alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.2

 

SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE

SUPERVALU INC.

EXECUTIVE AND OFFICER SEVERANCE PAY PLAN

 

SUPERVALU INC., a Delaware corporation, has heretofore established and maintains the plan entitled SUPERVALU INC. Executive and Officer Severance Pay Plan as amended from time to time (“Plan”).  Pursuant to Section 7 of the Plan document, the Plan is hereby amended as follows in “Second Amendment to the SUPERVALU INC. Executive and Officer Severance Pay Plan”:

 

1.              EXCLUSIONS.  Section 4(f) of the Plan is amended to read as follows:

 

4(f)  employee is employed in a business unit in which a sale or other transfer of the business unit, a portion of the business unit, or specific assets of the business unit to another employer occurs and, (i) upon or within one hundred twenty days (120) days following the closing of that transaction, (A) employee accepts any position with the other employer or (B) is offered a position that does not require relocation and with total annual cash compensation that is not less than the employee’s current total annual cash compensation, even if employee does not accept such offer; provided that, employee remains employed by the Company through the occurrence of either (A) or (B) or (ii) the employment of employees employed by such business unit is continued immediately following the closing of that transaction by operation of law.  For purposes of this subparagraph 4(f), “business unit” shall mean any subunit of the Company as defined at the discretion of the Company (e.g., subsidiary, district, region, or cost center may be “business units” under this subparagraph);

 

2.              CLAIMS PROCEDURE. Section 8(a) of the Plan is amended to read as follows:

 

8(a) Initial Claim and Decision. If a participant (referred to as claimant for remainder of Section 8) believes that she or he is not receiving a benefit she or he is entitled to receive under the Plan, the claimant may file a claim with the Senior Vice President of Corporate Human Resources.  The claim must be in writing, must include the facts and arguments the claimant wants considered, and must be filed within one year of the date the claimant knew (or should have known) the facts behind the claim.  The Senior Vice President of Corporate Human Resources has 90 days after receiving the claim to make a decision and notify the claimant if the claim is denied in whole or in part.  The notice of denial will state the reasons for denial, the Plan provisions on which the denial is based, a description of additional material (if any) needed from the claimant and why, the procedure for requesting a review of the denial, and the participant’s right to file a civil action under section 502(a) of ERISA if the claim is denied upon review.

 

3.              EFFECTIVE DATES: This Second Amendment is effective as to all participants under this plan as of January 3, 2013.

 











 

4.              SAVINGS CLAUSE.  Save and except as hereinabove expressly amended, the Plan document shall continue in full force and effect.
aeti-ex1037_6.htm



 

Exhibit 10.37

Summary of Compensation For Named Executive Officers 2018*

 

 

In February 2018 Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors established 2018 salary and target bonus applicable to our named executive officers as follows:

 

 


	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Named Executive
	
  
	
2018
Base Salary($)
	
 
	
  
	
2018
Target Bonus($)
	
 

	
Charles M. Dauber
	
  
	
 
	
350,000
	
  
	
  
	
 
	
175,000
	
  

	
William C. Miller
	
  
	
 
	
210,000
	
  
	
  
	
 
	
100,000
	
  

	
Neal T. Hare
	
  
	
 
	
156,568
	
  
	
  
	
 
	
100,000
	
  

	
James J. Steffek
	
  
	
 
	
102,995
	
  
	
  
	
 
	
100,000
	
  

	
William Brod
	
  
	
 
	
200,000
	
  
	
  
	
 
	
60,000
	
  




 

In connection with the 2018 salary and target bonus established for our named executive officers, the following were awarded performance-based restricted stock units under the 2007 Employee Stock Incentive Plan:

 


	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Named Executive
	
  
	
Restricted Stock Units
	
 

	
Charles M. Dauber
	
  
	
 
	
80,000
	
  

	
William C. Miller
	
  
	
 
	
56,787
	
  

	
William Brod
	
  
	
 
	
37,838
No. 58697.

protests 231911-K, etc. (New York).

#### Duncan Gilmour & Co., Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 130, C. A. D. 508) and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: cindy@highlandwestmonroe.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:24:17 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B). I also do

not appreciate your offering services that will require my insurance rates to go. They are already

extremely high and soon I will not be able to afford it. 

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Cindy Taylor

West Monroe, LA 71291
No. 62800.

#### Pollak Industrial Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 269272-K (Baltimore).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of straw hats similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Pollak Industrial Corp. et al.*v. *United States*(40 Cust. Ct. 251, C.D. 1991), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 61064.

protest 293507-K (New York).

#### Hudson Shipping Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
Exhibit 13.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Ping Wei, Chief Financial Officer of China Distance Education Holdings Limited (the Company), hereby certifies, to the best of her knowledge, that the Companys annual report on Form 20-F
for the year ended September 30, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.

Date: February 28, 2012



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Ping Wei           
|Name:  |  | Ping Wei               
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
No. 67556.

#### The Glemby Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/28620, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of nylon hair nets similar in use to manufactures of silk and following the principles set forth in *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 CCPA 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. P67/231.

#### Service Cycle Supply Corp. *v.*United States, protests 65/17374, etc. (New York).

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of certain padlocks similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Shriro Trading Corp.*v. *United States*(56 Cust. Ct. 422, C.D. 2669), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Mauricio DIAZ-GALICIA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-50069.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Aug. 17, 2005.

Joseph EL Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Donna F. Coltharp, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Mauricio Diaz-Galicia raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

TIMOTHY B. WHITMORE,

Plaintiff,

v.

PIERCE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF

COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5265RBL

ORDER ADOPTING

REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

 The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge J. Kelley

Arnold, objections to the Report and Recommendation, if any, and the remaining record, does hereby

find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) Defendant Patricia Brixey’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. This

defendant is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 

(3) Defendant Pierce Counties motion for partial summary judgment is GRANTED.

(4) Plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment as to liability is DENIED.

(5) This matter is re-referred to Magistrate Judge J. Kelley Arnold. 

(6) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff, counsel for defendants,

and to the Hon. J. Kelley Arnold.

DATED this 19th day of July, 2007.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-05265-RBL Document 236 Filed 07/19/07 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5 
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-1-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-01-1997
<CASH>                                         6,513
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,843
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    46,383
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               58,371
<PP&E>                                         37,874
<DEPRECIATION>                                 14,863
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 84,764
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          25,755
<BONDS>                                        6,681
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       85
<OTHER-SE>                                     50,534
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   84,764
<SALES>                                        32,624
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               32,624
<CGS>                                          18,126
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  18,126
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               10,328
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             398
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3,772
<INCOME-TAX>                                   566
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            3,206
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,206
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.38
        


</TABLE>
From: snslewis@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:18:42 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sharon Lewis

Garden Grove, CA 92845
Before the Third Division,

February 11, 1958

No. 61552.

#### H. P. Rossiger & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 300503-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Veterans Affairs
 The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. ch. 10, that the Executive Committee of the VA Voluntary Service (VAVS) National Advisory Committee (Committee) will meet on October 26-27, 2023 at the Veterans of Foreign Wars Washington Office located at 200 Maryland Avenue NE, Washington, DC 20002. The meeting sessions will begin and end as follows: Date(s)
Time(s)Thursday, October 26, 2023
9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time (EST).Friday, October 27, 2023
9:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. EST.
 The meeting sessions are open to the public. The Committee advises the Secretary, through the Under Secretary for Health, on the coordination and promotion of volunteer activities and strategic partnerships within VA health care facilities on matters related to volunteerism. The Committee is also comprised of 56 major Veteran, civic and service organizations. The Executive Committee consists of 20 representatives from the Committee member organizations. Agenda topics will include the Committee goals and objectives; review of minutes from the April 26, 2023 meeting; an update on VA Center for Development and Civic Engagement activities; Veterans Health Administration update and journey to become a High Reliability Organization; subcommittee reports; review of standard operating procedures; review of fiscal year 2023 organization data; 2024 annual the Committee meeting plans; and any new business. The public may submit written statements for the Committee's review to Sabrina C. Clark, Ph.D., Designated Federal Officer, VA Center for Development and Civic Engagement (15CDCE), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20420, or email at 
                    *Sabrina.Clark@va.gov.*
                     Any member of the public wishing to attend the meeting or seeking additional information should contact Dr. Clark at 202-536-8603. Dated: September 27, 2023. Jelessa M. Burney, Federal Advisory Committee Management Officer.


[FR Doc. 2023-21736 Filed 9-29-23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P
[4910-I3-PJ

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

:2'010-'047'1

rDocket No. FAA-W99--*****; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-OS6-AD)

RlN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directivesj BAE Systems (Operations) Limited (Jetstream) Model 4101

Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

~~

S(l Sy.',tIlOL

II(,,-T. T

N'T'''LS'SIG

1Wi~",

f;GSYMIlOL

ACTION: Notice ofpropased rulemaking (NPRM). SEA

SUl\'IMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products

listed above that would supersede an existing AD. This proposed AD results from

mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAl) originated by an aviation

authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation

':"~.V\~(

~'T'~ C~

m

JI"Yl1 {(J

A released propeller blade could result in engine failure and loss of control of the

product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as:

During ground manoeuvring, prolonged operation with either engine in the

restricted range between 82% and 90% RPM will result in damage

[cracking of the blade or hub] to [he propeller assembly that could

eventually result in the release of a propeller blade.

* * * * * * *

* * * EASA AD 2007-0268 [FAA AD 2008-13-02] was issued to reqUire

the installation ofa Propeller Warning Placard and implementation ofa

corresponding Aircraft Flight Manual (AFM) limitation instructing tbe

flight crew to taxi with the condition lever at FLIGHT in order to

minimize the time spent by the engines in the restricted range. BAE

Systems has now developed a Propeller Speed Warning System * * *.
H. Res. 762 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

October 22, 2007. 

Whereas bullying among school-aged children is aggressive 

behavior that is intentional, often involves an imbalance 

of power or strength, and is typically repeated over time; 

Whereas by some estimates, millions of students are bullied 

each year; 

Whereas bullying can take many forms, including hitting or 

punching; teasing or name-calling; intimidating through 

gestures or social exclusion, and sending insulting, 

threatening, or offensive messages or images via e-mail, 

text, telephone, or other electronic means; 

Whereas there is no single cause of bullying among schoolaged children; rather, individual, familial, peer, school, 

and community factors may place a child or youth at risk 

of bullying his or her peers; 

Whereas a majority of parents, students, and educators report that bullying and harassment are issues of major 

concern; 

Whereas school-aged children who are bullied are more likely 

than other children to be depressed, lonely, or anxious; 

have low self-esteem; be absent from school; have more 

physical complaints, such as headaches and stomach 

aches; and think about suicide; 
2 

•HRES 762 EH 

Whereas bullying others may be an early sign of other serious 

antisocial or violent behavior or both; 

Whereas school-aged children who frequently bully their peers 

are more likely than their peers to get into frequent 

fights, be injured in a fight, vandalize or steal property, 

drink alcohol, smoke, be truant from school, drop out of 

school, or carry a weapon; 

Whereas harassment and bullying have been linked to 75 percent of school shooting incidents, including the fatal 

shootings at Columbine High School in Colorado, 

Santana High School in California, and the Virginia 

Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia 

Tech); 

Whereas the stresses of being bullied or harassed can interfere with student’s engagement and learning in school 

and may have a negative impact on student learning; 

Whereas research indicates that bullying at school can be significantly reduced through comprehensive, school-wide 

programs designed to change norms for behavior; and 

Whereas National Bullying Prevention Awareness Week is 

October 21 through October 27: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) recognizes that bullying of school-aged children 

is a national concern; 

(2) recognizes that bullying is unhealthy for our 

families and communities; 

(3) commends the efforts of national and community organizations, schools, parents, recreation programs, 

and religious institutions for their efforts to promote 
3 

•HRES 762 EH 

greater public awareness about bullying and prevention 

activities; and 

(4) supports the goals of National Bullying Prevention Awareness Week. 

Attest: 

Clerk.