alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SPARTA, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Robert C. Sepucha
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Integrated Circuit Systems, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending January 1, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Hock E. Tan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Hock E. Tan        
|Hock E. Tan            
|Chief Executive Officer
|February 10, 2005
From: timbilsky@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:37:39 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Tim Bilsky

Canonsburg, PA 15317
Exhibit 10.21


 


Slipstream
Communications LLC


  


August
10, 2017


 


Rick
Mills 


CEO
of Creative Realities, Wireless Ronin Technologies Canada, Inc. and Conexus World


13100
Magisterial Drive, Suite 100


Louisville,
KY 40223


 


Re.:
Convertible Notes


 


Dear
Rick,


 


As
of January 17, 2017, Slipstream Communications, LLC is the sole owner of convertible note s in the aggregate principal amount
of $4,202,844 ("Convertible Notes"). Pursuant to Section 2 of the Convertible Notes, subject to the other terms and
conditions of the Convertible Notes, Slipstream hereby elects to extend the maturity of the Convertible Notes to October 15, 2018.


  


Sincerely,


  





	/s/ Alec Machiels	 	 
	Alec Machiels	 	 
	Authorized Signatory	 	 



 





Acknowledged
as of the date first written above:


 





	/s/ Richard Mills	 	 
	Rick Mills
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 16 (Tuesday, January 25, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 4244-4245]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-1505]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management

30 CFR Part 285

[Docket ID: BOEM-2010-0045]
RIN 1010-AD71

Regulation and Enforcement; Renewable Energy Alternate Uses of 
Existing Facilities on the Outer Continental Shelf--Acquire a Lease 
Noncompetitively

AGENCY: Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement 
(BOEMRE), Interior.

ACTION: Withdrawal of direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: BOEMRE is withdrawing the direct final rule to amend BOEMRE's 
renewable energy regulatory provisions that pertain to noncompetitive 
acquisition of leases, published on November 26, 2010 (75 FR 72679), 
under Docket ID: BOEM-2010-0045. In the direct final rule, BOEMRE 
stated that if it received significant adverse

[[Page 4245]]

comments during the rule's 30-day comment period, it would publish a 
notice of withdrawal in the Federal Register.
    BOEMRE has determined that it has received significant adverse 
comments during the comment period and, therefore, is withdrawing the 
direct final rule. BOEMRE intends to publish a notice of proposed 
rulemaking within 30 days of the date of this notice in order to 
reinitiate rulemaking. The proposed rule will have a 30-day public 
comment period. All comments received in response to the original 
November 26, 2010, notice will be considered in relation to the 
proposed rule unless they are withdrawn by the commenters, so those who 
commented on the original November 26, 2010, direct final rule need not 
re-submit their comments.
    However, parties who responded to the November 26, 2010, notice may 
submit additional comments on the proposed rulemaking.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Timothy Redding at (703) 787-1219.

    Dated: January 18, 2011.
Michael R. Bromwich,
Director, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and 
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2011-1505 Filed 1-24-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P
```
From: bush_victoria@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:32:13 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mary Bush

Kissimmee, FL 34745
Exhibit 10.12(a)    January 13,
2009  Mr. Michael
D. Owens President
and CEO Coastal
Carolina Bancshares Post
Office Box 2969 Myrtle
Beach, SC 29578  Dear
Mike:  Thank
you for your interest in obtaining an additional financing commitment from
South Carolina Bank and Trust to be used to fund a potential increase in
organizational expenses for your proposed Bank/Holding Company. As you continue
to move forward with the start-up phase of your bank, we look forward to
working with you and your Directors and founders.  The
following information is not a commitment to lend, but an indication of the
Banks anticipated financing structure.  PROPOSED TERMS AND CONDITIONSBorrower:
  
  Coastal
  Carolina Bancshares, Inc.Purpose:
  
  Proceeds
  will be used for the purpose of providing additional working capital to cover
  increasing pre-opening expenses for the company as it moves toward the
  start-up of your proposed new bank.Loan Amount:
  
  Up
  to $1,000,000Terms:
  
  The
  loan will be a revolving line of credit with a maturity of six months to be
  repaid from stock sale proceeds of the new bank holding company.Interest Rate:
  
  A
  variable rate of three month LIBOR plus a margin of 165 basis points with a
  floor rate of 5.5%Collateral:
  
  The
  loan would be unsecured.  www.SCBTonline.com
800-277-2175· P.O. Box 1030 · Columbia, SC 29202-1030


Guarantors:
  
  The
  loan would carry the 200% pro-rata guaranty (9.53% of the total outstanding
  balance) of each of your twenty-one founding Directors of the proposed bank
  and holding company who are also guarantors on your existing debt.Banking Relationship:
  
  The
  Borrower agrees to maintain a primary correspondent account with South
  Carolina Bank and Trust during the life of the loan.Other:
  
  The
  approval, commitment, and closing of this loan will be subject to the
  underwriting and/or documentation requirements of SCBT. Those requirements
  would include but may not be limited to the review and acceptance of a
  current personal financial statement, current tax returns, and a satisfactory
  credit report on each guarantor.As
  a condition of this loan, the guaranty structure of the existing loan of
  $2,000,000 would change so that each of the twenty-one guarantors would be
  responsible for a pro-rata guarantee of 7.14% (150% of 1/21st) of the outstanding balance.
  The rate and repayment terms of the original loan would remained unchanged
  until maturity in April, 2009.  Mike,
it is a pleasure to outline these terms which we hope you and your Directors
will find acceptable. We look forward to working with you on this credit.
Should there be questions or concerns, I would be happy to meet with you or
your organizational group.  Best
  wishes for the success of your new venture.Sincerely,James
  A. Shuford, IIIExecutive
  Vice-Presidentjw  2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 STEWART STREET

SUITE 5220

(206) 553-7970

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR

FILING INDICTMENT/FINLEY - 1

(05-5220M)

Magistrate Judge Strombom

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

) NO. 05-5220M

)

Plaintiff, )

) ORDER GRANTING SECOND

v. ) STIPULATED MOTION TO

) TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE

RONALD DEAN FINLEY, ) INDICTMENT 

)

Defendant. ) 

_________________________________)

THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the stipulated motion of the parties for

a second order extending the time within which an indictment shall be filed, and the Court

having considered the stipulated motion of the parties, together with the balance of the records

and files herein, the Court now finds and rules as follows:

The Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting the requested extension for

filing the indictment outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial,

in that the defendant is cooperating in an ongoing investigation and that the parties need

additional time for the defendant to complete his cooperation prior to charges being filed.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the second stipulated motion of the parties to extend

the time within which an indictment shall be filed is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the date by which the indictment shall be obtained and

filed in this case is extended from January 30, 2005, to February 24, 2006.

Case 3:05-mj-05220-JKA Document 14 Filed 01/20/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

700 STEWART STREET

SUITE 5220

(206) 553-7970

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR

FILING INDICTMENT/FINLEY - 2

(05-5220M)

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the period of delay from November 30, 2005, through

February 24, 2006, is excludable time pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section

3161(h)(8)(A), for the purpose of computing the time limitations imposed by the Speedy Trial

Act, Title 18, United States Code, Sections 3161 through 3164.

DATED this 20th day of January, 2006.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Presented by:

s/MIKE LANG 

MIKE LANG 

Assistant United States Attorney 

s/ Colin Fieman via telephone 

COLIN FIEMAN

Attorney for Ronald Finley

Case 3:05-mj-05220-JKA Document 14 Filed 01/20/06 Page 2 of 2
J.

court did not err in denying his petition as procedurally time barred. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.
Hardesty Douglas

cc: Hon. Michelle Leavitt, District Judge Johnnie Lee Parham Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A 

## e J. J.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff, 

v.

STACY CHARLES COMER,

Defendant.

CASE NO CR05-5747RBL

 ORDER

THIS MATTER comes on before the above-entitled Court upon a Motion for a New

Attorney (dkt #149). The Court having considered the entirely of the records and file herein,

it is now

ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED. The CJA Administrator is directed

to appoint new counsel for Mr. Comer.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of August, 2006.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Digitally Signed upon oral authorization (JAB)

Case 3:05-cr-05747-RBL Document 150 Filed 08/28/06 Page 1 of 1
From: dnclements@tds.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:34:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

David Clements

Medford, WI 54451
No. P67/87.

#### Oxford International Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 66/9986-15321 (Chicago).

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of hand-operated (not battery-operated) sirens similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Oxford International Corp.*v. *United States*(55 Cust. Ct. 472, Abstract 69607), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

(Note: The following protest was decided by a special second division consisting of Bao, Ford, and Bichardson, Judges.)
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 188 (Friday, September 29, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 67421]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21423]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12180]


Determination Under Section 506(a)(1) of the Foreign Assistance 
Act of 1961 To Provide Military Assistance to Ukraine

ACTION: Determination.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The State Department is publishing a Determination signed by 
the Secretary of State on August 1, 2022.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State, 
signed the following ``Determination Under Section 506(a)(1) of the 
Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 to Provide Military Assistance to 
Ukraine'' on August 1, 2022. The State Department maintains the 
original document.
    Pursuant to the authority vested in me by section 506(a)(1) of the 
Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (the ``Act'') (22 U.S.C. 2318(a)(1)) and 
Presidential Delegation of Authority dated August 1, 2022, I hereby 
determine that:
    <bullet> an unforeseen emergency exists which requires immediate 
military assistance to Ukraine; and
    <bullet> the emergency requirement cannot be met under the 
authority of the Arms Export Control Act or any other provision of law.
    I, therefore, pursuant to authority delegated to me by the 
President, direct the drawdown of up to $550 million in defense 
articles and services of the Department of Defense, and military 
education and training, under the authority of section 506(a)(1) of the 
Act to provide assistance to Ukraine. The Department of State will 
coordinate implementation of this drawdown.
    This determination shall be reported to the Congress and published 
in the Federal Register.

Joshua Paul,
Office Director, Office of Congressional & Public Affairs, Bureau of 
Political-Military Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2023-21423 Filed 9-28-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-P
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 98-1882NE

_____________

Ralph William Hubbard, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the District

* of Nebraska.

Lynn V. White, County Judge; Kirk E. *

Brumbaugh; Thomas Albert Valentine; * [UNPUBLISHED]

AT&T Universal Card Services Co., *

*

Appellees. *

_____________

 Submitted: May 5, 1998

Filed: May 6, 1998

_____________

Before BOWMAN, Chief Judge, WOLLMAN and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD,

Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Ralph William Hubbard appeals the district court's order granting the defendants'

separate motions to dismiss Hubbard's complaint. Having carefully reviewed the record

and Hubbard's assertions on appeal, we conclude the district court did not commit

error. We affirm the district court's judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a). We also deny

Hubbard's pending motion.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.