• .HARTMENT OF 

•"•riSPORWION 

• i/r.T npr-H,\7iQj\j,^J.S. DEPARTMENT OFTRANSPORTATIO: 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

1 • 1 ! 3 O 3 3^DERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

RECEIVED 

JUN- 6 26W 

HEARING DOCKET 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, 

Complainant, 

vs. 

DEAN INTERNATIONAL, INC., 

Respondent. 

FAA Docket No. FAA-2011 -0069 

FAA Case Nos. 201OSO190256, 

20 lOSO 190260 

Chief Judge Yoder 

AMENDED COMPLAINT 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.214 and the Order of Chief Administrative Judge Establishing 

Procedures, dated April 25, 2011, the FAA hereby amends the Complaint in this case as follows. 

Paragraphs 11,12, and 13 are re-numbered as paragraphs 14, 15, and 16, respectively. 

Paragraphs 3-10 are replaced with the following: 

3. a. On or about February 28, 2010, Dean International operated civil aircraft 

N6348B, aCE-152. 

b. Dean International operated N6348B on March 1, 2010. 

c. Dean International operated N634B on April 22, 2010. 

4. a. Flight instruction was given during the February 28, 2010 operation of 

N6348B. 

ofN6348B. 

N6348B. 

b. Flight instruction was given during the February March 1, 2010 operation 

c. Flight instruction was given during the April 22, 2010 operation of 
5. a. At the time of the February 28, 2010 operation, neither an annual nor 100-

hour inspection had been completed on N6348B within the proceeding 100 hours of time in 

service. 

b. At the time of the March 1, 2010 operation, neither an annual nor 100-

hour inspection had been completed on N6348B within the proceeding 100 hours of time in 

service. 

c. At the time of the April 22, 2010 operation, neither an armual nor 100-

hour inspection had been completed on N6348B within the proceeding 100 hours of time in 

service. 

6. a. Airworthiness Directive (AD) 87-20-03 R2 is applicable to N6348B. 

b. AD 87-20-03 R2 requires an inspection every 100 hours of time in service. 

7. a. At the time of the February 28, 2010 operation, the inspection required by 

AD 87-20-03 R2 had not been performed on N6348B in the proceeding 100 hours. 

b. At the time of the March 1, 2010 operation, the inspection required by AD 

87-20-03 R2 had not been performed on N6348B in the proceeding 100 hours. 

c. At the time of the April 22, 2010 operation, the inspection required by AD 

87-20-03 R2 had not been performed on N6348B in the proceeding 100 hours. 

8. a. At the time of the February 28, 2010 operation, N6348B did not meet the 

requirements of AD 87-20-03 R2. 

b. At the time of the March'1, 2010 operation, N6348B did not meet the 

requirements of AD 87-20-03 R2. 

c. At the time of the April 22, 2010 operation, N6348B did not meet the 

requirements of AD 87-20-03 R2. 

9. a. N6348B was not in an airworthy condition at the time of the February 28, 

2010, operation. 

b. N6348B was not in an airworthy condition at the time of the March 1, 

2010, operation. 

c. N6348B was not in an airworthy condition at the time of the April 22, 

2010, operation. 

10. On or about May 8 2010, Dean International operated civil aircraft N5276M, a 

CE-152. 
I 11. Flight instruction was given during this operation of N5276M. 

\j 

f| 12. At the time of this operation, neither an armual nor 100-hour inspection had been 

ij completed on N5276M within the proceeding 100 hours of time in service. 

;•( 

II 13. a. Airworthiness Directive (AD) 87-20-03 R2 is applicable to N5276M. 

f| 

sj b. AD 87-20-03 R2 requires an mspection every 100 hours of time in service. I 

•| c. At the time of the May 8, 2010 operation, the inspection required by AD 

I 87-20-03 R2 had not been performed on N5276M in the proceeding 100 hours. 

i;l 

I d. AtthetimeoftheMay 8, 2010 operation, N5276M did not meet the 

J requirements of AD 87-20-03 R2. 

1 

•I 

i 14. N5276M was not in an airworthy condition at the time of the May 8, 2010 

I operation. 

I 

I The remainder of the complaint remains unchanged. 

I 7 r 

! Respectfully submitted this ^-^ day of May, 2011. 

CHRISTOPHER R. STEVENSON 

Attorney 

Office of the Regional Counsel