alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: trudy5050@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:20:17 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Gertrude Roelofs

Ada, MI 49301
H. Res. 477 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 25, 2007. 

Whereas the President of the United States has issued a 

proclamation designating the month of June 2007 as National Homeownership Month; 

Whereas the national homeownership rate in the United 

States has reached a record high of almost 70 percent 

and more than half of all minority families are homeowners; 

Whereas the people of the United States are one of the besthoused populations in the world; 

Whereas owning a home is a fundamental part of the American dream and is the largest personal investment many 

families will ever make; 

Whereas homeownership provides economic security for homeowners by aiding them in building wealth over time and 

strengthens communities through a greater stake among 

homeowners in local schools, civic organizations, and 

churches; 

Whereas creating affordable homeownership opportunities requires the commitment and cooperation of the private, 

public, and nonprofit sectors, including the Federal Government and State and local governments; and 
2 

•HRES 477 EH 

Whereas the current laws of the United States, such as the 

American Dream Downpayment Act, encourage homeownership and should continue to do so in the future: 

Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) fully supports the goals and ideals of National 

Homeownership Month; and 

(2) recognizes the importance of homeownership in 

building strong communities and families. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Order entered April 20, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00110-CV

ANGELA NICHOLSON, Appellant

V.

WAL-MART STORES TEXAS, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-14576

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s April 16, 2021 motion for an extension of 

time to file her brief on the merits. We GRANT the motion. We ORDER the 

brief tendered to this Court by appellant on April 16, 2021 filed as of the date of 

this order.

Also before the Court is appellant’s April 16, 2021 motion to supplement the 

clerk’s record. We GRANT the motion. We ORDER Dallas County District 

Clerk Felicia Pitre to file, within ten days of the date of this order, a supplemental 
clerk’s record containing Exhibit A of Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant Wal-Mart 

Stores Texas, LLC’s Traditional and No Evidence Motion for Summary Judgment.

We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. 

Pitre and all parties.

/s/ CRAIG SMITH

JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 27, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 66468]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20988]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4492-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2023-0001]


South Carolina; Amendment No. 9 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of South Carolina (FEMA-4492-DR), dated March 27, 2020, 
and related determinations.

DATES: This change occurred on June 29, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Robert D. 
Samaan, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer 
for this disaster.
    This action terminates the appointment of Gracia B. Szczech as 
Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2023-20988 Filed 9-26-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
|  Property Name                     |   | State Organization |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|--------------------|
| Lightstone Value Plus REIT II, LP       |   | Delaware           |
| LVP Metairie, LLC                       |   | Delaware           |
| LVP Metairie Holding Corp.              |   | Delaware           |
| LVP Metairie JV, LLC                    |   | Delaware           |
| LVP CP Boston, LLC                      |   | Delaware           |
| LVP CP Boston Holding Corp.             |   | Delaware           |
| LVP CP Boston Holdings, LLC             |   | Delaware           |
| LVP East Rutherford LLC            |   | Delaware      |
| LVP East Rutherford Holding Corp.  |   | Delaware      |

----
From: slfox@wwdb.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:38:06 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge--no, DEMAND--in

the strongest way possible that you reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from

the list of mandatory preventive services.

Sincerely,

Susan Fox

Apache Junction, AZ 85119
SCWC-13-0000424

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

IN THE MATTER OF THE TAX APPEAL OF BOBBY R. NARMORE,

Petitioner/Appellant-Appellant,

vs.

DIRECTOR OF TAXATION, STATE OF HAWAI#I,

Respondent/Appellee-Appellee.

 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-13-0000424; CASE NO. 02-0065)

ORDER REJECTING PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)

The petition for writ of certiorari, filed on December

9, 2013, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, January 14, 2014.

Bobby R. Narmore, 

petitioner pro se 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-13-0000424

14-JAN-2014

07:50 AM
From: sudolabro@q.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:47:45 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Susy Hale

Aurora, CO 80011
From: Dslivingston77@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:56:35 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

David Livingston

Lake Ozark, MO 65049
### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

YAHMII BALOGUNUHURU, Plaintiff,
v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, etal., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 09-0566 (RJL)



## --------------------------) ORDER Forthe reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that defendants' motion for summaryjudgment [Dkt. #22] is GRANTED; and it is FURTHERORDERED that JUDGMENT shall be entered for defendants. This is a final appealable Order. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a). SO ORDERED.
From: Eileen DeAngellis

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:35:13 PM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Eileen DeAngellis
So Hamilton, Massachusetts
6/3/2016 TDCJ Offender Details 

### Texas Department of Criminal Justice TDCJ Home New Offender Search 

# Offender Information Details 

# %L$1"I'*

Return to Search list
05348668 SID Number: TDCJ Number: 01771771 Name: 

### JACKSON.DOUGLAS MARSHALL Race: B Gender: M DOB: 1976-06-17 

# RECEIVED-IN CnilftTOFCRIMINALAPff Maximum Sentence Date: 

### Current Facility: 2046-11-04 POLUNSKY 

# JUNO3 2016 Projected Release Date: 2046-11-04 

## Afe©!AG0Sta,G6@rt Parole Eligibility Date: 2020-08-04 

### Offender Visitation Eligible: NO 

### The offenderis temporarily ineligible forvisitation. Please call the offender's unit forany additional information. 

### The visitation information is updated once daily during weekdays and multiple times per day on visitation days.

SPECIAL INFORMATION FOR SCHEDULED RELEASE: Scheduled Release Date: 

### Scheduled Release Type: Scheduled Release Location: 

# Parole ReviewInformation Offense History: Offense

Date Offense Sentence Date Offender is not scheduled for release at this time. Will be determined when release date is scheduled. Will be determined when release date is scheduled.



### County Case No. Sentence (YY-MM-DD) 1993-08-07 BURHVEH 1998-03-30 DALLAS F-9337820-UW 2-00-00 https://offender.tdcj.texas.gov/OffenderSearch/offenderDetail.action?sid=05348668 1/26/3/2016 TDCJ Offender Details 1998-10-15 BURG OF BLDG 1998-12-16 DALLAS F-9853743 270 Days 2000-09-05 UUMV 2001-04-18 DALLAS F-005329-NJ 270 Days 2004-09-21 BURG HABIT 2007-03-16 DALLAS F-0418319-l 2-00-00 2004-09-20 BURG HABIT 2007-03-16 DALLAS F-0473644-I 2-00-00 

# | 2011-08-17 BURG HABIT 2012-02-23 DALLAS F-1114835-U 35-00-00

Return to Search list



### The Texas Department ofCriminalJustice updates this information regularly to ensure that it is complete and accurate, howeverthis informationcan change quickly. Therefore, the information on this site maynot reflect the true current location, status, scheduled termination date, or other information regarding an offender. 

## For questions and comments, you may contact the Texas Department of CriminalJustice, at (936) 295-6371 or webadmint&tdci.texas.gov. This information is made available to the public and law 

### enforcementin the interest ofpublic safety. Any unauthorized use ofthis information is forbidden and subject to criminal prosecution.
New Offender Search TDCJ Home Page

https-.//offender.tdcj.texas.gov/OffenderSearch/offenderDetaiI.action?si d=05348668 2/2
No. P69/101.

protest 67/27528 (Los Angeles).

#### Novelty Import Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of wire poodle dogs similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Novelty Import*Co., *Inc.*v. *United States*(60 Cust. Ct. 574, C.D. 3462), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 67501.

#### Agency Tile Supply Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 58/9774, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cylinder, enamel, or opal glass tiles and tiling, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 60199.

petition 7150-R (Honolulu, T. H.).

#### Motoshige Shoten, Ltd. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

The petition was dismissed.
Before the First Division,

October 16, 1962

No. 67123.

protests 59/14915, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### E. W. Bruno, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *Falcon Sales Company*and *J. J. Murphy & Co.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 129, C.D. 2292), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
----

**EXHIBIT      32.1**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Mediware. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  Dated:                February 6, 2007 | /s/                  James F. Burgess         |
|----------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|                                         | James                F. Burgess                         |
|                                         | Chief                Executive Officer                  |
|                                         |                                                    |
| Dated:                February 6, 2007       | /s/   Mark                B. Williams    |
|                                         |     Mark                B. Williams |
|                                         | Chief                Financial Officer                  |

----