alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 527 

Recognizing the month of November as ‘‘National Homeless Youth Awareness 

Month’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 28, 2007 

Mr. MCDERMOTT (for himself, Mr. WELLER of Illinois, Mr. STARK, Mr. PORTER, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Ms. BERKLEY, Mrs. BACHMANN, Mr. 

YARMUTH, and Mrs. DAVIS of California) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the month of November as ‘‘National Homeless 

Youth Awareness Month’’. 

Whereas an estimated 1,300,000 to 2,800,000 youths in the 

United States are homeless for at least one night each 

year, with many staying on the streets or in emergency 

shelters; 

Whereas homeless youth are typically too poor to secure basic 

needs, are often unable to access adequate medical or 

mental health care, and are often unaware of supportive 

services that are available; 

Whereas an average of 13 homeless youth die each day due 

to physical assault, illness, or suicide; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 527 IH 

Whereas some homeless youth are expelled from their homes 

or run away after physical, sexual, or emotional abuse by 

their parents or guardians, or are separated from their 

parents through death or divorce; 

Whereas other youth become homeless due to a lack of financial and housing resources as they exit juvenile corrections or foster care, including 25 percent of foster youth 

who experience homelessness within two to four years 

after exiting foster care; 

Whereas awareness of the tragedy of youth homelessness and 

its causes should be heightened to better coordinate current programs with the many families, businesses, law 

enforcement agencies, schools, and community and faithbased organizations working to help youth remain off the 

streets; and 

Whereas November would be an appropriate month to recognize as National Homeless Youth Awareness Month: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports helping vulnerable youth through 

3 current programs authorized under title IV of the 

4 Social Security Act; 

5 (2) encourages the promotion through such pro6 grams of assistance for especially foster youth in 

7 staying off the streets, staying in school, and obtain8 ing their high school diplomas and further education 

9 and training; 

10 (3) applauds the initiative of public and private 

11 organizations and individuals dedicated to helping 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 527 IH 

1 these programs prevent homelessness among youth, 

2 and provide aid when prevention fails; and 

3 (4) should recognize ‘‘National Homeless Youth 

4 Awareness Month’’ to support and further encourage 

5 such efforts. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350





The
      undersigned officer of ALLIED HEALTHCARE PRODUCTS, INC. (the "Company"), hereby
      certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly Report
      on
      Form 10-Q for the Company’s fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the "Report")
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in
      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the
      Company.





/s/
                DANIEL C. DUNNDaniel
                C. DunnVice
                President, Chief Financial Officer &
                Secretary


4
No. 66544.

#### Aut Customs Brokers, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/29815, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of horsemeat similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 66197, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 65217.

#### Ward International Products *v.*United States,

protest 60/12865 (New York).

Opinion by

Moulison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of carrizo baskets the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Chester K. Stoner*v. *United States*(42 Cust. Ct. 178, C.D. 2083), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: marp480@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:52:29 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mary Peleman

Washington, MI 48094
H. Res. 691 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

October 1, 2007. 

Whereas for 23 years the all-volunteer Gulf Coast Wing and 

West Houston Squadron of the Commemorative Air 

Force has performed in the Wings Over Houston Airshow 

at Ellington Field in Houston, Texas; 

Whereas the Wings Over Houston Airshow has been rated as 

one of the top events of its kind in the Nation; 

Whereas tens of thousands of people from southeast Texas 

and all over the United States attend the event each year 

and experience the unique opportunity to see the United 

States Air Force, Navy, Marines, and Coast Guard perform and to meet service members of the past and 

present; 

Whereas the Wings Over Houston Airshow has helped to increase awareness and appreciation for the United States 

Armed Forces and its active duty members and veterans; 

Whereas the Wings Over Houston Airshow serves to promote 

an understanding and appreciation of military history 

through the reenactment of battles and the acquisition, 

restoration, and display of vintage aircraft; 

Whereas throughout its history, Wings Over Houston Airshow has benefitted local and national charities, including 

the Wings Over Houston Airshow Scholarship Program, 
2 

•HRES 691 EH 

the Texas Southern University Aviation Career Academy, 

the Exchange Club of Sugar Land, and the Commemorative Air Force aircraft restoration and flying historical 

programs; 

Whereas the Wings Over Houston Airshow and its partners, 

including the Lone Star Flight Museum, the Houston 

Airport System, the Clear Lake Area Chamber of Commerce, the Bay Area Houston Convention and Visitors 

Bureau, the Greater Houston Convention and Visitors 

Bureau, Destination League City, and the cities of Houston, Kemah, Nassau Bay, Seabrook, and Webster, have 

contributed to the economy and growth of southeast 

Texas; and 

Whereas the Wings Over Houston Scholarship Program has 

promoted the importance of math and science education 

by helping southeast Texas students pursue college educations in the fields of aviation and aerospace: Now, 

therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives commends 

the Wings Over Houston Airshow for its great contribution 

to the appreciation, understanding, and future of the United 

States Armed Forces, the City of Houston, Texas, and 

Ellington Field. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
mbcc-ex1056_204.htm



Exhibit 10.56

January 15, 2018

 

 

 

Mr. Dennis Thatcher

Mission Broadcasting, Inc.

30400 Detroit Road 

Suite 304

Westlake, OH  44145

 

Re:  Agreement for the Sale of Commercial Time for KTVE-TV, El Dorado, Arkansas

 

Dear Dennis:

 

Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc. (“Nexstar”) and Mission Broadcasting, Inc. (“Mission”) are parties to an Agreement for the Sale of Commercial Time with respect to KTVE (the “JSA”) dated as of January 16, 2008, the initial term of which also expires as of January 16, 2018.  Pursuant Section 1 of the JSA, the term of the JSA shall be extended for an additional ten (10) year term, unless either party provides at least six months notice of its intent to terminate such Agreement.  

 

This letter is to confirm that neither Nexstar nor Mission has provided the requisite notice of termination for either Agreement; and it is the parties’ intent that the JSA continue in effect pursuant to the terms thereof (as amended from time to time).  Accordingly, Nexstar and Mission hereby agree to extend the terms of the JSA for a period of ten years.  Please confirm Mission’s agreement by signing the enclosed duplicate copy of this letter and returning it to my attention. 

 

Thank you.

 

Sincerely,

 

 

/s/ Elizabeth Ryder

Elizabeth Ryder

Executive Vice President & 

General Counsel

 

 

Acknowledged and Agreed:

Mission Broadcasting, Inc.

 

 

By: /s/ Dennis Thatcher

Title:  President
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James V. MAYS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-6039.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

June 8, 2001.

Before RALPH B. GUY, JR., BOGGS, and GILMAN, Circuit Judges.

*ORDER*

Pro se federal prisoner James V. Mays appeals a district court order that denied a motion in which he sought the rescission of a fine he received as part of his criminal sentence. The case has been referred to this panel pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. We unanimously agree that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).

As part of his criminal sentence, Mays received a $100,000 fíne. This court affirmed Mays’s conviction and sentence on direct appeal. *United States v. Mays,*77 F.3d 906, 909 (6th Cir.1996). In his direct appeal, Mays did not challenge the fine imposed. *Cf. United States v. Torres,*209 F.3d 308, 313 (3d Cir.2000) (concerning the defendant’s burden in challenging a fine on direct appeal).

On July 17, 2000, Mays filed an original action in the district court for the recission of the fine. The district court denied the motion as unauthorized, and this appeal followed.

The district court did not err. Mays claimed that the fine violated his due process rights because it was conditioned on his receipt of proceeds from a bankruptcy proceeding, and he received nothing. Mays incorrectly assumed that the district court was authorized to modify the fine on his motion. Title 18 U.S.C. § 3573, provides that the government may petition for the recission of a fine. By its own terms, § 3573 applies strictly to the government and not to defendants. *United States v. Linker,*920 F.2d 1, 2 (7th Cir.1990). Section 3573 “severely hampers the court’s ability to leave itself a safety valve” because the court does not have the authority to modify the fine in the future based on new information. *United States v. Seale,*20 F.3d 1279, 1286, n. 8 (3d Cir.1994).

Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 34(j)(2)(C), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                                   5

<MULTIPLIER>                                            1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                    JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                      JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                                  1,364
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          20,625
<ALLOWANCES>                                            1,249
<INVENTORY>                                            14,965
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       60,179
<PP&E>                                                150,537
<DEPRECIATION>                                         80,641
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        156,586
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  35,200
<BONDS>                                                41,145
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                19
<COMMON>                                                  109
<OTHER-SE>                                             77,283
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          156,586
<SALES>                                                24,258
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       95,145
<CGS>                                                  14,624
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          59,771
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           76
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      2,010
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         1,830
<INCOME-TAX>                                            1,046
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       784
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        13,269
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                           14,053
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            1.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            1.35
        


</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SPARTA, Inc. (the
Company) for the period ended October 3, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert C. Sepucha,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, in my capacity as an officer
of the Company pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the
financial statements included in the report. November 10, 2004 /s/ Robert C. Sepucha
Hassayampa

River Canyon

Wilderness

Prescott

Yarnell

Bureau of Land Management

Phoenix District Office

Phoenix, AZ

October 2009

Note: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM)

conducts land use planning only in the areas administered

by BLM. BLM has no planning authority under the

municipal or county planning legislation of the State

of Arizona.

No warranty is made by BLM for the use of this map

for purposes not intended by BLM, or to the accuracy,

reliability or completeness of the information shown.

Spatial information may not meet National Map Accuracy

standards. This information may be updated without

notification.

Note: Land Status legend located on Map 1

Map 15d

Bradshaw-Harquahala

Planning Area

Route Network for

Yarnell/Congress Area

0 1 2 3 4

Miles

BLM Wilderness

USFS Wilderness

Interstate

Major Road

Major River, Streams or Wash

Highway

Bradshaw Harquahala

Planning Area

Existing Route Type

Primary

Secondary

Single Track

Tertiary

Management Unit
From: fulhorst@swbell.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:52:32 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

William Fulhorst

Saint Louis, MO 63129
No. 59770.

#### R. C. Williams *&*Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 226114-K.

Protest abandoned February 16, 1956. (Not published.) (Initial No. 18144A-K.) Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

April 18, 2008

Before

JOHN L. COFFEY, Circuit Judge

KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge

DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge

No. 05‐4247

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appeal from the United States

District Court for the Western

Plaintiff‐Appellee, District of Wisconsin.

v. No. 05 CR 116

LEAVIE T. SCOTT, Barbara B. Crabb, Chief Judge.

Defendant‐Appellant.

O R D E R

This matter is before the court on remand from the Supreme Court of the United

States.  On January 7, 2008, the Supreme Court vacated the judgment of this court and

remanded the case to this court for further consideration in light of Kimbrough v. United

States, 552 U.S. ___, 128 S. Ct. 558 (2007).

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
No. 05-4247 Page 2

In their statements filed in accordance with this court’s Circuit Rule 54, the

parties agree that this case should be remanded to the district court for resentencing.

We agree.  The defendant  adequately preserved the issue of the unwarranted

sentencing disparity between crack and cocaine; he is entitled to be resentenced by the

district court under the standard set forth in Kimbrough.

Accordingly, the sentence of the district court is vacated and the case is

remanded for proceedings consistent with this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED
Exhibit 32.1





OFFICER’S CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. 1350)








The undersigned Roger A. Parker, the Chief Executive Officer of Recovery Energy, Inc., (the “Corporation”), in connection with the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), does hereby represent, warrant and certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, that, to the best of his knowledge:





1. The Report is in full compliance with reporting requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Corporation.





Date: August 12, 2011





Recovery Energy, Inc./s/ Roger A ParkerRoger A ParkerChief Executive Officer