alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

MIGUEL MASSARI, Individually and § 

on Behalf of All Similarly Situated § No. 504, 2019 

Individuals, § 

 § 

 Plaintiff-Appellant, § 

 § Court Below—Court of Chancery 

 v. § of the State of Delaware 

 § 

DANIEL MEYERS, SETH GELBER, § C.A. No. 2019-0017 

NANCY BEKAVAC, PETER § 

DROTCH, THOMAS EDDY, § 

WILLIAM D. HANSEN, JOHN § 

CARTER RISLEY, FP RESOURCES § 

USA INC., and FP RESOURCES § 

ACQUISITION CORP., § 

 § 

 Defendants-Respondents, § 

 Submitted: May 13, 2020 

 Decided: May 14, 2020 

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VAUGHN, and TRAYNOR, Justices. 

ORDER 

 This 14th day of May, 2020, after careful consideration of the parties’ briefs 

and the record on appeal, we find it evident that the final judgment of the Court of 

Chancery should be affirmed on the basis of and the reasons stated in its October 29, 

2019 transcript ruling. 
2

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of 

Chancery is AFFIRMED. 

 BY THE COURT: 

 /s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. 

 Chief Justice
From: lvallew@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:41:09 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

larry valentine

Glencoe, MO 63038
No. 60216.

protests 258627-K, 280413-K, and 280804-K (New York).

#### Teigh, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of glass bead Christmas tree ornaments similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Walco Bead Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 62, C. D. 1445), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
November 26, 1963

No. 68145.-

#### Brier Manufacturing Company *v.*United States,

protests 59/27159, etc.

Motion of Government for rehearing denied.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED DANIEL J. COYLE ,

Appellant , v. Case No. 5D2 2 -1209 LT Case No. 2009 -C F -0 39657 -A X STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee

. ________________________________/ Decision filed August 23, 2022 3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Ste phen G

. Henderson, Judge. Jason T. Forman , of Law Offices of Jason T. Forman, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. LAMBERT , C.J., EVANDER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Nationalcompensation survey. Delta County, MI**
 
1998 | 2006
 
SuDoc Number: L2.122/22:D 38/ | D 38/
Item Number:0768-B-22 (online) | 0768-B-55(online)
CGP systemNumber: 000808954
 
July 19, 2018
#### In re SILICON GAMING, INC.

No. 01-1024.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

June 8, 2001.

ORDER

Silicon Gaming, Inc. moves to voluntarily dismiss its appeal.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion is granted.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Brinks Holding Company, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ending December 31, 2008 (the Report), I, Stephen C. Yevich, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DATED this 31stday of March 2009.



/s/ Stephen C. YevichStephen C. YevichSenior Vice President andChief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Brinks
Home Security Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Brinks Home Security Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 221 (Wednesday, November 16, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 80664]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-27700]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9030-2]

Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7146 or http://www.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statement
Filed 11/07/2016 Through 11/11/2016
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html.

EIS No. 20160268, Final, OSM, PRO, Stream Protection Rule, Review 
Period Ends: 12/15/2016, Contact: Robin Ferguson 202-208-2802.

    Dated: November 14, 2016.
Dawn Roberts,
Management Analyst, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal 
Activities.
[FR Doc. 2016-27700 Filed 11-15-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

JD CHARLES MCMANUS,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOSEPH LEHMAN, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5563RBL

ORDER GRANTING I.F.P.

 APPLICATION

Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 1) is GRANTED. Plaintiff is 

currently detained at the Special Commitment Center on McNeil Island, and plaintiff does not appear to have

funds available to afford the $250.00 filing fee. Plaintiff shall note that leave to proceed as a pauper does

not necessarily entitle plaintiff to a waiver of any other cost(s) of litigation. . 

The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this Order to plaintiff.

DATED this 26th day of September, 2005.

/s/ J. Kelley Arnold J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:05-cv-05563-RBL Document 3 Filed 09/26/05 Page 1 of 1
From: davmarwils@carolina.rr.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:22:40 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dave Wilson

Landis, NC 28088
EX-35.3
(logo) imfb
       IndyMac
       Federal Bank


REG AB 1123 Statement of Compliance


I am an authorized officer for IndyMac Federal Bank, FSB, the servicer for the
transactions listed on the attached schedule and I certify:

a) A review of IndyMac Federal Bank's activities during the reporting period and
   of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement has been made
   under my supervision.
b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, IndyMac Federal Bank has
   fulfilled all of its obligations under the agreement in all material respects
   throughout the reporting period.


By: /s/ Robert M. Abramian
Robert M. Abramian
First Vice President
Home Loans Servicing
Investor Reporting
IndyMac Federal Bank, FSB


By: /s/ Bart Vincent
Bart Vincent
SVP, CFO-Home Loan Servicing
HLS Financing
IndyMac Federal Bank, FSB

Prepared for: Aurora Loan Services
Date:         February 27, 2009
Ref:          See attached "Exhibit A"


(page)


Exhibit A

903         ITF LXS 2006-2N 1/31/06
234         ITF SARM 2006-4 04/28/06
238         LXS 2006-7 04/28/06
137         LXS 2006-12N LB 7/27/06
286         ITF LXS 2006-10N (6-30-06)
139         LXS 2006-11 7/27/06
140         LMT 2006-4 7/28/06
193         ITF LXS 2006-13 8/31/06
276         ITF LXS 2006-8 05/31/06
187         ITF SARM 2006-8 (LB) 8/31/06
188         LXS 2006-14N (LB) 8/31/06
294         LMT 2006-5 8-31-06
374         ITF LXS 2006-16N 092906
377         ITF LXS 2006-15 092906
433         LMT 2006-6 09/29/06
441         ITF LXS 2006-17 10/30/06
443         LMT 2006-7 10/30/06
447         LXS 2006-18N 11/29/2006
448         LXS 2006-19 11/29/2006
449         LMT 2006-8 11/29/2006
4108        LMT 2006-9 12/29/06
4109        LXS 2006-20 12/29/06
4119        LXS 2007-1 01/31/2007
4120        LXS 2007-2N 1/31/2007
4123        LMT 2007-1 1/30/2007
4129        LMT 2007-2 02/28/07
4133        LXS 2007-3 02/28/07
4138        ITF LXS 2007-4N 03/30/07
4139/4142   LMT 2007-3 03/30/07
4152/4164   LXS 2007-6 04/30/07
4157/4162   LMT 2007-4 04/30/07
4171        ITF LXS 2007-9 05/31/07
4176/4182   ITF LXS 2007-11 06-29-07
4177        ITF LXS 2007-12N 06/29/07
4178/4188   ITF LMT 2007-7 07/31/07
4186        LXS 2007-15N 07/31/07
4202/4204   LMT 2007-10 (11/30/07)
4203        SARM 2007-11 (11/30/07)
4166/4168   LMT 2007-5 05-30-07
From: Kristenbeasley29@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:52:55 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kristen Beasley

Saucier, MS 39574
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Dated this 14th day of August , 2006

/S/ PETER H. VOELKER 

 Deputy Clerk

MINUTE ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the WESTERN DISTRICT of WASHINGTON

JOE and LAURA SPRINKLE,

 Plaintiff,

)

)

)

vs. )

) C05-1898 JPD

SB&C, LTD et al.,

 Defendant.

)

)

) MINUTE ORDER

The following Minute Order is made at the direction of the Court, the Honorable 

James P. Donohue, United States Magistrate Judge:

The defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (dkt #21) is hereby re-noted to

September 8, 2006, and will be considered in conjunction with the plaintiff’s Motion for Summary

Judgment (dkt #28).

Case 2:05-cv-01898-JPD Document 32 Filed 08/14/06 Page 1 of 1
Hummingbird

Springs Wilderness

Big Horn

Mountains

Wilderness

Harquahala

Mountains

Wilderness

Hells Canyon

Wilderness

Hassayampa

River Canyon

Wilderness

Castle Creek

Wilderness

Mohave County

Yavapai County

Yavapai

Marico

County

pa County

La Paz County

Maricopa County

White Tank

Mountains

Regional Park

Lake

Pleasant

Regional

Park

Prescott

Prescott

Valley

Cordes

Junction

Yarnell

BLACK

CANYON

CITY

NEW

RIVER

WICKENBURG

PEORIA

SURPRISE

BUCKEYE

GOODYEAR

PHOENIX

GLENDALE

Bureau of Land Management

Phoenix District Office

Phoenix, AZ

October 2009

Note: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM)

conducts land use planning only in the areas administered

by BLM. BLM has no planning authority under the

municipal or county planning legislation of the State

of Arizona.

No warranty is made by BLM for the use of this map

for purposes not intended by BLM, or to the accuracy,

reliability or completeness of the information shown.

Spatial information may not meet National Map Accuracy

standards. This information may be updated without

notification.

Note: Land Status legend located on Map 1

Map 18

Bradshaw-Harquahala

Planning Areas

Wilderness Characteristics

0 5 10 15

Miles

BLM Wilderness

USFS Wilderness

Interstate

Major Road

Major River, Streams or Wash

Highway

Agua Fria National

Monument Planning Area

Bradshaw Harquahala

Planning Area

Management Unit

Allocated to Maintain

Wilderness Characteristics
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CurrencyShares® Russian Ruble Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-K for the fiscal period ended October 31, 2010, as amended, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joseph Arruda, Chief Financial Officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Trust.

Date: March 10, 2011

|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                    
|/s/ JOSEPH ARRUDA                                                   
|Joseph Arruda* Chief
Financial Officer (principal financial officer)



|* | The Registrant is a trust and Joseph Arruda is signing in his capacity as the principal financial officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the
Registrant.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

CARLOS AGUILAR-ZURITA,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 05-491M

DETENTION ORDER 

Offense charged: 

Illegal Reentry After Deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).

Date of Detention Hearing: October 13, 2005.

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds:

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) A detainer has been placed on defendant by Immigration and Customs

Enforcement.

(2) Defendant has stipulated to detention, due to the immigration detainer lodged

against him, but reserves the right to contest his continued detention if there is a change in

circumstances.

Case 2:05-mj-00491-JPD Document 7 Filed 10/14/05 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with

counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant

is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose

of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States

Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 14th day of October, 2005.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:05-mj-00491-JPD Document 7 Filed 10/14/05 Page 2 of 2
From: jinshi.mail@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:13:03 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jin Shi

San Diego, CA 92122
Before the Third Division,

July 31, 1958

No. 62245.

#### M. Farris & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 313902-K (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

The protest was dismissed for- lack of prosecution.