alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

EMANUEL ROBERT DAVIS,

Plaintiff,

v.

DAVID DELUCA,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C05-1730-RSM-MAT

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS

This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff’s motion to stay these proceedings. The

Court, having reviewed plaintiff’s motion, and the balance of the record, does hereby find and

ORDER:

(1) Plaintiff’s motion to stay these proceedings (Dkt. No. 11) is DENIED. Plaintiff,

by way of the instant motion, seeks to stay these proceedings until he is able to secure counsel to

represent him in this matter. Plaintiff does not indicate whether he has yet made any attempts to

secure counsel nor does he indicate how long he believes this process might take. This Court will

not grant an indefinite stay. If plaintiff does not believe he is prepared to proceed with this matter

at the present time, he may seek a voluntary dismissal of this action under Rule 41(a) of the

Case 2:05-cv-01730-RSM-MAT Document 12 Filed 12/08/05 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS

PAGE -2

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

DATED this 8th day of December , 2005.

A

Mary Alice Theiler

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:05-cv-01730-RSM-MAT Document 12 Filed 12/08/05 Page 2 of 2
No. 63788.

protests 10559-K, etc. (New York).

#### Empire Liquor Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 66517.

#### Saks Fifth Avenue *v.*United States,

protest 259700-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of nylon knit wearing apparel similar in use to silk knit wear*358ing apparel and following *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
---

ENB
FINANCIAL CORP








Exhibit
23

















CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








We
consent to the incorporation by reference in this 2009 Annual Report on Form
10-K of ENB Financial Corp, in the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form
S-8, related to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, filed with the Security and
Exchange Commission on July 9, 2008, and in the Registrant’s Registration
Statement on Form S-3, related to the Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase
Plan, filed with the Security and Exchange Commission (Registration No.
333-152211), on our report dated March 24, 2010, which is included in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31,
2009.








/s/S.R.
Snodgrass, A.C.








Wexford,
Pennsylvania


March 24,
2010







107
Case 2:05-cv-01849-JLR Document 79 Filed 10/10/07 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:05-cv-01849-JLR Document 79 Filed 10/10/07 Page 2 of 2
No. 64523.

#### Arthur J. Humphreys *v.*United States,

protest 321176-K (Seattle).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of liquefied petroleum gas similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Arthur J. Humphreys*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 103, C.D. 2112), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA - 2012 - 0270 Directorate Identifier: 2011NM113AD

SBCN SBF50 - 24 - 032, R01 --- 3/22/11 SBCN SBF100 - 24 - 043, R01 --- 3/22/11

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
H. Res. 599 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

August 2, 2007. 

Resolved, That during further consideration of the bill 

(H.R. 3161) making appropriations for Agriculture, Rural 

Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related 

Agencies programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 

2008, and for other purposes, the bill shall be considered as 

read. No further debate on any pending amendment shall be 

in order. A further period of general debate shall be confined 

to the bill and shall not exceed 30 minutes equally divided 

and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member 

of the Committee on Appropriations. The amendments printed in part A of the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be considered as adopted in the 

House and in the Committee of the Whole. Notwithstanding 

clause 11 of rule XVIII, no further amendment shall be in 

order except those printed in part B of the report of the 

Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each such 

amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the 

report, may be offered only by a Member designated in the 
2 

•HRES 599 EH 

report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the 

time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by 

the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to 

amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division 

of the question in the House or in the Committee of the 

Whole. All points of order against such amendments are 

waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. 

At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment 

the Committee shall rise and report the bill, as amended, to 

the House with such further amendments as may have been 

adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered 

on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without 

intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or 

without instructions. 

SEC. 2. After a motion that the Committee rise has been 

rejected on a legislative day, the Chair may entertain another 

such motion on that day only if offered by the chairman of 

the Committee on Appropriations or the Majority Leader or 

designee. After a motion to strike out the enacting words of 

the bill (as described in clause 9 of rule XVIII) has been re-
3 

•HRES 599 EH 

jected, the Chair may not entertain another such motion during further consideration of the bill. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order Continuing Trial

Williams/CR05-417RSM –1 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

601 UNION STREET, SUITE 5100

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101-3903

(206) 553-7970

Judge Ricardo S. Martinez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

) NO. CR05-417RSM

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

JUSTIN BRICE WILLIAMS, ) ORDER CONTINUING

) TRIAL DATE

)

Defendant. )

 ______________________________________)

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on a stipulated motion of the government

and defendant JUSTIN BRICE WILLIAMS to continue the trial date. Having considered

the entirety of the record and files herein, the Court finds that failure to grant a

continuance would likely result in a miscarriage of justice. The case is complex, and

counsel for defendant WILLIAMS is out of the country for three weeks, returning on the

day of trial, May 8, 2006. This extended absence would prohibit defense counsel from

being adequately prepared for trial on May 8, 2006. 

IT IS NOW, THEREFORE, ORDERED that trial of defendant JUSTIN BRICE

WILLIAMS be continued from May 8, 2006 to June 26, 2006, and that the time between

the date of this Order and the new trial date be excludable time under the Speedy

Case 2:05-cr-00417-RSM Document 222 Filed 05/04/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order Continuing Trial

Williams/CR05-417RSM –2 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

601 UNION STREET, SUITE 5100

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101-3903

(206) 553-7970

Trial Act pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Sections 3161(h)(8)(A),

3161(h)(8)(B)(i), and 3161(h)(8)(B)(ii). 

 Dated this 4th day of May, 2006

A

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Presented by:

s/Douglas B. Whalley 

DOUGLAS B. WHALLEY

Assistant United States Attorney

United States Attorney's Office 

601 Union Street, Suite 5100 

Seattle, WA 98101-3903

(206) 553-4882, Fax: (206) 553-4440

E-mail: douglas.whalley@usdoj.gov

Washington State Bar #4625

s/ Lisca Borichewski 

LISCA BORICHEWSKI

Assistant United States Attorney

(206) 553-2266, Fax: (206) 553-4440

E-mail: lisca.borichewski@usdoj.gov

Washington State Bar #24300

Case 2:05-cr-00417-RSM Document 222 Filed 05/04/06 Page 2 of 2
Swanson, Brian (OST) 

From: 

Sent~ 

To: 

Subject: 

re Air service to Visalia California 

Jim and Sue Fouch <jdf@sti.net> 

Sunday, July 29, 2012 6:35 PM 

Swanson, Brian (OST) 

DOT -OST-2004-19916 

. Please continue necessary air service this small community . 

. Our preferred carrier is Great Lakes Airline_s, the current carrier. 

This service has proved very valuable to our family! Your help/support is appreciated. 

Susan Fouch 

50584 Deer Run Trail 

Oakhurst, CA 93644 

1 

..
Exhibit 32.2








Credex Corporation


Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350


Section 906 Certifications





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as enacted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Public Law 107-204), the undersigned, Arunkumar Rajapandy, the Chief Financial Officer of Credex Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that:





1.     The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





This Certification is signed on April 19, 2012.





Credex Corporation





By: __/S/ Arunkumar Rajapandy_


Arunkumar Rajapandy,


Chief Financial Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Credex Corporation and will be retained by Credex Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
I, Brent Kopenhaver, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Pure Earth, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) **[intentionally omitted]**for theregistrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 (b) **[Intentionally omitted]**
 (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and;
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 30, 2009
By:**/**s/ Brent Kopenhaver
Stephen G. Braun



### John W. bit, P.E. Manager, Fuels and Transportation 

# NationalRuralElectric CooperativeAssociation 4301 Wilson Blvd. EPI 1-255 Arlington, VA 22203-1860 Telephone: 703/907-5805 Fax: 703/907-5517 Internet: jwhl @nreca.org

4— 

# _II AIR-CONDmONJNG & REFRIGERATION INSTITUTE LawrenceR. Wethje, PE. DfrectorofPublic Fblicy & Technical Services 4301 North Fairfax Drive Suite425 Mington, Virginia 22203 lirector, Technical Services 

# NAIMA

NORTH AMERICAN INSULATION MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION

44 CANAL CENTER PLAZA • SUITE 310 • ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314 TELl 703f684-0084 • FAX 703/654-0427 

# [EM MANUFACTURERS 

# 1 PLUMBING INSTITUTE ROBERTCURRY Director, Government Affairs 1825 I Street, NW, Suite 400 (202) 429-2038 Fax (202) 775-4191 

# J Washington, DC. 20006



## Jason Glazer Principal Engineer 847 698 5686 

### fax: 847 698 5600 

### jglazer@gard.com 

# GARD

# Analyticsl Eneçgy, Economic and EnWronnientai Research 1028 Busse Highway ParkRidge Illinois 60068-1802 USA

(703) 524-8800 ext. 318 FAX: (703)528-3816

# ENERGY CODE FOR NEW FEDERAL COMMERCIALAND MULTI-FAMILY HIGH RISE RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS; PROPOSED RULE SEPTEMBER4, 1996
NAME AFFILIATION ADDRESS 

# Pe’v 

# ve. 

# O ooo TELEPHONE 

# (*5OOO FAX NO. 

# OOS 

# ;3 E-MAIL ADDRESS: 

# QYMLP c

# c ei 0
| Skip to Content*Release Date: September 20, 2012*Release dates |  Announcements |   Coded tables |  Historical dataCurrent release |  Screen reader |  PDF (450 KB) |  Data Download Program (DDP)**F.10 Derivation of Measures of Personal Saving 1** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 586 

Congratulating East High School of Denver, Colorado, on winning the 2007 

‘‘We the People: The Citizen and the Constitution’’ national competition. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 30, 2007 

Ms. DEGETTE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating East High School of Denver, Colorado, on 

winning the 2007 ‘‘We the People: The Citizen and the 

Constitution’’ national competition. 

Whereas in order to preserve our democracy, it is important 

that an in-depth understanding of the documents upon 

which our country was founded is passed on from generation to generation; 

Whereas students in the ‘‘We the People’’ competition demonstrate their understanding of the Constitution and the 

Bill of Rights and the documents’ contemporary significance by participating in simulated congressional hearings; 

Whereas the ‘‘We the People’’ competition, founded in 1987 

on the bicentennial of the adoption of the Constitution, 

celebrated its 20th consecutive year in 2007; 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HRES 586 IH 

Whereas in the 20 years of competition, East High School 

has gone to the ‘‘We the People’’ national finals 18 

times, placed in the top-ten fifteen times, placed in the 

top-three seven times, and placed in the top-two three 

times; 

Whereas on April 30, 2007, East High School placed first in 

the national ‘‘We the People: The Citizen and the Constitution’’ competition for the second time in the school’s 

history, the last time being in 1992; and 

Whereas the 28 team members exhibited an extraordinary 

grasp of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) congratulates the East High School team on 

3 winning the 2007 ‘‘We the People: The Citizen and 

4 the Constitution’’ competition; 

5 (2) recognizes the academic accomplishments of 

6 Dan Aschkinaski, Rachel Banks, Catilin Bell, Tyler 

7 Castle, Tessa Caudle, Carlo Davis, Emery Donovan, 

8 Mats Engdahl, Charlie Fine, Rye Finegan, Mac9 kenzie Gilchrist, Catie Gilwa, Morgan Hall, Tim 

10 Hambidge, Taylor Jones, Sam Keene, Tucker 

11 Larson, Marissa Latta, Sean McCarthy, Brian 

12 McQuinn, Alexa Morrill, Michelle Murphy, Kaitlyn 

13 Randol, Manon Scales, Katrina Sondermann, Matt 

14 Valeta, Max Visti-Hanka, and Davis Wert; 

15 (3) recognizes the guidance and commitment of 

16 coach Susan McHugh; 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
3 

•HRES 586 IH 

1 (4) recognizes the work of Loyal Darr, ‘‘We the 

2 People’’ coordinator for Colorado’s First District; 

3 and 

4 (5) directs the Clerk of the House of Represent5 atives to transmit a copy of this resolution to Denver 

6 School District Superintendent Michael Bennet and 

7 coach Susan McHugh for appropriate display. 

Æ 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
From: bev@johnliseepumps.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:02:42 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Bev Lisee

Bell Gardens, CA 90202
From: drumnjake@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:02:58 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jacob Newkirk

Lebec, CA 93243