alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 465 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 73
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 465

                          [Report No. 110-180]

 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 65) to provide for the 
   recognition of the Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 6, 2007

    Mr. Arcuri, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 65) to provide for the 
   recognition of the Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Resolved,  That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 65) to provide for the 
recognition of the Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina, and for other 
purposes. All points of order against consideration of the bill are 
waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The 
amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on 
Natural Resources now printed in the bill, modified by the amendment 
printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this 
resolution, shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall 
be considered as read. All points of order against the bill, as 
amended, are waived. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the bill, as amended, to final passage without intervening 
motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by 
the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Natural 
Resources; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
    Sec. 2. During consideration of H.R. 65 pursuant to this 
resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the 
Chair may postpone further consideration of the bill to such time as 
may be designated by the Speaker.
                                                  House Calendar No. 73

110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 465

                          [Report No. 110-180]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 65) to provide for the 
   recognition of the Lumbee Tribe of North Carolina, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              June 6, 2007

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 24-1027

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Willie Jay Lee

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Iowa

 ____________

 Submitted: July 24, 2024

Filed: August 9, 2024

[Unpublished]

____________

Before KELLY, GRASZ, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Willie Lee appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed after he pled guilty

to a drug offense. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief

1The Honorable Rebecca Goodgame Ebinger, United States District Judge for

the Southern District of Iowa.
under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), asserting claims of ineffective

assistance of counsel. Lee has also filed a motion for appointment of new counsel on

appeal.

We decline to consider Lee’s ineffective-assistance claim in this direct appeal. 

Ineffective-assistance claims are normally deferred for proceedings under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255, barring exceptional circumstances. See United States v. Looking Cloud, 419

F.3d 781, 788-89 (8th Cir. 2005). We conclude there are no such circumstances in

this case, as the record is not sufficiently developed to decide the merits of Lee’s

claim. See United States v. Ramirez-Hernandez, 449 F.3d 824, 826-27 (8th Cir.

2006) (stating ineffective-assistance claims are “usually best litigated in collateral

proceedings” where a record can be properly developed).

We have independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant

counsel leave to withdraw, deny Lee’s motion for appointment of new counsel, and

affirm.

______________________________

-2-
No. 62207.

#### Inter-Maritime Forwarding Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 313883-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of traveling irons similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Greatrex, Limited,*and *J. J. Gavin & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 79, C. D. 1639), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
II

Calendar No. 229

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1184

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at

2853 Candler Road in Decatur, Georgia, as the ‘‘Earl T. Shinhoster

Post Office’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 17, 2001

Mr. CLELAND (for himself and Mr. MILLER) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

NOVEMBER 16, 2001

Reported by Mr. LIEBERMAN, without amendment

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 2853 Candler Road in Decatur, Georgia, as

the ‘‘Earl T. Shinhoster Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF EARL T. SHINHOSTER POST

4 OFFICE.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The facility of the United States

6 Postal Service located at 2853 Candler Road in Decatur,
2

•S 1184 RS

1 Georgia, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Earl T.

2 Shinhoster Post Office’’.

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall

6 be deemed to be a reference to the Earl T. Shinhoster

7 Post Office.

Calendar No. 229

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1184

A BILL

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2853 Candler Road in Decatur, Georgia, as the ‘‘Earl T. Shinhoster Post

Office’’.

NOVEMBER 16, 2001

Reported without amendment
From: jppk@mncable.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:28:22 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Pat Hanson

Warroad, MN 56763
Before the First Division,

February 26, 1959

No. 62779.

#### Manca, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 328941-K and 330323-K (New York).

*289Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with, stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of parts of photographic cameras, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 188 (Friday, September 29, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 67327]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21358]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel Consortium for Food Allergy 
Research: Leadership Center (UM1 Clinical Trial Required).
    Date: November 1, 2023.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3F52, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Lindsey M. Pujanandez, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3F52 
Rockville, MD 20852, (240) 627-3206, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#187471767c6b7d6136686d72797679767c7d6258767170367f776e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bbd7d2d5dfc8dec295cbced1dad5dad5dfdec1fbd5d2d395dcd4cd">[email protected]</span></a>.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 25, 2023.
Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-21358 Filed 9-28-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 11

- 00331

- CV

WILLIAM MAYO APPELLANT

V.

TECHNICAL TRANSPORTA TION APPELLEE

------------

FROM THE 352ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

------------

We have considered the parties’ “ Agreed Motion For Remand .” The

motion is GRANTED . W e set aside, without regard to the merits

, the trial court = s

judgment and remand this case to the trial court for further proceedings in

accordance with th e parties’ agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B);

Innovative Office Sys., Inc. v. Johnson , 911 S.W. 2d 387, 388 (Tex. 1995); In re

Ortega , 225 S.W.3d 610, 610

– 11 (Tex. App.

–– El Paso 2006, no pet.).

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party inc urring the same, for which

let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: March 15, 2012
From: edison_davis@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:52:01 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Edison Davis

Colorado Springs, CO 80922
February 2010

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

Preventing Acts of Terrorism, Securing the Borders and 

Facilitating Legitimate Trade and Travel

Field Operations Air and Marine Border Patrol
February 2010

Office of Field Operations

OFO operates at 20 major field 

offices, 327 ports of entry, 58 

operational Container Security 

Initiative ports, and 15 

preclearance stations in Canada, 

Ireland, and the Caribbean.
February 2010

We protect American agriculture

 Agriculture specialists inspect 

ships, airplanes, vehicles, 

cargo, passengers, and their 

baggage for prohibited 

products that may carry

pests and disease.
February 2010

OAM protects by air and sea

 CBP Air and Marine is the 

world’s largest law 

enforcement air and marine 

force. 
February 2010

U.S. Border Patrol Background

 Founded May 28, 1924.

 Uniformed law enforcement component of DHS.

Provides border security between designated Ports of Entry.

Primary Responsibility for 6,000 miles of land border:

• 2,000 miles with Mexico

• 4,000 miles with Canada

 Operates in an “all-threats” environment.
February 2010

United States Border Patrol - Mission

 Priority Mission: Preventing terrorists and terrorist weapons from 

entering the United States.

 Traditional Mission: Preventing illegal aliens, smugglers, narcotics 

and other contraband from entering the United States.

 Strategic Goal: Establish and maintain effective operational control of 

our Nation’s borders.

 Operational Control is defined as the ability to consistently:

 Detect entries when they occur;

 Identify what the entry is and classify it’s level of threat (who they are, 

what they are doing, how many, etc.);

 Effectively and efficiently respond to the entry, and;

 Bring the situation to the appropriate law enforcement resolution.
February 2010

Strategic Deployment

Develop and Deploy the right combination of:

 Personnel

 Rapid Response Capability

 Infrastructure

 Roads, fence, boat ramps, etc.

 Technology

 Situational Awareness 
February 2010

Urban, Rural & Remote Environments
February 2010

Supplemental Enforcement Strategies

 Defense-in-Depth (Checkpoints, Transportation Checks, etc.)

 Partnerships

 Intelligence

 Situational Awareness/Common Operating Picture (COP)

 Legal Consequences (Operation Streamline)
No. 65175.

#### Rocca-Cuvi, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 316894-K (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *The Best Foods, Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 163, C.A.D. 751), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: majozim@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:22:40 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Margie Zimmerman

Auburn, NE 68305
Amendment No. 3 to the ING Americas Severance Pay Plan



 Exhibit 10.66 
 AMENDMENT NUMBER THREE 
 TO THE ING AMERICAS SEVERANCE PAY PLAN,

 AS AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2008 

WHEREAS, Section 4.2 of the ING Americas Severance Pay Plan as amended and restated effective as of January 1, 2008 (the
“Plan”) reserves to ING North America Insurance Corporation (the “Company”) the power to amend the Plan; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company has decided to amend the Plan, effective October 1, 2009, to modify the Plan as it applies to certain repatriated and involuntarily terminated employees of the Company.

 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the Company hereby amends the Plan effective October 1, 2009, as follows:

  

	 	1.	Effective October 1, 2009, Section 1.18(f), shall be added to the definition of Qualified Termination to read as follows: 


An Eligible Employee declining to continue employment where business needs require the Eligible Employee’s job to be
performed at home for all or a significant part of the workweek, including an Eligible Employee who declines to commence such a home work location arrangement. If, as a result of business needs, an Eligible Employee transitions from working in an
office to a home location, and within 30 days of commencing the home work location arrangement, the Eligible Employee communicates his/her desire to cease employment, the Company may, in its discretion, offer enhanced severance benefits to the
Eligible Employee. 
  

	 	2.	Effective October 1, 2009, Section 1.19, definition of Release Date is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: 


 

	 	1.19	 Release Date means for each Eligible Employee, the official last date at work established by the Company or his or her Participating Employer. With
respect to Eligible Employees who are involuntarily terminated as described in Section 1.18(d), “Release Date” shall be the first day the Eligible Employee is released to return to work under the STD Program. With respect to Eligible
Employees who are involuntarily terminated as described in Section 1.18(e), “Release Date” shall be no later than the 30th day following repatriation. With respect to Eligible Employees who are involuntarily terminated as described in
Section 1.18(f), “Release Date” shall be the last date at work established by the Company or the Participating Employer. 










	 	3.	Except as expressly amended by this Amendment Number Three, the provisions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment Number Three to be signed by its duly authorized officer effective as of
the date last executed below. 
  

			
	ING North America Insurance Corporation
		
	By:	 	/s/ William Delahanty
		 	William Delahanty
		 	Head of Rewards and Operations
		
	 Date:    
	 	December 21, 2009


 Amendment Three ING Americas Severance Pay Plan 
 Page 2 of 2