alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: sdesmit@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:23:49 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Steve DeSmit

Kalamazoo, MI 49009
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5                    
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000     
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAY-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   AUG-30-1997
<CASH>                                         952
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,881
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    49,062
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               56,621
<PP&E>                                         38,854
<DEPRECIATION>                                 15,842
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 82,883
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          26,388
<BONDS>                                        5,563
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       85
<OTHER-SE>                                     49,042
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   82,883
<SALES>                                        20,370
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               20,370
<CGS>                                          11,713
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  11,713
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               8,479
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             370
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (192)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (35)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (157)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (157)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.02)
        


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

MICHAEL LONG,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF SEATTLE, et al., 

Defendants.

NO. C05-1664P

 ORDER ON CITY OF SEATTLE’S

 MOTION TO STRIKE ATTEMPTED

 AMENDED COMPLAINT 

This matter comes before the Court on a motion by the City of Seattle titled “Motion to Strike

Attempted Amended Complaint Naming Additional Defendants.” (Dkt. No. 24). Through this

motion, the City of Seattle seeks to strike an amended complaint that Plaintiff Michael Long filed on

May 1, 2006 without leave of the Court. (Dkt. No. 23). Having reviewed the papers and pleadings

submitted by the parties, the Court finds and ORDERS as follows:

(1) Plaintiff filed his amended complaint after answers had been filed to his initial

complaint. As a result, Plaintiff was required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a) to obtain leave of Court or the

consent of Defendants in order to file an amended complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a) (after a

responsive pleading has been served, a pleading may be amended “only by leave of court or by written

consent of the adverse party”). Plaintiff did not comply with these requirements. In addition, Plaintiff

filed his amended complaint after the Court’s deadlines for filing amended pleadings and joining

Case 2:05-cv-01664-MJP Document 29 Filed 06/08/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 2

additional parties had passed. Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b), Plaintiff is required to make a showing of

good cause and to obtain leave of the Court in order to modify the case schedule. See Coleman v.

Quaker Oats Co., 232 F.3d 1271, 1294-95 (9th Cir. 2000). Although Plaintiff filed a “statement of

reservation of rights to join additional parties,” Plaintiff cites no authority that permits a party to

unilaterally extend deadlines in a Court’s case schedule by filing such a pleading. 

(2) Therefore, the Court GRANTS the City’s motion to strike Plaintiff’s attempted

amended complaint. The amended complaint filed by Plaintiff on May 1, 2006 (Dkt. No. 23) is

STRICKEN from the record. 

(3) The Court strikes Plaintiff’s amended complaint without prejudice to Plaintiff’s ability

to file a motion for leave to amend his complaint. Although Plaintiff included a request for leave to

file an amended complaint in his response to the City’s motion to strike, this request was not properly

filed as a motion. In order to seek leave to amend his complaint, Plaintiff must file a motion pursuant

to Rules 15(a) and 16(b).

(4) The clerk is directed to send copies of this order to all counsel of record.

Dated: June 8, 2006.

s/Marsha J. Pechman 

Marsha J. Pechman

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-01664-MJP Document 29 Filed 06/08/06 Page 2 of 2
No. P66/188. —

#### Monroe Fabricators, Inc. *v.*United States, protest 63/19679 (Los Angeles).

Nichols, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of rainwear similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Weather-Rite Sportswear Co., Inc.*(52 CCPA 7, C.A.D. 848), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: andybyrd91@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:48:29 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Andy Byrd

Bluefield, VA 24605
No. 58666.

protests 235893-K, etc. (New York).

#### W. J. Bush & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of camphor oil the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Orbis Products Corp.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 244, C. D. 1527), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: clifandlisa@triad.rr.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:48:23 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Lisa Griffin

Reidsville, NC 27320
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

                       [SCHERING CORPORATION LETTERHEAD]

                                                                   June 29, 2000

Mr. Vaughan M. Kailian, CEO
COR Therapeutics, Inc.
256 East Grand Avenue
South San Francisco, California 94080

Dear Vaughan:

This is with regard to the Collaboration Agreement, dated April 10, 1995, by
and among COR Therapeutics, Inc. ("COR"), and Schering Corporation and
Schering-Plough Ltd. (collectively "Schering"), as amended, (the "Agreement").

In the Second Amendment to the Agreement, dated November 5, 1999, COR and
Schering agreed to make certain elements of the Second Amendment conditional on
the conduct of a Phase III clinical trial for acute myocardial infarction
("AMI") and have made provision in the Second Amendment for modification of the
Second Amendment based upon the status of such trial as or pre-established
dates, and the Parties desire to modify those dates.

The parties are currently negotiating a Third Amendment to the Agreement to
address this and other issues relating to the Agreement. However, Section X.A
of the Second Amendment provides for the termination of certain provisions of
the Second Amendment in the event that "as of June 30, 2000, the JSC has not
voted to conduct the Phase III Study". Therefore, pending completion of the
Third Amendment, it is hereby agreed that the deadline for the decision of
the JSC with respect to the conduct of the Phase III Study is extended until
July 31, 2000.

Please indicate COR's acceptance and agreement to the provisions set forth in
this letter by signing below on behalf of COR and returning one signed original
to Schering.

     Very truly yours,

     Schering Corporation                    Schering-Plough Ltd.

     /s/ THOMAS C. LAUDA                     /s/ THOMAS C. LAUDA
     ----------------------                  -----------------------
     Thomas C. Lauda                         Thomas C. Lauda
     Vice President                          Manager (Director)


Acknowledged and Agreed to:

COR Therapeutics, Inc.

By:  /s/ VAUGHAN M. KAILIAN
   ----------------------------
   Vaughan M. Kailian
   Chief Executive Officer

Date:   6/29/00
     --------------------------
Zander
Therapeutics Inc.


4700
Spring Street, Suite 304


La
Mesa, CA 91942




 





 


February
7, 2018


 


Todd
Caven, CFO


Regen
BioPharma Inc.


4700
Spring Street, Suite 304


La
Mesa, CA 91942


 


Dear
Todd:


 


The
purpose of this letter is to confirm the following details of our recent phone conversation. This is to confirm our conversation
this morning that Zander is willing and able to pre-pay our June 2018 anniversary license fee early in exchange for a reduced
cost of $90,000 (a $10,000 savings to Zander).


 


The
terms discussed were as follows:


 


		(1)	Pursuant
                                         to Section 3.1.2 of that License Agreement by and between Zander Therapeutics, Inc. and
                                         Regen Biopharma, Inc.(“Agreement”) , Zander is obligated to pay to Regen
                                         an annual non-refundable payment of $100,000 on each anniversary date of the Agreement
                                         (“Annual Anniversary Fee”)



		(2)	Zander,
                                         by making payment of $90,000 on or before February 10, 2018, shall have fully satisfied
                                         its June 2018 Annual Anniversary Fee obligation.



 


Zander
is happy to move forward on this transaction immediately. Please sign below in agreement to these terms and return to me. I will
consummate this transaction as soon as I receive your executed agreement.


 


 


Sincerely,


 


/s/David
Koos


David
Koos


Chairman
& CEO


 


Agreed
to by:


/s/Todd
S. Caven


Todd
S. Caven


Chief
Financial Officer


Regen
Biopharma, Inc.
July 29, 1958

No. 62248.

#### Joleo Impex Company *v.*United States,

protests 306698-K and 308853-K.

Protests abandoned May 23, 1958. (Not published.) (Initial No. 299322-K.) Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
From: jljasp@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:18:20 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jim Jasper

Mesa, AZ 85202
EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.§1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Osteotech, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael J. Jeffries, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge: (1)          The
  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)          The
  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /S/Michael
  J. JeffriesMichael J.
  Jeffries
  Chief Financial Officer and
  Chief Accounting Officer
  August 9, 2005
From: joyfromhim@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:35:56 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jeanette Ferguson

Turlock, CA 95382
No. 64569.

#### Langfelder, Homma & Carroll, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 59/30960 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Since the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
Exhibit 24
  POWER OF
    ATTORNEY
  Form 10-K
    Signature

Title

Date/s/  William
    R. FitzgeraldWilliam
    R. Fitzgerald

Chairman of the Board, Director and
    Chief Executive Officer of Ascent Media Corporation

March 14, 2011/s/  Philip
    J. HolthousePhilip
    J. Holthouse

Director of Ascent Media Corporation

March 14, 2011John
    C. Malone

Director of Ascent Media Corporation

March 14, 2011/s/  Brian
    C. MulliganBrian
    C. Mulligan

Director of Ascent Media Corporation

March 14, 2011/s/  Michael
    J. PohlMichael
    J. Pohl

Director of Ascent Media Corporation

March 14, 2011/s/  Carl
    E. VogelCarl
    E. Vogel

Director of Ascent Media Corporation

March 14, 2011/s/  George
    C. PlatisaGeorge
    C. Platisa

Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
    of Ascent Media Corporation (Principal Accounting Officer)

March 14, 2011