alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

VINCENT D. HOPPER,

Plaintiff,

v.

MR. MYERS, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5680RBL

ORDER

Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 1) is incomplete. Local Civil Rule

CR 3 states the following:

(a) Civil Cover Sheet Required. Every complaint shall be accompanied by a Civil Cover Sheet,

Form JS-44 revised. Form JS-44 revised with instruction sheet may be obtained from the clerk.

(b) Proceedings In Forma Pauperis. At the time application is made under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 or

other applicable acts of Congress, for leave to commence any civil action or to file any petition

or motion without being required to prepay fees and costs or give security for them, each

petitioner, movant or plaintiff shall:

(1) Complete the in forma pauperis affidavit approved for use in this district; and

(2) File a written consent that the recovery, if any, in the action, to such amount as the

court may direct, shall be paid to the clerk who may pay therefrom all unpaid fees and costs

taxed against the plaintiff, and to his attorney the amount which the court allows or approves as

compensation for the attorney's services.

(3) In all proceedings in forma pauperis, for a writ of habeas corpus, or under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255, the marshal shall pay all fees of witnesses for the party authorized to proceed in forma

pauperis, upon the certificate of the judge.

Plaintiff has not filed her application on the court approved form, and the court explained this deficiency in its

order dated November 7, 2005. 

Case 3:05-cv-05680-RBL Document 10 Filed 12/02/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

Accordingly, plaintiff shall complete and file the appropriate documentation to amend his 

motion/application to proceed in forma pauperis by not later than December 31, 2005. Otherwise, the

matter may be dismissed by the court.

The clerk is directed to send a copy of this order to plaintiff along with the appropriate blank forms (a

(non-prisoner) IFP application along with a consent for payment form. 

DATED this 2nd day of December, 2005.

/s/ J. Kelley Arnold J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:05-cv-05680-RBL Document 10 Filed 12/02/05 Page 2 of 2
From: swainrights@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:04:52 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sandra Wainright

Grand Rapids, MI 49544
No. 64507.

#### Weinberg Corporation *v.*United States,

protest 59/30166 (New York).

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Jointintelligence.**
 
PDF | ePub
 
SuDoc Number:D 5.12:2-0/2013
Item Number:0315-C (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000955964
 
July 19, 2018
----

| i.     | A      review of the activities of Capmark Finance Inc. as Subservicer during the      period, and of its performance under this Subservicing Agreement, has been      made under my supervision.                                     |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
| ii.    | To the best of my      knowledge, based on such review, Capmark Finance Inc. as Subservicer has      fulfilled in all of its obligations under this Subservicing Agreement      in all material respects throughout the  period. |

|                                                  |  Capmark Finance      Inc. |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------|--------|
|                                                  |  116 Welsh      Road       |   |
|  Real Estate      Finance, Investments, Services |  Horsham, Pa      19044    |   |

----
From: thecaldwells3@woh.rr.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:08:11 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Marcy Caldwell

Miamisburg, OH 45342
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 578 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that there should 

be established a National Watermelon Month. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 26, 2007 

Mr. PUTNAM (for himself, Mr. CARDOZA, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Mr. 

MARIO DIAZ-BALART of Florida, Mr. CRENSHAW, Mr. BOYD of Florida, 

Mr. BUCHANAN, and Mr. LINCOLN DIAZ-BALART of Florida) submitted 

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

there should be established a National Watermelon Month. 

Whereas watermelon production constitutes an important sector of the agricultural industry of the United States; 

Whereas, according to the January 2006 statistics compiled 

by the National Agricultural Statistics Service of the 

United States Department of Agriculture, the United 

States produces 4,200,000,000 pounds of watermelon annually; 

Whereas watermelon is grown in 49 States, is purchased and 

consumed in all 50 States, and is exported to Canada; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 578 IH 

Whereas evidence indicates that eating 2.5 to 5 cups of fruits 

and vegetables daily as part of a healthy diet will improve 

health and protect against diseases such as cancer, high 

blood pressure, stroke, and heart disease; 

Whereas proper diet and nutrition are important factors in 

preventing diseases such as childhood obesity and diabetes; 

Whereas watermelon has no fat or cholesterol and is an excellent source of the vitamins A, B6, and C, fiber, and potassium, which are vital to good health and disease prevention; 

Whereas watermelon is also an excellent source of lycopene; 

Whereas lycopene, an antioxidant found only in a few red 

plant foods, has been shown to reduce the risk of certain 

cancers; 

Whereas watermelon is a heart-healthy food that has qualified for the heart-check mark from the American Heart 

Association; 

Whereas watermelon has been a nutritious summer favorite 

from generation to generation; 

Whereas it is important to educate citizens of the United 

States regarding the health benefits of watermelon and 

other fruits and vegetables; and 

Whereas July 2007 would be an appropriate month to establish as National Watermelon Month: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that there should be established a National 

3 Watermelon Month to recognize the health benefits of waVerDate Aug 31 2005 06:36 Jul 27, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR578.IH HR578

bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 578 IH 

1 termelon and the importance of watermelon to the agri2 culture industry of the United States. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
No. 61058.

#### Markt & Hammacher Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 306214-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of monofilament fishing lines the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 60183, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
|               | (1)                                  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|          |        |                                                                              |
|          | (2)                                  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the dates and periods covered by the Report. |

|  Date: November 12, 2010                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |                      |                     | /s/ Elizabeth A. Smith                |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                                                              |                      |      | Elizabeth A. Smith                    |
|                                                         |                      |      | President and Chief Executive Officer |
No. 67110.

protests 59/33458, etc. (New York).

#### Gemsco, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Eord, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of insignia similar in all material respects to those involved in Abstract 66583, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: dr.sipes@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:49:19 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Duane Sipes

Greencastle, PA 17225
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  
 - 27 -
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 612 Laid on Table in House (LTH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 612

           Raising a question of the privileges of the House.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 3, 2007

 Mr. Boehner submitted the following resolution; which was laid on the 
                                 table

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
           Raising a question of the privileges of the House.

Whereas clause one of House rule XXIII (Code of Official Conduct) states, ``A 
        Member, Delegate, Resident Commissioner, officer or employee of the 
        House shall conduct himself at all times in a manner that shall reflect 
        creditably on the House,'';
Whereas the House Ethics Manual states that, ``The public has a right to expect 
        Members, officers and employees to exercise impartial judgment in 
        performing their duties'' and ``This Committee has cautioned all Members 
        to avoid situations in which even an inference might be drawn suggesting 
        improper action'';
Whereas during proceedings of the House on August 3, 2007, with the gentleman 
        from Pennsylvania (Mr. Murtha) presiding, a question occurred on 
        approval of the Journal of the previous day's proceedings;
Whereas following the vote, the gentleman from Wisconsin, Representative 
        Sensenbrenner, inquired ``Could the chair tell me how many Members rose 
        to request a recorded vote and [the] total number of Members present in 
        the House upon which the chair made his decision?'';
Whereas Representative Murtha replied, ``It is up to the chair. Let me tell you 
        this, the vote will show that the approval would be approved by the 
        House as it has been.'';
Whereas the Speaker, as the presiding officer, has a duty to be a fair and 
        impartial arbiter of the proceedings of the House, held to the highest 
        ethical standards in deciding the various questions as they arise with 
        impartiality and courtesy toward all Members, regardless of party 
        affiliation;
Whereas a presiding officer of the House cannot achieve the requisite standard 
        of impartiality while attempting to influence the outcome of a vote, 
        predict the outcome of a vote, or express a preference for a particular 
        outcome of a vote; and
Whereas when the chair imbues his parliamentary statements with a partisan hue 
        or with language more appropriate to a participant in the debate than to 
        its presiding officer, Members' essential confidence in the impartiality 
        of the chair is impaired: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That by his actions on August 3, 2007, the gentleman from 
Pennsylvania, Mr. Murtha, has brought dishonor and discredit to the 
United States House of Representatives by misusing the powers of the 
chair.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with this Report of Eagle Oil Holding Company, Inc. (the
“Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the annual period ended April 30, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Registrant, certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1, fully
      complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant





Dated:
      August 21, 2009
                /s/
      Brian WilmotBrian
      Wilmot,  Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial
      Officer