APPENDIX E 

SOILS 

 
South George Vegetation and Fuels Management Project - DEIS 

E-1 

APPENDIX E 

Soils 

Ecological Hierarchy

South George project planning area is within the Tollgate Plateau Subsection in the far northern-most 

portion of the Blue Mountains section of the Blue Mountains Ecoregion (Province). The Tollgate Plateau 

is influenced by marine air flowing through the Columbia River Gorge and is particularly strong in this 

area with comparatively high rain and snowfall amounts and temperature moderated compared to 

southern portions of the Umatilla National Forest. 

Table E-1 Soils - Subsection Description 

SUBSECTION 

Blue Mountains Ecoregion/Province, FS 

Ecological 

Framework: 

Subsection 

Geomorphology 

Process, typical 

landform, top 

features, drainages 

Geology 

Lithology, 

structure, hard 

fracture 

Inferred climate, 

Potential Natural 

Vegetation, unique 

features 

Natural disturbance; 

Fire, flooding, slope 

stability, and flow regime 

M323Gaa 

Tollgate Plateau 

other names: 

CRB Plateaumaritime or 

Tollgate CRB 

Plateau-maritime 

Major process: 

Volcanism, fluvial 

erosion (stream 

incision) 

Major landforms: 

Upland plateaus, Vcanyons, narrow 

valley bottoms 

Dendritic and 

parallel drainage 

patterns, often 

follow structural 

features (faults) 

Moderate relief, 

~3000 (fluvial 

incision) 

Columbia River 

Basalts 

Thick sequence 

of basalt flows, 

with deep loess 

and ash soils on 

stable plateaus, 

north slopes and 

valley bottoms 

Local 

groundwater 

influence on 

base flows 

Basalts among 

more 

impermeable in 

the Blues (min. 

fracturing) 

Maritime influence 

zone directly 

intercepts maritime 

weather systems 

moving east through 

Columbia river 

gorge. 

Relatively high 

precip. for the 

elevation range and 

cool to cold 

temperatures 

Grand fir 

communities 

dominant 

Slope stability affected by 

ROS with localized shallow 

rapid landslides in 1st order 

drainages and steep concave 

headwalls 

Winter rain-on-snow, spring 

snow-melt mixed flow 

regimes with some localized 

flashy runoff (peak flows, 

low flows) moderated by 

deep surficial ash deposits 

Fire regime: III Mixed 

severity; II Stand-replacing 

non-forest on grass-tree 

mosaic canyons and shallow 

soil plateaus 

Land Type Associations (LTA)

A Land Type Association (LTA) is a grouping of ecologically similar geomorphic processes, landform 

and potential vegetation at a (larger) scale more detailed than subsections. An LTA map and descriptions 

has been completed for the three Blue Mountains National Forests, the Umatilla, Wallowa-Whitman, and 

Malheur (unpublished USFS data). 
South George Vegetation and Fuels Management Project - DEIS 

E-2 

Table E-2 displays the LTA codes, descriptive name, and primary and secondary soils found in these 

LTAs. The soils are discussed later in the Soils section. 

Table E-2- South George Land Type Associations 

LTA CODE DESCRIPTOR SLOPE 

GRADIENT 

MAJOR SOIL SECONDARY 

SOIL 

116 Moist Forest-Basic 

Igneous-Gentle 

Slopes 

0 -30% Limberjim Syrupcreek 

117 Moist Forest-Basic 

Igneous-Steep 

Slopes 

30 -60% Limberjim Mountemily 

118 Moist Forest-Basic 

Igneous-Canyons 

60%+ Harl Limberjim 

216 Dry Forest-Basic 

Igneous-Gentle 

Slopes 

0 -30% Larabee Bennettcreek 

217 Dry Forest-Basic 

Igneous-Steep 

Slopes 

30 -60% Klickson Larabee 

218 Dry Forest-Basic 

Igneous-Canyons 

60%+ Klicker Fivebit 

317 Dry Non-ForestBasic Igneous-Steep 30-60% Anatone Imnaha 

Table E-3 provides a compilation of the primary SRI map units for the harvest activity units described in 

the Proposed Action. Table E-4 lists soil map units for mechanized thinning activity units. The key 

management interpretations for hazards (ratings) due to machine activity are listed in the four columns on 

the right. Listed is hazard rating for Compaction, Displacement, Puddling, and Erosion, and Regeneration 

Potential as listed in the SRI. Ash soil depth is shown as a primary characteristic due to its importance for 

site properties and response to management activity. Interpretations for compaction, displacement, 

puddling and erosion hazard are listed for dominant soils (indicated as Primary SRI Map Unit). 

Table E-3- Summary SRI Soil Map of Activity Units 

HARVEST 

UNIT 

NUMBER 

PRIMARY 

SRI MAP 

UNIT 

[Complex] 

TOTAL SOIL 

DEPTH Average 

/ASH depth 

Average in inches 

REGEN. 

POT. 

COMP. 

HAZ. 

DISPL. 

HAZ. 

PUDD. 

HAZ. 

EROS. 

HAZ. 

1 14 [149] 40/25 H L H L M 

4 12 [312] 30/17 M L M L M 

6 17 [173] 22/0 M H M L M 

9 14 [000] 40/25 H H H L M 

10 12 [129] 30/17 M L H L H 

11 15 [000] 60/26 H H L M M 

12 13 [000] 36/26 H H L H M 

13 13 [000] 36/26 H H L H M 

14 91 [912] 4/0 L L H L H 

15 13 [000] 36/26 H H L H M 

16 17 [174] 22/0 L M L L H 

17 13 [000] 36/26 H H L H M 
South George Vegetation and Fuels Management Project - DEIS 

E-3 

HARVEST 

UNIT 

NUMBER 

PRIMARY 

SRI MAP 

UNIT 

[Complex] 

TOTAL SOIL 

DEPTH Average 

/ASH depth 

Average in inches 

REGEN. 

POT. 

COMP. 

HAZ. 

DISPL. 

HAZ. 

PUDD. 

HAZ. 

EROS. 

HAZ. 

18 14 [000] 40/25 H H H L M 

19 20 [209] 15/0 L L H L H 

20 15 [158] 60/26 M H L M M 

21 15 [158] 60/26 M H L M M 

22 14 [000] 40/25 H H H L M 

23 14 [000] 40/25 H H H L M 

24 15 [158] 60/26 M H L M M 

25 14 [000] 40/25 H H H L M 

26 17 [174] 22/0 L M L L H 

27 14 [000] 40/25 H H H L M 

28 14 [149] 40/25 H L H L M 

29 13 [135] 36/26 H M L H M 

30 14 [149] 40/25 H L H L M 

32 12 [129] 30/17 M L H L H 

35 15 [158] 60/26 M H L M M 

36 13 [138] 36/26 M M L M M 

37 13 [000] 36/26 H H L H M 

38 15 [158] 60/26 M H L M M 

40 13 [135] 36/26 H M L H M 

41 14 [000] 40/25 H H H L M 

42 12 [129] 30/17 M L H L H 

43 15 [315] 60/26 M H L M M 

44 15 [158] 60/26 M H L M M 

45 14 [000] 40/25 H H H L M 

46 18 [000] 50/27 M H L M M 

47 20 [209] 15/0 L L H L H 

48 18 [000] 50/27 M H L M M 

49 15 [158] 60/26 M H L M M 

50 12 [000] 30/17 M L M L M 

51 18 [000] 50/27 M H L M M 

52 18 [000] 50/27 M H L M M 

53 13 [135] 36/26 H M L H M 

54 14 [000] 40/25 H H H L M 

55 13 [135] 36/26 H M L H M 

58 13 [000] 36/26 H H L H M 

59 13 [135] 36/26 H M L H M 

60 18 [000] 50/27 M H L M M 

61 13 [000] 36/26 H H L H M 

62 13 [000] 36/26 H H L H M 

63 13 [138] 36/26 M M L M M 

64 12 [129] 30/17 M L H L H 

65 18 [000] 50/27 M H L M M 

68 13 [000] 36/26 H H L H M 

69 12 [000] 30/17 M L M L M 

71 13 [138] 36/26 M M L M M 

72 18 [000] 50/27 M H L M M 

73 17 [174] 22/0 L M L L H 

74 14 [000] 40/25 H H H L M 

75 13 [000] 36/26 H H L H M 
South George Vegetation and Fuels Management Project - DEIS 

E-4 

HARVEST 

UNIT 

NUMBER 

PRIMARY 

SRI MAP 

UNIT 

[Complex] 

TOTAL SOIL 

DEPTH Average 

/ASH depth 

Average in inches 

REGEN. 

POT. 

COMP. 

HAZ. 

DISPL. 

HAZ. 

PUDD. 

HAZ. 

EROS. 

HAZ. 

76 18 [000] 50/27 M H L M M 

77 14 [000] 40/25 H H H L M 

78 13 [000] 36/26 H H L H M 

79 13 [000] 36/26 H H L H M 

81 13 [000] 36/26 H H L H M 

82 13 [135] 36/26 H M L H M 

84 18 [000] 50/27 M H L M M 

85 13 [000] 36/26 H H L H M 

87 91 [912] 4/0 L L H L H 

88 14 [000] 40/25 H H H L M 

89 13 [135] 36/26 H M L H M 

90 13 [135] 36/26 H M L H M 

91 13 [135] 36/26 H M L H M 

92 13 [135] 36/26 H M L H M 

94 13 [138] 36/26 M M L M M 

95 13 [135] 36/26 H M L H M 

96 13 [138] 36/26 M M L M M 

97 13 [000] 36/26 H H L H M 

99 13 [139] 36/26 M M L M M 

100 13 [000] 36/26 H H L H M 

101 13 [000] 36/26 H H L H M 

102 13 [000] 36/26 H H L H M 

103 13 [000] 36/26 H H L H M 

104 17 [174] 22/0 L M L L H 

105 13 [139] 36/26 M M L M M 

106 13 [000] 36/26 H H L H M 

107 13 [000] 36/26 H H L H M 

108 17 [174] 22/0 L M L L H 

111 17 [173] 22/0 L M L L H 

112 13 [139] 36/26 M M L M M 

113 13 [139] 36/26 M M L M M 

114 12 [129] 30/17 M L H L H 

115 09 [000] 15/0 L M H H M 

116 13 [139] 36/26 M M L M M 

119 13 [000] 36/26 H H L H M 

120 14 [000] 40/25 H H H L M 

121 17 [174] 22/0 L M L L H 

122 13 [000] 36/26 H H L H M 

123 17 [173] 22/0 L M L L H 

124 17 [173] 22/0 L M L L H 

L = Low; M = Moderate H = High 
South George Vegetation and Fuels Management Project - DEIS 

E-5 

Table E-4- Summary SRI Soil Map of Activity Units, Mechanized Thinning 

THINNING 

UNIT 

NUMBER 

PRIMARY 

SRI MAP 

UNIT 

[Complex] 

TOTAL SOIL 

DEPTH Average 

/ASH depth 

Average in inches 

REGEN. 

POT. 

COMP. 

HAZ. 

DISPL. 

HAZ. 

PUDD. 

HAZ. 

EROS. 

HAZ. 

1 15 [158] 60/26 M H L M M 

2 17 [173] 22/0 L M L L H 

3 12 [312] 30/17 M L M L M 

4 12 [000] 30/17 M L M L M 

5 13 [135] 36/26 H M L H M 

6 18 [000] 50/27 M H L M M 

8 18 [000] 50/27 M H L M M 

9 12 [000] 30/17 M L M L M 

10 17 [173] 22/0 L M L L H 

11 17 [173] 22/0 L M L L H 

18 13 [135] 36/26 H M L H M 

19 13 [135] 36/26 H M L H M 

20 13 [138] 36/26 M M L M M 

21 13 [000] 36/26 H H L H M 

23 13 [139] 36/26 M M L M M 

24 13 [139] 36/26 M M L M M 

25 13 [000] 36/26 H H L H M 

26 13 [000] 36/26 H H L H M 

Table E-5 is a detailed listing of soil conditions by activitiy unit. The units with a history of multiple 

entries were evaluated more closely by the soil specialist to determine the existing detrimental soil 

condition (DSC). An estimate of DSC as a percentage of the areas was assigned for each activity unit to 

provide a consistent tracking measure. 

Table E-5- Summary Existing Condition of Harvest Units 

Harvest Unit 

Previous Harvest 

Entries 

Entries≥1:Ac

Existing Soil Disturbance 

Condition 

Description/Level Of 

Concern

Existing Detrimental Soil 

Condition (DSC) 

Percentage 

1 0 No/Low 0-2 

4 1 Low 0-4 

6 1-2 Moderate 4-6 

9 0-1 Low 0-4 

10 0-1 Low 0-4 

11 0-1 Low 0-4 

12 0-1 Low 0-4 

13 0 No/Low 0-2 

14 0 No/Low 0-2 

15 0 No/Low 0-2 

16 0-1 Low 0-4 

17 1 Low 0-4 

18 0-1 Low 0-4 

19 0 No/Low 0-2 

20 0-1 Low 0-4 
South George Vegetation and Fuels Management Project - DEIS 

E-6 

Harvest Unit 

Previous Harvest 

Entries 

Entries≥1:Ac

Existing Soil Disturbance 

Condition 

Description/Level Of 

Concern

Existing Detrimental Soil 

Condition (DSC) 

Percentage 

21 0-1 Low 0-4 

22 0 No/Low 0-2 

23 0 No/Low 0-2 

24 0-1 Low 0-4 

25 0-1 Low 0-4 

26 0-1 Low 0-4 

27 0-1 Low 0-4 

28 0 No/Low 0-2 

29 0 No/Low 0-2 

30 0 No/Low 0-2 

32 0 No/Low 0-2 

35 0 No/Low 0-2 

36 0-1 Low 0-4 

37 0 No/Low 0-2 

38 0 No/Low 0-2 

40 0 No/Low 0-2 

41 0 No/Low 0-2 

42 0 No/Low 0-2 

43 0-1 Low 0-4 

44 0-1 Low 0-4 

45 0 No/Low 0-2 

46 0 No/Low 0-2 

47 0 No/Low 0-2 

48 0-1 Low 0-4 

49 0 No/Low 0-2 

50 0 No/Low 0-2 

51 0 No/Low 0-2 

52 0 No/Low 0-2 

53 0 No/Low 0-2 

54 0-1 Low 0-4 

55 0 No/Low 0-2 

58 0-1 Low 0-4 

59 0 No/Low 0-2 

60 0-1 Low 0-4 

61 0-1 Low 0-4 

62 0 No/Low 0-2 

63 1-2 Moderate 4-6 

64 0 No/Low 0-2 

65 1-2 Moderate 4-6 

68 0 No/Low 0-2 

69 0 No/Low 0-2 

71 0-1 Low 0-4 

72 0-1 Low 0-4 

73 0 No/Low 0-2 

74 0 No/Low 0-2 

75 0-1 Low 0-4 

76 1-2 Moderate 4-6 

77 0-1 Low 0-4 

78 0-1 Low 0-4 

79 0-1 Low 0-4 
South George Vegetation and Fuels Management Project - DEIS 

E-7 

Harvest Unit 

Previous Harvest 

Entries 

Entries≥1:Ac

Existing Soil Disturbance 

Condition 

Description/Level Of 

Concern

Existing Detrimental Soil 

Condition (DSC) 

Percentage 

81 0-1 Low 0-4 

82 0-1 Low 0-4 

84 1 Low 0-4 

85 0 No/Low 0-2 

87 0 No/Low 0-2 

88 0 No/Low 0-2 

89 1-2 Moderate 4-6 

90 0 No/Low 0-2 

91 1-2 Moderate 4-6 

92 1-2 Moderate 4-6 

94 0 No/Low 0-2 

95 0-1 Low 0-4 

96 0 No/Low 0-2 

97 0-1 Low 0-4 

99 0-1 Low 0-4 

100 1 Low 0-4 

101 0-1 Low 0-4 

102 1 Low 0-4 

103 0-1 Low 0-4 

104 0-1 Low 0-4 

105 0-1 Low 0-4 

106 0 No/Low 0-2 

107 0-1 Low 0-4 

108 0 No/Low 0-2 

111 1 Low 0-4 

112 0 No/Low 0-2 

113 0 No/Low 0-2 

114 0 No/Low 0-2 

115 0-1 Low 0-4 

116 1 Low 0-4 

119 1 Low 0-4 

120 0-1 Low 0-4 

121 1 Low 0-4 

122 0-1 Low 0-4 

123 0-1 Low 0-4 

124 0-1 Low 0-4 

Assessment Methodology

Effects due to harvest, thinning, and associated operations were assessed on a unit basis. Direct effects 

estimates include observations from previous monitoring of both green and fire salvage operations on 

Umatilla National Forest. 

New temporary roads were factored in by converting miles into approximate acres and added to DSC by 

Alternative totals. Temporary roads would be obliterated as part of the project design and placed back 

into productive capacity in the long-term, but were factored into the detrimental soil condition tabulation 

for immediate post-project conditions. Calculated in acres, most are quite small (less than 1 acre) with 

little to no effect on overall unit percentages in most units. Use of existing unclassified/unauthorized 

roads would facilitate rehabilitation on those sites, improving the productive capacity from present 
South George Vegetation and Fuels Management Project - DEIS 

E-8 

condition. In total they represent restoration efforts to improve heavily disturbed sites and increase 

productivity in the area. Additional rehabilitation efforts under consideration for the area (unauthorized 

trails; road decommissioning) would further improve on current conditions as they occur. 

A primary intent of the Forest Plan standard and guidelines for the DSC is to inform managers of areas 

with potential and need for rehabilitation. Relatively higher numbers (percentage or acres) indicate areas 

where rehabilitation opportunity is more likely to exist. 

Table E-6 Detrimental Soil Condition, Alt B Harvest 

Harvest 

Unit 

Number 

Acres Average 

Existing 

DSC% 

Existing 

DSC Acres 

Pot Increase 

DSC 

Harvest%

Pot 

Increase 

Fuels%

Total 

Pot 

Increase 

DSC% 

Total 

Potential 

DSC Post 

Activity 

% 

Total 

Potential 

Acres 

DSC 

1 100 0 0 1 1 2 2 2.0 

4 99 2 2 5 1 6 8 5.9 

6 126 5 6 5 1 6 11 7.6 

9 27 2 1 2 2 4 6 1.1 

10 158 2 3 1 1 2 4 3.2 

11 17 2 0 5 1 6 8 1.0 

12 17 2 0 5 1 6 8 1.0 

13 37 0 0 5 5 5 1.9 

14 35 0 0 2 1 3 3 1.1 

15 66 0 0 5 1 6 6 4.0 

16 26 2 1 5 1 6 8 1.6 

17 18 2 0 5 1 6 8 1.1 

18 36 2 1 2 1 3 5 1.1 

19 27 0 0 2 1 3 3 0.8 

20 41 2 1 5 2 7 9 2.9 

21 99 2 2 5 2 7 9 6.9 

22 35 0 0 2 1 3 3 1.1 

23 69 0 0 2 1 3 3 2.1 

24 44 2 1 5 1 6 8 2.6 

25 16 2 0 5 1 6 8 1.0 

26 25 2 1 5 1 6 8 1.5 

27 7 2 0 5 1 6 8 0.4 

28 33 0 0 2 1 3 3 1.0 

29 29 0 0 5 1 6 6 1.7 

30 74 0 0 2 1 3 3 2.2 

32 51 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 

35 41 0 0 5 2 7 7 2.9 

36 33 2 1 5 1 6 8 2.0 

37 29 0 0 5 1 6 6 1.7 

38 18 0 0 5 2 7 7 1.3 

40 65 0 0 2 1 3 3 2.0 

41 35 0 0 2 2 2 0.7 

42 24 0 0 2 1 3 3 0.7 

43 10 2 0 5 2 7 9 0.7 

44 82 2 2 5 2 7 9 5.7 

45 23 0 0 5 5 5 1.2 

46 49 0 0 5 2 7 7 3.4 

47 31 0 0 2 2 4 4 1.2 

48 50 2 1 5 5 7 2.5 
South George Vegetation and Fuels Management Project - DEIS 

E-9 

Harvest 

Unit 

Number 

Acres Average 

Existing 

DSC% 

Existing 

DSC Acres 

Pot Increase 

DSC 

Harvest%

Pot 

Increase 

Fuels%

Total 

Pot 

Increase 

DSC% 

Total 

Potential 

DSC Post 

Activity 

% 

Total 

Potential 

Acres 

DSC 

49 19 0 0 2 2 2 0.4 

50 94 0 0 5 5 5 4.7 

51 44 0 0 5 2 7 7 3.1 

52 93 0 0 5 2 7 7 6.5 

53 6 0 0 5 1 6 6 0.4 

54 17 2 0 5 5 7 0.9 

55 138 0 0 5 2 7 7 9.7 

58 65 2 1 5 5 7 3.3 

59 51 0 0 5 5 5 2.6 

60 7 2 0 5 5 7 0.4 

61 9 2 0 5 1 6 8 0.5 

62 23 0 0 5 2 7 7 1.6 

63 154 5 8 5 5 10 7.7 

64 10 0 0 5 5 5 0.5 

65 99 5 5 5 5 10 5.0 

68 13 0 0 5 5 5 0.7 

69 30 0 0 2 1 3 3 0.9 

71 55 2 1 5 5 7 2.8 

72 34 2 1 5 2 7 9 2.4 

73 81 0 0 2 1 3 3 2.4 

74 18 0 0 2 1 3 3 0.5 

75 46 2 1 5 1 6 8 2.8 

76 46 5 2 5 5 10 2.3 

77 40 2 1 2 1 3 5 1.2 

78 37 2 1 5 5 7 1.9 

79 15 2 0 5 5 7 0.8 

81 6 2 0 5 5 7 0.3 

82 8 2 0 5 5 7 0.4 

84 21 2 0 5 1 6 8 1.3 

85 16 0 0 5 5 5 0.8 

87 18 0 0 2 1 3 3 0.5 

88 18 0 0 2 1 3 3 0.5 

89 17 5 1 5 5 10 0.9 

90 37 0 0 5 5 5 1.9 

91 18 5 1 5 5 10 0.9 

92 40 5 2 5 5 10 2.0 

94 24 0 0 5 5 5 1.2 

95 13 2 0 5 1 6 8 0.8 

96 25 0 0 2 2 2 0.5 

97 4 2 0 5 5 7 0.2 

99 9 2 0 5 1 6 8 0.5 

100 25 2 1 5 5 7 1.3 

101 15 2 0 5 2 7 9 1.1 

102 29 2 1 5 5 7 1.5 

103 16 2 0 5 2 7 9 1.1 

104 11 2 0 5 5 7 0.6 

105 28 2 1 5 5 7 1.4 

106 16 0 0 5 2 7 7 1.1 

107 66 2 1 5 5 7 3.3 
South George Vegetation and Fuels Management Project - DEIS 

E-10 

Harvest 

Unit 

Number 

Acres Average 

Existing 

DSC% 

Existing 

DSC Acres 

Pot Increase 

DSC 

Harvest%

Pot 

Increase 

Fuels%

Total 

Pot 

Increase 

DSC% 

Total 

Potential 

DSC Post 

Activity 

% 

Total 

Potential 

Acres 

DSC 

108 29 0 0 2 1 3 3 0.9 

111 38 2 1 5 1 6 8 2.3 

112 12 0 0 2 2 2 0.2 

113 22 0 0 5 2 7 7 1.5 

114 54 0 0 2 1 3 3 1.6 

115 6 2 0 5 1 6 8 0.4 

116 37 2 1 5 1 6 8 2.2 

119 27 2 1 5 1 6 8 1.6 

120 34 2 1 5 5 7 1.7 

121 31 2 1 5 5 7 1.6 

122 13 2 0 5 1 6 8 0.8 

123 21 2 0 5 1 6 8 1.3 

124 28 2 1 5 1 6 8 1.7 

Total 57 190.2 

Table E-7 - Cumulative Detrimental Soil Condition, Thinning Units 

Thinning 

Unit 

Number 

Acres Average 

Existing 

Dsc %

Existing Dsc 

Acres

Pot Increase 

Dsc 

Harvest%

Pot 

Increase 

Fuels%

Total Pot 

Increase 

Dsc %

Total 

Acres 

Dsc

HT7 105 2 2 0 0 2 0.0 

HT12 50 2 1 0 0 2 0.0 

HT15 45 2 1 0 0 2 0.0 

HT16 89 2 2 0 0 2 0.0 

HT17 57 2 1 0 0 2 0.0 

MT1 26 2 1 2 0 4 0.5 

MT2 106 2 2 2 0 4 2.1 

MT3 24 2 0 2 0 4 0.5 

MT4 115 2 2 2 0 4 2.3 

MT5 54 2 1 2 0 4 1.1 

MT6 40 2 1 2 0 4 0.8 

MT8 53 2 1 2 0 4 1.1 

MT9 94 2 2 2 0 4 1.9 

MT10 26 2 1 2 0 4 0.5 

MT11 22 2 0 2 0 4 0.4 

MT18 17 2 0 2 0 4 0.3 

MT19 37 2 1 2 0 4 0.7 

MT20 24 2 0 2 0 4 0.5 

MT21 18 2 0 2 0 4 0.4 

MT23 28 2 1 2 0 4 0.6 

MT24 9 2 0 2 0 4 0.2 

MT25 65 2 1 2 0 4 1.3 

MT26 37 2 1 2 0 4 0.7 

Total 23 15.9