alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 160 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 160

  Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Science and 
             Technology in the One Hundred Tenth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 14, 2007

 Mr. Gordon of Tennessee (for himself and Mr. Hall of Texas) submitted 
the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Science and 
             Technology in the One Hundred Tenth Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on Science and Technology 
(hereafter in this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), 
including the expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out 
of the applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for 
committee salaries and expenses, not more than $13,209,820 for the One 
Hundred Tenth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $6,475,402 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2007, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2008; and
            (2) not more than $6,734,418 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2008, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2009.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER GRANTING AGREED MOTION

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SUBMIT

TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

DAVID RICHARD ISRAEL, )

)

Petitioner, ) CASE NO. C05-1714-TSZ-JPD

)

v. )

)

KENNETH QUINN, ) ORDER GRANTING AGREED MOTION 

) FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SUBMIT

Respondent. ) TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS

____________________________________)

This matter comes before the Court on the agreed motion of the parties for an extension

of time to submit copies of the trial transcripts that are missing from the state court record

previously provided to this Court. The Court, having considered the motion, and the balance of

the record, does hereby ORDER as follows:

(1) The parties’ agreed motion for an extension of time (Dkt. No. 21) is GRANTED. 

Respondent is directed to submit the missing transcripts not later than June 26, 2006. 

(2) Petitioner’s federal habeas petition is RE-NOTED on the Court’s calendar for

consideration on June 30, 2006. 

Case 2:05-cv-01714-TSZ Document 23 Filed 06/16/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER GRANTING AGREED MOTION

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO SUBMIT

TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS - 2

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to all counsel of record and to

the Honorable Thomas S. Zilly.

DATED this 16th day of June, 2006.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:05-cv-01714-TSZ Document 23 Filed 06/16/06 Page 2 of 2
From: ZZZ777XYZ@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:10:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Steven Iorio

Romeoville, IL 60446
From: rccordell@cox.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:10:24 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ron Cordell

, 22015-2857
Post Of fice Box 12548, Austin, Texas 7 8 7 1 1 - 2 5 4 8 • ( 5 1 2 ) 4 6 3 - 2 1 0 0 • www.texasattorneygeneral.gov

March 18, 2015

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS VIA ELECTRONIC FILING

301 Fannin Street

Houston, Texas 77002-2066

ATTN: Christopher A. Prine

Re: Case No. 01-14-00899-CV; The State of Texas v. Titan Land Development,

Inc. and Bauer-Hockley 550, L.P.; In the First Court of Appeals, Houston,

Texas.

Dear Mr. Prine:

I will be presenting oral argument on behalf of The State of Texas at the oral

argument scheduled for April 8, 2015, in the above-referenced case. 

Sincerely,

/S/ Susan Desmarais Bonnen

Susan Desmarais Bonnen

Assistant Attorney General

susan.bonnen@texasattorneygeneral.gov

SDB/lfm

cc: Charles McFarland via email: cmcfarland@mcfarlandpllc.com

ACCEPTED

01-14-00899-cv

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

3/18/2015 3:03:13 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 3/18/2015 3:03:13 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
EXHIBIT 10.5







Directors' Compensation







All non-employee directors of The Old Point National Bank of Phoebus (the Bank) and Old Point Trust & Financial Services, N.A. (the Trust Company) receive $600 and $350, respectively, for each board meeting they attend. The non-employee directors of the Bank and Trust Company receive $200 for each committee meeting they attend except for the Bank's Investment Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Trust Company's Marketing Committee meetings, for which members receive $150 for attendance, and the Bank's Directors Loan Committee, Compensation and Benefits Committee and Audit Committee meetings, for which members receive $200 for attendance.







In addition, non-employee directors of the Bank and Trust Company receive an annual retainer fee of $12,000 and $4,000, respectively.  In addition, the chairman of the Audit Committee receives an additional $3,000 annual retainer, the chairman of the Trust Company Board receive an additional $2,000 annual retainer, the Lead Director of the Bank Board receives an additional $10,000 annual retainer, and the chairman of the Directors Loan Committee receives an additional $1,000 annual retainer.







All directors of Old Point Financial Corporation (the Company) have been elected as directors of the Bank, but there is no assurance that this practice will continue. However, not all Company directors serve as directors of the Trust Company. There are no additional fees paid for being a Company director.







The Company reimburses travel, lodging and meal expense for all directors living outside of Virginia to attend board and committee meetings. The Company also pays for all directors and their spouses to attend regular director seminars.


 


Non-employee directors are eligible to receive equity compensation awards under the Company’s 2016 Incentive Stock Plan.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 57 

Congratulating Illinois State University as it celebrates its sesquicentennial. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 12, 2007 

Mr. WELLER of Illinois (for himself, Mr. JOHNSON of Illinois, Mr. LIPINSKI, 

Mr. COSTELLO, Mr. KIRK, Mr. HASTERT, Mr. LAHOOD, Mr. HARE, Mr. 

GUTIERREZ, Mr. MANZULLO, Mr. ROSKAM, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mrs. 

BIGGERT, Mr. JACKSON of Illinois, Mr. RUSH, Mr. SHIMKUS, Mr. DAVIS

of Illinois, Mr. EMANUEL, and Ms. BEAN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating Illinois State University as it celebrates its 

sesquicentennial. 

Whereas Illinois State University marks its sesquicentennial 

with a year-long celebration, beginning with Founder’s 

Day on February 15, 2007; 

Whereas Illinois State Normal University was founded by 

Jesse W. Fell in 1857 as Illinois’ first public university 

and was established as a teacher education institution; 

Whereas Abraham Lincoln, then an attorney, drafted the 

bond that guaranteed that the citizens of Bloomington, 

Illinois, would fulfill pledges to finance the University; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 57 IH 

Whereas more than 2,000 staff members provide outstanding 

support to the educational mission of Illinois State University; and 

Whereas Illinois State University has more than 165,000 

alumni living around the world: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives con2 gratulates Illinois State University as it celebrates its ses3 quicentennial. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
From: davidandchariot@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:07:57 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

David Smith

Flatwoods, KY 41139
No. P69/91.

protests 63/5054-13333 and 62/17351-13155 (Chicago).

#### International Expediters, Inc. *v.*United States,

Maletz, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of Christmas light strings similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Gallagher & Ascher Company*v. *United States*(57 Cust. Ct. 348, C.D. 2813), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before the Third Division,

October 23, 1962

No. 67140.

protests 58/23556, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### Wilshire House et al. *v.*United States,

*271Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of copies of works of art similar in all material respects to those passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 C.C.P.A. 15, C.A.D. 458), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

_________________________________ )

RICHARD ROY SCOTT, ) No. MC05-5029

)

Plaintiff, ) 

v. ) ORDER PERMITTING CASE TO PROCEED

)

BECKY DENNY, )

)

Defendant. )

_________________________________ )

This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. On April 5, 2005, the United States

District Court judges who sit in Tacoma entered an order dismissing a number of plaintiff’s

causes of action and barring future litigation unless plaintiff provides a signed affidavit, along

with the proposed complaint, “verifying under penalty of perjury that none of the issues raised in

the proposed complaint have been litigated in the past by the plaintiff.” On October 3, 2006, the

Clerk of Court received a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, a consent for payment of costs, a

complaint, and a declaration signed by plaintiff. See Dkt. #94 and #95. These are now before

the undersigned for review pursuant to the terms of the bar order. 

Plaintiff asserts a § 1983 claim against Ms. Becky Denny, the legal coordinator at the

Washington State Department of Social and Health Services Special Commitment Center where

plaintiff resides. Plaintiff alleges that Ms. Denny denied plaintiff meaningful and effective court

access by issuing an order on September 28, 2006 that plaintiff could only make photocopies for

his civil commitment case with knowledge that this order would prevent plaintiff from

Case 3:05-mc-05029-MJP Document 102 Filed 10/24/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER -2-

proceeding in a pending action against Ms. Denny. See Dkt. #94. Plaintiff seeks damages for

intentional obstruction of his effective and meaningful court access. Id. Pursuant to the terms of

the “Order Adopting Report and Recommendation,” dated April 5, 2005, plaintiff has submitted

a signed declaration verifying that none of the issues raised in the proposed complaint have been

litigated in the past by plaintiff. See Dkt. #95.

The undersigned finds that the issues raised in the above-captioned matter have not been

previously litigated by plaintiff and may proceed subject to the other requirements imposed by

the “Order Adopting Report and Recommendation,” dated April 5, 2005. The Clerk of Court

shall docket this order in MC05-5029 and open a new cause of action containing all documents

related to plaintiff’s October 3, 2006, submission (Dkt. #94 and #95).

DATED this 23rd day of October, 2006.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge 

Case 3:05-mc-05029-MJP Document 102 Filed 10/24/06 Page 2 of 2
# T2-Min-Max X,Quantiles,POR>=10
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 588 

Recognizing Martha Coffin Wright on the 200th anniversary of her birth 

and her induction into the National Women’s Hall of Fame. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 31, 2007 

Mr. ARCURI, submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing Martha Coffin Wright on the 200th anniversary 

of her birth and her induction into the National Women’s 

Hall of Fame. 

Whereas, Martha Coffin Wright, sister of Lucretia Coffin 

Mott, was one of five organizers of the First Woman’s 

Rights Convention in Seneca Falls, New York, in 1848; 

Whereas from this convention came the ‘‘Declaration of Sentiments’’, an appeal for basic rights for women, modeled 

on the Declaration of Independence; 

Whereas when Martha Wright helped to plan the Seneca 

Falls Convention, she was six months pregnant with her 

seventh child, epitomizing the personal strength and dedication of the participants of the women’s rights movement; 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

HRES 588 IH 

Whereas the sites associated with the First Woman’s Rights 

Convention are preserved in the Women’s Rights National Historic Park in Seneca Falls, New York; 

Whereas after the Seneca Falls Convention, Martha Wright 

participated in many State and national women’s rights 

conventions in various capacities, often serving as president; 

Whereas during the antebellum years, Martha Wright was active in the abolition movement, attended the founding 

meeting of the American Anti-Slavery Society in Philadelphia in 1833, and later presided over numerous anti-slavery meetings; 

Whereas Martha Wright’s home in Auburn, New York, was 

part of the Underground Railroad; and 

Whereas slavery was abolished in 1865 with the ratification 

of the Thirteenth Amendment, and women’s suffrage was 

achieved in 1920 with the ratification of the Nineteenth 

Amendment: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the 200th birthday of Martha 

3 Coffin Wright; 

4 (2) recognizes the induction of Martha Coffin 

5 Wright into the National Women’s Hall of Fame; 

6 and 

7 (3) honors the accomplishments of Martha Cof8 fin Wright in her fight for equal rights for all Amer9 icans. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
No. 66508.

#### J. C. De Jong & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/17878, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of brass pole rings similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Kroder Reubel Co., Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(44 Cust. Ct. 274, C.D. 2186), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: janbantique@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:22:34 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that ll "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance with

no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for any

organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jan Bantique

Brentwood, CA 94513
Exhibit 24
  POWER OF
    ATTORNEY
  Form 10-K
    Signature

Title

Date/s/  William
    R. FitzgeraldWilliam
    R. Fitzgerald

Chairman of the Board, Director and
    Chief Executive Officer of Ascent Media Corporation

March 31, 2009/s/  Jose
    A. RoyoJose
    A. Royo

Director, President and Chief Operating Officer of Ascent Media
    Corporation

March 31, 2009/s/  Philip
    J. HolthousePhilip
    J. Holthouse

Director of Ascent Media Corporation

March 31, 2009/s/  Brian
    C. MulliganBrian
    C. Mulligan

Director of Ascent Media Corporation

March 31, 2009/s/  Michael
    J. PohlMichael
    J. Pohl

Director of Ascent Media Corporation

March 31, 2009/s/  George
    C. PlatisaGeorge
    C. Platisa

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
    of Ascent Media Corporation (Principal Accounting Officer)

March 31, 2009
No. 62243.

#### Ulrich Associates *v.*United States,

protest 316078-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.