alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1512 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1512

Expressing support for designation of February 8, 2010, as ``Boy Scouts 
       of America Day'' in celebration of the 100th anniversary.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 27, 2008

    Mr. Hall of Texas submitted the following resolution; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing support for designation of February 8, 2010, as ``Boy Scouts 
       of America Day'' in celebration of the 100th anniversary.

Whereas Boy Scouts of America was incorporated by Chicago publisher, William 
        Boyce on February 8, 1910, after learning of the scouting movement 
        during a visit to London;
Whereas, on June 21, 1901, a group of 34 national representatives met, developed 
        organization plans, and opened a temporary national headquarters in New 
        York;
Whereas the purpose of Boy Scouts of America is to ``teach [boys] patriotism, 
        courage, self-reliance, and kindred values'';
Whereas by 1912, Boy Scouts were enrolled in every State;
Whereas in 1916, Congress granted Boy Scouts of America a Federal charter;
Whereas each council will commit each Boy Scout to perform 12 hours of community 
        service yearly, totaling 200,000,000 community service hours each year;
Whereas there are now more than 111,000,000 Boy Scouts, and the organization is 
        found in 185 countries around the world;
Whereas February 8, 2010, would be an appropriate day to designate as ``Boy 
        Scouts of America Day'' in celebration of the 100th anniversary; and
Whereas Boy Scouts of America endeavors to develop United States citizens who 
        are physically, mentally, and emotionally fit, have a high degree of 
        self-reliance as evidenced in such qualities as initiative, courage, and 
        resourcefulness, have personal values based on religious concepts, have 
        the desire and skills to help others, understand the principles of the 
        United States social, economic, and governmental systems, take pride in 
        their American heritage and understand our Nation's role in the world, 
        have a keen respect for the basic rights of all people, and are prepared 
        to participate in and give leadership to the American society: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports the 
designation of ``Boy Scouts of America Day'' in celebration of the 
100th anniversary.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.2
ADDENDUM TO A CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT


THIS ADDENDUM TO A CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT (this “Addendum”) is executed as of March 15, 2018 by and among Aspen Insurance Holdings Limited, a Bermuda corporation (“Holdings”), Aspen Insurance UK Services Limited, an England corporation (“AUKSL”) and Scott Kirk (the “Executive”).
WHEREAS Holdings, AUKSL and the Executive entered into a Change in Control Agreement dated February 23, 2015 (the “Change in Control Agreement”);
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
		
	1.
	Defined terms in this Addendum which are not otherwise defined shall carry the meanings attributed to them in the Change in Control Agreement.




		
	2.
	Clause 6(a)(i)(B) of the Change in Control Agreement shall be deleted and replaced with the following:




		
	“(B)
	The amount equal to the product of (1) two and (2) the sum of (x) the Executive’s Annual Base Salary and (y) the Recent Average Bonus”


		
	3.
	All other provisions of the Change in Control Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.




		
	4.
	This Addendum shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of England & Wales.











IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Addendum as of the day and year first written above. 


ASPEN INSURANCE HOLDINGS LIMITED
By: /s/ Michael Cain
Name: Michael Cain
Title: Group General Counsel


ASPEN INSURANCE UK SERVICES LIMITED


By: /s/Michael Cain
Name: Michael Cain
Title: Director
        
SCOTT KIRK


/s/ Scott Kirk 
Scott Kirk
From: SAEE_Jam99@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:42:32 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Stephen Evelyn

Harker Heights, TX 76548
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Dated this 13th day of January , 2006

/S/ PETER H. VOELKER 

 Deputy Clerk

MINUTE ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the WESTERN DISTRICT of WASHINGTON

UNITED STATES of AMERICA,

 Plaintiff,

)

)

)

vs. )

) CR05-381 TSZ

JOSHUA KEBEDE,

 Defendant.

)

)

) MINUTE ORDER

) CONTINUING EVIDENTIARY 

) HEARING

The following Minute Order is made at the direction of the Court, the Honorable 

Mary Alice Theiler, United States Magistrate Judge:

Counsel have requested the Evidentiary Hearing on Bond Revocation be stricken from the

calendar on January 18, 2006, and be continued. The request is GRANTED. The evidentiary

hearing is hereby continued to Monday, February 13, 2006 at 9:30am. The hearing will be held

in Courtroom 12A, U.S. Courthouse, Seattle, Washington. 

Case 2:05-cr-00381-TSZ Document 45 Filed 01/13/06 Page 1 of 1
From: fajump@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:18:41 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Floyd Jump

Garner, IA 50438
From: mikeberry@centurytel.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:16:27 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mike Berry

Reeds Spring, MO 65737
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA- 

## 2ot

**-AI.M.- o~q-f\:1)**  Directorate Identifier: -AD ffyou make changes to the values in the table below. you must ensure the totals update accordingly
. ff they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell. Estimated Costs: Action Costs per Product (e.g. , aircraft, engine, (e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost (labor+ 

## u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do not include oncondition costs here access, testing, ( @ $85/h parts) Registered and close-up) our) Products 

### Revise AFM 1.0 $0 

### 43

The known number of products in compliance: 

### 0 Total Costs ofcompliance for U.S. fleet: $3,655 Costs covered under warranty 

### (if known) $ On-Condition Costs:



## ~ Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product (e.g., Inspection , (include access, (@$85/hour)

replacement) testing, and closeup)



### Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this fie ld to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious
. Thisfield can also be used to explain warranty costs) :

### Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered a " significant regulatory action"?



# ~ YES* 

## D NO 

### rg] *Explanation: 

### Cumulative cost per airplane type does not go over US$1 00,000,000.00. 

### AD will not restrict airworthiness. DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: Is the AD significant?

- YES* 

## D NO 

### rg] *Explanation: 

### Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number ofsmall entities? Explain for either a Yes or No answer. - YES 

# D NO 

### rg] Explanation: 

### Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode oftransportation?



# ~ YES* 

# D NO 

### rg] *Explanation:
### Barite resources of the United States

By: Donald Albert Brobst

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1072B

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (4683 pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (291 pdf)                        
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
From: ohanamcgaha@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:46:21 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Robert McGaha

Groton, CT 06340
From: jeff1stclass@charter.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: jeff1stclass@charter.net

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:16:58 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jeff Cutliff

Anderson, SC 29625
From: carricke@bellsouth.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:39:57 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ed Carrick

Alabaster, AL 35007
From: dmvolz@valp.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:50:11 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

David Volz

Valparaiso, FL 32580
#### Ashton M. Park, Respondent, v. Charles C. Clark, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by

Barker, J.