alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Službeni list C 57A/17.

| | ISSN 1977-1088 |
| --- | --- |
| Službeni list
  Europske unije | C 57A |
| | |
| Hrvatsko izdanje | Informacije i objave | Svezak 58.17. veljače 2015. |

ISSN 1977-1088

Službeni list

Europske unije

C 57A

Hrvatsko izdanje

Informacije i objave

Svezak 58.17. veljače 2015.

---

| Obavijest br. | Sadržaj | Stranica |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Ispravci |
| 2015/C 057A/01 | Ispravak Obavijesti o otvorenom natječaju EPSO/AST-SC/03/15 – Tajnici/Referenti (SC 1 i SC 2) u sljedećim područjima: 1. Administrativna podrška 2. Financijska podrška 3. Tajnička podrška ( SL C 3 A, 8.1.2015. ) | 1 |

Obavijest br.

Sadržaj

Stranica

Ispravci

2015/C 057A/01

Ispravak Obavijesti o otvorenom natječaju EPSO/AST-SC/03/15 – Tajnici/Referenti (SC 1 i SC 2) u sljedećim područjima: 1. Administrativna podrška 2. Financijska podrška 3. Tajnička podrška ( SL C 3 A, 8.1.2015. )

( SL C 3 A, 8.1.2015. )

1

---

| HR | |
| --- | --- |

HR

---

Ispravci

| 17.2.2015 | HR | Službeni list Europske unije | CA 57/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.2.2015

HR

Službeni list Europske unije

CA 57/1

---

Ispravak Obavijesti o otvorenom natječaju EPSO/AST-SC/03/15 – Tajnici/Referenti (SC 1 i SC 2) u sljedećim područjima: 1. Administrativna podrška 2. Financijska podrška 3. Tajnička podrška

(
  Službeni list Europske unije C 3 A od 8. siječnja 2015.
  )

(2015/C 057 A/01)

Stranica 2., odjeljak I., točka 3.:

| umjesto: | Rok za prijavu (uključujući potvrđivanje prijave): 10. veljače 2015. u 12.00 (podne) prema briselskom vremenu.; |
| --- | --- |

umjesto:

Rok za prijavu (uključujući potvrđivanje prijave): 10. veljače 2015. u 12.00 (podne) prema briselskom vremenu.;

| treba stajati: | Rok za prijavu (uključujući potvrđivanje prijave): 17. veljače 2015. u 12.00 (podne) prema briselskom vremenu. |
| --- | --- |

treba stajati:

Rok za prijavu (uključujući potvrđivanje prijave): 17. veljače 2015. u 12.00 (podne) prema briselskom vremenu.

---
No. 62263.

#### Daniel F. Young, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 317766-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
From: pngmisso@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:05:37 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Martha Dillon

Montague, MI 49437
From: d.zoutendam@att.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:55:49 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

The conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me must be protected. Many will object to

being forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services,

especially when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be

forced by the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the

strongest way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of

mandatory preventive services.

Sincerely,

David Zoutendam

, 75605-4158
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jeffrey Pinckney, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 203]

—Appeal by the defendant from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kriendler, J.), rendered January 18, 1994, convicting him of rape in the first degree and burglary in the second degree, under Indictment No. 9935/92, and imposing sentence, and (2) an amended judgment of the same court, also rendered January 18, 1994, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that he had violated a condition thereof, after a hearing, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of attempted robbery in the third degree under Kings County Indictment No. 10238/89. The appeal under Indictment No. 9935/92 brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment and the amended judgment are affirmed.

We find no merit to the defendant’s contention that the lineup in which he was identified was impermissibly suggestive because he was one of the youngest, shortest, and lightest individuals in the lineup. There is no requirement that a defendant in a lineup be surrounded by people nearly identical to him or her in appearance *(see, People v Brito,*179 AD2d 666). They need only be reasonably similar to the defendant in appearance *(see, People v Stephens,*143 AD2d 692, 694). Here, the height and weight disparities were diminished by the fact that the lineup was conducted with the participants sitting behind a table, which hid the participants’ bodies from the waist down. Furthermore, the age disparities between the defendant and the fillers were not so apparent as to single out the defendant. As there were no appreciable disparities singling out the defendant, we conclude that the lineup was not suggestive *(see, People v Garcia,*215 AD2d 584).

The defendant further contends that a juror who overheard a derogatory remark made by one of his witnesses should have been dismissed. We disagree. The court conducted an inquiry of the juror in the presence of the attorneys and the defendant *(see, People v Buford,*69 NY2d 290) to the satisfaction of both parties and determined that the juror was not grossly unqualified to serve on the jury. The court’s assessment is afforded great weight because of its unique position to observe the juror, *540and we find no basis to disturb the court’s determination *(see, People v Rodriguez,*71 NY2d 214, 219; *People v Ingram,*213 AD2d 723; *People v Martin,*177 AD2d 715, 716). Moreover, the defendant’s subsequent request for the court to conduct an inquiry of the other jurors as to whether they, too, heard the remark was untimely made. Thompson, J. P., Copertino, Hart and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1471 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 22, 2008.
Whereas in May 1958 Jack St. Clair Kilby joined Texas Instruments because it was 
        the only company that would permit him to work full-time on 
        miniaturization of electronics;
Whereas just four months later on September 12, 1958, Jack Kilby demonstrated 
        the first integrated circuit by combining a transistor, several 
        resistors, and a capacitor on a half inch piece of germanium in an 
        attempt to reduce transistor costs;
Whereas Jack Kilby spent his career at Texas Instruments, a productive 
        engineering career that resulted in over 60 patents and seminal 
        inventions, including the electronic calculator;
Whereas Jack Kilby received the National Medal of Science in 1969 and the 
        National Medal of Technology in 1990, and shared the Nobel Prize in 
        Physics in 2000, for his invention of and contributions to the 
        development of the integrated circuit;
Whereas during Kilby's lifetime integrated circuits provided a million fold 
        decrease in the costs of electronics;
Whereas Kilby's achievement revolutionized electronics and permitted it to grow 
        to over $1,500,000,000,000 in annual sales world wide;
Whereas the integrated circuit revolutionized computing and made possible 
        getting a man to the moon and modern space exploration;
Whereas the integrated circuit led to a revolution in communications, 
        transportation, and medical industries; and
Whereas the future will inevitably bring equally far-reaching integrated 
        circuit-based advances in many fields: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes and honors the research and development efforts of 
        Jack Kilby and his contemporaries, who by inventing and perfecting the 
        integrated circuit brought us modern electronics and changed the world; 
        and
            (2) recognizes the importance of continued advancements in 
        electronics to the well-being of America.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
No. 60195.

protest 252921-K (New York).

#### E. Leitz, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of printing boards and that the issue is the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 59555, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Motion GRANTED and Order filed May 25, 2021. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

____________

NO. 14-21-00269-CV

____________

IN RE TOM WRIGHT CONSTRUCTION, LLC D/B/A BUILT WRIGHT 

CONSTRUCTION, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

506th Judicial District Court

Waller County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 17-02-24157

ORDER

On May 14, 2021, relator Tom Wright Construction, LLC d/b/a Built Wright 

Construction, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. Relator challenges 

the Honorable Gary W. Chaney’s, Judge of the 506th Judicial District Court of

Waller County, Texas, May 5, 2021 order granting real party interest’s motion to 
2

compel, entered in trial court number 17-02-24157, styled Bolton Steel Erectors v. 

Tom Wright Construction, LLC d/b/a Built Wright Construction. 

Relator has also filed a motion for temporary stay of proceedings below. See 

Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(b), 52.10. On May 14, 2021, relator asked this court to stay 

proceedings in the trial court pending a decision on the petition for writ of 

mandamus.

It appears from the facts stated in the petition and motion that relator’s request 

for relief requires further consideration and that relator will be prejudiced unless 

immediate temporary relief is granted. We therefore GRANT relator’s motion and 

issue the following order:

We ORDER the May 5, 2021 order granting real party in interest’s motion to 

compel in trial court cause number 17-02-24157, Bolton Steel Erectors v. Tom 

Wright Construction, LLC d/b/a Built Wright Construction, STAYED until a final 

decision by this court on relator’s petition for writ of mandamus, or until further 

order of this court.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Bourliot, Poissant, and Wilson.
No. 58687.

protests 227317-K, etc. (New York).

#### Tanross Supply Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise and issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *John P. Herber & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 193, C. D. 1519). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the cited case, the protests were dismissed, and the matters were remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)).
SERVICER
CERTIFICATION
   I, Steven
R. Lambert, certify that:
  1.           I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form
10-K of Nissan Auto Receivables 2008-B Owner Trust (the “Exchange Act Periodic
Reports”);
  2.           Based
on my knowledge, the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, taken as a whole, do not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;
  3.           Based
on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information
required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is
included in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports;
  4.           I
am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based
on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer
compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB,
and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, the servicer has
fulfilled its obligations under the sale and servicing agreement in all material
respects; and
  5.           All
of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of
compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be
included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and
Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material
instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this
report on Form 10-K.
  In giving
the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me
by the following unaffiliated party:  Deutsche Bank Trust Company
Americas.
  Date:                      June
29, 2009
  By:/s/ Steven R. Lambert
 Steven R.
Lambert
 President and Chief
Executive Officer of
 Nissan Motor
Acceptance Corporation
 (senior officer in
charge of the
 servicing
function)
No. 66034.

#### Weiss & Biheller Merchandise Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 60/8218 and 60/15407 (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of candlesticks similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Mottahedeh Creations, Ltd., et al.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 9, C.D. 2095), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0323

_________________

IN THE MATTER OF:

J.E.S. and K.N.S.,

 Youths in Need of Care.

O R D E R

_________________

Counsel for Appellant Father has filed an Unopposed Motion to Supplement the 

Record and Stay Briefing Schedule in this matter. Counsel provides a list of exhibits that 

the District Court did not include with the record sent to the Clerk of the Supreme Court, 

and asks this Court to order the Clerk of the Glacier County District Court file the exhibits 

with the Supreme Court Clerk’s office by December 7, 2020. Counsel also requests that 

he be given 30 days from date of filing of the exhibits to file his opening brief.

Counsel states in his motion that Appellant Father’s District Court attorney has 

provided him with a copy of the exhibits he is requesting. Moreover, counsel has already 

been given one extension to file his opening brief, currently due November 30, 2020. This 

Court routinely grants only one extension of time in Youth in Need of Care matters.

IT IS ORDERED that on or before November 27, 2020, the Clerk of the Glacier 

County District Court shall file with the Clerk of the Supreme Court the following 

documents:

4-16-20 Motion to Take Judicial Notice with Exhibits

4-16-20 Exhibit A Police Report

4-16-20 Exhibit B Cascade County Adult Detention Facility Remand Report

4-16-20 Exhibit C Deferred Prosecution Agreement

4-16-20 Exhibit D Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice

4-16-20 Exhibit E Order Dismissing Without Prejudice

11/16/2020
2

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Father’s opening brief is due on or before 

December 14, 2020. No further extensions will be granted.

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to the Clerk of the Glacier 

County District Court, and to all counsel of record.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 16 2020
From: Nizich, Sharon [mailto:Nizich.Sharon@epa.gov]

Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 12:56 PM

To: Susan Miller <SMiller@bia.org>; Raymond, Gabrielle <graymond@rti.org>

Cc: Sroka, Kristin <ksroka@rti.org>; Holloway, Thomas C. (Tom) <tcholloway@rti.org>

Subject: RE: Questions about PM data

Yes that is correct.

Sharon Nizich

US EPA

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Sector Policies and Programs Division/SPPD

RTP NC 27711

(919) 541 2825

From: Susan Miller [mailto:SMiller@bia.org]

Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 9:17 AM

To: Raymond, Gabrielle

Cc: Nizich, Sharon; Sroka, Kristin; Holloway, Thomas C. (Tom)

Subject: RE: Questions about PM data

And that is compliance as well, yes?

Susan Miller

919 380-2191

smiller@bia.org

When you talk, you are only repeating what you already know; but when you listen, you may learn 

something new. 

-Dalai Lama

From: Raymond, Gabrielle [mailto:graymond@rti.org]

Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2015 9:16 AM

To: Susan Miller

Cc: Nizich, Sharon (Nizich.Sharon@epa.gov); Sroka, Kristin; Holloway, Thomas C. (Tom)

Subject: RE: Questions about PM data

The data used to calculate the PM MACT floor was based on the filterable front-half only.

Gabrielle Raymond
RTI International

3040 Cornwallis Road

P.O. Box 12194

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709

Phone: (919) 541-7015

From: Susan Miller [mailto:SMiller@bia.org]

Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 11:57 AM

To: Raymond, Gabrielle

Cc: Nizich, Sharon (Nizich.Sharon@epa.gov)

Subject: Questions about PM data

As I recall, the compliance for PM for the 2003 rule was front-half only, and the words in this rule 

appear to be the same. But- I cannot see that it says filterable anywhere except where it mentions 

measuring the one filter. Is that sufficient wording to make it front half only? Is that still what is 

intended? This is proving to be a VERY difficult number for most of our small businesses, so I 

want to be sure I am advising them correctly. Thanks in advance for your help understanding this.

susan

Susan Miller

919 380-2191

smiller@bia.org

When you talk, you are only repeating what you already know; but when you listen, you may learn 

something new. 

-Dalai Lama
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE PLAINTIFF’S REPLY BRIEF- [C05-

1609JCC] - 1 

 

Elie Halpern & Associates, P.S. 

1800 Cooper Point Road SW, Bldg. 19 

Olympia, WA 98502 

(360) 753-8055 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

United States Magistrate Judge Mary Alice Theiler 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

GLENN RITZMA, ) 

 ) CIVIL NO. C05-1609JCC 

) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

vs. ) 

 ) ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, ) FILE PLAINTIFF’S REPLY BRIEF 

Commissioner of Social Security, ) 

 ) 

 Defendant. ) 

Based on Plaintiff’s Stipulation for Extension of Time and the agreement of the 

parties, it is now, hereby, 

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Reply Brief shall be filed on or before March 7, 2006. 

DATED this 15th day of February, 2006. 

s/ Mary Alice Theiler 

United States Magistrate Judge 

Presented by: 

S/Amy Gilbrough_________ 

Amy Gilbrough 

Attorney for Plaintiff

Case 2:05-cv-01609-JCC Document 19 Filed 02/15/06 Page 1 of 2
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO FILE PLAINTIFF’S BRIEF- [«F494»] - 1 

 

Elie Halpern & Associates, P.S. 

1800 Cooper Point Road SW, Bldg. 19 

Olympia, WA 98502 

(360) 753-8055 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

Case 2:05-cv-01609-JCC Document 19 Filed 02/15/06 Page 2 of 2