alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: ridgwka@Texasbb.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:02:34 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Keith Ridgway

Chappell Hill, TX 77426
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Integrated Circuit Systems,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 28, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 11, 2003, as
amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto filed on the date hereof (as amended, the
"Report"), I, Hock E. Tan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Hock E. Tan
-----------------------------
Hock E. Tan
Chief Executive Officer
February 13, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                            6462
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      184
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                       1095
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  7767
<PP&E>                                            4733
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   13791
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             4983
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            55
<OTHER-SE>                                        7175
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     13791
<SALES>                                          13108
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 13108
<CGS>                                             6854
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     3565
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2689
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               2689
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2689
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .51
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Judy A. Schmeling, certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my
knowledge:

(1) the Annual Report of HSN, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 of HSN, Inc. (the
Report), which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HSN, Inc.



|                        |  |     |  |                         
|----------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------
|Date: February 23, 2011 |  | By: |  | /s/    JUDY A.
SCHMELING
|                        |  |     |  | Judy A. Schmeling       
|                        |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 58 (Tuesday, March 26, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 18324]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-07019]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Friday, April 19, 2013.

PLACE: 1155 21st St. NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance and Enforcement Matters. In the 
event that the times or dates of this or any future meetings change, an 
announcement of the change, along with the new time and place of the 
meeting will be posted on the Commission's Web site at http://www.cftc.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Melissa D. Jurgens, 202-418-5516.

 Natise Stowe,
 Executive Assistant.
[FR Doc. 2013-07019 Filed 3-22-13; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
From: laura_riley@bellsouth.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:00:19 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Laura Riley

New Orleans, LA 70126
EXHIBIT 35.1

ANNUAL SERVICERS COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

I, Harold E. Miller, Jr., the senior officer in charge of servicing
of Franklin Capital Corporation (FCC), the Servicer under the servicing agreement among Franklin Auto Trust 2008-A, as Issuer, Franklin Receivables LLC, as Depositor, Franklin Capital Corporation, as Servicer, and Franklin Resources,
Inc., as Representative, (the servicing agreement) relating to Franklin Auto Trust 2008-A (the trust), certify that:



| | (a) | A review of FCCs servicing activities during the period covered by the trusts report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 (the Reporting
Period) and of FCCs performance under the servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, FCC has fulfilled all of its servicing obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting
Period; except that there were instances in which FCC was in material noncompliance with the servicing agreement in the following respect: in certain cases, information provided in certain reports to investors was not calculated in accordance with
the terms specified in the transaction agreements. FCC has corrected its calculation and reporting procedures for the validation of the calculations in reports to investors and FCC believes that these additional controls and procedures are
effective.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 22nd day of December, 2008.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|Sincerely,                                          
|                                                    
|/s/ Harold E. Miller, Jr.                           
|HAROLD E. MILLER, JR.                               
|President & Chief Executive Officer                 
|(Senior officer in charge of the servicing function)
From: dougandkay@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:59:03 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Douglas Kimball

Galveston, IN 46932
From: ronlemera@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:58:02 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ronald Smith

Greeley, CO 80634
From: nam68@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:09:06 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Donnie Roberts

Colorado Springs, CO 80910
From: racingstude@pbtcomm.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:01:51 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

I DEMAND protection for the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to

being forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services,

especially when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. NO Americans should be

forced by the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the

strongest way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of

mandatory preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dolores Josker

Swansea, SC 29160
SMITH COUNTY COURTHOUSE

100 N. BROADWAY 4 th Floor TYLER, TEXAS 75702 April Allison Sikes, First Assistant 

# D. Matt Bingham Criminal District Attorney Smith County TELEPHONE: (903) 535-0520 TELECOPIER: (903) 590-1719 Jennifer Barfield, Office Manager Michael J. West. Appellate Chief Ms. Pam Estes, Clerk 12 th Court of Appeals 1517 W Front St., Ste. 354 Tyler, TX 75701 November 4, 2015
RE: Roper v. State , Cause Nos. 12-15-00215-CR, 12-15-00217-CR, 12-15-00218-CR
Dear Ms. Lusk: The State acknowledges receipt of the brief filed by Appellant’s counsel pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in the above-listed cause(s). The brief presents no claims of error; therefore, the State has no points to which to respond. See T EX
. R. A

PP
. P. 38.2(a)(2). The State will not file any further response unless the Court decides that the appeal is not frivolous and orders one. See Anders , 386 U.S. at 744; High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 810 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978). Respectfully submitted,
D. MATT BINGHAM Criminal District Attorney Smith County, Texas

_______________________ Michael J. West Assistant Criminal District Attorney SBOT# 21203300 ACCEPTED 12-15-00217-CR TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS 11/4/2015 10:03:37 AM

Pam Estes CLERKC ERTIFICATE OF S ERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the State’s acknowledgment of filing of an Anders brief was served by electronic filing on November 4, 2015, on Mr. Austin Jackson, Attorney at Law, 112 East Line, Ste. 310, Tyler, Texas 75702.

_________________________ Michael J. West Assistant Criminal District Attorney SBOT# 21203300 100 N. Broadway, 4th Fl. Tyler, Texas 75702 (903) 590-1720 (903) 590-1719 (fax) mwest@smith-county.com