alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 99.4**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

 

**18 U.S.C. §1350,**

 

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the annual report of Sandstorm Gold Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the period ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Nolan Watson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: February 18, 2013 | /s/ Nolan Watson        |
|------------------------------|-------------------------|
|                         | Nolan Watson            |
|                         | Chief Executive Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sandstorm Gold Ltd. and will be retained by Sandstorm Gold Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

This certification accompanies the annual report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Registrant for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

1

----

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

 

**18 U.S.C. §1350,**

 

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the annual report of Sandstorm Gold Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the period ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Erfan Kazemi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: February 18, 2013 | /s/ Erfan Kazemi        |
|------------------------------|-------------------------|
|                         | Erfan Kazemi            |
|                         | Chief Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sandstorm Gold Ltd. and will be retained by Sandstorm Gold Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

This certification accompanies the annual report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Registrant for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

2

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

 

McCULLUM ENTERPRIZE, INC.,

Plaintiff(s),

v.

WESTERN HERITAGE INSURANCE

COMPANY,

 Defendant(s).

 Case No. C05-2151P

 MINUTE ORDER

The following minute order is made by the direction of the court, the Honorable Marsha J.

Pechman:

At the request of counsel, an extension of time to file the joint status report is granted. The

report will be due on March 27, 2006. All other FRCP 26-related dates are adjusted accordingly.

Failure to adhere to these deadlines may result in sanctions, up to and including dismissal of this

action.

Filed this 13th day of March, 2006.

BRUCE RIFKIN, Clerk

By /s Mary Duett

Deputy Clerk

Case 2:05-cv-02151-MJP Document 4 Filed 03/13/06 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 677 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 122
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 677

                          [Report No. 110-348]

  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 52) 
  making continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2008, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 25, 2007

  Ms. Slaughter, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 52) 
  making continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2008, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 52) 
making continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2008, and for 
other purposes. All points of order against the joint resolution and 
against its consideration are waived except those arising under clause 
9 or 10 of rule XXI. The joint resolution shall be considered as read. 
The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the joint 
resolution to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one 
hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations; and (2) one 
motion to recommit.
    Sec. 2.  During consideration of House Joint Resolution 52 pursuant 
to this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous 
question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the joint 
resolution to such time as may be designated by the Speaker.
    Sec. 3.  House Resolution 659 is laid upon the table.
                                                 House Calendar No. 122

110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 677

                          [Report No. 110-348]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 52) 
  making continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2008, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 25, 2007

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
StorageD4 / D5StorageIntermediatesStorageFinal PolymerStorageRecovered D4 D5StorageWastewaterReactorPolymerizationReactorPolymerizationRecoveryD4 / D5PurificationFinal PolymerAbatementD4 / D5Storm waterSolid WasteFugitive7654321Block Flow Diagram:Processor of D4/D5 with on & off site WWTPTreatmentWastewaterTo Off-site POTWTo Off-siteWasteManagementFIGURE 5BLOCK FLOW DIAGRAM TEMPLATE FOR PROCESSORS OF D4OR D5WITH ON-SITE AND OFF-SITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTSSilicones Environmental, Health and Safety CouncilProcessor of D4 / D5Production Year 2010Throughput D4Throughput D5Operation ProductionStream No DescriptionLbs D4/ Lbs Final PolymerLbs D5/ Lbs Final Polymer hrs/year Lbs Final Polymer/hour1 D4/D5 Raw Material Consumed2 Final Polymer Produced3 Point Source Air Emissions4 Fugtive Air Emissions5 Treated Industrial Waste WaterDischarge to Off-site POTW6 Storm Water Discharge to Surface Waters7 Solid Waste Disposal to Off-site Waste ManagementMaterial balance based upon actual normal production rates,normal operating conditions, andaccepted engineering practicesStorageD4 / D5StorageIntermediatesStorageFinal PolymerStorageRecovered D4 D5StorageWastewaterReactorPolymerizationReactorPolymerizationRecoveryD4 / D5PurificationFinal PolymerAbatementD4 / D5Storm waterSolid WasteFugitive7654321Block Flow Diagram:Processor of D4/D5 with on & off site WWTPTreatmentWastewaterTo Off-site POTWTo Off-siteWasteManagementFigure DE-2
From: ladestef@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:28:43 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Laurel DeStefano

Westfield, IN 46074
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Dated this 19th day of December , 2005

/S/ PETER H. VOELKER 

 Deputy Clerk

MINUTE ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the WESTERN DISTRICT of WASHINGTON

UNITED STATES of AMERICA,

 Plaintiff,

)

)

)

vs. )

) CR05-417 JCC

ABRAHAM SHEENA and LUCUS QUILT,

 Defendant.

)

)

) MINUTE ORDER

The following Minute Order is made at the direction of the Court, the Honorable 

James P. Donohue, United States Magistrate Judge:

In light of the government’s withdrawal of the request for a review of the appearance

bonds of the above named defendants (dkt #98), the hearing scheduled for Wednesday, December

21, 2005, is hereby STRICKEN.

Case 2:05-cr-00417-RSM Document 99 Filed 12/19/05 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF THE

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER

Each of John W. Bordelon, President and Chief Executive Officer and Joseph B. Zanco, Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Home Bancorp, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|(1) | The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Sections 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                                                     
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 15, 2011 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ John W. Bordelon                                
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | John W. Bordelon                                    
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer               
|                     |  |  | 
|Date: March 15, 2011 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Joseph B. Zanco                                 
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Joseph B. Zanco                                     
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



|      |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|----- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Note: |  | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to Home Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 10, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-40976 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE ROBERTO ARDON, also known as Miguel Angel Ortiz-Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-03-CR-204-1

-------------------- Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jose Roberto Ardon appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Ardon complains that his sentence was improperly enhanced pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) based on a prior conviction. He argues that the sentencing provision is unconstitutional. Ardon thus contends that his sentence should not exceed the maximum terms ofNo. 03-40976 -2- imprisonment and supervised release prescribed in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Ardon acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
#### Vinh H. LAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC.; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 00-56003.

D.C. No. CV-00-04566-CM.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 11, 2001.*

Decided June 25, 2001.

Before O’SCANNLAIN, SILVERMAN, and RONALD M. GOULD, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Vinh H. Lam appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing his action under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have jurisdic*547tion under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) dismissal. *Brady v. United States, 211*F.3d 499, 502 (9th Cir.), *cert. denied,*— U.S.-, 121 S.Ct. 627, 148 L.Ed.2d 536 (2000). We affirm for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation filed on May 10, 2000, and adopted by the district court in its order filed on May 24, 2000.

To the extent that Lam’s “Oral Argument and Additional Citations,” filed on March 19, 2001, requests relief, that relief is denied.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
From: k-pporter@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:54:00 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kenneth Porter

Ellington, CT 06029
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

MINUTE ORDER

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

MCGINN FAMILY LAND TRUST, et al, 

 Appellants,

v.

JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, et al,

 Appellees.

 

Case No. C05-1602P

MINUTE ORDER

The following minute order is made by the direction of the court, the Honorable Marsha J.

Pechman:

This case is reassigned to the Honorable Ricardo S. Martinez, as related to C05-1507RSM.

All future pleadings filed in the case should reflect the change in the caption: C05-1602RSM.

Filed and entered this 28th day of September, 2005.

BRUCE RIFKIN, Clerk

By Eileen Scollard

Deputy Clerk

Case 2:05-cv-01602-RSM Document 5 Filed 09/28/2005 Page 1 of 1

JP Morgan Chase Bank v. John P. McGinn, et al Doc. 5

Dockets.Justia.com
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.1




                        OSTEOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                   COMPUTATION OF PRIMARY NET INCOME PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                    Three Months                               Nine Months
                                                 Ended September 30,                        Ended September 30,
                                         ------------------------------------- --- ---------------------------------------
                                              1996                1995                1996                  1995
                                              ----                ----                ----                  ----
<S>                                             <C>                <C>               <C>                  <C>
   Net income                                   $251,000           $4,709,000        $624,000             $4,000,000
                                                --------           ----------         --------             ----------

   Shares used in computing net
    income per share:

     Weighted average Common shares
      outstanding                              7,799,014            7,121,409       7,708,261              7,108,070

     Weighted average Common shares
      issuable upon the exercise of
      outstanding stock options and
      warrants                                 1,336,573            1,628,628       1,430,849              1,594,199

     Application of assumed
      proceeds towards repurchase
      of outstanding Common shares
     using the Treasury Stock
      method                                   (892,764)(a)         (606,722)(a)    (834,615)(b)           (684,407)(b)
                                               ------------        ------------   ------------         ------------

         Shares used in computation            8,242,823            8,143,315      8,304,495              8,017,862
                                               ---------            ---------      ---------              ---------

   Primary net income per share                     $.03                $.58           $.08                   $.50
                                                    ----                ----           ----                   ----


</TABLE>

     a) Computed  using assumed  proceeds of $5,679,766 and average market value
of $6.36 in 1996 and proceeds of $3,959,000 and an average market value of $6.53
in 1995.

     b) Computed  using  assumed  proceeds of $5,833,961  and an average  market
value of $6.99 in 1996 and proceeds of $3,751,000 and an average market value of
$5.48 in 1995.


                                       E-1