alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: wnmjruss@att.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:31:12 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

w russell

Richardson, TX 75081
H. Res. 441

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

May 24, 2007.

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is 

hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON HOUSE ADMINISTRATION: Mr. Brady of 

Pennsylvania, Chairman. 

Attest:

Clerk.
From: dann@gyi.cc

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:47:47 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dann Spader

Batavia, IL 60510
No. 62216.

#### C. J. Tower & Sons *v.*United States,

protests 209233-K, etc. (Buffalo).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of yellow cedar the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Border Brokerage Co. et al.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 179, C. D. 1923), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.36 MB)
 
 Green Mountain Boys AEW 380th Air Expeditionary Wing holidays combined Crew isil cjtf-oir F-16 Fighting Falcon isis Liberation MOSUL Defend the region Join Task Force-Operation Inherent Resolve meals crew chief air refueling deliver decisive airpower OIR FOOD REFUELING KC-10 EXTENDER Operation Inherent Resolve USCENTCOM pilot Iraq AFCENT Sortie Boom Operator Christmas
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION 

 

I, Leonard F. Ferro, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Collins & AikmanFloorcoverings, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
Before the Second Division,

October 10, 1962

No. 67107.

protests 61/859, etc. (New York).

#### Continental Diesel Corp. et al. *v.*United States

Opinion of

Lawrence J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           8,564
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,007
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,031)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                45,381
<PP&E>                                          20,600
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,351)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  68,795
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,503
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      54,962
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    68,795
<SALES>                                         24,777
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,777
<CGS>                                           14,568
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   33,770
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (13)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (190)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,284)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (6,506)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,506)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,506)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.51)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 451 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                          June 5, 2007.
Whereas on June 4, 2007, Representative William Jefferson was indicted on 16 
        criminal counts by a grand jury in the United States District Court for 
        the Eastern District of Virginia;
Whereas recent credible media accounts indicate that the Department of Justice 
        is investigating the conduct of other Members of the House of 
        Representatives, and these investigations may lead to further 
        indictments;
Whereas the One Hundred Tenth Congress, in its first day of session, 
        strengthened the rules concerning the ethical behavior of Members of the 
        House;
Whereas the House has approved on an overwhelming and bipartisan basis H.R. 
        2316, the Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2007, to 
        establish strict standards and penalties concerning the relationship 
        between lobbyists and Members; and
Whereas these actions by the One Hundred Tenth Congress demonstrate that 
        illegal, unethical, or inappropriate conduct by Members of the House 
        will not be tolerated: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That whenever a Member of the House of Representatives, including 
a Delegate or Resident Commissioner to the Congress, is indicted or otherwise 
formally charged with criminal conduct in a court of the United States or any 
State, the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct shall, not later than 30 
days after the date of such indictment or charge--
            (1) empanel an investigative subcommittee to review the allegations; 
        or
            (2) if the Committee does not empanel an investigative subcommittee 
        to review the allegations, submit a report to the House describing its 
        reasons for not empaneling such an investigative subcommittee, together 
        with the actions, if any, the Committee has taken in response to the 
        allegations.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
From: sweetmomster11@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:55:50 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Diane Belote

Climax, MI 49034
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### May 17, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 130123 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly 

### MICHAEL G. BRADLEY, Plaintiff-Appellee, Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,



### v SC: 130123 Justices


### COA: 263960 WCAC: 04-000256 GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 16, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

s0510 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 17, 2006

Clerk
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

RODNEY CLARK,

Plaintiff,

v.

SANDRA CARTER, et al.,

Defendant.

Case No. C05-5613FDB

ORDER

Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 1) is incomplete. Specifically,

plaintiff’s Acknowledgement and Authorization form is out of date and it does not reflect the current filing free

requirement of $250.00. Plaintiff shall file a supplement or amended application to correct this error by

not later than October 20, 2005. Otherwise, the court will recommend denial of his application and

dismissal of the underlying matter as frivolous.

DATED this 26th day of September, 2005.

/s/ J. Kelley Arnold J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:05-cv-05613-FDB Document 4 Filed 09/26/2005 Page 1 of 1

Clark et al v. Carter et al Doc. 4

Dockets.Justia.com
From: bbennett@connections.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:26:41 PM

Dear sirs:

As a citizen and business owner, I am asking that you rescind the unjust and coercive mandate that all

"contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance with no co-pay to

patients. If not, at the minimum expand conscience protections for 0rganizations that provide

insurance, and have moral or religious objections.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services.

These are kind of directives that make us want to join the Tea Party Movement. Thank you.

Sincerely,

William Bennett

Hollywood, FL 33020
From: james_jones210@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:24:04 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

James Jones

Pearcy, AR 71964
----

| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  Date:  July 31, 2009 |    /s/ Kent M. Adams           |
|--------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                                 |  Kent M. Adams                      |
|                                 |  President, Director                |
|                                 |  and Chief Executive Officer        |
|                                 |                                     |
|                                 |                                     |
|                                 |                                     |
|                                 |                                     |
|  Date:  July 31, 2009 |   /s/ James A. Duensing        |
|                                 |  James A. Duensing                  |
|                                 |  Executive Vice President and Chief |
|                                 |  Financial Officer                  |

----