alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 14-14-00062-CV

IN RE CLIFFORD HALL

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

TO THE SHERIFF OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS:

Clifford Hall, relator, has petitioned the Fourteenth Court of Appeals for a writ of habeas 

corpus in Trial Court Cause No. 2003-20180, alleging that he is illegally restrained of his liberty 

by you in the Harris County Jail, Harris County, Texas, by virtue of certain process issued out of 

the 310th District Court of Harris County, Texas.

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals has granted the petition for writ of habeas corpus and 

has ordered a writ of habeas corpus to issue in the following words:

This Court has reviewed the petition for writ of habeas corpus of 

relator, In Re Clifford Hall. 

The Court is of the opinion that relator’s petition requires further 

consideration. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b)(3). We therefore grant 

relator’s petition for writ of habeas corpus pending final 

determination of the cause. We further order the Clerk of this 

Court to issue a writ of habeas corpus in this cause, returnable on 

February 26, 2014. 

The relator will be admitted to bail upon his giving a good and 

sufficient bond, signed by relator as principal and his attorney, 

Tyesha Y. Elam, as surety, conditioned as required by law, or by 

any other surety acceptable to the Sheriff of Harris County, or cash 

in lieu of bond, in the sum of Five Hundred Dollars, pending the 

submission without oral argument on the return date of this writ, 

and until otherwise ordered by this Court.

 
NOW, THEREFORE, you are commanded to produce the body of relator, Clifford Hall, 

before the Fourteenth Court of Appeals, at Houston, Texas, on the 26th Day of February 2014 at 

1:30 p.m. unless you take the bond of relator in the sum of Five Hundred Dollars ($500) 

conditioned that he will abide by the decision of the Fourteenth Court of Appeals of Texas. If 

you release the relator on bond, you will forward the bond to the Clerk of this Court.

YOU ARE COMMANDED TO OBEY this writ fully. If you fail to abide by the terms 

of this writ, you are subject to legal penalty.

WITNESS, The Honorable Kem Thompson Frost, Chief Justice of our said Fourteenth 

Court of Appeals, with the seal thereof annexed, at Houston, Texas, on January 24, 2014.

CHRISTOPHER PRINE, Clerk

______________________________________
NO. 14-14-00062-CV

RETURN ON WRIT

To the Honorable Fourteenth Court of Appeals:

In response to a writ of habeas corpus, I respectfully state that I have in my custody and 

under my restraint Clifford Hall by virtue of the authority of the copy of the writ attached as a 

part of this return. I further bring Clifford Hall before the Fourteenth Court of Appeals at 

Houston, Texas, in obedience to said writ of habeas corpus.

____________________________________

SHERIFF, HARRIS COUNTY

By:_________________________________

 Deputy
From: dandorcdc@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:04:10 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Olin Poole

Duncanville, TX 75116
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the WESTERN DISTRICT of WASHINGTON

MARK L. SOWERS,

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

)

)

)

)

) C05-2141 MJP

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner

of Social Security,

 

 Defendant.

)

)

) MINUTE ORDER

)

) REASSIGNING and REFERRING CASE

)

This action has been reassigned to the Honorable Marsha J. Pechman, United

States District Judge. All future documents filed in this case must bear the cause

number C05-2141 MJP and bear the Judge’s name in the upper right hand corner of

the document.

It appearing from the files and records herein that this is an appropriate

proceeding to refer to a full-time United States Magistrate Judge for the purposes

hereinafter set forth, pursuant to Local Rule MJR 4(A)(4) and as authorized by

Mathews, Secretary of HEW vs Weber, 432 US 261 (1976), now therefore,

Pursuant to the General Order entered by the Chief Judge on 30 April 2004, IT

IS ORDERED that the above entitled action is hereby referred to the Honorable James

P. Donohue, United States Magistrate Judge, who is directed and empowered to 

Case 2:05-cv-02141-MJP-JPD Document 8 Filed 03/22/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated this 22nd day of March, 2006

Bruce Rifkin, Clerk of Court

 /S/ PETER H. VOELKER

Peter H. Voelker, Deputy Clerk

review the administrative record, and to submit proposed findings and conclusions, and

recommended disposition. The procedure for review of those recommendations shall

be in accordance with FRCP 72(b) and with Local Rule MJR 4(c).

Case 2:05-cv-02141-MJP-JPD Document 8 Filed 03/22/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 10.51

LETTER AGREEMENT

July 29,
2003

Special
Devices, Incorporated
14370 White Sage Road
Moorpark, CA 93021
Attn: James Reeder

Ladies
and Gentlemen:

This
letter agreement (this "Letter Agreement") is entered into by and between Special Devices, Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and Wells Fargo
Foothill, Inc. (fka Foothill Capital Corporation, the "Lender"). Reference is made to that certain Loan and Security Agreement dated as of June 27, 2001, between the Company and Lender,
as amended by those certain letter agreements dated as of July 17, 2002, October 22, 2002, March 28, 2003, and June 13, 2003 (as amended, the "Loan Agreement"). Capitalized
terms used but not otherwise defined in this Letter Agreement shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Loan Agreement. The term "Loan Documents" as defined in the Loan Agreement is hereby
amended and supplemented to include this Letter Agreement.

Borrower
and Lender have executed a Consent and Amendment No. 1 to Loan Documents, dated as of April 16, 2003 ("Amendment No. 1"), which has not become effective
because the conditions precedent to its effectiveness have not been satisfied. Borrower is required to cause Amendment No. 1 to become effective by July 31, 2003. At Borrower's request,
Lender hereby agrees to allow Amendment No. 1 to become effective no later than August 31, 2003. Borrower shall cause Amendment No. 1 to become effective no later than
August 31, 2003.

Except
as specifically set forth above and as set forth in other amendments and agreements in writing between the parties in accordance with Section 15.1 of the Loan Agreement,
the respective rights and obligations of the parties under the Loan Agreement shall remain unchanged.

This
Letter Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original, but all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument. The terms
and conditions of the Loan Agreement are hereby incorporated by reference into this Letter Agreement.

This
Letter Agreement shall become effective upon the Company returning a executed copy of this Letter Agreement to Lender.

Please
indicate your agreement by signing in the space provided below.

|Very truly yours,          |  | 
|-------------------------- |  | 
|                           |  | 
|WELLS FARGO FOOTHILL, INC. |  | 
|                           |  | 
|                           |  | 
|/s/ JOHN NOCITA            |  | 

---

AGREED AND ACKNOWLEDGED:

SPECIAL
DEVICES, INCORPORATED

|By:    |  | /s/ JAMES E. REEDER    |  | 
|------ |  | ---------------------- |  | 
|Name:  |  | JAMES E. REEDER        |  | 
|Title: |  | VICE PRESIDENT FINANCE |  | 
|Date:  |  | JULY 30, 2003          |  | 

---

QuickLinks
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

PETER DOUGLAS LOCKWOOD,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. CR05-463M

DETENTION ORDER 

Offense charged:

Armed Bank Robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2113(a) and (d).

Date of Detention Hearing: 10/4/05

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds

the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) In the Pretrial Services Report of October 4, 2005, a substantial number of

criminal violations are cited. A criminal record check reflects that the defendant has been

charged with previous assault charges. In addition, in this case he is being charged as an active

participant in a particularly violent offense.

Case 2:05-mj-00463-MAT Document 9 Filed 10/05/05 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

(2) Defendant is homeless and unemployed. In addition, he is addicted to

methamphetamine and is a crack cocaine user.

(3) Defendant has a history of prior failures to appear in Court.

(4) Defendant is viewed as a risk of danger due to the nature of the charges, his

substance-abuse addiction, and his criminal history.

(5) There appear to be no conditions or combination of conditions that will

reasonably assure the defendant’s appearance at future Court hearings.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with

counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

Government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant

is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose

of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States

Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 5th day of October, 2005.AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:05-mj-00463-MAT Document 9 Filed 10/05/05 Page 2 of 2
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 18-1424V

UNPUBLISHED

JENNIFER MITCHELL,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: December 12, 2019

Special Processing Unit (SPU);

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine 

Administration (SIRVA)

Edward Zwilling, Schwartz, Zweben & Slingbaum, LLP, Birmingham, AL, for petitioner.

Christine Mary Becer, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On September 18, 2018, Jennifer Mitchell filed a petition for compensation under 

the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2 (the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that the suffered a left Shoulder Injury Related to 

Vaccine Administration (SIRVA) after receiving the influenza (“flu”) vaccination on 

November 4, 2017. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing 

Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On December 5, 2019, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he

concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 

4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, Respondent states that Petitioner “had no history of pain, 

 1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am 

required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the EGovernment Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of 

Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to 

the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to 

redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of 

privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such 

material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).
2

inflammation or dysfunction of the affected shoulder prior to [the vaccine],” that 

Petitioner had onset of pain within forty-eight hours of vaccine administration, that 

Petitioner’s symptoms were limited to her left shoulder, and that Petitioner had no other 

condition that would explain her symptoms. Id. at 3. Respondent further agrees that 

the case was timely filed, the vaccine was received in the United States, and the 

Petitioner experienced the residual effects or complications of her injury for more than 

six months after vaccine administration. Id.

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1350 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 17, 2008.
    Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time on the legislative day of 
Thursday, July 17, 2008, for the Speaker to entertain motions that the House 
suspend the rules relating to a measure concerning the domestic production of 
oil and natural gas.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### In the Matter of Regina Dancy, Respondent, v Poughkeepsie Housing Authority, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 879]

—In a proceeding pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e for leave to serve a late notice of claim, the Poughkeepsie Housing Authority appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Jiudice, J.), entered January 21, 1994, which granted the application.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the application is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed.

The petitioner was injured when the car in which she was a passenger was involved in an accident with a vehicle that was owned and operated by the Poughkeepsie Housing Authority.

*414Approximately three months after the expiration of the 90-day period within which to serve a notice of claim, the petitioner commenced this proceeding for leave to serve a late notice of claim. According to the petitioner, the reason she failed to serve a timely notice of claim was that she was unaware of the notice-of-claim requirement. In addition, her attorney argued that the Poughkeepsie Housing Authority had actual notice of the accident since a police report was prepared with regard thereto. The Supreme Court granted the petitioner’s application for leave to serve a late notice of claim. We reverse.

The petitioner’s alleged ignorance of the law is not an excuse for her failure to serve a timely notice of claim *(see, Weber v County of Suffolk,*208 AD2d 527; *Matter of Plantin v New York City Hous. Auth.,*203 AD2d 579; *Matter of Tricomi v New York City Hous. Auth.,*191 AD2d 447; *Figueroa v City of New York,*92 AD2d 908). Additionally, under the circumstances of this case, the police report did not constitute notice to the Poughkeepsie Housing Authority *(see, Caselli v City of New York,*105 AD2d 251, 255-256; *see also, Ribeiro v Town of N. Hempstead,*200 AD2d 730, 731; *Matter of Dube v City of New York,*158 AD2d 457). Accordingly, the petitioner’s application for leave to serve a late notice of claim should have been denied. Sullivan, J. P., Thompson, Ritter and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER DENYING MOTION

FOR DEFAULT - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

MART LIIKANE, 

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF SEATTLE, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-1829L

ORDER DENYING MOTION

FOR DEFAULT

This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff’s motion for default (Dkt. #22)

against defendants the City of Seattle, the City Attorney of Seattle, Darby DuComb, the

Police Department of Seattle, Officer Eric Michl, the Department of Planning and

Development, the Department of Licensing, and Hank Landis (collectively,

“defendants”). Although plaintiff titled his motion as a “Motion for Default Judgment,”

the body of his motion, including his reference to Local Rule 55(a), indicate that he is

moving for default rather than for default judgment.

Pursuant to Local Rule 55(a), default may be entered against any party who has

been served as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and “who has failed to plead or otherwise

defend.” In this case, all defendants except the Department of Planning and

Case 2:05-cv-01829-RSL Document 33 Filed 04/19/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER DENYING MOTION

FOR DEFAULT - 2

Development have answered plaintiff’s complaint. Furthermore, although all defendants

except the Department of Planning and Development had appeared before plaintiff filed

his motion, plaintiff failed to give them written notice of his motion prior to filing it as

required by Local Rule 55(a). As for the Department of Planning and Development, it

appears that plaintiff has not served that entity in a manner authorized by Fed. R. Civ. 

P. 4.

Accordingly, the Court DENIES plaintiff’s motion for default (Dkt. #22).

DATED this 19th day of April, 2006.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-01829-RSL Document 33 Filed 04/19/06 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 697 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                       October 9, 2007.
Whereas on September 30, 2007, Green Bay Packers quarterback Brett Favre 
        established a National Football League (NFL) record by throwing his 
        421st touchdown pass;
Whereas in addition to the career touchdown mark, Brett Favre also holds the NFL 
        record for greatest number of wins by a starting quarterback and the NFL 
        record for playing in the most consecutive games as a starting 
        quarterback;
Whereas Brett Favre is the only 3-time winner of the NFL's Most Valuable Player 
        Award;
Whereas Brett Favre's 16 consecutive years of dedicated service with the Green 
        Bay Packers has enhanced the lives of the people of Northeast Wisconsin 
        and exemplified the Wisconsin work ethic;
Whereas Brett Favre's contributions to his community have extended beyond the 
        football field;
Whereas Brett Favre was born in Gulf Port, Mississippi, was raised in Kiln, 
        Mississippi, and attended the University of Southern Mississippi;
Whereas Brett Favre's loyalties to his home State of Mississippi and adopted 
        State of Wisconsin are reflected in his participation in and 
        organization of numerous charitable activities in those States, 
        including the Brett Favre Fourward Foundation, the Special Olympics, the 
        Make-A-Wish Foundation, and the Boys and Girls Clubs of America;
Whereas the Brett Favre Fourward Foundation aids disadvantaged children in 
        Wisconsin and Mississippi and has raised more than $1,000,000 for people 
        affected by Hurricane Katrina in Mississippi;
Whereas Brett Favre and his wife, Deanna Favre, co-founded the Deanna Favre Hope 
        Foundation, which provides assistance to women in need affected by 
        breast cancer; and
Whereas Brett Favre has demonstrated that hard work and single-mindedness of 
        purpose can bring success, and epitomizes the words of NFL Hall of Fame 
        Coach Vince Lombardi: ``People who work together will win, whether it be 
        against complex football defenses, or the problems of modern society.'': 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) commends Green Bay Packers quarterback Brett Favre for 
        establishing a National Football League record for most career touchdown 
        passes;
            (2) recognizes Brett Favre for his outstanding community service in 
        Wisconsin and Mississippi and his 16 consecutive years of dedicated 
        service with the Green Bay Packers, a community-owned organization; and
            (3) directs the Clerk of the House of Representatives to transmit a 
        copy of this resolution to Brett Favre, to the Green Bay Packers 
        organization, and to the Commissioner of the National Football League.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```