alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Az Európai Unió C 122A/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0979 |
| --- | --- |
| Az Európai Unió
  Hivatalos Lapja | C 122A |
| | |
| Magyar nyelvű kiadás | Tájékoztatások és közlemények | 58. évfolyam2015. április 16. |

ISSN 1977-0979

Az Európai Unió

Hivatalos Lapja

C 122A

Magyar nyelvű kiadás

Tájékoztatások és közlemények

58. évfolyam2015. április 16.

---

| Közleményszám | Tartalom | Oldal |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Helyesbítések |
| 2015/C 122A/01 | Helyesbítés nyílt versenyvizsga-felhíváshoz – Jogi kutatásra szakosodott tanácsos (AD 5/AD 7) – EPSO/AD/295/15 – bolgár (BG) jogi végzettséggel rendelkező jogász – EPSO/AD/296/15 – német (DE) jogi végzettséggel rendelkező jogász – EPSO/AD/297/15 – horvát (HR) jogi végzettséggel rendelkező jogász – EPSO/AD/298/15 – ír (IE) jogi végzettséggel rendelkező jogász – EPSO/AD/299/15 – litván (LT) jogi végzettséggel rendelkező jogász – EPSO/AD/300/15 – szlovák (SK) jogi végzettséggel rendelkező jogász — ( HL C 68 A., 2015.2.26. ) | 1 |

Közleményszám

Tartalom

Oldal

Helyesbítések

2015/C 122A/01

Helyesbítés nyílt versenyvizsga-felhíváshoz – Jogi kutatásra szakosodott tanácsos (AD 5/AD 7) – EPSO/AD/295/15 – bolgár (BG) jogi végzettséggel rendelkező jogász – EPSO/AD/296/15 – német (DE) jogi végzettséggel rendelkező jogász – EPSO/AD/297/15 – horvát (HR) jogi végzettséggel rendelkező jogász – EPSO/AD/298/15 – ír (IE) jogi végzettséggel rendelkező jogász – EPSO/AD/299/15 – litván (LT) jogi végzettséggel rendelkező jogász – EPSO/AD/300/15 – szlovák (SK) jogi végzettséggel rendelkező jogász — ( HL C 68 A., 2015.2.26. )

( HL C 68 A., 2015.2.26. )

1

---

| HU | |
| --- | --- |

HU

---

Helyesbítések

| 16.4.2015 | HU | Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja | CA 122/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2015

HU

Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja

CA 122/1

---

Helyesbítés nyílt versenyvizsga-felhíváshoz – Jogi kutatásra szakosodott tanácsos (AD 5/AD 7) – EPSO/AD/295/15 – bolgár (BG) jogi végzettséggel rendelkező jogász – EPSO/AD/296/15 – német (DE) jogi végzettséggel rendelkező jogász – EPSO/AD/297/15 – horvát (HR) jogi végzettséggel rendelkező jogász – EPSO/AD/298/15 – ír (IE) jogi végzettséggel rendelkező jogász – EPSO/AD/299/15 – litván (LT) jogi végzettséggel rendelkező jogász – EPSO/AD/300/15 – szlovák (SK) jogi végzettséggel rendelkező jogász

(
  Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja C 68. A, 2015. február 26.
  )

(2015/C 122 A/01)

A 2. oldalon, az I. cím 3. pontjában:

a következő szövegrész:

„Határidő (érvényesítéssel együtt): 2015. március 31., déli 12 óra (brüsszeli idő szerint)”

helyesen:

„Határidő (érvényesítéssel együtt): 2015. április 9., déli 12 óra (brüsszeli idő szerint)”.

---
From: nanebrown@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:35:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Karen Brown

Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

GERALD ROYCE ALESHIRE,

Plaintiff,

v.

OFFICER CHRIS RATHBUN,

Defendant.

Case No. C05-5296FDB

ORDER DISMISSING

COMPLAINT WITHOUT

PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO

FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b)(2)

 The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Karen L.

Strombom, objections to the report and recommendation, if any, and the remaining record, does hereby

find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice; 

(3) The Clerk is directed to terminate this action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b)(2); and

(4) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff and to the Hon. Karen L.

Strombom..

DATED this 6th day of March A2006.

FRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-05296-FDB Document 25 Filed 03/06/06 Page 1 of 1
#### FABARC STEEL SUPPLY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, Travelers Indemnity Company of Illinois, Plaintiff, v. ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-12064.

D.C. Docket No. 02-00449-CV-PT-1-E.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Aug. 24, 2005.

E. Ann McMahan, James P. Rea, Dominick Fletcher, Yeilding Wood & Lloyd, P.A., Birmingham, AL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Joel Scott Isenberg, Smith *&*Ely, L.L.P., Birmingham, AL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Carol A. Smith, Smith & Ely, Birmingham, AL, for Plaintiff.

Before BIRCH, CARNES and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

After reviewing the record, the briefs of the parties on appeal and hearing oral argument, we find no error in the thorough and well-reasoned Memorandum Opinion of the district court entered on 10 February 2004. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the order of the district court entered on 22 March 2004, filed in accordance with the Memorandum Opinion.
Before the Third Division,

January 6, 1955

No. 58674.

protests 229739-K, etc. (New York).

#### Capitol Distributors Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 130, C. A. D. 508) and *257*Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board

# DATES:

September 26, 2023 at 9 a.m.

# ADDRESSES:

                        Telephonic. Dial-in (listen only) information: Number: 1-202-599-1426, Code: 726 107 825#; or via web:                         *https://teams.microsoft.com/​l/​meetup-join/​19%3ameeting_​OGI3OTFlOGItOWM2YS00Y2FmLWI1NmYtZTUwM2IwNGNkMjU4%40thread.v2/​0?​context=​%7b%22Tid%22%3a%223f6323b7-e3fd-4f35-b43d-1a7afae5910d%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%221a441fb8-5318-4ad0-995b-f28a737f4128%22%7d.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kimberly Weaver, Director, Office of External Affairs, (202) 942-1640.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Board Meeting Agenda

### Open Session

1. Approval of the August 22, 2023, Board Meeting Minutes

2. Monthly Reports

                    (a) Participant Report                          ( print page 64433)    

(b) Investment Report

(c) Legislative Report

3. Quarterly Reports

(d) Vendor Risk Management Report

4. Enterprise Risk Management Update

### Closed Session

5. Information Covered Under 5 U.S.C. 552b (c)(6) and (c)(10)

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b (e)(1).                

Dated: September 14, 2023.

Dharmesh Vashee,

General Counsel, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.

[FR Doc. 2023-20217 Filed 9-18-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                 5

<S>                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  FEB-28-2000
<PERIOD-END>                       MAY-31-1999
<CASH>		                             		161,559
<SECURITIES>				               		            0
<RECEIVABLES>			     	             258,629,285
<ALLOWANCES>		  		                  10,997,000
<INVENTORY>					                     1,488,236
<CURRENT-ASSETS>				               234,036,845
<PP&E>					                          3,389,198
<DEPRECIATION>			                    1,515,680
<TOTAL-ASSETS>				                 257,427,834
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              187,974,850
<BONDS>							                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>					                   0
<PREFERRED>							                           0
<COMMON>					                       22,718,237
<OTHER-SE>					                     31,018,747
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>	      257,427,834
<SALES>					                       128,986,182
<TOTAL-REVENUES>				               133,783,302
<CGS>					                         121,710,289
<TOTAL-COSTS>				                  121,710,289
<OTHER-EXPENSES>				                 2,728,269
<LOSS-PROVISION>				                 2,491,869
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>		                 1,954,320
<INCOME-PRETAX>				                  4,898,555
<INCOME-TAX>			                      1,822,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>			               3,076,555
<DISCONTINUED>					                         	0
<EXTRAORDINARY>						                        0
<CHANGES>						                             	0
<NET-INCOME>			                      3,076,555
<EPS-BASIC>						                         0.59
<EPS-DILUTED>					                        0.57



</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 147 (Monday, August 1, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 45786]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-19439]

[[Page 45786]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Advanced Scientific Computing Advisory Committee; Meeting

AGENCY: Office of Science, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Advanced Scientific 
Computing Advisory Committee (ASCAC). Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) requires that public notice of these 
meetings be announced in the Federal Register

DATES: Tuesday, August 23, 2011, 9 a.m.-5 p.m.
    Wednesday, August 24, 2011, 9 a.m.-12 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Hilton Washington DC/Rockville Hotel & Executive Meeting 
Center, 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melea Baker, Office of Advanced 
Scientific Computing Research; SC-21/Germantown Building; U.S. 
Department of Energy; 1000 Independence Avenue, SW.; Washington, DC 
20585-1290; Telephone (301) 903-7486.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Purpose of the Meeting: The purpose of this meeting is to provide 
advice and guidance to the Department of Energy on scientific 
priorities within the field of advanced scientific computing research.

Tentative Agenda Topics

     ASCR program updates.
     EU Data Initiative.
     HPC & EERE Wind Program.
     Early Career Research on Energy Efficient Interconnect for 
Exascale Computing.
     Separating Algorithm and Implentation.
     Update on ASCR exascale planning & workshops.
     Update on ASCAC COV.
     Update on CSGF Review.
     Public Comment (10-minute rule).
    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. A webcast 
of this meeting may be available. Please check the Web site below for 
updates and information on how to view the meeting. If you would like 
to file a written statement with the Committee, you may do so either 
before or after the meeting. If you would like to make oral statements 
regarding any of the items on the agenda, you should contact Melea 
Baker by telephone at (301) 903-7486 or by e-mail at 
Melea.Baker@science.doe.gov. You must make your request for an oral 
statement at least five business days prior to the meeting. Reasonable 
provision will be made to include the scheduled oral statements on the 
agenda. The Chairperson of the Committee is empowered to conduct the 
meeting in a manner that will facilitate the orderly conduct of 
business. Public comment will follow the 10-minute rule.
    Minutes: The minutes of this meeting will be available on the U.S. 
Department of Energy's Office of Advanced Scientific Computing Web site 
for viewing at http://www.sc.doe.gov/ascr.

    Issued at Washington, DC on July 26, 2011.
LaTanya Butler,
Acting Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-19439 Filed 7-29-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
Exhibit





Exhibit 10.55



[LETTERHEAD OF SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION]




January 31, 2017 



Perry D. Schwartz
Vice President, Tools and Lawn & Garden




Dear Dean,


We are pleased to offer you the opportunity to serve as President, Tools, Lawn & Garden, Fitness, Sports, and Children’s Entertainment, effective January 29, 2017 (“Effective Date”).  As of the Effective Date your annual base salary will be increased to $400,000, subject to the approval of the Compensation Committee (“Compensation Committee”) of SHC’s Board of Directors.  


Your Target opportunity under SHC’s Annual Incentive Plan (“AIP”) and Long-Term Incentive Program will be 75% of your base salary.


Notwithstanding the foregoing, provided you fulfill the duties and responsibilities of your position for SHC’s 2017 fiscal year (as determined by SHC) and are actively employed on April 15, 2018, your AIP bonus for the 2017 fiscal year will be no less than $100,000.  Payment of the foregoing guaranteed amount is subject to offset for amounts you may owe to the Company to the maximum extent permitted by law and is also subject to applicable tax withholding requirements.


To acknowledge and accept this offer, please sign and date below and return this letter to me.  


Accepted:




___/s/ Perry D. Schwartz______________        __2__/__1__/_17_
Perry D. Schwartz                                        Date 




Business Unit Leader:




___/s/ Tiffany Morris_________________        _2_/__1__/__17_
Tiffany Morris                                            Date
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DETENTION ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W. D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff,

v.

DIONICIO ZURITA-RIOS,

 Defendant.

Case No. 05-5154M

DETENTION ORDER

THE COURT, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3142, finds that no condition or combination

of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and/or the safety of any

other person and the community.

This finding is based on 1) the nature and circumstances of the offense(s) charged, including whether the offense is a

crime of violence or involves a narcotic drug; 2) the weight of the evidence against the person; 3) the history and characteristics of

the person including those set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)(3)(A)(B); and 4) the nature and seriousness of the danger release would

impose to any person or the community.

Findings of Fact/ Statement of Reasons for Detention

Presumptive Reasons/Unrebutted:

 ( ) Conviction of a Federal offense involving a crime of violence. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(A)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(B)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of 10+ years as prescribed in the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C.§801 et seq.), the

Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C.§951 et seq.) Or the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (46

U.S.C. App. 1901 et seq.)

 ( ) Convictions of two or more offenses described in subparagraphs (A) through (C) of 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(1) of two or more

State or local offenses that would have been offenses described in said subparagraphs if a circumstance giving rise to

Federal jurisdiction had existed, or a combination of such offenses.

Safety Reasons:

 ( ) Defendant is currently on probation/supervision resulting from a prior offense.

 ( ) Defendant was on bond on other charges at time of alleged occurrences herein.

 ( ) Defendant’s prior criminal history.

Flight Risk/Appearance Reasons:

 ( ) Defendant’s lack of sufficient ties to the community.

 ( ) Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainer.

 ( ) Detainer(s)/Warrant(s) from other jurisdictions.

 ( ) Failures to appear for past court proceedings.

 ( ) Past conviction for escape.

Other:

 (/) Defendant stipulated to detention without prejudice

 

Order of Detention

< The defendant shall be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal.

< The defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel.

< The defendant shall on order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the Government, be delivered

to a United States marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.

 August 30, 2005.

_s/ Karen L. Strombom 

Karen L Strombom, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cr-05695-FDB Document 7 Filed 08/30/05 Page 1 of 1
From: bizobbtoo@aim.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:58:47 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Robert Shapland

Pisgah Forest, NC 28768
No. P66/28.

protests 61/11072-12042, etc. (Chicago).

#### Gallagher & Ascher Company *v.*United States,

*899Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered hy the foregoing protests consists of lock cylinders with keys similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Gallagher & Ascher Company*v. *United States*(54 Cust. Ct. 141, C.D. 2522), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2011-1163

Directorate Identifier: 2011NM022AD

94-25-011, I2 --- 11/6/07

94-25-012 --- 9/25/07

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

Appellate case name: Taj Mohammed v. D. 1050 W. Rankin, Inc.

Appellate case number: 01-13-00977-CV

Trial court case number: 1034730

Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 1 of Harris County

It is ordered that Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing is denied.

Judge’s signature: _/s/ Jane Bland_

Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Chief Justice Radack and Justices Bland and Huddle.

Date: March 26, 2015
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of SPARTA, Inc. (the
Company) for the period ended October 3, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David E. Schreiman,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, in my capacity as an officer
of the Company pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the
financial statements included in the report. November 10, 2004 /s/ David E. Schreiman