alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 15.3

January 31, 2013

China Distance Education Holdings Limited

18/F., Xueyuan International Tower

No.1 Zhichun
Road, Haidian District

Beijing, China 100083

Subject: WRITTEN CONSENT OF AMERICAN APPRAISAL CHINA LIMITED

We hereby consent to the references
to our name and our final appraisal reports (the Reports) addressed to the board of directors of China Distance Education Holdings Limited (the Holding Company), and to references to our valuation methodologies, assumptions
and conclusions associated with such Reports, in the annual report on Form 20-F of the Holding Company and any amendments thereto (the Annual Report) filed or to be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. We further
consent to the filing of this letter as an exhibit to the Annual Report.

The Reports relate to valuations of the designated assets and
liabilities of a joint venture named Beijing Zhengbao Yucai Education Technology Co., Ltd. (Zhengbao Yucai) of which certain assets and liabilities were contributed by Beijing Yinglun Yucai Education Consulting Co., Ltd. as of
March 10, 2009 and the designated assets and liabilities of a joint venture named Zhejiang Champion Xinlixiang Education Management Co., Ltd. (Champion Xinlixiang) of which certain assets and liabilities were contributed by
Mr. Junnan Ye and Mr. Xiujie Hu from their Gaokao re-take business as of September 30, 2009 to serve the Holding Company as a basis for allocation of the purchase price to the various accounts for financial reporting purposes in
accordance with U. S. GAAP. In reaching our valuation conclusions, we relied on the accuracy and completeness of the financial statements and other data provided by the Holding Company and its representatives. We did not audit or independently
verify such financial statements or other data and take no responsibility for the accuracy of such information. The Holding Company determined the fair value of the above-mentioned subjects and our valuation reports were used to assist the Holding
Company in reaching its determinations.

In giving such consent, we do not hereby admit that we come within the category of persons whose
consent is required under Section 7 of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the rules and regulations adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission thereunder (the Act), nor do we admit that we are experts with
respect to any part of such Annual Report within the meaning of the term experts as used in the Act.



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|Yours faithfully,                   
|                                    
|/s/ AMERICAN APPRAISAL CHINA LIMITED
|AMERICAN APPRAISAL CHINA LIMITED
EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  In connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-K of Strike Axe, Inc. for the period ending February 28, 2011, I, Daniel K. Leonard, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of Strike Axe, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:  1.Such annual report of Form 10-K for the period ending February 28, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.The information contained in such annual report of Form 10-K for the year ending February 28, 2011, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Strike Axe, Inc.  Date: May 25, 2011Strike Axe, Inc.By: /s/   Daniel K. LeonardDaniel K. Leonard
President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer,
Principal Accounting Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors
Before the First Division,

November 1, 1962

No. 67156.

protests 58/21210, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### W. J. Byrnes & Co., Inc., and Jones-Swanson Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *Falcon Sales Company*and *J. J. Murphy & Co.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 129, C.D. 2292), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Before the Second Division,

September 29, 1966

No. P66/235. —

No. P66/236. —

#### Nisonger Sales Co. and Nisonger Corp. *v.*United States, protests 61/21203 and 63/9868 (Los Angeles). Electra Spark Co. *v.*United States, protests 63/18566 and 64/4229 (New York).

Bao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of spark plugs, not dedicated to use in automobiles or any other vehicle or machine, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Lodge Spark Plug Co.*v. *United States*(49 Cust. Ct. 158, C.D. 2379), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
September 15, 1959

No. 63367.

Suit 4976.

#### United States *v.*Sandoz Chemical Works, Inc.

Abstract 62222, rehearing of C.D. 1956, affirmed June 30, 1959. C.A.D. 711.
**Exhibit 13.1**

** **

** **

** **

** **

**Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal FinancialOfficer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, I, Suresh Venkatesan, the Chief Executive Officer of POET Technologies Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify,that, to my knowledge:

 

1.The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 2015 (the "Report") ofthe Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

The foregoing certification is provided solely for purposes of complying with the provisionsof Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not intended to be used or relied upon for any other purpose.

 

 

Date: March 17, 2016

 

 

 

 

/s/ Suresh Venkatesaon

_____________________

 

Name: Suresh Venkatesan

 

Title: Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 498 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         June 20, 2007.
    Resolved,  That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the 
Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved 
into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for 
consideration of the bill (H.R. 2764) making appropriations for the Department 
of State, foreign operations, and related programs for the fiscal year ending 
September 30, 2008, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall 
be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill are 
waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. General debate 
shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Appropriations. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment 
under the five-minute rule. Points of order against provisions in the bill for 
failure to comply with clause 2 of rule XXI are waived. During consideration of 
the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord 
priority in recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment 
has caused it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record 
designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed 
shall be considered as read. When the committee rises and reports the bill back 
to the House with a recommendation that the bill do pass, the previous question 
shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final 
passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
    Sec. 2.  During consideration in the House of H.R. 2764 pursuant to this 
resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the Chair 
may postpone further consideration of the bill to such time as may be designated 
by the Speaker.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
From: ramon916@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:44:14 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jose Ruvalcaba

South Bend, IN 46601
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Motorvehicle use map. Heber-Kamas Ranger District, Uinta-Wasatch-Cache NationalForest, Utah**
 
2015 | 2016| 2018
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.28:UI 5/17/
Item Number:0080-G (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000962171
 
July 17, 2018
No. 59784.

#### Young Windows, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 202503-K, etc. (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of window regulators of the same kind in all material respects *381as those the subject of *Young*Windows, *Inc.*v. *United States*(34 Cust. Ct. 138, C. D. 1693), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 188 (Friday, September 29, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67332-67333]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21484]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Minority Health and 
Health Disparities Special Emphasis Panel; Technologies/Innovations 
for Improving Minority Health and Eliminating Health Disparities.
    Date: November 15-17, 2023.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, NIMHD, DEM II, Suite 800, 
6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).

[[Page 67333]]

    Contact Person: Jingsheng Tuo, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Office of Extramural Research Administration, National Institute on 
Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of 
Health, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Suite 800, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 
451-5953, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6d0704030a1e0508030a431918022d030405430a021b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="791310171e0a111c171e570d0c1639171011571e160f">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: September 25, 2023.
Victoria E. Townsend,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-21484 Filed 9-28-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

DANIEL T. MCGREW,

Petitioner,

v.

RICHARD MORGAN,

Respondent.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C06-129-MJP-JPD

ORDER GRANTING

RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME

This matter comes before the Court on respondent’s motion for an extension of time

to respond to petitioner’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus. Dkt. No. 16. 

Petitioner has not filed an opposition to the request. Having carefully considered

respondent’s motion and the balance of the record the Court ORDERS as follows:

(1) Respondent’s motion for extension of time to respond to petitioner’s 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 petition, (Dkt. No. 16), is GRANTED. Respondent has indicated that he cannot

prepare a timely response because he has not yet received the complete State court record. Id. 

Respondent shall file his response to the petition no later than July 28, 2006. 

(2) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this order to the parties and to the

Honorable Marsha J. Pechman.

DATED this 13th day of June, 2006.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:06-cv-00129-MJP Document 18 Filed 06/13/06 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                           6,342
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  154,390
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,428
<INVENTORY>                                        490
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               160,603
<PP&E>                                          52,348
<DEPRECIATION>                                  29,365
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 232,249
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          129,384
<BONDS>                                         24,420
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            45
<OTHER-SE>                                      78,400
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   232,249
<SALES>                                        425,609
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               481,063
<CGS>                                          385,171
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  424,759
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   918
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 513
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,674
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,543
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,131
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,131
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.52


</TABLE>
No. 65124.

#### F. W. Myers & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 271030-K, etc. (Detroit).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *The Best Foods, Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 163, C.A.D. 751), the claim *oí*the plaintiffs was sustained.
#### Kathryn Lucarello et al., Respondents, v New York Zoological Society, Defendant, and Lenox Hill Hospital et al., Appellants.

[632 NYS2d 548]

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard Silver, J.), entered May 23,1995, which denied defendants-appellants’ motion to change venue from Bronx County to either Putnam County or New York County, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs properly commenced the action in Bronx County since one of the defendants, no longer a party, resided there. The IAS Court properly exercised its discretion in declining to transfer the action to New York or Putnam County *(see, Callesto v Williams,*107 AD2d 1055), 41/2 years having passed since the commencement of the action and the case ready for jury selection. Pursuant to CPLR 510 (3), the movant bears the burden of demonstrating that the convenience of the material witnesses would be better served by the change of venue. Here, defendants-appellants did not establish that the convenience of two prospective witnesses would be served by the proposed transfer *(see, Rodriguez v Ryder Truck Rental,*100 AD2d 811). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Kupferman, Williams and Tom, JJ.
From: yobo411@earthlink.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:21:52 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Robert Young

Gentry, AR 72734
No. P67/318.

#### Frank P. Dow Co., Inc., and Lafayette Brass Mfg. Co., Inc. *v.*United States, protests 59/3581 and 59/9290 (Los Angeles).

Rao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of brass hose nozzles similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Lipman’s*(52 CCPA 59, C.A.D. 859), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
EXHIBIT 13.1

Certification

In connection with the annual report of China Mass Media Corp. (the
Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Shengcheng Wang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1). the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2). the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

Date: June 30, 2009



/s/    Shengcheng
WangName:

Shengcheng WangTitle:

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.