alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 595 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 97
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 595

                          [Report No. 110-286]

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

               August 1 (legislative day, July 31), 2007

  Ms. Slaughter, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

    Resolved,  That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a 
two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the 
same day it is presented to the House is waived with respect to any 
resolution reported on the legislative day of Wednesday, August 1, 
2007, providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3161) making 
appropriations for Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug 
Administration, and Related Agencies programs for the fiscal year 
ending September 30, 2008, and for other purposes.
                                                  House Calendar No. 97

110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 595

                          [Report No. 110-286]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

               August 1 (legislative day, July 31), 2007

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 09-2186

GREGORIO IGARTÚA, ET AL.,

Plaintiffs, Appellants,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL.,

Defendants, Appellees.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on November 24, 2010, is

amended as follows:

On pp. 77-78, footnote 47: insert a quotation mark at the

beginning of "was" to read ""was not a counter-offer")."

On p. 89, lines 4 and 17: should read "supra note 34"

On p. 91, line 4: should read "supra note 34"

On p. 91, lines 6 and 17 of footnote 53: should read "supra

note 34"

On p. 92, lines 1, 11, and 16: should read "supra note 34"

On p. 93, line 1: should read "supra note 34"

On p. 93, lines 8 and 16 of footnote 55: should read "supra

note 34"
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|   | Title of Each Class of |   | Maximum Aggregate |   | Amount of |   |
|   | Securities Offered |   | Offering Price(1) |   | Registration Fee(2) |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | 2.200% PowerNotes® | Due May 15, 2021 |   | $4,341,000 |   | $504.42 |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | 3.000% PowerNotes® | Due May 15, 2027 |   | $2,324,000 |   | $270.05 |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | TOTAL |   |   |   |   | $774.47 |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |

|     |                                    |
|-----|------------------------------------|
| (1) | Excludes accrued interest, if any. |

|     |                                                                             |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | Calculated in accordance with Rule 457(r) under the Securities Act of 1933. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | CUSIP | Aggregate |   | Selling | Gross |   | Net | Coupon | Coupon |   | Coupon |   | Maturity |   | 1st Coupon |   | 1st | Survivor's | Product |   |   |
|   | Number | Principal |   | Price | Concession |   | Proceeds | Type | Rate |   | Frequency |   | Date |   | Date |   | Coupon | Option | Ranking |   |   |
|   |   | Amount |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Amount |   |   |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | 14912HRS1 | $4,341,000.00 |   | 100% | 1.350% |   | $4,282,396.50 | Fixed | 2.200% |   | Semi- |   | 05/15/2021 |   | 11/15/2015 |   | $10.63 | Yes | Senior Unsecured |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Annual |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Notes |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | CUSIP | Aggregate |   | Selling | Gross |   | Net | Coupon | Coupon |   | Coupon |   | Maturity |   | 1st Coupon | 1st | Survivor's | Product |   |   |
|   | Number | Principal |   | Price | Concession |   | Proceeds | Type | Rate |   | Frequency |   | Date |   | Date | Coupon | Option | Ranking |   |   |
|   |   | Amount |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Amount |   |   |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | 14912HRT9 | $2,324,000.00 |   | 100% | 2.000% |   | $2,277,520.00 | Fixed | 3.000% |   | Semi- |   | 05/15/2027 |   | 11/15/2015 | $14.50 | Yes | Senior Unsecured |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Annual |   |   |   |   |   |   | Notes |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
<PAGE>   1

                                   EXHIBIT 11



                STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE
                                      LOSS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>




                                                                                      Three Months        Three Months
                                                                                          Ended               Ended
                                                                                      June 30, 1997       June 30, 1996
                                                                                      -------------       -------------

<S>                                                                                   <C>                 <C>          
Net loss                                                                              $ (4,027,732)       $ (4,943,991)
                                                                                      ============        ============

Calculation of shares outstanding:

        Weighted average common shares outstanding used in calculating net loss
           per share in accordance with generally accepted accounting
           principles                                                                   20,752,848          17,325,561
                                                                                      ------------        ------------


           Total                                                                        20,742,848          17,325,561
                                                                                      ============        ============

Net loss per share                                                                    $      (0.19)       $      (0.29)
                                                                                      ============        ============

</TABLE>
PUBLIC LAW 114–49—AUG. 7, 2015 129 STAT. 489 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2559: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 161 (2015): 

June 15, considered and passed House. 

Aug. 5, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 114–49 

114th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the ‘‘PFC Milton A. Lee Medal of Honor Memorial Highway’’ in 

the State of Texas. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

The segment of Interstate Route 10 between milepost 535 and 

milepost 545 at Kendall County, Texas, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘PFC Milton A. Lee Medal of Honor Memorial 

Highway’’. 

SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, 

or other record of the United States to the segment of Interstate 

Route 10 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘PFC Milton A. Lee Medal of Honor Memorial Highway’’. 

Approved August 7, 2015. 

Aug. 7, 2015 

[H.R. 2559] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: 2013-NM-231-AD 

Dear Sir/ Madam: 

Eaton Aerospace, LCC, hereafter referred to as "Eaton", is the original equipment manufacturer 

for part number 692D100-13 and 692D100-15. Eaton was notified by Emirates Airline of the 

omission of serial numbers in Service Bulletin 692D1 00-52-4, Revision 2, Dated AUG 01, 2013. 

Eaton has reviewed manufacturing records and found that two digits were transposed in Service 

Bulletin 692D100-52-4, Table 1. "692D100-13 Actuators with AMS9310 Steel Matched Gear 

Sets". Specifically what is listed as 3173B- 3813B, should be 3137B- 3813B. This error 

caused serial numbers 3137B - 3172B to be omitted even though they contain AMS9130 Steel 

Matched Gear Sets. 

Eaton has also reviewed the repair & overhaul record for 692D1 00-13 serial number 2257 and 

found that it was modified by Eaton to contain an AMS9130 Steel Matched Gear Set and reidentified as 2257B. 

To correct these omissions, Eaton recommends that Service Bulletin 692D100-52-4, Table 1 

"692D100-13 Actuators with AMS9310 Steel Matched Gear Sets" be updated to include serial 

numbers 2257B and 3137B- 3172B. In doing so, the Boeing Service Bulletins 767-52A0100, 

Rev 02, Dated 26-Sep-2013 and 777-52-0053, Rev 01, Dated 26-Sep-2013 will also need to be 

updated as they reference Service Bulletin 692D1 00-52-4 by revision level. 

In summary, 692D100-13 serial numbers 2257B and 3137B- 3172B were inadvertently omitted 

from Service Bulletin 692D100-52-4 and could be re-identified per paragraphs 3.B and 3.C to 

operate as intended by 2013-NM-231-AD. 

Regards, 

0y ~ f Okt---0 

Jay P. O'Neal 

Product Support Manager 

Eaton Aerospace, LLC
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                            5379
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   800
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      50545
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           19060
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             19386
<LOANS>                                         156612
<ALLOWANCE>                                       1618
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  239206
<DEPOSITS>                                      186844
<SHORT-TERM>                                       411
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               1538
<LONG-TERM>                                      27998
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           628
<OTHER-SE>                                       21787
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  239206
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   3363
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  942
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    51
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  4356
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                1700
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2096
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             2260
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       99
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   1626
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    821
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         821
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       652
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .27
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.37
<LOANS-NON>                                         25
<LOANS-PAST>                                       460
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   2992
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  1593
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       80
<RECOVERIES>                                         6
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 1618
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              1618
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            812
        

</TABLE>
From: tleonard@islandalliancechurch.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:39:45 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Thomas Leonard

Grasonville, MD 21638
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

September 28, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 128693 Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman,

Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 128693 

 COA: 252558 

Genesee CC: 03-011696-FC 

SHIRLEY ANN EWING,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 22, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0919 

I, CORBIN R. DAVIS, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 28, 2005 

Clerk
Before the Second Division,

September 13, 1966

No. P66/215. —

#### Lafayette Brass Co., Inc. *v.*United States, protests 64/22564 and 64/25120 (New York).
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 11.01

                            MICRONICS COMPUTERS, INC.
                   COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
                                   (UNAUDITED)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                     DECEMBER 31,
                                                           -----------------------------
                                                                1997              1996
                                                           --------------        -------
<S>                                                        <C>                   <C>    
BASIC EPS

Net income (loss) ..................................       $         (719)       $   166
                                                           ==============        =======

Average shares outstanding .........................               13,499         13,923
                                                           ==============        =======

Earnings per common share ..........................       $         (.05)       $   .01
                                                           ==============        =======


DILUTED EPS

Net income (loss) ..................................       $         (719)       $   166
                                                           ==============        =======

Average shares outstanding .........................               13,499         13,923

Options ............................................                   --              3
                                                           --------------        -------

   Total common stock and common stock equivalents..               13,499         13,926
                                                           ==============        =======

Earnings per common share - assuming dilution ......       $         (.05)       $   .01
                                                           ==============        =======
</TABLE>
From: Elaine Tegart

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:24:50 PM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Elaine Tegart
Johns Creek, Georgia
No. 65195.

#### T. R. Booth & Company *v.*United States,

protest 60/7503-11287 (Chicago).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protest was dismissed for want of prosecution.
From: ray_christian@tx.rr.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:07:14 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Raymond Christian

Grapevine, TX 76051