alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
10-5BBT_15MM_SEP_Equip_Loan_Addendum


Exhibit 10-5


Loan Agreement Addendum
9660933120/00005




This Loan Agreement Addendum to a loan agreement dated the 17th of April, 2012 for account number 9660933120 note 00005, in the original principal amount of $1,500,000 by and between BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY (“Bank”), a North Carolina banking corporation and Southeast Power Corporation, a State of Florida corporation (“Borrower”), having its executive offices at Melbourne, Florida is made this 15th day of January 2013 by and between BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, a North Carolina banking corporation (“Bank”) and Southeast Power Corporation, a State of Florida corporation (“Borrower”), having its executive offices at Melbourne, Florida.


Section V. FINANCIAL COVENANTS is amended as follows:


The paragraph beginning Tangible Net Worth is deleted and replaced with the following:


Tangible Net Worth. A minimum tangible net worth of not less than $18,000,000.00 as evidenced by Borrower’s consolidated annual audited financial statement as included in the Form 10-K beginning with its fiscal year ending December 31, 2012.  Tangible Net Worth is defined as net worth, plus obligations contractually subordinated to debts owed to Bank, minus goodwill, contract rights, and assets representing claims on stockholders or affiliated entities. 


All other conditions of the loan agreement are to remain unchanged including the paragraph beginning Debt to Tangible Net Worth following the section replaced in this addendum. 







            


SIGNATURE PAGE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Bank, Borrower and Guarantor(s) have caused this Agreement to be duly executed under seal all as of the date first above written.
	
				
	Witness:
	 
	BORROWER:

	 
	 
	 

	





	 
	Southeast Power Corporation, a Florida corporation



	John H. Sottile
	 
	By: /s/ Stephen R. Wherry

	Print Name:
	/s/ John H. Sottile
	 
	Stephen R. Wherry

	

/s/ Mary Manger
	 
	Title: Treasurer

	Print Name:
	Mary Manger
	 
	 






	
				
	Witness:
	 
	GUARANTORS:

	 
	 
	 

	





	 
	The Goldfield Corporation, a Delaware corporation



	John H. Sottile
	 
	By: /s/ Stephen R. Wherry

	Print Name:
	/s/ John H. Sottile
	 
	Stephen R. Wherry

	

/s/ Mary Manger
	 
	Title: Senior Vice President

	Print Name:
	Mary Manger
	 
	 

	 
	 
	

Pineapple House of Brevard, Inc., a Florida corporation



	John H. Sottile
	 
	By: /s/ Stephen R. Wherry

	Print Name:
	/s/ John H. Sottile
	 
	Stephen R. Wherry

	

/s/ Mary Manger
	 
	Title: Vice President

	Print Name:
	Mary Manger
	 
	 






	
				
	 
	 
	Bayswater Development Corporation, a Florida corporation



	John H. Sottile
	 
	By: /s/ Stephen R. Wherry

	Print Name:
	/s/ John H. Sottile
	 
	Stephen R. Wherry

	

/s/ Mary Manger
	 
	Title: Treasurer

	Print Name:
	Mary Manger
	 
	 













            










	
				
	Witness:
	 
	BANK:

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	Branch Banking and Trust Company



	John H. Sottile
	 
	By: /s/ Barry Forbes

	Print Name:
	/s/ John H. Sottile
	 
	 

	

/s/ Mary Manger
	 
	Name: Barry Forbes

	Print Name:
	Mary Manger
	 
	Title: Sr. Vice President
Case No. 14,816

#### UNITED STATES v. CLEMENTS.

[2 Cranch, C. C. 30.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Nov. Term, 1811.

Bastardy—Recognizance—How Taken.

A recognizance in a case of bastardy cannot be taken by a justice of the peace, in Virginia, unless upon the application of the overseers of the poor.

This was a recognizance taken by a justice of the peace in Alexandria in a case of bastardy.

E. J. Lee, for defendant,

moved the court to quash it because it was not taken at the request of the overseers of the poor, according to the act of assembly of Virginia of 26th December, 1792, p. 1S3, § 13.

1

 (Reported by Hon. William Cranch, Chief Judge.]

THE COURT

(THRUSTON. Circuit Judge,'

absent) ordered the recognizance to be discharged, unless the overseers of the poor should appear at this term and show cause to the contrary.
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the annual report of American Power Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Johannes Petersen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/ Johannes PetersenJohannes PetersenChief Financial Officer
 
 Date: January 13, 2011
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to American Power Corporation and will be retained by American Power Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 231 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require all committees 

post record votes on their Web sites within 48 hours of such votes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 9, 2007 

Mr. SESSIONS (for himself, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. FEENEY, Mr. KIRK, 

Mr. HENSARLING, Mr. PEARCE, Mr. SHAYS, Mr. BRADY of Texas, Mr. 

ALEXANDER, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. BONNER, Mr. BOUSTANY, Mr. BURGESS, Mr. DEAL of Georgia, Mr. LINCOLN DIAZ-BALART of Florida, Mr. 

MARIO DIAZ-BALART of Florida, Mr. DREIER, Mr. GOODLATTE, Ms. 

GRANGER, Mr. HALL of Texas, Mr. HAYES, Mr. ISSA, Mr. SAM JOHNSON

of Texas, Mr. KELLER of Florida, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. KINGSTON, Mr. 

LINDER, Mr. MCCARTHY of California, Mr. MCCAUL of Texas, Mr. 

MCCOTTER, Mr. MORAN of Kansas, Mr. PRICE of Georgia, Mr. RENZI, 

Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr. ROYCE, Mrs. SCHMIDT, Mr. TERRY, and Mr. 

WESTMORELAND) submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to 

require all committees post record votes on their Web 

sites within 48 hours of such votes. 

1 Resolved, That clause 2(e)(1)(B)(i) of rule XI of the 

2 Rules of the House of Representatives is amended— 

3 (1) in the first sentence, by inserting ‘‘and 

4 within 48 hours of such record vote on its Web site 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 231 IH 

1 on the Internet’’ before the period at the end there2 of; and 

3 (2) in the second sentence, by inserting ‘‘and 

4 information so available on its Web site’’ before 

5 ‘‘shall’’. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
From: glwelch@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:41:30 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I object to my health insurance company paying for contraceptives or any other form of medication that

results in the abortion of a fetus. forcing them to provide this strips me of my ability to refuse to pay for

such medications.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Gene Welch

San Clemente, CA 92673
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT





Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934





DATE OF REPORT (Date of earliest event reported): May 21, 2015





CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION


(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)





Delaware (STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION)001-11241 (COMMISSION FILE NUMBER)37-1105865 (IRS EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER)





2120 West End Avenue, Nashville, Tennessee    37203-0001 (ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES)    (ZIP CODE)


Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (615) 341-1000





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))











1


---






Item 8.01 Other Events .





Exhibits are filed herewith in connection with the issuance on May 21, 2015 by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation (the “Company”) of (i) $4,341,000 aggregate principal amount of its 2.200% PowerNotes® due May 15, 2021 (the “2021 Notes”) and (ii) $2,324,000 aggregate principal amount of its 3.000% PowerNotes® due May 15, 2027 (the “2027 Notes” and, together with the 2021 Notes, the “Notes”) pursuant to the Company’s previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-195039) (the “Registration Statement”) and the related Prospectus dated April 4, 2014, Prospectus Supplement dated April 4, 2014 and Pricing Supplement dated May 18, 2015 relating to the 2021 Notes and the 2027 Notes, respectively.





Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits .





(d) Exhibits . The following Exhibits are filed as part of this Report and as Exhibits to the Registration Statement:





ExhibitNumberDescription5.1Opinion of Sidley Austin LLP, as to the legality of the Notes.23.1Consent of Sidley Austin LLP (included as part of Exhibit 5.1).


2


---






SIGNATURE





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





Caterpillar Financial Services CorporationBy:/s/ Leslie S. ZmuggName: Leslie S. Zmugg Title:   Secretary





Date: May 21, 2015


3


---



EXHIBIT INDEX





ExhibitNumberDescription5.1Opinion of Sidley Austin LLP, as to the legality of the Notes.23.1Consent of Sidley Austin LLP (included as part of Exhibit 5.1).








4
From: dakjoel@cox.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:02:41 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Bridget Dickinson

Phoenix, AZ 85016
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 38 

To enhance intelligence oversight authority. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 9, 2007 

Mr. DREIER submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

To enhance intelligence oversight authority. 

1 Resolved, That in clause 4(a) of rule X of the Rules 

2 of the House of Representatives, add the following new 

3 paragraph at the end: 

4 ‘‘(5)(A) There is established a Select Intelligence 

5 Oversight Panel of the Committee on Appropriations 

6 (hereinafter in this paragraph referred to as the ‘select 

7 panel’). The select panel shall be composed of not more 

8 than 14 Members, Delegates, or the Resident Commis9 sioner appointed by the Speaker (in consultation with the 

10 minority leader), of whom not more than seven may be 

11 from the same political party. The select panel shall in12 clude the chairman and ranking minority member of the 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 38 IH 

1 Committee on Appropriations, the chairman and ranking 

2 minority member of its Subcommittee on Defense, six ad3 ditional members of the Committee on Appropriations, 

4 and four members of the Permanent Select Committee on 

5 Intelligence. 

6 ‘‘(B) The Speaker shall designate one member of the 

7 select panel as its chairman and one member as its rank8 ing minority member. 

9 ‘‘(C) Each member on the select panel shall be treat10 ed as though a member of the Committee on Appropria11 tions for purposes of the select panel. 

12 ‘‘(D) The select panel shall review and study on a 

13 continuing basis budget requests for and execution of in14 telligence activities; make recommendations to relevant 

15 subcommittees of the Committee on Appropriations; and, 

16 on an annual basis, prepare a report to the Defense Sub17 committee of the Committee on Appropriations containing 

18 budgetary and oversight observations and recommenda19 tions for use by such subcommittee in preparation of the 

20 classified annex to the bill making appropriations for the 

21 Department of Defense. 

22 ‘‘(E) Rule XI shall apply to the select panel in the 

23 same manner as a subcommittee (except for clause 

24 2(m)(1)(B) of that rule). 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 38 IH 

1 ‘‘(F) A subpoena of the Committee on Appropriations 

2 or its Subcommittee on Defense may specify terms of re3 turn to the select panel.’’. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Remington Oil and Gas
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending September 30,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, James A. Watt, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec.1350, as adopted pursuant to sec.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

     This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, and not for any other purpose.

                                                   /s/ JAMES A. WATT
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                      James A. Watt
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer

December 16, 2003

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Remington Oil and Gas Corporation and will be retained by
Remington Oil and Gas Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6281

JAMES CURTIS COBBERT, III,

 Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

ROBERT M. STEVENSON, III, Warden, Broad River CI,

 Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Anderson. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. 

(8:14-cv-03331-TMC)

Submitted: July 21, 2016 Decided: July 22, 2016

Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Curtis Cobbert, III, Appellant Pro Se. James Anthony 

Mabry, Assistant Attorney General, Donald John Zelenka, Senior 

Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

James Curtis Cobbert, III seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and 

recommendation and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Cobbert has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability, deny Cobbert’s motion for 

transcripts at government expense, and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
From: bertuccelli51@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:43:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Susan Bertuccelli

Yorktown Heights, NY 10598
Wichita 

SI 0-100401-002 

March 18.2010 

The Honorable Raymond H. LaHood 

Secretary 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Docket DOT-OST-2010-IMk 

Dear Mr. Secretary: 

Thank you for the opportunity to express our support for the application for antitrust 

immunity and proposed joint business agreement filed by American Airlines and Japan 

Airlines. The proposed alliance between these two airlines is vital for oneworld to 

compete effectively with the Star and SkyTeam alliance. This increased interalliance 

competition will in turn enhance the benefits of the Department's Open Skies policy -

first by solidifying U.S.-Japan Open Skies, then by serving as a foundation for further 

liberalization across Asia. 

After a thorough review, we encourage the Department of Transportation to approve this 

application as it would enable these oneworld alliance airlines to work closely together to 

deliver highly competitive air transportation services. Approval for AA/JAL alliance will 

have a positive impact on air travel by offering customers more service, scheduling and 

pricing options and will help to ensure that customers continue to benefit from having 

three competitive air alliances to choose from. We appreciate your prompt review and 

approval of this application. 

Respectfully, 

Monica J. Morris 

Airports Administrator 

City of Wichita Falls, Texas 

Department of Aviation, Traffic and Transportation 

4000 Armstrong Drive, Suite 8 

Wichita Falls. TX 76305 

(940) 855-3623 

Monica.Morris@wichitafallstx.gov 

1300 7lhStroet P.O. Box 1431 Wichita Falls. Toxas 76307