alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Robert C. Sepucha, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SPARTA, Inc.;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. May 10, 2005 /s/ Robert C. SepuchaRobert C. SepuchaChief Executive Officer
 - 21 -
1 

### Kelly, Shaheerah

From: Ora V. Marek-Martinez <oramm@navajo-nsn.gov>

Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 3:35 PM

To: Kelly, Shaheerah

Cc: dmallory@ResoluteEnergy.com; pflynn@Re soluteEnergy.com; dinetahdoo@yahoo.com Subject: RE: NHPA Consultation - Navajo Nati on Historic Preservation Department

Thank you for contacting me, I am in receipt of your package and will review. Please note that we have 30 calendar days

for review.

FYI ‐ Ron Maldonado is no longer with HPD and I am the THPO.

Best,

Ora

Ora Marek-Martinez, PhD Navajo Nation Tribal Historic Preservation Officer Historic Preservation Department

PO Box 4950
Window Rock, AZ 86515 Ph: (928) 871-7198 Fx: (928) 871-7886

From: Kelly, Shaheerah [mailto:Kelly.Shaheerah@epa.gov]

Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 4:05 PM

To: Ora V. Marek-Martinez

Cc: timothy_begay@yahoo.com; rpm_crcs@yahoo.com; dma llory@ResoluteEnergy.com; pflynn@ResoluteEnergy.com; dinetahdoo@yahoo.com; Kelly, Shaheerah Subject: NHPA Consultation - Navajo Nation Historic Preservation Department

Good afternoon,

Please review the attached documents. Feel free to contact me for questions.

************************************ Shaheerah Kelly
Permits Office, Air Division (AIR-3)

U.S. Environmental Protec tion Agency, Region 9
San Francisco, CA 94105

Phone: 415-947-4156

Fax: 415-947-3579

Email: kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 609 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 609

           Raising a question of the privileges of the House.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 3, 2007

Mr. Hoyer submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               withdrawn

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
           Raising a question of the privileges of the House.

    Resolved, That the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct shall 
immediately review the regularity of events surrounding the vote on the 
motion to recommit on H.R. 3161, which occurred on August 2, 2007, and 
report back to the House.
                                 <all>
```
No. 62271.

#### C. A. Haynes & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 320247-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER OF REFERENCE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

DONALD CRAIG KESSACK, )

)

Petitioner, )

) CASE NO. C05-1828Z

v. ) (CR89-272Z)

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ORDER OF REFERENCE

) (Petition for Writ of Error

Defendant. ) Audita Querela)

)

_________________________________________)

On October 31, 2005 petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Error Audita Querela. 

Petitioner explicitly stated that this petition is not to be construed as a motion pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2255. The Court concludes that this action should be treated within the context of his

criminal case. See United States v. Valdez-Pacheco, 237 F.3d 1077 (9th Cir. 2001). For

administrative purposes only, this action has been assigned a civil case number. 

The Clerk shall REFER this matter to the Honorable Monica J. Benton United States

Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), Local Rules MJR 3 and 4, and Fed. R.

Civ. P. 72.

The Clerk shall direct a copy of this Order to petitioner, and to all counsel of record.

DATED this 21st day of November, 2005.

AThomas S. Zilly

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-01828-TSZ Document 9 Filed 11/21/05 Page 1 of 1
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 23 (Wednesday, February 4, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 6156]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02263]

[[Page 6156]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 9025]

Notice of Public Meeting

    The Department of State will conduct an open meeting at 10:00 a.m. 
on Wednesday, March 11, 2015, at the offices of the Radio Technical 
Commission for Maritime Services (RTCM), 1611 N. Kent Street, Suite 
605, Arlington, VA 22209. The primary purpose of the meeting is to 
prepare for the second session of the International Maritime 
Organization's (IMO) Sub-Committee on Ship Systems and Equipment to be 
held at the IMO Headquarters, United Kingdom, March 23-27, 2015.
    Substantive agenda items to be considered include:

--Smoke control and ventilation
--Amendments to SOLAS regulation II-2/20 and associated guidance on air 
quality management for ventilation of closed vehicle spaces, closed ro-
ro and special category spaces
--Development of life safety performance criteria for alternative 
design and arrangements for fire safety (MSC/Circ.1002)
--New framework of requirements for life-saving appliances
--Safety objectives and functional requirements of the Guidelines on 
alternative design and arrangements for SOLAS chapters II-1 and III
--Measures for onboard lifting appliances and winches
--Considerations related to the double sheathed low-pressure fuel pipes 
for fuel injection systems in engines on crude oil tankers
--Amendments to the requirements for foam-type fire extinguishers in 
SOLAS regulation II-2/10.5
--Unified interpretation of provisions of IMO safety, security, and 
environment related conventions
--Review the MODU Code, LSA Code and MSC.1/Circ.1206/Rev.1
--Amendments to the Guidelines for vessels with dynamic positioning 
(DP) systems (MSC/Circ.645)
--Review of flashpoint requirements for oil fuel in SOLAS chapter II-2
--Revision of requirements for automatic sprinkler systems
--Revision of requirements for escape route signs and equipment 
location markings in SOLAS and related instruments
--Biennial agenda and provisional agenda for SSE 3
--Any other business

    Members of the public may attend this meeting up to the seating 
capacity of the room. To facilitate the building security process, and 
to request reasonable accommodation, those who plan to attend should 
contact the meeting coordinator, LT Charles Taylor, by email at 
Charles.W.Taylor@uscg.mil, or by phone at (202) 372-1356, not later 
than March 4, 2015, 7 days prior to the meeting. Requests made after 
March 4, 2015, might not be able to be accommodated. RTCM Headquarters 
is adjacent to the Rosslyn Metro station. For further directions and 
lodging information, please see: http://www.rtcm.org/visit.php. 
Additional information regarding this and other IMO public meetings may 
be found at: www.uscg.mil/imo.

    Dated: January 29, 2015.
Marc Zlomek,
Office of Ocean and Polar Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2015-02263 Filed 2-3-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-09-P
```
#### Nelson CLIVENS, a/k/a Shawn Edmond Shaw, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 04-56429.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*663Submitted Aug. 1, 2005.*

Decided Aug. 15, 2005.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CALLAHAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Nelson Clivens (aka Shawn Edmond Shaw) appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing for lack of subject matter jurisdiction his Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(g) (formerly Rule 41(e)) motion to return $27,145 seized by the Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, *United States v. Ritchie,*342 F.3d 903, 906 (9th Cir.2003), and we affirm.

The district court properly treated Clivens’ motion as a civil complaint seeking equitable relief. *See id.*The record shows that the government mailed notice to, and received a signed certificate of delivery from, the Los Angeles address that Clivens provided to DEA agents during the seizure. This notice was “reasonably calculated” to apprise Clivens of the pendency of the civil forfeiture proceedings under 19 U.S.C. § 1607(a). *See Dusenbery v. United States,*534 U.S. 161, 170-71, 122 S.Ct. 694, 151 L.Ed.2d 597 (2002) (holding the government is not required to provide actual notice or to evaluate “the possibility of a conceivable injury”). Accordingly, the district court properly declined to exercise jurisdiction over this motion. *See Ritchie,*342 F.3d at 907 (“[Wjhere a claimant has received adequate notice of an earlier administrative forfeiture proceeding, and thus has had an adequate remedy at law, the district court should deny a subsequent Rule 41(e) motion.”).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
No. P66/201. —

#### Dingelstedt & Co. *v.*United States, protests 65/12542, 65/7242, and 65/17940 (New York).

Oliver, *J.*

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of plastic feeders or fountains similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Zenith Novelty Go. et al.*v. *United States*(49 Oust. Ct. 215, Abstract 67011), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: dr.michaeljackson@catholichealth.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:37:12 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Michael D Jackson

Garden City, KS 67846
No. 64559.

#### King Shipping Co. *v.*United States,

protest 59/20666 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

.The protest was dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<MULTIPLIER>                           1,000
<CURRENCY>                             U. S. Dollars
       
<S>                                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                      1
<CASH>                                                           3,482
<SECURITIES>                                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   22,134
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     1,014
<INVENTORY>                                                     23,789
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                69,154
<PP&E>                                                         161,572
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  97,620
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 158,373
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           30,681
<BONDS>                                                         36,350
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                         19
<COMMON>                                                           114
<OTHER-SE>                                                      87,649
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   158,373
<SALES>                                                         36,431
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               146,536
<CGS>                                                           24,373
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   91,066
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    73
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               2,317
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  5,296
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     2,216
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              3,080
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                     3,080
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                        0.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                        0.28
        


</TABLE>
[ Draft ] 08/09/2013 10:16 am

Deletion Docket Index

for the

GEIGER (C & M OIL)

SCD980711279

7.0 REMEDIAL ACTION (RA)

 7. 8 Remedial Action Documents

1. "Durability and Leachability of Solidified/Stabilized (Monolith) Wastes, Geiger (C&M Oil) Site,

Hollywood, Charleston County, South Carolina," Black and Veatch. (January 25, 2013)

2. "Final Close Out Report for the Geiger (C&M Oil) Site, Rantowles, South Carolina," USEPA.

(August 08, 2013)

8.0 SITE CLOSEOUT

 8. 1 Correspondence

1. Letter from Catherine Templeton, SCDHEC to Franklin Hill, USEPA. Subject: State of South

Carolina Concurrence on National Priority List Deletion of Geiger (C&M) Oil. (July 10, 2013)

 8. 6 Long Term Response

1. "Third Five Year Review Report for Geiger (C&M Oil) Site, Rantowles, Charleston County, South

Carolina," E2, Inc. (April 22, 2009)
Exhibit 4.10

 

(English Translation)

 




 

Supplementary Agreement to the

 

Technical and Consulting Service Agreement

 




 

by and between

 

Beijing Run An Information Consultancy Co., Ltd.

 

and

 

Qian Cheng Wu You Network Information Technology
 (Beijing) Co., Ltd.

 

September 4, 2017

 











 

This Agreement is made and entered into by the following two parties on September 4, 2017:

 

Party A: Beijing Run An Information Consultancy Co., Ltd., a limited liability company duly organized and validly existing under the laws of the People’s Republic of China, with its registered address at Room 4 and 5, 6/F, Building 3, No. 10 Jiuxianqiao Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing.

 

Party B: Qian Cheng Wu You Network Information Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd., a wholly foreign owned enterprise duly organized and validly existing under the laws of the People’s Republic of China, with its registered address at Room 8, 6/F, Building 3, No. 10 Jiuxianqiao Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing.

 

(Any party in this agreement is referred to as a “Party” individually, and the “Parties” collectively.)

 

Whereas, the Parties made and entered into the Technical and Consulting Service Agreement on September 11, 2007, and this agreement became effective on the date of signature of the authorized representative and company seal of the Parties for ten (10) years. To extend the term of the Technical and Consulting Service Agreement, through friendly negotiations and consensus of the Parties, this Supplementary Agreement is entered into for the extension of the Technical and Consulting Service Agreement and the Parties mutually agree to the following:

 

1.         The effective term of the Technical and Consulting Service Agreement is extended to twenty (20) years.

 

2.         This Supplementary Agreement is an effective part of the Technical and Consulting Service Agreement. The other original provisions of the Technical and Consulting Service Agreement continue to be in effect, and the Parties still bear the responsibilities and obligations agreed upon in the Technical and Consulting Service Agreement.

 

3.         This Supplementary Agreement becomes effective on the date of signature and company seal of the Parties.

 

[No text below]

 











 

[This page has no text, signature page of the Supplementary Agreement to the Technical and Consulting Service Agreement]

 

	
Party A:
    	
 
    	
Party B:
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Beijing Run An Information Consultancy   Co., Ltd.
    	
 
    	
Qian Cheng Wu You Network Information Technology   (Beijing) Co., Ltd.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
[Company Seal of Beijing Run An Information   Consultancy Co., Ltd.]
    	
 
    	
[Company Seal of Qian Cheng Wu You Network   Information Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd.]
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Signature of Authorized Representative:
    	
 
    	
Signature of Authorized Representative:
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/ WANG Tao
    	
 
    	
/s/ Rick YAN
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Name:
    	
 
    	
Name:
    
	
Title:
    	
 
    	
Title:
Dear Stakeholder: 

Department of Energy 

Washington, DC 20585 

MP.Y 2 2 2000 

The Department of Energy is pleased to announce revised ENERGY STAR® specifications for 

refrigerators, dishwashers, and washers. The new ENERGY STAR qualifying levels and effective 

dates are summarized below. 

Appliance Effective January 1, 2001 Effective January 1, 2004 

ENERGY STAR Refrigerators 10% above the 2001 federal 15% above the 2001 federal 

minimum efficiency standard minimum efficiency standard 

ENERGY STAR Washers Modified energy factor (MEF) of MEF of 1.42 or greater 

1.26 or greater 

ENERGY STAR Dishwashers 25% above existing federal If appropriate, to be determined 

minimum efficiency standard by January 2002 

The efforts of the appliance industry and efficiency advocates were critical in helping us to set 

these new target levels. We look forward to working with all of our stakeholders to educate 

consumers that the ENERGY STAR label is the best way to identify products that save energy, save 

money, and protect the environment. 

Sincerely, 

Assistant Secretary 

Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy