alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DATED AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                              13
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,699
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,616
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,379
<PP&E>                                           7,573
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,649
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,363
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,766
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        328
<COMMON>                                           104
<OTHER-SE>                                     (5,812)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,363
<SALES>                                         39,924
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,924
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,593
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,523
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 678
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,128
<INCOME-TAX>                                       113
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,016
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,016
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05
        

</TABLE>
No. 65201.

#### The Huffman Manufacturing Co. *v.*United States,

protests 60/14378 and 60/14535 (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 187 (Thursday, September 28, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 66863]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21155]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Multi-Component Application.
    Date: October 25, 2023.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Dario Dieguez, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
National Institute on Aging, Scientific Review Branch, Gateway 
Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue (2W218), Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 
827-3101, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#066267746f6928626f636173637c46686f6e28616970"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="086c697a6167266c616d6f7d6d7248666160266f677e">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 22, 2023.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-21155 Filed 9-27-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

MINUTE ORDER

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

OSSIE LEE SLAUGHTER, 

Plaintiff,

v.

CAPTAIN LOLLIE, et al,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-1880P

MINUTE ORDER

The following minute order is made by the direction of the court, the Honorable Marsha J.

Pechman:

This case is transferred to the Honorable John C. Coughenour as related to C05-1689C.

All future pleadings should reflect the change in the case caption as follows: C05-1880C-MAT.

Filed and entered this 12th day of December, 2005.

BRUCE RIFKIN, Clerk

By /S/Eileen Scollard

Deputy Clerk

Case 2:05-cv-01880-JCC-MAT Document 6 Filed 12/12/05 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 10.19







The following form of agreement was executed by The Ohio Valley Bank Company and each of the following directors on the dates indicated beside their names:







	
Name

	 	
Date of Agreement


	 	 	 
	
David W. Thomas

	 	
December 20, 2016


	 	 	 
	
Harold A. Howe

	 	
December 13, 2016


	 	 	 
	
Jeffrey E. Smith

	 	
December 13, 2016


	 	 	 
	
Thomas E. Wiseman

	 	
December 13, 2016















2016 DETERMINATION OF DIRECTOR'S FEES


 


FOR PURPOSES OF THE DIRECTOR RETIREMENT AGREEMENT


FOR _____________







THIS AGREEMENT is made this ______ day of December, 2016, by and between THE OHIO VALLEY BANK COMPANY located in Gallipolis, Ohio (the "Company"), and ______________ (the "Director").


 


The Company and the Director entered into a DIRECTOR RETIREMENT AGREEMENT most recently amended and restated on ____________________, 20__ (the "Agreement").


 


The Director agrees that Director's "total annual or monthly fees" for purposes of sections 2.1.1 Normal Retirement Benefit, 2.2.1 Disability Benefit, and 3.1.1 Death During Active Service will include the annual board retainer and monthly fees paid to all directors, earned by the Director during a Plan Year and will not include committee fees of any type, lead director fees or other special director fees.







The parties, by executing this Agreement hereby agree to the terms stated herein.







 


	
DIRECTOR:

	 	
THE OHIO VALLEY BANK COMPANY


	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	
By:

	 
	 	 	
 


Title:
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of - )

)

Utah Department of Workforce ) ASBCA No. 62563

)

Under Contract No. FA8201-13-C-0115 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Vanessa R. Walsh, Esq.

 Assistant Utah Attorney General

 Salt Lake City, UT

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Jeffrey P. Hildebrant, Esq.

 Air Force Deputy Chief Trial Attorney

Capt Seiji Ohashi, USAF

 Trial Attorney

OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE THRASHER

The parties have resolved their dispute and request that the Board enter judgment 

in favor of appellant.

It is the Board’s decision, pursuant to 41 U.S.C. §§ 7105(e), 7108(b), and the 

parties’ stipulation and agreement, that the appeal is sustained. In the nature of a consent 

judgment, the Board makes a monetary award to appellant in the amount of $214,981. 

Interest shall be paid on this amount pursuant to 41 U.S.C. § 7109 from March 20, 2020

until date of payment.

Dated: July 15, 2020

JOHN J. THRASHER

Chairman

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

(Signatures continued)
2

I concur

RICHARD SHACKLEFORD

Administrative Judge

Vice Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

I concur

OWEN C. WILSON

Administrative Judge

Vice Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the 

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62563, Appeal of Utah 

Department of Workforce, rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: July 20, 2020

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

NATHAN JAMES MILLER,

Defendant.

 

Case No. CR05-5733RBL

 

INITIAL ORDER RE: ALLEGATIONS

OF VIOLATION OF CONDITIONS

OF SUPERVISION BY UNITED

STATES PROBATION OFFICE

THIS MATTER comes on for hearing on the Petition of the United States Probation Office

alleging that the defendant has violated the conditions of supervision.

The plaintiff appears through Special/Assistant US Attorney, GREGORY GRUBER:

The defendant appears personally and represented by counsel, RUSSELL LEONARD:

The U.S. Probation Office has filed a petition alleging violations of the terms and conditions of

supervision; the defendant has been advised of the allegation(s) and maximum potential sanction if

substantiated; and the court finding probable cause with regard to the alleged violation(s); 

The matter is scheduled for hearing before the Honorable RONALD B LEIGHTON:

Date: NOVEMBER 20, 2012 

Time: 10:00 A.M.

( ) Defendant is released pending the above scheduled hearing.

( X ) Defendant is ordered detained for failing to show that he/she will not flee or pose a danger to any

other person or the community pursuant to CrR 32.1(a)(1), and CrR 46(c), to be delivered as ordered

by the court for further proceedings. 

The clerks shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United States, to counsel for the

defendant, the United States Marshal and to the United States Probation Office. This Order is entered

without prejudice to review.

November 9, 2012.

AJ. Richard Creatura

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cr-05733-RBL Document 54 Filed 11/09/12 Page 1 of 1
RAKESH VERMA

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

C ASE NO. 1D 16

- 5389

Opinion filed February 3, 2017.

Petition for Writ of Prohibition

-- Or iginal Jurisdiction

.

Rakesh Verma, pro se , Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of prohibition is dismissed as unauthorized. See Logan v.

State

, 846 So. 2d 472 (Fla. 2004)

.

ROBERTS, C.J., WOLF and B.L. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required
to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Principal
Life Income Fundings Trust 2008-042 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, do
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information
required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is
included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;4.
    
    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this
report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act
periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing
agreement(s) in all material respects; and5.
    
    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of
compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included
in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.
   /s/ Dwight N. Soethout

Dwight N. SoethoutVice President  Principal Life Insurance Company
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 188 (Friday, September 29, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 67407]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21429]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-422, OMB Control No. 3235-0471]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; Extension: Rule 15c1-
5

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: U.S. Securities and 
Exchange Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, 
Washington, DC 20549-2736

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995 (`PRA'') (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management 
and Budget (``OMB'') a request for approval of extension of the 
previously approved collection of information provided for in Rule 
15c1-5 (17 CFR 240.15c1-5) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.).
    Rule 15c1-5 states that any broker-dealer controlled by, 
controlling, or under common control with the issuer of a security that 
the broker-dealer is trying to sell to or buy from a customer must give 
the customer written notification disclosing the control relationship 
at or before completion of the transaction. The Commission estimates 
that 175 respondents provide notifications annually under Rule 15c1-5 
and that each respondent would spend approximately 10 hours per year 
complying with the requirements of the rule for a total burden of 
approximately 1,750 hours per year. There is no retention period 
requirement under Rule 15c1-5. This Rule does not involve the 
collection of confidential information.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to, a collection of information under the PRA unless it 
displays a currently valid OMB control number.
    The public may view background documentation for this information 
collection at the following website: www.reginfo.gov. Find this 
particular information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day 
Review--Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function. 
Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent by October 30, 2023 to
    (i) www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain and (ii) David Bottom, 
Director/Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, 
c/o John Pezzullo, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, or by sending 
an email to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9ececcdfc1d3fff7f2fcf1e6deedfbfdb0f9f1e8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6c3c3e2d33210d05000e03142c1f090f420b031a">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: September 26, 2023.
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-21429 Filed 9-28-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-7580

JEVON EDWARD BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

PATRICK, Virginia Department of Corrections Officer, C/O, 

employee for Unit #27; MR. RAGSDALE, Virginia Department of

Transportation, Forman, "Crew Virginia"; MS. FRANCHER, 

Virginia Department of Corrections, Unit #27, Medical Care 

Assistant/Personnel; R. GRAMMER, Virginia Department of 

Corrections, Unit #27, former inmate; J. H. SNODGRASS; A. 

HARRIS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior

District Judge. (1:08-cv-01345-TSE-TRJ)

Submitted: March 29, 2012 Decided: April 3, 2012

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jevon Edward Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jevon Edward Brown appeals the district court’s order 

denying his self-styled motion for permission to appeal, which 

the district court construed as a Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion, 

and has filed motions for appointment of counsel and for a 

transcript at government expense. We have reviewed the record 

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Brown’s 

motions and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Brown v. Patrick, No. 1:08-cv-01345-TSE-TRJ (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 

2, 2011; entered Nov. 3, 2011). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SPARTA, Inc. (the
Company) for the period ended September 28, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert C. Sepucha,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, in my capacity as an officer
of the Company pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                                                
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the
financial statements included in the report.

November 11, 2003

/s/ Robert C. Sepucha
Robert C. Sepucha
Chief Executive Officer

- 22 -
Exhibit 23.2




Ralph E. Davis Associates, Inc.
 1717 St. James Place, Suite 460
 Houston, TX 77056
 
 March 31, 2011
 
 Recovery Energy, Inc.
 1515 Wynkoop Street, Suite 200
 Denver CO 80202
 Attention:  Jeffrey Beunier
 
 Dear Jeff:
 
 RE Davis hereby consents to being named in the Annual Report on Form 10-K being filed by Recovery Energy, Inc. on March 31, 2011 and to the filing of our report dated February 24, 2011 as an exhibit to the Annual Report.
 
 Sincerely,
 
 
 Ralph E. Davis Associates, Inc.
 
 /s/Allen C. Barron
 Allen C Barron, P.E.
 President
Before the Second Division,

November 17, 1964

No. 68891.

#### Lafayette Brass Mfg. Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 63/18131 and 63/9008 (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of rotary lawn sprinklers or metal parts thereof similar in all material respects to those the subject of *The Durst Mfg. Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(50 CCPA 56, C.A.D. 820), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 11.2


                        OSTEOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                COMPUTATION OF FULLY DILUTED NET INCOME PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                Three Months                                Nine Months
                                                            Ended September 30,                         Ended September 30,
                                                       -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                          1997                1996                 1997                  1996
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                    <C>                    <C>                <C>                   <C>     
   Net income                                          $1,608,000             $251,000           $3,843,000            $624,000
                                                      ==============================================================================

   Shares used in computing net income per share:

     Weighted average Common shares
      outstanding                                       8,196,979            7,799,014            8,016,508          7,708,261

     Weighted average Common shares
      issuable upon the exercise of
      outstanding stock options and
      warrants                                          1,703,060            1,336,573            1,915,825           1,430,849

     Application of assumed
      proceeds towards repurchase
      of outstanding Common shares
      using the Treasury Stock
      method                                             (481,533)(a)         (892,764)(a)         (527,124)(b)        (834,615)(b)
                                                      ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Shares used in computation                     9,418,506            8,242,823            9,405,209           8,304,495
                                                      ==============================================================================

   Net income per share
        assuming full dilution                               $.17                 $.03                 $.41                $.08
====================================================================================================================================
</TABLE>


       (a) Computed  using assumed  proceeds of $9,690,846  and a closing market
           value of $20.13 in 1997 and  proceeds  of  $5,679,766  and an average
           market value of $6.36 in 1996.

       (b) Computed using assumed  proceeds of $10,608,363  and a closing market
           value of $20.13 in 1997 and  proceeds  of  $5,833,961  and an average
           market value of $6.99 in 1996.

                                      E-58