alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DETENTION ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W. D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff,

v.

RICARDO AGUILAR-ESCORCIA,

 Defendant.

Case No. 05-5078M

DETENTION ORDER

THE COURT, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3142, finds that no condition or combination

of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and/or the safety of any

other person and the community.

This finding is based on 1) the nature and circumstances of the offense(s) charged, including whether the offense is a

crime of violence or involves a narcotic drug; 2) the weight of the evidence against the person; 3) the history and characteristics of

the person including those set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)(3)(A)(B); and 4) the nature and seriousness of the danger release would

impose to any person or the community.

Findings of Fact/ Statement of Reasons for Detention

Presumptive Reasons/Unrebutted:

 ( ) Conviction of a Federal offense involving a crime of violence. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(A)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(B)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of 10+ years as prescribed in the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C.§801 et seq.), the

Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C.§951 et seq.) Or the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (46

U.S.C. App. 1901 et seq.)

 ( ) Convictions of two or more offenses described in subparagraphs (A) through (C) of 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(1) of two or more

State or local offenses that would have been offenses described in said subparagraphs if a circumstance giving rise to

Federal jurisdiction had existed, or a combination of such offenses.

Safety Reasons:

 ( ) Defendant is currently on probation/supervision resulting from a prior offense.

 ( ) Defendant was on bond on other charges at time of alleged occurrences herein.

 ( ) Defendant’s prior criminal history.

Flight Risk/Appearance Reasons:

 ( ) Defendant’s lack of sufficient ties to the community.

 ( /) Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainer.

 ( ) Detainer(s)/Warrant(s) from other jurisdictions.

 ( ) Failures to appear for past court proceedings.

 ( ) Past conviction for escape.

Other:

 (/) Defendant stipulated to detention without prejudice

 

Order of Detention

< The defendant shall be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal.

< The defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel.

< The defendant shall on order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the Government, be delivered

to a United States marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.

 April 26, 2005.

_s/ Karen L. Strombom 

Karen L Strombom, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-mj-05078-KLS Document 6 Filed 04/26/05 Page 1 of 1
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 10, 2020

No. 04-19-00661-CV

STATE FARM COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF TEXAS,

Appellant

v.

Andrew Wayne BOCK,

Appellee

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CI19802

Honorable Cynthia Marie Chapa, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The court reporter’s second request for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record is 

GRANTED. The reporter’s record is due on or before January 17, 2020.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of January, 2020.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz,

Clerk of Court
# table 1

# table 2

# table 3

# table 4

# table 5
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 28, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 134856 & (14) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 134856 COA: 276899 Wayne CC: 03-010594-01 CHRISTOPHER WESLEY HOPKINS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 26, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to re lief under MCR 6.508(D). The motion to add issue is DENIED.

s1217 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 28, 2007

Clerk
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

RUSSELL L. COBB,

Petitioner,

v.

SUPERINTENDENT JOHN DOE

BRUNDON, et al,

Respondents.

Case No. C05-5776RBL

ORDER DISMISSING

COMPLAINT

The Court, having reviewed the Complaint, the Report and Recommendation of Judge Karen L.

Strombom, United States Magistrate Judge, and the remaining record, does hereby find and Order:

(1) the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) petitioner’s complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice; and

(3) the Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to petitioner and to Magistrate Judge

Karen L. Strombom.

DATED this 26th day of May, 2006.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-05776-RBL Document 10 Filed 05/26/06 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 188 (Friday, September 29, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 67319]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21490]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Eye Institute; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Eye Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel; Mentored Clinical Scientist Research Career Development Award 
(K08/K23) and Conference Grant (R13) Applications.
    Date: October 26, 2023.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Eye Institute, 6700 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, 
MD 20817 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Brian Hoshaw, Ph.D., Designated Federal 
Official, Division of Extramural Research, National Eye Institute, 
National Institutes of Health, 6700 B Rockledge Dr., Rockville, MD 
20892, 301-451-2020, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#264e49554e475144664b474f4a08484f4e08414950"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="432b2c302b223421032e222a2f6d2d2a2b6d242c35">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Eye Institute Special Emphasis 
Panel; Pathways to Independence (K99) Applications.
    Date: November 6, 2023.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Eye Institute, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, 
MD 20817 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Ashley Fortress, Ph.D., Designated Federal 
Official, Division of Extramural Activities, National Eye Institute, 
National Institutes of Health, 6700 B Rockledge Dr., Bethesda, MD 
20817, (301) 451-2020, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f796849f9b928ed99198858385928484b7999e9fd9909881"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2b4a5843474e52054d44595f594e58586b454243054c445d">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.867, Vision 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 25, 2023.
Victoria E. Townsend,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-21490 Filed 9-28-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Before the First Division,

February 1, 1960

No. 63758.

protest 59/1457 (New York).

#### Levin Bros. *v.*United States,

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This protest is limited to the merchandise which is described on the invoice as “Patio Lamp with % wick, brass spring, burner & *330copper reflector” and whicu was classified as an entirety under the provision for illuminating glass articles in paragraph 228(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified, with a duty assessment at the rate of 30 per centum ad valorem.

At the time of trial, counsel for the respective parties entered into a stipulation of submission, establishing that the item in question consists of two separate entities, that both are household utensils, that the metal reflector is in chief value of steel, and that “the balance of the item, which is the chimney and the bottom portion” is in chief value of brass.

On the agreed facts, we hold the articles in question, as hereinabove identified, to be properly classifiable as household utensils; the metal reflector at the rate of 20 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 339, as modified by T.D. 52373, supplemented by T.D. 52476, as a household utensil in chief value of steel, the value thereof being 60 cents each; and the balance of the merchandise at the rate of 15 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 339, as modified by T.D. 51802, supplemented by T.D. 51909, as a household utensil in chief value of brass, as claimed by plaintiff.

To the extent indicated, the protest is sustained and judgment will be rendered accordingly.
H. Res. 725 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

October 16, 2007. 

Whereas clean water is a natural resource of tremendous 

value and importance to the Nation; 

Whereas there is resounding public support for protecting 

and enhancing the quality of the Nation’s rivers, streams, 

lakes, marine waters, and wetlands; 

Whereas maintaining and improving water quality is essential 

to protect public health, fisheries, wildlife, and watersheds and to ensure abundant opportunities for public 

recreation and economic development; 

Whereas it is a national responsibility to provide clean water 

for future generations; 

Whereas since the enactment of the Clean Water Act in 

1972, substantial progress has been made in protecting 

and enhancing water quality due to a deliberate and national effort to protect the Nation’s waters; 

Whereas substantial improvements to the Nation’s water 

quality have resulted from a successful partnership 

among Federal, State, and local governments, the private 

sector, and the public; 

Whereas serious water pollution problems persist throughout 

the Nation and significant challenges lie ahead in the effort to protect water resources from point and nonpoint 
2 

•HRES 725 EH 

sources of pollution and to maintain the Nation’s commitment to a ‘‘no net loss’’ of wetlands; 

Whereas the Nation’s decaying water infrastructure and a 

lack of available funding to maintain and upgrade the 

Nation’s wastewater infrastructure pose a serious threat 

to the water quality improvements achieved over the past 

35 years; 

Whereas the Environmental Protection Agency, the Congressional Budget Office, and other stakeholders have identified a funding gap of between $300,000,000,000 and 

$400,000,000,000 over the next 20 years for the restoration and replacement of wastewater infrastructure; 

Whereas further development and innovation of water pollution control programs and advancement of water pollution control research, technology, and education are necessary and desirable; and 

Whereas October 18, 2007, is the 35th anniversary of the enactment of the Clean Water Act: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) recognizes the 35th anniversary of the Federal 

Water Pollution Control Act (commonly known as the 

Clean Water Act); 

(2) recommits itself to restoring and maintaining 

the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Nation’s waters in accordance with the goals and objectives 

of the Clean Water Act; 
3 

•HRES 725 EH 

(3) dedicates itself to working toward a sustainable, 

long-term solution to address the Nation’s decaying 

water infrastructure; and 

(4) encourages the public and all levels of government— 

(A) to recognize and celebrate the Nation’s accomplishments under the Clean Water Act; and 

(B) to renew their commitment to restoring 

and protecting the Nation’s rivers, lakes, streams, 

marine waters, and wetlands for future generations. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
No. 65125.

#### Toftman Corp. of California et al. *v.*United States,

protests 272494-K, etc. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *The Best Foods, Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 163, C.A.D. 751), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      The certification set forth below is hereby made solely for the purpose of
satisfying the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
may not be relied upon or used for any other purposes.

      In connection with the Annual Report of Realmark Property Investors
Limited Partnership - III (the "Partnership") on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph M. Jayson, Individual General Partner and
Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Partnership.




March 29, 2007                                   /s/ Joseph M. Jayson
--------------                                   --------------------
     Date                                        Joseph M. Jayson
                                                 Individual General Partner and
                                                 Principal Financial Officer
No. 61068.

#### Overseas Housewares Co., by: W. J. Byrnes & Company of N. Y., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 294741-K (New York).

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
December 17, 1964

No. 68961.

Appeal 5192.

#### United States *v.*A. N. Deringer, Inc.

C.D. 2474. Appeal dismissed September 28, 1964.
Before the Third Division,

January 8, 1953

No. 57016.

protests 139629-K and 146986-K (Tampa).

#### Green Brothers, Incorporated *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Eicwall, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that involved in *Allied Food Corporation of America*v. *United States*(28 Cust. Ct. 222, C. D. 1412). In view of this agreement and on the authority of the decision cited, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 60486.

#### Victor B. Handall & Bro., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 296628-K and 298747-K (New York).

*409Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of pearl ladders and strips similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 60159, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Case No. 8,212.

#### LEGIONARY PAYMASTER v. SPALDING.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 387.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Dec. Term, 1806.

Official Bond — Collector op Militia Fines— What Notice against Surety.

Judgment upon ten days’ notice, cannot be rendered upon the bond given by the collector of militia fines.

[This was an action at law by the Legionary Paymaster against Enoch Spalding, collector of militia fines.)

Motion on ten days’ notice, to recover the amount of militia fines, under the 22d section of the act of March 3d, 1803 [2 Stat. 222). The notice was a motion for judgment against him and his sureties, on his collector’s bond. Refused.
Exhibit 15.2

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-157129) pertaining to the China Distance Education Holdings Limited Share Incentive Plan and the China Distance Education Holdings Limited 2008 Performance Incentive
Plan of our report dated December 10, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of China Distance Education Holdings Limited included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended September 30, 2009.



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/ Ernst & Young Hua Ming

Shenzhen, the Peoples Republic of China

March 30, 2010
#### Danny M. KELLY, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. TOWN OF CHELMSFORD, et al., Defendants, Appellees.

No. 00-2095.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

June 14, 2001.

Danny M. Kelly, on brief pro se.

Leonard H. Kesten, Deidre Brennan Regan and Brody, Hardoon, Perkins *&*Kesten, on brief for appellee Town of Chelmsford.

Before SELYA, Circuit Judge, CAMPBELL and STAHL, Senior Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

After affording plaintiff an opportunity to file an amended complaint which “clearly and concisely” set forth his claims, and after two hearings on the matter, the district court granted defendants’ motions to dismiss. Reviewing the dismissal *de novo*in light of the briefs and the record, we see no error. The complaint failed to understandably state a cognizable claim for relief and some of the relief demanded was not within the court’s jurisdiction. Plaintiffs memorandum response to the court’s order to clarify suggested that plaintiff was unable or unwilling to cure the deficiencies.

*Affirmed.*
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Annual Report of Orofino Gold Corp.  (the  "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period  ending May 31, 2010 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Shi Long Ning, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the  undersigned  has executed  this  certification  as of
September 3, 2010.


/s/ Shi Long Ning
--------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 *
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of Stonecrest One, Inc., (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C.§ 1350), George C. Critz, III, the President, principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies that, to the best of my knowledge:
  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and
  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.
    Date: November 19, 2010                                                                           By: /s/ George C. Critz, III
 George C. Critz, III
 President (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
    *   This certification accompanies the Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.