alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

JEFFREY L. CAMPBELL,

Petitioner,

v.

HAROLD CLARKE,

Respondent.

Case No. C05-5611RBL

ORDER DIRECTING

PETITIONER TO SHOW CAUSE

The Court, having reviewed the petition filed in this case, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court will not order a response to the petition because (i) petitioner has filed the

required $5.00 filing fee or filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis, and (ii) the petition does not

indicate that petitioner's grounds for federal relief have been properly exhausted in state court. More

specifically, the petition does not show that his claims for federal relief have been presented to the

Washington State Supreme Court.

The exhaustion of state court remedies is a prerequisite to the granting of a petition for writ of

habeas corpus. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1). If exhaustion is to be waived, it must be waived explicitly by

respondent. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(3). A waiver of exhaustion, thus, may not be implied or inferred. A

petition can satisfy the exhaustion requirement by providing the highest state court with a full and fair

opportunity to consider all claims before presenting them to the federal court. Picard v. Connor, 404 U.S.

270, 276 (1971); Middleton v. Cupp, 768 F.2d 1083, 1086 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 478 U.S. 1021 (1986). 

Full and fair presentation of claims to the state court requires “full factual development” of the claims in

Case 3:05-cv-05611-RBL Document 4 Filed 09/29/2005 Page 1 of 2

Campbell v. State of Washington et al Doc. 4

Dockets.Justia.com
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

that forum. Kenney v. Tamayo-Reyes, 504 U.S. 1, 8 (1992).

(2) Petitioner is directed to show cause by October 25, 2005, why the petition should not be

dismissed for lack of prosecution and lack of exhaustion. 

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order and the General Order to petitioner.

DATED this 29th day of September, 2005.

_/s/ J. Kelley Arnold J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate

Case 3:05-cv-05611-RBL Document 4 Filed 09/29/2005 Page 2 of 2
From: meskomom@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:56:38 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Roberta Mesko

Traverse City, MI 49686
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER - 1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

LEXINGTON INSURANCE CO.,

Plaintiff,

v.

SANDRA SWANSON, 

Defendant.

No. C05-1614MJP

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT

SWANSON’S MOTION FOR A

RULE 56(f) CONTINUANCE

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Swanson’s motion for a Fed. R. Civ. P.

56(f) continuance. (Dkt. No. 217.) Swanson requests that the Court continue Lexington’s motion for

partial summary judgment, currently noted for consideration on July 6, 2007, until this Court rules on

Lexington’s pending motions to quash the depositions of Christopher Neal and Earl Sutherland and

Swanson’s renewed CR 37 motion for in camera review and to compel production of withheld claims

file documents. Plaintiff Lexington opposes the motion. (Dkt. No. 228.)

The motion is DENIED. If, after reading the papers on Lexington’s motion for summary

judgment, and ruling on the pending discovery motions, the Court determines that additional

discovery would have bearing on the issues presented in Lexington’s summary judgment motion, the

Court will delay a ruling to consider any discovery ordered.

The Clerk is directed to send copies of this order to all counsel of record. 

Dated: June 29th, 2007. AMarsha J. Pechman

 United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-01614-MJP Document 235 Filed 06/29/07 Page 1 of 1
From: angel_ear@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:32:38 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Darlene Ellis

Whiting, IA 51063
From: rlwinn@mchsi.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:06:06 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ronald Winn

Milton, FL 32570
#### AKS Jewelry Manufacturing Corp., Appellant, v Regosin, Edwards, Stone & Feder, Respondent.

[632 NYS2d 464]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Jane Goodman, J.), entered on or about June 16, 1994, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Goodman, J., without costs and disbursements. No opinion. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Wallach, Rubin, Ross and Nardelli, JJ.
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                      |        |                                       |
|---------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|                      |   |                                       |   |
| Date:      April 15, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Brent      Kopenhaver             |   |
|                      |   | Brent      Kopenhaver                 |   |
|                      |   | Chairman,      Executive Vice President,   |   |
|                      |   | Chief      Financial Officer and Treasurer |   |

----
#### James M. RUSH, Appellant, v. METROPOLITAN COUNCIL TRANSIT OPERATIONS, a political subdivision, Appellee.

No. 00-3209.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted June 15, 2001.

Decided July 5, 2001.

Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, MAGILL, and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

James M. Rush appeals the district court’s1 grant of summary judgment for the Metropolitan Council Transit Operations (“MCTO”) in Rush’s employment discrimination action. Rush alleged that the MCTO refused to hire him because it regarded him as disabled within the meaning of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Minnesota Human Rights Act. The district court concluded that the MCTO did not regard Rush as disabled because the MCTO’s decision that Rush was unable to perform one job, that of part-time bus driver, did not support a conclusion that he was limited in the substantial life activity of “working.”

After a careful examination of the record, this court finds that the district court correctly granted summary judgment in favor of the MCTO. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s thorough opinion. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.
From: vincentmontagna@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:18:50 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

S. Vincent Montagna

Saddle Brook, NJ 07663
From: tpls@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:48:08 PM

To HHS Representatives:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. Citizens have over the counter options in local pharmacies, grocery stores

and clinics at very reasonable cost. Even citizens on low incomes can afford these options.

If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for any organizations that

provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I strongly oppose the

government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and devices that I

oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Tim Shinogle

Arlington, TX 76013
No. 62797.

#### Center Tool Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 229310-K, etc. (New York).

*295Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of angle plates similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 61507, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Dissolved Oxygen Percent (%) Saturation Sheet

Temp D.O. (mg/L)

(C) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15*

0 7% 14% 21% 27% 34% 41% 48% 55% 62% 68% 75% 82% 89% 96% 103%

1 7% 14% 21% 28% 35% 42% 49% 56% 63% 70% 78% 85% 92% 99% 106%

2 7% 14% 22% 29% 36% 43% 51% 58% 65% 72% 80% 87% 94% 101% 109%

3 7% 15% 22% 30% 37% 45% 52% 60% 67% 74% 82% 89% 97% 104% 112%

4 8% 15% 23% 31% 38% 46% 53% 61% 69% 76% 84% 92% 99% 107% 115%

5 8% 16% 24% 31% 39% 47% 55% 63% 71% 78% 86% 94% 102% 110% 118%

6 8% 16% 24% 32% 40% 48% 56% 64% 72% 80% 88% 97% 105% 113% 121%

7 8% 17% 25% 33% 41% 50% 58% 66% 74% 83% 91% 99% 107% 116% 124%

8 8% 17% 25% 34% 42% 51% 59% 68% 76% 85% 93% 101% 110% 118% 127%

9 9% 17% 26% 35% 43% 52% 61% 69% 78% 87% 95% 104% 113% 121% 130%

10 9% 18% 27% 35% 44% 53% 62% 71% 80% 89% 98% 106% 115% 124% 133%

11 9% 18% 27% 36% 45% 54% 64% 73% 82% 91% 100% 109% 118% 127% 136%

12 9% 19% 28% 37% 46% 56% 65% 74% 84% 93% 102% 112% 121% 130% 139%

13 10% 19% 29% 38% 48% 57% 67% 76% 86% 95% 105% 114% 124% 133% 143%

14 10% 19% 29% 39% 49% 58% 68% 78% 87% 97% 107% 117% 126% 136% 146%

15 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 79% 89% 99% 109% 119% 129% 139% 149%

16 10% 20% 30% 41% 51% 61% 71% 81% 91% 102% 112% 122% 132% 142% 152%

17 10% 21% 31% 41% 52% 62% 73% 83% 93% 104% 114% 124% 135% 145% 155%

18 11% 21% 32% 42% 53% 63% 74% 85% 95% 106% 116% 127% 138% 148% 159%

19 11% 22% 32% 43% 54% 65% 76% 86% 97% 108% 119% 130% 140% 151% 162%

20 11% 22% 33% 44% 55% 66% 77% 88% 99% 110% 121% 132% 143% 154% 165%

21 11% 22% 34% 45% 56% 67% 79% 90% 101% 112% 124% 135% 146% 157% 169%

22 11% 23% 34% 46% 57% 69% 80% 92% 103% 115% 126% 138% 149% 161% 172%

23 12% 23% 35% 47% 58% 70% 82% 93% 105% 117% 129% 140% 152% 164% 175%

24 12% 24% 36% 48% 60% 71% 83% 95% 107% 119% 131% 143% 155% 167% 179%

25 12% 24% 36% 49% 61% 73% 85% 97% 109% 121% 133% 146% 158% 170% 182%

26 12% 25% 37% 49% 62% 74% 87% 99% 111% 124% 136% 148% 161% 173% 185%

27 13% 25% 38% 50% 63% 75% 88% 101% 113% 126% 138% 151% 164% 176% 189%

28 13% 26% 38% 51% 64% 77% 90% 102% 115% 128% 141% 154% 166% 179% 192%

29 13% 26% 39% 52% 65% 78% 91% 104% 117% 130% 143% 156% 169% 183% 196%

30 13% 27% 40% 53% 66% 80% 93% 106% 119% 133% 146% 159% 172% 186% 199%

31 13% 27% 40% 54% 67% 81% 94% 108% 121% 135% 148% 162% 175% 189% 202%

32 14% 27% 41% 55% 69% 82% 96% 110% 124% 137% 151% 165% 179% 192% 206%

33 14% 28% 42% 56% 70% 84% 98% 112% 126% 140% 154% 168% 182% 196% 209%

34 14% 28% 43% 57% 71% 85% 99% 113% 128% 142% 156% 170% 184% 199% 213%

35 14% 29% 43% 58% 72% 87% 101% 115% 130% 144% 159% 173% 188% 202% 216%

36 15% 29% 44% 59% 73% 88% 103% 117% 132% 147% 161% 176% 191% 205% 220%

37 15% 30% 45% 60% 75% 89% 104% 119% 134% 149% 164% 179% 194% 209% 224%

38 15% 30% 45% 61% 76% 91% 106% 121% 136% 151% 166% 182% 197% 212% 227%

39 15% 31% 46% 61% 77% 92% 108% 123% 138% 154% 169% 184% 200% 215% 230%

* If D.O. is greater than 15 mg/L then use the formula 

on pg. 175 in your Stream Keepers Field Guide:

Actual Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L)

Max Oxygen Concentration at Water Temp
From: reds@woltornist.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:16:47 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Maria Woltornist

Neshanic Station, NJ 08853
Dolat Ventures, Inc. 10-K





Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF


PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending February 28, 2010 (the “Report”) of Dolat Ventures, Inc. (the “Company”), the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacities as President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the undersigned’s knowledge:





1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.








Date: July 15, 2011/s/ Shmuel Dovid HauckShmuel Dovid Hauck

President and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Executive and Financial Officer)





The foregoing certification is furnished as an exhibit to the Report and will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.