alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

 Plaintiff, ) CASE NO. CR05-417RSM

 )

 )

 v. ) ORDER

 )

JOHN JAY CUNNINGHAM, et al., )

)

 Defendants. )

____________________________________)

 

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on a joint motion (Dkt.#102) by the United

States and defendants Abraham Sheena, Lucus Quilt, Fayve Quilt, Dide Quilt, Joanne Rosette,

Erin Casper, and Ranger Oppenheim to sever the trial of these defendants from the trial of

their co-defendants and to continue the trial date. The trial date has previously been

continued by this Court’s Order (see Dkt.#123). Having considered the entirety of the record

and files herein, the Court finds that severance of trials is appropriate.

IT IS NOW, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the trial of defendants Abraham Sheena,

Lucus Quilt, Fayve Quilt, Dide Quilt, Joanne Rosette, Erin Casper, and Ranger Oppenheim is

severed from the trial of the remaining defendants.

DATED this 2nd day of February, 2006

A

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:05-cr-00417-RSM Document 128 Filed 02/02/06 Page 1 of 1
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Oilpossibilities in and around Baxter Basin, in the Rock Springs uplift,Sweetwater County, Wyoming**
 
Report | Plate
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:702
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000957640
 
July 25, 2018
No. 63829.

protests 74124-K, etc. (New York).

#### Julius Wile Sons & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, James A. Watt, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Remington Oil and
Gas Corporation;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;

          (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
     controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
     the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
     of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

          (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
     control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
     recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
     of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
     to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
     reporting; and

     5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
     or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
     reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial information; and

          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
     other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     control over financial reporting.

Date: August 8, 2003

         /s/ JAMES A. WATT
--------------------------------------
            James A. Watt
President and Chief Executive Officer
Before The First Division,

September 21, 1960

No. 64573.

#### The Coldwater Seafood Corporation *v.*United States,

protest 58/24734 (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the *279merchandise consists of fish similar in all material respects to the fish blocks the subject of *The Lee Herrmann Co., a/c The Coldwater Seafood Corp.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 49, C.D. 2101), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: menic.wright@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:22:27 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Veronica Wright

Franklin, VT 05457
Exhibit 31.1

                               302 CERTIFICATION

I, Helen Siwak, Chief Executive Officer and acting Principal Financial Officer,
certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Sync2 Networks Corp;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures, as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a - 14 and 15d - 14, for the
     registrant and have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report
          is being prepared;
     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this annual
          report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c)   presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date.

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors or
     persons performing the equivalent functions (being myself at this time):

     a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a role in the registrant's internal controls.

6.   I have indicated in this annual report whether there were changes in
     internal controls or in other factors that could affect internal controls
     subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
     corrective actions with regard to deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: October 12, 2010


/s/ Helen Siwak
-------------------------------------------
Helen Siwak,
CEO and acting Principal Financial Officer
---

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14(b) AND 15d-14(b) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, Thomas L. Wegman, the President, Principal
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of BioSpecifics Technologies
Corp. (the Company), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:

| | 1. | The Companys report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
      period ended March 31, 2010 (the Report), fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                              
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
      of the Company.                                              

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this
certification this 10th day of May, 2010.

/s/ Thomas L.
WegmanThomas L. Wegman President, Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer

This certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)
or otherwise subject to liability pursuant to that section. Such certification
shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent
that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W.D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

THOMAS MICHAEL CORDERO,

Defendant.

Case No. CR05-5705FDB

INITIAL ORDER RE: ALLEGATIONS

OF VIOLATION OF CONDITIONS

OF SUPERVISION BY UNITED

STATES PROBATION OFFICE

THIS MATTER comes on for hearing on the Petition of the United States Probation Office alleging

that the defendant has violated the conditions of supervision.

The plaintiff appears through Special/Assistant United States Attorney, DOUGLAS HILL;

The defendant appears personally and represented by counsel, JOHN CARPENTER;

The U.S. Probation Office has filed a petition alleging violations of the terms and conditions of

supervision; the defendant has been advised of the allegation(s)and maximum potential sanction if

substantiated; and the court finding probable cause with regard to the alleged violation(s); 

The matter is scheduled for hearing before the Honorable FRANKLIN D. BURGESS:

Date: MARCH 31, 2010

Time: 11:00 AM

( ) Defendant is released pending the above scheduled hearing.

( X ) Defendant is ordered detained for failing to show that he/she will not flee or pose a danger to any

other person or the community pursuant to CrR 32.1(a)(1), and CrR 46(c), to be delivered as ordered

by the court for further proceedings. 

The clerks shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United States, to counsel for the defendant,

the United States Marshal and to the United States Probation Office and/or Pretrial Services Office.

A

March 1, 2010.

J. Richard Creatura

United States Magistrate Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
        
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                            36,036
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                       20,189
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  76,337
<PP&E>                                           571,687
<DEPRECIATION>                                   101,950
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   598,865
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             81,201
<BONDS>                                           43,783
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                             495
<OTHER-SE>                                       463,482
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     598,865
<SALES>                                          321,120
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 324,004
<CGS>                                            125,183
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    270,359
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   706
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   34,669
<INCOME-TAX>                                      12,411
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               22,258
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                      22,258
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.45
        

</TABLE>
From: carriebmp@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:05:54 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Carrie Patch

Bricelyn, MN 56014
(October 31, 1995)

#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v John Skinner, Respondent.

[633 NYS2d 29]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Murray Mogel, J.), entered on or *351about March 22, 1994, which granted defendant’s motion to suppress identification testimony, unanimously affirmed.

While the police are permitted to rely on the direction of their fellow officers to make an arrest, they cannot be considered to have relied on information possessed by each other without the guidance of any communication of either the information itself or a direction to arrest having been imparted and received *(People v Mitchell,*185 AD2d 163, 164, *appeal dismissed*81 NY2d 819). Here, the testimony at the suppression hearing did not establish the identity of the officer who initially detained defendant, nor whether that officer actually received any information from another officer who may have possessed probable cause. As the People failed to meet their burden of establishing the legality of the arrest, the identifications were properly suppressed.

The People’s argument that, since custody of defendant was transferred to an officer who undeniably had probable cause prior to the challenged identifications, the causal link between the illegal detention and the identifications was broken, is being raised for the first time on appeal, and therefore is not preserved for our review *(see, People v Dodt,*61 NY2d 408, 416). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Wallach, Ross, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.
# 

# CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

Registration No.  333-97047

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  379                                                               Trade Date:  01/09/04

(To Prospectus Supplement dated August 15, 2002 &

  Prospectus dated August  8, 2002)                                                                     Issue Date:   01/15/04

The Date of this Pricing SupplementJanuary 09, 2004

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

  CUSIP                                                                                                                                Date and terms of redemption or

     or        Stated                                                                  Interest                                    repayment (including any

Common  Interest                      Price to  Discounts &        Payment  Survivors                  applicable regular or special

  Code      Rate (1)               Maturity                Public (2)                Commissions      Frequency      Option     Yes/No                record dates)

14911QRU7   5.5%                        01/15/19          100%                    1.75%                  Quarterly           YES                       YES                        Callable at 100% beginning 01/15/07

                                                                                                                                                                                                                    and quarterly thereafter.                                 

 

Principal                                                                                1st Payment Day         

Amount                   Proceeds                 Dealer                            Date                  Count

$2,855,000.00                $2,805,037.50         ABN AMROInc.                 04/15/04                 30/360    

Original Issue Discount Note:                                                                   Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes                X   No                                                                                   N/A

The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the effective date of the change.  Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $393.344 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (SM) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (SM) will be made under the Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated August 8,2002.

Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.