alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
63

49

88

28

25

20

9

49

65

54

55

58

18

18

59

60

62

52

Canyon

City

Hamilton

Long

Creek

Fox

Mount

Vernon

Prairie

City

John

Day

Canyon

City

Beech Creek

Logdell

x

Little Canyon

Mountain

395

395

395

26

26

402

Fork

Middle

John

Day

River

3 0 3 6 Kilometers

3 0 3 6 Miles

N

E

S

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

PRINEVILLE DISTRICT

John Day Basin

Resource Management Plan

Draft Environmental Impact Statement

2008 No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these 

data for individual or aggregate use with other data. Original data were compiled from various sources. This 

information may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was developed through digital means 

and may be updated without notication. M07-09-01:9-5-08

W

Map 12E, 13E, & 14E Errata: All Alte rnatives Travel Management 

 and O Highway Vehicle Designations - Upper John Day 

LEGEND

Road Density Prescription

 Zero Miles per Square Mile

 Two Miles per Square Mile

Administered Land

 Bureau of Land Management

 Forest Service

 State

 Private or Other

* Note: Access to some areas listed as open may require

 landowner permission to cross private lands

Transportation 

 Interim Road

 Open Road Seasonally

 Closed Road

 U.S. Highway

 State Highway

 County Road

 Forest Service Primary Route

 Forest Service Secondary Route

 Private Road- Closed to public use

 or unknown

O Highway Vehicle Designation

 Closed- Motorized Use O Roads

 Probhibited

 Limited- Motorized Vehicle Use Limited

 to Designated Roads and Trails,

 Seasonally, or by Type of Vehicle

 Seasonal Motor Vehicle Restrictions

 

52

26

402 19

ORE G O N

Prineville 

District

John Day Basin

Planning Area

Map Area

T

16

S

T

9

S

T

10

S

T

11

S

T

12

S

T

13

S

T

14

S

T

15

S

T

16

S

T

9

S

T

10

S

T

11

S

T

12

S

T

13

S

T

14

S

T

15

S

R 28 E R 29 E R 30 E R 31 E R 32 E R 33 E R 34 E

R 28 E R 29 E R 30 E R 31 E R 32 E R 33 E R 34 E

North

Pit

South Pit

 MALHEUR NATIONAL FOREST

 MALHEUR

NATIONAL

FOREST

20

North

Pit

South Pit

52

x

Little Canyon

Mountain

Canyon

City

All Alternatives

The routes highlighted 

in red were erroneously 

depicted in the Draft 

EIS; these routes no 

longer exist due to 

obliteration.
Before the Second Division,

August 23, 1966

No. P66/202. —

#### Freedman & Slater, Inc., a/c Durst Manufacturing Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States, protests 215178-K, etc. (New York).

Bao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of hose nozzles similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Lipman's*(52 CCPA 59, C.A.D. 859), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 66525.

#### Tafco Commercial, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 288946-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of nylon fish nets similar in use to cotton fish nets and following the principles set forth in *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), the items marked “A” were held dutiable at 30 percent under the provision in paragraph 923, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 51802), for cotton fishing nets, valued at 50 cents or more per pound, and the items marked “B” at 40 percent ad valorem under said paragraph of the act as cotton fishing nets, not valued at 50 cents or more per pound.
737-60 0/-700/-800/-900

AIRPLAN EFLIG H TMANUAL

 Code 4000

FAA APPROVED 03-13-15 D631A001 Section 1 Page 14A

M I S C E L L A N E O U S L I M I T A T I O N S

CABIN ALTITUDE WARNING TAKEOFF BRIEFING (required by AD 2008-23-07)

With the CABIN ALTITUDE and TAKEOFF CONFIG lights not installed, or

installed but not activated:

As part of the Takeoff Briefing before engine start for the first

flight of the day or following any change of either flight crew

member, the pilot-in-command will ensure the Cabin Altitude Warning

indications and procedures are briefed in accordance with the

procedures contained in the Normal Procedures Section of this

manual.

COLD SOAKED FUEL FROST

Takeoff with cold soaked fuel frost on the wing tank upper surfaces

is not permitted if any of the following conditions are present:

1. The ambient air temperature is below +4°C, +39°F.

2. The tank fuel temperature is below -16°C, +3°F.

3. There is cold soaked fuel frost on the wing tank upper surfaces

that is beyond the lines defining the permissible cold soaked

fuel frost area.

4. There is precipitation or visible moisture (rain, snow,

drizzle, or fog with less than 1 mile visibility).
From: bemerciful@centurytel.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:45:17 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kathy Felch

Minneota, MN 56264
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**I, Frederick M. Danziger, certify that:**

 

**1.**     I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Griffin Land & Nurseries, Inc.;

 

**2.**     Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

**3.**     Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

**4.**     The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

**a)**     Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

**b)**    Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

**c)**     Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and

 

**5.**     The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

 

**a)**     All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

**b)**    Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| **Date:**November 1, 2005 | **/s/ FREDERICK M. DANZIGER**             | ** ** |
|--------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|------------|
| ** **                     | **Frederick M. Danziger**                 |
| ** **                     | **President and Chief Executive Officer** |

 

----
[Type text] [Type text]

June 5, 2012

Honorable Ray LaHood, Secretary

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, D.C. 20590

RE: DOT-OST-2012-0083

Dear Secretary LaHood:

Please accept this letter of support for the application of Volaris to operate scheduled passenger service 

between Denver International Airport (“DEN”) and Mexico City’s Benito Juárez International Airport. 

The Colorado Tourism Office believes the expanded passenger service will be economically beneficial to 

growing the local and national economy. Mexico is one of the top international markets for visitors to 

Colorado, and the improved passenger service will provide opportunities to expand travel for Mexican 

citizens and increase visits to Colorado and the mountain west for recreation.

DEN has lacked year-round nonstop service to Mexico City since the bankruptcy of Mexicana in August 

2010. The introduction of new service by Volaris will stimulate market demand, further growing 

passenger traffic that will benefit all carriers. In addition, new international air service is a key driver of 

increased tourism activity, creating new jobs and increased tax revenue across the State of Colorado.

Thank you for your consideration. We urge you to approve this application.

Sincerely,

Al White,

Director, Colorado Tourism Office
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

PONDEXTER BRYANT,

Plaintiff,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5607RJB

REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

Noted for February 17, 2006

This case has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local MJR 3 and 4. This matter is before the court because of plaintiff’s failure to

notify the court of his current address. After reviewing the record, the undersigned recommends that the

court dismiss plaintiff’s complaint for the reasons set forth below.

DISCUSSION

On October 26, 2005, the court ordered plaintiff to cure certain deficiencies in his application to

proceed in forma pauperis by no later than November 26, 2005, or show cause why this matter should not

be dismissed. (Dkt. #3). On November 8, 2005, the postal service returned the copy of that order that was

sent to plaintiff at his last known address. (Dkt. #4). Local Rule CR 41(b)(2) states: 

A party proceeding pro se shall keep the court and opposing parties advised as to his

current address. If mail directed to a pro se plaintiff by the clerk is returned by the post

office, and if such plaintiff fails to notify the court and opposing parties within sixty

days thereafter of his current address, the court may dismiss the action without

prejudice for failure to prosecute.

 Here, the court has sent plaintiff its order to show cause to the address provided to it by plaintiff, even

though plaintiff has the responsibility for notifying the court of any change of address. The court is

Case 3:05-cv-05607-RJB Document 7 Filed 01/20/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

unaware of any other place of residence or confinement for plaintiff, and, as discussed above, plaintiff has

failed to provide the court with a notice of a change in his mailing address or responses to its order. 

CONCLUSION

Based on the foregoing discussion, the undersigned recommends that the court dismiss this matter

without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Local Rule CR 41(b)(2). 

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedures, the

parties shall have ten (10) days from service of this Report and Recommendation to file written objections

thereto. See also Fed.R.Civ.P. 6. Failure to file objections will result in a waiver of those objections for

purposes of appeal. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Accommodating the time limit imposed by Rule

72(b), the clerk is directed set this matter for consideration on February 17, 2006, as noted in the caption. 

DATED this 20th day of January, 2006.

A

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-05607-RJB Document 7 Filed 01/20/06 Page 2 of 2
From: joecmama@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:22:03 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Joseph Choi

Rochester, NY 14623
From: gpjmorri@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:42:05 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Paula Morrison

East Taunton, MA 02718
No. 64506.

#### Gallagher & Ascher Company *v.*United States,

protest 59/12401-10939 (Chicago).

*256Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
From: emjptaylor@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:13:05 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

John Taylor

Westerville, OH 43081
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1428 

Congratulating Nastia Liukin, Shawn Johnson, Chellsie Memmel, Samantha 

Peszek, Alicia Sacramone, and Bridget Sloan of the United States Women’s Gymnastics team for their outstanding performances and representation of the United States during the 2008 Olympics in Beijing, China. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 11, 2008 

Mr. BOSWELL (for himself, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. LATHAM, Mr. 

LOEBSACK, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mrs. MALONEY of New York, Mr. BACA, 

Mr. HARE, Mr. TERRY, Ms. MCCOLLUM of Minnesota, Ms. BORDALLO, 

Mr. WALZ of Minnesota, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Mr. MCGOVERN, 

and Mr. BRALEY of Iowa) submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating Nastia Liukin, Shawn Johnson, Chellsie 

Memmel, Samantha Peszek, Alicia Sacramone, and 

Bridget Sloan of the United States Women’s Gymnastics 

team for their outstanding performances and representation of the United States during the 2008 Olympics 

in Beijing, China. 

Whereas Nastia Liukin won the gold medal and Shawn Johnson won the silver medal in Beijing for the 2008 Olympics Women’s Individual All-Around; 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1428 IH 

Whereas Shawn Johnson won the gold medal and Nastia 

Liukin won the silver medal in Beijing for the 2008 

Olympics Women’s Balance Beam competition; 

Whereas Nastia Liukin won the silver medal in Beijing for 

the 2008 Olympics Women’s Uneven Bars competition; 

Whereas Shawn Johnson won the silver medal and Nastia 

Liukin won the bronze medal in Beijing for the 2008 

Olympics Women’s Floor Exercise; 

Whereas the members of the United States Women’s Gymnastics team, Nastia Liukin, Shawn Johnson, Chellsie 

Memmel, Samantha Peszek, Alicia Sacramone, and 

Bridget Sloan, won the silver medal in Beijing for the 

2008 Olympics for the Women’s Team finals; and 

Whereas these young women have brought great pride and 

honor to their families, friends, communities, and the 

United States with their amazing accomplishments while 

representing our Nation: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives con2 gratulates Nastia Liukin, Shawn Johnson, Chellsie 

3 Memmel, Samantha Peszek, Alicia Sacramone, and 

4 Bridget Sloan of the United States Women’s Gymnastics 

5 team for their outstanding performances and representa6 tion of the United States during the 2008 Olympics in 

7 Beijing, China. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS