1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 ORDER

Page - 1

HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

DAVID KING and RHONDA KING,

husband and wife,

 Plaintiffs,

v.

KALAMA SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 402

and JAMES SUTTON,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5675RBL

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Costs and Partial Attorneys’ Fees

[Dkt. #248]. The Court has considered the motion, opposition, and reply together with the entirety of the

record and files herein. For the reasons stated herein, the motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

In 2005 plaintiffs filed a complaint against the defendants in Cowlitz County Superior Court alleging

violations of 42 U.S.C. §1983, RCW 41.56, and RCW 4.96.020. The defendants removed the case to this

Court. After amending their complaint and after this Court’s ruling on cross motions for summary judgment,

the case was tried to a jury on plaintiffs’ claims that defendants retaliated against him for exercising his First

Amendment rights (union activities) and discriminated against him based on his age. The jury was also asked

to consider whether plaintiffs were liable to defendants for malicious prosecution. After a ten-day jury trial,

the jury returned verdicts in favor of defendants on plaintiffs’ claims and in favor of plaintiffs on defendants’

counterclaim for malicious prosecution. The defendants thereafter filed the instant motion seeking statutory

Case 3:05-cv-05675-RBL Document 255 Filed 01/07/08 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 ORDER

Page - 2

costs against plaintiffs in the amount of $10,713.76 and attorneys’ fees against plaintiffs’ attorneys in the

amount of $15,860.50 pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 and 28 U.S.C. §1927.

I. Attorneys’ Fees Against Plaintiffs’ Attorneys Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 and 28

U.S.C. §1927.

Defendants seek attorneys’ fees against plaintiffs’ attorneys Duane Crandall and Crandall O’Neill &

McCreary for defending against plaintiffs’ RCW 41.56 claim (dismissed on summary judgment), plaintiffs’

RCW 4.96.020 claim (dismissed on summary judgment), plaintiffs’ age discrimination claim, and plaintiffs’

damages claim for constructive discharge. They seek fees directly against plaintiffs’ counsel arguing that

counsel filed these claims knowing they were unsupported by facts or law, were frivolous, were brought with

the intent to harass defendants, and unnecessarily increased the cost of the litigation in violation of Fed. R. Civ.

P. 11(b) and 28 U.S.C. §1927. The Court finds that plaintiffs’ attorneys did not violate the above standards,

and therefore declines to award defendants attorneys’ fees.

II. Statutory Costs Against Plaintiffs David and Rhonda King.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d)(1) provides: “costs other than attorney’s fees shall be awarded

as a matter of course to the prevailing party unless the court otherwise directs.” The Court has discretion to

award costs and may deny them in the appropriate situation. The Court finds that an award of costs as set

forth below is appropriate.

A. Attorney docket fee.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1923(a) the attorney docket fee is allowed. $ 20.00

B. Deposition transcripts.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1920(2) the following costs for deposition transcripts necessarily obtained are

taxed:

David King, Vol. I and II $966.50

Lori Byrnes $226.20

Joe Martin, Vol. I $271.00

Tina Merz $ 69.40

Erv Stein, Vol. I $338.20

Sean Ryan, Vol. I $203.80

Reporting fee $351.50

Case 3:05-cv-05675-RBL Document 255 Filed 01/07/08 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 ORDER

Page - 3

Joe Martin, Vol. II $207.00

Sean Ryan, Vol. II $163.20

Reporting fee $162.50

Dr. Lewis $184.60

Dr. Boylon $ 85.60

Nate Salisbury $139.20

Reporting fee $150.00

Erv Stein, Vol. II $ 75.80

Cindy Granitir $ 56.60

Reporting fee $100.00

Mark Buchanan $185.60

Paul Huddleston $ 59.80

Dr. Jacob $164.15

David King, Vol. III $261.40

Reporting fee for items 29 and 30 $ 75.00

Subtotal: $4,497.05

C. Trial transcripts.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1920(2) the Court finds that trial transcripts were not necessarily obtained, and

costs for such transcripts are denied.

D. Witness fees and mileage costs.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1920(3) the following witness fees and mileage costs are taxed:

Mike Hamilton $252.39

Charles Anderson $245.98

Greg Rayl $139.97

Paul Huddleston $312.29

Tim Swett $237.39

Nate Salisbury $237.39

Subtotal: $1,425.41

Case 3:05-cv-05675-RBL Document 255 Filed 01/07/08 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 ORDER

Page - 4

E. Fees for exemplification of copies and papers.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1920(4) the Court declines to tax these fees as costs. The blow up

exhibits were unnecessary and the copy costs for exhibits are exorbitant. 

Statutory costs in favor of the defendants and against plaintiffs are hereby taxed in the amount of

$5,942.46.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated this 7th day of January, 2008.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-05675-RBL Document 255 Filed 01/07/08 Page 4 of 4