alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: chip6562000@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:57:53 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

William Newkirk

Wilmer, AL 36587
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-1-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-2-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                         3,711
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,616
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    49,508
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               57,659
<PP&E>                                         35,103
<DEPRECIATION>                                 13,350
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 82,946
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          26,107
<BONDS>                                        7,788
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       85
<OTHER-SE>                                     47,257
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   82,946
<SALES>                                        15,868
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               15,868
<CGS>                                          8,972
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  8,972
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               7,501
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             332
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (937)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (168)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (769)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (769)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.09)
        


</TABLE>
No. 64561.

#### Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 58/19998 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
### SERVE D NOVEMBE R2 , 201 0 '-FPARTMEN T O F 

## ^ :^ANSPORW!0 N U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N ' . •(•; : I OPERATION S OFFIC E O FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C iOi O NO V - 3 A R

: 3 0 I N TH E MATTERO F CONTINENTA LAIRLINES , INC . FA A DOCKE T NO . CPlOSWOO l 1 (Civi l Penalty Action ) DM S NO . FAA-2010-097 8

NOTIC E O FASSIGNMEN T O FPROCEEDIN G Thi s proceedin g (heretofor e designate da s Cas e No . 2009SW270058 ) ha s bee n assigne dt o Administrativ e Law Judg e Richar dC . Goodwin . Al l future pleading s an dothe r communication s regardin g thi s proceedin g shal l b e serve do n th e Judge , th e FA A Hearin g Docket , an dth e othe r person s o n th e attache dServic e List .

Coiraji e A . Yode r Chie f Administrativ e La : Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tm w

FA A Docke t

No . CPlOSWOO l 1 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430 , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1»00 '

ON ECOP Y Thoma s Newto n Boiling , Respondent' s Counse l Managin g Attorney , Regulator y Affair s Continenta l Airlines , Inc. , Responden t 160 0 Smit hStreet , 15 * Floo r

HQSL G Houston , TX 7700 2 TEL : 713-324-513 1 FAX: 713-324-516 0 Ti mDuff , Complainant' s Counse l Attorney , Offic e o f

Regiona l Counsel , ASW- 7 Southwes t

Regio n Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 260 1 l^ea<*amBlvd . Ft . Worth , T X 76193-000 7 TE L817-222-509 9 FAX 817-222-5945/509 2 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e Law Judg e U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Offic e o f Hearings , M-20 , 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Building , Groun dFloor , Roo mE12-32 0 Washington , D.C . 2059 0 TEL : Attorney-Adviso r 202

- 366-213 9 Lega l Assistan t

202-366-512 1 FAX: 202-366-753 6

' Service was b

y U.S . Mail . Fo

r servic e i n person o r b y expeditedcourier , us e the followin g address : federal Aviatio n Administration , 600 Independenc e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2Wl6(lN() , Washington , D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearing Docke t Clerk, AGC-430 .
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20- 0511 IN THE MATTER OF: S.E., Respondent and Appellant. **ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 1 0, 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 6 2021

08/06/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0511
From: sdhowell5@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:06:21 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sheila Howell

Mount Pleasant, NC 28124
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350





The undersigned officer of ALLIED HEALTHCARE PRODUCTS, INC. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Company’s fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Earl R. RefslandEarl R. RefslandPresident & Chief Executive Officer


May 6, 2011
No. 69689.

#### W. N. Proctor Company *v.*United States,

protests 62/19042, 63/8292, and 63/14539 (Boston).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of porcelain thermocouple tubes and that the involved articles are not chemical porcelain ware but are, in fact, articles in chief value of earthy or mineral substances, not decorated or commercially susceptible of decoration in any manner, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. *John H. Faunce, Philadelphia, Inc.*v. *United States*(42 Cust. Ct. 196, C.D. 2085), followed.
From: taksan@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:01:37 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

Your proposed requirement that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered free by

private health insurance is harmful to provate insurers. It will, along with other mandates in

Obamacare, drive them out of business.

I find it strange that you exempt "religious employers" but not workers who have moral objections

against certain procedures and drugs.

I am one of millions of Americans who oppose Obamacare and am striving to have it rescinded.

Sincerely,

John Takeuchi

Fairfield, CA 94534
No. 59246.

Suit 4819.

#### Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., and Scap Foreign Trade, New York *v.*United States.

C. D. 1603 affirmed April 28, 1955. C. A. D. 591.
From: joe-joellen@att.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:43:50 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

Enough is enough. Is there no end in sight to the assault on our religious beliefs and rights? Their is a

high cost to be paid by any country that has no moral values - no soul, so to speak. Greed has

destroyed our economy. Must we also pander to lust.

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Joe Schrader

Paso Robles, CA 93446
Exhibit 23.1





SEALE AND BEERS, CPAs


PCAOB & CPAB REGISTERED AUDITORS


www.sealebeers.com

















CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM







We consent to the use, in the statement on Form 10K/A of PashminaDepot.com, Inc., of our report dated September 25, 2009 on our audit of the financial statements of PashminaDepot.com, Inc. as of May 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the year ended May 31, 2009,
and the periods from inception on November 13, 2007 through May 31, 2008 and 2009, and the reference to us under the caption “Experts.”























/s/Seale and Beers, CPAs





Seale and Beers, CPAs


Las Vegas, Nevada


September 29, 2009































Seale and Beers, CPAs PCAOB & CPAB Registered Auditors


6490 WEST DESERT INN RD, LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89146 (702) 253-7492 Fax: (702)253-7501
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ronnie Bush, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 621]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Aiello, J.), rendered July 9, 1985, convicting him of murder in the second degree and manslaughter in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress statements made by him to law enforcement officials.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

After voluntarily accompanying the police to headquarters concerning an incident that occurred in the 77th Precinct, the police told the defendant that two eyewitnesses had identified him as being at the scene of the shooting. By their own admission, the police had no grounds for this accusation. In response, the defendant replied, "I didn’t shoot him, Shorty shot him”. At this point the defendant was immediately advised of his *Miranda*rights. Thereafter, the defendant made inculpatory oral, audiotaped, and videotaped statements.

The defendant claims that he was subjected to custodial interrogation. However, it is clear that a person innocent of any crime would not have believed that he was under arrest under the circumstances then present merely because the police asserted that he was at the scene of the shooting *(see, People v Walls,*199 AD2d 292; *People v Spellman,*168 AD2d 318). Thus, the hearing court properly denied suppression of the statements made by the defendant to law enforcement officials.

The defendant’s sentence was not excessive *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review. Mangano, P. J., Balletta, Pizzuto and Santucci, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 
 18 U.S.C. 1350,
 
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
 In connection with the Annual Report of China Wi-Max Communications, Inc. on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven Berman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  
 Date: April 15, 2011
 
 
 By: /s/ Steven Berman
 Steven Berman
 Chief Executive Officer
Case 3:05-cv-05675-RBL Document 167 Filed 04/23/07 Page 1 of 1
From: johnmileusnic@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:55:52 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Diane Mileusnic

Schererville, IN 46375
**Exhibit 21**

 

**List of Subsidiaries**

The following is a list of subsidiaries of Ascent Media Corporation, the names under which such subsidiaries do business, and the state or country in which each was organized, as of February 29, 2012. The list does not include dormant subsidiaries or subsidiaries which would not, if considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, constitute a significant subsidiary within the meaning of Item 601(b)(21)(ii) of Regulation S-K.

 
| **Subsidiary**                         | ** ** | **Jurisdiction of Formation** |
|----------------------------------------|------------|-----------------------------------------|
| Monitronics   International, Inc. |       | Texas                                   |
|                                   |       |                                    |
| Monitronics   Canada, Inc.        |       | Canada                                  |
|                                   |       |                                    |
| MI   Servicer HC, LLC                  |       | Delaware                                |
|                                   |       |                                    |
| MI   Servicer LP, LLC                  |       | Delaware                                |
|                                   |       |                                    |
| MI   Servicer GP, LLC                  |       | Delaware                                |
|                                   |       |                                    |
| MIBU   Servicer Inc.                   |       | Delaware                                |
|                                   |       |                                    |
| Monitronics   Security LP              |       | Delaware                                |
|                                   |       |                                    |
| MI   Funding HC, LLC                   |       | Delaware                                |
|                                   |       |                                    |
| MI   Funding LP, LLC                   |       | Delaware                                |
|                                   |       |                                    |
| MI   Funding GP, LLC                   |       | Delaware                                |
|                                   |       |                                    |
| Monitronics   Funding LP               |       | Delaware                                |
|                                   |       |                                    |
| Ascent   Media Property Holdings, LLC  |       | Delaware                                |
|                                   |       |                                    |

 

----
CONSENT OF COUNSEL

                  We consent to the reference to our Firm under the heading
"Counsel and Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" in Post-Effective
Amendment No. 21 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A of New Jersey Daily
Municipal Income Fund, Inc. as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on or about May 30, 2008.

/S/ PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP
PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP


New York, New York
May 30, 2008