alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert FRANCIS, Defendant-Appellant. *502United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Germaine Davis, also known as Gary Henderson, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Anthony Francis, Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Leo Muhammad, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 02-3467, 02-3498, 02-3964, 02-3965.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 24, 2005.

Decided: July 21, 2005.

John James Ware, Tiffany G. Becker, U.S. Attorney’s Office, St. Louis, MO, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Robert Francis, Lompoc, CA, pro se.

Germaine Davis, Memphis, TN, pro se.

Joseph M. Hogan, Clayton, MO, for Defendant-Appellant, Anthony Francis.

Oscar Trivers, Hardiman & Alexander, Cleveland, OH, for Defendant-Appellant, Leo Muhammad.

Before MELLOY, BEAM, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM

Appellants Robert Francis, Anthony Francis, and Germaine Davis each filed petitions for writ of certiorari with the United States Supreme Court. The Unit*503ed States Supreme Court granted a writ of certiorari as to each of those defendants and vacated the decision as to each of them. Appellant Leo Muhammad filed a petition for rehearing by the panel. That petition remains pending.

We grant Leo Muhammad’s petition for rehearing by the panel. As to all four cases, this court has conducted a review of the record in this case and the opinion filed May 12, 2004, is reinstated in its entirety, with the exception that the cases are remanded to the district court for re-sentencing under the advisory regime outlined in *United States v. Booker,*- U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).

In remanding these cases, the court notes that as to each defendant the district court enhanced the sentence based upon judge determined guideline adjustments. Accordingly, there is a Sixth Amendment error as discussed in *Booker.*The defendants preserved the Sixth Amendment issue by specifically referencing the decision in *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). *See United States v. Pirani,*406 F.3d 543, 549 (8th Cir.2005). The four defendants were tried together and the defendants adopted each others objections to the presentence reports, which objections included a reference to *Apprendi*error. Since there is preserved Sixth Amendment error, the court will remand for resentencing under the advisory sentencing regime as outlined in *Booker.*

In conclusion, the court reinstates the decision filed May 12, 2004, in this matter, except as may be inconsistent with the remand for resentencing under the advisory guideline system as outlined in *United States v. Booker.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PACIFIC
SUNWEAR OF CALIFORNIA, INC.'S FORM 10Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED AUGUST 2,
1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-02-1998
<CASH>                                      12,961,692
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,607,251
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 47,843,515
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            70,506,562
<PP&E>                                      81,303,911
<DEPRECIATION>                            (22,554,994)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             138,555,151
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       24,107,929
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       208,086
<OTHER-SE>                                 106,587,206
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               138,555,151
<SALES>                                     73,203,194
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            73,203,194
<CGS>                                       48,627,331
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,594,562
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (219,346)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,200,647
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,234,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,966,647
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,966,647
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.24<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.23
<FN>
<F1>FOR PURPOSES OF THIS EXHIBIT, PRIMARY MEANS BASIC.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
## Memorandum From: William Sweitlik, USEPA/OW/OST ph: (202) 566

- 1129, swietlik.william@epa.gov To: Public Docket for the Preliminary 2012 Effluent Guidelines Program Plan EPA Docket Number EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 2010

- 0824 (http://www.regulations.gov) Date: May 10, 2012 Re: Docket EPA - HQ - OW - 2008 - 0517 Incorporated by Reference EPA is required by the Clean Wat er Act to annually review all existing effluent guidelines with each successive review building upon the results of earlier reviews. Specifically, the information and data collected in the docket supporting the 2010 Effluent Guidelines Program Plan (Octobe r 26, 2011; 76 FR 66286 ) informs and supports the Preliminary and Final 2012 Effluent Guidelines Program Plans. Therefore, the following docket, “2010 Effluent Guidelines Program Plan,” EPA Docket Number: OW

- 2008

- 0517, is incorporated by reference through this memorandum into the public record for the “2012 Effluent Guidelines Program Plan,” EPA Docket Number: OW

- 2010

- 0824.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

BANNER BANK, a Washington State 

Chartered Bank,

Plaintiff,

v.

VESSEL ISABELLA, Official No. 

1101268; AMIR HESHMATPOUR 

and KATHY HESHMATPOUR, 

husband and wife and their marital 

community,

Defendants.

C02-2251Z

ORDER

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Judgment Creditor Banner Bank’s 

Motion and Petition for Extension of Judgment for Additional Ten Years Pursuant to 

RCW 6.17.020(3), docket no. 59. Having considered the motion and all pleadings filed 

in support, and recognizing that Defendants have not filed an opposition, the Court enters 

the following Order:

Case 2:02-cv-02251-TSZ Document 61 Filed 10/21/13 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

ORDER - 2

The Court finds that a Judgment was entered by this Court on November 6, 2003, 

and that the petition to extend the judgment is being made within ninety (90) days of the 

expiration date of November 6, 2013. RCW 6.17.020(3).

Judgment Creditor Banner Bank’s Motion and Petition for Extension of Judgment 

for Additional Ten Years Pursuant to RCW 6.17.020(3), docket no. 59, is GRANTED. 

UPDATED JUDGMENT SUMMARY

Judgment Creditor: Banner Bank

Attorney for Judgment Creditor: Craig Miller

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

1201 Third Avenue, Suite 2200

Seattle, WA 98101

Judgment Debtor(s): AMIR HESHMATPOUR and KATHY 

HESHMATPOUR, individually and the 

marital community composed thereof

Original Amount of Judgment: The amount due under the $598,000 vessel 

note, including principal, interest, default 

interest and fees, as calculated in the 

Declaration of Lee Frank filed July 29, 

2003, docket no. 47, to wit: $429,893.86

Total Proceeds Received and Applied to 

Interest and Principal:

$0.00

Judgment Balance, Fees and Costs shall continue to bear interest at 6.875% per 

annum as set forth in the original judgment. The original judgment shall be extended for 

an additional ten years from the date of this Order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to all counsel of record.

Case 2:02-cv-02251-TSZ Document 61 Filed 10/21/13 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

ORDER - 3

Dated this 21st day of October, 2013

A.

THOMAS S. ZILLY

United States District Judge

Case 2:02-cv-02251-TSZ Document 61 Filed 10/21/13 Page 3 of 3
TP 7245E 1 of 1 AD Number: CF - 201 5- 18 

# AIRWORTHINESS DIRECT **IVE** This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is issued pursuant to Canadian Aviation Regulation (CAR) 521.427. No person shall conduct a take - off or permit a take - off to be conducted in an aircraft that is in the ir legal custody and control , unless the requirements of CAR 605.84 pertaining to ADs are met. Standard 625 - Aircraft Equipment and Maintenance Standards Appendix H provides information concerning alternative m eans of compliance (AMOC) to AD s. Number: CF - 201 5- 18 ATA: 27 Effective D ate: 16 July 201 5 Type Certificate: A - 131 Subject : Stall Protection System – Incorrect Calibration of Angle Of Attack (AOA) Transducers Applicability: Bombardier Inc. : Model CL - 600 - 2C10 aeroplanes , s erial nu mbers 10002 through 10999 , Model CL - 600 - 2D15 and CL - 600 - 2D24 aeroplanes , s er ial n umbers 15001 through 1599 0, Model CL - 600 - 2E25 aeroplanes , s erial n umbers 19001 through 19990 , e quipped with AOA Transducers with Part Numbers (P/Ns) and Serial Numbers (S/Ns) included in Section 1A, Effectivity, of Bombardier Service Bulletin (SB) 670BA - 27 - 069, Initial Issue, dated 30 March 2015

. Compliance: Within 2500 hours air time or 12 months, whichever occurs first, from the effective date of this AD, unless already accomplished. Background: It was discovered that a number of AOA transducers installed on Bombardier CL - 600 - 2C10, CL - 600 - 2D15, CL - 600 - 2D24 and CL - 600 - 2E25 aeroplanes were incorrectly calibrated due to a quality control problem at both the production and repair facilities. Incorrect calibration of the AOA transducer could result in a late activation of the stick pusher. This AD mandates the replacement of the incorrectly calibrated AOA transducers

. Corrective Actions: A. Replace the AOA transducer(s) in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier SB 670BA - 27 - 069 , Initial Issue, dated 30 March 2015, or later revisions approved by the Chief, Continuing Airworthiness, Transport Canada. B. As of the effective date of this AD, it is prohibited for anyone to install the AOA Transducers with P/Ns and S/Ns included in Section 1A, Effectivity, of Bombardier SB 670BA - 27 - 069 , Initial Issue, dated 30 March 2015. Authorization: For the Minister of Transport, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Philip Tang Actin g Chief, Continuing Airworthiness Issued on 3 July 2015 Contact: Gordanko Jeremic, Continuing Airworthiness, Ottawa, telephone 613 - 952 - 4357, facsimile 613 - 996 - 9178 or e - mail AD - CN@tc.gc.ca or any Transport Canada Centre.
No. 62241.

#### Morris Friedman for account of Herman D. Steel Company et al. *v.*United States,

protests 234463-K, etc. (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protests were dismissed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER -1-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

AKRAM ASWAD ALMUSSA and JOSHUA

KEBEDE,

Defendants.

No. CR05-381Z

ORDER

Defendant, Akram Almussa, having filed a motion to continue the trial date and the

Court, having reviewed the Motion and Declaration of Counsel, finds that a failure to grant

the requested continuance would adversely affect his ability to defend himself and impact the

free exercise of religion, and taking into account the exercise of due diligence, within the

meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A). The Court also finds that the ends of justice will be

served by continuing the trial date and that a continuance is necessary to ensure effective

trial preparation and the ability of the defendant to effectively assist his lawyer at trial and to

be capable of taking the stand and testify without being unduly effected by fasting required

during the time between dawn and dusk as required by his religion, and these factors

outweigh the best interests of the public in a more speedy trial within the meaning of 18

U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A).

Case 2:05-cr-00381-TSZ Document 91 Filed 08/16/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER -2-

For these reasons, the Court hereby ORDERS that the trial date be continued from

September 25, 2006, to October 30, 2006. Pre-trial motions shall be due on September 15,

2006.

It is ORDERED that the time between September 25, 2006, and October 30, 2006,

shall be excluded in the computation of time under the Speedy Trial Act as to all defendants

as this is a reasonable period of delay pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3161(h).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 16th day of August, 2006.

AThomas S. Zilly

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cr-00381-TSZ Document 91 Filed 08/16/06 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 97-7055

KEMBA NIAMBI SMITH,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk.

Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge.

(CR-93-162, CA-97-411-2)

Submitted: August 27, 1998

Decided: September 15, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and

BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

George Kendall, Leah Song Richardson, NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE

& EDUCATIONAL FUND, New York, New York; Gerald Thomas

Zerkin, GERALD T. ZERKIN & ASSOCIATES, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Fernando Groene, OFFICE OF THE UNITED

STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Kemba Niambi Smith appeals from a district court order that concluded her motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998) was barred by the one-year limitations period of 28

U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1998). Smith's conviction became final

in 1995, and she filed her habeas motion on April 23, 1997. Because

Smith had until April 23, 1997 to file her § 2255 motion, see Brown

v. Angelone, ___ F.3d ___, 1998 WL 389030 (4th Cir. July 14, 1998)

(Nos. 96-7173, 96-7208), her motion was not time barred. For these

reasons, we grant a certificate of appealability on this issue, vacate the

district court's order, and remand for further proceedings. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED

 2
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 188 (Friday, September 29, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 67326]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21364]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel; NINDS T32 applications review.
    Date: October 16-17, 2023.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: San Francisco Marriott Union Square Hotel, 480 Sutter 
Street, San Francisco, CA 94108.
    Contact Person: Abhignya Subedi, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Activities, NINDS/NIH, NSC, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 
20852, 301-496-9223, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3a5b58525314494f585f5e537a545352145d554c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3b5a59535215484e595e5f527b555253155c544d">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 25, 2023.
Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-21364 Filed 9-28-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 58694.

protests 154267-K, etc. (New York).

#### Radio Corp. of America, RCA Victor Div. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to the paper coverings containing phonograph records the subject of *United States*v. *Radio Corp. of America, RCA Victor Division*(41 C. C. P. A. 137, C. A. D. 541), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
United States 

Department of 

Agriculture 

DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL

IMPACT STATEMENT

Forest Service 

Pacific Northwest 

Region 

February 2012 

SOUTH GEORGE 

VEGETATION AND 

FUELS MANAGEMENT 

PROJECT

Umatilla National Forest 

Pomeroy Ranger District 

Asotin and Garfield Counties, Washington 

Lead Agency:

Responsible Official: 

For Information Contact: 

Website Address: 

USDA Forest Service 

Monte Fujishin, District Ranger 

Umatilla National Forest 

Pomeroy Ranger District 

71 W. Main Street 

Pomeroy, WA 99347 

Dan Castillo 

Pomeroy Ranger District 

71 W. Main Street 

Pomeroy, WA 99347 

(509) 843-1891 

docastillo@fs.fed.us 

http://www.fs.fed.us/nepa/fs-usda-pop.php/?project=26469
USDA Nondiscrimination Statement 

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, 

color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not 

all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of 

program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice 

and TDD). 

To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and 

Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice or TDD). USDA is an equal 

opportunity provider and employer. 

Spanish: 

El Departamento de Agricultura de los Estados Unidos (USDA) prohibe la discriminación por raza, color, nacionalidad, edad, 

discapacidad, y donde se aplique sexo, estado civil, estado familiar, estado paternal, religión, orientación sexual, 

información genética, ideológia política, represalias, o porque el total o parte de los ingresos de un individuo se deriven de 

cualquier programa de asistencia pública. (No todas las bases de prohibición se aplican a todos los programas). Aquellas 

personas con discapacidad que requieran medios alternativos para obtener información sobre los programas (tales como, 

sistema Braille, letra de tamaño grande, cinta de audio, etc.) deben comunicarse con el Centro TARGET del USDA al (202) 

720-2600 (voz y dispositivos de telecomunicación para sordos [TDD]). Para presentar una denuncia por discriminación, 

escriba a USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 o llame al 

(800) 795-3272 (voz) o (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA es un proveedor y empleador de acceso igualitario. 

. 

F14-PM-02-12
No. 63845.

protest 59/13924 (New York).

#### Precision Time Corporation *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NorthernTechnologies International Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ending May 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, G. Patrick Lynch, Presidentand Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 
| (1)    |   | The  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                 |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                   |
| (2)    |   | The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 
|                                       |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| G. Patrick. Lynch                     |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| (principal executive officer)         |   |
|                                  |   |
| Circle  Pines, Minnesota              |   |
| July 14, 2009                    |   |

 

----
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 127-19 Filed 04/15/04 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 127-19 Filed 04/15/04 Page 2 of 2