alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Before the Third Division,

February 24, 1960

No. 63856.

protest 59/13473 (New York).

#### Advance Pet Supply Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 634 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 24, 2007.
Whereas, since the beginning of the 20th century, hunters and fishermen of the 
        United States have been among the most vocal supporters of the 
        scientific management of wildlife and conservation of the natural 
        environment;
Whereas President Theodore Roosevelt, who was himself a hunter, fisherman, and 
        conservationist, called throughout his Presidency for laws to promote 
        wildlife conservation and to provide lands for recreation;
Whereas, in June 1971, Senator Thomas McIntyre of New Hampshire and 
        Representative Robert Sikes of Florida sponsored a joint resolution 
        calling for the celebration of ``National Hunting and Fishing Day'' on 
        the fourth Saturday of every September;
Whereas, in 2006, an estimated 42,500,000 individuals in the United States 
        participated in hunting or fishing activities;
Whereas, in 2006, hunters and fishermen made a significant contribution to the 
        economy of the United States by spending nearly $75,000,000,000 on 
        hunting and fishing activities;
Whereas hunters and fishermen recognize the importance of natural resources to 
        the character, heritage, and future of the United States, and work to 
        protect and conserve those resources; and
Whereas the fourth Saturday of September would be an appropriate day to as 
        celebrate National Hunting and Fishing Day: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That--
            (1) it is the sense of the House of Representatives that--
                    (A) there should be established a day known as National 
                Hunting and Fishing Day; and
                    (B) the President should issue a proclamation calling on the 
                people of the United States to observe such a day with 
                appropriate programs and activities; and
            (2) the House of Representatives--
                    (A) encourages participation in hunting and fishing; and
                    (B) commends the contributions of hunters and fishermen 
                toward the scientific management of wildlife and conservation of 
                the natural environment.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 15-3333

___________________________

Brock Meeler

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

LVNV Funding, LLC; Hosto & Buchan, PLLC; Brien Saputo, Individually

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock

____________

 Submitted: July 7, 2016

Filed: July 15, 2016

[Unpublished]

____________

Before COLLOTON, GRUENDER, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Brock Meeler appeals the district court’s1

 dismissal of his complaint under the

Federal Debt Collection Practices Act. Upon de novo review, we conclude that the

1

The Honorable Billy Roy Wilson, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Arkansas.
dismissal was proper, for the reasons stated by the district court. See H & Q

Properties, Inc. v. Doll, 793 F.3d 852, 855 (8th Cir. 2015) (court reviews de novo

district court’s grant of motion to dismiss).

The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

RICHARD A. OLIVER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D22-3393

February 2, 2024

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Philippe Matthey, 

Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Tosha Cohen, Assistant 

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Elba Caridad Martin, 

Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SLEET, C.J., and LaROSE and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
2

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
(R.D. 11551)

#### Trans World International Service Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 547204.

(Decided June 27, 1968)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*Edwin L. Weisl, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Watson, Judge:

When this appeal was called for trial, the same was submitted without the introduction of any evidence.

Examination of the official papers fails to disclose anything to disturb the presumptively correct appraised value of the merchandise.

Accordingly, the appeal herein is overruled. Judgment will issue accordingly.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Ronald Kunisaki , certify that:



1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Hydrodynex, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this Report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods
presented in this Report;



4. The small business issuers other
certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 31a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f)) for the small business issuer and
we have:



a) Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this Report is being prepared;



b) Evaluated the
effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
Report based on such evaluation; and



c) Disclosed in this
Report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal
quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial
reporting; and



5. The small business issuers other
certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers
auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether
or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial
reporting.



Date: May 20, 2009



/s/ Ronald Kunisaki



Ronald Kunisaki

President and Chief Executive Officer
No. 63844.

protest 59/11587 (New York).

#### American Cyanamid Company *v.*United States,

*355Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the articles consist of parts of machines, not specially provided for, and that such machines are not operated by electricity, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-23-00304-CR

TONY STATURE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from County Criminal Court No. 7

of Tarrant County (1724153)

July 18, 2024

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Wallach

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Mike Wallach___________________

 Justice Mike Wallach
No. 59791.

#### Kittay & Blitz, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 221340-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 59105, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked with the letter “A” at 10 percent under the provision in paragraph 1528, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52739), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52836), for imitation semiprecious stones, faceted, and (2) the items marked with the letter “B” at 30 percent under the provision in said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 51802, supplemented by T. D. 51898, for imitation semiprecious stones, not faceted.
H. Res. 728 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

November 6, 2007. 

Whereas heavy rainstorms brought severe flooding to Ohio 

and the upper Midwest over the week of August 19, 

2007; 

Whereas, in many parts of Ohio, this was the worst flood 

since 1913 with nearly 15 inches of rain in some areas; 

Whereas the record storms and flooding were responsible for 

up to 18 deaths across parts of the upper Midwest— 

some of these in Ohio; 

Whereas over 500 citizens were forced to flee their homes and 

businesses and many hundreds of homes and businesses 

were damaged; 

Whereas, on August 21, 2007, Allen, Crawford, Hancock, 

Hardin, Paulding, Putnam, Richland, Seneca, Van Wert 

and Wyandot counties made initial local emergency declaration; 

Whereas, on August 22, 2007, Governor Ted Strickland 

issued a State disaster declaration for Allen, Crawford, 

Hancock, Hardin, Putnam, Richland, Seneca, Wyandot 

and Van Wert Counties; 

Whereas, on August 27, 2007, President George W. Bush 

issued a Federal disaster declaration for Allen, Crawford, 
2 

•HRES 728 EH 

Hancock, Putnam, Richland and Wyandot Counties and 

later added Hardin and Seneca Counties; and 

Whereas Michigan, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois, Iowa and 

Indiana also experienced serious, storms, flooding and 

tornadoes: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) expresses its support and profoundest sympathy 

for the victims of the devastating flooding that occurred 

across much of Ohio and the surrounding region in August 2007; 

(2) conveys its gratitude to the local, State and 

Federal officials and emergency personnel who responded to this emergency and continue working to restore normalcy in the affected counties; 

(3) thanks the many volunteers, charitable organizations, business and individual donors, churches and religious organizations for their generosity in responding 

to this crisis; and 

(4) commends the people of Ohio for their indomitable spirit and for the grace and magnanimity with 

which they have supported one another during the flooding and continuing recovery. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
August 4, 1955

No. 59245.

Suit 4816.

#### Scap Foreign Trade, N. Y. *v.*United States.

C. D. 1603. (Appeal dismissed May 24, 1954, to correct appellants’ name. See Abstract 59246 relating”to suit 4819, which was substituted for suit 4816.)
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 190 (Tuesday, October 3, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 68157]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21876]



[[Page 68157]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice: 23-101]


NASA Federal Advisory Committees; Charter Renewal

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Notice of charter renewal for NASA Federal advisory committee.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), and 
after consultation with the Committee Management Secretariat, General 
Services Administration, the NASA Administrator has determined that 
renewal of the charter of International Space Station Advisory 
Committee is in the public interest in connection with the performance 
of duties imposed on NASA by law. The renewed charter is for a two-year 
period ending September 27, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Patricia Diane Rausch, NASA 
Advisory Committee Management Officer, NASA Headquarters, Washington, 
DC 20546; 202-358-4510 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dfbbb6beb1baf1adbeaaacbcb79fb1beacbef1b8b0a9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b1d5d8d0dfd49fc3d0c4c2d2d9f1dfd0c2d09fd6dec7">[email protected]</span></a>.

Patricia Rausch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2023-21876 Filed 10-2-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 59235.

protest 212690-K (New York).

#### International Expediters, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the items marked *“A”*on the invoice accompanying entry 785583, referred to as “slingex,” consist of articles composed wholly or in chief value of rattan core or reed of about one-quarter of an inch in diameter, from which the cane, skin, or peel has been removed. Following the principle of the decisions in *Steinhardt & Bro. et al.*v. *United States*(9 Ct. Cust. Appls. 62, T. D. 37940) and *Calif-Asia Co., Ltd.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 133, C. A. D. 475), it was held that the merchandise is excluded from the provision for articles, wholly or partly manufactured of rattan and that articles, wholly or in chief value of reed, are, in the absence of more specific provision, dutiable under paragraph 412 as manufactures of wood. The claim was, therefore, sustained as to entry 785583. The protest having been abandoned as to entries 797936 and 807228, same was overruled.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: AguaFria National Monument record of decision, approved resource management plan**
 
ROD-ARMP| Maps: 01020304050607080910
 
SuDoc Number:I 53.59/2: AG 9
Item Number:0629-E-10 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000681157
 
July 26, 2018
No. 59258.

protests 242854-K, etc. (San Francisco).

#### Zado Goldenberg et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of so-called silk squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Before the Second Division,

June 8, 1966

No. P66/86.

protest 62/17672 (New York).

#### National Silver Co. *v.*United States,

Bao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of electric vacuum brushes similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Bruce Duncan*Company, *a/c Sims-Worms*v. *United States*(45 Cust. Ct. 85, C.D. 2202), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 13-40355 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. VIDAL RICO-TOVAR, also known as Vidal Rico, Defendant-Appellant

A ppeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:12-CR-1925-1

Before JOLLY, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the judgment in a c riminal c ase, Vidal R ico-Tovar r aises an argument t hat he c oncedes i s foreclosed by United States v. Rodriguez-Escareno , 700 F.3d 751, 753-54 (5th Cir. 2012), cert. denied , 133 S

. Ct. 2044 (2013), which held that the sentence enhancement provided for in U

. S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(i) applies to a conviction for th e f e d e r a l c r ime of conspiracy to commit a federal drug-trafficking o f

fense. The appellant’s motion for s u m m a r y d i sposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. U n i t e d S t a te s C o u r t o f A p p e al s

F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D October 25, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47. 5. 4. Case: 13-40355 Document: 00512419672 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/25/2013
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 779 

Recognizing the 100th anniversary of the American Society of Agronomy. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 30, 2007 

Mr. LATHAM (for himself, Mr. COSTA, Mrs. MUSGRAVE, and Ms. HERSETH

SANDLIN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Agriculture 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 100th anniversary of the American Society 

of Agronomy. 

Whereas the American Society of Agronomy was founded in 

1907, with Mark A. Carleton as its first President; 

Whereas the American Society of Agronomy is one of the premier scientific societies in the world, as evidenced by its 

world-class journals, international and regional meetings, 

and broad range of educational programs; 

Whereas the science and scholarship of the American Society 

of Agronomy are mission-directed, with the goal of finding solutions to agricultural challenges facing humanity; 

Whereas the American Society of Agronomy significantly contributes to the scientific and technical knowledge necVerDate Aug 31 2005 02:28 Oct 31, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR779.IH HR779

hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HRES 779 IH 

essary to protect and sustain natural resources in the 

United States; 

Whereas the American Society of Agronomy plays a key role 

in sustainable agricultural management and biodiversity 

conservation for the protection and stewardship of the 

agronomic resources of the world; 

Whereas the mission of the American Society of Agronomy 

continues to expand, from the development of sustainable 

production of food and forage to the production of renewable energy and novel industrial products; 

Whereas in industry, extension, and basic research, the 

American Society of Agronomy has fostered a dedicated 

professional and scientific community that includes more 

than 8,035 members; 

Whereas the American Society of Agronomy was the parent 

society that led to the formation of the Crop Science Society of America, the Soil Science Society of America, 

and the Agronomic Science Foundation; and 

Whereas the approximately 13,500 Certified Crop Advisers of 

the American Society of Agronomy provide farmers and 

ranchers with sound agronomic recommendations: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the 100th anniversary of the 

3 American Society of Agronomy; 

4 (2) commends the American Society of Agron5 omy for 100 years of dedicated service to advance 

6 the science and practice of agronomy; and 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
3 

•HRES 779 IH 

1 (3) acknowledges the promise of the American 

2 Society of Agronomy to continue to enrich the lives 

3 of all Americans, by improving stewardship of the 

4 environment, combating world hunger, and enhanc5 ing the quality of life for the next 100 years and be6 yond. 

Æ 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
Here is my clean air being shredded . I am also testifying on behalfof Stan Hansen who was unable to make it to today's hearing. Stan lives at 9212 Loma Vista Drive, DallasTX 75243. Here is his testimony: {Quote) "My late wife's name was Barbara Hansen. She was in excellent physical health when she was diagnosed with lung cancer in 2005, at the age of 63. She loved life and loved to run . She ran three marathons. and often finished first in her age group. The doctors reasoned that environmental issues were most likely the cause of her disease. She was a non smoker and had not been exposed to asbestos. Runners inhale more deeply, and particulate matter gets into the deepest recesses ofthe lungs. where it is the most damaging. She died 6 months after her diagnosis. Again , she had been in excellent physical health, and was a vibrant, happy person , full of life and loving life. We trust the EPA to protect us from the abuses ofthe environment. I thought thatwas the charter. Please adhere to your charter and stand up to the those who place profits above human life." 

### (End Quote) Here is a photo of Barbara before she was diagnosed with lung cancer. If the EPA delays implementing these rules for 2 more years, how many more people like Barbara will be diagnosed with an environmentally related disease?
No. P66/272. —

#### Enlite Products Co. *v.*United States, protest 63/17634 (Philadelphia).

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of hand operated (not battery operated) sirens of the same kind in all material respects as those the subject of *Oxford International Corp.*v. *United States*(55 Cust. Ct. 472, Abstract 69607), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 66542.

#### Joseph H. Brown & Son *v.*United States,

protests 60/7519, etc. (El Paso).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of horsemeat similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 66197, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.