alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #18016 and #18017; Vermont Disaster Number VT-00046]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 6.

# SUMMARY:

                        This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Vermont (FEMA-4720-DR), dated 07/14/2023.                              ( print page 66928)    

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms, Flooding, Landslides, and Mudslides.                    

*Incident Period:*                         07/07/2023 through 07/21/2023.                    

# DATES:

Issued on 09/19/2023.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         10/12/2023.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         04/15/2024.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for the State of Vermont, dated 07/14/2023, is hereby amended to re-establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning 07/07/2023 through 07/21/2023. All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Francisco Sánchez, Jr.,

Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.

[FR Doc. 2023-21189 Filed 9-27-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Varsity Brands, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John M. Nichols,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: May 15, 2003                              /s/ JOHN M. NICHOLS
                                                 --------------------------
                                                 John M. Nichols
                                                 Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Varsity Brands, Inc. and will be retained by Varsity Brands, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of




Rampart Studios

, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, G.J. de Klerk, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ G.J. de KlerkPrincipal Executive Officer 


April 19, 2013
Exhibit 32.1

Statement





Pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of Luxemburg Bancshares, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that to the knowledge of the undersigned:



(1)

the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2)

the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  November 5, 2003





/s/ John A. Slatky

John A. Slatky

Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Luxemburg Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by Luxemburg Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.  This statement accompanies the periodic report to which it relates and shall not be deemed as filed as part of the report or otherwise for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 459 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         June 12, 2007.
    Resolved,  That the election contest relating to the office of 
Representative from the Twenty-first Congressional District of Florida is 
dismissed.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-19-00092-CV

Noble Capital Servicing, LLC, Appellant

v.

Action Roofing & Construction, Inc., Appellee

FROM THE 126TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NO. D-1-GN-19-000222, THE HONORABLE DON R. BURGESS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

Appellant Noble Capital Servicing, LLC has filed an unopposed motion to 

dismiss the appeal, advising that the interlocutory appeal is moot due to a final judgment 

rendered by the trial court. We grant appellant’s motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.1(a)(1).

__________________________________________

Thomas J. Baker, Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Triana

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: June 26, 2019
Case *No.*9,510.

#### In re METZGER.

[2 N. B. R. 355 (Quarto, 114); 1 Chi. Leg. News, 163; 2 Am. Law T. Rep. Bankr. 53.) 1

District Court, N. D. New York.

1868.

Bankruptcy — Assignee—Rights an» Duties— Preferred Mortgagee.

The assignee in bankruptcy represents the whole body of creditors, and it is his right and duty to contest the validity of any mortgage by which one creditor has obtained a preference over another.

[Cited in Potter v. Coggeshall, Case No. 11,-322.)

[Approved in Southard v. Benner, 72 N. Y. 428.)

In this case [Jacob] Metzger had been adjudicated a bankrupt upon the petition of his creditors. The assignee, upon his appointment, took possession of a stock of goods upon which Abemethy & Co. claimed to hold a chattel mortgage, executed prior’ to the filing of the petition. An order was granted that the sale of the goods by the assignee should not prejudice the right of these mortgagees; but that they should have the same lien upon the fund as upon the goods themselves. Subsequently Abemethy & Co. filed their petition, setting forth their mortgage, and praying that the assignee might be ordered to satisfy the same out of the funds in his hands. The assignee filed his answer to this petition, setting up that the mortgage was fraudulent and void as to the creditors. The case was tried, and the invalidity of the mortgage as to creditors, under the decisions of the court of appeals of this state, was fully proven. Upon the argument of the case, however, the counsel for Abemethy & Co. claimed that -this defence could not be set up by the assignee in bankruptcy, as he succeeded only to the rights which the bank-rapt had, and that, as between the bankrupt and Abemethy & Co., the mortgage was valid. Further, that none but judgment creditors could contest the validity of the mortgage, and that the assignee did not stand in that position. The counsel for the assignee argued that in bankruptcy the assignee succeeded as well to the rights of the creditors as the bankrupt: that he was entitled to maintain the void character of this mortgage; that if this were not so bankrupts might prefer creditors with impunity, and dispose of their property to pretended creditors; that the rule “regarding judgment creditors only being entitled to contest the mortgage” did not apply- to bankruptcy proceedings, for they took the place of judgments, and creditors were prohibited from prosecuting to judgment their claims.

1

 [Reported from 2 N. B. R. 355 (Quarto, 114), by uermission. 2 Am. Law T. Rep. Bankr. 53, and 1 Chi. Leg. News, 163, contain only partial reports.)

HALL, District Judge.

The position assumed by the assignee was the proper one; he represented the whole body of creditors, and it was his right and duty to contest the validity of any mortgage by which one creditor had obtained a preference over the others, the whole object of the bankrupt law [of 1867 (14 Stat. 517)] being to compel an equal distribution of the failing debtor’s property among all his creditors.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MINUTE ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

ÖSSUR HOLDINGS, INC., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

BELLACURE, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

CASE NO. C05-1552JLR

MINUTE ORDER

The following minute order is made by the direction of the court, the Honorable

James L. Robart:

The court has received Defendants’ notice of withdrawal and substitution of

counsel (Dkt. # 112). First, Defendants’ counsel, Michael Droke, need not file a

substitution of counsel as he has already entered his notice of appearance in this matter

(Dkt. # 10). Second, Defendants’ pleading is improper as it does not comply with Local

Rules W.D. Wash. GR 2(f)(4)(A). The court, however, construes the pleading as a

motion for leave to withdraw as counsel. The court will consider any objection to the

withdrawal filed on or before Monday, April 24, 2006. See Local Rules W.D. Wash

7(d)(2)(E). Counsel are cautioned to follow the Local Rules in the future.

Filed and entered this 20th day of April, 2006.

BRUCE RIFKIN, Clerk

s/Mary Duett

By

Deputy Clerk

Case 2:05-cv-01552-JLR Document 114 Filed 04/20/06 Page 1 of 1
From: donreneek@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:48:19 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Don and Irene Kershisnik

Porter Ranch, CA 91326
From: familyharris09@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:29:04 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Randall Harris

Oblong, IL 62449
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 188 (Friday, September 29, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 67277]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21435]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL OP-OFA-088]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information 202-564-5632 or https://www.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)
Filed September 18, 2023 10 a.m. EST Through September 25, 2023 10 a.m. 
EST
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: https://cdxapps.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-II/public/action/eis/search.

EIS No. 20230124, Final, FHWA, LA, I-10 Calcasieu River Bridge 
Improvements, Review Period Ends: 10/30/2023, Contact: Charles Harkless 
225-757-7621.
EIS No. 20230125, Draft, UDOT, UT, I-15 Farmington to Salt Lake City, 
Comment Period Ends: 11/13/2023, Contact: Brandon Weston 801-965-4603.
EIS No. 20230126, Draft, BLM, CA, Northwest California Resource 
Management Plan (NCIP), Comment Period Ends: 12/28/2023, Contact: 
Victoria Slaughter 707-825-2315.
EIS No. 20230127, Draft, NPS, USFWS, WA, Draft Grizzly Bear Restoration 
Plan--Environmental Impact Statement North Cascades Ecosystem, Comment 
Period Ends: 11/13/2023, Contact: Denise Shultz 360-854-7200.
EIS No. 20230128, Final, BOEM, VA, Coastal Virginia Offshore Wind 
Commercial, Review Period Ends: 10/30/2023, Contact: Jessica Stromberg 
703-787-1730.
EIS No. 20230129, Final Supplement, USPS, DC, Next Generation Delivery 
Vehicle Acquisitions, Review Period Ends: 10/30/2023, Contact: Davon 
Collins 202-268-4570.
EIS No. 20230130, Final, DOE, NV, ADOPTION--Thacker Pass Lithium Mine 
Project, Review Period Ends: 10/30/2023, Contact: Anna Eskridge 240-
743-1304.

    The Department of Energy (DOE) has adopted the Bureau of Land 
Management's Final EIS No. 20200247 filed 11/25/2020 with the 
Environmental Protection Agency. The DOE was not a cooperating agency 
on this project. Therefore, republication of the document is necessary 
under Section 1506.3(b)(1) of the CEQ regulations.

Amended Notice

EIS No. 20230096, Draft, NHTSA, REG, Corporate Average Fuel Economy 
Standards for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks, Model Years 2027-2032, 
and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Heavy-Duty Pickup Trucks and Vans, 
Model Years 2030-2035, Comment Period Ends: 10/16/2023, Contact: Hannah 
Fish 202-366-1099.

    Revision to FR Notice Published 08/04/2023; Extending the Comment 
Period from 10/04/2023 to 10/16/2023.

    Dated: September 25, 2023.
Nancy Abrams,
Associate Director, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2023-21435 Filed 9-28-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, James D. Palm, Chief Executive Officer
of Gulfport Energy Corporation (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: November 6, 2009



/s/ James D. PalmJames D. PalmChief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
From: gailb@springcom.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:31:41 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Gail Burkwalt

Homer, MI 49245