alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER- 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

HARLEY SCHRAMM,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF WASHINGTON,

Respondent.

Case No. C05-5623RJB

 ORDER TO AMEND 

This 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petition for habeas corpus relief has been referred to the undersigned

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) and local Rules MJR 3 and 4. In reviewing the

petition prior to service the court notes that petitioner has failed to name a proper respondent and

petitioner does not indicate he ever presented his petition to the state supreme court. Both these

items must be addressed before the court considers service of the petition. 

Petitioner names only the state of Washington as a respondent. 28 U.S.C. § 2243 indicates

that writs are to be directed “to the person having custody of the person detained”. This person

typically is the superintendent of the facility in which the petitioner is incarcerated. Failure to name

the petitioner's custodian deprives federal courts of personal jurisdiction. Stanley v. California

Supreme Court, 21 F.3d 359, 360 (9th Cir. 1994). Petitioner will need to file an amended petition

that names the proper respondent.

There is nothing in the petition to indicate petitioner ever filed for review in the state supreme

court. In order to satisfy the exhaustion requirement, petitioner’s issues must have been fairly

Case 3:05-cv-05623-RJB Document 3 Filed 10/06/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER- 2

presented to the state's highest court. Picard v. Connor, 404 U.S. 270, 276 (1971); Middleton v.

Cupp, 768 F.2d 1083, 1086 (9th Cir. 1985). A federal habeas petitioner must provide the state

courts with a fair opportunity to correct alleged violations of prisoners' federal rights. Duncan v.

Henry, 513 U.S.364, 115 S.Ct. 887, 888 (1995). It is not enough that all the facts necessary to

support the federal issue were before the state courts or that a somewhat similar state law claim was

made. Id, citing Picard v. Connor, 404 U.S. 270 (1971) and Anderson v. Harless, 459 U.S. 4

(1982). A federal court faced with an unexhausted petition dismisses the petition, without prejudice,

so that the petitioner has an opportunity to exhaust the issues in state court. Rose v, Lundy, 455

U.S. 509, 522 (1982).

Petitioner will need to amend the petition to show the issues he is attempting to raise were

before the state supreme court. Accordingly, the court orders petitioner to amend the petition to

cure these defects. An amended petition must be received on or before November 11th, 2005 or the

court will recommend that this petition be dismissed without prejudice as unexhausted and for lack

of jurisdiction.

The clerk is directed to send copies of this order to petitioner and to note the November

11th, 2005 due date.

DATED this 3rd day of October, 2005.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-05623-RJB Document 3 Filed 10/06/05 Page 2 of 2
#            

# CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (R)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

Registration No.  333-109182

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  460                                                                   Trade Date:  07/26/04

(To Prospectus Supplement dated November 6, 2003 &

  Prospectus dated October 15,2003)                                                              Issue Date:   07/29/04

The Date of this Pricing SupplementJuly 26, 2004

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

 CUSIP                                                                                                                                   Date and terms of redemption or

     or       Stated                                                                   Interest                                       repayment (includingany

Common  Interest                      Price to  Discounts &        Payment     Survivors                  applicable regular or special

  Code      Rate (1)   Maturity  Public (2) Commissions       Frequency       Option  Yes/No     record dates)

14911QVD0  4.25%         07/15/11           100%              1.25%                  Monthly                      YES         NO                                                                                                                                                                

                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

Principal                                                                                 1st Payment             Day         

Amount                  Proceeds                  Dealer                           Date                   Count

$570,000.00            $562,875.00            ABN AMROInc.        08/15/04                              30/360    

Original Issue DiscountNote:                                                                          Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes                X   No                                                                                  N/A

The interest rates on the PowerNotes (R) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (R) offered prior to the effective date of the change.  Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $123.357 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (R) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (R) will be made under the Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated October 15,2003.

Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 570 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 570

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that there should 
 be established a National School-Based Health Centers Month to raise 
    awareness of health services provided by school health centers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 25, 2007

  Mr. Davis of Illinois submitted the following resolution; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that there should 
 be established a National School-Based Health Centers Month to raise 
    awareness of health services provided by school health centers.

Whereas physical and mental health care is of vital importance to ensuring the 
        well-being of the youth in the United States;
Whereas all youth deserve access to comprehensive health care, yet youth are 
        less likely than other age groups to have medical insurance and have the 
        lowest rate of utilization of health care;
Whereas health centers are found in more than 1500 schools across the United 
        States;
Whereas enrollment rates at school health centers of 65 to 85 percent are 
        important evidence of overwhelming parental support for these centers;
Whereas school-based health centers improve the lives of the Nation's youth and 
        their families by offering affordable and accessible high-quality health 
        care and health education;
Whereas high-quality physical and mental health care is necessary for the 
        Nation's students to attain high levels of academic achievement;
Whereas school-based health centers offer this necessary combination by 
        providing medical care in addition to preventive and mental services;
Whereas school-based health centers are supported by a diverse range of members 
        of the community, including parents, teachers, school administrators, 
        and other concerned citizens; and
Whereas school-based health centers serve as a vital link in the Nation's health 
        care network: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that--
            (1) there should be established a ``School-Based Health 
        Center Awareness Month'' to raise awareness of the health 
        services provided by schools and the extent to which these 
        services improve the health and well-being of the Nation's 
        youth; and
            (2) the President should issue a proclamation calling on 
        the people of the United States and interested organizations to 
        observe such a month with appropriate programs and activities.
                                 <all>
```
ex_107979.htm


Exhibit 10.2.2


 


GEOVAX, INC.


SALARY DEFERRAL AGREEMENT


 


 


This Salary Deferral Agreement (the “Agreement”) is entered into as of April 25, 2016 by and between GeoVax, Inc., a Georgia Corporation (the “Company”), and Mark W. Reynolds (the “Employee”).


 


Whereas, the Company and Employee recognize that it is in the best interests of the Company, its shareholders, and its collective Employees to conserve the Company’s cash resources; and


 


Whereas, as part of its cash conservation measures, the Company is asking certain of its employees to accept salary reductions and/or deferrals; 


 


Whereas, Employee currently is currently earning an annualized gross salary of $234,392 (“Base Salary”); 


 


Now, therefore, the parties hereby agree as follows:


 


	
			1.

				
			Salary Deferral.

			
	 	Effective May 1, 2016, Employee agrees to accept a deferral of 40% of his Base Salary, which amount will be accrued and paid to Employee as described below.



 


	
			2.

				
			Discontinuance of Salary Reduction and/or Deferral

			
	 	Employee’s Salary Deferral pursuant to this Agreement shall end upon the earlier of (i) a significant event (to include financing, corporate partnership, etc., as determined by the Company), or (ii) December 31, 2016 (the “Discontinuance Date”).



 


	
			3.

				
			Payment of Accumulated Deferred Salary.

			
	 	At the Discontinuance Date, the Company in its sole discretion will determine the form of payment to be made to Employee for the accumulated Deferred Salary. Such payment may be made in cash, in the form of Company Stock, or in a combination of cash and stock.



 


 


ACCEPTANCE


	 	 	 	 
	
			Employee

				 	 	
			Date

				 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
			Agreed:

				 	 	 	 
	 	
			GeoVax, Inc.

				 	 	 
	 	
			By:
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Xun Energy Inc.  (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended May 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



3.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:   October 10, 2012



By: /s/ Jerry G. Mikolajczyk

Jerry G. Mikolajczyk,

Chief Executive Officer
No. P66/58.

protests 61/12388, etc. (Tampa).

#### Soderhamn Machine Manufacturing Co. *v.*United States,

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of Cambio De-barkers and parts thereof similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Soderhamn Machine Mfg. Co.*v. *United States*(54 Cust. Ct. 369, Abstract 69205), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 68950.

#### Manca, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 64/4548 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the articles of merchandise, designated on the invoice as “Monla illuminators,” are not essential for the operation of a microscope, can be used with items other than microscopes, and that they are, in fact, lamps in chief value of metal, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: redrosemarty@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:54:56 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dan Gregory

Corpus Christi, TX 78414
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

July 2, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135851 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 135851 

 COA: 271870 

Genesee CC: 04-013953-FH 

BARBARA SUE WILLIAMS, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 22, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals. In 

People v Boyd, 174 Mich 321, 324 (1913), this Court discussed common-law obstruction 

of justice, and stated as follows: “At common law, to dissuade or prevent, or to attempt 

to dissuade or prevent, a witness from attending or testifying upon the trial of a cause is 

an indictable offense.” Actual intimidation of the witness is not required; a defendant is 

guilty of common-law obstruction of justice who uses an unlawful means to attempt to 

intentionally dissuade a witness from testifying. See Boyd, 174 Mich 324-326; People v 

Coleman, 350 Mich 268, 274 (1957); see also People v Davis, 408 Mich 255, 294 (1980) 

(Levin, J.). In this case, the defendant knowingly violated a no-contact order when she 

wrote to the victim, asking her to drop the embezzlement charges. In an attempt to 

conceal her violation of the no-contact order, the defendant put a false return address on 

the envelope. Based upon this evidence, a factfinder could properly convict the 

defendant of common-law obstruction of justice. Accordingly, we REMAND this case to 

the Genesee Circuit Court for reinstatement of the trial court’s order denying the 

defendant’s motion to withdraw her guilty plea to common law obstruction of justice. 

CAVANAGH and KELLY, JJ., would deny leave to appeal. 

t0625 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 2, 2008 

 Clerk
No. 59777.

#### S. E. Laszlo *v.*United States,

protest 257234-K (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *John P. Herber & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 193, C. D. 1519), the protest was dismissed, and the matter was remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)).
No. P66/10.

protest 65/4913 (New York).

#### Roxy Import Corp. *v.*United States,

Oliver, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of chord organs and parts thereof similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Excelsior Accordions, Inc.*v. *United States*(48 Cust. Ct. 148, C.D. 2328), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Case No. 10,228.

#### NICHOLLS v. GEORGETOWN.

[4 Cranch, C. C. 576.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

March Term, 1835.

If the business of selling lottery tickets is lawful, the coloration of Georgetown has not power to restrain it; if unlawful, no power to license it.

This was a motion or petition for a cer-tiorari to bring up a prosecution pending before the mayor of Georgetown, D. ’C., for a penalty of $20 for selling a lottery ticket on the 27th of April, 1835, without a license from the corporation; half to the informer, half *180to the corporation, under a by-law of the 21st of February, 1835. Judgment below May 9,1835, for the penalty and costs.

Mr. Brent, for plaintiff, Nicholls.

The corporation can only exercise -powers specifically given and such as are necessary to the exercise of . those expressly given. No power is given by its charter to license the sale of lottery tickets. It has power to restrain and prohibit gambling, but not to license it. The charters of Washington and Alexandria give the specific power to license vendors of lottery tickets, but no such power is given to Georgetown.

Mr. Dunlop, contra.

The charter of 1805, § 12, gives the power “to restrain or prohibit gambling.” This is a species of gambling; and as it may be restrained it may be licensed. ' The tax operates as a restraint. State v. Smith, and State v. Lane, 2 Yerg. 272. Buying and selling tickets is gaming.

THE COURT

(THRUSTON, Circuit Judge, absent) was of opinion, that if the business of vending lottery tickets was lawful, the corporation had no power to restrain it; if unlawful, no power to license it.
Searched for **http://www.foodsafetyworkinggroup.gov/Home.htm**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.foodsafetyworkinggroup.gov/Home.htm**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
H. Res. 485 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 18, 2007. 

Whereas many citizens of the United States remember Donald Jeffry Herbert as ‘‘Mr. Wizard’’ and mourn his passing; 

Whereas Don Herbert was born in Waconia, Minnesota and 

graduated from the La Crosse State Teacher’s College in 

Wisconsin in 1940 where he trained to be a science 

teacher; 

Whereas Don Herbert volunteered for the U.S. Army Air 

Corps and served our country in the Atlantic theater and 

earned the Distinguished Flying Cross and the Air Medal 

with three oak leaf clusters; 

Whereas Don Herbert developed the idea for science programming culminating in ‘‘Watch Mr. Wizard’’, a live television show produced from 1951 to 1964 and honored 

by a Peabody Award in 1954; 

Whereas the National Science Foundation and the American 

Chemical Society lauded Don Herbert and his show for 

promoting interest in science and his contributions to 

science education and has since been recognized by numerous awards; 
2 

•HRES 485 EH 

Whereas an additional educational program, ‘‘Mr. Wizard’s 

World’’, inspired children from 1983 to 1990 on cable 

television; 

Whereas ‘‘Mr. Wizard’’ continued to serve as an ambassador 

for science education by authoring multiple books and 

programs, and by traveling to schools and providing 

classroom demonstrations; 

Whereas educational research indicates that young children 

make decisions about future careers at a very early age 

and are influenced greatly by positive contacts with 

science and technology; 

Whereas a strong education in science and technology is one 

of the building blocks of a productive, competitive, and 

healthy society; 

Whereas ‘‘Mr. Wizard’’ encouraged children to duplicate his 

experiments at home, driving independent inquiry into 

science with simple household equipment; 

Whereas ‘‘Mr. Wizard’s’’ dynamic and energetic science experiments attracted unprecedented numbers of children 

to educational programming, even those who were disinterested or unmotivated in science; 

Whereas Mr. Wizard Science Clubs were started across the 

United States and had more than 100,000 children enrolled in 5,000 clubs by the mid-1950s; and 

Whereas Don Herbert will be remembered as a pioneer of 

commercial educational programming and instrumental in 

making science education exciting and approachable for 

millions of children across the United States: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 
3 

•HRES 485 EH 

(1) expresses its appreciation for the profound public service and educational contributions of Donald Jeffry Herbert; 

(2) recognizes the profound impact of higher educational institutions that train teachers; 

(3) encourages students to honor the heritage of 

Don Herbert by exploring our world through science, 

technology, engineering, and mathematics fields; and 

(4) tenders its condolences to the family of Don 

Herbert and thanks them for their strong familial support of him. 

Attest: 

Clerk.