alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: aquinas2008@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:20:57 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Philip Ferguson

Boise, ID 83709
From: carol64golden@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:13:46 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Carol Dorsey

Fairfax Station, VA 22039
Order filed February 26, 2019 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-19-00070-CV

____________

KYEKYEKU OPOKU-PONG, Appellant

V.

PRISCILLA BOAHEMAA, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1105370

O R D E R

This is an appeal from a judgment signed December 17, 2018. The notice of 

appeal was due January 16, 2019. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. Appellant, however, 

filed the notice of appeal on January 25, 2019, a date within 15 days of the due date 

for the notice of appeal. A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when 

the perfecting instrument is filed within 15 days of its due date. Verburgt v. Dorner, 

959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Appellant did not file a motion to extend time to 

file the notice of appeal. While an extension may be implied, appellant is still 
obligated to come forward with a reasonable explanation to support the late filing. 

See Miller v. Greenpark Surgery Center Assocs., Ltd., 974 S.W.2d 805, 808 (Tex. 

App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.). 

Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file a proper motion to extend time to 

file the notice of appeal on or before 10 days after the date of this order. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 26.3;10.5(b). If appellant does not comply with this order, we will dismiss 

the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 10(a)





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 


 


We consent to the incorporation by reference
in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 265 to Registration Statement No. 33-26305 on Form N-1A of our report dated November 21, 2012,
relating to the financial statements and financial highlights of BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity Portfolio and BlackRock Small
Cap Growth Equity Portfolio, each a series of BlackRock Funds, appearing in the Annual Report on Form N-CSR of BlackRock Funds
for the year ended September 30, 2012, and to the references to us under the headings “Financial Highlights” and “Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Prospectuses and “Financial Statements” in the Statement of Additional
Information, which are part of such Registration Statement.


	 
	/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
	 
	Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
 January 24, 2013
H. Res. 331

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

April 26, 2007.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 249) to restore the prohibition on the commercial sale and slaughter of wild free-roaming horses and burros. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All 

points of order against consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. General 

debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one 

hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 

ranking minority member of the Committee on Natural Resources. After general debate the bill shall be considered for 

amendment under the five-minute rule. The bill shall be considered as read. Notwithstanding clause 11 of rule XVIII, no 

amendment to the bill shall be in order except those printed 

in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for 

that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII and except pro forma 
2

•HRES 331 EH 

amendments for the purpose of debate. Each amendment so 

printed may be offered only by the Member who caused it to 

be printed or his designee and shall be considered as read. 

At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment 

the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with 

such amendments as may have been adopted. The previous 

question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 

amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

SEC. 2. During consideration in the House of H.R. 249 

pursuant to this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of 

the previous question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the bill to such time as may be designated by the 

Speaker. 

Attest:

Clerk.
From: Christ.follower1@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:29:31 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kathleen Saunders

Kansas City, MO 64118
H. Res. 1390 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 22, 2008. 

Whereas barely 18 percent of 12th grade students perform at 

or above the proficient level in science; 

Whereas the need for science education, especially outside the 

classroom, is crucial to our country’s ability to remain 

globally competitive; 

Whereas today only 32.4 percent of undergraduates in the 

United States are leaving college with a bachelor’s degree 

in science or engineering, compared to 63.3 percent in 

Japan, 62.1 percent in Germany, and 56.2 percent in 

China; 

Whereas American businesses will face a competitive crisis 

with the advancing science- and technology-driven global 

economy unless they have a workforce that has been 

trained in scientific fields; 

Whereas the future global economy will be driven by market 

sectors that are based in science, engineering, and technology; 

Whereas current scientists and engineers are retiring in 

record numbers, creating a potentially large void of 

skilled workers; 

Whereas 4–H and other out-of-school programs that focus on 

science, engineering and technology are an important 
2 

•HRES 1390 EH 

part of educating and developing leaders who are welltrained and technically competent; 

Whereas 4–H is preparing America’s future workforce by developing their passion for science, engineering, and technology at an early age; 

Whereas 4–H’s educational programs have an unparalleled 

reach of more than 6,000,000 youth in all 50 States; 

Whereas 4–H, in partnership with more than 106 land-grant 

universities, shape programs in the sciences that are important to today’s workforce and critical for managing 

the world’s resources for years to come; 

Whereas youth, parents, teachers, schools, and youth organizations have the ability to participate in fun, accessible, 

science-related activities that encourage youth exploration 

and experimentation at an early age; and 

Whereas October 8, 2008 would be an appropriate day to 

designate as 4–H National Youth Science Day: Now, 

therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) expresses support for the designation of a 4–H 

National Youth Science Day; 

(2) requests that the President issue a proclamation 

calling upon the people of the United States to observe 

4–H National Youth Science Day; 

(3) encourages the people of the United States to 

observe the day with appropriate ceremonies and activities; and 
3 

•HRES 1390 EH 

(4) encourages young people of all ages and backgrounds to pursue science studies and enter into science 

careers. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 *





In connection with the Annual Report of Bethesda C0801, Inc., (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C.§ 1350), David M. McNamee, the President, principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies that, to the best of my knowledge:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.





Date: September 27, 2011
By:
/s/ David M. McNameeDavid M. McNameePresident (Principal Executive Officer and

Principal Financial Officer)





*   This certification accompanies the Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
From: jopeterson07@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:44:17 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

JoAnn Peterson

Redmond, WA 98053
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-03-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-26-1998
<CASH>                                          19,278
<SECURITIES>                                    17,645
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,419
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,864
<INVENTORY>                                      6,899
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                69,664
<PP&E>                                          34,087
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,871
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 110,123
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,051
<BONDS>                                          1,318
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        56,654
<OTHER-SE>                                      38,809
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   110,123
<SALES>                                         68,015
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                68,015
<CGS>                                           31,972
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,593
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,683
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  64
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,093
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,432
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,661
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,661
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .70
        

</TABLE>
From: silat2@juno.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:48:08 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

ROBERT & REBECCA MC DOWELL

Puyallup, WA 98371
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DETENTION ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W. D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff,

v.

SERGIO LOPEZ-SANTANA,

 Defendant.

Case No. CR05-5677

DETENTION ORDER

THE COURT, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3142, finds that no condition or combination

of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and/or the safety of any

other person and the community.

This finding is based on 1) the nature and circumstances of the offense(s) charged, including whether the offense is a

crime of violence or involves a narcotic drug; 2) the weight of the evidence against the person; 3) the history and characteristics of

the person including those set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)(3)(A)(B); and 4) the nature and seriousness of the danger release would

impose to any person or the community.

Findings of Fact/ Statement of Reasons for Detention

Presumptive Reasons/Unrebutted:

 ( ) Conviction of a Federal offense involving a crime of violence. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(A)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(B)

 ( X ) Potential maximum sentence of 10+ years as prescribed in the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C.§801 et seq.), the

Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C.§951 et seq.) Or the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (46

U.S.C. App. 1901 et seq.)

 ( ) Convictions of two or more offenses described in subparagraphs (A) through (C) of 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(1) of two or more

State or local offenses that would have been offenses described in said subparagraphs if a circumstance giving rise to

Federal jurisdiction had existed, or a combination of such offenses.

Safety Reasons:

 ( ) Defendant is currently on probation/supervision resulting from a prior offense.

 ( ) Defendant was on bond on other charges at time of alleged occurrences herein.

 ( ) Defendant’s prior criminal history.

 ( ) 

Flight Risk/Appearance Reasons:

 ( ) Defendant’s lack of community ties and resources..

 ( X ) Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainer.

 ( ) Detainer(s)/Warrant(s) from other jurisdictions.

 ( ) Failures to appear for past court proceedings.

 ( ) Past conviction for escape.

Order of Detention

< The defendant shall be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal,

without prejudice to review..

< The defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel.

< The defendant shall on order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the Government, be delivered

to a United States marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.

 September 19, 2005.

s/ J. Kelley Arnold 

J. Kelley Arnold, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cr-05677-FDB Document 20 Filed 09/19/05 Page 1 of 1