alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Agustin MARTINEZ-GARZA, also known as Tino Garza, also known as Augustin Martinez, also known as Augstin Martinez, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-50200

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 17, 2005.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

M. Carolyn Fuentes, Federal Public Defender’s Office Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

*342PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Agustín Martinez-Garza raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
From: glennangella@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:16:05 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Glenn Berry Jr

Burnsville, MN 55337
From: martss@cox.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:51:53 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Stephen Martin

Henderson, NV 89002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                                31
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                          23
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                   1,447
<CASH>                                             105
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               2,179
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,979
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                  4,957
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                 14
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                    550
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,211)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,979
<PREMIUMS>                                         126
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                                115
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                  10
<OTHER-INCOME>                                     330
<BENEFITS>                                         259
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                        113
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (137)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         2
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (139)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (139)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                   5,814
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                 4,957
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Before the Second Division,

April 1, 1969

No. P69/85.

protest 66/20918 (New York).

#### Seedman International Corp. *v.*United States,

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of electric bicycle sirens similar in all material respects to those the subject of *S. Hiller & Co. et al.*v. *United States*(59 Cust. Ct. 79, C.D. 3082), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

MINUTE ORDER

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

OSSIE LEE SLAUGHTER, 

Plaintiff,

v.

SGT. KIM SNODGRASS, et al,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-1881P

MINUTE ORDER

The following minute order is made by the direction of the court, the Honorable Marsha J.

Pechman:

This case is transferred to the Honorable John C. Coughenour as related to C05-1689C.

All future pleadings should reflect the change in the case caption as follows: C05-1881C-MAT.

Filed and entered this 12th day of December, 2005.

BRUCE RIFKIN, Clerk

By /S/Eileen Scollard

Deputy Clerk

Case 2:05-cv-01881-JCC-MAT Document 6 Filed 12/12/05 Page 1 of 1
From: shaunagee@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:55:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

shauna Gee

Salt Lake City, UT 84115
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ambac Financial Group, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), David Trick, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ David Trick                                                       
|Name: David Trick                                                     
|Title: Senior Managing Director,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|Date: November 15, 2010
R43-0E

T 8-0N

R43-0E

T 7-0N

R44-0E

T 7-0N

R43-0E

T 9-0N

R44-0E

T 9-0N

2

5

5

6

7 11 12

10

8 9

12

7

11 10 9 8

18

35 34

33 32

31

31

36 35 33 32 34 31 36

6

1

7

3 4

5

6

1 2

3 4 5

6

7

12

11

10 10 9

9

8

8

7 7

12

11

18

13

13

14 14 15 15 16 16

17

17

4

18

19

24

23 24

23 22 22 21

21

20 19

20

19

30

25 26

25

26

27 27 29 28

30

28 29

30

31

36 35 36

35 31 34 34

32 33

33 32

31

6

1

2

1 6

3

2

3

4

Asotin Creek

Wenatchee Creek

CLOVERLAND SP

WICKIUP

CG

WENATCHEE TH WENATCHEE

GUARD

STATION RC

CABIN SADDLE CG

INDIAN

TOM TH

First Creek

Rattlesnake Creek

Lower George Creek

North Fork Asotin Creek

Menatchee Creek

Upper George Creek

South Fork Asotin Creek

Cottonwood Creek

South George Project Planning Area

Subwatershed Area Map

South George Project Planning Area

Washington State Fish and Wildlife

Pomeroy Ranger District

Inventoried Roadless Area(IRA)

Wenaha-Tucannon Wilderness

Subwatershed

Recreation Feature

Stream

BullTrout

Steelhead/Summer &

ATTE

B

NT

u

ION

lltrout  ́ This product is reproduced from geospatial information

prepared by the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest

Service. GIS data and product accuracy may vary. They

may be: developed from sources of differing accuracy,

accurate only at certain scales, based on modeling or

interpretation, incomplete while being created or

revised. etc... Using GIS products for purposes other

than those for which they were created may yield

inaccurate or misleading results. The Forest Service

reserves the right to correct,update,modify,or replace

GIS products without notification. For more information

contact the The Umatilla National Forest Supervisors office.

(541)278-3716

0 0.25 0.5 1

Miles

Donna Dixon

GIS Specialist

05/23/2011
No. 64565.

#### L. & R. Organic Products Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 59/30227 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
Searched for **https://aids.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://aids.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rodney Elliot, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 114]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lowe, III, J., at hearings; Michael Obús, J., at trial and sentence), rendered May 13, 1993, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 41/2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed. Since defendant did not object to the arresting officer’s reference to a conversation with a nontestifying person, the issue as to whether such reference violated defendant’s right to confrontation is unpreserved for appellate review as a matter of law *(see, People v Canty,*208 AD2d 405, 406, *Iv denied*84 NY2d 1029), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review it, we would find that the reference to a 30-second conversation with a woman encountered at the scene who identified herself as the person who made the 911 call, pointed down an alley, and then went inside the building, was appropriate narrative necessary to explain why the officer then proceeded down the alley, where he noticed an open window with a missing security bar and defendant standing inside a disheveled apartment *(see, People v Perez,*203 AD2d 123,124, *Iv denied*83 NY2d 970). We have reviewed defendant’s argument that he was denied a fair trial by the prosecutor’s summation, and find it to be without merit *(see, People v McCray,*167 AD2d 304, *Iv denied*77 NY2d 880; *People v D’Alessandro,*184 AD2d 114, 118-119, *Iv denied*81 NY2d 884). Concur—Murphy, P. J., Rubin, Kupferman and Williams, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 478 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         June 12, 2007.
    Resolved,  That the following named Member be, and is hereby, elected to the 
following standing committee of the House of Representatives to rank after Mr. 
Capuano:
    
     Joint Committee on Printing: Mrs. Davis of California.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 18 Filed 08/14/03 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 18 Filed 08/14/03 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 18 Filed 08/14/03 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 18 Filed 08/14/03 Page 4 of 4
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO 
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Alex Eliashevsky, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Culture Medium Holdings
      Corp., for the year ended March 31, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Culture Medium Holdings Corp.                                                             

Dated: August 15, 2011



| | /s/
      Alex Eliashevsky          
| | ------------------------------------
| | Alex Eliashevsky                    
| | Chief Executive Officer and Director
| | (Principal Executive Officer)       
| | Culture Medium Holdings Corp.       



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Culture Medium
Holdings Corp. and will be retained by Culture Medium Holdings Corp. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
From: d_kastner@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:08:40 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dawn Kastner

Fairmont, MN 56031