alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-2264

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JACOB WAYNE LONG,

Claimant - Appellant,

and

$1197.00 US CURRENCY; ONE 1967 CAMARO

CHEVROLET, Vin #124377N13878; ONE 1997

KAWASAKI 4-WHEELER, Vin #JKAVFKB12WB500920;

ONE 1991 MAZDA SUV, Vin #4F2CU44XMUM12755; ONE

1987 ITASCA CHEVROLET R/V CAMPER, Vin

#1GBKP37W7H3328434,

Defendants.

No. 07-1133

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RONALD LONG,

Claimant - Appellant,

and
- 2 -

$1197.00 US CURRENCY; ONE 1967 CAMARO

CHEVROLET, Vin #124377N13878; ONE 1997

KAWASAKI 4-WHEELER, Vin #JKAVFKB12WB500920;

ONE 1991 MAZDA SUV, Vin #4F2CU44XMUM12755; ONE

1987 ITASCA CHEVROLET R/V CAMPER, Vin

#1GBKP37W7H3328434,

Defendants.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, Senior

District Judge. (1:00-cv-00164-WLO)

Submitted: June 15, 2007 Decided: July 10, 2007

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jacob Wayne Long and Ronald Long, Appellants Pro Se. Lynne P.

Klauer, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Jacob W. Long and Ronald

Long appeal the district court’s order denying their motions to set

aside default judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. United States v. Long and United States v.

$1197.00 US Currency, No. 1:00-cv-00164-WLO (M.D.N.C. Aug. 31, 2006

& Sept. 1, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 64524.

#### Isbrandtsen Co. of Calif. and Arthur J. Fritz & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 59/3979 (San Francisco).

*260Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of birch plywood, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 58243.

protests 212613-K and 218554-K (New York).

#### Melville Boyd, Trustee for Arthur Doniger Paper Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to the paper napkins the subject of *Freund Mayer & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 123, C. A. D. 474). Upon the agreed statement of *308facts and following the cited authority, it was held that the merchandise is dutiable at 15 percent under paragraph *1413,*as modified, *supra.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR HOOVER'S INC. FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          16,575
<SECURITIES>                                       127
<RECEIVABLES>                                      796
<ALLOWANCES>                                        98
<INVENTORY>                                         16
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,525
<PP&E>                                           2,248
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,086
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  19,961
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,846
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            85
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,904
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    19,961
<SALES>                                          3,165
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,165
<CGS>                                            1,451
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,451
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,618
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  12
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,812)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,812)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,812)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.25)


</TABLE>
From: mgbedard@juno.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:26:02 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

Please rescind the unjust and coercive mandate for all contraceptives and sterilization procedures to be

covered by private health insurance with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse that part, then

please expand conscience protections for any organizations providing individual or group insurance and

have moral or religious objections. I strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on

Americans especially for drugs and devices I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion

(such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization or business having moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you to reverse

course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory preventive services.

Sincerely,

MICHAEL BEDARD

Melbourne, FL 32940
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

SHOW CAUSE ORDER

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

NATHAN LORING,

Petitioner, 

v.

ALICE PAYNE,

Respondent.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C05-1599-JLR-JPD

SHOW CAUSE ORDER

Petitioner is an inmate at the McNeil Island Corrections Center in Steilacoom,

Washington who has filed a pro se 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus. Dkt.

No. 4. By order dated March 24, 2006, this Court determined that the petition presented both

exhausted and unexhausted claims. Dkt. No. 13. The Court therefore gave petitioner the

option to (1) amend his petition to proceed only with his exhausted claims, (2) withdraw the

entire petition and resubmit it upon exhausting his remaining claims, or (3) show good cause as

to why the Court should stay the entire petition pending the exhaustion of his unexhausted

claims. Id. 

In response, petitioner moved the Court to stay and abey his petition, so that he could

exhaust his unexhausted claims in state court. Dkt. No. 14. On May 15, 2006, the Court

granted this request and ordered that petitioner’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition be held in abeyance,

enabling petitioner to make every effort to properly exhaust his claims and/or verify that he was

Case 2:05-cv-01599-RAJ Document 18 Filed 09/21/06 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

SHOW CAUSE ORDER

PAGE -2

procedurally barred from doing so. Dkt. No. 17. Importantly, petitioner was ordered to advise

the Court of the status of his petition no later than August 18, 2006. 

No status report was filed by petitioner. In fact, the Court has not heard from petitioner

since his May 2, 2006 motion for a stay and abeyance, and the Court has no independent

knowledge of the status of petitioner’s state court proceedings. The Court therefore ORDERS

petitioner to SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be dismissed. Petitioner shall file his

response with the Court no later than Monday, October 23, 2006. The Clerk is directed to

send a copy of this order to the parties.

DATED this 21st day of September, 2006.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:05-cv-01599-RAJ Document 18 Filed 09/21/06 Page 2 of 2
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Socorro VELETA-ENRIQUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-10412.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Aug. 17, 2005.

Denise B. Williams, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Lubbock, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

David E. Sloan, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Northern District of Texas, Lubbock, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Socorro Veleta-Enriquez raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal *379offense. The Government’s motion for *summary*affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
No. 61504.

#### Felix Lorenzoni et al. *v.*United States,

protests 243292-K, etc. (New York).

*426Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of marble slabs similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *General Shipping & Trading Co. et al.*(44 C. C. P. A. 168, C. A. D. 656), the claim of plaintiffs was sustained.
PROPOSED DEFINITIONS FOR CERTAIN FLUORESCENT LAMPS AND INCANDESCENT LAMPS
Docket No. EE-RM-94-220-NOPR



### AGENDA

9:30 a.m. 9:45 a.m. Opening Remarks - Terry Logee Peter A. Bleasby 

### Director, Industry Relations & Standards OSRAM Sylvania Inc. 10:00 a.m. ..... .... . Irving E. Stine Chief Engineer Hytron Electric Products 10:15 a.m.. ........... A. C. Rousseau Manager, Technical Relations Philips Lighting Company 10:30 a.m. Steven L. Martel Commercial Engineer Duro-Test 

### 10:45 a.m. .......... Russell D. Churchill Manager, GE Lighting Institute 

### and Worldwide Technology Standards 11:00 a.m. ....... Walk-in Speakers 11:15 a.m. ........ . . Written Questions from Audience 11:30 a.m. ........ Closing Remarks
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 518 

Recognizing the 50th anniversary of Malaysia’s independence. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 26, 2007 

Mr. MEEKS of New York (for himself and Mr. SESSIONS) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 50th anniversary of Malaysia’s independence. 

Whereas Malaysia is a modern, multi-religious, and multi-racial democracy in Southeast Asia that is important to the 

United States’ strategic interests; 

Whereas Malaysia is one of the United States’ key allies in 

the global war on terror, and it condemns all terrorism, 

regardless of its cause or objectives; 

Whereas the Prime Minister of Malaysia, Datuk Seri 

Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, has condemned those seeking 

to incite race and religious hatred, including anti-Semitism; 

Whereas Malaysia has taken a leading regional role in 

counter-terrorism and counter-narcotics in Southeast 

Asia, through intelligence sharing, close cooperation in 

law enforcement, participation in joint exercises and 


ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 518 IH 

training, and other cooperative efforts with its neighboring countries and the United States; 

Whereas Malaysia is the United States’ 10th largest trading 

partner, and the two countries have signed a Trade and 

Investment Framework Agreement and are currently engaged in talks for a free trade agreement; 

Whereas Malaysia has consistently been a favored destination 

of American investment due to its competitive advantages, including good infrastructure, a highly-trained, 

educated, and multilingual workforce, and a businessfriendly government; 

Whereas the Malaysian Constitution guarantees gender 

equality, and the many accomplishments of Malaysian 

women evidence Malaysia’s commitment to the advancement of women’s social, economic, and legal status; 

Whereas Malaysia was ruled by the United Kingdom until 

1957; 

Whereas Malaysia gained independence from the United 

Kingdom on August 31, 1957; and 

Whereas August 31, 2007, is the 50th anniversary of Malaysia’s independence, as well as the United States-Malaysia 

relationship: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the 50th anniversary of Malay3 sia’s independence; 

4 (2) expresses congratulations to Malaysia on 

5 reaching this national milestone; and 

6 (3) expresses its support for an ongoing strong 

7 bilateral relationship between the United States and 


ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 518 IH 

1 Malaysia and the continued cooperation of the two 

2 countries in such important areas as counter-ter3 rorism, counter-narcotics, and trade. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
No. 58234.

protests 214431-K, etc. (San Francisco).

#### Thalson Co. and Joseph A. Paredes & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise and issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *John P. Herber & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 193, C. D. 1519), In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the cited case, the protests were dismissed, and the matters were remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisemént for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)).
Exhibit 99.1   Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  To the Shareholders of NSTAR:  We have reviewed the accompanying consolidatedbalance sheetof NSTAR and its subsidiariesas of March 31, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of income, retained earnings and comprehensive income for each of the three-month periods ended March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006and the consolidatedstatement of cash flows for three-monthperiods ended March 31, 2007 and March 31, 2006. These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.  We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters.  It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.  Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying consolidated interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, retained earnings, and of cash flows for the year then ended, managements assessment of the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 and the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006; and in our report dated February 16, 2007, we expressed unqualified opinions thereon. As discussed in Note E to the accompanying consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48),  Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement No.109). In addition, as discussed in Note A (4) to the accompanying consolidated financial statements, effective December 31, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans - an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R). The consolidated financial statements and managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting referred to above are not presented herein.  In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.   /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP  Boston, Massachusetts May 1, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 518 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 17, 2007.
Whereas Malaysia is a multi-religious and multi-racial democracy in Southeast 
        Asia that is important to the United States' strategic interests;
Whereas Malaysia is one of the United States' key allies in efforts to combat 
        international terrorism, and it condemns all terrorism, regardless of 
        its cause or objectives;
Whereas the Prime Minister of Malaysia, Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, has 
        condemned those seeking to incite race and religious hatred, including 
        anti-Semitism;
Whereas Malaysia has taken a leading regional role in counter-terrorism and 
        counter-narcotics in Southeast Asia, through intelligence sharing, close 
        cooperation in law enforcement, participation in joint exercises and 
        training, and other cooperative efforts with its neighboring countries 
        and the United States;
Whereas Malaysia is the United States' 10th largest trading partner, and the two 
        countries have signed a Trade and Investment Framework Agreement;
Whereas Malaysia has consistently been a favored destination of American 
        investment due to its competitive advantages, including good 
        infrastructure, a highly-trained, educated, and multilingual workforce, 
        and a business-friendly government;
Whereas the Malaysian Constitution guarantees gender equality, and the many 
        accomplishments of Malaysian women evidence Malaysia's commitment to the 
        advancement of women's social, economic, and legal status;
Whereas Malaysia was ruled by the United Kingdom until 1957;
Whereas Malaysia gained independence from the United Kingdom on August 31, 1957; 
        and
Whereas August 31, 2007, is the 50th anniversary of Malaysia's independence, as 
        well as the United States-Malaysia relationship: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the 50th anniversary of Malaysia's independence;
            (2) expresses congratulations to Malaysia on reaching this national 
        milestone; and
            (3) expresses its support for an ongoing strong bilateral 
        relationship between the United States and Malaysia and the continued 
        cooperation of the two countries in such important areas as counter-
        terrorism, counter-narcotics, and trade.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
129 STAT. 434 PUBLIC LAW 114–35—JULY 20, 2015 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1350: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 161 (2015): 

June 15, considered and passed House. 

July 8, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 114–35 

114th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 442 East 

167th Street in Bronx, New York, as the ‘‘Herman Badillo Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. HERMAN BADILLO POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 442 East 167th Street in Bronx, New York, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Herman Badillo Post Office 

Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Herman Badillo Post Office Building’’. 

Approved July 20, 2015. 

July 20, 2015 

[H.R. 1350] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

SUZANNE CAREY,

Plaintiff,

v.

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY

COMMISSION,

Defendant.

Case No. C05-5720FDB

ORDER DENYING SECOND

MOTION FOR RECUSAL

This cause of action, as well as the appeal herein, has been dismissed. [Dkt. #32 & #59]

Plaintiff has been directed to file no further documents in this closed case. [Dkt. # 40 & 62]

Nevertheless, Plaintiff continues to file documents in this cause of action. NOW, THEREFORE, 

IT IS ORDERED: 

1. Plaintiff’s Motion for More Definite Statement [Dkt. # 61] appears to be directed to

the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, but to the extent that it is directed to this Court

and appears on our motion calendar it is found to be improper and is DENIED.

2. Plaintiff’s Second Motion for Recusal [Dkt. # 63] also is improper and is DENIED. 

SO ORDERED.

DATED this 29th day of March, 2007.

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-05720-FDB Document 64 Filed 03/29/07 Page 1 of 1