alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

LEOPOLDO GOMEZ-ZAVALA,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 05-203M

DETENTION ORDER 

Offenses charged:

Count I: Unlawful entry, first offense (misdemeanor) in violation of 8 U.S.C.

§ 1325(a)(2).

Count II: Unlawful entry, second offense (felony) in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1325 (a)(2).

Date of Detention Hearing: Initial Appearance, 4/28/2005.

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds

that no condition or combination of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure

the appearance of defendant as required. If new issues surface, then the defendant may request

another hearing on release.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) In the Complaint for Violation dated April 21, 2005, criminal records are cited that

reflect several prior controlled-substance offenses committed by Defendant. In addition, the

Case 2:05-cr-00178-JLR Document 7 Filed 04/28/05 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

Complaint notes other violations relating to deportation and removal.

(2) Defendant appears to have no substantial ties to the community or to the Western

District of Washington.

(3) The defendant has stipulated to detention due to the detainer placed on defendant

by the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, but reserves the right to the possibility

of a subsequent motion for release if there is a change of circumstances. 

(4) No conditions or combination of conditions are apparent that will reasonably assure

the defendant’s appearance at future Court hearings.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of

the Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation

with counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for

the government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant

is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose

of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States,

to counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United

States Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 28th day of April, 2005.

s/ JAMES P. DONOHUE 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:05-cr-00178-JLR Document 7 Filed 04/28/05 Page 2 of 2
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 05, 2021. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, February 05, 2021 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A21D0186. IN THE INTEREST OF P. A. B., A CHILD (MOTHER).
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2000182
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**Certification**

 

I, Craig M. Nash, certify that:

 

1.                                      I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2017 of ILG, Inc.;

 

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 
| Dated: April 30, 2018 | /s/ CRAIG M. NASH                                              |
|----------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       | Craig M. Nash*Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of Rangeford Resources, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), I, Frederick Ziegler, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:   (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated this 16th day of July, 2010.   /s/ Frederick ZieglerFrederick ZieglerChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 17 Filed 08/14/03 Page 1 of 9
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 17 Filed 08/14/03 Page 2 of 9
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 17 Filed 08/14/03 Page 3 of 9
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 17 Filed 08/14/03 Page 4 of 9
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 17 Filed 08/14/03 Page 5 of 9
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 17 Filed 08/14/03 Page 6 of 9
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 17 Filed 08/14/03 Page 7 of 9
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 17 Filed 08/14/03 Page 8 of 9
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 17 Filed 08/14/03 Page 9 of 9
Search Help More Search Options 

Printable Version 

Fluorescent and 

Incandescent Lamps 

Energy Conservation 

Standard Advanced 

Notice of Proposed 

Rulemaking Analytical 

Spreadsheets 

The Department of Energy 

prepared the analytical 

spreadsheets below for the 

Advance Notice of Proposed 

Rulemaking stage of its energy 

conservation standards rulemaking 

on fluorescent and incandescent 

lamps. 

ANOPR Analytical 

Spreadsheets 

z Life-Cycle Cost Spreadsheet 

(Excel 17 MB) 

z General Service Fluorescent 

Lamp National Impact 

Analysis Spreadsheet (Excel

2.7 MB) 

z Incandescent Reflector Lamp 

National Impact Analysis 

Spreadsheet (Excel 5.7 MB) 

Printable Version 

EERE Information Center 

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards: Fluorescent and Incandescent Lamps En... Page 1 of 2

http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/residential/gs_fluorescent_incan... 10/7/2008

 EE-2006-STD-0131 COMMENT 16.2
Building Technologies Program Home | EERE Home | U.S. Department of Energy

Webmaster | Web Site Policies | Security & Privacy | USA.gov 

Content Last Updated: 06/13/2008 

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards: Fluorescent and Incandescent Lamps En... Page 2 of 2

http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/residential/gs_fluorescent_incan... 10/7/2008

 EE-2006-STD-0131 COMMENT 16.2
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                                  SPARTA, INC.

                  EXHIBIT TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                             Three months ended March 31
                           -------------------------------
                               1999               1998
                           -----------        ------------
<S>                        <C>                <C>        
Basic EPS

  Net income               $ 1,447,000        $ 1,220,000
  Less accretion              (319,000)          (450,000)
                           -----------        ----------- 
                           $ 1,128,000        $   770,000
                           ===========        ===========

Shares outstanding           5,702,710          5,632,277

Per share amounts          $      0.20        $      0.14
                           ===========        ===========

Dilutive Effect

  Net income               $ 1,447,000        $ 1,220,000
  Less accretion              (319,000)          (450,000)
                           -----------        ----------- 
                           $ 1,128,000        $   770,000

Shares outstanding           5,702,710          5,632,277
Stock options                  128,351            124,737
Deferred Stock                  87,395             68,858
                           -----------        ----------- 
                             5,918,456          5,825,872

   Per share amounts       $      0.19        $      0.13
                           ===========        ===========
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 65 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      January 17, 2007.
    Resolved,  That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 5) to amend the Higher Education Act of 
1965 to reduce interest rates for student borrowers. All points of order against 
the bill and against its consideration are waived except those arising under 
clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The bill shall be considered as read. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the bill to final passage without 
intervening motion except: (1) three hours of debate equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Education and Labor; and (2) one motion to recommit.
    Sec. 2. During consideration of H.R. 5 pursuant to this resolution, 
notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the Chair may postpone 
further consideration of the bill to a time designated by the Speaker.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           8,479
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   89,675
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,510
<INVENTORY>                                     73,792
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               172,400
<PP&E>                                         126,685
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,612
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 300,791
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           56,072
<BONDS>                                         95,375
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              985
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                     143,062
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   300,791
<SALES>                                        547,076
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               547,076
<CGS>                                          427,381
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  524,874
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,297
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,175
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,993
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,182
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (342)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,840
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.83
        

</TABLE>
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Descriptivegeology of Nevada south of the fortieth parallel and adjacent portions ofCalifornia**
 
Report | Plate
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:208
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000956034
 
July 18, 2018
H. Res. 684 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

November 13, 2007. 

Whereas Shawn Johnson won four gold medals at the 2007 

Pan American Games in Rio de Janiero for team competition, all around, uneven bars, and balance beam, as 

well as one silver medal for floor; 

Whereas Shawn Johnson won the 2007 Visa Championships 

in San Jose, California, to become the United States 

champion in gymnastics; 

Whereas Shawn Johnson won three gold medals at the 2007 

World Artistic Gymnastics Championships in Stuttgart, 

Germany, making her the 2007 world all-around champion, one of only four American women to have achieved 

such recognition; and 

Whereas Shawn Johnson has brought great pride and honor 

to her family, friends, and the citizens of Iowa with her 

numerous accomplishments at the age of 15: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives congratulates Shawn Johnson on her outstanding accomplishment in 
2 

•HRES 684 EH 

becoming the 2007 World Gymnastics Champion in women’s 

gymnastics. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         393
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                11578
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (940)
<INVENTORY>                                  17185
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             30633
<PP&E>                                       32076
<DEPRECIATION>                              (20006)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               70820
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         8423
<BONDS>                                      16288
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                       101
<OTHER-SE>                                   46788
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 70820
<SALES>                                      16758
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             16758
<CGS>                                       (12133)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               (12133)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (4266)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (16)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (418)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (75)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    51
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (126)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (126)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.02)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 4.22


 


Letter of Support


 


TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF DAQO NEW ENERGY CORP.


 


We, as major shareholders, acknowledge
the net current liability position of Daqo New Energy Corp. as of December 31, 2017 and agree to provide necessary financial support
to Daqo New Energy Corp. and its subsidiaries through Daqo Group Co., Ltd. (“Daqo Group”), another company wholly owned
by the shareholders of us and a related party of Daqo New Energy Corp., which has sufficient capital and access to resources and
hence the ability to do so.


 


The details of our agreed financial support to Daqo New Energy
Corp. include the following:


 


	 	1.	We agree that Daqo New Energy Corp. does NOT have to repay us the amount of USD6.1 million owed as of December 31, 2017 to Daqo Group, Chongqing Daqo Solar Co., Ltd., Xinjiang Daqo Investment Co., Ltd and Daqo New Material Co., Ltd. before April 1, 2019.


 


	 	2.	In addition, we agree to provide Daqo New Energy Corp. additional financial funding to support the Company’s operation between January 1, 2018 and March 31, 2019. Daqo New Energy Corp. does NOT have to repay us this amount before April 1, 2019.


 


	 	3.	In addition, the management of Daqo New Energy Corp. should immediately suspend the capacity expansion project in its Xinjiang facilities if they don’t have sufficient financial recourses to continue the project after repaying all other financial obligations.


 


We agree to provide funding to support the Company
to repay all the financial obligations already committed related to the capacity expansion project in its Xinjiang facilities.
Daqo New Energy Corp. does NOT have to repay us this amount before April 1, 2019. 


 


	Investor name: 	MILLION FORTUNE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
	Signature:	/s/ Wanlin Gao	 
	Date:	February 23, 2018 	 


 


	Investor name: 	BEST MOUNT INTERNATIONAL LIMITED 
	Signature:	/s/ Jianrong Tang	 
	Date:	February 23, 2018  	 


 


	Investor name: 	ACE PRO HOLDINGS LIMITED
	Signature:	/s/ Bin Cai	 
	Date:	February 23, 2018  	 


 




    	 



     


    

 


	Investor name: 	INSTANTUP INVESTMENTS LIMITED
	Signature:	/s/ Dafeng Shi	 
	Date:	February 23, 2018  	 


 


	Investor name: 	GOLD INTELLECT LIMITED
	Signature:	/s/ Guangfu Xu	 
	Date:	February 23, 2018  	 


 


	Investor name: 	PLENTY CHINA LIMITED
	Signature:	/s/ Xiang Xu	 
	Date:	February 23, 2018   	 


 


	Investor name: 	RUIAN INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
	Signature:	 /s/ authorized signatory	 
	Date:	 February 23, 2018	 


 


	Investor name: 	LUCKY PROSPER INVESTMENTS LIMITED
	Signature:	/s/ Dafeng Shi	 
	Date:	February 23, 2018  	 


 


	Investor name: 	JIA XIN ENTERPRISES LIMITED
	Signature:	/s/ Bin Cai	 
	Date:	February 23, 2018   	 


 


	Investor name: 	DUKE ELITE LIMITED
	Signature:	/s/ Xiang Xu	 
	Date:	February 23, 2018  	 


 


	Investor name: 	DAQO GROUP CO., LTD.
	Signature:	/s/ Guangfu Xu	 
	Date:	February 23, 2018
July 1, 1954

No. 58252.

Suit 4785.

#### Coro, Inc. *v.*United States.

C. D. 1524 affirmed March 23, 1954. C. A. D. 554.
From: judithmace12@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:22:43 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Judith Mace

Huntsville, AL 35802
_______________________________________ __ Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 28, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh 128693 Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 128693 COA: 252558 Genesee CC: 03-011696-FC SHIRLEY ANN EWING, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 22, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t0919 I, CORBIN R. DAVIS, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 28, 2005

Clerk
No. 61063.

protests 291888-K, etc. (New York).

#### Reichard-Coulston, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protests were dismissed for lack of prosecution.
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

JOE and LAURA SPRINKLE,

Plaintiffs,

v.

SB&C LTD, a/k/a Skagit Bonded Collectors,

et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. CV05-1898-JPD

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

The present matter comes before the Court upon the defendants’ motion for

reconsideration of this Court’s Order Denying Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment

and Granting Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 44). The Court has

reviewed Defendant’s motion for reconsideration (Dkt. No. 51). Pursuant to Local Rules

W.D. Wash. CR 7(h)(1), motions for reconsideration are disfavored, and will ordinarily be

denied unless there is a showing of (a) manifest error in the prior ruling, or (b) facts or legal

authority which could not have been brought to the attention of the court earlier, through

reasonable diligence. Because defendants have not made either showing, the motion for

reconsideration (Dkt. No. 51) is DENIED.

Case 2:05-cv-01898-JPD Document 53 Filed 09/25/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

PAGE -2

DATED this 25th day of September, 2006.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:05-cv-01898-JPD Document 53 Filed 09/25/06 Page 2 of 2