alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. P67/287.

#### Dayco Corp. *v.*United States, protest 66/76176 (New York).

Watson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of panels, sheets, and bars, made from and advanced beyond the stage of synthetic resin or resin-like products into finished panels, sheets, and bars of specific sizes and shapes dedicated to specific uses, similar to manufactures of india rubber, other, and following Hensel, *Bruckmann*Lorbacher, *Inc.*v. *United States*(53 Cust. Ct. 212, C.D. 2498), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EX-35.1
(logo) AURORA LOAN SERVICES


Depositor:       Structured Asset Securities Corporation
                 Attention: Contract Finance SARM 2008-1
                 745 Seventh Avenue, 13th Floor
                 New York, New York 10019

Master Servicer: Aurora Loan Services LLC
                 Michele Olds
                 10350 Park Meadows Drive
                 Littleton, CO 80124

Trustee:         Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
                 Attention: Kimberly J. Wiggins / SARM 2008-1
                 9062 Old Annapolis Road
                 Columbia, MD 21045

Subject:         Annual Officer's Certification
Fiscal Year:     2008
Investor Code:   J29
Investor Name:   SARM 2008-1


I, Thomas L. Wind, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Aurora Loan
Services LLC (the "Servicer"), do certify the following for the Calendar Year
2008:

1. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period beginning on the
cut-off date and ending on December 31, 2008 (the reporting period) and of its
performance under the Agreement for such period has been made under my
supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material aspects throughout
such reporting period.



Certified by: AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC

By      /s/ Thomas L. Wind
Name:   Thomas L. Wind
Title:  Managing Director
From: fhayes@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:28:52 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

francine hayes

Duxbury, MA 02332
|               | (1)                                  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|          |        |                                                                              |
|          | (2)                                  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the dates and periods covered by the Report. |

|  Date: May 14, 2010                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |                      |                     | /s/ Dirk A. Montgomery                            |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                                                              |                      |      | Dirk A. Montgomery                                |
|                                                         |                      |      | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
EXHIBIT 15
 
 ACCOUNTANT’S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
 
 
 To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
 of Mediware Information Systems, Inc.:
 
 We have reviewed, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Oversight Board (United States), the unaudited interim financial information of Mediware Information Systems, Inc. for the three and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, as indicated in our report dated May 4, 2010; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.
 
 We are aware that Mediware Information Systems, Inc. has incorporated by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-07591, No. 333-83016, No. 333-119503, No. 333-123496 and No. 333-130576 its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, which includes our report dated May 4, 2010 covering the unaudited interim financial information contained therein. Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Act”), that report is not considered a part of the registration statement prepared or certified by our firm or a report prepared or certified by our firm within the meaning of Section 7 and 11 of the Act. It should be noted that we have not performed any procedures subsequent to May 4, 2010.
 
 
 Eisner LLP
 New York, New York
 May 4, 2010
Remington Oil and Gas Corporation
                      Computation of Earnings per Share
                                Exhibit 11.1
                   (In thousands, except per share amounts)


                                              For the Three Months Ended
                                                         March 31,
                                                  1999           1998
                                              --------------------------
Net income (loss) available for basic
 income per share                              $   (6,676)   $   (1,995)
 Interest expense on the Notes (net of 
  tax) (1)                                             -             -  
                                              --------------------------
Net income (loss) available for diluted 
 income per share                              $   (6,676)   $   (1,995)
                                              ==========================

Basic income (loss) per share                  $    (0.31)   $    (0.10)
                                              ==========================

Diluted income (loss) per share                $    (0.31)   $    (0.10)
                                              ==========================

Weighted average
 Common Stock                                      21,247            -  
 Class A Stock                                         -          3,222
 Class B Stock                                         -         17,129
                                              --------------------------
Total common shares for basic income 
 (loss) per share                                  21,247        20,351
                                              --------------------------
 Dilutive stock options outstanding 
  (treasury stock method) (1)                          -             -  
 Shares assumed issued by conversion of
  the Notes (1)                                        -             -  
                                              --------------------------
Total common shares for diluted income 
 (loss) per share                                  21,247        20,351
                                              ==========================

(1) Non dilutive.

Potential increase to net income for diluted
 income per share
 Interest expense on Notes (net of tax)        $      341    $     514

Potential issues of common stock for diluted
 income per share
 Weighted average stock options outstanding         1,226          562
 Weighted average warrant outstanding                 300           -  
 Weighted average shares issued assuming
  conversion of Notes                               2,342        3,488
H. Res. 455 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 12, 2007. 

Whereas, on May 16, 2007, the United States Senate passed 

a resolution designating June 2007 as ‘‘National Internet 

Safety Month’’; 

Whereas there are more than 1,000,000,000 Internet users 

worldwide; 

Whereas, in the United States, 35,000,000 children in kindergarten through grade 12 have Internet access; 

Whereas approximately 80 percent of the children of the 

United States in grades 5 through 12 are online for at 

least 1 hour per week; 

Whereas approximately 41 percent of students in grades 5 

through 12 do not share with their parents what they do 

on the Internet; 

Whereas approximately 24 percent of students in grades 5 

through 12 have hidden their online activities from their 

parents; 

Whereas approximately 31 percent of the students in grades 

5 through 12 have the skill to circumvent Internet filter 

software; 

Whereas 61 percent of the students admit to using the Internet unsafely or inappropriately; 
2 

•HRES 455 EH 

Whereas 20 percent of middle school and high school students have met face-to-face with someone they first met 

online; 

Whereas 23 percent of students know someone who has been 

bullied online; 

Whereas 56 percent of parents feel that online bullying of 

children is an issue that needs to be addressed; 

Whereas 47 percent of parents feel that their ability to monitor and shelter their children from inappropriate material on the Internet is limited; and 

Whereas 61 percent of parents want to be more personally 

involved with Internet safety: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) supports the goals and ideals of recognizing National Internet Safety Month; 

(2) recognizes that National Internet Safety Month 

provides the citizens of the United States with an opportunity to learn more about— 

(A) the dangers of the Internet; and 

(B) the importance of being safe and responsible online; 

(3) commends and recognizes national and community organizations for— 

(A) promoting awareness of the dangers of the 

Internet; and 
3 

•HRES 455 EH 

(B) providing information and training that 

develops critical thinking and decision-making skills 

that are needed to use the Internet safely; and 

(4) calls on parents, educators, Internet safety organizations, law enforcement, community leaders, and 

volunteers to increase their efforts to raise the level of 

awareness for the need for online safety in the United 

States. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 501 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 30, 2007.
Whereas Craig Biggio has reached 3,000 base hits as a Major League Baseball 
        player and all while playing for the Houston Astros with an unmatched 
        hustle and work ethic;
Whereas Craig Biggio is only the 27th player in Major League Baseball history to 
        reach this historic milestone, joining such baseball greats as Willie 
        Mays, Hank Aaron, Tony Gwynn, Cal Ripken Jr., and Ty Cobb;
Whereas Craig Biggio is not only a member of the exclusive 3,000 hit club, but 
        also holds the Major League record for most games played with one team 
        at 2,768 and counting over the past 20 seasons;
Whereas Craig Biggio is 7th all-time in Major League Baseball with 653 doubles 
        and should move into 5th place by the end of the current season;
Whereas Craig Biggio holds the Astros career records for games played, at-bats, 
        runs scored, hits, doubles, and extra-base hits;
Whereas Craig Biggio is a tireless leader in the community for charitable 
        causes, serving for the last decade as lead spokesperson for Sunshine 
        Kids, which is an organization that supports children fighting cancer 
        and their families;
Whereas Craig Biggio and his wife Patti have helped to raise nearly $2,000,000 
        dollars for Sunshine Kids and have impacted numerous cancer-stricken 
        families throughout the Houston area by leading fun activities like 
        attending Houston Astros, Rockets, and Texan games and The Houston 
        Livestock Show and Rodeo;
Whereas Houston Astros owner Drayton McLane, Jr. recently stated, ``No one has 
        meant more to our community development than Craig and Patty Biggio.''; 
        and
Whereas Craig Biggio has been honored with many awards to recognize his 
        distinguished contributions to the sport of baseball and to the 
        community, including the Hutch Award in 2005 for resilience and always 
        showing a fighting competitive spirit, and being named one of Sporting 
        News' Good Guys in 2004 for all his community service work off the 
        field: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) commends Craig Biggio of the Houston Astros for reaching 3,000 
        base hits as a Major League Baseball player;
            (2) recognizes his outstanding service to the community through his 
        charitable work and dedication to the Houston Astros organization; and
            (3) directs the Clerk of the House of Representatives to transmit a 
        copy of this resolution to Craig Biggio of the Houston Astros and to 
        Astros team owner Mr. Drayton McLane, Jr. for appropriate display.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 

March 18, 2018 
 Life Storage, Inc. 

Life Storage LP 
 6467 Main Street 

Williamsville, New York 14221 
 Attn: David L. Rogers, Chief
Executive Officer     
  

	 	Re:	Employment Agreement by and among Life Storage, Inc. (the “Corporation”), Life Storage LP (the “Partnership”) and Kenneth F. Myszka (the “Executive”), as amended and restated as of
January 1, 2009, and as further amended by an amendment dated as of January 19, 2015 and an amendment dated as of February 22, 2017 (as amended, the “Employment Agreement”) 


Dear Dave: 
 Reference is hereby made to the
Employment Agreement.    Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have such meanings as set forth in the Employment Agreement. 

Section 4(e) of the Employment Agreement provides that I, the Executive under the Employment Agreement, may terminate the Employment
Agreement for Good Reason. Good Reason is defined in the Employment Agreement to exist if certain events occur including, as set forth in clause (v) of such definition, if I am not elected to the Board of the Corporation at any annual meeting
of the Corporation’s shareholders. 
 On or about the date hereof, I have advised the Corporation that I have voluntarily chosen not to
stand for reelection as a member of the Board of the Corporation at the 2018 annual meeting of the Corporation’s shareholders (the “2018 Annual Meeting”); and, as such, I will not be elected to the Board of the Corporation at the 2018
Annual Meeting. 
 By this letter, I hereby acknowledge and agree with the Corporation and the Partnership that the definition of Good
Reason in the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to delete clause (v) of such definition and that, I shall not have the right to terminate the Employment Agreement or otherwise make a claim against the Corporation or the Partnership as a
result of me not being elected to the Board of the Corporation at the 2018 Annual Meeting or any other meeting, it being acknowledged that I have voluntarily elected to not stand for election. 

 

	
	Very Truly Yours,
	
	 /s/ Kenneth F. Myszka

	Kenneth F. Myszka










			
	Acknowledged and Agreed:
	
	 LIFE STORAGE, INC.

		
	By:	 	 /s/ David L. Rogers

		 	David L. Rogers, Chief Executive Officer


					
	
	 LIFE STORAGE LP

			
		 	By:	 	Life Storage Holdings, Inc., its General Partner
			
		 	By:	 	 /s/ David L. Rogers

		 		 	David L. Rogers, Chief Executive Officer
From: dellsun@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:13:56 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dell Evensen

Saint Paul, MN 55107
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended May 31,2005 (the “Report”) of Immucor, Inc. (the “Registrant”), as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I certify, to the bestof my knowledge, that:

 

(1)                         TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)                         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

 
| October 18, 2005 | /s/ Patrick D. Waddy            |   |
|------------------|---------------------------------|--------|
|             | Patrick D. Waddy                |
|             | Interim Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Before the First Division,

August 1, 1966

No. P66/176. —

#### Rettinger Raincoat Mfg. Co. et al. *v.*United States, protests 65/18772, etc. (New York).

Nichols, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of articles of synthetic rubber similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Weather-Bite Sportswear Co., Inc.*(52 CCPA 7, C.A.D. 848), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: jlabatto@horizondrywall.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:57:35 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Julie Labatto

Aurora, CO 80010
Before the Second Division,

April 21, 1969

No. P69/107.

protests 67/31509, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### U.S. Import Equipment Distributors, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Newman, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of conveyor chains similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Border Brokerage Company et al.*v. *United States*(58 Cust. Ct. 228, C.D. 2947), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.