alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: dentcrew@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:01:51 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ramona Dent

Eugene, OR 97404
• MITSUBISHI ..... POWER SYSTEMS 

Mfsuasli Power Systems Amelicos.lnc.l 1 00 BoyY.ew Cide. Sute w:JJ I Newporl Beoch. CA 926UJ USA I Phone 949.856.8400 I Fox949 .856.4481 

April 9, 2009 

U.S. Steel - Headquarters 

600 Grant Street Room 2028 

Pittsburgh, Pa. 15219 

Attention: Mr. Alex Parou 

(copy: Mr. Darren Gietzen) 

SUBJECT: Decline to Bid 

REFERENCE: RFQ- UM0-0486-1 MINNTAC LOW NOx REDUCTION SYSTEM 

Dear Sir, 

With reference to above mentioned subject and project, MPSA would like to inform you that we will not 

be submitting our proposal to your RFQ (ref UM0-0486-1). Having attended the pre-bid meeting this 

week, we now have a better understanding of the Minntac's goals and targets, manufacturing process, 

and at the same time, the challenges that SCR, as a technology, would have in its application. 

1) Temperature and layout pose significant challenges for SCR. And the same challenges are most 

likely non-issues for other technologies. An example of this is how best to extract 100% of the 

flue gas and treat them in the optimal SCR operating range of 600 N 750F. 

2) NOx reduction requirement of 70% is well within the capabilities of SNCR and LoTOx. 

For these reasons, we feel that SNCR and LoTOx will likely offer better solutions for your particular 

application. If you have SCR related questions or if the project parameters change, please let us 

know and we will try our best to assist. 

We wish the best of luck to US Steel. 

Sincerely, 

FusatoDana 

Manager, Contract Administration 

Tel: 949-856-8416 

Cel: 949-275-8368 

e-mail: fdana@mpshq.com
From: drrob61-congo@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:31:40 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Robert Renberg

Holland, MI 49424
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004

- 2595  p202 624

- 2500  f202 628

- 5116

Marc L. Warren

(202) 624

- 2531

mwarren@crowell.com

December 16 , 2015

VIA FDMS

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12

- 140

Attn: FAA Dockets

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Infinigy

– Petition to Amend Exemption No. 13386 (Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 1953 )

Dear Sir or Madam :

On October 28

, 2015

, the FAA granted Infinigy Engineering & Surveying PLLC (“ Infinigy ”)

an exemption pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012

authorizing Infinigy to operate the Aerialtronics Altura Zenith, Vulcan Black Widow and Sci.Aero

cyberQuad u n manned aircraft systems (“UAS”) to conduct aerial photography, cinematography,

inspection s

, and surveying (“Exemption No. 13386 ”). 1 Pursuant to O perating Condition and

L imitation No. 1 indicated therein, Infinigy petitions the FAA to amend its Section 333

exemption authority to enable Infinigy to operat e the Delta Drone Delta

- H UAS (8.8 lbs.

, multi

rotor) under the same operating conditions and limitations as specified in Exemption No.

13386.

The Delta Drone Delta

- H UAS meet s all of the relevant criteria described in Exemption

No. 13386

, and Infinigy’s operations with this UAS will comply with all conditions and

limitations specified therein. I nfinigy will maintain and update the technical manuals for this

UAS as necessary. 2 The same public interest and safety factors that supported the FAA’s

issuance of Exemption No. 13386 exist here. Moreover, granting this amendment request

would be consistent with the amendment relief the FAA has provided to over 200 other UAS

operators already operating under Section 333.

Should you have any questions or require any additional infor mation, please do not

hesitate to contact me at mwarren@crowell.com or (202) 624

- 2531

.

1 In the Matter of the Petition of Infinigy Engineering & Surveying PLLC , Grant of Exemption No.

13386 ( Oct

. 2 8 , 2015), Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 1953

.

2 Manuals for the Delta Drone Delta

- H UAS will be provided to FAA upon request.FAA Dockets

December 16 , 2015

Page 2 of 2

Crowell & Moring LLP  www.crowell.com  Washington, DC  New York  San Francisco  Los Angeles  Orange County  Anchorage  London  Brussels Respectfully submitted,

Marc L. Warren

Counsel for

Infinigy Engineering & Surveying PLLC
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Page 1 ORDER- [C05-5573-FDB]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

SHEENA N. LOOMER-BATTON,

Plaintiff,

vs.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant

Civil No. C05-5573-FDB

ORDER

Based on the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that the above-captioned

case be REVERSED and REMANDED for further administrative proceedings. On remand, the

ALJ will evaluate all medical source opinions in accordance with 20 C.F.R § 416.927, SSRs, and

Ninth Circuit case law. As necessary, the ALJ will further develop the record by recontacting

Plaintiff's medical sources to determine the bases for their opinions. The ALJ will reevaluate

Plaintiff's credibility, including consideration of lay evidence, pursuant to SSR 96-7p. The ALJ

will revaluate the claimant's residual functional capacity, including consideration of Plaintiff's

Case 3:05-cv-05573-FDB Document 14 Filed 02/07/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Page 2 ORDER- [C05-5573-FDB]

obesity, pursuant to SSR 96-8p and SSR 02-1p. The ALJ will reevaluate Plaintiff's capacity to

perform other work at step five of the sequential process, and, if necessary, obtain additional

vocational expert testimony. The ALJ will take any other actions necessary to develop the record

and issue a new decision. Plaintiff will be afforded the opportunity to submit additional evidence

and argument. 

This case is reversed and remanded on the above grounds pursuant to sentence four of 

42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and Plaintiff is entitled to reasonable attorney's fees and costs pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), upon proper request to this Court.

DATED this 6th day of February 2006.AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Recommended for Entry:

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Presented by:

s/ RICHARD A. MORRIS WSB # 33780

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Office of the General Counsel

701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2900 MS/901

Seattle, Washington 98104-7075

Telephone: (206) 615-2156

FAX: (206) 615-2531

Rick. Morris@ssa.gov

Case 3:05-cv-05573-FDB Document 14 Filed 02/07/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Michael G. Moore, Chief Financial Officer of Gulfport Energy Corporation (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 6, 2010



/s/ Michael G. MooreMichael G. MooreChief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

WAYNE WALTON,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5545RJB

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT 

AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable J. Kelley Arnold,

United States Magistrate Judge, and the remaining record, does hereby find and Order:

(1) The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation.

(2) The petition is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The case fails to name a person as a

defendant. 

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to petitioner and to Judge Arnold.

DATED this 22nd day of November, 2005.

ARobert J. Bryan

United States District Judge 

Case 3:05-cv-05545-RJB Document 7 Filed 11/22/05 Page 1 of 1
From: davedurbin@embarqmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:40:51 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

David Durbin

Sidney, OH 45365
No. P66/16.

protest 63/21098-13909 (Chicago).

#### Goldblatt Brothers, Inc. *v.*United States,

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of *G. Joannou Cycle Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(46 Cust. Ct. 172, C.D. 2253), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
H. Res. 39

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 16, 2007.

Whereas, on January 8, 2007, the University of Florida 

Gators won the 2006 Bowl Championship Series national 

title with a stunning 41–14 defeat over the Ohio State 

University Buckeyes; 

Whereas the University of Florida is one of the premier academic institutions in the State of Florida; 

Whereas the University of Florida football program celebrated its 100th Anniversary this season; 

Whereas the University of Florida Gators captured the South 

Eastern Conference (SEC) Championship title on December 2, 2006; 

Whereas the University of Florida won the NCAA Championship title in basketball in April 2006; 

Whereas the University of Florida is the first Division I 

school to hold the national championship title in both 

football and men’s basketball concurrently; 

Whereas Florida football Head Coach Urban Meyer is only 

the 7th coach to win a national championship in his first 

two seasons as a Division I college football coach; 

Whereas senior quarterback Chris Leak was the Most Valuable Player of the BCS national championship game; 
2

•HRES 39 EH 

Whereas the Florida defense held Ohio State to only 82 yards 

of offense, the lowest ever for a BCS game; 

Whereas the University of Florida student athletes are 

among the most talented in the Nation; 

Whereas University of Florida fans worldwide supported and 

encouraged the Gators throughout the football season; 

Whereas J. Bernard Machen, President of the University of 

Florida, and Athletic Director Jeremy N. Foley have 

shown great leadership in bringing success and glory to 

the University of Florida; and 

Whereas the University of Florida students, faculty, alumni, 

and all Gator fans are deeply committed to bringing 

pride to the University of Florida and the entire State of 

Florida: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) commends the Florida Gators for their victory 

in the 2006 Bowl Championship Series and for winning 

the national college football championship; 

(2) recognizes the achievements of the players, 

coaches, students, and staff whose hard work and dedication helped the University of Florida Gators win the 

championship; and 

(3) directs the Clerk of the House of Representatives to transmit a copy of this resolution to University 

of Florida President J. Bernard Machen, football Head 
3

•HRES 39 EH 

Coach Urban Meyer, and Athletic Director Jeremy N. 

Foley for appropriate display. 

Attest:

Clerk.
~--- 

.` 

.,~ 

tinuwy Owl 1'rotitictioiis 

4200 James Ray Drive 

Suite 161 

Grand Forks, ND 58202 

Tel: 701-738-4825 

matt(iD skyskopes. com 

17 August 2015 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Ma.nagement System 

1200 New Jersey Ave S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 

Re: Amendment to Snowy Owl Productions, LLC ExemptionNo. 

11752 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-0947 

Dear Sir orMadam: 

Snowy Owl Productions, LLC ("Snowy Owl") requests an amendment to FAA Exemption No. 11752, Docket 

No. FAA-2015 -0947 for the purpose of changing section 2 page 3 under Conditions and Limitations. 

We respectfully request that FAA permit Snowy Owl to conduct Closed Set Motion Picture and 

Television Filming and submit the attached Motion Picture and Television Flight Operation Manual. 

If we can provide any additional information to assist your understanding or review of this document, 

please do not hesitate to contact us at 701-738-4825 or via email at matt@skyskopes.com . Thank you. 

Very respectfully, 

Matt Dunlevy 

President and CEO
**TKP** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21 - 0 143 JILL MARIE LOTTER ,

Petitioner and Appellant, v. STATE OF MONTANA ,

Respondent and Appellee .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including April 17 , 2022 , within which to prepare, serve, and file the State’s response .

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 11 2022

03/11/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0143
N OTE : This o rder is non precedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals** 

**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

IN RE PREMA JYOTHI LIGHT

______________________

2014

- 1598

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark

Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in No.

76/293,327.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R

Prema Jyothi Light moves for an extension of time,

until November 5, 2014, to file her opening brief.

Upon consideration thereof,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT :

(1) The motion is granted.

(2) The revised official caption is reflected above. Case: 14-1598 Document: 9 Page: 1 Filed: 09/03/2014IN RE LIGHT 2

F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

Daniel E. O’Toole

Clerk of Court

s21 Case: 14-1598 Document: 9 Page: 2 Filed: 09/03/2014
sail-ex1036_238.htm



Exhibit 10.36

SailPoint Technologies Holdings, Inc.
Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation

This document summarizes the non-employee director compensation policy of SailPoint Technologies Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) effective November 21, 2017, but subject to revision from time to time by the Board or its Compensation Committee.  

The non-employee members of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of SailPoint Technologies Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) will be entitled to receive the following compensation during each year of service as a director:

 


	
Annual cash retainer
	
 
	
$
	
30,000
	
 

	
Additional annual cash retainer for the Chairman of the Board
	
 
	
$
	
20,000
	
 

	
Additional annual cash retainer for Chairman of the Audit Committee
	
 
	
$
	
20,000
	
 

	
Additional cash retainer for members of the Audit Committee
	
 
	
$
	
10,000
	
 

	
Additional cash retainer for the Chairman of the Compensation Committee
	
 
	
$
	
12,000
	
 

	
Additional annual cash retainer for members of the Compensation Committee
	
 
	
$
	
6,000
	
 

	
Additional annual cash retainer for Chairman of the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee
	
 
	
$
	
7,500
	
 

	
Additional cash retainer for members of the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee
	
 
	
$
	
3,750
	
 

	
Annual equity retainer of restricted stock units
	
 
	
$
	
170,000
	
 




 

The cash retainer and committee and chairmanship fees are payable in cash on a quarterly basis.  Annual amounts are subject to pro ration for partial years of service.
From: boomer0021@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:35:12 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Terrance Wilson

Muskogee, OK 74403