alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32

WRITTEN STATEMENT
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, Greg H. Weaver, the Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer of Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. (the Company), and
Carl W. Womack, the Chief Executive Officer of Pacific Sunwear of California,
Inc., pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, hereby certify that:



| | (i)  |  | the Quarterly Report of the Company, on Form
10-Q for the period ended August 2, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | ---- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (ii) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                    

|                      |  |                                                                                                                
|--------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 27,2003 |  | /s/ Greg H. Weaver                                                                                             
|                      |  |                                                                                                                
|                      |  | Greg H. Weaver
Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc.           
|Dated: August 27,2003 |  | /s/ Carl W. Womack                                                                                             
|                      |  |                                                                                                                
|                      |  | Carl W. Womack
Senior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc.

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. and will be retained by Pacific
Sunwear of California, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
H. Res. 517 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 27, 2007. 

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 2829) making appropriations for financial services and general government for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2008, and for other purposes. The first reading 

of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against 

consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under 

clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. General debate shall be confined 

to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 

controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 

the Committee on Appropriations. After general debate the 

bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute 

rule. Points of order against provisions in the bill for failure 

to comply with clause 2 of rule XXI are waived. During consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the 

Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition 
2 

•HRES 517 EH 

on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment 

has caused it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule 

XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. 

When the committee rises and reports the bill back to the 

House with a recommendation that the bill do pass, the previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 

amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

SEC. 2. During consideration in the House of H.R. 2829 

pursuant to this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of 

the previous question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the bill to such time as may be designated by the 

Speaker. 

SEC. 3. It shall be in order, any rule of the House to 

the contrary notwithstanding, to consider concurrent resolutions providing for the adjournment of the House and Senate 

during the month of July. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Case 3:05-cv-05575-RBL Document 64 Filed 12/30/06 Page 1 of 17
Case 3:05-cv-05575-RBL Document 64 Filed 12/30/06 Page 2 of 17
Case 3:05-cv-05575-RBL Document 64 Filed 12/30/06 Page 3 of 17
Case 3:05-cv-05575-RBL Document 64 Filed 12/30/06 Page 4 of 17
Case 3:05-cv-05575-RBL Document 64 Filed 12/30/06 Page 5 of 17
Case 3:05-cv-05575-RBL Document 64 Filed 12/30/06 Page 6 of 17
Case 3:05-cv-05575-RBL Document 64 Filed 12/30/06 Page 7 of 17
Case 3:05-cv-05575-RBL Document 64 Filed 12/30/06 Page 8 of 17
Case 3:05-cv-05575-RBL Document 64 Filed 12/30/06 Page 9 of 17
Case 3:05-cv-05575-RBL Document 64 Filed 12/30/06 Page 10 of 17
Case 3:05-cv-05575-RBL Document 64 Filed 12/30/06 Page 11 of 17
Case 3:05-cv-05575-RBL Document 64 Filed 12/30/06 Page 12 of 17
Case 3:05-cv-05575-RBL Document 64 Filed 12/30/06 Page 13 of 17
Case 3:05-cv-05575-RBL Document 64 Filed 12/30/06 Page 14 of 17
Case 3:05-cv-05575-RBL Document 64 Filed 12/30/06 Page 15 of 17
Case 3:05-cv-05575-RBL Document 64 Filed 12/30/06 Page 16 of 17
Case 3:05-cv-05575-RBL Document 64 Filed 12/30/06 Page 17 of 17
No. 64547.

#### John F. Kilroy Company *v.*United States,

protests 240162-K and 240163-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

When this case was first called for trial, request was made for a continuance in order to obtain information from the German manufacturer. When the case was again called for hearing, counsel reported that the information received was unsatisfactory, and counsel for the Government moved to dismiss the protests for lack of prosecution. The protests were dismissed.
From: stevenhenke@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:33:42 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Steven Henke

Seattle, WA 98146
No. 60531.

#### National Carloading Corp. and David Levin *v.*United States,

protest 167971-K (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silent butlers and smoothing irons the same in all material respects as those involved in *The Fan Co.*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 42, C. D. 1261) and *Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(28 Cust. Ct. 280, C. D. 1423), respectively, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: marysjoys@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:29:22 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Leticia Velasquez

Canterbury, CT 06331
From: mccombs@geneseo.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:56:37 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Marjean McCombs

Geneseo, IL 61254
From: rnmedic103@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:41:11 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Robert Swayze

Marion, IL 62959
Case 2:05-cv-01593-MJP Document 19 Filed 07/24/06 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 10.1
                                AMENDMENT NO. 2
                             TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

     Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement dated as of February 1, 1994 as
amended May 15, 1995 (the "Employment Agreement") between Riddell, Inc., an
Illinois corporation (the "Employment Agreement"), between Riddell, Inc., an
Illinois corporation (the "Company"), and Dan Cougill.

     WHEREAS, Mr. Cougill has been elected Chief Operating Officer and
President of the Riddell Group of Riddell Sports Inc. and the President and
Chief Operating Officer of the Company.

     WHEREAS, the Employment Agreement, unless extended, expires on May 15,
1998 and the Company wishes to provide Mr. Cougill incentive to continue
providing excellent leadership to the Company and to extend the term of the
Employment Agreement.

     NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration receipt of which is
hereby acknowledged the parties hereto agree as follows:

     (A)  Section 2 of the Employment Agreement be and hereby is amended to
          provide in full as follows:

          "2.  Term.     This Agreement is for a term ("Term") commencing on
                         the date of this Agreement and terminating on May 15,
                         1999, or upon the Executive's earlier death,
                         disability or other termination of employment pursuant
                         to Section 11."

     (B)  All Other provisions on the Employment Agreement shall remain in full
          force and effect.


Dated:    September 11, 1997            RIDDELL, INC.
          ------------------
                                   By:  /s/ David Mauer
                                       --------------------------------
                                        David Mauer
                                   Its: Chief Executive Officer


                                        EXECUTIVE

                                        /s/ Dan Cougill
                                       ---------------------------------
                                        Dan Cougill
ex10_2.htm








Exhibit 10.2







SOUTH JERSEY INDUSTRIES, INC.


 


SCHEDULE OF OFFICER AGREEMENTS


 


Pursuant to Rule 12b-31, the following sets forth the material details which differ in the Officer Change in Control Agreements, the form of which is filed herewith as Exhibit 10.1.


 



	
Name

	
Capacities in Which Served

	
Effective


 Date


 of


Agreement

	
Severance


Multiple of


Base Salary


and Average


Annual Bonus

	
Duration of Continued Medical


Insurance


	  	  	  	  	  
	
Edward J. Graham

	
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, South Jersey Industries, Inc.

	
1/1/13

	
3X

	
3 years


	  	  	  	  	  
	
Jeffrey E. DuBois

	
Senior Vice President, South Jersey Industries, Inc.; President, South Jersey Gas Company

	
1/1/13

	
2X

	
2 years


	  	  	  	  	  
	
David A. Kindlick

	
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, South Jersey Industries, Inc.

	
1/1/13

	
2X

	
2 years


	  	  	  	  	  
	
Michael J. Renna

	
Senior Vice President, South Jersey Industries, Inc.; President, South Jersey Energy Solutions, LLC

	
1/1/13

	
2X

	
2 years


	  	  	  	  	  
	
Kevin D. Patrick

	
Vice President, South Jersey Industries, Inc.

	
1/1/13

	
2X

	
2 years
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 188 (Friday, September 29, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67454-67455]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21406]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Enhanced-Use Lease of U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Real 
Property for the Development of Permanent Supportive Housing at the 
Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, West Los Angeles, California 
Campus

AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.

ACTION: Notice of intent to enter into an enhanced-use lease.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The purpose of this Federal Register notice is to provide the 
public with notice that the Secretary of the Department of Veterans 
Affairs (VA) intends to enter an enhanced-use lease (EUL) of certain 
assets identified herein on the campus of the Greater Los Angeles 
Healthcare System-West Los Angeles (GLAHS-WLA).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: C. Brett Simms, Executive Director, 
Office of Asset Enterprise Management, Office of Management, 810 
Vermont Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20420, 202-502-0262. This is not a 
toll-free number.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 8161-8169 and the West 
Los Angeles Leasing Act of 2016, Public Law 114-226, as amended, the 
Secretary of VA is authorized to enter into an EUL for a term of up to 
99 years on the GLAHS-WLA campus for the provision of supportive 
housing if the lease is not inconsistent with and will not adversely 
affect the mission of VA. Consistent with this authority, the Secretary 
of VA intends to enter into an EUL for the purpose of outleasing 
MacArthur Field, consisting of approximately 2.81 acres of land on the 
GLAHS-WLA campus, to develop 75 units of permanent supportive housing 
for Veterans and their families. The competitively selected EUL lessee/
developer, MacArthur B, LP, will finance, design, develop, construct, 
manage, maintain and operate permanent supportive housing for eligible 
homeless Veterans or Veterans at risk of homelessness and their 
families on a priority placement basis. The housing will be developed 
over the next 2 years consistent with the GLAHS-WLA Master Plan 2022. 
In addition, the lessee/developer will be required to provide 
supportive services that guide Veteran residents towards long-term 
independence and self-sufficiency.

[[Page 67455]]

Signing Authority

    Denis McDonough, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, approved and signed 
this document on September 22, 2023, and authorized the undersigned to 
sign and submit the document to the Office of the Federal Register for 
publication electronically as an official document of the Department of 
Veterans Affairs.

Luvenia Potts,
Regulation Development Coordinator, Office of Regulation Policy & 
Management, Office of General Counsel, Department of Veterans Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2023-21406 Filed 9-28-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
From: marilroan@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:41:41 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Marilyn Apsey

Harrisville, MI 48740