alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: edarya@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:20:20 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Enoch Arya

Culver City, CA 90230
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 567 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 27, 2007.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 1) to provide for the 
implementation of the recommendations of the National Commission on Terrorist 
Attacks Upon the United States. All points of order against the conference 
report and against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be 
considered as read.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
H. Res. 349 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

May 2, 2007. 

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 1867) to authorize appropriations for fiscal 

years 2008, 2009, and 2010 for the National Science Foundation, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill 

shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under clause 

9 or 10 of rule XXI. General debate shall be confined to the 

bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 

Committee on Science and Technology. After general debate 

the bill shall be considered for amendment under the fiveminute rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original 

bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule 

the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by 

the Committee on Science and Technology now printed in the 
2 

•HRES 349 EH 

bill. All points of order against the committee amendment in 

the nature of a substitute are waived except those arising 

under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. Notwithstanding clause 11 

of rule XVIII, no amendment to the committee amendment 

in the nature of a substitute shall be in order except those 

printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated 

for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII and except pro 

forma amendments for the purpose of debate. Each amendment so printed may be offered only by the Member who 

caused it to be printed or his designee and shall be considered 

as read. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for 

amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill to 

the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. 

Any Member may demand a separate vote in the House on 

any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to 

the bill or to the committee amendment in the nature of a 

substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage 

without intervening motion except one motion to recommit 

with or without instructions. 

SEC. 2. During consideration in the House of H.R. 1867 

pursuant to this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of 

the previous question, the Chair may postpone further consid-
3 

•HRES 349 EH 

eration of the bill to such time as may be designated by the 

Speaker. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
From: mifindley41@dishmail.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:24:28 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Harold Findley

Grantville, GA 30220
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

DONALD COLE BURCHETT,

Plaintiff,

v.

DR. YOUNG,

Defendant.

CASE NO. C05-5715RBL

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION

 This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of Judge KAREN L.

STROMBOM, United States Magistrate Judge [Dkt. #4]. The Court has reviewed the report and the

underlying record, and does hereby find and ORDER:

 (1) The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [Dkt. #4];

 (2) The Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED, and Plaintiff shall have 30

days from the date of this Order to pay the filing fee ($250.00) or his Complaint will be dismissed;

 (3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to the plaintiff at his last known address and

to defendant's counsel and Magistrate Judge KAREN L. STROMBOM. 

DATED this 23rd day of February, 2006.ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-05715-RBL Document 5 Filed 02/23/06 Page 1 of 1
No. 143.

#### Young *v.*United States.

*Max Kabatznick*and *Israel Bernstein*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Cox,*

*Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg*and *Robert G. Maysack*for the United States.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Mohammad Qazi, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 780]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Finnegan, J.), rendered August 8,1992, convicting him of reckless endangerment in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of the branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The hearing court properly denied the branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress the axe that was recovered from a closet in the living room of the defendant’s apartment *(see, People v Adams,*53 NY2d 1, *cert denied*454 US 854; *People v Cosme,*48 NY2d 286). The hearing court’s determination that the defendant’s roommate voluntarily consented to a warrantless search of the apartment is supported by the record and should not be disturbed *(see, People v Prochilo,*41 NY2d 759; *People v Gonzalez,*39 NY2d 122).

The defendant has failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that the evidence is legally insufficient to establish his guilt of reckless endangerment in the second degree beyond a reasonable doubt *(see,*CPL 470.50 [2]; *People v Johnson,*185 AD2d 247; *People v Udzinski,*146 AD2d 245). In any event, this contention is without merit. Viewed in the light most favorable to the People *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), the evidence establishes that the defendant swung an axe at the complainant, who was standing a short distance away from him. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, *465we are satisfied that the jury’s verdict is not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

We have considered the defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Copertino, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, Gerald Pietroforte, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of Lehman Mortgage Trust 2008-3 (the "Exchange Act periodic
    reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
    in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
    disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
    fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
    material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Bank
    of America, National Association, as successor by merger to LaSalle
    Bank National Association, as Custodian for Lehman Mortgage Trust,
    Series 2007-1, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company as Custodian for
    Lehman Mortgage Trust, Series 2007-1, IndyMac Federal Bank, FSB f/k/a
    IndyMac Bank, F.S.B. as Servicer for Lehman Mortgage Trust, Series
    2007-1, Newport Management Corporation as Sub-Contractor for Aurora
    Loan Services LLC, Newport Management Corporation as Sub-Contractor for
    IndyMac Federal Bank, F.S.B. f/k/a IndyMac Bank, F.S.B., U.S. Bank
    National Association as Custodian for Lehman Mortgage Trust, Series
    2007-1, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as
    Trustee for Lehman Mortgage Trust, Series 2007-1, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
     as Paying Agent , Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Paying Agent for Lehman
    Mortgage Trust, Series 2007-1 and Westlake Settlement Services, LLC as
    Sub-Contractor for Aurora Loan Services LLC.

    Dated:   April 9, 2009


    By: /s/ Gerald Pietroforte
    Name: Gerald Pietroforte
    Title: Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
From: markpatro@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:19:07 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask to you i agree with the President regarding the mandate that all

"contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance!

Thank you for defining "religious employer" as one that must adhere to the American ideals that all

people are equal and no organization or business may discriminate on the basis of religious objection.

They may be allowed to teach what they want which is protected by the first amendment.

Discrimination is not covered by that speech.

Sincerely,

Mark Patro

Perry Hall, MD 21128
# Presidential Determination and Certification With Respect to the Child Soldiers Prevention Act of 2008

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State

Pursuant to section 404 of the Child Soldiers Prevention Act of 2008 (22 U.S.C. 2370c-1) (CSPA), I hereby:

Determine that it is in the national interest of the United States to waive the application of the prohibition in section 404(a) of the CSPA with respect to Egypt; to waive in part the application of the prohibition in section 404(a) of the CSPA with respect to Turkey to allow for the provision of International Military Education and Training (IMET) and Peacekeeping Operations (PKO) assistance, the issuance of direct commercial sales (DCS) licenses, and support provided pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 331 and 10 U.S.C. 333, to the extent that the CSPA would restrict such assistance or support; to waive in part the application of the prohibition in section 404(a) of the CSPA with respect to Libya and Somalia to allow for the provision of IMET and PKO assistance and support provided pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 331 and 10 U.S.C. 333, to the extent that the CSPA would restrict such assistance or support; to waive in part the application of the prohibition in section 404(a) of the CSPA with respect to the Democratic Republic of the Congo to allow for the provision of IMET and PKO assistance and the issuance of DCS licenses in connection with the reexport of transport aircraft, to the extent that the CSPA would restrict such assistance; to waive in part the application of the prohibition in section 404(a) of the CSPA with respect to the Central African Republic and Yemen to allow for the provision of IMET and PKO assistance, to the extent that the CSPA would restrict such assistance; and to waive the application of the prohibition in section 404(a) of the CSPA to allow for the issuance of DCS licenses related to other United States Government assistance for the above countries and, with respect to the Russian Federation, solely for the issuance of DCS licenses in connection with the International Space Station; and

Certify that the governments of the above countries are taking effective and continuing steps to address the problem of child soldiers.

Accordingly, I hereby waive such applications of section 404(a) of the CSPA.

                    You are authorized and directed to submit this determination and certification to the Congress, along with the Memorandum of Justification, and to publish this determination in the                     *Federal Register*.                

[FR Doc. 2023-21374

Billing code 4710-10-P
Hummingbird

Springs Wilderness

Big Horn

Mountains

Wilderness

Harquahala

Mountains

Wilderness

Hells Canyon

Wilderness

Hassayampa

River Canyon

Wilderness

Castle Creek

Wilderness

Mohave County

Yavapai County

Yavapai

Marico

County

pa County

La Paz County

Maricopa County

White Tank

Mountains

Regional Park

Lake

Pleasant

Regional

Park

Prescott

Prescott

Valley

Cordes

Junction

Yarnell

BLACK

CANYON

CITY

NEW

RIVER

WICKENBURG

PEORIA

SURPRISE

BUCKEYE

GOODYEAR

PHOENIX

GLENDALE

Bureau of Land Management

Phoenix District Office

Phoenix, AZ

October 2009

Note: Land Status legend located on Map 1

Map 12

Bradshaw-Harquahala

Planning Area

Closed to Locatable Minerals

0 5 10 15

Miles

BLM Wilderness

USFS Wilderness

Interstate

Major Road

Major River, Streams or Wash

Highway

Agua Fria National

Monument Planning Area

Bradshaw Harquahala

Planning Area

Management Unit

Closed to Locatable Minerals

Note: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM)

conducts land use planning only in the areas administered

by BLM. BLM has no planning authority under the

municipal or county planning legislation of the State

of Arizona.

No warranty is made by BLM for the use of this map

for purposes not intended by BLM, or to the accuracy,

reliability or completeness of the information shown.

Spatial information may not meet National Map Accuracy

standards. This information may be updated without

notification.
Case No. 12,926.

#### In re SKOLL.

[16 N. B. R. 175; 1 1 N. W. Rep. (O. S.) 108; 1 Month. Jur. 350: 9 Chi. Leg. News. 377: 6 Am. Law Rec. 15; 1 Tex. Law J. 42; 4 Law & Eq. Rep. 196; 24 Pittsb. Leg. J. 207.]

District Court, D. Minnesota.

July 21, 1877.

Bankruptcy — Assignment for Benefit of Creditors — Injunction.

Upon the institution of proceedings in bankruptcy an assignee for the benefit of creditors may be enjoined from interfering with the debtor’s assets before an adjudication has been had.

Certain creditors of [Jacob] Skoll, a clothier at Minneapolis, claiming to represent one-fourth iot number of his creditors, and one-third of the amount of his indebtedness provable under the bankrupt law. have commenced proceedings to have him adjudged bankrupt. On July 7th. Skoll made an assignment to one Clementson of his stock of goods for the benefit of his creditors equally. On filing the petition in bankruptcy, application was made for an injunction to restrain Clementson from making any transfer of the debtor’s property, which was granted. A motion is now made to dissolve the injunction.

1

 [Reprinted from 10 N. B. R. 175, by permission.]

NELSON, District Judge.

This assignment is a fraud upon the bankrupt law [of ISO" (14 Stat. 517)], and an act of bankruptcy. Such is the settled doctrine in this district. In re Burt [Case No. 2,210]. Clementson, the assignee, does not occupy the position of a bona fide purchaser. The assignment to him is voidable, and creditors can by bankruptcy proceedings set it aside. If they comply with the 39th section of the bankrupt law of 1S67, as amended, the debtor will be adjudged a bankrupt, and the assignment having been *305made by him when admittedly insolvent, his assignee in bankruptcy may recover the property or the value thereof. The bankrupt law contemplates a distribution of the debt- or’s assets in the federal court and a full administration in that jurisdiction; and provides that transfers or conveyances defeating its operation shall be void. It is manifestly then my duty to protect the right of creditors to have the property thus distributed, and to that end restrain, by injunction, the assignee under the state law, seeking to take the property from the control of the bankrupt court, and compel him to desist from disposing of it before an adjudication in bankruptcy. In that way only can full effect be given to the operation of the bankrupt law. Motion denied.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

VINCENT HOPPER,

Plaintiff,

v.

MICHAEL MELENDEZ, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5680RBL

ORDER

This matter is before the court upon plaintiff’s submission of a complaint without paying the required

filing fee or filing an application to proceed in forma pauperis. The clerk wrote plaintiff a letter, dated October

20, 2005, explaining this deficiency. 

Plaintiff shall either file the required application or pay the required filing fee ($250.00) by no later

than November 21, 2005. Otherwise, the court will recommend denial of his application and dismissal of the

underlying matter as frivolous.

The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this Order along with a blank IFP application form to plaintiff.

DATED this 7th day of November, 2005.

/s/ J. Kelley Arnold J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:05-cv-05680-RBL Document 5 Filed 11/07/05 Page 1 of 1