alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Osteotech,  Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 1997
and the Condensed  Consolidated Statement of Operations for the six months ended
June 30, 1997 and is qualified  in its  entirety by reference to such  financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
              
       
<S>
                                    <C>               <C>     
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      6-MOS               
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                        DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                             JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                                    $7,953,000
<SECURITIES>                                               3,445,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                              6,228,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 150,000
<INVENTORY>                                                  761,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          21,473,000
<PP&E>                                                    17,098,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                             8,541,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            33,327,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      6,874,000
<BONDS>                                                      517,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                              0
<PREFERRED>                                                        0
<COMMON>                                                      80,000
<OTHER-SE>                                                25,595,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              33,327,000
<SALES>                                                    1,165,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          20,787,000
<CGS>                                                        862,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             17,263,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            79,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            3,758,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                               1,523,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        2,235,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0
<CHANGES>                                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                               2,235,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    .25
                                                                    


</TABLE>
No. 61084.

protests 244989-K and 244991-K (Baltimore).

#### Samuel Shapiro & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, facts, and issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *R. J. Saunders & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(37 Cust. Ct. 267, C. D. 1834), the collector was directed to reliquidate the entries, assessing duty upon the basis of the unit appraised value per conditioned pound or kilo, multiplied by the total number of-conditioned pounds or kilos in each shipment, as set forth in the respective invoices in question.
No. 66537.

#### Novelty Import Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 61/7405 (New York).

*363Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of plastic back scratehers the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(45 Cust. Ct. 161, C.D. 2218), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Remington Oil and Gas
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, J. Burke Asher, Vice President/Finance (Principal Financial
Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

     This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, and not for any other purpose.

                                                  /s/ J. BURKE ASHER
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                      J. Burke Asher
                                                  Vice President/Finance
                                              (Principal Financial Officer)

December 16, 2003

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Remington Oil and Gas Corporation and will be retained by
Remington Oil and Gas Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 15, 2010 

0908 

Order 

 

September 15, 2010 

140937 

BEVERLY DUFFY, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 140937 

 COA: 289644 

Ct of Claims: 08-000094-MD 

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 

and STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 9, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall 

include among the issues to be briefed whether the Little Manistee Trail is a “highway” 

within the meaning of MCL 691.1401(e), and, if it is, whether MCL 691.1402(1) exempts 

the state and the Department of Natural Resources from liability for maintaining a 

trailway that is not adjacent to any vehicular highway. 

 Persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this 

case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.
No. 60232.

protests 166100-K, etc. (San Francisco).

#### American Mercantile Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of sazae similar in all material respects to the commodity involved in *Pacific Mutual Sales Co.*v. *United States*(36 Cust. Ct. 100, C. D. 1758), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: kbiglersr@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:15:01 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ken Bigler

Thiensville, WI 53092
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Timothy Armes, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report of MedCareers Group, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2017 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of MedCareers Group, Inc.  By:/s/ Timothy Armes Timothy Armes Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial/Accounting Officer)  May 23, 2018
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of a meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable materials, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Library of Medicine Special Emphasis Panel; E-Curation for Biomedical Research.                    

*Date:*                         November 30, 2023.                    

*Time:*                         11:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Library of Medicine, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Video Assisted Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Ali Sharma, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, National Library of Medicine, NIH, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 500, Bethesda, MD 20892-7968,                         *ali.sharma@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.879, Medical Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 26, 2023.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-21612 Filed 9-29-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
No. 60228.

protest 285635-K (A) (New York).

#### B. L. Pulver & Son *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 59105, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked with the letter “A” at 10 percent under the provision in paragraph 1528, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52739), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52836), for imitation semiprecious stones, faceted, and (2) the items marked with the letter “B” at 30 percent under the provision in said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 51802, supplemented by T. D. 51898, for imitation semiprecious stones, not faceted.
From: Andy Missler

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:32:18 PM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Andy Missler
Willard, Ohio
No. 58705.

protests 129959-K and 129960-K (Philadelphia).

#### William Hepworth & Sons *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

It was stipulated that for duty purposes the clean content of the wool in question was determined in accordance with the instructions contained in T. D. 53159, which was issued following *United States*v. *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 19, C. A. D. 492). In that case, it was held that the statutory language, clean content of wool, as used in paragraph 1102 (b), was construed to mean the product commercially usable as wool and from' which all the weight of grease and foreign material has been removed, including the wool fibers which are unavoidably and irrevocably lost as a result of commercially applied cleaning processes. Accordingly, the wool in question was held dutiable at the rate applied by the collector on the basis of the percentages of clean content as set forth in the column headed “T. D. 53159 Clean Content” in the schedule attached to and made a part of the decision in this case.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                          11,361
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  169,516
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,533
<INVENTORY>                                      8,169
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               191,184
<PP&E>                                          36,424
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,081
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 263,790
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          161,564
<BONDS>                                         26,948
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            44
<OTHER-SE>                                      75,234
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   263,790
<SALES>                                        653,578
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               653,578
<CGS>                                          579,060
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  579,060
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,477
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,803
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,713
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,606
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,107
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,107
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.71
        

</TABLE>
#### Alfred Olson, Appellant, v County of Westchester, Defendant, and City of White Plains, Respondent.

[633 NYS2d 1000]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nicolai, J.), dated February 10, 1994, which granted the motion of the defendant City of White Plains for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff was injured when he fell on an allegedly defective sidewalk owned by the City of White Plains. However, since the plaintiff failed to prove either that the City’s prior written notice requirements set forth under White Plains Code *731article XIII were met or that the City created the allegedly defective sidewalk, the Supreme Court properly granted the City’s motion for summary judgment *(see, Messina v City of New York,*190 AD2d 659; *Kiernan v Thompson,*73 NY2d 840; *Combs v Incorporated Vil. of Freeport,*139 AD2d 688). Bracken, J. P., Santucci, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
No. P66/138. —

#### Broadway Hale Stores, Inc., et al. *v.*United States, protests 61/17856, etc. (Los Angeles).

*791Nao, C.J.

In accordance with, stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of battery-operated misers similar in all material respects to the food mixers the subject of *F. B. Vandegrift & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(53 Cust. Ct. 231, Abstract 68674), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Economicgeology of the Independence quadrangle, Kansas**
 
Report | Plate
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:296
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000957593
 
July 25, 2018
## F I FTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5 D 2 3

- 2873 LT Case No. 2021

- CF

- 001096

- A

_____________________________ B ONNIE H ARTMANN , Petitioner ,

v. S TATE O F F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________
Petition for Belated Appeal

. A Case of Original Jurisdiction

. Bonnie Hartmann , Ocala , pro se
. Ashley Moody, Attorney General Tallahassee, and Rebecca Rock McG uigan Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach , for Respondent. December 1, 2023

P ER C URIAM

. The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this opinion shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the notice of appeal from the August 17, 2022 judgment and sentence rendered in Case No. 202 1

- CF

- 001096

- A , in the Circuit Court in and for Hernando County, Florida. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)(6)(D).2 P ETITION G RANTED

. J AY , H ARRIS , and B OATWRIGHT , JJ., concur
.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331
.

_____________________________
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Motorvehicle use map. Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest. Ogden Ranger District,Utah**
 
2009 | 2012| 2015 | 2018
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.28:UI 5/18/
Item Number:0080-G (online)
CGP systemNumber:000962177
 
July 17, 2018