alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DETENTION ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W. D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff,

v.

NELLY ROJOP-TOLEDO,

 Defendant.

Case No. 05-5193M

DETENTION ORDER

THE COURT, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3142, finds that no condition or combination

of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and/or the safety of any

other person and the community.

This finding is based on 1) the nature and circumstances of the offense(s) charged, including whether the offense is a

crime of violence or involves a narcotic drug; 2) the weight of the evidence against the person; 3) the history and characteristics of

the person including those set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)(3)(A)(B); and 4) the nature and seriousness of the danger release would

impose to any person or the community.

Findings of Fact/ Statement of Reasons for Detention

Presumptive Reasons/Unrebutted:

 ( ) Conviction of a Federal offense involving a crime of violence. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(A)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(B)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of 10+ years as prescribed in the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C.§801 et seq.), the

Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C.§951 et seq.) Or the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (46

U.S.C. App. 1901 et seq.)

 ( ) Convictions of two or more offenses described in subparagraphs (A) through (C) of 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(1) of two or more

State or local offenses that would have been offenses described in said subparagraphs if a circumstance giving rise to

Federal jurisdiction had existed, or a combination of such offenses.

Safety Reasons:

 ( ) Defendant is currently on probation/supervision resulting from a prior offense.

 ( ) Defendant was on bond on other charges at time of alleged occurrences herein.

 ( ) Defendant’s prior criminal history.

Flight Risk/Appearance Reasons:

 ( ) Defendant’s lack of sufficient ties to the community.

 (X) Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainer.

 ( ) Detainer(s)/Warrant(s) from other jurisdictions.

 ( ) Failures to appear for past court proceedings.

 ( ) Past conviction for escape.

Other:

 (X) Defendant stipulated to detention without prejudice

 

Order of Detention

< The defendant shall be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal.

< The defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel.

< The defendant shall on order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the Government, be delivered

to a United States marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.

 November 3, 2005.

__s/ Karen L. Strombom 

Karen L Strombom, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cr-05809-RBL Document 26 Filed 11/03/05 Page 1 of 1
f10q1112ex10iv_oslholdings.htm


Exhibit 10.4


 


Bob Rothenberg







This contract will govern the terms by which Bob Rothenberg("Executive") will be employed by OSL Holdings, Inc on an at will basis as President  or such other position as mutually agreed upon beginning on January 2, 2013


 


1) Executive will receive a monthly salary of $20,000


 


2) Executive will receive health insurance and other benefits as approved by the Board of Directors from time to time


 


3) Executive will receive 15,000,000 shares of common stock . Such stock will be issued in six certificates consisting of one certificate for  7,500,000 shares and five certificates for 1,500,000 each. The 7,500,000 share certificate will be delivered to Executive on or about January 2 2013 and the remaining certificates will be held by the Company's CFO and disbursed every thirty days commencing on Feb 1, 2013


 


4) In the event Executive's employment is terminated for cause or he executive resigns for any reason the undistributed shares held by the CFO shall be surrendered back to the Company by Executive.


 


5) At the present time,the Company owes Executive a balance of 200,000. Such amount shall remain a liability on the books of Company until paid and shall be paid as soon as the Board determines sufficient cash exists.


 


6) At any time during his employ, Executive may convert any or all of funds owed to him into common shares of the company at a 70%discount to the average closing price for the previous five days.


 


7) Upon change of control, all outstanding shares due the Executive shall vest immediately.


 


8) The board shall also award other cash and stock bonuses and incentive plans as it sees fit from time to time


 


9) Should the Executive be terminated without cause, the Executive shall a receive 12 months salary and six months medical benefits as severance.


 


10) Executive agrees to a one year national non compete upon accepting the common shares.


 


11) This agreement will be construed by and governed by New York Law.


 


12) This is the complete agreement between the parties and any previous agreements are null and void.


 


Bob Rothenberg


 


OSL Holdings Inc
opiatoa so. v-80 

aatml :.86paatoa. . . 

: ATTORNEY.GENERAL OB TEXAS
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1. | The                Company’s Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007                (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | Information                contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operation of the                Company. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                        |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/                Thomas L. Wegman                                                         |   |
| Thomas                L. Wegman                                                             |
| President                                                                                   |
| (Principal                Executive Officer and Principal Financial                Officer) |
From: sacredhearts2000@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:03:34 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

It also goes against our Declaration to allow for "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." Conscience

is the basis of our freedom, life must be brought to term to seek happiness.

In it for Life,

Sr. Marie Teresa

Sincerely,

Sr. Marie Teresa Tellier

, 21502-3705
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dennis Patterson, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 600]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Clabby, J.), rendered September 9, 1993, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

During the People’s direct case, Ricardo Romero, a passenger in the vehicle in which a revolver was recovered, testified pursuant to an agreement with the prosecution. He testified that in exchange for his truthful testimony, the District Attorney’s office agreed to dismiss the charge against him. On cross-*626examination, the defendant’s counsel elicited that the agreement also called for the dismissal of the charge against codefendant Tutankhamu Livingston, who was then on trial with the defendant. The defendant’s counsel subsequently published this agreement to the jury. At the close of the People’s case and outside the presence of the jury, the prosecution moved to dismiss the charges against Livingston. Livingston was released without objection. The jury returned, and without indicating that the charges had been dismissed against Livingston, the court ordered the jury not to speculate as to what happened to Livingston.

The defendant’s contention that the dismissal of the charges against Livingston constituted bolstering of Romero’s testimony is unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Udzinski,*146 AD2d 245). In any event, testimony regarding such an agreement with the prosecution does not constitute de facto bolstering of the testimony of the witness. The court properly instructed the jury not to speculate as to Livingston’s absence from the remainder of the trial, and correctly explained to the jury the weight to be accorded to Romero’s testimony.

The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review. Mangano, P. J., Balletta, Pizzuto and Santucci, JJ., concur.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Page 1 ORDER- [C05-5285JKA]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

CATHERINE BLOMBERG,

Plaintiff,

vs.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant

Civil No. C05-5285JKA

ORDER

Based on the stipulation of the parties it is hereby ORDERED that the above-captioned

case be remanded for further administrative proceedings by a different Administrative Law Judge

(ALJ). Upon remand, the ALJ will give the Plaintiff an opportunity for a de novo hearing and

consider any additional medical evidence produced at the new hearing. The ALJ will obtain

evidence from a medical expert to resolve any inconsistencies in the record with respect to

Plaintiff’s maximum residual functional capacity, including nonexertional limitations, in

accordance with Social Security Ruling 96-8p. The ALJ will address the medical opinions of

Case 3:05-cv-05285-JKA Document 21 Filed 11/30/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Page 2 ORDER- [C05-5285JKA]

record and state what weight is given to each opinion, and will consider lay witness statements. 

The ALJ will follow the special technique for evaluating mental impairments pursuant to 20

C.F.R. § 416.920a. The ALJ will evaluate each of Plaintiff’s past jobs and make findings of fact

as to whether each job is considered past relevant work. The ALJ will obtain evidence from a

vocational expert to identify jobs Plaintiff can perform, if any, given her exertional and nonexertional limitations. In this regard, the ALJ will evaluate any inconsistencies between the jobs

identified and their descriptions in the Dictionary of Occupational Titles.

This Court hereby reverses the Commissioner’s decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C.

§ 405(g) with a remand of the cause to the Commissioner for further proceedings. See

Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991).

DATED this 30th day of November, 2005.

/s/ J. Kelley Arnold 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Presented by:

s/ CAROL A. HOCH WSB # 9289

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorney for Defendant

Office of the General Counsel

701 Fifth Ave, Ste 2900, M/S 901

Phone: 206-615-2684

Fax: 206-615-2531

carol.a.hoch@ssa.gov

Case 3:05-cv-05285-JKA Document 21 Filed 11/30/05 Page 2 of 2
From: bethobefinch@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:10:37 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Bethany Finch

Arlington, WA 98223
H. Res. 460 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 6, 2007. 

Resolved, That on such date as the Speaker of the House 

of Representatives may designate, official photographs of the 

House may be taken while the House is in actual session. 

Payment for the costs associated with taking, preparing, and 

distributing such photographs may be made from the applicable accounts of the House of Representatives. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Anthony MCQUEEN, a/k/a Champ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-6025.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 31, 2001.

Decided June 15, 2001.

Anthony McQueen, pro se.

Anne Margaret Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, NC, for appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Anthony McQueen seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000) and his motion for enlargement of time to file a motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *United States v. McQueen,*Nos. CR-95-26-BR; CA-98-201-7-BR (E.D.N.C. Nov. 8, 2000; Nov. 30, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Insight Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Elizabeth S.C.S Murray, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|/s/ Elizabeth S.C.S. Murray                                                               
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Elizabeth S.C.S Murray Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer August 4, 2003



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of this report or as a separate disclosure document.
You are here: EPA Home Pesticides Science & Policy Advisory Committee Pesticide Program

Dialogue Committee Pesticide Program Dialogue Committee November 29-30, 2012 Meeting



# Pesticide Program Dialogue Committee November

29-30, 2012 Meeting

You will need Adobe Reader to view some of the files on this page. See EPA's PDF

page to learn more.

Agenda (PDF) (3 pp, 36k)

Transcript (PDF) (338 pp, 598k)

Background Materials

Session I - Updates

FY 2011/2012/2013 OPP Budget Update (PDF) (5 pp, 53k)

Session II - Pollinator Protection

Background Materials (PDF) (11 pp, 128k)

Workgroup on Pollinator Protection (PDF) (6 pp, 63k)

Session III - Integrated Pest Management

Quantitative Benefits Subgroup (PDF) (9 pp, 779k)

Measuring the Success of EPA ’ s School IPM Initiative (PDF) (16 pp, 321k)

Evaluating the Success of US EPA ’ s School IPM Initiative (PDF ) (12 pp, 213k)

Session IV - PPDC Work Group on Comparative Safety Statements

Insect Repellency Mark (PDF) (15 pp, 194k)

Session V - OPP Databases - Pubic Availability

Information Technology Activities (PDF) (26 pp, 639k)

Session VI - Opportunity for Discussion Regarding Updates

Soil Fumigant Mitigation Factsheet:Implementation Schedule (PDF) (2 pp, 126k)

Pesticide Worker Safety Regulation Improvements Agricultural Worker

Protection Regulation (PDF) (1 pg, 18k)

NPDES Pesticide General Permit (PDF) (1 pg, 17k)

International Pesticide Registration Activities (PDF) (7 pp, 61k)

Status of the Label Review Manual (PDF) (1 pg, 47k)

The Role of Pesticide Usage Data in the Office of Pesticide Programs (PDF) (3

pp, 29k)

Update on the Spray Drift PR Notice and Spray Drift Petitions (PDF) (1 pg, 19k)

Water Monitoring Data (PDF) (1 pg, 32k)

Web

- Distributed Labeling for Pesticide Products (PDF) (1 pg, 27k)

Policy Paper Revised risk assessment methods for agriculture workers (PDF) (1

pg, 78k)

Soil Fumigant Implementation Update (PDF) (1 pg, 61k)

Session VII - 21st Centur y Toxicology Activities

NAFTA (Q)uantitative Structure Activity Relationship Guidance Document (PDF)

(14 pp, 107k)

OPP 21st Century Ac tivities (PDF) (6 pp, 156k)

PPDC 21st Century Toxicology/ New Integrated Testing Strategies Workgroup

(PDF) (9 pp, 235k)

Session VIII - Endocrine Di sruptor Screening Program

Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program Update (PDF) (20 pp, 716k)

Session IX - Endangered Species Act Update

Endangered Species Act Update (PDF) (9 pp, 73k)

Session X - Registration Review Update

Re g istration Review U p date ( PDF ) ( 21 pp , 400k ) 

## Pesticides: Science and Policy htt p : // www.e p a. g ov /p esticides /pp dc / 2012 / november / nov-mt g .html

Last u p dated on Wednesda y, A p ril 24

, 2013 

## Pa g e 1 of 1 Pesticide Pro g ram Dialo g ue Committee November 29-30, 2012 Meetin g | Pesticides:Scie

...

10/18/2013 htt p ://www.e p a. g ov/ p esticides/ pp dc/2012/november/nov-mt g .html
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION BY PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Mistras Group, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended May 31, 2011, I, Sotirios Vahaviolos, Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

 

(1) such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2011, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2011, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

 
| Date:   August 12, 2011 | /s/    SOTIRIOS VAHAVIOLOS                                                           |
|------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                         | Sotirios   Vahaviolos   Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer   (Principal Executive Officer) |

 

----