alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

AMANDA MILJUS,

Plaintiff,

v.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner of

Social Security

Defendant.

Case No. C06-5009RBL

ORDER REGARDING SERVICE

OF THE COMPLAINT

This matter has been referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1), Local Magistrates Rules MJR 3 and 4, and Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

The case is before the Court on plaintiff’s failure to timely service the complaint. After reviewing the

balance of the record in this case, the Court finds and orders as follows:

Service of the summons and complaint must be made within 120 days after filing of the complaint.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Fed. R. Civ. P.”) 4(m). Failure to properly serve the summons and

complaint within this time frame may result in the dismissal of this case without prejudice. Id. Fed. R. Civ.

P. 4(m) further provides in relevant part as follows:

If service of the summons and complaint is not made upon a defendant within 120 days

after the filing of the complaint, the court, upon motion or on its own initiative after

notice to the plaintiff, shall dismiss the action without prejudice as to that defendant or

direct that service be effected within a specified time; provided that if the plaintiff shows

good cause for the failure, the court shall extend the time for service for an appropriate

period. 

Case 3:06-cv-05009-RBL Document 4 Filed 06/06/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

On January 9, 2006, plaintiff filed her complaint. (Dkt. #1). It thus has been more than 120 days

since plaintiff filed her complaint. To date, however, it does not appear plaintiff has served that complaint

on defendant. Accordingly, plaintiff shall serve the complaint on defendant and file proof of such service

with the Court by no later than July 6, 2006, or show cause why this matter should not be dismissed for

failure to prosecute. 

The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to plaintiff.

DATED this 6th day of June, 2006.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-cv-05009-RBL Document 4 Filed 06/06/06 Page 2 of 2
Bureau of Land Management

Phoenix District Office

Phoenix, AZ

October 2009

Note: Land Status legend located on Map 1

Map 26

Upper Agua Fria River

Basin Management Unit

Multiple Resource Allocation

0 1 2 3 4

Miles

Interstate

Major Road

Major River, Streams or Wash

Highway

Bradshaw Harquahala

Planning Area

Resource Allocations

Special Recreation

Management Area

(SRMA)

Recreation Management

Zone (RMZ)

North Black Canyon

Hiking and Equestrian

Trails RMZ

Management Unit

Agua Fria National Monument

Planning Area

Upper Agua Fria

River Basin SRMA

AGUA FRIA

NATIONAL

MONUMENT

Prescott

Valley

CORDES

JUNCTION

Wilderness Area

Galena

Gulch

SCRMA

Special Cultural Resource

Management Area

(SCRMA) - Public Use

Note: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM)

conducts land use planning only in the areas administered

by BLM. BLM has no planning authority under the

municipal or county planning legislation of the State

of Arizona.

No warranty is made by BLM for the use of this map

for purposes not intended by BLM, or to the accuracy,

reliability or completeness of the information shown.

Spatial information may not meet National Map Accuracy

standards. This information may be updated without

notification.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 18, 2015

p1215 

# Order

Clerk December 18, 2015

151065

ANDREW SHIRVELL,

Petitioner

- Appellant,

v SC: 151065

COA: 316146

Ingham CC: 12

- 001089

- AA

DEPARTMENT OF ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent

- Appellee,

and

CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION,

Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 8, 2015

judgment of the Cour t of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 558 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 23, 2007.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 3074) making appropriations for the Departments of Transportation, 
and Housing and Urban Development, and related agencies for the fiscal year 
ending September 30, 2008, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill 
shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill 
are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. General debate 
shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Appropriations. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment 
under the five-minute rule. Points of order against provisions in the bill for 
failure to comply with clause 2 of rule XXI are waived. During consideration of 
the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord 
priority in recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment 
has caused it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record 
designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed 
shall be considered as read. When the committee rises and reports the bill back 
to the House with a recommendation that the bill do pass, the previous question 
shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final 
passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
    Sec. 2.  During consideration in the House of H.R. 3074 pursuant to this 
resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the Chair 
may postpone further consideration of the bill to such time as may be designated 
by the Speaker.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 10.17.2
 SCHEDULE
to the
Master Agreement
 
  Termination Provisions
  Specified Entity
 
  
 Specified Transaction
 Cross Default
 Specified Indebtedness
 Threshold Amount
 Termination Currency
 Credit Event Upon Merger
 Automatic Early Termination
 Payments on Early Termination




---



##### 



Additional Termination Event
 Part II
 Tax Representations
 Payer Representation.
  Payee Representations:
    Part III
 Agreement to Deliver Documents




---



##### 



Covered by SectionParty Required to
    
    Form/Document/
    
    Date by which to be
    
    3(d)Deliver Document
    
    Certificate
    
    Delivered
    
    RepresentationParty B
    
    Any document
requested by Party
A in its sole
discretion to
cross-collateralize
all of the debts,
obligations and
liabilities of
Party B under this
Agreement with all
collateral pledged
to Party A under
any Credit Support
Document.
    
    As required by the
Term Loan Agreement
and Loan Documents
(other than this
Agreement)
    
    YesParty B
    
    Balance sheets
and/or income
statements and/or
federal tax returns
as required by
Party A.
    
    As required by the
Term Loan Agreement
and Loan Documents
(other than this
Agreement)
    
    YesParty A and Party B
    
    IRS Form W-9, or
any successor form
thereto.
    
    Upon execution of
this Agreement and
promptly upon such
time as the Form
W-9 previously
delivered by either
Party A or Party B
shall be inaccurate
or incorrect.
    
    YesParty A and Party B
    
    Evidence of the
authority and true
signature of the
signatories of this
Agreement and each
Confirmation on its
behalf.
    
    Upon execution of
this Agreement
    
    Yes
 Part IV
 Miscellaneous
 Governing Law.
 Notices.




---



##### 



Netting of Payments.
 Multibranch Party.
   Credit Support Document:




---



##### 



Security: ,
 Credit Support Provider:
 Process Agent:
   Offices:
  Part V
 Other Provisions
 ISDA Definitions.
 Inconsistency.
 Setoff.




---



##### 



Calculation Agent.
 Waiver of Right to Trial by Jury.
 Application of Events of Default for Fully Paid Transactions.
 Consent to Recording.
 Additional Representations.
 Eligible Contract Participant or Accredited Investor: Eligible Contract Participant Accredited Investor




---



##### 



Relationship Between Parties.
 Non-Reliance.
 Evaluation and Understanding.
 Status of the Parties.
 Principal.
 Severability.
  Confidentiality.




---



##### 



Transfer




---



##### 



SUSQUEHANNA BANKBy:
    /s/ Hugh J. ArbuthnotNAME: Hugh J. ArbuthnotTITLE: Commercial relationship Manager  Casie Ecology Oil Salvage, Inc.By:
    /s/ Gregory CallNAME: Gregory CallTITLE: PresidentCasie Ecology Oil Salvage, Inc.By:
    /s/ Brent KopenhaverNAME: Brent KopenhaverTITLE: TreasurerMidAtlantic Recycling Technologies, Inc.By:
    /s/ Gregory CallNAME: Gregory CallTITLE: PresidentMidAtlantic Recycling Technologies, Inc.By:
    /s/ Brent KopenhaverNAME: Brent KopenhaverTITLE: Treasurer




---



##### 



Rezultz, Inc.By:
    /s/ Gregory CallNAME: Gregory CallTITLE: PresidentRezultz, Inc.By:
    /s/ Brent KopenhaverNAME: Brent KopenhaverTITLE: Treasurer
Exhibit 99.8

CONSENT OF HAROLD BRISSON

I, Harold Brisson,
hereby consent to the references to, and the use of information derived from, the technical report dated effective June 19, 2014
titled “Technical Report on the Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve Estimates for the Black Fox Complex” (the “Report”)
in the annual report on Form 40-F of Sandstorm Gold Ltd. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 and any amendments
thereto (the “Annual Report”) being filed with United States Securities and Exchange Commission, which Annual Report
incorporates by reference and attaches as an exhibit the Sandstorm Gold Ltd. Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31,
2014 which refers to information contained in the Report.

I also consent to
the use of my name, including as an expert or “qualified person,” in connection with the Annual Report.

Date: March 17, 2015



| | /s/ Harold Brisson                            
| | ----------------------------------------------
| | Name:  Harold Brisson, Eng., Ph.D.,           
| | Title:  Resource Manager, Primero Mining Corp.
March 20, 2018






















James E. Evans


Great American Insurance Group Tower


301 East Fourth Street


Cincinnati, Ohio 45202







RE: Consulting Agreement







Dear Jim:







The purpose of this letter is to set forth in writing our agreement concerning your service as an executive consultant to American Financial Group, Inc. ("AFG") during 2018.







To that end, you and the Company hereby agree as follows:


1. Consulting Arrangement.  Beginning on the date of this letter and continuing through December 31, 2018, you agree to provide consulting services to AFG and related organizations, including, without limitation, the subsidiaries and affiliates of AFG and their shareholders, officers, directors, employees and agents (collectively, the "Company"), making yourself available to answer questions and consult with the Company upon reasonable request.  This consulting arrangement shall be on substantially the same terms as provided in our prior consulting agreement dated August 19, 2013, as amended, that expired on December 31, 2017, except as provided herein.


2. Consulting Fee.  The consulting fee for your consulting services to the Company hereunder shall be $300,000, paid in installments as agreed upon.





















If after review of this letter, you find it acceptable, please sign, date and return an original copy to me.


	 	
Very truly yours,


 


AMERICAN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.


 


By:         /s/ S. Craig Lindner                                    


S. Craig Lindner


Co-Chief Executive Officer





















	
ACCEPTED AND AGREED:


 


 


/s/ James E. Evans                                                                       


James E. Evans


 


            March 20, 2018                                                              


Date
727 South Wolfe Street Baltimore, Maryland 21231 - 3536 U.S.A. (410)342 - 2626 www.belfortinstrument.com fax (410)342 - 702 8 April 11, 2013 PETITIONS FOR RULEMAKING Federal Docket Management System Docket Operations West Building Ground Floor, RM W12 - 140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 ELECRONIC SUBMISSION Petitioner: Ralph F Petragnani Belfort Instrument Company 727 S Wolfe Street Baltimore, MD 21231 410 342 - 2626 410 342 - 7028 FAX rpetragnani@belfortinstrument.com Belfort Instrument is seeking exemption from FAA Order 7 110.104, dated 9/7/90, Non - Federal AWOS connected to WMSCR. Belfort is requesting that FAA certified and FAA commission AWOS AV systems be permitted to connect to the FAA WMSCR network. The reason for seeking this exemption is there are approximately 125 + AWOS AV systems installed throughout the country providing safe, reliable METAR reports locally, but not over the FAA NADIN/WMSCR network.

1. The AWOS AV meets and is certified to the same FAA Advisory Circular (AC 150/5220 - 16C) as the AWOS III. The ins pection cycles and FAA commissioning of the AWOS AV meet the same Advisory Circular requirements as the AWOS III. 2. FAA memo Dated July 11, 2008 from Frank San Martin , Manager, Airports Financia l Assistance Division, APP - 500 wherein it speaks to program eli gibility for AWOS grants. Section e. AWOS Selection:” benefit- cost analysis is not needed for AWOS A or AWOS AV”. “However, to request grant funding for a more advanced AWOS, an airport must submit a positive benefit- cost analysis”. So this memo sees no problem with the AWOS AV and, in fact, tacitly endorses its use.727 South Wolfe Street Baltimore, Maryland 21231 - 3536 U.S.A. (410)342 - 2626 www.belfortinstrument.com fax (410)342 - 702 8 PETITIONS FOR RULEMAKING Page 2

3. In the past

, the NTSB called a hearing investigating the accident rate of the nation’s Emergency Medical System (EMS) programs. One of the recommenda tions from the NTSB and the Helicopter Association International (HAI) was the availability of more weather reporting. If permitted into the network, AV’s would add 125+ weather stations to the database. (With more stations being added every month). 4. State Aviation Directors continually request AWOS AV inclusion into the network and unfortunately because of the out dated FAA order is depriving the NAS users of additional weather information. Granting this request will greatly increase both aviation flig ht safety and public safety by adding more locations of weather reporting into the national network where, not only FAA. But the NWS will have real time weather access . So, Belfort Instrument Company is requesting that an FAA commissioned , Non - Federal AWO S AV Be permitted to connect to FAA WMSCR network and revise FAA Order 7110.104, dated 9/7/90, Non Federal AWOS connected to WMSCR to include the AWOS AV. Please feel free to contract me if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely ,

Ralph F Petragnani Vice President, Sales & Marketing
|   |   | (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|   |   |   |                                                                                                                                                 |

|   | /s/ Dr. Yash R. Puri                                                                               |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Dr. Yash R. PuriExecutive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-1860

___________

Tina Sue McClanahan, *

 *

Appellant, *

 *

v. *

 *

City of Moberly, *

 *

Defendant, *

 * Appeal from the United States

Gerald Gander, Sheriff of Shelby * District Court for the

County, * Eastern District of Missouri. 

 *

Appellee, * [UNPUBLISHED]

 *

Michael L. Garbulski, Chief of Police; *

P. Pollard, also known as Corky *

Pollard, Captain of Police, #230; *

Randy Cook, Patrolman, #232; Rex *

V. Gump, Moberly City Judge; *

Wayne E. Schirmer, Moberly City *

Attorney, *

 *

Defendants. *

___________

 Submitted: November 12, 1998

 Filed: November 20, 1998

___________

Before FAGG, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.
 The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, United States District Judge for the Eastern 1

District of Missouri.

-2-

___________

PER CURIAM.

Tina Sue McClanahan appeals from the district court&s adverse grant of

1

summary judgment in her suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. After careful review of the

record and the parties’ briefs, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

8th Cir. R. 47B. 

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
H. Res. 631 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 5, 2007. 

Whereas on August 6, 2007, six miners, Kerry Allred, Don 

Erickson, Juan Carlos Payan, Brandon Phillips, Manuel 

Sanchez, and Jose Luis Hernandez, were trapped 1,800 

feet below ground in the Crandall Canyon mine in Utah; 

Whereas Federal, State, and local rescue crews worked relentlessly in an attempt to locate and rescue the trapped 

miners; 

Whereas three rescuers, Gary Jensen, Brandon Kimber, and 

Dale ‘‘Bird’’ Black lost their lives during the rescue attempt; 

Whereas the loss of the miners has had a tremendous effect 

on the local community; 

Whereas the emergency efforts coordinated by the Emery 

County Sheriff’s Department have been exemplary; 

Whereas Utah is one of the largest coal producing States in 

the Nation, producing over 21 million tons of coal in 

2005; 

Whereas coal continues to be the economic engine for many 

communities; 
2 

•HRES 631 EH 

Whereas during the last century over 100,000 coal miners 

have been killed in mining accidents in the Nation’s coal 

mines; 

Whereas the Nation is greatly indebted to coal miners for the 

difficult and dangerous work they perform to provide the 

fuel needed to operate the Nation’s industries and to provide energy to homes and businesses; and 

Whereas many residents of Emery County and Carbon County, Utah, and the surrounding areas, came together to 

support the miners’ families and the community has been 

steadfast in its efforts to help the families of the missing 

and deceased: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) recognizes Kerry Allred, Don Erickson, Juan 

Carlos Payan, Brandon Phillips, Manuel Sanchez, Jose 

Luis Hernandez, Gary Jensen, Brandon Kimber, and 

Dale ‘‘Bird’’ Black for their sacrifice in the Crandall 

Canyon, Utah coal mine; 

(2) extends the deepest condolences of the Nation 

to the families of these men; 

(3) recognizes the many volunteers who participated 

in the rescue efforts and provided support for the miners’ families during the rescue operations; and 
3 

•HRES 631 EH 

(4) honors the long national heritage of coal mining 

families and supports the tradition for the future. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS, STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS, AND STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE
NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          19,937
<SECURITIES>                                    58,022
<RECEIVABLES>                                      832
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                87,348
<PP&E>                                          23,142
<DEPRECIATION>                                (18,231)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  92,259
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,709
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                      73,904
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    92,259
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,412
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,695
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 140
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,276)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,276)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,276)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.22)
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

DENNIS BARNETT and WILLIAM

BARNETT,

Plaintiffs,

v.

T.D. ESCROW SERVICES, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

CASE NO. C05-799JLR

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

On September 23, 2005 this court issued an amended minute order (Dkt. # 32)

directing the parties to show cause by October 7, 2005 why this case should not be

dismissed for failure to submit a joint status report. The court reaffirmed this directive in

its order granting summary judgment for Defendant Wilshire Credit Corporation on

September 27, 2005. (Dkt. # 33). As of the date of this order, the parties have not

submitted the joint status report. Accordingly, the court ORDERS that this action and

any and all remaining claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. 

DATED this 14th day of October, 2005.

A JAMES L. ROBART

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-00799-JLR Document 34 Filed 10/14/05 Page 1 of 1