alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

ORDER FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT

NO. C05-5608 

WEBB LAW FIRM

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

225 106TH AVENUE NORTH EAST

BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98004

TEL. 425.454.3800

THE HONORABLE JUDGE RONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

CHRISTINE STEPHENS,

Plaintiff,

vs.

DONOBI, INC., a Washington Corporation,

and DONOBI, INC., a Nevada Corporation

aka GOTAPLAY INTERACTIVE, INC. a

Nevada Corporation,

Defendants.

NO. C05-5608 (RBL)

ORDER FOR ENTRY

OF CONFESSED JUDGMENT 

AGAINST GOTAPLAY INTERACTIVE,

INC.

This matter having come on for consideration by motion of Christine Stephens for

entry of Judgment confessed by DONOBI, INC., a Washington Corporation and

DONOBI, INC., a Nevada Corporation now also known as Gotaplay Interactive, Inc. a

Case 3:05-cv-05608-RBL Document 36 Filed 06/20/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

ORDER FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT

NO. C05-5608 

WEBB LAW FIRM

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

225 106TH AVENUE NORTH EAST

BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98004

TEL. 425.454.3800

Nevada corporation in favor of Christine Stephens in the principal amount of

$200,000.00. The court having considered the matter, related submissions and the

Declaration of Gordon C. Webb, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is

hereby 

ORDERED that Judgment is hereby entered against DONOBI, INC., a

Washington Corporation, DONOBI, INC., a Nevada Corporation and GOTAPLAY

INTERACTIVE, INC., a Nevada corporation in the principal amount of $200,000.00 in

favor of Christine Stephens. The Clerk of the Court is directed to file the confessed

Judgment via ECF. 

DONE this 20th day of June, 2008.

A

RONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Presented By:

 s/GORDON WEBB

By______________________________

GORDON WEBB, WSBA #22777

JAMES B. PARSONS, WSBA #12539

Case 3:05-cv-05608-RBL Document 36 Filed 06/20/08 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit
      32.2**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Sunrise Energy
      Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Roman Livson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
      Report
      fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:
      November 7, 2006


By:
            /s/
                Roman LivsonRoman
                LivsonChief
                Financial Officer
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.11.1


FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED SUPPLY AGREEMENT




THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED SUPPLY AGREEMENT (this "Amendment"), is made as of August 26, 2008 by and between DSW Inc. an Ohio corporation with a business address of810 DSW Drive, Columbus, Ohio 43219 ("Supplier"), and Stein Mart, Inc., a Florida corporation with a business address of 1200 Riverplace Boulevard, Jacksonville, Florida 32207 ("Stein Mart").


Background


A.Supplier and Stein Mart entered into an amended and restated Supply Agreement, dated as of May 30, 2006, (the "Agreement"), whereby Supplier agreed to supply Merchandise to Stein Mart.


B.Supplier and Stein Mart desire to amend the Agreement on the terms set forth in this Amendment.


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements contained in this Amendment, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto, each intending to be legally bound, agree as follows:


1.Definitions. Defined terms used in this Amendment shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Agreement.


2.Term. Section 7.1 shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following in lieu thereof:


7.1 Basic Term and Renewals. The term of this Agreement shall commence on May 30, 2006 and shall continue until December 31, 2012 (the "Initial Term"). Upon the expiration of the Initial Term, this Agreement shall automatically be extended for additional periods of three (3) years each (each such period shall be referred to as a "renewal period") unless either party gives the other written notice of its intent not to renew the Agreement at least one hundred and eighty (180) days prior to the expiration of the Initial Term or applicable renewal period.


3.Agreement in Effect. Except as set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


4.Controlling Law. This Amendment and all questions relating to its validity, interpretation, performance and enforcement (including, without limitation, provisions concerning limitations of actions), shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed and delivered this Amendment by their duly authorized officers as of the date first above written.




DSW INC.


By:____________________
Title:___________________


STEIN MART, INC.


 By:_____________________
 Title:_____________________
From: marknbj@q.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:05:03 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Billie Jo Nelson

Baker City, OR 97814
[Major League Baseball Players Association Letterhead]



                                                               February 7, 1996


Mr. Daun Kauffman
Director of Sports Marketing
Fleer/Skybox International
Executive Plaza
1120 Route 73
Mt Laurel, NJ 08054

Dear Daun:

         This letter will confirm our agreement to amend Schedule B of the
License Agreement with the Major League Baseball Players Association, dated
December 22, 1994, as follows:

         Effective immediately, the Licensed Territory will include China and
Taiwan.

         All other terms and conditions of the License Agreement including all
Schedules and Addenda shall remain in full force and effect.

         Sales of Licensed Product in this additional territory shall not
commence until this amendment is fully executed.

         Please sign in the appropriate space below indicating your agreement
with the foregoing.

                                                     Sincerely,

                                                     /s/ Jennifer Cooney
                                                     ----------------------
                                                     Jennifer Cooney

MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL                                FLEER CORP.
PLAYERS ASSOCIATION


/s/ Donald Fehr                             /s/ Daun Kauffman
------------------------------              ----------------------------
Donald M. Fehr                              Daun Kauffman
Executive Director                          Director of Sports Marketing
From: jeflone@att.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:55:20 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Julio Figueroa

San Antonio, TX 78259
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

Order THOMAS A. CENA, JR.

Attorney at Law

2115 North 30th, Suite 201

Tacoma, WA 98403

(253) 572-5120 Fax: (253) 593-4503

E-MAIL: TomC55@nventure.com

JUDGE RONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, ) NO. CR05-5747RBL

)

vs. ) ORDER 

)

STACY CHARLES COMER, ) 

)

Defendant. )

____________________________________)

THIS MATTER having come on regularly before the above-entitled Court upon the Motion

of the Defendant, STACY CHARLES COMER, for production of trial testimony transcripts prior to

sentencing, the Court having considered the Motion, the files and records of this proceeding and the

declaration of counsel for Defendant, and the Court being fully advised, now, therefore, it is hereby

Case 3:05-cr-05747-RBL Document 166 Filed 10/26/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

Order THOMAS A. CENA, JR.

Attorney at Law

2115 North 30th, Suite 201

Tacoma, WA 98403

(253) 572-5120 Fax: (253) 593-4503

E-MAIL: TomC55@nventure.com

ORDERED that defense counsel for the Defendant, STACY CHARLES COMER, is

authorized to receive transcripts of all trial testimony with respect to this matter. 

DATED this 26th day of October, 2006.

A

RONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Presented by:

/s/ Thomas A. Cena, Jr.

__________________________________________

THOMAS A. CENA, JR., WSBA NO. 6539

Attorney for Defendant Comer

Case 3:05-cr-05747-RBL Document 166 Filed 10/26/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 67097.

protests 61/17945, etc. (San Francisco).

#### Arthur J. Fritz & Company and Ideal Trading Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *Falcon Sales Company*and *J. J. Murphy & Co.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 129, C.D. 2292), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
EXHIBIT 11.2


                        OSTEOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                COMPUTATION OF FULLY DILUTED NET INCOME PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                    Three Months                                Nine Months
                                                Ended September 30,                         Ended September 30,
                                        ------------------------------------- --- -----------------------------------------
                                             1996                1995                 1996                 1995
                                             ----                ----                 ----                 ----
<S>                                            <C>               <C>                <C>                <C>
   Net income                                  $251,000          $4,709,000         $624,000           $4,000,000
                                               --------          ----------          --------           ----------

   Shares used in computing net
    income per share:

     Weighted average Common shares
      outstanding                             7,799,014            7,121,409       7,708,261            7,108,070
                                              ---------            ---------       ---------            ---------

     Weighted average Common shares
      issuable upon the exercise of
      outstanding stock options and
      warrants                                1,336,573            1,628,628       1,430,849            1,594,199
                                              ---------            ---------       ---------            ---------

     Application of assumed
      proceeds towards repurchase
      of outstanding Common shares
      using the Treasury Stock
      method                                  (892,764)(a)         (479,936)(a)     (834,615) (b)       (454,695)(b)
                                             ------------        ------------      ---------         ------------

         Shares used in computation           8,242,823            8,270,101       8,304,495            8,247,574
                                              ---------            ---------       ---------            ---------

   Net income per share
        assuming full dilution                     $.03                  $.57           $.08                 $.48
                                                   ----                  ----           ----                 ----

</TABLE>

     a) Computed  using  assumed  proceeds of $5,679,766  and an average  market
value of $6.36 in 1996 and proceeds of $3,959,000  and a closing market value of
$8.25 in 1995.

     b) Computed  using  assumed  proceeds of $5,833,961  and an average  market
value of $6.99 in 1996 and proceeds of $3,751,000  and a closing market value of
$8.25 in 1995.

                                       E-2
No. 69267.

#### J. Gerber & Co., Inc., and Novelty Veiling Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 64/4174 and 62/15007 (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of rayon labels similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Bruce Duncan Co., Inc., a/c Standard Commodities Import & Export Corp.*v. *United States*(51 Cust. Ct. 27, C.D. 2409), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# Gazzetta ufficiale C 122A/16 a

| | ISSN 1977-0944 |
| --- | --- |
| Gazzetta ufficiale
  dell’Unione europea | C 122A |
| | |
| Edizione in lingua italiana | Comunicazioni e informazioni | 58° anno16 aprile 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0944

Gazzetta ufficiale

dell’Unione europea

C 122A

Edizione in lingua italiana

Comunicazioni e informazioni

58° anno16 aprile 2015

---

| Numero d'informazione | Sommario | pagina |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Rettifiche |
| 2015/C 122A/01 | Rettifica al bando di concorsi generali — Amministratori (AD 5/AD 7) specializzati nella ricerca giuridica: EPSO/AD/295/15 — Giuristi con formazione in diritto bulgaro (BG), EPSO/AD/296/15 — Giuristi con formazione in diritto tedesco (DE), EPSO/AD/297/15 — Giuristi con formazione in diritto croato (HR), EPSO/AD/298/15 — Giuristi con formazione in diritto irlandese (IE), EPSO/AD/299/15 — Giuristi con formazione in diritto lituano (LT), EPSO/AD/300/15 — Giuristi con formazione in diritto slovacco (SK) — ( GU C 68 A del 26.2.2015 ) | 1 |

Numero d'informazione

Sommario

pagina

Rettifiche

2015/C 122A/01

Rettifica al bando di concorsi generali — Amministratori (AD 5/AD 7) specializzati nella ricerca giuridica: EPSO/AD/295/15 — Giuristi con formazione in diritto bulgaro (BG), EPSO/AD/296/15 — Giuristi con formazione in diritto tedesco (DE), EPSO/AD/297/15 — Giuristi con formazione in diritto croato (HR), EPSO/AD/298/15 — Giuristi con formazione in diritto irlandese (IE), EPSO/AD/299/15 — Giuristi con formazione in diritto lituano (LT), EPSO/AD/300/15 — Giuristi con formazione in diritto slovacco (SK) — ( GU C 68 A del 26.2.2015 )

( GU C 68 A del 26.2.2015 )

1

---

| IT | |
| --- | --- |

IT

---

Rettifiche

| 16.4.2015 | IT | Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea | CA 122/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2015

IT

Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea

CA 122/1

---

Rettifica al bando di concorsi generali — Amministratori (AD 5/AD 7) specializzati nella ricerca giuridica: EPSO/AD/295/15 — Giuristi con formazione in diritto bulgaro (BG), EPSO/AD/296/15 — Giuristi con formazione in diritto tedesco (DE), EPSO/AD/297/15 — Giuristi con formazione in diritto croato (HR), EPSO/AD/298/15 — Giuristi con formazione in diritto irlandese (IE), EPSO/AD/299/15 — Giuristi con formazione in diritto lituano (LT), EPSO/AD/300/15 — Giuristi con formazione in diritto slovacco (SK)

(
  Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea C 68 A del 26 febbraio 2015
  )

(2015/C 122 A/01)

A pagina 2, titolo I, punto 3:

anziché:

«Termine ultimo (compresa la convalida): 31 marzo 2015 alle ore 12:00 (mezzogiorno), ora di Bruxelles.»,

leggi:

«Termine ultimo (compresa la convalida): 9 aprile 2015 alle ore 12:00 (mezzogiorno), ora di Bruxelles.»

---
#### COLER v. CITY OF LAMPASAS.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

December 14, 1903.)

No. 1,270.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the-United States for the Western District of Texas.

Ben B. Cain, for appellant. Robt. G. West. Thos. B. Cochran, and Walter Acker, for appellee.

Before PARDEE, McCOKMICK, and SHELBY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

As to the ownership or possession of the original waterworks in the city of Lampasas, the claim of the appellant herein is without equity. The decree of the Circuit Court is affirmed.
From: schauere@bellsouth.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:55:17 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Elizabeth Schauer

Pensacola, FL 32514
No. 66051.

#### Joseph A. Paredes and Cara Supply et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/21860, etc. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of coffee brewers the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 64580, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.