alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Before the First Division,

November, 6, 1968

No. P68/475.

protests 58/7821, etc. (Philadelphia).

No. P68/476.

protests 61/6561, etc. (Philadelphia).

No. P68/477.

protests 62/11969, etc. (Philadelphia).

#### Morris Friedman et al. *v.*United States, Morris Friedman et al. *v.*United States, Morris Friedman *v.*United States,

Watson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consists of bags or baskets in chief value of rush similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Carson M. Simon & Co.*v. *United States*(55 Cust. Ct. 103, C.D. 2558) and that the items of merchandise marked “B” consist of maize or com husk baskets similar in all material respects to those the subject of C.D. 2558, *supra,*and *Morris Friedman*v. *United States*(58 Cust. Ct. 456, C.D. 3019), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                     1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                Jan-31-1999                   
<PERIOD-START>                   Feb-01-1998                
<PERIOD-END>                     Apr-30-1998                
<CASH>                           4,667,626                  
<SECURITIES>                     2,011,788                  
<RECEIVABLES>                    1,250,424                  
<ALLOWANCES>                     0                          
<INVENTORY>                      1,405,891                  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 442,249                    
<PP&E>                           3,062,465                  
<DEPRECIATION>                   2,217,873                  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   11,089,689                 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            1,242,266                  
<BONDS>                          0                          
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>            0                          
<PREFERRED>                      0                          
<COMMON>                         4,891                      
<OTHER-SE>                       10,308,230                 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     9,623,175                   
<SALES>                          1,707,658                 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 1,707,658                 
<CGS>                            546,757                   
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    546,757                   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 421,818                   
<LOSS-PROVISION>                 0                         
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               1,643                     
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  368,623                   
<INCOME-TAX>                     136,100                   
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              228,623                   
<DISCONTINUED>                   0                         
<EXTRAORDINARY>                  0                         
<CHANGES>                        0                         
<NET-INCOME>                     228,623                   
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    0.05                      
<EPS-DILUTED>                    0.05                      
                                              
                                 

</TABLE>
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 635 

Recognizing the commencement of Ramadan, the Islamic holy month of fasting and spiritual renewal, and commending Muslims in the United States 

and throughout the world for their faith. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 5, 2007 

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas (for herself, Mr. MEEKS of New 

York, and Mr. ELLISON) submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the commencement of Ramadan, the Islamic 

holy month of fasting and spiritual renewal, and commending Muslims in the United States and throughout 

the world for their faith. 

Whereas since the terrorist attacks on the United States on 

September 11, 2001, threats and incidents of violence 

have been directed at law-abiding, patriotic Americans of 

African, Arab, and South Asian descent, particularly 

members of the Islamic faith; 

Whereas, on September 14, 2001, the House of Representatives passed a concurrent resolution condemning bigotry 

and violence against Arab-Americans, American Muslims, 

and Americans from South Asia in the wake of the terrorist attacks; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 635 IH 

Whereas it is estimated that there are approximately 

1,500,000,000 Muslims worldwide; 

Whereas Ramadan is the holy month of fasting and spiritual 

renewal for Muslims worldwide, and is the 9th month of 

the Muslim calendar year; and 

Whereas the observance of the Islamic holy month of Ramadan commences at dusk on September 13, 2007, and continues for one lunar month: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That— 

2 (1) during this time of conflict, in order to 

3 demonstrate solidarity with and support for mem4 bers of the community of Islam in the United States 

5 and throughout the world, the House of Representa6 tives recognizes the Islamic faith as one of the great 

7 religions of the world; and 

8 (2) in observance of and out of respect for the 

9 commencement of Ramadan, the Islamic holy month 

10 of fasting and spiritual renewal, the House of Rep11 resentatives acknowledges the onset of Ramadan and 

12 expresses its deepest respect to Muslims in the 

13 United States and throughout the world on this sig14 nificant occasion. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Chris T. Sullivan, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
of Outback Steakhouse, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period
         ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") which this certification
         accompanies fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
         and

         (2) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

/s/ Chris T. Sullivan
--------------------------
Chris T. Sullivan
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
May 15, 2003

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company, and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Before the First Division,

December 4, 1968

No. P68/504.

protests 62/690, etc. (Honolulu).

#### Arthur J. Fritz & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Watson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of wooden doors similar in all material respects to those the subject of *B. A. McKenzie & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(58 Cust. Ct. 460, C.D. 3020), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: mary9felix@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:59:07 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mary Rijos

Stamford, NY 12167
H. Res. 344 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

May 1, 2007. 

Whereas charter schools deliver high-quality education and 

challenge our students to reach their potential; 

Whereas charter schools provide thousands of families with 

diverse and innovative educational options for their children; 

Whereas charter schools are public schools authorized by a 

designated public entity that are responding to the needs 

of our communities, families, and students and promoting 

the principles of quality, choice, and innovation; 

Whereas in exchange for the flexibility and autonomy given 

to charter schools, they are held accountable by their 

sponsors for improving student achievement and for their 

financial and other operations; 

Whereas 40 States and the District of Columbia have passed 

laws authorizing charter schools; 

Whereas charter schools improve their students’ achievement 

and stimulate improvement in traditional public schools; 

Whereas charter schools must meet the student achievement 

accountability requirements under the Elementary and 

Secondary Education Act of 1965 in the same manner as 

traditional public schools, and often set higher and addi-
2 

•HRES 344 EH 

tional individual goals to ensure that they are of high 

quality and truly accountable to the public; 

Whereas charter schools give parents new freedom to choose 

their public school, routinely measure parental satisfaction levels, and must prove their ongoing success to parents, policymakers, and their communities; 

Whereas charter schools nationwide serve a higher percentage 

of low-income and minority students than the traditional 

public system; 

Whereas charter schools have enjoyed broad bipartisan support from the Administration, Congress, State Governors 

and legislatures, educators, and parents across the 

United States; and 

Whereas the eighth annual National Charter Schools Week, 

to be held April 29 through May 5, 2007, is an event 

sponsored by charter schools and grassroots charter 

school organizations across the United States to recognize the significant impacts, achievements, and innovations of charter schools: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) acknowledges and commends charter schools 

and their students, parents, teachers, and administrators 

across the United States for their ongoing contributions 

to education and improving and strengthening our public 

school system; 

(2) supports the eighth annual National Charter 

Schools Week; and 

(3) joins the President in calling on the people of 

the United States to conduct appropriate programs, 
3 

•HRES 344 EH 

ceremonies, and activities to demonstrate support for 

charter schools during this weeklong celebration in communities throughout the United States. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lamont Lee NELSON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-10106

Non-Argument Calendar.

D.C. Docket No. 04-00184-CR-J-25-MMH.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Aug. 26, 2005.

Susan H. Raab, Jacksonville, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

James H. Burke, Jr., Federal Public Defender, Jacksonville, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BIRCH, BARKETT and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Lamont Lee Nelson appeals his conviction for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g) and 924(e). For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

I.

On May 28, 2004, Nelson was found in Florida in possession of a firearm. Subsequently, Nelson was indicted for being a previously convicted felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g) and 924(e).1 At the trial, Nelson stipulated that he had been convicted of a felony for purposes of that element of the offense. Additionally, ATF agent Nichlos Cheremeta testified that the firearm was manufactured in Massachusetts. The jury found Nelson guilty, and the court sentenced him to the mandatory minimum sentence of 180 months’ imprisonment, to be followed by three years supervised release. This appeal followed.

II.

On appeal, Nelson argues for the first time that § 922(g) is facially invalid because Congress failed to define commerce as “interstate or foreign commerce” and is otherwise unconstitutional because Congress exceeded its commerce clause power in enacting the statute by failing to require that the possession of the firearm substantially affect interstate commerce.

Although generally a constitutional challenge is subject to *de novo*review, when a defendant fails to raise the objection before the district court, we review for plain error. *United States v. Walker,*59 F.3d 1196, 1198 (11th Cir.1995); *see also United States v. Hall,*314 F.3d 565, 566 (11th Cir.2002). “Plain error occurs where (1) there is an error; (2) that is plain or obvious; (3) affecting the defendant’s substantial rights in that it was prejudicial and not harmless; and (4) that seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of the judicial proceedings.” *Hall,*314 F.3d at 566.

As Nelson concedes, we have consistently upheld the constitutionality of § 922(g) against the challenges that Nelson raises on appeal.2
      *See, e.g., United States v.*
      *911
      *Peters,*403 F.3d 1263, 1277 (11th Cir.2005); *United States v. Nichols,*124 F.3d 1265, 1266 (11th Cir.1997); *United States v. McAllister,*77 F.3d 387, 389-90 (11th Cir.1996). Accordingly, Nelson cannot establish any error and we AFFIRM his conviction.

AFFIRMED.

. The indictment listed four prior convictions. Nelson did not challenge the indictment.

*.*Here, the interstate nexus was established by the ATF agent’s testimony that the gun was *911manufactured in Massachusetts and found in Florida.
#### In the Matter of Jennifer L. and Others, Children Alleged to be Abused. Weimin L., Appellant; Commissioner of Social Services, Respondent, et al., Respondent.

[633 NYS2d 8]

—Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Mary Bednar, J.), entered September 22, 1994, which placed respondent-appellant’s children with the Commissioner of Social Services for up to 12 months, following a fact-finding determination that, *inter alia,*respondent father had sexually abused his daughter, Jennifer L., and that respondent-appellant knew or should have known of the abuse and failed to protect the child, and that, as a result, the other children were derivatively abused, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The seven-year-old victim’s consistent out-of-court statements that appellant knew that her father had forced her to masturbate him, had beaten the child when appellant discov*326ered the abuse, and would beat her for reporting the abuse to outsiders, were corroborated by the out-of-court statements of her sister *(Matter of Latasha M.,*205 AD2d 457), by the testimony of a detective that when she paid a surprise visit to the home during the hours following the father’s arrest, she observed that Jennifer had many fresh bruises over her body, and by appellant’s incredible explanation thereof. Concur— Kupferman, J. P., Asch, Williams and Tom, JJ.
From: wlwwqh@att.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:50:38 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Wilbur Wood

Gainesville, FL 32606
From: rlpenney@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:27:29 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Russell Penney

Whitney, TX 76692
----

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Mediware. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  Dated: May 12, 2009 | /s/ T. Kelly Mann                                   |   |
|---------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                      |  T. Kelly Mann Chief Executive Officer    |   |
|                      |                                                |   |
| Dated: May 12, 2009       | /s/ Mark B. Williams                                |   |
|                      |  Mark B. Williams Chief Financial Officer |   |

----
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE00613A5

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.