alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: GramaJES@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:14:11 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jean E Saunders

Brooklyn, NY 11236
From: robert.charnock@att.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:39:55 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Susan Charnock

, 77064-8819
Before the First Division,

September 5, 1956

No. 60215.

protest 262053-K (Seattle).

#### Richards Brush Company and Wm. A. Hausman Co. *v.*United States,

Wilson, Judge:

The merchandise in the case at bar was classified under paragraph 1525 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and assessed with duty at the rate of 40 per centum ad valorem under the provision for “* * * manufactures of every description, wholly or in chief value of * * * horsehair, not specially provided for.” Plaintiffs claim the imported product is properly dutiable at either 5 or 10 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1558 of the pertinent act, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802 and the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 52739, as nonenumerated unmanufactured or nonenumerated manufactured articles.

The imported product (plaintiffs’ exhibit 1) is brush-making material which is put in a brush block as part of a sweeping broom.

Plaintiffs’ witness testified that the imported merchandise, which was imported from England, is a “blend” of horsehair and vegetable fibers. It appears that the vegetable fibers are produced in Mexico, where they are cut from a cactus plant, subjected to a so-called dressing process, and then cut to size. The horsehair, after removal from the horse, is “hackled,” then boiled and cleaned. The long hairs are pulled out and laid in lengths; the ends of the hair are then cut to give it a “flag end,” that is, a split so as to spread the material out to make the sweeping area a little finer. There is then nothing further to be done to the material, except to put it into the wooden handle or brush block of the broom. The record further discloses that the bundle of material is doubled when put in the broom, giving it a soft top.

It is “fundamental in customs law that when the classification of the collector is challenged, the dual burden of proving that such classification is incorrect and that its own claimed classification is correct, rests upon the importer.” *Yardley & Co., Ltd., et al*v. *United States,*41 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 85, C. A. D. 533. In the case at bar, the dressing, trimming, and flagging, to which the imported merchandise has been subjected, constitute a manufacturing process. Plaintiffs have further failed to establish the component material of chief value of the imported product which the record establishes is a manufactured article. Accordingly, the presumption of correctness attaching to the classification of the collector that the involved merchandise, in its condition as imported, is a manufacture, wholly or in chief value of horsehair, has not been overcome.

On the record herein, we hold the involved merchandise is properly dutiable as classified. The protest is overruled. Judgment will issue accordingly.
breslow113012.htm






  





  











  













 


DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE


 


 







 


 



Exhibit 10.84









 







 


 


$100,000                                                                           Date:  November 30, 2012


 


 







 


 


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned jointly and severally promise to pay to the order of Warren Breslow, the sum of One Hundred Thousand Dollars and no/100 ($100,000.00), together with interest of 10% per annum on the unpaid balance.


 


 


The entire principal and any accrued interest shall be fully and immediately payable UPON DEMAND of any holder thereof.


 


 







 


 


 

 


 


 


”Borrower”


 


Aura Systems, Inc.

















____________________


Melvin Gagerman


Chief Executive Officer







 


Dated: November 30, 2012
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 451 

Directing the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct to respond to 

the indictment of, or the filing of charges of criminal conduct in a 

court of the United States or any State against, any Member of the 

House of Representatives by empaneling an investigative subcommittee 

to review the allegations not later than 30 days after the date the 

Member is indicted or the charges are filed. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 5, 2007 

Mr. HOYER (for himself, Mr. CLYBURN, Mr. EMANUEL, and Mr. LARSON of 

Connecticut) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules 

JUNE 5, 2007 

The Committee on Rules discharged; considered and agreed to 

RESOLUTION 

Directing the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct 

to respond to the indictment of, or the filing of charges 

of criminal conduct in a court of the United States 

or any State against, any Member of the House of Representatives by empaneling an investigative subcommittee 

to review the allegations not later than 30 days after 

the date the Member is indicted or the charges are 

filed. 

Whereas on June 4, 2007, Representative William Jefferson 

was indicted on 16 criminal counts by a grand jury in the 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HRES 451 ATH 

United States District Court for the Eastern District of 

Virginia; 

Whereas recent credible media accounts indicate that the Department of Justice is investigating the conduct of other 

Members of the House of Representatives, and these investigations may lead to further indictments; 

Whereas the One Hundred Tenth Congress, in its first day 

of session, strengthened the rules concerning the ethical 

behavior of Members of the House; 

Whereas the House has approved on an overwhelming and bipartisan basis H.R. 2316, the Honest Leadership and 

Open Government Act of 2007, to establish strict standards and penalties concerning the relationship between 

lobbyists and Members; and 

Whereas these actions by the One Hundred Tenth Congress 

demonstrate that illegal, unethical, or inappropriate conduct by Members of the House will not be tolerated: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That whenever a Member of the House of 

2 Representatives, including a Delegate or Resident Com3 missioner to the Congress, is indicted or otherwise for4 mally charged with criminal conduct in a court of the 

5 United States or any State, the Committee on Standards 

6 of Official Conduct shall, not later than 30 days after the 

7 date of such indictment or charge— 

8 (1) empanel an investigative subcommittee to 

9 review the allegations; or 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

3 

•HRES 451 ATH 

1 (2) if the Committee does not empanel an in2 vestigative subcommittee to review the allegations, 

3 submit a report to the House describing its reasons 

4 for not empaneling such an investigative sub5 committee, together with the actions, if any, the 

6 Committee has taken in response to the allegations. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 189 (Monday, October 2, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 67781]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21575]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center for Complementary & Integrative Health; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Complementary and 
Integrative Health Special Emphasis Panel NIH-DoD-VA Pain Management 
Collaboratory Pragmatic and/or Implementation Science Demonstration 
Projects.
    Date: December 5, 2023.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate cooperative agreement 
applications.
    Place: National Center for Complementary and Integrative 
Democracy II, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual 
Meeting).
    Contact Person: MARTA V Hamity, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review, Division of Extramural 
Activities, NCCIH/NIH, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 401, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#204d415254410e48414d495459604e49480e474f56"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bcd1ddcec8dd92d4ddd1d5c8c5fcd2d5d492dbd3ca">[email protected]</span></a>.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.213, 
Research and Training in Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: September 26, 2023.
Victoria E. Townsend,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-21575 Filed 9-29-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
December 14, 2017

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ALI RASSOULI, Appellant

NO. 14-15-00353-CV V.

NATIONAL SIGNS HOLDINGS, LLC, NATIONAL SIGNS, LLC, AND LOUIS 

GIRARD, Appellees

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment confirming the arbitration award, 

signed December 5, 2016, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have 

inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the 

court below AFFIRMED. 

We order appellees, National Signs Holdings, LLC, National Signs, LLC, and 

Louis Girard, jointly and severally, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

ANTHONY WALLER,

Petitioner,

v.

KENNETH QUINN,

Respondent.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C05-1904-MJP-MAT

ORDER GRANTING

RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME

The Court, having considered respondent’s motion for extension of time, and the balance

of the record, does hereby find and ORDER as follows:

(1) Respondent’s motion for an extension of time to file an answer to petitioner’s

federal habeas petition (Dkt. No. 14) is GRANTED. Respondent is directed to file and serve his

answer not later than June 23, 2006.

(2) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to petitioner, to counsel for

respondent, and to the Honorable Marsha J. Pechman.

DATED this 26th day of May, 2006.

A

Mary Alice Theiler

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:05-cv-01904-MJP Document 15 Filed 05/26/06 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

VINCENT DANIEL HOPPER,

Plaintiff,

v.

G. WIGEN, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5662 FDB

ORDER ADOPTING

REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION AND 

 DISMISSING COMPLAINT 

 WITHOUT PREJUDICE

 The Magistrate Judge recommends that this Civil Rights action be dismissed without

prejudice as the Plaintiff has advised the Court he no longer wishes to pursue this action. As detailed

by the Judge Magistrate, the Plaintiff has stated that the conduct on which he based his complaint,

certain policies of the Northwest Detention Center, have ceased and that he has suffered no

compensable injury.

Plaintiff has filed an objection asserting that dismissal is not warranted and the Court should

stay dismissal to determine whether Plaintiff is entitled to costs in this action. There is no basis for

an award of costs in this action and Plaintiff’s assertions are insufficient to convince this court that

this matter is not subject to dismissal.

The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Karen L.

Strombom, objections to the report and recommendation, and the remaining record, does hereby find

and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

Case 3:05-cv-05662-FDB Document 33 Filed 06/09/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

(2) The complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)

of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and 

(3) United States’ Motion to Dismiss Claims Against the Federal Defendant [Dkt # 27] is

stricken as MOOT.

 (4) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff, to counsel for

Defendants, and to the Hon. Karen L. Strombom.

DATED this 9th day of June, 2006.

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-05662-FDB Document 33 Filed 06/09/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of
Brinks Holding Company, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2009 (the Report), I, Stephen C. Yevich, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DATED this 24th day of February 2010



/s/ Stephen C. YevichStephen C. YevichExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Brinks Home Security Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Brinks Home Security Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being furnished
solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Registration No. 333-73083 424 (b)(2)
                                     Pricing Supplement No:233 Cusip:14912LE23
                                     Dated:  June 02,1999

	Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation
	Medium-Term Notes, Series F
	(Fixed Rate)
	With Maturities of 9 Months or More from Date of Issue
	Interest payable each April 1 and October 1 and at Maturity

Principal Amount:       Interest Rate:                Proceed Amount:
$10,000,000                 6.54%                       $9,975,000

Original Issue Date:    Commission Fee:               Maturity Date:
06/08/1999                $25,000                       12/02/2002

Dealer:
Salomon Smith Barney


Specified Currency:     Option to Elect Payment       Authorized Denominations
x U.S. dollars          in U.S. dollars               (only applicable if
_ Other:___________     (only applicable if           Specified Currency is
                        Specified Currency is         other than U.S.
                        other than U.S. dollars):      N/A
                           N/A

The Note is a:                                        Exchange Rate Agent
    X Global Note                                     (if other than First
      Certificated Note                                Trust New York): N/A
      (only applicable if
       Specified Currency
       is other than U.S. dollars)

Original Issue           Total Amount of OID: N/A    Terms of Amortizing
Discount Note:                                       Notes:  N/A
   Yes     x No          Issue Price (expressed
                         as a percentage of
                         aggregate principal
                         amount): 100%


Redemption Date(s) (including                        Redemption Price(s): N/A
any applicable regular or
special record dates): N/A

Repayment Date(s) (including                         Repayment Price(s): N/A
any applicable regular or
special record dates):  N/A

Interest Rate Reset Option:  _ Yes    X No

Optional Reset Dates (only applicable if option to reset interest rate):  N/A

Basis for Interest Rate Reset (only applicable if option to reset interest
rate): N/A

Stated Maturity Extension Option:  _ Yes    x No

Extension Period(s) and Final Maturity Date (only applicable if option to
extend stated maturity): N/A

Basis for Interest Rate During Extension Period (only applicable if option to
extend stated maturity): N/A



Historical Exchange Rate (only applicable if Specified Currency other than
U.S. dollars): N/A

     The interest rates on the Notes may be changed by Caterpillar Financial
Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect
the interest rate on any Note ordered prior to the effective date of the
change.  Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $658.80MM principal
amount of the Notes had been sold at interest rates then in effect.

	_________________________________

	Pricing Supplement to Prospectus Supplement dated March 25, 1999
	and Prospectus dated March 25, 1999
Exhibit 23.1  Silberstein Ungar, PLLC CPAs and Business Advisors Phone (248) 203-0080 Fax (248) 281-0940 30600 Telegraph Road, Suite 2175 Bingham Farms, MI 48025-4586 www.sucpas.com   April 13, 2011  To the Board of Directors of Propell Corporation San Anselmo, California   Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  Silberstein Ungar, PLLC, hereby consents to the use in the Form 10-K, Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, filed by Propell Corporation of our report dated April 6, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Propell Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, as of and for the years ending December 31, 2010 and 2009.  Sincerely,  /s/ Silberstein Ungar, PLLC  Silberstein Ungar, PLLC  Bingham Farms, Michigan