alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDERING CONTINUING STAY AND ABEYANCE

PAGE - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

NATHAN LORING,

Petitioner, 

v.

ALICE PAYNE,

Respondent.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C05-1599-JLR-JPD

ORDERING CONTINUING 

STAY AND ABEYANCE

Petitioner, an inmate at the McNeil Island Corrections Center in Steilacoom,

Washington, has filed a pro se 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus. Dkt. No. 4. 

By order dated May 15, 2006, the Court granted plaintiff’s request for a stay of his petition and

ordered that it be held in abeyance, enabling petitioner to make every effort to properly exhaust

his claims. Dkt. No. 17. Because petitioner later failed to update the Court as to the status of

his state court litigation by the designated date of August 18, 2006, the Court, on September

21, 2006, directed petitioner to show cause why his petition should not be dismissed. Dkt. No.

18. On October 2, 2006, this Court received timely notice from petitioner that his motion for

discretionary review before the Washington Supreme Court, to which the State was required to

answer by October 2, 2006, has yet to be ruled upon. After careful consideration of petitioner’s

Answer to Show Cause Order (Dkt. No. 19) and the balance of the record, the Court hereby

ORDERS:

Case 2:05-cv-01599-RAJ Document 20 Filed 10/30/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDERING CONTINUING STAY AND ABEYANCE

PAGE - 2

(1) The Court directs that petitioner’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition shall continue to be

HELD IN ABEYANCE. Dkt. No. 4. Petitioner has shown good cause to grant such a stay, so

that he can make every effort to properly exhaust his claims. Petitioner shall advise the Court of

the status of his petition no later than January 16, 2007 or no more than fifteen days after

the Washington Supreme Court’s decision on petitioner’s motion for discretionary review,

whichever date comes first. 

(2) The Court is directed to send a copy of this order to the parties and to the

Honorable James L. Robart.

DATED this 30th day of October, 2006.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:05-cv-01599-RAJ Document 20 Filed 10/30/06 Page 2 of 2
EX-35.1
(logo) AURORA LOAN SERVICES


Depositor:       Structured Asset Securities Corporation
                 Attention: Contract Finance LMT 2006-9
                 745 Seventh Avenue, 13th Floor
                 New York, New York 10019

Master Servicer: Aurora Loan Services LLC
                 Michele Olds
                 10350 Park Meadows Drive
                 Littleton, CO 80124

Trustee:         Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
                 Attention: Kimberly J. Wiggins/LMT 2006-9
                 9062 Old Annapolis Road
                 Columbia, MD 21045

Subject:         Annual Officer's Certification
Fiscal Year:     2008
Investor Code:   F94
Investor Name:   LMT 2006-9


I, Thomas L. Wind, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Aurora Loan
Services LLC (the "Servicer"), do certify the following for the Calendar Year
2008:

1. A review of the activities of the Servicer for the calendar year ended
December 31, 2008 (the reporting period) and of its performance under the
Agreement for such period has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material aspects throughout
such reporting period.

Certified by: AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC

By /s/ Thomas L. Wind
Name:  Thomas L. Wind
Title: Managing Director
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-1006 

_____________________________

CYNDY REED STEWART,

Appellant,

v.

MADISON COUNTY SCHOOL 

BOARD and FLORIDA SCHOOL 

BOARDS INSURANCE TRUST,

Appellees.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Office of the Judges of Compensation Claims.

Jacquelyn L. Newman, Judge.

Date of Accident: April 18, 2019.

February 28, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Moise v. Disney Pop Century Resort, 244 So. 3d 

403 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018).

OSTERHAUS, C.J., and ROBERTS and RAY, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Natalie A. Cavallaro of Morgan & Morgan, Tallahassee, and 

Thomas Warren Sculco and Shannon McLin of Florida Appeals, 

Orlando, for Appellant.

Todd J. Sanders of Chartwell Law, Tallahassee, for Appellees.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

LAWRENCE P. SHANDOLA,

Petitioner,

v.

HAROLD CLARKE,

Respondent.

Case No. C05-5840RBL

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the Hon. J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge, objections to the Report and Recommendation, if any, and the

remaining record, does hereby find and Order:

(1) Petitioner’s Motion for Oral Argument [Dkt. #21] is DENIED.

(2) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(3) The petition is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for the reasons set forth in the

Report and Recommendation.

(4) The clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to counsel for Petitioner, counsel for

Respondent, and to the Hon. J. Kelley Arnold.

DATED this 5th day of October, 2006.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-05840-RBL Document 22 Filed 10/05/06 Page 1 of 1
No. 59255.

protests 222804-K and 226602-K (Los Angeles).

#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk scarves or squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-2264
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JACOB WAYNE LONG, Claimant - Appellant, and $1197.00 US CURRENCY; ONE 1967 CAMARO CHEVROLET, Vin #124377N13878; ONE 1997 KAWASAKI 4-WHEELER, Vin #JKAVFKB12WB500920; ONE 1991 MAZDA SUV, Vin #4F2CU44XMUM12755; ONE 1987 ITASCA CHEVROLET R/V CAMPER, Vin #1GBKP37W7H3328434, Defendants.
No. 07-1133
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RONALD LONG, Claimant - Appellant, and- 2 - $1197.00 US CURRENCY; ONE 1967 CAMARO CHEVROLET, Vin #124377N13878; ONE 1997 KAWASAKI 4-WHEELER, Vin #JKAVFKB12WB500920; ONE 1991 MAZDA SUV, Vin #4F2CU44XMUM12755; ONE 1987 ITASCA CHEVROLET R/V CAMPER, Vin #1GBKP37W7H3328434, Defendants. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, Senior District Judge. (1:00-cv-00164-WLO) Submitted: June 15, 2007 Decided: July 10, 2007 Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jacob Wayne Long and Ronald Long, Appellants Pro Se. Lynne P. Klauer, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 3 - PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Jacob W. Long and Ronald Long appeal the district court’s order denying their motions to set aside default judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Longand United States v. $1197.00 US Currency , No. 1:00-cv-00164-WLO (M.D.N.C. Aug. 31, 2006 & Sept. 1, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-25-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-26-1999
<CASH>                                           1,313
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  270,609
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (21,587)
<INVENTORY>                                    343,127
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               630,994
<PP&E>                                         319,128
<DEPRECIATION>                                (64,391)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,045,477
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,043,810
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (87,872)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,045,477
<SALES>                                      4,160,231
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,160,231
<CGS>                                        3,792,372
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,792,372
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               423,494
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,240
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              43,642
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (113,082)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       872
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (113,954)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (113,954)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350)







In
connection with the Quarterly Report of ANC USA Incorporated. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2001 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William P.
Williams, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:




(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Registrant
            
            American
      Nortel Communications, Inc.Date:
      March 31, 2008
            
            By:
      /s/ William P. WilliamsWilliam
      P. WilliamsChairman,
      President Chief Executive Officer (Principle Executive Officer, Principle
      Financial Officer)
Exhibit 10.74 Real Estate Term Loan Note



		

			Exhibit 10.74

		


		

			 

		




		
			REAL ESTATE TERM LOAN NOTE
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

			
					
						$2,000,000

					
					
						December 29, 2017

				



		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Micron Products Inc., a Massachusetts corporation, hereby promises to pay Rockland Trust Company, a Massachusetts trust company (“Lender”), or order, at said Lender, the principal amount of TWO MILLION DOLLARS ($2,000,000), payable at the times set forth in the Credit Agreement (as defined below). This Note shall bear interest from the date hereof on the unpaid balance from time to time outstanding at the rate or rates and payable at the times specified in the Credit Agreement.
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			This Note is being executed and delivered pursuant to that certain Credit and Security Agreement of even date between Lender and the undersigned (as amended, modified, supplemented or restated from time to time, the “Credit Agreement”).
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			The undersigned agrees to pay upon demand reasonable costs of collection incurred by the holder of this Note, including reasonable fees of attorneys.
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			[Signature page follows]
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			 
		


		

		

		 


		

			 

		




 


		

			 

		




		No delay or omission on the part of the holder in exercising any right hereunder shall operate as a waiver of such right or of any other right of such holder, nor shall any delay, omission or waiver on any one occasion be deemed a bar to or waiver of the same or any other right on any future occasion. The undersigned regardless of the time, order or place of signing waives presentment, demand, protest and notices of every kind and assent to any one or more indulgences, to any substitutions, exchanges or releases of collateral if at any time there be available to the holder collateral for this Note, and to the additions or releases of any other parties or persons primarily or secondarily liable.
		

		
			﻿
		

			
					
						﻿

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						MICRON PRODUCTS INC.

				
	
					
						﻿

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						﻿

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Witness:

					
					
						/s/ Derek T Welch

					
					
						 

					
					
						By:

					
					
						/s/ SALVATORE EMMA, JR.

				
	
					
						﻿

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						Name: SALVATORE EMMA, JR.

				
	
					
						﻿

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						Title: PRESIDENT & CEO

				



		
			﻿
		

		 


		

			Signature Page to Real Estate Term Loan Note
Exhibit





Exhibit 10.58





[LETTERHEAD OF SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION]






January 29, 2014




Ms. Leena Munjal




Dear Leena, 


As you continue in the role of Senior Vice President, Customer Experience and Integrated Retail, we are pleased to provide you with the following compensation changes effective February 2, 2014, subject to approval by the Compensation Committee of the Sears Holdings Corporation Board of Directors (the “Compensation Committee”). 


The changes to your compensation package are as follows:
		
	•
	Annual base salary at a rate of $475,000.


		
	•
	You will be eligible to receive a long-term incentive cash award of $350,000 (gross).  The grant date of this award is February 2, 2014, subject to Compensation Committee approval.  This award will be scheduled to vest on a graded basis, with $50,000 of the award vesting on the first anniversary of the grant date and $150,000 of the award vesting on each of the second and third anniversaries of the grant date, provided you are actively employed on the applicable vesting date, and will be payable as soon as administratively possible following the applicable vesting date.  This award is separate from and not in the place of your participation under the Sears Holdings long-term incentive programs.  Once approved by the Compensation Committee, this award will be documented by a Sears Holdings Corporation Executive LTI Cash Award Agreement (“Award Agreement”).  Enclosed for your information is a draft of the Award Agreement, which includes the specific terms of the award. 



Leena, we are excited about the important contributions you will continue to make to the company as a member of the Executive Leadership Team.  I look forward to your acceptance of our offer.  If you need additional information or clarification, please call.  


To accept, sign and date this letter and the Agreement and return both documents to me.


Sincerely,


Dean Carter


Accepted: 

____/s/ Leena Munjal_________________        _2_/_4_/_14_
Leena Munjal                                                 Date
Before the Second Division,

October 28, 1968

No. P68/454.

protests 67/55099, etc. (New York).

#### Gosho Trading Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of waterproof cloth similar in all material respects, including waterproofing, to the velveteen cloth the subject of *Amity*Fabrics, *Inc.*v. *United States*(51 Cust. Ct. 97, C.D. 2416), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Beeore the Third Division,

October 5, 1966

No. P66/245. —

No. P66/246. —

No. P66/247. —

#### Fujii Junichi Shoten, Ltd., and American Customs Brokerage Co. et al. *v.*United States, protests 61/8860, etc. (Honolulu). Royal Trading Co., Ltd., and American Customs Brokerage Co. et al. *v.*United States, protests 63/22266, etc. (Honolulu). Nishimoto Trading Co. of Hawaii, Ltd., and American Customs Brokerage Co. et al. *v.*United States, protests 64/2934, etc. (Honolulu).

DoNLON, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of Iso peanuts, peanut crackers, and Japanese rice crackers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Hilo Rice Mill*Co., *Ltd., American Customs Brokerage Company et al.*v. *United States*(52 CCPA 106, C.A.D. 866), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January

17 , 2013

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 12

- 00126

- CV

ALBERT ORTIZ , Appellant

V.
THE JUNELL LAW FIRM, SANDERS & JUNELL P.C ., MARK JUNELL, INDIVIDUAL L Y, AND BERGMAN ADR GROUP , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 55th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011

- 24922

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed October 31, 2011 . On January 14,

2013 , appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal because the case has been

settled. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Jamison, and McCally.
Case 3:05-cr-05649-KLS Document 19 Filed 01/26/06 Page 1 of 4
Case 3:05-cr-05649-KLS Document 19 Filed 01/26/06 Page 2 of 4
Case 3:05-cr-05649-KLS Document 19 Filed 01/26/06 Page 3 of 4
Case 3:05-cr-05649-KLS Document 19 Filed 01/26/06 Page 4 of 4
Before the Third Division,

May 11, 1966

No. P66/54.

protests 63/20939, etc. (New York).

#### W. Kay Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “B” covered by the foregoing protests consist of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *W. Kay*Company, *Inc.*v. *United States*(53 Cust. Ct. 130, C.D. 2484), and that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Company*(47 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 719), the claims of the plaintiff were sustained.
No. 61050.

protest 290110-K (New York).

#### Atalanta Trading Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

An examination of the record disclosing no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct classification made by the collector, the protest was overruled.
H. Res. 69

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 7, 2007.

Whereas Benny Parsons was born in Wilkes County, North 

Carolina, on July 12, 1941, and resided in the towns of 

Ellerbe and Concord, North Carolina in the Eighth Congressional District; 

Whereas Benny Parsons was the son of Hazel and the late 

Harold Parsons and the brother of Steve, Phil and Patty; 

Whereas Benny Parsons started racing in 1963 at the Mt. 

Clemens Speedway in Mt. Clemens, Michigan; 

Whereas Benny Parsons was the Automobile Racing Club of 

America (ARCA) Rookie of the Year in 1965 and ARCA 

Champion in 1968 and 1969; 

Whereas Benny Parsons was the first ARCA Champion inducted into the International Sports Hall of Fame; 

Whereas Benny Parsons made his Winston Cup debut in 

1970 and had his first Winston Cup victory at South 

Boston Virginia Speedway in 1971; 

Whereas Benny Parsons was Winston Cup Champion in 

1973; 

Whereas Benny Parsons had an extraordinary career as a 

National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing 
2

•HRES 69 EH 

(NASCAR) driver, winning 21 races, including the 1975 

Daytona 500; 

Whereas in 1982 Benny Parsons qualified for the NASCAR 

Winston 500 at Talladega Superspeedway at 200.175 

miles per hour, the first NASCAR qualification run over 

200 mph; 

Whereas in 1998 Benny Parsons was named one of the 50 

Greatest Drivers in NASCAR History; 

Whereas after a successful career as a driver, Benny Parsons 

developed a successful career in broadcasting, further expanding his sport through his insight and commentary; 

Whereas Benny Parsons was known for his kindness by all 

who had the good fortune to meet him; 

Whereas Benny Parsons was a loving husband to his wife 

Terri and an exceptional father to his sons Kevin and 

Keith; 

Whereas Benny Parsons was a man of strong faith and character; and 

Whereas Benny Parsons passed away on January 16, 2007, 

prompting friend and former competitor Darrell Waltrip 

to state that ‘‘Benny Parsons was the kindest, sweetest, 

most considerate person I have ever known. He was a 

great champion, a great ambassador for our sport but 

more than that, he was a great person. He exemplified 

that good guys can be winners too.’’: Now, therefore, be 

it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) recognizes Benny Parsons as one of the greatest 

race car drivers ever to participate in the sport of auto 
3

•HRES 69 EH 

racing and recognizes his many contributions to the Nation throughout his lifetime; 

(2) honors Benny Parsons for transcending the 

sport of auto racing to become a role model as both a 

talented competitor and mentor and as a loving husband 

and father; and 

(3) extends its deepest condolences to the family of 

Benny Parsons. 

Attest:

Clerk.
Docket No: FAA-2015-0494 Dir ID: 2014-NM-160-AD
R eco rd o f Discu ss ion D

ocke t No. FAA- Di r ectorate ld en ti tier:

-A D
With whom outside the F AA has this AD action been discu ssed (i.e. , Design Approval Holder, manufacturer, ATA, NBAA , RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)?

O RGAN I ZAT I ON PE R SON CONTACTED DATE TOP I CS DI S C USSED Boe i ng Todd Esselstyn Nu m erous Concur. B oeing Joan L e n ker Nume rous Concur. B oe i ng Frank W ic hm an N umero u s Concur. ATA Robert L. Ireland 8/ 14 / 201 5 Co n cur.

Oth e r

/ Add i tiona l In fo rmation:
September 16, 1959

No. 63368.

Suit 4950.

#### A. Millner Co. *v.*United States.

C.D. 1935 affirmed May 22, 1959. C.A.D. 706.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

TODD R. RENDA 

 ATTORNEY AT LAW 

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF ’S PETITION 6314 19th St. West, Suite 20 

FOR COSTS AND ATTORNEY FEES Tacoma, Washington 98466-6223

 (253) 566-6701 

 FAX (253) 564-6523 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAREN L. STROMBOM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

NATHAN L. CHANDLER, | CASE NO. C05-5302KLS | Plaintiff, | ORDER GRANTING | PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION FOR vs. | COSTS AND ATTORNEY FEES | JO ANNE B. BARNHART, |

Commissioner of Social Security, || Defendant. | ____________________________________|

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412 and upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Petition for Costs and

Fees, it is hereby ORDERED that costs in the amount of $250.00 and attorney fees in the amount

of $4,438.00 be awarded to plaintiff.

DATED this 16th day of March, 2006.

__s/ Karen L. Strombom____________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Presented by:

TODD R. RENDA, ATTORNEY AT LAW

s/ Todd R. Renda WSBA# 20779

Attorney for plaintiff

Case 3:05-cv-05302-KLS Document 18 Filed 03/16/06 Page 1 of 1