alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of PanAmSatCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Michael J. Inglese, Executive VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
|   |   | /s/   Michael J. Inglese               |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Michael  J. Inglese                                   |
|   |   | Executive Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |
|   |   |                                                  |
|   |   | Date: July 29, 2004                                   |

 

----
----

**EXHIBIT      32.1**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                Mediware. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  January                31, 2006 | /s/                James F. Burgess    |
|---------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                                              |                                   |
|                                              |               |
|                                              | James                F. Burgess        |
|                                              | Chief                Executive Officer |
|                                              |                                   |
|                                              |                                   |
| Dated:  January                31, 2006 | /s/                Jill H. Suppes      |
|                                              |                                   |
|                                              |               |
|                                              | Jill                H. Suppes          |
|                                              | Chief                Financial Officer |

----
Exhibit  23.01














CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





The Board of Directors


CommunityOne Bancorp and Subsidiaries


Charlotte, North Carolina








We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on Amendment No. 2 of Form S-3 of CommunityOne Bancorp and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) of our reports dated March 6, 2015, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of CommunityOne Bancorp and Subsidiaries and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which reports are included in the Company’s 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.





We also consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Experts” in the Registration Statement.





/s/ Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP





Charlotte, North Carolina


April 14, 2015
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 15-3 Filed 08/14/03 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 15-3 Filed 08/14/03 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 15-3 Filed 08/14/03 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 15-3 Filed 08/14/03 Page 4 of 4
Before the Second Division,

March 27, 1967

No. P67/82.

#### Soderhamn Machine Manufacturing Co. *v.*United States,

protest 63/7258 (Seattle).

*875Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of Cambio debarkers and parts thereof similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Soderhamn Machine Mfg. Co.*v. *United States*(54 Cust. Ct. 369, Abstract 69205), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: dcharris2@frontier.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:12:18 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services. 

Thank you,

Dan Harris,

Tualatin, Oregon

Sincerely,

Daniel Harris

Tualatin, OR 97062
No. 61024.

protests 964762-G, etc. (New York).

#### Chas. Kalb, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

*356Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of kidskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Kung Chen Fur Corpn.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480) or *Prime Fur Corp.*v. *United States*(37 Cust. Ct. 83, C. D. 1802) and lambskin plates similar to those the subject of *A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643) or C. D. 1802, *supra,*the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Mollison, J.,

dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinions in C. D. 1480 and C. D. 1643, *supra.*
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 468 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that officials of local 

governments who are also members of the National Guard or Reserves 

and are deployed as part of their service in the Armed Forces should 

be granted reasonable accommodation to fulfill their governmental duties 

while so deployed. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 6, 2007 

Mr. PATRICK J. MURPHY of Pennsylvania submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

officials of local governments who are also members of 

the National Guard or Reserves and are deployed as 

part of their service in the Armed Forces should be 

granted reasonable accommodation to fulfill their governmental duties while so deployed. 

Whereas every American citizen has the right to participate 

in government; 

Whereas every American citizen constitutionally eligible to 

vote should not ever have that right abridged; 

Whereas members of the Armed Forces have served bravely 

and heroically in Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation 

Enduring Freedom; 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 468 IH 

Whereas the stresses of these conflicts has led to multiple 

and extended deployments for many members of the 

Armed Forces; and 

Whereas modern technology has made it possible to actively 

participate in government proceedings without being in 

physical attendance: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that— 

3 (1) officials of local governments who are also 

4 members of the National Guard or Reserves and are 

5 deployed as part of their service in the Armed 

6 Forces maintain their rights while so deployed; and 

7 (2) local governments should make reasonable 

8 accommodations to protect the right of members of 

9 the Armed Forces who also serve as government of10 ficials to participate in governmental proceedings 

11 while so deployed. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
No. 58239.

protest 171559-K (Buffalo).

#### C. J. Tower *&*Sons *v.*United States,

*307Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of *United States*v. *Geo. Wm. Rueff, Inc.*(41 C. C. P. A. 95, C. A. D. 535), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 162 (Wednesday, August 21, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 51803]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-20430]

[[Page 51803]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8428]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``L[eacute]ger: Modern Art and the Metropolis''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000, and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003, I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``L[eacute]ger: Modern Art and the 
Metropolis,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at 
the Philadelphia Museum of Art, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, from on or 
about October 10, 2013, until on or about January 5, 2014, and at 
possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in 
the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: August 14, 2013.
Lee Satterfield,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-20430 Filed 8-20-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
From: seanpatrickmulligan@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:20:40 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sean Mulligan

Denver, CO 80210
From: rlodestro@coca-cola.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:24:08 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Robert LoDestro

Corona, CA 92882
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 232 Filed 12/14/04 Page 1 of 17
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 232 Filed 12/14/04 Page 2 of 17
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 232 Filed 12/14/04 Page 3 of 17
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 232 Filed 12/14/04 Page 4 of 17
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 232 Filed 12/14/04 Page 5 of 17
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 232 Filed 12/14/04 Page 6 of 17
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 232 Filed 12/14/04 Page 7 of 17
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 232 Filed 12/14/04 Page 8 of 17
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 232 Filed 12/14/04 Page 9 of 17
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 232 Filed 12/14/04 Page 10 of 17
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 232 Filed 12/14/04 Page 11 of 17
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 232 Filed 12/14/04 Page 12 of 17
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 232 Filed 12/14/04 Page 13 of 17
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 232 Filed 12/14/04 Page 14 of 17
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 232 Filed 12/14/04 Page 15 of 17
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 232 Filed 12/14/04 Page 16 of 17
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 232 Filed 12/14/04 Page 17 of 17
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Terry Lee ROSEBORO, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 05-6737.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Aug. 18, 2005.

Decided: Aug. 26, 2005.

*234Terry Lee Roseboro, Appellant pro se. Kasey Warner, United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Terry Lee Roseboro seeks to appeal the district court’s order referring his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings in light of Roseboro’s recently filed motions. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders. 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Roseboro seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
From: jpfeifer1@tampabay.rr.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:02:58 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jean Pfeifer

Dunedin, FL 34698
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary fiancial information extracted from our
statements for the year ended December 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                              50
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    10744
<ALLOWANCES>                                       111
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                            1108
<DEPRECIATION>                                     338
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   11135
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                           6201
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           675
<OTHER-SE>                                         526
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     11135
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1046
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   295
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    70
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 502
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    179
<INCOME-TAX>                                        67
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       112
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Unclassified balance sheet
</FN>
        

</TABLE>