alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                EXHIBIT 11.01

                            MICRONICS COMPUTERS, INC.
                   COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
                                   (UNAUDITED)




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                THREE MONTHS ENDED             SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                     MARCH 31,                     MARCH 31,
                                             -----------------------       -----------------------
                                               1997           1996           1997           1996
                                             --------       --------       --------       --------
<S>                                          <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>     
PRIMARY

Net income (loss) .....................      $ (2,664)      $   (916)      $ (2,498)      $     13
                                             ========       ========       ========       ========

Average shares outstanding ............        13,979         13,765         13,947         13,752
Options ...............................          --             --             --                7
                                             --------       --------       --------       --------
Total common stock and common
    stock equivalents .................        13,979         13,765         13,947         13,759
                                             ========       ========       ========       ========

Net income (loss) per common share ....      $   (.19)      $   (.07)      $   (.18)      $      0
                                             ========       ========       ========       ========

FULLY DILUTED

Net income (loss) .....................      $ (2,664)      $   (916)      $ (2,498)      $     13
                                             ========       ========       ========       ========

Average shares outstanding ............        13,979         13,765         13,947         13,752
Options ...............................          --             --             --                7
                                             --------       --------       --------       --------
Total common stock and common
    stock equivalents .................        13,979         13,765         13,947         13,759
                                             ========       ========       ========       ========

Net income (loss) per common share ....      $   (.19)      $   (.07)      $   (.18)      $      0
                                             ========       ========       ========       ========
</TABLE>
No. 76-682.

#### Santa Clara Pueblo et al. *v.*Martinez et al.

C. A. 10th Cir. The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.
From: Gregg Pawlowski

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:19:53 PM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Gregg Pawlowski
Chenango Forks, New York
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, DANIEL C. DUNN, certify that:

1. I have reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ALLIED HEALTHCARE
PRODUCTS, INC.

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) omitted as not yet applicable;

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.

Date: May 3, 2006


                                        /s/ DANIEL C. DUNN
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Daniel C. Dunn
                                        Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
                                        & Secretary
#### Frederick E. MELVIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 959; Mitch Huggins; Gideon A. Massey, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 01-1454.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 21, 2001.

Decided June 28, 2001.

Frederick E. Melvin, pro se.

Theresa Faith Merrill, Assistant General Counsel, United Steelworkers of America, Pittsburgh, PA, for appellees.

*103Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit J.

PER CURIAM.

Frederick E. Melvin appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Melvin v. United Steelworkers of America,*No. CA-00-63-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 11 & Mar. 2, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned, Richard Liu, the Chief Financial Officer of CHINA POLYPEPTIDE
GROUP, INC. (the “Company”), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that:





1.   The
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30,
2010 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.   Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operation of the Company.





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement this 13th day of
January, 2011.





/s/ Richard LiuRichard
      LiuChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
China Polypeptide Group, Inc. and will be retained by China Polypeptide Group,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.





The
forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 396 

Congratulating Qatar on the occasion of Qatari-American Friendship Day. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 10, 2007 

Mrs. MALONEY of New York (for herself and Mr. RAHALL) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating Qatar on the occasion of Qatari-American 

Friendship Day. 

Whereas the United States Embassy in Doha, Qatar, will observe Monday, May 14, 2007, as ‘‘Qatari-American 

Friendship Day’’; 

Whereas Qatar is a major defense ally of the United States 

in the Middle East, with the Qatari and American forces 

benefitting from close cooperation; 

Whereas democracy, under the leadership of His Highness 

the Emir, Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa Al-Thani, is developing in Qatar, which has successfully completed elections for its third Municipal Council, and Qatari women 

have always enjoyed the same political rights as men; 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HRES 396 IH 

Whereas Qatar’s constitution has created a legislative body, 

of which 30 will be elected and 15 will be appointed, and 

those elections are expected in 2008; 

Whereas Qatar is a major exporter of energy resources and, 

with Exxon Mobil and Conoco Phillips, plans to begin 

supplying the United States with natural gas in 2009, 

some of which would be delivered through a new facility, 

Golden Pass, in southeast Texas; 

Whereas Qatar, through its wholly-owned company Qatar Petroleum, has been a dependable partner for American energy companies, also including Anadarko and Occidental 

Petroleum; and 

Whereas Qatar, under the direction of His Highness, the 

Emir, and Her Highness Sheikha Moza Nasser AlMisnad, has embarked on an ambitious program of social 

development and change, particularly in the education 

sector, and at the visionary Education City Qatar hosts 

five major American universities, including Virginia Commonwealth University School of the Arts in Qatar 

(VCUQ), Weill Cornell Medical College in Qatar 

(WCMC–Q), Texas A&M University at Qatar (TAMUQ), 

Carnegie Mellon University in Qatar (CMU–Q), and, 

Georgetown University School of Foreign Service in 

Qatar (SFS–Qatar): Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) congratulates Qatar on the occasion of 

3 Qatari-American Friendship Day; 

4 (2) commends Qatar’s progressive vision for the 

5 future; 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

3 

•HRES 396 IH 

1 (3) wishes the Qatari people continued happi2 ness and prosperity; and 

3 (4) renews America’s commitment to Qatar as 

4 a partner in freedom. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
**Exhibit
      10.02**


Jody
      Bilney


**RESTRICTED
        STOCK
        AGREEMENT**
  THIS RESTRICTED STOCK AGREEMENT
  WHEREAS,
  WHEREAS,
  NOW,
        THEREFORE
  Grant
      Vesting
  Purchase Price and Terms Section 8
  Transferability
  Termination of Employment Section
        5 Section 2
  Shareholder Rights and Restrictions
  Jody
          Bilney
  Section 7.  Dividends. All dividends payable on the Restricted Stock
        (whether or not vested) will be payable in cash.
  Taxes
  Securities Law Compliance
      Rights of the Grantee
  Governing Law
  Right to Withhold Amounts Owed to the Company
      OSI
        RESTAURANT PARTNERS, INC.
   /s/
        Joseph J.
        Kadow /s/ A. William Allen, III
   
     ACCEPTANCE
        OF AGREEMENT
              /s/ Jody Bilney  9-7-06


























3
No. 69653.

#### Advance Pet Supply Co. *v.*United States,

protest 64/24880 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of plastic feeders or fountains similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 67011, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: amjbwheeler@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:55:54 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

ASHLEY WHEELER

Plano, TX 75075
From: classyben2000@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:05:56 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Beverly Wiley

Ashland, OH 44805
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1251 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1251

                   For the relief of Nancy B. Wilson.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 26, 2001

Ms. Snowe (for herself and Ms. Collins) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                   For the relief of Nancy B. Wilson.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ENTITLEMENT TO WIDOW'S INSURANCE BENEFITS.

    (a) In General.--For purposes of determining the eligibility of 
Nancy B. Wilson, the wife of Alphonse M. Wilson (social security number 
000-00-9548), to widow's insurance benefits under section 202(e) of the 
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 402(e)), Nancy B. Wilson shall be deemed 
to have been married to Alphonse M. Wilson for a period of not less 
than 9 months immediately prior to the day on which Alphonse M. Wilson 
died.
    (b) Effective Date.--Subsection (a) shall take effect on March 21, 
1991.
    (c) Payment.--Any benefits to which Nancy B. Wilson is entitled for 
the period prior to the date of the enactment of this Act shall be paid 
to her in a lump sum.
                                 <all>
```
No. 68923.

#### Lantoy Sales Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 64/525, etc. (New York).

*323Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of plastic paperweights similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 67488, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: tedsmail@oregonwireless.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:31:52 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ted Harris

Cove, OR 97824