alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07-08-0098-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

FEBRUARY 28, 2008

______________________________

In re ALBERTO GOMEZ,

Relator

_________________________________

Opinion on Original Proceeding for Writ of Mandamus

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL AND HANCOCK, JJ.

Pending before this court is the application of Alberto Gomez for writ of mandamus

concerning his request to “review entire records of trial case number [94-418-631].” The

petition does not clearly request this court to order the 237 District Court of Lubbock th

County to act upon his motion to review the records. Instead, it appears Gomez wants a

free appellate record provided to him for the purpose of “proof [sic] his ‘Actual Innocence’

in his case.” For the following reasons, we deny the application.

First, Rule 52 of the appellate rules requires the application for extraordinary relief

to include a 1) section identifying the parties and counsel, 2) table of contents, 3) index of

authorities, 4) statement of the case, and 5) statement of the issues presented. TEX. R.

APP. P. 52.3. Each is missing from Gomez’ application, and that he may be acting pro se

does not relieve him of complying with those rules. Holt v. F.F. Enters., 990 S.W.2d 756,

759 (Tex. App.–Amarillo 1998, pet. denied). Also missing is an appendix containing a
2

"certified or sworn copy of . . . [the] document[s] showing the matter complained of." TEX.

R. APP. P. 52.3(j). In this case, the matter complained of would be the request for a free

record, which an unsworn or uncertified copy has been attached.

Next, Gomez seeks the record in effort to determine whether grounds exist to attack

his prior conviction. This court affirmed his conviction on June 12, 1996, in cause number

07-95-0230-CR, which action resulted in his exhausting his direct appellate remedies. See

Ex parte Brown, 662 S.W.2d 3, 4 (Tex. Crim. App. 1983) (stating that one must first

exhaust his direct appeals before invoking art. 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal

Procedure). His direct appeals being exhausted, he is generally not entitled to a free

record. In re McCarty, No. 08-05-0355-CR, 2005 Tex. App. LEXIS 10197 at *1 (Tex.

App.–El Paso December 8, 2005, orig. proceeding); In re Trevino, 79 S.W.3d 794, 795-96

(Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 2002, orig. proceeding). Thus, the relief Gomez ultimately

seeks from the trial court is not permitted by law, without a showing of exceptional

circumstances as explained in In re Miller, No. 07-07-0144-CV, 2007 Tex. App. LEXIS 3764

(Tex. App.–Amarillo May 16, 2007, orig. proceeding), and we have been cited to no such

circumstances. 

Accordingly, the application for writ of mandamus pending before this court is

denied.

Brian Quinn 

 Chief Justice
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 609 

Raising a question of the privileges of the House. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 3, 2007 

Mr. HOYER submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 

withdrawn 

RESOLUTION 

Raising a question of the privileges of the House. 

1 Resolved, That the Committee on Standards of Offi2 cial Conduct shall immediately review the regularity of 

3 events surrounding the vote on the motion to recommit 

4 on H.R. 3161, which occurred on August 2, 2007, and 

5 report back to the House. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
From: dlshults@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:44:31 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dixie Shults

Knoxville, TN 37938
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the WESTERN DISTRICT of WASHINGTON

SEATTLE AUDUBON SOCIETY, et al,

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

GALE NORTON, Secretary of the Interior,

 Defendant.

)

)

)

) C05-1835 JPD

)

)

) MINUTE ORDER RESETTING

) DEADLINES

The following Minute Order is made at the direction of the Court, the Honorable James P.

Donohue, United States Magistrate Judge:

Plaintiff has requested additional time in which to comply with the Order Regarding Initial

Disclosures, Joint Status Report, and Early Settlement (dkt. # 5). The request is GRANTED.

The parties will adhere to the following schedule:

Initial Disclosure deadline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . February 16, 2006

Joint Status Report due . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . February 23, 2006

The date by which the Clerk is to be informed whether the individual parties are

consenting to have this matter heard by the Honorable James P. Donohue, United States

Magistrate Judge, is extended to February 23, 2006. (See Notice of Initial Assignment to a U.S.

Magistrate Judge & Consent Form (dkt. # 4.) The parties may indicate in the Joint Status Report

their desire to consent to Judge Donohue, or have the case reassigned to a district judge; should

the parties decide earlier than February 23, 2006, to consent or decline, deputy clerk Peter H.

Voelker may be notified at (206) 370-8422, or by fax at (206) 370-8425. An individual party’s

decision on consent is not to be filed electronically or forwarded in any form to the chambers of

Case 2:05-cv-01835-RSL Document 11 Filed 01/25/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Judge Donohue.

Dated this 25th of January, 2006

Bruce Rifkin, Clerk of Court

/s/ PETER H. VOELKER 

Peter H. Voelker, Deputy Clerk

Case 2:05-cv-01835-RSL Document 11 Filed 01/25/06 Page 2 of 2
​

**EXHIBIT**** ****13.1**

**PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION**** ****1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION**** ****906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF**** ****2002**

I, Jan G. van de Winkel, President and Chief Executive Officer of Genmab A/S, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

        (1)   The Annual Report on Form 20-F of Genmab A/S for the period ended December 31, 2022 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

        (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Genmab A/S.

| ​                  | ​ |
|--------------------------|---------|
| Date: February 22, 2023  | ​ |
| ​                  | ​ |
| /s/ Jan G. van de Winkel | ​ |

​

AMERICAS/2017215013.2

​

----
Exhibit 10.2


 





 



March 18, 2018




 


Partner Communications Company Ltd.


8 Amal Street


Afeq Industrial Park


Rosh-Ha’ayin 48103


Israel


 


Dear Sirs:







We hereby consent to the use of our name, Giza Singer Even ltd, with regards to the Impairment valuation studies as of December 31, 2015 in Partner Communications Company Ltd (Partner) Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 2017, and in Partner's Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2017.







By  ___/s/_______







Giza Singer Even LTD.







Name: Nir Harush







Title: CEO - GSE financial advisory services LTD
No. 69707.

#### Polk’s Model Craft Hobbies, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 62/19390 (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of meters similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *G. L. Electronics, Inc., Arrow Sales, Inc.*(49 CCPA 111, C.A.D. 804), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

MARK E. FARRELL,

Petitioner,

v.

DOUG WADDINGTON,

Respondent.

Case No. C05-5832RBL

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the Hon. Karen L.

Strombom United States Magistrate Judge, objections to the Report and Recommendation, if any,

and the remaining record, does hereby find and Order:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) The petition is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for the reasons set forth in the

Report and Recommendation.

(3) The clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Petitioner, counsel for

Respondent, and to the Hon. Karen L. Strombom.

DATED this 5th day of May, 2006.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-05832-RBL Document 16 Filed 05/05/06 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MINUTE ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

KEATING FIBRE INTERNATIONAL,

INC.,

Defendant.

CASE NO. C05-1986JLR

MINUTE ORDER

The following minute order is made by the direction of the court, the Honorable

James L. Robart:

The court has received the parties’ stipulation (Dkt. # 26) to consolidate Case No.

C05-1986JLR with Case No. C06-487JLR. The court GRANTS the stipulation and

orders the clerk to consolidate the two matters under consolidated Case No. C05-

1986JLR. The court will hear the consolidated cases under the case management

schedule currently in effect in Case No. C05-1986JLR.

Filed and entered this 17th day of April, 2006.

BRUCE RIFKIN, Clerk

s/Mary Duett

By

Deputy Clerk

Case 2:05-cv-01986-JLR Document 27 Filed 04/17/06 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 15.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No. 333-157129 on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 30, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements of China Distance Education Holdings Limited, its subsidiaries and its
variable interest entity (collectively, the Group) as of and for the year ended September 30, 2009 and the effectiveness of the Groups internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of
China Distance Education Holdings Limited for the year ended September 30, 2009.



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|/s/ Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu CPA Ltd.  
|Beijing, the Peoples Republic of China
|                                       
|March 30, 2010
Before the Third Division,

August 7, 1958

No. 62276.

#### International Packers Commercial Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 204234-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of meats, prepared or preserved, not specially provided for, similar in all material respects to the meat the subject of *United States*v. *Mercantil Distribuidora, S. A., et al.*(45 C. C. P. A. 20, C. A. D. 667), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT FEBRUARY 1, 1998, AND THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EARNINGS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED FEBRUARY 1, 1998, AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-01-1998
<CASH>                                         479,748
<SECURITIES>                                 4,750,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               19,706,049
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (30,037)
<INVENTORY>                                 15,372,270
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            42,346,066
<PP&E>                                      88,165,118
<DEPRECIATION>                            (25,862,832)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             104,783,735
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,629,658
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        77,887
<OTHER-SE>                                  84,849,810
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               104,783,735
<SALES>                                     40,732,373
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            40,732,373
<CGS>                                       32,523,427
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               35,180,371
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              50,487
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,561,978
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,175,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,386,978
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,386,978
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     $.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     $.42
        

</TABLE>
Case 3:05-cv-05737-RJB-JKA Document 137-2 Filed 06/09/06 Page 1 of 39
Case 3:05-cv-05737-RJB-JKA Document 137-2 Filed 06/09/06 Page 2 of 39
Case 3:05-cv-05737-RJB-JKA Document 137-2 Filed 06/09/06 Page 3 of 39
Case 3:05-cv-05737-RJB-JKA Document 137-2 Filed 06/09/06 Page 4 of 39
Case 3:05-cv-05737-RJB-JKA Document 137-2 Filed 06/09/06 Page 5 of 39
Case 3:05-cv-05737-RJB-JKA Document 137-2 Filed 06/09/06 Page 6 of 39
Case 3:05-cv-05737-RJB-JKA Document 137-2 Filed 06/09/06 Page 7 of 39
Case 3:05-cv-05737-RJB-JKA Document 137-2 Filed 06/09/06 Page 8 of 39
Case 3:05-cv-05737-RJB-JKA Document 137-2 Filed 06/09/06 Page 9 of 39
Case 3:05-cv-05737-RJB-JKA Document 137-2 Filed 06/09/06 Page 10 of 39
Case 3:05-cv-05737-RJB-JKA Document 137-2 Filed 06/09/06 Page 11 of 39
Case 3:05-cv-05737-RJB-JKA Document 137-2 Filed 06/09/06 Page 12 of 39
Case 3:05-cv-05737-RJB-JKA Document 137-2 Filed 06/09/06 Page 13 of 39
Case 3:05-cv-05737-RJB-JKA Document 137-2 Filed 06/09/06 Page 14 of 39
Case 3:05-cv-05737-RJB-JKA Document 137-2 Filed 06/09/06 Page 15 of 39
Case 3:05-cv-05737-RJB-JKA Document 137-2 Filed 06/09/06 Page 16 of 39
Case 3:05-cv-05737-RJB-JKA Document 137-2 Filed 06/09/06 Page 17 of 39
Case 3:05-cv-05737-RJB-JKA Document 137-2 Filed 06/09/06 Page 18 of 39
Case 3:05-cv-05737-RJB-JKA Document 137-2 Filed 06/09/06 Page 19 of 39
Case 3:05-cv-05737-RJB-JKA Document 137-2 Filed 06/09/06 Page 20 of 39
Case 3:05-cv-05737-RJB-JKA Document 137-2 Filed 06/09/06 Page 21 of 39
Case 3:05-cv-05737-RJB-JKA Document 137-2 Filed 06/09/06 Page 22 of 39
Case 3:05-cv-05737-RJB-JKA Document 137-2 Filed 06/09/06 Page 23 of 39
Case 3:05-cv-05737-RJB-JKA Document 137-2 Filed 06/09/06 Page 24 of 39
Case 3:05-cv-05737-RJB-JKA Document 137-2 Filed 06/09/06 Page 25 of 39
Case 3:05-cv-05737-RJB-JKA Document 137-2 Filed 06/09/06 Page 26 of 39
Case 3:05-cv-05737-RJB-JKA Document 137-2 Filed 06/09/06 Page 27 of 39
Case 3:05-cv-05737-RJB-JKA Document 137-2 Filed 06/09/06 Page 28 of 39
Case 3:05-cv-05737-RJB-JKA Document 137-2 Filed 06/09/06 Page 29 of 39
Case 3:05-cv-05737-RJB-JKA Document 137-2 Filed 06/09/06 Page 30 of 39
Case 3:05-cv-05737-RJB-JKA Document 137-2 Filed 06/09/06 Page 31 of 39
Case 3:05-cv-05737-RJB-JKA Document 137-2 Filed 06/09/06 Page 32 of 39
Case 3:05-cv-05737-RJB-JKA Document 137-2 Filed 06/09/06 Page 33 of 39
Case 3:05-cv-05737-RJB-JKA Document 137-2 Filed 06/09/06 Page 34 of 39
Case 3:05-cv-05737-RJB-JKA Document 137-2 Filed 06/09/06 Page 35 of 39
Case 3:05-cv-05737-RJB-JKA Document 137-2 Filed 06/09/06 Page 36 of 39
Case 3:05-cv-05737-RJB-JKA Document 137-2 Filed 06/09/06 Page 37 of 39
Case 3:05-cv-05737-RJB-JKA Document 137-2 Filed 06/09/06 Page 38 of 39
Case 3:05-cv-05737-RJB-JKA Document 137-2 Filed 06/09/06 Page 39 of 39
No. 64560.

#### King Shipping Co. v. United States,

protest 59/20667 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

The protest was dismissed.
Exhibit 99.10

CONSENT OF HOWARD BIRD

I, Howard Bird,
hereby consent to the references to, and the use of information derived from, the technical report dated January 6, 2011 titled
“Black Fox Project National Instrument, NI 43-101 Technical Report Prepared for Brigus Gold Corp.” (the “Report”)
in the annual report on Form 40-F of Sandstorm Gold, Ltd. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 and any amendments
thereto (the “Annual Report”) being filed with United States Securities and Exchange Commission, which Annual Report
incorporates by reference and attaches as an exhibit the Sandstorm Gold Ltd. Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31,
2013 which refers to information contained in the Report.

I also consent to
the use of my name, including as an expert or “qualified person,” in connection with the Annual Report.

Date: March 11, 2014



| | /s/ Howard Bird                          
| | -----------------------------------------
| | Name:  Howard Bird                       
| | Title: Senior Vice President, Exploration
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Richard Kunisaki, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hydrodynex Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;



4. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 31a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f)) for the small business issuer and we have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this Report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  March 12, 2009



/s/ Richard Kunisaki



Richard Kunisaki

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)