alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          11,218
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,230
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (465)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,848
<PP&E>                                          21,725
<DEPRECIATION>                                (12,180)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  45,459
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,131
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      5,375
<COMMON>                                        22,524
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    45,459
<SALES>                                         59,959
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                59,959
<CGS>                                           54,435
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   54,435
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (12)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,875
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,950
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,925
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,925
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.91


</TABLE>
March 6, 1956

No. 59759.

#### Gold-Silver & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 196211-K.

Motion of Government for rehearing denied.
Searched for **http://www.climate.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.climate.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published

and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. 

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________________

No. 95-40213

(Summary Calendar)

_________________________

RUBEN GARZA CORONADO, 

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES MARSHALL,

McAllen, Texas, ET AL.,

Respondents-Appellees.

____________________________________________________

Appeal from United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(B-94-CV-283)

__________________________________________________

July 9, 1996

Before JOLLY, JONES and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Ruben Garza Coronado appeals the denial of his motion for reconsideration of the dismissal

of his petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2241. Coronado argues that the Parole Commission has

lost jurisdiction over him because, if he is credited with previously earned statutory good time, his
2

sentence has expired. He further argues that he is aware that he lost his street time when he violated

his parole, but maintainsthat Congress never intended to punish prisoners byforfeiting theirstatutory

good-time creditssimplybecause theywere released on parole, thus he is challenging 28C.F.R. §2.35

and 523.2(c). 

Because Coronado’s notice of appeal was from the order denying his motion for

reconsideration, his motion is construed as a Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend the

judgment. Harcon Barge Co. v. D. &. G. Boat Rentals, Inc., 784 F.2d 665, 669 (5th Cir. )(en banc),

cert. denied, 479 U.S. 930 (1986). A ruling on such a motion is reviewed for abuse of discretion.

Simon v. United States, 891 F.2d 1154, 1159 (5th Cir. 1990).

Coronado admitsthat this Court’s precedent contradicts his argument. Grannville v. Hogan,

591 F.2d 323, 324 (5th Cir. 1979); Lambert v. Warden, United States Penitentiary, 591 F.2d 4, 8

(5th Cir. 1979). Accordingly, the district court did not abuse its discret ion when it denied

Coronado’s motion for reconsideration and itsjudgment is AFFIRMED. Coronado’s request for the

appointment of counsel is DENIED.
From: reachwc10@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:14:04 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Phillip Brandis

Kansas City, MO 64152
CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

 

Registration No.  333-97047

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  235				Trade Date: 12/05/02
(To Prospectus Supplement dated August 15, 2002 & 

  Prospectus dated August 8,2002)					Issue Date:  12/10/02
The Date of this Pricing Supplement December 05, 2002
SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

  CUSIP									Date and terms of redemption or

     or	Stated				             Interest			repayment (including any

Common	Interest		  Price to	 Discounts &         Payment	Survivors		applicable regular or special

  Code	Rate (1)	Maturity	Public (2)	Commissions       Frequency	  Option	Yes/No	record dates)

14911QKU4  3.25%	12/15/06	     100%	        0.8%                Monthly	     YES	    NO	

Principal						1st Payment	Day	

Amount		Proceeds		Dealer		      Date		Count

$1,425,000.00	$1,413,600.00	ABN AMRO Inc.	   1/15/03		30/360	
 

Original Issue Discount Note:					Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes	  X   No						N/A

 

 
- The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the effective date of the change.   Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $26.973 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (SM) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (SM) will be made under the Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated August 8, 2002.
- Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 567 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 91
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 567

                          [Report No. 110-260]

 Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the 
bill (H.R. 1) to provide for the implementation of the recommendations 
of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 25, 2007

  Mr. Hastings of Florida, from the Committee on Rules, reported the 
  following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and 
                         ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the 
bill (H.R. 1) to provide for the implementation of the recommendations 
of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States.

    Resolved,  That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 1) 
to provide for the implementation of the recommendations of the 
National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States. All 
points of order against the conference report and against its 
consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered as 
read.
                                                  House Calendar No. 91

110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 567

                          [Report No. 110-260]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the 
bill (H.R. 1) to provide for the implementation of the recommendations 
of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 25, 2007

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
Before the Second Division,

April 16, 1969

No. P69/102.

protest 67/24817 (Los Angeles).

#### Sinclair Paint Company *v.*United States,

Bao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of hanging paper similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Victor England*Agencies, *Inc.*v. *United States*(50 Cust. Ct. 83, C.D. 2394), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 99.

Certification of filing by officers

I,  Barry  McDaniel,  the Chief  Executive  Officer of  Stratesec  Incorporated,
certify that (i) the form 10-Q fully complies with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information  contained
in the form 10-Q  fairly  presents,  in all  material  respects,  the  financial
condition and results of operations of Stratesec Incorporated.

/s/  BARRY MCDANIEL
-----------------------------
Barry McDaniel
President and Chief Executive Officer



I, Richard  Roomberg,  the Chief  Financial  Officer of Stratesec  Incorporated,
certify that (i) the form 10-Q fully complies with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information  contained
in the form 10-Q  fairly  presents,  in all  material  respects,  the  financial
condition and results of operations of Stratesec Incorporated.

/s/  RICHARD ROOMBERG
-----------------------------
Richard Roomberg
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
2.12





AGREEMENT




Reference
is made to the Private Placement Warrant Escrow Agreement dated August 11, 2008
(the “Agreement”), by
and among Chardan 2008 China Acquisition Corp., a British Virgin Islands
business company of limited liability (the “Company”), the private
placement warrant holders listed as “Purchasers” on the signature page thereto
(collectively, the “Purchasers”), and Continental
Stock Transfer & Trust Company, a New York corporation, as escrow agent (the
“Escrow
Agent”).  Any capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise
defined shall have the same meaning for such term as is contained in the
Agreement.




For good
and valuable consideration in connection with the transactions related to the
consummation of a business combination by the Company, each Purchaser executing
this Amendment hereby agrees with the Company and with the Escrow Agent that the
Escrow Period with respect to such person’s Private Placement Warrants shall not
terminate upon the consummation of a business combination, but rather at the
earlier of (i) the Termination Date (as defined in the Warrant Sale Agreement
between the Company, the Purchasers, the Law Offices of David J. Stern, P.A.,
Professional Title and Abstract Company of Florida, Inc. and Default Servicing,
Inc., 0dated January 15, 2010 (the “Warrant Sale Agreement”)) or
(ii) the sale or exercise of the Private Placement Warrants as set forth in the
Warrant Sale Agreement.  The Escrow Agent agrees to hold such Private
Placement Warrants in accordance with the terms of the Agreement during such
additional six month period.  All of the other terms of the Agreement
remain in full force and effect.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
execution of the Agreement is as of January 15, 2010.




CHARDAN 2008 CHINA ACQUISITION
      CORP.By:
              /s/ Kerry
      PropperName: Kerry
      PropperTitle: Chief
      Executive OfficerCONTINENTAL STOCK TRANSFER
      & TRUST COMPANY/s/ Steven
      NelsonName: Steven
      NelsonTitle: Chairman
H. Res. 413 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

May 22, 2007. 

Whereas the United States Merchant Marine served as the 

Nation’s first Navy and helped George Washington’s 

Continental Army defeat the British Navy; 

Whereas since 1775, United States Merchant Mariners have 

served valiantly in times of peace and in every war; 

Whereas after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, 

29 United States Merchant Marine Academy cadets operated a fleet of boats in New York Harbor, transporting 

firefighters and other emergency equipment workers, 

medical supplies, and food; 

Whereas today, more than 8,000 Merchant Mariners serve in 

the Military Sealift Command, most of them working in 

support of Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom; 

Whereas the United States Merchant Marine Academy is the 

only one of the five service academies that sends its cadets into war, and 142 undergraduates of the Academy 

were lost during World War II; 

Whereas during World War II, Merchant Mariners served 

honorably in combat but were denied veterans benefits 

and recognition at the end of the war despite sustaining 
2 

•HRES 413 EH 

the highest rate of casualties of any of the armed services; 

Whereas more than 95 percent of the Allied Forces and materiel that was transported during World War II was 

transported by Merchant Marine ships; 

Whereas the Merchant Mariners of World War II were denied 

the unprecedented benefits of the Servicemen’s Readjustment Act of 1944 (known as the ‘‘GI Bill of 1944’’); 

Whereas the story of the United States Merchant Mariners 

of World War II is one of patriotism, of youthful exuberance, of dedication to duty, of bravery in the midst of 

battle, and of a Nation that forgot these heroes after the 

end of the war for more than 40 years until 1988, when 

they were given veteran status; 

Whereas by that time, over 125,000 of those Merchant Mariners had died and many had lost out on opportunities 

and benefits they greatly deserved; and 

Whereas, on National Maritime Day, Congress recognizes the 

tremendous sacrifices and contributions of the Merchant 

Marine and its veterans and the entire maritime industry 

to the Nation: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That on National Maritime Day, the House of 

Representatives recognizes the heroic and invaluable sacrifices that the United States Merchant Marine veterans have 

made to help ensure our Nation’s prosperity and safety. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
|               | (1)                                  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|          |        |                                                                              |
|          | (2)                                  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the dates and periods covered by the Report. |

|  Date: August 13, 2010                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |                      |                     | /s/ Elizabeth A. Smith                |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                                                              |                      |      | Elizabeth A. Smith                    |
|                                                         |                      |      | President and Chief Executive Officer |
No. 63335.

protests *58/11467, etc.*(New York).

#### McKesson & Robbins, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: lfroehlich@cox.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:06:40 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Loren Froehlich

Goodyear, AZ 85395
Case No. 14,207.

#### TRUNDLE v. HEISE.

[2 Cranch, C. C. 44.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

June Term. 1812.

Marshal — Capias—Failure to Return Depend-ant — Appearance op Dependant — Discharge.

If the defendant has been discharged under the insolvent law upon a capias ad respondendum, the marshal will be discharged from his amercement for not bringing.him in at the return of the writ, upon the defendant’s entering his appearance in proper person.

The marshal was amerced for not bringing in the defendant on the return of the capias ad respondendum. The defendant had been discharged under the insolvent act. The marshal moved to be discharged from the amercement upon the defendant's entering his appearance in proper person without bail; granted.
Exhibit 13.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of DJSP Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in his
capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:
April 1, 2010
 By:
                /s/ David J. SternName :
      David J. SternTitle :
      President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
    Officer)