alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2



                 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                             Chief Financial Officer

         The undersigned, as the chief financial officer of Allied Healthcare
         Products, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify for purposes of 18
         U.S.C. ss.1350 that (i) the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-K for
         the Company's fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2002 (the "Report"),
         as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 14,
         2002, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
         the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) information contained in
         the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
         financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and
         for the periods covered in the Report.



                             s/       Daniel C. Dunn
                               ----------------------------------
                                      Daniel C. Dunn, Chief Financial Officer



                                      February 12, 2003
Exhibit 10.36

FIRST AMENDMENT TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into effective as of October 20, 2017 (the “Effective Date”) by and between Summer Energy Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Employer”), and Neil Leibman (“Employee”). 

RECITALS

A. Employer and Employee are parties to that certain Employment Agreement dated as of January 1, 2017 (the “Employment Agreement”).  Unless otherwise indicated, all capitalized terms herein shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Employment Agreement; and 

 

B.Pursuant to Section 9 of the Employment Agreement, Employer and Employee desire to amend the Employment Agreement pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Amendment.   

  

AGREEMENT

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and conditions set forth herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, Employer and Employee hereby agree as follows: 

1.Exhibit A to the Employment Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the second bullet point in section 5 of Exhibit A and replacing it in its entirety with the following language:   

Beginning on and measured from October 1, 2017, and continuing through the term of this Agreement, Employee will be granted a fully-vested option to purchase 15,000 shares of Employer’s common stock each calendar quarter, provided Summer LLC’s (i) quarterly commercial sales volume exceeds 22,500,000 KWh for such quarter (as measured by the ERCOT Commercial Rolling Metrics report) and (ii) EBITDA after SG&A expenses, divided by Gross Profit, each as set forth on Employer’s internal energy schedule, exceeds 9.0% for such quarter.  Provided such metrics were met for a particular quarter, Employer will grant said options as promptly as possible following the end of such fiscal quarter with a strike price equal to the greater of (i) the fair market value of a share of stock on the date of grant, and (ii) $2.50 per share.  Such option will be granted pursuant to the terms and conditions of a Stock Option Grant Agreement and the Employer’s 2015 Stock Option and Stock Award Plan.  Upon the occurrence of a Change of Control (as defined in this Agreement, as amended), unless otherwise agreed to by the parties, the incentive compensation described in this paragraph shall terminate.  

2.All other provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this First Amendment to Employment Agreement as of the Effective Date.

 

EMPLOYER:EMPLOYEE: 

 

SUMMER ENERGY HOLDINGS, INC.

a Nevada corporation/s/ Neil Leibman 

Neil Leibman 

By: /s/ Jaleea P. George 

Name:Jaleea P. George 

Title:CFO 


1
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 86 (Thursday, May 3, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 26254]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10816]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE

Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

    The Board of Directors of the Corporation for National and 
Community Service gives notice of the following meeting:

DATE AND TIME: Wednesday, May 9, 2012, 10:00-11:30 a.m.

PLACE: Corporation for National and Community Service, 1201 New York 
Avenue, NW., Suite 8312, Washington, DC 20525 (Please go to 10th floor 
reception area for escort).

CALL-IN INFORMATION: This meeting is available to the public through 
the following toll-free call-in number: 888-391-6586 conference call 
access code number 8723527. Any interested member of the public may 
call this number and listen to the meeting. Callers can expect to incur 
charges for calls they initiate over wireless lines, and CNCS will not 
refund any incurred charges. Callers will incur no charge for calls 
they initiate over land-line connections to the toll-free telephone 
number. Replays are generally available one hour after a call ends. The 
toll-free phone number for the replay is 800-262-5024. The end replay 
date is June 9, 2012, 10:29 p.m. (CT). This meeting will also be 
broadcast live on the web. Members of the public may view proceedings 
by visiting http://www.nationalservice.gov/about/newsroom/live.asp

STATUS: Open.

Matters To Be Considered

I. Chair's Opening Comments and Swearing in of New Members
II. Consideration of Previous Meeting's Minutes
III. CEO Report
IV. Discussion, Deliberation and Official Actions
V. Public Testimony from Senior Corps Participants in Honor of 
Senior Corps Week
VI. Public Comments

    Members of the public who would like to comment on the business of 
the Board may do so in writing or in person. Individuals may submit 
written comments to esamose@cns.gov subject line: MAY 2012 CNCS BOARD 
MEETING by 4:00 p.m. ET on Friday May 4th. Individuals attending the 
meeting in person who would like to comment will be asked to sign-in 
upon arrival. Comments are requested to be limited to 2 minutes.

REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS: The Corporation for National and Community 
Service provides reasonable accommodations to individuals with 
disabilities where appropriate. Anyone who needs an interpreter or 
other accommodation should notify Ida Green at igreen@cns.gov or 202-
606-6861 by 5 p.m., May 4, 2012.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Emily Samose, Strategic Advisor 
for Board Engagement, Corporation for National and Community Service, 
1201 New York Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20525. Phone: (202) 606-7564. 
Fax: (202) 606-3460. TTY: (800) 833-3722. Email: esamose@cns.gov.

    Dated: May 1, 2012.
Valerie Green,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2012-10816 Filed 5-1-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6050-$$-P
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 21 (Friday, January 31, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 5510]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-02077]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8617]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Bodies in Balance: The Art of Tibetan Medicine''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Bodies in Balance: The Art of Tibetan 
Medicine,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at 
the Rubin Museum of Art, New York, New York, from on or about March 15, 
2014, until on or about September 8, 2014, and at possible additional 
exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national 
interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: January 24, 2014.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-02077 Filed 1-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER -1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

WADE B. COOK and LAURA M. COOK,

Defendants.

No. CR05-424Z

ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on defendant Wade Cook’s Motion for Amendment

of Conditions of Release, docket no. 33. Pretrial Services has issued its Supplemental Pretrial

Services Report, dated January 24, 2006, finding that defendant is “viewed as a risk of financial

danger due to lack of information regarding the defendant’s employment, current income, and

assets and liabilities.” As a condition of release Pretrial Services recommended and Magistrate

Judge Mary Alice Theiler imposed certain conditions of an Appearance Bond which are now

the subject matter of defendant’s motion. Specifically, defendant’s Appearance Bond prohibits

self-employment under any business entity unless permitted by Pretrial Services and requires

defendant Wade Cook to provide Pretrial Services “with any information regarding . . . financial

status, income sources, and investments.” 

Defendant Wade Cook and his co-defendant wife Laura Cook, were charged by

Information in December 2005 with seven counts of conspiracy, income tax evasion and filing

false tax returns. A separate Indictment also returned in December 2005 charged the defendants

Case 2:05-cr-00424-TSZ Document 46 Filed 02/14/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER -2-

with obstruction of justice. The Government has recently filed a Superseding Indictment

charging these same crimes. See docket no. 39. The Government alleges that the Cooks

conspired to fraudulently obtain and conceal approximately $8.9 million in royalties involving

hundreds of financial transactions over several years and later attempted to obstruct justice by

presenting to the Government a false and fraudulent “Secured Promissory Note.” 

The Court has considered the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g) and concludes as

a matter of law that the conditions set by the Magistrate Judge are reasonably necessary to assure

the appearance of Wade Cook and to assure the safety of the community. 

Any disclosure of financial information to Pretrial Services shall be treated as confidential

by Pretrial Services and shall not be disclosed to Government counsel without prior order of the

Court. 

The defendant’s Motion for Amendment of Conditions of Release, docket no. 33, is

DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 14th day of February, 2006.

AThomas S. Zilly

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cr-00424-TSZ Document 46 Filed 02/14/06 Page 2 of 2
From: jteran@hcisdowls.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:49:49 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Loree Teran

Hale Center, TX 79041
No. 63836.

protests 105207-K, etc. (New York).

#### Empire Liquor Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved *351in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
#### In the Matter of Abdullah Y. Salahuddin, Petitioner, v Alice Calonga, as Nurse of Sullivan Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.

[632 NYS2d 324]

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Sullivan County) to review a determination of respondents which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule prohibiting inmates from physically interfering with staff in the performance of their duties as a result of an incident involving respondent Alice Calonga, a facility nurse. Petitioner contends that the administrative determination is not supported by substantial evidence. We disagree. In addition to the misbehavior report, the testimony of the nurse and the correction officer who responded to Calonga’s call for assistance establishes that petitioner approached Calonga and stood between her and the door of the examining room after a verbal confrontation. In view of this, we find that substantial evidence supports the determination. Petitioner’s remaining arguments have been considered and rejected as lacking in merit.

Cardona, P. J., Crew III, White, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 45985

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

COLTON HUNTER MARLEY,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Filed: January 18, 2019

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Elmore County. Hon. Nancy Baskin, District Judge. 

Judgment and sentence and order of probation, affirmed.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Sally J. Cooley, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before HUSKEY, Judge; LORELLO, Judge;

and BRAILSFORD, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Colton Hunter Marley entered an Alford1 plea to felony driving under the influence of 

alcohol. I.C. § 18-8004(1)(a). The district court sentenced Marley to a unified ten-year 

sentence, with three years determinate, and after a period of retained jurisdiction, suspended the 

sentence and placed Marley on probation for ten years. Marley appeals, contending that the 

district court abused its discretion by imposing an excessive sentence and by placing Marley on 

probation for a period of ten years.

 1 See North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 (1970). 
2

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of a sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). 

Applying the foregoing standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot 

say that the district court abused its discretion either in imposing the original sentence or by 

placing Marley on probation for a term of ten years. Therefore, the original sentence and the 

order placing Marley on probation are affirmed.
No. 63840.

protests 304741-K, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### Castelazo & Associates and David Chow & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

*352Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of iron pictures the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Marshall Field & Co.*v. *United States*(45 C.C.P.A. 72, C.A.D. 676), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection
with the Quarterly Report of Northern Technologies International  Corporation (the Company)
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending  November 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the  date hereof (the Report), I, G. Patrick Lynch,
President and  Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of  2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

| | (1) | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The
information contained in the Report  fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results  of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



President and Co-Chief Executive Officer (principal
executive officer)




---

Lino Lakes,
MinnesotaJanuary 13, 2003
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 192 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Small Business 

in the One Hundred Tenth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2007 

Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

Small Business in the One Hundred Tenth Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Small Business 

4 (hereafter in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Com5 mittee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries, there 

6 shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the House 

7 of Representatives for committee salaries and expenses, 

8 not more than $6,257,410.00 for the One Hundred Tenth 

9 Congress. 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 192 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $3,009,086.00 shall be avail4 able for expenses incurred during the period begin5 ning at noon on January 3, 2007, and ending imme6 diately before noon on January 3, 2008; and 

7 (2) not more than $3,248,324.00 shall be avail8 able for expenses incurred during the period begin9 ning at noon on January 3, 2008, and ending imme10 diately before noon on January 3, 2009. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Jose Angel Madrigal REYNOSO, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 03-30222.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 14, 2004.*

Decided Aug. 11, 2005.

Matthew H. Thomas, Esq., Douglas James Hill, Esq., USTA-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tacoma, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Mark W. Muenster, Esq., Vancouver, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.

*640Before: HALL, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

*

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

ORDER and MEMORANDUM **

The petition for panel rehearing is granted.

The Memorandum Disposition filed June 24, 2004, is WITHDRAWN and replaced with the following Memorandum Disposition:

Jose Angel Madrigal Reynoso appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for use of a communications facility to facilitate a drug transaction, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 843(b) and (d), and unlawful entry by an alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1352(a)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we remand.

Reynoso contends that his counsel was ineffective because he failed to advocate for a downward adjustment of Reynoso’s sentence under U.S.S.G. § 2Dl.l(b)(6). Because resolution of Reynoso’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim requires the development of facts outside the record, we decline to review it on direct appeal. *See United States v. Hanoum,*33 F.3d 1128, 1131-32 (9th Cir.1994) (observing that ineffective assistance claim is more properly raised by collateral attack under 28 U.S.C. § 2255).

The Sentencing Guidelines are no longer mandatory and we cannot determine from the record whether the sentence imposed would have been materially different had the district court known that the Guidelines were advisory. *See United States v. Ameline,*409 F.3d 1073, 1074 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). On remand, therefore, the district court should also consider in its discretion Reynoso’s sentence in light of *Ameline.*

REMANDED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.