alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
        
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                            11,656
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                       18,531
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  42,475
<PP&E>                                           485,583
<DEPRECIATION>                                    70,475
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   487,619
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             66,385
<BONDS>                                           52,321
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                             480
<OTHER-SE>                                       360,150
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     487,619
<SALES>                                          268,824
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 271,037
<CGS>                                            103,820
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    228,152
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   437
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   27,069
<INCOME-TAX>                                       9,880
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               17,189
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                      17,189
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.35
        

</TABLE>
Annual
Statement of Compliance
 
 VIA:
EMAIL
 
 Banc of
America Commercial Mortgage Inc.
 214 North
Tryon Street, NC1-027-22-03
 Charlotte,
North Carolina 28255
 
 Re:           Banc
of America Commercial Mortgage Trust 2008-1
 
 
 Reference
is made to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as of
June 1, 2008 among Banc of America Commercial Mortgage Inc., as Depositor, Bank
of America, National Association, as Master Servicer, CWCapital Asset Management
LLC, as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee, and LaSalle Bank
National Association, as Certificate Administrator and REMIC
Administrator.
 
 I, James
A. Jendra, a Senior Vice President of Bank of America, National Association as
successor by merger to LaSalle Bank National Association, as Certificate
Administrator and REMIC Administrator hereby certify that:
 
 (1)
A review of the activities of the Certificate Administrator and REMIC
Administrator during the preceding calendar year and of the performance of the
Certificate Administrator and REMIC Administrator under the Agreement has been
made under my supervision; and
 
 (2)
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Certificate Administrator
and REMIC Administrator have fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement
in all material respects throughout such year or a portion
thereof.
 
 Date: 3/10/09
 Bank of
America, National Association as successor by merger to LaSalle Bank National
Association, as Certificate Administrator and REMIC Administrator
 
 
 /s/
James A.
Jendra
 James A.
Jendra
 Senior
Vice President
 Americas
Executive


Tel:
312.904.1671


IL4 -
135-17-16


135 S. LaSalle St.,
Chicago, IL 60603




Recycled Paper
From: vickilyle66@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:37:10 PM

The choice to have children or not to should be up to women not the government. It would be cheaper

for women to be able to get free birth control or have abortions than for us to help support unwanted

children or those with parents nont financially able to care for them. Do whatever we can to help make

it affordable for women to make the choice they feel is best for their own situation.

Sincerely,

Vicki White

Summerfield, FL 34491
Open Literature Review Screen

Chemical Name: Atrazine

CAS No: 1912-24-9

Citation:

Bouldin, J. L., 1. L. Farris, M. T. Moore, S. Smith, Jr., W. W. Stephens, and C. M.

Cooper. (2005). "Evaluated fate and effects of atrazine and lambda-cyhalothrin in

vegetated and unvegetated microcosms." Environmental Toxicology 20(5): 487-498.

(1'11 ~IID i1't;2btIO <;-)

Date of Screen: October 8, 2009

Rationale for Not Conducting a Full Open Literature Review Summary: Endpoints

specific for aquatic plants are not provided. Vegetation was an independent/controlled

variable, but the study endpoints were water quality parameters and acute toxicity ofthe

water to fathead minnow, water flea, and midge.

Primary Reviewer: Sara H. Hendrix, M.S., Subcontracting Scientist, Cambridge

Environmental Inc.

Secondary Reviewer: Teri Myers, Senior Scientist, Cambridge Environmental Inc.

\11111111. 2087832
From: mdm0651@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:50:32 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

M D Mise

Henrico, VA 23238
No. 63338.

protests 278468-K, etc. (New York).

#### Jules Orteig, Ltd. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the facts and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C.C.P.A. 112, C.A.D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited, it was held that duty and internal revenue tax are not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protests were sustained to this extent.
From: grandet99@att.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:15:49 PM

Dear HHS Staff:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Thomas Grande

Stow, OH 44224
From: fmwoodall@mindspring.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:44:26 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Frank Woodall

Dublin, GA 31021
Case Uo. 9,490.

#### The MERSEY.

[Blatchf. Pr. Cas. 658.] 1

Circuit Court, S. D. New York.

July 17, 1863.2

Prize— Violation op Blockade — Enemy Property — Mutilation op Log-Book.

Decree of the district court condemning vessel and cargo reversed, they not being enemy property, and there having been no violation of, or attempt to violate, the blockade.

[Appeal from the district court of the United States for the Southern district of New York.]

[The schooner Mersey and cargo were cap- ’ timed as a prize of war, and it was decreed that both be condemned and forfeited. Case No. 9,489. The case is now before this court on an appeal.]

1

 [Reported by Samuel Blatchford, Esq.]

2

 [Reversing Case No. 9,489.]

NELSON, Circuit Justice.

This vessel and cargo were captured on the 26th of April, 1862, in the Gulf Stream, about one hundred miles from land, and two days out from Nassau, N. r., on a voyage from the latter place to Baltimore and back. Her cargo, which was put on board at Nassau, consisted of salt, coffee, soap, merchandise, &c. The vessel is owned by Roberts, a merchant and resident of Nassau, and a British subject. The cargo is owned by Sawyer & Menendez, of the same place, *160one of them a British subject, and the other a Spanish. According to the evidence the vessel was in her proper course, pursuing her voyage to Baltimore, and without any intent to run the blockade of any of the Confederate ports. She seems to have been convicted on suspicion, from hearsay evidence and report that she had run the blockade of Charleston on her previous voyage, and that she was still the property of a citizen and resident of some of the Southern states. I am not satisfied that these facts, or any of them, have been established by competent proof. The cargo, it is admitted, belongs to British and Spanish subjects. Much stress is laid upon a mutilation of the log-book, which is fully explained by the further evidence of the mate and steward. Decree below reversed.
Exhibit 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I John Moore certify that:

1.   I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K of Sync2 Networks Corp.

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to a state material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and financial information
     included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
     financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
     as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintain disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for
     the registrant and have:

     a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared.
     b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
     c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant's fourth quarter in the case
          of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
          likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
          financial reporting; and

5.   I have disclosed, based on my recent evaluation of internal control over
     financial reporting, to registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
     registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
     functions):

     a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record,process,summarize and report financial information;and
     b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's control over
          financial reporting

September 26, 2011
                                            /s/ John Moore
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            CEO/CFO/DIRECTOR
Before the Second Division,

February 19, 1959

No. 62768.

#### Grossman *&*Weissman, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 58/1278 and 58/3029 (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of narrow woven fabrics of cotton similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Beer Stern Import Corp.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 294, C.D. 1944), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Record of Discussion 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate ldenti tier: -AD 

With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, 

manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)? 

ORGAN IZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED 

Boeing Todd Esselstyn Numerous Concur. 

Boeing Joan Lenker Numerous Concur. 

Boeing Frank Wichman Numerous Concur. 

ATA Robert L. Ireland 8/ 14/201 5 Concur. 

Other/ Additional Information:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER FOR SERVICE AND RETURN, 2254 PETITION - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

JON ROYAL FLEMING,

Petitioner,

v.

KEN QUINN,

Respondent.

Case No. C05-5719RJB

ORDER FOR SERVICE AND

RETURN, § 2254 PETITION AND

RE-NOTING PETITIONER’S

MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT

OF COUNSEL 

This 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief has been referred to the undersigned

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) and local Rules MJR 3 and 4. Petitioner in this

action is seeking federal habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

Petitioner has filed a motion for appointment of a counsel. (Dkt. # 9). That motion is renoted by the court for January 20th, 2006 to give respondent time to respond to the motion. The

court now ORDERS:

(1) The clerk shall arrange for service by certified mail upon respondent, a copy of the

petition, of all documents in support thereof, and of this Order. All costs of service shall be

advanced by the United States. The Clerk shall assemble the necessary documents to effect service. 

The Clerk shall send petitioner a copy of this Order, the General Order. The clerk will also send a

Case 3:05-cv-05719-RJB Document 12 Filed 12/08/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER FOR SERVICE AND RETURN, 2254 PETITION - 2

courtesy copy of the petition to the Washington State Attorney General’s Office Criminal Justice

Division. 

(2) Within forty-five (45) days after such service, respondent shall file and serve an

 answer in accordance with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases in United States District

Courts. As part of such answer, respondents should state whether petitioner has exhausted available

state remedies, whether an evidentiary hearing is necessary, and whether there is any issue of abuse

of delay under Rule 9. Respondent shall not file a dispositive motion in place of an answer without

first showing cause as to why an answer is inadequate. Respondent shall file the answer with the

Clerk of Court and serve a copy of the answer upon petitioner.

(3) The answer will be treated in accordance with Local Rule CR 7. Accordingly, upon

 receipt of the Answer the Clerk will note the matter for consideration on the fourth Friday after the

answer is filed, petitioner may file and serve a response not later than on the Monday immediately

preceding the Friday appointed for consideration of the matter, and respondent may file and serve a

reply brief not later than on the Thursday immediately preceding the Friday designated for

consideration of the matter.

DATED this 8th day of December, 2005.

/S/ J. Kelley Arnold

J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-05719-RJB Document 12 Filed 12/08/05 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 588 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                       October 9, 2007.
Whereas, Martha Coffin Wright, sister of Lucretia Coffin Mott, was one of five 
        organizers of the First Woman's Rights Convention in Seneca Falls, New 
        York, in 1848;
Whereas from this convention came the ``Declaration of Sentiments'', an appeal 
        for basic rights for women, modeled on the Declaration of Independence;
Whereas when Martha Wright helped to plan the Seneca Falls Convention, she was 
        six months pregnant with her seventh child, epitomizing the personal 
        strength and dedication of the participants of the women's rights 
        movement;
Whereas the sites associated with the First Woman's Rights Convention are 
        preserved in the Women's Rights National Historic Park in Seneca Falls, 
        New York;
Whereas after the Seneca Falls Convention, Martha Wright participated in many 
        State and national women's rights conventions in various capacities, 
        often serving as president;
Whereas during the antebellum years, Martha Wright was active in the abolition 
        movement, attended the founding meeting of the American Anti-Slavery 
        Society in Philadelphia in 1833, and later presided over numerous anti-
        slavery meetings;
Whereas Martha Wright's home in Auburn, New York, was part of the Underground 
        Railroad; and
Whereas slavery was abolished in 1865 with the ratification of the Thirteenth 
        Amendment, and women's suffrage was achieved in 1920 with the 
        ratification of the Nineteenth Amendment: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the 200th birthday of Martha Coffin Wright;
            (2) recognizes the induction of Martha Coffin Wright into the 
        National Women's Hall of Fame; and
            (3) honors the accomplishments of Martha Coffin Wright in her fight 
        for equal rights for all Americans.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
No. 58220.

protest 158665-K (San Francisco).

#### Illfelder Importing Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of chinaware tea sets similar in all material respects to those the subject of *B. Shackman & Co.*and *S. Stern Henry & Co.*v. *United States*(28 Cust. Ct. 298, C. D. 1426), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.