alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AMENDMENT TO THE
                              PANAMSAT CORPORATION
                         LONG-TERM STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
                               ESTABLISHED IN 1997

         WHEREAS, PanAmSat Corporation (the "Company") sponsors the PanAmSat
Corporation Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan Established in 1997 (the "Plan"), as
amended and restated on April 9, 1998;

         WHEREAS, Section 5.10 of the Plan provides that the Board of Directors
of the Company may, subject to the approval of the shareholders of the Company,
amend the Plan from time to time, for among other things, to extend the period
during which an award under the Plan may be exercised; and

         WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan;

         NOW THEREFORE, subject to approval by the shareholders of the Company,
the Plan is hereby amended, effective July 9, 1999, as follows:

         1. Paragraph (b)(iii) of Section 1.03 of the Plan is amended and
restated in its entirety to read as follows:

            "(iii) impose, modify or amend any such limitations, restrictions
            and conditions upon any such award as the Committee shall deem
            appropriate;"


         2. A new subsection (d) is hereby added to Section 1.08 of the Plan to
read

<PAGE>

as follows:

            "(d) For purposes of this Section 1.08, effective for any awards
            granted under this Plan on or after July 9, 1999, "Company" shall
            include PanAmSat Corporation, its subsidiaries and any affiliated
            companies."


         3. A Section 5.11 is hereby added to the Plan to read as follows:

         "Deferral of Restricted Stock.

            Subject to the terms of the Plan and the 1999 Non-Employee Directors
            Compensation Deferral Plan ("Directors Deferral Plan"), an award of
            Restricted Stock made under this Plan to a non-employee director in
            connection with his or her service as a member of the Board of
            Directors of the Company may be deferred under the terms of the
            Directors Deferral Plan; provided, however, that any election to
            defer such Restricted Stock is made at least 30 days prior to the
            date of the annual meeting of shareholders in which the Restricted
            Stock is awarded (or, if applicable, within thirty days of such
            director first becoming eligible to participate in the Deferral
            Plan). The payment of such award shall be subject to the terms of
            the Directors Deferral Plan."


         4. In all other respects, the Plan is hereby ratified and confirmed.


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment to the Plan has been executed the
9th day of July, 1999.


                                       PANAMSAT CORPORATION


                                       By:  /s/ James W. Cuminale
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            James W. Cuminale
                                            Executive Vice President & Secretary
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 443 

Recognizing the service of the 65th Infantry Borinqueneers during the Korean 

War, honoring the people of Puerto Rico who continue to serve and 

volunteer for service in the Armed Forces and make sacrifices for the 

country, and commending all efforts to promote and preserve the history 

of the 65th Infantry Borinqueneers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 24, 2007 

Mr. MCGOVERN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the service of the 65th Infantry Borinqueneers 

during the Korean War, honoring the people of Puerto 

Rico who continue to serve and volunteer for service 

in the Armed Forces and make sacrifices for the country, 

and commending all efforts to promote and preserve 

the history of the 65th Infantry Borinqueneers. 

Whereas the 65th Infantry Regiment, the only Hispanic-segregated unit in United States military history, was mandated by Congress to be comprised primarily of Puerto 

Ricans; 

Whereas the 65th Infantry Regiment became better known as 

the Borinqueneers from the word Borinquen, the name 

that the native Taino Indians called Puerto Rico; 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HRES 443 IH 

Whereas the Borinqueneers, throughout their service in 

World War I, World War II, and, most notably, the Korean War, served with distinction; 

Whereas the Borinqueneers demonstrated their military 

prowess in Korea and earned the respect and admiration 

of their fellow soldiers and military authorities, most notably General Douglas MacArthur; 

Whereas the Borinqueneers were sent to battle on the front 

lines in Korea and participated in nine major campaigns 

during the Korean War; 

Whereas the Borinqueneers made valuable contributions to 

the war effort, including by suffering a tremendous number of casualties that was disproportionate to the population of Puerto Rico; 

Whereas the 65th Infantry Borinqueneers earned well-deserved praise, including a Presidential Unit Citation, a 

Meritorious Unit Commendation, and two Republic of 

Korea Unit Citations; and 

Whereas the 65th Infantry has ceased to exist as an all-Puerto Rico unit, but thousands of Puerto Ricans have continued to volunteer freely and serve in the Armed Forces 

and have served ably during wartime: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the service of the 65th Infantry 

3 Borinqueneers during the Korean War; 

4 (2) honors the people of Puerto Rico, who con5 tinue to serve and volunteer for service in the Armed 

6 Forces and make sacrifices for the country; and 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

3 

•HRES 443 IH 

1 (3) commends all efforts to promote and pre2 serve the history of the 65th Infantry 

3 Borinqueneers. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
From: iswank@juno.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:23:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

IRENE SWANK

Shawnee, KS 66203
**EXHIBIT
        15**
 
 **AWARENESS
        LETTER**
 
 To
        the
        Board of Directors and Shareholders of
 Mediware
        Information Systems, Inc.
 
 We
        have
        reviewed, in accordance with standards established by the Public Company
        Accounting Oversight Board (United States) the unaudited interim condensed
        consolidated financial statements of Mediware Information Systems, Inc. and
        subsidiaries as of March 31, 2007 and for the three- and nine-month periods
        ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 as indicated in our review report dated April
        26,
        2007.  Because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on
        those financial statements.
 
 We
        are
        aware that our review report, which is included in your Quarterly Report
        on
        Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, is incorporated by
        reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-07591,
        No. 333-83016, No. 333-119503, No. 333-123496 and No.
        333-130576).
 
 We
        are
        also aware that our review report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the
        Securities Act of 1933 (the "Act"), is not considered a part of the Registration
        Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
        certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the
        Act and the accountants’ Section 11 liability does not extend to such
        report.
 
 
 Eisner
        LLP
 New
        York,
        New York
 April
        26,
        2007
From: SeamanTN@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:04:02 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ron Seaman

, 37923-2304
From: linahatch@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:47:13 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Lina Hatch

Gilbert, AZ 85233
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

(PROPOSED) ORDER GRANTING STIP.

TO CONT. TRIAL DATE/BROWN

CR05-0395JLR - 1 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

Judge James L. Robart

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

) NO. CR05-0395JLR

Plaintiff, )

) ORDER GRANTING 

v. ) STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL

)

CALVIN JOSEPH BROWN, )

)

Defendant. ) )

THE COURT having considered the stipulation of the parties, the records and files

herein, including, but not limited to the defendant’s agreement to extend the time for trial,

and hereby makes the following findings of fact:

1. The Court finds that a failure to grant the continuance would deny counsel

the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise

of due diligence, within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(ii).

2. The Court further finds that the ends of justice will be served by ordering a

continuance in this case and that a continuance is necessary to insure effective trial

preparation and that these factors outweigh the bests interests of the public in a more

speedy trial within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A). 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the trial date be continued from February 27,

2006, to March 28, 2006. 

Case 2:05-cr-00395-JLR Document 21 Filed 02/08/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 (PROPOSED) ORDER GRANTING STIP.

TO CONT. TRIAL DATE/BROWN

CR05-0395JLR - 2 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, Washington 98101-1271

(206) 553-7970

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the period of time from February 7, 2006, up to

and including the new proposed trial date of March 28, 2006, shall be excludable time

pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161, et. seq. 

DONE this 8th day of February, 2006. 

A 

JAMES L. ROBART

United States District Judge

Presented by:

 s/ C. Andrew Colasurdo 

C. ANDREW COLASURDO

Special Assistant United States Attorney

WA Bar #27449

United States Attorney’s Office

700 Stewart Street, Suite 5220

Seattle, WA 98101-1271

Telephone: (206) 553-4075

Fax: (206) 553-0755

E-mail: Andy.Colasurdo@usdoj.gov

 s/ approved via telephone 

SUZANNE LEE ELLIOTT

Attorney for Calvin Joseph Brown

Case 2:05-cr-00395-JLR Document 21 Filed 02/08/06 Page 2 of 2
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Bibliographyof North American geology.**
 
1906-07 | 1908| 1909 | 1910
1911 | 1912 | 1913 | 1914 | 1915 | 1916 | 1917 | 1918 | 1919-20
1919-28
1923-24 | 1925-26 | 1929-30
1931-32 | 1933-34 | 1935-36
1929-39
1940-41 | 1942-43 | 1944-45 | 1946-47 | 1948| 1949
1940-1949
1950 | 1951 | 1952-53 | 1954| 1955 | 1956| 1957 | 1958| 1959
1950-59:Part One | Part Two
1960 | 1961 | 1962 | 1963 | 1964 | 1965 | 1966 | 1967 | 1968 | 1969
1970
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3: G 29/
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000955618
 
July 17, 2018
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001037115
<NAME> ORBIT/FR, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997             JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1                       1
<CASH>                                          15,459                  13,303
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,309                   5,424
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                     116
<INVENTORY>                                      2,545                   2,184
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,044                  24,695
<PP&E>                                           2,533                   2,066
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,235                   1,048
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  27,511                  27,106
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,005                   4,300
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            60                      61
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,440                  20,023
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    27,511                  27,106
<SALES>                                          5,314                   3,747
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,314                   3,747
<CGS>                                            3,140                   2,406
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,140                   2,406
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,331                   (223)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       466                    (78)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                       865                   (145)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20                   (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20                   (.02)
        

</TABLE>
#### Stephen Brown, as Executor, etc., Respondent, v. George M. Crippen, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Bockes, J.
From: jyoshimoto@alpha-analytical.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:03:36 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jeff Yoshimoto

Reno, NV 89511
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

MATHEW JAGGER,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOSEPH LEHMAN,

Defendant.

Case No. C05-5576FDB

ORDER GRANTING I.F.P.

 APPLICATION

Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 1) is GRANTED. Plaintiff is 

currently detained at the Special Commitment Center on McNeil Island, and plaintiff does not appear to have

funds available to afford the $250.00 filing fee. Plaintiff shall note that leave to proceed as a pauper does

not necessarily entitle plaintiff to a waiver of any other cost(s) of litigation. . 

The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this Order to plaintiff.

DATED this 28th day of September, 2005.

/s/ J. Kelley Arnold J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:05-cv-05576-FDB Document 3 Filed 09/28/05 Page 1 of 1
No. 63328.

protests 95318-K, etc. (New York).

#### Park & Tilford Import Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co. Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.