alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the annual report of Evetsco, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned principal executive and financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:  April 11, 2010   /s/ Joseph Nemelka Joseph Nemelka, President (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)E
From: i_samaniego@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:02:51 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ivan Samaniego

San Antonio, TX 78233
# United States Court of Appeals

f or the Fifth Circuit

No. 21

- 10981 Summary Calendar

United States of America,

Plaintiff

— Appellee ,

versus

Hugo Alejandro Castilleja,

Defendant

— Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:21

- CR

- 102

- 1

Before King, Costa, and Ho, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam : *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Hugo Alejandro Castilleja has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Castilleja has not filed a response. We have

* Pursuant to 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir cuit R ule 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 4, 2022
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-10981 Document: 00516307485 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/04/2022No. 21

- 10981

2 reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for app ellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED

. See 5th Cir.

R. 42.2

. Case: 21-10981 Document: 00516307485 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/04/2022
EXHIBIT 3.4

                  CERTIFICATE OF RETIREMENT AND PROHIBITION OF

                              REISSUANCE OF SHARES

                                       OF

                                 OSTEOTECH, INC.

             (Pursuant to Section 243 of the General Corporation Law
                            of the State of Delaware)


It is hereby certified that:

      1. The name of the corporation (the "Corporation") is Osteotech, Inc.

      2. Pursuant to Section 3.3(e)(v) of the Corporation's Restated Certificate
of Incorporation, the Corporation has retired 675,595 of its Preferred stock, of
which shares 98,027 were Series A Preferred Stock, 251,076 were Series B
Preferred Stock, 10,180 were Series C Preferred Stock and 316,312 were Series D
Preferred Stock.

      3. Section 3.3(e)(v) of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Corporation prohibits the reissuance of any of the shares described above of
such Preferred Stock.

Signed on April 4, 2002.




                                          OSTEOTECH, INC.

                                                 /s/ Richard W. Bauer
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Richard W. Bauer, President and Chief
                                          Executive Officer


                                                                             E-1
**Exhibit 23**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board of Directors and Stockholders Ascent Capital Group, Inc.:

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-156231 and 333-156230) of Ascent Capital Group, Inc. of our report dated February 29, 2012, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Ascent Capital Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2011, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, which reports appear in the December 31, 2011 annual report on Form 10-K of Ascent Capital Group, Inc..

 

 
| /s/ KPMG LLP           |
|------------------------|
| Dallas, Texas          |
| February 29, 2012 |

 

----
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 16-3 Filed 08/14/03 Page 1 of 1
Remington Energy Corporation
                        Computation of Earnings per Share
                                  Exhibit 11.1
                      (In thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               Three Months Ended      Six Months Ended 
                                                     June 30,               June 30,
                                                  1998       1997        1998       1997
                                               ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
<S>                                            <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
Net income (loss) available for basic income
   per share                                   $ (1,157)  $   (462)  $ (3,152)  $  1,345
 Interest expense on the Notes 
  (net of tax) (1)                                    -          -          -          -
                                               ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Net income (loss) available for diluted
   income per share                            $ (1,157)  $   (462)  $ (3,152)  $  1,345
                                               =========  =========  =========  =========

Basic income (loss) per share                  $  (0.06)  $  (0.02)  $  (0.15)  $   0.06
                                               =========  =========  =========  =========

Diluted income (loss) per share                $  (0.06)  $  (0.02)  $  (0.15)  $   0.06
                                               =========  =========  =========  =========

Weighted average
 Class A Stock                                    3,222      3,246      3,222      3,248
 Class B Stock                                   17,165     17,422     17,148     17,487
                                               ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Total common shares for basic income (loss)
   per share                                     20,387     20,668     20,370     20,735
                                               =========  =========  =========  =========
 Dilutive stock options outstanding (treasury
  stock method) (1)                                   -          -          -          -
 Shares assumed issued by conversion of the
  Notes (1)                                           -          -          -          -
                                               ---------  ---------  ---------  ---------
Total common shares for diluted income 
   (loss) per share                              20,387     20,668      20,370    20,735
                                               =========  =========  =========  =========

(1) Non dilutive.

Potential increase to net income for diluted
   income per share
 Interest expense on Notes (net of tax)             514        736       1,029     1,464

Potential issues of common stock for diluted
   income per share
 Weighted average stock options granted             801        279         755       279
 Weighted average shares issued assuming
  conversion of Notes                             3,488      5,007       3,488     5,007

</TABLE>
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N
NO. 03-15-00434- CV
In re H.L. “Larry” G ardner, Jr.

ORI GINAL P ROCEEDI NG F ROM TRAVIS CO UNTY
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On J u l y 1 5 , 2 0 1 5, rela

tor H.L
. “L arr

y ” Gar dner, J r. filed his petition for writ of mandamus and motion for temporar y re l i ef
. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8, 52.10. The rea l parties in interest, Tra cen G ardne r, Sasa Watt, and Anne Clare, filed a response to the motion for temporar y relief on the same da

y . Having revie wed the petition a nd the rec ord and the motion for tempor ary relief and the r esponse, we deny the motion and the petition for wr it of mandamus.

__________________________________________ Cindy Olson Bour land, J ustice Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Goodwin, and B ourland Filed: Jul y

15, 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Marvel
Entertainment Group, Inc. Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and Statements
of Operations.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                                       0000874808
<NAME>                 Marvel Entertainment Group, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                 1,000,000
<CURRENCY>                                U.S. Dollars
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
       
<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                              16
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      120
<ALLOWANCES>                                        29
<INVENTORY>                                         49
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   213
<PP&E>                                              78
<DEPRECIATION>                                      20
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     622
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              478
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                       (358)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       622
<SALES>                                            378
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   378
<CGS>                                              275
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      275
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   144
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  37
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (107)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (3)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (100)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (100)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     $(1)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
Order filed, December 27, 2018.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 18

- 01027

- CV

____________ RONDA G. NEELY, INDI VIDUALLY AND ON BEHA LF OF THE ESTATE OF JANET S. GOEHRING , DECEASED, AND MICH ELLE PATRICK, INDIVIDUALLY, AND R OYCE GREGORY GOEHRIN G,

INDIVIDUALLY , Appellant

V.

UNION CARBIDE CORPOR ATION , Appellee

On Appeal from the 11th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2007

- 32446

- ASB



### ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due December 06, 20 18

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. On December 11, 2018, this court ordered the court reporter to file the record within 10 days. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following o rder.We order Mark Miller , the official court reporter, to file the record in this

appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

. No further extension will be entertained absent exceptional circumstances. The trial and appellate courts are jointly res ponsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). If Mark Miller does not timely file the record as ordered, we

may issue an order directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the
reason for the failure to file the record.

PER CURIAM
1401 H Street, NW, Suite 1075, Washington, DC 20005 (202) 326-5154 Fax (202) 898-4810

February 16, 2015

Mr. Paul Gretch

Director

Office of International Aviation

United States Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: US Airways, Inc. – TAP Air Portugal Codesharing 

(Docket DOT-OST-2006-24670)

Dear Mr. Gretch:

On May 17, 2006, the Department of Transportation (“Department”) issued a blanket 

Statement of Authorization to US Airways, Inc. (“US Airways”) and TAP Air Portugal (“TAP”)

to display each other’s code, “US” and “TP,” respectively, on flights between the United States 

and Portugal, both non-stop and via intermediate points, and to third country points beyond the 

United States and beyond Portugal. (See Department Action on Application in Docket OST2006-24670, May 17, 2006, (“Action”).)

In accordance with the Conditions set forth in the Action, US Airways hereby advises the 

Department that the US Airways-TAP codeshare arrangement has been terminated effective 

immediately. Accordingly, US Airways and TAP will no longer place their respective 

designator codes on each other’s flights. 

Respectfully submitted,

Howard Kass

Vice President – Regulatory Affairs

Robert A. Wirick

Managing Director, Regulatory & International 

Affairs

Abigail Donovan

Director, Congressional and Federal Affairs

cc: Service List

William Karas, Counsel for TAP
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that, on February 16, 2015, I caused to be served a copy of the foregoing Letter 

by email upon those addressees listed below:

urskr@state.gov (Department of State)

cristinasa@state.gov (Department of State)

brian.hedberg@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

todd.homan@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

peter.irvine@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

laura.remo@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

brett.kruger@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

john.allen@faa.gov (Federal Aviation Administration)

dan.weiss@united.com (United)

steve.morrissey@united.com (United))

gmurphy@crowell.com (Counsel for United)

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com (Delta)

chris.walker@delta.com (Delta)

_________________________

Abigail Donovan
No. P66/277. —

#### Hudson Shipping Co., Inc. *v.*United States, protest 61/823 (New York).

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of automobile heaters similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Gallagher & Ascher Company*v. *United States*(52 CCPA 11, C.A.D. 849), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MINUTE ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

JOANNE GIORGIO,

Plaintiff,

v.

HOLLAND AMERICA LINE, INC., et al.,

Defendants. ___________________________________

JOANNE GIORGIO,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

HOLLAND AMERICA LINE, INC., et al.,

 Defendants.

CASE NO. C05-38JLR

 MINUTE ORDER

 CASE NO. C05-764JLR

The following minute order is made by the direction of the court, the Honorable

James L. Robart:

The above-captioned cases are hereby consolidated. All future pleadings filed in

this matter shall bear the caption shown above. These cases shall be completed on the

trial schedule set forth in C05-38JLR.

Filed and entered this 16th day of May 2005.

BRUCE RIFKIN, Clerk

s/Mary Duett

By

Deputy Clerk

Case 2:05-cv-00764-JLR Document 20 Filed 05/16/05 Page 1 of 1
OMB Control No. 2060 - 0 347

The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average up to 2.5 hours per response. Send comments on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for mi nimizing respondent burden, including through the use of automated collection techniques to the Director, Collection Strategi es Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2822T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, W ashington, D.C. 20460. Include the OMB con trol number in any correspondence. Do not send the completed form to this address. EPA Form 5900 - 198
Exhibit 23.1




SilbersteinUngar, PLLCCPAs and Business Advisors
 
 Phone (248) 203-0080
  Fax (248) 281-0940
  Telegraph Road, Suite 2175
  Bingham Farms, MI 48025-4586
  wwwsucpas.com
 
  September 4, 2010
 
  To the Board of Directors of
  TouchIT Technologies, Inc.
  Istanbul, Turkey
  
  To Whom It May Concern:
  Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  SilbersteinUngar, PLLC, hereby consents to the use in the Form 10-K, Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, filed by TouchIT Technologies, Inc. (formerly Hotel Management Systems, Inc.) of our report dated August 11, 2010, relating to the financial statements of Hotel Management Systems, Inc., a Nevada Corporation, as of and for the years ending April 30, 2010 and 2009 and for the period from April 15, 2008 (date of inception) to April 30, 2010.
  
  Sincerely,
 
  /s/ SilbersteinUngar, PLLC
  SilbersteinUngar, PLLC
-79 -78 -77 -76 -75

38 39 40


### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 07/20 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 20 Jul 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.92 N 77.01 WMeters AGL
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-4 Filed 02/01/10 Page 1 of 31
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-4 Filed 02/01/10 Page 2 of 31
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-4 Filed 02/01/10 Page 3 of 31
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-4 Filed 02/01/10 Page 4 of 31
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-4 Filed 02/01/10 Page 5 of 31
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-4 Filed 02/01/10 Page 6 of 31
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-4 Filed 02/01/10 Page 7 of 31
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-4 Filed 02/01/10 Page 8 of 31
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-4 Filed 02/01/10 Page 9 of 31
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-4 Filed 02/01/10 Page 10 of 31
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-4 Filed 02/01/10 Page 11 of 31
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-4 Filed 02/01/10 Page 12 of 31
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-4 Filed 02/01/10 Page 13 of 31
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-4 Filed 02/01/10 Page 14 of 31
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-4 Filed 02/01/10 Page 15 of 31
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-4 Filed 02/01/10 Page 16 of 31
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-4 Filed 02/01/10 Page 17 of 31
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-4 Filed 02/01/10 Page 18 of 31
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-4 Filed 02/01/10 Page 19 of 31
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-4 Filed 02/01/10 Page 20 of 31
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-4 Filed 02/01/10 Page 21 of 31
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-4 Filed 02/01/10 Page 22 of 31
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-4 Filed 02/01/10 Page 23 of 31
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-4 Filed 02/01/10 Page 24 of 31
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-4 Filed 02/01/10 Page 25 of 31
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-4 Filed 02/01/10 Page 26 of 31
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-4 Filed 02/01/10 Page 27 of 31
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-4 Filed 02/01/10 Page 28 of 31
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-4 Filed 02/01/10 Page 29 of 31
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-4 Filed 02/01/10 Page 30 of 31
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 192-4 Filed 02/01/10 Page 31 of 31
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

REVERSE MORTGAGE SOLUTIONS, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

MARIE THERESE FRANCOIS,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-1089

[January 11, 2018]

Appeal of a non-final order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth 

Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Joel T. Lazarus, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

CACE-16-002972.

David Rosenberg and Jarrett Cooper of Robertson, Anschutz & 

Schneid, P.L., Boca Raton, for appellant.

Michael H. Hirsch of Michael H. Hirsch, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for 

appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, LEVINE and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.