alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.4





 Exhibit 10.4 

CONFIDENTIAL 
  

***Text Omitted and Filed Separately 

with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 

Confidential Treatment Requested 

Under 17 C.F.R. Sections 200.80(b)(4) 

and Rule 406 of the 

Securities Act of 1933, 
 as
amended. 
 CONFIDENTIAL 

Execution Copy 
 To 

Carlos M. Arruda 
 Sr Manager, Research Operations and 

Strategic Planning 
 Centocor, Inc. 

200 Great Valley Parkway 
 Mail Code: R-1-3 
 Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355 

USA 
 CONFIDENTIAL 

November 7, 2006 
 Re: First
amendment to the Amended and Restated Research and License Agreement (“Agreement”) effective as of December 22, 2004, between Centocor, Inc. (“CENTOCOR”) and MorphoSys
AG (“MORPHOSYS”), related to Appendix 1.33 and the transfer of new Ig expression vectors to CENTOCOR (“First Amendment”). 

Dear Mr. Arruda, 
 MORPHOSYS owns
[...***...] belonging to its [...***...] family, (each, a “[...***...]”) and CENTOCOR has manifested its interest in having access to such [...***...] under the Agreement. MORPHOSYS agrees to give CENTOCOR access to
such [...***...] under the Agreement. 
 MORPHOSYS and CENTOCOR hereby agree to amend Appendix 1.33 (MORPHOSYS HuCAL GOLD Library) of the
Agreement in order to add the [...***...] to MORPHOSYS Technology1, free of charge to CENTOCOR. Such amendment shall be effective as of the date of this letter as above mentioned, subject to
CENTOCOR’s countersignature below. Appendix 1.33 of the 
  

1 Unless defined herein or clearly indicated
otherwise, each capital term appearing in this letter shall have the meaning set forth in the Agreement 

  
 1/4 


 ***Confidential Treatment Requested 













 CONFIDENTIAL 
  

Agreement shall be deleted and replaced in its entirety by the Appendix 1.33 attached to this First Amendment. 

  
 2/4 


 ***Confidential Treatment Requested 













 CONFIDENTIAL 
  

If the foregoing terms are agreeable to CENTOCOR, please countersign and date this letter herebelow and return the original to MORPHOSYS. MORPHOSYS
shall, after receipt of such countersigned letter, transfer the Vectors to CENTOCOR, as further agreed upon between MORPHOSYS and CENTOCOR. 
 Best
regards, 
  

							
	 /s/ Dr. Elisabeth Thomassen-Wolf
	 		  	 /s/ Dr. Harald Watzka
	  	
				
	 Dr. Elisabeth Thomassen-Wolf
	 		  	 Dr. Harald Watzka
	  	
				
	 Manager, Alliance Management
	 		  	Director, Head of Alliance
Management	  	
				
	 MorphoSys AG
	 		  	 MorphoSys AG
	  	
				
	 Date:
	 		  	 Date:
	  	


  

									
	 By       /s/ [Illegible]
	 		 	 date
	 	 12/1/06
	 	
				
	 Title SrVP Discovery Research
	 		 		 	
					
	 Centocor, Inc.
	 		 		 		 	



  
 3/4 


 ***Confidential Treatment Requested 













 CONFIDENTIAL 
  

APPENDIX 1.33 
 MORPHOSYS HuCAL GOLD Library

 [...***...] 

  
 4/4 


 ***Confidential Treatment Requested
From: tsm1972@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:07:06 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Suzy Moreno

Shreveport, LA 71106
Case 3:06-cv-05044-FDB Document 4 Filed 03/01/06 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-05044-FDB Document 4 Filed 03/01/06 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Danny
Elbaz   the Chief Executive Officer,  and Director of The
Mobile Star Corp  , certifies, under the standards set forth and
solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on
Form 10-K/A of the Registrant for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-K/A fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and  results of operations of the Registrant.





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.




Date:
      October 6, 2010
            The
      Mobile Star CorpBy:
            /s/Danny ElbazName:Danny
      Elbaz
              Title:    Chief Executive Officer,
      and  Director




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Before the Third Division,

August 18, 1955

No. 59263.

protests 185282-K, etc. (Rochester).

#### Daniel De Lelys *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Swift & Company et al.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 212, C. D. 1655), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**HYDRODYNEX, INC.**

**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS**

In connection with the periodic Report of HYDRODYNEX, INC., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the period ended May 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Jerod Edington, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: September 15, 2014

 

/s/ Jerod Edington

Jerod Edington

President and Chief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operation Officer,

VP, Treasurer, Secretary, Director
Before the First Division,

December 21, 1964

No. *68962.*

#### Cosmos *Products Co.*et al. *v.*United States,

protests 63/9166, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of electric motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 66961, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: hphollow@juno.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:55:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ella Mae Hedgepeth

, 10940-7401
Statement of Abengoa at EPA hearing on proposed 111d regulations Denver, CO July 30, 2014

My name is Ryan Shininger. I am the Director of Engineering for Abengoa Solar. Our US headquarters are in Lakewood, Colorado. Abengoa applies innovative technology solutions for sustainability in the energy and environment sectors, generating electricity from renewable resources, converting biomass into biofuels and producing drinking water from sea water. Abengoa's solar business unit develops and applies technologies to generate electricity from the sun using mostly solar thermal electric technologies, also known as Concentrating Solar Power or "CSP."

Abengoa supports the Environmental Protection Agency's use of Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from the power sector and EPA's approach that provides states with the flexibility to take advantage of solar as part of a diverse compliance portfolio. We also support including solar in the definition of the Best System of Emission Reduction (BSER), as solar is a suite of proven technologies that can play a significant role in helping states reach compliance.

In particular, Concentrating Solar Power (CSP) can be a significant part of Western states' compliance plans. CSP uses mirrors to concentrate the radiation from the sun to generate steam to turn a conventional steam turbine. This thermal energy can also be stored to produce electricity when it is needed, night or day.

A CSP plant with thermal energy storage offers all of the services provided by fossil-fueled plants — without carbon and other emissions. CSP plants with thermal energy storage can provide operational attributes and other grid services that can assist utilities and grid operators in maintaining grid reliability. CSP can be combined with conventional power plants to form hybrid plants. Hybridization lowers dependency on conventional fuel and cuts CO2 emissions from fossil plants. CSP also diversifies the energy mix and hedges against the volatility of natural gas.

This technology is commercially available today. Abengoa's Solana is a 280-MW CSP plant with 6 hours of thermal energy storage, providing dispatchable energy after sunset or when cloudy. Solana delivers enough electricity to supply approximately 70,000 Arizona households and will prevent the emission of more than 475,000 tons of CO2 into the atmosphere every year. For example, if a power plant like Solana were to displace a coal plant it would prevent the emission of more than 1 million tons of CO2
every year.

In addition to clean energy, CSP creates jobs and economic growth throughout the US. Over 70 percent of the construction components, products, and services for our Solana and Mojave CSP plants were sourced from companies here in the US, involving 300 companies from 31 states.

For Abengoa, sustainability is the cornerstone of company strategy and we are convinced that CSP with thermal energy storage can contribute significantly to strong and diverse 111(d) compliance plans.

Thank you 

### i t 7,e11-1 

## SE-t` a 146 6(t-



## - 5 

## k ; So 

### fo.r. ckbe /75 oc: 01 1 1 7 2-0 _ - 7 4 ( 1 

### ( tn0 

### ;LC,
Case No. 8,826.

#### McINTIRE v. WOOD.

[Cited in U. S. v. Kendall, Case No. 15,517. Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible. See same case, 7 Cranch (11 U. S.) 504.]
Order entered October 28 , 2013

In The



## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 13

- 000 25

- CV

ERICA STENSON, APPEL LANT

V.

HIGH POINTE VILLAGE, APPELLEE

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 4

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 12

- 07 145

- D



### O RDER

As the court reporter has informed us appellant has failed to request a reporter’s record,

we ORDER the appeal submitted without the reporter’s record. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3( c )( 1 ).

Appellant shall file her brief within thirt y days of the date of this order.

/Elizabeth Lang

- Miers/

ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                       1,418,410
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,364,697
<ALLOWANCES>                                    32,000
<INVENTORY>                                    792,627
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,368,941
<PP&E>                                       2,215,900
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,111,709
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,656,217
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          217,026
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        77,275
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,241,916
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,656,217
<SALES>                                      4,161,268
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,161,268
<CGS>                                        2,048,189
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,048,189
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 7,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,357,921
<INCOME-TAX>                                   425,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            932,921
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   932,921
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .24
        


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1685

BARBARA SCHWARZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION; FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA98-154-PJM) Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 22, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Barbara Schwarz, Appellant Pro Se. Larry David Adams, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Barbara Schwarz appeals a district court order granting Defendants summary judgment in an action filed under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Schwarz v. United States Parole Comm’n , No. CA-98-154-PJM (D. Md. May 1, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 15

- 00492

- CR

George MUNOZ

, Jr.,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR5575

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE MARTINEZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED January 4, 2017.

_____________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NorthernTechnologies International Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ending May 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Matthew C. Wolsfeld, ChiefFinancial Officer and Corporate Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 
| (1)    |   | The  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                 |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                   |
| (2)    |   | The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 
|                                                                 |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                            |   |
| Matthew C. Wolsfeld, CPA                                        |   |
| Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary                 |   |
| (principal financial officer and principal accounting  officer) |   |
|                                                            |   |
| Circle  Pines, Minnesota                                        |   |
| July 14, 2009                                              |   |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 654 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                       October 9, 2007.
Whereas, on September 16, 2007, the Phoenix Mercury won the 2007 Women's 
        National Basketball Association (WNBA) Championship after cruising to 
        victory over the defending champion Detroit Shock with a strong final 
        score of 108 to 92 in the fifth and deciding game of the series;
Whereas this is the Mercury's first WNBA Championship since the team's formation 
        in 1997 as one of the WNBA's original 8 teams;
Whereas the Mercury is the first team to win the WNBA Championship on the road;
Whereas, after only 2 seasons as head coach, the superb leadership and up-tempo 
        style of Coach Paul Westhead guided the Mercury to this Championship;
Whereas, after only 2 years in the WNBA, Cappie Pondexter scored 26 points in 
        the final game of the series and was chosen as the Most Valuable Player 
        for the WNBA Finals;
Whereas Cappie Pondexter was ably assisted by Penny Taylor, who scored 30 
        points, and Diana Taurasi, who scored 17 points, in addition to 
        outstanding efforts from teammates Tangela Smith, Kelly Miller, Kelly 
        Mazzante, Kelly Schumacher, Belinda Snell, Olympia Scott, Jennifer 
        Derevjanik, and Jennifer Lacy;
Whereas this impressive win makes Coach Paul Westhead the first coach in history 
        to capture both the NBA Championship and WNBA Championship;
Whereas the Mercury entered the WNBA Playoffs with their best record in 
        franchise history at 23-11 and after 6 years of having missed inclusion 
        in the Playoffs;
Whereas there was no doubt who was taking control of the final game as the 
        Mercury led by as many as 14 points in the first quarter, posted an 
        impressive record by shooting 73.3 percent for the first quarter, and 
        led by as many as 18 points in the second quarter; and
Whereas the city of Phoenix joins the Phoenix Mercury owner, Robert Sarver, in 
        taking enormous pride in the accomplishment of this outstanding team: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives congratulates the Phoenix 
Mercury and Coach Paul Westhead for winning the 2007 Women's National Basketball 
Association Championship.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 6, 2010

0929 

# Order

October 6, 2010

141153

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141153 COA: 285666 Wayne CC: 05-009901-FC JAMES CHRISTOPHER SCHNEIDER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 6, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
No. 63369.

Suit 4989.

#### United States *v.*S. H. Kress & Co.

C.D. 2037 affirmed July 10, 1959. C.A.D. 716.
No. P67/123.

#### Famous Jobbing Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 63/17176, etc. (Los Angeles).

Oliver, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issue herein is the specific issue in *United States*v. *Weather-Rite Sportswear Co., Inc.*(52 CCPA 7, C.A.D. 848), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.