alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, DANIEL C. DUNN, certify that:

1. I have reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ALLIED HEALTHCARE
PRODUCTS, INC.

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) omitted as not yet applicable;

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.

Date: November 7, 2006


                                        /s/ DANIEL C. DUNN
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Daniel C. Dunn
                                        Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
                                        & Secretary
From: tringa@charter.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:25:51 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kathy Kocik

Wausau, WI 54403
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.26



          SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE LICENSE AND SUPPLY AGREEMENT BETWEEN

                           COR THERAPEUTICS AND SOLVAY



This Amendment is entered into effective as of the 1st day of June, 1995 between
COR THERAPEUTICS, INC. ("COR"), a Delaware corporation, with its principal
offices at 256 East Grand Avenue, South San Francisco, California 94080, U.S.A.
and SOLVAY, Societe Anonyme ("SOLVAY"), a Belgian corporation, with its
principal offices at 33, rue du Prince Albert, 1050 Bruxelles, Belgium.

                                   WITNESSETH

WHEREAS, COR and SOLVAY have entered into a License and Supply Agreement
effective as of 27 July 1994 (the "Agreement") on their behalf and on behalf of
their Affiliates (as defined in the Agreement);

WHEREAS, COR and SOLVAY have modified a provision of the Agreement by a First
Amendment effective as of 13 March 1995;

WHEREAS, COR and SOLVAY are presently willing to modify the same provision a
second time;

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the parties agree to amend
the Agreement as follows:

In section 2.2, on page 5, replace line 13 by "(...) as the breach or default
remains uncured. If by 15 September 1995, SOLVAY and COR have not (...)".

All the other provisions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full
force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, COR and SOLVAY have executed this Amendment to be effective
on the date first set forth hereabove.



COR THERAPEUTICS, Inc.                     SOLVAY S.A.



By:                                        By:
   ----------------------------------         ----------------------------------

Title:                                     Title: General Manager
      -------------------------------             Research and Development


                                       1.
From: jimmysonecow@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:50:43 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

j[mmy powell

Royse City, TX 75189
From: jgeorge@foqus.biz

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:33:53 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

James George

Newark, NJ 07112
From: candy32708@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:07:33 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Candy Prietsch

Winter Springs, FL 32708
Before the Second Division,

August 18, 1966

No. P66/193.

#### Roto Bag Machine Corp. and Roberts, Reilly & Sons, Inc., et al. *v.*United States, protests 65/14548, etc. (New York).

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of bag-making machines and parts thereof, which parts are dedicated to use on or for said bag-making machines, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Roto Bag Machine Corp. and Rohner, Gehrig &*Co., *Inc.*v. *United States*(48 Cust. Ct. 401, Abstract 66656), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: Marge Hinson

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:50:36 PM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Marge Hinson
Lucernemines, Pennsylvania
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Insight Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Jeffrey E. Stiefler, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|                          
|--------------------------
|                          
|/s/    Jeffrey E. Stiefler
|Jeffrey E. Stiefler       
|Chief Executive Officer   
|August 9, 2004            



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Digital Insight and will be retained by Digital Insight and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 577 

Congratulating Mr. Kermit Cintro ́n on the successful defense of his IBF 

welterweight title on Saturday, July 14, 2007, and for his continued 

success in and out of the ring. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 26, 2007 

Mr. GUTIERREZ submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating Mr. Kermit Cintro ́n on the successful defense 

of his IBF welterweight title on Saturday, July 14, 2007, 

and for his continued success in and out of the ring. 

Whereas sports figures, through their perseverance, discipline, and good behavior, can serve as an example of excellence, dedication and devotion to our youth; 

Whereas Kermit Cintro ́n had a very difficult childhood, losing 

both of his parents at an early age; 

Whereas these hardships did not harden him but served to 

motivate him to be a great fighter—and role model—in 

the ring and in life; 

Whereas all too often, life’s trials and tribulations can discourage, and even defeat the most able and privileged 

amongst us; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 577 IH 

Whereas Kermit Cintro ́n was never dejected or angry because 

of the blows life dealt him; 

Whereas Kermit Cintro ́n overcame past challenges to become 

IBF Welterweight champion in May of 2007, showing us 

all that we can rise above life’s trials and tribulations if 

we work hard and persevere; 

Whereas on July 14, 2007, Kermit Cintro ́n defeated his opponent by knockout at the start of the second round in 

his title defense fight; 

Whereas this victory showed us how powerful the combination 

of discipline, desire, and dedication can be; 

Whereas throughout his career Kermit Cintro ́n has embodied 

the talent, exuberance and determination that we associate with the very best qualities of sports and athletic 

competition; 

Whereas Kermit Cintro ́n has consistently conducted himself 

with modesty and humility that has been an inspiration 

to all Americans; 

Whereas Kermit Cintro ́n has shown prolific dominance and 

talent in the ring, but his courage out of the ring and 

in life can serve equally as a model for young people 

across the country; and 

Whereas as a native of Puerto Rico, Kermit Cintro ́n has 

proven to be an outstanding role model and source of 

pride for all Puerto Ricans, as well as all Latin Americans and all immigrants to the United States from across 

the globe: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives con2 gratulates and commends Kermit Cintro ́n, IBF 

3 welterweight champion for his accomplishment and thanks 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 577 IH 

1 him for being a role model and an inspiration for our 

2 youth, and for the people of Puerto Rico and Latin Amer3 ica. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
From: bashamullins@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:09:52 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sharon Mullins

Austin, IN 47102
#### UNITED STATES ex rel. MONTANA ORE PURCHASING CO. et al. v. CIRCUIT COURT OF UNITED STATES FOR DISTRICT OF MONTANA et al.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

October 20, 1903.)

No. 1,007.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Montana. John J. McHatton and James M. Denny, for petitioners. Crittenden Thornton, for respondent. No opinion. Petition denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1514 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 28, 2008.
    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a two-thirds 
vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the same day it is 
presented to the House is waived with respect to any resolution reported on the 
legislative day of September 28, 2008, or September 29, 2008.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```