alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-27-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-28-1999
<CASH>                                           2,804
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      414
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     30,516
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,921
<PP&E>                                          37,020
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,706
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  52,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,525
<BONDS>                                         13,275
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            87
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,167
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    52,600
<SALES>                                         13,835
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,835
<CGS>                                            9,226
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,226
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,165
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 277
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,833)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,933)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,933)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.46)


</TABLE>
#### Talal Ibrahim BATIKH, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 04-72370.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 1, 2005.*

Decided Aug. 4, 2005.

Gihan Thomas, Los Angeles, CA, for Petitioner.

Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration *&*Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, OIL, DOJ — Ü.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CALLAHAN and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Talal Ibrahim Batikh, a native and citizen of Syria and a member of the Maronite *607Christian religion, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision, which summarily affirmed the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) order denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We uphold a determination regarding asylum eligibility if it is supported by substantial evidence, and may reverse only if petitioner shows that the evidence he presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution. *See Prasad v. INS,*47 F.3d 336, 338 (9th Cir.1995). We deny the petition for review.

Where, as here, the BIA affirms without an opinion, we review the IJ’s decision directly. *See Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft,*350 F.3d 845, 849 (9th Cir.2003).

The IJ properly concluded that Batikh did not suffer religious persecution because there is no evidence establishing that the incidents occurred on account of Batikh’s religious beliefs. *See Singh v. INS,*134 F.3d 962, 970 (9th Cir.1998) (stating a petitioner must demonstrate a connection between the acts of harassment and his membership in a protected group). In fact, Batikh only speculates as to who his persecutor was and why he was hurt. In addition, Batikh failed to prove that the source of the harassment was a group the government was unwilling or unable to control. *See Avetova-Elisseva v. INS,*213 F.3d 1192, 1996 (9th Cir.2000). The record supports the finding of the IJ that no facts sustain Batikh’s argument that he was persecuted on the basis of his religion.

Because Batikh failed to establish eligibility for asylum, he necessarily failed to meet the more stringent standard for withholding of removal. *See Al-Harbi v. INS,*242 F.3d 882, 888-89 (9th Cir.2001).

As Batikh relies on the same testimony, and points to no additional evidence the BIA should have considered regarding the likelihood of torture if returned to Syria, his CAT claim also must fail. *See Ali v. Ashcroft,*394 F.3d 780, 791 (9th Cir.2005).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Before the Third Division,

February 23, 1960

No. 63846.

protests 191179-K, etc. (Philadelphia).

#### Philadelphia Brokerage Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 61245, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
H. Res. 717 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

October 9, 2007. 

Resolved, That the House has heard with profound sorrow of the death of the Honorable Jo Ann Davis, a Representative from the Commonwealth of Virginia. 

Resolved, That a committee of such Members of the 

House as the Speaker may designate, together with such 

Members of the Senate as may be joined, be appointed to attend the funeral. 

Resolved, That the Sergeant-at-Arms of the House be 

authorized and directed to take such steps as may be necessary for carrying out the provisions of these resolutions and 

that the necessary expenses in connection therewith be paid 

out of applicable accounts of the House. 

Resolved, That the Clerk communicate these resolutions 

to the Senate and transmit a copy thereof to the family of 

the deceased. 
2 

•HRES 717 EH 

Resolved, That when the House adjourns today, it adjourn as a further mark of respect to the memory of the deceased. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Northern Technologies International Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-QSB for the period ending May 31, 2008 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, G.Patrick Lynch, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge andbelief:

 

                1.             TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

                2.             Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|                                       |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| G. Patrick. Lynch                     |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| (principal executive officer)         |   |

 

CirclePines, Minnesota

Date: July 11,2008

 

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

THOMAS A. CLARK,

Petitioner,

v.

CLARK COUNTY,

Respondent.

Case No. C06-5015RJB

ORDER DENYING

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS

The Court, having reviewed the report and recommendation, petitioner’s application to proceed in

forma pauperis and the remaining record, hereby finds and ORDERS:

(1) the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation is approved and adopted;

(2) petitioner’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED.

(3) petitioner shall pay the required filing fee ($5.00) to the Clerk of the Court within 30 days of

the date of this Order, otherwise this action will be dismissed.

(4) the Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to petitioner and any other party that has

appeared in this action.

DATED this 1st day of March, 2006.

ARobert J. Bryan

United States District Judge 

Case 3:06-cv-05015-RJB Document 6 Filed 03/01/06 Page 1 of 1
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>	5

<S>	<C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>	9-MO
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>	SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>	JUNE-30-2000
<CASH>	251,222
<SECURITIES>	0
<RECEIVABLES>	606,105
<ALLOWANCES>	0
<INVENTORY>	794,346
<CURRENT-ASSETS>	1,651,673
<PP&E>	2,204,934
<DEPRECIATION>	1,940,831
<TOTAL-ASSETS>	5,747,770
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>	611,578
<BONDS>	0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>	0
<PREFERRED>	0
<COMMON>	62,899
<OTHER-SE>	922,649
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>	5,747,770
<SALES>	2,288,291
<TOTAL-REVENUES>	2,288,291
<CGS>	1,407,269
<TOTAL-COSTS>	1,407,269
<OTHER-EXPENSES>	2,137,252
<LOSS-PROVISION>	1,256,230
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>	289,144
<INCOME-PRETAX>	985,685
<INCOME-TAX>	0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>	985,685
<DISCONTINUED>	0
<EXTRAORDINARY>	0
<CHANGES>	0
<NET-INCOME>	985,685
<EPS-BASIC>	(0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>	0
Before the Third Division,

April 26, 1966

No. P66/44.

protests 59/18387, etc. (New York).

No. P66/45.

protests 60/10994, etc. (New York).

#### Ross Products, Inc. *v.*United States, Ross Products, Inc. v. United States,

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “T” covered by the foregoing protests consist of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *W. Kay*Company, *Inc.*v. *United States*(53 Cust. Ct. 130, C.D. 2484), and that the items of merchandise marked “D” covered by the foregoing protests consist of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Company*(47 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 719), the claims of the plaintiffs were sustained.
From: jodi.heintz@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:50:55 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

jodi heintz

Fond Du Lac, WI 54935
From: lsgranberry@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44-JUST NOT RIGHT OR CONSTITUTIONAL

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:47:19 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Linda Granberry

Camarillo, CA 93010
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Source Gold Corp., (the “Company”) on Amended Form 10-K/A for the year ending July 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edward J. Aruda, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    /s/Edward J. Aruda By: Edward J. Aruda Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Dated: May 28, 2014  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required
to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Principal
Life Income Fundings Trust 2008-051 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, do
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information
required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is
included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;4.
    
    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this
report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act
periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing
agreement(s) in all material respects; and5.
    
    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of
compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included
in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.
   /s/ Dwight N. Soethout

Dwight N. SoethoutVice President  Principal Life Insurance Company
#### THE TALLAHASSEE. THE SENATOR SULLIVAN.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

November 7, 1903.)

Nos. 179, 180.

Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York. Eugene Carver, for appellant. Herbert Barry, for appellee. Before LACOMBE, TOWNSEND, and COKE, Circuit Judges. No opinion. Affirmed, on opinion of District Court 117 Fed. 176.
No. 57746.

petition 6940-R (New York).

#### D. Hauser, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From the testimony, it appeared that there was an advance in value which amounted to less than 1 percent. The advance did not involve the merchandise other than the dutiable packing, which inadvertently was entered at $1.20 rather than $2. From an examination of the record it was held that there was no intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the ease or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Robert C. Sepucha, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SPARTA, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. May 11, 2004 /s/ Robert C. SepuchaRobert C. SepuchaChief Executive Officer
Exhibit
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350
 
 The
undersigned officer of ALLIED HEALTHCARE PRODUCTS, INC. (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the Company’s fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2008 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/
      Earl R. RefslandEarl
      R. RefslandPresident
      & Chief Executive OfficerFebruary
      9, 2009
### Coal resources of Trinidad-Aguilar area, Las Animas and Huerfano Counties, Colorado

By: R. L. HarbourG. H. Dixon

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1072G

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 10**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 11**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 12**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 13**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 14**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.