alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: psample36116@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:44:59 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Patricia Sample

Montgomery, AL 36116
Exhibit 4.10







Amendment No. 6


to


Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. 2008 Share Incentive Plan


(the “Plan”)


Dated February 12, 2018







The terms of the Plan are hereby revised as follows:








		-	
In Section 6(a) of the Plan, the first sentence is hereby deleted and replaced by the following wording:












“Subject to the provisions of Section 6(b), the maximum number of Ordinary Shares that may be issued under the Plan is 6,037,000 in a fungible pool of Ordinary Shares”.








		-	
All other terms shall remain unchanged.
# Eiropas Savienības C 122A/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0952 |
| --- | --- |
| Eiropas Savienības
  Oficiālais Vēstnesis | C 122A |
| | |
| Izdevums latviešu valodā | Informācija un paziņojumi | 58. sējums2015. gada 16. aprīlis |

ISSN 1977-0952

Eiropas Savienības

Oficiālais Vēstnesis

C 122A

Izdevums latviešu valodā

Informācija un paziņojumi

58. sējums2015. gada 16. aprīlis

---

| Paziņojums Nr. | Saturs | Lappuse |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Labojumi |
| 2015/C 122A/01 | Labojums paziņojumā par atklātajiem konkursiem – Administratori (AD 5/AD 7), kas specializējušies juridiskās pētniecības jomā: EPSO/AD/295/15 – Juristi, kuriem ir Bulgārijas (BG) juridiskā izglītība – EPSO/AD/296/15 – Juristi, kuriem ir Vācijas (DE) juridiskā izglītība – EPSO/AD/297/15 – Juristi, kuriem ir Horvātijas (HR) juridiskā izglītība – EPSO/AD/298/15 – Juristi, kuriem ir Īrijas (IE) juridiskā izglītība – EPSO/AD/299/15 – Juristi, kuriem ir Lietuvas (LT) juridiskā izglītība – EPSO/AD/300/15 – Juristi, kuriem ir Slovākijas (SK) juridiskā izglītība — ( OV C 68 A, 26.2.2015. ) | 1 |

Paziņojums Nr.

Saturs

Lappuse

Labojumi

2015/C 122A/01

Labojums paziņojumā par atklātajiem konkursiem – Administratori (AD 5/AD 7), kas specializējušies juridiskās pētniecības jomā: EPSO/AD/295/15 – Juristi, kuriem ir Bulgārijas (BG) juridiskā izglītība – EPSO/AD/296/15 – Juristi, kuriem ir Vācijas (DE) juridiskā izglītība – EPSO/AD/297/15 – Juristi, kuriem ir Horvātijas (HR) juridiskā izglītība – EPSO/AD/298/15 – Juristi, kuriem ir Īrijas (IE) juridiskā izglītība – EPSO/AD/299/15 – Juristi, kuriem ir Lietuvas (LT) juridiskā izglītība – EPSO/AD/300/15 – Juristi, kuriem ir Slovākijas (SK) juridiskā izglītība — ( OV C 68 A, 26.2.2015. )

( OV C 68 A, 26.2.2015. )

1

---

| LV | |
| --- | --- |

LV

---

Labojumi

| 16.4.2015 | LV | Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis | CA 122/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2015

LV

Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis

CA 122/1

---

Labojums paziņojumā par atklātajiem konkursiem – Administratori (AD 5/AD 7), kas specializējušies juridiskās pētniecības jomā: EPSO/AD/295/15 – Juristi, kuriem ir Bulgārijas (BG) juridiskā izglītība – EPSO/AD/296/15 – Juristi, kuriem ir Vācijas (DE) juridiskā izglītība – EPSO/AD/297/15 – Juristi, kuriem ir Horvātijas (HR) juridiskā izglītība – EPSO/AD/298/15 – Juristi, kuriem ir Īrijas (IE) juridiskā izglītība – EPSO/AD/299/15 – Juristi, kuriem ir Lietuvas (LT) juridiskā izglītība – EPSO/AD/300/15 – Juristi, kuriem ir Slovākijas (SK) juridiskā izglītība

(
  “Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis” C 68 A, 2015. gada 26. februāris
  )

(2015/C 122 A/01)

2. lappusē I sadaļas 3. punktā:

tekstu:

“Termiņš (ieskaitot apstiprināšanu): 2015. gada 31. marts līdz plkst. 12.00 (dienā) pēc Briseles laika.”

lasīt šādi:

“Termiņš (ieskaitot apstiprināšanu): 2015. gada 9. aprīlis līdz plkst. 12.00 (dienā) pēc Briseles laika.”

---
No. 59744.

#### G. L. Ramsey a/c Juvenile Mfg. Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 179463-K (Laredo).

*360Opinion by

Toed, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of embroidered cotton wearing apparel similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *G. L. Ramsey a/c Juvenile Mfg. Co.*(42 C. C. P. A. 106, C. A. D. 580), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Registration No. 333-73083 424 (b)(2)
                                     Pricing Supplement No:236 Cusip:14912LE56
                                     Dated:  June 03,1999

	Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation
	Medium-Term Notes, Series F
	(Fixed Rate)
	With Maturities of 9 Months or More from Date of Issue
	Interest payable each April 1 and October 1 and at Maturity

Principal Amount:       Interest Rate:                Proceed Amount:
$14,000,000                 6.57%                       $13,965,000

Original Issue Date:    Commission Fee:               Maturity Date:
06/08/1999                $35,000                       03/03/2003

Dealer:
Chase Securities


Specified Currency:     Option to Elect Payment       Authorized Denominations
x U.S. dollars          in U.S. dollars               (only applicable if
_ Other:___________     (only applicable if           Specified Currency is
                        Specified Currency is         other than U.S.
                        other than U.S. dollars):      N/A
                           N/A

The Note is a:                                        Exchange Rate Agent
    X Global Note                                     (if other than First
      Certificated Note                                Trust New York): N/A
      (only applicable if
       Specified Currency
       is other than U.S. dollars)

Original Issue           Total Amount of OID: N/A    Terms of Amortizing
Discount Note:                                       Notes:  N/A
   Yes     x No          Issue Price (expressed
                         as a percentage of
                         aggregate principal
                         amount): 100%


Redemption Date(s) (including                        Redemption Price(s): N/A
any applicable regular or
special record dates): N/A

Repayment Date(s) (including                         Repayment Price(s): N/A
any applicable regular or
special record dates):  N/A

Interest Rate Reset Option:  _ Yes    X No

Optional Reset Dates (only applicable if option to reset interest rate):  N/A

Basis for Interest Rate Reset (only applicable if option to reset interest
rate): N/A

Stated Maturity Extension Option:  _ Yes    x No

Extension Period(s) and Final Maturity Date (only applicable if option to
extend stated maturity): N/A

Basis for Interest Rate During Extension Period (only applicable if option to
extend stated maturity): N/A



Historical Exchange Rate (only applicable if Specified Currency other than
U.S. dollars): N/A

     The interest rates on the Notes may be changed by Caterpillar Financial
Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect
the interest rate on any Note ordered prior to the effective date of the
change.  Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $740.80MM principal
amount of the Notes had been sold at interest rates then in effect.

	_________________________________

	Pricing Supplement to Prospectus Supplement dated March 25, 1999
	and Prospectus dated March 25, 1999
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Orbit/FR, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the three months ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Israel
Adan, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

May 16, 2005

/s/ Israel Adan
-------------------
Israel Adan
President and Chief Executive Officer
                                                                              19
H. Res. 266

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

March 27, 2007.

Whereas social workers have the demonstrated education and 

experience to guide individuals, families, and communities 

through complex issues and choices; 

Whereas social workers connect individuals, families, and 

communities to available resources; 

Whereas social workers are dedicated to improving the society 

in which we live; 

Whereas social workers are positive and compassionate professionals; 

Whereas social workers stand up for others to make sure everyone has access to the same basic rights, protections, 

and opportunities; 

Whereas social workers have been the driving force behind 

important social movements in the United States and 

abroad; and 

Whereas Professional Social Work Month, and World Social 

Work Day, which is March 27, 2007, will build awareness 

of the role of professional social workers and their commitment and dedication to individuals, families, and communities everywhere though service delivery, research, 

education, and legislative advocacy: Now, therefore, be it 
2

•HRES 266 EH 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) supports the goals and ideals of Professional 

Social Work Month and World Social Work Day; 

(2) acknowledges the diligent efforts of individuals 

and groups who promote the importance of social work 

and who are observing Professional Social Work Month 

and World Social Work Day; 

(3) encourages the American people to engage in 

appropriate ceremonies and activities to further promote 

awareness of the life-changing role of social workers; 

(4) recognizes with gratitude the contributions of 

the millions of caring individuals who have chosen to 

serve their communities through social work; and 

(5) encourages young people to seek out educational 

and professional opportunities to become social workers. 

Attest:

Clerk.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-05-00640-CR

Sandra Harding, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY, 119TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. B-99-0076-S, HONORABLE THOMAS J. GOSSETT, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant’s motion to dismiss this appeal is granted. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).

The appeal is dismissed.

__________________________________________

W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Pemberton and Waldrop

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: November 3, 2005

Do Not Publish
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 343 

Commemorating the marinas of the United States, expressing support for 

the designation of the sixth annual National Marina Day, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2007 

Mr. ROGERS of Kentucky submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

RESOLUTION 

Commemorating the marinas of the United States, expressing 

support for the designation of the sixth annual National 

Marina Day, and for other purposes. 

Whereas the citizens of the United States highly value recreation time and their ability to access 1 of the greatest 

natural resources of the United States, its waterways; 

Whereas, in 1928, the word ‘‘marina’’ was used for the first 

time by the National Association of Engine and Boat 

Manufacturers to define a recreational boating facility; 

Whereas the United States is home to over 12,000 recreational boating facilities that contribute substantially to 

their local communities by providing safe, reliable gateways to boating for members of their communities and 

welcomed guests; 


pwalker on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 343 IH 

Whereas marinas of the United States also serve as stewards 

of the environment, actively seeking to protect their surrounding waterways not only for the enjoyment of the 

current generation, but for generations to come; and 

Whereas marinas of the United States also provide their communities and visitors a place where friends and families, 

united by a passion for the water, can come together for 

recreation, rest, and relaxation: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) commemorates the marinas of the United 

3 States for providing environmentally friendly gate4 ways to boating for the citizens of, and the visitors 

5 to the United States; and 

6 (2) supports designation of the sixth annual 

7 ‘‘National Marina Day’’ in order— 

8 (A) to honor the marinas of the United 

9 States for their many contributions to their 

10 local communities; and 

11 (B) to make citizens, policy makers, elect12 ed officials, and employees more aware of the 

13 overall contributions marinas make to their 

14 well-being. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Sutphin Complete Medical Care, a/a/o Rafael D. Baez-Villar, Plaintiff-Appellant, <br><br>against<br><br>Hereford Ins. Co., Defendant-Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Tanya R. Kennedy, J.), entered November 12, 2014, which granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied plaintiff's cross motion for summary judgment.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Order (Tanya R. Kennedy, J.), entered November 12, 2014, modified to deny defendant's motion for summary judgment and to reinstate the complaint; as modified, order affirmed, with $10 costs.</p><p>This action, seeking recovery of assigned first-party no-fault benefits, is not ripe for summary disposition. While defendant established that it properly mailed the notices for independent medical examinations (IMEs) to plaintiff's assignor and his attorney (<a href="../2013/2013_07416.htm" target="_blank"><i>see American Tr. Ins. Co. v Marte-Rosario</i>, 111 AD3d 442</a> [2013]), the record raises triable issues as to whether the assignor failed to appear for the scheduled IMEs (<a href="../2006/2006_09604.htm" target="_blank"><i>see Stephen Fogel Psychological, P.C. v Progressive Cas. Ins. Co.</i>, 35 AD3d 720</a>, 721 [2006]; <a href="../2016/2016_50339.htm" target="_blank"><i>Village Med. Supply, Inc. v Travelers Prop. Cas. Co. of Am., </i>51 Misc 3d 126</a>[A], 2016 NY Slip Op 50339[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2016]; <a href="../2016/2016_50174.htm" target="_blank"><i>Metro 8 Med. Equip., Inc. v ELRAC, Inc.</i>, 50 Misc 3d 140</a>[A], 2016 NY Slip Op 50174[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2016]). The existence of triable issues precludes an award of summary judgment to either party.</p><p>Plaintiff's remaining contentions are unpreserved and/or without merit.</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: May 13, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
From: waterman.anne@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:14:35 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Anne Waterman

Louisville, KY 40243
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

MARSHIA MEAUX,

Plaintiff,

v.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, Commissioner of

Social Security,

Defendant.

CASE NO. C05-5580RBL

ORDER

The Court, having reviewed plaintiff's complaint, the Report and Recommendation of Judge

Karen L. Strombom, United States Magistrate Judge, and objections to the report and recommendation, if

any, and the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) the ALJ erred in his decision as described in the report;

(3) the matter is therefore REVERSED and remanded to the Commissioner for further

administrative proceedings; and

(4) the Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff's counsel, defendant’s counsel

and Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom.

DATED this 2nd day of June, 2006.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-05580-RBL Document 28 Filed 06/02/06 Page 1 of 1
From: ronellie100@att.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:38:09 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Eleanor Dowler

Washington Court House, OH 43160