alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  Allon Messenberg, the President, Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and Director of OMA Enterprises Corp., certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the
Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
  OMA ENTERPRISES, CORP.Date:  July 24, 2009
By:
/s/ Allon MessenbergName: Allon MessenbergTitle: President and Chief Executive  Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
(Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer)




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
32


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 The
following certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and in accordance with SEC Release No. 33-8238.
These certifications shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall they be incorporated
by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.
 
 Certification
of Principal Executive Officer
 
 Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned officer of Lapolla Industries, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to his knowledge,
that:
 
 (i)
              the
      accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period
      ended March 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and
 
 (ii)
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 Date:
      May 15, 2009
                LAPOLLA
      INDUSTRIES, INC.By:
                /s/
      Douglas J. Kramer, CEODouglas
      J. KramerPrincipal
      Executive Officer
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Lapolla Industries, Inc. and will be retained by Lapolla Industries, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
 
 Certification
of Principal Financial Officer
 
 Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned officer of Lapolla Industries, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to his knowledge,
that:
 
 (i)
              the
      accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period
      ended March 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements
      of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and
 
 (ii)
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 Date:
      May 15, 2009
                      LAPOLLA
      INDUSTRIES, INC.By:
                      /s/
      Paul Smiertka, CFOPaul
      SmiertkaPrincipal
      Financial
Officer
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Lapolla Industries, Inc. and will be retained by Lapolla Industries, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
United St Air and Radiation ; EPA420-F-00-015
Environm | Protection Agency May 2000

SEPA Office of : i and Air Quality

Comimuter _ =
Choice Ei:

Commuters,

Companies,
Communities... "a

Gling Te th laf
TRAQ Website: www.epa.gov/otaq/traq

EPA's Transportation Air Quality Center Telephone Information Request Line: (734) 214-4100


Wat is Commuter Choice?

Commmuter Choice is a best business and management practice that
encourages a broad range of community options by providing financial and
other incentives to employers and employees.

Who will benefit

_ from Commuter Choice?

" a ee
Employees: Employers: .
- Save money - Save on payroll taxes :

- More transportation - Enhance recruiting and retention
choices L

Entire Communities: |

- Improve air quality and reduce congestion
- Improve quality of life through more transportation choices
- Increase use of transit, vanpools, carpools, bikepaths and walkways

E A large t
xamples of possible savings ... | employer
sal , can realize |
An - f in / $1 million |

employee For a business with, 1N payroll
can save An employee who 25,000 employees | tax savings.
j - sets aside $65 a who each set aside 7
; $218 in month before taxes $65 a month before be —— ae a
taxes. for transit benefits, taxes for transit benefits, the employer
receives a total of does not have to pay federal payroll
— a + $780 per year in taxes on $19.5 million per year. At a
untaxed compedaiiee. Ata tax rate tax rate of 6%, the employer has an
of 28%, the employee has $218 in annual tax savings of. over $1 million.

actual annual tax savings.

EPA’s Transportation Air Quality Center Telephone Information Request Line: (734) 214-4100

Find it all at http://www.epa.gov/otaq/traq


Tax Law

Information H Commuter Choice
--- Information is available ow do I Fact Sheets
on the TRAQ website : ae 5
about recent tax law find out a a ew ilies po
bane — Detailed description of
more about z benefits for employers and
= employees

Commuter 5s
State Choice?

Implementation

: Check out the
Plan (SIP) Guidance if .
4 Website
----> Detailed description of how

states and regions can incorporate
emissions reductions from WwW. cpa. gov/otaq/traq
Commuter Choice Programs :
into their efforts to meet -
Clean Air Act requirements

EPA’s ene Air oT Center ZR Information Request Line: (734) 214-4100

‘Printed on recycled paper that contains at least 20% post consumer fiber.

2 ES BE Be

<< a Oe Ge See
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 2, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-50583 Summary Calendar

TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF BUSINESS; WILLIAM O. HAMMOND, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus MIKE BADNARIK; TONY BUZBEE; DAVID CAIN; PAUL CLAYTON; DAVID COUNTS; BOB GLAZE; MIKE HEAD; DONNIE JARVIS; NATHANIEL LAFLEUR; DAVID LENGEFELD; JOSEPHINE MILLER; ROBIN MOORE; ROBERT PARKER; RAUL PRADO; GEORGE ROBINSON; TOM UHER; KEN YARBROUGH, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-02-CV-826-SS

-------------------- Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Texas Association of Business (TAB) and William O. Hammond appeal the district court’s dismissal of their complaint for lack of jurisdiction. They argue that the district court erred in determining that the complaint did not allege facts establishing an actual case or controversy as they have beenNo. 03-50583 -2- threatened with lawsuits and a criminal investigation concerning their creation and publishing of issue-oriented advertisements discussing the records of various candidates for the 2002 Texas elections. Because TAB and Hammond have not alleged that the threat of litigation is fairly traceable to the challenged action of the defendants, they have not met their burden to establish that an actual case or controversy exists. See Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife , 504 U.S. 555, 560-61 (1992).
AFFIRMED.
Order entered November 19, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00883-CR

ROBERT GARRETT, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F10-52395-R

ORDER

The reporter’s record has been filed in this appeal, but the clerk’s record is overdue. 

Appellant’s docketing statement reflects that the clerk’s record was requested on July 2, 2013.

Accordingly, this Court ORDERS the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within 

TWENTY-FIVE DAYS of the date of this order, a complete clerk’s record.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Gary 

Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk; the Dallas County District Clerk’s Office, Criminal 

Records Division; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 538 

Recognizing Mukhtar Mai for her courage and her humanitarian work. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 11, 2007 

Mr. MEEKS of New York submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing Mukhtar Mai for her courage and her 

humanitarian work. 

Whereas Mukhtar Mai is a Pakistani woman from the village 

of Meerwala, in the rural county of Jatoi of the 

Muzaffargarh District of Pakistan; 

Whereas Mukhtar Mai’s brother, Shakoor, was suspected and 

accused of being seen in the company of a Mastoi woman 

and was accused of engaging in sexually inappropriate 

behavior with her; 

Whereas the village council suggested that Shakoor marry the 

girl he was seen with and Mukhtar Mai, a divorcee, be 

married to a Mastoi man; 

Whereas the Mastois reportedly rejected the deal, insisting 

the issue be settled with the eye-for-an-eye principle; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 538 IH 

Whereas Mukhtar Mai was called to the council to apologize 

for her brother’s conduct; 

Whereas when Mukhtar Mai appeared before the council she 

was taken by force and gang raped by 4 men; 

Whereas Mukhtar Mai, an illiterate woman, courageously 

took her case to court where the 4 defendants were found 

guilty; 

Whereas Mukhtar Mai took the settlement money provided by 

the government following her court case and opened 2 

schools in her village—one for boys and one for girls, as 

well as a center for refuge and education known as the 

Mukhtar Mai Women’s Welfare Organization; 

Whereas on August 2, 2005, the Pakistani Government 

awarded Mukhtar Mai the Fatima Jinnah gold medal for 

bravery and courage; 

Whereas on November 2, 2005, Glamour Magazine named 

Mukhtar Mai its ‘‘Glamour Woman of the Year’’; 

Whereas on October 31, 2006, Mukhtar Mai’s memoir was 

released in the United States, titled ‘‘In the Name of 

Honor: A Memoir’’; 

Whereas in March 2007, Mukhtar Mai won the North-South 

Prize from the European Union Council of Europe; and 

Whereas Mukhtar Mai continues to campaign for women’s 

rights and the promotion of education around the world: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes Mukhtar Mai for her courage to 

3 fight for justice; and 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 538 IH 

1 (2) recognizes Mukhtar Mai for promoting edu2 cation and being a champion of women’s rights. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
Filed 12/6/18 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2018 ND 248

Indiana Nordin Sorlie, Plaintiff and Appellant

v.

Michael John Sorlie, Defendant and Appellee

No. 20180071

Appeal from the District Court of Sargent County, Southeast Judicial District,

the Honorable Bradley A. Cruff, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Erica L. Chisholm, Wahpeton, ND, for plaintiff and appellant.

Tracey R. Lindberg, Breckenridge, MN, for defendant and appellee.
Sorlie v. Sorlie

No. 20180071

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Indiana Sorlie appealed from a district court judgment awarding Michael Sorlie

primary residential responsibility of their minor child. Indiana Sorlie argues the

district court erred in applying the best interest factors and in awarding primary

residential responsibility to Michael Sorlie instead of to her, or, in the alternative, not

awarding equal residential responsibility to the parties. This Court reviews a district

court’s decision on primary residential responsibility under the clearly erroneous

standard. Rebenitsch v. Rebenitsch, 2018 ND 48, ¶ 4, 907 N.W.2d 41. Indiana Sorlie

did not request equal residential responsibility from the district court. We conclude

the court’s findings on the best interest factors and its award of primary residential

responsibility of the child to Michael Sorlie were not clearly erroneous. Follman v.

Follman, 2017 ND 58, ¶ 1, 891 N.W.2d 778. We summarily affirm the judgment

under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Jerod E. Tufte

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jon J. Jensen

1
Before the First Division,

September 9, 1955

No. 59271.

protest 865345-G (New York).

#### Schild Adelstein Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of lambskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of *A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1643, *supra.*
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT - SANITIZED 

PMN: 10-0545, 0546

Post-Focus Draft Revision 3 11/10/2010

ENGINEER: Arnold \ DDH \ JAS

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: 

USE: 

Consolidated Set: P-10-545 and P-10-546. 

 

OTHER USES:

MSDS: Yes Label: No

Gen Eqpt: wear suitable gloves/ wear chemical safety

goggles/ use only in well ventilated areas/ keep

container tightly closed

Respirator: no respirator recommendation provided in

submission

Health Effects: may be harmful if swallowed or inhaled/

may cause irritation to skin, eyes and respiratory tract

TLV/PEL:

none established.

CRSS :

Consumer Use: 

SAT (concerns) (09/21/2010):

Migration to groundwater: unknown

PBT rating: P3B1T1

Health: 1-2 Inhalation

Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC =)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2-3B

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. This

is a consolidated set of two PMNs (P10-0545 and P10-0546).

 

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT-SANITIZED 

PMN: 10-0545, 0546

Manufacturing

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 4
Number of Sites/ Location: 

Days/yr: 

Basis:

Process Description: 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note:

Air

Output 2: days/yr from sites

to: 

from: 

basis:

Incineration or land

Output 

from:

basis:

RELEASE TOTAL

kg/yr - all sites

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 

Basis:

Inhalation:

Exposure to 

Output 2: 

Number of workers (all sites) with inhalation exposure:

Basis:

INHALATION MONITORING DATA REVIEW

1) Uncertainty (estimate based on model, regulatory limit

 or data not specific to industry): 

2)a) Exposure level > 1 mg/day? 

 OR

 b) Hazard Rating for health of 2 or greater? 

Inhalation Monitoring Data Desired? 

Dermal:

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 4
Exposure to 

High End: 

Number of workers (all sites) with dermal exposure: 

Basis:

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT-SANITIZED 

PMN: 10-0545, 0546

Processing/Use: 

Number of Sites/ Location: 

Basis:

Process Description: 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: 

 

 

Air

Output 2: 

to: 

from: 

basis:

Incineration or land

Output 

to: 

from:

basis:

Incineration

Conservative: 

to: 

from:

basis:

RELEASE TOTAL

 kg/yr - all sites

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 4
Basis:

Inhalation:

Exposure to 

Output 2: 

Number of workers (all sites) with inhalation exposure: 

Basis: 

INHALATION MONITORING DATA REVIEW

1) Uncertainty (estimate based on model, regulatory limit

 or data not specific to industry): 

2)a) Exposure level > 1 mg/day? 

 OR

 b) Hazard Rating for health of 2 or greater? 

Inhalation Monitoring Data Desired? 

Dermal:

Exposure to 

High End:

Number of workers (all sites) with dermal exposure: 

Basis:

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 4
1

Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Troutman, Jake (FAA)

Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 10:30 AM

To: 'adsuav@gmail.com'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA)

Subject: Request for Additional Information - GD LLC

Dear Mr. Hodges:  

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA‐2015‐

1779).  This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.  

* Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 8900.1,

Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1.  If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closed‐set filming from

your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.  

Please submit the additional information (non‐proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e‐mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov.  If you want us

to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 8/5/15.  If we do not receive

the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.  

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267‐9521.  

Sincerely,

Jake J Troutman

Program Analyst | Rulemaking

FAA Office of Aviation Safety

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

202‐267‐9521
U. S. Department ofTransportation Docket Management System 

### 1200 NewJerseyAve., SE Washington, DC 

### 20590 3/20/16

Re: Amendment to Nicholas M. Brown 's Exemption 

### #12559 in Regulatory Docket No. FAA

### 2015-1295 Dear Siror Madam: Nicholas M . Brown hereby requests an amendmentto exemption #12559 to allow for four (4) additional types of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) that fully comply with the conditions ofthe Petition for Exemption . Nicholas M. Brown wishes to operate the DJI Phantom 3, DJI Phantom 4, DJI Matrice 100 and a Sensefly eBee RTK underthe same terms and conditions contained in exemption 

### #12559. Attached hereto, and submitted as highly proprietary and confidential documents, are the Flight Operations and Procedures Manuals (FOPM) for the four (4) additional UAS. All operations of the additional UAS will be in full compliance with the terms of exemption 

### #12559. Asthis is an amendment 

### to an existing exemption asking foronlythe addition ofothertypes of unmanned aerial vehicles, Nicholas M. Brown respectfully submits that good cause exists so that notice does not need to 

### be published in the Federal Register for the requested amendment. Please contact the undersigned should you have any questions concerning this request for an amendment to exemption 

### #12559. 

# (/;7 nfL Nicholas M. Brown 

### 14400 W. Memorial Ad . I Piedmont, OK 

### 730781405.209.3062
Before the Third Division,

March 1, 1956

No. 59745.

#### Bel Paese Sales Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 228236-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the net weight of certain Pecorino cheese contained in cases 601 to 700, inclusive, was 10,417 pounds and that, if the period of time permitted under section 515 had not expired, the entry would have been reliquidated in respect to said cases on that basis, the collector was directed to reliquidate the entry as to said cases and assess duty thereon on the basis of a net weight of 10,417 pounds. As to all other items and in all other respects, the protest was overruled.
D.Dixon

GIS/Data Service Specialist

01/19/2011

35

12 8 7 8 9 10 11

31 32 33 34 35 36 31

3

33 34 36 31 32

6 2 1

3

4 5 2 1 6

7

6 5 4

10 11 12 7

10

9

9

8

7 8

7

11 12

18 13

13

14

14

15

15

16

16

17

17

18

18

23 24 19

23 24

22

22

21

21

19 20

19 20

25 30 26

26 25

27

27

29 28 30

30 29 28

35 36 31

36

31

35

34

34

33 32

31 32 33

6 2 1

1 6 3

2 3

4

4

5

5 6

7

10 11 12 9

Asotin Creek

Wenatchee Creek

WICKIUP CG

WENATCHEE

GUARD

STATION RC

CABIN SADDLE CG INDIAN

TOM TH

CLOVERLAND SP

South George Project Planning Area - Inventory of Potential Wilderness Areas

H-2A

1 0.5 0 1 Miles

LEGEND

South George Project Planning Area

Washington State Fish and Wildlife

Pomeroy Ranger District

Inventoried Roadless Area (IRA)

Wenaha-Tucannon Wilderness

Past Harvest

Recreation Feature

Forest Roads

Map H-2A: Removal of Past Timber Harvest Area

Depicts Pomeroy Ranger District's

past harvest and Inventoried Roadless Areas.

Past harvest areas where logging and

roads are evident will be removed from 

further examination per (FSH 1909.12 71.11(9)).

 ́

This product is reproduced from geospatial information prepared by the U.S. Department of 

Agriculture, Forest Service. GIS data and product accuracy may vary. They may be: developed from 

sources of differing accuracy, interpretation, incomplete while being created or revised, etc. 

Using GIS products for purposes other than those for which they were created may yield inaccurate 

or misleading results. The Forest Service reserves the right ot correct, update, modify, or replace GIS 

products without notification. For more information contact the Umatilla National Forest Supervisors Office. 

D.Dixon

GIS/Data Service Specialist

06/03/2011

4300

4304

4400
Before the Second Division,

September 6, 1961

No. 66036.

#### Edda International Corp. and Milton Snedeker Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 324054-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of textile warping machinery and parts thereof the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 64990, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.