alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 ... S eeTe x. R. App . P. 47. 4. 

## COURT OFAPPEALS SECOND DISTRICTOF TEXAS FORT WORTH NOS. 2 - 09 - 00 7- CR 2- 09 - 00 8- CR B E NI T O T . M E NDE Z J R . AP P E L L ANT V . THE STATE OF TE XA S STATE

----- ----- FR O M THE 2 97 DI STRI CT CO URT O F TARRA NT CO UN TY TH

----- ----- 

### MEMORANDU M OPI NI ON 1 

### AND J UDGME NT

----- ----- W e h ave con si der ed app el l ant ’ s “M ot i on To D i sm i ss A ppe al . ” The m ot i on com pl i es w i t h r ul e 42. 2( a) oft he r ul esofap pel l at e p r oce dur e. Tex . R. A pp. P. 42 . 2( a) . N o deci si on of t hi s cour t havi ng been del i ver ed bef or e w e rec ei ved th i s m o ti o n , w e g ra n t th e m o ti o n a n d d i s m i s s th e a p p e a l . S eeT ex. R . A pp. P. 4 2 .2 (a ), 4 3 .2 (f).

P E R CU R I AM PA N EL: L I V I N G STO N , D A U PH I N O T, an d GA RD N ER, JJ. DO NO T P UBLI SH Tex. R. A pp. P. 47. 2( b) DEL I VERE D: F e br ua r y 19, 2009
<EX-31(b)>
                                                 Exhibit 31(b)
                        CERTIFICATIONS
I, James C. Estill, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of
   Calloway's Nursery, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
   untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
   material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
   of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
   not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
   report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
   other financial information included in this report, fairly
   present in all material respects the financial condition,
   results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,
   and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
   responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
   controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-
   15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
       caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
       under our supervision, to ensure that material information
       relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
       subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
       entities, particularly during the period in which this report
       is being prepared;
    b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
       disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
       report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
       disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
       period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
    c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
       internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
       the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's
       fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that
       has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to affect,
       the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
       and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
   disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
   control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors
   and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
   persons performing the equivalent function):

    a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
       the design or operation of internal control over financial
       reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
       registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
       financial information; and
    b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
       management or other employees who have a significant role in
       the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:     May 13, 2004

/s/ James C. Estill
James C. Estill
President and Chief Executive Officer
From: eileen.vincent34@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:58:03 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

I ask you to heed the voice of the people.

Eileen Vincent

Sincerely,

Eileen Vincent

San Antonio, TX 78240
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 339 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 339

       Supporting the goals of Motorcycle Safety Awareness Month.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2007

  Mr. Burgess (for himself and Ms. Giffords) submitted the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
       Supporting the goals of Motorcycle Safety Awareness Month.

Whereas approximately 7,000,000 motorcyclists ride on our Nation's roads and 
        highways to commute, travel, and recreate;
Whereas motorcycles are a valuable component of the transportation mix;
Whereas motorcycles are fuel-efficient and decrease congestion while having 
        little impact on our Nation's transportation infrastructure;
Whereas the United States is the world leader in motorcycle safety, promoting 
        education, licensing, use of protective gear, and motorcycle awareness;
Whereas the motorcycling community is committed to decreasing motorcycle crashes 
        through licensing, training, education, enforcement, personal 
        responsibility, and increased public awareness;
Whereas, according to a comprehensive study conducted on motorcycle crash 
        causation in the United States the ``Motorcycle Accident Cause Factors 
        and Identification of Countermeasures'' (Hurt Report), in approximately 
        two-thirds of fatal car-motorcycle crashes, the driver of the car was at 
        fault;
Whereas motorcycle awareness is beneficial to all road users and will help to 
        decrease car-motorcycle crashes;
Whereas May is designated as ``Motorcycle Safety Awareness Month''; and
Whereas National Highway Traffic Safety Administration promotes Motorcycle 
        Safety Awareness Month to encourage riders to always wear helmets and 
        other protective gear, never drink and ride, be properly licensed, and 
        get training and to remind all riders and motorists to always share the 
        road: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the contribution motorcycles make to the 
        transportation mix;
            (2) encourages all road users to be more aware of 
        motorcycles and motorcyclists' safety; and
            (3) supports the goals of Motorcycle Safety Awareness 
        Month.
                                 <all>
```
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

_________________________________ 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

March 9, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 131655(96)(98) Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

PAMELA PEREZ, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 SC: 131655 

v COA: 249737 

Wayne CC: 01-134649-CL

FORD MOTOR COMPANY and 

DANIEL P. BENNETT,

Defendants-Appellants. 

 On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by plaintiff-appellee for extension 

of the time fore filing her supplemental brief is considered and it is GRANTED. The 

motion by the Michigan Trial Lawyers Association for leave to file a brief amicus curiae 

is considered and it is GRANTED. 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 9, 2007 

 Clerk
Before the Second Division,

April 29, 1969

No. P69/139.

protest 64/9995 (New York).

#### Milo Mills, Inc. *v.*United States,

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of rayon yarn similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Chester Tricot*Mills, *Inc.*v. *United States*(56 Cust. Ct. 532, C.D. 2695), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
September 4, 1959

No. 63332.

protest 295406-K.

#### Brown Boveri Corp. *v.*United States,

Case restored to docket by order of the court.
No. 60525.

#### Frederic Henjes, Jr., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 261843-K and 266474-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protests were dismissed for lack of prosecution.
From: patch@accsedu.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:52:02 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Blake Blakey

Moscow, ID 83843
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1331 Broadway , Suite 400

Tacoma, Washington 98402

ORDER SEALING – page 1 (253) 593-6710

JUDGE RONALD B. LEIGHTON 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

JACOB GARDNER,

Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. CR05-5823RBL 

ORDER SEALING DEFENDANT’S

SENTENCING MEMORANDUM

The Court having considered the Motion for Order Sealing Defendant’s

Sentencing Memorandum and attachments thereto, 

NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendant’s

Sentencing Memorandum and attachments thereto, are to be sealed. 

DONE this 23rd day of July, 2007.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

Presented by: UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

/s______________________

Russell V. Leonard

Attorney for Defendant 

Case 3:05-cr-05823-RBL Document 279 Filed 07/23/07 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit      10.02**

**OUTBACK      STEAKHOUSE, INC**

**Amendment      To Officer Employment Agreement**

**Recitals**

**.**
**Change      of Employee’s Title**
** **

**Ratification**

|          |                                                                    |  “**EMPLOYER**” |
|---------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------|
|          |                                                                         |                                  |  |  |
|  Attest: | OS                    RESTAURANT SERVICES, INC., a Delaware corporation |                             |
|          |                                                                    |                             |   |   |
|  By:     |  /s/                    Joseph J. Kadow                            |  By:                        |  /s/                      A. William Allen, III    |   |
|          | Joseph                      J. Kadow, Secretary                         |                                  | A.                    William Allen, III, Chief Executive Officer |  |
|          |                                                                    |                             |   |   |
|          |                                                                         |  “**COMPANY**”  |  |
|          |                                                                    |                             |   |   |
|  Attest: | OUTBACK                      STEAKHOUSE, INC., a Delaware corporation   |                                  |
|          |                                                                    |                             |   |   |
| By:      |  /s/                    Joseph J. Kadow                            | By:                         |  /s/                      A. William Allen, III |   |
|          | Joseph                    J. Kadow, Secretary                           |                             | A.                    William Allen, III, Chief Executive Officer |  |

|  WITNESSES:                                                  |  “**EMPLOYEE**” |                                                          |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                              |                             |                                                          |   |
|                                                              |                             |                                                          |   |
|  /s/                    Kelly                    B. Lefferts |                             |  /s/                    Paul                    E. Avery |   |
|                                                              |                             | PAUL                    E. AVERY                              |   |
|                                                              |                             |                                                          |   |
No. 67571.

#### William Shaland Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 59/22856 and 59/20267 (New York).

*257Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists or miniature pocketknives similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 65737, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Dated this 5th day of September , 2006

/S/ PETER H. VOELKER 

 Deputy Clerk

MINUTE ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the WESTERN DISTRICT of WASHINGTON

CARPENTERS HEALTH & SECURITY

TRUST of WESTERN WASHINGTON, et

al.,

 Plaintiff,

)

)

)

vs. )

) MS06-6 JPD

MUSCAT CONSTRUCTION, INC.,

 Defendant.

)

)

) MINUTE ORDER

The following Minute Order is made at the direction of the Court, the Honorable 

James P. Donohue, United States Magistrate Judge:

The debtor, Edger Muscat, having self-surrendered on the civil contempt warrant issued in

the above entitled matter, and having submitted to the debtor examination, is hereby ordered

released from the custody of the United States Marshal.

Case 2:06-mc-00006-JPD Document 24 Filed 09/05/06 Page 1 of 1
ex_107982.htm


Exhibit 10.3.3


 


GEOVAX, INC.


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO SALARY DEFERRAL AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment No. 1 to Salary Deferral Agreement (the “Agreement”) is entered into as of July 1, 2017 by and between GeoVax, Inc., a Georgia Corporation (the “Company”), and Harriet L. Robinson (the “Employee”).


 


Whereas, the Company and Employee entered into a Salary Deferral Agreement (the “Original Agreement”) dated April 25, 2016; and


 


Whereas, the Company and Employee recognize that it is in the best interests of the Company, its shareholders, and its collective Employees to conserve the Company’s cash resources; and as part of its cash conservation measures, the Company has asked certain of its employees to accept salary reductions and/or deferrals; and


 


Whereas, the Company and Employee acknowledge that the Original Agreement and this amendment have been entered into for the express purpose of conserving the Company’s cash resources and not for executive compensation tax planning purposes, and 


 


Whereas, Employee currently is currently earning an annualized gross salary of $265,750 (“Base Salary”), which has been previously reduced by 50% to $132,875, based on Employee’s reduction of her time devoted to the Company’s business; 


 


Now, therefore, the parties hereby agree as follows:


 


	
			1.

				
			Accumulated Salary Deferral.

			
	 	Employee acknowledges his prior verbal agreement to continue the salary deferral pursuant to the Original Agreement through June 30, 2017. The Company and Employee acknowledge and agree that the accumulated amount of deferred salary owed to Employee as of June 30, 2017 is $77,510.44



 


	
			2.

				
			Continuation of Salary Deferral.

			
	 	Employee agrees to continue deferral 50% of her Base Salary as previously reduced, which amount will be accrued and paid to Employee as described below.



 


	
			3.

				
			Discontinuance of Salary Reduction and/or Deferral

			
	 	Employee’s Salary Deferral pursuant to this Agreement shall end upon the occurrence of a significant event (to include financing, corporate partnership, etc., as determined solely by the Company) (the “Discontinuance Date”).



 


	
			4.

				
			Payment of Accumulated Deferred Salary.

			
	 	At the Discontinuance Date, the Company in its sole discretion will determine the form of payment to be made to Employee for the accumulated Deferred Salary. Such payment may be made in cash, in the form of Company Stock, or in a combination of cash and stock.



 


ACCEPTANCE


	 	 	 	 
	
			Employee

				 	 	
			Date

				 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
			Agreed:

				 	 	 	 
	 	
			GeoVax, Inc.

				 	 	 
	 	
			By:
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

No. 04-0899

NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA., AIG TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY, AND THE INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA

v.

ULTRAMAR, INC., DIAMOND SHAMROCK REFINING AND MARKETING COMPANY, ULTRAMAR ENERGY, INC., AND ULTRAMAR LIMITED

On Petition for Review

**ORDERED:**

1.Petitioners’ emergency motion for stay of trial pending resolution of interlocutory appeal, filed July 25, 2005, is granted. 

Done at the City of Austin, this August 17, 2005.

Andrew Weber, Clerk

Supreme Court of Texas

By Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk
Exhibit 12.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Leonidas Korres, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this
amendment no. 2 to the annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 of Navios Maritime Acquisition Corporation; and

2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report.



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Leonidas Korres                                  
|Leonidas Korres                                      
|Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer)

Date: August 29, 2013
1 

### Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Troutman, Jake (FAA)

Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 9:04 AM

To: 'XOinnovation@gmail.com'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA)

Subject: Request for Additional Information - XO Innovations

Tracking Tracking: Recipient Read

'XOinnovation@gmail.com'

Pappas, Rob (FAA)

Hightower, Gerald CTR (FAA) Read: 7/14/2015 9:05 AM

Dear Mr. Amaya:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA

‐ 2015

‐ 0344). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

• A safety case is required for nighttime operations by Order 8900.1, Volume 16, Chapter 5, Section 3, Paragraph 16

‐ 5

‐

3

‐ 7I. The required components of a safety case and safety case format may be found in Order 8900.1, Volume 16,

Chapter 7, Section 1, Paragraph 16

‐ 7

‐ 1

‐ 3. required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us

to proceed without safety case and remove nighttime operations from your proposed operation please inform of us of

your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non

‐ proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e

‐ mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov

. If you want us

to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 7/29/2015. If we do not

receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267

‐ 9521.

Sincerely,

Jake J Troutman

Program Analyst | Rulemaking

FAA Office of Aviation Safety

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

202

‐ 267

‐ 9521