alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

DAVID V. GARRISON,

Plaintiff,

v.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner

of Social Security,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: 05-1489-JPD

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS AND

DIRECTING RETURN OF

SUMMONS

Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Dkt. No. 1, is GRANTED. 

Plaintiff does not appear to have funds available to afford the $250.00 filing fee.

(1) The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to plaintiff’s counsel, and to

issue summonses to plaintiff’s counsel to enable proper service of the complaint on the

appropriate parties. Plaintiff shall note that it is her/his and/or her/his attorney’s

responsibility to properly serve copies of the complaint along with appropriate

summonses as required by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

(2) The Clerk is directed to send to plaintiff’s counsel a copy of the Notice of Initial

Assignment and Consent to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge.

DATED this 2nd day of September, 2005.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:05-cv-01489-JLR Document 2 Filed 09/02/05 Page 1 of 1
From: beckiej@mca.org.tw

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:27:54 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Rebecca Johnson

Hillsboro, OR 97124
Before the First Division,

April 10, 1967

No. P67/98.

#### Gillespie & Co. of N.Y., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 64/205 (New York).

Oliver, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of miniature motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of *James G. Wiley*
      *879
      *Co., a/c Ungar Electric Tools, Inc.*v. *United States*(49 Cust. Ct. 199, Abstract 66961), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

- 1 STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER TO EXTEND FILING

DEADLINE FOR DISCOVERY MOTIONS

Selchow v. Hewlett-Packard Co., No. C05-5683RBL

MARKOWITZ, HERBOLD,

GLADE & MEHLHAF, P.C.

SUITE 3000 PACWEST CENTER

1211 SW FIFTH AVENUE

PORTLAND, OREGON 97204-3730

(503) 295-3085

The Honorable Ronald B. Leighton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

INGO SELCHOW,

Plaintiff,

v.

HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY,

Defendant.

Case No. C05-5683RBL

STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER

TO EXTEND FILING DEADLINE FOR DISCOVERY

MOTIONS

I.STIPULATED MOTION

Pursuant to CR 16(g), the parties to this action, through their undersigned counsel,

hereby stipulate and request that the Court extend the current deadline for filing discovery

motions of December 11, 2006 to December 14, 2006. In support of this request, the

undersigned counsel for plaintiff notes that a continuance is needed because the parties

have not yet conferred on portions of the motion, and as managing shareholder of her firm

she has been preparing for a year-end meeting to occur today, December 11, 2006. The

extension would allow counsel to confer prior to the motion being filed. 

Case 3:05-cv-05683-RBL Document 25 Filed 12/15/06 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The parties respectfully request that the Court issue a Revised Order Setting Case

Schedule. 

DATED this 11th day of December, 2006.

ATER WYNNE LLP MARKOWITZ, HERBOLD, GLADE &

MEHLHAF, P.C.

By: /s/ Kathy Feldman ________ By: _/s/ Lynn R. Nakamoto___________

Kathy L. Feldman, WSBA #15273 Lynn R. Nakamoto, OBS#88087

Attorneys for Defendant Pro Hac Vice

Attorneys for Plaintiff

II.ORDER

It is so ordered. The deadline for discovery motions is reset to December 14, 2006. 

DATED: December 15, 2006.

A

RONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

SELC\120040

Case 3:05-cv-05683-RBL Document 25 Filed 12/15/06 Page 2 of 2
From: Galatte2@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Protect Conscience of Military Members

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:22:54 PM

Dear Congressman Reichert:

Please support Congressman Hunter (CA) as he seeks to protect conscience, religious and free speech

rights of military persons who believe differently than the law supporting homosexual persons serving in

the military. While the law provides for homosexual military membership, those who feel differently will

accept such but shouldn't have to espouse what is truly not their moral belief!

Please protect the conscience rights of military who do not accept homosexual behavior as moral but

who yet are committed to working alongside those same homosexual military brothers/sisters for

effective military service.

Sincerely, A Cowart

Sincerely,

A Cowart

Carnation, WA 98014
From: wlynch63@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:31:52 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Woodford Lynch

, 45036-1156
From: kwolgamuth@cfaith.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:05:16 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kathy Wolgamuth

Millersville, PA 17551
From: vlsebree@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:22:51 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Veronica Sebree

Greenwood, IN 46143
From: masterjohnson@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:55:50 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Andrew Johnson

Salida, CA 95368
```

[114th Congress Public Law 32]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 129 STAT. 431]]

Public Law 114-32
114th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 7050 Highway BB in Cedar Hill, Missouri, as the ``Sergeant First Class 
  William B. Woods, Jr. Post Office''. <<NOTE: July 20, 2015 -  [H.R. 
                                 728]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SERGEANT FIRST CLASS WILLIAM B. WOODS, JR. POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 7050 Highway BB in Cedar Hill, Missouri, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Sergeant First Class William B. Woods, Jr. Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant 
First Class William B. Woods, Jr. Post Office''.

    Approved July 20, 2015.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 728:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 161 (2015):
            June 15, considered and passed House.
            July 8, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
From: jlmtiketernity@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:06:53 PM

 We ask that you change the directive that private health insurance must cover drugs, etc. that can

cause abortions, violating the sincerely held principles of millions. Richard and Carol Scott

Sincerely,

C Scott

Greeley, CO 80634
From: sdanna21@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:28:52 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Susan Danna

Houston, TX 77057
Exhibit 32.1







CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




(18 U.S.C. 1350)




Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of (18 U.S.C. 1350), the undersigned officer of SwissINSO Holding Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to the best of such officer's knowledge and belief, that:




(1)           The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Form 10-K/A”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all materials respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:  June 17, 2011


/s/Yves Ducommun


Yves Ducommun


Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SwissINSO Holding Inc. and will be retained by SwissINSO Holding Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
From: tntstone@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:35:58 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Teresa Stone

Florissant, MO 63033