alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case No. 8,822.

#### In re McINTIRE.

[1 Ben. 543; 21 N. B. R. 151; Bankr. Reg. Supp. 33; 6 Int. Rev. Rec. 165.]

District Court, S. D. New York.

Nov., 1867.

Bankruptcy — Service op Notice, Form No. 52— Request, Form No. 28.

1. When the discharge of a bankrupt is applied for after sixty days from the adjudication, the notice, form No. 52, need be served only on the creditors who have proved their debts, even though it contains a notice of the second and third general meetings of creditors.

2. It is not necessary, in such case, that the request of the assignee, form No. 28, should be furnished to the register.

[For subsequent proceedings in this case, see Case No. 8,323.]

In this case, at the request of the bankrupt [Charles H. Melntire], the register certified to the court two questions, viz.: (1) Whether, ■when the discharge is applied for after sixty days from the adjudication, the notice, form No. 52, if containing the notice of the second and third general meetings of the creditors, must be mailed to all the creditors known to the bankrupt, or only to such as have proved their debts; (2) Whether, in applying for the order to show cause why a discharge should not be granted, after sixty days from the adjudication, the bankrupt must furnish to the register the request, form No. 28. The register expressed his opinion, that it was safer to require the notice to be given to all the creditors, and that the request, form No. 2S, ought to be furnished.

BLATCHFORD, District

Judge. The notice need be mailed only to those creditors who have proved their debts, and it is not necessary that the request of the assignee, form No. 28, should be furnished.
From: billy.k@dedges.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:27:28 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Billy Kennedy

Jacksonville, FL 32205
No. 65210.

#### National Canadian Distiller’s, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 767584-G (Cleveland).

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: ShaZamGeo@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:54:49 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Geo Tseko

Huntington Beach, CA 92646
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER VACATING ORDER OF DISMISSAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

_______________________________________)

JERRY BRENDEN, )

) Case No. C05-1681L

Plaintiff, ) 

v. )

) ORDER VACATING ORDER OF 

SELLEN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, ) DISMISSAL 

)

Defendant. )

_______________________________________)

This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. On November 28, 2005, the

above-captioned matter was dismissed because plaintiff failed to correct a deficiency in his

application to proceed in forma pauperis. Dkt. # 4. Two days later, the Court received in the

mail a second application to proceed in forma pauperis which contains page two of the

application and appears to resolve the deficiency noted by the Honorable James P. Donohue,

United States Magistrate Judge. The “Order of Dismissal” (Dkt. # 4) is hereby VACATED and

plaintiff’s second application to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. # 5) is referred to Magistrate

Judge Donohue for consideration.

DATED this 7th day of December, 2005.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-01681-RSL Document 6 Filed 12/07/05 Page 1 of 1
|               | (1)                                  | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|          |        |                                             |
|          | (2)                                  | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

|  Date:      May 15, 2009                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |                      |                     | /s/ Dirk A. Montgomery                                |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                              |                      |      | Dirk      A. Montgomery                               |
|                                                         |                      |      | Senior      Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer |
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 638 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United Nations 

should forthwith take the procedural actions necessary to amend Article 

23 of the Charter of the United Nations to establish India as a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 6, 2007 

Mr. BILIRAKIS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

the United Nations should forthwith take the procedural 

actions necessary to amend Article 23 of the Charter 

of the United Nations to establish India as a permanent 

member of the United Nations Security Council. 

Whereas the United Nations Security Council is charged with 

maintaining peace and security among the nations of the 

world; 

Whereas the United Nations Security Council currently has 

five permanent members; 

Whereas the Republic of India achieved its independence 

from the British Empire on August 15, 1947, and has 


bajohnson on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 638 IH 

since that time maintained a democratic system of government; 

Whereas India is the largest democratic country in the world 

in which all political views are freely expressed and respected; 

Whereas India is the world’s second most populous country, 

with over one billion citizens residing within its borders; 

Whereas India is one of the largest contributors of troops to 

United Nations-mandated peacekeeping missions; and 

Whereas the people of India have demonstrated a strong commitment to promote the peaceful development of the 

South Asian region and to global peace: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the United Nations should forthwith take 

3 the procedural actions necessary to amend Article 23 of 

4 the Charter of the United Nations to establish India as 

5 a permanent member of the United Nations Security 

6 Council. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PRODPC61 with BILLS
From: tamib906@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:57:59 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Tamara Becker

Flushing, MI 48433
From: klhardy33@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:20:35 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kevin Hardy

Blairsville, GA 30512
\

In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-23-00167-CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant

V.

ELIJAH JOEL ROBINSON

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from Criminal District Court 

No. 2

of Tarrant County (1710742)

May 23, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was error in the trial court’s order. It is ordered that the trial court’s Order granting 

the Motion to Suppress is reversed, and this case is remanded to the trial court for 

further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Brian Walker

 Justice Brian Walker
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 61 (Wednesday, March 30, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 17637]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7446]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Oak Ridge 
Reservation

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Environmental 
Management Site-Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB), Oak Ridge 
Reservation. The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 
Stat. 770) requires that public notice of this meeting be announced in 
the Federal Register.

DATES: Wednesday, April 13, 2011, 6 p.m.

ADDRESSES: DOE Information Center, 475 Oak Ridge Turnpike, Oak Ridge, 
Tennessee 37830.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia J. Halsey, Federal 
Coordinator, Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Office, P.O. Box 
2001, EM-90, Oak Ridge, TN 37831. Phone (865) 576-4025; Fax (865) 576-
2347 or e-mail: halseypj@oro.doe.gov or check the Web site at http://www.oakridge.doe.gov/em/ssab.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the Board is to make 
recommendations to DOE-EM and site management in the areas of 
environmental restoration, waste management, and related activities.
    Tentative Agenda: The main meeting presentation will be an update 
on the DOE- EM Oak Ridge Fiscal Year 2013 budget request.
    Public Participation: The EM SSAB, Oak Ridge, welcomes the 
attendance of the public at its advisory committee meetings and will 
make every effort to accommodate persons with physical disabilities or 
special needs. If you require special accommodations due to a 
disability, please contact Patricia J. Halsey at least seven days in 
advance of the meeting at the phone number listed above. Written 
statements may be filed with the Board either before or after the 
meeting. Individuals who wish to make oral statements pertaining to the 
agenda item should contact Patricia J. Halsey at the address or 
telephone number listed above. Requests must be received five days 
prior to the meeting and reasonable provision will be made to include 
the presentation in the agenda. The Deputy Designated Federal Officer 
is empowered to conduct the meeting in a fashion that will facilitate 
the orderly conduct of business. Individuals wishing to make public 
comments will be provided a maximum of five minutes to present their 
comments. This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting date due to programmatic issues that had to be resolved prior 
to the meeting date.
    Minutes: Minutes will be available by writing or calling Patricia 
J. Halsey at the address and phone number listed above. Minutes will 
also be available at the following Web site: http://www.oakridge.doe.gov/em/ssab/minutes.htm.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on March 24, 2011.
LaTanya Butler,
Acting Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-7446 Filed 3-29-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods presented in the financial statements included in the report.
  /s/ David E. SchreimanDavid E. SchreimanChief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
| (1) | the      Annual Report on Form 10-K of Savoy Energy Corporation for the year      ended December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;      and |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the      information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year      ended December 31, 2009, fairly presents in all material respects,      the financial condition and results of operations of Savoy Energy      Corporation. |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/ Arthur Bertagnolli                                                      |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                        |
| Name:  | Arthur      Bertagnolli                                                     |
|   |                                                                        |
| Title: | Principal      Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and  Director |
|   |                                                                        |
| Date:  | April      16, 2010                                                         |

----