alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: seraphim@monasteryicons.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:55:30 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Seraphim Weber

Cedar Crest, NM 87008
From: rjrighter@earthlink.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:52:38 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Robert Righter

Fountain Valley, CA 92708
From: sheaf33@restel.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:53:15 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Richard Sheaffer

Watford City, ND 58854
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 14, 2015

No. 04-13-00858-CR

Wesley Allen DOTSON,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Karnes County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13-01-00015-CRK

Honorable Bert Richardson, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

On April 15, 2015, the Court of Criminal Appeals vacated this court’s judgment and 

remanded for re-consideration of the issue on appeal in light of the Court’s recent opinion in 

Meadows v. State, 455 S.W.3d 166 (Tex. Crim. App. 2015). The Court’s mandate has since 

issued. 

If the appellant wishes to file a brief addressing the issue on appeal in light of Meadows, 

he must do so no later than June 15, 2015. If appellant does not wish to file a new brief on 

remand and wishes to rely on his original brief filed in this cause, appellant must notify this court 

in writing no later than June 15, 2015. 

The State shall have thirty days following the filing of appellant’s brief or notification of 

reliance on appellant’s original brief in which to file its brief or written notice with this court that 

it does not wish to file a new brief on remand and wishes to rely on its original brief filed in this 

cause. The case will then be submitted for consideration by this court.
_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 14th day of May, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 12.1

CERTIFICATION

I, POLYS HAJIOANNOU, CERTIFY THAT:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F/A of Safe Bulkers, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

|                   |  |                                      | 
|------------------ |  | ------------------------------------ | 
|Date: July 6, 2012 |  | /s/ POLYS HAJIOANNOU                 | 
|                   |  | Polys Hajioannou                     | 
|                   |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer | 
|                   |  | (Principal Executive Officer)        | 

---
September 15,2014 

Dennis J. McLerran, Regional Administrator 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10 

1200 Sixth Avenue 

Mail Code: RA-140 

Seattle, WA 98101 

RE: Withdraw SIP revisions for PM2.5 inter-pollutant offsets 

Dear Dennis: 

Environmental Quality 

H_ca._dqturters 

811 SW Sixth Avenue 

Portland, OR 97204-1390 

(503) 229-5696 

FAX (503) 229-6124 

TTY: 711 

As the Governor's designee for the Clean Air Act State Implementation Plan, the Oregon 

Department of Environmental Quality requests withdrawal of the SIP revisions for OAR 340-225-

0090(2)(a)(C). 

The revision concerns PM2.5 inter-pollutant offsets. DEQ submitted the revision to EPA on May 5, 

2011 and then resubmitted the revision on December 20, 2012. EPA is unable to approve the revisions 

without supplemental information. It is possible DEQ may resubmit the revisions after resolving 

outstanding issues. 

Thank you for your assistance with these revisions to Oregon's SIP. If you need additional information or 

have questions, please contact Andrea Oartenbaum, SIP Coordinator at (503) 229-5946. 

Sincerely, 

\ 

\ 

Jori ,Hammond, 

Deputy Director 

CC David Collier, DEQ AQ Planning 

Paul Koprowski, EPA Oregon Operations office 

Justin Spenillo, EPA, Region 10 

Andrea Oartenbaum, DEQ SIP Coordinator 

Robbye Lanier, Lane Regional Air Protection Agency
From: jay1963@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:09:01 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I wholeheartedly support the federal government's move to mandate private insurance coverage of safe

and legal family planning methods. American families struggling to meet health care costs in a

constrained economy depend on this coverage.

I oppose efforts to include "conscience clauses" in the legislation. These efforts, by the Family Research

Council and others, attempt to impose religiously based restrictions on all Americans, regardless of their

faiths, and in effect try to legislate discriminatory policies on those least equipped to combat them.

Health care costs have risen in all areas, but family planning health care costs have risen comparatively

more as minority special interest groups meddle with citizens' rights to access these health care options.

Sincerely,

Jay Babcock

Saint Louis, MO 63110
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 200 Filed 10/01/04 Page 1 of 11
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 200 Filed 10/01/04 Page 2 of 11
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 200 Filed 10/01/04 Page 3 of 11
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 200 Filed 10/01/04 Page 4 of 11
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 200 Filed 10/01/04 Page 5 of 11
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 200 Filed 10/01/04 Page 6 of 11
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 200 Filed 10/01/04 Page 7 of 11
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 200 Filed 10/01/04 Page 8 of 11
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 200 Filed 10/01/04 Page 9 of 11
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 200 Filed 10/01/04 Page 10 of 11
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 200 Filed 10/01/04 Page 11 of 11
No. 64526.

#### Frederick H. Cone & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 59/32466, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic filaments similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Empire Brushes, Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(42 Cust. Ct. 145, C.D. 2078), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: lindamclean@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:23:22 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mary Linda

Grapevine, TX 76051
H. Res. 1343 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 16, 2008. 

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 5959) to authorize appropriations for fiscal 

year 2009 for intelligence and intelligence-related activities of 

the United States Government, the Community Management 

Account, and the Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and 

Disability System, and for other purposes. The first reading 

of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against 

consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under 

clause 9 of rule XXI. General debate shall be confined to the 

bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 

Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. After general 

debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the 

five-minute rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute 
2 

•HRES 1343 EH 

rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence now printed in the bill. The committee amendment in 

the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. All 

points of order against the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute are waived. Notwithstanding clause 11 of 

rule XVIII, no amendment to the committee amendment in 

the nature of a substitute shall be in order except those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying 

this resolution. Each such amendment may be offered only in 

the order printed in the report, may be offered only by a 

Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, 

shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally 

divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, 

shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject 

to a demand for division of the question in the House or in 

the Committee of the Whole. All points of order against such 

amendments are waived except those arising under clause 9 

or 10 of rule XXI. At the conclusion of consideration of the 

bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the 

bill to the House with such amendments as may have been 

adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in the 

House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of the 

Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be consid-
3 

•HRES 1343 EH 

ered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final 

passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

SEC. 2. During consideration in the House of H.R. 5959 

pursuant to this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of 

the previous question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the bill to such time as may be designated by the 

Speaker. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the use in the Statement of Additional Information
constituting part of this Post-Effective Amendment No. 18 to the registration
statement on Form N-1A (the "Registration Statement") of our report dated
February 8, 1996, relating to the financial statements and financial highlights
of United Gold & Government Fund, Inc., which appears in such Statement of
Additional Information, and to the incorporation by reference of our report into
the Class A Shares Prospectus and the Class Y Shares Prospectus which constitute
part of this Registration Statement.  We also consent to the reference to us
under the heading "Custodial and Auditing Services" in such Statement of
Additional Information, to the reference to us under the heading "Financial
Highlights" in the Class A Shares Prospectus and to the references to us under
the heading "Independent Accountants" in the Class A Shares Prospectus and the
Class Y Shares Prospectus.



Price Waterhouse LLP
Kansas City, Missouri
February 15, 1995
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 538 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 538

   Recognizing Mukhtar Mai for her courage and her humanitarian work.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 11, 2007

  Mr. Meeks of New York submitted the following resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Recognizing Mukhtar Mai for her courage and her humanitarian work.

Whereas Mukhtar Mai is a Pakistani woman from the village of Meerwala, in the 
        rural county of Jatoi of the Muzaffargarh District of Pakistan;
Whereas Mukhtar Mai's brother, Shakoor, was suspected and accused of being seen 
        in the company of a Mastoi woman and was accused of engaging in sexually 
        inappropriate behavior with her;
Whereas the village council suggested that Shakoor marry the girl he was seen 
        with and Mukhtar Mai, a divorcee, be married to a Mastoi man;
Whereas the Mastois reportedly rejected the deal, insisting the issue be settled 
        with the eye-for-an-eye principle;
Whereas Mukhtar Mai was called to the council to apologize for her brother's 
        conduct;
Whereas when Mukhtar Mai appeared before the council she was taken by force and 
        gang raped by 4 men;
Whereas Mukhtar Mai, an illiterate woman, courageously took her case to court 
        where the 4 defendants were found guilty;
Whereas Mukhtar Mai took the settlement money provided by the government 
        following her court case and opened 2 schools in her village--one for 
        boys and one for girls, as well as a center for refuge and education 
        known as the Mukhtar Mai Women's Welfare Organization;
Whereas on August 2, 2005, the Pakistani Government awarded Mukhtar Mai the 
        Fatima Jinnah gold medal for bravery and courage;
Whereas on November 2, 2005, Glamour Magazine named Mukhtar Mai its ``Glamour 
        Woman of the Year'';
Whereas on October 31, 2006, Mukhtar Mai's memoir was released in the United 
        States, titled ``In the Name of Honor: A Memoir'';
Whereas in March 2007, Mukhtar Mai won the North-South Prize from the European 
        Union Council of Europe; and
Whereas Mukhtar Mai continues to campaign for women's rights and the promotion 
        of education around the world: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes Mukhtar Mai for her courage to fight for 
        justice; and
            (2) recognizes Mukhtar Mai for promoting education and 
        being a champion of women's rights.
                                 <all>
```
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-19-00289-CR

Frank Anthony CASTILLO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR0005W

Honorable Steve Hilbig, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. 

SIGNED September 4, 2019.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
April8,2010 Christopher R. Donovan Boston Executive Hellcoptell 209 Access Road Norwood, Massachusetts 

### 02062 Mr . Russ Maguire, AAE, ACE Manager, Norwood Municipal Airport 125 Access Road
'- Dear Mr. 

### Maguire, '•



### I would like to appear before the next available Norwood Airport Commission meeting to introduce myself and appl y 

### for my initial Airport Commercial Operators pennit. If you have any questions please call Christopher R . Donovan , President at 

### 781·603·6186 . Sincerely ,

Boston Executive Heli copters 

### 209 Access 

### Road Norwood, Massachusetts 

### 02062 (781) 603·6186

. . 

### .... .. . .... .. ...., .. 4.

**-~~-** , ._ .. ::.: •. :.. ....... o o-0 0

:_ :

.:

**~** 0'- 0 0 0 .. 000oo 0 000 A O .... 

### . . " .

**~** . ..... " . .. . .
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER ON MOTION FOR PRETRIAL

DISCLOSURE OF RULE 404(b)

EVIDENCE

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff,

v.

RAJINDER JOHAL, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. CR05-334RSL

ORDER ON MOTION FOR PRETRIAL

DISCLOSURE OF RULE 404(b)

EVIDENCE

This matter comes before the Court on “Defendant Johal’s Motion for Pretrial Disclosure

of Rule 404(b) Evidence” (Dkt. # 136). The Court has considered this motion and the

government’s response and finds that the government recognizes its obligations in this area. Per

its response, the government will disclose any 404(b) evidence it intends to use no later than one

month before trial. Because there is currently nothing to be disclosed, the motion is DENIED

AS MOOT.

DATED this 25th day of May, 2006.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cr-00334-RSL Document 157 Filed 05/25/06 Page 1 of 1