alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: kfisch2006@peoplepc.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:16:50 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Katharina Fischer

Palatine, IL 60074
EXHIBIT 32

<PAGE>


     In  connection  with the  Annual  Report  of  Daulton  Capital  Corp.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-K for the year  ending  April 30,  2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Ryan Beamin, the Principal
Executive and Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of the Company.


Date:  July 17, 2009

                                 By: /s/ Ryan Beamin
                                     ---------------------------------
                                    Ryan Beamin, Principal  Executive and
                                    Financial Officer
No. 67495.

#### D. N. & E. Walter *&*Co. and Perryman, Mojonier Co. *v.*United States,

protest 61/6421 (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of valances similar in all material respects to those the subject of *D. N. & E. Walter & Co. et al.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 26, C.D. 2098), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: mdkilmer@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:27:54 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mark Kilmer

Santee, CA 92071
H. Res. 634 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 24, 2007. 

Whereas, since the beginning of the 20th century, hunters 

and fishermen of the United States have been among the 

most vocal supporters of the scientific management of 

wildlife and conservation of the natural environment; 

Whereas President Theodore Roosevelt, who was himself a 

hunter, fisherman, and conservationist, called throughout 

his Presidency for laws to promote wildlife conservation 

and to provide lands for recreation; 

Whereas, in June 1971, Senator Thomas McIntyre of New 

Hampshire and Representative Robert Sikes of Florida 

sponsored a joint resolution calling for the celebration of 

‘‘National Hunting and Fishing Day’’ on the fourth Saturday of every September; 

Whereas, in 2006, an estimated 42,500,000 individuals in the 

United States participated in hunting or fishing activities; 

Whereas, in 2006, hunters and fishermen made a significant 

contribution to the economy of the United States by 

spending nearly $75,000,000,000 on hunting and fishing 

activities; 

Whereas hunters and fishermen recognize the importance of 

natural resources to the character, heritage, and future 
2 

•HRES 634 EH 

of the United States, and work to protect and conserve 

those resources; and 

Whereas the fourth Saturday of September would be an appropriate day to as celebrate National Hunting and Fishing Day: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That— 

(1) it is the sense of the House of Representatives 

that— 

(A) there should be established a day known as 

National Hunting and Fishing Day; and 

(B) the President should issue a proclamation 

calling on the people of the United States to observe 

such a day with appropriate programs and activities; and 

(2) the House of Representatives— 

(A) encourages participation in hunting and 

fishing; and 

(B) commends the contributions of hunters 

and fishermen toward the scientific management of 

wildlife and conservation of the natural environment. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Exhibit





Exhibit 10.59





[LETTERHEAD OF SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION]




January 8, 2018




Leena Munjal
SVP, Customer Experience and Integrated Retail 



Dear Leena,  

We are pleased to offer you the position of Chief Digital Officer.  In addition to your current responsibilities, in this new role your additional responsibilities will include leadership over:  Data Analytics, Online and the Marketing Business Units (“BU”).  In addition, you will provide leadership oversight to MT until a new leader is found, including working with that team to identify SG&A savings of $100 million.  As a result of these additional responsibilities, we are very pleased to offer you a special retention award and an increase in your annual base salary.  Both the retention award and base salary increase are subject to approval of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Director (the “Committee”) of Sears Holdings Corporation (the “Company”) and your written acceptance of our offer.  Upon your written acceptance, effective May 1, 2017, your annual base salary will be increased to $700,000.  Your annual base salary will be reviewed again by December 1, 2018.


We are also pleased to offer you a special retention award totaling $400,000.  The total award is contingent upon you signing the enclosed Special Retention Award Agreement (“Agreement”) and all of the terms of the Agreement.


NOTE:  The terms of this letter and the enclosed Special Retention Award Agreement do not replace, change or nullify the terms of the Executive Severance Agreement you executed on October 29, 2012.  Copy attached as Exhibit A. 


Upon acceptance, please sign this letter and the Agreement, and return both documents to me.  IMPORTANT:  If you do not sign, date and return this letter, the change to your annual base salary will not take effect.  Similarly, you will not be entitled to any of the retention award unless you sign, date and return the Agreement. 


If you need additional information or clarification, please contact me.  



 
____/s/ Leena Munjal_________________    __1__/__8__/__18__
Leena Munjal                                                             Date 






Business Unit Leader: 

___/s/ Julie Ainsworth_________________    _1___/__10__/__18__
Julie A. Ainsworth                                            Date 






Enclosure
A

g

u

a

F r i a

R i v

e r

Tonto National Forest

Bradshaw-Harquahala

Planning Area

Black Canyon City

Cordes

Junction

Bureau of Land Management

Phoenix District Office

Phoenix, AZ

October 2009

Note: Land Status legend located

on Map 1

Note: The Bureau of Land Management

(BLM) conducts land use planning only

in the areas administered by BLM. BLM

has no planning authority under the

municipal or county planning legislation

of the State of Arizona.

No warranty is made by BLM for the use

of this map for purposes not intended by

BLM, or to the accuracy, reliability or

completeness of the information shown.

Spatial information may not meet National

Map Accuracy Standards. This information

may be updated without notification.

Map 4

Agua Fria

National Monument

Special Cultural Resource

Management Areas

0 1 2

Miles

Interstate

Highway

Agua Fria

National Monument

Planning Area

Major Road

Minor Road

Major River, Streams or

Wash

Cultural

Resource Allocations

High Public Use SCRMA

Moderate Public Use

SCRMA
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-21-00250-CR

MONTE RODNEY SCALES JR.

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

36th District Court of San Patricio County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. S-17-3011CR

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and rendered. The 

Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and RENDERS judgment in 

accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

November 10, 2022
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER – 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

JESSE BECERRIL MONTES,

Defendant.

CASE NO. CR05-0167C

ORDER

THE COURT having considered the stipulation of the parties to extend the due date of

the pretrial motions, the affidavit of defense counsel Robert H. Gombiner in support of the

stipulation, and the records and files herein, the Court hereby makes the following findings:

1. The Court finds that a failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the

reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due

diligence, within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(ii).

2. The Court further finds that the ends of justice will be served by ordering a

continuance in this case and that a continuance is necessary to insure effective trial preparation.

Case 2:05-cr-00167-JCC Document 21 Filed 05/24/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER – 2

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the time within which pretrial motions must be filed

in this case is extended from May 26, 2005, to June 9, 2005. This continuance balances the

need expressed by counsel and the current trial schedule in this case.

DONE this 24th day of May, 2005.

AUNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:05-cr-00167-JCC Document 21 Filed 05/24/05 Page 2 of 2
Before the Second Division,

July 15, 1953

No. 57426.

#### Associated Lace Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 183464-K (New York).

*220Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of nets or nettings made on a bobbinet machine, wholly or in chief value of nylon, which nylon is similar in all material respects to that the classification of which was involved in *Holeproof Hosiery Co.*v. *United States*(27 Cust. Ct. 176, C. D. 1366), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained
From: jsalmieri@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:49:30 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

joseph salmieri

Clementon, NJ 08021
# Jornal Oficial C 122A/16 d

| | ISSN 1977-1010 |
| --- | --- |
| Jornal Oficial
  da União Europeia | C 122A |
| | |
| Edição em língua portuguesa | Comunicações e Informações | 58.° ano16 de abril de 2015 |

ISSN 1977-1010

Jornal Oficial

da União Europeia

C 122A

Edição em língua portuguesa

Comunicações e Informações

58.° ano16 de abril de 2015

---

| Número de informação | Índice | Página |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Retificações |
| 2015/C 122A/01 | Retificação do anúncio de concursos gerais — Administradores (AD 5/AD 7) especializados em investigação jurídica — EPSO/AD/295/15 — Juristas com formação jurídica búlgara (BG) — EPSO/AD/296/15 — Juristas com formação jurídica alemã (DE) — EPSO/AD/297/15 — Juristas com formação jurídica croata (HR) — EPSO/AD/298/15 — Juristas com formação jurídica irlandesa (IE) — EPSO/AD/299/15 — Juristas com formação jurídica lituana (LT) — EPSO/AD/300/15 — Juristas com formação jurídica eslovaca (SK) — ( JO C 68 A de 26.2.2015 ) | 1 |

Número de informação

Índice

Página

Retificações

2015/C 122A/01

Retificação do anúncio de concursos gerais — Administradores (AD 5/AD 7) especializados em investigação jurídica — EPSO/AD/295/15 — Juristas com formação jurídica búlgara (BG) — EPSO/AD/296/15 — Juristas com formação jurídica alemã (DE) — EPSO/AD/297/15 — Juristas com formação jurídica croata (HR) — EPSO/AD/298/15 — Juristas com formação jurídica irlandesa (IE) — EPSO/AD/299/15 — Juristas com formação jurídica lituana (LT) — EPSO/AD/300/15 — Juristas com formação jurídica eslovaca (SK) — ( JO C 68 A de 26.2.2015 )

( JO C 68 A de 26.2.2015 )

1

---

| PT | |
| --- | --- |

PT

---

Retificações

| 16.4.2015 | PT | Jornal Oficial da União Europeia | CA 122/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2015

PT

Jornal Oficial da União Europeia

CA 122/1

---

Retificação do anúncio de concursos gerais — Administradores (AD 5/AD 7) especializados em investigação jurídica — EPSO/AD/295/15 — Juristas com formação jurídica búlgara (BG) — EPSO/AD/296/15 — Juristas com formação jurídica alemã (DE) — EPSO/AD/297/15 — Juristas com formação jurídica croata (HR) — EPSO/AD/298/15 — Juristas com formação jurídica irlandesa (IE) — EPSO/AD/299/15 — Juristas com formação jurídica lituana (LT) — EPSO/AD/300/15 — Juristas com formação jurídica eslovaca (SK)

(
  «Jornal Oficial da União Europeia» C 68 A de 26 de fevereiro de 2015
  )

(2015/C 122 A/01)

Na página 2, no título I, ponto 3:

onde se lê:

«Data-limite (incluindo validação): 31 de março de 2015 às 12 horas (meio-dia), hora de Bruxelas.»,

deve ler-se:

«Data-limite (incluindo validação): 9 de abril de 2015 às 12 horas (meio-dia), hora de Bruxelas.».

---
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Michael Raab, certify
that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Ardelyx, Inc.; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                                                                              
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 11, 2015 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Michael Raab                                                             
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Michael Raab                                                                 
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
Before the Second Division,

February 21, 1961

No. 65179.

#### A. E. Lyon Co. *v.*United States,

protest 59/29077 (Los Angeles).

*346Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of toilet-box mechanisms similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 60910, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
ORDER EXTENDING JUDGMENT 

ADDITIONAL TEN YEARS - 1 

CASE NO. C06-149RSM 

#1254085 v1 / 72190-004

KARR TUTTLECAMPBELL

701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300

Seattle, Washington 98104

Main: (206) 223 1313

Fax: (206) 682 7100

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 

WAYNE SEMINOFF, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

SUNG HONG a/k/a LAWRENCE HONG and 

YOUNG HONG, a married couple; HYO HONG, a 

single woman; and H & H GROUP, INC., a 

Washington corporation, 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

CASE NO. C06-149 RSM

ORDER EXTENDING JUDGMENT 

ADDITIONAL TEN YEARS (RCW 

6.17.020(3)) 

JUDGMENT SUMMARY 

Judgment Creditor: Wayne Seminoff 

Judgment Debtor: Sung Hong, a/k/a Lawrence Hong 

Amount of Original Judgment: $655,834.00 

Interest: n/a (interest waived) 

Additional Court Costs: + .00 

Total Judgment: $ 655,834.00

The court having considered the evidence and being fully advised in the premises; now 

therefore: 
ORDER EXTENDING JUDGMENT 

ADDITIONAL TEN YEARS - 2 

CASE NO. C06-149RSM 

#1254085 v1 / 72190-004

KARR TUTTLECAMPBELL

701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300

Seattle, Washington 98104

Main: (206) 223 1313

Fax: (206) 682 7100

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

IT IS ORDERED that the June 23, 2009 judgment is renewed as set forth in the Judgment 

Summary above. 

DATED this 19th day of July 2019. 

A 

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 

Presented by: 

/s/ Paul Richard Brown__________ 

Paul Richard Brown, WSBA 19357
Hummingbird

Springs Wilderness

Big Horn

Mountains

Wilderness

Harquahala

Mountains

Wilderness

Hells Canyon

Wilderness

Hassayampa

River Canyon

Wilderness

Castle Creek

Wilderness

Mohave County

Yavapai County

Yavapai

Marico

County

pa County

La Paz County

Maricopa County

White Tank

Mountains

Regional Park

Lake

Pleasant

Regional

Park

Prescott

Prescott

Valley

Cordes

Junction

Yarnell

BLACK

CANYON

CITY

NEW

RIVER

WICKENBURG

PEORIA

SURPRISE

BUCKEYE

GOODYEAR

PHOENIX

GLENDALE

Bureau of Land Management

Phoenix District Office

Phoenix, AZ

October 2006

Note: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM)

conducts land use planning only in the areas administered

by BLM. BLM has no planning authority under the

municipal or county planning legislation of the State

of Arizona.

No warranty is made by BLM for the use of this map

for purposes not intended by BLM, or to the accuracy,

reliability or completeness of the information shown.

Spatial information may not meet National Map Accuracy

standards. This information may be updated without

notification.

Note: Land Status legend located on Map 1-1

Map 9

Bradshaw-Harquahala

Planning Area

Utility & Transportation

Corridors and

Communication Sites

0 5 10 15

Miles

BLM Wilderness

USFS Wilderness

Interstate

Major Road

Major River, Streams or Wash

Highway

Agua Fria National

Monument Planning Area

Bradshaw Harquahala

Planning Area

Corridors Allocations

Multi-use Corridor

Transportation Corridor

Communication Site