alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-29-1997
<CASH>                                          17,725
<SECURITIES>                                        24
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,689
<ALLOWANCES>                                       608
<INVENTORY>                                     13,267
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                52,806
<PP&E>                                          24,052
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,479
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  85,714
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,019
<BONDS>                                          1,541
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        40,572
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,286
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    85,714
<SALES>                                         73,946
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                73,946
<CGS>                                           43,458
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   43,458
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                32,042
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  44
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (817)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,428
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,245)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (3,705)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,950)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.70)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.70)
        

</TABLE>
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-14-00075-CR

Adam Wayne Walker

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

36th District Court of San Patricio County, Texas

Trial Cause No. S-13-3014-CR

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

February 20, 2014
From: rmchapel@live.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:47:51 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Thomas Daniel

Divide, CO 80814
ex4-1.htm


 


Exhibit 4.1


 






	
LAIKES Entertainment, Inc. INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS CUSIP 51206P 109 THIS CERTIFIES THAT is the owner of SHARES OF FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $.01 PER SHARE, OF LAKES ENTERTAINMENT, INC. transferable on the books of the Corporation by the hoidel’ hereo{ in person or by duly auth orized attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed. This certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent and Registrar. WITNESS the facsimile signatures of the Corporation’s duly authorized officers. Dated:
Before the First Division,

September 5, 1961

No. 66017.

#### F. W. Woolworth Company *v.*United States,

protest 60/26571 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beads the same in all material respects as those the subject of *United States*v. *S. H. Kress & Co.*(46 C.C.P.A. 135, C.A.D. 716), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: billhughes.ins@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:35:53 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

william hughes

Fort Wayne, IN 46895
ORDER EXTENDING 

 MOTIONS DEADLINE. - 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

THE HONORABLE ROBERT S. LASNIK 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

The United States of America, 

 Plaintiff 

 v. 

LAKHWINDER SINGH JOHAL 

 Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. CR05-334RSL 

ORDER EXTENDING MOTIONS 

DEADLINE TO DECEMBER 26, 2012 

THIS MATTER came before the Court as a stipulated motion filed December 14, 

2012. A short continuance of the motions deadline is warranted in order to permit the parties 

to review of the large volume of discovery in this matter and to permit the parties to continue 

the on-going discussions about settlement of the case. Therefore, the deadline for pre-trial 

motions is hereby extended to Wednesday, December 26, 2012. In all other aspects, the Case 

Management Order (Docket #263) is unchanged. 

DATED this 18th day of December 2012. 

A

Robert S. Lasnik 

United States District Judge

 

Case 2:05-cr-00334-RSL Document 266 Filed 12/18/12 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PACIFIC
SUNWEAR OF CALIFORNIA, INC.'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JULY 30,
2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-04-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-30-2000
<CASH>                                      13,203,699
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,868,223
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 96,204,472
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           125,541,139
<PP&E>                                     153,766,479
<DEPRECIATION>                            (43,631,807)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             249,372,406
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       56,363,015
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       318,171
<OTHER-SE>                                 179,557,168
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               249,372,406
<SALES>                                    131,969,736
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           131,969,736
<CGS>                                       88,185,078
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               31,901,745
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (168,817)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             12,051,730
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,681,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,370,730
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,370,730
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.23


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350 (SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)  In connection with the Annual Report of, Pole Perfect Studios, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tammy Skalko, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated: March 25, 2010  By: /s/ Tammy Skalko Tammy Skalko, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director
From: troy_me@fastmail.us

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:04:23 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Troy Simonsen

Fargo, ND 58104
From: cu_n_az_2000@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:56:22 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Venus Scott

Phoenix, AZ 85023
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be
filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Chrysler Financial
Auto Securitization Trust 2008-B (the Exchange Act periodic reports);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information
required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included
in the Exchange Act periodic reports;4.
    
    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my
knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance
statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the
servicing agreement in all material respects; and5.
    
    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance
with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included
as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on
Form 10-K.
   /s/
Eugene G. Nelson
Eugene G. NelsonVice President, Corporate Finance, of
Chrysler Financial Services Americas LLC,
as servicer(senior officer in charge of servicing
function)
From: goyhya@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:02:11 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Gordon Young

Roswell, GA 30075
| Exhibit                      32.2 |
|-----------------------------------|

|   | 1. | The                      Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section                      13(a) or                      15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,                      as amended;                      and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents,                      in all                      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                      of                      the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                      ANTHONY J. GALICI                                 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Anthony                      J. Galici                                     |
| Vice                      President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary |
| October                      11, 2007                                      |
|               | (1)                                  | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|          |        |                                             |
|          | (2)                                  | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

|  Date:      August 14, 2009                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |                      |                     | /s/ A. William Allen,III     |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|------------------------------|
|                                                              |                      |      | A.      William Allen, III   |
|                                                         |                      |      | Chief      Executive Officer |