alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NorthernTechnologies International Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ending February 28, 2010 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, G. Patrick Lynch,President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

(1)                                                        The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                                        The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|                                       |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| G. Patrick. Lynch                     |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| (principal executive officer)         |   |

 

CirclePines, Minnesota

April 13, 2010

 

----
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

In re Occidental Oil & Gas * Original Mandamus Proceeding,

Corporation et al.,

No. 11

- 1 8

- 00 071

- CV * April 19, 2018

* Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Willson, J.,

Bailey, J. , and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment)

This court has considered R elator s ’ agreed motion to dismiss and concludes that

the motion should be granted. Therefore, in accordance with this cou rt’s opinion, the

motion is granted and the proceeding is dismissed.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 417 

Expressing no confidence in the performance of Attorney General Alberto 

Gonzales, and urging the President to request his resignation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 21, 2007 

Mr. SCHIFF (for himself, Mr. DAVIS of Alabama, Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, 

Mr. BOUCHER, Mr. COHEN, Mr. ELLISON, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. THOMPSON of California, Mr. ACKERMAN, Ms. BERKLEY, Mr. STARK, Mr. FARR, 

Mr. GRIJALVA, and Mr. FATTAH) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing no confidence in the performance of Attorney 

General Alberto Gonzales, and urging the President to 

request his resignation. 

Whereas at this critical time in the Nation’s history when the 

American people confront unprecedented challenges posed 

by global terrorism, when so many critical issues remain 

to be addressed at home, and when it is essential that the 

Nation has the service of an Attorney General who has 

the full confidence of the American people to enforce the 

law, to defend the United States from foreign and domestic threats, to prevent crime, to seek punishment for 

those guilty of committing crimes, and to ensure the fair 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HRES 417 IH 

and impartial administration of justice for all Americans; 

and 

Whereas Attorney General Alberto Gonzales has failed to 

adequately and properly manage the Department of Justice and faithfully execute the duties of his office, as reflected in his mismanagement of the dismissal of United 

States attorneys, the conflicting and incomplete testimony before Congress by the Attorney General and his 

top aides, and his inability to assure the public that the 

laws of the Nation are being enforced in an independent, 

nonpartisan, and judicious manner: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives and the 

2 American people have lost confidence in Attorney General 

3 Alberto Gonzales, and urge the President to request his 

4 resignation and to nominate a new candidate more capable 

5 of serving as the head of the Department of Justice. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
EXHIBIT
13.1


Certification





In connection with the annual report of
China Mass Media Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December
31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, Shengcheng Wang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:




(1).               the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2).               the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
August 31, 2010




By:
                  /s/
      Shengcheng WangName:
                  Shengcheng
      WangTitle:
                  Chairman
      and Chief Executive
Officer




The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as
part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Judicial Conference of the United States

# AGENCY:

Judicial Conference of the United States.

# ACTION:

Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure; notice of open meeting.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure will hold a meeting in a hybrid format with remote attendance options on January 4, 2024 in Austin, TX. The meeting is open to the public for observation but not participation. An agenda and supporting materials will be posted at least 7 days in advance of the meeting at:                         *https://www.uscourts.gov/​rules-policies/​records-and-archives-rules-committees/​agenda-books.*

# DATES:

January 4, 2024.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        H. Thomas Byron III, Esq., Chief Counsel, Rules Committee Staff, Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, One Columbus Circle NE, Suite 7-300, Washington, DC 20544, Phone (202) 502-1820,                         *RulesCommittee_Secretary@ao.uscourts.gov.*

(Authority: 28 U.S.C. 2073.)

Dated: September 26, 2023.

Shelly L. Cox,

Management Analyst, Rules Committee Staff.

[FR Doc. 2023-21830 Filed 10-2-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 2210-55-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Sensory-Motor Neuroscience Study Section, October 12, 2023, 10:00 a.m. to October 13, 2023, 8:00 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 18, 2023, 88 FR 63969, Doc. No. 2023-20104.                

This meeting is being amended to change the date from October 12, 2023-October 13, 2023, to October 12, 2023. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: September 25, 2023.

Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-21355 Filed 9-28-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Farm Credit Administration

# TIME AND DATE:

10 a.m., Thursday, October 12, 2023.

# PLACE:

                        You may observe the open portions of this meeting in person at 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102-5090, or virtually. If you would like to observe, at least 24 hours in advance, visit                         *FCA.gov,*                         select “Newsroom,” then select “Events.” From there, access the linked “Instructions for board meeting visitors” and complete the described registration process.                    

# STATUS:

Parts of this meeting will be open to the public. The rest of the meeting will be closed to the public.

      ( print page 67281)    

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

The following matters will be considered:

# PORTIONS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC:

 

    - Approval of Minutes for September 14, 2023
    - Young, Beginning, and Small Farmers and Ranchers Final Rule

# PORTIONS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC:

 

Office of Secondary Market Oversight Periodic Report [1] 

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

If you need more information or assistance for accessibility reasons, or have questions, contact Ashley Waldron, Secretary to the Board. Telephone: 703-883-4009. TTY: 703-883-4056.

Ashley Waldron,

Secretary to the Board.

# Footnotes

1.                             Session Closed-Exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(8) and (9).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2023-21601 Filed 9-27-23; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
EXHIBIT 31.2





CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION





I, Juqun Zhao, certify that:





1. I have reviewed the report on Form 10-K of China Ceetop.com, Inc.





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:





a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;





c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.





5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.





(Registrant)
CHINA CEETOP.COM, INC.By:
/s/ Juqun ZhaoJuqun Zhao, CFODate:  April 13, 2011

April 13, 2011
(R.D. 11545)

#### Wheeler & Miller *v.*United States

Entry No. 20154.

(Decided June 13, 1968)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn; Cadwalader, Wiclcersham & Taft,*associate counsel; for the plaintiff.

*Edmn L. Weisl, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Chief Judge:

The instant appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, as follows:

> 1. That the merchandise covered by the above-entitled appeal for reappraisement consists of spark plugs and parts thereof exported from the United Kingdom; that the said merchandise was entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption after the effective date (February 27, 1958) of Section 6(a) of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956; that the said merchandise is not identified on the Final List (T.D. 54521) published by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to the said Customs Simplification Act.

> 2. That on or about the date of exportation, the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or offered for sale in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the ususal wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and covering of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, was the invoice unit price as indicated in the column marked “Selling Price to Customers”, plus the cost of cases and packing labor as invoiced.

> 3. That the above-entitled appeal for reappraisement may be submitted on this stipulation.

Upon the agreed facts and the cited authority, I find export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of Í956, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the spark plugs and parts thereof covered by this appeal for reappraisement, and that such value was the invoice unit price as indicated in the column marked “Selling Price to Customers”, plus the cost of cases and packing labor as invoiced.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Oiland gas fields of Greene County, Pa.**
 
Report | Plate
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:304
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000957656
 
July 25, 2018
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the annual Report of Great Wall Builders Ltd., (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended on June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tian Jia, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:






(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






(2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


















Dated: September 24, 2010






Great Wall Builders Ltd.,






/s/ Tian Jia




Tian Jia




CEO/CFO
Case No. 13,652.

#### STRUVER v. The RODERICK DHU.

[N. Y. Times,

Nov. 29, 1854.]

District Court, D. New York.

Nov. 28, 1854.

Bill op.Lading — Shoktage of *Cargo*— Evidence.

[The wharf being the place of delivery, evidence that 38 hogsheads of sugar, the full number called for by the bill of lading, were placed thereon, will exonerate the ship, as a gainst evidence that only 37 hogsheads were received at the consignee’s storehouse, whither his own cartmen conveyed them.]

[This was a libel by Charles Struver against the bark Roderick Dhu to recover the alleged shortage of cargo.]

Wright & Lane, for libeHant.

Benedict, Scoville & Benedict, for claimant

BY

THE COURT.

This suit is brought to recover the value of a hogshead of sugar alleged to have been shipped on board of the bark, but not delivered to the plaintiff. This was one of a parcel of thirty-eight hogsheads. It is admitted that thirty-seven of them were safely delivered, as also another parcel of seventeen, and the question is only as to the one remaining. This depends upon the question, where was the place of delivery V It is very evident that the wharf was the place. The parcel of seventeen was delivered there, and sold by the consignee to be taken from thence, and the consignee sent his own cart-men to the wharf to get the thirty-eight, and if they were safely delivered there, even if a loss occurred between the time when they were landed and the time when they were taken away, yet the carrier is discharged. The libellant’s clerk says that only thirty-seven were received by the consignee, and that he was on the wharf and counted only thirty-seven. But two witnesses are brought who say that six days after the arrival of the bai-k, and after all the other sugar had been taken away, and only a short time before the libellant’s cartmen came for them, they counted the thirty-eight hogsheads on the wharf. I think that as the wharf was the place of delivery, — as the consignee sent there to receive the sugar, — the evidence is sufficient to show that they were all landed, that the libellant had notice that they' were there, and that they were all there when the cartmen went down. If all the cartmen had been introduced, and had said that they had only carted away thirty-seven, it might go to show that these two witnesses were mistaken; but only one is brought up, and he says that only thirty-seven were receipted for at the storehouse; and that is not inconsistent with their testimony. As the evidence before me is very satisfactory that all the hogsheads were on the wharf just before the cartmen were sent to take them away, it is sufficient to satisfy me that the *270contract in the bill of lading was performed on the part of the bark. Libel dismissed with costs.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 4, 2023

NO. 03

- 22

- 00269

- CR

Zachariah Joshua Holm , Appellant

v.

The State of Texas , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY
BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYR NE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND THEOFANIS

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE THEOFANIS

This is an appeal from the judgment s of conviction entered by the trial court. Having review e d

t he record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment s of conviction

. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment s of

conviction

. Because appellant is indigent and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs

is made.
No. 58237.

protests 169031-K, etc. (New York).

#### Alfred Hornung *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of pedometers of a type known as step counters similar in all material respects to those passed upon in *Alfred Hornung*v. *United States*(31 Cust. Ct. 126, C. D. 1558), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.