alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Sillenger Exploration Corp., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that: The Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2009****(the "Form *10-K*") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form *10-K* fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     /s/ Carolyne Sing Carolyne Sing, Chief Financial   Officer
     /s/ Carolyne SingDate: May 28, 2009Carolyne Sing, Chief Financial   Officer
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# U nit edSta tes C ou rt o f App eal s For t h e Firs t C ircu it

Nos. 06-1210, 06-1211, 06-1212, 06-1851, 06-1852, 06-1918, 06-2094 VANESSA DIXON, Plaintiff, Appellee/Cross-Appellant,

v . INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF POLICE OFFICERS; INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF POLICE OFFICERS, LOCAL 382; JOHN LEARY,

Defendants, Appellants/Cross-Appellee,

KENNETH T. LYONS, Defendant, Cross-Appellee.

ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on September 28, 2007, is amended as follows: On the coverpage, line 23, replace "Lint" with "Lunt" Page 8, footnote 1: "National Association of Governance Employees" is corrected to "National Association of Government Employees" Page 17, second paragraph: The citation to Bain is amended to read "Bain, 678 N.E.2d at 161"
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     ALLIED HEALTHCARE PRODUCTS, INC.
     FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE FOR THIRD QUARTER
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<CURRENCY>                                U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             964   
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,794
<ALLOWANCES>                                       470
<INVENTORY>                                     27,485
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                58,454
<PP&E>                                          21,337
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,089
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 133,087
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,582
<BONDS>                                         48,283
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           101
<OTHER-SE>                                      62,749
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   133,087
<SALES>                                         30,466
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,466
<CGS>                                           20,741
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,741
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,143
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,732
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (221)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        81
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (302)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (302)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
No. *P67/90.*

#### Henry Wedemeyer, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 65/5493 and 65/12664 (New York).

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of battery-operated *877mixers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *F. B. Vandegrift & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(53 Cust. Ct. 231, Abstract 68674), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 192 Filed 09/24/04 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 192 Filed 09/24/04 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 192 Filed 09/24/04 Page 3 of 3
No. 68935.

#### AMT Corporation *v.*United States,

protest 64/17898 (Detroit).

Opinion by

Oliver, O.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of miniature motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 66961, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 58680.

protest 237690-K (New York).

#### Edmond J. Lang *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bird’s-foot trefoil seed *(Lotus corniculaius)*similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Transcontinental Seed, Inc. (Alltransport, Incorporated)*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 163, C. D. 1462), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 57738.

protest 148353-K (Honolulu).

#### Hal Craig *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From an examination of the papers in this case, the court was unable to find anything to overcome the presumption of correctness of the collector’s classification. The protest was therefore overruled.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

           <ARTICLE>                5

           <S>                      <C>
           <PERIOD-TYPE>            9-MOS
           <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 FEB-29-2000
           <PERIOD-END>                      NOV-30-1999
           <CASH>                                  20,191
           <SECURITIES>                                 0
           <RECEIVABLES>                      238,226,259
           <ALLOWANCES>                        11,652,000
           <INVENTORY>                          1,594,324
           <CURRENT-ASSETS>                     6,590,872
           <PP&E>                               3,697,195
           <DEPRECIATION>                       1,708,000
           <TOTAL-ASSETS>                     257,667,889
           <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              199,231,753
           <BONDS>                                      0
           <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
           <PREFERRED>                                  0
           <COMMON>                            22,788,031
           <OTHER-SE>                          35,361,878
           <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       257,667,889
           <SALES>                             18,908,149
           <TOTAL-REVENUES>                    26,670,608
           <CGS>                               16,940,999
           <TOTAL-COSTS>                       16,940,999
           <OTHER-EXPENSES>                     2,623,877
           <LOSS-PROVISION>                       452,784
           <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   4,067,603
           <INCOME-PRETAX>                      2,585,345
           <INCOME-TAX>                           970,000
           <INCOME-CONTINUING>                  1,615,345
           <DISCONTINUED>                               0
           <EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
           <CHANGES>                                    0
           <NET-INCOME>                         1,615,345
           <EPS-BASIC>                             0.31
           <EPS-DILUTED>                             0.30




</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 654 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 654

    Congratulating the Phoenix Mercury for winning the 2007 Women's 
          National Basketball Association (WNBA) Championship.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 17, 2007

 Mr. Pastor submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
            the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Congratulating the Phoenix Mercury for winning the 2007 Women's 
          National Basketball Association (WNBA) Championship.

Whereas, on September 16, 2007, the Phoenix Mercury won the 2007 Women's 
        National Basketball Association (WNBA) Championship after cruising to 
        victory over the defending champion Detroit Shock with a strong final 
        score of 108 to 92 in the fifth and deciding game of the series;
Whereas this is the Mercury's first WNBA Championship since the team's formation 
        in 1997 as one of the WNBA's original 8 teams;
Whereas the Mercury is the first team to win the WNBA Championship on the road;
Whereas, after only 2 seasons as head coach, the superb leadership and up-tempo 
        style of Coach Paul Westhead guided the Mercury to this Championship;
Whereas, after only 2 years in the WNBA, Cappie Pondexter scored 26 points in 
        the final game of the series and was chosen as the Most Valuable Player 
        for the WNBA Finals;
Whereas Cappie Pondexter was ably assisted by Penny Taylor, who scored 30 
        points, and Diana Taurasi, who scored 17 points, in addition to 
        outstanding efforts from teammates Tangela Smith, Kelly Miller, Kelly 
        Mazzante, Kelly Schumacher, Belinda Snell, Olympia Scott, Jennifer 
        Derevjanik, and Jennifer Lacy;
Whereas this impressive win makes Coach Paul Westhead the first coach in history 
        to capture both the NBA Championship and WNBA Championship;
Whereas the Mercury entered the WNBA Playoffs with their best record in 
        franchise history at 23-11 and after 6 years of having missed inclusion 
        in the Playoffs;
Whereas there was no doubt who was taking control of the final game as the 
        Mercury led by as many as 14 points in the first quarter, posted an 
        impressive record by shooting 73.3 percent for the first quarter, and 
        led by as many as 18 points in the second quarter; and
Whereas the city of Phoenix joins the Phoenix Mercury owner, Robert Sarver, in 
        taking enormous pride in the accomplishment of this outstanding team: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives congratulates the 
Phoenix Mercury and Coach Paul Westhead for winning the 2007 Women's 
National Basketball Association Championship.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Felix Maurent, Petitioner, v Peter Lacy, as Superintendent of Bare Hill Correctional Facility, Respondent.

[— NYS2d —]

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Franklin County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

As the result of his possession of certain documentation, petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule prohibiting inmates from possessing contraband. Petitioner argues that this determination is not supported by substantial evidence in the record. Since the commencement of this proceeding, respondent has annulled the subject determination and expunged it from petitioner’s records. As the matter is now moot, we need not address the merits of petitioner’s claim. Furthermore, petitioner is not entitled to the recovery of incidental expenses.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Casey, Yesawich Jr. and Spain, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Remington Oil and Gas
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending June 30, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, James A. Watt, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec.1350, as adopted pursuant to sec.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

     This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, and not for any other purpose.

                                                   /s/ JAMES A. WATT
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                      James A. Watt
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer

December 16, 2003

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Remington Oil and Gas Corporation and will be retained by
Remington Oil and Gas Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
From: misg@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:23:07 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Melissa Gentry

Theodore, AL 36582
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 22 Filed 08/25/03 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 22 Filed 08/25/03 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 22 Filed 08/25/03 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 22 Filed 08/25/03 Page 4 of 4
From: kskidook@starband.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:18:40 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Keith Kovac

Iron River, MI 49935
[Westlake Settlement Services Logo] ANNUAL ASSESSMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE The Tax Outsourcing Service Agreement dated as of October 1, 2006 (together with all amendments thereto, the "Agreement"), between Aurora Loan Services and WestLake Settlement Services, LLC  I, Debra D. Lewis, Director of WestLake Settlement Services, certify to Aurora Loan Services, LLC ("Aurora"), with the knowledge and intent that it will rely upon this certification, that: (1)As of and for the year ended December 31, 2008, WestLake Settlement Services, LLC has complied with the applicable servicing criteria set forth, in Item. 1122(d) of Regulation AB applicable to WestLake (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria"):  1122(d)(4)(xi) Payments made on behalf of an obligor (such as tax or insurance payments) are made on or before the related penalty or expiration dates, as indicated on the appropriate bills or notices for such payments, provided that such support has been received by the servicer at least 30 calendar days prior to these dates, or such other number of days specified in the transaction agreements. 1122(d)(4)(xii) Any late payment penalties in connection with any payment to be made on behalf of an obligor are paid from the servicer's funds and not charged to the obligor, unless the late payment was due to the obligor's error or omission.         (2) The transactions covered by this report include all loans in which WestLake performs activities related to the Regulation AB criteria on behalf of Aurora.         (3) WestLake has complied, in all material respects, with the applicable servicing criteria as of December 31, 2008 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform taken as a whole.         (4) Virchow, Krause & Company LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on Aurora's assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the Reporting Period.  WESTLAKE SETTLEMENT SERVICES, LLC  /s/ Debra D. Lewis Debra D. Lewis, Officer  Director of Operations  Title  March 20, 2009  1 First American Way, Westlake, TX, 76262 Mail Stop 6-4-100
DJI PHANTOM 2 VISION+ Manufacturer’s User Manual

User manual can be found at:

http://www.dji.com/product/phantom‐2‐vision/download
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DETENTION ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W. D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff,

v.

ISRAEL TIMOTEO,

 Defendant.

Case No. CR05-5415

DETENTION ORDER

THE COURT, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3142, finds that no condition or combination

of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and/or the safety of any

other person and the community.

This finding is based on 1) the nature and circumstances of the offense(s) charged, including whether the offense is a

crime of violence or involves a narcotic drug; 2) the weight of the evidence against the person; 3) the history and characteristics of

the person including those set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)(3)(A)(B); and 4) the nature and seriousness of the danger release would

impose to any person or the community.

Findings of Fact/ Statement of Reasons for Detention

Presumptive Reasons/Unrebutted:

 ( ) Conviction of a Federal offense involving a crime of violence. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(A)

 ( X ) Potential maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(B)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of 10+ years as prescribed in the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C.§801 et seq.), the

Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C.§951 et seq.) Or the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (46

U.S.C. App. 1901 et seq.)

 ( ) Convictions of two or more offenses described in subparagraphs (A) through (C) of 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(1) of two or more

State or local offenses that would have been offenses described in said subparagraphs if a circumstance giving rise to

Federal jurisdiction had existed, or a combination of such offenses.

Safety Reasons:

 ( ) Defendant is currently on probation/supervision resulting from a prior offense.

 ( ) Defendant was on bond on other charges at time of alleged occurrences herein.

 ( ) Defendant’s prior criminal history.

 ( ) 

Flight Risk/Appearance Reasons:

 (X ) Defendant’s lack of community ties and resources..

 ( X ) Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainer.

 ( ) Detainer(s)/Warrant(s) from other jurisdictions.

 ( ) Failures to appear for past court proceedings.

 ( ) Past conviction for escape.

Order of Detention

< The defendant shall be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal,

without prejudice to review..

< The defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel.

< The defendant shall on order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the Government, be delivered

to a United States marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.

 January 4, 2006.

s/ J. Kelley Arnold 

J. Kelley Arnold, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:06-mj-05001-JKA Document 8 Filed 01/04/06 Page 1 of 1