alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 492 

Honoring William ‘‘Bill’’ Clifton France, the former president, chief executive 

officer, and chairman of NASCAR, for his lifetime of contributions and 

dedication to motorsports. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 18, 2007 

Ms. CASTOR submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring William ‘‘Bill’’ Clifton France, the former president, chief executive officer, and chairman of NASCAR, 

for his lifetime of contributions and dedication to motorsports. 

Whereas Bill France led NASCAR for 31 years before retiring in 2003; 

Whereas Bill France replaced his father, the founder of 

NASCAR, as president in 1972; 

Whereas the Daytona 500 was televised by CBS in 1979 as 

a result of negotiations by Bill France, gaining national 

recognition for motorsports; 

Whereas NASCAR emerged from its Southern base in Daytona, Florida to reach the Indianapolis Motor Speedway 

in 1994; 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 492 IH 

Whereas the International Speedway Corporation, of which 

Bill France was chief executive officer since 1981, was 

named to Forbes list of the ‘‘200 Best Small Companies 

in America’’ in 1998; 

Whereas NASCAR became the third-ranked professional 

sports entity on television, after the NFL and NBA, after 

signing contracts with FOX, NBC, and TBS in 1999; 

Whereas Bill France was named ‘‘International Entrepreneur 

of the Year’’ by the University of Missouri-Kansas City 

in 2001; 

Whereas the NASCAR Foundation Family of Charities, a 

group of more than 30 organizations that support children’s programs, animal welfare, and conservation, was 

an initiative of Bill France and the France family that 

began in 2003; 

Whereas Bill France was inducted into the International Motorsports Hall of Fame in Talladega, Alabama in 2004; 

Whereas Bill France was inducted into the Motorsports Hall 

of Fame of America in Novi, Michigan in 2004; 

Whereas Bill France was inducted into the Automotive Hall 

of Fame in Midland, Michigan in 2006; 

Whereas the International Speedway Corporation currently 

promotes more than 100 annual racing events in addition 

to several other motorsports activities, owns or operates 

13 of the nation’s major motorsports entertainment facilities, and owns and operates MRN Radio, the nation’s 

largest independent sports radio network; and 

Whereas Bill France passed on his title as International 

Speedway Corporation’s chief executive officer to his 

brother, James C. France, his position as chairman and 

chief executive officer of NASCAR to his son, Brian 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 492 IH 

France, and his daughter, Lesa France Kennedy, has become president of International Speedway Corporation: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors 

2 William Clifton France, the former president, chief execu3 tive officer, and chairman of NASCAR, for his lifetime 

4 of contributions and dedication to motorsports. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
From: ttizedes@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:25:05 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Tamara Tizedes

Brighton, MI 48116
From: steeves@willex.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:30:35 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jon Steeves

Willsboro, NY 12996
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Remington Oil and Gas
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending September 30,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, J. Burke Asher, Vice President/Finance (Principal Financial
Officer) of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec.1350, as adopted
pursuant to sec.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

     This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, and not for any other purpose.

                                                  /s/ J. BURKE ASHER
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                      J. Burke Asher
                                                  Vice President/Finance
                                              (Principal Financial Officer)

December 16, 2003

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Remington Oil and Gas Corporation and will be retained by
Remington Oil and Gas Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

 

EON-NET LP,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

COOLANIMALSTUFF.COM,

 Defendant(s).

 Case No. C05-1844P

 MINUTE ORDER

The following minute order is made by the direction of the court, the Honorable Marsha J.

Pechman:

At the request of counsel, an extension of time to file the joint status report is granted. The

report will be due on April 28, 2006. All other FRCP 26-related dates are adjusted accordingly.

Failure to adhere to these deadlines may result in sanctions, up to and including dismissal of this

action.

Filed this 9th day of March, 2006.

BRUCE RIFKIN, Clerk

By /s Mary Duett

Deputy Clerk

Case 2:05-cv-01844-MJP Document 28 Filed 03/09/06 Page 1 of 1
From: goldfinger13@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:11:34 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

FRANK ZAWISLAK

Rochester, PA 15074
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DEC 31, 1997
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-Q
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          18,686
<SECURITIES>                                       999
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,032
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,392
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,097
<PP&E>                                           9,939
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,445
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  44,591
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,287
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           130
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,174
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    44,591
<SALES>                                         19,459
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,459
<CGS>                                           16,905
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,905
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,273
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (719)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (719)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (719)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)
        

</TABLE>
Before the Second Division,

February 17, 1960

No. 63818.

protest 59/11610 (New York).

#### Pierre Ruedin Jewels *v.*United States,

Lawrence, Judge:

This case relates to certain medals imported from Switzerland which were classified by the collector of customs as articles or wares not specially provided for, plated, but not in chief value of gold, in paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1001, par. 397), and duty was imposed thereon at the rate of 65 per centum ad valorem.

It is the contention of plaintiff herein that said merchandise should properly have been classified as jewelry, commonly or commercially so known, finished or unfinished, valued at not over $5 per dozen pieces, within the purview of paragraph 1527(a)(2) of said act (19 U.S.C. §1001, par. 1527(a)(2)), as modified by the Japanese Trade Agreement, 90 Treas. Dec. 234, T.D. 53865, supplemented by Presidential notification, 90 Treas. Dec. 280, T.D. 53877, for which duty at the rate of 55 per centum is provided.

There was received in evidence as plaintiff’s exhibit 1 a sample of the imported merchandise representative of the articles described on the commercial invoice accompanying the entry herein as “medals 30 mm 0, of bronze with patina, with ring, models Nr. 57692-3” (hereinafter referred to as the “second item”), which is a golden anniversary medal of Marymount College.

Pierre Ruedin, plaintiff herein, testified that exhibit 1 is the same in all respects so far as form, images, and ornamentations are concerned as the “first item” of medals appearing on the commercial invoice which is described as “medals 30 mm 0, of common metal, with ring, models Nr. 57692-3.”

An oral stipulation of fact was entered into by the parties hereto, wherein it was agreed that the medals described in the first item appearing on the commercial invoice are gold plated; that those described on the invoice as the second item and represented by exhibit 1 are not gold plated; that the laboratory report, which is a part of the official papers before the court, only related to a sample of the first item of merchandise; that all of the medals are composed wholly or in chief value of metal, other than gold or platinum; that said medals are not devotional in character, but are ornamental and designed to be worn on apparel or carried on or about or attached to a person; and that said articles are valued at not over $5 per dozen pieces.

The case was thereupon submitted for decision on the record and the official papers before the court.

Accordingly, we find and hold that the anniversary medals before the court should properly have been classified as jewelry, commonly or commercially so known, finished or unfinished, and valued at not over $5 per dozen pieces, in paragraph 1527 (a) (2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified, *supra,*and subjected to duty at the rate of 55 per centum as alleged by plaintiff. The claim in the protest is, therefore, sustained.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
No. P67/291.

#### Eldon Industries, Inc. *v.*United States, protests 64/16798, etc. (Los Angeles).

Watson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of *James G. Wiley*Co., *a/c Ungar Electric*Tools, *Inc.*v. *United States*(49 Cust. Ct. 199, Abstract 66961), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. P66/63.

protests 64/9661, etc. (New York).

#### Roto Bag Machine Corp. and Markand Thakar et al. *v.*United States,

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of parts essential to and dedicated to use with bag-making machines similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Roto Bag Machine Corp. and*Rohner, *Gehrig & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(48 Cust Ct. 401, Abstract 66656), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Final Environmental Impact Statement

Jordan Cove Energy Project, L.P.

Docket No. CP07-444-000

Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline, L.P.

Docket No. CP07-441-000

FERC/EIS 0223 F

May 2009

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Office of Energy Projects

Washington, DC 20426

Cooperating Agencies

USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region

Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers, Portland District

US Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10

US Department of Homeland Security Coast Guard, Portland

US Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

US Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management, Oregon State Office

US Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation, Klamath Basin Area Office

US Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service, Oregon State Office

Douglas County, Oregon

Volume I - Executive Summary, Sections 1, 2, 3, and 4.0 - 4.4
Jordan Cove Energy and Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline Project

Final Environmental Impact Statement - Volume I

Docket Nos.

 CP07-441-000

CP07-444-000 May 2009 FERC/EIS 0223 F
Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





Board of
Directors and Shareholders


Invesco
Mortgage Capital Inc.





We have
issued our report dated March 23, 2010, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements included in the Annual Report of Invesco Mortgage


Capital
Inc. and subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2009.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said
report in the


Registration
Statement of Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-163249,
effective November 20, 2009).











/s/ GRANT
THORNTON LLP


Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania


March 23,
2010
Case No. 14,789a.

#### UNITED STATES v. CHA-TO-KAH-NA-PE-SHA et al.

[Hempst. 27.] *1*

Superior Court, Territory of Arkansas.

Oct. 1824.

Indians—Criminal Jurisdiction Over—How Far Indian Tribes Independent.

1. Congreso has the constitutional power to pass laws punishing Indians for crimes and of-fences committed against the United States.

2. Indian tribes are not so far independent natious as to lie exempt from this kind of legislation.

[Indictment against Cha-to-kah-ua-pe-sha and Wa-na-she-shinger, Osage Indians, for murder.]

Before JOHNSON, SCOTT, and TRIM- ; BLE. JJ. i

1

 [Reported by Samuel H. Hempstead. Esq.]

OPINION OF THE COURT. This is a motion for a new trial, and the grounds relied on are (1) that the verdict is contrary to law; and (2) that it is contrary to and without evidence. In support of the first ground, it has been contended that the Osage Indians are a sovereign and independent nation, possessing the right to declare war and commence hostilities against the United States, or any other nation; that the facts stated in the indictment constitute an act of war against the United States; and that the prisoners cannot be made amenable to the civil tribunals of this country. Even if this position was sound, which is not the fact, still the proof in the case shows that the Osage-Nation were in amity with the United States, and had no intention of going to war by the murder of which the prisoners are found guilty. It was an attack upon our citizens by a party of Osages, for the purpose of robbery and plunder, unauthorized by the Osage Nation. The nation, in fact, has disavowed the act and surrendered the accused, together with others, to be tried. Does this court, then, possess the power? Congress has passed a law expressly giving this court jurisdiction of offences committed by Indians, such as the one charged against the prisoners. That the act a:'uded to is constitutional we have no doubt, and we are bound to carry its provisions into effect. With regard to the other ground, that the verdict is contrary to evidence, it is sufficient to remark, that the proof satisfied the jury of the guilt of tli(> prisoners, and it was so strong no reasonable doubt exists in the minds of the court, of the justice and propriety of the verdict which the jury have rendered, aryd the motion for a .,ew trial must be overruled. Motion denied.

The counsel for the prisoners then moved the court in arrest of judgment, on the following grounds: (1) It does not appear in tiie indictment chat the offence was committed on lands belonging to the nation or tribe of Indians, as by law it ought to do; (21 the offence with which the prisoners are charged, is not set forth with sufficient certainty; (3) it does not appear from the indictment with sufficient certainty, that Curtis Wilborn was killed and murdered by the Indian chiefs and warriors.

But after the argument THE COURT overruled the motion, and sentenced the prisoners to lie executed by the marshal, by hanging. on the 21st of December, 1S24. between the lioure of 12 o’clock m. and 4 o'clock p. m.' of that day, and they were executed accordingly.