alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: qiquyaliqsuq@acsalaska.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:17:49 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mel Bennett

Anchorage, AK 99503
From: mgmt1999-home@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:56:42 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sharon Tochilin

Anaheim, CA 92807
From: tcruice@charter.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:31:03 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Thomas Cruice

Maryville, TN 37803
From: klpobanz@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:34:53 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Keith Pobanz

Grand Island, NE 68803
February 4, 2010 

Meeting with Semiconductor Industry Association on February 4, 2010 

Attendees: 

Anna Wood, EPA 

Tom Diamond, SIA 

Laura Mendocino, Freescale 

Reed Content, Global foundaries 

Mike McIntyre, Micron 

Stephen Harper, Intel Corporation 

Kevin Fay, Alcalde and Fay 

Julie Hatcher, Latham and Watkins 

Cynthia Johnson, Texas Instruments 

Jeff Davidson, Analog Devices 

Andrea Fava, Intel 

Subject: SIA Comments on the Proposed GHG Tailoring Rule 

Attachment – Briefing Slides
No. P67/269.

No. P67/270.

#### James Betesh Import Co. *v.*United States, protest 60/24233 (New York). Charles Sadek Import Co., Inc. *v.*United States, protest 61/23890 (New York).

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of plaques similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Arnart*Imports, *Inc.*v. *United States*(54 Cust. Ct. 187, C.D. 2531), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: cormmik@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:27:27 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Michael Cormier

Auburn, MA 01501
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

                  SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION FOR TIMOTHY M. HARMON

Mr. Harmon retired as the Company's President and Chief Merchandising Officer
effective July 1, 2005. Mr. Harmon's annual base salary at the time of his
retirement was $750,000 per year. Mr. Harmon has a performance-based bonus award
agreement as described in more detail in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
March 25, 2005. A prorated portion of this bonus for the period prior to his
retirement, and excluding any portion related to his individual performance,
will be paid to Mr. Harmon at the time that bonuses under this program are paid
to the Company's executive officers. A severance agreement with Mr. Harmon was
filed as an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on April 9, 1998. No
payment was made under this agreement in connection with Mr. Harmon's
retirement. The Company has agreed to extend the standard employee discount
privilege to Mr. Harmon and his spouse for his and her lifetimes, provided that
Mr. Harmon does not at any time have an affiliation (as employee, consultant,
board member, advisor or otherwise) with any entity that could be considered a
competitor of the Company.
No. 65182.

#### Wear Ever Baby Carriage Co., Inc., and Bilt Rite Baby Carriage Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 60/33 and 59/20400 (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of ribbons similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Beer Stern Import Corp.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 294, C.D. 1944), except that the merchandise herein is velvet pile ribbon, wholly or in chief value of cotton, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Judy A. Schmeling, certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my
knowledge:

(1) the Annual Report of HSN, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 of HSN, Inc. (the
Report), which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HSN, Inc.



|                    |  |     |  |                         
|------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------
|Date: March 4, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/    JUDY A.
SCHMELING
|                    |  |     |  | Judy A. Schmeling       
|                    |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
|                                                                    |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                    |  |  |  |  |
| Delaware                                                           |   | 001-11241 |   | 37-1105865 |
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)                     |   | (Commission File Number) |   | (IRS Employer Identification Number) |
|                                                               |   |   |   |   |
| 2120 West End Avenue, Nashville, Tennessee                         |   |   |  37203-0001 |
| (Address of principal executive offices)                           |   |   |   | (Zip Code) |
|                                                               |   |   |   |   |
| Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (615) 341-1000 |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | o | Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
|   |   |   |
|   | o | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
|   |   |   |
|   | o | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
|   |   |   |
|   | o | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |

|                                                             |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                             |  |  |
| Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: |
| Title of each class                                         | Trading Symbol(s) | Name of each exchange on which registered |
| Medium-Term Notes, Series H,3.300% Notes Due 2024           | CAT/24 | New York Stock Exchange |

----

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |
| d)     | Exhibits: |   |
|   | The following is furnished as an exhibit to this report: |
|   |   |   |   |
|   |   | 99.1 | Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation press release dated July 24, 2019 |
|   |   |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |

----

|                                |
|--------------------------------|
|                                |  |
| Date:  July 24, 2019 |           By:  /s/ Michael G. Sposato |
|                           |                       Michael G. Sposato |
|                           |                       Secretary |
Rupprecht Law P. A. 

2811 Grande Parkway, Suite 113 | Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 

P: (561) 222-6979 | E: jon@jrupprechtlaw.com | W: www.jrupprechtlaw.com 

 

September 22, 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE, 

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,

Washington, DC 20590

RE: Receipt of Confidentially Submitted Documents for Elevated Productions, LLC

Dear Sir or Madam:

Elevated Productions, LLC (Docket ID: FAA-2015-1693) confidentially submitted to 

333exemptions@faa.gov the manuals for the assembly and operation of the Cinestar 6 and its flight 

controller. A receipt was obtained on Tue, September 22, 2015.

If I can be of any assistance to further expedite this petition, please do not hesitate to contact me 

at (561)222-6979 or at my email jon@jrupprechtlaw.com

Sincerely yours,

_____________________

Jonathan Rupprecht, Esq.
From: aebrhb@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:35:18 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Allen Barr

Stevensville, MT 59870
ORDER - 1 

(C05-1573-JPD)

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

SCHROETER, GOLDMARK & BENDER 

500 Central Building ● 810 Third Avenue ● Seattle, WA 98104 

(206) 622-8000 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT SEATTLE 

RUTH A. JONES, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner of 

the Social Security Administration, 

 Defendant. 

No. C05-1573-JPD 

ORDER 

 

Based upon the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s 

attorney, Anne Kysar, is awarded an attorney’s fee of $2,382.12 and expenses for messenger 

service, legal research, telephone and postage in the amount of $173.07, under the Equal Access 

to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412; and costs for the filing fee and photocopies in the 

amount of $255.85, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1920. 

 DONE this 16th day of March, 2006. 

 /s/ JAMES P. DONOHUE

 United States Magistrate Judge 

PRESENTED BY: 

SCHROETER, GOLDMARK & BENDER 

s/ANNE KYSAR

Anne Kysar, WSBA # 28351 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

Schroeter Goldmark & Bender 

810 Third Avenue, Suite 500 

Seattle, WA 98104 

Phone: (206) 622-8000 

Fax: (206) 682-2305 

E-mail: kysar@SGB-law.com 

Case 2:05-cv-01573-JPD Document 23 Filed 03/16/06 Page 1 of 1
From: yoli5000@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:38:23 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Washington, stop the nonsense and listen to the people!!!!

Sincerely,

Yolanda Flores

San Antonio, TX 78229