alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 183 (Friday, September 22, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 65360]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20593]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Upper Lake Ranger District; California; Pine Mountain Late-
Successional Reserve Habitat Protection and Enhancement Project; 
Withdrawal of Draft Environmental Impact Statement

AGENCY: Forest Service, Agriculture (USDA).

ACTION: Notice; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Mendocino National Forest is withdrawing its draft 
environmental impact statement (DEIS) for the Pine Mountain Late-
Successional Reserve Habitat Protection and Enhancement Project on the 
Upper Lake Ranger District. The Mendocino National Forest's decision to 
withdraw the DEIS is due to major changes to the landscape after the 
2018 Ranch Fire. Multiple challenges delayed the publication of this 
notification including the government furlough in 2019, Covid pandemic 
starting in 2020, the 2020 1-million-acre August Complex wildfire and a 
shift in forest priorities to recover the acres burned in the August 
Complex.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions concerning this notice 
should be directed to Upper Lake District Ranger Frank Aebly at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3b5d495a5550155a5e5957427b4e485f5a155c544d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="98feeaf9f6f3b6f9fdfaf4e1d8edebfcf9b6fff7ee">[email protected]</span></a> or 707-275-1401. Individuals who use 
telecommunication devices for the deaf or hard-of-hearing (TDD) may 
call the Federal Relay Service at 800-877-8339, 24 hours a day, every 
day of the year, including holidays.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Mendocino National Forest is withdrawing 
its DEIS for the Pine Mountain Late-Successional Reserve Habitat 
Protection and Enhancement Project. The original Notice of Intent was 
published in the Federal Register on May 20, 2014 (79 FR 28883), and 
the Notice of Availability was published in the Federal Register on May 
5, 2017 (82 FR 21228).

    Dated: September 15, 2023.
Troy Heithecker,
Associate Deputy Chief, National Forest System.
[FR Doc. 2023-20593 Filed 9-21-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3411-15-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 65120.

#### M. S. Cowen & Company *v.*United States,

protests 265986-K and 265979-K (Laredo).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *The Best Foods, Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 163, C.A.D. 751), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JOSE LUIS REYNA-ROBLES, a.k.a. Jose

Reyna-Robles,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-10093

D.C. No. 4:09-cr-02546-RCC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Raner C. Collins, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 15, 2011** 

Before: CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

Jose Luis Reyna-Robles appeals from the sentence of 13 months and one

day imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for reentry after deportation, in

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and

FILED

JUN 24 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-10093

we affirm. 

Reyna-Robles contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable

because he should have been granted a departure or variance based on cultural

assimilation. In light of the totality of the circumstances and the 18 U.S.C.

§ 3553(a) factors, Reyna-Robles’s sentence within the Guidelines range is

substantively reasonable. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). 

AFFIRMED.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

STEVEN T. MILLER,

Petitioner,

v.

GARY FLEMING,

Respondent.

Case No. C05-5661FDB

ORDER

The petitioner in this action is seeking federal habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

2254. This case has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C.

§§ 636 (b) (1) (A) and 636 (b) (1) (B) and Local Magistrates’ Rules MJR 3 and MJR 4.

The petitioner filed this petition and on the same day moved to stay the action as he is

currently in state court litigating issues related to his conviction in a personal restraint petition. (Dkt.

# 5 and 6). The court entered a show cause order and explained:

The Untied States Supreme Court has recently addressed the stay and

abeyance of habeas corpus petitions. Rhines v. Weber, ___ U.S. ___, 125 S. Ct.

1528. A district Court has discretion to stay a petition, but the courts discretion has

had limits placed on it by the passage of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death

Penalty Act, AEDPA. The stay and abeyance process should only be used when there

is good cause for not exhausting the issue prior to filing the petition.

Petitioner was directed to show cause why the petition should be stayed on or before

Case 3:05-cv-05661-FDB Document 8 Filed 03/13/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

February 17th, 2006. Petitioner has not responded to the court’s order. The motion to stay is

DENIED. By separate Report and Recommendation the court will recommend this petition be

dismissed without prejudice as the issues raised are unexhausted by petitioners admission.

The Court Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to petitioner.

DATED this 13th day of March, 2006.

/S/ J. Kelley Arnold

J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-05661-FDB Document 8 Filed 03/13/06 Page 2 of 2
H. Res. 299 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

April 24, 2007. 

Whereas child abuse and neglect continue to pose a serious 

threat to our Nation’s children; 

Whereas according to the most recent annual estimates, 

3,600,000 children were the subject of child abuse and 

neglect investigations in 2005, an increase of 462,000 

children from 2001; 

Whereas more than 899,000 children were found to be the 

victims of abuse and neglect in 2005; 

Whereas as of the end of 2005, approximately 513,000 children were unable to live safely with their families and instead were living in foster homes and institutions; 

Whereas an estimated 1,460 children died because of abuse 

and neglect in 2005; 

Whereas more than 75 percent of the children who died because of abuse and neglect in 2005 were under the age 

of 4; 

Whereas studies have found that abused and neglected children tend to be at least 25 percent more likely than the 

general population of children to experience problems 

such as delinquency, teen pregnancy, low academic 

achievement, drug use, and mental illness; 
2 

•HRES 299 EH 

Whereas a National Institute of Justice study indicated abuse 

or neglect during childhood increased the likelihood of arrest as a juvenile by 59 percent and adult criminal behavior by 28 percent; 

Whereas studies have found that abusive parents often were 

themselves the victims of child abuse; 

Whereas it is estimated that approximately 1⁄3 of abused and 

neglected children will eventually victimize their own children; 

Whereas child abuse and neglect can have long-term economic 

and societal costs through the increased use of the juvenile and adult criminal justice systems, the increased 

health care costs resulting from mental illness, substance 

abuse, and domestic violence, and the loss of economic 

productivity due to unemployment and underemployment; 

and 

Whereas it is appropriate to designate the month of April, 

2007 as National Child Abuse Prevention Month: Now, 

therefore, be it 

Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that Congress should increase public awareness of child 

abuse and neglect and should continue to work with the 

States to reduce the incidence of child abuse and neglect 

through such programs as the Child Welfare Services and 

Promoting Safe and Stable Families programs. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
No. P67/76.

#### Henry A. Wess, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 64/16606 (Cleveland).

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of rainwear similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *Weather-Rite Sportswear*Go., *Inc.*(52 CCPA 7, C.A.D. 848), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 507 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Save for Retirement Week. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 20, 2007 

Ms. SCHWARTZ (for herself and Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Financial 

Services 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Save for 

Retirement Week. 

Whereas Americans are living longer and the cost of retirement continues to rise, in part because the number of 

employers providing retiree health coverage continues to 

decline, and retiree health care costs continue to increase 

at a rapid pace; 

Whereas Social Security remains the bedrock of retirement 

income for the great majority of the people of the United 

States, but was never intended by Congress to be the sole 

source of retirement income for families; 

Whereas recent data from the Employee Benefit Research Institute indicates that, in the United States, less than 2⁄3

of workers or their spouses are currently saving for retirement and that the actual amount of retirement savVerDate Aug 31 2005 00:15 Aug 03, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR507.IH HR507

cnoel on PRODPC75 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 507 IH 

ings of workers lags far behind the amount that will be 

needed to adequately fund their retirement years; 

Whereas many workers may not be aware of their options for 

saving for retirement or may not have focused on the importance of, and need for, saving for their own retirement; 

Whereas many employees have available to them through 

their employers access to defined benefit and defined contribution plans to assist them in preparing for retirement, yet many of them may not be taking advantage of 

employer-sponsored defined contribution plans at all or to 

the full extent allowed by the plans as prescribed by Federal law; 

Whereas all workers, including public- and private-sector employees, employees of tax-exempt organizations, and selfemployed individuals, can benefit from increased awareness of the need to save adequate funds for retirement 

and the availability of tax-preferred savings vehicles to 

assist them in saving for retirement; and 

Whereas October 21 through October 27, 2007, has been designated as ‘‘National Save for Retirement Week’’: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of National 

3 Save for Retirement Week, including raising public 

4 awareness of the importance to save adequately for 

5 their retirement and the availability of employer6 sponsored retirement savings vehicles; and 


cnoel on PRODPC75 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 507 IH 

1 (2) calls on the States, localities, schools, uni2 versities, nonprofit organizations, businesses, other 

3 entities, and the people of the United States to ob4 serve this week with appropriate programs and ac5 tivities with the goal of increasing the retirement 

6 savings for all the people of the United States. 

Æ 


cnoel on PRODPC75 with BILLS
Before the Second Division,

July 28, 1955

No. 59236.

protests 248529-K, etc. (New York).

#### Artmart Linen Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

*223Opinion by

Foed, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of doilies similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 58520, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: charface@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:18:14 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Charlene Tache

Plano, TX 75024
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
ALLIED HEALTHCARE PRODUCTS, INC.
Financial Data Schedule for Second Quarter 
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                         1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                          1
<CASH>                               1,406
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                       26,920
<ALLOWANCES>                           412
<INVENTORY>                         28,040
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    60,338
<PP&E>                              21,657
<DEPRECIATION>                       2,663
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     135,788
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               21,196
<BONDS>                             50,068
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<COMMON>                               101
<OTHER-SE>                          63,051
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       135,788
<SALES>                             28,389
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    28,389
<CGS>                               19,664
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       19,664
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     8,233
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   1,409
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       (946)
<INCOME-TAX>                          (390)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   (556)
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                          (556)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In   connection   with  the  Annual  Report  of  Triangle  Alternative  Network
Incorporated (the "Company")  on  Form  10-K for the period ending December 31,
2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission  on  the date hereof
(the   "Report"),  Lyle  J  Mortensen,   Chief  Executive Officer,  and   Gerry
Shirren,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company, respectively,  do  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section  1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his and her knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,  in  all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: April 15, 2010

/s/ Lyle J Mortensen
-----------------------
By: Lyle J Mortensen
Its: Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Gerry Shirren
-----------------
By: Gerry Shirren
Its: Chief Financial Officer
Appendix J – Comment

J.CO-176

CO12 Trout Unlimited CO12-1 We believe the EIS, in section 4.3.2, in

the impacts of the proposed pipeline crand proposed measures to avoid, reducAs explained in section 4.3.2, potentiacrossed or adjacent to the pipeline woumeasures specified in Pacific Connectocomment IND3-1. 

CO12-2 We disagree. The FERC staff has dev

appropriately and reasonably avoid, menvironmental impacts resulting from the proposed Project. In addition, Pacmitigation to offset unavoidable impacsection 4.3 of the final EIS. 

CO12-3 See response to comment IND6-2. Th

EIS include an analysis of alternatives River. The EIS discusses the alternativRogue River in section 3.4.2.13. ShouPacific Connector would be required to and authorizations for in-water construagencies prior to commencing an open 
Appendix J – Comment

J.CO-177

CO12 Trout Unlimited (continued) 

CO12-4 Access roads for the pipeline would be 

USFS), state, county, and private roadpipeline alignment. Temporary access access roads (PARs) would be construto minimize potential impacts. All TAreplanted upon completion of construclandowner or agency requirements. PAunavoidable, permanent impacts, convvegetation to roads. Most of the PARs Pacific Connector’s permanent easemelands would be subject to the POD preUSFS and BLM. All road maintenancimprovements would be required to corequirements. No maintenance or impon any road not authorized for use and 

CO12-5 The potential impacts of the proposed 

of coho salmon are addressed in sectioresponse to comment IND3-1. 

CO12-6 Potential sources of hydrostatic test wa

Pipeline are listed in table 2.4.2.1-2, anlocations are listed in table 2.4.2.1-3 anThe potential impact of hydrostatic tesaquatic organisms is discussed in secti

CO12-7 See response to comment IND3-1. We 

EIS is inadequate. The EIS adheres to complying with the NEPA and identifiadequate detail. 
Appendix J – Comment

J.CO-178

CO13 Citizens Against LNG, Inc
From: mksandford@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: About RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:28:12 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Maryellen Sandford

Lansing, MI 48912
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (i)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.
 Dated: August 31, 2005
    /s/ SETH R. JOHNSONSeth R. JohnsonChief Executive Officer
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc.
(Principal Executive Officer) Dated: August 31, 2005
    /s/ GERALD M. CHANEYGerald M. ChaneySenior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc.
(Principal Financial Officer)