alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Vincent Kimbro, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 980]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Firetog, J.), rendered November 30, 1993, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree (four counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence regarding the fifth count of grand larceny in the fourth degree was not preserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see, People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Udzinski,*146 AD2d 245), and, in any event, are without merit *(see, People v Cappetta,*86 AD2d 876, 877). Altman, J. P., Hart, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.
No. 63778.

protests 329901-K, 58/164, and 58/166 (Laredo).

#### Mexican Products Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of carrizo baskets the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Chester K. Stoner*v. *United States*(42 Cust. Ct. 178, C.D. 2083), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 2259** 

In re: DENNIS SHIPMAN ,

Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus . ( 13

- 10403 )

Submitted : February 11, 2014 Decided: February 20, 2014

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

. Dennis Shipman , Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Dennis Shipman petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district court to act in two emergency appeals filed in his bankruptcy case, which has since been dismissed . We conclude that Shipman is not entitled to mandamus relief. Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976) ; United States v. Moussaoui , 333 F.3d 509, 516

- 17 (4th Cir. 2003) . Further, mandamus relief is available only when the peti tioner has a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan

Ass ’ n , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988)

. The relief sought by Shipman is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
February 23, 1956

No. 59737.—Suit 4854.

#### Terrazzo & Marble Supply Co., Inc. *v.*United States.

C. D. 1696. (Appeal dismissed January 10, 1956.)
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 9 Filed 12/10/02 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 9 Filed 12/10/02 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 9 Filed 12/10/02 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 9 Filed 12/10/02 Page 4 of 4
Description of the Material Terms of the Registrant's Retention Program



 Exhibit 10.2 
 DESCRIPTION OF THE MATERIAL TERMS OF 
 LOCAL CORPORATION RETENTION PROGRAM

 AS OF JANUARY 16, 2013 
 The Local Corporation Retention Program (the “Retention Program”) provides for the payment of a retention bonus to all employees of Local Corporation (the “Company”) and its
subsidiaries as of January 16, 2013, including the Company’s currently employed named executive officers (the “NEOs,” as named in the Company’s most recently filed Form 10-K). On January 16, 2013, the Compensation
Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) established the Retention Program to reward employees who continue in service to the Company through January 2, 2014. The Retention Program provides employees with a
bonus equal to their threshold semi-annual bonus target as of January 16, 2013. 
 The Company’s Named Executive Officers will be
eligible to receive a bonus equal to the amounts set forth in the following table: 
  

					
	 Name and Title
	  	Retention Bonus Potential	 
	 Heath B. Clarke, Chief Executive Officer
	  	$	177,847	  
	 Michael A. Sawtell, President and Chief Operating Officer
	  	$	91,391	  
	 Kenneth S. Cragun, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
	  	$	65,528	  
	 Erick Herring, Sr. Vice President, Technology
	  	$	58,427	(1) 
	 Peter S. Hutto, Sr. Vice President Corporate Development
	  	$	50,000	(1) 

  

	(1)	Amounts to be paid via an equity grant under the Company’s 2011 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended.
From: aaamundsen@embarqmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Gov"t suppression of Conscience Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:15:52 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Art & Anne Amundsen

Carlisle, PA 17013
No. 67554.

#### The Spiegel Bros. Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 60/11591 (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bench vises the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 59420, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 360 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 360

  Recognizing the 70th anniversary of the Idaho Potato Commission and 
  expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that an Idaho 
                  Potato Month should be established.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 1, 2007

    Mr. Simpson (for himself and Mr. Sali) submitted the following 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Recognizing the 70th anniversary of the Idaho Potato Commission and 
  expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that an Idaho 
                  Potato Month should be established.

Whereas the State of Idaho produces approximately one-third of all of the 
        potatoes grown in the United States, harvesting an average of 
        12,000,000,000 to 14,000,000,000 pounds annually;
Whereas the State of Idaho's unique climate of warm days, cool nights, mountain-
        fed irrigation, and rich volcanic soil is conducive to growing world-
        renowned potatoes;
Whereas Idaho potatoes are top-selling and highly recognized potatoes in the 
        United States due to their consistently great taste, versatility, and 
        nutritional content;
Whereas the Idaho potato ``brand'' is recognized throughout the world for its 
        high quality, and is an identifying characteristic of the great State of 
        Idaho;
Whereas May of 2007 marks the 70th consecutive year that Idaho potatoes have 
        been promoted by the Idaho Potato Commission, an Idaho potato industry 
        group responsible for generating attention for the numerous attributes 
        of Idaho potatoes;
Whereas the Idaho Potato Commission is recognized nationally and internationally 
        as a top promotional authority for Idaho's potatoes and potato products;
Whereas the Idaho Potato Commission's requirement, since 1959, that only 
        potatoes grown in the State of Idaho are allowed to wear the ``Grown in 
        Idaho'' Federal certification mark contributed toward the creation of a 
        distinctive, enduringly successful, and popular brand for the Russet 
        Burbank potato variety; and
Whereas Idaho's potato industry contributes approximately $2,700,000,000 to the 
        economy of Idaho and employs 39,000 residents of that State: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the 70th anniversary of the Idaho Potato 
        Commission; and
            (2) expresses its sense that an Idaho Potato Month should 
        be established.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 187 (Thursday, September 28, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 66831]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21182]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology

AGENCY: Office of Science, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, and Code of 
Federal Regulations, and following consultation with the Committee 
Management Secretariat, General Services Administration, notice is 
hereby given that the President's Council of Advisors on Science and 
Technology (PCAST) has been renewed for a two-year period.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Reba Bandyopadhyay, Designated 
Federal Officer, PCAST, email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4c1c0f0d1f180c233f383c6229233c622b233a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a0f0e3e1f3f4e0cfd3d4d08ec5cfd08ec7cfd6">[email protected]</span></a>; telephone: (202) 
881-7163.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Council will provide advice and 
recommendations to the President on science and technology.
    Additionally, the Secretary of Energy has determined that renewal 
of the PCAST is essential to conduct business and is in the public 
interest in connection with the performance duties imposed by law upon 
the Department of Energy. The Council will continue to operate in 
accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 
the Department of Energy Organization Act, and the rules and 
regulations in implementation of these acts.
    Signing Authority: This document of the Department of Energy was 
signed on September 22, 2023, by Sarah E. Buter, Committee Management 
Officer, pursuant to delegated authority from the Secretary of Energy. 
That document with the original signature and date is maintained by 
DOE. For administrative purposes only, and in compliance with 
requirements of the Office of the Federal Register, the undersigned DOE 
Federal Register Liaison Officer has been authorized to sign and submit 
the document in electronic format for publication, as an official 
document of the Department of Energy. This administrative process in no 
way alters the legal effect of this document upon publication in the 
Federal Register.

    Signed in Washington, DC, on September 25, 2023.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S. Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2023-21182 Filed 9-27-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
02/03/2010 18:33 FAX 2024835142 FAA 	 .. OMS 141001/004 

, ~,~I/;aCIVEr~; R'\. Lf-l' ,;~'" L- ~ ,""""" !""". 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION JA!"~ 2 ~ 2010 

OFFTCEOF HEARINGS HEJ\R.tNG DOCKeT 

WASHmGTON, D.C. 

hl the Matter of Piedmont Airlines, Inc. 

FAA Docket No. CP08S00010 

AGENCY'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF HEARTNG 


COMES NOW the Agency) by and through its designated representative, the Regional 

Counsel for the Eastern Region and his duly designated agents, and moves for a continuance 

ofthe hearing in this case, which is scheduled for April 6, 2010 in Washington, D.C. 

The basis for this motion is that the Agency's representative. the undersigned, will not 

be available on April 6 due to religious observance (Passover). Counsel for Respondent, 

.	Maren L. Matal, has indicated that she has no objection to continuance of the hearing. Widl 

respect to rescheduling the hearing, 1he parties agree that May 26, 2010 would be a mutually 

convenient date. 

WHEREFORE, the Agency requests that this motion be granted and that the hearing 

1 
02/03/2010 18:33 FAX 2024935142 FAA .,. OMS 002/004 

be continued. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Alfred R. Jolmson, Jr. 

Regional Counsel 

Date: By: z;.cIwyJil~ Attorney 


Federal Aviation Adrninisn"ation 


1 Aviation Plaza 


Jamaica, NY 11434 


Telephone: 718 553-3258 


Facsimile: (718) 995-5699 


2 

02/03/2010 1B:33 FAX 2024935142 FAA + OMS III 003/004 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

[ hereby certi1)r that on this day copies of the foregoing Agency's Motion for Continuance 

was sent via first class mail and facsimile, addressed as follows: 

Maren L. Matal, Esq. 

US Airways 

1401 HStreetNW, Suite 1075 

Washington, DC 20005 

Telefax: (202)326-5162 

Mark W. Atwood 

Alison B. Macdonald 

Sher & BlackwelL LLP 

1850 M Street, N.W. 

Waslrington, DC 20036 

Telefax: (202)463-4950 

The Honorable Isaac D. Ben1cin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department ofTransportatioll 

1200 New Jersey Avenue) S.E. 

East Building Growld Floor, Room E12-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

Telefax: (202)366-7536 

I hereby certify that on this day copies of the foregoing Agency's Motion for Continuance 

was sent via first class mail, addressed as follows: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 lndependence Avenue, S.W. 

Washinbrton, D.C. 20591 

3 
-----

02/03/2a10 18:33 FAX 2024835142 FAA 	 -l' OMS 004/004 

Attention: 	Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2WIOOOO 

JAN 1 3 2010 	 .~ //~; Date: ." ., ~;7-4~.

L' Hooks

Paralegal Specialist 

Office ofRegional Counsel 

1Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

4
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Alonzo Greene, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 474]

—Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate a decision and order of this Court dated May 15, 1989 *(People v Greene,*150 AD2d 604), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered November 28, 1983, and an order of the same court dated November 22, 1984, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The defendant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see, Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745). Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Balletta and Thompson, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 35.4

 

**Subservicer Compliance Statement**

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Sallie Mae, Inc., the Subservicer for the Nelnet Student Loan Trust 2008-3 (the “Trust”), does hereby certify that: 

 

|   | (a) | This certificate is delivered pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

(b)       A review of the subservicing activities of the Subservicer as of December 31, 2008 and for the period January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008 (the “Reporting Period”) and their performance under the subservicing agreement for the Trust, dated April 18, 2008 (the “Subservicing Agreement”), has been made under my            supervision; and

 

(c)       To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Subservicer has fulfilled all of their obligations under the Subservicing Agreement for the Trust in all material respects through the Reporting Period.

 

March 30, 2009

 

| /S/JOHNF.REMONDI |   |
|------------------|--------|

John F. Remondi

Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer

Sallie Mae, Inc.
From: hec ybanez <hybanez@gmail.com>

To: Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 04/05/2010 11:58 PM Subject: Re: PCA THC Variability Analysis I think that correct Section 3 is the THC for THC when you look at the 99th percentile of long term data none of the sources could meet the standard

Rankin g RndmKilnCo Name DataField Count 1 1520 Lehigh Union Bridge E02 -001 30- Day Rolling Average 668 2 THC- 1 Suwannee Bradford, FL 1 30- Day Rolling Average 274 3 1226 Holcim Trident 30- Day Rolling Average 762 4 1239 TXI Midlothian Kiln 5 30- Day Rolling Average 444 5 1316 Holcim Mason City Kiln 2 30- Day Rolling Average 701 On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 4:08 PM, <Barnett.Keith@epamail.epa.gov> wrote: I think you are talking about Appendix 1 section 3. Keith W. Barnett USEPA/OAQPS/SPPD/MMG Mail Code D243 - 02 Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 919 - 541 - 5605 barnett.keith@epa.gov
EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Safe Bulkers, Inc. (the Company) for
the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officer
of the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and
for, the periods presented in the report.

The foregoing
certification is provided solely for purposes of complying with the provisions
of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not intended to be used
or relied upon for any other purpose.

Date:  May 18, 2009

| |                                      | 
| | ------------------------------------ | 
| | /s/ KONSTANTINOS ADAMOPOULOS         | 
| | Konstantinos Adamopoulos             | 
| | Chief Financial Officer and Director | 

Exhibit 13.2

---
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 241 Filed 01/03/05 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 241 Filed 01/03/05 Page 2 of 2
No. 69225.

#### Standard Commodities Import-Export Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 63/17166, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of rayon labels similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Bruce Duncan Co., Inc., a/c Standard Commodities Import & Export Corp.*v. *United States*(51 Cust. Ct. 27, C.D. 2409), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1997 AND STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      16,913,000
<SECURITIES>                                 6,651,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               32,580,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            82,081,000
<PP&E>                                      15,324,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             125,744,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      135,755,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     12,000
<COMMON>                                       244,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (13,659,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               125,744,000
<SALES>                                    111,496,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           111,496,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              127,511,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (299,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,911,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (21,627,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (21,627,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (21,627,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.89)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tyrone Pallins, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 599]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Starkey, J.), rendered February 26, 1990, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and resisting arrest, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The sanction imposed upon the People for loss of *Rosario*material was not, under the circumstances presented, an improvident exercise of the court’s discretion *(see, People v Gibbs,*85 NY2d 899; *People v Martinez,*71 NY2d 937, 940; *see also, People v Matarrese,*184 AD2d 591; *People v Franco,*189 AD2d 589, 590).

The trial court’s supplemental instructions on constructive possession are problematic because the trial court used an example with facts which were similar to the People’s theory of the facts in the instant case *(see, People v Hommel,*41 NY2d 427, 430). However, the trial court also used an alternative hypothetical and the instructions, read as a whole, were a fair and correct statement of the law. Thus, any prejudice was "adequately dissipated” *(People v Johnson,*171 AD2d 532, 533).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review (CPL 470.05 [2]), or without merit. Thompson, J. P., Copertino, Hart and Goldstein, JJ., concur.