alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: mzumbrun@wyomail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:03:14 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

LOLA ZUMBRUNNEN

Lusk, WY 82225
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 342 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 342

      Congratulating Berkeley College on the occasion of its 75th 
                              anniversary.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 26, 2007

 Mr. Pascrell (for himself, Mr. Garrett of New Jersey, Mrs. Maloney of 
New York, and Mr. Sires) submitted the following resolution; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
      Congratulating Berkeley College on the occasion of its 75th 
                              anniversary.

Whereas Berkeley College's educational traditions date back to 1931 when the 
        school first opened in East Orange, New Jersey, as a private institution 
        dedicated to executive secretarial training for women;
Whereas Berkeley College provides an all-encompassing educational experience 
        designed to develop professional competencies in preparation for 
        business careers and to provide the knowledge, understanding, and 
        appreciation of our culture necessary to meet the demands of an ever-
        changing society;
Whereas throughout its impressive history, Berkeley College has consistently 
        brought together distinguished and dedicated administrators, faculty, 
        and staff whose talents, expertise, vision, and commitment have enabled 
        generations of students to explore and enjoy exciting new worlds of 
        knowledge and enrichment;
Whereas more than 5,000 students from 7 locations in New York and New Jersey, 
        students from 29 states and 88 foreign countries, have chosen Berkeley 
        College as their higher education provider;
Whereas Berkeley College's 7 locations can be found in Newark, New Jersey; West 
        Paterson, New Jersey; Woodbridge, New Jersey; Paramus, New Jersey; White 
        Plains, New York; and two locations in New York City, New York;
Whereas the College continues to grow and seek ways to enable more citizens 
        access to higher education at new locations in New York and New Jersey 
        and online through the Internet; and
Whereas Berkeley College offers superior programs that balance traditional 
        academic preparation with professional training and hands-on experience: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives--
            (1) congratulates Berkeley College on the occasion of its 
        75th anniversary; and
            (2) commends the President of Berkeley College, Dr. Mildred 
        Garcia, and the administration, faculty, staff, students, and 
        alumnae of the College for their outstanding achievements and 
        their contribution to the community.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of the Canistel Acquisition Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2008 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James M. Cassidy
                                 President and Director and
                                 Chief Executivie Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer
Date: March 30, 2009
From: 1momjohn@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:51:40 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Cindy Johnson

Wamego, KS 66547
From: tovesjose@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:47:16 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jose Toves

Fredericksburg, VA 22406
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 6 Filed 11/04/02 Page 1 of 1
From: heaton_house@mchsi.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:38:57 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Linda Heaton

, 52722-6750
No. 68114.

#### Max Eckardt & Sons, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 294730-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of plastic paperweights similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 67488, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Letter from FAA to petitioner acknowledging receipt of petition.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FILED AS PART OF THE QUARTERLY REPORT
ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERNCE TO SUCH REPORT
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             646
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,726
<ALLOWANCES>                                       784
<INVENTORY>                                     15,267
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,067
<PP&E>                                           7,018
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,673
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  80,061
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,103
<BONDS>                                         25,594
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            81
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,955
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    80,061
<SALES>                                         57,663
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                59,793
<CGS>                                           31,316
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,316
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,992
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   390
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,176
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,324
<INCOME-TAX>                                       190
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,134
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,134
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.48
        


</TABLE>
From: barringhaus1@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:22:44 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Anne Barringhaus

Ballwin, MO 63021
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR A WRIT OF CONTINUING GARNISHMENT - 1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOHN RAYMOND SALVATOR

BEZEREDI,

Defendant,

And

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.

Garnishee.

CASE NO. C05-1739 MJP

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

A WRIT OF CONTINUING

GARNISHMENT

This matter comes before the Court upon Plaintiff’s Application for Writ of Continuing

Garnishment (Dkt. No. 29). Finding that Plaintiff failed to provide a supporting declaration with

its application or provide any evidentiary basis for it request, which comes 14 years after the

Court’s final Judgment was entered, the Court DENIES the Request.
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR A WRIT OF CONTINUING GARNISHMENT - 2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

Marsha J. Pechman

United States Senior District Judge

The clerk is ordered to provide copies of this order to all counsel.

Dated April 30, 2021.

A
# LDNR Office Of Conservation

Status Code Description Well Status Code Code Description 01 PERMITTED 02 APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT INJECTION WELL 03 PERMIT EXPIRED 08 INACTIVE INJECTION WELL (COMMERCIAL OR OTHER) 09 ACTIVE - INJECTION 10 ACTIVE - PRODUCING 11 ACTIVE PRODUCING/CYCLIC INJCT 13 OPERATOR CHANGE -NO MD10RA 16 MULTIPLE COMPLETED/PA - 35 WELL 17 EDUCATIONAL/SERVICE COMPANY 18 TEMPORARILY ABANDONED WELL 19 INACTIVE WELL, NO RESP. PARTY 20 PA - 35 TEMPORARY INACTIVE WELL TO BE OMITTED FROM PROD. REPORT 21 RVRTD TO LANDOWNER - FRESH WATER 22 REVERTED TO SINGLE COMPLETION 23 ACT 404 ORPHAN WELL - ENG 24 RVRTD L/O - RESIDENT CONSUMPTION 25 SL - STATE JUR,BHL - FED JUR 26 ACT 404 ORPHAN WELL - INJECTION AND MINING 27 ABANDONED SWD - NOT PLUGGED 28 UNABLE TO LOCATE WELL - NO PLUGGED AND ABANDONED 29 DRY AND PLUGGED 30 PLUGGED AND ABANDONED 31 SHUT- IN DRY HOLE - FUTURE UTILITY 32 SHUT- IN DRY HOLE - NO FUTURE UTILITY 33 SHUT- IN PRODUCTIVE - FUTURE UTILITY 34 SHUT- IN PRODUCTIVE - NO FUTURE UTILITY 36 SHUT- IN WAITING ON PIPELINE 37 SHUT- IN WAITING ON MARKET 46 FORMATION STORAGE - GAS 49 OBSERVATION WELL - FORMATION GAS STORAGE 64 ACTIVE PRODUCING/ANNULAR SWD 73 WATER 74 GEOTHERMAL WELL 78 IRON ORE 80 * UNKNOWN * 82 CONVERSION TO OIL / GAS WELL 90 P&A PER INSPECTION 98 NON - WELL/ FOR UIC MANIFEST ONLY 99 SALT WATER OIL RECOVERY POINT ZZZZZ VIRTUAL/BAD DATA 

### Page 1 of 1 LDNR Office Of Conservation

12/31/2012 http://sonlite.dnr.state.la.us/sundown/cart_prod/cart_con_wellstcode
From: hgifford@stec.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:20:27 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Arthur Gifford

Victoria, TX 77905