alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MEDIWARE'S
QUARTERLY REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             4083
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      8603
<ALLOWANCES>                                        750
<INVENTORY>                                         655
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  13560
<PP&E>                                             4462
<DEPRECIATION>                                     2549
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    27086
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             10438
<BONDS>                                             206
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                            619
<OTHER-SE>                                        15823
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      27086
<SALES>                                            7003
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   7003
<CGS>                                              2289
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      6456
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   20
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     565
<INCOME-TAX>                                        204
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 361
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                        361
<EPS-BASIC>                                         .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       .05



</TABLE>
Before the Second Division,

April 8, 1963

No. 67580.

#### Keuffel & Esser Co. *v.*United States,

protests 60/27625, 62/3990, and 62/10809 (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of drawing instrument cases similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 59557, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
September 13, 1961

No. 66065.

#### Fairchild Camera & Instrument Corp. and Inter-Maritime Forwarding Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 319849-K.

Plaintiffs’ application for rehearing denied.
From: patchscabbagevalaam@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:20:57 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Vincent Young

Upland, CA 91786
## Draft Proposal CB-26

This concept has been developed by the DOE Building Energy Codes Program (BECP) as a possible code

change proposal to the Commercial provisions of the 2012 International Energy Conservation Code

(IECC). Interested parties are asked to submit any and all comments on DOE's initial concepts and draft

code change proposals. For instructions on submitting comments, visit:

www.energycodes.gov/development/ commercial/codes/iecc/concepts/



## Equipment and System Sizing (CB-26)

Objective: Clarify intent that the provisions are written to apply to the output capacity of the

equipment that provides heating or cooling functions.

Suggested Code Change Proposal

Revise Section C403.2.2 as follows:

C403.2.2 Equipment and system sizing. The output capacity of heating and cooling equipment and

systems shall not exceed the loads calcula ted in accordance with Section C403.2.1. A single piece of

equipment providing both heating and cooling shall satisfy this provision for one function with the

capacity for the other function as small as po ssible, within available equipment options.

(Exceptions remain unchanged.)

Reason: While not defined, there is a distinct difference between systems and equipment.

The equipment refers to the piece of equipment (or the appliance) that converts delivered energy into

heating and/or cooling capability. The system is much broader in scope and includes not only the

equipment but the distribution system, controls, etc. The design loads in Section C403.2.1 will cover the

distribution system loads such that the loads in question and the point of comparison with size occurs at

the output to the equipment.

Cost Impact: There is no cost impact associated with this proposed change.
From: hbungert@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:38:30 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Helen Bungert

Mission Viejo, CA 92691
Before the First Division,

March 21, 1966

No. P66/1.

protests 64/19917, etc. (New York).

#### Levin Bros., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Oliver, J.

In accordance with, stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of plastic paperweights similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Ace Importing Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(50 Cust. Ct. 226, Abstract 67488), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Donte Daise, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 191]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Moskowitz, J.), rendered September 27, 1993, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, attempted robbery in the first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the hearing court was biased because it allegedly curtailed his cross-examination of a police witness is unpreserved for appellate review *(see, People v Charleston,*56 NY2d 886). In any event, the claim is baseless. The questions that allegedly were curtailed had little or no relevance to the purpose of the hearing and the People’s objections thereto were properly sustained.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the admission into evidence of a post-arrest photograph showing the defendant lying on the floor holding his leg did not deprive him of a fair trial. The photograph was properly admitted since it had some probative value and it did not portray the defendant in a prejudicial or disreputable manner *(see, People v Pobliner,*32 NY2d 356, 370, *cert denied*416 US 905; *cf., People v Gerbino,*132 AD2d 566).

The defendant’s contention that he was prejudiced because of the prosecutor’s remarks during summation is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, is without merit. The prosecutor did not exceed the wide latitude afforded to counsel and her comments did not call upon the jury to draw conclusions that were not fairly inferable from the evidence *(see, People v Halm,*81 NY2d 819; *People v Ashwal,*39 NY2d 105; *People v Pilgrim,*208 AD2d 868). Mangano, P. J., Balletta, Pizzuto and Santucci, JJ., concur.
H. Res. 65

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 17, 2007.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 5) 

to amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to reduce interest rates for student borrowers. All points of order against 

the bill and against its consideration are waived except those 

arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The bill shall be 

considered as read. The previous question shall be considered 

as ordered on the bill to final passage without intervening 

motion except: (1) three hours of debate equally divided and 

controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 

the Committee on Education and Labor; and (2) one motion 

to recommit. 

SEC. 2. During consideration of H.R. 5 pursuant to this 

resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous 
2

•HRES 65 EH 

question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the 

bill to a time designated by the Speaker. 

Attest:

Clerk.
From: Jurtles@Hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:02:11 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Judith Ellis

Jacksonville, FL 32211
No. 58216.

protest 223125-K (New York).

#### Barnett International Forwarders, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues are similar to those the subject involved in Abstract 57104, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 329 

Congratulating the Barton College men’s basketball team for winning the 

2007 NCAA Division II Men’s Basketball National Championship. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 23, 2007 

Mr. JONES of North Carolina (for himself and Mr. BUTTERFIELD) submitted 

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the Barton College men’s basketball team 

for winning the 2007 NCAA Division II Men’s Basketball National Championship. 

Whereas the Barton College Bulldogs of Wilson, North Carolina, defeated Winona State University of Rochester, 

Minnesota, the undefeated and defending NCAA Division 

II Men’s Basketball National Champions, 77–75 on 

March 24, 2007, to become the 2007 NCAA Men’s Basketball National Champions; 

Whereas Anthony Atkinson of Barton College, the Elite 

Eight most valuable player, scored 10 points in the final 

39 seconds of the game, including a layup at the buzzer, 

to give Barton College the NCAA Division II men’s basmstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HRES 329 IH 

ketball title and its first NCAA championship in any 

sport; 

Whereas Barton College played and won 9 overtime games 

during the 2006–2007 season to finish the season 31–5, 

including winning its last 21 games, a school record; 

Whereas Barton College, a school with just 1,000 students, 

defeated teams during the Elite Eight from schools with 

much larger student bodies (Grand Valley State, Michigan, 23,000 students, Cal State San Bernardino, 17, 000 

students, and Winona State University, 8,000 students); 

Whereas Coach Ron Lievense of Barton College, who had 

served as a graduate assistant at Winona State University, summed up the Barton College victory: ‘‘I don’t see 

how any ending could be any better for any team—ever’’; 

Whereas Barton College continues the long tradition of North 

Carolina schools winning NCAA basketball championships; 

Whereas Barton College was founded in 1902 as Atlantic 

Christian College and changed its name in 1990; and 

Whereas Barton College was named a ‘‘Best Southeastern 

College’’ for 2006 by the Princeton Review: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives con2 gratulates the Barton College men’s basketball team for 

3 winning the 2007 NCAA Division II Men’s Basketball Na4 tional Championship. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
IV 

House Calendar No. 94 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 580 

[Report No. 110–264] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 986) to amend the Wild and 

Scenic Rivers Act to designate certain segments of the Eightmile River 

in the State of Connecticut as components of the National Wild and 

Scenic Rivers System, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 27, 2007 

Ms. CASTOR, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 986) to amend 

the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate certain 

segments of the Eightmile River in the State of Connecticut as components of the National Wild and Scenic 

Rivers System, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

3 986) to amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to des4 ignate certain segments of the Eightmile River in the 

5 State of Connecticut as components of the National Wild 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

HRES 580 RH 

1 and Scenic Rivers System, and for other purposes. All 

2 points of order against consideration of the bill are waived 

3 except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. 

4 The amendment in the nature of a substitute rec5 ommended by the Committee on Natural Resources now 

6 printed in the bill, modified by the amendment printed in 

7 the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this 

8 resolution, shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as 

9 amended, shall be considered as read. All points of order 

10 against provisions of the bill, as amended, are waived. The 

11 previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 

12 bill, as amended, to final passage without intervening mo13 tion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and 

14 controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member 

15 of the Committee on Natural Resources; and (2) one mo16 tion to recommit with or without instructions. 

17 SEC. 2. During consideration of H.R. 986 pursuant 

18 to this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the 

19 previous question, the Chair may postpone further consid20 eration of the bill to such time as may be designated by 

21 the Speaker. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS

pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 94 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 580 

[Report No. 110

–264] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 986) 

other purposes. National Wild and Scenic Rivers System, and for the State of Connecticut as components of the ignate certain segments of the Eightmile River in to amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to desJULY 27, 2007 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
Amended Certificate of Limited Partnership for MDS Energy Public 2014-B LP



 Exhibit 4.5 

AMENDED CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 
 FOR 
 MDS ENERGY PUBLIC 2014-B LP 








					
		  	Delaware	  	PAGE 1
		  	The First State	  	

 I, JEFFREY W. BULLOCK, SECRETARY OF STATE OF TEE STATE OF DELAWARE, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THE ATTACHED IS
A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF “MDS ENERGY PUBLIC 2012-A LP”, CHANGING ITS NAME FROM “MDS ENERGY PUBLIC 2012-A LP” TO “MDS ENERGY PUBLIC 2014-B LP”, FILED IN THIS OFFICE ON THE SEVENTEENTH
DAY OF OCTOBER, A.D. 2012, AT 4:03 O’CLOCK P.M. 
  

					
		  	



	  	/s/ Jeffrey W. Bullock
		  	  	Jeffrey W. Bullock, Secretary of State
	            5148280    8100	  	  	AUTHENTICATION: 9924584
	                121139726	  	  	  
 DATE: 10-17-12

	You may verify this certificate online at corp. delaware.gov/authver.shtml	  	  	
		  	  	
		  	  	
		  	  	
		  	  	
		  	  	
		  	  	









					
		 		  	 State of Delaware
 Secretary of State
 Division of Corporations

Delivered 04:19 PM 10/17/2012
 FILED 04:03 PM 10/17/2012
 SRV 121139726—5148280
FILE


 STATE OF DELAWARE 
 AMENDMENT TO THE CERTIFICATE OF 
 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 

The undersigned, desiring to amend the Certificate of Limited Partnership pursuant to the provisions of Section 17-202 of the Revised Uniform
Limited Partnership Act of the State of Delaware, does hereby certify as follows: 
  

	
	FIRST: The name of the Limited Partnership is              
                                         
                                         
                                
	MDS Energy Public 2012-A LP

 SECOND: Article First of the Certificate of Limited Partnership shall be amended as follows: 

 

	
	First: The name of the limited partnership is MDS Energy Public 2014-B LP,

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned executed this Amendment to the Certificate of Limited
Partnership on this17th day of
October      , A.D. 2012. 
  

			
	 MDS Energy Development, LLC
 Managing General Partner

		
	By:	 	/s/ Michael D. Snyder
	Name:	 	Michael D. Snyder
		
		 	        Print or Type
		
		 	 Authorized Person of

Managing General Partner
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals3058626-MAY-201109:34 AM
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Lilis Energy, Inc. (“Registrant”); and |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|                                                                |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                |  |
| /s/ Joseph C. Daches                                           |   |
| Joseph C. Daches                                               |   |
| Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
Before the Second Division,

July 23, 1953

No. 57434.

#### Felix Kramarsky Corporation *v.*United States,

protest 174997-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of metal scrap made from obsolete lead pipe which was imported to be used in re-manufacture by remelting, and that it has been so used. An examination of the papers disclosed that affidavits have been filed in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to Public Law 869, *supra.*Upon the record presented, it was held that the merchandise comes within the provisions of Public Law 869, *supra,*and is properly entitled to free entry.