alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 440 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that any comprehensive 

plan to combat illegal immigration must increase resources for border 

patrol, establish an instant employment eligibility verification system, 

renew a limited temporary worker program, prohibit blanket amnesty 

for illegal aliens who have deliberately broken the law, and give priority 

to law-abiding, highly-skilled immigrants applying for legal citizenship. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 24, 2007 

Mr. GILLMOR submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

any comprehensive plan to combat illegal immigration 

must increase resources for border patrol, establish an 

instant employment eligibility verification system, renew 

a limited temporary worker program, prohibit blanket 

amnesty for illegal aliens who have deliberately broken 

the law, and give priority to law-abiding, highly-skilled 

immigrants applying for legal citizenship. 

Whereas there are more than 12,000,000 illegal aliens currently residing in the United States, the highest level in 

history; 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HRES 440 IH 

Whereas illegal aliens are willing to make the arduous and 

potentially lethal journey to the United States in order to 

pursue economic opportunity, seek reunification with 

family, and escape political and civil unrest; 

Whereas the number of illegal aliens continues to grow significantly, increasing by 500,000 annually; 

Whereas, in 2005, 1,300,000 apprehensions of illegal aliens 

attempting to enter the United States occurred along 

8,000 miles of international border; 

Whereas, in 2005, 453 potential illegal aliens died during 

their attempt to cross the United States-Mexico border; 

and 

Whereas 6,300,000 illegal aliens are estimated to be working 

in the United States despite laws prohibiting the hiring, 

recruiting, referring for a fee, and employment of illegal 

aliens: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that to deter further illegal immigration and 

3 strengthen the economy of the United States the following 

4 must be included in any immigration bill considered by 

5 the 110th Congress: 

6 (1) Increased resources for Federal and State 

7 authorities to strengthen border patrol efforts. 

8 (2) A vigorous prohibition of the hiring of ille9 gal aliens coupled with the establishment of an in10 stant employment eligibility verification system. 

11 (3) A renewed and limited temporary worker 

12 program to allow a certain, but not unlimited, nummstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

3 

•HRES 440 IH 

1 ber of documented foreign workers to live in the 

2 country legally for a fixed amount of time. 

3 (4) A prohibition of blanket amnesty for illegal 

4 aliens who have deliberately broken the law that 

5 does not harm the innocent victims of circumstance. 

6 (5) A priority given to law-abiding, highly7 skilled immigrants applying for legal entry. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|               | (1)                                  | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|          |        |                                                                           |
|          | (2)                                  | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |

|  Date:                May 10, 2007                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |                      |                     | /s/                Dirk A. Montgomery                                           |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                              |                      |      | Dirk                A. Montgomery                                               |
|                                                         |                      |      | Senior                Vice President and Chief Financial                Officer |
No. 67533.

#### Armeatco Corp. and B.N.S. Int’l Sales Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 61/21680 and 61/5544 (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of decharaeterized horsemeat, fresh, chilled, or frozen, similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 66254, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: mary@proctor.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:56:52 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mary Proctor

Fair Oaks, CA 95628
From: janisw2@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:43:20 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Janis Wise

Fairfax, VA 22032
From: rmp1047@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:55:26 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Rhonda Pickett

Gruetli Laager, TN 37339
From: djmcgov@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:15:59 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dennis J McGovern

Irvine, CA 92603
From: grace1barnes@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:21:13 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Leonie Barnes

Santa Rosa, CA 95403
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                         11898024
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                        13007457
<RECEIVABLES>                                   729462
<ASSETS-OTHER>                                  134093
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                13871012
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                        397212
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                              0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                       139349
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                             536561
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                                      0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                      13490271
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                            94852
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                           109323
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                            0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                         (42286)
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                              0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                     (1317758)
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                       1109371
<NET-ASSETS>                                  13334451
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                                58040
<INTEREST-INCOME>                                32389
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<EXPENSES-NET>                                (128751)
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                        (38322)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                       1935974
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                    (4865293)
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                        (2967641)
<EQUALIZATION>                                       0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                            0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                             0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                                0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                        4792410
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                  (7193374)
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                                  0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                       (5368605)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                            0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                         (3964)
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                   (3253732)
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                           123471
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                                 310997
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                          15540824
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                            17.11
<PER-SHARE-NII>                                 (0.02)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                         (3.03)
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                                 0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                            0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                                 0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                              14.06
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                                   2.40


</TABLE>
From: julisch2@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:35:46 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Julia Schuerger

Rockville Centre, NY 11570
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BULENT ERTUR,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

CAROL L. EDWARD, Attorney; CAROL

L. EDWARD PS, a Washington

Professional Service Corporation doing

business in Washington; JESSE F.

BERGER,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 07-35394

D.C. No. CV-05-01532-JLR

Western District of Washington,

Seattle

MANDATE

The judgment of this Court, entered 10/27/08, takes effect this date.

This constitutes the formal mandate of this Court issued pursuant to Rule

41(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

FOR THE COURT:

Molly C. Dwyer 

Clerk of Court 

By: Lee-Ann Collins

Deputy Clerk

FILED

NOV 18 2008

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK OF COURT

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

Case 2:05-cv-01532-JLR Document 61 Filed 11/18/08 Page 1 of 1 Case: 07-35394 11/18/2008 Page: 1 of 1 DktEntry: 6710070
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BJs Wholesale Club, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended July 29, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, Frank D. Forward, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the undersigneds knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |                        
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Dated: September 6, 2006 |  | /S/ FRANK D. FORWARD   
|                         |  | Frank D. Forward       
|                         |  | Chief Financial Officer