alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 66030.

#### Abercrombie & Fitch Company *v.*United States,

protests 59/19237 and 295187-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of outerwear jackets, similar in use to coats, wholly or in chief value of cotton, having a staple of 1% inches or more in length, which subjects the involved merchandise to additional duty, and following the principles set forth in *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: kkschuck@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:09:52 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Karen Schuck

Pflugerville, TX 78660
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 469 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Iraqi National 

Assembly should cancel or postpone its planned two-month recess scheduled to begin in July 2007 and work toward meeting political, social, 

and military benchmarks. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 6, 2007 

Mr. STEARNS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

the Iraqi National Assembly should cancel or postpone 

its planned two-month recess scheduled to begin in July 

2007 and work toward meeting political, social, and military benchmarks. 

Whereas the Iraqi National Assembly plans to take its regular summer break, a two-month recess scheduled to 

begin in July 2007; 

Whereas such an extended break demonstrates a lack of will 

and urgency to reach reconciliation among rival factions 

by the Iraqi National Assembly; 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 469 IH 

Whereas the United States Congress and President George 

W. Bush have set out 18 benchmarks for the Iraqi Government; 

Whereas United States aid and military support could be conditioned on the Iraqi Government meeting these benchmarks; 

Whereas many of these benchmarks call for the Iraqi National Assembly to enact and implement legislation to 

carry out ‘‘de-Baathification’’ measures; to ensure the equitable distribution of hydrocarbon resources of the people of Iraq without regard to the sect or ethnicity of recipients; to ensure that the energy resources of Iraq benefit Sunni Arabs, Shia Arabs, Kurds, and other Iraqi citizens in an equitable manner; to establish an Independent 

High Electoral Commission, provincial elections law, provincial council authorities, and a date for provincial elections; and to establish a strong militia disarmament program to ensure that the security forces of Iraq are accountable only to the central government and loyal to the 

Constitution of Iraq; 

Whereas United States Armed Forces continue to fight and 

give their lives to stabilize Iraq; and 

Whereas every member of the United States Armed Forces 

in Iraq deserves the utmost respect and support from 

Congress: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the Iraqi National Assembly should can3 cel or postpone its planned two-month recess scheduled to 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 469 IH 

1 begin in July 2007 and work toward meeting political, so2 cial, and military benchmarks. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1999             MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1999             FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                       4,206,000               4,206,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,837,000               1,837,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (71,000)                (71,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    164,000                 164,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,196,000               6,196,000
<PP&E>                                      16,067,000              16,067,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (5,069,000)             (5,069,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,052,000              30,052,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,684,000               5,368,000
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        71,000                  71,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,052,000              30,052,000
<SALES>                                      4,387,000              13,716,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,707,000              17,793,000
<CGS>                                        4,166,000              12,880,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,459,000              16,567,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             146,000                 479,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                102,000                 747,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    19,000                 142,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    83,000                 605,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01                     .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01                     .09
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

RONALD AND DEBORAH KEAL,

Plaintiffs,

v.

STATE OF WASHINGTON, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5737RJB

ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION AND

GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT

MALLOQUE’S MOTION FOR

JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL ON

THE PLEADINGS

 The court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge J. Kelley

Arnold (Dkt. 163-1) and the file herein, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The court adopts the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 163-1).

(2) Defendant Malloque’s Motion for Judgment of Dismissal on the Pleadings (Dkt. 139)

is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: 

(3) Plaintiff Deborah Keal has failed to state a cause of action against defendant

Malloque. The motion is therefore GRANTED as to Ms. Keal, and her claims against

defendant Malloque are DISMISSED.

(4) Plaintiff Ronald Keal has sufficiently alleged exhaustion of administrative remedies

and personal participation by defendant Malloque to withstand the motion for

judgment on the pleadings. The motion is therefore DENIED as to Mr. Keal.

(5) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiffs, counsel for any

defendants who have appeared, and to the Hon. J. Kelley Arnold.

DATED this 26th day of September, 2006.

ARobert J. Bryan

United States District Judge

Case 3:05-cv-05737-RJB-JKA Document 175 Filed 09/26/06 Page 1 of 1
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER DISMISSING § 1983 ACTION

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

JOSEPH ELIJAH AGEE,

Plaintiff,

v.

SHANE STEVENSON, et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C05-1506-MJP

ORDER DISMISSING § 1983 ACTION

The Court, having reviewed defendants’ motion for summary judgment and motion to

dismiss, the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Mary Alice Theiler, United States

Magistrate Judge, any objections thereto, and the balance of the record, does hereby ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Dkt. #28) is GRANTED. The

complaint and this § 1983 action are DISMISSED as frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. §

1915(e)(2)(B)(i);

(3) Defendant Duffy’s motion to dismiss (Dkt. #31) is DENIED as moot;

(4) This dismissal shall count as a dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); and

/ / /

Case 2:05-cv-01506-MJP Document 37 Filed 10/03/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER DISMISSING § 1983 ACTION

PAGE -2

(5) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff, to counsel for

defendants, and to Judge Theiler.

DATED this _2nd day of ____October____________________, 2006.

A

Marsha J. Pechman

U.S. District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-01506-MJP Document 37 Filed 10/03/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 4.2

 

OneSmart International Education Group Limited - Class A Ordinary Shares

(Incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands)

 

	
Number
    	
 
    	
Shares
    


 

Share capital US$50,000 divided into 50,000,000,000 shares comprising of

(i) 37,703,157,984 Class A Ordinary Shares of a par value of US$0.000001 each,

(ii) 2,296,842,016 Class B Ordinary Shares of a par value of US$0.000001 each, and

(iii) 10,000,000,000 shares of a par value of US$0.000001 each

 

	
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
is   the registered holder of
    	
 
    


 

Shares in the above-named Company subject to the Memorandum and articles of association thereof.

 

 

EXECUTED for and on behalf of the Company on

 

 

 

 

 

	
DIRECTOR
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

DEPARTMENT OF 

RAMSPOBTATION 

r^XKET OPERATIONS 

m NOV 2U A 0 lb 

TRAVEL GROUP, INC., D/B/A REPUBLIC AIR TRAVEL 

AND SCOT SPENCER 

AIRLIFT GROUP, INC. 

AND RICHARD BERNARD 

Unauthorized Air Transportation, Unfair and Deceptive 

Practices and Unfair Methods of Competition, and 

Violations of Public Charter Rules 

EXPRESS ONE INTERNATIONAL, INC. 

Unfair and Deceptive Practices and Unfair Methods of 

Competition, and Violations of Public Charter Rules 

Enforcement Proceeding 

DOT-OST-1995-272 

formerly 

Docket 49233 

STATUS REPORT 

The Office of the Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and 

Proceedings ("Enforcement Office"), pursuant to Your Honor's March 22, 2006, Order 

staying this proceeding, files this report detailing the current status of this proceeding and 

settlement negotiations. 

The Department has not ruled on the outstanding motions filed by Respondents 

and opposed by the Enforcement Office in Ascend Aviation Group, Docket OST-2004-

17486. 
There have been no further settlement discussions. 

Date: November 24, 2010. 

Respectfully submitted. 

Samuel Podberesky 

Assistant General Counsel for 

Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings 

Dayton Lehman, Jr. 

Deputy Assistant General Counsel for 

Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings 

L l&^£>^^.\UJfi 

I William J. Wagflei:' /I 

•j Senior Trial Attorney 

% United States Department of Transportation 

I Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings 

I 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

! Room 96-429 

1 Washington, D.C. 20590 

I TEL: 202-366-9342 

I FAX: 202-366-7152 
Docket No. DOT-OST-1995-272 

I hereby certify that on this 24th day of November, 2010, a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing Status Report was served in the following manner to the following: 

Original 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building Ground Floor 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

By Personal Service 

The Honorable Ronnie A Yoder 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

East Building Ground Floor 

Room El2-320 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

TEL: (202) 366-2142 

FAX: (202) 366-7536 

By First Class Mail 

Scot Spencer 

SBD Aircraft Services 

255 S Leland Norton Way 

Sam Bernardino, CA 92408 

.-^P^ 

/ ^ y iwyw\A 

-fv 

/
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: TheYukon-Tanana region, Alaska : description of Circle quadrangle**
 
Report | Plate
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:295
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000957589
 
July 25, 2018
Order entered October 23, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00657-CV

ANGELA NAILS, Appellant

V.

MARK FRELS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 160th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-15238

ORDER

Asserting a copy of the reporter’s record mailed to her belongs to an unrelated appeal, 

appellant moves to strike the record and for an extension of time to file an amended brief. 

Because the reporter’s record filed in this appeal relates to this appeal, we DENY appellant’s 

motion to strike. We GRANT appellant’s extension request to the extent that we ORDER 

appellant to file her amended brief no later than November 3, 2014. Appellant is cautioned that 

failure to comply may result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice. 

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
From: someones.unicorn@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:33:24 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kelsey Barrion

Kaneohe, HI 96744
From: snwise@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:26:42 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Steven Wise

, 37027-4949
Before the Second Division,

May 11, 1966

No. P66/52.

protests 65/12564 and 65/18963 (New York).

#### Magnesium Elektron, Inc. *v.*United States,

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of magnesium alloys similar hi all material respects to those the subject of *Magnesium Electron, Inc.*v. *United States*(50 Cust. Ct. 71, C.D. 2391), and that the percentage of the metallic magnesium content of the items in entry 801728, protest 65/18963, where no percentage is indicated, is 66 percent, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: William Smith

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:46:46 PM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

William Smith
Newtown, Pennsylvania