alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0000874690
<NAME> SUN TELEVISION AND APPLIANCES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-27-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,345<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    109,950
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               126,520
<PP&E>                                          75,483
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 225,913<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           65,527
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           174
<OTHER-SE>                                      64,079
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   225,913
<SALES>                                        109,531
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               109,531
<CGS>                                           82,672
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   82,672
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                34,996
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,780
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,917)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,917)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.63)
<FN>
<F1>Trade accounts receivable net allowance for doubtful accounts of $475.
<F2>Includes assets held for sale of $4,629 and other noncurrent assets of 
$5,344.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION 

FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

MARIA DEL TORO-CHACON,

Petitioner,

v.

MICHAEL CHERTOFF, et al.,

Respondents. __________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C05-1861RSL-MJB

ORDER GRANTING

PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

The Court, having reviewed the habeas corpus petition, the motion for

preliminary injunction, the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Monica J.

Benton, United States Magistrate Judge, and any objections or responses thereto, and

the remaining record, finds and Orders as follows:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) The motion for preliminary injunction (Dkt. #2) is GRANTED;

(3) This matter is REMANDED to the Seattle Immigration Court for the

purpose of providing petitioner with an individualized bond hearing within 10 days of

the date of this Order. The Immigration Judge is to determine whether and under what

conditions petitioner may be released from custody pending petitioner’s Petition for

Review in the Ninth Circuit; 

(4) If bond is set by the Immigration Judge, respondents shall promptly

release petitioner upon tender of the bond amount; 

(5) Having hereby granted the alternative relief sought by petitioner in her

Case 2:05-cv-01861-RSL Document 16 Filed 05/08/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S MOTION 

FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

PAGE -2

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in

this matter.

(6) The Clerk shall send a copy of this Order to all counsel of record and to

the Honorable Monica J. Benton.

DATED this 5th day of May, 2006.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-01861-RSL Document 16 Filed 05/08/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 66046.

#### Amity Fabrics, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 59/23148, 59/25311, and 59/28926 (NewYork).

*307Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of waterproof cotton cloth similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *D. H. Grant & Co., Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 20, C.A.D. 723), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Agenda Air Quality Team

June 2 1,2005

Comment Cards Re-Confirm MeetingRoom Dist. 4 -- 

### De Sign for MeetingRoom Directions to Dist 4 

# -- 11- 

## (5'gns Stephanie (food) Set -Up How are we going to do it Badges Dress (fairly formal) Flip charts, pens DEQ Booth Display (Darrell)

9 TIP DOCUMENTS FOR HEARING:
TSDs for display table Clean hr for Good Health (Post docs in booth) Break out Ordinances with summaries (Post in booth) Video Player-Video cassettes Power Point Pres. (Run through Pres., Revise open burning) Lap Tops for Comments Extension Cords
9 WORK SESSION (6-24-05 11:OO TILL DONE) "otify Colleen and Doug Power Point (complete revisions of short version) One of everything from Hearing Contact Council Ke to ensureeveryone has received Books and notification ofmeeting Work Session Agenda:
11:00

## - Overview of TIP Ordinances (Open Burning)(Fugitive Dust) Break for Lunch Return and finish Up
No. 62247.

#### Trans World Shipping Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 318475-K (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

The protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required
to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Principal
Life Income Fundings Trust 2008-048 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, do
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information
required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is
included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;4.
    
    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this
report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act
periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing
agreement(s) in all material respects; and5.
    
    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of
compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included
in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.
   /s/ Dwight N. Soethout

Dwight N. SoethoutVice President  Principal Life Insurance Company
From: marissa.mantey@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:31:04 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Marissa Mantey

Dryden, MI 48428
From: myersmaryann69@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:05:04 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mary Myers

Lincoln, NE 68510
### HUNTSMAN CORPORATION HUNGARY

ANALYTICAL LABORATORY

SANITIZED



### UV/VIS REPORT
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BOX ENERGY
CORPORATION'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000874992
<NAME> BOX ENERGY CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,675
<SECURITIES>                                    30,592
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,732
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                48,102
<PP&E>                                         199,829
<DEPRECIATION>                                 128,520
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 134,835
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,123
<BONDS>                                         55,077
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        20,803
<OTHER-SE>                                      51,832
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   134,835
<SALES>                                         31,939
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,194
<CGS>                                           23,892
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   29,673
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,451
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,070
<INCOME-TAX>                                       725
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,345
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,345
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>
Case 3:05-cv-05653-RJB Document 33 Filed 06/03/08 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

ORDER - 1 Law Offices of

Suzanne Lee Elliott

1300 Hoge Building

705 Second Avenue

Seattle, Washington 98104-1705

206.623.0291

FAX 206.623.2186

Judge James L. Robart

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff,

V.

CALVIN J. BROWN,

 Defendant.

No. CR05-0395 JLR

ORDER CONTINUING TIME FOR

TRIAL

Noted for: December 22, 2005

In view of the stipulation of the parties, the Court hereby makes the following

findings:

1. The Court finds that a failure to grant the continuance would deny counsel

reasonable time for effective preparation by due diligence under the provisions of

the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, Federal Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C.

§ 3161 et seq., and the Plan for the Prompt Disposition of Criminal Cases

promulgated by the United States District Court for the Western District of

Washington pursuant to the Federal Speedy Trial Act.

2. The Court further finds that the ends of justice will be served by ordering a

continuance in this case, that a continuance is necessary to insure effective trial

preparation, and that these factors outweigh the best interests of the public in a

speedy trial under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A).

Case 2:05-cr-00395-JLR Document 17 Filed 12/22/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

ORDER - 2 Law Offices of

Suzanne Lee Elliott

1300 Hoge Building

705 Second Avenue

Seattle, Washington 98104-1705

206.623.0291

FAX 206.623.2186

3. The court further finds that on December 19, 2005, Mr. Brown filed a waiver of his

right to a speedy trial.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the trial in this matter is continued to

February 27, 2006. 

Dated this 22nd day of December, 2005.

A

JAMES L. ROBART

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cr-00395-JLR Document 17 Filed 12/22/05 Page 2 of 2
EX-35.4
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Structured Asset Securities Corporation
745 Seventh Avenue
13th Floor
New York, NY 10019

RE: Annual Statement as to Compliance

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells
Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows for the calendar year 2008:

(a) a review of Wells Fargo's activities as Trustee under the servicing
agreement(s) listed on Schedule A hereto (the "Servicing Agreement(s)") has been
made under my supervision; and

(b) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review Wells Fargo has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material respects
throughout the reporting period.

February 24, 2009

/s/ Scott Runkles

SCOTT RUNKLES
Vice President


(page)


(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

To: Structured Asset Securities Corporation

Schedule A

List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series

1 Trust Agreement for Lehman Mortgage Trust Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
  Series 2008-3, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee.

2 Trust Agreement for Lehman Mortgage Trust Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
  Series 2008-4, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee.
From: vikingblue@netscape.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:57:22 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Vincent Bowers

, 34477-1153
Case 2:05-cr-00416-RSL Document 15 Filed 12/15/05 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:05-cr-00416-RSL Document 15 Filed 12/15/05 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:05-cr-00416-RSL Document 15 Filed 12/15/05 Page 3 of 3
From: asanchezpr04@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:11:35 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

WHO CAN BE SO STUPID AS TO THINK THAT CONTRACEPTIVES WILL NOT BE PAID BY THE TAXPAYER

UNDER THIS SHAM THAT OBAMACARE IS! NOT THE CITIZENS, WE KNOW WHO WILL WIND UP

PAYING, AND THE LIES OF THIS ADMINISTRATION WILL BE ITS DEPEAT! ! !

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

AUREA SANCHEZ

Princeton, TX 75407
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 187 (Thursday, September 28, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 66843]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21554]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Tuesday, October 3, 2023 at 10:30 a.m. and its 
continuation at the conclusion of the open meeting on October 5, 2023.

PLACE: 1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC and virtual (this meeting 
will be a hybrid meeting.)

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Compliance matters pursuant to 52 U.S.C. 
30109.
    Information the premature disclosure of which would be likely to 
have a considerable adverse effect on the implementation of a proposed 
Commission action.
    Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or 
arbitration.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: This meeting will be cancelled if the 
Commission is not open due to a funding lapse.
* * * * *

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

(Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b)

Laura E. Sinram,
Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2023-21554 Filed 9-26-23; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P