alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: virgietb@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:59:08 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Virgie Brown

Winthrop Harbor, IL 60096
October 11, 1962

No. 67111.

protest 61/23396.

#### Express Forwarding & Storage Co., Inc., a/c Pharmacia Laboratories, Inc. *v.*United States,

Plaintiff’s application for rehearing denied.
From: jimvolpe@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:40:01 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

James Volpe

Wayne, PA 19087
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350





The
undersigned officer of ALLIED HEALTHCARE PRODUCTS, INC. (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the Company’s fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2010 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Earl R. RefslandEarl
      R. RefslandPresident
      & Chief Executive Officer


February
8, 2011
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 369 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Osteoporosis Awareness and 

Prevention Month. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 3, 2007 

Ms. BERKLEY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Osteoporosis 

Awareness and Prevention Month. 

Whereas osteoporosis, a disease characterized by low bone 

mass, structural deterioration of bone, and increased susceptibility to fractures, is a public health threat for an estimated 44 million Americans; 

Whereas in the United States, 10 million individuals already 

have the disease and almost 34 million more are estimated to have low bone mass, placing them at increased 

risk for osteoporosis; 

Whereas one in two women and one in four men over age 50 

will have an osteoporosis-related fracture in her or his remaining lifetime; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 369 IH 

Whereas building strong bones during childhood and adolescence can be the best defense against developing 

osteoporosis later; 

Whereas osteoporosis is often thought of as an older person’s 

disease, but bone health is a concern for any age; 

Whereas substantial risk has been reported in people of all 

ethnic backgrounds; 

Whereas although osteoporosis often has no symptoms in its 

early stages, a bone mineral density test can be used to 

assess fracture risk and to establish the diagnosis and severity of the disease in people at risk before they start 

fracturing their bones; 

Whereas osteoporosis is responsible for more than 1.5 million 

fractures annually; 

Whereas the Surgeon General of the Public Health Service 

says that caring for bone fractures from osteoporosis 

costs America $18 billion annually; 

Whereas the Surgeon General believes that bone health is 

critically important to the overall health and quality of 

the life of Americans; that it is in jeopardy and will only 

get worse if left unchecked; and that great improvements 

in the bone health status of Americans can be made by 

applying what is already known about early prevention, 

assessment, diagnosis, and treatment; 

Whereas optimum bone health and prevention of osteoporosis 

can be maximized by a balanced diet rich in calcium and 

vitamin D; weight-bearing exercise; and a healthy lifestyle 

with no smoking or excessive alcohol intake; and 

Whereas May 2007 would be an appropriate month to observe National Osteoporosis Awareness and Prevention 

Month: Now, therefore, be it 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 369 IH 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 the goals and ideals of National Osteoporosis Awareness 

3 and Prevention Month and urges the people of the United 

4 States to observe appropriate programs and activities with 

5 respect to osteoporosis, including talking with their health 

6 care professionals about their bone health. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
From: LSTANLEY@DVDIE.COM

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44 DO THE RIGHT THING

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:59:08 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Respectfully submitted,

Linda Stanley

Sincerely,

LINDA STANLEY

Peabody, MA 01960
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED APRIL 26, 1997. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-25-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-26-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-26-1997
<CASH>                                           1,003
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,968
<ALLOWANCES>                                       300
<INVENTORY>                                     18,378
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,354
<PP&E>                                          34,034
<DEPRECIATION>                                     999
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 222,898
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,455
<BONDS>                                        150,750
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,397
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   222,898
<SALES>                                         32,634
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                33,838<F1>
<CGS>                                           21,860
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,966
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,551
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,743)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,125
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,618)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,618)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1> REVENUES ARE REPORTED NET OF CREDITS IN THE STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL 
POSITION.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
No. 61059.

protests 260136-K, etc. (New York).

#### The Dynamo Tulle Importing Co. and H. W. Robinson Air Freight Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

*377Opinion by

Ford, J.-

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk malines similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Elvic Import Corp. v. United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 13, C. D. 1837), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 62784.

#### Maison Rozen Importers, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 58/4419 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
EXHIBIT 23.1

                                                         LAKE & ASSOCIATES CPA'S


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
            --------------------------------------------------------

We consent to the use, in the report on Form 10-K of TheWebDigest Corp. (A
Development Stage Company), of our report dated March 16, 2010 on our audit of
the financial statements of TheWebDigest Corp. (A Development Stage Company) as
of December 31, 2009, and the related statements of operations, stockholders'
equity/(deficit) and cash flows from inception on September 17, 2007 through
December 31, 2009, and the reference to us under the caption "Experts."

/s/Lake & Associates, CPA's LLC
Lake & Associates, CPA's LLC
Boca Raton, Florida
April 9, 2010


1905 Wright Boulevard                              20283 State Road 7, Suite 300
Schaumburg, IL 60193                                   Boca Raton, Florida 33498

Phone: 847-524-0800                                          Phone: 561.982.9874
Fax: 847-524-1655                                              Fax: 561.982.7985
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Air Transport Group Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending April 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Arnold
Leonora, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of April
15, 2009.


/s/ Arnold Leonora
--------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with this Annual Report (the Report) of Forbes Energy Services Ltd. filed on Form 10-K (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, L. Melvin Cooper, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ L. Melvin CooperL. Melvin CooperSenior Vice President,Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary


Date: March 31, 2010
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Osteotech, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael J.
Jeffries, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.


                                        /S/ Michael J. Jeffries
                                        -----------------------------------
                                        Michael J. Jeffries
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        (Principal Financial Officer and
                                        Chief Accounting Officer)
                                        November 14, 2002
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 409 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 63
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 409

                          [Report No. 110-156]

 Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the 
concurrent resolution (S. Con. Res. 21) setting forth the congressional 
   budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2008 and 
 including the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2007 and 
                           2009 through 2012.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 16, 2007

    Ms. Sutton, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the 
concurrent resolution (S. Con. Res. 21) setting forth the congressional 
   budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2008 and 
 including the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2007 and 
                           2009 through 2012.

    Resolved,  That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the concurrent 
resolution (S. Con. Res. 21) setting forth the congressional budget for 
the United States Government for fiscal year 2008 and including the 
appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2007 and 2009 through 
2012. All points of order against the conference report and against its 
consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered as 
read. The conference report shall be debatable for one hour equally 
divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 
the Committee on the Budget.
                                                  House Calendar No. 63

110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 409

                          [Report No. 110-156]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the 
concurrent resolution (S. Con. Res. 21) setting forth the congressional 
   budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2008 and 
 including the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2007 and 
                           2009 through 2012.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 16, 2007

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
No. 68910.

#### Dansk Designs, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 64/9046 (New York).

Opinion by

Nichols, J.

Since the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely, 'by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER GRANTING MOTION

FOR AN EXTENSION - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

MART LIIKANE, 

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF SEATTLE, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-1829L

ORDER GRANTING MOTION

FOR AN EXTENSION

This matter comes before the Court sua sponte. On March 10, 2006, the Court

issued an order to show cause (Dkt. #4) why this case should not be dismissed for

plaintiff’s failure to serve defendant within the time limits set forth in Fed. R. Civ. P.

4(m). On March 10, 2006, plaintiff filed a “Request for an Extension of Service”

requesting to extend the time to serve one defendant until March 15, 2006.

Accordingly, the Court GRANTS plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to

serve defendant until March 15, 2006. (Dkt. #6). No later than March 24, 2006, plaintiff

must file proof of service with this Court or show cause why his complaint should not be

dismissed for failure to effect service. Plaintiff is reminded that the requirements for 

Case 2:05-cv-01829-RSL Document 7 Filed 03/15/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER GRANTING MOTION

FOR AN EXTENSION - 2

service are set forth in Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

DATED this 15th day of March, 2006.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-01829-RSL Document 7 Filed 03/15/06 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>


                                  Exhibit 99.1


                 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                             Chief Executive Officer

         The undersigned, as the chief executive officer of Allied Healthcare
         Products, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify for purposes of 18
         U.S.C. ss.1350 that (i) the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
         the Company's fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2002 (the "Report"),
         as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 14,
         2002, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
         the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) information contained in
         the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
         financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and
         for the periods covered in the Report.



                            s/       Earl R. Refsland
                              -----------------------
                                     Earl R. Refsland, Chief Executive Officer



                                     November 14, 2002