alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: runwjoy@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:36:34 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Irina Kandratieff

Oregon City, OR 97045
#### Erik MARCELENO, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Anthony LAMARQUE, Warden, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 04-56377.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued & Submitted Aug. 1, 2005.

Decided Aug. 15, 2005.

Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Erik Marceleno appeals the district court’s denial of his habeas petition brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We are precluded from granting relief unless the state court’s decision was “contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States” or “was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d).

The state court did not determine facts unreasonably in ruling: (1) that Marceleno failed to establish that the juror’s answers in his jury questionnaire or on voir dire *673were false or concealed a bias, and (2) that the juror’s statements during deliberations were not inconsistent with his previous representations. *See Dyer v. Calderon,*151 F.3d 970, 973 (9th Cir.1998) (en banc) (stating standard to prevail on a juror bias claim). Nor were those rulings contrary to, or an unreasonable application of, Supreme Court precedent.

The state court also did not contravene or unreasonably apply Supreme Court precedent, or determine facts unreasonably, in holding that the juror’s personal opinion or speculation concerning the gang members’ probation status did not constitute misconduct or the impermissible introduction of extrinsic evidence into deliberations. *See United States v. Navarro-Garcia,*926 F.2d 818, 821-22 (9th Cir.1991) (discussing what constitutes extrinsic evidence in jury deliberations).

AFFIRMED.

*

 This disposition, is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Before the First Division,

December 17, 1968

(Note: The following protest was decided by a special first division consisting of Watson, Maletz, and Newman, Judges.)

No. P68/509.

protest 67/52265 (New York).

#### Walter Imports *v.*United States,

Newman, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of folding wood doors similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Gitkin Co.*v. *United States*(58 Cust. Ct. 383, C.D. 2997), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/ Paul Attaway                                   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                               |
| Name:  | Paul Attaway                                       |
|   |                                               |
| Title: | Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial Officer |
|   |                                               |
| Date:  |  April 15, 2011                               |

----
No. 62265.

#### Beattie Manufacturing Co. and American Express Company *v.*United States,

protest 319142-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

______________________________

RAFIQ BIN BASHIR BIN :

JALLUL ALHAMI, et al., :

:

Petitioners, :

:

v. : Civil Action No. 05-359 (GK) 

 :

BARACK H. OBAMA, et al., :

:

Respondents. :

______________________________:

ORDER

A Status Conference was held in this case on April 27, 2009,

which was closed to the public due to the discussion of classified

information. Upon consideration of the representations of the

parties, and the entire record herein, it is hereby

ORDERED, that Petitioners shall file their motions to compel

discovery, if any, by June 2, 2009; the Government’s oppositions

are due by June 11, 2009; Petitioners’ replies are due by June 16,

2009; and it is further

ORDERED, that the deadline for Petitioners to submit their

Traverses is postponed. A date will be set when discovery issues

are crystallized; and it is further

ORDERED, that a discovery hearing shall be held, if necessary,

on July 6, 2009, at 10:00 a.m.

 /s/ 

April 27, 2009 Gladys Kessler

United States District Judge

Copies to: Attorneys of Record via ECF
Printed on 100% recycled/recyclable paper with 100% post-consumer fiber and process chlorine free.

Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474

8/27/13

The Honorable Robert M. Summers

Secretary, Maryland Department of the Environment

1800 Washington Boulevard

Baltimore, Maryland 21230

Dear Secretary Summers:

On August 14, 2013, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to the 

Maryland State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Maryland Department of Environment (MDE)

pertaining to the applicable infrastructure elements for the 2010 nitrogen dioxide national ambient air 

quality standard (NAAQS) specified in section 110(a)(2)(A) through (M) of the Clean Air Act (CAA). 

Additionally, on August 14, 2013 EPA received a SIP revision pertaining to the requirements of section 

128 (State Boards) for all pollutants. EPA has determined that these submittals are administratively and 

technically complete. 

EPA will be reviewing the revisions and will prepare a Direct Final Rulemaking Notice (DFRN) 

action for the State Boards revision and a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPR) action for the 2010 

nitrogen dioxide NAAQS revision. If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them 

to Ms. Ruth Knapp, Office of Air Program Planning, at (215) 814-2191. She is the principal contact for 

this rulemaking. 

Sincerely, 

/s/

Diana Esher, Director

Air Protection Division 

cc: George (Tad) S. Aburn, Jr., Director, Air and Radiation Management Administration

 Diana Franks, Program Manager, Air Quality Planning Program
Before the First Division,

November 21, 1963

No. 68128.

#### Rene R. Romero and National Import Co. *v.*United States,

protest 59/29914 (San Diego).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of carrizo baskets the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Chester K. Stoner*v. *United States*(42 Cust. Ct. 178, C.D. 2083), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
ex10-5.htm


Exhibit 10.5


 


LOAN AGREEMENT


 


THIS LOAN AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) dated this 24th day of October, 2014.


 


Between


A. Bosa & Co (Kootenay) Ltd.


(The Lender)







And







DSG Tag Systems Inc


(The Borrower)







DSG Tag Systems Inc. agrees to pay A. Bosa & Co (Kootenay) Ltd. $250,000 from remaining loans not converted to shares. The interest portion of the $250,000 loan prior to the date of this agreement had interest at 15% per annum accrued and converted to shares, the total amount of interest converted was $155,676.37 CDN. The interest was converted at $0.25USD per share (“Common Stock”), at the rate of USD = 1.10 CDN, for a total of 566,096 shares ($155,676.37 / 1.10 rate = $141,523.97 USD / $0.25 per share). The Debt Conversion Agreement is attached for the interest converted portion.







Interest will be accrued and paid at 15% per annum from the date of this agreement. Total interest accrued as of December 31, 2014 is $6,883.54 CDN.


 












/s/ Robert Silzer               


DSG Tag Systems Inc.

















/s/ Bruno Benedet              


A. Bosa & Co. (Kootenay) Ltd.
EX-10.12(c)



 Exhibit 10.12(c) 

June 1, 2017 
 Secor Capital Advisors L.P. 

One Penn Plaza – Suite 4625 
 New York, New York 10119 

Attention: Ms. Christina van Beelen 
  

	 	Re:	 Management Agreement Renewal 



Dear Ms. van Beelen: 
 We
are writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made below (the “Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2018 and all
other provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged. 
  

	 	•	 	 Secor Master Fund L.P. 



	 	•	 	 Emerging CTA Portfolio L.P. 



	 	•	 	 MSSB Spectrum Technical L.P. 



Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of
Mr. Patrick T. Egan at 522 Fifth Avenue – 7th Floor, New York, NY 10036. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 212-296-6808. 

Very truly yours, 
 CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC 

 

			
	 By:    
	 	 /s/ Patrick T. Egan

Patrick T. Egan
 President and
Director


 SECOR CAPITAL ADVISORS L.P. 
  

	
	 By: /s/ Raymond
Iwanowski                            

	
	 Print Name: Raymond
Iwanowski                   

	
	 PE/tr
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   By: |   /s/ Zandra Grace Hernandez                                     |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:     |  Zandra Grace Hernandez                                               |
|  Title:    |  Principal Executive Officer,Principal Financial Officer and Director |
|  Date:     |  June 4, 2010                                                         |
From: kmloibl@cox.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:29:09 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kurt Loibl

La Mesa, CA 91941
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1331 Broadway, Ste. 400

Tacoma, Washington 98402

(253) 593-6710

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION

TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE 1

JUDGE FRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

 JAMES JEAN FEDERSPIEL,

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. CR05-5827FDB

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED

MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL

DATE AND PRETRIAL MOTIONS’

DEADLINE

Upon the stipulation of the parties to continue the trial date in the abovecaptioned case, the Court finds that a failure to grant the continuance would deny

counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the

exercise of due diligence, within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(ii). 

The Court further finds that the ends of justice will be served by ordering a

continuance in this case, that a continuance is necessary to insure effective trial

preparation and that these factors outweigh the best interests of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial, within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A). 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the trial date of February 13, 2006 be

continued to April 17, 2006, and the due date for the pretrial motions be extended to

February 10, 2006. 

//

//

Case 3:05-cr-05827-RBL Document 15 Filed 01/17/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1331 Broadway, Ste. 400

Tacoma, Washington 98402

(253) 593-6710

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION

TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE 2

 The period of delay resulting from the continuance of the trial date from February 13,

2006, up to and including the new trial date of April 17, 2006, is hereby excluded for

speedy trial purposes under 18 U.S.C. §3161(h)(8)(A) and (B).

DONE this 17th day of January, 2006.

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

Presented By: UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

/s/ /s/ 

MIRIAM F. SCHWARTZ KENT LIU 

Attorney for Defendant Assistant United States Attorney

Case 3:05-cr-05827-RBL Document 15 Filed 01/17/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 63340.

protest 330252-K (San Francisco).

#### C. Tennant & Sons Co. of New York *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *J. H. Brown et al.*(46 C.C.P.A. 1, C.A.D. 686), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
#### Nelson BRADLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Douglas VARGO; Alphonso Hicks; Marvin Lee; David Garraghty, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 01-6489.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 31, 2001.

Decided June 11, 2001.

Nelson Bradley, pro se. William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for appellees.

Before WILKINS, TRAKLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Nelson Bradley appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *Bradley v. Vargo,*No. CA-99-1230-2 (E.D.Va. Feb. 26, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
From: Designsofdist@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:13:47 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Vallie Piccirelli

Conover, NC 28613
H. Res. 316

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

May 1, 2007.

Whereas, according to the National Academies landmark report ‘‘Rising Above the Gathering Storm’’, the United 

States is in peril of losing its global competitive edge unless we make substantial investments in science, math, 

research, and innovation; 

Whereas breakthroughs in scientific research are the building 

blocks of a productive, competitive, and healthy society; 

Whereas the Nobel Prize is a prestigious international award 

administered annually by the Nobel Foundation in Stockholm, Sweden, and has since 1901 recognized the world’s 

most outstanding achievements in physics, chemistry, 

physiology or medicine, literature, and peace; 

Whereas on December 10, 2006, in Stockholm, Sweden, the 

following five American scientists were awarded the three 

Nobel Prizes for science. The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 

was awarded to Roger D. Kornberg from Stanford University in Palo Alto, California, for his studies of the molecular basis of eukaryotic transcription. The Nobel Prize 

in Physiology or Medicine was awarded to Andrew Fire 

from the Stanford University School of Medicine in Palo 

Alto, California, and Craig Mello from the University of 

Massachusetts Medical School in Worcester, Massachusetts, for their discovery of RNA interference through 
2

•HRES 316 EH 

gene silencing by double-stranded RNA. The Nobel Prize 

in Physics was awarded to John C. Mather from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Goddard 

Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, and the 

University of Maryland and George F. Smoot, a National 

Science Foundation grantee from the University of California at Berkeley for their discovery of the blackbody 

form and anisotropy of the cosmic microwave background 

radiation; 

Whereas American scientists have not swept the Nobel Prize 

science awards since 1983; 

Whereas Roger D. Kornberg, Andrew Fire, Craig Mello, John 

C. Mather, and George F. Smoot have represented the 

United States and have served as unofficial ambassadors 

of science overseas; and 

Whereas the accomplishments of these scientists are significant achievements in the field of scientific research and 

further promote the United States among the world leaders in science: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) recognizes Roger D. Kornberg, Andrew Fire, 

Craig Mello, John C. Mather, and George F. Smoot for 

advancing scientific discovery and dedicating their careers to scientific research; 

(2) recognizes the National Science Foundation and 

the National Aeronautics and Space Administration for 

their support of the physics Nobel Prize winners; and 

(3) congratulates the achievement of Roger D. 

Kornberg, Andrew Fire, Craig Mello, John C. Mather, 
3

•HRES 316 EH 

and George F. Smoot for being awarded Nobel Prizes in 

science. 

Attest:

Clerk.