alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: srswens@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:33:05 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ralph Swenson

Mora, MN 55051
No. 61035.

protests 252068-K, etc. (New York).

#### H. Rosenhirsch Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of monofilament fishing lines the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 60183, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 458 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 458

 Supporting the goals and ideals of National Fishing and Boating Week.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 5, 2007

 Mr. Putnam submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to 
  the Committee on Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Supporting the goals and ideals of National Fishing and Boating Week.

Whereas recreational boating and fishing are among this country's favorite 
        pastimes;
Whereas each year, more than 50,000,000 Americans enjoy these activities;
Whereas after years of steady growth, recreational boating and fishing 
        participation rates have leveled off and declined in some States;
Whereas stewardship of natural resources is based on valuing natural resources, 
        and avid boaters and anglers are among those who most value the aquatic 
        environment;
Whereas anglers and boaters greatly contribute to aquatic conservation efforts;
Whereas the Congress passed the Sportfishing and Boating Safety Act of 1998 
        (subtitle D of title VII of Public Law 105-178), requiring the Secretary 
        of the Interior to implement a national outreach and communication plan 
        to address participation issues associated with recreational fishing and 
        boating; and
Whereas National Fishing and Boating Week will be the week of June 2 through 10: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of National Fishing and 
        Boating Week; and
            (2) urges the people of the United States to recognize such 
        a week as an opportunity to learn more about boating.
                                 <all>
```
From: adamswp7@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:04:06 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Anne Adams

Kennewick, WA 99336
From: sjwilson82@myfairpoint.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:27:57 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Scott Wilson

Rangeley, ME 04970
H. Res. 269

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

March 27, 2007.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 835) 

to reauthorize the programs of the Department of Housing 

and Urban Development for housing assistance for Native 

Hawaiians. All points of order against the bill and its consideration are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 

of rule XXI. The bill shall be considered as read. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill to 

final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour 

of debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 

ranking minority member of the Committee on Financial 

Services; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

SEC. 2. During consideration of H.R. 835 pursuant to 

this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous 
2

•HRES 269 EH 

question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the 

bill to such time as may be designated by the Speaker. 

Attest:

Clerk.
No. 60529.

#### Holland Colombo Trading Society, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 284185-K (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the

merchandise consists of coconut shell charcoal the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Holland Colombo Trading*Society, *Inc.*v. *United States*(34 Cust. Ct. 90, C. D. 1684), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1802 was sustained.
No. 58682.

protest 234256-K (Baltimore).

#### Samuel Shapiro & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

An examination of the record failing to disclose any evidence sufficient to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s action, the protest was overruled.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

VINCENT DANIEL HOPPER,

Plaintiff,

v.

G. WIGEN WARDEN NORTHWEST

DETENTION CENTER et. al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5662FDB

ORDER

This Civil Rights action has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to

Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On January 19th, 2006 this court entered an order directing the

plaintiff to provide four filled out United States Marshals Service forms and four copies of the first

amended complaint so that the court could order the United States Marshals Service to attempt

service by mail. 

Rather than comply with the court order plaintiff has filed documents indicating he mailed

copies of the complaint to the named defendants and he has seen the documents in the custody of at

least one defendant. 

Case 3:05-cv-05662-FDB Document 20 Filed 02/23/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER - 2

The court was clear and concise in the January order. Plaintiff is again ordered to fill out the

four service forms and provide copies of the first amended complaint. The plaintiff’s sending copies

of the complaint by mail to the defendants does not constitute service unless the defendants agree to

waive service and accept service by mail. From plaintiff’s pleading it is clear at least one defendant

threw the complaint into the trash and has not agreed to accept service by mail.

Plaintiff has disregarded a court order and his actions have delayed this case. Plaintiff will be

given until March, 24th, 2006 to comply with the courts January 19th, 2006 order. If plaintiff fails to

follow the court order or his filings are not complete the court will recommend this action be

dismissed and may consider other sanctions. The court will not tolerate a litigant not following a

court order

The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to plaintiff and to note this matter for the

court’s March 24th, 2006 docket.

DATED this 22nd day of February, 2006. 

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-05662-FDB Document 20 Filed 02/23/06 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the annual report of Cemtrex, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Arun Govil, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 (1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/ Arun Govil
 
 Arun Govil
 Chief Executive Officer
 and Principal Executive Officer
 August 31, 2011
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MARCH 31,
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-Q
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          19,945
<SECURITIES>                                       500
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,893
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,448
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,061
<PP&E>                                           9,941
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,582
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  39,420
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,816
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           130
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,474
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    39,420
<SALES>                                         30,332
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,332
<CGS>                                           27,297
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,297
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,454
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,419)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,419)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,419)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.26)
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         September 27, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 21, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 63 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2023-278, CP2023-281.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-20942 Filed 9-26-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
SCUDDER                             (logo)


Scudder Variable Life 
Investment Fund

Capital Growth Portfolio

Supplement to Prospectus
Dated May 1, 1997

Until  August 1,  1997,  Scudder  Variable  Life  Investment  Fund's  investment
adviser,  Scudder,  Stevens & Clark,  Inc.,  has  agreed to waive  0.025% of its
investment  management fee payable by Capital Growth Portfolio (the "Portfolio")
based on the  average  daily  net  assets  of the  Portfolio  in  excess of $500
million.





July 1, 1997
From: burnedmarshmallows@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:24:23 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

*any* organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections.

I strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sarah Hines

Mesa, AZ 85201
APPENDIX
“A”


 


SECOND
AMENDMENT


to


2003
OUTSIDE DIRECTORS STOCK PLAN


 


THIS
SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE PERMA-FIX ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 2003 OUTSIDE DIRECTORS STOCK PLAN (the “Second Amendment”)
was approved by the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (the “Company”)
to be effective on July 12, 2012, subject to the approval of the shareholders of the Company.


 


WHEREAS,
Article IX of the 2003 Outside Directors Stock Plan, effective July 29, 2003 (as amended, the “Plan”), provides that
the Board may at any time, and from time to time and, in any respect amend or modify the Plan;


 


WHEREAS,
as of July 9, 2012, the maximum number of shares of our common stock that may be issued under the Plan is 2,000,000 shares (subject
to adjustment as provided in the 2003 Plan), of which 1,810,168 have previously been issued or reserved for issuance under the
Plan, comprised of 1,054,168 shares previously been issued under the Plan, and 756,800 shares issuable under outstanding options
granted under the Plan;


 


WHEREAS,
in order to continue to attract and retain qualified members of the Board who are not employees of the Company, the Board is of
the opinion that it is necessary that the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued under the Plan be increased
from 2,000,000 to 3,000,000 shares (subject to adjustment as provided in the Plan); and,


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, the following amendments to the plan are unanimously adopted by the Board, subject to the approval of the shareholders
of the Company:


 


Amendment
to Section 4.1:


 


Section
4.1 of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting the number “2,000,000” from the first full sentence contained therein
and substituting in lieu thereof the number “3,000,000.”


 


The
Plan is hereby amended and modified only to the extent specifically amended or modified by this Second Amendment to the 2003 Outside
Directors Stock Plan. None of the other terms, conditions or provisions of the Plan, is amended or modified by this Second Amendment
to the 2003 Outside Directors Stock Plan.