alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: cclandaiche@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:26:00 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

carol Landaiche

, 30290-2553
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTIONS FOR DEFAULT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

_______________________________________)

JERRY A. BRENDEN, )

) Case No. C05-1681L

Plaintiff, ) 

v. )

) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

SELLEN CONSTRUCTION, INC., ) MOTIONS FOR DEFAULT

)

Defendant. ) 

_______________________________________)

This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff’s “Motion: Default of, Request for

Admission of Papers Attached” and “Motion: Default of: No. 05-35606, November 30, 2005.” 

Dkt. # 27. In the first motion, plaintiff asserts that he sent something to defendant on November

28, 2005, and seeks confirmation that “this was done in the time frame of the 21 days to

prosecute.” In the second motion, plaintiff requests the production of certain medical records

from defendant and asks the Court to “hold previous decision” regarding two prior litigations in

which plaintiff was involved. 

Neither of these documents sets forth any set of facts which would support the

entry of default against defendant. In fact, defendant answered the complaint on December 30,

2005. With regards to the first motion, plaintiff does not explain what was served on defendant

on November 30, 2005, or the genesis of the “21 days to prosecute” mentioned three times in the

one-page motion. That motion is therefore DENIED.

As to the second motion, plaintiff’s request for production should be addressed to

Case 2:05-cv-01681-RSL Document 31 Filed 02/06/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTIONS FOR DEFAULT -2-

defendant, not the Court. Unless a response has already been made, defendant shall respond to

this request for medical records within thirty days from the date of this Order, as set forth in

Fed. Civ. R. Pro. 34(b). To the extent plaintiff is seeking an immediate trial of this matter

and/or a change of venue, those requests are DENIED.

DATED this 6th day of February, 2006.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-01681-RSL Document 31 Filed 02/06/06 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1
2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 1800            1177 Avenue of the Americas
Dallas, TX 75201-2997                   New York, NY 10036
Telephone 214 754 7900                  Telephone 212 596 7000
Facsimile 214 754 7929                  Facsimile 212 596 8959

1201 Louisiana, Suite 2900              400 South Hope Street
Houston, TX 77002-5678                  Los Angeles, CA 90071-2889
Telephone 713 654 4100                  Telephone 213 236 3000
Facsimile 713 750 6000                  Facsimile 213 452 7910


BTS LLC
A subsidiary of Price Waterhouse LLP


June 17, 1997

Sun Television and Appliances, Inc.         Sun Television and Appliances, Inc.
c/o Mr. Paul Bauer                          c/o Mr. Brady Churches
182 Roxbury Park                            1677 Taylor Corner Circle
East Amherst, NY 14501                      Blacklick, OH 43004

Sun Television and Appliances, Inc.
c/o Mr. Thomas Epstein
229 Upper Mountain Ave.
Upper Montclair, NJ 07043


To the Executive Committee of the Board of Directors:

This letter will amend paragraph VI of the Agreement between Sun Television and
Appliances, Inc. ("SNTV" or the "Company") and BTS, LLC ("BTS"), a subsidiary
of Price Waterhouse LLP, as set forth in a letter agreement dated February 11,
1997 (the "Agreement").

From and after June 17, 1997, BTS will endeavor not to bill the Company for
time expended by BTS employees (other than R. Carter Pate) in the day-to-day
operation of the Company's business in an aggregate amount in excess of $10,000
per week, plus their reasonable out-of-pocket (including out-of-town living)
expenses. However, the Company will pay BTS for time expended by such employees
in connection with the day-to-day operation of the Company's business in an
aggregate amount not to exceed $12,000, plus their reasonable out-of-pocket
(including out-of-town living) expenses.

In addition, the Company will pay BTS for time expended by BTS employees (other
than R. Carter Pate) and outside consultants engaged by BTS at standard hourly
rates on special projects that have received prior written approval from the
Company's Board of Directors ("Special Projects"), including the current
Special Projects involving the proposed 10 Store expansion and the solicitation
and closing of new financing arrangements.

Mr. Pate will continue to be compensated for his services at the hourly rate of
$350 as provided in paragraph IX of the Agreement.

Sincerely,

BTS, LLC
a Subsidiary of Price Waterhouse LLP


By: /s/ R. Carter Pate 
    -----------------------------------
    R. Carter Pate (not individually)


SUN TELEVISION AND APPLIANCES, INC.


By: /s/ Paul D. Bauer
    -----------------------------------

Its: Director
     ----------------------------------

Date: 7/7/97
      ---------------------------------
Exhibit 4.6








THE FIRST BANCORP, INC., ISSUER


and


[              ],


TRUSTEE





INDENTURE


Dated as of [         ], 201[ ]





Senior Debt Securities
From: momperrin@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:11:02 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Maryellen Perrin

Arroyo Grande, CA 93420
|               | (1)                                  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|          |        |                                                                              |
|          | (2)                                  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the dates and periods covered by the Report. |

|  Date: November 12, 2010                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |                      |                     | /s/ Dirk A. Montgomery                            |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                                                              |                      |      | Dirk A. Montgomery                                |
|                                                         |                      |      | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
From: merriel46@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:54:02 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Merriel Blyler

Flemington, NJ 08822
From: bkerns84@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:37:24 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Barbara Kerns

Midlothian, VA 23112
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

ORDER RE: NINTH CIRCUIT MANDATE- 1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

In re: RICHARD ROY SCOTT

CASE NO. MC05-5029 MJP

ORDER RE: NINTH CIRCUIT 

MANDATE

On December 22, 2015, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued a mandate in 

Case No. 14-35501, effectuating an order from earlier in the year reversing this Court’s decision 

to deny Mr. Scott IFP status in regards to a complaint he had filed. (See Dkt. No. 142-1, Richard 

Roy Scott v. Mark Strong.)

In light of that order, the Court rules as follows: 

IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall open a new civil case, Richard Roy 

Scott v. Mark Strong, and shall file in that docket both the original complaint (Dkt. No. 142-1) 

and the amended complaint (Dkt. No. 150) which Mr. Scott filed upon receipt of the Ninth 

Circuit’s order.

Case 3:05-mc-05029-MJP Document 153 Filed 01/12/16 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

ORDER RE: NINTH CIRCUIT MANDATE- 2 

Marsha J. Pechman

United States Chief District Judge

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Scott’s request to be permitted to proceed in forma 

pauperis in the above-mentioned matter is GRANTED.

The clerk is ordered to provide copies of this order to all counsel. 

Dated this 12th day of January, 2016. 

 

 

 

 

A

Case 3:05-mc-05029-MJP Document 153 Filed 01/12/16 Page 2 of 2
EX-10.3



 Exhibit 10.3 

SECOND AMENDMENT 
 TO
THE RESEARCH AND LICENSE AGREEMENT 
 This Second Amendment to Research and License Agreement (the “Second Amendment”) is made by and
between The Technion Research & Development Foundation Ltd (“TRDF”) and Eloxx Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (“Licensee” or “Eloxx”). 

WHEREAS, TRDF and Eloxx are parties to Research and License Agreement with an effective date of August 29th 2013 (the “Agreement”), as amended by the First Amendment to Research and License Agreement, dated November 26, 2013; and 

WHEREAS, the parties desire to continue the relationship contemplated by the Agreement and therefore to further amend the Agreement as set
forth herein; 
 Now, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree as follows; 

 

	1.	Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms used in this Second Amendment shall have the meanings assigned thereto in the Agreement. 


 

	2.	Subject to the full execution of this Second Amendment, TRDF and Eloxx agree to further amend the Agreement as set forth herein. 

  

	3.	Exhibit D to the Agreement is hereby replaced with Exhibit D attached hereto. 

  

	4.	The Parties wish to amend section 2.2.1 (Funding) as follows: 

  

	 	4.1	Licensee shall fund the Research to be performed during the first year of the Research Period in the total amount of eighty thousand US dollars ($80,000) (“First Year Research Budget”). The Research
shall commence on October 1st 2013 for 12 months until September 30th 2014. 


 

	 	4.2	Licensee shall pay the First Year Research Budget in the following schedule: 

  

	 	4.2.1	First installment of thirty thousand US dollars ($30,000) shall be paid upon signing this Second Amendment. 

  

	 	4.2.2	Second installment of thirty thousand US dollars ($30,000) shall be paid no later than March 30th, 2014, 

  

	 	4.2.3	Third installment of thirty thousand US dollars ($20,000) shall be paid no later than September 30th, 2014. 

  

	 	4.3	VAT as applicable on time of payment, shall be added to each installment. TRDF shall issue a proper invoice for each installment. 

  

	 	4.4	TRDF shall issue a proper invoice for each installment. 

  

	5.	Except as amended herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, specifically to the Research as shall be conducted in the coming years. 








 Confidential 
  

	6.	This Second Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. Any signature page delivered by facsimile or
electronic image transmission shall be binding to the same extent as an original signature page. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereby
accept and agree to the terms and conditions of this Second Amendment. 
  

											
	Eloxx Pharmaceuticals Ltd.	 		 	 THE TECHNION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION
LTD.



											
						
	By:	 	 /s/ Silvia Noiman
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Rita Bruckstein
	 	
	Name: Silvia Noiman	 		 	Name: Rita Bruckstein	 	
	Title: Chairman	 		 	Title: Research Authority Director	 	
	Date: 1/14/2013	 		 	Date: 12/30/2013
From: Ga_Geologist@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:46:17 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Bill Rivers

Warthen, GA 31094