Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 16, 2012 / Notices 28875 

1EPA has posted copies of these actions at: http:// 

www.epa.gov/reg3artd/airregulations/delegate/ 

vadelegation.htm. 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

[Docket No. CP12–340–000] 

Gulfstream Natural Gas System, L.L.C.; 

Notice of Request Under Blanket 

Authorization 

Take notice that on April 30, 2012 

Gulfstream Natural Gas System, L.L.C. 

(Gulfstream), 2701 North Rocky Point 

Drive, Suite 1050, Tampa, Florida, 

33607, filed in the above Docket, a prior 

notice request pursuant to sections 

157.205, and 157.210 of the 

Commission’s regulations under the 

Natural Gas Act (NGA), for 

authorization to update its mainline 

design to reflect an increase in its total 

system capacity from 1,271.2 MMcfd 

(1,298 MDthd) to 1,278.3 MMcfd (1,300 

Dthd), all as more fully set forth in the 

application which is on file with the 

Commission and open to public 

inspection. The filing may also be 

viewed on the Web at http:// 

www.ferc.gov using the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link. 

Enter the docket number excluding the 

last three digits in the docket number 

field to access the document. For 

assistance, please contact FERC Online 

Support at 

FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or toll 

free at (866) 208–3676, or TTY, contact 

(202) 502–8659. 

Gulfstream will post this capacity on 

its electronic bulletin board as available 

capacity subject to approval of this 

Notice. Gulfstream will allocate this 

available capacity on a first-come, firstserved basis, in accordance with its 

FERC Gas Tariff. 

Any questions concerning this 

application may be directed to Lisa A. 

Connolly, General Manager, Rates and 

Certificates, Gulfstream Natural Gas 

System, L.L.C., 5400 Westheimer Court, 

P.O. Box 1642, Houston, Texas, 77251– 

1642 at (713) 627–4102, or by email at 

laconnolly@spectraenergy.com. 

Any person may, within 60 days after 

the issuance of the instant notice by the 

Commission, file pursuant to Rule 214 

of the Commission’s Procedural Rules 

(18 CFR 385.214) a motion to intervene 

or notice of intervention. Any person 

filing to intervene or the Commission’s 

staff may, pursuant to section 157.205 of 

the Commission’s Regulations under the 

Natural Gas Act (NGA) (18 CFR 157.205) 

file a protest to the request. If no protest 

is filed within the time allowed 

therefore, the proposed activity shall be 

deemed to be authorized effective the 

day after the time allowed for protest. If 

a protest is filed and not withdrawn 

within 30 days after the time allowed 

for filing a protest, the instant request 

shall be treated as an application for 

authorization pursuant to section 7 of 

the NGA. 

The Commission strongly encourages 

electronic filings of comments, protests, 

and interventions via the internet in lieu 

of paper. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) 

and the instructions on the 

Commission’s Web site (www.ferc.gov) 

under the ‘‘e-Filing’’ link. 

Dated: May 9, 2012. 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2012–11738 Filed 5–15–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[FRL–9669–4] 

Delegation of Authority to the 

Commonwealth of Virginia To 

Implement and Enforce Additional or 

Revised National Emission Standards 

for Hazardous Air Pollutants and New 

Source Performance Standards 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of delegation of 

authority. 

SUMMARY: On March 5, 2012, EPA sent 

the Commonwealth of Virginia 

(Virginia) a letter acknowledging that 

Virginia’s delegation of authority to 

implement and enforce National 

Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air 

Pollutants (NESHAP) and New Source 

Performance Standards (NSPS) had been 

updated, as provided for under 

previously approved delegation 

mechanisms. To inform regulated 

facilities and the public of Virginia’s 

updated delegation of authority to 

implement and enforce NESHAP and 

NSPS, EPA is making available a copy 

of EPA’s letter to Virginia through this 

notice. 

DATES: On March 5, 2012, EPA sent 

Virginia a letter acknowledging that 

Virginia’s delegation of authority to 

implement and enforce NESHAP and 

NSPS had been updated. 

ADDRESSES: Copies of documents 

pertaining to this action are available for 

public inspection during normal 

business hours at the Air Protection 

Division, U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103– 

2029. Copies of Virginia’s submittal are 

also available at the Virginia 

Department of Environmental Quality, 

629 East Main Street, Richmond, 

Virginia 23219. Copies of Virginia’s 

notice to EPA that Virginia has updated 

its incorporation by reference of Federal 

NESHAP and NSPS, and of EPA’s 

response, may also be found posted on 

EPA Region III’s Web site at: http:// 

www.epa.gov/reg3artd/airregulations/ 

delegate/vadelegation.htm. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ray 

Chalmers, (215) 814–2061, or by email 

at chalmers.ray@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

February 16, 2012, Virginia notified 

EPA that Virginia has updated its 

incorporation by reference of Federal 

NESHAP and NSPS to include many 

such standards, as they were published 

in final form in the Code of Federal 

Regulations dated July 1, 2011. On 

March 5, 2012, EPA sent Virginia a 

letter acknowledging that Virginia now 

has the authority to implement and 

enforce the NESHAP and NSPS as 

specified by Virginia in its notice to 

EPA, as provided for under previously 

approved automatic delegation 

mechanisms. All notifications, 

applications, reports and other 

correspondence required pursuant to 

the delegated NESHAP and NSPS must 

be submitted to both the U.S. EPA 

Region III and to the Virginia 

Department of Environmental Quality. 

A copy of EPA’s letter to Virginia 

follows: 

‘‘Michael G. Dowd, Director, Air Quality 

Division, Virginia Department of 

Environmental Quality, 629 East Main 

Street, P.O. Box 1105, Richmond, Virginia 

23218. 

Dear Mr. Dowd: 

The United States Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) has previously 

delegated to the Commonwealth of Virginia 

(Virginia) the authority to implement and 

enforce various federal National Emissions 

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants 

(NESHAP) and New Source Performance 

Standards (NSPS), which are found at 40 CFR 

Parts 60, 61 and 63.1 In those actions, EPA 

also delegated to Virginia the authority to 

implement and enforce any future EPA 

NESHAP or NSPS on the condition that 

Virginia legally adopt the future standards, 

make only allowed wording changes, and 

provide specified notice to EPA. 

In a letter dated February 16, 2012, 

Virginia informed EPA that Virginia had 

updated its incorporation by reference of 

federal NESHAP and NSPS to include many 

such standards, as they were published in 

final form in the Code of Federal Regulations 

dated July 1, 2011. Virginia noted that its 

intent in updating its incorporation by 

reference of the NESHAP and NSPS was to 

retain the authority to enforce all standards 

included in the revisions, as per the 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
28876 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 16, 2012 / Notices 

2 Sierra Club v. EPA, 551 F.3rd 1019 (D.C. Cir. 

2008). 

provisions of EPA’s previous delegation 

actions. Virginia committed to enforcing the 

federal standards in conformance with the 

terms of EPA’s previous delegations of 

authority. Virginia made only allowed 

wording changes. 

Virginia provided copies of its revised 

regulations specifying the NESHAP and 

NSPS which Virginia has adopted by 

reference. These revised regulations are 

entitled 9 VAC 5–50 ‘‘New and Modified 

Stationary Sources,’’ and 9 VAC 5–60 

‘‘Hazardous Air Pollutant Sources.’’ These 

revised regulations have an effective date of 

February 15, 2012. 

Accordingly, EPA acknowledges that 

Virginia now has the authority, as provided 

for under the terms of EPA’s previous 

delegation actions, to implement and enforce 

the NESHAP and NSPS standards which 

Virginia has adopted by reference in 

Virginia’s revised regulations 9 VAC 5–50 

and 9 VAC 5–60, both effective on February 

15, 2012. 

Please note that on December 19, 2008, in 

Sierra Club v. EPA,2 the United States Court 

of Appeals for the District of Columbia 

Circuit vacated certain provisions of the 

General Provisions of 40 CFR Part 63 relating 

to exemptions for startup, shutdown, and 

malfunction (SSM). On October 16, 2009, the 

Court issued a mandate vacating these SSM 

exemption provisions, which are found at 40 

CFR § 63.6(f)(1) and (h)(1). 

Accordingly, EPA no longer allows sources 

the SSM exemption as provided for in the 

vacated provisions at 40 CFR § 63.6(f)(1) and 

(h)(1), even though EPA has not yet formally 

removed these SSM exemption provisions 

from the General Provisions of 40 CFR Part 

63. Because Virginia incorporated 40 CFR 

Part 63 by reference, Virginia should also no 

longer allow sources to use the former SSM 

exemption from the General Provisions of 40 

CFR Part 63 due to the Court’s ruling in 

Sierra Club vs. EPA. 

EPA appreciates Virginia’s continuing 

NESHAP and NSPS enforcement efforts, and 

also Virginia’s decision to take automatic 

delegation of additional and more recent 

NESHAP and NSPS by adopting them by 

reference. 

Sincerely, 

Diana Esher, Director 

Air Protection Division’’ 

This notice acknowledges the update 

of Virginia’s delegation of authority to 

implement and enforce NESHAP and 

NSPS. 

Dated: April 18, 2012. 

Diana Esher, 

Director, Air Protection Division, Region III. 

[FR Doc. 2012–11847 Filed 5–15–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

Information Collections Being 

Submitted for Review and Approval to 

the Office of Management and Budget 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Communications 

Commission (FCC), as part of its 

continuing effort to reduce paperwork 

burdens, invites the general public and 

other Federal agencies to take this 

opportunity to comment on the 

following information collection, as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act (PRA) of 1995. An agency may not 

conduct or sponsor a collection of 

information unless it displays a 

currently valid control number. No 

person shall be subject to any penalty 

for failing to comply with a collection 

of information subject to the PRA that 

does not display a valid control number. 

Comments are requested concerning 

whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

Commission, including whether the 

information shall have practical utility; 

the accuracy of the Commission’s 

burden estimate; ways to enhance the 

quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information collected; ways to minimize 

the burden of the collection of 

information on the respondents, 

including the use of automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology; and ways to 

further reduce the information 

collection burden on small business 

concerns with fewer than 25 employees. 

The FCC may not conduct or sponsor a 

collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid control 

number. No person shall be subject to 

any penalty for failing to comply with 

a collection of information subject to the 

PRA that does not display a valid Office 

of Management and Budget (OMB) 

control number. 

DATES: Written comments should be 

submitted on or before June 15, 2012. If 

you anticipate that you will be 

submitting comments, but find it 

difficult to do so within the period of 

time allowed by this notice, you should 

advise the contacts below as soon as 

possible. 

ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to 

Nicholas A. Fraser, OMB, via fax 202– 

395–5167, or via email 

Nicholas_A._Fraser@omb.eop.gov; and 

to Cathy Williams, FCC, via email 

PRA@fcc.gov <mailto:PRA@fcc.gov> and 

to Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov. Include in 

the comments the OMB control number 

as shown in the SUPPLEMENTARY

INFORMATION section below. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

additional information or copies of the 

information collection, contact Cathy 

Williams at (202) 418–2918. To view a 

copy of this information collection 

request (ICR) submitted to OMB: (1) Go 

to the Web page <http:// 

www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain>, 

(2) look for the section of the Web page 

called ‘‘Currently Under Review,’’ (3) 

click on the downward-pointing arrow 

in the ‘‘Select Agency’’ box below the 

‘‘Currently Under Review’’ heading, (4) 

select ‘‘Federal Communications 

Commission’’ from the list of agencies 

presented in the ‘‘Select Agency’’ box, 

(5) click the ‘‘Submit’’ button to the 

right of the ‘‘Select Agency’’ box, (6) 

when the list of FCC ICRs currently 

under review appears, look for the OMB 

control number of this ICR and then 

click on the ICR Reference Number. A 

copy of the FCC submission to OMB 

will be displayed. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

OMB Control Number: 3060–1150. 

Title: Structure and Practices of the 

Video Relay Service Program, Second 

Report and Order and Order, CG Docket 

No. 10–51. 

Form Number: N/A. 

Type of Review: Revision of a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities. 

Number of Respondents and 

Responses: 28 respondents; 89 

responses. 

Estimated Time per Response: .017 

hours (1 minute) to 50 hours. 

Frequency of Response: Annual, on 

occasion, and one-time reporting 

requirements; third party disclosure 

requirement. 

Obligation to Respond: Required to 

obtain or retain benefits. The statutory 

authority for the information collections 

are found at section 225 of the Act, 47 

U.S.C. 225. The law was enacted on July 

26, 1990, as Title IV of the ADA, Public 

Law 101–336, 104 Stat. 327, 366–69. 

Total Annual Burden: 934 hours. 

Total Annual Cost: None. 

Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: 

An assurance of confidentiality is not 

offered because this information 

collection does not require the 

collection of personally identifiable 

information (PII) from individuals. 

Privacy Impact Assessment: No 

impact(s). 

Needs and Uses: On July 28, 2011, in 

document FCC 11–118, the Commission 

released a Second Report and Order and 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES