alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER- 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

JON ROYAL FLEMING,

Petitioner,

v.

KEN QUINN,

Respondent.

Case No. C05-5719RJB

ORDER

This 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas corpus relief has been referred to the undersigned

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) and local Rules MJR 3 and 4. Before the court is

petitioner’s motion asking for an immediate telephonic or in person conference. (Dkt. # 13). 

Petitioner argues the case should settle and he should be released from incarceration. 

Plaintiff has the ability to contact counsel in writing and has not shown a telephonic or in

person conference to be necessary. The motion is DENIED.

The clerk is ordered to send copies of this order to the petitioner and counsel for respondent.

DATED this 4th day of January, 2006.

/S/ J. Kelley Arnold

J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cv-05719-RJB Document 16 Filed 01/04/06 Page 1 of 1
From: j-maness@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:55:35 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jessica Maness

Iola, KS 66749
Exhibit 32**Section 1350 Certification**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 (“Section 906”), John D. Kavazanjian and Robert W. Fishback, the President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer and Vice President — Finance and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of UltralifeBatteries, Inc., certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of Ultralife Batteries, Inc.A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to UltralifeBatteries, Inc. and will be retained by Ultralife Batteries, Inc. and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.        Date: August 9, 2007 /s/ John D. Kavazanjian   John D. Kavazanjian   President and Chief Executive Officer      Date: August 9, 2007 /s/ Robert W. Fishback   Robert W. Fishback   Vice President — Finance andChief Financial Officer   
45
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000874690
<NAME> SUN TELEVISION AND APPLIANCES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-27-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,345<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    109,950
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               126,520
<PP&E>                                          80,112
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 225,913
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           65,527
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           174
<OTHER-SE>                                      64,079
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   225,913
<SALES>                                        109,531
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               109,531
<CGS>                                           82,672
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   82,672
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                34,996
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,780
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,917)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,917)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.63)
<FN>
<F1>Trade accounts receivable net allowance for doubtful accounts of $475.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

WILLIAM D. BURKETT,

Petitioner,

v.

MAGGIE MILLER-STOUT,

Respondent.

Case No. C05-5612FDB

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of the Hon. J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge, the remaining record, and there being no objections filed, does

hereby find and Order:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) The petition is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for the reasons set forth in the

Report and Recommendation. Petitioner admits he cannot file a habeas petition as he

is time barred under AEDPA.

(3) The clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Petitioner, counsel for

Respondent, and to the Hon. J. Kelley Arnold.

DATED this 22nd day of November 2005.

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-05612-FDB Document 11 Filed 11/28/05 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|               | (1)                                  | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|          |        |                                                                           |
|          | (2)                                  | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |

|  Date:  January                17, 2007                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |                      |                     | /s/                Dirk A. Montgomery                                           |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                              |                      |      | Dirk                A. Montgomery                                               |
|                                                         |                      |      | Senior                Vice President and Chief Financial                Officer |
From: amyt262@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:53:16 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Amy Tatum

Winter Park, FL 32789
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of the Canistel Acquisition Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2009 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James M. Cassidy
                                 President and Director and
                                 Chief Executivie Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer
Date: April 14, 2010
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 27, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 66508]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21283]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

MORRIS K. UDALL AND STEWART L. UDALL FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Electronic Board of Trustees Meeting to be held via 
email exchanges Wednesday, October 4, 2023, 8:00 a.m. (MST-AZ), through 
Wednesday, October 11, 2023, 4:00 p.m. (MST-AZ).

PLACE: Board of Trustees meeting held via email exchanges.

STATUS: This special meeting of the Board of Trustees, to be held 
Electronically (in accordance with the Operating Procedures of the 
Board of Trustees of the Morris K. Udall and Stewart L. Udall 
Foundation), is open to the public. Members of the public who would 
like to observe this electronic meeting should email David Brown at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e486968b938aa49180858888ca838b92"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4123332e362f013425202d2d6f262e37">[email protected]</span></a> prior to Wednesday, October 4, 2023, 8:00 a.m. (MST-
AZ).

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: (1) Call to Order and Chair's Remarks and (2) 
Board Operating Procedures Revisions (including a resolution regarding 
Amendment of Operating Procedures of the Board of Trustees of the 
Morris K. Udall and Stewart L. Udall Foundation).

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: David P. Brown, Executive 
Director, 434 E. University Blvd., Suite 300, Tucson, AZ, 85705, (520) 
901-8560.

    Dated: September 25, 2023.
David P. Brown
Executive Director, Morris K. Udall and Stewart L. Udall Foundation.
[FR Doc. 2023-21283 Filed 9-25-23; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6820-FN-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DETENTION ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W. D. OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff,

v.

MOISES GALLARDO BARRAGAN,

 Defendant.

Case No. 05-5171M

DETENTION ORDER

THE COURT, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3142, finds that no condition or combination

of conditions which defendant can meet will reasonably assure the appearance of the defendant as required and/or the safety of any

other person and the community.

This finding is based on 1) the nature and circumstances of the offense(s) charged, including whether the offense is a

crime of violence or involves a narcotic drug; 2) the weight of the evidence against the person; 3) the history and characteristics of

the person including those set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)(3)(A)(B); and 4) the nature and seriousness of the danger release would

impose to any person or the community.

Findings of Fact/ Statement of Reasons for Detention

Presumptive Reasons/Unrebutted:

 ( ) Conviction of a Federal offense involving a crime of violence. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(A)

 ( ) Potential maximum sentence of life imprisonment or death. 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(B)

 ( x ) Potential maximum sentence of 10+ years as prescribed in the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C.§801 et seq.), the

Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C.§951 et seq.) Or the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (46

U.S.C. App. 1901 et seq.)

 ( ) Convictions of two or more offenses described in subparagraphs (A) through (C) of 18 U.S.C.§3142(f)(1) of two or more

State or local offenses that would have been offenses described in said subparagraphs if a circumstance giving rise to

Federal jurisdiction had existed, or a combination of such offenses.

Safety Reasons:

 ( ) Defendant is currently on probation/supervision resulting from a prior offense.

 ( ) Defendant was on bond on other charges at time of alleged occurrences herein.

 ( ) Defendant’s prior criminal history.

 ( ) 

Flight Risk/Appearance Reasons:

 (X ) Defendant’s lack of community ties and resources..

 (X ) Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainer.

 ( ) Detainer(s)/Warrant(s) from other jurisdictions.

 ( ) Failures to appear for past court proceedings.

 ( ) Past conviction for escape.

Order of Detention

< The defendant shall be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility

separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal,

without prejudice to review..

< The defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel.

< The defendant shall on order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the Government, be delivered

to a United States marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding.

 September 22, 2005.

s/ J. Kelley Arnold 

J. Kelley Arnold, U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case 3:05-cr-05748-RBL Document 15 Filed 09/22/05 Page 1 of 1
From: cstanley174@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:31:03 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Cheryl Stanley

Boone, NC 28607
From: galfam6@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:20:03 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Anne Galivan

Tallahassee, FL 32312
Before the First Division,

February 28, 1957

No. 60535.

#### Better Houseware Company *v.*United States,

protests 271736-K (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

The protest was dismissed.