alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOTE: Pursuant to Fed. Cir. R. 47.6, this disposition is 

not citable as precedent. It is a public record. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

 

05-3297 

EDWARD K. TAKAKI, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, 

 Respondent. 

 __________________________ 

 DECIDED: July 11, 2006 

 __________________________ 

Before MAYER, LOURIE, and PROST, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM. 

Edward K. Takaki appeals the final decision of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board, affirming his removal from his position of machinist by the Navy. Takaki v. Dep’t 

of the Navy, SF0752050330-I-1 (MSPB May 9, 2005). We affirm. 

This court may only reverse the board’s decision if it was arbitrary, capricious, an 

abuse of discretion, or unlawful; procedurally deficient; or unsupported by substantial 

evidence. See 5 U.S.C. § 7703(c) (2000). The board’s findings that Takaki was unable 

to perform the essential duties of his position, that he failed to prove that he was a 

“qualified” disabled person, that he failed to show his removal resulted from illegal 
discrimination based on perceived disability, and that the agency’s action was

responsibly considered and did not exceed the maximum reasonable action under the 

circumstances is supported by substantial evidence. It is irrelevant that Takaki did 

some recycling work while in the position of Machinist; the relevant finding is that he 

could no longer perform the official duties of that position, his permanent position of 

record. 

05-3297 2
From: kruse.jm@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:55:00 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

John Kruse

Saint Charles, IL 60175
From: angler08@knology.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:54:55 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Robert Dale

Sturgis, SD 57785
EX-10.13



 Exhibit 10.13 

NINTH ADDENDUM 
 TO THE
RESEARCH AND LICENSE AGREEMENT 
 This Ninth Addendum to Research and License Agreement (the “Ninth Addendum”) is made by and between
the Technion Research and Development Foundation Ltd. (“TRDF”) and Eloxx Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (“Licensee” or “Eloxx”). 

Whereas, TRDF and Eloxx are parties to a Research and License Agreement with an effective date of August
29th, 2013 (the “License Agreement”), as amended on November 26th, 2013, January 14th, 2014, June 9th, 2014, August 3rd, 2014, January 21st, 2015”), February 9th 2015, April 29th, 2015, June 2nd, 2015, January 1st, 2016, March 6th, 2016 and June __, 2017 (collectively, the
“Agreement”); and 
 Whereas, according to Section 1.26 to the License Agreement, as amended, all previous Research Periods
have ended and related Research Plans were all completed respectively; 
 Whereas, the parties desire to extend and continue the Research Period and
the Research for a fourth year; and 
 Whereas, the parties desire to continue the relationship contemplated by the Agreement and therefore to
further amend the Agreement as set forth herein; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree as follows: 

 

	1.	Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms used in this Seventh Addendum shall have the meaning assigned thereto in the Agreement. 


 

	2.	The parties wish to extend the Research Period for a fourth year, commencing on May 1st 2017 for twelve (12) months until April 30th, 2018 (“Fourth Research Period”). The extension shall be on the same terms and conditions as contained in the Agreement unless otherwise agreed in this Seventh Addendum.


  

	3.	Exhibit D to the Agreement is hereby replaced with a new Exhibit D attached hereto (“Fourth Research Plan”). 

  

	4.	The parties wish to set the terms for the funding for the performance of the Fourth Research Plan during the Fourth Research Period, and replace section 2.2.1 of the License Agreement, as follows: 


 

	 	a)	Licensee shall fund the Research to be performed during the Fourth Research Period under the Fourth Research Plan in the total amount of fifty thousand US Dollars ($50,000) in accordance with the following schedule:


  

	 	1)	First installment of twenty thousand US Dollars ($25,000) shall be paid upon signing this Ninth Addendum. 

  

	 	2)	Second installment of twenty thousand US Dollars ($25,000) shall be paid upon completion of the Fourth Research Plan and no later than April 30th, 2018.


  

	 	b)	V.A.T as applicable on time of payment shall be added to each installment. 

  

	 	c)	TRDF shall issue a proper invoice for each installment. 









	5.	Except as amended herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 

  

							
	ELOXX PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.	    	THE TECHNION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION LTD.
				
	By:	  	 /s/ Silvia Noiman
	    	By:	  	 /s/ Rita Bruckstein

	Name:	  	Dr. Silvia Noiman, CEO	    	Name:	  	/s/ Rita Bruckstein
	Date:	  	July 16, 2017	    	Date:	  	07-12-2017


  
 2
10.1.3.Addendum C 401(k) Plan




SUNTRUST BANKS, INC. 401(k) PLAN
Amended and Restated January 1, 2012 including amendments 
through December 31, 2012


ADDENDUM C
PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS




		
	1.
	GenSpring Holdings, Inc. (formerly, AMA Holdings, Inc.)


		
	2.
	National Commerce Bank Services, Inc.


		
	3.
	Premium Assignment Corporation


		
	4.
	Prime Performance, Inc.


		
	5.
	STB Management Corporation


		
	6.
	SunTrust Bank


		
	7.
	SunTrust Banks, Inc.


		
	8.
	SunTrust Bank Holding Company


		
	9.
	SunTrust Capital Markets, Inc.


		
	10.
	SunTrust Delaware Trust Company


		
	11.
	SunTrust Community Capital LLC (formerly, SunTrust Community Development Corporation)


		
	12.
	SunTrust Education Financial Services Corporation


		
	13.
	SunTrust Insurance Company


		
	14.
	SunTrust Insurance Services, Inc.


		
	15.
	SunTrust Investment Services, Inc.


		
	16.
	SunTrust Leasing Corporation


		
	17.
	SunTrust Mortgage, Inc.


		
	18.
	SunTrust Procurement Services, L.L.C.


		
	19.
	Teton Trust Company


		
	20.
	Transom Development, Inc.


		
	21.
	Ridgeworth Capital Management, Inc. (formerly, Trusco Capital Management, Inc.)





*In addition, 80% or more owned entities of a company listed are also eligible when they have Eligible Employees unless otherwise excluded in accordance with the terms of the Plan document.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel International Research in Infectious Diseases (R01 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).                    

*Date:*                         November 30-December 1, 2023.                    

*Time:*                         9:30 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3E70A, Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Soheyla Saadi, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3E70A, Rockville, MD 20852, 301-435-0903,                         *saadisoh@niaid.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

      ( print page 67326)    
Dated: September 25, 2023.

Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-21362 Filed 9-28-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### DEC 21 2000 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
GAYLEN MERIWETHER, co-trustee for the Faris William Gore Living Irrevocable Trust,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. KENNETH S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant-Appellee. No. 99-3361 (D.C. No. 98-CV-2172-KHV)

(D. Kan.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before TACHA , EBEL , and BRISCOE , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously to grant the parties’ request for a dec ision on the briefs without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The c ase is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.-2-

Appellant Gaylen Meriwether’s father, Faris Gore, d isappeared on July 2, 1987. The Social Security Administration continuedto send benefit checks to Mr. Gore’s address for several years after his disappearance. Ms. Meriwether, as the co-trustee of her father’s property, received the checks and arranged for them to be deposited in a bank account. Upon learning o f Mr. Gore’s disappearance, the Commissioner instituted proceedings to recover over $55,000 in retirement benefits. The ALJ determined that the date of Mr. Gore’s disappearance was also most likely the date of his death. The district co urt affirmed that conclusion. Ms. Meriwether appeals, and we affirm. The sole issue on appeal is whether the district co urt was correct in agreeing with the Commissioner’s conclusion that Mr . Gore’s date of death was July 2, 1987. Our review on appeal is limited to d etermining whether substantial evidence supports the decision of the Commissioner and whether the proper legal standards were applied. Clifton v. Chater , 79 F.3d 1007, 1009 (10th Cir. 1996). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the app licable law, and the record in this case and affirm for substantially the reasons stated by the district court.-3-

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Entered for the Court

Mary Beck Briscoe Circuit Judge
From: prhorton48@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:43:17 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ron Horton

Fort Worth, TX 76179
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7229

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CORWIN TYRELL WOODSON, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CR-94-79, CA-99-213-3) Submitted: January 26, 2001 Decided: February 7, 2001 Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Corwin Tyrell Woodson, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Hannah Lauck, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Corwin Tyrell Woodson seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000), and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we deny Woodson’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Woodson , Nos. CR-94-79; CA-99-213-3 (E.D.N.C. June 27 & Aug. 7, 2000). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
From: david@jacobsonplastics.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:34:19 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

David Gates

San Pedro, CA 90731
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Xun Energy Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended May 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



3.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:   September 13, 2012



By: /s/ Jerry G. Mikolajczyk

Jerry G. Mikolajczyk

Chief Financial Officer
|   |      (1)     The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;    and |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |      (2)     The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      November 15, 2010 |        |                               |
|------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------|
|                         |   |                               |   |
|                              | By:    | /s/ John      Shearer         |   |
|                         |   | John      Shearer                  |   |
|                         |   | Chief      Executive Officer       |   |
|                         |   | (Principal      Executive Officer) |   |

----