alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(R.D. 11553)

#### Thyssenstahl Corp. *v.*United States

Entry No. 8619, etc.

(Decided June 27, 1968)

*Sharretts, Paley, Garter & Blauvelt*for the plaintiff.

*Edwin L. Weisl, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in the schedule attached hereto and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States that the merchandise covered by the above enumerated appeals consists of steel wire rods exported from West Germany during September, October and December, 1963 and that said merchandise is not on the list of products published in T.D. 54521 from which the application of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (P.L. 927, 84th Congress, Second Session) is withheld.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the price at the time of exportation to the United States of the instant merchandise at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold, or in the absence of sales offered for sale in the principal markets in tire country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities, and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, was $87.50 per metric ton, net, packed.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the instant appeals are submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

*916Upon the agreed facts, I find export value as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the steel wire rods covered by these appeals for reappraisement, and that such value was $87.50 per metric ton, net, packed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
p.1 

OAR Box 1208 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

122) ll-E-8 

Docket Number: 

A-89-10 

Printed 5/9/2008 10:08:24 AM Sheet 122 of 127 
P.2 

.1 

a

t CD 

Cf 

_9^^B_^_\\\_____W _m__-^--.-m^-l 

@©E__3®__iW0SB l 

CONTACT REPORT 

II-E- 8 

Date __. 

Originator 

CONTACT BY: TELEPHONE )_\ MEETING D Other 

| NAME, TITLE & ORGANIZATION T o ^ ^ LWIX A .*_ 

>>a r _ 

ADDRESS & TELEPHONE NUMBER Q U . /$ /Y7 V 

PURPOSE OR SUBJECT (Give project number if appropriate) 

SUMMARY 

_r_ 

• o • 

A V ^ 

• M.M. 7*s, ^ . ;<<_U. /v,..^. «/*.«- #/.oo/.. v r_^jt 

Distribution:
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER 
PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14(b) AND 15d-14(b) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, Thomas L. Wegman, the President, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of BioSpecifics Technologies Corp. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

|1. | The Companys report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.                                                  

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification this 6th day of November, 2009.

/s/ Thomas L. Wegman_______________________ Thomas L. Wegman 
President, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer

This certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange of 1934, or otherwise subject to liability pursuant to that section. Such certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-8075

KEITH MICHAEL BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

D. BOYD, Officer,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief

District Judge. (2:11-cr-00330-RBS-LRL)

Submitted: March 28, 2013 Decided: April 2, 2013

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keith Michael Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, 

Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Keith Michael Brown appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Brown v. Boyd, No. 2:11-cv-00330-RBS-LRL (E.D. Va. Nov. 

9, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
From: tn.jesus.freak@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:10:33 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Glenn Souder

Knoxville, TN 37938
Before the First Division,

June 23, 1954

No. 58205.

protest 210528-K (Los Angeles).

#### The American Import Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of articles in chief value of glass beads the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Walco Bead Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 62, C. D. 1445), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: TheAnvik-Andreafski region, Alaska (including the Marshall district)**
 
Report | Plates: OneTwoThreeFour
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:683
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000956633
 
July 18, 2018
Exhibit 32.2





OFFICER'S CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C 1350)








The undersigned A. Bradley Gabbard, the Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of Recovery Energy, Inc., (the "Corporation"), in connection with the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), does hereby represent, warrant and certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, that, to the best of his knowledge:





1.
The Report is in full compliance with reporting requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Corporation.





By: /s/ A. Bradley Gabbard


A. Bradley Gabbard


Principal Financial and Accounting Officer





August 12, 2011
**Exhibit 13.2**

** **

** **

** **

** **

**Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal FinancialOfficer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, I, Kevin Barnes, the Chief Financial Officer of POET Technologies Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify,that, to my knowledge:

 

1.The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 2015 (the "Report") ofthe Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

The foregoing certification is provided solely for purposes of complying with the provisionsof Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not intended to be used or relied upon for any other purpose.

 

 

Date: March 17, 2016

 

 

 

 

/s/ Kevin Barnes

_____________________

 

Name: Kevin Barnes

 

Title: Chief Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Johnny Hartwell, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 11]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Tejada, J.), rendered January 12, 1993, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 15 years to life and *S1h to 1*years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s claim that his allocution showed that he did not understand the nature of the depraved indifference murder charge to which he was pleading, and that his plea should not have been accepted, is unpreserved for appellate review as a matter of law since he neither moved to withdraw the plea before sentencing nor to vacate the judgment of conviction on that ground *(People v Claudio,*64 NY2d 858, 859), and we decline to review the claim in the interest of justice. In any event, were we to review it, we would find that the allocution sufficiently established circumstances evincing depraved indifference to human life and defendant’s understanding thereof. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Rubin, Kupferman and Asch, JJ., concur.
No. 62257.

#### Traveler Trading Co. *v.*United States,

protests 311904-K (A), 311904-K (B), and 313144-K (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of artificial flowers the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 61346, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

JD CHARLES McMANUS,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOSEPH LEHMAN,

Defendant.

Case No. C05-5563RBL

ORDER ADOPTING

REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

 The Court, having reviewed, the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge J. Kelley

Arnold, objections to the report and recommendation, if any, and the remaining record, does hereby

find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) The complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to comply with

the courts order to provide service documents.

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff, and to the Hon. J.

Kelley Arnold.

DATED this 19th day of December, 2005.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-05563-RBL Document 7 Filed 12/19/05 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

 

GERBER,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

FIRST HORIZON HOME LOAN CORP.,

 Defendant(s).

 Case No. C05-1554P

 MINUTE ORDER

The following minute order is made by the direction of the court, the Honorable Marsha J.

Pechman:

At the request of counsel, an extension of time to file the joint status report is granted. The

report will be due on December 15, 2005. All other FRCP 26-related dates are adjusted

accordingly. Failure to adhere to these deadlines may result in sanctions, up to and including

dismissal of this action.

Filed this 23rd day of November, 2005.

BRUCE RIFKIN, Clerk

By /s Mary Duett

Deputy Clerk

Case 2:05-cv-01554-RSL Document 25 Filed 11/23/05 Page 1 of 1
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with Amendment No. 3 (the “Amendment”) on Form 20-F/A to the Annual
Report of DJSP Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report,” and as amended by the Amendment, the “Amended
Report”), the undersigned, in his capacity and on the date indicated below,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his
knowledge:




1. The
Amended Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in the Amended Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.




Date:
June 30, 2010





/s/ Kumar GursahaneyName:
              Kumar
      GursahaneyTitle:
              Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (PrincipalFinancial
      Officer)
Case No. 14,826.

#### UNITED STATES v. COHEN.

[Cited in U. S. v. Blodgett, Case No. 14.d11. Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible.]
From: freercw@libertypolemessage.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:32:35 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Richard C Wilmot

Apopka, FL 32703
Before the Second Division,

March 13, 1969

No. P69/72.

protest 62/15234 (New York).

#### Lipman’s *v.*United States,

Newman, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of aerators in chief value of brass similar in -all material respects to those the subject of *Globe Importing Company*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 248, Abstract 65882), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXTEND 

-- 1 

GRAHAM & DUNN PC

Pier 70, 2801 Alaskan Way ~ Suite 300 

Seattle, Washington 98121-1128 

(206) 624-8300/Fax: (206) 340-9599

No. C05-5295RJB 

M31664-627088 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

The Honorable Robert J. Bryan 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT TACOMA 

BOSTON PIZZA RESTAURANTS, LP, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

OR-CAN, LLC; TERRY SMYL; CAROL ANNE

SMYL; JOSEPH LOFTGREN; KAREN 

SPEYER-LOFTGREN; MICHAEL 

SALISBURY; JULIE SALISBURY; AND 

KATHERINE SALISBURY, 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

No. C05-5295RJB 

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED 

MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR 

PLAINTIFF'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF 

MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, based on the Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Extend 

Deadline for Plaintiff’s Reply in Support of Motion for Injunctive Relief, that the deadline for 

Plaintiff’s reply brief shall be extended to August 5, 2005, and that the motion shall be re-noted 

for that same date. 

 DONE IN OPEN COURT this 25th day of July 2005. 

 A

ROBERT J. BRYAN 

United States District Judge 

Case 3:05-cv-05295-RJB Document 41 Filed 07/25/05 Page 1 of 2
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXTEND 

-- 2 

GRAHAM & DUNN PC

Pier 70, 2801 Alaskan Way ~ Suite 300 

Seattle, Washington 98121-1128 

(206) 624-8300/Fax: (206) 340-9599

No. C05-5295RJB 

M31664-627088 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Presented by: 

GRAHAM & DUNN, PC 

By/s/ David M. Byers 

David M. Byers 

WSBA# 29228 

Email: dbyers@grahamdunn.com 

Douglas C. Berry 

WSBA#12291 

Email: dberry@grahamdunn.com 

Pier 70 

2801 Alaskan Way, Suite 300 

Seattle, WA 98121-1128 

Telephone: 206.340.9649 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Boston Pizza Restaurants, LP 

HAYNES AND BOONE, L.L.P. 

Deborah S. Coldwell 

Texas Bar # 04535300 

Altresha Q. Burchett 

Texas Bar #24045582 

901 Main Street, Suite 3100 

Dallas, Texas 75202-3789 

Telephone: 214.651.5260 

Telecopier: 214.651.5940 

Email: deborah.coldwell@haynesboone.com

Of Counsel, Admitted Pro Hac Vice

Case 3:05-cv-05295-RJB Document 41 Filed 07/25/05 Page 2 of 2
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Nationalassessment of Title I: final report: a report prepared for IES.**
 
Volumes: OneTwo | Appendix A | Summary of Key Findings
 
SuDoc Number:
Item Number:
CGP systemNumber:
 
May 15, 2018
#### Cecelia M. KITTO, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.

No. 00-3307.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 5, 2001.

Before CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge, FRIEDMAN Senior Circuit Judge, and LINN, Circuit Judge.

Judgment

PER CURIAM.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R.36