alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 58708.

protest 235490-K (New York).

#### Sam Forwand Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

An examination of the record failing to disclose any reason for disturbing the action of the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protest was overruled.
No. 63382.

protest 58/10186 (Los Angeles).

#### Castelazo *&*Associates, a/c David Chow & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of rattan flower cages the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Quon Quon Company*v. *United States*(41 Cust. Ct. 181, C.D. 2039), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before the First Division,

March 22, 1956

No. 59772.

#### California Artificial Flower Co. *v.*United States,

protest 246638-K (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of artificial flowers, composed wholly or in chief value of feathers, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Clinical Trial Implementation Cooperative Agreement (U01 Clinical Trial Required).                    

*Date:*                         October 30, 2023.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3E71, Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Ann Marie M. Brighenti, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3E71, Rockville, MD 20852, 301-761-3100,                         *AnnMarie.Cruz@niaid.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 26, 2023.

Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-21641 Filed 9-29-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
From: lavonnemac@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:34:05 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Lavonne McGregor

Mira Loma, CA 91752
35

12 8 7 8 9 10 11

31 32 33 34 35 36 31

3

33 34 36 31 32

6 2 1

3

4 5 2 1 6

7

6 5 4

7 10 11 12

10

9

9

8

7 8

7

11 12

18 13

13

14

14

15

15

16

16

17

17

18

18

23 24 19

23 24

22

22

21

21

19 20

19 20

25 30 26

26 25

27

27

29 28 30

30 29 28

35 36 31

36

31

35

34

34

33 32

31 32 33

6 2 1

1 6 3

2 3

4

4

5

5 6

7

10 11 12 9

Asotin Creek

Wenatchee Creek

WICKIUP CG

WENATCHEE

GUARD

STATION RC

CABIN SADDLE CG INDIAN

TOM TH

CLOVERLAND SP

South George Project Planning Area - Inventory of Potential Wilderness Areas

H-3A

1 0.5 0 1 Miles

LEGEND

South George Project Planning Area

Washington State Fish and Wildlife

Pomeroy Ranger District

Inventoried Roadless Area (IRA)

Wenaha-Tucannon Wilderness

Acres with Evidence of Stumps

Recreation Feature

Forest Roads  ́

Map H-3A: Forest Roads

Depicts forest roads. PWA boundaries were located 

300 feet either side of semi-permanent, human 

made forest roads to facilitate easy on-the-ground 

identification. This boundary also excludes stumps

created by road construction, danger tree 

maintenance, and personal-use firewood gathering. 

(FSH 1909. 12 ch.71 and 71.11 (9)).

This product is reproduced from geospatial information prepared by the U.S. Department of 

Agriculture, Forest Service. GIS data and product accuracy may vary. They may be: developed from 

sources of differing accuracy, interpretation, incomplete while being created or revised, etc. 

Using GIS products for purposes other than those for which they were created may yield inaccurate 

or misleading results. The Forest Service reserves the right ot correct, update, modify, or replace GIS 

products without notification. For more information contact the Umatilla National Forest Supervisors Office. 

D.Dixon

GIS/Data Service Specialist

06/03/2011

4300

4304

4400
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

HARRY VERN FOX,

Plaintiff,

v.

HENRY RICHARDS, Ph.D, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C06-5063 RBL/KLS

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Karen L.

Strombom, objections to the Report and Recommendation, if any, and the remaining record, does

hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) The motion for injunctive relief (Dkt. # 42) is DENIED;

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff, counsel for Defendants

and to the Hon. Karen L. Strombom.

DATED this 6th day of August, 2007.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-05063-RBL Document 61 Filed 08/06/07 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 10.3
 COMPANY
 ACT
 
 AMENDED AND RESTATED  THREE-YEAR SUBORDINATED  CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE
 $3,419,920
    
    Newark, New York
 , ULTRALIFE CORPORATION f/k/a ULTRALIFE BATTERIES, INC. Company ), WILLIAM MAHER ( Holder )
 Purchase Agreement




---



##### 



1. Interest .
   2. Payments.
  2




---



##### 



Maturity Date
 3. Voluntary Prepayments .
 4. Conversion Rights .
 Conversion Shares Conversion Rights Conversion Price
  Exhibit I Conversion Notice Conversion
Date provided however
 3




---



##### 



provided however
   5. Adjustments to Conversion Rights .
 4




---



##### 



General
 Notices.
 6. Company Right to Compel Conversion
 7. Subordination Senior
Indebtedness
 5




---



##### 



6




---



##### 



8. Events of Default.
 Event of Default
   7




---



##### 



8




---



##### 



9. Amendment and Waiver.
 10. Cancellation.
 11. Payments.
 12. Transfer of Note.
 13 . Business Days .
 14 . Right of Offset.
 15. Notices .
 16. New York Law.
 17. Taxes
 9




---



##### 



10




---



##### 



ULTRALIFE CORPORATION/s/ Robert W. FishbackRobert W. FishbackVice President of Finance and
Chief Financial OfficerACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED TO:/s/ William MaherWilliam Maher 11




---



##### 



Note Company Shares
    
 12
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

ATTORNEY’S FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

SANDRA L. WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff,

v.

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C02-2252-JCC

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES

PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)

Plaintiff filed a motion for attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). (Dkt. 25.)

Defendant does not object to plaintiff’s request. (Dkt. 27.) Having considered plaintiff’s motion

and the accompanying documents, it is hereby ORDERED that:

(1) The Court GRANTS plaintiff’s motion and authorizes a gross attorney’s fee of 

$10,804.75 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), reduced by the previously awarded Equal Access to

Justice Act award of $3,473.75. Plaintiff’s attorney shall therefore be awarded the net sum of

$7,331.00.

(2) Defendant will release the above-described fee, minus any applicable processing

fees as allowed by statute, within thirty days (30) of the date of this Order.
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

ATTORNEY’S FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)

PAGE -2

(3) The Clerk shall send copies of this Order to the parties.

DATED this 2nd day of September, 2008.

A

Mary Alice Theiler

United States Magistrate Judge
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the WESTERN DISTRICT of WASHINGTON

VICTOR B. PINEDA,

 

 Plaintiff, 

 

 vs. 

CITY of SEATTLE, et al.,

 Defendant.

 C06-157 RSL

 MINUTE ORDER

 REASSIGNING CASE

Pursuant to the Amended General Order entered by the Chief Judge on

November 3, 2004, this action has been reassigned to the Honorable Robert S. Lasnik, United

States District Judge. 

All future documents filed in this case must bear the cause number C06-157 RSL and bear

the Judge’s name in the upper right hand corner of the document.

Dated this 6th day of February, 2006

BRUCE RIFKIN

Clerk of Court

by: /s/ PETER H. VOELKER

 Peter H. Voelker, Deputy Clerk

Case 2:06-cv-00157-RSL Document 6 Filed 02/06/2006 Page 1 of 1

Pineda v. City of Seattle et al Doc. 6

Dockets.Justia.com
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
SK Shasta Acquisition Corp. 1 (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended April 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kurt Pichler, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Kurt PichlerKurt
      Pichler
                Principal
      Executive Officer
                July
      21, 2009
From: Beverly McCormick

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:54:00 PM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Beverly McCormick
Perkasie, Pennsylvania
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of American Energy Fields, Inc., (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, David P. Lieberman, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: February 16, 2011




/s/ David P. LiebermanDavid P. Lieberman

Acting Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
811 First Avenue, Suite 620

Seattle, WA 98104

Tel 206-264-8135

Fax 206-264-8144

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STATUS REPORT 

AND MOTION TO MAINTAIN

SUSPENDED CASE SCHEDULE, 

AND ORDER- 1

The Hon. Robert S. Lasnik

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

JESSE McCUNE and BRIGITTE

McCUNE, on behalf of themselves and

others similarly situated,

 Plaintiffs,

 v.

WILSHIRE CREDIT CORPORATION, 

 Defendant.

CASE NO. C05-01511RSL

 

 

JOINT STATUS REPORT AND MOTION

TO MAINTAIN SUSPENDED CASE

SCHEDULE, AND ORDER

Come now Plaintiffs McCune and Defendant Wilshire Credit Corporation (“Wilshire”)

and jointly inform the Court as follows: on June 19, 2006 the Court granted the parties’ joint

motion to suspend case deadlines while they engaged in settlement negotiations. The Order

required the parties to report to the Court on July 17, 2006 regarding the status of the case and

to suggest new dates for the case schedule. McCune and Defendant Wilshire hereby report that

they are still engaged in settlement negotiations. Wilshire has provided information and data to

counsel for the McCunes which is required for the McCunes to evaluate settlement alternatives

and possibilities, and counsel for the McCunes are formulating a response. The parties wish to

continue to devote their efforts at settlement negotiations, and therefore jointly request the Court

to enter an order continuing the suspended status of the deadlines in the case until August 17,

Case 2:05-cv-01511-RSL Document 29 Filed 08/07/06 Page 1 of 2
811 First Avenue, Suite 620

Seattle, WA 98104

Tel 206-264-8135

Fax 206-264-8144

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STATUS REPORT 

AND MOTION TO MAINTAIN

SUSPENDED CASE SCHEDULE, 

AND ORDER- 2

2006, when they shall report to the Court the status of their settlement negotiations and their

suggested dates for a new case schedule. 

DATED THIS ________ day of July, 2006.

BECKETT LAW OFFICES, PLLC DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 

 /s/ /s/

Guy W. Beckett, WSBA #14939 Curt R. Hineline, WSBA # 16317

 Attorneys for Defendant 

WILLIAMSON & WILLIAMS

KELLER ROHRBACK, L.L.P.

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

ORDER

THIS MATTER came on before the Honorable Robert S. Lasnik on the motion of the

parties. The Court has considered the motion and is fully advised in the premises. Now

therefore, it is hereby 

ORDERED that deadlines applicable to this case shall remain temporarily suspended to

permit the parties to continue to attempt to negotiate a settlement. The parties shall report to the

Court on or before August 17, 2006 regarding the status of their settlement negotiations and to

suggest new deadlines which they believe should be applicable to the case.

DONE THIS 7th day of August, 2006.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-01511-RSL Document 29 Filed 08/07/06 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Joseph Koegel, the President and Chief Executive Officer, Chairman, and Director of Entertainment Art, Inc. (the “Registrant”), certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





Date: June 29, 2011





ENTERTAINMENT ART, INC.








By:      /s/ Joseph Koegel


Name: Joseph Koegel


Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer,


Chairman, and Director


(Principal Executive Officer)








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# EQCHEARINGRECORD Title 129 Rehearing

December 1, 2011

# /'

ORDER The following hearings are scheduled to be held before the Environmental Quality Council beginning at 9:00 a.m. Central Time, December 1, 2011, at The Cornhusker Hotel, 333 South 13th Street, Lincoln, Nebraska: 1. Public Hearing on Amendment ofTitle 117, Surface Water Quality Standards. 2. Public Hearing on Amendment ofTitle 195, Rules and Regulations Pertaining to Chemigation. 3. Public Hearing on Amendment ofTitle 133, Litter Reduction and Recycling Grant Program. 4. Public Hearing on Litter Reduction and Recycling Grant Program, 2012 Funding Percentage Allocations. 5. Public Hearing on Amendment ofTitle 129, Nebraska Air Quality Regulations (rehearing from June 23, 2011). 6. Public Hearing on Amendment ofTitle 129, Nebraska Air Quality Regulations. It is necessarythat a hearing officer be appointed to conductthis hearing. IT IS ORDERED THATTom Lamberson be appointed as the Hearing Officer.

# ~~/L~/~~~ MarkWhitehead, Chair ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY COUNCIL

EXHIBIT 

# I
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Clarence Edward ALEXANDER, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 05-6545.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Aug. 18, 2005.

Decided: Aug. 25, 2005.

Clarence Edward Alexander, Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Victoria Watford-McKinney, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Clarence Edward Alexander seeks to appeal his conviction and sentence. In criminal cases, the defendant must file his notice of appeal within ten days of the entry of judgment. Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(1)(A). With or without a motion, the district court may grant an extension of time to file of up to thirty days upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause. Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(4); *United States v. Reyes,*759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir.1985).

The district court entered its judgment on February 2, 1996. Alexander filed his notice of appeal on March 16, 2005, far beyond the appeal or extension period. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as untimely filed. We dispense with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court.

*DISMISSED*