alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
          This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from
          the Osteotech,  Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Balance Sheet as of
          March 31, 1998 and the Condensed  Consolidated Statement of Operations
          for the three  months  ended  March 31, 1998 and is  qualified  in its
          entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         15,221,000
<SECURITIES>                                    2,945,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   7,547,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                      145,000
<INVENTORY>                                     1,101,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               30,985,000
<PP&E>                                         21,998,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  9,117,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 47,127,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           8,061,000
<BONDS>                                           100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           89,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     38,482,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   47,127,000
<SALES>                                           318,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               13,475,000
<CGS>                                             174,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  10,175,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 28,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 3,552,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    1,446,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             2,106,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                    2,106,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .22
                                                
                                             

</TABLE>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Darren Oliver ROBINSON, a/k/a Stretch, a/k/a Desaun Talib Bethel, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 05-4388.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 13, 2005.

Decided: July 28, 2005.

*108Jacqueline Ann Hallinan, Hallinan Law Offices, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. Thomas Edward Johnston, United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Remanded by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Darren Oliver Robinson seeks to appeal his conviction for possession with intent to distribute cocaine base and his 202-month sentence of imprisonment. In criminal cases, the defendant must file an appeal within ten days of the entry of judgment or the notice of appeal by the government. Fed. RApp. P. 4(b)(1)(A). When a notice of appeal is filed within thirty days of the expiration of the appeal period, the district court may grant an extension, with or without a motion, upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause. Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(4); *United States v. Reyes,*759 F.2d 351, 352-53 (4th Cir.1985).

The district court entered its judgment on February 16, 2005. Under Rule 4(b)(1)(A), Robinson had ten days, or until March 3, 2005, to file a notice of appeal.1 Under *Houston v. Lack,*487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988), the notice of appeal was filed on April 4, 2005, which was after the ten-day period expired but within the thirty-day excusable neglect period.2 Because the notice of appeal was filed within the excusable neglect period, we remand the case to the district court for the court to determine whether Robinson has shown excusable neglect or good cause warranting an extension of the ten-day appeal period. The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration. We also defer ruling on the United States’ motion to dismiss the appeal pending the district court’s determination. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*REMANDED*

1

. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 26(a)(2) (providing that intermediate Saturdays, Sundays, and legal holidays are excluded when period is less than eleven days).

2

. The notice of appeal was date stamped and entered by the district court on April 6, 2005, but the notice also contained a second date stamp reflecting a date of April 4, 2005, thereby suggesting Robinson had delivered it to prison officials for mailing prior to the expiration of the thirty-day excusable neglect period.
Exhibit 99.02

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Players Network (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

May _____, 2003                             By: /s/ Seth Horn
                                            ------------------------
                                                    Seth Horn,
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.8.1


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO


10% FIXED SECURED CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY
NOTE


 


THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO 10% FIXED SECURED
CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into this 16th day of November 2017, by and
between HELIX TCS, INC. (the “Company”), and REDDIAMOND PARTNERS, LLC (“Lender”).


 


RECITALS


 


A.      The
Company and the Lender are parties to a 10% Fixed Secured Convertible Promissory Note (the “Agreement”), signed
February 13, 2017.


 


B.       The
Company and the Lender desire to amend the Agreement upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth herein.


 


AGREEMENT


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
recitals, the mutual covenants and agreements set forth herein and in the Agreement, and for other good and valuable consideration,
the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:


 


1.       Each
party agrees that the “Principal Amount”, including accrued interest, is $281,900.46 as of the date of this Amendment.


 


2.       The
definition of “Conversion Price” is deleted and replaced with the following:


 


“Conversion Price” shall be
equal to a 40% discount to the lowest one-day Volume Average Weighted Price (“VWAP”) during the 30 trading days preceding
such conversion.”


 


3.       The
definition of “Maturity Date” is deleted and replaced with the following:


 


“Maturity Date” shall be the
6-month anniversary of the date of this Amendment.”


 


4.       The
interest rate of the Agreement, effective on the Issuance Date, is 5% per annum.


 


5.       All
references to prepayment are deleted and the parties agree that the Agreement is prepayable at any time at 110% of the unpaid principal
and accrued interest.


 


6.       Except
as specifically amended or modified by this Amendment, the terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain unimpaired, unaffected
and unchanged in every particular as set forth therein. Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein shall have the
meanings set forth in the Agreement.


 


7.       This
Amendment may be executed in several counterparts and delivered by electronic transmission, each of which shall be deemed an original,
but which counterparts shall together constitute one and the same Amendment.


 






    


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have caused this Amendment to be executed and delivered as of the date first written above.


 


	 	HELIX TCS, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Zachary L. Venegas, CEO
	 	 	Zachary L. Venegas, CEO
	 	 	 
	 	LENDER:
	 	 
	 	REDDIAMOND PARTNERS, LLC
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Neil B Rock
	 	Name:	Neil B Rock
	 	Title:	Member
Before the Second Division,

August 28, 1967

No. P67/278.

#### The Rembar Co., Inc. *v.*United States, protests 61/22336, etc. (New York).

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of trays (boats) similar in all material respects to those the subject of *The Rembar*Co., *Inc.*v. *United States*(57 Cust. Ct. 239, C.D. 2774), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|               | (1)                                  | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|          |        |                                                                           |
|          | (2)                                  | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |

|  Date:                  January                17, 2007                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |                      |                     | /s/                A. William Allen, III |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                                                              |                      |      | A.                William Allen, III     |
|                                                         |                      |      | Chief                Executive Officer   |
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 189 (Monday, October 2, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 67772]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21594]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Machine Learning.
    Date: October 27, 2023.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Kimberly Firth, Ph.D., National Institutes of 
Health, National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C212, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-7702, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2b4d42595f4340466b464a424705454243054c445d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e4828d96908c8f89a489858d88ca8a8d8cca838b92">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 26, 2023.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-21594 Filed 9-29-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case r

United States District Court

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

TIMOTHY B. WHITMORE

JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

v.

PIERCE COUNTY DEPARTMENT

OF COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS, et al.,

CASE NUMBER: C05-5265RBL

 Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried

and the jury has rendered its verdict.

 XX Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been

tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.

 IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED

That Plaintiff’s “FRCP [sic] 59 Motion for an Amendment to the Judgment Rendered in Docket 223

Regarding the Habeas Corpus Portion of the Complaint” [Dkt. #238] and the amendments thereto

[Dkt.. #s 243, 244, 245] is considered as a motion for reconsideration of this Court’s prior Order

adopting the Report and Recommendation dismissing plaintiff’s habeas corpus claims and, as

such, is DENIED. 

The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

Defendant Pierce County’s motion for summary judgment as to all remaining claims is GRANTED;

and

Plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment is DENIED. 

 August 21, 2007 BRUCE RIFKIN 

Date Clerk

 s/CM Gonzalez 

Deputy Clerk

Case 3:05-cv-05265-RBL Document 253 Filed 08/21/07 Page 1 of 1
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

DWIGHT PHILLIPS,

Plaintiff,

v.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

____________________________________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C05-1537-JCC-JPD

ORDER REMANDING CASE FOR

FURTHER ADMINISTRATIVE

PROCEEDINGS

Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis and through counsel in this civil action

challenging the Commissioner of Social Security Administration’s decision to deny him

Supplemental Security Income benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. Defendant

has filed a motion to remand in lieu of an answer. Dkt. No. 10. She argues that a remand is

necessary because, she has been unable to locate the files relating to the administrative

decision. Dkt. No. 10. Plaintiff does not oppose the motion. Id.; Dkt. No. 11. 

Having carefully reviewed defendant’s motion and the record, the Court orders that the

action be REMANDED in order permit the defendant to locate the appropriate file. 41 U.S.C.

§ 405(g) sent. 6; Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 297 n.2 (1993) (noting that remands

pursuant to sentence six are appropriate when the Commissioner requests remand before filing

an answer). Should defendant be unable to locate the proper file within 60 days of the date of

this order, defendant shall hold additional administrative proceedings necessary to reconstruct 

Case 2:05-cv-01537-JCC-JPD Document 12 Filed 12/28/05 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER

PAGE -2

the record and make a determination of whether to award benefits.

DATED this 28th day of December, 2005.

A

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Recommended for Entry this

 21st day of December , 2005.

s/ James P. Donohue 

JAMES P. DONOHUE

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:05-cv-01537-JCC-JPD Document 12 Filed 12/28/05 Page 2 of 2
## I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

N o. 12-60487
CLEVE GALE; ALEX GATES, Bankruptcy Trustee, Plaintiffs-Appellees v. TOWN OF COMO, MISSISSIPPI, Defendant-Appellant

A ppeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi USDC No. 2:09-CV-00169
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * 

### For the reasons articulated in the district court’s d enial of DefendantAppellant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law, remittitur, or a new trial, we AFFIRM. See 5 T H 

### C I R


### . R

. 47.6. U n i t e d S t a te s C o u r t o f A p p e al s F i f t h C i rc u i t 

## F I L E D June 13, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R
. R. 47. 5, the court has determ ined that this op inion s hould not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R
. R. 47. 5. 4. 

### Case: 12-60487 Document: 00512273507 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/13/2013
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SUMMARY REPORT OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE AS

TO ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF SUPERVISED RELEASE 

PAGE -1- 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

MANUEL DAVID HANNS,

 Defendant.

 CASE NO. CR05-411 JLR

 SUMMARY REPORT OF U.S.

 MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 AS TO ALLEGED VIOLATIONS

 OF SUPERVISED RELEASE

INTRODUCTION

I conducted an evidentiary hearing on alleged violations of supervised release in this

case on April 23, 2007. The United States was represented by Norman Barbosa. The

defendant was represented by Ralph Hurvitz.

CONVICTION AND SENTENCE

Defendant had been convicted of Bank Fraud on or about June 19, 2006. The Hon.

James L. Robart of this court sentenced Defendant to 81 days of confinement, followed by

five years of supervised release. On August 22, 2006 Defendant’s original sentence was

revoked for violations of supervised release, and a new sentence of 30 days confinement

was issued with credit for time served. The conditions of supervised release included

requirements that defendant comply with the standard 13 conditions.

Case 2:05-cr-00411-JLR Document 53 Filed 04/24/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SUMMARY REPORT OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE AS

TO ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF SUPERVISED RELEASE 

PAGE -2- 

DEFENDANT'S ADMISSION

U.S. Probation officer Felix Calvillo alleged that Defendant violated the conditions

of supervised release in the following respects:

(1) Failing to satisfactorily participate in community corrections center program

for 120 days, absconding on or about November 16, 2006, in violation of the

special condition of supervision.

(2) Using cocaine on or before October 22, 2006, in violation of special condition

of supervision and standard condition #7. 

At today’s hearing, I advised the defendant of these charges and of his constitutional rights.

Defendant admitted the violation, waived any hearing as to whether they occurred, and

consented to having the matter set for a disposition hearing. 

RECOMMENDED FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

Based upon the foregoing, I recommend the Court find that Defendant has violated

the conditions of his supervised release as alleged and set the matter for a disposition

hearing.

Defendant shall remain in custody pending a final determination by the Court.

DATED this 23rd day of April, 2007.

AMONICA J. BENTON

United States Magistrate Judge

cc: Sentencing Judge : Hon. James L. Robart Assistant U.S. Attorney : Norman Barbosa

Defense Attorney : Ralph Hurvitz

U. S. Probation Officer : Felix Calvillo

Case 2:05-cr-00411-JLR Document 53 Filed 04/24/07 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Northern Technologies InternationalCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending May 31,2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, G. Patrick Lynch, President and Chief Executive Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of my knowledge and belief:

 

(1)                                                        The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                                        The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|                                                                    |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| G.  Patrick. Lynch                                                      |   |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer 

(principal  executive officer) |   |
|                                                                    |   |
| Circle  Pines, Minnesota                                                |   |
| July 15,  2010                                                     |   |

 

----