alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

LORETO VEGA-VELAZQUEZ,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 05-191M

DETENTION ORDER 

Offense charged: 

Possession with Intent to Distribute Cocaine (21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2).

Date of Detention Hearing: Initial appearance, April 22, 2005.

The Court conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f). Based upon

the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, the Court finds that

no condition or combination of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure the

appearance of defendant as required.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) The defendant has stipulated to detention due to the detainer placed on defendant

by the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, but reserved the right to file a

subsequent motion for release if there is a change of circumstances.

Case 2:05-cr-00185-MJP Document 15-2 Filed 04/25/05 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

(2) Defendant appears to have no substantial ties to the community or to the Western

District of Washington.

(3) No conditions or combination of conditions are apparent that will reasonably

assure the defendant’s appearance at future Court hearings.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with

counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant is

confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose of

an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States

Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 25th day of April, 2005.

/s/ JAMES P. DONOHUE 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:05-cr-00185-MJP Document 15-2 Filed 04/25/05 Page 2 of 2
From: carlb@ku.edu

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:33:42 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Carl Burkhead

Lawrence, KS 66047
1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required
to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Principal
Life Income Fundings Trust 2008-056 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, do
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information
required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is
included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;4.
    
    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this
report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act
periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing
agreement(s) in all material respects; and5.
    
    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of
compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included
in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.
   /s/ Dwight N. Soethout

Dwight N. SoethoutVice President  Principal Life Insurance Company
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 178 (Friday, September 13, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 56768]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-22344]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8470]

Waiver of Restriction on Assistance to the Central Government of 
Libya

    Pursuant to Section 7031(b)(3) of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2012 (Div. I, Pub. 
L.112-74) (``the Act''), as carried forward by the Further Continuing 
Appropriations Act, 2013, (Div. F, Pub. L. 113-6) and Department of 
State Delegation of Authority Number 245-1, I hereby determine that it 
is important to the national interest of the United States to waive the 
requirements of Section 7031(b)(1) of the Act and similar provisions of 
law in prior year Acts with respect to Libya, and I hereby waive this 
restriction.
    This determination and the accompanying Memorandum of Justification 
shall be reported to the Congress, and the determination shall be 
published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: June 17, 2013.
 William J. Burns,
 Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-22344 Filed 9-12-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-31-P
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

_______________________________________)

GE CAPITAL SMALL BUSINESS ) No. C06-0136RSL

FINANCE CORPORATION, )

)

Plaintiff, ) 

v. )

) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

PAUL G. JAMESON, et al., ) MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

) JUDGMENT

Defendants. )

_______________________________________)

This matter comes before the Court on “Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment

on Guarantees.” Dkt. # 10. Although the parties stipulated to a continuation of this motion,

neither defendant filed an opposition. Plaintiff’s motion is, therefore, GRANTED. 

Plaintiff is entitled to judgment against defendant Paul G. Jameson, individually,

and against defendant James A. Slazas, individually and his marital community, jointly and

severally, in the amount of $253,606.19, plus pre-judgment interest at the rate of $58.60 per day

from March 16, 2006, until the date of judgment, plus post-judgment interest at the maximum

legal rate from the date of judgment until the judgment is satisfied. Plaintiff is also entitled to an

award of reasonable attorney’s fees and costs, the amount of which will be determined by

subsequent motion.

Case 2:06-cv-00136-RSL Document 16 Filed 06/09/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT -2-

The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of plaintiff and against

defendants in this matter.

DATED this 9th day of June, 2006.

A

Robert S. Lasnik,

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cv-00136-RSL Document 16 Filed 06/09/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit
32.1



CERTIFICATION
OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned certifies that this periodic report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this periodic
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Rangeford Resources, Inc..



Date:
January 22, 2019



|By: | /s/
    Thomas E. Lindholm  | 
|--- | --------------------------- | 
|    | Thomas
    E. Lindholm      | 
|    | Chief
    Executive Officer |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         September 26, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 20, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 62 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2023-277, CP2023-280.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-20918 Filed 9-25-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order Continuing Trial and Pretrial

Motions Deadline/Murray 

CR05-417RSM –1

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101-3903

(206) 553-7970

Judge Ricardo S. Martinez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

) NO. CR05-418RSM

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

) ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL

DAVID MURRAY, ) DATE AND PRETRIAL

)

Defendant. )

_______________________________________)

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on a stipulated motion of the government

and defendant to continue the trial date and the pretrial motions deadline. Having

considered the entirety of the record and files herein, the Court finds that failure to grant

a continuance would likely result in a miscarriage of justice. The case is complex

involving over three thousand pages of discovery, over one thousand intercepted audio

recordings and hundreds of exhibits. It is unreasonable to expect adequate

preparation for trial before the current trial date of February 27, 2006. The Court further

finds that the interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial in this case are

outweighed by the ends of justice. 

IT IS NOW, THEREFORE, ORDERED that trial of defendant DAVID MURRAY

be continued to April 3, 2006, and that the time between the date of this Order and the

new trial date be excludable time under the Speedy Trial Act pursuant to Title 18, United

States Code, Sections 3161(h)(8)(A), 3161(h)(8)(B)(i), and 3161(h)(8)(B)(ii). 

Case 2:05-cr-00418-RSM Document 9 Filed 02/23/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order Continuing Trial and Pretrial

Motions Deadline/Murray 

CR05-417RSM –2

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 STEWART STREET, SUITE 5220

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101-3903

(206) 553-7970

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pre-trial motions shall be filed on or before

March 10, 2006.

 Dated this 23rd day of February, 2006

A

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Presented by:

s/Douglas B. Whalley 

DOUGLAS B. WHALLEY

Assistant United States Attorney

United States Attorney's Office 

601 Union Street, Suite 5100 

Seattle, WA 98101-3903

(206) 553-4882, Fax: (206) 553-4440

E-mail: douglas.whalley@usdoj.gov

Washington State Bar #4625

s/ Lisca Borichewski 

LISCA BORICHEWSKI

Assistant United States Attorney

(206) 553-2266, Fax: (206) 553-4440

E-mail: lisca.borichewski@usdoj.gov

Washington State Bar #24300

s/ James Frush 

James Frush

Cable Langenbach Kinerk & Bauer 

1000 2nd Ave, Ste. 2500

Seattle, WA 98104 

206-292-8800 

Email: jfrush@cablelang.com 

Case 2:05-cr-00418-RSM Document 9 Filed 02/23/06 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 39 Filed 05/04/06 Page 1 of 11
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 39 Filed 05/04/06 Page 2 of 11
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 39 Filed 05/04/06 Page 3 of 11
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 39 Filed 05/04/06 Page 4 of 11
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 39 Filed 05/04/06 Page 5 of 11
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 39 Filed 05/04/06 Page 6 of 11
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 39 Filed 05/04/06 Page 7 of 11
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 39 Filed 05/04/06 Page 8 of 11
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 39 Filed 05/04/06 Page 9 of 11
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 39 Filed 05/04/06 Page 10 of 11
Case 2:05-cv-02129-RSM Document 39 Filed 05/04/06 Page 11 of 11
# OAR Box 1828

Prepped byOllie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 203 ) ll-K-(I)-1 6 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/200811:12:55AM Sheet 203 of 325 P. 1P. 2 

# A\= e

II-K-(J0-1 6

COA L UTILIZATIO NMODE L O F TH E INDUSTRIA L SECTOR . VOL . I AN D II . PRIMAR Y MODE L DOCUMENTATION . EEA , Inc . Octobe r 23 , 1978 . THI S INFORMATIO NCA

NB E FOUN D I NDOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE M II-K-(I)-1 6
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 672 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Prostate Cancer Awareness 

Month, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2007 

Ms. MATSUI (for herself and Mr. LATHAM) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Prostate Cancer 

Awareness Month, and for other purposes. 

Whereas countless American families live with prostate cancer; 

Whereas 1 in 6 men in the United States will be diagnosed 

with prostate cancer during his lifetime; 

Whereas over the past decade, prostate cancer has been the 

most commonly diagnosed nonskin cancer in the United 

States; 

Whereas prostate cancer has been the second most common 

cancer killer of American men over the last 10 years; 

Whereas over 218,000 men in the United States will be diagnosed with prostate cancer in 2007; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 672 IH 

Whereas according to the American Cancer Society, 27,000 

American men will die of prostate cancer this year; 

Whereas 30 percent of new cases of prostate cancer occur in 

men under the age of 65; 

Whereas American men over the age of 50 are particularly 

susceptible to prostate cancer, and a man in the United 

States turns 50 years old approximately every 14 seconds; 

Whereas African American males suffer a prostate cancer incidence rate up to 65 percent higher than White males; 

Whereas a man’s risk of developing prostate cancer is doubled if one of his family members already has the disease, 

and quintupled if two family members have prostate cancer; 

Whereas screening procedures such as digital rectal examinations and prostate specific antigen blood tests can diagnose prostate cancer in earlier and more treatable stages, 

thereby reducing prostate cancer mortality; 

Whereas ongoing research promises further improvements in 

prostate cancer prevention, early detection, and treatments; and 

Whereas educating people in the United States—including 

health care providers—about prostate cancer and early 

detection strategies is crucial to saving men’s lives and 

preserving and protecting families: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of National 

3 Prostate Cancer Awareness Month; and 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 672 IH 

1 (2) declares that the Federal Government has a 

2 responsibility— 

3 (A) to raise awareness about the impor4 tance of available prostate cancer screening 

5 methods and treatment options; 

6 (B) to increase research funding that is 

7 commensurate with the seriousness of prostate 

8 cancer in an effort to improve screening, treat9 ments, and cures for the disease; and 

10 (C) to implement policy that improves ac11 cess to, and the quality of, health care services 

12 that detect and treat prostate cancer. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-60487

CLEVE GALE; ALEX GATES, Bankruptcy Trustee,

Plaintiffs-Appellees

v.

TOWN OF COMO, MISSISSIPPI, 

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 2:09-CV-00169

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

For the reasons articulated in the district court’s denial of DefendantAppellant’s motion for judgment as a matter of law, remittitur, or a new trial,

we AFFIRM. See 5TH CIR. R. 47.6.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 13, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 12-60487 Document: 00512273507 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/13/2013
No. 59266.

protest 248114-K (St. Louis).

#### L. E. McCullough & Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

An examination of the official record disclosing no reason for disturbing the classification of the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protest was overruled.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Humberto MARTINEZ-VALDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 99-10104.

D.C. No. CR-96-00413-JMR.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 9, 2001.*

Decided July 19, 2001.

Before KOZINSE3, T.G. NELSON and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Humberto Martinez-Valdez appeals his 21-month sentence imposed following the revocation of his supervised release. We dismiss this appeal as moot because Martinez-Valdez has completed serving his entire sentence, and thus lacks standing to raise any challenge to it. *See United States v. Palomba,*182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir.1999) (citing *Spencer v. Kemna,*523 U.S. 1, 118 S.Ct. 978, 140 L.Ed.2d 43 (1998)).

DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
From: Lkw1cubs@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:13:04 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Linda Williams

Springfield, IL 62711