alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: joansandkamp@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:12:51 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Joan Sandkamp

Inver Grove Heights, MN 55077
From: belindaziko@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:57:03 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Belinda Ziko

Fort Wayne, IN 46835
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

CHRISTY MICHELLE BERRY v. LESTER STEPHEN BERRY

Appeal from the Chancery Court for Knox County

No. 148677-2 Daryl R. Fansler, Chancellor

No. E2004-01832-COA-R3-CV - FILED MAY 31, 2005

CHARLES D. SUSANO, JR., concurring.

I concur in the majority’s opinion. I write separately to stress that which is missing in this

case, i.e., evidence, be it in the form of expert testimony or otherwise, showing that the subject child

has been, or can reasonably be expected to be, adversely affected by his mother’s lifestyle. In my

opinion, the trial court’s judgment must be reversed because of a lack of proof to support its critical

finding of adverse effect.

_______________________________

CHARLES D. SUSANO, JR., JUDGE
From: crhogan@twlakes.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:40:55 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Cecil Hogan

Celina, TN 38551
Exhibit
32.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection
with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Sunrise Energy Resources,  Inc. (the Company)
for the period ended June 30, 2005 as  filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the  Report), I, Konstantin Tsirulnikov, President
and Chief Financial Officer  of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1)     The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of  the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2)     The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,  the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 8,
2005

| | By:
 /s/ Konstantin Tsirulnikov
      Konstantin Tsirulnikov
      Chief Financial Officer
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350





The
undersigned officer of ALLIED HEALTHCARE PRODUCTS, INC. (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the Company’s fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





/s/
      Earl R. RefslandEarl
      R. RefslandPresident
      & Chief Executive OfficerMay
      12, 2009
From: johnm@ccconline.cc

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:11:58 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

John Malinowski

Sacramento, CA 95827
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W.D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

DEXTER E GREEN,

Defendants.

Case No. CR05-5736

ORDER RE: ALLEGATIONS OF

VIOLATION OF CONDITIONS OF

SUPERVISION

THIS MATTER comes on for an initial hearing on the Petition of the United States Pretrial

Services Office alleging that the defendant has violated the conditions of supervision under bond.

The plaintiff appears through Assistant United States Attorney, Ken Tyndal.

The defendant appears personally and represented by counsel, Steve Krupa. 

The U.S. Pretrial Services Office has filed a petition alleging violations of the terms and

conditions of supervision by using marijuana on or about December 28, 2006 and January 3, 2007;

failing to call the drug testing scheduling system on December 21, 2006, December 28, 2006, and

January 11, 2007; and failing to comply with Department of Corrections supervision as of January 17,

2007. The defendant has been advised of the allegations and of his right to a hearing and the

maximum consequences if found to have been in violation. The defendant freely and voluntarily

acknowledged the alleged violations.

NOW THEREFORE, the court finds the defendant has violated the conditions of his Pretrial

Supervision while on release under bond, and orders that the defendant be detained for failing to show

that he will not flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community pursuant to CrR 32.1(a)(1),

and CrR 46(c), to be delivered as ordered by the court for further proceedings.

The clerks shall direct copies of this order to counsel for the United States, to counsel for the

defendant, the United States Marshal and to the United States Probation Office and/or Pretrial Services

Office.

February 23, 2007.

_s/ Karen L. Strombom_________________

Karen L. Strombom, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cr-05736-KLS Document 17 Filed 02/23/07 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 MINUTE ORDER – 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

U.S. BANK, N.A.,

Plaintiff,

v.

ENTERTAINER, Official No. 627953, their

Engines, Machinery, Appurtenances, etc., 

and 

FIRST CAPITAL PARTNERS, LTD., and S

HILTON SMITH, In Personam,

Defendants.

IN ADMIRALTY

CASE NO. C 05-1534C

MINUTE ORDER

The following Minute Order is made by direction of the Court, the Honorable John C. 

Coughenour, United States District Judge:

This matter comes before the Court on the Stipulation of the parties (Dkt. No. 35) and this

Court’s Order approving such stipulation (Dkt. No. 36). Because the stipulation partially moots the

now-pending summary judgment motion (Dkt. No. 26), the Court STRIKES such motion and grants 

//

//

Case 2:05-cv-01534-JCC Document 37 Filed 04/26/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 MINUTE ORDER – 2

leave for the parties to raise the outstanding issues of attorney’s fees briefed therein at a later date, should

the parties so choose.

DATED this 26th day of April, 2006.

BRUCE RIFKIN, Clerk of Court

By /s/ C. Ledesma 

Deputy Clerk

Case 2:05-cv-01534-JCC Document 37 Filed 04/26/06 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

MICHAEL D. MATTHEWS,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF WASHINGTON,

Respondent.

Case No. C05-5670RBL

ORDER GRANTING I.F.P.

 APPLICATION

Petitioner's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Petitioner does not

appear to have funds available to afford the $5.00 filing fee.

The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this Order to petitioner.

DATED this 7th day of November, 2005.

_/s/ J. Kelley Arnold_______ J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:05-cv-05670-RBL Document 3 Filed 11/07/05 Page 1 of 1
From: fhigdon09@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:41:56 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Fila Higdon

Tallahassee, FL 32308
NO. 07

- 13

- 0008

- CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL B JANUARY 28 , 2013

____________________________ In re TERRY BLANKENSHIP , Relator

___________________________ **O rder of**  **D ismissal** 

__________________________ Before QUI NN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK , JJ. Relator Terry Blankenship filed a petition for writ of mandamus on June 5 , 2012, but failed to pay the $12 5 filing fee required under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 5. We info rmed relator, by letter dated January 11, 2013 , that the filing fee was outstanding and that the appeal would be dismissed un less it was paid by January 22,
2013

. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(c); see Holt v. F.F. Enterprises , 990 S.W.2d 756 (Tex. App.

– Amarillo 19 98, pet. ref’d). The fee has not been paid to date. Nor does the record show him to be indigent or having request ed leave to proceed as an indigent

.
Because relator has failed to pay the requisite filing fee as directed by the c o urt, we dismiss the appea l pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(c).

Per Curiam
From: ltmamrosh@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:55:52 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Leslie Mamrosh

Winter Haven, FL 33881
Due to the file size of ADEQ’s CALPUFF modeling files, they are not available from the 

electronic docket. These files are available upon request. 

Please email your request to: Michael Feldman (feldman.michael@epa.gov) or call 

214-665-7200. 

Thank you.
From: shelby1018@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:26:28 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Michele Meiers

, 19096-3640