alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
33.2





MANAGEMENT’S
ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE





Management
of the Agency and Trust division of Citibank, N.A. (or “Company”) is
responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in
Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange
Commission.





Management
has determined that the servicing criteria in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB are
applicable in regard to the servicing platform for the period as
follows:





Platform:  Publicly-issued
(i.e., transaction-level
reporting initially required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended) automobile loan or lease-backed securities and student loan-backed
securities issued on or after January 1, 2006, for which the Company provides
trustee and paying agent services (the “Platform”)





Applicable Servicing
Criteria:  All servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d), to
the extent required by Item 1122(d) servicing criteria in regards to the
activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform as to any
transaction, except for the following criteria: 1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(iv),
1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(vi)-1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i)
and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv), which management has determined are not
applicable to the activities the Company performs with respect to the Platform
(the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”).





Period:  Twelve
months ended December 31, 2008 (the “Period”).





With
respect to the Platform as of and for the Period, the Company’s management
provides the following assertion of compliance with respect to the Applicable
Servicing Criteria:




·
            The
      Company’s management is responsible for assessing the Company’s compliance
      with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria.




·
            The
      Company’s management has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing
      Criteria.  In making this assessment, management used the
      criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph
      (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.




·
            Based
      on such assessment, the Company has complied, in all material respects,
      with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria.




KPMG LLP,
a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report with
respect to management’s assertion of compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria as of and for the Period.





CITIBANK,
N.A.





By:  /s/ KAREN
MONTBACH




Its: Managing
Director


Dated:
February 27, 2009
No. 63361.

protests 317917-K, etc. (New York).

#### Miya Co., Inc. *v*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Shoji panels similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United Enterprises et al.*v. *United States*(41 Cust. Ct. 73, C.D. 2023), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 ORDER

Page - 1

HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

VINCENT DANIEL HOPPER,

 Plaintiff,

v.

MYERS, et al,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5680RBL

ORDER

THIS MATTER comes on before the above-entitled Court upon Plaintiff’s “Request That You

Consider Affirming Certain Facts Relative to Marks v. Melendez, 05-5680 RBL JKA”. [Dkt. #200]. 

Having considered the entirety of the records and file herein, the Court finds and rules as follows:

This matter is currently on appeal, and, as such, the Court lacks jurisdiction to consider this motion. 

Plaintiff’s “Request” is therefore STRICKEN.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

The Clerk shall send uncertified copies of this order to all counsel of record, and to any party

appearing pro se.

Dated this 23rd day of December, 2008.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
September 17, 1959

No. 63370.

Suit 5003.

#### United States *v.*A. N. Deringer, Inc.

A.R.D. 102. (Appeal dismissed June 24, 1959.)
No. 57734.

protests 168057-K, etc. (Baltimore).

#### F. Burkart Manufacturing Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of istle or Tampico fiber the same in all material respects as *363that the subject of *F. Burhart Manufacturing Company*v. *United States*(31 Cust. Ct. 7, C. D. 1537), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 693 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 693

           Condemning the recent actions of the Ku Klux Klan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 27, 2007

 Mr. Serrano submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
           Condemning the recent actions of the Ku Klux Klan.

Whereas the Ku Klux Klan has long preached hate against people of an ethnicity, 
        race, or religion differing from its members;
Whereas the Ku Klux Klan has recently distributed hate-filled, anti-immigrant 
        fliers in Manassas, Virginia, and other places;
Whereas the distribution of these flyers is yet another attempt to demonize 
        minorities to further the Ku Klux Klan's own extremist philosophy;
Whereas the Ku Klux Klan violently opposed the Civil Rights Movement by 
        terrorizing innocent people;
Whereas civil society must always strongly denounce the pernicious racism and 
        violence espoused by the Ku Klux Klan;
Whereas the terrible actions of the Ku Klux Klan highlights the need to be more 
        welcoming to immigrants; and
Whereas the Ku Klux Klan has long used hate and violence to spread fear among 
        people they view as antithetical to their disturbing vision of the 
        future of the United States as a place that excludes all differences of 
        belief, nationality, or race: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives strongly condemns the 
Ku Klux Klan for its long history of hate and for its most recent 
expression through the targeting of immigrant groups.
                                 <all>
```
April 27, 1965

No. 69282.

#### Sphinx Import Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 64/13671.

Protest dismissed March 16, 1965.

Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
From: jsherwood1149@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:12:22 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

John Sherwood

Rogersville, MO 65742
No. 66531.

#### M. S. Cowen Co. *v.*United States,

protest 282314-KS (Seattle).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *The Best Foods, Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 163, C.A.D. 751), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT JOHN J. 

CUNNINGHAM’S MOTION TO CONTINUE 

SENTENCING HEARING - 1 

LAW OFFICES OF STEPHAN R. ILLA, INC. P.S. 

600 FIRST AVENUE, SUITE 433 

SEATTLE, WA 98104 

(206) 464-4142

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Hon. Ricardo Martinez 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT SEATTLE 

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

JOHN J. CUNNINGHAM, 

 Defendant. 

No. CR05-417 RSM 

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT JOHN J.

CUNNINGHAM’S MOTION TO 

CONTINUE SENTENCING HEARING 

 DEFENDANT JOHN J. CUNNINGHAM’s motion to continue his sentencing hearing 

came on regularly for hearing, and, the court being fully advised, 

 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Mr. Cunningham’s sentencing hearing is continued to 

Friday, September 29, 2006. 

ORDERED this 6th day of July, 2006. 

A

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

Submitted by: 

LAW OFFICES OF STEPHAN R. ILLA

Stephan R. Illa 

WSBA No. 15793 

Attorney for Defendant John J. Cunningham 

Case 2:05-cr-00417-RSM Document 267 Filed 07/06/06 Page 1 of 1
ANNUAL
STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE





OFFICER'S
CERTIFICATION








Re:     Banc
of America Commercial Mortgage Inc.


Commercial
Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates


Series
2007-4








In
connection with the above-referenced transaction the undersigned officer, on
behalf of Bank of America, National Association, hereby certifies that (i) a
review of the Servicing activities, for the period ending December 31, 2008 and
of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of
November 1, 2007 has been made under my supervision, and (ii) to the best of my
knowledge, based on such review, Bank of America, National Association has
fulfilled all of its obligations under this agreement in all material respects
throughout the aforementioned period.








Bank of
America, National Association








/s/
Janice M. Smith


Janice M.
Smith


Managing
Director








/s/
H. Michael Lumadue


H.
Michael Lumadue


Principal
No. P67/307.

#### The Daher Company, Inc. *v.*United States, protests 65/7560 and 65/12586 (New York).

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of containers of tinplate, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, and not containing electrical heating elements, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Fabius & Co., Inc.,*and *Daher Company, Inc.*v. *United States*(55 Cust. Ct. 305, C.D. 2595), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: dianehazen39@q.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:49:33 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Diane Hazen

Mesa, AZ 85207
From: kman1701@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:38:00 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

William Kolkman

Grandville, MI 49418
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Dated this 5th day of January , 2006

/S/ PETER H. VOELKER 

 Deputy Clerk

MINUTE ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the WESTERN DISTRICT of WASHINGTON

BONNIE J. ORR and RUFUS D. ORR,

 Plaintiff,

)

)

)

vs. )

) C05-1610 JPD

CITY of SEATTLE,

 Defendant.

)

)

) MINUTE ORDER

The following Minute Order is made at the direction of the Court, the Honorable 

James P. Donohue, United States Magistrate Judge:

The parties have filed a stipulated motion to extend the deadline for disclosure of expert

witness testimony from January 6, 2006, to April 15, 2006 (dkt #11). Having considered the

motion and the balance of the record, the Court GRANTS the parties’ motion. The deadline for

disclosure of expert witness testimony under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16(a)(2) shall be

extended to April 15, 2006. All other deadlines set by the Court, including deadlines for

discovery, dispositive motions, and trial, shall remain in effect. No further changes to the

schedule will be granted without a showing of good cause.

Case 2:05-cv-01610-JPD Document 12 Filed 01/05/06 Page 1 of 1
#### Charles CASON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. William D. CATOE, Director of South Carolina Department of Corrections; Charles M. Condon, Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 01-6511.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 31, 2001.

Decided June 11, 2001.

*70Charles Cason, pro se. Derrick K. McFarland, Office of the Attorney General of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, for appellees.

Before WILKINS, TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Charles Cason seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *Cason v. Catoe,*No. CA-00-1505-3-20 (D.S.C. March 20, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 189 (Monday, October 2, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 67755]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21669]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

[Document Identifier: CMS-R-26, CMS-R- 185, CMS-116, CMS-2746 and CMS-
10261]


Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB 
Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, HHS.

ACTION: Notice; partial withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On Monday, September 25, 2023, the Centers for Medicare & 
Medicaid Services (CMS) published a notice document entitled, ``Agency 
Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB Review; Comment 
Request.'' That notice invited public comments on five separate 
information collection requests, under Document Identifiers: CMS-R-26, 
CMS-R- 185, CMS-116, CMS-2746 and CMS-10261. Through the publication of 
this document, we are withdrawing the portion of the notice requesting 
public comment on the information collection request titled, ``Clinical 
Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) Regulations.'' Form number: 
CMS-R-26 (OMB control number: 0938-0612). We are also withdrawing the 
portion of the notice requesting public comment on the information 
collection request titled, ``Granting and Withdrawal of Deeming 
Authority to Private Nonprofit Accreditation Organizations and CLIA 
Exemption Under State Laboratory Programs.'' Form number: CMS-R-185 
(OMB control number 0938-0686).

DATES: The original comment period for the document that published on 
September 25, 2023, remains in effect and ends October 25, 2023.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    In FR document, 2023-20739, published on September 25, 2023 (88 FR 
65689), we are withdrawing item 1 '' Clinical Laboratory Improvement 
Amendments (CLIA) Regulations'' which begins on page 65689. We are also 
withdrawing item 2 '' Granting and Withdrawal of Deeming Authority to 
Private Nonprofit Accreditation Organizations and CLIA Exemption Under 
State Laboratory Programs.'' which begin on page 65690. These items 
were published in error. Both items will be republished at a later 
date, thereby providing the public a full 30-day comment period as 
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et 
seq.).

    Dated: September 27, 2023.
William N. Parham, III,
Director, Paperwork Reduction Staff, Office of Strategic Operations and 
Regulatory Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2023-21669 Filed 9-29-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      654809 
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              1873817 
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           3302701 
<PP&E>                                       78247 
<DEPRECIATION>                               16119 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             3648365 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      2211673 
<BONDS>                                     650000 
<COMMON>                                  22073002 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               3648365 
<SALES>                                    4152602 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           4152602 
<CGS>                                      2925874 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               320078 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           13500 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         906650 
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                895618 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .06 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .06 
        

</TABLE>
No. 63357.

protest 58/15726 (New York).

#### We Moderns, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the proper classification of the merchandise is as claimed in the protest, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.