alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

### Sutton, Lisa

From: Mastro, Donna
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2015 7:05 AM

To: Brachtl, Megan; Sutton, Lisa; Johansen, Amy Subject: FW: SSM SIP Call Final Rule

Attachments: McCabe letter to air directors final SSM SI P call 05-22-15.pdf; SSM SIP final rule_Fact Sheet.pdf

DC

Donna L. Mastro - EPA Region III – ORC - Air Branch Chief - (215) 814-2777

From: Esher, Diana

Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 2:44 PM

To: Beall, Cecily (DDOE); rama.tangirala@dc.gov

Cc: Arnold, David; Johansen, Amy; Mastro, Donna; Fernandez, Cristina Subject: SSM SIP Call Final Rule



### I’m writing to inform you that earlier t oday, the Administrator signed a final action to ensure states have in place air pollution rules that appl y to sources at all times, includi ng periods of startup, shutdown, or malfunction (SSM).

EPA is calling for 36 states, including your state, to make changes to their State Implementation Plans (SIPs), to protect public health and ensure consistency with th e Clean Air Act and EPA’s current SSM Policy. In response to this action, your state will need to correct specific SSM provisions in your state plan as indicated in

the final action.

The Clean Air Act allows a maximum of 18 months from the issuance of the final action to submit a SIP revision. Therefore your revised SIP subm ission is due to EPA by November 22, 2016.

For your information, here is the link to the pre-p ublication version of the final action signed today. http://www.epa.gov/airquality/ur banair/sipstatus/emissions.html SSM provisions for the District of Columbia are addr essed in final action’s pr epublication version, under section IX, at subsection D. 2 (p. 454).

I have also attached a copy of a no tification letter signed by Acting Assistant Administrator Janet McCabe and a copy of the SSM Fact Sheet for your information.

We will continue to work closely with you to ensure this SIP revision process is as effi cient as possible. Please let me know if your have any questions.

Diana Esher Director, Air Prot ection Division EPA Region 3

215-814-2706 esher.diana@epa.gov
```

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 188 (Friday, September 29, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 67328]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21479]

[[Page 67328]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Center for Complementary & Integrative Health; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Complementary and 
Integrative Health Special Emphasis Panel; Exploratory Clinical 
Trials of Mind and Body Interventions (MB).
    Date: November 2-3, 2023.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Center for Complementary and Integrative, 
Democracy II, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual 
Meeting).
    Contact Person: BAILA SARA Hall, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review, Division of Extramural 
Activities, NCCIH/NIH, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Suite 401, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 443-9285, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.213, 
Research and Training in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 25, 2023.
Victoria E. Townsend,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-21479 Filed 9-28-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
From: crichmond1@carolina.rr.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:35:56 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Whitney Richmond

Charlotte, NC 28277
From: crystalcreek9@frontier.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:45:03 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kathryn Anthony

Coos Bay, OR 97420
From: rbarnica1@tx.rr.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:53:04 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Richard Barnica

Plano, TX 75025
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 361 

Recognizing and honoring Jack Valenti and expressing the condolences of 

the House of Representatives to his family on his death. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 1, 2007 

Ms. WATSON (for herself, Mr. ISSA, Ms. KILPATRICK, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. 

LAMPSON, Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. TOWNS, Mr. 

DINGELL, Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. FERGUSON, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. COBLE, Mr. LANTOS, and Mr. 

WEXLER) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing and honoring Jack Valenti and expressing the 

condolences of the House of Representatives to his family 

on his death. 

Whereas Jack Valenti was born in Houston, Texas on September 5, 1921, and resided in Washington, DC and 

Beverly Hills, California; 

Whereas Jack Valenti graduated from the University of 

Houston with a Bachelor of Arts and a M.B.A from Harvard University; 

Whereas Jack Valenti served as special assistant to President 

Lyndon B. Johnson; 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 361 IH 

Whereas Jack Valenti was the distinguished president of the 

Motion Picture Association of America for 38 years; 

Whereas Jack Valenti was a trusted presidential advisor, a 

war hero and an author who was a pioneer in the American film industry; 

Whereas Jack Valenti was a loving husband to his wife, Mary 

Margaret, and exceptional father to his three children, 

Alexandra, John and Courtenay; 

Whereas Jack Valenti’s spirit touched everyone he encountered whether in his political career or in his time spent 

with the Motion Picture Association; 

Whereas Jack Valenti revolutionized the movie industry 

through the creation of a voluntary movie ratings system 

that has endured to this day; 

Whereas Jack Valenti’s vision for the movie industry has 

stood the test of time and provided guidance for families 

in their movie viewing experiences as well as safeguards 

for our filmmakers; 

Whereas the vision and character Jack Valenti brought to the 

industry will be gravely missed; and 

Whereas on April 26, 2007, Jack Valenti passed away, 

prompting friend and confidant Dan Glickman to say 

‘‘Jack was a showman, a gentleman, an orator, and a 

passionate champion of this country, its movies, and the 

enduring freedoms that made both so important to this 

world. He also embodied the theatricality of our industry 

with his conviction, quick wit and boundless energy. In 

a very real sense, he was the ultimate leading man.’’: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 361 IH 

1 (1) recognizes Jack Valenti as one of the great2 est contributors to the motion picture industry; 

3 (2) honors Jack Valenti for his service to his 

4 country, tremendous accomplishments, and contribu5 tions to the industry and to the nation; and 

6 (3) extends its deepest condolences to the fam7 ily of Jack Valenti. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
From: hahnfamily@frontiernet.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:46:35 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Marion Hahn

, 7519
LASALLE GLOBAL TRUST
SERVICES Logo
  Annual
Statement of Compliance
 
 VIA:
EMAIL
 
 J.P.
Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.
 270 Park
Avenue, 10th Floor
 New York,
New York 10017
 
 Re:
                    J.P.
      Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust
      2008-C2
                      Commercial
      Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2008-C2 (the
      "Trust")
 
 I, James
A. Jendra on behalf of Bank of America, National Association as successor by
merger to LaSalle Bank National Association, as trustee and paying agent (the
“Certifying Servicer”) certify to J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage
Securities Corp. and its officers, directors and affiliates, and with the
knowledge and intent that they will rely upon this certification,
that
 
 1.    I
have reviewed the Certifying Servicer's activities during the preceding calendar
year or portion thereof and the Certifying Servicer's performance under the
Pooling and Servicing Agreement; and
 
 2.    To
the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Certifying Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement in
all material respects throughout such year or portion thereof.
 
 Date: 3/10/09
 Bank of
America, National Association as successor by merger to LaSalle Bank National
Association
 
 
 /s/
James A.
Jendra
 James A.
Jendra
 Senior
Vice President
 Americas
Executive


Tel:
312.904.1671


IL4 -
135-17-16


135 S. LaSalle St, Chicago,
IL 60603




Recycled Paper
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 21, 2018

t1114 

# Order

Clerk November 21, 2018

157522

HONIGMAN MILLER SCHWARTZ AND

COHN, LLP,

Petitioner

- Appellee,

v SC: 157522

COA: 336175

Tax Tribunal: 16

- 000202

CITY OF DETROIT,

Respondent

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 18, 2018

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and i t is GRANTED. The parties shall

address whether the Court of Appeals erred in its construction of the phrase “services

rendered within the city” in the Uniform City Income Tax Ordinance, MCL 141.623.

The time allowed for oral argument shall be 20 minutes for each side. MCR 7.314(B)(1).

The City of Grand Rapids and the Taxation Section of the State Bar of Michigan

are invited to file brief s amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the

determination of the issue presented in this case ma y move the Court for permission to

file briefs amicus curiae.
From: rick-liz@cox.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:16:49 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Richard Johnson

Springdale, AR 72762
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case r

United States District Court

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

TYRONE WASHINGTON

Plaintiff, JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

v.

 WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT, CASE NUMBER: C05-5630RBL

 OF CORRECTIONS, et al.,

 Defendants,

 Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried

and the jury has rendered its verdict.

X Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been

tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.

 IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED

The Court Adopts the Report and Recommendation except as to the report's recommendation that

plaintiff's claim against Officer Patton as analyzed under the Fourth Amendment, survives

summary judgment.

Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt #36) is GRANTED. 

Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

 February 23, 2007 BRUCE RIFKIN 

Clerk

 /s/ Pat LeFrois 

 Deputy Clerk

Case 3:05-cv-05630-RBL Document 45 Filed 02/23/07 Page 1 of 1
From: BandDpol@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:38:45 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. We do not agree with the procedures and medications included in this

category and object to having them mandated, for mandating the procedures means we are paying for

something with which we disagree and have no choice to opt out of payment. If you do not reverse

course, we ask you to expand conscience protections for any organizations that provide individual and

group insurance and have moral or religious objections. We strongly oppose the government forcing

free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and devices that we oppose because some of

these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

We also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like us who object to being forced

by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially when

some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by the

federal government to essentially subsidize services to which they object. We again urge you in the

strongest way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of

mandatory preventive services.

Sincerely,

Richard & Betty Bartlett

Roswell, NM 88201