alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: bradley516@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:59:45 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Bill Bradley

Owensboro, KY 42303
From: ed@estimations.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:40:37 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Wanda Beach

Mount Vernon, TX 75457
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 446 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                          June 6, 2007.
Whereas Walter Schirra was born on March 12, 1923, in Hackensack, New Jersey;
Whereas as an exchange pilot with the 154th Fighter Bomber Squadron during the 
        Korean War, he flew 90 combat missions in F-84E jets and was credited 
        with downing at least one MIG fighter;
Whereas on October 3, 1962, Walter Schirra became the fifth person to fly in 
        space when he piloted Mercury 8 (Sigma 7) on a six-orbit mission lasting 
        9 hours, 13 minutes and 11 seconds;
Whereas on December 15, 1965, Walter Schirra piloted Gemini 6A in what was the 
        first attempted rendezvous by two manned spacecraft in earth orbit;
Whereas on October 11, 1968, he concluded his third and final mission when he 
        was launched as commander of Apollo 7, the first manned Apollo mission, 
        making Commander Schirra the only astronaut to fly aboard Mercury, 
        Gemini and Apollo spacecrafts;
Whereas Commander Schirra was the recipient of many distinguished awards, 
        including three distinguished flying crosses, two air medals, two NASA 
        Distinguished Services Medals and induction into the National Aviation 
        Hall of Fame;
Whereas after he retired to San Diego in 1984, Wally dedicated much of his later 
        years to working with children on connecting them to the amazing 
        possibilities that a career on space exploration could provide, and as a 
        tireless advocate for discovery, Wally was an inspirational figure for 
        countless San Diegans; and
Whereas Commander Schirra was an exemplary resident of the State of California 
        where he resided in La Jolla until the time of his death on May 2, 2007: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives--
            (1) honors the life and accomplishments of Astronaut Walter Marty 
        Schirra and expresses condolences on his passing; and
            (2) recognizes the profound importance of Astronaut Schirra's record 
        as a pioneer in space exploration and long-time contributor to NASA's 
        mission as a catalyst to space exploration and scientific advancement in 
        the United States.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
From: penguinoaks@att.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:09:22 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Marcus Oaks

Saint Louis, MO 63126
UNITED STAT ES DIS TRICT COURT F OR THE DIS TRICT OF COLUM BIA

David L. Call oway, P etitioner , v. Civil Action No. 10-0279 (JD B) P arole Board, Respondent.

MEMORAN DUM In response to the Orde r direc ting r espondents to show ca use why the writ of

habeas corpus should not iss ue, the United States ha s documented why the writ should not issue. See United States’ Opposition to Petit ioner’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus [Dkt. 8] . By Orde r of August 9, 2010, petitioner was g iven until September 10, 2010, to reply to the United States’ opposition, but t he orde r wa s returne d to the Court as undelivere d with an indication that petitioner has be en re lease d from his incar cer ation. SeeDkt. No. 12. I t appea ring that the habe as petition is m oot, the Court will sum marily deny the petition and dismiss t he ca se. A sepa rate Orde r ac companies this Memora ndum. s/

J OHN D. B ATES United States District J udg e DATE: Oc tober 4, 2010
-1- 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

COURT OF APPEALS 

MARY FREE BED REHABILITATION 

HOSPITAL, BRONSON HEALTH CARE 

GROUP INC, and YU JU CHEN, 

 Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

UNPUBLISHED 

December 22, 2015 

v 

FARMERS INSURANCE GROUP OF 

COMPANIES, a/k/a FARMERS GROUP, INC., 

and MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY, 

 Defendants, 

and 

No. 321328 

Kent Circuit Court 

LC No. 13-002433-NF 

ILLINOIS FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

Before: MARKEY, P.J., and MURPHY and STEPHENS, JJ. 

MARKEY, J. (concurring). 

 I concur in result only. 

/s/ Jane E. Markey
Before the Second Division,

March 28, 1963

No. 67543.

#### Rex-Spanall, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 62/11597 (Tampa).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of form supports similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Universal Builders Supply Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(48 Cust. Ct. 99, C.D. 2319), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before the Second Division,

April 4, 1966

No. P66/14.

protests 62/5813, etc. (Philadelphia).

#### John H. Faunce Phila., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of battery-operated mixers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *F. B. Vandegrift & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(53 Cust. Ct. 231, Abstract 68674), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: b_swagg@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:12:44 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Rebecca Swaggerty

Rossville, GA 30741
From: doris.oshiro@capatriots.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:08:35 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

doris oshiro

Honolulu, HI 96819
Promissory Note



 Exhibit 10.7 
 PROMISSORY NOTE 
  

			
	 $12,958,162.00
	  	January 16, 2013

 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned CHP CLAREMONT CA OWNER, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company (the "Borrower"), hereby promises to pay to the order of REGIONS BANK, an Alabama banking corporation (the "Bank"), the aggregate principal amount of the Claremont Advances (as hereinafter defined)
owing to Bank by Borrower pursuant to that certain Credit Agreement of even date herewith between Borrower and Bank (as amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the "Credit Agreement"; capitalized terms used herein as
therein defined), together with interest on the unpaid principal amount of each Claremont Advance from the date of such Claremont Advance until such principal amount is paid in full, at such interest rates, and payable at such times, as are
specified in the Credit Agreement. 
 This Promissory Note is the Claremont Note referred to in, and is entitled
to the benefits of, the Credit Agreement, to which reference is made for a statement of the rights and obligations of Borrower and Bank in relation thereto; but neither this reference to the Credit Agreement nor any provision thereof shall affect or
impair the absolute and unconditional obligation of Borrower to pay the principal sum of and interest on this Promissory Note when due. The Credit Agreement (i) provides for the making of Advances of the Claremont Project Loan (the
"Claremont Advances") by Bank in an aggregate amount up to the U.S. dollar amount first above mentioned, the indebtedness resulting from the Claremont Advances being evidenced by this Promissory Note, and (ii) contains provisions for
acceleration of the maturity hereof upon the happening of certain stated events and also for prepayments on account of principal hereof prior to the maturity hereof upon the terms and conditions therein specified. The obligations of Borrower under
this Promissory Note are secured by the Collateral as provided in the Loan Documents. 
 * * * * * 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Borrower has caused this Promissory Note to be
executed as of the date first above written. 
  

			
	 CHP CLAREMONT CA OWNER, LLC,

	 a Delaware limited liability company

	
	 By: /s/ Joshua J. Taube

	 Name: Joshua J. Taube

	 Title: Vice President



 This Note was executed inside the State of Florida. Accordingly, documentary stamp tax in the
amount of $2,450 has been, or will be, paid directly to the Florida Department of Revenue upon the execution and delivery of this Note.
From: sfulton@dc.ntcmail.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:44:29 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sherry Fulton

Jackson, MS 39211
No. 61025.

protests 45819-K, etc. (New York).

#### M. Segerman and American Express Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of kidskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Kung Chen Fur Corpn.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480) or *Prime Fur Corp.*v. *United States*(37 Cust. Ct. 83, C. D. 1802) and lambskin plates similar to those the subject of *A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643) or C. D. 1802, *supra,*the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained, except as to the following merchandise:

Merchandise Entry . Protest

“cat plates” 97709 48882-K

“house cat plates” 82601 97340-K

“Leopard cat plates” “ “

“cat plates” 82480 107489-K

“ 84312 “

“white slink skins” 49853 940791-G

which was abandoned.

Mollison, J.,

dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinions in C. D. 1480 and C. D. 1643, *supra.*
No. 67082.

protests 59/20860, etc. (New York).

#### Biddle Purchasing Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *Falcon Sales Company*and *J. J. Murphy & Co.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 129, C.D. 2292), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
### Geology and thorium deposits of the Wet Mountains, Colorado; a progress report

By: Robert Adam ChristmanM. R. BrockR. C. PearsonQ. D. Singewald

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1072H

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 15**                            (8624 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 16**                            (1186 pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Wet Mountain thorium investigations, 1952-1954, Fremont and Custer Counties, Colorado(1955)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.