alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 ORDER

Page - 1

HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

EFFIE LIGON, as Manager of IBIS GROUP,

 Petitioner,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL

REVENUE, PAUL R. SHIPLEY #91-02526,

Revenue Agent, Approving Officer/Group

Manager,

Respondents.

Case No. C05-5597 RBL

ORDER GRANTING UNITED STATES’

MOTION TO DISMISS

THIS MATTER comes on before the above-entitled Court upon the United States’ Motion to Dismiss.

Having considered the entirety of the records and file herein, the Court rules as follows:

The United States filed the instant Motion to Dismiss on November 7, 2005. Pursuant to Local Rule

W.D. Wash CR7(d)(3) the motion was noted for December 2, 2005; therefore, petitioner’s response to the

motion was due on November 28, 2005. Petitioner has failed to file any response to the motion. Pursuant to

Local Rule W.D. Wash. CR 7(b)(2), this Court will consider petitioner’s failure to file an opposition as an

admission that the motion has merit. Furthermore, upon review of the motion, the Court finds that it is welltaken. This Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction over this action. See 26 U.S.C. § 7609.

Therefore, it is hereby 

Case 3:05-cv-05597-RBL Document 7 Filed 12/09/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 ORDER

Page - 2

ORDERED that the United States’ Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. #5] is GRANTED. 

The Clerk shall send uncertified copies of this order to all counsel of record, and to any party appearing

pro se.

Dated this 9th day of December, 2005.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-05597-RBL Document 7 Filed 12/09/05 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit






Exhibit 4.1




PROSPER MARKETPLACE, INC.
AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO 2015 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN


This Amendment No. 3 (this “Amendment”) to the Prosper Marketplace, Inc. 2015 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is made effective as of January 23, 2018.  Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Plan.
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 14 of the Plan, the Company desires to adjust the maximum aggregate number of Shares that may be issued pursuant to all Awards under the Plan from 35,996,488 Shares to 66,711,395 Shares, plus that number of Shares returned to the Plan as a result of the forfeiture, cancellation or expiration of Prior Awards pursuant to the terms of Section 3(b) hereof.
WHEREAS, this Amendment has received the requisite approval of the Company’s Board of Directors and stockholders.  
NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:
1.  Section 3(a) of the Plan is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:
“3(a).    Reserved Shares. Subject to the provisions of Sections 11 and 12, below, (i) the maximum aggregate number of Shares which may be issued pursuant to all Awards is 66,711,395 Shares plus that number of Shares returned to the Plan as a result of the forfeiture, cancellation or expiration of Prior Awards pursuant to the terms of Section 3(b), and (ii) the maximum aggregate number of Shares which may be issued pursuant to Incentive Stock Options is 66,711,395 Shares plus that number of Shares returned to the Plan as a result of the forfeiture, cancellation or expiration of Prior Awards pursuant to the terms of Section 3(b) (which, together with the 66,711,395 Shares, in no event shall exceed 166,778,488 Shares).  The Shares may be authorized, but unissued, or reacquired Common Stock.”
2.  Except as specifically amended hereby, the Plan shall continue in full force and effect and is hereby ratified and affirmed.


[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank]





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No. 3 to 2015 Equity Incentive Plan has been executed as of the date first set forth above.
PROSPER MARKETPLACE, INC. 
 

By:    /s/ David Kimball         
       David Kimball
       Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 361 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         June 25, 2007.
Whereas Jack Valenti was born in Houston, Texas, on September 5, 1921, and 
        resided in Washington, DC and Beverly Hills, California;
Whereas Jack Valenti graduated from the University of Houston with a Bachelor of 
        Arts degree and from Harvard University with a Master of Business 
        Administration degree;
Whereas Jack Valenti served as special assistant to President Lyndon B. Johnson;
Whereas Jack Valenti was the distinguished president of the Motion Picture 
        Association of America for 38 years;
Whereas Jack Valenti was a trusted presidential advisor, a war hero, an author, 
        and a pioneer in the American film industry;
Whereas Jack Valenti was a great humanitarian who served as a powerful 
        spokesperson for the global fight against AIDS, tuberculosis, and 
        malaria;
Whereas Jack Valenti was a loving husband to his wife, Mary Margaret, and an 
        exceptional father to his three children, Alexandra, John, and 
        Courtenay;
Whereas Jack Valenti's spirit touched everyone he encountered, whether in his 
        political career or in his time spent with the Motion Picture 
        Association of America;
Whereas Jack Valenti revolutionized the movie industry through the creation of a 
        voluntary movie rating system that has endured to this day;
Whereas Jack Valenti's vision for the movie industry has withstood the test of 
        time, and has provided guidance for families in their movie viewing 
        experiences as well as safeguards for our filmmakers;
Whereas the vision and character Jack Valenti brought to the movie industry will 
        be greatly missed; and
Whereas on April 26, 2007, Jack Valenti passed away, prompting his friend and 
        confidant, Dan Glickman, to say, ``Jack was a showman, a gentleman, an 
        orator, and a passionate champion of this country, its movies, and the 
        enduring freedoms that made both so important to this world. He also 
        embodied the theatricality of our industry with his conviction, quick 
        wit and boundless energy. In a very real sense, he was the ultimate 
        leading man.'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes Jack Valenti as one of the greatest contributors to 
        the motion picture industry;
            (2) honors Jack Valenti for his service to his country, for his 
        tremendous accomplishments, and for his contributions to the movie 
        industry and to the Nation; and
            (3) extends its deepest condolences to the family of Jack Valenti.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
From: ivaheart13@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:16:41 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course, I ask that you expand conscience protections

for any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections.

I strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I would ask that you reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Iva Hartwell

Waldron, IN 46182
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

RONALD AND DEBORAH KEAL,

Plaintiffs,

v.

STATE OF WASHINGTON et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5737RJB

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT

THE RECORD

This Civil Rights action has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge

pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The plaintiffs are proceeding in forma pauperis. (Dkt. #

4). Before the court is plaintiff’s motion to supplement a response in opposition to a motion to

dismiss. (Dkt. # 159). Prior to this motion being ripe for review a Report and Recommendation

granting in part and denying in part the motion to dismiss was entered. Accordingly the motion to

supplement the record is DENIED.

The local rules allow for the filing of a motion, a response, and a reply. The filing of

additional pleadings is prejudicial to the opposing party as the ability to address the supplemental

pleadings does not exist under the local rules.

The clerk is directed to send a copy of this order to plaintiff and counsel for defendants.

DATED this 13th day of September, 2006.

/S/ J. Kelley Arnold

J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-05737-RJB-JKA Document 168 Filed 09/13/06 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5                                        
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAY-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   NOV-29-1997
<CASH>                                         4,416
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,288
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    52,075
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               63,577
<PP&E>                                         39,147
<DEPRECIATION>                                 16,483
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 89,403
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          33,359
<BONDS>                                        5,281
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       85
<OTHER-SE>                                     48,873
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   89,320
<SALES>                                        41,404
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               41,404
<CGS>                                          23,710
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  23,710
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               17,306
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             796
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (408)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (82)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (326)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (326)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.04)
        


</TABLE>
PUBLIC LAW 114–157—MAY 20, 2016 130 STAT. 393 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4238: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016): 

Feb. 29, considered and passed House. 

May 9, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 114–157 

114th Congress 

An Act 

To amend the Department of Energy Organization Act and the Local Public Works 

Capital Development and Investment Act of 1976 to modernize terms relating 

to minorities. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. MODERNIZATION OF TERMS RELATING TO MINORITIES. 

(a) OFFICE OF MINORITY ECONOMIC IMPACT.—Section 211(f)(1) 

of the Department of Energy Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7141(f)(1)) 

is amended by striking ‘‘a Negro, Puerto Rican, American Indian, 

Eskimo, Oriental, or Aleut or is a Spanish speaking individual 

of Spanish descent’’ and inserting ‘‘Asian American, Native 

Hawaiian, a Pacific Islander, African American, Hispanic, Puerto 

Rican, Native American, or an Alaska Native’’. 

(b) MINORITY BUSINESS ENTERPRISES.—Section 106(f)(2) of the 

Local Public Works Capital Development and Investment Act of 

1976 (42 U.S.C. 6705(f)(2)) is amended by striking ‘‘Negroes, 

Spanish-speaking, Orientals, Indians, Eskimos, and Aleuts’’ and 

inserting ‘‘Asian American, Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islanders, African American, Hispanic, Native American, or Alaska Natives’’. 

Approved May 20, 2016. 

May 20, 2016 

[H.R. 4238] 


kgrant on DSKB33CYQ1 with PUBLAW
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 23, 2013

NO. 03-13-00514-CR

Craig Rainey Walker, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF COMAL COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, ROSE AND GOODWIN

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE ROSE

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the written motion of the appellant to dismiss the appeal and 

the same being considered, it is the opinion of this Court that the same should be granted. IT IS 

THEREFORE ORDERED that the appellant be allowed to withdraw his notice of appeal and 

that the appeal be dismissed; that the appellant pay all costs relating to this appeal; and that this 

decision be certified below for observance.
From: kbos20@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:59:47 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kimberly Bos

Schererville, IN 46375
IV 

House Calendar No. 104 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 613 

[Report No. 110–298] 

Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 3, 2007 

Mr. MCGOVERN, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules. 

1 Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time on 

2 the legislative day of Saturday, August 4, 2007, for the 

3 Speaker to entertain motions that the House suspend the 

4 rules relating to the following measures: 

5 (1) A bill to authorize additional funds for emergency 

6 repairs and reconstruction of the Interstate I–35 bridge 

7 located in Minneapolis, Minnesota, that collapsed on Au8 gust 1, 2007, to waive the $100,000,000 limitation on 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

HRES 613 RH 

1 emergency relief funds for those emergency repairs and 

2 reconstruction, and for other purposes. 

3 (2) A bill to amend the Foreign Intelligence Surveil4 lance Act of 1978 to establish a procedure for authorizing 

5 certain electronic surveillance. 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS

bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 104 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 613 

[Report No. 110

–298] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of motions to suspend 

the rules. 

AUGUST 3, 2007 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
Before the First Division,

March 8, 1962

No. 66535.

#### Magnus Mabee & Reynard, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 319955-K, 323501-K, and 325122-K (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issue herein is the same as that involved in *United States*v. *Dodge & Olcott, Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 100, C.A.D. 737), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: liabussell@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:06:32 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Lia Bussell

San Diego, CA 92120
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 645 

Expressing the gratitude and appreciation of the House of Representatives 

to the professionalism and dedication of the United States Capitol Police. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 10, 2007 

Mr. MARIO DIAZ-BALART of Florida (for himself and Mr. MCHENRY) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the gratitude and appreciation of the House of 

Representatives to the professionalism and dedication of 

the United States Capitol Police. 

Whereas the United States Capitol Police force consists of 

over 1,500 officers who are dedicated to the protection 

and security of the Capitol Complex and its employees 

and visitors; 

Whereas the United States Capitol Police continually sacrifice 

to provide safety and security to the Members, staff, and 

nearly 3 million visitors each year to the Capitol Complex; 

Whereas while the United States Capitol Police endure physical and verbal assaults in some extreme cases, the offiVerDate Aug 31 2005 02:56 Sep 11, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR645.IH HR645

bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 645 IH 

cers continue to provide courteous, responsible, and diligent services in an unbiased and nonpartisan manner; 

Whereas the United States Capitol Police face many threats 

to their safety and must remain constantly alert for suspicious actions or for failure to respond to requests and 

instructions; 

Whereas the United States Capitol Police, as the first line of 

the defense of the Capitol, has shared in the ultimate 

sacrifice in law enforcement; 

Whereas the United States Capitol Police are on the front 

lines of the War on Terrorism and remain on constant 

alert against unauthorized access to Capitol buildings, 

terrorism, and other threats to the Capitol Complex; 

Whereas Capitol Police officers stationed throughout the Capitol Complex act in a professional manner and treat 

Members, staff, and visitors with dignity and respect; 

Whereas the United States Capitol Police consistently apply 

security and safety measures to all, including Members of 

Congress; and 

Whereas the United States Capitol Police is one of the best 

trained, most highly respected law enforcement agencies 

in the United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) expresses its gratitude and appreciation for 

3 the professional manner in which the United States 

4 Capitol Police carry out their diverse missions; 

5 (2) expresses appreciation for the dedication 

6 United States Capitol Police officers have for pro7 tecting the Capitol Complex; and 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 645 IH 

1 (3) commends the United States Capitol Police 

2 for their continued courage and professionalism in 

3 protecting the Capitol Complex and its employees 

4 and visitors. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS