alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT facility

DONALD O. SALAREA,

Plaintiff,

v.

DOCTORS OF MENTAL HEALTH AT

WASHINGTON CORRECTIONS CENTER et

al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5679RJB

SECOND ORDER TO AMEND THE

COMPLAINT 

This civil rights action has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to

Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Plaintiff has been given leave to proceed in forma pauperis. 

On November 11th, 2005 the court entered an order requiring plaintiff to file an amended

complaint that named the defendants. (Dkt. # 6). Since that time plaintiff has filed two service order

forms. One form names Eric Currier and the other form names Roberta Knesse. (Dkt. Staff note

dated December 19th, 2005. 

Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint that tells the court what these two people did and

Case 3:05-cv-05679-RJB Document 8 Filed 01/03/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER

why plaintiff believes these two people to be proper defendants.

In order to state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a complaint must allege that (l) the conduct

complained of was committed by a person acting under color of state law and that (2) the conduct

deprived a person of a right, privilege, or immunity secured by the Constitution or laws of the United

States. Parratt v. Taylor, 451 U.S. 527, 535 (1981), overruled on other grounds, Daniels v.

Williams, 474 U.S. 327 (1986) (emphasis added). Section 1983 is the appropriate avenue to remedy

an alleged wrong only if both of these elements are present. Haygood v. Younger, 769 F.2d 1350,

1354 (9th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 478 U.S. 1020 (1986). 

Plaintiff still needs to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff will also need to send the court a

 copy of the complaint. The court will not order the United States Marshals Service to attempt

service by mail without copies of the complaint and filled out service forms. The amended complaint

will act as a complete substitute for the original and must be received on or before February 3rd,

2006 or the court will enter a Report and Recommendation that this action be dismissed.

The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to plaintiff, and note the due date for the

amended complaint as February 3rd, 2006.

DATED this 3rd day of January, 2006.

/S/ J. Kelley Arnold

J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-05679-RJB Document 8 Filed 01/03/06 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 188 (Friday, September 29, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 67332]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21440]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Frederick National 
Laboratory Advisory Committee to the National Cancer Institute.
    The meeting will be held virtually and is open to the public. 
Individuals who plan to view the virtual meeting and need special 
assistance or other reasonable accommodations to view the meeting, 
should notify the Contact Person listed below in advance of the 
meeting. The meeting will be videocast and can be accessed from the NIH 
Videocasting and Podcasting website (http://videocast.nih.gov).

    Name of Committee: Frederick National Laboratory Advisory 
Committee to the National Cancer Institute.
    Date: October 19, 2023.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: Ongoing and new activities at the Frederick National 
Laboratory for Cancer Research.
    Place: National Cancer Institute Shady Grove, 9609 Medical 
Center Drive, Rockville, MD 20850 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Christopher D. Kane, Ph.D., Health Science 
Administrator and Program Officer, NCI at Frederick Office of 
Scientific Operations, National Cancer Institute, National 
Institutes of Health, 1050 Boyles Street, Building 427, Room 4, 
Frederick, Maryland 21702, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d0b3b8a2b9a3a4bfa0b8b5a2febbb1beb590beb9b8feb7bfa6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1e7d766c776d6a716e767b6c30757f707b5e70777630797168">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed 
on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, 
telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: FNLAC: https://deainfo.nci.nih.gov/advisory/fac/fac.htm, where 
an agenda and any additional information for the meeting will be 
posted when available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 26, 2023.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-21440 Filed 9-28-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
From: ejej4@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:05:03 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Eric Fekkes

Thousand Oaks, CA 91360
From: mum_carroll@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:25:17 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Lillian Carroll

Erie, IL 61250
Before the First Division,

August 7, 1967

No. P67/259.

#### Acme Venetian Blind & Window Shade *Corp. v.*United States, protests 64/5421, etc. (New York).

Beckworth, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of Philippine mahogany sticks or slats similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Acme Venetian Blind & Window Shade Corp.*v. *United States*(56 Cust. Ct. 563, C.D. 2704), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/gpo59141 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
From: JOHNGCURTIS@MSN.COM

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:14:18 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

JOHN CURTIS

Keokuk, IA 52632
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Thomas Reyes, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 17]

—Judgment, Supreme *336Court, Bronx County (Harold Silverman, J.), rendered September 27, 1993, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 20 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant told the detective who arrested him that he was in Chicago on the night of the murder and that he had used a plane ticket issued in another person’s name to fly there. Two of defendant’s prior attorneys mentioned in discussions with the prosecutor that defendant might interpose an alibi defense, but neither filed a formal alibi notice. During jury selection, new defense counsel announced in open court that there might be an alibi witness whom defendant had mentioned to one of his previous attorneys, but after speaking with defendant, he too declined to give formal notice. Defendant later testified at trial that he was at the scene and witnessed the murder. Since, on this record, the details of the alibi defense were not fairly attributable to defendant, the trial court erred in permitting the prosecutor to impeach him regarding his discussions with his attorneys concerning his alibi *(People v Jones,*190 AD2d 31, 33; *compare, People v Shuff,*168 AD2d 348, *Iv denied*77 NY2d 967). However, such error was harmless because the issue of defendant’s alibi was properly raised through questions regarding his statements to the arresting officer, and because the evidence of defendant’s guilt was overwhelming.

The court’s accomplice charge, when viewed as a whole, "clearly advised the jury how to evaluate the corroborating evidence” *(People v Prittler,*214 AD2d 311, 312, *Iv denied*86 NY2d 739). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Ross, Asch and Nardelli, JJ.
Exhibit 21
 List of Subsidiaries
  Subsidiary
    
    Jurisdiction of FormationMonitronics International, Inc.
    
    TexasMonitronics Canada, Inc.
    
    CanadaMI Servicer HC, LLC
    
    DelawareMI Servicer LP, LLC
    
    DelawareMI Servicer GP, LLC
    
    DelawareMIBU Servicer Inc.
    
    DelawareMonitronics Security LP
    
    DelawareMI Funding HC, LLC
    
    DelawareMI Funding LP, LLC
    
    DelawareMI Funding GP, LLC
    
    DelawareMonitronics Funding LP
    
    DelawareFour Media Company, LLC
    
    DelawareTodd-AO, Espana
    
    California103 Todd-AO Estudio S.L.
    
    SpainAscent Media Holdings Limited
    
    EnglandAscent Media Limited
    
    EnglandRushes Televisión, S.A. de C.V.
    
    MexicoServicios Administravos de Post Produccion S.A. de C.V.
    
    MexicoAscent Media GP Ltd.
    
    EnglandAscent Media UK Limited Partnership
    
    EnglandAscent Media Property Holdings, LLC
    
    DelawareAscent Media Systems Integration, LLC
    
    DelawareDHC Pramer Acquisition, Inc.
    
    Delaware
From: memeswallace@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:53:55 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sara Hadden

Pooler, GA 31322
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 187 (Thursday, September 28, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 66861]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21234]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Establishment of the Social and Community Influences on Health 
Integrated Review Group

    Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 
U.S.C. 1001-1014), the Director, National Institutes of Health (NIH) 
announces the establishment of the Social and Community Influences on 
Health Integrated Review Group (IRG) as authorized by 42 U.S.C. 
282(b)(16), section 402(b)(16) of the Public Health Service Act, as 
amended.
    The Director, NIH, has determined that the Social and Community 
Influences on Health IRG is in the public interest in connection with 
the performance of duties imposed on NIH by law, and that these duties 
can best be performed through the advice and counsel of the committee.
    The committee provides advice and recommendations on funding 
applications and proposals, including but not limited to, the 
scientific and technical merit of applications for grants-in-aid for 
research, research training, or research-related grants and cooperative 
agreements, or contract proposals relating to scientific areas relevant 
to social, interpersonal, community, and cultural influences on health, 
development, and well-being across the life span.
    Inquiries may be directed to Claire Harris, Director, Office of 
Federal Advisory Committee Policy, Office of the Director, National 
Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 1000, Bethesda, 
Maryland 20892 (Mail code 4875), Telephone (301) 496-2123, or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8fcce3eee6fdeaa1c7eefdfde6fccfe1e6e7a1e8e0f9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="07446b666e7562294f6675756e7447696e6f29606871">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: September 21, 2023.
Lawrence A. Tabak,
Acting NIH Director, National Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. 2023-21234 Filed 9-27-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 69678.

#### J. E. Bernard & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 64/17849-14526 (Chicago).

Opinion by

Nichols, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of wood statuary similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Fusek’s*v. *United States*(53 Cust. Ct. 109, C.D. 2480), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: alancarolyn@earthlink.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:31:00 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Alan Resnicke

Silver City, NM 88061
February 19, 1957

No. 60513.

#### Star-Kist Foods, Inc. *v.*United States (Bruno Scheidt, Inc., Party in Interest),

protest 258737-K.

C. D. 1819. Plaintiff’s application for rehearing denied. Mollison, J., dissented.
No. 66003.

#### United Merchants & Mfgrs., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 69/6862 and 59/9086 (Norfolk).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic yarns similar in use to thrown silk not more advanced than singles, tram, or organzine and following the principles set forth in *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Be th Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 9, 2015

p0831 

# Order

Clerk September 9, 2015

150455 & (15)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 150455

COA: 321789

Wayne CC: 05

- 011168

- FC

HASSAN MOHAMMED RIZK

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 19, 2014

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The

motion to remand is DENIED.