alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 5, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-30560

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ALBERT BAHAM; JACK WILLIE,

Defendants-Appellants.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

 

No. 03-30580

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JACK WILLIE,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 01-CR-236-2

USDC No. 01-CR-292-1-C

Before JONES, BARKSDALE, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*
2

Counsel appointed to represent Albert Baham and Jack

Willie in appeal No. 03-30560 have requested leave to withdraw and

have filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

738 (1967). Willie’s same court-appointed attorney has also requested leave to withdraw and has filed an Anders brief in appeal

No. 03-30580. We sua sponte consolidate the appeals pursuant to

FED. R. APP. P. 3(b)(2).

In appeal No. 03-30560, Baham and Willie have each filed

separate responses in which they both seek the appointment of

substitute counsel. Baham’s and Willie’s pro se requests are

DENIED.

Our independent review of counsels’ briefs and the

records for both appeals discloses no nonfrivolous issues.

Counsels’ motions for leave to withdraw are GRANTED, counsel are

excused from further responsibilities, and appeal Nos. 03-30560 and

03-30580 are DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

APPEALS CONSOLIDATED; PRO SE REQUESTS FOR SUBSTITUTE

APPELLATE COUNSEL DENIED; APPEALS DISMISSED; MOTIONS TO WITHDRAW

GRANTED.
United States Department of Agriculture

It’s exciting and fun.

U.S. Department of Agriculture • Food and Nutrition Service • March 2014

FNS-467-D • USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

http://teamnutrition.usda.gov
6/3/2016 TDCJ Offender Details

Texas Department of Criminal Justice TDCJ Home New Offender Search

Offender Information Details

%L$1"I'*

Return to Search list

SID Number: 05348668

TDCJ Number: 01771771

Name: JACKSON.DOUGLAS MARSHALL

Race: B

Gender: M

DOB: 1976-06-17

RECEIVED-IN

CnilftTOFCRIMINALAPff

Maximum Sentence Date:

Current Facility:

2046-11-04

POLUNSKY

JUNO3 2016

Projected Release Date: 2046-11-04 Afe©!AG0Sta,G6@rt

Parole Eligibility Date: 2020-08-04

Offender Visitation Eligible: NO

The offender is temporarily ineligible for visitation. Please call the offender's unit for any

additional information.

The visitation information is updated once daily during weekdays and multiple times per day

on visitation days.

SPECIAL INFORMATION FOR SCHEDULED RELEASE:

Scheduled Release Date:

Scheduled Release Type:

Scheduled Release Location:

Parole Review Information

Offense History:

Offense

Date

Offense

Sentence

Date

Offender is not scheduled for release at this time.

Will be determined when release date is scheduled.

Will be determined when release date is scheduled.

County Case No. Sentence (YY-MM-DD)

1993-08-07 BURHVEH 1998-03-30 DALLAS F-9337820-UW 2-00-00

https://offender.tdcj.texas.gov/OffenderSearch/offenderDetail.action?sid=05348668 1/2
6/3/2016 TDCJ Offender Details

1998-10-15 BURG OF

BLDG 1998-12-16 DALLAS F-9853743 270 Days

2000-09-05 UUMV 2001-04-18 DALLAS F-005329-NJ 270 Days

2004-09-21 BURG HABIT 2007-03-16 DALLAS F-0418319-l 2-00-00

2004-09-20 BURG HABIT 2007-03-16 DALLAS F-0473644-I 2-00-00

| 2011-08-17 BURG HABIT 2012-02-23 DALLAS F-1114835-U 35-00-00

Return to Search list

The Texas Department of Criminal Justice updates this information regularly to ensure that it is

complete and accurate, however this information can change quickly. Therefore, the information on

this site may not reflect the true current location, status, scheduled termination date, or other

information regarding an offender.

For questions and comments, you may contact the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, at (936)

295-6371 or webadmint&tdci.texas.gov. This information is made available to the public and law

enforcement in the interest ofpublic safety. Any unauthorized use of this information is forbidden and

subject to criminal prosecution.

New Offender Search TDCJ Home Page

https-.//offender.tdcj.texas.gov/OffenderSearch/offenderDetaiI.action?si d=05348668 2/2
Before the First Division,

October 15, 1962

No. 67113.

protests 59/18034, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### E. W. Bruno Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

*256Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *Falcon Sales Company*and *J. J. Murphy & Co.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 129, C.D. 2292), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 67540.

#### C. S. Emery & Company *v.*United States,

protest 59/31501 (St. Albans).

*248Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of decharaeterized horsemeat, fresh, chilled, or frozen, similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 66254, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Universal Solar Technology, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Ling Chen, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
March 31, 2010





/s/
      Ling ChenLing
      Chen
                  Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:19:38 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private <a

href="http://lwken.com/click/?s=63452&c=149579" style="color:#006600;font-weight:bold;textdecoration:underline;background:none;padding:0;margin:0;">health insurance</a> with no co-pay to

patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for any organizations

that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I strongly oppose

the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and devices that I

oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

<a href="http://lwken.com/click/?s=63452&c=149579" style="color:#006600;font-weight:bold;textdecoration:underline;background:none;padding:0;margin:0;">health insurance</a>.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

B. Mitchell
From: janette_sheely@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:36:43 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Janette Sheely

High Springs, FL 32655
Exhibit
13.1









CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Chardan 2008 China Acquisition Corp. (the
“Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned, in his capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his
knowledge:




1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:
      April 8, 2009
            
            
            
            /s/
      Kerry
      S. PropperName:
            
            Kerry
      S. PropperTitle:
            
            Chief
      Executive Officer
              (Principal
      Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ambac Financial Group, Inc.
(the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Sean T. Leonard, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |                                                  
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|/s/    Sean T. Leonard
|Name:                  |  | Sean T. Leonard                                  
|Title:                 |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|Date:                  |  | August 10, 2009
No. 66528.

#### Aut Customs Brokers, Inc. v. United States,

protest 60/14609 (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of horsemeat similar in all material respects to that the subject -of Abstract 66197, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before the Second Division,

February 24, 1961

No. 65194.

#### H. B. Lehman Connor Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 58/11079 and 58/16691 (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of waterproof cotton cloth similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *D. H. Grant & Co., Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 20, C.A.D. 723), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 69820.

protests 275957-K, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### East West Import Co. and James G. Wiley et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

LaNdis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Company*(47 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 719), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: sharol_shearer@att.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:08:49 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sharol Shearer

Naperville, IL 60563
From: ljmalon1645@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:36:58 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

LARRY MALONE

San Antonio, TX 78232
From: vnaron@llcpa.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:20:56 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Vickie Naron

Semmes, AL 36575
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 258 Filed 04/12/05 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 258 Filed 04/12/05 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 258 Filed 04/12/05 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 258 Filed 04/12/05 Page 4 of 4
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 188 (Friday, September 29, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 67328]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21486]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting of the 
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering Special 
Emphasis Panel.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and 
Bioengineering Special Emphasis Panel; P41 NCBIB Review C-SEP.
    Date: October 25-27, 2023.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Democracy II, Suite 920, 
6707 Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20817 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Manana Sukhareva, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and 
Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Blvd., 
Suite 959, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 451-3397, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4132342a292033242c012c20282d6f2f28296f262e37"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="99eaecf2f1f8ebfcf4d9f4f8f0f5b7f7f0f1b7fef6ef">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, 
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, 
National Institutes of Health)

    Dated: September 25, 2023.
Victoria E. Townsend,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-21486 Filed 9-28-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Case No. 9,529.

#### In re MICKEL.

[See 6 Fed. 706.]