alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 514 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         June 26, 2007.
    Resolved,  That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the 
Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved 
into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for 
consideration of the bill (H.R. 2643) making appropriations for the Department 
of the Interior, environment, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending 
September 30, 2008, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall 
be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill are 
waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. General debate 
shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Appropriations. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment 
under the five-minute rule. Points of order against provisions in the bill for 
failure to comply with clause 2 of rule XXI are waived. During consideration of 
the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord 
priority in recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment 
has caused it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record 
designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed 
shall be considered as read. When the committee rises and reports the bill back 
to the House with a recommendation that the bill do pass, the previous question 
shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final 
passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
    Sec. 2.  During consideration in the House of H.R. 2643 pursuant to this 
resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the Chair 
may postpone further consideration of the bill to such time as may be designated 
by the Speaker.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 Plaintiff filed a notice of change of address dated May 10, 2006, in which he requested a fortyfive day stay of all of his cases because he had been moved to the King County Jail and apparently lacked

the resources necessary to pursue this litigation. The undersigned has therefore postponed

consideration of the matters pending in MC05-5029.

ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

_________________________________ )

RICHARD ROY SCOTT, ) No. MC05-5029

)

Plaintiff, ) 

v. ) ORDER PERMITTING CASE TO PROCEED

)

SPECIAL COMMITMENT CENTER, )

)

Defendant. )

_________________________________ )

This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. On April 5, 2005, the United

States District Court judges who sit in Tacoma entered an order dismissing a number of

plaintiff’s causes of action and barring future litigation unless plaintiff provides a signed

affidavit, along with the proposed complaint, “verifying under penalty of perjury that none of the

issues raised in the proposed complaint have been litigated in the past by the plaintiff.” On

April 25, 2006, the Clerk of Court received a proposed complaint, a motion to proceed in forma

pauperis, a written consent for payment of costs, a praecipe for service, and a declaration signed

by Mr. Scott. Dkt. # 61 and 62. As directed in the bar order, the Clerk forwarded the

documents to the undersigned for review.1

 

Case 3:05-mc-05029-MJP Document 70 Filed 06/26/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER -2-

Plaintiff’s proposed complaint alleges deprivations of liberty and property without

due process of law arising out of the “Treatment Plan Addi_____” (illegible) and “Behavior

Management Report” systems used at the Special Commitment Center. In particular, plaintiff

seeks a declaration that defendant’s disciplinary policies, which allow the deprivation of liberty

and/or property without hearing, without appeal, and without the detainee’s effective

participation, violate the Due Process Clause. 

Plaintiff has submitted an affidavit asserting that none of the claims for declaratory

relief asserted in the proposed complaint have been litigated before. The undersigned finds that

the issues raised in the April 25, 2006, proposed complaint (Dkt. # 61) have not been finally

resolved and may proceed subject to the other requirements imposed by the “Order Adopting

Report and Recommendation,” dated April 5, 2005. The Clerk of Court shall docket this order

in MC05-5029 and open a new cause of action containing all documents related to plaintiff’s

April 25, 2006, submission. 

DATED this 26th day of June, 2006.

A

Robert S. Lasnik,

Chief Judge, United States District Court 

Case 3:05-mc-05029-MJP Document 70 Filed 06/26/06 Page 2 of 2
- 1

- Alexander Van der Bellen

Managing Director and

Associate General Counsel

Delta Air Lines, Inc.

1212 New York Avenue NW

Washington, DC 20005

202.842.4184

s ascha.vanderbellen@ delta .com

April 8 , 201 3

via email and regulations.gov

Esta Rosenberg

Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division

Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Joint Application of Delta Air Lines, Inc. , KLM Royal Dutch Airlines an d GoJet

Airlines, LLC

For A Statement of Authorization Allowing Blanket Codesharing

Docket DOT

- OST

- 2004

- 19214

Dear Ms. Rosenberg :

This letter is to confirm that Delta has polled all of the carrier s on the service list to the above

referenced applicat ion and t here are no objec tions. In these circumstances, we urge that the

application be granted as soon as possible.

Respectfully submitted,

Alexander Van der Bellen

cc: info@airlinein fo.com
Case 2:02-cv-02257-RSL Document 1 Filed 11/04/02 Page 1 of 11
Case 2:02-cv-02257-RSL Document 1 Filed 11/04/02 Page 2 of 11
Case 2:02-cv-02257-RSL Document 1 Filed 11/04/02 Page 3 of 11
Case 2:02-cv-02257-RSL Document 1 Filed 11/04/02 Page 4 of 11
Case 2:02-cv-02257-RSL Document 1 Filed 11/04/02 Page 5 of 11
Case 2:02-cv-02257-RSL Document 1 Filed 11/04/02 Page 6 of 11
Case 2:02-cv-02257-RSL Document 1 Filed 11/04/02 Page 7 of 11
Case 2:02-cv-02257-RSL Document 1 Filed 11/04/02 Page 8 of 11
Case 2:02-cv-02257-RSL Document 1 Filed 11/04/02 Page 9 of 11
Case 2:02-cv-02257-RSL Document 1 Filed 11/04/02 Page 10 of 11
Case 2:02-cv-02257-RSL Document 1 Filed 11/04/02 Page 11 of 11
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

JUAN AYALA-CERDA,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 05-201M

DETENTION ORDER 

Offense charged:

Unlawful entry, second offense — violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(2).

Date of Detention Hearing: Initial Appearance, 4/28/2005.

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds

that no condition or combination of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure

the appearance of defendant as required. If new issues surface, then the defendant may request

another hearing on release.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) In the Complaint for Violation dated April 25, 2005, criminal records are cited that

reflect prior offenses committed by Defendant, including violations of deportation and removal

orders. 

Case 2:05-mj-00201-JPD Document 7 Filed 04/28/05 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

(2) Defendant appears to have no substantial ties to the community or to the Western

District of Washington.

(3) The defendant has stipulated to detention due to the detainer placed on defendant

by the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, but reserves the right to the possibility

of a subsequent motion for release if there is a change of circumstances. 

(4) No conditions or combination of conditions are apparent that will reasonably assure

the defendant’s appearance at future Court hearings.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of

the Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation

with counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for

the government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant

is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose

of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States,

to counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United

States Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 28th day of April, 2005.

s/ JAMES P. DONOHUE 

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:05-mj-00201-JPD Document 7 Filed 04/28/05 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 400 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                          May 22, 2007.
Whereas on the evening of Friday, May 4, 2007, a tornado struck the community of 
        Greensburg, Kansas;
Whereas this tornado was classified as an EF-5, the strongest possible type, 
        with winds estimated at 205 miles per hour;
Whereas 9 lives were lost;
Whereas approximately 95 percent of Greensburg was destroyed, causing over 1,500 
        residents to be displaced from their homes; and
Whereas the strength, courage, and determination of the citizens of Greensburg, 
        Kansas, have been evident following the tornado: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives--
            (1) expresses its deepest sympathies to the citizens of Greensburg, 
        Kansas, over the devastation caused by the powerful tornado that struck 
        the community on May 4, 2007; and
            (2) expresses its support as the citizens of Greensburg continue 
        their efforts to rebuild their community and their lives.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
### Geology of uranium deposits in Triassic rocks of the Colorado Plateau region

By: Warren Irvin Finch

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1074D

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 6**                            (2162 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 8**                            (2409 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 10**                            (2757 pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 658 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 658

   Supporting the goals and ideals of Federal Credit Union Month and 
recognizing the importance of Federal credit unions to the economy, and 
        their critical mission in serving those of modest means.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 18, 2007

   Mrs. Maloney of New York (for herself and Mr. Walsh of New York) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                         on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Supporting the goals and ideals of Federal Credit Union Month and 
recognizing the importance of Federal credit unions to the economy, and 
        their critical mission in serving those of modest means.

Whereas, on June 26, 1934, President Franklin Roosevelt signed into law the 
        Federal Credit Union Act, thus enabling credit unions to be organized 
        throughout the United States under the charters approved by the Federal 
        Government;
Whereas Federal credit unions were chartered as uniquely democratic economic 
        organizations, founded on the principle that persons of good character 
        and all backgrounds, including those of modest means, joining together 
        in cooperative spirit and action, can promote thrift, create a source of 
        credit for productive purposes, and build a better standard of living 
        for themselves;
Whereas Federal credit unions have consistently met those purposes and 
        exemplified the traditional American values of thrift, self-help, and 
        volunteerism, carving out a special place for themselves among the 
        Nation's financial institutions;
Whereas Federal credit unions operate with the credo ``Not for profit, not for 
        charity--but for service'' and have consistently reflected this 
        philosophical tradition and the cooperative spirit of ``people helping 
        people'' that gave birth to the Federal Credit Union Act;
Whereas there are over 5,000 Federal credit unions in the United States serving 
        nearly 50,000,000 Americans in all 50 States; and
Whereas September 2007 has been designated as Federal Credit Union Month: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of Federal Credit Union 
        Month; and
            (2) recognizes the importance of Federal credit unions to 
        the economy, and their critical mission in serving those of 
        modest means.
                                 <all>
```
From: gildavis@cantonnursingcenter.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:51:50 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Gil Davis

Canton, GA 30114
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000875385    
<NAME>                        Access Solutions International, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US$
       
<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Jun-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jul-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         4,136,584
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  351,930
<ALLOWANCES>                                   38,637
<INVENTORY>                                    529,158
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5,185,995
<PP&E>                                         1,123,093
<DEPRECIATION>                                 803,739
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5,577,562
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          889,677
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       39,652
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,628,574
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5,577,562
<SALES>                                        584,486
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               584,486
<CGS>                                          169,517
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  169,517
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,097,492
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             52,102
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,734,625)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,734,625)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,734,625)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.51)
        


</TABLE>
From: gonesimple@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:46:15 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

John Hunsbedt

Visalia, CA 93291