alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ 

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

GEORGE HENDERSON,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

WHATCOM COUNTY FIRE

PROTECTION DISTRICT NO. 18, et al.,

 Defendants.

Case No. C05-1722RSL

ORDER GRANTING

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

EXTENSION TO TIME

This matter comes before the Court on defendants’ “Motion to Enlarge

Time for Identifying Witness.” Plaintiff does not object to the late identification of

Donald Kerr as a witness in this matter, but challenges his designation as an expert. 

Defendants’ motion for an extension of time in which to identify Donald

Kerr as a witness is GRANTED. Whether Mr. Kerr will be permitted to testify as an

expert can be determined at a later date. 

DATED this 8th day of June, 2006.

A

Robert S. Lasnik,

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-01722-RSL Document 32 Filed 06/08/06 Page 1 of 1
No. 62777.

#### H. T. Kennedy Co., Inc., and Daniel F. Young, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 317976-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of “Aladdin” rail lubricators similar in all material respects to those the subject of *H. T. Kennedy Co., Inc.,*and *Daniel F. Young, Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 68, C.D. 1637), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1999
<CASH>                                          10,159
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  141,037
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,683
<INVENTORY>                                        374
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               169,475
<PP&E>                                          40,791
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,926
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 233,604
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          142,941
<BONDS>                                         10,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            45
<OTHER-SE>                                      80,118
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   233,604
<SALES>                                        214,998
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               228,403
<CGS>                                          193,675
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  204,742
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   588
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 250
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,256
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,323
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,933
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (486)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,447
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.35


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 ORDER

Page - 1

HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

JAMES WILLIS WALTENBURG,

Petitioner,

v.

DOUG WADDINGTON,

Respondent.

Case No. C05-5767 RBL/KLS

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

The Court, having reviewed petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus, the Report and

Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom, objections to the Report and

Recommendation, if any, and the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) Petitioner’s writ of habeas corpus (Dkt. # 6) is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH

PREJUDICE; and

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff, counsel for defendants and to

the Hon. Karen L. Strombom.

DATED this 18th day of September, 2006.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-05767-RBL Document 18 Filed 09/18/06 Page 1 of 1
CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

 

Registration No.  333-97047

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  237				Trade Date: 12/12/02
(To Prospectus Supplement dated August 15, 2002 & 

  Prospectus dated August 8,2002)					Issue Date:  12/17/02
The Date of this Pricing Supplement December 12, 2002
SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

  CUSIP									Date and terms of redemption or

     or	Stated				             Interest			repayment (including any

Common	Interest		  Price to	 Discounts &         Payment	Survivors		applicable regular or special

  Code	Rate (1)	Maturity	Public (2)	Commissions       Frequency	  Option	Yes/No	record dates)

14911QKW0  3.25%	12/15/06	     100%	        0.625%                Semi-Annually	     YES	    NO	

Principal						1st Payment	Day	

Amount		Proceeds		Dealer		      Date		Count

$749,000.00	$744,318.75.	ABN AMRO Inc.	   6/15/03		30/360	
 

Original Issue Discount Note:					Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes	  X   No						N/A

 

 
- The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the effective date of the change.   Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $30.662 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (SM) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (SM) will be made under the Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated August 8, 2002.
- Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Remington Oil and Gas
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, J. Burke Asher, Vice President/Finance (Principal Financial
Officer) of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

     This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, and not for any other purpose.

                                                  /s/ J. BURKE ASHER
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                      J. Burke Asher
                                                  Vice President/Finance
                                              (Principal Financial Officer)

May 2, 2003

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Remington Oil and Gas Corporation and will be retained by
Remington Oil and Gas Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
ALONZIE WIGGINS,

Petitioner,

v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D13-6114

Opinion filed July 3, 2014.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari -- Original Jurisdiction.

Alonzie Williams, pro se, Petitioner.

Jennifer Parker, General Counsel, and Barbara Debelius, Assistant General Counsel, 

Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits.

PADOVANO, WETHERELL, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
abwn_ex41.htm

EXHIBIT 4.1

 

AMENDMENT

 

TO THE $287,500 PROMISORRY NOTE DATED September 15, 2017

 

This Amendment (this “Agreement”) is entered into as of March 16, 2018 (the “Effective Date”), by and between Airborne Wireless Network, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”) and Black Mountain Equities, Inc. (the “Holder”) collectively, the Company and Holder shall be referred to as the “Parties” and each a “Party.”

 

RECITALS:

 

WHEREAS, on September 15, 2017 (the “Issuance Date”), the Company and the Holder entered into a Promissory Note (the “Note”) pursuant to which the Company promised to pay $287,500 (the “Original Principal Amount”).

 

WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to enter into this Amendment to the Note.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the Parties hereby agree as follows:

 

1) The Maturity Date is hereby extended to June 14, 2018.

 

2) The Original Principal Amount is hereby amended to $305,500

 

ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE NOTE REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT.

 

Please indicate acceptance and approval of this amendment dated March 16, 2018 by signing below:

 

 


	/s/ Michael J. Warren			/s/ Adam Baker	
	Michael J. Warren 			Adam Baker	
	Airborne Wireless Network			Black Mountain Equities, Inc.	
	
Chief Executive Officer
	
	
	
Principal
From: tim.keys@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:53:10 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Timothy Keys, MS, DABR

Saint Louis, MO 63139
#### Carol L. NUSS, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.

No. 01-3042.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 25, 2001.

ORDER

The petitioner having failed to file the brief required by Federal Circuit Rule 31(a) within the time permitted by the rules, it is

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002




I, Donna
Brandin, the Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer
of Lightstone Value Plus Real Estate Investment Trust II, Inc. (the “Company”)
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:





(1) The
Special Financial Report of the Company for the period April 28, 2008 (date of
inception) through December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C
78m); and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Donna
Brandin


Donna
Brandin


Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer


(Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)


June 10,
2010
----

|  WELLS FARGO      Logo |   |  Corporate      Trust Services |
|-----------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------|
|                        |   |  MAC      N2702-011            |
|                        |   |  9062 Old      Annapolis Road  |
|                        |   |  Columbia, MD      21045       |
|                        |   |  410      884-2000             |
|                        |   |  410 715-2380      Fax         |
|                        |   |                                |
|                        |   |  Wells Fargo Bank,      N.A.   |

----

----

|  WELLS FARGO      Logo |   |  Corporate Trust Services     |
|-----------------------------|--------|------------------------------------|
|                        |   |  MAC      N2702-011           |
|                        |   |  9062 Old      Annapolis Road |
|                        |   |  Columbia, MD      21045      |
|                        |   |  410      884-2000            |
|                        |   |  410 715-2380      Fax        |
|                        |   |                               |
|                        |   |  Wells Fargo Bank,      N.A.  |

|  1 | Pooling      and Servicing Agreement for Banc of America Commercial Mortgage Inc.,      Commercial Mortgage      Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2008-1, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as      Trustee    |
|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|  2 | Pooling      and Servicing Agreement for Banc of America Commercial Mortgage Inc.,      Commercial Mortgage      Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2008-LS1, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as      Trustee. |

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Frank Pinero, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 205]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Nelson, J.), rendered December 7, 1993, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered. The facts have been considered and determined to have been established.

Reversal is mandated in this case by virtue of the Court of Appeals decision in *People v Antommarchi*(80 NY2d 247). The prosecutor and the defense counsel, in the presence of the court but in the absence of the defendant, questioned a prospective juror about his employment as an FBI agent and its potential influence on his objectivity. Such questioning of a prospective juror in the absence of the defendant has been held to be improper, and reversal is mandated, despite the absence of an objection by the defendant *(see, People v Antommarchi, supra,*at 250). Moreover, harmless error analysis is inapplicable *(People v Mehmedi,*69 NY2d 759; *People v Daniels,*213 AD2d 419).

We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Balletta, J. P., Rosenblatt, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.
# ^M S 

# Q U S . Departmen t 8° ° independenc e Ave. . S.W . o f Transportatio n Washington , D.C . 2059 1 Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n August 18 , 200 8 VI A FACSIMIL E AN D REGULA RMAI L Davi dM . Murray , Esq . Assistan t County Attorne y Miami-Dad e Count y P.O . Bo x 02550 4 Miami , Florid a33102-550 4 T :

— I

' —- I Michae l A . Pizzi , Esq . 1527 1 N.W . 6 0 Avenu e Suite 206 A -'c} j Miam i Lakes , Florid a3301 4 ^ ' g

'•••"' ' S RE : Alca , e t

al. , v . Miami-Dad e County FA A Docke t

No . 16-08-0 5 Reques t for Extensio n o f

Tim e Dear Messrs . Murra y an dPizzi : Counse l for

Responden t

Miami-Dad e County , viareques t serve dJul y 29 , 2008 , ha s requeste da n extensio n o f

tim e throug h Septembe r

19,200 8 t o file an Answe r t o th e 1 4 CF RPar t

1 6 Complain t

filedi n th e above-reference dmatter . Counse l advise s tha t Counse l fo r

th e Complainant s consente dt o an extensio n throug h Septembe r 19 , 2008 , premise do n th e Responden t

engagin g i n meaningfia

l discussion s wit h th e complainin g tenant s an dagreein g t o sta y pendin g litigatio n i n Miami-Dad e Count y unti l th e conclusio n o f th e FA A Par t

1 6 proceeding . Counse l for

Responden t

state s th e tw o condition s ar e acceptabl e t o th e Respondent . Althoug h Part

1 6 i s intende dt o expedit e substantiall y th e handlin g an ddispositio n o f airport

relate dcomplaints , th e Rule s o f Practic e fo r

Federall y Assiste dAirpor t Enforcemen t Proceedings , Fina l Rule , 6 1 Fed . Reg . 5399 8 (Octobe r 16 , 1996) , provid e tha t

a n extensio n o f tim e may b e grante dwher e necessar y o r appropriat e fo r

afai r an dcomplet e hearin g o f th e matter s before th e agency . Whil e asixty (60 ) day extensio n o f tim e wdl l delay issuanc e o f

th e Director' s Determination , th e denial o f sai dextensio n o f

tim e coul dresul t

i n prejudice i f

th e Responden t

i s unabl e t o adequatel y respond . I n renderin g it s decision , th e FA A may rel y entirel y o n th e complain t an d responsiv e pleadings . Par t 1 6 require s tha t

eac h part y shal l file document s sufficien t t o presen t

### al

l relevan t facts an dargumen

t necessar y fo r the FA A t o determine whethe

r the sponso

r i s i n compliance . Accordingly , Respondent' s reques t fo r a n extension through Septembe r 19 , 200 8 i s granted . Respondent' s Answe

r i s now due on o

r befor e Septembe

r 19 , 2008 . Th

e Complainant s ma

y file aRepl y within te n (10 ) day s o f

the dat e o f servic e o f the Answer . Sincerely , ElizabOT h Newma n Attorney , Airport s La

w Branch cc : Par t 1 6 Airpor t Proceeding s Docke

t ACO 10 0
Order Sealing Sentencing Memo PHIL BRENNAN, Esq. 

P.O. Box 22837 

Seattle, WA 98122 

(206) 372-5881 

1

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISCTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT TACOMA 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

THOMAS EVANS DUNIGAN, et. al. 

 Defendant. 

CASE NO. 05-5823 RBL 

Order Re Dunigan’s Motion to Seal 

Sentencing Memo 

Order 

Defendant Thomas Dunigan moves the Court to seal his sentencing memo. 

The Court has already ordered that the Government’s Sentencing memo be sealed. 

The reasons supporting that Order likewise apply to Mr. Dunigan’s sentencing 

memo. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Mr. Dunigan’s motion and his sentencing 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 20th day of June 2007 

 ARONALD B. LEIGHTON 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 Digitally Signed upon authorization (JAB) 

Presented By: 

By: /s/____________________________________ 

 PHIL BRENNAN, WSBA #25711* 

 Attorney for Def. Dunigan; Date: 6/19/07 

Case 3:05-cr-05823-RBL Document 256 Filed 06/20/07 Page 1 of 1
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER OF REMAND

PAGE - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

WILLIAM R. BURKETT, JR.,

Plaintiff,

v.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner 

of Social Security Administration,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. CV05-1856-RSM

ORDER OF REMAND

The Court, having reviewed plaintiff’s complaint, all papers and exhibits in support of

and opposition to that complaint, the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable James P.

Donohue, United States Magistrate Judge, and the remaining record, does hereby find and

ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) The final decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and the case is

REMANDED to the Social Security Administration for further proceedings

consistent with the Report and Recommendation; and

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to the parties and to Judge

Donohue.

DATED this 19 day of September 2006.

A

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:05-cv-01856-RSM Document 29 Filed 09/19/06 Page 1 of 1