alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

 

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the annual reportof Cemtrex, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Renato Dela Rama, principal financial officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of my knowledge and belief:

 

(1)            the Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)            theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operationsof the Company.

 

 

****A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging,or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.
# Europos Sąjungos C 122A/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0960 |
| --- | --- |
| Europos Sąjungos
  oficialusis leidinys | C 122A |
| | |
| Leidimas lietuvių kalba | Informacija ir pranešimai | 58 tomas2015m. balandžio 16d. |

ISSN 1977-0960

Europos Sąjungos

oficialusis leidinys

C 122A

Leidimas lietuvių kalba

Informacija ir pranešimai

58 tomas2015m. balandžio 16d.

---

| Pranešimo Nr. | Turinys | Puslapis |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Klaidų ištaisymas |
| 2015/C 122A/01 | Pranešimo apie viešus konkursus klaidų ištaisymas – Administratoriai (AD 5/AD 7), kurių specializacija – teisiniai tyrimai: EPSO/AD/295/15 – Bulgarijos (BG) teisės išsilavinimą įgiję teisininkai EPSO/AD/296/15 – Vokietijos (DE) teisės išsilavinimą įgiję teisininkai EPSO/AD/297/15 – Kroatijos (HR) teisės išsilavinimą įgiję teisininkai EPSO/AD/298/15 – Airijos (IE) teisės išsilavinimą įgiję teisininkai EPSO/AD/299/15 – Lietuvos (LT) teisės išsilavinimą įgiję teisininkai EPSO/AD/300/15 – Slovakijos (SK) teisės išsilavinimą įgiję teisininkai — ( OL C 68 A, 2015 2 26 ) | 1 |

Pranešimo Nr.

Turinys

Puslapis

Klaidų ištaisymas

2015/C 122A/01

Pranešimo apie viešus konkursus klaidų ištaisymas – Administratoriai (AD 5/AD 7), kurių specializacija – teisiniai tyrimai: EPSO/AD/295/15 – Bulgarijos (BG) teisės išsilavinimą įgiję teisininkai EPSO/AD/296/15 – Vokietijos (DE) teisės išsilavinimą įgiję teisininkai EPSO/AD/297/15 – Kroatijos (HR) teisės išsilavinimą įgiję teisininkai EPSO/AD/298/15 – Airijos (IE) teisės išsilavinimą įgiję teisininkai EPSO/AD/299/15 – Lietuvos (LT) teisės išsilavinimą įgiję teisininkai EPSO/AD/300/15 – Slovakijos (SK) teisės išsilavinimą įgiję teisininkai — ( OL C 68 A, 2015 2 26 )

( OL C 68 A, 2015 2 26 )

1

---

| LT | |
| --- | --- |

LT

---

Klaidų ištaisymas

| 16.4.2015 | LT | Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys | CA 122/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2015

LT

Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys

CA 122/1

---

Pranešimo apie viešus konkursus klaidų ištaisymas – Administratoriai (AD 5/AD 7), kurių specializacija – teisiniai tyrimai: EPSO/AD/295/15 – Bulgarijos (BG) teisės išsilavinimą įgiję teisininkai EPSO/AD/296/15 – Vokietijos (DE) teisės išsilavinimą įgiję teisininkai EPSO/AD/297/15 – Kroatijos (HR) teisės išsilavinimą įgiję teisininkai EPSO/AD/298/15 – Airijos (IE) teisės išsilavinimą įgiję teisininkai EPSO/AD/299/15 – Lietuvos (LT) teisės išsilavinimą įgiję teisininkai EPSO/AD/300/15 – Slovakijos (SK) teisės išsilavinimą įgiję teisininkai

(
  Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys C 68 A, 2015 m. vasario 26 d.
  )

(2015/C 122 A/01)

2 puslapis, I antraštinė dalis, 3 punktas:

yra:

„Galutinis terminas (iki kurio reikia užpildyti ir patvirtinti paraišką): 2015 m. kovo 31 d. 12.00 (vidurdienis) Briuselio laiku.“,

turi būti:

„Galutinis terminas (iki kurio reikia užpildyti ir patvirtinti paraišką): 2015 m. balandžio 9 d. 12.00 (vidurdienis) Briuselio laiku“.

---
From: bdfagan@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:56:27 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Bryan Fagan

Hardy, VA 24101
H. Res. 491 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 18, 2007. 

Resolved, That during the remainder of the 110th Congress it shall not be in order to consider a conference report 

to accompany a regular general appropriation bill unless the 

joint explanatory statement prepared by the managers on the 

part of the House and the managers on the part of the Senate includes a list of congressional earmarks (as that term is 

used in clause 9(d) of rule XXI) in the conference report or 

joint statement (and the name of any Member, Delegate, 

Resident Commissioner, or Senator who submitted a request 

to the respective House or Senate committee for each respective item included on such list) that were not committed to 

the conference committee by either House, not in a report on 

such bill, and not in a report of a committee of the Senate 

on a companion measure. 

SEC. 2. It shall not be in order to consider a rule or 

order that waives the application of the first section of this 

resolution. 
2 

•HRES 491 EH 

SEC. 3. A point of order under this resolution shall be 

disposed of by the question of consideration under the same 

terms as specified in clause 9(b) of rule XXI. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
From: bartchp@afgimail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:36:12 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance. Bible Camps,YMCA, YWCA, Campus Life, and many other Christian youth organizations

should all fall under the exemption.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Charles Bartholomew

Anchorage, AK 99516
From: RAJoyce@AOL.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:34:06 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Allison Joyce

Temple, TX 76502
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 51 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      January 23, 2007.
Whereas America's Catholic schools are internationally acclaimed for their 
        academic excellence, but provide students more than a superior 
        scholastic education;
Whereas Catholic schools ensure a broad, values-added education emphasizing the 
        lifelong development of moral, intellectual, physical, and social values 
        in America's young people;
Whereas the total Catholic school student enrollment for the 2005-2006 academic 
        year was about 2,400,000 and the student-teacher ratio was 15 to 1;
Whereas Catholic schools teach a diverse group of students;
Whereas more than 27 percent of school children enrolled in Catholic schools are 
        from minority backgrounds, and nearly 14 percent are non-Catholics;
Whereas Catholic schools produce students strongly dedicated to their faith, 
        values, families, and communities by providing an intellectually 
        stimulating environment rich in spiritual, character, and moral 
        development;
Whereas in the 1972 pastoral message concerning Catholic education, the National 
        Conference of Catholic Bishops stated: ``Education is one of the most 
        important ways by which the Church fulfills its commitment to the 
        dignity of the person and building of community. Community is central to 
        education ministry, both as a necessary condition and an ardently 
        desired goal. The educational efforts of the Church, therefore, must be 
        directed to forming persons-in-community; for the education of the 
        individual Christian is important not only to his solitary destiny, but 
        also the destinies of the many communities in which he lives.''; and
Whereas January 28 to February 3, 2007, has been designated as Catholic Schools 
        Week by the National Catholic Educational Association and the United 
        States Conference of Catholic Bishops: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals of Catholic Schools Week, an event co-
        sponsored by the National Catholic Educational Association and the 
        United States Conference of Catholic Bishops and established to 
        recognize the vital contributions of America's thousands of Catholic 
        elementary and secondary schools; and
            (2) congratulates Catholic schools, students, parents, and teachers 
        across the Nation for their ongoing contributions to education, and for 
        the key role they play in promoting and ensuring a brighter, stronger 
        future for this Nation.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Case 3:05-cv-05575-RBL Document 1 Filed 09/02/05 Page 1 of 7
Case 3:05-cv-05575-RBL Document 1 Filed 09/02/05 Page 2 of 7
Case 3:05-cv-05575-RBL Document 1 Filed 09/02/05 Page 3 of 7
Case 3:05-cv-05575-RBL Document 1 Filed 09/02/05 Page 4 of 7
Case 3:05-cv-05575-RBL Document 1 Filed 09/02/05 Page 5 of 7
Case 3:05-cv-05575-RBL Document 1 Filed 09/02/05 Page 6 of 7
Case 3:05-cv-05575-RBL Document 1 Filed 09/02/05 Page 7 of 7
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 10.1


                                 ALLONGE TO NOTE

     Reference is made to that certain $3,187,496 original principal amount
promissory note dated December 23, 1994 (the "1994 Note") made by Alkermes, Inc.
("Alkermes") and payable to the order of Fleet Bank of Massachusetts, N.A.
("Fleet Mass"). Fleet National Bank (the "Bank") is the successor by merger to
Fleet Mass. For good and valuable consideration, receipt and sufficiency are
hereby acknowledged, the Bank, Alkermes and Alkermes Controlled Therapeutics,
Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Alkermes ("ACT
I") agree as follows:

     1. The 1994 Note is hereby modified:

     a. By providing that all references in the 1994 Note to the "Bank" will be
deemed to refer to Fleet National Bank.

     b. By providing that all references in the 1994 Note to a "Letter
Agreement" will be deemed to refer to that certain letter agreement dated
September 27, 1996 among the Bank, Alkermes, ACT I and Alkermes Controlled
Therapeutics Inc. II.

     c. By deleting in its entirety the first sentence of the seventh paragraph
in the text of the 1994 Note and by substituting in its stead the following:

     "This note is the 1994 Note referred to in, and is entitled to the benefits
     of, the Letter Agreement and the Security Agreement (as defined in the
     Letter Agreement)."

     2. ACT I and Alkermes are hereby substituted for Alkermes as, and hereby
assume the obligations of, the "Borrower" described in the 1994 Note. Each of
ACT I and Alkermes agrees that it is jointly and severally liable for the
payment and performance of the 1994 Note.

     3. Except as expressly affected hereby, the 1994 Note remains in full force
and effect.

     Executed, as an instrument under seal, as of this 27th day of September,
1996.

                                             ALKERMES, INC.


                                             By: /s/ Michael Landine
                                                -------------------------------
                                                Name: Michael Landine
                                                Title: Senior Vice President
                                                       and CFO

<PAGE>   2


                                             ALKERMES CONTROLLED
                                              THERAPEUTICS, INC.


                                             By: /s/ Michael Landine
                                                -------------------------------
                                                Name: Michael Landine
                                                Title: Vice President


                                             FLEET NATIONAL BANK


                                             By: /s/ Catherine Bruton
                                                -------------------------------
                                                Name: Catherine Bruton
                                                Title: VP




                                      -2-
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER STRIKING MOTION FOR

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

THOMAS A. WEBER, 

Plaintiff,

v.

TIME WARNER, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-1706L

ORDER STRIKING MOTION FOR

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

This matter comes before the Court on “Plaintiff’s Adjournment of December 9, 2005

Hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction” (the “Adjournment”). (Dkt. #25). 

On November 14, 2005, plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, filed a motion for a preliminary

injunction and noted the motion for consideration on December 9, 2005. Defendants responded.

Plaintiff did not file a reply in support of the motion. Instead, on December 7, 2005,

plaintiff filed the Adjournment stating that he “has adjourned the evidentiary hearing in order to

allow the parties to engage in either direct settlement discussions . . . or by ADR mediation . . . . 

If it appears that the parties cannot reach an omnibus settlement agreement on all claims against

all parties then Plaintiff will re-schedule the hearing date on Plaintiff’s Motion for a Preliminary

Injunction.” Adjournment at p. 1. 

Because plaintiff has “adjourned” the hearing and stated that he would rather pursue

Case 2:05-cv-01706-RSL Document 32 Filed 12/13/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER STRIKING MOTION FOR

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION - 2

settlement negotiations rather than his motion for a preliminary injunction, the Court STRIKES

plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction (Dkt. #8). Plaintiff may refile the motion if he so

chooses.

DATED this 13th day of December, 2005.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-01706-RSL Document 32 Filed 12/13/05 Page 2 of 2
No. 68907.

#### Strauss Veilings, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/12644 (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of maline silk made on a lace or net machine, not bobbinet, similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Elvic Import Corp.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 13, C.D. 1837), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: elmer2flp@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:03:47 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Edward Elmer

Pleasanton, TX 78064