and effective solutions to problems. EPA

encourages you to become involved in its rule and policymaking process. For more information about

public involvement in EPA activities, please visit www.epa.gov/open.

D. What Actions Are Included in the E-Agenda and the Regulatory Flexibility Agenda?

EPA includes regulations and certain major policy documents in the e-Agenda. However, there is no

legal significance to the omission of an item from the agenda, and EPA generally does not include the

following categories of actions:

• Administrative actions such as delegations of authority, changes of address, or phone numbers;

• Under the CAA: Revisions to state implementation plans; equivalent methods for ambient air quality

monitoring; deletions from the new source performance standards source categories list; delegations of

authority to states; area designations for air quality planning purposes;

• Under FIFRA: Registration-related decisions, actions affecting the status of currently registered

pesticides, and data call-ins;

### • Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act: Actions regarding pesticide tolerances and food

a d d itive regulations;

• Under RCRA: Authorization of State solid waste management plans; hazardous waste delisting

petitions;

• Under the CWA: State Water Quality Standards; deletions from the section 307(a) list of toxic

pollutants; suspensions of toxic testing requirements under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination

System (NPDES); delegations of NPDES authority to States;

• Under SDWA: Actions on State underground injection control programs.

The Regulatory Flexibility Agenda includes:

• Actions likely to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.

• Rules the Agency has identified for periodic review under section 610 of the RFA.

EPA is opening one 610 review and concluding one other in fall 2013. One 610 review remains

ongoing during this time.

E. How Is the E-Agenda Organized?

You can choose how to organize the agenda entries online by specifying the characteristics of the

entries of interest in the desired individual data fields for both the www.reginfo.gov and

www.regulations.gov versions of the e-Agenda. You can sort based on the following characteristics: EPA

sub agency; stage of rulemaking, which is explained below; alphabetically by title; and by the Regulation

Identifier Number (RIN), which is assigned sequentially when an action is added to the agenda.

Each entry in the Agenda is associated with one of five rulemaking stages. The rulemaking stages are:

1. Prerule Stage – This section includes EPA actions generally intended to determine whether the

agency should initiate rulemaking. Prerulemakings may include anything that influences or leads to

rulemaking, such as Advance Notices of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRMs), studies or analyses of the

possible need for regulatory action.

2. Proposed Rule Stage—This section includes EPA rulemaking actions that are within a year of proposal

(publication of Notices of Proposed Rulemakings [NPRMs]).

3. Final Rule Stage—This section includes rules that will be issued as a final rule within a year.

### 4. Long-Term Actions—This section includes rulemakings for which the next scheduled regulatory action

i s a fter December 2012. We urge you to explore becoming involved even if an action is listed in the

Long-Term category. By the time an action is listed in the Proposed Rules category you may have

missed the opportunity to participate in certain public meetings or policy dialogues.

5. Completed Actions—This section contains actions that have been promulgated and published in the

Federal Register since publication of the spring 2013 Agenda. It also includes actions that EPA is no

longer considering and has elected to “withdraw.” EPA also announces the results of any RFA section

610 review in this section of the agenda.

F. What Information Is in the Regulatory Flexibility Agenda and the E-Agenda?

The Regulatory Flexibility Agenda entries include only the nine categories of information that are

required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 and by Federal Register Agenda printing requirements:

Sequence Number, RIN, Title, Description, Statutory Authority, Section 610 Review, if applicable,

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required, Schedule and Contact Person. Note that the electronic version

of the Agenda (E-Agenda) has more extensive information on each of these actions.

E-Agenda entries include:

Title: a brief description of the subject of the regulation. The notation ‘‘Section 610 Review’’ follows the

title if we are reviewing the rule as part of our periodic review of existing rules under section 610 of the

RFA (5 U.S.C. 610).

Priority: Entries are placed into one of five categories described below.

a. Economically Significant: Under Executive Order 12866, a rulemaking that may have an annual effect

on the economy of $100 million or more, or adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of

the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or

tribal governments or communities.

b. Other Significant: A rulemaking that is not economically significant but is considered significant for

other reasons. This category includes rules that may:

1. Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another

agency;

### 2. Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs, or the rights

a n d obligations of recipients; or

3. Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President’s priorities, or the

principles in Executive Order 12866.

c. Substantive, Nonsignificant: A rulemaking that has substantive impacts but is not Significant, Routine

and Frequent, or Informational/Administrative/Other.

d. Routine and Frequent: A rulemaking that is a specific case of a recurring application of a regulatory

program in the Code of Federal Regulations (e.g., certain State Implementation Plans, National Priority

List updates, Significant New Use Rules, State Hazardous Waste Management Program actions, and

Tolerance Exemptions). If an action that would normally be classified Routine and Frequent is reviewed

by the Office of Management and Budget under EO 12866, then we would classify the action as either

“Economically Significant” or “Other Significant.”

e. Informational/Administrative/Other: An action that is primarily informational or pertains to an action

outside the scope of EO 12866.

Major : a rule is "major" under 5 U.S.C. 801 (Pub. L. 104-121) if it has resulted or is likely to result in an

annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or meets other criteria specified in that Act.

Unfunded Mandates:

whether the rule is covered by section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4). The Act requires that, before issuing an NPRM likely to result in a mandate that

may result in expenditures by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private

sector of more than $100 million in 1 year.

Legal Authority: The sections of the United States Code (U.S.C.), Public Law (Pub. L.), Executive Order

(EO), or common name of the law that authorizes the regulatory action.

CFR Citation: The sections of the Code of Federal Regulations that would be affected by the action.

Legal Deadline: An indication of whether the rule is subject to a statutory or judicial deadline, the date of

that deadline, and whether the deadline pertains to a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, a Final Action, or

some other action.

Abstract: A brief description of the problem the action will address.

### Timetable : the dates and citations (if available) for all past steps and a projected date for at least the next

s t e p for the regulatory action. A date displayed in the form 06/00/14 means the agency is predicting the

month and year the action will take place but not the day it will occur. For some entries, the timetable

indicates that the date of the next action is “to be determined.”

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Indicates whether EPA has prepared or anticipates that it will be

preparing a regulatory flexibility analysis under section 603 or 604 of the RFA. Generally, such an

analysis is required for proposed or final rules subject to the RFA that EPA believes may have a

significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.

Small Entities Affected: Indicates whether the rule is anticipated to have any effect on small businesses,

small governments or small nonprofit organizations.

Government Levels Affected: Indicates whether the rule may have any effect on levels of government

and, if so, whether the governments are State, local, tribal, or Federal.

Federalism Implications: Indicates whether the action is expected to have substantial direct effects on the

States, on the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of

power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

Energy Impacts: Indicates whether the action is a significant energy action under Executive Order 13211.

Sectors Affected: Indicates the main economic sectors regulated by the action. The regulated parties are

identified by their North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes. These codes were

created by the Census Bureau for collecting, analyzing, and publishing statistical data on the U.S.

economy. There are more than 1,000 NAICS codes for sectors in agriculture, mining, manufacturing,

services, and public administration.

International Trade Impacts : Indicates whether the action is likely to have international trade or

investment effects, or otherwise be of international interest.

Agency Contact: The name, address, phone number, and email address, if available, of a person who is

knowledgeable about the regulation.

Additional Information: Other information about the action including docket information.

URLs: For some actions, the Internet addresses are included for reading copies of rulemaking

documents, submitting comments on proposals, and getting more information about the rulemaking and

### the program of which it is a part. (Note: To submit comments on proposals, you can go to the associated

e l e c tronic docket, which is housed at www.regulations.gov. Once there, follow the online instructions to

access the docket in question and submit comments. A docket identification [ID] number will assist in the

search for materials.)

RIN: The Regulation Identifier Number is used by OMB to identify and track rulemakings. The first four

digits of the RIN identify the EPA office with lead responsibility for developing the action.

G. How Can You Find Out About Rulemakings That Start Up After the Regulatory Agenda Is

Signed?

EPA posts monthly information of new rulemakings that the Agency’s senior managers have decided

that to develop. This list is also distributed via email. You can find the current list, known as the Action

Initiation List (AIL), at http://www2.epa.gov/laws-regulations/actions-initiated-month where you will also

find information about how to get an email notification when a new list is posted.

H. What Tools Are Available for Mining Regulatory Agenda Data and for Finding More About EPA

Rules and Policies?

1. The http://www.reginfo.gov/ Searchable Database

2. The Regulatory Information Service Center and Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs have a

Federal regulatory dashboard that allows users to view the Regulatory Agenda database

(http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/eAgendaMain), which includes search, display, and data transmission

options. Subject Matter EPA Websites

Some actions listed in the Agenda include a URL that provides additional information about the

action.

3. Public Dockets

When EPA publishes either an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) or a Notice of

Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) in the Federal Register , the Agency typically establishes a docket to

accumulate materials throughout the development process for that rulemaking. The docket serves as the

repository for the collection of documents or information related to a particular Agency action or activity.

EPA most commonly uses dockets for rulemaking actions, but dockets may also be used for RFA section

610 reviews of rules with significant economic impacts on a substantial number of small entities and for

### various non-rulemaking activities, such as F e d e ral Register documents seeking public comments on

draft guidance, policy statements, information collection requests under the PRA, and other non-rule

activities. Docket information should be in that action’s agenda entry. All of EPA’s public dockets can be

located at www.regulations.gov.

4. EPA’s Regulatory Development and Retrospective Review Tracker

EPA’s Regulatory Development and Retrospective Review Tracker (www.epa.gov/regdarrt/) serves

as a portal to EPA’s priority rules, providing you with earlier and more frequently updated information

about Agency regulations than is provided by the Regulatory Agenda. It also provides information about

retrospective reviews of existing regulations. Not all of EPA’s Regulatory Agenda entries appear on Reg

DaRRT; only priority rulemakings can be found on this Web site.

I. Reviews of Rules with Significant Impacts on a Substantial Number of Small Entities

Section 610 of the RFA requires that an agency review, within 10 years of promulgation, each rule that

has or will have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. EPA is opening

one 610 review and concluding one other in fall 2013. One 610 review remains ongoing during this time.

Review Title RIN Docket ID #

Section 610 Review of Control of Emissions of Air

Pollution from Nonroad Diesel Engines and Fuel 2060-AR91 EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0642

Section 610 Review of National Pollutant Discharge

Elimination System Permit Regulation and Effluent

Limitations Guidelines Standards for Concentrated

Animal Feeding Operations 2040-AF46 EPA-HQ-OW-2012-0813

Section 610 Review of Heavy-Duty Engine and

Vehicle Standards and Highway Diesel Fuel Sulfur

Control Requirements (Completed) 2060-AR83 EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0313

EPA established an official public dockets for each 610 Review under the docket identification (ID)

numbers indicated above. All documents in the dockets are listed on the www.regulations.gov Web site.

### Alt hough listed in the index, some information is not publicly available; e.g., confidential business

i n f o rmation (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material,

such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy

form. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically through www.regulations.gov

or in hard copy at the Air or Water dockets, EPA/DC, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue

NW., Washington, DC 20460. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday

through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202)

566-1744.

J. What Other Special Attention Does EPA Give to the Impacts of Rules on Small Businesses,

Small Governments, and Small Nonprofit Organizations?

For each of EPA’s rulemakings, consideration is given whether there will be any adverse impact on

any small entity. EPA attempts to fit the regulatory requirements, to the extent feasible, to the scale of the

businesses, organizations, and governmental jurisdictions subject to the regulation.

Under RFA as amended by SBREFA, the Agency must prepare a formal analysis of the potential

negative impacts on small entities, convene a Small Business Advocacy Review Panel (proposed rule

stage), and prepare a Small Entity Compliance Guide (final rule stage) unless the Agency certifies a rule

will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. For more detailed

information about the Agency’s policy and practice with respect to implementing RFA/SBREFA, please

visit the RFA/SBREFA Web site at http://www.epa.gov/sbrefa/.

K. Thank You for Collaborating With Us

Finally, we would like to thank those of you who choose to join with us in making progress on the

complex issues involved in protecting human health and the environment. Collaborative efforts such as

EPA’s open rulemaking process are a valuable tool for addressing the problems we face, and the

regulatory agenda is an important part of that process.

DATED: August 28, 2013.

NAME: Shannon Kenny,

Principal Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Policy.The 179 Regulatory Agendas

Regional Office Chicago - Long-term Action

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Withdrawal of Federal Water Quality Guidance for the Great Lakes System for Michigan 2005-AA02

Regional Office Seattle - Proposed Rule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Revisions to Federal Implementation Plans Under the Clean Air Act for Indian Country in Idaho, Oregon, and Washington 2012-AA02

Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance - Long-term Action

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule 2020-AA47

Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance - Completed Action

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Amendments to the Civil Monetary Penalty Inflation Adjustment Rule 2020-AA49

Office of Environmental Information - Proposed Rule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Toxics Release Inventory; Addition of Six Phthalates 2025-AA37

Environmental Protection Agency Freedom of Information Act Regulations Update 2025-AA38

Office of Environmental Information - Final Rule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Toxics Release Inventory; Addition of Nonylphenol 2025-AA34

Office of Environmental Information - Long-term Action

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Modification of Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) Reporting Requirements Primarily Associated with Metal Mining 2025-AA11

Office of Environmental Information - Completed Action

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Electronic Reporting of Toxics Release Inventory Data Under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA) 2025-AA30

Toxics Release Inventory; Addition of Ortho-Nitrotoluene 2025-AA35

Updating the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) Reporting North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Codes
to 2012 NAICS 2025-AA36Water - PreRule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

NPDES Regulations to Address Water Quality Impacts from Forest Road Discharges 2040-AF43

Section 610 Review of National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Regulation and Effluent Limitations Guidelines Standards for Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations 2040-AF46

Water - Proposed Rule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Uniform National Discharge Standards for Vessels of the Armed Forces - Phase II 2040-AD39

Development of Best Management Practices for Recreational Boats under Section 312(o) of the Clean Water Act 2040-AF03

Water Quality Standards Regulatory Clarifications 2040-AF16

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Application and Program Updates Rule 2040-AF25

Definition of "Waters of the United States" Under the Clean Water Act 2040-AF30

Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants Under the Clean Water Act; Analysis and Sampling Procedures 2040-AF48

Water - Final Rule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES): Use of Sufficiently Sensitive Test Methods for Permit Applications and Reporting 2040-AC84

Criteria and Standards for Cooling Water Intake Structures 2040-AE95

Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Source Category 2040-AF14

Water Quality Standards for the State of Florida's Estuaries and Coastal Waters 2040-AF21

Water Quality Standards for the State of Florida's Streams and Downstream Protection of Lakes: Remanded Provisions 2040-AF39

Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Construction and Development Point Source Category 2040-AF44

Water - Long-term Action

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Underground Injection Control: Update of State Programs 2040-AD40

Oil and Gas Construction Stormwater Rule 2040-AF05

Stormwater Regulations Revision to Address Discharges from Developed Sites 2040-AF13

National Primary Drinking Water Regulations for Lead and Copper: Regulatory Revisions 2040-AF15

Effluent Guidelines and Standards for the Dental Point Source Category 2040-AF26

National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Regulation of Perchlorate 2040-AF28

National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Group Regulation of Carcinogenic Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) 2040-AF29

Effluent Guidelines and Standards for Unconventional Oil and Gas Extraction Including Coalbed Methane and Shale
Gas Extraction 2040-AF35

Water - Completed Action

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Regulation Revision: Removal of the Pesticide Discharge Permitting Exemption in Response to Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Decision 2040-AF47

Solid Waste and Emergency Response - PreRule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Hazardous Waste Requirements for the Retail Sector; Clarifying and Making the Program More Effective 2050-AG72

Solid Waste and Emergency Response - Proposed RuleTitle Regulation
Identifier
Number

Revisions to the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan; Subpart J Product Schedule Listing Requirements 2050-AE87

Management Standards for Hazardous Waste Pharmaceuticals 2050-AG39

Addition of Subsurface Component to the Hazard Ranking System (HRS) 2050-AG67

Improvements to the Hazardous Waste Generator Regulatory Program (Parts 261 - 265) 2050-AG70

Additions to List Section 241.4 Categorical Non-Waste Fuels 2050-AG74

Revisions to RCRA Subtitle D Research, Demonstration & Development Permit Rule 2050-AG75

Amending the National Contingency Plan (NCP) Provisions for Public Notices for Specific Superfund Activities 2050-AG76

Hazardous Waste Export -Import Revisions Rule 2050-AG77

National Contingency Plan Revisions to Align With the National Response Framework 2050-AG78

Solid Waste and Emergency Response - Final Rule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Hazardous Waste Manifest Revisions--Standards and Procedures for Electronic Manifests 2050-AG20

Revising Underground Storage Tank Regulations--Revisions to Existing Requirements and New Requirements for Secondary Containment and Operator Training 2050-AG46

Hazardous Waste Management System: Conditional Exclusion for Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Streams in Geologic Sequestration Activities 2050-AG60

Rulemaking on the Definition of Solid Waste 2050-AG62

Revisions to the Export Requirements of the Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Rule 2050-AG68

Solid Waste and Emergency Response - Long-term Action

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Standards for the Management of Coal Combustion Residuals Generated by Commercial Electric Power Producers 2050-AE81

RCRA Smarter Waste Reporting 2050-AF01

Revisions to Land Disposal Restrictions Treatment Standards and Amendments to Recycling Requirements for Spent Petroleum Refining Hydrotreating and Hydrorefining Catalysts 2050-AG34

Financial Responsibility Requirements under CERCLA Section 108(b) for Classes of Facilities in the Hard Rock Mining Industry 2050-AG61

Solid Waste and Emergency Response - Completed Action

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Modifications to RCRA Rules Associated With Solvent-Contaminated Industrial Wipes 2050-AE51

Air and Radiation - PreRule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Supplemental Determination for Renewable Fuels Produced Under the Final RFS2 Program from Pulpwood 2060-AQ49

Revised Regulation for Environmental Radiation Protection Standard for Nuclear Power Operations--40 CFR Part 190 2060-AR12

Section 610 Review of Control of Emissions of Air Pollution from Nonroad Diesel Engines and Fuel 2060-AR91

Air and Radiation - Proposed Rule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Review of New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) and Amendments to Emissions Guidelines (EG) for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills (WWW and Cc) 2060-AM08

New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) Review under CAA Section111(b)(1)(B) 2060-AO60

Protection of the Stratospheric Ozone: Motor Vehicle Air Conditioning System Servicing 2060-AO75

New Source Performance Standards for Grain Elevators--Amendments 2060-AP06

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) Subpart W: Standards for Radon Emissions FromOperating Uranium Mill Tailings: Review 2060-AP26

Revision of 40 CFR Part 192--Health and Environmental Protection Standards for Uranium and Thorium Mill Tailings and Uranium In Situ Leaching Processing Facilities 2060-AP43

Electronic Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements for New Source Performance Standards Rulemaking 2060-AP63

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP): Brick and Structural Clay Products Manufacturing and Clay Ceramics Manufacturing 2060-AP69

Standards of Performance for New Residential Wood Heaters, New Residential Hydronic Heaters and Forced-Air Furnaces, and New Residential Masonry Heaters 2060-AP93

Withdr.of the Prior Deter. or Presump. That Compl. w/CAIR or the NOx SIP Call Const. RACT or RACM for the 97 8-Hr Ozone & 97Fine Part. NAAQS; & Rev. to RACT Guid. & RFP Req. for the 97Fine Part. NAAQS 2060-AQ07

Risk and Technology Review for Ferroalloys Production 2060-AQ11

Residual Risk and Technology Review Amendments to the Secondary Aluminum Production National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) 2060-AQ40

Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Lead 2060-AQ44

Implementation Rule for 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS 2060-AQ48

Petroleum Refinery Sector Risk and Technology Review and NSPS 2060-AQ75

Revisions to Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements, and Proposed Confidentiality Determinations Under the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program 2060-AQ81

Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units 2060-AQ91

Residual Risk and Technology Review Amendments to the Primary Aluminum Reduction National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) 2060-AQ92

General Permits and Permits by Rule for the Tribal Minor New Source Review Program 2060-AQ95

National Emission Standards for Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework Facilities Risk and Technology Review 2060-AQ99

Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Adjustments to the Allowance System for Controlling HCFC Production, Import, and Export for 2015 Through 2019 2060-AR04

Data Requirements Rule for the 1-Hour Sulfur Dioxide Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) 2060-AR19

New Source Review and Title V Operating Permit Programs--Reconsideration of PSD Requirements for Particulate Matter Less Than 2.5 Micrometers (PM2.5) and Revision to Public Notice Requirements 2060-AR28

Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Existing Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units 2060-AR33

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) from Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations
RTR 2060-AR47

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) Emissions: Manufacture of Amino/Phenolic Resins, Acrylic and Modacrylic Fibers Production, and Polycarbonate Production RTR 2060-AR49

Identification of Additional Qualifying Renewable Fuel Pathways III and Modification to the Renewable Fuels Program 2060-AR50

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants Residual Risk and Technology Review for Flexible Polyurethane Foam Production 2060-AR58

Criteria for the Certification and Recertification of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant's Compliance With the Disposal Regulations; Panel Closure Redesign 2060-AR60

Air Quality: Revision to Definition of Volatile Organic Compounds--Amendment to the Exclusion of t-Butyl Acetate 2060-AR65

Reconsideration of the Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants 2060-AR73

Renewable Fuel 2014 Volume Standards 2060-AR76

Federal Plan Requirements for Sewage Sludge Incineration Units Constructed on or Before October 14, 2010 2060-AR77

Amendments and Confidentiality Determinations for Subpart L (Fluorinated Gas Production) and Amendments to Subpart A 2060-AR78

Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: The 2014 Critical Use Exemption From the Phaseout of Methyl Bromide 2060-AR80

Performance Specification 18 for Hydrogen Chloride Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems 2060-AR81

Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Modified Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units 2060-AR88

Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Technical Updates to HTS Codes and Party Ratification Status Under the Montreal
Protocol 2060-AR89

NESHAP for Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines; New Source Performance Standards for Stationary Internal Combustion Engines; Notice of Reconsideration 2060-AR90

Air Quality: Revisions to Definition of Volatile Organic Compounds--Exclusion of 2-Amino-2-Methyl-1-Propanol (AMP) 2060-AR92

Air Quality: Revision to Definition of Volatile Organic Compounds--Exclusion of Benzotrifluoride 2060-AR93

Air Quality: Revision to Definition of Volatile Organic Compounds--Exclusion of 1,1,2,2-Tetrafluoro-1-(2,2,2- trifluoroethoxy) ethane (HFE-347pc-f) 2060-AR94

Revisions to the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Source Category of the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule 2060-AR96

General Permits and Permits by Rule for the Tribal Minor New Source Review Program 2060-AR98

Revisions to Ambient Monitoring Quality Assurance and Other Requirements 2060-AS00

Oil and Natural Gas Sector: Reconsideration of Additional Provisions of New Source Performance Standards 2060-AS01

Treatment of Data Influenced by Exceptional Events--Rule Revisions 2060-AS02Air and Radiation - Final Rule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Procedure 3 - Quality Assurance Requirements for Continuous Opacity Monitoring Systems at Stationary Sources 2060-AH23

Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Listing of Substitutes for Ozone-Depleting Substances: N-Propyl Bromide 2060-AK26

Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Revision to the Venting Prohibition for Specific Substitute Refrigerants 2060-AM49

Requirements for Reformulated Gasoline (RFG) Under the 8-hour Ozone Standard for Bump-up Areas Designated
Attainment for the 1-hour Ozone Standard Prior to Revocation 2060-AN63

Revisions to Test Method for Determining Stack Gas Velocity Taking Into Account Velocity Decay Near the Stack Walls 2060-AP08

Revisions to Test Methods and Testing Regulations 2060-AQ01

Stationary Combustion Turbine New Source Performance Standard (NSPS) Amendments to Address UARG
Reconsideration Petition 2060-AQ29

Supplemental Determinations for Renewable Fuels Produced Under the Final RFS2 Program From Palm Oil 2060-AQ36

Amendments to Tribal Delegation of Authority Provisions in the Prevention of Significant Deterioration Program 2060-AQ55

Amendments to Compliance Certification Content Requirements for State and Federal Operating Permits Programs 2060-AQ71

Control of Air Pollution From Motor Vehicles: Tier 3 Motor Vehicle Emission and Fuel Standards 2060-AQ86

NESHAP Risk and Technology Review for the Mineral Wool and Wool Fiberglass Industries; NESHAP for Wool Fiberglass Area Sources 2060-AQ90

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP): Group IV Polymers and Resins, Pesticide Active Ingredient Production, and Polyether Polyols Production Risk and Technology Review 2060-AR02

RFS Pathways II and Amendments to the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS2) 2060-AR21

Review of New Sources and Modifications in Indian Country; Definitions and Exempted Units and Activities 2060-AR25

Revisions to the Air Emissions Reporting Requirements: Revisions to Lead (Pb) Reporting Threshold and Clarifications to Technical Reporting Details 2060-AR29

Implementation of the 2008 National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone: State Implementation Plan Requirements 2060-AR34

Heavy-Duty Highway Program: Revisions for Emergency Vehicles and SCR Maintenance 2060-AR46

Heavy-Duty GHG On-Highway and Non-Road Engine and Vehicle Regulation Streamlining and Technical Amendments 2060-AR48

2013 Revisions to the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule and Proposed Confidentiality Determinations for New or Substantially Revised Data Elements 2060-AR52

Kraft Pulp Mills NSPS Review 2060-AR64

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Secondary Lead Smelters; Amendments 2060-AR66

State Implementation Plans: Response to Petition; Findings of Substantial Inadequacy; and SIP Calls to Amend Provisions Applying to Excess Emissions During Periods of Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction 2060-AR68

RFS Renewable Identification Number (RIN) Quality Assurance Program 2060-AR72

Clarification of Requirements for Method 303 Certification Training 2060-AR97

Vacatur of the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) of PM2.5 Significant Impact Levels (SILs) and Significant Monitoring Concentration (SMC) 2060-AR99

Air and Radiation - Long-term Action

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) and Emission Guidelines (EG) for Large Municipal Waste Combustors (MWCs). 2060-AO18

Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone 2060-AP38

Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Nonattainment New Source Review (NSR): Reasonable Possibility in Recordkeeping; Reconsideration 2060-AP71

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction Amendments to Part 63
Standards 2060-AP96

Residual Risk and Technology Review Amendments to the Phosphoric Acid Manufacturing and Phosphate Fertilizer Production National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) 2060-AQ20

Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Nonattainment New Source Review (NSR): Reconsideration of Inclusion of Fugitive Emissions; Reconsideration 2060-AQ47

NESHAP Emissions for Primary Lead Processing: Residual Risk and Technology Review and NESHAP from Secondary Lead Smelting: Residual Risk and Technology Review; Reconsiderations 2060-AR79

Air and Radiation - Completed Action

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Labeling of Products Using HCFCs 2060-AO68Federal Reference Method for Lead in Total Suspended Particulate Matter 2060-AP89

Air Quality Designations for the 2010 Sulfur Dioxide Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standard 2060-AR18

Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: The 2013 Critical Use Exemption From the Phaseout of Methyl Bromide 2060-AR41

Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) Volume Standards for 2013 2060-AR43

Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program: Final Amendments and Confidentiality Determinations for Electronics Manufacturing 2060-AR61

Air Quality: Revision to Definition of Volatile Organic Compounds--Exclusion of trans 1-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoroprop-1-ene [SolsticeTM 1233zd(E)] 2060-AR67

Petroleum Refinery Sector Amendment for Flares 2060-AR69

Air Quality: Revision to Definition of Volatile Organic Compounds--Exclusion of 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene 2060-AR70

Oil and Natural Gas Sector: Reconsideration of Certain Provisions of New Source Performance Standards 2060-AR75

Section 610 Review of Heavy-Duty Engine and Vehicle Standards and Highway Diesel Fuel Sulfur Control Requirements 2060-AR83

Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Additional Qualifying Renewable Fuel Pathways under Renewable Fuel Standard Program; Addressing Invasive Species Concerns for Giant Reed and Napier Grass 2060-AR85

Amendment to the Renewable Fuel Standard Definition of Heating Oil 2060-AR87

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances - PreRule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Hydraulic Fracturing Chemicals; Chemical Information Reporting under TSCA section 8(a) and Health and Safety Data Reporting under TSCA section 8(d) 2070-AJ93

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances - Proposed Rule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Pesticides; Agricultural Worker Protection Standard Revisions 2070-AJ22

Pesticides; Expansion of Crop Grouping Program 2070-AJ28

Nanoscale Materials; Chemical Substances When Manufactured, Imported, or Processed as Nanoscale Materials; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Significant New Use Rule 2070-AJ54

Pesticides; Clarifying Changes to Labeling 2070-AJ61

CBI: PMN Amendments Claiming Chemical and Microorganism Identity as Confidential in Data from Health and Safety
Studies Submitted Under TSCA Prior to the Commencement of Manufacture 2070-AJ87

CBI; Reassertion and Resubstantiation of Confidentiality Claims Submitted Under TSCA 2070-AJ90

Significant New Use Rule for Toluene Diisocyanates (TDI) and Related Compounds 2070-AJ91

Significant New Use Rules; Amendment of Hazard Communication Program and Worker Protection Requirements 2070-AJ94

Certain Nonylphenols and Nonylphenol Ethoxylates; Significant New Use Rule 2070-AJ96

MDI and TDI; Health and Safety Data Reporting under TSCA 8(d) 2070-AJ97

Long-Chain Perfluoroalkyl Carboxylate and Perfluoroalkyl Sulfonate Chemical Substances; Significant New Use Rule 2070-AJ99

Pesticides; Technical Amendments to Data Requirements 2070-AK00

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances - Final Rule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Certain Polybrominated Diphenylethers; Significant New Use Rule (SNUR) and Test Rule 2070-AJ08

Formaldehyde; Third-Party Certification Framework for the Formaldehyde Standards for Composite Wood Products 2070-AJ44

Significant New Use Rule for Glymes 2070-AJ52

Pesticides; Satisfaction of Data Requirements; Minor Revisions to the Procedures to Ensure Protection of Data Submitters' Rights 2070-AJ58

Microorganisms: General Exemptions from Reporting Requirements; Revisions of Recipient Organisms Eligible for Tier I and Tier II Exemptions 2070-AJ65

Significant New use Rule (SNUR); Benzidine-based Dyes; Di-n-pentyl phthalate (DnPP); and Alkanes, C12-13, Chloro 2070-AJ73

Electronic Reporting under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) 2070-AJ75

Significant New Use Rule (SNUR); HBCD (Hexabromocyclododecane) Used in Textiles 2070-AJ88

Formaldehyde Emissions Standards for Composite Wood Products 2070-AJ92

Electronic Reporting; Revisions to Notification Regulations for TSCA Section 5 Premanufacture and Significant New Use
Notification 2070-AJ98Response to Request for Exemption of Certain Food-Related Chemical Substances From TSCA Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) Processing and Use Information Reporting Requirements in 2016 2070-AK01

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances - Long-term Action

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs); Reassessment of Use Authorizations 2070-AJ38

Lead; Renovation, Repair, and Painting Program for Public and Commercial Buildings 2070-AJ56

Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances - Completed Action

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Chemicals of Concern List Under Section 5(b)(4) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) 2070-AJ70

Significant New Use Rule for Perfluoroalkyl Sulfonates and Long-Chain Perfluoroalkyl Carboxylates Used as Part of Carpets 2070-AJ95

Office of the Administrator - Proposed Rule

Title Regulation
Identifier
Number

Nondiscrimination in Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Assistance from the Environmental Protection Agency 2090-AA39

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Regional Office Chicago ( ROCHICAGO ) RIN: 2005-AA02

View Related Documents

Title: Withdrawal of Federal Water Quality Guidance for the Great Lakes System for Michigan

Abstract: On August 4, 2000, EPA specified at 40 CFR 132.6(c) that certain requirements set forth in the Water Quality Guidance for the Great Lakes System (Guidance) at 40 CFR Part 132 apply to discharges within the Great Lakes System in the States of Indiana, Michigan, and Ohio because those states had not adopted requirements pertaining to whole effluent toxicity (WET) consistent with the Guidance. On September 19, 2005, Michigan submitted to EPA revisions to the rules that addressed WET requirement.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 132.6(c) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM

Direct Final Rule

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Robert Pepin Environmental Protection Agency Regional Office Chicago WT-15J, Chicago, IL 60604 Chicago , IL 60604
Phone: 312 886-1505

FAX: 312 886-0168

E -Mail: pepin.robert@.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Regional Office Seattle ( ROSEATTLE ) RIN: 2012-AA02

View Related DocumentsTitle: Revisions to Federal Implementation Plans Under the Clean Air Act for Indian Country in Idaho, Oregon, and Washington

Abstract: After seven years of experience implementing the Federal Air Rules for Reservations, EPA plans to revise the original rules to apply to all Indian Country, including new reservations in the Pacific NW. EPA also plans to revise the rules to improve implementation and to better address sources of air pollution on Indian Reservations in Idaho, Oregon, and Washington.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 49 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 07/00/2014

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-R10 -OAR-2011-0373

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/r10earth/FARR.htm Agency Contact: Nancy Helm Environmental Protection Agency Regional Office Seattle USEPA REGION 10, 1200 Sixth Avenue, Mail Code: AWT-107, Seattle, WA 98101 Seattle , WA 98101
Phone: 206 553-6908

FAX: 206 330-6967

E -Mail: helm.nancy@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance ( OECA ) RIN: 2020-AA47

View Related Documents

Title: NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule

Abstract: The EPA has responsibility to ensure that the Clean Water Act's (CWA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program is effectively and consistently implemented across the country. This regulation would identify the essential information that EPA needs to receive electronically, primarily from NPDES permittees with some data required from NPDES agencies (NPDES-authorized States, territories and tribes) to manage the national NPDES permitting and enforcement program. Through this regulation, EPA seeks to ensure that such facility-specific information would be readily available, accurate, timely and nationally consistent on the facilities that are regulated by the NPDES program. In the past, EPA primarily obtained this information from the Permit Compliance System (PCS). However, the evolution of the NPDES program since the inception of PCS has created an increasing need to better reflect a more complete picture of the NPDES program and the diverse universe of regulated sources. In addition, information technology has advanced significantly so that PCS no longer meets EPA's national needs to manage the full scope of the NPDES program or the needs of individual States that use PCS to implement and enforce the NPDES program.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 123, 403, and 501 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 33 USC 1314(i) and 1361(a) CWA sec 304(i) and 501(a) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Notice 07/01/2010 75 FR 38068

Notice 06/23/2011 76 FR 36919

NPRM 07/30/2013 78 FR 46005

NPRM Comment Period End 10/28/2013

Final Rule 12/00/2014

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OECA-2009-0274Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: Yes Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.regulations.gov/exchange/topic/npdes Public Comment

URL: http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQOECA- 2009-0274-0097 Agency Contact: Andrew Hudock Environmental Protection Agency Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance 2222A, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-6032
E-Mail: Hudock.Andrew@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: John Dombrowski Environmental Protection Agency Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance 2222A, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0742
E-Mail: Dombrowski.John@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance ( OECA ) RIN: 2020-AA49

View Related Documents

Title: Amendments to the Civil Monetary Penalty Inflation Adjustment Rule

Abstract: EPA has promulgated a final rule that amends the Civil Monetary Penalty Inflation Adjustment Rule. This action is mandated by the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996 (DCIA) to adjust for inflation certain statutory civil monetary penalties that may be assessed for violations of EPA-administered statutes and their implementing regulations. EPA is required to review the civil monetary penalties under the statutes it administers at least once every four years and to adjust such penalties as necessary for inflation according to a formula prescribed by the DCIA. The regulations contain a list of all civil monetary penalty authorities under EPA-administered statutes and the applicable statutory amounts, as adjusted for inflation, since 1996.

Priority: Info./Admin./Other Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action
Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 19.4 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 31 USC 3701 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Rule 11/06/2013 78 FR 66643

Final Rule Effective 12/06/2013

Additional Information: SAN No. 5325.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Caroline Hermann Environmental Protection Agency Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance 2248A, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-2876
E-Mail: hermann.caroline@epa.gov Agency Contact: Susan O'Keefe Environmental Protection Agency Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance 2248A, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-4021
E-Mail: OKeefe.Susan@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)Office of Environmental Information ( OEI ) RIN: 2025-AA37

View Related Documents

Title: Toxics Release Inventory; Addition of Six Phthalates

Abstract: EPA is evaluating whether to add 6 phthalates (diisobutyl phthalate (DIBP), butyl benzyl phthalate (BBP), di-n-pentyl phthalate (DnPP), di-n-octyl phthalate (DnOP), diisononyl phthalate (DINP), and diisodecyl phthalate (DIDP)) to the list of chemicals reportable under section 313 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (i.e., the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI)). Phthalate exposure can produce a variety of adverse effects in laboratory animals especially on the development of the male reproductive system, and therefore there are implications for human health. Phthalates are produced in high volume and they are used in numerous industrial and consumer products. Phthalates appear in biomonitoring surveys, such as the National Health and Nutrition Examination survey, that provide evidence of widespread human exposure. Phthalates are also found in the environment and wildlife species. EPA is concerned with phthalates based on toxicity, particularly to the development of the male reproductive system, prevalence in the environment, widespread use and human exposure, and recent work focusing on the potential cumulative effect of mixtures of phthalates.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 372 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 11023(d)(2)(B) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: No

Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/tri Agency Contact: Daniel Bushman Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Environmental Information 2842T, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0743

FAX: 202 566-0677

E -Mail: bushman.daniel@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Larry Reisman Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Environmental Information 2844T, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0751
E-Mail: reisman.larry@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Environmental Information ( OEI ) RIN: 2025-AA38

View Related Documents

Title: Environmental Protection Agency Freedom of Information Act Regulations Update

Abstract: The Environmental Protection Agency is revising its Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) regulations, 40 CFR part 2, subpart A, which were last updated in 2002 in order to comply with the 2007 Open Government Act, reflect EPA's business process, and correct obsolete information.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR part 2 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: subpart A Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2013

Final Rule 05/00/2014Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Larry Gottesman Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Environmental Information 2822T, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-2162
E-Mail: gottesman.larry@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Environmental Information ( OEI ) RIN: 2025-AA34

View Related Documents

Title: Toxics Release Inventory; Addition of Nonylphenol

Abstract: EPA is evaluating whether to add nonylphenol to the list of chemicals reportable under section 313 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (i.e., the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI)). Nonylphenol is persistent in the aquatic environment and extremely toxic to aquatic organisms. Nonylphenol has been found in environmental samples taken from freshwater, saltwater, groundwater, sediment, soil, and aquatic biota. EPA has developed an Action Plan to addressconcerns for releases of nonylphenol to the environment (http://www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals/pubs/actionplans/npnpe.html). The Action Plan includes the initiation of rulemaking to add nonylphenol to the TRI.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 372 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 11023(d)(2)(B) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/20/2013 78 FR 37176

Final Rule 01/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: No

Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/tri Agency Contact: Daniel Bushman Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Environmental Information 2842T, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0743

FAX: 202 566-0677

E -Mail: bushman.daniel@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Larry Reisman Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Environmental Information 2844T, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0751
E-Mail: reisman.larry@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Environmental Information ( OEI ) RIN: 2025-AA11

View Related Documents

Title: Modification of Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) Reporting Requirements Primarily Associated with Metal Mining

Abstract: The Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) currently requires reporting from metal mining facilities if they manufacture or process 25,000 pounds or more of a listed chemical or otherwise use 10,000 pounds or more of a listed chemical. These mining facilities engage in the removal of naturally occurring materials from the earth. EPA had considered naturally occurring materials to be manufactured by natural processes. A recent court order set aside EPA's interpretation of manufacture in the miningcontext, stating that naturally occurring ores in situ have not been manufactured within the meaning of Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act (EPCRA) section 313. EPA is considering clarifying how the definitions of manufacturing and processing under EPCRA section 313 apply to the mining sector processes of extraction and beneficiation. This action will not affect the coal extraction activities exemption.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 372 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 11001 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OEI-2009-0453. Facilities included in the following NAICS manufacturing codes (corresponding to SIC codes 20 through 39): 311*,312*, 313*, 314*, 315*, 316, 321, 322, 323*, 324, 325*, 326*, 327, 331, 332, 333, 334*, 335*, 336, 337*, 339*,111998*, 211112*, 212234*, 212235*, 212393*, 212399*, 488390*, 511110, 511120, 511130, 511140*, 511191,511199, 511220, 512230*, 516110*, 541710*, or 811490*. *Exceptions and/or limitations exist for these NAICS codes. Facilities included in the following NAICS codes (corresponding to SIC codes other than SIC codes 20 through 39): 212111, 212112, 212113 (correspond to SIC 12, Coal Mining (except 1241)); or 212221, 212222, 212231, 212234, 212299 (correspond to SIC 10, Metal Mining (except 1011, 1081, and 1094)); or 221111, 221112, 221113, 221119, 221121, 221122 (Limited to facilities that combust coal and/or oil for the purpose of generating power for distribution in commerce) (correspond to SIC 4911, 4931, and 4939, Electric Utilities); or 424690, 425110, 425120 (Limited to facilities previously classified in SIC 5169, Chemicals and Allied Products, Not Elsewhere Classified); or 424710 (corresponds to SIC 5171, Petroleum Bulk Terminals and Plants); or 562112 (Limited to facilities primarily engaged in solvent recovery services on a contract or fee basis (previously classified under SIC 7389, Business Services, NEC)); or 562211, 562212, 562213, 562219, 562920 (Limited to facilities regulated under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, subtitle C, 42 U.S.C. 6921 et seq.) (correspond to SIC 4953, Refuse Systems).

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: www.epa.gov/tri/programs/mining/index.htm Agency Contact: Daniel Teitelbaum Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Environmental Information 2844T, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0964

FAX: 202 566-0741

E -Mail: Teitelbaum.Daniel@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Gilbert Mears Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Environmental Information 2844T, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0954

FAX: 202 566-0741

E -Mail: mears.gilbert@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Environmental Information ( OEI ) RIN: 2025-AA30

View Related Documents

Title: Electronic Reporting of Toxics Release Inventory Data Under the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA)

Abstract: Currently, facilities must report to the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) program electronically via the Toxics Release Inventory-Made Easy Web application (TRI-MEweb) or by paper. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed to require facilities to report non-confidential information via TRI-MEweb. Facilities reporting trade secrets would continue to file paper forms. The use of TRI-MEweb will help ensure data accuracy, while also enabling the Agency to more effectively provide the public with access to the latest TRI data on toxic chemical releases and other waste management within communities. This rule promotes EPA efforts to eliminate paper-based submissions in favor of electronic reporting following the direction providing by the Government Paperwork Elimination Act, which requires Federal agencies to provide for electronic reporting when practicable. For over a decade, EPA has promoted the use of electronic reporting for TRI data, with 95 percent of TRI facilitiesreporting TRI data electronically for RY 2010. This rule is a continuation of this policy to promote electronic reporting.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action
Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 372.85 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: EPCRA sec 313 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 03/05/2012 77 FR 13061

Final Rule 08/27/2013 78 FR 52860

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -TRI-2011-0174. Facilities included in the following NAICS manufacturing codes (corresponding to SIC codes 20 through 39): 311*,312*, 313*, 314*, 315*, 316, 321, 322, 323*, 324, 325*, 326*, 327, 331, 332, 333, 334*, 335*, 336, 337*, 339*,111998*, 211112*, 212234*, 212235*, 212393*, 212399*, 488390*, 511110, 511120, 511130, 511140*, 511191,511199, 511220, 512230*, 516110*, 541710*, or 811490*. *Exceptions and/or limitations exist for these NAICS codes. Facilities included in the following NAICS codes (corresponding to SIC codes other than SIC codes 20 through 39): 212111, 212112, 212113 (correspond to SIC 12, Coal Mining (except 1241)); or 212221, 212222, 212231, 212234, 212299 (correspond to SIC 10, Metal Mining (except 1011, 1081, and 1094)); or 221111, 221112, 221113, 221119, 221121, 221122 (Limited to facilities that combust coal and/or oil for the purpose of generating power for distribution in commerce) (correspond to SIC 4911, 4931, and 4939, Electric Utilities); or 424690, 425110, 425120 (Limited to facilities previously classified in SIC 5169, Chemicals and Allied Products, Not Elsewhere Classified); or 424710 (corresponds to SIC 5171, Petroleum Bulk Terminals and Plants); or 562112 (Limited to facilities primarily engaged in solvent recovery services on a contract or fee basis (previously classified under SIC 7389, Business Services, NEC)); or 562211, 562212, 562213, 562219, 562920 (Limited to facilities regulated under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, subtitle C, 42 U.S.C. 6921 et seq.) (correspond to SIC 4953, Refuse Systems)

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Public Comment

URL: http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQTRI- 2011-0174-0005

Sectors Affected: 111998; 212399; 511199; 315; 312; 511130; 325; 334; 212234; 511140; 335; 332; 311; 337; 511191; 316; 333; 339; 512230; 211112; 511110; 327; 212393; 811490; 488390; 322; 511120; 324; 326; 331; 323; 313; 314; 336; 321 Agency Contact: David Turk Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Environmental Information 2844T, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1527
E-Mail: Turk.David@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Environmental Information ( OEI ) RIN: 2025-AA35

View Related Documents

Title: Toxics Release Inventory; Addition of Ortho-Nitrotoluene

Abstract: On November 7, 2013, EPA added ortho-nitrotoluene (o-nitrotoluene) to the list of toxic chemicals subject to reporting under section 313 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to- Know Act (EPCRA) of 1986 and section 6607 of the Pollution Prevention Act (PPA) of 1990. o-Nitrotoluene has been classified by the National Toxicology Program in its 12th Report on Carcinogens as ''reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen.'' EPA determined that o-nitrotoluene meets the EPCRA section 313(d)(2)(B) criteria because it can reasonably be anticipated to cause cancer in humans.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action
Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 372 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 11023(d)(2)(B) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 03/13/2013 78 FR 15913NPRM Comment Period End 05/13/2013

Final Rule 11/07/2013 78 FR 66848

Final Rule Effective 11/29/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/tri Agency Contact: Daniel Bushman Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Environmental Information 2842T, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0743

FAX: 202 566-0677

E -Mail: bushman.daniel@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Larry Reisman Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Environmental Information 2844T, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0751
E-Mail: reisman.larry@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Environmental Information ( OEI ) RIN: 2025-AA36

View Related Documents

Title: Updating the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) Reporting North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Codes to
2012 NAICS

Abstract: The Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) Program issued a direct final rule to incorporate the 2012 North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes for TRI reporting purposes. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) updates the NAICS codes every 5 years. OMB approved the 2012 NAICS codes on August 17, 2011 (76 FR 51240) and the new NAICS codes are effective for calendar year 2012. The actual data required by a TRI form has not changed as a result of this rulemaking, nor does the rule affect the universe of TRI reporting facilities that are required to submit reports to the Agency
under EPCRA section 313.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action
Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 372 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: EPCRA 313 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 07/18/2013 78 FR 42910

Direct Final Rule 07/18/2013 78 FR 42875

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OEI-2011-0979

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Judith Kendall Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Environmental Information 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0750

FAX: 202 566-0741

E -Mail: kendall.judith@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF43View Related Documents

Title: NPDES Regulations to Address Water Quality Impacts from Forest Road Discharges

Abstract: The EPA is exploring the use flexible non-permitting approaches under the Clean Water Act to regulate certain discharges of stormwater from forest roads, including logging roads, in order to address water quality impacts from those discharges. The EPA recognizes that effective best management practices (BMPs) exist that protect receiving waters and minimize impacts. The EPA is considering approaches that leverage effective BMP programs.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: PreRule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 122.26 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 33 USC 1251(a) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

ANPRM 01/00/2014

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OW-2012-0195

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater/forestroads Public Comment URL: www.regulations.gov

Related RINs: Related to 2040- AF42 Agency Contact: Connie Bosma Environmental Protection Agency
Water 4203M, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-6773

FAX: 202 564-6431

E -Mail: bosma.connie@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF46

View Related Documents

Title: Section 610 Review of National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Regulation and Effluent Limitations
Guidelines Standards for Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations

Abstract: The EPA promulgated revised regulations for Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) on February 12, 2003 (68 FR 7175). The "2003 CAFO Rule" expanded the number of operations covered by the CAFO regulations and included requirements to address the land application of manure from CAFOs. The 2003 CAFO Rule required all CAFOs to seek NPDES permit coverage. The EPA developed a Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA) for the 2003 CAFO Rule. The EPA took several steps to minimize the impacts of the 2003 CAFO Rule on small businesses, including regulatory revisions designed to focus on the largest producers, eliminating the "mixed" animal calculation for operations with more than a single animal type for determining which Animal Feeding Operations (AFOs) are CAFOs, raising the duck threshold for dry manure handling duck operations, and adopting a dry-litter chicken threshold higher than proposed. There have been a number of changes to the 2003 regulations due to court decisions based on legal challenges to the rulemaking; however, this action only pertains to the 2003 rule. Pursuant to section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, on October 31, 2012, the EPA initiated a review of the 2003 CAFO rule to determine if the provisions as they relate to small entities should be continued without change, or should be rescinded or amended to minimize adverse economic impacts on small entities (77 FR 65840). The EPA has solicited comments on, and will consider, the following factors: (1) The continued need for the rule; (2) the nature of complaints or comments received from the public concerning the rule; (3) the complexity of the rule; (4) the extent to which the rule overlaps, duplicates, or conflicts with other Federal, State, or local Government rules; and (5) the degree to which technology, economic conditions, or other factors have changed in the area affected by the rule. After publication, the EPA received requests for additional time to submit comments and extended the public comment period until March 1, 2013 (78 FR 277). The results of the EPA's review will be summarized in a report and placed in the rulemaking docket at the conclusion of this review. This review's Docket ID number is EPA-HQ-OW-2012-0813; the docket can be accessed at www.regulations.gov.

Priority: Info./Admin./Other Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: PreRule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: None (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations )Legal Authority: 5 USC 610 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Rule 02/12/2003 68 FR 7176
Begin Review 10/31/2012 77 FR 65840

Comment Period Extended 01/03/2013 78 FR 277

End Review 11/00/2013

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OW-2012-0813

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/rfa/section-610.html Public Comment

URL: http://www.regulations.gov/documentDetail;D=EPA-HQOW- 2012-0813-0001

Sectors Affected: 11299; 112111; 11232; 112112; 11231; 11212; 11242; 11221; 11292; 11239; 11234; 11241; 11233 Agency Contact: Hema Subramanian Environmental Protection Agency
Water 4203M, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-5041

FAX: 202 564-6384

E -Mail: subramanian.hema@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AD39

View Related Documents

Title: Uniform National Discharge Standards for Vessels of the Armed Forces - Phase II

Abstract: CWA section 312(n) directs EPA and DoD to establish national discharge standards for discharges incidental to the normal operation of a vessel of the Armed Forces. The proposed standards will apply to approximately 6,000 vessels of the Armed Forces and are intended to reduce the adverse environmental impacts associated with the discharges, stimulate the development of improved pollution control devices, and advance the development of environmentally sound ships by the military.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 1700 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 33 USC 1322; 33 USC 1361 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/00/2013

Final Rule 10/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: Yes Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/rules/UNDS Agency Contact: Katherine Weiler Environmental Protection Agency
Water 4504T, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1280
E-Mail: Weiler.Katherine@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: David Redford Environmental Protection Agency
Water 4504T, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460Phone: 202 566-1288

FAX: 202 566-1546
E-Mail: Redford.David@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF03

View Related Documents

Title: Development of Best Management Practices for Recreational Boats under Section 312(o) of the Clean Water Act

Abstract: This action is for the development of regulations by EPA to implement the Clean Boating Act (Public Law 110-288), which was signed by the President on July 29, 2008. The Clean Boating Act amends section 402 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) to exclude recreational vessels from National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permitting requirements. In addition, it adds a new CWA section 312(o) directing EPA to develop regulations that identify the discharges incidental to the normal operation of recreational vessels (other than a discharge of sewage) for which it is reasonable and practicable to develop management practices to mitigate adverse impacts on waters of the United States. The regulations also need to include those management practices, including performance standards for each such practice. Following promulgation of the EPA performance standards, new CWA section 312(o) directs the Coast Guard to promulgate regulations governing the design, construction, installation, and use of the management practices. Following promulgation of the Coast Guard regulations, the Clean Boating Act prohibits the operation of a recreational vessel or any discharge incidental to their normal operation in waters of the United States and waters of the contiguous zone (i.e., 12 miles into the ocean), unless the vessel owner or operator is using an applicable management practice meeting the EPA-developed performance standards.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 140 (revision) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 33 USC 1251 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 09/00/2014

Final Rule 09/00/2015

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 713990; 336612; 441222; 483212; 713930; 441221; 488330; 487210 Agency Contact: Brian Rappoli Environmental Protection Agency
Water 4504T, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1548
E-Mail: Rappoli.Brian@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: David Redford Environmental Protection Agency
Water 4504T, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1288

FAX: 202 566-1546

E -Mail: Redford.David@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF16

View Related Documents

Title: Water Quality Standards Regulatory Clarifications

Abstract: EPA proposed changes to the water quality standards (WQS) regulation to improve its effectiveness in helping restore and maintain the Nation's Waters. The core of the current WQS regulation has been in place since 1983. Since then, a number of issues have been raised by stakeholders or identified by EPA in the implementation process that will benefit from clarification and greater specificity. The proposed rule addresses the following six key areas: 1) Administrator's determination that new or revised WQS are necessary, 2) designated uses, 3) triennial review requirements, 4) antidegradation, 5) variancesto water quality standards, and 6) compliance schedule authorizing provisions. These revisions will allow EPA, States, and authorized tribes to better achieve program goals by providing clearer more streamlined requirements to facilitate enhanced water resource protection.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 131 (revision) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 33 USC 1251 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Notice 07/30/2010 75 FR 44930

NPRM 09/04/2013 78 FR 54517

NPRM Comment Period End 12/03/2013

Final Rule 05/00/2014

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OW-2010-0606

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://epa.gov/waterscience/standards Agency Contact: Shari Barash Environmental Protection Agency
Water 4305T, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0996

FAX: 202 566-1053

E -Mail: barash.shari@epa.gov Agency Contact: Janita Aguirre Environmental Protection Agency
Water 4305T, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1149

FAX: 202 566-0409

E -Mail: aguirre.janita@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF25

View Related Documents

Title: National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Application and Program Updates Rule

Abstract: EPA plans to propose regulations that would update specific elements of the existing National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) in order to better harmonize regulations and application forms, improve permit documentation and transparency, and provide clarifications to the existing regulations. In this effort EPA plans to address application, permitting, monitoring, and reporting requirements that have become obsolete or outdated due to programmatic, technical or other changes that have occurred over the past 35 years. Specifically, EPA plans to focus on revising the NPDES permit application forms to specifically include all final Agency data standards, improving the consistency between the application forms, updating the applications to better reflect current program practices, and specifically incorporate new program areas into the forms (e.g., Clean Water Act section 316(b) requirements for cooling water intake structures). EPA also plans to address other program elements including permit documentation, EPA State permit objection, and public participation procedures to improve the quality and transparency of permit development. As an example of a regulation which could be proposed to change to reduce burden, as well as improve transparency and public access to information, EPA is considering whether to revise the public notice requirements to allow a State to post notices of draft NPDES permits and other permit actions under the Clean Water Act on their State Agency websites in lieu of traditional newspaper posting.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 122; 40 CFR 125; 40 CFR 123; 40 CFR 124 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 33 USC 1251 et seq Legal Deadline: NoneTimetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 03/00/2014

Final Rule 03/00/2015

Additional Information: This action includes retrospective review under EO 13563; see: http://www.epa.gov/regdarrt/retrospective/history.html.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State; Tribal

Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Kathryn Kelley Environmental Protection Agency
Water 4203M, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-7004

FAX: 202 564-9544

E -Mail: Kelley.Kathryn@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: David Hair Environmental Protection Agency
Water 4203M, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-2287

FAX: 202 564-9544

E -Mail: Hair.David@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF30

View Related Documents

Title: Definition of "Waters of the United States" Under the Clean Water Act

Abstract: After U.S. Supreme Court decisions in SWANCC and Rapanos, the scope of "waters of the US" protected under all CWA programs has been an issue of considerable debate and uncertainty. The Act has a single definition for "waters of the United States." As a result, these decisions affect the geographic scope of all CWA programs. SWANCC and Rapanos did not invalidate the current regulatory definition of "waters of the United States." However, the decisions established important considerations for how those regulations should be interpreted, and experience implementing the regulations has identified several areas that could benefit from additional clarification through rulemaking. U.S. EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers are developing a proposed rule for determining whether a water is protected by the Clean Water Act. This rule would make clear which waterbodies are protected under the Clean Water Act.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 33 USC 1251 Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: After U.S. Supreme Court decisions in SWANCC and Rapanos, the scope of "waters of the US" protected under all CWA programs has been an issue of considerable debate and uncertainty. The Act has a single definition for "waters of the United States." As a result, these decisions affect the geographic scope of all CWA programs. SWANCC and Rapanos did not invalidate the current regulatory definition of "waters of the United States." However, the decisions established important considerations for how those regulations should be interpreted, and experience implementing the regulations has identified several areas that could benefit from additional clarification through rulemaking. EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers are developing a proposed rule for determining whether a water is protected by the Clean Water Act. This rule would clarify which water bodies are protected under the Clean Water Act.

Legal Basis: To be determined.

Alternatives: To be determined.

Costs and Benefits: To be determined.

Risks: To be determined.Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Federalism: Undetermined Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Donna Downing Environmental Protection Agency
Water 4502T, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1367
E-Mail: Downing.Donna@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Rachel Fertik Environmental Protection Agency
Water 4502T, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1452
E-Mail: Fertik.Rachel@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF48

View Related Documents

Title: Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants Under the Clean Water Act; Analysis and Sampling

Procedures

Abstract: This regulatory action would amend "Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants" at 40 CFR part 136 to approve test procedures (analytical methods) for use by testing laboratories for water monitoring. These test procedures are used to implement the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program unless an alternate procedure is approved by a Regional Administrator. The regulation would also revise, clarify, and correct errors and ambiguities in existing methods and the water monitoring regulations.

Priority: Routine and Frequent Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 136; 40 CFR 260; 40 CFR 423 revision; 40 CFR 435 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 33 USC 1311(a); 33 USC 1314; 33 USC 1361; CWA 301; CWA 304; CWA 501 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 05/00/2014

Final Rule 05/00/2015

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Robin Oshiro Environmental Protection Agency
Water 4303T, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1075

FAX: 202 566-1053

E -Mail: Oshiro.Robin@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AC84

View Related Documents

Title: National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES): Use of Sufficiently Sensitive Test Methods for Permit Applications and ReportingAbstract: EPA is launching an effort to update specific elements of the existing NPDES regulations in order to provide clarifications related to the NPDES permit application and NPDES permit monitoring analytical detection level requirements.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 122; 40 CFR 136 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 33 USC 1311 CWA 301; 33 USC 1312 CWA 302; 33 USC 1314 CWA 304; 33 USC 1316 CWA 306; 33 USC 1318 CWA 308; 33 USC 1342 CWA 402; 33 USC 1361 CWA 501 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/23/2010 75 FR 35712

Final Rule 04/00/2014

Additional Information: EPA publication information: NPRM - http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/pdf/2010-15254.pdf

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Kathryn Kelley Environmental Protection Agency
Water 4203M, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-7004

FAX: 202 564-9544

E -Mail: Kelley.Kathryn@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: David Hair Environmental Protection Agency
Water 4203M, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-2287

FAX: 202 564-9544

E -Mail: Hair.David@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AE95

View Related Documents

Title: Criteria and Standards for Cooling Water Intake Structures

Abstract: Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act (CWA) requires EPA to ensure that the location, design, construction, and capacity of cooling water intake structures reflect the best technology available (BTA) for minimizing adverse environmental impacts. Under a consent decree with environmental organizations, EPA divided the 316(b) rulemaking into three phases. All new facilities except offshore oil and gas exploration facilities were addressed in Phase I in December 2001. In July, 2004, EPA promulgated Phase II which covered large existing electric generating plants. In July 2007, EPA suspended the Phase II rule following the Second Circuit decision. Several parties petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to review that decision, and the Supreme Court granted the petitions, limited to the issue of whether the Clean Water Act authorized EPA to consider the relationship of costs and benefits in establishing 316(b) standards. On April 1, 2009, the Supreme Court reversed and remanded the case to the Second Circuit. The Second Circuit subsequently granted a request from EPA that the case be returned to the Agency for further consideration. In June 2006, EPA promulgated the Phase III regulation, covering existing electric generating plants using less than 50 MGD of cooling water, new offshore oil and gas facilities, and all existing manufacturing facilities. Petitions to review this rule were filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. In July 2010, the U. S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued a decision upholding EPA's rule for new offshore oil and gas extraction facilities. The court also granted the request of EPA and environmental petitioners to remand the existing facility portion of the rule to the Agency. EPA entered a settlement agreement with the plaintiffs in two lawsuits related to Section 316(b) rulemakings. Under the settlement agreement EPA agreed to sign a notice of a proposed rulemaking implementing section 316(b) of the CWA at existing facilities no later than March 28, 2011 and to sign a notice taking final action on the proposed rule no later than November 4, 2013 as discussed below. Plaintiffs agreed to seek dismissal of both their suits, subject to a request to reopen one of the lawsuits in the event EPA failed to meet the deadlines. EPA's proposed regulation includes uniform controls at all existing facilities to prevent fish from being trapped against screens (impingement), site-specific controls for existing facilities other than new units to prevent fish from being drawn through cooling systems (entrainment), and uniform controls equivalent to closed cycle cooling for new units at existing facilities (entrainment). Other regulatory options analyzed included similar uniform impingement controls, and progressively more stringent requirements for entrainment controls. Another option considered would imposed the uniform impingement controls only for facilities withdrawing 50 or more MGD of cooling water, with site-specific impingement controls forfacilities withdrawing less than 50 MGD. EPA issued two Notices of Data Availability in June 2012 that described measures to provide additional flexibility that EPA is considering as part of the impingement mortality standard and that described the preliminary results of surveys of households' willingness to pay for incremental reductions in fish mortality. In light of the Supreme Court 2009 decision and its recognition that EPA has broad discretion in its 316(b) regulations, EPA initiated consultation with the Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act. EPA and the Services began informal consultation in 2012, but concluded in 2013 that formal consultation was necessary. In order to accommodate the regulatory 135-day time frame for formal consultation, plaintiffs agreed to a modification to the settlement agreement, extending final rule deadline to November 4, 2013.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: Private Sector

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 122; 40 CFR 125 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: CWA 101; CWA 301; CWA 304; CWA 308; CWA 316; CWA 401; CWA 402; CWA 501; CWA 510 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial NPRM: 3/28/2011 - Settlement Agreement - As per 14 day extension granted 3/10 (or 4 days if no CR). Riverkeeper v. EPA, 06-12987, SDNY (signed 11/22/2010). 03/28/2011

Other Judicial Settlement Agreement 01/14/2014

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: Cooling water is withdrawn for the purpose of dissipating waste heat from industrial processes. Over half of all water withdrawn in the United States each year is for cooling purposes. The withdrawal of cooling water removes and kills hundreds of billions of aquatic organisms from waters of the United States each year, including plankton, fish, crustaceans, shellfish, sea turtles, and marine mammals. In addition to direct loss of organisms, a number of indirect, ecosystem-level effects may also occur, and environmental degradation can result from the cumulative impacts. The long life of the capital equipment in industries withdrawing cooling water implies that these adverse environmental impacts could continue for decades. Private decision making at facilities that use cooling water may not take society's preferences for fish protection into account. The beneficiaries of fish protection at cooling water intakes include fisherman, and citizens interested in well-functioning and healthy aquatic ecosystems. In addition, deregulation in the electric industry has made it more difficult for merchant power producers to both remain competitive and pass along to consumers costs associated with fish protection, putting them at a disadvantage to rate-regulated electric utilities that are vertically integrated.

Legal Basis: The Clean Water Act requires EPA to establish best technology available standards to minimize adverse environmental impacts from cooling water intake structures. On February 16, 2004, EPA took final action on regulations governing cooling water intake structures at certain existing power producing facilities under section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act (Phase II rule). 69 FR 41576 (July 9, 2004). These regulations were challenged, and the Second Circuit remanded several provisions of the Phase II rule on various grounds. Riverkeeper, Inc. v. EPA, 475F.3d83, (2d Cir., 2007). EPA suspended most of the rule in response to the remand. 72 FR 37107 (July 9, 2007). The remand of Phase III does not change permitting requirements for these facilities. Until the new rule is issued, permit directors continue to issue permits on a case-by-case, Best Professional Judgment basis for existing facilities.

Alternatives: This analysis will cover various sizes and types of potentially regulated facilities and control technologies. EPA is considering whether to regulate on a national basis, by subcategory, by broad water body category, or some other basis.

Costs and Benefits: The technologies under consideration in this rulemaking are similar to the technologies considered for the original Phase II and Phase III rules, and costs have been updated to 2009. The annual social costs associated with EPA's proposed regulation are $384 million, plus an additional $15 million in costs associated with the new units provision. The annual social costs of the other options ranged from $327 million to $4.63 billion. EPA monetized only a portion of the expected annual benefits of the rule, amounting to $18 million. The monetized benefits for the other options ranged from $17 million to $126 million. EPA also conducted a stated preference survey to provide a more comprehensive estimate of the monetized benefits and expects to have the Science Advisory Board review this study.

Risks: Cooling water intake structures may pose significant risks for aquatic ecosystems.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 04/20/2011 76 FR 22174

NPRM Comment Period Extended 07/20/2011 76 FR 43230

Notice 06/11/2012 77 FR 34315

Notice 06/12/2012 77 FR 34927

Final Rule 01/00/2014

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OW-2008-0667

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: NoRIN Information
URL: http://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/lawsguidance/cwa/316b/index.cfm

Sectors Affected: 336412; 332999; 321999; 324199; 326299; 331521; 331524; 331315; 311313; 313210; 311312; 327310; 611310; 333120; 333922; 331525; 339914; 211111; 321912; 332211; 312140; 221121; 221122; 331112; 313320; 333111; 311225; 221112; 332212; 332510; 221111; 212210; 331111; 221210; 211112; 221113; 332323; 221119; 332618; 332439; 332919; 321918; 312229; 333923; 322130; 324110; 325992; 333315; 212391; 332117; 331312; 331419; 333911; 336510; 321219; 326192; 331221; 322291; 321113; 331492; 337215; 321212; 311222; 221330; 331222; 111991; 111930; 311311; 326211; 312210; 311221 Agency Contact: Tom Born Environmental Protection Agency
Water 4303T, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1001

FAX: 202 566-1053

E -Mail: born.tom@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Julie Hewitt Environmental Protection Agency
Water 4303T, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1031
E-Mail: hewitt.julie@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF14

View Related Documents

Title: Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Source Category

Abstract: EPA establishes national technology -based regulations, called effluent limitations guidelines and standards, to reduce discharges of pollutants from industries to waters of the U.S. These requirements are incorporated into National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) discharge permits issued by EPA and States and through the national pretreatment program. The steam electric effluent limitations guidelines and standards apply to steam electric power plants using nuclear or fossil fuels, such as coal, oil and natural gas. There are about 1,200 nuclear- and fossil-fueled steam electric power plants nationwide; approximately 500 of these power plants are coal-fired. In a study completed in 2009, EPA found that the current regulations, which were last updated in 1982, do not adequately address the pollutants being discharged and have not kept pace with changes that have occurred in the electric power industry over the last three decades. The rulemaking may address discharges associated with coal ash waste and flue gas desulfurization (FGD) air pollution controls, as well as other power plant waste streams. Power plant discharges can have major impacts on water quality, including reduced organism abundance and species diversity, contamination of drinking water sources, and other effects. Pollutants of concern include metals (e.g., mercury, arsenic and selenium), nutrients, and total dissolved solids. The proposed rule was published in the Federal Register on June 17, 2013 ("Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating Point Source Category," 78 Federal Register 110 (7 June 2013), pp. 34432 - pp. 34543).

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 423 (revision) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 33 USC 1311; 33 USC 1314; 33 USC 1316; 33 USC 1317; 33 USC 1318; 33 USC 1342; 33 USC 1361 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial Consent Decree 04/19/2013

Other Judicial 5/22/2014 - Consent Decree deadline for Final Action - Defenders of Wildlife v. Jackson, 10-1915, D. D.C. 05/22/2014

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: Steam electric power plants contribute over half of all toxic pollutants discharged to surface waters by all industrial categories currently regulated in the United States under the Clean Water Act. For example, steam electric plants annually discharge: • 64,400 lb. of lead • 2,820 lb. of mercury • 79,200 lb. of arsenic • 225,000 lb. of selenium • 1,970,000 lb. of aluminum • 4,990,000 lb. of zinc • 30,000,000 lb. of nitrogen • 682,000 lb. of phosphorus • 14,500,000 lb. of manganese • 158,000 lb. of vanadium; and • 27 other pollutants. Discharges of these toxic pollutants are linked to cancer, neurological damage, and ecological damage. Many of these toxic pollutants, once in the environment, remain there for years. These pollutant discharges contribute to: • over 160 water bodies not meeting State quality standards • 185 waters for which there are fish consumption advisories; and • degradation of 399 water bodies across the country that are drinking water supplies. The revised steam electric rule would strengthen the existing controls on discharges from these plants. It would set the first Federal limits on the levels of toxic metals in wastewater that can be discharged from power plants, based on technology improvements in the industry over the last three decades.Legal Basis: Section 301(b)(2) of the Clean Water Act requires EPA to promulgate effluent limitations for categories of point sources, using technology-based standards that govern the sources' discharge of certain pollutants. 33 USC Section 1311(b). Section 304(b) of the Act directs EPA to develop effluent limitations guidelines (ELGs) that identify certain technologies and control measures available to achieve effluent reductions for each point source category, specifying factors to be taken into account in identifying those technologies and control measures. 33 U.S.C. Section 1314(b). Since the 1970s, EPA has formulated effluent limitations and ELGs in tandem through a single administrative process. Am. Frozen Food Inst. v. Train, 539 F.2d 107 (D.C. Cir. 1976). The CWA also requires EPA to perform an annual review of existing ELGs and to revise them, if appropriate. 33 U.S.C. Section 1314(b); see also 33 U.S.C. Section 1314(m)(1)(A). EPA originally established effluent limitations and guidelines for the steam electric generating industry in 1974 and last updated them in 1982. 47 Fed. Reg. 52,290 (Nov. 19, 1982). As described above, EPA determined the existing regulations do not adequately address the pollutants being discharged and that revisions are appropriate.

Alternatives: Due to the widespread discharge of pollutants in steam electric discharges, EPA has not identified alternatives to regulation.

Costs and Benefits: EPA recently proposed revisions to the steam electric rule and identified a range of preferred regulatory options. EPA's estimates of the annual social costs of the steam electric rule range from $185 million to $954 million with associated annual pollutant discharge reductions of 470 million to 2.62 billion pounds and water use reductions of 50 billion to 103 billion gallons. EPA's estimate of the monetized benefits, which only includes a portion of the benefits, range from $139 million to $483 million.

Risks: Effluent limitations guidelines and standards are technology based discharge requirements. As such, EPA has not assessed risk associated with this action. However, as detailed in the Statement of Need, toxic pollutant discharges from steam electric plants are linked to cancer, neurological damage, and ecological damage.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/07/2013 78 FR 34431

NPRM Comment Period Extended 07/12/2013 78 FR 41907

Final Rule 05/00/2014

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OW-2009-0819

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Federalism: Yes Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://water.epa.gov/scitech/wastetech/guide/steam_index.cfm

Sectors Affected: 22111; 221112; 221113 Agency Contact: Ronald Jordan Environmental Protection Agency
Water 4303T, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1003

FAX: 202 566-1053

E -Mail: Jordan.Ronald@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Jezebele Alicea Environmental Protection Agency
Water 4303T, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1755

FAX: 202 566-1053

E -Mail: alicea.jezebele@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF21

View Related Documents

Title: Water Quality Standards for the State of Florida's Estuaries and Coastal Waters

Abstract: EPA is under a Consent Decree deadline to sign a notice of final rulemaking for numeric nutrient water quality criteria (which are elements of water quality standards) for the State of Florida's estuaries and coastal waters by September 30, 2013. Pursuant to a judicial order, EPA's obligation to sign a notice of final rulemaking for numeric nutrient water quality criteria for flowing waters in south Florida (including canals), tidally influence segments, and the downstream protection values for flowing waters into estuaries by September 30, 2013 has been stayed until 30 days after the court rules on EPA's motion to modify the Consent Decree to relieve EPA of its obligation to finalize criteria for those waters. Per the terms of the Consent Decree, EPA signed for publication in the Federal register proposed criteria for these three categories on November 30, 2012.EPA has approved as Water Quality Standards numeric nutrient criteria for certain estuaries, certain coastal waters and quantitative procedures for downstream protection developed by the State of Florida. For any estuaries and/or coastal waters for which Florida adopts and EPA approves numeric nutrient water quality criteria by September 30, 2013, EPA is relieved of its obligation to sign a notice of final rulemaking for those waters.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 131 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 33 USC 1251 et seq Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial 11/30/2012- Consent Decree. As per extension approved 7/16/2012 (Florida Wildlife Federation v. EPA #08-324 USDC Northern District of Florida). Original deadline was 11/14/2011. 11/30/2012

Other Judicial 9/30/2013 - Consent Decree. As per extension approved 7/16/2012 (Florida Wildlife Federation v. EPA#08-324 USDC Northern District of Florida). 09/30/2013

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/18/2012 77 FR 74924

Final Rule 11/00/2013

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OW-2010-0222. http://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/rulesregs/florida_coastal.cfm

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Erica Fleisig Environmental Protection Agency
Water 4305T, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1057
E-Mail: Fleisig.Erica@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Corey Buffo Environmental Protection Agency
Water 4305T, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1279
E-Mail: Buffo.Corey@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF39

View Related Documents

Title: Water Quality Standards for the State of Florida's Streams and Downstream Protection of Lakes: Remanded Provisions

Abstract: This final rule addresses an order by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida from February 18, 2012, which remanded to the EPA two portions of its numeric water quality standards for nutrients in Florida that were promulgated and published on December 6, 2010. This rule promulgates criteria for the remanded provisions and provides additional explanation: the flowing waters criteria derived using the reference condition approach for Florida streams and for the derivation of the downstream protective values (DPVs) for unimpaired lakes. Per the terms of the Consent Decree, EPA signed for publication in the Federal Register proposed criteria on November 30, 2012. EPA has approved as Water Quality Standards numeric nutrient criteria for streams and quantitative procedures for downstream protection developed by the State of Florida and there is uncertainty as whether finalization of this rule will be necessary. This is because EPA has amended its Determination to state that NNC are no longer necessary for water management Conveyances and DPVs, which are the remaining waters subject to this Phase I rule. EPA has filed a motion to modify the CD with the court asking the judge to modify the CD to relieve EPA of the obligation to Promulgate NNC for these waters. The judge has scheduled a hearing for September 24, 2013 and has stayed the August 31, 2013 deadline for these waters to 30 days after his ruling on EPA's motion.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 131 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 33 USC 1251 et seq Legal Deadline: Per court order the final rule must be signed 30 days after the judge's ruling unless the judge grants EPA'smotion to modify the CD for these waters

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial 11/30/2012 - Consent Decree deadline for NPRM - Florida Wildlife Federation v. EPA, #08-324, USDC Northern District of Florida 11/30/2012

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/18/2012 77 FR 74985

Final Rule 11/00/2013

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OW-2009-0596. http://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/rulesregs/florida_inland.cfm

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 31-33; 2123; 22132 Agency Contact: Mario Sengco Environmental Protection Agency
Water 4305T, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-2676

FAX: 202 566-9981

E -Mail: sengco.mario@epa.gov Agency Contact: Corey Buffo Environmental Protection Agency
Water 4305T, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1279
E-Mail: Buffo.Corey@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF44

View Related Documents

Title: Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Construction and Development Point Source Category

Abstract: This action will address revisions to the effluent guidelines and standards for the construction and development (C & D) point source category 40 CFR 450. The C&D rule was issued on December 1, 2009 and became effective on February 1, 2010. This action would revise several of the non-numeric portions of the rule in response to litigation.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR Part 450 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 33 USC 1311; 33 USC 1312 CWA 302; 33 USC 1314; 33 USC 1316; 33 USC 1341; 33 USC 1342; 33 USC 1361; 33 USC 1370 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial 02/28/2014 - Settlement Agreement deadline for Final Action - Wisconsin Builders Ass'n v. EPA, 7th Cir., No. 09-4113, as per 12/21/2012 settlement agreement. 02/28/2014

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 04/01/2013 78 FR 19434

Final Rule 02/00/2014

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -2010-0884

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 236; 237 Agency Contact: Jesse Pritts Environmental Protection Agency
Water4303T, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1038
E-Mail: Pritts.Jesse@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Janet Goodwin Environmental Protection Agency
Water 4303T, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1060
E-Mail: Goodwin.Janet@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AD40

View Related Documents

Title: Underground Injection Control: Update of State Programs

Abstract: The regulations at 40 CFR part 147 codify each State's UIC program description and incorporate by reference the rules and regulations that the respective primacy State will implement. This includes codifying programs upon which EPA directly implements. The primary reason for part 147 is to incorporate by reference into the Code of Federal Regulations the State program authorities and regulations so EPA may bring a direct enforcement action if the State fails to comply with the State UIC program. This update is necessary to ensure that the CFR accurately reflects current approved State UIC programs and that requirements of those programs are federally enforceable. EPA Regional Offices will be submitting State revision packages as they are completed. Part 147 will then be updated in several stages. This is the first stage. This effort should have no impact on the regulated community because EPA will merely be incorporating by reference elements of already approved State programs.

Priority: Info./Admin./Other Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 147 (revision) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 300h- 1 SDWA 1422; 42 USC 300h-4 SDWA 1425 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Direct Final Rule

Additional Information: SAN No. 4236

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Robert-Eu Smith Environmental Protection Agency
Water 4606M, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-3895

FAX: 202 564-3756

E -Mail: Smith.Robert-Eu@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Jeff Jollie Environmental Protection Agency
Water WTR9, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-3886

FAX: 415 947-3549

E -Mail: Jollie.Jeff@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF05

View Related Documents

Title: Oil and Gas Construction Stormwater RuleAbstract: On June 12, 2006, EPA published a final rule to address a new provision added by the Energy Policy Act of 2005. The 2006 regulation effectively exempted from National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements stormwater discharges of sediment from construction activities associated with oil and gas exploration, production, processing, or treatment operations or transmission facilities unless the relevant facility had a discharge of stormwater resulting in a discharge of a reportable quantity of oil or hazardous substances. Shortly thereafter, the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) petitioned the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (Ninth Circuit) for direct review of EPA's action. On May 23, 2008, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion in NRDC v. U.S. EPA, 526 F.3d 591 (9th Cir. 2008), vacating EPA's 2006 oil and gas construction stormwater regulation. On July 21, 2008, EPA filed a petition for rehearing in this case. On November 3, 2008, the Ninth Circuit issued its order denying EPA's request for rehearing of the Court's decision vacating EPA's 2006 oil and gas construction stormwater regulation. This action will be included as part of EPA's Stormwater Regulations Revision to Address Discharges from Developed Sites (RIN 2040-AD13). EPA will (1) remove the codified 2006 rule from the Code of Federal Regulations consistent with the court vacatur and (2) codify the revised 2005 Energy Policy Act definition of "oil and gas exploration, production, processing, treatment, and transmission operations" to clarify that certain uncontaminated discharges from oil and gas construction activities are exempt from permitting as identified in section 402(I)(2) of the Clean Water Act.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 122.26(a)(2)(ii) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 33 USC 1342(l) and 1362(24) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM

Additional Information: SAN No. 5330

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Bryan Rittenhouse Environmental Protection Agency
Water 4203M, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-0577

FAX: 202 564-6431

E -Mail: rittenhouse.bryan@epa.gov Agency Contact: Connie Bosma Environmental Protection Agency
Water 4203M, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-6773

FAX: 202 564-6431

E -Mail: bosma.connie@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF13

View Related Documents

Title: Stormwater Regulations Revision to Address Discharges from Developed Sites

Abstract: Stormwater discharges from developed areas are a major cause of degradation of surface waters. Stormwater conveys pollutants to nearby waterbodies and can impact the hydrology of waterbodies because of increased stormwater discharge volumes and velocities. Current stormwater regulations were promulgated in 1990 and 1999. In 2006, the Office of Water asked the National Research Council (NRC) to review the stormwater program and recommend ways to strengthen it. The NRC Report, which was finalized in October 2008, found that the current stormwater program "...is not likely to adequately control stormwater's contribution to waterbody impairment" and recommended that EPA take action to address the harmful effects of stormwater. This action could propose requirements for managing stormwater discharges from newly developed and redeveloped sites and may propose regulating additional municipal separate storm sewer systems

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 122.26 and 40 CFR 122.30-37 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 33 USC 1251 et seqLegal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial 6/17/2013 - Settlement Agreement deadline for NPRM - Fowler, et al. v. EPA; # 09-0005; D. D.C.; as per 6/10/2013 modification 06/17/2013

Other Judicial 12/10/2014 - Settlement Agreement deadline for Final Action - Fowler, et al. v. EPA; # 09-0005; D. D.C.; as per 6/28/2012 modification 12/10/2014

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: EPA -HQ-OW-2009-0817.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Federalism: Yes Energy Affected: Undetermined

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater Agency Contact: Connie Bosma Environmental Protection Agency
Water 4203M, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-6773

FAX: 202 564-6431

E -Mail: bosma.connie@epa.gov Agency Contact: Janet Goodwin Environmental Protection Agency
Water 4303T, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1060
E-Mail: Goodwin.Janet@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF15

View Related Documents

Title: National Primary Drinking Water Regulations for Lead and Copper: Regulatory Revisions

Abstract: Beginning in 2004, EPA conducted a wide-ranging review of implementation of the Lead and Copper Rule (LCR) to determine if there is a national problem related to elevated lead levels. EPA's comprehensive review consisted of several elements, including a series of workshops designed to solicit issues, comments, and suggestions from stakeholders on particular issues; a review of monitoring data to evaluate the effectiveness of the LCR; and a review of the LCR implementation by States and water utilities. As a result of this multi-part review, EPA identified seven targeted rule changes and EPA promulgated a set of short-term regulatory revisions and clarifications on October 10, 2007, to strengthen implementation of the existing Lead and Copper Rule. In developing the short-term revisions, EPA identified several regulatory changes to be considered as part of identifying more comprehensive changes to the rule. These considerations are longer-term in nature as they require additional data collection, research, analysis, and stakeholder involvement to support decisions. This action addresses the remaining regulatory revisions to be completed in the 2013/2014 time frame. Changes will be made to make the rule more cost effective and more protective of public health.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 141; 40 CFR 142 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 300f et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 09/00/2015

Final Rule 03/00/2017

Additional Information: This action includes retrospective review under EO 13563; see: http://www.epa.gov/regdarrt/retrospective/history.html.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: UndeterminedFederalism: Undetermined Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/rulesregs/sdwa/lcr/index.cfm Agency Contact: Jeffrey Kempic Environmental Protection Agency
Water 4607M, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-4880

FAX: 202 564-3760

E -Mail: Kempic.Jeffrey@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF26

View Related Documents

Title: Effluent Guidelines and Standards for the Dental Point Source Category

Abstract: EPA is developing pretreatment standards for pollutant discharges from dental offices. When dentists place or remove amalgam fillings, mercury and other contaminants are flushed into the sewer. Dental amalgam contains mercury and other metals that have the potential to pass through or interfere with municipal wastewater treatment at Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTWs). EPA's technology assessment will focus on best management practices, such as use of amalgam separators, as a regulatory requirement.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 441 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 33 USC 1314 33 USC 1317(b) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Small Entities Affected: Undetermined Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://water.epa.gov/scitech/wastetech/guide/dental/

Sectors Affected: 339116; 621210 Agency Contact: Damon Highsmith Environmental Protection Agency
Water 4303T, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-2504
E-Mail: Highsmith.Damon@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Jan Matuszko Environmental Protection Agency
Water 4303T, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1035

FAX: 202 566-1053

E -Mail: matuszko.jan@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF28

View Related Documents

Title: National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Regulation of Perchlorate

Abstract: The Agency is developing a national regulation for perchlorate in drinking water. The Safe Drinking Water Act describes EPA's requirements for regulating contaminants. In accordance with these requirements, EPA will consider the Science Advisory Board's guidance on how to best interpret perchlorate health information to derive a Maximum ContaminantLevel Goal for perchlorate. The Agency is also evaluating the feasibility and affordability of treatment technologies to remove perchlorate from drinking water and will examine the costs and benefits of a Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) and alternative MCLs. EPA is also seeking input through informal and formal processes from the National Drinking Water Advisory Council, the Department of Health and Human Services, State and tribal drinking water programs, the regulated community (public water systems), public health organizations, academia, environmental and public interest groups, and other interested stakeholders on a number of issues relating to the regulation.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 141 40 CFR 142 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 300f et seq Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Statutory SDWA requires NPRM not later than 24 months after determination to regulate. 02/11/2013

Other Statutory SDWA requires Final Action within 18 months of NPRM; may be extended up to 9 months. 08/11/2014

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2014

Final Rule 09/00/2015

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OW-2011-03331

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Federalism: Undetermined Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/unregulated/perchlorate.cfm Agency Contact: Daniel Olson Environmental Protection Agency
Water 4607M, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-5239
E-Mail: Olson.Daniel@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Eric Burneson Environmental Protection Agency
Water 4607M, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-5250
E-Mail: burneson.eric@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF29

View Related Documents

Title: National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Group Regulation of Carcinogenic Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)

Abstract: EPA announced in February 2011 that it plans to develop one national primary drinking water regulation (NPDWR) covering up to 16 carcinogenic volatile organic compounds (VOCs). EPA will propose a regulation to address carcinogenic VOC contaminants as a group rather than individually in order to provide public health protections more quickly and also allow utilities to more effectively and efficiently plan for improvements. PCE and TCE, which the Agency determined were candidates for regulatory revision under the second 6-year review of the existing NPDWRs, will be included in the VOC drinking water standard. Besides PCE and TCE, the group may include up to six additional regulated VOCs and up to eight unregulated VOCs from the EPA's Contaminant Candidate List 3. SDWA section 1412(b)(1)-(6) describes EPA's requirements for regulating contaminants. In accordance with these requirements, the Agency will evaluate the health effects of carcinogenic VOCs, the feasibility of treatment, the affordability of treatment for small systems, and the costs and the benefits (as part of the Health Risk Reduction Cost Analysis). EPA has reached out to stakeholders via multiple meetings and the Web before deciding to develop the carcinogenic VOC group rule. EPA also plans to seek input from the Science Advisory Board, the National Drinking Water Advisory Council, the Department of Health and Human Services, and State and tribal drinking water programs prior to issuing a proposed rule.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: UndeterminedCFR Citation: 40 CFR 141; 40 CFR 142 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 300f et seq. Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2014

Final Rule 06/00/2016

Additional Information: This action includes retrospective review under EO 13563; see: http://www.epa.gov/regdarrt/retrospective/history.html.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/rulesregs/sdwa/dwstrategy/index.cfm Agency Contact: Kesha Forrest Environmental Protection Agency
Water 4607M, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-3632

FAX: 202 564-3760

E -Mail: forrest.kesha@epa.gov Agency Contact: Rajiv Khera Environmental Protection Agency
Water 4607M, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-4881
E-Mail: Khera.Rajiv@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF35

View Related Documents

Title: Effluent Guidelines and Standards for Unconventional Oil and Gas Extraction Including Coalbed Methane and Shale Gas

Extraction

Abstract: In recent years there has been substantial growth in extraction and production of oil and gas resources including shale gas using unconventional technologies. Part of this growth can be attributed to advances in directional drilling and hydraulic fracturing. This unconventional oil and gas production can generate substantial volumes of wastewater. These wastewaters have been found to contain elevated concentrations of some or all of the following pollutants: fracturing fluid additives, salt content (often expressed as total dissolved solids or TDS), conventional pollutants, organics, metals, and NORM (naturally occurring radioactive material) which, if discharged, can directly impact aquatic life and drinking water sources. The current state of regulations for discharges associated with these unconventional activities varies. This action will collect information, review existing technologies, and develop regulatory options to control discharges of pollutants from these sources.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 435 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 33 USC 1311; 1314; 1316; 1317; 1318; 1342; 1361 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 10/00/2014

Final Rule 04/00/2016

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OW-2011-0334

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Federalism: No Energy Affected: Undetermined

RIN InformationURL: http://water.epa.gov/scitech/wastetech/guide/cbm_index.cfm

Sectors Affected: 213111; 213112 Agency Contact: Lisa Biddle Environmental Protection Agency
Water 3028C, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0350

FAX: 202 566-1053

E -Mail: biddle.lisa@epa.gov Agency Contact: Jan Matuszko Environmental Protection Agency
Water 4303T, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1035

FAX: 202 566-1053

E -Mail: matuszko.jan@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Water ( WATER ) RIN: 2040-AF47

View Related Documents

Title: National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Regulation Revision: Removal of the Pesticide Discharge Permitting Exemption in Response to Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Decision

Abstract: This action removes 40 CFR 122.3(h) from the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), where EPA had codified exclusions to NPDES permitting for application of pesticides to waters of the United States on November 27, 2006 and which were subsequently vacated by the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals on January 7, 2009. The U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals held in National Cotton Council, et al., v. EPA, that the 2006 final rule was not a reasonable interpretation of the Clean Water Act and that NPDES permits are required for all biological pesticide applications and chemical pesticide applications that leave a residue in water when such applications are made in or over, including near, waters of the U.S. As of October 31, 2011, NPDES permits are required for application of pesticides to waters of the United States.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action
Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 122.3(h) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 33 USC 1251 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Direct Final Rule 06/27/2013 78 FR 38591

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OW-2003-0063

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Prasad Chumble Environmental Protection Agency
Water 4203M, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-0021
E-Mail: chumble.prasad@epa.gov Agency Contact: Katherine Telleen Environmental Protection Agency
Water Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-7933
E-Mail: telleen.katherine@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG72View Related Documents

Title: Hazardous Waste Requirements for the Retail Sector; Clarifying and Making the Program More Effective

Abstract: In response to public comments submitted in connection with the EPA's periodic retrospective review of regulations under Executive Order 13563 and following substantial dialogue with representatives of the Retail Sector, the EPA is exploring ways to clarify and make the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) hazardous waste regulations more effective for managing waste generated in the retail sector. The EPA has stated its intent to analyze relevant information to determine what the retail RCRA issues of concern are and what options may exist for addressing the issues. The EPA expects this Notice of Data Availability (NODA) to: 1) present data and information the EPA has gathered thus far from stakeholders and other sources; 2) request additional relevant data and information from the public; and 3) request comment on issues of concern for managing waste generated in the retail sector and options for addressing the issues. The EPA will use this information to evaluate possible next steps.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: PreRule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No Legal Authority: 42 USC 6901 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Notice 11/00/2013

Additional Information: This action includes retrospective review under EO 13563; see: http://www.epa.gov/regdarrt/retrospective/history.html.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Richard Huggins Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response 5304P, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-0017
E-Mail: huggins.richard@epa.gov Agency Contact: Jessica Young Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response 5304P, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-0026

FAX: 703 308-0514

E -Mail: Young.Jessica@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AE87

View Related Documents

Title: Revisions to the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan; Subpart J Product Schedule Listing Requirements

Abstract: The Clean Water Act requires EPA to prepare a schedule identifying dispersants, other chemicals, and other spill mitigating devices and substances, if any, that may be used in carrying out the National Contingency Plan (NCP); and the waters and quantities in which they may be used. EPA is considering revising Subpart J of the NCP to address the efficacy, toxicity, and environmental monitoring of dispersants, other chemical and biological agents, and other spill mitigating substances, as well as public, State, local, and Federal officials concerns on their authorization and use. Specifically, the Agency is considering revisions to the technical product requirements under Subpart J, including amendments to the effectiveness and toxicity testing protocols, and establishing new effectiveness and toxicity thresholds for listing certain products on the Schedule. Additionally, the Agency is considering amendments to area planning requirements for agent use authorization and advanced monitoring techniques. The Agency is also considering revisions to harmonize 40 CFR part 110.4 with the definitions for chemical and biological agents proposed for Subpart J. These changes, if finalized, will help ensure that chemical and biological agents have met rigorous efficacy and toxicity requirements, that product manufacturers provide important use and safety information, and that the planning and response community is equipped with the proper information to authorize and use the products in a judicious and effective manner.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: NoCFR Citation: 40 CFR 300; 40 CFR 110 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 33 USC 1321(d)(2); 33 USC 1321(b)(3); 33 USC 1321(j) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/00/2014

Additional Information: Includes Retrospective Review under Executive Order 13563.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/oilspill/

Sectors Affected: 325; 424; 211; 541; 562 Agency Contact: William Nichols Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response 5104A, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-1970

FAX: 202 564-2625

E -Mail: nichols.nick@epa.gov Agency Contact: Craig Matthiessen Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response 5104A, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-8016

FAX: 202 564-2625

E -Mail: mattheissen.craig@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG39

View Related Documents

Title: Management Standards for Hazardous Waste Pharmaceuticals

Abstract: A small portion of pharmaceuticals are regulated as hazardous waste under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act when discarded. Healthcare (and associated) facilities that generate hazardous waste pharmaceuticals have reported having difficulties complying with the manufacturing-oriented framework of the Subtitle C hazardous waste regulations for a number of reasons. First, under the current hazardous waste regulatory scheme, healthcare workers, whose primary focus is to provide care for patients, are often involved in the implementation of the regulations. Second, a healthcare facility can have thousands of items in its formulary, making it difficult to ascertain which ones are hazardous wastes when disposed. Third, some active pharmaceutical ingredients are listed as acute hazardous wastes, which are stringently regulated even in small amounts. To facilitate compliance and to respond to these concerns, EPA is proposing to revise the regulations to improve management and disposal of hazardous waste pharmaceuticals. The revisions are also intended to clarify regulation of a major mechanism used by healthcare facilities for management of unused and/or expired pharmaceuticals, known as reverse distribution. In 2008, the Agency proposed to address pharmaceutical hazardous waste management issues by adding them to the Universal Waste rule. However, in order to address the adverse comments received on the 2008 proposal, EPA is now considering re-proposing healthcare facility-specific regulations for the management of hazardous waste pharmaceuticals in order to provide a regulatory scheme that is adapted to the unique issues that hospitals, pharmacies and other healthcare-related facilities face.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 260; 40 CFR 261; 40 CFR 262; 40 CFR 264; 40 CFR 265; 40 CFR 266; 40 CFR 268; 40 CFR 270 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 6912(a); 42 USC 6921-6939 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/02/2008 73 FR 73520

NPRM Comment Period Extended 01/30/2009 74 FR 5633

Second NPRM 08/00/2014Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ-RCRA-2007-0932

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Federalism: Undetermined Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/waste/hazard/generation/pharmaceuticals.htm Public Comment URL: NPRM:http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPAWASTE/2008/December/Day-02/f28161.pdf

Sectors Affected: 622110; 562112; 562211; 562219; 562119; 446110; 562111; 562213; 562212; 541940 Agency Contact: Mary Jackson Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response 5304P, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8453
E-Mail: Jackson.Mary@epa.gov Agency Contact: Kristin Fitzgerald Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response 5304P, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8286

FAX: 703 308-0522

E -Mail: fitzgerald.kristin@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG67

View Related Documents

Title: Addition of Subsurface Component to the Hazard Ranking System (HRS)

Abstract: The Hazard Ranking System (HRS), required by the Superfund statute, is the primary mechanism used by EPA to assess the relative threat associated with actual or potential releases of hazardous substances. As a matter of Agency policy, those sites that score 28.50 or greater under the HRS are eligible for inclusion on the National Priorities List (NPL). The NPL is intended primarily to guide the EPA in determining which sites warrant further investigation. A score of 28.50 does not represent a specified level of risk but is a cutoff point that serves as a screening-level indicator of the highest priority releases or threatened releases. The HRS includes four scoring pathways--ground water, surface water, air, and soil exposure. Additional pathways have been identified as posing significant threats to human health and the environment that should be considered when evaluating sites for the NPL. One such pathway is subsurface intrusion. Subsurface intrusion occurs when contaminants are released, enter the subsurface environment and move into occupied structures (e.g., residences, workplaces, and other buildings) as a gas, vapor, or liquid. Over the past decade EPA and State environmental programs have learned significantly more information regarding the risk that this pathway poses to human health. Historically, EPA's Superfund program has responded to vapor intrusion contamination by two mechanisms: (1) through its emergency response program at sites not on the NPL, or (2) through sites placed on the NPL because of other pathway-related risks. In a May 2010 report, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) concluded that if vapor intrusion sites are not assessed and, if needed, listed on the NPL, some seriously contaminated hazardous waste sites with unacceptable human exposure may not otherwise be cleaned up. Thus, EPA is working toward a proposed rulemaking to add a new screening component to the HRS that would allow sites with vapor intrusion contamination to be evaluated for placement on the NPL. This addition would enable the HRS to directly consider the human exposure to contaminants that enter building structures through the subsurface environment.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 300 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 9601 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Notice 01/31/2011 76 FR 5370

NPRM 04/00/2014

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -SFUND-2010-1086

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: NoEnergy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/superfund/sites/npl/hrsaddition.htm#addition Agency Contact: Terry Jeng Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response 5204P, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 603-8852
E-Mail: Jeng.Terry@epa.gov Agency Contact: Brenda Cook Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response USEPA REGION 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, 6SF, Dallas, TX 75202 Dallas , TX 75202
Phone: 214 665-7436

FAX: 214 665-6660

E -Mail: cook.brenda@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG70

View Related Documents

Title: Improvements to the Hazardous Waste Generator Regulatory Program (Parts 261 - 265)

Abstract: This rule would make several changes to the hazardous waste generator regulatory program to improve its clarity and effectiveness. One improvement under consideration would consolidate all of the hazardous waste generator regulations, where appropriate, in part 262 of title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations. Other possible improvements would modify various regulatory provisions, such as requirements for marking tanks and closing waste accumulation units by large quantity generators, as well as improve the effectiveness of the hazardous waste generator program. Finally, another change being considered involves addressing situations where a generator has either a planned or unplanned episodic event resulting in a temporary change in regulatory status.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 258, 260 -265, 268, 270, and 273 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations )

Legal Authority: 42 USC 6907, 6912, 6921, 6922, 6923, 6924, 6927, and 6930 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 31-33; 44 -45; 48-49; 22 Agency Contact: Jim O'Leary Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response 5304P, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8827

FAX: 703 308-0514

E -Mail: oleary.jim@epa.gov Agency Contact: Richard Huggins Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response 5304P, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-0017
E-Mail: huggins.richard@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG74View Related Documents

Title: Additions to List Section 241.4 Categorical Non-Waste Fuels

Abstract: In the 2013 Non -Hazardous Secondary Materials (NHSM) final rule, the Agency established a rulemaking process for categorical determinations for adding NHSMs as non-waste fuels. In addition, EPA identified several NHSMs that it considered to be good candidates for a categorical listing. Rulemakings for adding NHSMs to the list of categorical non-wastes will have to demonstrate how the NHSMs successfully meet the criteria listed in 40 CFR 241.4(b)(5).

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 241 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 6903; 42 USC 6912; 42 USC 7429 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/wastes/nonhaz/define/

Sectors Affected: 32731; 236; 561730; 31 -33; 713930; 322; 488310; 482; 321113; 487110; 238910; 562111; 562213; 562212; 221; 321114; 321 Agency Contact: Tab Tesnau Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response 1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW., Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 605-0636
E-Mail: tesnau.tab@epa.gov Agency Contact: George Faison Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response 5303P, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 305-7652

FAX: 703 308-0509

E -Mail: faison.george@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG75

View Related Documents

Title: Revisions to RCRA Subtitle D Research, Demonstration & Development Permit Rule

Abstract: EPA is considering modifying the permit term provision of the Research, Demonstration and Development (RD&D) rule in the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Subtitle D regulations for municipal solid waste landfills. EPA originally promulgated the RD&D rule in 2004. One of the issues that has arisen is the 12 year time limitation on RD&D permits. States that have issued RD&D permits indicate to EPA that this limitation discourages long-term research and shortens the investment period needed to recoup costs, because the lag time from design to operation can be as much as three years. The majority of state stakeholders believe that removing the time limit is appropriate. EPA is not considering changes to any other provisions of the RD&D rule as part of this effort.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 258 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC sec 6907; 6912(a); 6944; 6945(c); 6949a; 6981(a) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 09/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: StateSmall Entities Affected: No Federalism: Undetermined Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/waste/nonhaz/municipal/landfill/mswlficr/index.htm Agency Contact: Craig Dufficy Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response 5306W, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-9037

FAX: 703 308-8686

E -Mail: dufficy.craig@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG76

View Related Documents

Title: Amending the National Contingency Plan (NCP) Provisions for Public Notices for Specific Superfund Activities

Abstract: EPA is considering amending the National Oil and Hazardous Substance Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) to add language to broaden ways the Agency can inform the public of site-related activities. By modifying the NCP, it will allow the regions to adopt a communications approach that is most appropriate for the community and stage of the Superfund process. In some cases, publishing a public notice in a major local newspaper may be the most economical and effective way to inform thepublic. However, in other cases, other outreach methods may be more appropriate, e.g., direct mailings to individual homes, email notifications, etc.. These changes will give Superfund site teams the flexibility to design a communications approach suitable for the community and the situation.

Priority: Info./Admin./Other Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 300 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 33 USC 1321(c)(2); 42 USC 9601-9657; EO 12777; 56 FR 54757; 3 CFR; 1991 Comp p 351; EO 12580; 52 FR 2923; 3 CFR; 1987 Comp p 193 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 01/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/osweroe1/content/lawsregs/ncpover.htm Agency Contact: Jean Farrell Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response 5204P, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW., Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 603-8780
E-Mail: farrell.jean@epa.gov Agency Contact: Suzanne Wells Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response 5204G, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 603-8863

FAX: 703 603-9100

E -Mail: wells.suzanne@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG77

View Related Documents

Title: Hazardous Waste Export-Import Revisions Rule

Abstract: EPA is considering the development of proposed revisions to the hazardous waste export-import relatedrequirements in 40 CFR parts 262-265 for the purpose of (1) making existing export and import related requirements more consistent with the current import-export requirements required for shipments between members of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD); (2) enabling electronic submittal of all export and import-related documents (e.g., export notices, export annual reports); and (3) enabling electronic validation of export shipment data prior to exit.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 262- 265 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 6901 et seq; 42 USC 6938 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 10/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of

international interest.

Sectors Affected: 325199; 452990; 441310; 483113; 334; 483111; 2211; 335; 332; 484121; 562112; 482111; 333; 713930; 562920; 325411; 339; 423120; 441110; 481212; 562119; 324; 331; 423930; 481112; 562111; 484230; 4842; 335911; 441320;

336 Agency Contact: Laura Coughlan Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response 5304P, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-0005

FAX: 703 308-0514

E -Mail: coughlan.laura@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG78

View Related Documents

Title: National Contingency Plan Revisions to Align With the National Response Framework

Abstract: The purpose of this regulation is to revise the National Contingency Plan (NCP) to align it with the National Response Framework (NRF) and the National Incident Management System (NIMS). The purpose of the NCP is to provide the organizational structure and procedures for preparing for and responding to discharges of oil and releases of hazardous substance, pollutants, and contaminants. The purpose of the NRF is to provide a guide that describes how the Nation conducts all-hazard response to domestic incidents. The NRF does not alter the existing authorities of Federal departments and agencies, but rather, establishes the coordinating framework to integrate the authorities of various agencies into an all-hazard approach to incident management. The NRF is based on NIMS, which provides a consistent nationwide template for the management of domestic incidents. The NRF and NIMS were developed by the Department of Homeland Security, in consultation with other Federal agencies (including EPA) and incident response organizations. Alignment of the NCP with the NRF and NIMS will facilitate smooth integration of emergency response activities under the NCP with the NRF and NIMS. EPA is making other minor revisions to the NCP. The revisions will update the description of Federal agency organizational structures and capabilities and how they operate, as well as, recognize the establishment of the Department of Homeland Security.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 300 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 33 USC 1321; 42 USC 9601 to 9657 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Rule

NPRM 01/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: NoEnergy Affected: No Agency Contact: Lynn Beasley Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response 5104A, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-1965

FAX: 202 564-2625

E -Mail: beasley.lynn@epa.gov Agency Contact: Jean Schumann Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response 5104A, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-1977

FAX: 202 564-2620

E -Mail: schumann.jean@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG20

View Related Documents

Title: Hazardous Waste Manifest Revisions--Standards and Procedures for Electronic Manifests

Abstract: The "Hazardous Waste Electronic Manifest Establishment Act," signed into law by the President on October 5, 2012, established the authority for an electronic manifest program, including the development of a system collection of user fees and the establishment of an advisory group. The Act requires that the EPA issue regulations by October 5, 2013 that authorize the use of electronic manifests in lieu of the current manifest form (i.e., EPA Form 8700-22 and 8700-22A). There are between 4.6 to 5.6 million manifests processed each year, including manifests for State-defined hazardous wastes. Pursuant to the Act, this action is aimed at finalizing the development of EPA's Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) regulatory standards and procedures that will govern the initiation, signing, transmittal, and retention of hazardous waste manifests using electronic documents and systems. EPA proposed electronic manifest standards in May 2001 as part of a more general manifest revision action that also addressed standardizing the paper manifest form's data elements and procedures (EPA Form 8700-22). The May 2001 electronic manifest proposed rule was a standards-based decentralized approach under which EPA would establish and maintain the standards that would guide the development of electronic manifest systems by private sector entities that chose to participate in the system. Since the proposal, the Agency has (1) continued its engagement with affected industry,States, and the general public to solicit input on the development of a nationwide e-manifest system, and (2) published an emanifest approach in an April 18, 2006, Notice of Data Availability. EPA envisions that an e-manifest system will facilitate the electronic transmittal of manifests throughout the hazardous waste shipping process, including enabling better transparency by sharing data with the public at appropriate stages. This rule does not address the collection of fees, which will be dealt with in a subsequent rulemaking.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 260; 40 CFR 262; 40 CFR 263; 40 CFR 264; 40 CFR 265; 40 CFR 271 (To search for a specific CFR,

visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 6922; 42 USC 6923; 42 USC 6924; 42 USC 6926; PL 105-277 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory The Hazardous Waste Electronic Manifest Establishment Act of 2012 requires the EPA to authorize the use of e-manifests by October 5,
2013. 10/05/2013

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: Federal and State laws for the current paper-based manifest system require hazardous waste handlers(i.e., generators, transporter, and treatment, storage, and disposal facilities) to track hazardous waste shipments from cradle-tograve using the uniform hazardous waste manifest form (EPA Form 8700-22). Currently, hazardous waste handlers prepare between 4.6 to 5.6 million manifests annually. The current paper-based manifest system is inefficient and waste handlers incur substantial costs to comply with the current requirements to complete, carry, sign, file, and mail paper manifest copies. EPA has been exploring ways to reduce burden for hazardous waste handlers by transitioning from a paper-based reporting system to an electronic reporting system. This is consistent with EO 13563's directive to reduce regulatory burden. This action also codifies new statutory provisions contained in the "Hazardous Waste Electronic Manifest Establishment Act," which directs EPA to issue a regulation that authorizes use of electronic manifests for tracking hazardous wastes."

Legal Basis: The President signed the "Hazardous Waste Electronic Manifest Establishment Act" into law on October 5, 2012. The Act amended RCRA to direct the EPA Administrator to establish a hazardous waste electronic manifest system. Section 2(g)(1)(A) of the Act directs EPA to promulgate final regulations, after consultation with the Secretary of Transportation, authorizing the use of electronic manifests within one year of enactment (i.e., by October 5, 2013). Section 2(b) directs theAgency to establish an e-Manifest system that may be used by any user within three years from the date of enactment of the Act (i.e., by October 5, 2015). This action simply codifies several of the provisions of the e-Manifest Act and authorizes the use of the electronic manifests that will be available when the information technology (IT) system is developed and operational.

Alternatives: EPA has explored various electronic manifest approaches for tracking hazardous wastes. In May 2001, EPA proposed a standards-based decentralized approach under which EPA would establish and maintain the standards that would guide the development of electronic manifest systems by private sector entities that chose to participate in the system. In May 2004, EPA held a two-day public meeting to solicit input and preferences from stakeholders and other interested persons on the development and implementation of the e-Manifest. Based on comments to the 2001 proposed rule and input received from stakeholders at the public meeting, EPA published a follow-up notice in April 2006, which announced and requested comment on EPA's preferred approach for electronically completing and transmitting manifests through a national, centralized web-based IT system.

Costs and Benefits: This action does not establish a system for the collection of electronic manifests, nor does it compel industry or State stakeholders now using the paper manifest system to change their behavior and thus incur costs or benefits. This action simply establishes the legal and policy framework for the national e-Manifest system and by itself will not result in any tangible costs, benefits, or other impacts to the regulated community or the Government at this time. The e-Manifest option will only become available when EPA develops and implements this new electronic system and establishes a program of fees to be imposed upon users of the e-manifest system. A subsequent rulemaking will establish the schedule of user fees for the system and announce the date on which the e-Manifest will be implemented and available to users. While this action does not quantify the economic benefits for an e-Manifest system, EPA expects that the non-economic benefits will be significant as the system will provide (1) much improved data quality from the manifest creation and editing aids that will be available in an electronic system; (2) greater inspection and oversight efficiencies for regulators who can access manifests more readily with electronic search aids; (3) greater transparency for and empowerment of communities with more accurate information about completed waste shipments and management trends; and (4) the efficiencies of consolidating duplicative Federal and State waste data reporting requirements with one-stop reporting.

Risks: This action does not address any particular risks in EPA's jurisdiction as it does not change existing requirements for manifesting hazardous waste shipments. It merely authorizes the use of electronic manifests at such time as the system to receive them is built and operational.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 05/22/2001 66 FR 28240

Notice 04/01/2004 69 FR 17145

Notice 04/18/2006 71 FR 19842

Notice 02/26/2008 73 FR 10204

Final Rule 11/00/2013

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -RCRA-2001-0032

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: www.epa.gov/epaoswer/hazwaste/gener/manifest/

Sectors Affected: 325; 2211; 332; 2122; 2111; 326; 331; 323; 3221; 482; 484; 5621; 5622; 483 Agency Contact: Rich LaShier Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response 5304P, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8796

FAX: 703 308-0514

E -Mail: LaShier.Rich@epa.gov Agency Contact: Bryan Groce Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response 5304P, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8750

FAX: 703 308-0514

E -Mail: Groce.Bryan@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG46

View Related DocumentsTitle: Revising Underground Storage Tank Regulations--Revisions to Existing Requirements and New Requirements for Secondary Containment and Operator Training

Abstract: The Underground Storage Tank (UST) regulations were first promulgated in 1988 primarily to prevent releases from retail petroleum marketers (gas stations) and other facilities into the environment. These regulations have reduced the incidents of contamination. However, there is a need to revise the regulations to incorporate changes to the UST program from the Energy Policy Act of 2005, as well as to update outdated portions of the regulations due to changes in technology since the 1980s. On August 8, 2005, President Bush signed the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct). Title XV, Subtitle B of this act (entitled the Underground Storage Tank Compliance Act of 2005), amends Subtitle I of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, the original legislation that created the UST program. There are key provisions of the EPAct that apply to States receiving Federal UST funding but do not apply in Indian Country, including requirements for secondary containment and operator training. EPA will also use our knowledge of the program gained over the last 20 years to update and revise the regulations to make targeted changes to improve implementation and prevent UST releases. In the NPRM, EPA proposed: adding secondary containment requirements for new and replaced tanks and piping; adding operator training requirements; adding periodic operation and maintenance requirements for UST systems; removing certain deferrals; adding new release prevention and detection technologies; updating codes of practice; making editorial and technical corrections; and updating State program approval requirements to incorporate these new changes.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: Private Sector

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 280- 281 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 6991et seq
Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/18/2011 76 FR 71708

NPRM Comment Period Extended 02/15/2012 77 FR 8757

Final Rule 05/00/2014

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -UST-2011-0301

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/oust/fedlaws/proposedregs.html Public Comment

URL: http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQUST-2011 -0301-0001

Sectors Affected: 72; 481; 48811; 112; 111; 2211; 447; 622; 31-33; 486; 44-45; 485; 484; 483; 42 Agency Contact: Elizabeth McDermott Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response 5401P, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 603-7175

FAX: 703 603-0175

E -Mail: McDermott.Elizabeth@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Paul Miller Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response 5401P, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 603-7165

FAX: 703 603-0175

E -Mail: Miller.Paul@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG60

View Related Documents

Title: Hazardous Waste Management System: Conditional Exclusion for Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Streams in Geologic Sequestration Activities

Abstract: On July 25, 2008, EPA published a proposed rule under the Safe Drinking Water Act Underground Injection Control Program to create a new class of injection wells (Class VI) for geologic sequestration (GS) of carbon dioxide (CO2). In response to that proposal, EPA received numerous comments asking for clarification on how the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) hazardous waste requirements apply to CO2 streams. EPA published a proposed rule under RCRA and is now considering a final a rule that would conditionally exclude from the RCRA requirements CO2 streams that otherwisemeet the definition of hazardous waste, in order to facilitate implementation of GS, while protecting human health and the

environment.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 260 to 261 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 6912; 42 USC 6921-29; 42 USC 6934 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 08/08/2011 76 FR 48073

Notice 09/09/2011 76 FR 55846

Final Rule 11/00/2013

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -RCRA-2010-0695

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/epawaste/nonhaz/industrial/geosequester/index.htm Public Comment URL: NPRM - http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail; D=EPA- HQRCRA-2010-0695-0001

Sectors Affected: 211111; 22; 31- 33; 48-49 Agency Contact: Ross Elliott Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response 5304P, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8748

FAX: 703 308-0514

E -Mail: elliott.ross@epa.gov Agency Contact: Melissa Kaps Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response 5304P, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-6787
E-Mail: kaps.melissa@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG62

View Related Documents

Title: Rulemaking on the Definition of Solid Waste

Abstract: EPA's reexamination of the 2008 definition of solid waste final rule identified areas that could be improved to better protect public health and the environment with a particular focus on communities adjacent to hazardous waste recycling facilities. Potential regulatory changes should improve accountability and oversight of hazardous materials recycling, while allowing flexibility to promote economic and environmental benefits. Facilities affected include those that send hazardous waste off-site to be recycled and those that recycle hazardous waste on-site.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 261.2 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 6903; RCRA sec 1004 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial The settlement agreement requires signature of the proposed rule by June 30, 2011. 06/30/2011

Other Judicial The settlement agreement requires signature of the final rule by December 31, 2012. 12/31/2012

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 07/22/2011 76 FR 44094Notice 08/26/2011 76 FR 53376

Final Rule 02/00/2014

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -RCRA-2010-0742

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/epawaste/hazard/dsw/rulemaking.htm Public Comment

URL: http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQRCRA- 2010-0742-0001

Sectors Affected: 61; 31-33; 54; 92 Agency Contact: Tracy Atagi Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response 5304-P, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8672

FAX: 703 308-0514

E -Mail: atagi.tracy@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG68

View Related Documents

Title: Revisions to the Export Requirements of the Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Rule

Abstract: The Agency is considering revising the cathode ray tube (CRT) final rule published on July 28, 2006 (71 FR 42927) to address certain implementation concerns. We are considering adding a definition of "exporter," which will clarify the liabilities of intermediaries, such as brokers, in fulfilling the export-related requirements of the rule. We are also considering including additional items to the notification required for CRTs exported for reuse. These requirements will make it easier to implement the export requirements of the rule and will enable the Agency to obtain additional information on the export of this class of used

electronics.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 261 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 6912(a); 42 USC 6921 to 6925 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 03/15/2012 77 FR 15336

Final Rule 02/00/2014

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -RCRA-2011-1014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of

international interest.

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/osw/hazard/international/crts/index.htm Public Comment

URL: http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQRCRA- 2011-1014-0001 Agency Contact: Amanda Kohler Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response 5304P, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 347-8975
E-Mail: kohler.amanda@epa.gov Agency Contact: Tracy Atagi Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response 5304-P, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460Phone: 703 308-8672

FAX: 703 308-0514
E-Mail: atagi.tracy@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AE81

View Related Documents

Title: Standards for the Management of Coal Combustion Residuals Generated by Commercial Electric Power Producers

Abstract: On June 21, 2010, EPA proposed to regulate coal combustion residuals generated from the combustion of coal at electric utilities and independent power producers to address risks from the disposal of coal combustion residuals in surface impoundments and landfills. EPA sought public comments on two approaches available under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). One proposed option would be to list these residuals as "special wastes," and draws from remedies available under Subtitle C of RCRA, which creates a comprehensive program of federally enforceable requirements for waste management and disposal. The other proposed option included remedies under Subtitle D of RCRA, which gives EPA authority to set disposal standards for waste management facilities. Under both options, EPA proposed not to regulate the beneficial use of coal combustion residuals, such as its use in concrete. In addition, this rule would not address coal combustion residuals generated from non-utility boilers burning coal, nor would it address the placement of coal combustion residuals in mines or non-minefill uses of coal combustion residuals at coal mine sites. Since the publication of the proposed rule, EPA has issued three Notices of Data Availability (NODAs) seeking public comment on additional data and information obtained by EPA. In the most recent NODA, issued on August 2, 2013, EPA is inviting comment on additional information to supplement the Regulatory Impact Analysis and risk assessment; information on large scale fill; and data on the surface impoundment structural integrity assessments. With this NODA, EPA is also seeking comment on two issues associated with the requirements for coal combustion residual management units.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action

Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: State, Local, Or Tribal Governments; Private Sector

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 257; 261; 264; 265; 268; 271; 302 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 6905; 42 USC 6906; 42 USC 6907(a)(3); 42 USC 6912; 42 USC 6912(a); 42 USC 6912(a)(1); 42 USC 6921; 42 USC 6922; 42 USC 6923; 42 USC 6924; 42 USC 6925; 42 USC 6925(j); 42 USC 6935; 42 USC 6936; 42 USC 6937; 42 USC 6944(a); 42 USC 6949a(c); 33 USC 1345(d); 33 USC 1345(e) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Rule

Notice 08/29/2007 72 FR 49714

NPRM 06/21/2010 75 FR 35128

Notice 10/12/2011 76 FR 63252

Notice 08/02/2013 78 FR 46940

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -RCRA-2009-0640, EPA-HQ-RCRA-2011-0392. http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=EPA-HQ-RCRA-2009-0640

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: Yes Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/epawaste/nonhaz/industrial/special/fossil/ccrrule/index.htm Public Comment

URL: http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=EPAHQ-RCRA- 2011-0392

Sectors Affected: 221112 Agency Contact: Alexander Livnat Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response 5304P, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-7251

FAX: 703 605-0595

E -Mail: Livnat.Alexander@epa.gov Agency Contact: Steve Souders Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response 5304P, Washington, DC 20460Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8431

FAX: 703 605-0595

E -Mail: souders.steve@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AF01

View Related Documents

Title: RCRA Smarter Waste Reporting

Abstract: By implementing the Smarter Waste Reporting initiative, EPA hopes to decrease the regulatory burden on respondents completing the Biennial Report (BR) by eliminating the form for waste shipped offsite. We plan to do this by proposing to: (1) substitute the BR data with the more-timely data from the eManifest system and (2) improve the information we currently receive from respondents who manage their waste onsite, in an effort to improve the quality of BR data.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 262.41 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 6922(a)(6) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM

Additional Information: Includes Retrospective Review under Executive Order 13563.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 325; 2211; 332; 2122; 2111; 326; 331; 323; 3221; 482; 484; 5621; 5622; 483 Agency Contact: Peggy Vyas Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response 5303P, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-5477

FAX: 703 308-8433

E -Mail: vyas.peggy@epa.gov Agency Contact: Lori Furr Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response 5303P, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 603-0596

FAX: 703 308-8433

E -Mail: furr.lori@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG34

View Related Documents

Title: Revisions to Land Disposal Restrictions Treatment Standards and Amendments to Recycling Requirements for Spent Petroleum Refining Hydrotreating and Hydrorefining Catalysts

Abstract: In response to a rulemaking petition, the Environmental Protection Agency is considering amending the Land Disposal Restriction (LDR) treatment requirements for EPA Waste Codes K172 and F037. EPA is also responding to other elements of the rulemaking petition in the notice. Finally, in response to separate comments received from petroleum industry representatives, EPA is considering proposing a rule to help encourage consistent levels of recycling of spent hydrotreating and hydrorefining catalysts, in a manner that protects human health and the environment.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 261; 40 CFR 268; 40 CFR 271 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations )Legal Authority: 42 USC 1006; 42 USC 2002(a); 42 USC 3001-3009; 42 USC 3014; 42 USC 6905; 42 USC 6906; 42 CFR 6912; 42 USC 6921; 42 USC 6922; 42 USC 6924-6927; 42 USC 6934; 42 USC 6937; 42 USC 6938 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM

Notice 10/20/2003 68 FR 59935

Additional Information: Docket #:Legacy Docket No. RCRA-2003-0023 for 10/20/03 NODA

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/wastes/hazard/wastetypes/wasteid/petroleum/

Sectors Affected: 324110; 562211 Agency Contact: Ross Elliott Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response 5304P, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8748

FAX: 703 308-0514

E -Mail: elliott.ross@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AG61

View Related Documents

Title: Financial Responsibility Requirements under CERCLA Section 108(b) for Classes of Facilities in the Hard Rock Mining Industry

Abstract: Section 108(b) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, establishes certain authorities concerning financial responsibility requirements. The Agency has identified classes of facilities within the Hard Rock mining industry as those for which financial responsibility requirements will be first developed. EPA intends to include requirements for financial responsibility, as well as notification and implementation.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 9601 et seq; 42 USC 9608 (b) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Notice 07/28/2009 74 FR 37213

NPRM 08/00/2016

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -SFUND-2009-0265. Split from RIN 2050-AG56.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business Government Levels Affected: Federal

Federalism: Undetermined Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/superfund/policy/financialresponsibility/ Public Comment

URL: http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQSFUND- 2009-0265-0001

Sectors Affected: 212; 331 Agency Contact: Ben Lesser Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response 5302P, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-0314
E-Mail: Lesser.Ben@epa.govAgency Contact: David Hockey Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response 5303P, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8846
E-Mail: Hockey.David@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Solid Waste and Emergency Response ( SWER ) RIN: 2050-AE51

View Related Documents

Title: Modifications to RCRA Rules Associated With Solvent-Contaminated Industrial Wipes

Abstract: EPA published a final rule that modified its hazardous waste management regulations for solvent-contaminated wipes under theResource Conservation and Recovery Act. Specifically, this rule revised (1) the definition of solid waste to conditionally exclude solventcontaminated wipes that are cleaned and reused, and (2) the definition of hazardous waste to conditionally exclude solvent-contaminatedwipes that are disposed. The final rule provides a consistent regulatory framework that is appropriate to the level of risk posed by solventcontaminated wipes in a way that maintains protection of human health and the environment, while reducing overall compliance costs for industry, many of which are small businesses.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action
Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 261 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 6921 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/20/2003 68 FR 65586

Notice 10/27/2009 74 FR 55163

Final Rule 07/31/2013 78 FR 46447

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -RCRA-2003-0004

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State;

Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/wastes/hazard/wastetypes/wasteid/solvents/wipes.htm Public Comment

URL: http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPAHQ-RCRA- 2003-0004-0414

Sectors Affected: 325; 334; 332; 337; 333; 441; 812; 323; 811; 336 Agency Contact: Amanda Kohler Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response 5304P, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 347-8975
E-Mail: kohler.amanda@epa.gov Agency Contact: Tracy Atagi Environmental Protection Agency Solid Waste and Emergency Response 5304-P, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-8672

FAX: 703 308-0514

E -Mail: atagi.tracy@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ49

View Related Documents

Title: Supplemental Determination for Renewable Fuels Produced Under the Final RFS2 Program from Pulpwood

Abstract: As indicated in the final rule for the Renewable Fuels Standard Program, while the Agency issued lifecyclegreenhouse gas (GHG) threshold determinations for the major fuel pathways projected to meet the bulk of the RFS volume mandates, assessments of other new fuel pathways such as renewable fuels from pulpwood could not be completed in time for the final rule. In the process of assessing these fuels, the Agency is issuing determinations through several supplemental
notices to the final rule.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: PreRule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 86; 40 CFR 80 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act 211(o)
Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Notice 10/00/2014

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2005-0161. Split from RIN 2060-AQ36. Split from RIN 2060-AO81.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: Yes International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of

international interest.

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/fuels/renewablefuels/index.htm

Sectors Affected: 324110 Agency Contact: Paul Argyropoulos Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation 6401A, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-1123
E-Mail: argyropoulos.paul@epa.gov Agency Contact: Robert Larson Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation AAFC, Ann Arbor, MI 48105 Ann Arbor , MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4277
E-Mail: larson.robert@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR12

View Related Documents

Title: Revised Regulation for Environmental Radiation Protection Standard for Nuclear Power Operations--40 CFR Part 190

Abstract: EPA issued the "Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for Nuclear Power Operations" in 1977. Since issuance of these standards, the understanding of radiation risk and dose to humans has advanced and new methodologies have been developed to calculate radiation doses. In view of the developments over the past decades, EPA is evaluating whether to update the Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for Nuclear Power Operations in 40 CFR part 190. If EPA were to issue an updated rule, it would draw on updated science and clarify how safety should be demonstrated. EPA is issuing an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) to solicit public input on general questions and approaches to start a public discussion about whether to update the existing rule.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: PreRule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 190 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Atomic Energy Act; Reorg. Plan 3 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

ANPRM 11/00/2013

Additional Information: EPA Docket information: NA at this timeRegulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/radiation/ Agency Contact: Brian Littleton Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation 6608J, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9216
E-Mail: littleton.brian@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Tom Peake Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation 6608J, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9765

FAX: 202 343-2304

E -Mail: peake.tom@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR91

View Related Documents

Title: Section 610 Review of Control of Emissions of Air Pollution from Nonroad Diesel Engines and Fuel

Abstract: The rulemaking "Control of Emissions of Air Pollution From Nonroad Diesel Engines and Fuel" was finalized by EPA in June 2004 (69 FR 38958, June 29, 2004). This program set new emission standards for nonroad diesel engines, and fuel standards requiring sulfur reductions in nonroad diesel fuel. EPA developed a Small Entity Compliance Guide, which provides descriptions of the regulations and small entity provisions, Q&As, and other helpful compliance information. This new entry in the regulatory agenda announces that EPA will review this action pursuant to section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 610) to determine if the provisions that could affect small entities should be continued without change, or should be rescinded or amended to minimize adverse economic impacts on small entities. As part of this review, EPA will consider and solicit comments on the following factors: (1) The continued need for the rule; (2) the nature of complaints or comments received from the public concerning the rule; (3) the complexity of the rule; (4) the extent to which the rule overlaps, duplicates, or conflicts with other Federal, State, or local government rules; and (5) the degree to which the technology, economic conditions or other factors have changed in the area affected by the rule. Comments must be received within 60 days of this notice. In submitting comments, please reference Docket ID EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0642 and follow the instructions provided in the preamble to this issue of the Regulatory Agenda. This docket can be accessed at www.regulations.gov.

Priority: Info./Admin./Other Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: PreRule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 5 USC 610 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Rule 06/29/2004 69 FR 38958
Begin Review 11/00/2013

Additional Information: Docket #: EPA- HQ-OAR-2013-0642

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/rfa/section-610.html

Related RINs: Related to 2060- AK27 Agency Contact: Tom Eagles Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation 6103A, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-1952

FAX: 202 564-1554

E -Mail: Eagles.Tom@epamail.epa.govEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AM08

View Related Documents

Title: Review of New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) and Amendments to Emissions Guidelines (EG) for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills (WWW and Cc)

Abstract: Section 111(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) directs the EPA to review and, if appropriate, revise the New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) at least every 8 years after promulgation. This is a review of subpart WWW, Standards of Performance for Municipal Solid Waste Landfills, which was last promulgated in 1996. Issues raised in amendments proposed for the NSPS and Emissions Guidelines (EG) in 2002 and 2006 will also be addressed.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7411 Legal Deadline: Consent decree deadline for proposal is 2/4/2014.

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Statutory deadline for the 8 year review was 3/15/04. 03/12/2004

Other Judicial Section 111(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) directs the EPA to review and, if appropriate, revise the New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) at least every 8 years after promulgation. 02/04/2014

Other Judicial Environmental Defense Fund v. Perciasepe, 11-04492, USDC Southern
District of NY 02/04/2014

Other Judicial Environmental Defense Fund v. Perciasepe, 11-04492, USDC Southern
District of NY 12/17/2014

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 09/08/2006 71 FR 53272
Supplemental NPRM 02/00/2014

Final Rule 01/00/2015

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2003-0215. NPRM was published 09/08/2006 (71 FR 53272) as RIN 2060-

AJ41.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Local; State

Federalism: Yes Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 924110; 562212

Related RINs: Previously Reported as 2060 -AH13; Previously Reported as 2060- AJ41 Agency Contact: Hillary Ward Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation E143-05, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3154
E-Mail: ward.hillary@epa.gov Agency Contact: David Cozzie Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation 1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW., Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 919 541-5356
E-Mail: cozzie.david@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO60

View Related Documents

Title: New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) Review under CAA Section111(b)(1)(B)

Abstract: The goal of EPA's New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) Review under CAA section 111(b)(1)(B) is to address our obligation to review and revise each NSPS at a minimum of every 8 years. The review will outline the factors that the Agency will consider in determining whether review of a standard is appropriate in light of the efficacy of the standard. Thestrategy also seeks to minimize the administrative burden of the NSPS program by initially addressing those NSPS that remain effective based on "readily available information" and do not need to be revised.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No Legal Authority: 42 USC 7411; 42 USC 7429 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

ANPRM 10/24/2011 76 FR 65653

NPRM 02/00/2014

Final Rule 09/00/2014

Additional Information: This action includes retrospective review under EO 13563; see: http://www.epa.gov/regdarrt/retrospective/history.html.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: Undetermined Agency Contact: Janice Godfrey Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation D205-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3391

FAX: 919 541-5600

E -Mail: godfrey.janice@epa.gov Agency Contact: Lisa Conner Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation D205-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5060
E-Mail: conner.lisa@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO75

View Related Documents

Title: Protection of the Stratospheric Ozone: Motor Vehicle Air Conditioning System Servicing

Abstract: The motor vehicle air conditioning industry is moving to alternative refrigerants. This action would establish service, maintenance, and equipment provisions, as required by the Clean Air Act, for new alternative refrigerants in the motor vehicle air conditioning sector. These provisions will help ensure the safe and effective servicing of motor vehicle air conditioning systems.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7671 to 7671q Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/00/2013

Final Rule 06/00/2014

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2013-0597

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: No

Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/ozone/title6/609

Sectors Affected: 441310; 811111; 441110Agency Contact: Rebecca VondemHagen Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation 6205J, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9445

FAX: 202 343-2363

E -Mail: vondemhagen.rebecca@epa.gov Agency Contact: Cindy Newberg Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation 6205J, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9729

FAX: 202 343-2363

E -Mail: Newberg.Cindy@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP06

View Related Documents

Title: New Source Performance Standards for Grain Elevators--Amendments

Abstract: The New Source Performance Standard for Grain Elevators was promulgated in 1978 with the latest amendments made in 1984. Since that time there have been a number of changes in the technology used for storing and loading/unloading grain at elevators. The rule has seen increased activity of late, due to the increase in ethanol production that has lead to bumper crops of corn being grown, which, in turn, has led to a need for increased grain storage. For these reasons a review and potential revision may be necessary to ensure the appropriate standards are being applied consistently throughout the industry.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60.300 (revision) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7411; Clean Air Act sec 111 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2013

Final Rule 10/00/2014

Additional Information: This action includes retrospective review under EO 13563; see: http://www.epa.gov/regdarrt/retrospective/history.html.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 115114 Agency Contact: Bill Schrock Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation E143-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5432

FAX: 919 541-3470

E -Mail: schrock.bill@epa.gov Agency Contact: Robin Dunkins Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation E143-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5335

FAX: 919 541-3470

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP26

View Related DocumentsTitle: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) Subpart W: Standards for Radon Emissions From Operating Uranium Mill Tailings: Review

Abstract: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) Subpart W protects human health and the environment by setting radon emission standards and work practices for operating uranium mill tailings impoundments. EPA is in the process of reviewing this standard. If necessary, the agency will revise the NESHAP requirements for radon emissions from operating uranium mill tailings.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 61.250 - 61.256 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/00/2013

Final Rule 08/00/2014

Additional Information: SAN No. 5281

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: Undetermined Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Reid Rosnick Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation 6608J, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9563

FAX: 202 343-2304

E -Mail: rosnick.reid@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Dan Schultheisz Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation 6608J, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9349

FAX: 202 343-2304

E -Mail: schultheisz.daniel@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP43

View Related Documents

Title: Revision of 40 CFR Part 192--Health and Environmental Protection Standards for Uranium and Thorium Mill Tailings and Uranium In Situ Leaching Processing Facilities

Abstract: EPA's regulations in 40 CFR part 192 establishes standards for the protection of public health, safety, and the environment from radiological and nonradiological hazards associated with uranium ore processing and disposal of resulting waste materials. These cross-media standards, which apply to pollutant emissions and site restoration, must be adopted by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, their Agreement States, and the Department of Energy. We propose to review the standards in the existing rule and to revise the regulations, taking into particular account the significant changes in uranium industry extraction technologies and their potential impacts to groundwater. In addition, new facilities being proposed in states from Virginia to Alaska add to the importance of this effort.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 192 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 2022; 2114; Atomic Energy Act sec 275; UMTRCA sec 206(a) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Rule

NPRM 11/00/2013Additional Information: SAN No. 5319

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 212291 Agency Contact: Andrea Cherepy Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation 6608J, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9317

FAX: 202 343-2304

E -Mail: Cherepy.Andrea@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Tom Peake Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation 6608J, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9765

FAX: 202 343-2304

E -Mail: peake.tom@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP63

View Related Documents

Title: Electronic Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements for New Source Performance Standards Rulemaking

Abstract: EPA published an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) in October 2009 seeking comment on proposed approaches to improving the emissions factors program. The Agency sought comment on acquiring data for the development or improvement of the emissions factors; specifically, proposing to require the submission (via electronic reporting) of performance testing information already collected by industry by revising the reporting requirements in 40 CFR part 60 for a new source performance standard (NSPS). Performance tests are conducted periodically to measure the air pollutant emissions from an industrial process and are used as an indicator of compliance with regulations. In addition to performance test data, this rulemaking proposes to require the electronic submission of other selected compliance data, such as excess emissions reports, that are already being complied and submitted by industry to regulatory authorities. These data can be used for regulation development, control strategy development, rule effectiveness studies, risk analyses, and other air pollution control activities.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Rule

ANPRM 10/14/2009 74 FR 52723

Second ANPRM 11/13/2009 74 FR 58574

NPRM 04/00/2014

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2009-0174

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: Undetermined

Sectors Affected: 424710 Agency Contact: Garwood Gerri Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation D243-05, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2406

FAX: 919 541-1039

E -Mail: garwood.gerri@epa.gov Agency Contact: Bob Schell Environmental Protection AgencyAir and Radiation E-143-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-4116

FAX: 919 541-3207

E -Mail: schell.bob@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP69

View Related Documents

Title: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP): Brick and Structural Clay Products Manufacturing and Clay Ceramics Manufacturing

Abstract: This rulemaking will establish emission limits for hazardous air pollutants (hydrogen flouride (HF), hydrogen chloride (HCl) and metals) emitted from brick and clay ceramics kilns, as well as dryers and glazing operations at clay ceramics production facilities. The brick and structural clay products industry primarily includes facilities that manufacture brick, clay, pipe, roof tile, extruded floor and wall tile, and other extruded dimensional clay products from clay, shale, or a combination of the two. The manufacturing of brick and structural clay products involves mining, raw material processing (crushing, grinding, and screening), mixing, forming, cutting or shaping, drying, and firing. Ceramics are defined as a class of inorganic, nonmetallic solids that are subject to high temperature in manufacture and/or use. The clay ceramics manufacturing source category includes facilities that manufacture traditional ceramics, which include ceramic tile, dinnerware, sanitary ware, pottery, and porcelain. The primary raw material used in the manufacture of these traditional ceramics is clay. The manufacturing of clay ceramics involves raw material processing (crushing, grinding, and screening), mixing, forming, shaping, drying, glazing, and firing.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined Legal Authority: Clean Air Act Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/00/2014

Final Rule 12/00/2014

Additional Information: SAN No. 5367

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Federalism: No Energy Affected: Undetermined Agency Contact: Jeff Telander Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation D243-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5427

FAX: 919 541-5600

E -Mail: Telander.Jeff@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Keith Barnett Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation D243-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5605

FAX: 919 541-5450

E -Mail: barnett.keith@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP93

View Related Documents

Title: Standards of Performance for New Residential Wood Heaters, New Residential Hydronic Heaters and Forced-Air Furnaces, and New Residential Masonry HeatersAbstract: EPA is revising the New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for new residential wood heaters. This action is necessary because it updates the 1988 NSPS to reflect significant advancements in wood heater technologies and design, broadens the range of residential wood-heating appliances covered by the regulation, and improves and streamlines implementation procedures. This rule is expected to require manufacturers to redesign wood heaters to be cleaner and lower emitting. In general, the design changes would also make the heaters perform better and be more efficient. The revisions are also expected to streamline the process for testing new model lines by allowing the use of International Standards Organization (ISO)-accredited laboratories and certifying bodies, which will expand the number of facilities that can be used for testing and certification of the new model lines. This action is expected to include the following new residential wood-heating appliances: adjustable burn rate wood heaters, pellet stoves, single burn rate wood heaters, outdoor hydronic heaters (outdoor wood boilers), indoor hydronic heaters (indoor wood boilers), wood-fired forced air furnaces, and masonry heaters. These standards would apply only to new residential wood heaters and not to existing residential wood-heating appliances.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: CAA Section 111(b)(1)(B) Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory This statutory final rule deadline is not driving the schedule for this
action. 02/26/1996

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/00/2013

Final Rule 11/00/2014

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2009-0734

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State; Tribal

Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 333414; 333415; 238140 Agency Contact: Gil Wood Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation C404-05, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5272

FAX: 919 541-0242

E -Mail: wood.gil@epa.gov Agency Contact: David Cole Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation C404-05, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5565

FAX: 919 541-0242

E -Mail: cole.david@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ07

View Related Documents

Title: Withdr.of the Prior Deter. or Presump. That Compl. w/CAIR or the NOx SIP Call Const. RACT or RACM for the 97 8-Hr Ozone & 97Fine Part. NAAQS; & Rev. to RACT Guid. & RFP Req. for the 97Fine Part. NAAQS

Abstract: This NRPM will propose to withdraw any prior determination or presumption that compliance with the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) or the NOx SIP Call constitutes reasonably available control technology (RACT) or reasonably available control measures (RACM) for oxides of nitrogen (NOx) or sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions from electric generating unit (EGU) sources participating in these regional cap-and-trade programs. This rule will propose revisions to preamble guidance in the final Implementation Rule for the 1997 PM2.5 national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS) concerning the economic feasibility criteria for determining RACT for sources located within nonattainment areas. The rule will also propose to clarify the situations under which emission reductions from outside of a nonattainment area can be credited toward meeting the Reasonable Further Progress (RFP) requirements for the 1997 PM2.5 NAAQS.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: NoCFR Citation: 40 CFR Part 51 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 23 USC 101; 42 USC 7401-7671q Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Rule

NPRM 04/00/2014

Additional Information: SAN No. 5411

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 221112 Agency Contact: Kristin Riha Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation C539-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2031

FAX: 415 947-3583

E -Mail: riha.kristin@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Rich Damberg Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation C539-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5592

FAX: 919 541-0824

E -Mail: damberg.rich@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ11

View Related Documents

Title: Risk and Technology Review for Ferroalloys Production

Abstract: This action is the Risk and Technology Review (RTR) for Ferroalloys Production. It will address both EPA's obligation under the Clean Air Act (CAA) to conduct a residual risk review and to conduct a technology review. Under the "technology review" provision of the CAA, EPA is required to review maximum achievable control technology (MACT) standards and to revise them "as necessary (taking into account developments in practices, processes and control technologies)" no less frequently than every 8 years. Under the "residual risk" provision of the CAA, EPA must evaluate the MACT standards within 8 years after promulgation and promulgate standards if required to provide an ample margin of safety to protect public health or prevent an adverse environmental effect. The new deadline for this final rulemaking is 12/10/2013.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR part 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial NPRM: 11/4/2011 - Consent Decree - As per 4 day extension granted on 10/31. (Sierra Club v. Jackson, 09-0152, USDC Northern District of CA) 10/31/2011

Other Judicial Supplemental NPRM --Court Order 05/30/2014

Other Judicial Court Order 02/27/2015

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/23/2011 76 FR 72508

NPRM Comment Period Extended 12/29/2011 76 FR 81903
Supplemental NPRM 06/00/2014

Final Rule 03/00/2015

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2010-0895Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 331112; 331419 Agency Contact: Conrad Chin Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation D243-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1512

FAX: 919 541-3207

E -Mail: chin.conrad@epa.gov Agency Contact: Chuck French Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation D243-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-7912

FAX: 919 541-3207

E -Mail: french.chuck@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ40

View Related Documents

Title: Residual Risk and Technology Review Amendments to the Secondary Aluminum Production National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP)

Abstract: The existing 40 CFR part 63, subpart RRR National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Secondary Aluminum Production facilities was promulgated in 2000. This rule regulates Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAP) from secondary aluminum production facilities that are major sources of HAP and that operate aluminum scrap shredders, thermal chip dryers, scrap dryers/delacquering kilns/decoating kilns, group 2 furnaces, sweat furnaces, dross only furnaces, rotary dross coolers, and secondary aluminum processing units (SAPUs). SAPUs include group 1 furnaces and in-line fluxers. Area sources of HAP are regulated only with respect to emissions of dioxins/furans (D/F) from thermal chip dryers, scrap dryers/delacquering kilns/decoating kilns, sweat furnaces, and SAPUs. Section 112(f)(2) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) directs EPA to conduct risk assessments on each source category subject to maximum achievable control technology (MACT) standards and determine if additional standards are needed to reduce residual risks. The section 112(f)(2) residual risk review is to be done within 8 years after promulgation. Section 112(d)(6) of the CAA requires EPA to review and revise the MACT standards, as necessary, taking into account developments in practices, processes, and control technologies. The section 112(d)(6) technology review is to be done at least every 8 years. These risk and technology reviews for secondary aluminum production facilities will be conducted in this rulemaking, which will address possible residual risks, technology advancements, and clarifications to the existing rule.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial Consent Decree 01/30/2012

Other Judicial Supplemental NPRM--Court Order 08/28/2014

Other Judicial Court Order 05/28/2015

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/14/2012 77 FR 8576

NPRM Comment Period Extended 03/23/2012 77 FR 16987
Supplemental NPRM 09/00/2014

Final Rule 06/00/2015

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2010-0544

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Rochelle Boyd Environmental Protection Agency
Air and RadiationD-243-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1390

FAX: 919 541-3207

E -Mail: boyd.rochelle@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Chuck French Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation D243-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-7912

FAX: 919 541-3207

E -Mail: french.chuck@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ44

View Related Documents

Title: Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Lead

Abstract: Under the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, EPA is required to review and if appropriate, revise the air quality criteria for the primary (health-based) and secondary (welfare-based) national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) every 5 years. On November 12, 2008, EPA published a final rule to revise the primary and secondary NAAQS for lead to provide increased protection for public health and welfare. EPA has now initiated the next review. This new review includes the preparation of an Integrated Review Plan, an Integrated Science Assessment, and, if warranted, a Risk/Exposure Assessment, and also a Policy Assessment Document by EPA, with opportunities for review by EPA's Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee and the public. These documents inform the Administrator's proposed decision as to whether to retain or revise the standards. This decision will be published in the Federal Register with opportunity provided for public comment. The Administrator's final decisions will take into consideration these documents and public comment on the proposed decision.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 50 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7408; 42 USC 7409 Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: Under the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, EPA is required to review and if appropriate revise the air quality criteria for the primary (health-based) and secondary (welfare-based) national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) every 5 years. In the last lead NAAQS review, EPA published a final rule on November 12, 2008, to revise the primary and secondary NAAQS for lead to provide increased protection for public health and welfare.

Legal Basis: Under the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, EPA is required to review and if appropriate revise the air quality criteria for the primary (health-based) and secondary (welfare-based) national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) every 5

years.

Alternatives: The main alternative for the Administrator's decision on the review of the national ambient air quality standards for lead is whether to retain or revise the existing standards.

Costs and Benefits: The Clean Air Act makes clear that the economic and technical feasibility of attaining standards are not to be considered in setting or revising the NAAQS, although such factors may be considered in the development of State plans to implement the standards. Accordingly, when the Agency proposes revisions to the standards, the Agency prepares cost and benefit information in order to provide States information that may be useful in considering different implementation strategies for meeting proposed or final standards. In those instances, cost and benefit information is generally included in the regulatory analysis accompanying the final rule.

Risks: As part of the review, EPA prepares an Integrated Review Plan, an Integrated Science Assessment, and, if warranted, a Risk/Exposure Assessment, and also a Policy Assessment Document, with opportunities for review by EPA's Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee and the public. These documents inform the Administrator's proposed decision as to whether to retain or revise the standards. The proposed decision will be published in the Federal Register with opportunity provided for public comment. The Administrator's final decisions will take into consideration these documents and public comment on the proposed decision.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Rule

NPRM 07/00/2014Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2010-0108

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/naaqs/standards/pb/s_pb_index.html Agency Contact: Deirdre Murphy Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation C539-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 Research Triangle Park , NC 27709
Phone: 919 541-0729

FAX: 919 541-0840

E -Mail: murphy.deirdre@epa.gov Agency Contact: Karen Martin Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation C504-06, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5274

FAX: 919 541-0237

E -Mail: Martin.Karen@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ48

View Related Documents

Title: Implementation Rule for 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS

Abstract: This proposed rule will address a range of implementation requirements for the 2012 National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for PM2.5. The requirements expected to be addressed in this rule include the timing of State Implementation Plan submissions, the attainment deadlines for areas designated nonattainment, PM2.5 precursor policies, and requirements pertaining to attainment demonstrations, emission inventories, reasonably available control technology, reasonably available control measures, best available control measures, reasonable further progress, mid-course reviews, and contingency

measures.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 57.100 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Rule

NPRM 05/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: State

Small Entities Affected: Undetermined Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Rich Damberg Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation C539-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5592

FAX: 919 541-0824

E -Mail: damberg.rich@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ75

View Related Documents

Title: Petroleum Refinery Sector Risk and Technology Review and NSPSAbstract: This action pertains to the Petroleum Refining industry and specifically to petroleum refinery sources that are subject to maximum achievable control technology (MACT) standards in 40 CFR part 63, subparts CC (Refinery MACT 1) and UUU (Refinery MACT 2) and new source performance standards (NSPS) in 40 CFR part 60, subpart Ja. This action is the Petroleum Refining Sector Rulemaking which will address our obligation to perform Risk and Technology Reviews (RTR) for Petroleum Refinery MACT 1 and 2 source categories and will address issues related to the reconsideration of Petroleum Refinery New Source Performance Standard (NSPS) subpart Ja. Petroleum refineries are facilities engaged in refining and producing products made from crude oil or unfinished petroleum derivatives. Emission sources include petroleum refinery-specific process units unique to the industry, such as fluid catalytic cracking units (FCCU) and catalytic reforming units (CRU), as well as units and processes commonly found at other types of manufacturing facilities (including petroleum refineries), such as storage vessels and wastewater treatment plants. Refinery MACT 1 regulates hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions from common processes such as miscellaneous process vents (e.g., delayed coking vents), storage vessels, wastewater, equipment leaks, loading racks, marine tank vessel loading, and heat exchange systems at petroleum refineries. Refinery MACT 2 regulates HAP from those processes that are unique to the industry including sulfur recovery units (SRU) and from catalyst regeneration in FCCU and
CRU.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60; 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 111 and 112 Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: The Clean Air Act (CAA) requires that existing air toxics standards undergo periodic review. In this action, EPA will conduct such a review for the Petroleum Refineries MACT standard, as well as addressing issues that have arisen regarding the Petroleum Refineries New Source Performance Standard.

Legal Basis: The periodic air- toxics-standard reviews are required by CAA section 112. New Source Performance Standards
are issued under CAA section 111.

Alternatives: Not yet determined.

Costs and Benefits: EPA is currently assessing the costs and benefits associated with this action.

Risks: EPA is currently assessing risks for this action.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/00/2014

Final Rule 01/00/2015

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2010-0682

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/petrefine/petrefpg.html

Sectors Affected: 324110 Agency Contact: Brenda Shine Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation E143-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3608

FAX: 919 541-0246

E -Mail: shine.brenda@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Penny Lassiter Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation E143-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5396

FAX: 919 541-0246

E -Mail: lassiter.penny@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ81View Related Documents

Title: Revisions to Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements, and Proposed Confidentiality Determinations Under the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program

Abstract: This action concerns Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program data reporting elements used as inputs to emission equations (for direct emitters) for which the reporting deadline was deferred until 2015. Based on stakeholder concerns regarding the potential release of these data, the EPA deferred reporting of these data elements (see August 25, 2011 final action, 76 FR 53057) to allow the EPA to complete its evaluation of the potential impact on facilities from the public release of these data elements (see 76 FR 53060) and, if appropriate, to propose amendments to the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program. Based on the evaluation conducted, this action proposes amendments to the reporting, recordkeeping, and verification requirements of the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 98 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/27/2010 75 FR 81366

Second NPRM 09/11/2013 78 FR55993

Second NPRM Comment Period End 11/12/2013

Final Rule 10/00/2014

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2010-0929

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/ghgreporting/

Sectors Affected: 327910; 325181; 325188; 325199; 311611; 212113; 212112; 325182; 327310; 221121; 331112; 325193; 327211; 221112; 311411; 311421; 327213; 325120; 331111; 327410; 221210; 211112; 322122; 325311; 327212; 322121; 322130; 325110; 324110; 325312; 486210; 212391; 331312; 331419; 322110; 331492; 221320; 562212 Agency Contact: Lisa Grogan-McCulloch Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation 6207J, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9743
E-Mail: grogan-mcculloch.lisa@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ91

View Related Documents

Title: Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units

Abstract: This action will establish the first new source performance standards for greenhouse gas emissions. This rule will establish CO2 emission standards for certain new fossil fuel-fired electric generating units.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: CAA 111 Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: EGU GHG NSPS is the first action item in President Obama's Climate Action Plan (CAP). The CAP called for EPA to issue a proposal by September 20, 2013, to regulate carbon emissions from fossil fuel-fired power plants.

Legal Basis: CO2 is a regulated pollutant and, thus, is subject to regulation under section 111 of the Clean Air Act as

Amended in 1990.

Alternatives: None.Costs and Benefits: No costs and no quantified benefits.

Risks: The risk addressed is the current and future threat of climate change to public health and welfare, as demonstrated in the 2009 Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases Under section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act. The EPA made this determination based primarily upon the recent, major assessments by the U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP), the National Research Council (NRC) of the National Academies, and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 04/13/2012 77 FR 22392

Second NPRM 11/00/2013

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2011-0660

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Public Comment

URL: http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQOAR- 2011-0660-0001

Sectors Affected: 221 Agency Contact: Christian Fellner Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation D243-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-4003

FAX: 919 541-5450

E -Mail: fellner.christian@epa.gov Agency Contact: Nick Hutson Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation D243-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 451-2968

FAX: 919 541-5450

E -Mail: hutson.nick@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ92

View Related Documents

Title: Residual Risk and Technology Review Amendments to the Primary Aluminum Reduction National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP)

Abstract: In this action the EPA is conducting a risk assessment to determine if the promulgated maximum achievable control technology (MACT) standards for hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions from primary aluminum reduction facilities are already protective of public health with an ample margin of safety or must be revised in order to provide that level of protection. The EPA is also determining whether the promulgated MACT standards adequately protect against adverse environmental effects. The EPA is also reviewing technical progress in emissions control in the primary aluminum reduction source category to determine if it is necessary to revise the standards taking into account developments in practices, processes and control technologies. This action would implement sections 112(f)(2) and 112(d)(6) of the Clean Air Act. The EPA promulgated National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Primary Aluminum Reduction Plants (found in 40 CFR part 63, subpart LL) in 1997. This NESHAP applies to the owner or operator of each new pitch storage tank or new or existing potline, paste production plant, or anode bake furnace associated with primary aluminum reduction which is located at a major source, as defined in 40 CFR section 63.2. The EPA proposed standards addressing residual risk and technology developments on December 6, 2011. If finalized, the proposed amendments would include new emissions standards for carbonyl sulfide emissions from new and existing potlines; new emissions standards for polycyclic organic matter (POM) from new and existing prebake potlines and existing pitch storage tanks; reduce the emissions standards for POM from existing Soderberg potlines; eliminate the startup, shutdown and malfunction exemption; and make certain other technical and editorial changes.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 112 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412 Legal Deadline:Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial as per 4 day extension granted on 10/31. (Sierra Club v. Jackson, 09- 0152, USDC Northern District of CA) 11/04/2011

Other Judicial Supplemental NPRM--Court Order 08/28/2014

Other Judicial Court Order 05/28/2015

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/06/2011 76 FR 76260

NPRM Comment Period Extended 01/19/2012 77 FR 2677
Supplemental NPRM 09/00/2014

Final Rule 06/00/2015

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2011-0797

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 33131 Agency Contact: David Putney Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation D-243-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2016

FAX: 919 541-3207

E -Mail: putney.david@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Rochelle Boyd Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation D-243-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1390

FAX: 919 541-3207

E -Mail: boyd.rochelle@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ95

View Related Documents

Title: General Permits and Permits by Rule for the Tribal Minor New Source Review Program

Abstract: The Tribal Minor New Source Review (NSR) program applies to new and modified minor sources and minor modifications at major sources in Indian Country. The program, established in a final rule the EPA issued on July 1, 2011, and codified at 40 CFR sections 49.151-49.161, is implemented through issuance of preconstruction permits that can include, among other requirements, pollutant emission limits for minor sources and emission limitations on the potential-to-emit of sources that would otherwise be considered major sources. This minor source program for Indian country is similar to state minor NSR programs. State minor NSR programs often use general permits and a few State programs allow permits by rule for similar emission units or stationary sources. A general permit or permit by rule may be written to address a single emissions unit, a group of the same type of emissions units, or an entire category of minor sources. General permits and permits by rule can offer a cost-effective means of issuing permits and provide a quicker and simpler alternative mechanism for permitting minor sources than a site-specific permitting process. This action proposes source category permits by rule/general permits for the Tribal Minor NSR program for the following five source categories: gasoline dispensing facilities; petroleum-based dry cleaner facilities; autobody repair and miscellaneous surface coating operations; hot mix asphalt facilities; and sand, gravel, rock crushing and screening facilities.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 49 CFR 49.151- 161 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/00/2013

Final Action 03/00/2014Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Chris Stoneman Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation C304-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-0823

FAX: 919 541-0072

E -Mail: stoneman.chris@epa.gov Agency Contact: Mark Sendzik Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation C-304.03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5534

FAX: 919 541-0942

E -Mail: sendzik.mark@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ99

View Related Documents

Title: National Emission Standards for Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework Facilities Risk and Technology Review

Abstract: On September 1, 1995 (60 FR 45948), EPA promulgated the National Emission Standards for Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework Facilities (40 CFR part 63, subpart GG) under section 112(d) of the Clean Air Act (CAA). The national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) sets maximum achievable control technology (MACT) standards for existing and new major sources of hazardous air pollutant emissions and includes standards to control volatile organic compounds (VOC) emissions. Under CAA section 112(d)(6) EPA is required to review standards issued under section 112 and to revise them "as necessary (taking into account developments in practices, processes and control technologies)" no less frequently than every 8 years. EPA also must evaluate the MACT standards within 8 years after promulgation and promulgate standards under CAA section 112 (f)(2) if required to provide an ample margin of safety to protect public health or prevent an adverse environmental effect. The source category will be assessed for inhalation risks, including cancer risk and incidence, population cancer risk, and non-cancer effects (chronic and acute). EPA also plans to evaluate multi pathway risk associated with this source category. The agency will follow the Benzene Policy to determine if the source category has low risk, acceptable risk, or unacceptable risk. EPA will then evaluate the effectiveness and cost of additional risk reduction options and make acceptability and ample-margin-of-safety determinations. If the need for additional controls are identified, the standards will include technology, work practice, or performance standards as amendments to the existing MACT standards.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7412 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial Sierra Club v. Jackson, 09-0152, USDC Northern District of CA; as per
10/24/2011 extension. 03/15/2014

Other Judicial Sierra Club v. Jackson, 09-0152, USDC Northern District of CA; as per
10/24/2011 extension. 01/15/2015

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 04/00/2014

Final Rule 02/00/2015

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2004-0450

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/aerosp/aeropg.html Agency Contact: Kim Teal Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation D243-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5580

FAX: 919 541-5450

E -Mail: teal.kim@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Keith Barnett Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation D243-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5605

FAX: 919 541-5450

E -Mail: barnett.keith@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR04

View Related Documents

Title: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Adjustments to the Allowance System for Controlling HCFC Production, Import, and Export for 2015 Through 2019

Abstract: EPA is proposing to adjust the allowance system that controls the U.S. consumption and production of ozonedepleting substances known as hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) to lower the amount of available allowances. The U.S. is obligated under the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer to limit HCFC consumption and production in a stepwise fashion achieving specific levels by specific dates. This rulemaking would implement the next phasedown step under the treaty, a reduction to 90 percent below the production and consumption baselines beginning January 1, 2015. While much less destructive to stratospheric ozone than chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), HCFCs contribute to ozone depletion and alternatives are available. The HCFC allowance system is part of EPA's program to phaseout chemicals that deplete the stratospheric ozone layer. Protection of the stratospheric ozone layer helps reduce rates of skin cancer and cataracts.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7671 to 7671(q) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2013

Final Rule 10/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/ozone/title6/phaseout/classtwo.html

Sectors Affected: 333415; 423620; 325120; 424690; 238220; 423730 Agency Contact: Luke Hall-Jordan Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation 6205J, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9591

FAX: 202 343-2338

E -Mail: Hall-Jordan.Luke@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR19

View Related Documents

Title: Data Requirements Rule for the 1-Hour Sulfur Dioxide Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS)

Abstract: This rule will describe requirements for air agencies to characterize sulfur dioxide concentrations through ambient monitoring or air quality modeling techniques in targeted areas around the country in which the largest sources of emissions are located. The air quality information collected by the air agencies will then be used to inform future rounds of area designations under the Clean Air Act. The rule will reference appropriate guidance on monitoring and modeling techniques, and it will includetimelines for air agencies to conduct the required analyses.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 23 USC 101; 42 USC 7401 to 7671q Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Rule

NPRM 03/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Larry Wallace Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation C539-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-0906

FAX: 919 541-0824

E -Mail: wallace.larry@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Rich Damberg Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation C539-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5592

FAX: 919 541-0824

E -Mail: damberg.rich@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR28

View Related Documents

Title: New Source Review and Title V Operating Permit Programs--Reconsideration of PSD Requirements for Particulate

Matter Less Than 2.5 Micrometers (PM2.5) and Revision to Public Notice Requirements

Abstract: This rulemaking is in response to the January 22, 2013, U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit decision that vacated the Significant Monitoring Concentration (SMC) and two provisions in EPA's prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) regulations containing Significant Impact Levels (SILs) that were contained in the 2010 final rule promulgating fine particulate matter (PM2.5) increments, SMC, and SILs for PM2.5. (Sierra Club v. EPA, No. 10-1413 (D.C. Circuit), 2013 WL 216018). This rulemaking will remove the PM2.5 SMCs from the PSD regulations, and address the court's decision regarding SILs. This rulemaking will also re-propose for public comment two provisions of the rule that were not addressed in that court decision. The reason that EPA is re-proposing these two provisions is because the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) filed a Petition for Reconsideration to the Administrator regarding several provisions contained in the 2010 final rule. In response to the TCEQ petition, EPA agreed to reconsider, by re-proposing, the following three provisions: 1) The revised definition of "baseline area" that includes a new significance level for PM2.5, which is used for determining whether a particular attainment or unclassifiable area should be included in the baseline area for the PM2.5 increments; 2) the requirement that PM2.5 precursor emissions be included in the significant impact analysis; and 3) the level selected for the SMC for PM2.5. In each case, the TCEQ claimed that EPA did not provide an opportunity for public comment prior to issuing the provisions as part of the 2010 final rule. The third of these claims by TCEQ has subsequently been made moot by the court decision saying that no PM2.5 SMC is allowed under the Clean Air Act.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51.156 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7470 to 7479 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Rule

NPRM 09/00/2014Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov Agency Contact: Phil Lorang Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation C304-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5463
E-Mail: lorang.phil@epa.gov Agency Contact: Raj Rao Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation C504-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5344

FAX: 919 541-5509

E -Mail: rao.raj@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR33

View Related Documents

Title: Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Existing Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units

Abstract: On June 25, 2013, President Obama issued a presidential memorandum directing the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to work expeditiously to complete greenhouse standards for the power sector. The agency is using its authority under section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act to issue emission guidelines, to address greenhouse gases (GHG) from existing power plants. The presidential memorandum specifically directs EPA to build on state leadership, provide flexibility and take advantage of a wide range of energy sources and technologies towards building a cleaner power sector. The presidential memorandum directs EPA to issue proposed GHG standards, regulations or guidelines, as appropriate, for existing power plants by no later than June 1, 2014, and issue final standards, regulations or guidelines, as appropriate, by no later than June 1, 2015. In addition, the presidential memorandum directs EPA to include in the guidelines addressing existing power plants a requirement that states submit to EPA the implementation plans required under section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act and its implementing regulations by no later than June 30, 2016.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: CAA 111 Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: On December 7, 2009, the EPA found that current and projected concentrations of greenhouse gases (GHG) in the atmosphere threaten the public health and welfare of current and future generations. Electric generating units (EGUs) are the single biggest stationary source of greenhouse gases and account for well over a third of all greenhouse gas emissions in the United States. Recognizing that greenhouse gases pose a threat to the public health and welfare and that EGUs are one of the largest sources of GHG emissions, the EPA has begun taking regulatory steps to ensure reductions of GHG emissions from EGUs. The regulatory path that the EPA has embarked upon commits the agency to regulating emissions from, not just new EGUs, but also existing EGUs.

Legal Basis: EPA will use the Clean Air Act authority under section 111 (d) to set GHG guidelines for states to set GHG standards for existing EGU sources. The Clean Air Act (CAA) gives the Agency broad authority to set standards for emissions of "air pollutants." GHGs have been determined by the U.S. Supreme Court to be "air pollutants" that are subject to regulation under the CAA. Because of this and the fact that GHGs are not currently regulated under either National Ambient Air Quality Standards or under the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants, EPA has the authority to address them under the NSPS program.

Alternatives: Not yet determined.

Costs and Benefits: At this time we do not have any estimates regarding the benefits and costs of this action, but we do expect it to be a significant regulatory action with annual effects on the economy exceeding $100 million.

Risks: Not yet determined.

Timetable:

Action Date FR CiteNPRM 06/00/2014

Final Rule 06/00/2015

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2013-0602. Split from RIN 2060-AQ91.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: State; Tribal

Federalism: Yes Energy Affected: Yes

Related RINs: Split From 2060- AQ91 Agency Contact: Sharon Nizich Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation D243, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2825

FAX: 919 541-5450

E -Mail: nizich.sharon@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Lisa Conner Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation D205-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5060
E-Mail: conner.lisa@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR47

View Related Documents

Title: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) from Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations RTR

Abstract: In this action EPA will perform the risk and technology review for National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) from off-site waste and recovery operations. The Clean Air Act (CAA) sections 112(f)(2) and 112(d)(6) require EPA to conduct residual risk and technology reviews. Under the "technology review" provision of the CAA section 112, EPA is required to review maximum achievable control technology (MACT) standards and to revise them "as necessary (taking into account developments in practices, processes and control technologies)" no less frequently than every 8 years. Under the "residual risk" provision of CAA section 112, EPA must evaluate the MACT standards within 8 years after promulgation and promulgate standards if required to provide an ample margin of safety to protect public health or prevent an adverse environmental effect. As part of this NESHAP revision, EPA will also remove startup, shutdown, and malfunction exemptions as required by recent court decisions.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 112 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Statutory Clean Air Act 07/01/2008

NPRM Judicial Court Order 05/30/2014

Other Judicial Court Order 02/27/2015

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/00/2014

Final Rule 03/00/2015

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2012-0360

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: No

Federalism: No Energy Affected: Undetermined Agency Contact: Mary Kissell Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation E143-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-4516FAX: 919 541-0246
E-Mail: kissell.mary@epa.gov Agency Contact: Penny Lassiter Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation E143-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5396

FAX: 919 541-0246

E -Mail: lassiter.penny@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR49

View Related Documents

Title: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) Emissions: Manufacture of Amino/Phenolic Resins, Acrylic and Modacrylic Fibers Production, and Polycarbonate Production RTR

Abstract: In this action EPA will perform risk and technology reviews for the following three National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP): Manufacture of Amino/Phenolic Resins; Acrylic and Modacrylic Fibers Production; and Polycarbonate Production. Clean Air Act (CAA) sections 112(f)(2) and 112(d)(6) require EPA to conduct these reviews. Under the "technology review" provision of CAA section 112, EPA is required to review maximum achievable control technology (MACT) standards and to revise them "as necessary (taking into account developments in practices, processes and control technologies)" no less frequently than every 8 years. Under the "residual risk" provision of CAA section 112, EPA must evaluate the MACT standards within 8 years after promulgation and promulgate standards if required to provide an ample margin of safety to protect public health or prevent an adverse environmental effect. EPA will also remove startup, shutdown, and malfunction exemptions for these source categories, as required by recent court decisions.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 112 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial Court-ordered deadline 12/11/2013

Other Judicial Court-order 09/16/2014

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/00/2013

Final Rule 09/00/2014

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2012-0133

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 325199; 32522; 325211 Agency Contact: Nick Parsons Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation E143-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5372

FAX: 919 541-0246

E -Mail: parsons.nick@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Penny Lassiter Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation E143-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5396

FAX: 919 541-0246

E -Mail: lassiter.penny@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR50

View Related Documents

Title: Identification of Additional Qualifying Renewable Fuel Pathways III and Modification to the Renewable Fuels Program

Abstract: The Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) 2 program was required by the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA 2007), which amended the Clean Air Act (CAA). The final regulations for RFS2 were published in the Federal Register on March 26, 2010 (75 FR 14670). EPA has previously published clarifications and modifications, technical amendments, and new pathways, to the final RFS2 regulations. This proposed regulation would provide additional clarifications, modifications, and technical amendments to RFS2 and will clarify, modify and technically amend other fuels programs in 40 CFR part 80. This proposed action would also propose amendments to table 1 to section 80.1426 of the RFS2 regulations to include additional fuel pathways and assign each pathway a D-Code. It would allow producers or importers of fuel produced under these pathways to generate renewable identification numbers under the program, providing that the fuel meets the other requirements for renewable fuel. This proposed action would outline EPA's lifecycle greenhouse gas evaluation, specified in Clean Air Act section 211(o), as amended by EISA for several new pathways.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007; Clean Air Act sec 211(o) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 03/00/2014

Final Rule 06/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Sharyn Lie Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation 6401 A, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-1092

FAX: 202 564-1686

E -Mail: lie.sharyn@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR58

View Related Documents

Title: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants Residual Risk and Technology Review for Flexible Polyurethane Foam Production

Abstract: This action addresses the residual risk and technology reviews conducted for national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP) for flexible polyurethane foam production. The Flexible Polyurethane Foam MACT standard was promulgated in October 1998 (see 63 FR 53980). EPA is required to review standards issued under Section 112 and to revise them "as necessary (taking into account developments in practices, processes and control technologies)" no less frequently than every 8 years. EPA also must evaluate the MACT standards within 8 years after promulgation and promulgate standards under CAA section 112 (f)(2) if required to provide an ample margin of safety to protect public health or prevent an adverse environmental effect. The source category potentially will be assessed for inhalation risks, including cancer risk and incidence, population cancer risk, and non-cancer effects (chronic and acute). EPA also plans to potentially evaluate multipathway risk associated with the source categories with significant levels of persistent and bioaccumulative HAP. The agency will follow the Benzene Policy to identify the source category as low risk, acceptable risk, or unacceptable risk. EPA will then evaluate the effectiveness and cost of additional risk reduction options and make acceptability and ample-margin-of-safety determinations. If the need for additional controls is identified, the standards will include technology, work practice, and/or performance standards as amendments to the existing MACT standards.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: CAA112 Legal Deadline: Consent decree deadline 10/30/13 for proposal

Action Source Description DateNPRM Judicial Court ordered deadline 10/30/2013

Other Judicial Court ordered deadline 07/30/2014

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/06/2013 78 FR 66107

NPRM Comment Period End 12/04/2013

Final Rule 08/00/2014

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2012-0510

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: No

Federalism: Undetermined Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/foam/foampg.html Agency Contact: Kaye Whitfield Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation E-143-03, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 919 541-2509

FAX: 919 541-1039

E -Mail: whitfield.kaye@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Keith Barnett Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation D243-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5605

FAX: 919 541-5450

E -Mail: barnett.keith@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR60

View Related Documents

Title: Criteria for the Certification and Recertification of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant's Compliance With the Disposal Regulations; Panel Closure Redesign

Abstract: This rule will propose to modify a small portion of 40 CFR part 194, "Criteria for the Certification and Recertification of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant's Compliance with the 40 CFR part 191 Disposal Regulations." 40 CFR part 194, appendix A, condition 1 currently stipulates that the Option D Panel Closure included in DOE's 1996 Compliance Certification application be implemented to seal filled waste panels in the repository. On September 28, 2011, DOE submitted a Planned Change Request which proposes the replacement of the concrete monolith and mortared explosion wall included in the Option D Panel Closure with an alternative design consisting of steel bulkheads and mined salt backfill. According to DOE, implementation of Option D presents significant technical obstacles, and the proposed change meets the same operational performance requirements while reducing costs and impacts on waste emplacement activities. Participation is expected from EPA Region VI and OGC.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 194 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: WIPP LWA (PL 102 -579) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/00/2013

Final Rule 03/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Jonathan Walsh Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation 1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW., Mail Code 6608J, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460Phone: 202 343-9238

FAX: 202 343-2305
E-Mail: walsh.jonathan@epa.gov Agency Contact: Tom Peake Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation 6608J, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9765

FAX: 202 343-2304

E -Mail: peake.tom@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR65

View Related Documents

Title: Air Quality: Revision to Definition of Volatile Organic Compounds--Amendment to the Exclusion of t-Butyl Acetate

Abstract: The EPA is proposing to remove the existing special emission reporting requirements for this compound that were established in 2004 when the compound was excluded from the definition of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), because these reporting requirements are now considered to be unnecessarily burdensome. This change will allow industrial users of solvents to use it without the burden of reporting emissions.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7602(s) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 05/00/2014

Final Rule 12/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Dave Sanders Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation C539-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3356

FAX: 919 541-0824

E -Mail: sanders.dave@epa.gov Agency Contact: Krishna Viswanathan Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation C539-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-0641

FAX: 919 541-0824

E -Mail: viswanathan.krishna@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR73

View Related Documents

Title: Reconsideration of the Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants

Abstract: This action is in response to four petitions for reconsideration by industry and environmental stakeholders of the April 2012 Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (PVC NESHAP). The petitions identify notice and comment issues, as well as several technical consistency and policy issues. This action includes reconsideration of issues in both the Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) and Generally Available Control Technology (GACT) portions of the April 2012 final rule.Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2013

Final Rule 12/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Undetermined Federalism: Undetermined Energy Affected: Undetermined

Sectors Affected: 325211 Agency Contact: Andrea Siefers Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation E143-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1185

FAX: 919 541-0246

E -Mail: siefers.andrea@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Penny Lassiter Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation E143-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5396

FAX: 919 541-0246

E -Mail: lassiter.penny@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR76

View Related Documents

Title: Renewable Fuel 2014 Volume Standards

Abstract: The Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) requires EPA to promulgate regulations that specify the annual statutory volume requirements for renewable fuels, including cellulosic biofuel, biomass-based diesel, advanced biofuel, and total renewable fuel that must be used in transportation fuel annually. In the case of the cellulosic biofuel standard, the Act specifically requires that the standard be set based on the volume projected to be available during the following year. If the volumes are lower than those specified under the Act, then EPA may also lower the advanced biofuel and total renewable fuel standards each year accordingly. This regulatory action will establish, as required, the annual statutory volume requirements for the RFS2 fuel categories (cellulosic, biomass-based diesel, advanced biofuel, and renewable fuel) that apply to all gasoline and diesel produced or imported in 2014. Entities potentially affected by this final rule are those involved with the production, distribution, and sale of transportation fuels, including gasoline and diesel fuel or renewable fuels such as ethanol and biodiesel.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/00/2013

Final Rule 02/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: Undetermined International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of

international interest. Agency Contact: David Korotney Environmental Protection AgencyAir and Radiation N27, Ann Arbor, MI 48105 Ann Arbor , MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4507
E-Mail: korotney.david@epa.gov Agency Contact: Paul Argyropoulos Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation 6401A, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-1123
E-Mail: argyropoulos.paul@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR77

View Related Documents

Title: Federal Plan Requirements for Sewage Sludge Incineration Units Constructed on or Before October 14, 2010

Abstract: On March 21, 2011, the EPA promulgated new source performance standards and emission guidelines for sewage sludge incineration units located at wastewater treatment facilities designed to treat domestic sewage sludge. This final rule set limits for nine pollutants under section 129 of the Clean Air Act: cadmium, carbon monoxide, hydrogen chloride, lead, mercury, nitrogen oxides, particulate matter, polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans, and sulfur dioxide. Section 129(b)(2) of the Clean Air Act directs states with existing sewage sludge incinerators subject to the emission guidelines to submit plans to the EPA that implement and enforce the emission guidelines. The deadline for states to submit new state plans to the EPA for review was March 21, 2012. If a state with existing sewage sludge incinerators does not submit an approvable plan within 2 years after promulgation of the emission guidelines, section 129(b)(3) of the Clean Air Act requires the EPA to develop, implement and enforce a Federal plan for sewage sludge incinerators in the state. This action proposes the sewage sludge incinerators Federal plan to implement the emission guidelines adopted on March 21, 2011, for those states that do not have an approved new state plan implementing the emission guidelines, as amended, in place by March 21, 2012.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 62 (new) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7429; Clean Air Act sec 129 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/00/2014

Final Rule 12/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/129/ssi/ssipg.html

Sectors Affected: 221320; 562213 Agency Contact: Amy Hambrick Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation E143-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-0964

FAX: 919 541-3470

E -Mail: hambrick.amy@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: David Cozzie Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation 1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW., Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 919 541-5356
E-Mail: cozzie.david@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR78View Related Documents

Title: Amendments and Confidentiality Determinations for Subpart L (Fluorinated Gas Production) and Amendments to Subpart

A

Abstract: This action would amend the reporting requirements for the Fluorinated Gas Production source category (subpart L) of the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program. It would also assign Confidential Business Information (CBI) determinations for any data reporting elements added under this action. This action would amend what is reported to EPA.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 98 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414 and 7542 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/19/2013 78 FR 69337

NPRM Comment Period End 01/21/2014

Final Rule 07/00/2014

Additional Information: Docket # EPA- HQ-OAR-2009-0927

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/ghgreporting

Sectors Affected: 333415; 423610; 423620; 334111; 325120; 334419; 335313; 423730 Agency Contact: Lisa Grogan-McCulloch Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation 6207J, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9743
E-Mail: grogan-mcculloch.lisa@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR80

View Related Documents

Title: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: The 2014 Critical Use Exemption From the Phaseout of Methyl Bromide

Abstract: Methyl bromide was phased out under the Clean Air Act and the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer in 2005, except for limited exemptions. This action would authorize uses for the 2014 critical use exemption, and would authorize the amount of methyl bromide that may be produced or imported for those uses in 2014. Absent this rulemaking, production and import of methyl bromide for critical uses would be zero for 2014. EPA takes this action under the authority of the Clean Air Act to reflect a consensus Decision of the Parties to the Montreal Protocol in November 2012.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7671c(d)(6) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/00/2013

Final Rule 05/00/2014

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2011-0431

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be ofinternational interest.

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/ozone/mbr Public Comment

URL: http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=EPA-HQOAR- 2011-0431 Agency Contact: Jeremy Arling Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation 6205J, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9055

FAX: 202 343-2338

E -Mail: Arling.Jeremy@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: David Donaldson Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation 6205J, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9086
E-Mail: donaldson.david@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR81

View Related Documents

Title: Performance Specification 18 for Hydrogen Chloride Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems

Abstract: EPA is proposing to establish Performance Specification 18 for Hydrogen Chloride (HCl) Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems (CEM). Performance Specification 18 (PS 18) would provide Quality Assurance/Quality Control procedures for assessing the acceptability of all HCl CEMS when they are initially installed. Currently the regulations specify the use of an extractive Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) and Performance Specification 15 to measure HCl continuously. Performance Specification18 is a flexible measurement-based PS for both FTIR and non-FTIR technologies.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2013

Final Rule 02/00/2015

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Candace Sorrell Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation E143-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1064

FAX: 919 541-0516

E -Mail: sorrell.candace@epa.gov Agency Contact: Raymond Merrill Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation Building E, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 Research Triangle Park , NC 27709
Phone: 919 541-5225

FAX: 919 541-0516

E -Mail: merrill.raymond@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR88

View Related DocumentsTitle: Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Modified Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units

Abstract: This action will amend the electric generating units (EGU) New Source Performance Standards for modified sources for greenhouse gas (GHG) under Clean Air Act section 111(b).

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: CAA 111 Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: On December 7, 2009, the EPA found that current and projected concentrations of greenhouse gases (GHG) in the atmosphere threaten the public health and welfare of current and future generations. Electric generating units (EGUs) are the single biggest stationary source of greenhouse gases and account for well over a third of all greenhouse gas emissions in the United States. Recognizing that greenhouse gases pose a threat to the public health and welfare and that EGUs are one of the largest sources of GHG emissions, the EPA has begun taking regulatory steps to ensure reductions of GHG emissions from EGUs. The regulatory path that the EPA has embarked upon commits the agency to regulating emissions from, not just new EGUs, but also existing EGUs (including those that are modified).

Legal Basis: EPA will use the Clean Air Act authority under section 111 (b) to set GHG standards for modified EGU sources. The Clean Air Act (CAA) gives the Agency broad authority to set standards for emissions of "air pollutants." GHGs have been determined by the U.S. Supreme Court to be "air pollutants" that are subject to regulation under the CAA. Because of this and the fact that GHGs are not currently regulated under either National Ambient Air Quality Standards or under the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants, EPA has the authority to address them under the New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) program.

Alternatives: Not yet determined.

Costs and Benefits: At this time we do not have any estimates regarding the benefits and costs of this action, but we do expect it to be a significant regulatory action with annual effects on the economy exceeding $100 million.

Risks: Not yet determined.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/00/2014

Final Rule 06/00/2015

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2013-0603. Split from RIN 2060-AQ91

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Federal; State; Tribal

Federalism: No Energy Affected: Yes

Related RINs: Related to 2060- AQ91; Related to 2060- AR33 Agency Contact: Sharon Nizich Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation D243, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2825

FAX: 919 541-5450

E -Mail: nizich.sharon@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Lisa Conner Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation D205-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5060
E-Mail: conner.lisa@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR89

View Related Documents

Title: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Technical Updates to HTS Codes and Party Ratification Status Under the Montreal

ProtocolAbstract: This action is a technical update to address outdated appendices in the stratospheric protection regulations as well as associated outdated regulatory text language. First, appendix C (a list of Parties to the Montreal Protocol as of January 2003) will be deleted and regulatory text will refer to the Ozone Secretariat's website for lists of countries that have ratified various amendments of the Montreal Protocol. This will help clarify those countries the Unites States is able to trade with per ratification status and decisions of the Montreal Protocol. Referring to the Montreal Protocol website will increase certainty by avoiding the need for future updates to ratification status. The regulatory text will be updated to reflect that developing countries are now subject to control requirements on hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) and therefore the Montreal Protocol's HCFC trade provisions now apply to trade with these countries. Second, appendix K will be updated to reflect the current harmonized tariff schedule (HTS) codes associated with ozone-depleting substances. This will help importers identify what HTS code they should

use.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7671c(d)(6) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2013

Direct Final Rule 12/00/2013

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2013-0600

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of

international interest.

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/ozone/strathome.html

Sectors Affected: 325120; 424690 Agency Contact: Staci Gatica Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation 6205J, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9469

FAX: 202 343-2338

E -Mail: Gatica.Staci@epa.gov Agency Contact: Elizabeth Whiteley Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation 6205J, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW., Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9310
E-Mail: whiteley.elizabeth@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR90

View Related Documents

Title: NESHAP for Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines; New Source Performance Standards for Stationary Internal Combustion Engines; Notice of Reconsideration

Abstract: On January 30, 2013, EPA issued final amendments to the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines and the New Source Performance Standards for Stationary Internal Combustion Engines. EPA received three petitions for reconsideration of the final amendments. On June 28, 2013, EPA granted reconsideration on three issues raised in the petitions. The petitions for reconsideration indicated that the public lacked an opportunity to comment on these provisions. Although EPA added these provisions in response to public comments on the proposal, EPA granted reconsideration to provide an opportunity for public comment on these three issues. EPA plans to issue a Federal Register notice announcing our decision to grant reconsideration and soliciting public comment on the three issues.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60; 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations )Legal Authority: 42 USC 7411; 42 USC 7412 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 09/05/2013 78 FR 54606

NPRM Comment Period End 11/04/2013

Final Rule 05/00/2014

Additional Information: Docket #: EPA- HQ-OAR-2008-0708

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: Governmental Jurisdictions Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/rice/ricepg.html

Sectors Affected: 2211 Agency Contact: Melanie King Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation D243-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2469
E-Mail: king.melanie@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Robert Wayland Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation D243-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1045

FAX: 919 541-5450

E -Mail: Wayland.RobertJ@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR92

View Related Documents

Title: Air Quality: Revisions to Definition of Volatile Organic Compounds--Exclusion of 2-Amino-2-Methyl-1-Propanol (AMP)

Abstract: This direct final with parallel proposal would revise EPA's definition of VOC for purposes of preparing SIPs to attain the NAAQS for ozone. The action would add AMP to the list of compounds excluded from the definition of VOC on the basis that this compound makes a negligible contribution to tropospheric ozone formation. VOC exemption petition submitted by Angus/Dow on 10/3/12.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7602(s) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/00/2013

Direct Final Rule 11/00/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Dave Sanders Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation C539-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3356

FAX: 919 541-0824

E -Mail: sanders.dave@epa.gov Agency Contact: Krishna Viswanathan Environmental Protection AgencyAir and Radiation C539-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-0641

FAX: 919 541-0824

E -Mail: viswanathan.krishna@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR93

View Related Documents

Title: Air Quality: Revision to Definition of Volatile Organic Compounds--Exclusion of Benzotrifluoride

Abstract: This direct final with parallel proposal would revise EPA's definition of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) for purposes of preparing State Implementation Plans (SIPs) to attain the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ozone. The action would add benzotrifluoride (also known as trifluorotoluene, CASNR 98-08-8) to the list of compounds excluded from the definition of VOC on the basis that this compound makes a negligible contribution to tropospheric ozone formation. VOC exemption petition submitted by Kowa American Corp. (Prior: OCC) on 7/29/12.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7602(s) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/00/2014

Direct Final Rule 02/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Dave Sanders Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation C539-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3356

FAX: 919 541-0824

E -Mail: sanders.dave@epa.gov Agency Contact: Krishna Viswanathan Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation C539-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-0641

FAX: 919 541-0824

E -Mail: viswanathan.krishna@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR94

View Related Documents

Title: Air Quality: Revision to Definition of Volatile Organic Compounds--Exclusion of 1,1,2,2-Tetrafluoro-1-(2,2,2- trifluoroethoxy) ethane (HFE-347pc -f)

Abstract: This direct final with parallel proposal proposes to revise EPA's definition of Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) for purposes of preparing State Implementation Plans (SIPs) to attain the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ozone. The proposal would add 1,1,2,2-Tetrafluoro-1-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy) ethane (HFE-347pc-f) (CAS-RN: 406-78-0) to the list of compounds excluded from the definition of VOC on the basis that this compound makes a negligible contribution to tropospheric ozone formation. VOC exemption petition submitted by AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc. on 2/5/07.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: NoCFR Citation: 40 CFR 51 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7602(s) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2013

Direct Final Rule 12/00/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Dave Sanders Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation C539-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3356

FAX: 919 541-0824

E -Mail: sanders.dave@epa.gov Agency Contact: Krishna Viswanathan Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation C539-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-0641

FAX: 919 541-0824

E -Mail: viswanathan.krishna@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR96

View Related Documents

Title: Revisions to the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems Source Category of the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule

Abstract: This rule would make revisions to the Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems source category (Subpart W) of the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule. Specifically, this rule would correct technical errors, revise unclear or ambiguous provisions, address implementation issues raised by facilities, improve consistency of the data collected, and help ensure that data collected is representative of industry.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 98 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2013

Final Rule 08/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/ghgreporting/

Sectors Affected: 221210; 211112; 211; 486210 Agency Contact: Alexis McKittrick Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation 6207J, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW., Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9153

FAX: 202 343-2359

E -Mail: mckittrick.alexis@epa.gov Agency Contact: Lisa Grogan-McCulloch Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation 6207J, Washington, DC 20460Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9743
E-Mail: grogan-mcculloch.lisa@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR98

View Related Documents

Title: General Permits and Permits by Rule for the Tribal Minor New Source Review Program

Abstract: The Tribal Minor New Source Review (NSR) program applies to new and modified minor sources and minor modifications at major sources of air pollution in Indian country. The program, established in 2011, is implemented through issuance of preconstruction permits that can include, among other requirements, pollutant emission limits for minor sources and emission limitations on the potential of sources to emit pollution that would otherwise be considered major sources. This minor source program for Indian country is similar to state minor NSR programs. State minor NSR programs often use general permits and permits by rule as streamlined permitting approaches for similar emission units or stationary sources. This action provides general permits and permits by rule for certain source categories of minor sources wishing to locate in Indian country. This action proposes general permits for boilers and engines; and permits by rule (and general permits in the alternative) for printing operations (including degreasing and solvent cleaning); stone quarrying and processing; concrete batch plants and saw mills.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 49.151 to 49.161 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 01/00/2014

Final Rule 09/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business;
Governmental Jurisdictions Government Levels Affected: Local; Tribal

Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Chris Stoneman Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation C304-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-0823

FAX: 919 541-0072

E -Mail: stoneman.chris@epa.gov Agency Contact: Mark Sendzik Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation C-304.03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5534

FAX: 919 541-0942

E -Mail: sendzik.mark@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AS00

View Related Documents

Title: Revisions to Ambient Monitoring Quality Assurance and Other Requirements

Abstract: Quality assurance (QA) and other ambient monitoring requirements have become increasingly complex due to the many revisions to the national ambient air quality standards since 2008. This complexity has increased the burden on state and local agencies who must comply with the requirements as well as the EPA Regions and Headquarters staff that must interpret the regulations and provide supplemental explanatory guidance. This action will reduce the compliance burden on states by identifying opportunities for efficiency in the implementation of QA regulations and also by clarifying rule language to more clearly articulate minimum technical requirements. In addition to proposing a simplified structure for QA requirements described in the CFR, this action will address other common-sense revisions that have been suggested by states or EPA staff in the areasof data reporting and certification, annual monitoring network plans, network design, and the review and approval of new or revised ambient methods. The overall goal of this rule is the identification of opportunities for monitoring agency burden reduction while maintaining the current high quality of the resulting ambient data.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 58 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/00/2013

Final Rule 04/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Lewis Weinstock Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation C304-06, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3661

FAX: 919 541-1903

E -Mail: weinstock.lewis@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AS01

View Related Documents

Title: Oil and Natural Gas Sector: Reconsideration of Additional Provisions of New Source Performance Standards

Abstract: This action will address issues raised by petitioners following the final rule published on August 16, 2012, that were
not addressed in the action "Oil and Natural Gas Sector: Reconsideration of Certain Provisions of New Source Performance Standards." This action will also finalize provisions for compliance monitoring of storage vessels and associated closed vent systems. Equipment and operations affected by these actions are located at oil and natural gas upstream and midstream operations.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2013

Final Rule 12/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: No

Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Chris Frantz Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation E143-05, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive , Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 Research Triangle Park , NC 27709
Phone: 919 541-4312
E-Mail: frantz.chris@epa.gov Agency Contact: Bruce Moore Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation E143-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5460
FAX: 919 541-0246E-Mail: moore.bruce@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AS02

View Related Documents

Title: Treatment of Data Influenced by Exceptional Events--Rule Revisions

Abstract: This proposal will revise the Exceptional Events Rulemaking to clarify and streamline certain rule elements, including, but not limited to, those associated with high wind dust events, historical fluctuations, the "not reasonably controllable or preventable" criterion, and "but for." On March 22, 2007, the EPA promulgated the "Treatment of Data Influenced by Exceptional Events; Final Rule" (72 FR 13560) pursuant to the 2005 amendment of Clean Air Act (CAA) Section 319. This rule, known as the Exceptional Events Rule (EER), superseded the EPA's previous natural events guidance and those sections of the interim fire policy document that address exceptional events. The EER created a regulatory process codified at 40 CFR parts 50 and 51 (50.1, 50.14 and 51.930). These regulatory sections contain definitions, procedural requirements, requirements for air agency demonstrations, and criteria for EPA approval for the exclusion of air quality data from regulatory decisions under the EER. Since EPA promulgated the EER in 2007, numerous interested parties have raised questions and issues regarding implementation of the rule.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51; 40 CFR 50 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: title 42; chapter 85; subchapter III; sec 7619 (CAA sec 319) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 04/00/2014

Final Rule 04/00/2015

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: No

Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Elizabeth Palma Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation C539-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5432

FAX: 919 541-3470

E -Mail: palma.elizabeth@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AH23

View Related Documents

Title: Procedure 3 - Quality Assurance Requirements for Continuous Opacity Monitoring Systems at Stationary Sources

Abstract: This rulemaking establishes quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) procedures for continuous opacity monitoring systems (COMS) installed for compliance. This action is necessary because EPA does not currently have QA/QC procedures for COMS. The procedures would apply to COMS used to determine continuous compliance with opacity standards in federally enforceable regulations.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7411 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 05/08/2003 68 FR 24692

Direct Final Rule 02/14/2012 77 FR 8160

Second NPRM 02/14/2012 77 FR 8209Notice 03/28/2012 77 FR 18709

Final Rule 12/00/2013

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2003-0115

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/emc/proposed/m203.pdf Agency Contact: Lula Melton Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation E143-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2910

FAX: 919 541-4511

E -Mail: melton.lula@epa.gov Agency Contact: Conniesue Oldham Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation E143-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-7774

FAX: 919 541-0516

E -Mail: oldham.conniesue@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AK26

View Related Documents

Title: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Listing of Substitutes for Ozone-Depleting Substances: N-Propyl Bromide

Abstract: This rule would make a determination as to whether n-propyl bromide (nPB) is an acceptable substitute for Class I and Class II ozone depleting substances used in aerosol solvent and adhesives end uses. If found acceptable, this would provide industry with another alternative to solvents with higher ozone depletion potential. An acceptability determination could include specific conditions on the use of nPB as a solvent, such as limiting the specific applications in which it may be used to those with low emissions and requiring exposure limits that would be sufficient to mitigate risk and that are consistent with industry practices. Any conditions would be for the purpose of ensuring that nPB is used in a manner that is as safe and environmentally protective as other available substitutes. OSHA does not currently regulate nPB. If we determine that nPB cannot be used safely in a specific end use, as compared with other substitutes available for that end use, we would find it unacceptable.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7601; 42 USC 7671 to 7671q Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/03/2003 68 FR 33283

Second NPRM 10/02/2003 68 FR 56809

Second NPRM 05/30/2007 72 FR 30168

Final Rule 06/00/2014

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2002-0064. Split from RIN 2060-AJ58

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/ozone/snap

Sectors Affected: 238320; 326150 Agency Contact: Margaret Sheppard Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation 6205J, Washington, DC 20460Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9163

FAX: 202 343-2338

E -Mail: sheppard.margaret@epa.gov Agency Contact: Melissa Fiffer Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation 6205J, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9464

FAX: 202 343-2342

E -Mail: fiffer.melissa@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AM49

View Related Documents

Title: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Revision to the Venting Prohibition for Specific Substitute Refrigerants

Abstract: Using authority under section 608 of the Clean Air Act, this rule would exempt hydrocarbon refrigerants from the existing prohibition on venting, release and disposal of refrigerants. EPA recently listed hydrocarbon refrigerants as being acceptable or acceptable subject to use conditions as substitutes for ozone depleting substances under EPA's Significant New Alternative Policy Program. EPA is proposing to take this action based on current evidence that venting, release and disposal of hydrocarbon refrigerants do not pose a threat to the environment.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7601; 42 USC 7671 to 7671(q) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 04/12/2013 78 FR 21871

Final Rule 02/00/2014

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2012-0580

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/ozone/title6/608 Public Comment

URL: http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=EPA-HQOAR- 2012-0580

Sectors Affected: 333415; 811412; 562920; 423930 Agency Contact: Sally Hamlin Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation 6205J, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9711

FAX: 202 343-2362

E -Mail: hamlin.sally@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AN63

View Related Documents

Title: Requirements for Reformulated Gasoline (RFG) Under the 8-hour Ozone Standard for Bump-up Areas Designated
Attainment for the 1- hour Ozone Standard Prior to Revocation

Abstract: Reformulated Gasoline (RFG) is gasoline blended to reduce emissions that cause ozone. The Clean Air Act (CAA) requires certain areas to use RFG, depending on how serious the ozone problem. In some cases, areas that previously had a less-serious ozone problem subsequently experience worse air quality, and in such cases the Clean Air Act requires them to be "bumped up" to a higher category, thereby requiring use of RFG. The Agency is now implementing the transition from theprevious 1-hour ozone standard to the 8-hour standard. This rule would set regulations for such cases.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act 211(k)
Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/23/2006 71 FR 36042

Final Rule 01/00/2014

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2006-0318

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 324110; 484220; 484230 Agency Contact: Kurt Gustafson Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation 6406J, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9219

FAX: 202 343-2800

E -Mail: gustafson.kurt@epa.gov Agency Contact: Leila Cook Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation AASMCG, Ann Arbor, MI 48105 Ann Arbor , MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4820
E-Mail: cook.leila@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP08

View Related Documents

Title: Revisions to Test Method for Determining Stack Gas Velocity Taking Into Account Velocity Decay Near the Stack Walls

Abstract: This action revises the voluntary test method for determining volumetric gas flow taking into account the velocity decay near the stack or duct walls. The current method addresses only sources where the flow measurements are made in
locations with circular cross-sections. This revised test method addresses flow measurement locations with both circular and rectangular cross-sections, increases the accuracy of the method, and simplifies its application. The primary users of the method are owners and operators of utility units subject to the Acid Rain program and large electric generating units and large non-generating units that are subject to the nitrogen oxide State Implementation Plan call.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR part 60 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act title I Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 08/25/2009 74 FR 42819

Final Rule 04/00/2014

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2008-0697

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 221112Agency Contact: Jason Dewees Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation E143-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-9724

FAX: 919 541-0516

E -Mail: dewees.jason@epa.gov Agency Contact: Conniesue Oldham Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation E143-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-7774

FAX: 919 541-0516

E -Mail: oldham.conniesue@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ01

View Related Documents

Title: Revisions to Test Methods and Testing Regulations

Abstract: This action will make needed corrections and updates to source testing methods and testing provisions in 40 CFR parts 60, 61, and 63. For example, Method 5, which determines particulate matter from stationary sources is being edited to remove silica gel as the prescribed drying agent. Silica gel has been listed as a potential carcinogen and other agents that are safer and more environmentally friendly are being prescribed. In Method 2, which determines stack gas velocity, a misplaced square root sign in one of the equations is being corrected. This is a periodic action that is done every several years to keep the rules up-to-date and to ensure that compliance testing and monitoring are done correctly.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51 40 CFR 60 40 CFR 61 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 to 7601 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 01/09/2012 77 FR 1130

Final Rule 11/00/2013

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2010-0114

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 325188; 325199; 212299; 324122; 311812; 212393; 333618; 322121; 324110; 331312; 221320; 335911;

333611 Agency Contact: Foston Curtis Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation E143-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1063

FAX: 919 541-0516

E -Mail: curtis.foston@epa.gov Agency Contact: Conniesue Oldham Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation E143-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-7774

FAX: 919 541-0516

E -Mail: oldham.conniesue@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ29

View Related Documents

Title: Stationary Combustion Turbine New Source Performance Standard (NSPS) Amendments to Address UARG

Reconsideration Petition

Abstract: EPA is amending specific provisions in the new source performance standard (NSPS) for stationary combustion turbines to resolve issues and questions raised by the utility air regulatory group (UARG) on the original final rulemaking published on July 6, 2006 (71 FR 38482), and to address other technical and editorial issues that have been identified since promulgation. The primary issues raised in the petition include the NOx standard and the monitoring and reporting requirements for owners/operators that elect to install NOx CEMS. This rule would also amend the location and wording of existing paragraphs to clarify the requirements of the NSPS. It would also exempt owners/operators of stationary combustion turbines that meet the applicability criteria of and that are complying with the SO2 standard in either subparts J or Ja (standards of performance for petroleum refineries) or only burn fuels containing inherently low amounts of sulfur from complying with the otherwise applicable SO2 limit in subpart KKKK. In addition, at proposal, we requested comment on defining reconstruction specific to subpart KKKK. Also, in recognition that the ultra-low sulfur diesel requirements include Hawaii, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands we are intending to require owner/operators of turbines in these locations to the meet the same sulfur requirements as owner/operators of turbines located in State territories. Finally, we are requiring electronic reporting of performance testing.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: CAA 111 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 08/29/2012 77 FR 52553

NPRM Comment Period Extended 10/26/2012 77 FR 65351

Final Rule 10/00/2014

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2004-0490

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State; Local; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 211111; 211112; 486210 Agency Contact: Christian Fellner Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation D243-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-4003

FAX: 919 541-5450

E -Mail: fellner.christian@epa.gov Agency Contact: Melanie King Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation D243-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2469
E-Mail: king.melanie@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ36

View Related Documents

Title: Supplemental Determinations for Renewable Fuels Produced Under the Final RFS2 Program From Palm Oil

Abstract: As indicated in the final rule for the Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS) Program, while the Agency issued lifecycle greenhouse gas (GHG) threshold determinations for the major fuel pathways projected to meet the bulk of the RFS volume mandates, assessments of other new fuel pathways such as biofuels produced from palm oil, could not be completed in time for the final rule. In the process of assessing these fuels, the Agency is issuing determinations through several supplemental notices to the final rule, including Palm Oil.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final RuleMajor: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 86; 40 CFR 80 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act 211(o)
Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Notice 01/27/2012 77 FR 4300

Comment Period Extended 02/14/2012 77 FR 8254

Final Rule 08/00/2014

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ - OAR-2005-0161. Split from RIN 2060-AO81.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of

international interest.

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/fuels/renewablefuels/index.htm

Sectors Affected: 324110 Agency Contact: Paul Argyropoulos Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation 6401A, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-1123
E-Mail: argyropoulos.paul@epa.gov Agency Contact: Robert Larson Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation AAFC, Ann Arbor, MI 48105 Ann Arbor , MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4277
E-Mail: larson.robert@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ55

View Related Documents

Title: Amendments to Tribal Delegation of Authority Provisions in the Prevention of Significant Deterioration Program

Abstract: This amendment will be a policy update of a rule from several decades ago. It will amend the Part 52 Approval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans, 1977 Clean Air Act Amendments to Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) 52.21(u) Delegation of Authority. This rule will delete a section that restricts tribes from taking delegation of the PSD program. It will add tribes to paragraph 2 along with States and local air pollution control agencies. These changes are intended to ensure that tribes are treated the same as states and locals and to enable direct delegation of New Source Review to tribes. This rule will also update paragraph numbering and an erroneous cross reference to be consistent with the current program.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 42 CFR 52.21(u) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/30/2011 76 FR 82234

Final Rule 11/00/2013

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2010-0943

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: NoSectors Affected: 924110; 238990; 324121; 811121; 721120; 323110; 212321; 211111; 424510; 331511; 332812; 221210; 211112; 311119; 424710; 327320; 321113; 221320; 321212; 562212; 337110 Agency Contact: Regina Chappell Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation C304-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3650

FAX: 919 541-0942

E -Mail: chappell.regina@epa.gov Agency Contact: Laura McKelvey Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation C304-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5497

FAX: 919 541-0942

E -Mail: mckelvey.laura@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ71

View Related Documents

Title: Amendments to Compliance Certification Content Requirements for State and Federal Operating Permits Programs

Abstract: The EPA finalizing amendments to the compliance certification requirements for State and Federal operating permits programs that were published in the Federal Register on June 27, 2003. In that action, one sentence was removed from the rules in error. This action restores the sentence to its original location in the rules.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 70.6(c)(5)(iii)(B); 40 CFR 71.6(c)(5)(iii)(B) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 03/29/2013 78 FR 19164

Final Rule 07/00/2014

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2002-0062

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg/t5pfpr.html Agency Contact: Joanna Swanson Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation C304-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5282

FAX: 919 541-5509

E -Mail: swanson.joanna@epa.gov Agency Contact: Juan Santiago Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation C504-05, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1084

FAX: 919 541-5509

E -Mail: santiago.juan@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ86View Related Documents

Title: Control of Air Pollution From Motor Vehicles: Tier 3 Motor Vehicle Emission and Fuel Standards

Abstract: This action would establish more stringent vehicle emissions standards and reduce the sulfur content of gasoline as part of a systems approach to addressing the impacts of motor vehicles and fuels on air quality and public health. The rule would result in significant reductions in pollutants such as ozone, particulate matter, and air toxics across the country and help state and local agencies in their efforts to attain and maintain health-based National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). These proposed vehicle standards are intended to harmonize with California's Low Emission Vehicle program, thus creating a federal vehicle emissions program that would allow automakers to sell the same vehicles in all 50 states. The vehicle standards would also coordinate with the light-duty vehicle greenhouse gas standards for model years 2017-2025, creating a nationwide alignment of vehicle programs for criteria pollutant and greenhouse gases.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: Private Sector

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80; 40 CFR 86; 40 CFR 85; 40 CFR 600; 40 CFR 1036; 40 CFR 1037; 40 CFR 1065; 40 CFR 1066 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 202(a); Clean Air Act sec 202(k); Clean Air Act sec 211(c) Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: States are working to attain National Ambient Air Quality Standards for ozone, PM and NOx. Light-duty vehicles are responsible for a significant portion of the precursors to these pollutants and are large contributors to ambient air toxic pollution. In many nonattainment areas, by 2014, cars and light trucks are projected to contribute 30 to 45 percent of total nitrogen oxides (NOx) emissions, 20 to 25 percent of total volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions, and 5 to 10 percent of total direct particulate matter (PM2.5) emissions. Importantly, without future controls, by 2020 mobile sources are expected to be as much as 50 percent of the inventories of these pollutants for some individual urban areas. EPA has estimated that light-duty vehicles will contribute about half of the 2030 mobile source inventory of air toxics emissions from all mobile sources. The most recent National-Scale Air Toxics Assessment showed that, in 2005, mobile sources were responsible for over 50 percent of the

cancer risk and noncancer hazard.

Legal Basis: The Clean Air Act section 202(a) provides EPA with general authority to prescribe vehicle standards, subject to any specific limitations elsewhere in the Act. In addition, section 202(k) provides EPA with authority to issue and revise regulations applicable to evaporative emissions of hydrocarbons from all gasoline-fueled motor vehicles. EPA is also using its authority under section 211(c) of the Clean Air Act to address gasoline sulfur controls.

Alternatives: The rulemaking proposal discussed regulatory alternatives that were considered in addition to the Agency's primary proposal.

Costs and Benefits: EPA estimates that the proposed program would cost about a penny per gallon of gasoline, and about $130 per vehicle. The annual cost of the overall program in 2030 would be approximately $3.4 billion; however, EPA estimates that in 2030 the annual monetized health benefits of the proposed Tier 3 standards would be between $8 and $23 billion.

Risks: Approximately 158 million people currently live in counties designated nonattainment for one or more of the NAAQS, and this figure does not include the people living in areas with a risk of exceeding the NAAQS in the future. These people experience unhealthy levels of air pollution, which are linked with respiratory and cardiovascular problems and other adverse health impacts that lead to increased medication use, hospital admissions, emergency department visits, and premature mortality. The reductions in ambient ozone and PM2.5 that would result from the proposed Tier 3 standards would provide significant health benefits. In addition, more than 50 million people live, work, or go to school in close proximity to high-traffic roadways, and the average American spends more than one hour traveling along roads each day. Exposure to traffic-related pollutants has been linked with adverse health impacts such as respiratory problems (particularly in asthmatic children) and cardiovascular problems. The Tier 3 standards would reduce criteria pollutant and air toxic emissions from cars and light trucks, which continue to be a significant contributor to air pollution directly near roads.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 05/21/2013 78 FR 29815

NPRM Comment Period Extended 05/29/2013 78 FR 32223

Final Rule 02/00/2014

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2011-0135

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business Government Levels Affected: No

Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/tier3.htm Public Comment

URL: http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=EPA-HQOAR- 2011-0135

Sectors Affected: 11; 811198; 325199; 336111; 811112; 336311; 325193; 493130; 336312; 811111; 336120; 336112; 336211;335312; 211112; 424690; 333618; 325110; 424710; 324110; 486910 Agency Contact: Catherine Yanca Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation NVFEL S87, Ann Arbor, MI 48105 Ann Arbor , MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4769
E-Mail: yanca.catherine@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Kathryn Sargeant Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation NVFEL S77, Ann Arbor, MI 48105 Ann Arbor , MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4441
E-Mail: Sargeant.Kathryn@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ90

View Related Documents

Title: NESHAP Risk and Technology Review for the Mineral Wool and Wool Fiberglass Industries; NESHAP for Wool Fiberglass Area Sources

Abstract: The maximum achievable control technology (MACT) standard for Mineral Wool Production was promulgated on June 1, 1999, and the MACT for Wool Fiberglass Production was promulgated on June 14, 1999. The Clean Air Act requires EPA to evaluate the risk remaining to human health within 8 years of promulgation of each MACT standard; for these regulations, that date expired in June 2007. Along with risk, the EPA is also required to review new technology in the industry that can reduce hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions from regulated sources in the industry, and may consider costs under this technology review. EPA is addressing these Clean Air Act requirements under a combined risk and technology review (RTR). EPA was petitioned to review the risk for these source categories, and also to determine MACT floors for pollutants and processes that were not regulated by the MACT standards. The court entered into an agreement with EPA and the litigants; the resulting deadline for proposal was November 4, 2011, the supplemental proposal was published in the Federal Register on April 15, 2013 (78 FR 22370), and the promulgation of the two RTRs and a final rule for wool fiberglass area sources is scheduled for January 30, 2014.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 1175 -1196; 40 CFR 63 1380-1399 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial Consent Decree--As per 4 day extension granted on 10/31. (Sierra Club v. Jackson, 09-0152, USDC Northern District of CA) 10/31/2011

Other Judicial 1/30/14--Consent Decree deadline for final rule--Sierra Club v. Jackson, 09-0152, USDC Northern District of CA, as per 11/28/12 stipulation. 01/30/2014

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/25/2011 76 FR 72770

Notice 12/20/2011 76 FR 78872

Notice 01/23/2012 77 FR 3223
Supplemental NPRM 04/15/2013 78 FR 22369

Final Rule 02/00/2014

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2010-1041, EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-1042

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: No

Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/rrisk/rtrpg.html

Sectors Affected: 327993 Agency Contact: Susan Fairchild Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation D-243-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711Phone: 919 541-5167

FAX: 919 541-5450
E-Mail: fairchild.susan@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Keith Barnett Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation D243-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5605

FAX: 919 541-5450

E -Mail: barnett.keith@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR02

View Related Documents

Title: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP): Group IV Polymers and Resins, Pesticide Active Ingredient Production, and Polyether Polyols Production Risk and Technology Review

Abstract: In this action EPA will finalize risk and technology reviews for the following three National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP): Group IV Polymers and Resins, Pesticide Active Ingredient Production, and Polyether Polyols Production. The proposal for these NESHAP was published on January 9, 2012 (77 FR 1268), and under a consent decree deadline, the final rule must be promulgated in January 2014: Group IV Polymers and Resins, Pesticide Active Ingredient Production, and Polyether Polyols Production. Clean Air Act (CAA) sections 112(f)(2) and 112(d)(6) require EPA to conduct residual risk and technology reviews. Under the "technology review" provision of CAA section 112, EPA is required to review maximum achievable control technology (MACT) standards and to revise them "as necessary (taking into account developments in practices, processes and control technologies)" no less frequently than every 8 years. Under the "residual risk" provision of CAA section 112, EPA must evaluate the MACT standards within 8 years after promulgation and promulgate standards if required to provide an ample margin of safety to protect public health or prevent an adverse environmental effect. EPA will also remove startup, shutdown, and malfunction exemptions for these source categories, as required by recent court decisions.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR part 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 112 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial Sierra Club v. Jackson, 09-0152, USDC Northern District of CA; consent decree deadline applies to RTRs for subparts JJJ, MMM, and PPP only 11/30/2011

Other Judicial Sierra Club v. Jackson, 09-0152, USDC Northern District of CA; consent decree deadline applies to RTRs for subparts JJJ, MMM, and PPP only 01/31/2014

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 01/09/2012 77 FR 1268

NPRM Comment Period Extended 03/21/2012 77 FR 16508

Final Rule 12/00/2013

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2011-0435

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 325199; 325320; 325211 Agency Contact: Nick Parsons Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation E143-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5372

FAX: 919 541-0246

E -Mail: parsons.nick@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Penny Lassiter Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation E143-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5396FAX: 919 541-0246
E-Mail: lassiter.penny@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR21

View Related Documents

Title: RFS Pathways II and Amendments to the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS2)

Abstract: In May, EPA issued a proposal to amend the RFS2 regulations to facilitate the introduction of new renewable fuels and improve implementation of the program. The proposal included various new renewable fuel pathways that will enhance the ability of the biofuels industry to supply advanced biofuels, including cellulosic biofuels, to the market. The proposed amendments would allow renewable diesel, renewable naphtha, and renewable electricity (used in electric vehicles) produced from landfill biogas to generate cellulosic or advanced biofuel renewable identification numbers (RINs). Renewable compressed natural gas (CNG) and liquefied natural gas (LNG) produced from landfill biogas are also proposed to generate cellulosic RINs, and EPA proposed to allow butanol to qualify as an advanced biofuel. The rulemaking also proposed a clarification regarding the definition of crop residue to include corn kernel fiber and proposed an approach to determining the volume of cellulosic RINs from various cellulosic feedstocks. The proposed rule includes minor amendments to the regulations for E15 misfueling mitigation regulations to improve implementation. Finally, EPA proposed to reduce the survey requirements associated with the ultra-low sulfur diesel (ULSD) program in view of the high compliance rate that has been achieved.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80(M) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act; title II Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/14/2013 78 FR 36041

Final Rule 12/00/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Anne-Marie Pastorkovich Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation 6406J, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9623

FAX: 202 343-2801

E -Mail: pastorkovich.anne-marie@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR25

View Related Documents

Title: Review of New Sources and Modifications in Indian Country; Definitions and Exempted Units and Activities

Abstract: This final rule will add units/activities for exemption under the minor New Source Review (NSR) program in Indian Country originally published on July 1, 2011. These additional categories will make the list more similar to State exemption lists, where possible. In addition, we are revising how the term "commence construction" is used in the July 1, 2011, rule. That final rule used the term "commence construction" for certain permitting deadlines but the term was not defined. Although "commence" and "construction" are defined in the major NSR provisions, and referenced in the July 1, 2011, minor NSR rule, we are revising the use of "commence construction" to make implementation of the minor NSR rule easier. Additionally, we are reviewing comments on the June 4, 2013, proposed rule to reduce the advance notification period required to the reviewing authority before a true minor source relocates and we may revise the 30-day requirement in the existing rule.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 49.151 to 49.161; 40 CFR 49.166 to 49.173 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seqLegal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/04/2013 78 FR 33266

Final Rule 03/00/2014

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2003-0076. Split from RIN 2060-AH37

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/nsr/

Sectors Affected: 924110; 238990; 324121; 811121; 721120; 323110; 212321; 211111; 424510; 331511; 332812; 221210; 211112; 311119; 424710; 327320; 321113; 221320; 321212; 562212; 337110 Agency Contact: Greg Nizich Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation E143-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3078
E-Mail: nizich.greg@epa.gov Agency Contact: Raj Rao Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation C504-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5344

FAX: 919 541-5509

E -Mail: rao.raj@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR29

View Related Documents

Title: Revisions to the Air Emissions Reporting Requirements: Revisions to Lead (Pb) Reporting Threshold and Clarifications to Technical Reporting Details

Abstract: The existing Air Emissions Reporting Requirements (AERR) in 40 CFR part 51 include a reporting threshold of 5 tons per year for lead (Pb). This action proposes to bring that threshold into line with the requirements of the revised Pb national standards (NAAQS) and its associated monitoring requirements of 0.5 tons per year. In this action, EPA will finalize technical corrections to appendix A of subpart A of the AERR final rule to make it consistent with the final implementation of the Emission Inventory System (EIS), which is used to collect the data required as part of the AERR. The final rule would affect State, local, and tribal agencies that are responsible for submitting data to EIS by requiring them to collect and submit data from additional Pb sources based on the lower emissions reporting threshold. The final action would also help clarify for these data submitters the technical elements of their submissions to the EIS by reducing inconsistencies with other features of appendix A.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51 subpart A; 40 CFR 51.122 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 110 and 172 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/20/2013 78 FR 37164

Final Rule 12/00/2013

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ_OAR -2004-0489

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Marc Houyoux Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation C339-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3649

FAX: 919 541-0684

E -Mail: houyoux.marc@epa.gov Agency Contact: Kim Paylor Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5474
E-Mail: paylor.kim@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR34

View Related Documents

Title: Implementation of the 2008 National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone: State Implementation Plan Requirements

Abstract: This final rule will address a range of implementation requirements for the 2008 National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ozone, including requirements pertaining to attainment demonstrations, reasonable further progress, reasonably available control technology, reasonably available control measures, nonattainment new source review, emission inventories, and the timing of State Implementation Plan submissions and compliance. Other issues also addressed in this final rule are the revocation of the 1997 ozone NAAQS for purposes other than transportation conformity; anti-backsliding requirements that would apply when the 1997 NAAQS are revoked; and routes to terminate the section 185 fee program.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 50; 40 CFR 51; 40 CFR 70; 40 CFR 71 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7409; 42 USC 7410; 42 USC 7511 to 7511f; 42 USC 7601(a)(1) Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: This rule is needed to establish requirements for what states must include in their state implementation plans (SIPs) to bring nonattainment areas into compliance with the 2008 ozone NAAQS. There is no court-ordered deadline for this final rule. However, the CAA requires the nonattainment area plans addressed by this rule to be developed and submitted by states within 2 to 3 years after the July 20, 2012 date of nonattainment designations.

Legal Basis: CAA Section110

Alternatives: The proposed rule included several alternatives for meeting implementation requirements, including but not limited to options for SIP submittal dates, NOx substitution for VOC in RFP SIPs, alternative baseline years for RFP and alternatives for addressing anti-backsliding requirements once the 1997 ozone NAAQS has been revoked. Additionally the EPA is solicited comments on a number of topics, including alternative approaches to achieving RFP, RACT flexibility and alternate
revocation dates for the 1997 ozone NAAQS.

Costs and Benefits: The annual burden for this information collection averaged over the first 3 years is estimated to be a total of 120,000 labor hours per year at an annual labor cost of $2.4 million (present value) over the 3-year period or approximately $91,000 per State for the 26 State respondents, including the District of Columbia. The average annual reporting burden is 690 hours per response, with approximately 2 responses per State for 58 State respondents. There are no capital or operating and maintenance costs associated with the proposed rule requirements. Burden is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).

Risks: Ozone concentrations that exceed the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) to can cause adverse public health and welfare effects, as discussed in the March 27, 2008 Final Rule for NAAQS for Ozone (73 FR 16436).

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/06/2013 78 FR 34177

NPRM Comment Period Extended 07/24/2013 78 FR 44485

Final Rule 05/00/2014

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2010-0885

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Karl Pepple Environmental Protection AgencyAir and Radiation C539-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2683

FAX: 919 541-0824

E -Mail: pepple.karl@epa.gov Agency Contact: Rich Damberg Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation C539-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5592

FAX: 919 541-0824

E -Mail: damberg.rich@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR46

View Related Documents

Title: Heavy-Duty Highway Program: Revisions for Emergency Vehicles and SCR Maintenance

Abstract: On January 18, 2001, EPA published a rule promulgating more stringent NOx and PM standards for heavy duty highway engines ("the heavy-duty highway rule"), entitled "Control of Air Pollution from New Motor Vehicles: Heavy-Duty Engine and Vehicle Standards" (66 FR 5001). EPA has previously published clarifications and technical amendments to that final heavy-duty highway rule. This action would provide additional clarification, modifications and technical amendments to the regulations for heavy-duty highway engines and would clarify, modify and technically amend some provisions in 40 CFR parts 86 and 1068. This action would assist regulated parties to comply with requirements by clarifying and/or simplifying those requirements. Specifically, this action would provide flexibility for on-highway emergency-response vehicles with respect to emissions of particulate matter and oxides of nitrogen. This action would also amend the requirements for emission-related scheduled maintenance with respect to replacement of diesel exhaust fluid, which is used in selective catalytic reduction control systems. This action is not expected to result in significant changes in regulatory burdens or costs.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 86 and 1068 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/08/2012 77 FR 34149

Final Rule 02/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/highwaydiesel/regs/2007-heavy -duty-highway.htm Agency Contact: Matt Spears Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation Mail Code: ASD1, Ann Arbor, MI 48105 Ann Arbor , MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4921

FAX: 734 214-4816

E -Mail: spears.matt@epa.gov Agency Contact: Lauren Steele Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation Ann Arbor, MI 48105 Ann Arbor , MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4788
E-Mail: steele.lauren@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR48View Related Documents

Title: Heavy-Duty GHG On-Highway and Non-Road Engine and Vehicle Regulation Streamlining and Technical Amendments

Abstract: This direct final rule consists of two parts: joint EPA/NHTSA amendments to the Medium- and Heavy-Duty Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Fuel Efficiency regulations issued on September 15, 2011 and EPA-exclusive amendments related to other EPA mobile source regulations. EPA and NHTSA are each adopting amendments to eliminate duplicative reporting requirements, reduce inadvertent minor differences between the EPA and NHTSA programs regarding such matters as voluntary early model year compliance, align testing procedures to market realities, and reduce unnecessary testing burdens. EPA is also adopting amendments including the engine replacement compliance provisions, technical hardship provisions related to emission standards for nonroad diesel engines, fuel line permeation test procedures for large spark ignition engines, and other nonroad spark-ignition engine amendments. This rule will assist regulated parties with complying with requirements by clarifying those requirements. This action is not expected to result in significant changes in regulatory burdens or costs.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 86; 40 CFR 1036; 40 CFR 1037; 40 CFR 1066; 40 CFR 1068 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/17/2013 78 FR 36135

Final Rule 06/17/2013 78 FR 36369

Notice 08/16/2013 78 FR 49963

Final Rule 11/00/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/ Agency Contact: Matt Spears Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation Mail Code: ASD1, Ann Arbor, MI 48105 Ann Arbor , MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4921

FAX: 734 214-4816

E -Mail: spears.matt@epa.gov Agency Contact: Angela Cullen Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation AAHDOC, Ann Arbor, MI 48105 Ann Arbor , MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4419
E-Mail: Cullen.Angela@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR52

View Related Documents

Title: 2013 Revisions to the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule and Proposed Confidentiality Determinations for New or Substantially Revised Data Elements

Abstract: The amendments in this action consist of two parts: amendments related to updating global warming potentials (GWPs) and other amendments and clarifications. The changes would improve the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program by clarifying compliance obligations and reducing confusion for reporters, improving consistency of the data collected, and ensuring that data collected through the GHGRP is representative of industry and comparable to the annual U.S. Greenhouse Gas Inventory (Inventory). The action also makes confidentiality determinations for newly proposed data elements.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 98 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414 and 7542 Legal Deadline: NoneTimetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 04/02/2013 78 FR 19802

Final Rule 11/00/2013

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2012-0934

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/ghgreporting

Sectors Affected: 211; 211111; 211112; 212112; 212113; 221; 221112; 221121; 221210; 221320; 311411; 311421; 311611; 316; 321; 322; 322110; 322121; 322122; 322130; 324; 324110; 325; 32511; 325110; 325120; 32518; 325193; 325199; 325212; 32531; 325312; 326; 326150; 327211; 327212; 327213; 327310; 327410; 327910; 331; 33111; 33131; 33141; 33149; 331492; 332; 333415; 334111; 334413; 334419; 33531; 335313; 336; 339; 423610; 423620; 423730; 4431; 486210; 562212; 611; 622 Agency Contact: Rachel Schmeltz Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation 6207J, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9124
E-Mail: Schmeltz.rachel@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR64

View Related Documents

Title: Kraft Pulp Mills NSPS Review

Abstract: Section 111(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) directs EPA to review and, if appropriate, revise the New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) at least every 8 years after promulgation. This is a review of subpart BB, Standards of Performance for Kraft Pulp Mills sections 60.280-285 which was promulgated in 1978 and last reviewed in 1986. The subpart is applicable to the following sources in kraft pulp mills that were installed after 1978: digester systems, brown stock washers, evaporator systems, recovery furnaces, smelt dissolving tanks, lime kilns, and condensate stripper systems. The pollutants regulated in this subpart include total reduced sulfur (TRS) compounds and particulate matter (PM). This action is subject to a citizen suit under section 304(a)(2) of the Clean Air Act brought against the U.S. EPA under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 701-06. This complaint seeks to compel the Administrator to fulfill her mandatory duty to review the NSPS for new and modified kraft pulp mills.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Private Sector

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2005; 42 USC 7411; CAA 111 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

NPRM Judicial Mandatory 8 year review 05/15/2013

NPRM Judicial Mandatory 8 year review 05/15/2013

Other Judicial Mandatory 8 year review 03/14/2014

Other Judicial Mandatory 8 year review 03/14/2014

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 05/23/2013 78 FR 31315

NPRM Comment Period Extended 06/28/2013 78 FR 38877

Final Rule 03/00/2014

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2012-0640

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 3221 Agency Contact: Kelley Spence Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation E143-03 , Research Triangle Park, NC 27711Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3158

FAX: 919 541-3470

E -Mail: spence.kelley@epa.gov Agency Contact: Robin Dunkins Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation E143-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5335

FAX: 919 541-3470

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR66

View Related Documents

Title: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Secondary Lead Smelters; Amendments

Abstract: These amendments will fix an inadvertent error that occurred when the Secondary Lead Smelting Residual Risk and Technology Review (RTR) was added to the eCFR. The final rule regulatory text for the RTR reproduced the entire subpart rather than only including amendatory text and used the same section numbers as the original National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP). This was done to aid the public in locating and understanding the entire subpart in one location since many changes were made to the original rule. As a result, the entire subpart was replaced in the eCFR, removing the old sections and replacing them with the new versions. The compliance date for existing sources to meet the requirements of the RTR is January 6, 2014. The Agency intended for those sources to continue complying with the requirements included in the original NESHAP until the compliance date for the RTR amendments arrives. The eCFR no longer contains those requirements due to the inadvertent replacement of the entire subpart. These amendments will add a paragraph to the regulatory text that clarifies sources must continue complying with the requirements that were in effect prior to the RTR amendments until the compliance date for the RTR amendments arrives. Additionally, these amendments will correct typos in a table of dioxin/furan congeners in the regulatory text, correct an error in the total hydrocarbon testing requirements, and clarify certain provisions related to monitoring differential pressure.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: CAA sec 112 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Direct Final Rule 11/00/2013

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2011-0344

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 331492 Agency Contact: Nathan Topham Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation D243-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-0483

FAX: 919 541-3207

E -Mail: topham.nathan@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Chuck French Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation D243-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-7912

FAX: 919 541-3207

E -Mail: french.chuck@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR68

View Related Documents

Title: State Implementation Plans: Response to Petition; Findings of Substantial Inadequacy; and SIP Calls to Amend Provisions Applying to Excess Emissions During Periods of Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction

Abstract: In this final action, EPA will issue findings of substantial inadequacy for certain states whose State Implementation Plans (SIPs) are inconsistent with the CAA and with current EPA rules and policies concerning treatment of a source's excess emissions during periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction (SSM). In addition, EPA is under this action issuing a "SIP call" for each of the states for which a SIP inadequacy is confirmed, which requires the state to revise its SIP as necessary to correct the inadequacy. The SIP call will establish a deadline by which each of these states must submit its corrective SIP revision. A corrective SIP revision will ensure that: (1) all periods of excess emissions, regardless of cause, will be treated as violations subject to EPA enforcement action; and (2) no periods of excess emissions can be automatically exempted from emissions

limits.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 52 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: CAA 110(k)(5) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/22/2013 78 FR 12460

NPRM Comment Period Extended 04/08/2013 78 FR 20855

Final Rule 11/00/2013

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2012-0322

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/air/urbanair/sipstatus/ Agency Contact: Lisa Sutton Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation C504-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3450

FAX: 919 541-5509

E -Mail: sutton.lisa@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Krishna Viswanathan Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation C539-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-0641

FAX: 919 541-0824

E -Mail: viswanathan.krishna@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR72

View Related Documents

Title: RFS Renewable Identification Number (RIN) Quality Assurance Program

Abstract: The Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) program regulations finalized in 2007 (RFS1) and 2010 (RFS2) were developed in collaboration with refiners, renewable fuel producers, and many other stakeholders. The RFS compliance program is based on the use of unique renewable identification numbers (RINs) assigned to batches of renewable fuel by renewable fuel producers and importers. These RINs can then be sold or traded, and used by any obligated party to demonstrate compliance with the applicable standard. The production, transfer, and use of invalid RINs has resulted in violations for parties that were not aware that the RINs were invalid. The rule will propose a voluntary mechanism for ensuring that RINs have been appropriately generated.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: NoCFR Citation: 40 CFR 80 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act 211(k) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/21/2013 78 FR 12158

Final Rule 12/00/2013

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2012-0621

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Public Comment

URL: http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQOAR- 2012-0621-0001

Sectors Affected: 325199; 325193; 45431; 424690; 424710; 324110; 424720 Agency Contact: Holly Pugliese Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation AAIO, Ann Arbor, MI 48105 Ann Arbor , MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4288
E-Mail: pugliese.holly@epa.gov Agency Contact: David Korotney Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation N27, Ann Arbor, MI 48105 Ann Arbor , MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4507
E-Mail: korotney.david@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR97

View Related Documents

Title: Clarification of Requirements for Method 303 Certification Training

Abstract: The EPA is proposing changes to Method 303 to better define the requirements associated with conducting Method 303 certification courses. Method 303 is an air pollution test method used to determine the visible emissions from coke ovens. This action adds additional language that clarifies the criteria used by the EPA to determine the competency of training providers, but does not change the requirements for conducting the test method. These changes will help entities interested in conducting training classes to better understand the requirements necessary to be approved to conduct these training courses.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: None (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Direct Final Rule 11/00/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Kim Garnett Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation E143-02, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive , Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 Research Triangle Park , NC 27709
Phone: 919 541-1158
E-Mail: garnett.kim@epa.gov Agency Contact: Robin Segall Environmental Protection AgencyAir and Radiation EW143-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-0893

FAX: 919 541-0516

E -Mail: Segall.Robin@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR99

View Related Documents

Title: Vacatur of the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) of PM2.5 Significant Impact Levels (SILs) and Significant Monitoring Concentration (SMC)

Abstract: This final rule would amend prevention of significant deterioration regulations for PM2.5 to remove the vacated portions of the Significant Impact Levels (SIL) and Significant Monitoring Concentration (SMC) provisions. On January 22, 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit granted an EPA request to vacate and remand to the EPA portions of the SIL provisions for PM2.5. The Court further vacated parts of two PSD rules establishing a PM2.5 SMC.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51; 40 CFR 52 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7601; 42 USC 7475 to 7479 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 11/00/2013

Additional Information: Docket #: EPA- HQ-OAR-2006-0605

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/nsr Agency Contact: Ben Garwood Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation C504-03, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 Research Triangle Park , NC 27709
Phone: 919 541-1358
E-Mail: garwood.ben@epa.gov Agency Contact: Dan Deroeck Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation C504-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5593

FAX: 919 685-3009

E -Mail: Deroeck.Dan@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO18

View Related Documents

Title: New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) and Emission Guidelines (EG) for Large Municipal Waste Combustors (MWCs).

Abstract: EPA originally adopted air emission standards for new and existing large municipal waste combustors (MWCs) in 1995. As required by section 129 of the Clean Air Act, EPA reviewed these standards and proposed revised standards. The proposal occurred on Dec 19, 2005, and final standards were published on May 10, 2006 (71 FR 27323). A number of individuals filed petitions on various aspects of the standards. Moreover, the Agency received a separate petition to reopen the section 129(a)(2) standards. EPA agreed to initiate such an action. Accordingly, EPA petitioned the court to remand the 2006 LMWC rule to EPA. The court issued the remand in February 2008.Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act sec 129 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM

Notice 03/20/2007 72 FR 13016

Additional Information: EPA publication information: Notice of reconsideration of final rule - http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPAAIR/2007/March/Day-20/a5022.htm

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 924110; 562213 Agency Contact: Charlene Spells Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation E-143-05, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5255

FAX: 919 541-3470

E -Mail: spells.charlene@epa.gov Agency Contact: David Cozzie Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation 1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW., Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 919 541-5356
E-Mail: cozzie.david@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP38

View Related Documents

Title: Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone

Abstract: Under the Clean Air Act, EPA is required to review and, if appropriate, revise the air quality criteria for the primary (health-based) and secondary (welfare-based) national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) every 5 years. On March 23, 2008, the EPA published a final rule to revise the primary and secondary NAAQS for ozone to provide increased protection of public health and welfare. With regard to the primary standard for ozone, EPA revised the level of the 8-hour ozone standard to 0.075 ppm. With regard to the secondary ozone standard, EPA made it identical in all respects to the primary ozone standard, as revised. EPA initiated the current review in October 2008 with a workshop to discuss key policy-relevant issues around which EPA would structure the review. This review includes the preparation of an Integrated Science Assessment, Risk/Exposure Assessment, and a Policy Assessment Document by EPA, with opportunities for review by EPA's Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee and the public. These documents inform the Administrator's proposed decision as to whether to

retain or revise the standards.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 50 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7408; 42 USC 7409 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM

Notice 04/28/2011 76 FR 23755

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2008-0699

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State; Local; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: NoEnergy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/ozone/ Agency Contact: Susan Stone Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation C504-06, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-1146

FAX: 919 541-0237

E -Mail: stone.susan@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP71

View Related Documents

Title: Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Nonattainment New Source Review (NSR): Reasonable Possibility in Recordkeeping; Reconsideration

Abstract: The EPA is convening a proceeding for reconsideration of a final rule published in the Federal Register on December 21, 2007 (72 FR 62607). The subject rule was promulgated in response to a remand by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in New York v. EPA, 413 F.3d 3 (D.C. Cir. 2005), in order to clarify the "reasonable possibility" recordkeeping and reporting standard under the New Source Review (NSR) program. After review of issues raised by the State of New Jersey by petition and letter, we have decided to exercise our discretion to conduct a reconsideration of this final rule and will therefore be reopening the public comment period for the rule. The rule will remain in effect while our reconsideration proceeding is under way.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51 app S; 40 CFR 51.165; 40 CFR 51.166; 40 CFR 52.21 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7470 to 7515 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2001-0004

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/nsr/

Sectors Affected: 325520; 325181; 325188; 325199; 325998; 336399; 324199; 331311; 336111; 325414; 325182; 221121; 221122; 325193; 325920; 221112; 221111; 325120; 325131; 336112; 325411; 336213; 336211; 336340; 336350; 211112; 322122; 221113; 221119; 325510; 322121; 322130; 324110; 325412; 325910; 325132; 336212 Agency Contact: David Painter Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation C504-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5515

FAX: 919 541-5509

E -Mail: painter.david@epa.gov Agency Contact: Raj Rao Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation C504-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5344

FAX: 919 541-5509

E -Mail: rao.raj@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP96View Related Documents

Title: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction Amendments to Part 63
Standards

Abstract: This action proposes to amend regulations in the General Provisions of regulations promulgated under the Clean Air Act (subpart A of Part 63) that provide for or are related to an exemption from the requirement to comply with Clean Air Act section 112 emission standards during startup, shutdown, and malfunction (SSM) events. On December 19, 2008, in Sierra Club v. EPA, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated the SSM. These General Provisions are not specific to any source category and apply when incorporated into source category-specific standards. In addition, other subparts with similar provisions will be amended so that applicable standards will no longer have exceptions for sources that report malfunction conditions, to reflect the court vacatur.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7401 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Rule

NPRM 12/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 325; 334; 335; 332; 311; 337; 333; 424; 212; 339; 327; 211; 322; 324; 326; 331; 323; 313; 314; 336; 221;

321 Agency Contact: Matthew Witosky Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation D205-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2865
E-Mail: witosky.matthew@epa.gov Agency Contact: Lisa Conner Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation D205-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5060
E-Mail: conner.lisa@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ20

View Related Documents

Title: Residual Risk and Technology Review Amendments to the Phosphoric Acid Manufacturing and Phosphate Fertilizer
Production National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP)

Abstract: The Clean Air Act requires EPA to review maximum achievable control technology (MACT) standards and to revise them "as necessary (taking into account developments in practices, processes and control technologies)" no less frequently than every 8 years. Under the "residual risk" provision of the Clean Air Act, EPA must evaluate the MACT standards within 8 years after promulgation and promulgate standards if required to provide an ample margin of safety to protect public health or prevent an adverse environmental effect. The MACT for phosphoric acid and phosphate fertilizer were promulgated in June 1999. Facilities subject to these rules were required to be in compliance by June 2002. This action will address both the residual risk and technology reviews for the phosphoric acid and phosphate fertilizer source categories, as well as address other regulatory actions for the source category as deemed appropriate. The production processes for these two source categories typically are located at the same facilities.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: Not Yet Determined (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act Section 112 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description DateNPRM Judicial Court Order 10/21/2014

Other Judicial Court Order 07/21/2015

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/00/2014

Final Rule 08/00/2015

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Tina Ndoh Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation D205-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2750

FAX: 919 541-5600

E -Mail: ndoh.christina@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Keith Barnett Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation D243-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5605

FAX: 919 541-5450

E -Mail: barnett.keith@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AQ47

View Related Documents

Title: Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Nonattainment New Source Review (NSR): Reconsideration of Inclusion of Fugitive Emissions; Reconsideration

Abstract: EPA is proposing a rule based on the results of its reconsideration of the final rule titled, "Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Nonattainment New Source Review (NSR): Reconsideration of Inclusion of Fugitive Emissions" (Fugitive Emissions Rule), published on December 19, 2008. Through a letter signed on April 24, 2009, EPA granted reconsideration on a petition submitted by the National Resources Defense Council (NRDC), as well as an administrative stay of the Fugitive Emissions Rule provisions. On March 30, 2011 EPA issued an interim rule that stayed the Fugitive Emissions Rule by reverting the text of the affected sections of the CFR to back to the prior rule language. This stay will remain in effect until EPA completes its reconsideration and undertakes any associated rulemaking. In this action EPA will consider the petition for reconsideration, public comments, and information contained in the rulemaking docket to reach a decision on the
reconsideration and finalize the rule.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51 to 52 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7470 to 7515 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2004-0014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: Undetermined Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/nsr

Sectors Affected: 211112; 221111; 221112; 221113; 221119; 221121; 221122; 322121; 322122; 322130; 324110; 324199; 325120; 325132; 325131; 325182; 325181; 325188; 325199; 325193; 325411; 325412; 325414; 325520; 325510; 325920; 325910; 325998; 331311; 336111; 336112; 336211; 336399; 336340; 336350; 336212; 336213 Agency Contact: Peter Keller Environmental Protection Agency
Air and RadiationC504-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5339

FAX: 919 541-5509

E -Mail: keller.peter@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Raj Rao Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation C504-03, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5344

FAX: 919 541-5509

E -Mail: rao.raj@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR79

View Related Documents

Title: NESHAP Emissions for Primary Lead Processing: Residual Risk and Technology Review and NESHAP from Secondary Lead Smelting: Residual Risk and Technology Review; Reconsiderations

Abstract: This action addresses a reconsideration petition received on the 2011 final rule for residual risk and technology review of the primary lead processors national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants. The EPA agreed to reconsider limited aspects of the final rule. Additionally, this action addresses reconsideration petitions received on the 2012 final rule for residual risk and technology review of the secondary lead smelters national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants. The EPA agreed to reconsider limited aspects of the final rule.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2014

Final Rule 06/00/2015

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Nathan Topham Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation D243-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-0483

FAX: 919 541-3207

E -Mail: topham.nathan@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Chuck French Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation D243-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-7912

FAX: 919 541-3207

E -Mail: french.chuck@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AO68

View Related Documents

Title: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Labeling of Products Using HCFCs

Abstract: In accordance with section 611 of the Clean Air Act, products made with or containing HCFCs (hydrochlorofluorocarbons) must be labeled by January 1, 2015, indicating the use of an ozone depleting substance. EPApromulgated a rule in 1993 implementing this requirement to help consumers and others make informed choices about using products which damage the stratospheric ozone layer, resulting in increased skin damage and cancers. EPA is withdrawing this rule and is addressing this topic in the 2015-2019 HCFC Allocation Rule (RIN 2060-AR04).

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action
Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7601; 42 USC 7671j Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Withdrawn 10/31/2013

Additional Information: SAN No. 5151

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/ozone/title6/labeling

Sectors Affected: 333415; 335222 Agency Contact: Jeremy Arling Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation 6205J, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9055

FAX: 202 343-2338

E -Mail: Arling.Jeremy@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: David Donaldson Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation 6205J, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9086
E-Mail: donaldson.david@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AP89

View Related Documents

Title: Federal Reference Method for Lead in Total Suspended Particulate Matter

Abstract: On November 12, 2008, EPA substantially strengthened the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for lead. EPA revised the level of the primary (health-based) standard from 1.5 micrograms per cubic meter (g/m3) to 0.15 g/m3, measured as total suspended particles (TSP) and revised the secondary (welfare-based) standard to be identical in all respects to the primary standard. In conjunction with strengthening the lead (Pb) NAAQS, EPA identified the need for States to improve existing lead monitoring networks. Depending on specific circumstances, States may have the option of using monitoring for either lead in TSP (Pb-TSP) or lead in PM10 (Pb-PM10) using approved Federal Reference Methods (FRMs) or Federal Equivalent Methods (FEMs) to meet monitoring requirements. To support new monitoring requirements, an FRM for Pb-PM10 was developed with the November 8, 2008 rulemaking. The FRM for Pb-TSP was left unchanged. The Pb-TSP FRM was promulgated in 1978. EPA recognizes that significant advances in measurement technology have been made since the promulgation of the original FRM. In order to support new monitoring requirements for Pb-TSP and update the FRM to improve it based on advanced measurement technology, a new FRM must be developed.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action
Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 50 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7403; 42 USC 7410; 42 USC 7601(a); 42 USC 7611; 42 USC 7618 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/05/2013 78 FR 8066

Final Rule 07/03/2013 78 FR 40000Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0210

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Joann Rice Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation C304-06, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3372

FAX: 919 541-1903

E -Mail: Rice.Joann@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Lewis Weinstock Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation C304-06, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3661

FAX: 919 541-1903

E -Mail: weinstock.lewis@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR18

View Related Documents

Title: Air Quality Designations for the 2010 Sulfur Dioxide Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standard

Abstract: This rule established air quality designations for certain areas in the United States for the 2010 primary Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). The EPA issued this rule to identify areas that, based on recorded air quality monitoring data showing violations of the NAAQS, do not meet the 2010 SO2 NAAQS and areas that contribute to SO2 air pollution in a nearby area that does not meet the SO2 NAAQS. At this time, the EPA designated as nonattainment most areas in locations where existing monitoring data from 2009-2011 indicate violations of the 1-hour SO2 standard. The EPA intends to address in separate future actions the designations for all other areas for which the agency is not yet prepared to issue designations and that are consequently not addressed in this final rule. The Clean Air Act (CAA) directs areas designated nonattainment by this rule to undertake certain planning and pollution control activities to attain the NAAQS as expeditiously as practicable.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action
Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 81 (revision) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7407(d) Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Final initial designations are required no later than 2 years from the June 3, 2010 promulgation of the revised NAAQS 06/03/2013

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Rule 08/05/2013 78 FR 47191

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2012-0233

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Rhonda Wright Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation C539-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 Research Triangle Park , NC 27709
Phone: 919 541-1087

FAX: 919 541-0824

E -Mail: Wright.Rhonda@epa.gov Agency Contact: Rhea Jones Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation C539-04, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-2940

FAX: 919 541-5489

E -Mail: jones.rhea@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR41

View Related Documents

Title: Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: The 2013 Critical Use Exemption From the Phaseout of Methyl Bromide

Abstract: Methyl bromide was phased out under the Clean Air Act and the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer in 2005, except for limited exemptions. This action authorizes uses that qualify for the 2013 critical use exemption and specifies the amount of methyl bromide that may be produced or imported for those uses. This rule also amends the regulatory framework to remove certain requirements related to sale of pre-phaseout inventory for critical uses. EPA is taking this action under the authority of the Clean Air Act to reflect a consensus decision taken by the Parties to the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer at the Twenty-Third Meeting of the Parties.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action
Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 82 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7671c(d)(6) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/14/2012 77 FR 74435

Final Rule 07/22/2013 78 FR 43797

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2010-0280

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of

international interest.

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/ozone/mbr Public Comment

URL: http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=EPA-HQOAR- 2010-0280

Sectors Affected: 111334; 311111; 493130; 111422; 311211; 311822; 111336; 493110; 111332; 111421; 111339; 111219; 325320; 115114; 311212; 115112; 111333; 111335 Agency Contact: Jeremy Arling Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation 6205J, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9055

FAX: 202 343-2338

E -Mail: Arling.Jeremy@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: David Donaldson Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation 6205J, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9086
E-Mail: donaldson.david@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR43

View Related Documents

Title: Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) Volume Standards for 2013

Abstract: Under Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA), the Environmental Protection Agency is required to promulgateregulations that specify the annual statutory volume requirements for renewable fuels, including cellulosic biofuel, biomassbased diesel, advanced biofuel, and total renewable fuel that must be used in transportation fuel annually. In the case of the cellulosic biofuel standard, EISA specifically requires that the standard be set based on the volume projected to be available during the following year. If the volumes are lower than those specified under EISA, then EPA may also lower the advanced biofuel and total renewable fuel standards each year accordingly. This regulatory action established, the annual statutory volume requirements for the RFS2 fuel categories (cellulosic, biomass-based diesel, advanced biofuel, and renewable fuel) that apply to all gasoline and diesel produced or imported in 2013. Entities potentially affected by this final rule are those involved with the production, distribution, and sale of transportation fuels, including gasoline and diesel fuel or renewable fuels such as ethanol

and biodiesel.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action
Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: CAA 211(o) Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Statutory Deadline 11/30/2012

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/07/2013 78 FR 9282

Final Rule 08/15/2013 78 FR 49793

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2012-0546

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Public Comment

URL: http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQOAR- 2012-0546-0022 Agency Contact: David Korotney Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation N27, Ann Arbor, MI 48105 Ann Arbor , MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4507
E-Mail: korotney.david@epa.gov Agency Contact: Paul Argyropoulos Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation 6401A, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-1123
E-Mail: argyropoulos.paul@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR61

View Related Documents

Title: Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program: Final Amendments and Confidentiality Determinations for Electronics Manufacturing

Abstract: EPA has amended the calculation and monitoring methodologies for electronics manufacturers covered by the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule. These changes included revising certain calculation methods and adding a new method, amending data reporting requirements, and clarifying terms and definitions. In this final rule, EPA also made confidentiality determinations for new and revised data elements pertaining to electronics manufacturing. Additionally, the rule finalized amendments to the general provisions of the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule to remove entries for data elements that are being moved from reporting to recordkeeping.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action
Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 98 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414 and 7542 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR CiteNPRM 10/16/2012 77 FR 63538

Final Rule 11/13/2013 78 FR 68161

Final Rule Effective 01/01/2014

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2011-0028

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/ghgreporting/ Public Comment

URL: http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQOAR- 2011-0028-0088

Sectors Affected: 334111; 334419; 334413 Agency Contact: Alexis McKittrick Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation 6207J, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW., Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9153

FAX: 202 343-2359

E -Mail: mckittrick.alexis@epa.gov Agency Contact: Lisa Grogan-McCulloch Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation 6207J, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9743
E-Mail: grogan-mcculloch.lisa@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR67

View Related Documents

Title: Air Quality: Revision to Definition of Volatile Organic Compounds--Exclusion of trans 1-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoroprop-1-ene [SolsticeTM 1233zd(E)]

Abstract: This action exempts the chemical compound 1-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoroprop-1-ene, also known as 1233zd(E), from the definition of volatile organic compounds (VOC). This exemption allows 1233zd(E) to be used in a number of applications including as a solvent in aerosol and non-aerosol applications, and as a blowing agent for insulating foams and a refrigerant.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action
Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7602(s) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/15/2013 78 FR 11119

Direct Final Rule 02/15/2013 78 FR 11101

NPRM Comment Period End 04/01/2013

Direct Final Rule Comment Period End 04/01/2013

Withdrawal Notice 04/18/2013 78 FR 23149

Direct Final Rule Effective 05/16/2013

Final Rule 08/28/2013 78 FR 53029

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2012-0393

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Dave Sanders Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation C539-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3356FAX: 919 541-0824
E-Mail: sanders.dave@epa.gov Agency Contact: Tom Coda Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation C539-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3037
E-Mail: coda.tom@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR69

View Related Documents

Title: Petroleum Refinery Sector Amendment for Flares

Abstract: Flares are often used at petroleum refineries as a control device for regulated vent streams, as well as to handle non-routine emissions (e.g., leaks, purges, emergency releases). Better flare operation practices will ultimately result in improved combustion efficiencies that have the potential to improve public health by reducing emissions of air toxics and volatile organic compounds that may pose a health risk to vulnerable populations including the young, elderly and those with respiratory problems. Thus, this action, which has now been subsumed into RIN 2060-AQ75, will amend the flare operational requirements in 40 CFR part 63, subparts CC and UUU (a.k.a., Refinery Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) 1 and 2).

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action
Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 63 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: CAA sec 112 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Withdrawn 08/13/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Sectors Affected: 32411 Agency Contact: Brenda Shine Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation E143-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3608

FAX: 919 541-0246

E -Mail: shine.brenda@epamail.epa.gov Agency Contact: Penny Lassiter Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation E143-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5396

FAX: 919 541-0246

E -Mail: lassiter.penny@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR70

View Related Documents

Title: Air Quality: Revision to Definition of Volatile Organic Compounds--Exclusion of 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene

Abstract: This final action will add 2,3,3,3-tetrafluoropropene (also known as HFO-1234yf) to the list of compounds excluded from the definition of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) on the basis that this compound makes a negligible contribution to tropospheric ozone formation. The exemption of this compound from control as a VOC will allow industrial users of refrigerants to use it without the burden of controlling emissions.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed ActionMajor: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 51 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7602(s) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Rule 10/22/2013 78 FR 62451

Final Rule Effective 11/21/2013

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2010-0605

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Local; State

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Dave Sanders Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation C539-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3356

FAX: 919 541-0824

E -Mail: sanders.dave@epa.gov Agency Contact: Tom Coda Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation C539-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-3037
E-Mail: coda.tom@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR75

View Related Documents

Title: Oil and Natural Gas Sector: Reconsideration of Certain Provisions of New Source Performance Standards

Abstract: This action will involve addressing issues concerning storage vessel applicability and compliance dates raised by petitioners following the final rule published on August 16, 2012. Storage vessels affected by this action are located primarily at oil and natural gas upstream operations.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action
Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 60 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: Clean Air Act Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 04/12/2013 78 FR 22126

Final Rule 09/23/2013 78 FR 58415

Final Rule Effective 09/23/2013

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2010-0505

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Bruce Moore Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation E143-01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Research Triangle Park , NC 27711
Phone: 919 541-5460

FAX: 919 541-0246

E -Mail: moore.bruce@epamail.epa.govAgency Contact: David Cozzie Environmental Protection Agency

Air and Radiation 1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW., Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 919 541-5356
E-Mail: cozzie.david@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR83

View Related Documents

Title: Section 610 Review of Heavy-Duty Engine and Vehicle Standards and Highway Diesel Fuel Sulfur Control Requirements

Abstract: On January 18, 2001, EPA established new exhaust emission standards for heavy-duty highway engines and vehicles, and new quality standards for highway diesel fuel (66 FR 5002). Pursuant to section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, on October 31, 2012, EPA initiated a review of this rule to determine if the provisions as they relate to small entities should be continued without change, or should be rescinded or amended to minimize adverse economic impacts on small entities (77 FR 65840). EPA has solicited comments on the following factors: (1) The continued need for the rule; (2) the nature of complaints or comments received from the public concerning the rule; (3) the complexity of the rule; (4) the extent to which the rule overlaps, duplicates, or conflicts with other Federal, State, or local government rules; and (5) the degree to which technology, economic conditions, or other factors have changed in the area affected by the rule. The current heavy-duty engine and fuel standards program provided substantial flexibility for refiners, especially small refiners, and for manufacturers of engines and vehicles, and does not warrant revision at this time. See EPA's report summarizing the results of this review in the docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0313. This docket can be accessed at www.regulations.gov.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action
Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 5 USC 610 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Rule 01/18/2001 66 FR 5002
Begin Review 10/31/2012 77 FR 65840

End Review 08/30/2013

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OAR-2012-0313

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/rfa/section-610.html Public Comment

URL: http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQOW- 2012-0813-0001

Related RINs: Related to 2060- AI69 Agency Contact: Tad Wysor Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation USEPA, Ann Arbor, MI 48105 Ann Arbor , MI 48105
Phone: 734 214-4332

FAX: 734 214-4816

E -Mail: Wysor.Tad@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR85

View Related Documents

Title: Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Additional Qualifying Renewable Fuel Pathways under Renewable Fuel Standard Program; Addressing Invasive Species Concerns for Giant Reed and Napier Grass

Abstract: On January 5, 2012, EPA proposed that renewable fuel made from giant reed (Arundo donax) and napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum) met the greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction requirements for cellulosic biofuel under the requirements ofthe renewable fuels standards (RFS) program. Comments on that proposal focused on the potential for these crops to behave as invasive species. This final rule will make a final determination those pathways.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action
Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7521(1); 42 USC 7545; 42 USC 7601(a) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 07/11/2013 78 FR 41703

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of

international interest. Agency Contact: Edmund Coe Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation 1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW., Washington, WY 20460 Washington , WY 20460
Phone: 202 564-8994
E-Mail: coe.edmund@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Air and Radiation ( AR ) RIN: 2060-AR87

View Related Documents

Title: Amendment to the Renewable Fuel Standard Definition of Heating Oil

Abstract: EPA published a direct final rule on October 9, 2012 to amend the definition of heating oil in 40 CFR 80.1401 in the Renewable Fuel Standard (''RFS'') program under section 211(o) of the Clean Air Act. Because EPA received adverse comments on the heating oil definition, EPA withdrew the direct final. After reviewing and addressing the comments, EPA is amending the definition of heating oil by expanding the scope of renewable fuels that can qualify for compliance in the RFS program. This expansion will allow fuel oil that will be used to generate heat to warm buildings or other facilities where people live, work, recreate, or conduct other activities to qualify under the program. This rule will allow producers or importers of fuel oil that meets the amended definition of heating oil to generate Renewable Identification Numbers (RINs), provided that other requirements specified in the regulations are met. Fuel oils used to generate process heat, power, or other functions will not be approved for RIN generation under the amended definition of heating oil. The amendment will not modify, limit, or change other fuels qualifying that quality as heating oil under the of heating oil at 40 CFR section 80.2(ccc).

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action
Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 80 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 42 USC 7414; 42 USC 7542; 42 USC 7545; 42 USC 7601(a) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Final Action 10/22/2013 78 FR 62462

Final Action Effective 12/23/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

Related RINs: Related to 2060- AR44; Related to 2060- AR86 Agency Contact: Paul Argyropoulos Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation 6401A, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-1123
E-Mail: argyropoulos.paul@epa.govAgency Contact: Madison Le Environmental Protection Agency
Air and Radiation Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 343-9094
E-Mail: le.madison@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ93

View Related Documents

Title: Hydraulic Fracturing Chemicals; Chemical Information Reporting under TSCA section 8(a) and Health and Safety Data Reporting under TSCA section 8(d)

Abstract: In response to a petition filed under section 21 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), EPA plans to initiate rulemaking proceeding under TSCA sections 8(a) and 8(d) to obtain data on chemical substances and mixtures used in hydraulic fracturing. Although EPA has granted the petitioners' request to initiate a rulemaking proceeding under TSCA sections 8(a) and 8(d), the Agency is not committing to a specific rulemaking outcome. EPA intends to first develop an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) and initiate a stakeholder process to provide input on the design and scope of the TSCA reporting requirements that would be included in a proposed rule. EPA anticipates that States, industry, public interest groups, and members of the public will be participants in the process. The stakeholder process will bring stakeholders together to discuss the information needs and help EPA to ensure any reporting burdens and costs are minimized, ensuring information already available is considered in order to avoid duplication of efforts. The dialogue will also assist EPA in determining how information that is claimed Confidential Business Information could be aggregated and disclosed to maximize transparency and public understanding.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: PreRule Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 712; 40 CFR 716 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2601 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

ANPRM 08/00/2014

Additional Information: Docket #: EPA- HQ-OPPT-2011-1019

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Federalism: Undetermined Energy Affected: Undetermined

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/hydraulicfracture/ Agency Contact: Mark Seltzer Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 7405M, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-2910
E-Mail: Seltzer.Mark@epa.gov Agency Contact: Paul Lewis Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 7405M, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-6738

FAX: 202 564-4755

E -Mail: lewis.paul@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ22

View Related Documents

Title: Pesticides; Agricultural Worker Protection Standard Revisions

Abstract: EPA is developing a proposal under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act to revise the federalregulations that direct agricultural worker protection (40 CFR 170). The changes under consideration are intended to improve agricultural workers' ability to protect themselves from potential exposure to pesticides and pesticide residues and to protect their families from potential secondary exposures to pesticides and pesticide residues. EPA is also considering adjustments to improve and clarify current requirements to facilitate compliance; to align the WPS' hazard communication requirements with Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requirements; and to improve pesticide safety training, with improved worker safety the intended outcome. This proposal is in response to EPA discussions with key stakeholders beginning in 1996. Since then, EPA has held numerous public meetings throughout the country during which the public submitted written and verbal comments on issues and concerns with the existing requirements.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 170 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 7 USC 136w Legal Deadline: None

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: The agricultural workforce may be exposed to pesticides and pesticide residues that have the potential to pose long- and short-term health risks. In addition, families may potentially be exposed through secondary exposure to pesticide residues. These direct and indirect exposures have the potential to pose long- and short-term health risks. Implementing the Worker Protection Standards (WPS) is a key part of EPA's strategy for reducing occupational exposures to agricultural pesticides. The WPS is designed to protect employees on farms, forests, nurseries, and greenhouses from occupational exposures to agricultural pesticides; and offers protections to approximately 2.5 million agricultural workers (people involved in the production of agricultural plants) and pesticide handlers (people who mix, load, or apply pesticides) that work at over 600,000 agricultural establishments. Although EPA has taken a number of steps to ensure effective national implementation of and compliance with the WPS regulation, the need to consider potential changes to the WPS arose from EPA discussions with key stakeholders beginning in 1996. Since that time, EPA has held several public meetings throughout the country during which written and verbal comments identified issues and concerns with the existing requirements.

Legal Basis: EPA establishes standards for protecting agricultural workers from potential exposure to pesticides and pesticide residues under the authority of sections 2 through 35 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), 7 USC 136-136y, and particularly section 25(a), 7 USC 136w(a).

Alternatives: In implementing the existing WPS, EPA has addressed identified deficiencies in the existing regulation throughnon-regulatory means whenever possible. For example, the Agency has developed improved training materials that are sectorspecific and in multiple languages; improved capacity for outreach; a train-the-trainer program; health care practitioner (HCP) curricula to train HCPs on pesticide exposure identification and treatment; and a bilingual manual for HCPs to use in identifying pesticide poisonings. The Agency also provides financial support for pesticide safety training. Changes under consideration for the WPS regulation are necessary improvements but will not replace these non-regulatory measures. In fact, EPA intends to consider continued support for and potential additions to these and other potential non-regulatory measures that may contribute to improving protections and compliance.

Costs and Benefits: EPA is currently evaluating the incremental costs and benefits of the changes under consideration and will present the EPA estimates in the proposed rule. In general, EPA anticipates that the potential incremental benefits will likely accrue to workers and handlers through improved health outcomes, and that the potential incremental costs will involve revised requirements for agricultural employers.

Risks: Agricultural workers and pesticide handlers are at risk from pesticide exposure through their work activities, and may put their families at risk of secondary exposures. These exposures can pose significant long- and short-term health risks that are difficult to quantify in terms of a specific level of risk because workers and handlers are potentially exposed to a wide range of pesticides with varying toxicities and risks.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 03/00/2014

Additional Information: Docket #: EPA- HQ-OPP-2005-0561. http://epa.gov/sbrefa/worker-protection-standards.html

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal; Local; State; Tribal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/health/worker.htm

Sectors Affected: 111; 541690; 32532; 541712; 8133; 115 Agency Contact: Kathy Davis Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 7506P, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-7002FAX: 703 308-2962
E-Mail: davis.kathy@epa.gov Agency Contact: Jeanne Kasai Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances PYS1162, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-3240

FAX: 703 308-3259

E -Mail: kasai.jeanne@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ28

View Related Documents

Title: Pesticides; Expansion of Crop Grouping Program

Abstract: In phases, EPA is revising the current pesticide crop grouping regulations to create new crop groupings, add new subgroups, and expand existing crop groups by adding new commodities. The current crop groupings allow EPA to establish pesticide tolerances for multiple related crops based upon data for a representative set of crops. EPA expects these revisions to promote greater use of crop grouping for tolerance-setting purposes and to facilitate the availability of pesticides for minor crop uses. EPA is currently developing a proposed rule--the fourth in the series.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 180.41 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 21 USC 346(a) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 05/23/2007 72 FR 28920

Final Rule 12/07/2007 72 FR 69150

Second NPRM 01/06/2010 75 FR 807

Second Final Rule 12/08/2010 75 FR 76285

Third NPRM 11/09/2011 76 FR 69693

Third Final Rule 08/22/2012 77 FR 50617

Fourth NPRM 03/00/2014

Additional Information: Docket #: EPA- HQ-OPP-2006-0766

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of

international interest.

RIN Information
URL: http://cfpub1.epa.gov/oppref/food_feed/index.cfm

Sectors Affected: 325320 Agency Contact: Laura Nollen Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 7505P, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 305-7390

FAX: 703 305-5884

E -Mail: nollen.laura@epa.gov Agency Contact: Barbara Madden Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 7505P, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 305-6463

FAX: 703 305-5884

E -Mail: madden.barbara@epa.govEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ54

View Related Documents

Title: Nanoscale Materials; Chemical Substances When Manufactured, Imported, or Processed as Nanoscale Materials; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Significant New Use Rule

Abstract: EPA is developing a proposal to establish reporting and recordkeeping requirements under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) for chemical substances when manufactured (defined by statute to include import) or processed as nanoscale materials. Specifically, EPA is developing a significant new use rule (SNUR) under TSCA section 5(a)(2) that would require persons who intend to manufacture, import, or process this/these chemical substance(s) for an activity that is designated as a significant new use by the proposed rule to notify EPA at least 90 days before commencing that activity. The required notification would provide EPA with the opportunity to evaluate the intended use and, if necessary, to prohibit or limit that activity before it occurs to prevent unreasonable risk to human health or the environment. In addition, EPA is developing a proposal to require reporting and recordkeeping under TSCA section 8(a), which would require that persons who manufacture these nanoscale materials notify EPA of certain information including production volume, methods of manufacture and processing, exposure and release information, and available health and safety data. The proposed reporting of these activities will provide EPA with an opportunity to evaluate the information and consider appropriate action under TSCA to reduce any risk

to human health or the environment.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 704 and 721 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2604(a); TSCA 5(a); 15 USC 2607(a); TSCA 8(a) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2013

Additional Information: Docket #: EPA- HQ-OPPT-2010-0572. Merged with RIN 2070-AJ67 because the rulemakings were combined into a single proposal.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/nano/

Sectors Affected: 325; 324 Agency Contact: Jim Alwood Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 7405M, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-8974

FAX: 202 564-9490

E -Mail: Alwood.Jim@epa.gov Agency Contact: Greg Schweer Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 7405M, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-8469

FAX: 202 564-9094

E -Mail: Schweer.Greg@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ61

View Related Documents

Title: Pesticides; Clarifying Changes to Labeling

Abstract: EPA is considering a proposal to make minor revisions to 40 CFR part 156, Labeling Requirements for Pesticides and Devices. The purpose of this effort is to update the structure of the regulation and make several clarifying changes. In addition to these planned minor revisions, EPA will solicit suggestions from stakeholders on what the Agency might consider for future changes to the labeling regulations.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed RuleMajor: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 156 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 7 USC 136 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 07/00/2014

Additional Information: SAN No. 5393

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/regulating/labels/productlabels.htm

Sectors Affected: 325320 Agency Contact: Rame Cromwell Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 7506P, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 308-9068

FAX: 703 305-5884

E -Mail: Cromwell.Rame@epa.gov Agency Contact: Rose Kyprianou Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 7506P, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 305-5354

FAX: 703 305-5884

E -Mail: kyprianou.rose@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ87

View Related Documents

Title: CBI: PMN Amendments Claiming Chemical and Microorganism Identity as Confidential in Data from Health and Safety
Studies Submitted Under TSCA Prior to the Commencement of Manufacture

Abstract: EPA has decided to discontinue work on this action at this time.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 720.90; 40 CFR 725.92; 40 CFR 725.94 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2613 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 12/00/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals/pubs/transparency.html

Sectors Affected: 325 Agency Contact: Ryan Wallace Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 7408M, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460Phone: 202 564-8824
E-Mail: Wallace.Ryan@epa.gov Agency Contact: Scott Sherlock Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 7408M, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-8257

FAX: 202 564-8251

E -Mail: Sherlock.Scott@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ90

View Related Documents

Title: CBI; Reassertion and Resubstantiation of Confidentiality Claims Submitted Under TSCA

Abstract: EPA is planning to establish regulations relating to claims for confidential business information (CBI) submitted under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) that would require the periodic reassertion and resubstantiation of such claims. Confidentiality claims which are not reasserted and resubstantiated would expire. EPA expects this action would increase transparency and availability of public health and environmental effects information on chemicals in commerce.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 2.306 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2613 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Federal

Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals/pubs/transparency.html Public Comment

URL: http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPAHQ-OPPT- 2010-0446-0001

Sectors Affected: 325 Agency Contact: Aakruti Shah Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 7408M, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-8183
E-Mail: Shah.Aakruti@epa.gov Agency Contact: Ryan Wallace Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 7408M, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-8824
E-Mail: Wallace.Ryan@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ91

View Related Documents

Title: Significant New Use Rule for Toluene Diisocyanates (TDI) and Related Compounds

Abstract: EPA intends to propose a significant new use rule (SNUR) under section 5(a)(2) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) for 2,4-toluene diisocyanate, 2,6-toluene diisocyanate, toluene diisocyanate unspecified isomers (these three chemical substances are hereafter referred to as toluene diisocyanates or TDI) and related compounds (toluene diisocyanate trimer, poly (toluene diisocyanate), toluene diisocyanate dimer, and toluene diisocyanate cyclic trimer). Diisocyanates are well known dermal and inhalation sensitizers in the workplace and have been documented to cause asthma, lung damage, and in severe cases, fatal reactions. Worker exposures are already subject to protective controls in occupational settings, but EPA is concerned aboutpotential health effects that may result from exposures to the consumer or self-employed worker while using products containing uncured TDI and its related polyisocyanates (e.g., spray-applied sealants and coatings) or incidental exposures to the general population while such products are used in or around buildings including homes or schools. The SNUR would require persons who intend to manufacture (including import) or process these chemical substances for an activity that is designated as a significant new use by the proposed rule to notify EPA at least 90 days before commencing that activity. EPA also intends to propose to make the general SNUR article exemption for persons who import or process these chemical substances as part of an article inapplicable. The required notification would provide EPA with the opportunity to evaluate the intended use and, if necessary, to prohibit or limit that activity before it occurs.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 721 (revision) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2604(a) "TSCA 5(a)" Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 04/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: No

Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals

Sectors Affected: 326199; 325; 3255; 32411; 326150 Agency Contact: Katherine Sleasman Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 7405M, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-7716

FAX: 202 564-4775

E -Mail: sleasman.katherine@epa.gov Agency Contact: Leslie Cronkhite Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 4606, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-3878
E-Mail: cronkhite.leslie@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ94

View Related Documents

Title: Significant New Use Rules; Amendment of Hazard Communication Program and Worker Protection Requirements

Abstract: EPA issued regulations in 1990 for the "Protection in the Workplace" (40 CFR 721.63) and "Hazard Communication Program" (40 CFR 721.72) components of the Significant New Uses of Chemical Substances regulations at 40 CFR 721. Where possible, these regulations are closely aligned with Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations at 29 CFR 1910.1200. OSHA issued a final rule on March 26, 2012 that aligns OSHA's Hazard Communication Standards with the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS). EPA is considering proposing changes to the applicable Significant New Uses of Chemical Substances regulations at 40 CFR 721 to align the EPA regulations, where possible, with the final revisions to the OSHA Hazard Communications Standards.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 721 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2601 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: NoSmall Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/newchems/ Agency Contact: Jim Alwood Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 7405M, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-8974

FAX: 202 564-9490

E -Mail: Alwood.Jim@epa.gov Agency Contact: Greg Schweer Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 7405M, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-8469

FAX: 202 564-9094

E -Mail: Schweer.Greg@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ96

View Related Documents

Title: Certain Nonylphenols and Nonylphenol Ethoxylates; Significant New Use Rule

Abstract: EPA intends to propose a significant new use rule (SNUR) under section 5(a)(2) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) for related chemicals known commonly as nonylphenols (NPs) and nonylphenol ethoxylates (NPEs). The SNUR would require persons who intend to manufacture, import, or process certain NP and NPE chemicals for an activity that is designated as a significant new use by the proposed rule to notify EPA at least 90 days before commencing that activity. The required notification would provide EPA with the opportunity to evaluate the intended use and, if necessary, to prohibit or limit that activity before it occurs to prevent unreasonable risk to human health or the environment. The NP and NPE chemicals that would be subject to this SNUR are toxic to aquatic organisms, and can be used in a variety of industrial and consumer applications that lead to releases to the environment.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 721 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2604(a); TSCA 5(a) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 05/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals/pubs/actionplans/npnpe.html

Sectors Affected: 325; 324110 Agency Contact: John Schaeffer Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 7405M, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-8173

FAX: 202 564-4765

E -Mail: Schaeffer.John@epa.gov Agency Contact: Jeffrey Taylor Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 7405M, Washington, DC 20004 Washington , DC 20004
Phone: 202 564-8828

FAX: 202 564-4775

E -Mail: taylor.jeffrey@epa.govEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ97

View Related Documents

Title: MDI and TDI; Health and Safety Data Reporting under TSCA 8(d)

Abstract: EPA is considering the development of a proposed rule under section 8(d) of the Toxic Substances Control Act that would require chemical manufacturers (including importers) to submit unpublished health and safety data on diisocyanates. Diisocyanates are well known dermal and inhalation sensitizers in the workplace and have been documented to cause asthma, lung damage, and in severe cases, fatal reactions. EPA is concerned about potential health effects that may result from exposures to the consumer or self-employed worker while using products containing diisocyanates (e.g., spray-applied foam sealants, adhesives, and coatings) or incidental exposures to the general population while such products are used in or around buildings including homes or schools. These chemicals have been identified by the Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics and recommended for testing consideration by the Interagency Testing Committee. There is an established regulation and process for imposing this type of one-time reporting requirement.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 716 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2607(d); TSCA 8(d) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 03/00/2014

Final Rule 01/00/2015

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Katherine Sleasman Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 7405M, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-7716

FAX: 202 564-4775

E -Mail: sleasman.katherine@epa.gov Agency Contact: Leslie Cronkhite Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 4606, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-3878
E-Mail: cronkhite.leslie@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ99

View Related Documents

Title: Long-Chain Perfluoroalkyl Carboxylate and Perfluoroalkyl Sulfonate Chemical Substances; Significant New Use Rule

Abstract: EPA intends to propose a significant new use rule (SNUR) under section 5(a)(2) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) for long-chain perfluoroalkyl carboxylate (LCPFAC) chemical substances, and for perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) or its salts. EPA also intends to propose to make the article exemption inapplicable to the import of certain identified chemical substances. In addition, EPA is also intends to propose an amendment to a SNUR for perfluoroalkyl sulfonate (PFAS) chemical substances that would make the article exemption inapplicable to the import of PFAS chemical substances as part of carpets. The SNUR would require persons who intend to manufacture, import, or process these chemicals for an activity that is designated as a significant new use by the proposed rule to notify EPA at least 90 days before commencing that activity. The required notification would provide EPA with the opportunity to evaluate the intended use and, if necessary, to prohibit or limit that activity before it occurs to prevent unreasonable risk to human health or the environment.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 720 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations )Legal Authority: 15 USC 2601 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 02/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals/pubs/actionplans/pfcs.html Agency Contact: Toni Krasnic Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 7405M, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-0984
E-Mail: Krasnic.Toni@epa.gov Agency Contact: Nicholas Nairn-Birch Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 7405M, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-3668
E-Mail: nairn-birch.nicholas@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AK00

View Related Documents

Title: Pesticides; Technical Amendments to Data Requirements

Abstract: Since updating its data requirements for the registration of conventional, microbial, and biochemical pesticides in October 2007, and for antimicrobial pesticides in May 2013, EPA has identified the need to make some technical revisions to make corrections or necessary editorial changes to the test notes. This rulemaking is intended to improve clarity and reduce the frequency of inquiries or confusion related to a few technical aspects of the regulations. In particular, EPA is considering several editorial and technical changes, including, for example: (1) the correction of scientific units used in the test notes; (2) clarification of information on appropriate test species cited in the test notes; and (3) correction of incomplete test notes. EPA does not intend for this rulemaking to include any changes that would increase the burden because the changes being considered do not involve requiring new data, or changing the frequency with which the existing data are required.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 158 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 7 USC 136 to 136(y) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 07/00/2014

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Federal

Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/opp00001/regulating/data_requirements.htm

Sectors Affected: 32532 Agency Contact: Lily Negash Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 7506P, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 347-8515
E-Mail: negash.lily@epa.gov Agency Contact: Martha Shimkin Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances7506P, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 305-5160
E-Mail: Shimkin.martha@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ08

View Related Documents

Title: Certain Polybrominated Diphenylethers; Significant New Use Rule (SNUR) and Test Rule

Abstract: On April 2, 2012, EPA proposed a significant new use rule (SNUR) under section 5(a)(2) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), as well as a test rule under section 4 of TSCA, for certain polybrominated diphenylethers (PBDEs). Under a SNUR, persons who intend to engage in any significant new use would be required to notify EPA at least 90 days before commencing that new use. The required notification would enable EPA to evaluate the significant new use of these chemical substances and, if necessary, appropriately address risks to human health or the environment by limiting or prohibiting those uses before they occur. EPA proposed to designate processing for any use as a significant new use of tetraBDE, pentaBDE, hexaBDE, heptaBDE, octaBDE, and nonaBDE. EPA also proposed that manufacturing, importing, or processing of these 6 PBDEs for any use as part of an article be designated as a significant new use. In addition, EPA proposed to designate manufacturing, importing and processing (including as part of an article), of a seventh PBDE, decabromodiphenyl ether (decaBDE) for any use, as a significant new use. Finally, EPA proposed to require that anyone who manufactures, imports, or processes c-pentaBDE, c-octaBDE, or c-decaBDE after December 31, 2013, conduct testing to obtain and subsequently submit to EPA specific data on health effects, environmental effects, and chemical fate. PBDEs are a family of chemicals with a common structure of a brominated diphenyl ether molecule which may have anywhere from one to ten bromine atoms attached. PBDEs have been widely used as flame retardants in a number of applications: c-pentaBDE was used primarily as an additive flame retardant in flexible polyurethane foams; c-octaBDE was used in a crylonitrile-butadiene-styrene (ABS) plastic which was used as casing for certain electric and electronic devices used in both offices and homes. Domestic manufacture of c-pentaBDE and c-octaBDE ceased in 2004 when the Great Lakes Chemical Corporation (now Chemtura Corporation) voluntarily phased out their production. In December of 2009, the two U.S. producers of decaBDE, Albemarle Corporation and Chemtura Corporation, and the largest U.S. importer, ICL Industrial Products, Inc., announced commitments to phase out manufacture and importation of decaBDE for most uses in the United States by December 31, 2012, and to end manufacture and import for all uses by the end of 2013.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 721; 40 CFR 790 to 799 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2601 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/25/1991 56 FR 29140

Second NPRM 04/02/2012 77 FR 19862

NPRM Comment Period Extended 05/24/2012 77 FR 30972

Final Rule 04/00/2014

Additional Information: Docket #:EPA-HQ -OPPT-2010-1039. http://www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals/pubs/actionplans/pbde.html

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: Federal

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: www.epa.gov/oppt/chemtest Public Comment

URL: http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQOPPT- 2010-1039-0001

Sectors Affected: 325520; 325188; 325199; 325998; 335999; 339999; 314999; 326199; 326299; 334310; 336111; 337920; 313210; 322221; 322222; 334112; 334113; 331421; 331422; 335931; 314121; 325991; 335211; 334111; 313320; 562211; 336120; 335221; 335224; 335222; 335212; 326130; 336112; 337910; 327993; 313230; 337214; 331319; 335929; 334119; 335228; 322121; 325211; 334220; 326220; 325212; 313312; 337121; 326150 Agency Contact: Catherine Roman Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 7405M, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-8172

FAX: 202 564-4765E-Mail: Roman.Catherine@epa.gov Agency Contact: Kirsten Hesla Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 4410-E, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-2984

FAX: 202 564-4775

E -Mail: hesla.kirsten@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ44

View Related Documents

Title: Formaldehyde; Third-Party Certification Framework for the Formaldehyde Standards for Composite Wood Products

Abstract: On July 7, 2010, the Formaldehyde Standards for Composite Wood Products Act was enacted as Title VI of Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), 15 U.S.C. 2697, to establish specific formaldehyde emission limits for hardwood plywood, particleboard, and medium-density fiberboard, which are identical to the California emission limits for these products. On June 10, 2013, EPA issued a proposed rule under TSCA Title VI to establish a framework for a TSCA Title VI Third-Party Certification Program whereby third-party certifiers (TPCs) are accredited by accreditation bodies (ABs) so that they may certify composite wood product panel producers under TSCA Title VI. The proposed rule identifies the roles and responsibilities of the groups involved in the TPC process (EPA, ABs, and TPCs), as well as the criteria for participation in the program. This proposal contains general requirements for TPCs, such as conducting and verifying formaldehyde emission tests, inspecting and auditing panel producers, and ensuring that panel producers' quality assurance and quality control procedures comply with the regulations set forth in the proposed rule. A separate Regulatory Agenda entry (RIN 2070-AJ92) covers the other proposed regulation to implement the statutory formaldehyde emission standards for hardwood plywood, medium-density fiberboard, and particleboard sold, supplied, offered for sale, or manufactured (including imported) in the United States.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 770 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2697; TSCA section 601 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Deadline for promulgation of regulations, per 15 USC 2697(d). 01/01/2013

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: Formaldehyde is a colorless, flammable gas at room temperature that has a strong odor. It is found in resins used in the manufacture of composite wood products (i.e., hardwood plywood, particleboard and medium-density fiberboard). It is also found in household products such as glues, permanent press fabrics, carpets, antiseptics, medicines,cosmetics, dishwashing liquids, fabric softeners, shoe care agents, lacquers, plastics and paper product coatings. It is a byproduct of combustion and certain other natural processes. Examples of sources of formaldehyde gas inside homes include cigarette smoke, unvented, fuel-burning appliances (gas stoves, kerosene space heaters), and composite wood products made using formaldehyde-based resins.

Legal Basis: The Formaldehyde Standards for Composite Wood Products Act, which created Title VI of the Toxic SubstancesControl Act (TSCA), established formaldehyde emission standards for composite wood products (hardwood plywood, mediumdensity fiberboard (MDF), and particleboard) sold, supplied, offered for sale or manufactured in the United States. Under TSCA Title VI, manufacturers of composite wood products must comply with specific formaldehyde emission standards, and their compliance must be verified by a third-party certifier (TPC). TSCA Title VI requires EPA to promulgate implementing regulations by January 1, 2013.

Alternatives: TSCA Title VI establishes national formaldehyde emission limits for hardwood plywood, particleboard, and medium-density fiberboard and EPA has not been given the authority to change the limits. However, EPA will evaluate various implementation alternatives during the course of this rulemaking.

Costs and Benefits: EPA prepared an analysis of the potential impacts associated with the proposed rulemaking. This analysis is summarized in greater detail in Unit VI.A. of the preamble for the proposed rule, and is briefly summarized here. Costs: EPA estimates the annualized costs of this proposed rule to be approximately $34,000 per year using either a 3% discount rate or a 7% discount rate. Small Entity Impacts: This rule would impact an estimated 9 small entities, of which 8 are expected to have impacts of less than 1% of revenues or expenses, and 1 is expected to have impacts between 1% and 3%. Effects on State, Local, and Tribal Governments: Government entities are not expected to be subject to the rule's requirements, which apply to third-party certifiers and accreditation bodies. The rule does not have a significant intergovernmental mandate, significant or unique effect on small governments, or have Federalism implications.

Risks: Formaldehyde is both an irritant and a known human carcinogen. Depending on concentration, formaldehyde cancause eye, nose, and throat irritation, even when exposure is of relatively short duration. In the indoor environment, sensory reactions and various symptoms as a result of mucous membrane irritation are some potential effects from exposure. There is also evidence that formaldehyde may be associated with changes in pulmonary function and respiratory related effects. In addition, formaldehyde is a by-product of human metabolism; therefore, endogenous levels are present in the body.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

ANPRM 12/03/2008 73 FR 73620

Second ANPRM 01/30/2009 74 FR 5632

NPRM 06/10/2013 78 FR 34795

NPRM Comment Period End With Extension 09/25/2013 78 FR 44090

Final Rule 09/00/2014

Additional Information: Docket #: ANPRM stage: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2008-0627; NPRM stage: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2011-0380.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of

international interest.

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/chemtest/formaldehyde/index.html Public Comment

URL: http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPAHQ-OPPT- 2011-0380-0001

Sectors Affected: 541611; 541990; 561990; 813910; 541330; 813920; 321219; 541380; 3212 Agency Contact: Robert Courtnage Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 7404T, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1081
E-Mail: courtnage.robert@epa.gov Agency Contact: Sara Kemme Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 7404T, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0511

FAX: 202 566-0473

E -Mail: kemme.sara@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ52

View Related Documents

Title: Significant New Use Rule for Glymes

Abstract: On July 12, 2011, EPA is proposed a significant new use rule (SNUR) under section 5(a)(2) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) for certain ethylene glycol ethers (also known as glymes). This rule would require persons who intend to manufacture (including import) or process certain ethylene glycol ethers for an activity that is designated as a significant new use by this rule to notify EPA at least 90 days before commencing any significant new use. The required notifications would provide EPA with the opportunity to evaluate the intended use and, if necessary, to prohibit or limit that activity before it occurs.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 721 (revision) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2601 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 07/12/2011 76 FR 40860

Final Rule 04/00/2014

Additional Information: Docket #: EPA- HQ-OPPT-2009-0767

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: NoEnergy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals/ Public Comment

URL: http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQOPPT- 2009-0767-0001

Sectors Affected: 325520; 325199; 336340; 325510; 335912; 325910 Agency Contact: Kirsten Hesla Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 4410-E, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-2984

FAX: 202 564-4775

E -Mail: hesla.kirsten@epa.gov Agency Contact: Leslie Cronkhite Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 4606, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-3878
E-Mail: cronkhite.leslie@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ58

View Related Documents

Title: Pesticides; Satisfaction of Data Requirements; Minor Revisions to the Procedures to Ensure Protection of Data Submitters' Rights

Abstract: In January 2011, EPA proposed revisions to its regulations governing procedures for the satisfaction of data requirements under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, which are codified in 40 CFR part 152, subpart E. These provisions include, among other things, procedures for the protection of exclusive use and data compensation rights of data submitters. EPA proposed to update the regulations to accommodate statutory changes and changes in practice that have occurred since 1984; to make minor changes to clarify the regulations; and to make changes that would simplify the procedures and reduce burdens for certain data submitters. The proposal did not otherwise propose to make substantive changes to the requirements.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 152(e) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 7 USC 136(a) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/05/2010 75 FR 68297

NPRM Comment Period Extended 01/04/2011 76 FR 302

Final Rule 11/00/2013

Additional Information: Docket #: EPA- HQ-OPP-2009-0456

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/registrationkit/

Sectors Affected: 325320 Agency Contact: Scott Drewes Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 7506P, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 703 347-0107
E-Mail: drewes.scott@epa.gov Agency Contact: Mark Dyner Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 2333, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460Phone: 202 564-1754
E-Mail: dyner.mark@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ65

View Related Documents

Title: Microorganisms: General Exemptions from Reporting Requirements; Revisions of Recipient Organisms Eligible for Tier I and Tier II Exemptions

Abstract: In 1997, EPA promulgated a final rule under section 5 of Toxic Substances and Control Act (TSCA) to establish the notification procedures for review of certain new microorganisms before they are introduced into commerce. ‘‘New microorganisms are those formed by deliberate combinations of genetic material from organisms classified in different taxonomic genera. This review process is designed to prevent unreasonable risk of injury to human health and the environment without imposing unnecessary regulatory burdens on the biotechnology industry. The rule also established TSCA section 5(h)(4) exemptions from full reporting when 10 specific microorganisms are used as the recipient microorganisms for the introduced genetic material and placed requirements on these recipient microorganism, the introduced genetic material, and the physical containment (40 CFR 725, Subpart G). The rule established a mechanism (40 CFR 725.67) for the public to petition the Agency to propose additional recipient microorganisms for such exemptions. Those regulations also describe the appropriate supporting information that must be submitted with the petition to provide EPA with a starting point for determining whether the recipient should be listed as a candidate for the tiered exemption. EPA received petitions to add Trichoderma reesei and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens to the list of microorganisms that may be used as recipient microorganisms in order to qualify for the exemption from full notification and reporting procedures under the TSCA for new microorganisms that are being manufactured (defined by statute to include import) for introduction into commerce. Based on EPA's evaluation of these petitions, EPA has made a preliminary determination that certain strains of both microorganisms will not present an unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment when used as a recipient microorganism provided that certain criteria for the introduced genetic material and the physical containment conditions are met. Therefore, EPA proposed to add two additional microorganisms to the list of recipient microorganisms that are eligible for exemptions from full reporting for the manufacture (including import) of new microorganisms.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 725 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2601 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 09/05/2012 77 FR 54499

Final Rule 02/00/2014

Additional Information: Docket #: EPA- HQ-OPPT-2011-0740

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/biotech/index.htm Public Comment

URL: http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQOPPT- 2011-0740-0001

Sectors Affected: 325 Agency Contact: Brian Lee Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 7405M, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-6293
E-Mail: lee.brian@epa.gov Agency Contact: Greg Schweer Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 7405M, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-8469

FAX: 202 564-9094

E -Mail: Schweer.Greg@epa.govEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ73

View Related Documents

Title: Significant New use Rule (SNUR); Benzidine-based Dyes; Di-n-pentyl phthalate (DnPP); and Alkanes, C12-13, Chloro

Abstract: On March 28, 2012, EPA proposed a significant new use rule (SNUR) under section 5(a)(2) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) for 9 benzidine-based chemical substances (dyes), di-n-pentyl-pthalate (DnPP) and alkanes, C12-13, chloro (CASRN 71011-12-6). Under a SNUR, persons who intend to engage in any significant new use would be required to notify EPA at least 90 days before commencing that new use. The required notification would enable EPA to evaluate the significant new use uses of these chemical substances and, if necessary, appropriately address risks to human health or the environment by limiting or prohibiting those uses before they occur. EPA proposed to add nine chemicals (dyes) to the benzidine-based chemical substances (dyes) Significant New Use Rule (SNUR) at 40 CFR section 721.1660. The amendment would make the exemption for persons that process or import these chemical substances as part of articles inapplicable for chemicals previously listed in 40 CFR section 721.1660(a)(2) as well as for the nine benzidine-based dyes identified in the proposed SNUR. EPA also proposed to designate any use of DnPP, except as a chemical standard for laboratory use, as a significant new use. In addition, EPA proposed to designate any use of alkanes, C12-13, chloro (CASRN 71011-12-6) a significant new use.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 721 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2601 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 03/28/2012 77 FR 18752

Final Rule 06/00/2014

Additional Information: Docket #: EPA- HQ-OPPT-2010-0573. This action has been merged with 2070-AJ78 and 2070-AJ81.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/newchems/pubs/snun.htm Public Comment

URL: http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQOPPT- 2010-0573-0001

Sectors Affected: 325998; 4243; 325; 316; 322; 324191; 324; 325211; 313 Agency Contact: Sara Kemme Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 7404T, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0511

FAX: 202 566-0473

E -Mail: kemme.sara@epa.gov Agency Contact: Lynn Vendinello Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 7404T, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0514
E-Mail: vendinello.lynn@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ75

View Related Documents

Title: Electronic Reporting under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)

Abstract: EPA proposed to require electronic reporting of certain information that must be submitted under the Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA). Under this proposal, EPA would require that test data developed under a TSCA section 4 test rule or an enforceable consent agreements, TSCA section 8(a) Preliminary Assessment Information Rule (PAIR) information, and TSCA section 8(d) health and safety data be submitted electronically. In addition, EPA also proposed amendments to TSCA section 5 reporting regulations at 40 CFR 720, 40 CFR 723, and 40 CFR 725 to require electronic reporting for Notices of Commencement of Manufacture of Import (NOCs) and support documents (e.g. correspondence, amendments, test data)relating to TSCA section 5 notices submitted to EPA prior to April 6, 2010, the effective date of the electronic-PMN final rule. This action is intended to streamline the reporting process, reduce the administrative costs associated with submission and recordkeeping required for the rules, and establish standards for using EPA's Central Data Exchange (CDX), which provides a single portal to enable electronic submission of forms, reports, and other documents to the Agency.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 790 to 799; 40 CFR 712; 40 CFR 716; 40 CFR 720; 40 CFR 725 (To search for a specific CFR, visit

the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2601 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 04/17/2012 77 FR 22707

Final Rule 11/00/2013

Additional Information: Docket #: EPA- HQ-OPPT-2011-0519. http://www.epa.gov/oppt/chemtest/ereporting/index.html

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/chemtest/index.html Public Comment

URL: http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQOPPT- 2011-0519-0001

Sectors Affected: 325; 324110 Agency Contact: Katherine Sleasman Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 7405M, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-7716

FAX: 202 564-4775

E -Mail: sleasman.katherine@epa.gov Agency Contact: Leslie Cronkhite Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 4606, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-3878
E-Mail: cronkhite.leslie@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ88

View Related Documents

Title: Significant New Use Rule (SNUR); HBCD (Hexabromocyclododecane) Used in Textiles

Abstract: On March 23, 2012, EPA proposed a significant new use rule (SNUR) under section 5(a)(2) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) for hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD) and 1,2,5,6,9,10- hexabromocyclododecane (collectively referred to as HBCD). Under a SNUR, persons who intend to engage in any significant new use would be required to notify EPA at least 90 days before commencing that new use. The required notification would enable EPA to evaluate the significant new use uses of these chemical substances and, if necessary, appropriately address risks to human health or the environment by limiting or prohibiting those uses before they occur. EPA proposed to designate as a significant new use any use of HBCD in consumer textiles other than for use in motor vehicles (which is ongoing) as a significant new use. EPA also proposed to make the exemption for persons that process or import these chemical substances as part of articles inapplicable for persons who would import or process HBCD in consumer textiles other than for use in motor vehicles. HBCD is a brominated flame retardant used in polystyrene foam for thermal insulation boards, in electrical and electronic applications, and textiles. The chemical is found world-wide in the environment and wildlife. HBCD is transported long distances in the environment, it bioaccumulates and biomagnifies in the food chain, and is highly toxic to aquatic organisms. Human exposure is evidenced from its presence in breast milk, adipose tissue, and blood. Animal test results indicate that HBCD causes potential reproductive, developmental and neurological effects. EPA has evidence to suggest that the use of HBCD in textiles may be limited to specialty commercial applications.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: NoCFR Citation: 40 CFR 721 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2601 et seq; 15 USC 2604 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 03/26/2012 77 FR 17386

Final Rule 05/00/2014

Additional Information: Docket #: EPA- HQ-OPPT-2011-0489

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals/ Public Comment

URL: http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPA-HQOPPT- 2011-0489-0001

Sectors Affected: 314999; 337920; 325; 314121; 423210; 423220; 337125; 337910; 314129; 238320; 811420; 313312 Agency Contact: Sue Slotnick Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 7404T, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-1973
E-Mail: slotnick.sue@epa.gov Agency Contact: Lynn Vendinello Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 7404T, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0514
E-Mail: vendinello.lynn@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ92

View Related Documents

Title: Formaldehyde Emissions Standards for Composite Wood Products

Abstract: On July 7, 2010, the Formaldehyde Standards for Composite Wood Products Act was enacted as Title VI of Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), 15 U.S.C. 2697, and requires that EPA promulgate implementing regulations to establish specific formaldehyde emission limits for hardwood plywood, particleboard, and medium-density fiberboard, which limits are identical to the California emission limits for these products. On June 10, 2013, EPA proposed regulations to implement emissions standards established by TSCA Title VI for composite wood products sold, supplied, offered for sale, or manufactured in the United States. Pursuant to TSCA section 3(7), the definition of "manufacture" includes import. As required by Title VI, these regulations apply to hardwood plywood, medium-density fiberboard, and particleboard. TSCA Title VI also directs EPA to promulgate supplementary provisions to ensure compliance with the emissions standards, including provisions related to labeling; chain of custody requirements; sell-through provisions; ULEF resins; no-added formaldehyde-based resins; finished goods; third-party testing and certification; auditing and reporting of third-party certifiers; recordkeeping; enforcement; laminated products; and exceptions from the requirements of regulations promulgated pursuant to this subsection for products and components containing de minimis amounts of composite wood products. A separate Regulatory Agenda entry (RIN 2070-AJ44) addresses requirements for accrediting bodies and third-party certifiers.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: Private Sector

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 770 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2697; TSCA section 601 Legal Deadline:

Action Source Description Date

Other Statutory Statutory Deadline 01/01/2013

Regulatory Plan:

Statement of Need: Formaldehyde is a colorless, flammable gas at room temperature that has a strong odor. It is found in resins used in the manufacture of composite wood products (i.e., hardwood plywood, particleboard and medium-density fiberboard). It is also found in household products such as glues, permanent press fabrics, carpets, antiseptics, medicines,cosmetics, dishwashing liquids, fabric softeners, shoe care agents, lacquers, plastics and paper product coatings. It is a byproduct of combustion and certain other natural processes. Examples of sources of formaldehyde gas inside homes include cigarette smoke, unvented, fuel-burning appliances (gas stoves, kerosene space heaters), and composite wood products made using formaldehyde-based resins.

Legal Basis: The Formaldehyde Standards for Composite Wood Products Act, which created Title VI of the Toxic SubstancesControl Act (TSCA), established formaldehyde emission standards for composite wood products (hardwood plywood, mediumdensity fiberboard (MDF), and particleboard) sold, supplied, offered for sale or manufactured in the United States. Under TSCA Title VI, manufacturers of composite wood products must comply with specific formaldehyde emission standards, and their compliance must be verified by a third-party certifier (TPC). In addition, Congress directed EPA to consider a number ofelements for inclusion in implementing the regulations. These elements include: labeling, chain of custody requirements, sellthrough provisions, ultra low-emitting formaldehyde resins, no added formaldehyde-based resins, finished goods, third-party testing and certification, auditing and reporting of TPCs, recordkeeping, enforcement, laminated products, and exceptions from the requirements of regulations promulgated for products and components containing de minimis amounts of composite wood products. TSCA Title VI requires EPA to promulgate implementing regulations by January 1, 2013.

Alternatives: TSCA Title VI establishes national formaldehyde emission limits for hardwood plywood, particleboard, and medium-density fiberboard and EPA has not been given the authority to change the limits. However, the notice of proposed rulemaking addresses the alternatives considered by EPA for the implementation of the statutory emission limits for various provisions of the rule. Most of these alternatives would have applied to both small and large entities but, given the number of small entities in the affected industries, some of these alternatives could affect many small entities. EPA made a concerted effort to keep the costs and burdens associated with this rule as low as possible while still ensuring compliance with the TSCA Title VI emissions standards. In developing the proposed rule, EPA considered the statutory requirements and the benefits from protection of human health and the environment, as well as the compliance costs imposed by the rule, both in general and on small entities. EPA took a number of steps to reduce the economic impacts of the rule where doing so was consistent with the statutory mandate.

Costs and Benefits: EPA prepared an analysis of the potential impacts associated with the proposed rulemaking. This analysis is summarized in greater detail in Unit V.A. of the preamble for the proposed rule, and is briefly summarized here. Benefits: This proposed rule will reduce exposures to formaldehyde, resulting in benefits from avoided adverse health effects. For the subset of health effects where the results were quantified, the estimated annualized benefits (due to avoided incidence of eye irritation and nasopharyngeal cancer) are $20 million to $48 million per year using a 3% discount rate, and $9 million to $23 million per year using a 7% discount rate. There are additional unquantified benefits due to other avoided health effects. Costs: The monetized costs of this proposed rule are estimated at $72 million to $81 million per year using a 3% discount rate, and $80 million to $89 million per year using a 7% discount rate. Small Entity Impacts: This proposed rule is estimated to impact nearly 879,000 small businesses: Over 851,000 have costs impacts less than 1% of revenues, over 23,000 firms have impacts between 1% and 3%, and over 4,000 firms have impacts greater than 3% of revenues. Most firms with impacts over 1% have annualized costs of less than $250 per year. Effects on State, Local, and Tribal Governments: Government entities are not expected to be subject to the proposed requirements, which apply to entities that manufacture, fabricate, distribute, or sell composite wood products. The proposed rule does not have a significant intergovernmental mandate, significant or unique effect on small governments, or have Federalism implications. Environmental Justice and Protection of Children: This proposed rule is expected to increase the level of environmental protection for all affected populations without having any disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on any population, including any minority or low-income population or

children.

Risks: Formaldehyde is both an irritant and a known human carcinogen. Depending on concentration, formaldehyde can cause eye, nose, and throat irritation, even when exposure is of relatively short duration. In the indoor environment, sensory reactions and various symptoms as a result of mucous membrane irritation are some potential effects from exposure. There is also evidence that formaldehyde may be associated with changes in pulmonary function and respiratory related effects. In addition, formaldehyde is a by-product of human metabolism; therefore, endogenous levels are present in the body.

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 06/10/2013 78 FR 34820

NPRM Comment Period End With Extension 10/09/2013 78 FR 44089

Final Rule 09/00/2014

Additional Information: Docket #: EPA- HQ-OPPT-2012-0018. Split from RIN 2070-AJ44.

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Business Government Levels Affected: No

Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of

international interest.

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/chemtest/formaldehyde/index.html Public Comment

URL: http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EPAHQ-OPPT- 2012-0018-0001

Sectors Affected: 325199; 423110; 337212; 321213; 423210; 442110; 444130; 321211; 444110; 337127; 423310; 453930; 321991; 336213; 337122; 444190; 423390; 325211; 321992; 321219; 441210; 337215; 321212; 336214; 337121; 337110; 337211; 337129Agency Contact: Cindy Wheeler Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 7404T, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0484
E-Mail: wheeler.cindy@epa.gov Agency Contact: Lynn Vendinello Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 7404T, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0514
E-Mail: vendinello.lynn@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ98

View Related Documents

Title: Electronic Reporting; Revisions to Notification Regulations for TSCA Section 5 Premanufacture and Significant New Use
Notification

Abstract: This direct final rule would amend the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) section 5 Premanufacture, Significant New Use Notification and biotechnology regulations by mandating the use of an updated version of the e-PMN reporting software. In January 2010, EPA issued a final rule requiring the use of the e-PMN reporting software for the submission of Premanufacture Notices (PMNs) and other TSCA section 5 notices and support documents to the Agency using the Internet through EPA's Central Data Exchange (CDX). This new version of the e-PMN software will operate as a "cloud" software system rather than as a downloadable software system. This updated version of the software will eliminate certain firewall and file submission size limitations that exist with the current version of the software. In addition, this rule would require electronic
submission of bonafide intents to manufacture.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 720; 40 CFR 721; 40 CFR 721 (revision); 40 CFR 725 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2601 et seq Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Direct Final Rule 12/00/2013

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/newchems/index.htm

Sectors Affected: 325; 324110 Agency Contact: Geraldine Hilton Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 7405M, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-8986

FAX: 202 564-9490

E -Mail: hilton.geraldine@epa.gov Agency Contact: Greg Schweer Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 7405M, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-8469

FAX: 202 564-9094

E -Mail: Schweer.Greg@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AK01View Related Documents

Title: Response to Request for Exemption of Certain Food-Related Chemical Substances From TSCA Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) Processing and Use Information Reporting Requirements in 2016

Abstract: EPA received a petition from the Corn Refiners Association Coalition requesting that three food-related chemicals be exempted from the Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) processing and use reporting requirements in 2016. The chemicals include the following: 1,3-Propanediol (CASRN 504-63-2); Bentonite (Acid Leached) (CASRN 70131-50-9), and Palm Kernel Oils (CASRN 8023-79-8). The petitioners asked that these three chemical substances be added to the 40 CFR 711.6(b)(2)(iv) list of specific chemical substances that are exempt from the reporting requirements of 40 CFR 711.15(b)(4) (i.e., exempt from the requirement to report industrial processing and use and commercial/consumer use information). The chemical substances already included on this "partial exemption" list are substances for which EPA has previously determined that there is a low current interest in the CDR processing and use information. The inclusion of a chemical substance under this partial exemption is not based on the potential risks of a chemical. This partial exemption is based on the Agency's current assessment of the need for collecting CDR processing and use information for the specific chemical. In determining whether there is low current interest in CDR processing and use information related to a specific chemical substance, EPA will look to the specific circumstances surrounding the chemical in question and may use one or more considerations. EPA is developing its response to this petition, which may include rulemaking if EPA decides to grant the petition. The considerations used by EPA in reviewing this petition and an analysis of how those considerations relate to these chemicals will be addressed in EPA's response.

Priority: Routine and Frequent Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Final Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 711.6(b)(2)(iv); 40 CFR 711.15(b)(4) (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2607(a) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

Direct Final Rule 03/00/2014

Additional Information: Docket #: EPA- HQ-OPPT-2012-0221

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://epa.gov/oppt/

Sectors Affected: 325; 32411 Agency Contact: Karen Hoffman Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 7405M, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-8158
E-Mail: hoffman.karen@epa.gov Agency Contact: Ellie Clark Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 7404T, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0498

FAX: 202 566-0469

E -Mail: clark.ellie@epamail.epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ38

View Related Documents

Title: Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs); Reassessment of Use Authorizations

Abstract: EPA's regulations governing the use of Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) in electrical equipment and other applications were first issued in the late 1970s and have not been updated since 1998. EPA has initiated rulemaking to reassess the ongoing authorized uses of PCBs to determine whether certain use authorizations should be ended or phased out because they can no longer be justified under section 6(e) of the Toxic Substances Control Act, which requires that the authorized use will not present an unreasonable risk of injury to health and the environment. As the first step in this reassessment, EPA published an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) on April 7, 2010, and took comment through August 20, 2010. EPA reviewed and considered all comments received on the ANPRM in planning the current rulemaking. This action willaddress the following specific areas: (1) the use, distribution in commerce, marking and storage for reuse of liquid PCBs in electric equipment; (2) improvements to the existing use authorization for natural gas pipelines; and (3) definitional and other regulatory "fixes". The reassessment of use authorizations related to liquid PCBs in equipment will focus on small capacitors in fluorescent light ballasts, large capacitors, transformers and other electrical equipment. In addition, revised testing, characterization, and reporting requirements for PCBs in natural gas pipeline systems to provide more transparency for the Agency and the public when PCB releases occur will be considered. Consistent with Executive Order 13563, "Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review", wherever possible and consistent with the overall objectives of this rulemaking, the Agency will also eliminate or fix regulatory inefficiencies noted by the Agency or in public comments on the ANPRM.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: Undetermined Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 761 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2605; TSCA 6(e) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

ANPRM 04/07/2010 75 FR 17645

Second ANPRM 06/16/2010 75 FR 34076

NPRM 11/00/2014

Additional Information: Docket #: EPA- HQ-OPPT-2009-0757

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Local; State; Tribal

Federalism: Yes Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/epawaste/hazard/tsd/pcbs/index.htm

Sectors Affected: 31-33; 54; 92; 53; 811; 48-49; 22; 562 Agency Contact: Sara Kemme Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 7404T, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0511

FAX: 202 566-0473

E -Mail: kemme.sara@epa.gov Agency Contact: Peter Gimlin Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 7404T, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0515

FAX: 202 566-0473

E -Mail: gimlin.peter@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ56

View Related Documents

Title: Lead; Renovation, Repair, and Painting Program for Public and Commercial Buildings

Abstract: Section 402(c)(3) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) requires EPA to regulate renovation or remodeling activities that create lead-based paint hazards in target housing (most pre-1978 housing), pre-1978 public buildings, and commercial buildings. In a 2008 rule, EPA addressed lead-based paint hazards created by these activities in target housing and child-occupied facilities built before 1978 (child-occupied facilities are a subset of public and commercial buildings or facilities where children under age 6 spend a great deal of time). The 2008 rule established requirements for training renovators, other renovation workers, and dust sampling technicians; for certifying renovators, dust sampling technicians, and renovation firms; for accrediting providers of renovation and dust sampling technician training; for renovation work practices; and for recordkeeping. The current rulemaking effort will address renovation or remodeling activities in the remaining buildings described in TSCA section 402(c)(3), i.e., public buildings built before 1978 and commercial buildings that are not child-occupied facilities. In 2010, EPA issued an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) that solicited public comment on lead-safe work practices and other requirements EPA should consider for renovations of public and commercial buildings and whether such renovations create lead-based paint hazards. EPA is currently developing a proposal to address lead-based paint hazards that may be created by renovation, repair and painting of public and commercial buildings. As part of a settlement agreement reached in 2009 and most recently amended in September 2012, EPA held a public meeting in 2013 to discuss the issues under consideration for this rulemaking. In addition, after considering the information it gathers and its related analyses, EPA hasagreed to either sign a proposed rule covering renovation, repair, and painting activities of public and commercial buildings, or determine that these activities do not create lead-based paint hazards by July 1, 2015. If EPA issues a proposed rule, EPA has further agreed to take final action on or before the date 18 months after the proposal is published.

Priority: Economically Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Long-term Action Major: Yes Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 745 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2682(c)(3) Legal Deadline: Per 9/7/2012 amended settlement agreement in National Association of Homebuilders v. EPA.

Action Source Description Date

Other Judicial ANPRM - 2009 Settlement agreement 04/22/2010

NPRM Judicial Deadline from 2012 amended; Settlement agreement 07/01/2015

Other Judicial Deadline from 2012 amended; Settlement agreement 01/01/2017

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

ANPRM 05/06/2010 75 FR 24848

Notice 12/31/2012 77 FR 76996

Notice 05/13/2013 78 FR 27906

NPRM 07/00/2015

Additional Information: Docket #: EPA- HQ-OPPT-2010-0173

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Undetermined Government Levels Affected: Undetermined

Federalism: Undetermined Energy Affected: No

RIN Information URL: http://www.epa.gov/lead/lead/rrpreg.html#public

Sectors Affected: 236220; 238310; 238210; 238350; 238150; 236210; 531120; 531312; 238390; 921190; 238320; 238220; 238170; 238340 Agency Contact: Hans Scheifele Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 7404T, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-3122
E-Mail: Scheifele.Hans@epa.gov Agency Contact: Cindy Wheeler Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 7404T, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0484
E-Mail: wheeler.cindy@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ70

View Related Documents

Title: Chemicals of Concern List Under Section 5(b)(4) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)

Abstract: EPA has decided to discontinue work on this action at this time.

Priority: Other Significant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action
Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 720 and 707 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2604 and 2611 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite
Withdrawn via Reg Agenda 09/06/2013

Additional Information: SAN No. 5430Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals/pubs/managechemrisk.html

Sectors Affected: 325 Agency Contact: Jessica Barkas Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 7405M, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 250-8880
E-Mail: Barkas.Jessica@epa.gov Agency Contact: Maria Doa Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 7404T, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 566-0718
E-Mail: Doa.Maria@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances ( OPPTS ) RIN: 2070-AJ95

View Related Documents

Title: Significant New Use Rule for Perfluoroalkyl Sulfonates and Long-Chain Perfluoroalkyl Carboxylates Used as Part of Carpets

Abstract: On August 15, 2012, EPA proposed a significant new use rule (SNUR) under section 5(a)(2) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) for certain perfluoroalkyl sulfonates (PFAS) and certain long-chain perfluoroalkyl carboxylates (LCPFAC) chemical substances. Under a SNUR, persons who intend to engage in any significant new use would be required to notify EPA at least 90 days before commencing that new use. The required notification would enable EPA to evaluate the significant new use uses of these chemical substances and, if necessary, appropriately address risks to human health or the environment by limiting or prohibiting those uses before they occur. EPA proposed to designate processing as a significant new use of certain PFAS chemical substances that have completed the TSCA new chemical review process but have not yet commenced production or import. EPA also proposed to designate manufacturing, importing, or processing for use as part of carpets or for treating carpet (e.g., for use in the carpet aftercare market) as a significant new use of certain LCPFAC chemical substances. EPA also proposed to revoke the Article Exemption described in 40 CFR section 721.45(f) for persons that import the LCPFAC chemical substances as part of carpets. Studies have found PFAS chemicals in very small amounts in the blood of the general human population as well as in wildlife. Although most of the health and environmental studies have focused primarily on perfluorooctyl sulfonates (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), analysis of the structure of these compounds indicates that the results of those studies may be applied to a larger category of PFAS and LCPFAC chemicals. EPA believes that the chemical similarity between PFOS and PFAS raises the likelihood that health and environmental concerns are present for PFAS, and that LCPFAC compounds may degrade to PFOA.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Completed Action
Major: No Unfunded Mandates: No

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 721 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 15 USC 2604(a); TSCA 5(a) Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 08/15/2012 77 FR 48924

Final Rule 10/22/2013 78 FR 62443

Final Rule Effective 12/23/2013

Additional Information: Docket #: EPA- HQ-OPPT-2012-0268

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No International Impacts: This regulatory action will be likely to have international trade and investment effects, or otherwise be of

international interest.

RIN Information
URL: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/existingchemicals/ Public Comment

URL: http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=EPA-HQOPPT-2012-0268

Sectors Affected: 314110; 561740; 325; 31311; 423220; 324110 Agency Contact: Nicholas Nairn-Birch Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 7405M, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-3668
E-Mail: nairn-birch.nicholas@epa.gov Agency Contact: Toni Krasnic Environmental Protection Agency Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances 7405M, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-0984
E-Mail: Krasnic.Toni@epa.gov

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of the Administrator ( AdmO ) RIN: 2090-AA39

View Related Documents

Title: Nondiscrimination in Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Assistance from the Environmental Protection Agency

Abstract: EPA's nondiscrimination regulations prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and sex in the programs and activities that receive Federal Financial Assistance. Promulgating these amendments will conform EPA's Title VI regulations with those of US Department of Justice and over twenty other Federal Agencies.

Priority: Substantive, Nonsignificant Agenda Stage of Rulemaking: Proposed Rule Major: No Unfunded Mandates: Undetermined

CFR Citation: 40 CFR 7; 40 CFR 9 (To search for a specific CFR, visit the Code of Federal Regulations ) Legal Authority: 33 USC 1251; 42 USC 7000; 29 USC 794 Legal Deadline: None

Timetable:

Action Date FR Cite

NPRM 11/00/2013

Final Rule 04/00/2014

Additional Information: Docket #: EPA- HQ-OA-2013-0031

Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: No Government Levels Affected: No

Small Entities Affected: No Federalism: No Energy Affected: No Agency Contact: Helena Wooden-Aguilar Environmental Protection Agency
Office of the Administrator 1201A, Washington, DC 20460 Washington , DC 20460
Phone: 202 564-0792
E-Mail: Wooden-Aguilar.Helena@epamail.epa.gov