alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 185 (Tuesday, September 26, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66060-66061]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20768]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to The National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Maritime Sustainment Technology and Innovation 
Consortium

    Notice is hereby given that, on July 7, 2023, pursuant to section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), the Maritime Sustainment 
Technology and Innovation Consortium (``MSTIC'') has filed written 
notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal 
Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Action Engineering 
LLC, Golden, CO; Baker Manufacturing, Inc., Tacoma, WA; Beacon 
Industries, Inc., Newington, CT; Bogue Systems, Inc., Paterson, NJ; 
Carver Pump Company, Muscatine, IA; HERMTAC, Dallas, TX; Jered LLC, 
Brunswick, GA; Johnson Controls Navy Systems LLC, York, PA; L3Harris 
Technologies, Inc. Maritime Power and Energy Solutions, Anaheim, CA; 
Marotta Controls, Montville, NJ; NetImpact Strategies, Falls Church, 
VA; Quality Aero, Inc., Columbus, OH; Solvus Global LLC, Worcester, MA; 
Systems Innovation Engineering LLC, Mullica Hills, NJ; Thunderbolt 
Software LLC, Tuckerton, NJ; TRABUS dba Trabus Technologies, San Diego, 
CA; and United States Technologies, Inc., Fair Lawn, NJ, have been 
added as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and MSTIC intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On October 21, 2020, MSTIC filed its original notification pursuant 
to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a 
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the

[[Page 66061]]

Act on November 19, 2020 (85 FR 73750).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on April 6, 
2023. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on June 12, 2023 (88 FR 38097).

Suzanne Morris,
Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2023-20768 Filed 9-25-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
H. Res. 395 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 11, 2007. 

Whereas, for over 100 years, the Olympic movement has built 

a more peaceful and better world by educating young 

people through athletics, by bringing together athletes 

from many countries in friendly competition, and by forging new relationships bound by friendship, solidarity, 

sportsmanship, and fair play; 

Whereas the United States Olympic Committee is dedicated 

to coordinating and developing athletic activity in the 

United States to foster productive working relationships 

among sports-related organizations; 

Whereas the United States Olympic Committee promotes and 

supports athletic activities involving the United States 

and foreign nations; 

Whereas the United States Olympic Committee promotes and 

encourages physical fitness and public participation in 

athletic activities; 

Whereas the United States Olympic Committee assists organizations and persons concerned with sports in the development of athletic programs for able-bodied and disabled 

athletes regardless of age, race, or gender; 

Whereas the United States Olympic Committee protects the 

opportunity of each athlete, coach, trainer, manager, ad-
2 

•HRES 395 EH 

ministrator, and official to participate in athletic competition; 

Whereas the United States Olympic Training Centers in Colorado, California, New York, Michigan, and Alabama are 

dedicated to the development of Olympic athletes; 

Whereas athletes representing the United States at the Olympic games have achieved great success personally and for 

the Nation; 

Whereas thousands of men and women of the United States 

are focusing their energy and skill on becoming part of 

the United States Olympic team and aspire to compete 

in the 2008 Olympic games; 

Whereas the Nation takes great pride in the qualities of commitment to excellence, grace under pressure, and good 

will toward other competitors exhibited by the athletes of 

the United States Olympic team; and 

Whereas June 23, 2007 is the anniversary of the founding 

of the modern Olympic movement, representing the date 

on which the Congress of Paris approved the proposal of 

Pierre de Coubertin to found the modern Olympic games: 

Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) supports the ideals and values of the Olympic 

movement; 

(2) calls upon the President to issue a proclamation 

recognizing the anniversary of the founding of the modern Olympic movement; and 
3 

•HRES 395 EH 

(3) calls upon the people of the United States to observe such anniversary with appropriate ceremonies and 

activities. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
# 

# CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

Registration No.  333-97047

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  375                                                               Trade Date:  12/22/03

(To Prospectus Supplement dated August 15, 2002 &

  Prospectus dated August  8, 2002)                                                                     Issue Date:   12/26/03

The Date of this Pricing SupplementDecember 22, 2003

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

  CUSIP                                                                                                                                Date and terms of redemption or

     or        Stated                                                                  Interest                                    repayment (including any

Common  Interest                      Price to  Discounts &        Payment  Survivors                  applicable regular or special

  Code      Rate (1)               Maturity                Public (2)                Commissions      Frequency      Option     Yes/No                record dates)

14911QRP8   3.75%                        12/15/09          100%                    1.1%                 Monthly            YES                       NO                                        

 

Principal                                                                                1st Payment Day         

Amount                   Proceeds                 Dealer                            Date                  Count

$1,374,000.00                $1,358,886.00         ABN AMROInc.                 01/15/04                 30/360    

Original Issue Discount Note:                                                                   Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes                X   No                                                                                   N/A

The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the effective date of the change.  Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $383.552 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (SM) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (SM) will be made under the Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated August 8,2002.

Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
PUBLIC LAW 114–34—JULY 20, 2015 129 STAT. 433 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1326: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 161 (2015): 

June 15, considered and passed House. 

July 8, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 114–34 

114th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2000 Mulford 

Road in Mulberry, Florida, as the ‘‘Sergeant First Class Daniel M. Ferguson 

Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SERGEANT FIRST CLASS DANIEL M. FERGUSON POST 

OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 2000 Mulford Road in Mulberry, Florida, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Sergeant First Class Daniel 

M. Ferguson Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Sergeant First Class Daniel M. Ferguson Post Office’’. 

Approved July 20, 2015. 

July 20, 2015 

[H.R. 1326] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
From: cbs4-him@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:29:35 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Carole Strumsky

Finksburg, MD 21048
Order filed May 30, 2013

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 00176

- CV

____________ IN THE ESTATE OF BIL LIE LEE MARTIN, DECE ASED , Appellant

On Appeal from the County Court at Law Waller County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. P09

- 52



### ORDER

The clerk’s record was due on or before March 27, 2013 , but it has not been filed. The clerk responsible for preparation of the record advised this court that appellant had not made arrangements to pay for the record.

Unless, within fifte en days from the date of this order, appellant pays or makes arrangements to pay for the record and provides this court with proof of payment, the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

PER CURIAM
From: walt1976@suddenlink.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: HHS providing contracetives

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:32:19 PM

There are already several place;s that give out contraceptives and bith control. we do not need our tax

money giving theses out also and funding abortions.

We also need to stop plan parenthood with our tax money.

Stop any marriage that is not Man and Woman.

May God Bless

Sincerely,

Dan Rykard

Alexandria, LA 71303
From: frlbaj@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:25:09 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Lawrence Bieschke

Huntley, IL 60142
Before Chief Judge Rao,

September 12, 1968

No. R68/30.

reappraisements R60/14515, etc. (Boston).

No. R68/31.

reappraisements R63/4548, etc. (Boston).

No. R68/32.

reappraisement R64/12075 (Boston).

#### Chadwick-Miller Importers, Inc. *v.*United States, Chadwick-Miller Importers, Inc. *v.*United States, Chadwick-Miller Importers, Inc. *v.*United States,

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, facts, and issues are the same in all material respects as those involved in *United States*v. *Chadwick-Miller Importers, Inc., et al.*(54 CCPA 93, C.A.D. 914), the court found and held that export value as that value is defined in section 402 (b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the sundry and novelty items here involved and that such values are the invoice unit ex-factory prices, net packed.
From: paulkat99@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:08:36 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

WE WISH TO SPEAK UP ON BEHALF OF LIFE AND CONSCIENCE PROTECTIONS FOR ALL GROUPS OR

INDIVIDUALS THAT HAVE CONSCIENCE OBJECTIONS TO ANY CONTRACEPTIVES AS WELL AS THOSE

THAT CAN CAUSE ABORTION.

WE ARE writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

k szach

Antioch, IL 60002
#### WILLIAM HAYES, Respondent, *v.*THE BUSH & DENSLOW MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Appellant.

*Negligence*— *an employee violating a rule, which is necessarily or habitually violated, is not chargeable with contributory negligence.*

Upon the trial of this action it appeared that the plaintiff, a boy of fifteen years, was employed by the defendant to feed a press with strips of tin, out of which were stamped “ bottoms,” twelve “ bottoms ” out of each strip. While pushing the strip under the punch for the last bottom, his finger passed under the punch and was injured by it. In the factory were conspicuous notices forbidding the placing of hands or fingers between the dies for any purpose. The evidence of the boy tended to show that it was necessary, in the ordinary prosecution of his work, to place his fingers under the punch when the last bottom of the strip was to, be stamped, and that such was the ordinary custom in the factory.

*Held,*that it was error to dismiss the complaint on the ground of the contributory negligence of the boy; that if the defendant prosecuted the work in such a manner as to render a violation of the rule necessary or probable, or if it suffered and approved its being habitually disregarded, the rule was rendered inoperative.

Appeal from a judgment in ^ favor of the defendant, entered upon an order dismissing the complaint made at the Kings County Circuit.

*Charles J.*Patterson, for the appellant.

*WilterM.*Posébault, for the respondent.

*408Cullen, J.:

This action is brought by an employee to recover damages for personal injuries received while working on a press. The plaintiff’s evidence tends to show that the machine was defective, and that injury occurred from such defect. The complaint was dismissed at the circuit because of the contributory negligence of the plaintiff. The plaintiff, a boy of fifteen years, was employed feeding a press with strips of tin, out of which were stamped “ bottoms,” twelve “bottoms” out of each strip. While pushing the strip in under the punch or die for the last bottom, his finger passed under the punch, and the press being set in motion he was injured. In the factory were conspicuous notices forbidding placing hands or fingers between the dies for any purpose. The evidence of the boy tended to show that it was necessary, in the ordinary prosecution of his work, to place his fingers under the punch when the last bottom of the strip was to be stamped, and that such was the ordinary custom in the factory.

We do not think the notice or printed rule conclusive on the question of plaintiff’s negligence. Ordinarily, disobedience of a rule would be negligence, but if the defendant prosecuted the work in a manner that rendered a violation of the rule necessary or probable, or if it suffered and approved its habitual disregard, the rule was inoperative. We think the question of the plaintiff’s negligence should have been submitted to the jury.

Judgment reversed and new tidal ordered, costs to abide event.

Present — Barnard, P, J., and Dtkman, J.

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event.
From: mcreakenp@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:17:07 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Patrick McReaken

Layton, UT 84040
Before the Third Division,

September 11, 1959

No. 63326.

protests 719766-G, etc. (New York).

#### Park *&*Tilford Import Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.