## SERVE D JUL Y 14 , 201 0 U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C IN TH E MATTE RO F TM WCORPORATIO N d/b/ a CASTL E PRECISIO N INDUSTRIE S FA A DOCKE T NO . CP10WP000 8 (Civi l Penalty Action ) DM S No . FA A 2010-054 3 PROCEDURA LORDE R I n orde r t o expedit e th e hearin g i n thi s matter , th e partie s shal l compl y withth e Procedura l Schedul e se t

fort hhereinbelow . Th e Rule s o f Practic e for

thi s proceedin g ar e se t fort hi n 1 4 C.F.R . Part

13 , Subpart

G , o f th e Federa l Aviatio n Regulations' . Thos e rule s provide , inte r alia , tha t th e Responden t

mus t file awritte n Answe r

o r motio n withi n thirt y (30 ) day s after servic e o f

th e Complain t

(1 4 C.F.R . $ 13.209(a)) , tha t a genera l denia l i s deeme dafailur e t o file a n Answe r ( § 13.209(e)) , tha t

failur e t o file a

n Answe r withou t goo dcaus e i s deeme da n admissio n o f eac hallegatio n i n th e Complain t ( § 13.209(f)) , an dthat , absen t agreemen t

o f th e parties , aparty seekin g an extensio n o f tim e mus t

file awritte n motio n not les s tha n seve n (7 ) day s befor e th e documen t i s due , absen t goo dcaus e show n ( § 13.213(a ) an d(b)) . Mor e specifically , 14CFR § 13.209(e ) states : A perso n filing a n answe r shal l admit , deny , o r

stat e that th e perso n i s withou t sufficien t knowledg e o r

informatio n t o admit

o r deny , eac hnumbere dparagrap h o f th e complaint . An y statemen t o r allegatio n containe di n th e complain t tha t i s no t specificall y denie di n th e answe r ma y b e deeme dan admissio n o f th e trutho f tha t allegation . A genera l denia l o f th e complain t

i s deeme dafailur e t o file an answer . Unde r FA A Orde r

2150.3 A an dth e Rule s governin g thes e proceedings , th e Agenc y attorne y an dth e Responden t ar e encourage dt o conside r th e possibilit y o f settlemen t

an dcompromis e o f

thi s matter.' ^ Compromis e ma y b e effecte dwit ho r withou t afinding o f

violatio n (1 4 C.F.R . §13.1 6 (n ) (D) .

' The Rule s of

Practice , a s wel

l a s othe r material s relatin g to civil penalt y cases , ar e availabl e o

n the internet at : http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title 14/14ta b 02.tpl . ^ Se e Lind aJoyc e Goodman . FA

A Docke t No . CP89WP0061 , Orde

r datedMa y 30 , 1989 .

# T

NOTE : Thi s presidin g Judg e doe s not requir e "Discovery " t o b e serve do n th e Judge . Othe r

Judge s hav e different

policies , but

a s lon g a s thi s cas e i s assigne dt o th e undersigne dpresidin g Judg e th e partie s may , bu t ar e not required , serv e discover y o n th e undersigned . Th e judg e wil l not

discus s th e cas e withan y party , o r it s representativ e o n an e x part e basis . I f

aparty ha s anon-substantiv e matte r t o discuss , the y shoul dcontac t th e judge' s attorney-advisor , Mr . Ir aLeibowit z at (202 ) 366-213 9 (Ira.Leibowitz(a),dot.gov) . Administrativ e matter s may b e addresse dt o th e judge's . Lega l Assistant , Pat Matthew s [202-366-5121 ] (Patricia.Matthews@dot.gov) . WHEREFORE , th e partie s b e an dar e hereb y ORDERE D t o adher e t o th e followin g procedtira l schedule : 1 . Venu e shal l b e Lo s Angeles , CA. ; 2 . O n o r

befor e Octobe r

15 , 2010 , th e partie s shal l conclud e al l discover y including , bu t

no t limite dto , depositions , documen t production , response s t o productio n request s and/o r interrogatories . I f

th e partie s canno t

resolv e adiscovery disput e the y shal l submi t th e disput e t o th e undersigne dfor resolutio n i n atimel y manner ; 3 . NOTIC E I S HEREB Y GIVE N th e partie s shal l b e prepare dt o presen t thi s cas e at ahearin g o n o r

after Octobe r 15,2010^ , subjec t

t o th e availabilit y o f courtroomfacilities . 4 . Th e partie s wil l hav e th e opportunit y t o file Post-Hearin g brief s an d argument s pursuan t

t o aschedul e t o b e determine dat th e hearing . Fo r guidance , th e followin g schedul e i s typicall y used : Complainan t shal l file it s brie f fifteen (15 ) day s after

receip t o f th e transcript ; Responden t shal l it s brie f fifteen (15 ) day s thereafter ; an dan y rebutta l brie f b y th e Complainan t

shal l b e filedseve n (7 ) day s thereafter . 5 . Settle dcase s wil l no t b e remove dfi"omth e hearin g docke t unti l th e prope r writte n pleading(s) , consisten t wit hth e applicabl e rules,' * i s receive db y th e presidin g judge. ^ 14 C.F.R . § 13.22 1 states : "The administrative la w Judg e shal

l give eac hpart y a t leas t 6 0 day s notic e of the date , tim

e an dlocation o

f the hearing. " 14 C.F.R . § 13.21 5 states : A t an y tim e befor e or during ahearing , a

n agenc y attorne y ma y withdra w a complain t o r part y ma y withdra w areques t

fo r ahearing withou

t th e consen

t of th e administrativ e la

w judge . I f a n agency attorne

y withdraw s the complain

t or apart y withdraw s the reques t

fo r ahearin g an

dthe answer, the administrative la w judg e shal

l dismis s the proceeding s unde r thi s subpar

t wit hprejudice . ^ See : I n th e Matte

r of Lewi s Drak

e & Associates . FA

A Docke t No . CP03SO0045 , DMS . No . FAA-2003

- 16379 , "Orde

r Terminating Proceeding" , servedFebruar y 26,2005 ; citing Kerr

y Jame s Eldridge . FA

A Docke t CP89GL0458 , "Orde

r Canceling Hearing an

dTerminating Proceeding" , servedJanuar y 16 , 1991 , a t 1 ; In The Matte

r of Rober t Harri s FA A Docke t No . CP03EA0001 . DMS No . FAA-2002-14236. , Order s date dOctobe r 18,200 4 an

dOctobe r 27 , 2004 . USAIR . Inc. . FA A Docke t CP90NE0359 . Tran s Worl

dTh e partie s ar e advise dtha t submission s sen t

t o th e stree t

addres s o f

th e U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportation , Offic e o f Hearings , ma y b e delaye d du e t o screenin g conducte db y th e U.S . Posta l Servic e and/o r othe r security agencie s an dmay tak e u p t o four (4 ) week s t o b e delivered . Additionally , submission s may b e "irradiated" , whic haffect s th e qualit y , ^ o f submissions . Th e partie s ar e encouraged , bu t not required , t o file submission s b y privat e delivery service , facsimile , o r email . Th e certificat e o f

servic e shaLLj-eftSc

t tti^tfianne r

o f service . Qchar dC . Goodwi n U.S . Administrativ e La w udg e Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis t

Airlines . Inc. . FA A Docket s CP90GL0085 . CP90CE0110 . CP90CE0114 . CP90CE0134 . Orde r o f Administrativ e Law Judg e Burto n S . Koiko , serve dApri l 8 , 1992 , p . 2 . Se e "Orde r Dismissin g Complainant' s Appeal" . I n Th e Matte r

o f Robert Harris . FAA Docke t

No . CP03EA0001 . DM S No . FAA

2005-14 , Augus t

15 , 2005 ./

FA A Docke t

No . CP10WP000 8 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) SERVIC E LIS T ORIGINA L& ON E COP Y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 ' ON E COP Y Gar y Berger , Presiden t TM WCorporation , d/

b / aCastl e Precisio n Industries , Responden t 1514 8 Bledso e Stree t Sylmar,C A 9134 2 TEL : 818-362-5665 FAX : 818-367-893 6 AdamRunkel , Complainant' s Counse l Attorney , Western-Pacifi c Region , AWP-7.1 2 Offic e o f th e Regiona l Coimse l Federal Aviatio n Administratio n P.O . Bo x 92000 7 Lo s Angeles , C A 90009-200 7 TEL : 310-725-714 2 FAX : 310-725-681 6 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 2^2-366-213 9 Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-512 1 Lega l Assistan t FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Servic e wa s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r servic e i n perso n o r b y expedite dcourier , us e th e followin g address : Federa l Aviatio n Administration, 60

0 Independenc

e Avenue, S.W. , Wilbu

r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington

, D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin

g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430 .