alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: michael.blount@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:02:34 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Michael Blount

Spring, TX 77382
Hummingbird

Springs Wilderness

Big Horn

Mountains

Wilderness

Harquahala

Mountains

Wilderness

Hells Canyon

Wilderness

Hassayampa

River Canyon

Wilderness

Castle Creek

Wilderness

Mohave County

Yavapai County

Yavapai

Marico

County

pa County

La Paz County

Maricopa County

White Tank

Mountains

Regional Park

Lake

Pleasant

Regional

Park

Prescott

Prescott

Valley

Cordes

Junction

Yarnell

BLACK

CANYON

CITY

NEW

RIVER

WICKENBURG

PEORIA

SURPRISE

BUCKEYE

GOODYEAR

PHOENIX

GLENDALE

Bureau of Land Management

Phoenix District Office

Phoenix, AZ

October 2009

Note: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM)

conducts land use planning only in the areas administered

by BLM. BLM has no planning authority under the

municipal or county planning legislation of the State

of Arizona.

No warranty is made by BLM for the use of this map

for purposes not intended by BLM, or to the accuracy,

reliability or completeness of the information shown.

Spatial information may not meet National Map Accuracy

standards. This information may be updated without

notification.

Note: Land Status legend located on Map 1

Map 8

Bradshaw-Harquahala

Planning Areas

Lands Available for

Sale or Exchange

0 5 10 15

Miles

BLM Wilderness

USFS Wilderness

Interstate

Major Road

Major River, Streams or Wash

Highway

Agua Fria National

Monument Planning Area

Bradshaw Harquahala

Planning Area

Available for Sale or Exchange

Available for Exchange Only

Lands upon which mineral resources are

federally administered appear on the Minerals,

Alternative A , map.

Current tortoise management categories

appear on the Tortoise Habitat map.
Exhibit 32.1

                                AEROCENTURY CORP.

                                  Certification


In connection with this quarterly report of AeroCentury Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Neal D. Crispin, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of
Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best
of my knowledge:

              (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
              13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
              1934, and

              (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
              all material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
              indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.


Date: August 11, 2004              /s/ Neal D. Crispin
                                    --------------------------
                                    Neal D. Crispin
                                    Chief Executive Officer
From: frgill@live.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:11:07 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

fred gillespie

Clover, SC 29710
No. P67/94.

#### Crown Handkerchief, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 66/1241 (New York).

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of handkerchiefs, not block-printed by hand, similar in all material respects to those *878the subject of *Ashear Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(55 Cust. Ct. 238, C.D. 2582), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Areconnaissance of some mining camps in Elko, Lander, and Eureka counties,Nevada**
 
Report | Plate
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:408
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000958775
 
July 31, 2018
Exhibit






EXHIBIT 10.2


CLOUDERA BONUS PLAN – 2019 PERFORMANCE METRICS


Below is a summary of the performance metrics applicable under the Cloudera Bonus Plan – Executive Officers and Leadership Team (the “Bonus Plan”) for fiscal year 2019 (the “2019 Performance Metrics”):


Pursuant to the 2019 Performance Metrics, the Bonus Plan provides each participant with the opportunity to earn an annual cash bonus that is paid based on the achievement of the performance level for each of bookings, revenue and operating cash flow for fiscal year 2019. Each of these performance metrics receives a different weight when the bonus attainment is calculated. All cash bonuses will be subject to threshold performance in each performance metric, and each of the performance metrics is measured independently of the other.


The amount of annual bonus earned depends on whether Cloudera achieves the performance level for the applicable performance metric in its annual operating plan.  For fiscal year 2019, in determining the actual bonus amount earned, the bookings metric is weighted at 50%, the revenue metric is weighted at 20% and the operating cash flow metric is weighted at 30%. If performance for a particular metric is achieved at target under the operating plan, the bonus for that metric is paid out at target based on its percentage weight. Over performance relative to plan of 120%, 115% or 150% for bookings, revenue or operating cash flow, respectively, would result in increased bonus payment of up to 50% for that particular weighted metric.


The target annual bonus amount for each participating named executive officer is set forth in the table below. The annual cash bonus for each named executive officer will be equal to (1) the applicable target annual bonus amount multiplied by (2) the percentage achievement applicable to the weighted combination of those metrics identified above as achieved by Cloudera in fiscal 2019. The Board of Directors retains discretion to modify the actual bonus payment based on a number of factors, including individual performance.






	
		
	

Named Executive Officer
	Target Annual Bonus
Amount($)

	Thomas J. Reilly, Chief Executive Officer
	425,000

	Jim Frankola, Chief Financial Officer
	252,000

	Michael A. Olson, Chief Strategy Officer
	142,000
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 269 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 33
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 269

                          [Report No. 110-73]

 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 835) to reauthorize the 
programs of the Department of Housing and Urban Development for housing 
                    assistance for Native Hawaiians.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 26, 2007

  Mr. Hastings of Florida, from the Committee on Rules, reported the 
  following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and 
                         ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 835) to reauthorize the 
programs of the Department of Housing and Urban Development for housing 
                    assistance for Native Hawaiians.

    Resolved,  That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 835) to reauthorize the 
programs of the Department of Housing and Urban Development for housing 
assistance for Native Hawaiians. All points of order against the bill 
and its consideration are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 
10 of rule XXI. The bill shall be considered as read. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the bill to final passage 
without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally 
divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 
the Committee on Financial Services; and (2) one motion to recommit 
with or without instructions.
    Sec. 2. During consideration of H.R. 835 pursuant to this 
resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the 
Chair may postpone further consideration of the bill to such time as 
may be designated by the Speaker.
                                                  House Calendar No. 33

110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 269

                          [Report No. 110-73]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 835) to reauthorize the 
programs of the Department of Housing and Urban Development for housing 
                    assistance for Native Hawaiians.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 26, 2007

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
Before the Second Division,

April 20, 1964

No. 68471.

protests 62/16484 and 62/7183 (New York).

#### Orientex, Ltd., and The Lang Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Bao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of wallpaper sample books similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Carson M. Simon & Co.*v. *United States*(46 Cust. Ct. 118, C.D. 2243), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. §1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of InfoTech USA, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the six months ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, J. Robert Patterson, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Director of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | /s/ J. Robert Patterson                                                                         |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | J. Robert Patterson, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and Director |
|   |                                                                                            |
|   | Date: May 15, 2006                                                                         |
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER -1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS SERVICES,

INC., formerly known as AT&T Wireless

Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

CELLCOM TECH, INC., a New York

corporation,

Defendant.

No. C05-1736Z

ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff New Cingular Wireless Services,

Inc.’s Motion for Default Judgment against Defendant Cellcom Tech, Inc. (“Cellcom”),

docket no. 9. An earlier Order of Default having been entered against Cellcom for failure to

appear, answer, plead or otherwise defend in this action, docket no. 7, the Court, being fully

advised, FINDS:

1. Cellcom owes Cingular the liquidated sum of $1,808,530.00; plus

2. Prejudgment interest of $241,891.39 through February 24, 2006; plus

3. Attorneys’ fees and costs of $10,203.16.

The Court substantially GRANTS Cingular’s requests for judgment. However, the

Court FINDS that there is an insufficient basis to award judgment for amounts invoiced by

Cingular to Cellcom for services rendered to Cellcom customers beyond the June 15, 2005

Case 2:05-cv-01736-TSZ Document 14 Filed 02/24/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER -2-

termination of the Reseller Agreement. The Court FINDS that Cingular is not entitled to

judgment for one-half of the July 2005 invoice balance, and the entire August through

November 2005 invoice balances. Accordingly, the Court does not award prejudgment

interest on these invoice amounts. This Order shall not foreclose Cingular from providing

additional evidence to this Court to support a judgment against Cellcom for these invoice

balances.

The Court also FINDS that there is an insufficient basis to award judgment for

attorneys’ fees and costs in the proceedings before the New York state court or the United

States District Court for the Southern District of New York. This Order shall not foreclose

Cingular from providing additional evidence to this Court to support a judgment against

Cellcom for these attorneys’ fees and costs.

Finally, the Court DENIES Cingular’s claim that post-judgment interest should accrue

at the contract rate of 1.5% per month (18% per annum). Judgment should be entered

granting interest at the federal judgment interest rate as determined under 28 U.S.C. § 1961.

The Court hereby ORDERS that:

1. The Court GRANTS Cingular’s Motion for Default Judgment, and

2. The Court directs the Clerk to enter judgment in favor of Cingular and against

Cellcom in the amount of $2,060,624.55, said judgment to bear interest at the federal interest

rate of 4.7% per annum under 28 U.S.C. § 1961.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 24th day of February, 2006.

AThomas S. Zilly

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-01736-TSZ Document 14 Filed 02/24/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.7
	
	
	Notice of Grant of
Restricted Stock Units and Nonqualified Stock Options

	[Name]




Subject to the terms and conditions of the 2017 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) the Award Agreements, and the Summary of Performance Objectives accompanying this Notice, you have been granted an award of Restricted Stock Units [and Nonqualified Stock Options] (“Awards”) as follows:
	
		
	Grant Date:
	January 10, 2018

	Number of Shares:
	Your Awards consist of the following:
          Restricted Stock Units (each a “Unit”)1
          Restricted Stock Units (ROIC) (each a “Unit”)2
          Restricted Stock Units (EPS) (each a “Unit”)3
         Nonqualified Stock Options (NQSO) (each an “Option”)

	Vesting Schedule:
	Your Units [and Options] will be subject to vesting on the third anniversary of the Grant Date.

	Settlement:
	You will receive one Share for each Unit that vests in accordance with the terms and conditions described in the Award Agreements, the Summary of Performance Objectives (if applicable), this Notice of Grant, and the Plan. The Committee may, however, in its sole discretion, determine instead to settle Units that vest in cash. [Payment for Shares purchased upon the exercise of Options may be made in cash, by tendering previously acquired Shares, by cashless exercise (including by withholding Shares deliverable upon exercise or through a broker-assisted arrangement to the extent permitted by applicable law), or by a combination of these methods.]




This Notice of Grant, the Award Agreement and the Summary of Performance Objectives describe your Awards and the terms and conditions of your Awards.  To ensure you fully understand these terms and conditions, you should:
		
	•
	Read the Plans carefully to ensure you understand how the Plans works; and


		
	•
	Read this Notice of Grant and the corresponding Award Agreements and Summary of Performance Objectives carefully to ensure you understand the nature of your Awards and what you must do to earn them.


You may contact Katie Pickle, Global Total Rewards Senior Manager, by telephone ((713)705-0428) or email (Katie.Pickle@aschulman.com) if you have any questions about your Awards or the Award Agreements.






















_________________________________________
1 Determined by (i) multiplying $[______] (the target dollar amount used to determine your total Awards for fiscal year 2018) by .25, and (ii) dividing the result in (i) by $37.16, the average reported closing price of a Share during the 30-day period ending on the last trading day prior to the Grant Date. The resulting number of Units were rounded to the nearest multiple of 10.
2 Determined by multiplying the number of Restricted Stock Units determined in note 1 times 2.
3 Determined by multiplying the number of Restricted Stock Units determined in note 1 times 2.