alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

|  TRUSTEE and      PAYING AGENT:                                 |   |  DEPOSITOR:                                                       |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  LaSalle Bank      National Association                         |   |  J.P.      Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securiteis Corp. |
|  135 South      LaSalle Street, Suite 1625                      |   |  270 Park      Avenue, 10th Floor                                 |
|  Chicago,      Illinois 60603                                   |   |  New York, New      York 10017                                    |
| Attn: Global Securities and Trust Services, J.P. Morgan      2008-C2 |   |  Attn: Dennis      Schuh, Vice President,                         |
|                                                                 |   |  Telecopy number: (212)834-6593                              |

|   | (A)    | a      review of CWCAM's activities during the period 5/8/2008-12/31/2008 and of      CWCAM's performance under this Agreement has been made under my      supervision; and                |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|   | (B)    | to      the best of my knowledge, based on such review, CWCAM has fulfilled all      its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout      the period noted above. |

----
Order entered February 14, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00684-CR

STEPHANIE ANNE TIMINEY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 001-84907-2020

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s second motion for an extension of time to file 

her brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant’s brief due by March 14, 

2022.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
H. Res. 588 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

October 9, 2007. 

Whereas, Martha Coffin Wright, sister of Lucretia Coffin 

Mott, was one of five organizers of the First Woman’s 

Rights Convention in Seneca Falls, New York, in 1848; 

Whereas from this convention came the ‘‘Declaration of Sentiments’’, an appeal for basic rights for women, modeled 

on the Declaration of Independence; 

Whereas when Martha Wright helped to plan the Seneca 

Falls Convention, she was six months pregnant with her 

seventh child, epitomizing the personal strength and dedication of the participants of the women’s rights movement; 

Whereas the sites associated with the First Woman’s Rights 

Convention are preserved in the Women’s Rights National Historic Park in Seneca Falls, New York; 

Whereas after the Seneca Falls Convention, Martha Wright 

participated in many State and national women’s rights 

conventions in various capacities, often serving as president; 

Whereas during the antebellum years, Martha Wright was active in the abolition movement, attended the founding 

meeting of the American Anti-Slavery Society in Philadel-
2 

•HRES 588 EH 

phia in 1833, and later presided over numerous anti-slavery meetings; 

Whereas Martha Wright’s home in Auburn, New York, was 

part of the Underground Railroad; and 

Whereas slavery was abolished in 1865 with the ratification 

of the Thirteenth Amendment, and women’s suffrage was 

achieved in 1920 with the ratification of the Nineteenth 

Amendment: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) recognizes the 200th birthday of Martha Coffin 

Wright; 

(2) recognizes the induction of Martha Coffin 

Wright into the National Women’s Hall of Fame; and 

(3) honors the accomplishments of Martha Coffin 

Wright in her fight for equal rights for all Americans. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

MINUTE ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

GENE JUAREZ SALONS, INC., et al.,

Plaintiff,

v.

AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant.

No. C05-2153

MINUTE ORDER

The following minute order is made by the direction of the court, the Honorable Marsha J.

Pechman:

The parties have not complied with the order directing that a joint status report be filed by

February 15, 2006. The time for filing the report is hereby extended to ten days from the date of this

order. If the report is not filed by that time, sanctions may be ordered. Sanctions may include

dismissal of the action without prejudice.

Filed this 27th day of February, 2006.

BRUCE RIFKIN, Clerk

By: /s Mary Duett

Deputy Clerk

Case 2:05-cv-02153-MJP Document 8 Filed 02/27/06 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 188 (Friday, September 29, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 67325]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21369]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Special 
Emphasis Panel; Developing Regulated Therapeutic and Diagnostic 
Solutions for Patients Affected by Opioid and/or Stimulants Use 
Disorders.
    Date: November 9, 2023.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Drug 
Abuse, 301 North Stonestreet Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual 
Meeting).
    Contact Person: Sudhirkumar U. Yanpallewar, M.D., Scientific 
Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Drug 
Abuse, NIH, 301 North Stonestreet Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 
443-4577 <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#582b2d3c30312a332d35392a76213936283934343d2f392a18363130763f372e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7f0c0a1b17160d140a121e0d51061e110f1e13131a081e0d3f11161751181009">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.277, Drug 
Abuse Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, Scientist 
Development Awards, and Research Scientist Awards; 93.278, Drug 
Abuse National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 
93.279, Drug Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 25, 2023.
Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-21369 Filed 9-28-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 632 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     September 5, 2007.
    Resolved, That the House has heard with profound sorrow of the death of the 
Honorable Paul E. Gillmor, a Representative from the State of Ohio.
    Resolved, That a committee of such Members of the House as the Speaker may 
designate, together with such Members of the Senate as may be joined, be 
appointed to attend the funeral.
    Resolved, That the Sergeant-at-Arms of the House be authorized and directed 
to take such steps as may be necessary for carrying out the provisions of these 
resolutions and that the necessary expenses in connection therewith be paid out 
of applicable accounts of the House.
    Resolved, That the Clerk communicate these resolutions to the Senate and 
transmit a copy thereof to the family of the deceased.
    Resolved, That when the House adjourns today, it adjourn as a further mark 
of respect to the memory of the deceased.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

DION K. HUMPHREY, )

)

Petitioner, ) CASE NO. C05-1866-JCC-JPD

)

v. )

)

DOUG WADDINGTON, ) ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S

) MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

Respondent. )

____________________________________)

Respondent has filed a motion for an extension of time to file an answer to petitioner’s

habeas petition. (Doc. #23). Based upon a review of the motion and the balance of the record,

the court hereby finds and ORDERS as follows: 

(1) Respondent seeks a 30-day extension of time, until March 28, 2006, to file the

answer. This is the first extension of time sought by respondent. Respondent’s motion (Doc.

#23) is GRANTED. 

(2) The answer shall be filed and served no later than March 28, 2006. The answer

will be treated in accordance with Local Rule CR 7. Accordingly, on the face of the answer,

respondent shall note the answer for consideration on the fourth Friday after filing. 

Petitioner may file and serve a response no later than the Monday immediately preceding the

Friday designated for consideration of the matter. Respondent may file and serve a reply no

later than the Friday designated for consideration of the matter. 

Case 2:05-cv-01866-JCC Document 25 Filed 03/03/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

PAGE 2

(3) The Clerk shall send a copy of this Order to petitioner, to counsel for respondent,

and to the Honorable John C. Coughenour.

DATED this 3rd day of March, 2006.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:05-cv-01866-JCC Document 25 Filed 03/03/06 Page 2 of 2
EX-10.4(c)



 Exhibit 10.4(c) 

June 1, 2017 
 Aventis Asset Management, LLC 

2150 E. Lake Cook Road, Suite 720 
 Buffalo Grove, IL 60089 

Attention:     Mr. Steve Hwang 

Re:   Management Agreement Renewals 

Dear Mr. Hwang: 
 We are
writing with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity pools to which reference is made below (the “Management Agreements”). We are extending the term of the Management Agreements through June 30, 2018 and all other
provisions of the Management Agreements will remain unchanged. 
  

	 	•	 	 MB Master Fund L.P. 



 

	 	•	 	 Institutional Futures Portfolio L.P. 



 

	 	•	 	 MSSB Spectrum Strategic L.P. 



 

	 	•	 	 Ceres Tactical Commodity L.P. 



 

	 	•	 	 Managed Futures Custom Solutions Fund LP 



Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of
Mr. Patrick T. Egan at 522 Fifth Avenue – 7th Floor, New York, NY 10036 or fax to 866-428-9026. If
you have any questions, I can be reached at 212-296-6808 or contact Jack Yuen at
212-296-1320. 
  

			
	 Very truly yours,

	
	 CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC

 

	 By:
	 	 /s/ Patrick T. Egan

		 	 Patrick T. Egan

		 	 President and Director

	
	 AVENTIS ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC
  

	 By:
	 	 /s/ Steven Hwang

		 	Print Name: Steven
Hwang                                
		 	 PE/tr
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                         306,493
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,831,623
<ALLOWANCES>                                   294,785
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,877,442
<PP&E>                                       1,640,261
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,392,369
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,466,227
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,183,532
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         7,952
<OTHER-SE>                                    (725,258)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,466,227
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,816,950
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,517,879
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,108,462
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                38,642
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              74,356
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (883,747)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (883,747)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (883,747)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.11)
        

</TABLE>
From: esculp@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:06:55 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Elisabeth Culp

Indianapolis, IN 46260
No. 65186.

#### Pivar Goodman Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 320288-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of pile ribbons made of synthetic textile similar in use to pile ribbons, wholly or in chief value of silk, and following the principles set forth in *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
MOORE
& ASSOCIATES, CHARTERED
 ACCOUNTANTS AND
ADVISORS
 PCAOB
REGISTERED
 
 
 
 
 
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 
 We
consent to the use, in the statement on Form 10K of Tenshon, Inc. fka Shade Down
Under, Inc. of our report dated March 19, 2009 on our audit of the financial
statements of Tenshon, Inc. fka Shade Down Under, Inc. as of December 31, 2008
and 2007, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and
cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2008 and for the periods from
inception on May 29, 2007 to December 31, 2007 and 2008, and the reference to us
under the caption “Experts.”
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 /s/ Moore & Associates,
Chartered
 Moore
& Associates Chartered
 Las
Vegas, Nevada
 March 31,
2009
 
 
 
     
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 6490 West Desert Inn Rd, Las
Vegas, NV 89146 (702)253-7499 Fax (702)253-7501
Before the First Division,

April 21, 1965

No. 69255.

#### Rene D. Lyon Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 64/25393 (Portland, Oreg.).

*404Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of glass balls on stems similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Joseph Markovits, Inc.*v. *United States*(45 Cust. Ct. 151, C.D. 2216), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before the Second Division,

May 12, 1966

No. P66/55.

protest 62/8012 (Philadelphia).

#### Keer, Maurer Co. *v.*United States,

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of bag-making machines and parts thereof, which parts are dedicated to use on or for said bag-making machines, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Roto Bag Machine Corp. and Rohner, Gehrig &*Co., *Inc.*v. *United States*(48 Cust. Ct. 401, Abstract 66656), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DARRU K. “KEN” HSU, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE DARRU K. HSU AND GINA T. HSU LIVING TRUST U/A05/05/03, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES INC., Defendant - Appellee. No. 11-17131 D.C. No. 3:11-cv-02076-WHA
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California William H. Alsup, District Judge, Presiding Submitted December 7, 2012 ** San Francisco, California
Before: O’SCANNLAIN and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges, and EZRA, Senior 

# FILED
FEB 11 2013 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS*** The Honorable David A. Ezra, Senior U.S. District Judge for the District of Hawaii, sitting by designation. 2 District Judge. *** Darru K. “Ken” Hsu (“Hsu”) appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his action under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“IAA”), 15 U.S.C. § 80b-1 et seq., against UBS Financial Services Inc. (“UBS”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm the dismissal of the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). Hsu argues that UBS deceived clients — thereby violating its fiduciary duty as an investment advisor under § 206 — by leading them to believe that they waived certain “unwaivable fiduciary dutie s” through a series of “hedge clauses.” He fails to state a claim because he ne ver identifies or explains what those “unwaivable fiduciary duties” are and th erefore has not provided UBS with fair notice of the wrongs it has allegedly committed. Cf. Cooper v. Pickett , 137 F.3d 616, 625 (9th Cir. 1997) (to satisfy Rule 9, “a plaintiff must set forth more than the neutral facts necessary to identify the tran saction. The plaintiff must set forth what is false or misleading about a statement, and why it is false.”). Assuming that Hsu could pursue an action for rescission based on an alleged violation of § 215, Hsu’s claim fails because the clauses he point s to do not waive compliance with any provision of the IAA.3 Hsu also argues for the first time on appeal that the wrap fee contract fraudulently provides that clients may select an investment manager of their choice when, in practice, UBS allegedly requires clients to use a manager from a UBSapproved list. However, “we will not cons ider arguments that are raised for the first time on appeal.” Smith v. Marsh , 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999). Thus, this Court affirms the dismissal of the FAC for failure to state a claim. The Court therefore need not address whic h statute of limitations properly applies to the IAA. AFFIRMED.
From: mrs.mikey@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:05:20 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Michelle Lontine

Brighton, CO 80602