alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required
to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Principal
Life Income Fundings Trust 2008-050 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, do
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information
required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is
included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;4.
    
    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this
report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act
periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing
agreement(s) in all material respects; and5.
    
    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of
compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included
in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.
   /s/ Dwight N. Soethout

Dwight N. SoethoutVice President  Principal Life Insurance Company
EXHIBIT 32.1






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002










In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Crater Mountain Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the




“Report”), I, Roger Renken, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






a) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and






b) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of all the Company.






Dated:  September 21, 2010






CRATER MOUNTAIN RESOURCES, INC., Registrant




/s/ Roger Renken




By: Roger Renken, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Mandamus Dismissed and Opinion Filed November 21, 2013.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-13-01602-CV

IN RE MICHAEL STOUT, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 283rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F91-02544-MT

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices FitzGerald, Lang, and Myers 

Opinion by Justice Myers

In this original mandamus proceeding, relator asks this Court to order the director of the 

Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, to recalculate relator’s parole 

eligibility date on his 25-year sentence and to notify relator when the 25-year sentence ceases to 

operate and relator’s 60-year sentence starts. This Court has no mandamus jurisdiction over the 

director of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division. See TEX. GOV.

CODE ANN. § 22.221(b) (West 2010) (writ power of courts of appeals). We dismiss the petition 

for writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction.

 

131602F.P05

/Lana Myers/

LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1000
<CASH>                                          18,674
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   96,838
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               160,375
<PP&E>                                       1,592,258
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,172,440
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          106,928
<BONDS>                                      1,371,315
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           807
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,172,440
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               311,635
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               230,027
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              55,508
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,100
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,307
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  6,773
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,020
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 546 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 546

   Recognizing Mukhtar Mai for her courage and her humanitarian work.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 13, 2007

  Mr. Meeks of New York (for himself, Mr. Burton of Indiana, and Ms. 
  Jackson-Lee of Texas) submitted the following resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Recognizing Mukhtar Mai for her courage and her humanitarian work.

Whereas Mukhtar Mai is a Pakistani woman from the village of Meerwala, in the 
        rural county of Jatoi of the Muzaffargarh District of Pakistan;
Whereas Mukhtar Mai's brother, Shakoor, was suspected and accused of being seen 
        in the company of a Mastoi woman and was accused of engaging in sexually 
        inappropriate behavior with her;
Whereas the village council suggested that Shakoor marry the girl he was seen 
        with and Mukhtar Mai, a divorcee, be married to a Mastoi man;
Whereas the Mastois reportedly rejected the deal, insisting the issue be settled 
        with the eye-for-an-eye principle;
Whereas Mukhtar Mai was called to the council to apologize for her brother's 
        conduct;
Whereas when Mukhtar Mai appeared before the council she was taken by force and 
        gang raped by 4 men;
Whereas Mukhtar Mai, an illiterate woman, courageously took her case to court 
        where the 4 defendants were found guilty;
Whereas Mukhtar Mai took the settlement money provided by the government 
        following her court case and opened 2 schools in her village--one for 
        boys and one for girls, as well as a center for refuge and education 
        known as the Mukhtar Mai Women's Welfare Organization;
Whereas on August 2, 2005, the Pakistani Government awarded Mukhtar Mai the 
        Fatima Jinnah gold medal for bravery and courage;
Whereas on November 2, 2005, Glamour Magazine named Mukhtar Mai its ``Glamour 
        Woman of the Year'';
Whereas on October 31, 2006, Mukhtar Mai's memoir was released in the United 
        States, titled ``In the Name of Honor: A Memoir'';
Whereas in March 2007, Mukhtar Mai won the North-South Prize from the European 
        Union Council of Europe; and
Whereas Mukhtar Mai continues to campaign for women's rights and the promotion 
        of education around the world: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes Mukhtar Mai for her courage to fight for 
        justice; and
            (2) recognizes Mukhtar Mai for promoting education and 
        being a champion of women's rights.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-30483 Conference Calendar

HENRY HARRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus PAROLE BOARD ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 96-CV-89

- - - - - - - - - - October 24, 1996 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Henry Harris, Louisiana inmate #116174, appeals the dismissal of his civil rights complaint. Harris’ arguments fail to challenge the district court’s judgment. Thus, any issue as to the propriety of the dismissal, without prejudice, for failure to exhaust Harris’ available state remedies, is deemed abandoned on appeal. See Eason v. Thaler , 14 F.3d 8, 9 n.1 (5th Cir. 1994).No. 96-30483 - 2 - The appeal is without arguable merit and is thus frivolous. 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Because it is frivolous, it is DISMISSED.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
No. 65168.

#### Geo. H. Maus, Inc., and F. Murray Hill Co. *v.*United States,

protest 59/32898 (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fish netting similar in all material respects to that involved in Abstract 63947, the cláim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 40050 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

RODOLFO LUCERO

- RODRIGUEZ ,
Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:15

- CR

- 1197

- 1

Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rodolfo Lucero

Rodriguez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lucero

- Rodriguez h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 31, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-40050 Document: 00513739950 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/31/2016No. 16

- 40050

2 nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leav e to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-40050 Document: 00513739950 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/31/2016
No. 64504.

#### W. A. Taylor & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 265903-K (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

      ( print page 67786)    
Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; TRND 5: Pharmacology Studies, Animal Model Development & Related Services for Drug Development..                    

*Date:*                         November 15, 2023.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Room 1073, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         M. Lourdes Ponce, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Blvd., Room 1073, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-435-0810,                         *lourdes.ponce@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and Biological Chemistry Research; 93.350, B—Cooperative Agreements; 93.859, Biomedical Research and Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 26, 2023.

Melanie J. Pantoja, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-21599 Filed 9-29-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
No. 62789.

#### Rohner, Gehrig & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 58/827 (New York).

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Dean Li, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of China Media Inc. for the year ended June 30, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of China Media Inc.





Dated: September 28, 2010/s/ Dean LiDean LiChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to China Media Inc. and will be retained by China Media Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
From: marilyn mortelliti

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:25:30 PM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

marilyn mortelliti
Sewell, New Jersey
H. Res. 562 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 25, 2007. 

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 3093) making appropriations for the Departments of Commerce and Justice, and Science, and Related 

Agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2008, and 

for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the 

bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of 

rule XXI. General debate shall be confined to the bill and 

shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by 

the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee 

on Appropriations. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. Points of 

order against provisions in the bill for failure to comply with 

clause 2 of rule XXI are waived. During consideration of the 

bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the 
2 

•HRES 562 EH 

Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of 

whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to 

be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. When the committee rises and reports the bill back to the House with a recommendation that the bill do pass, the previous question shall 

be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto 

to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

SEC. 2. During consideration in the House of H.R. 3093 

pursuant to this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of 

the previous question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the bill to such time as may be designated by the 

Speaker. 

SEC. 3. The Chairman of the Committee on Appropriations is authorized, on behalf of the Committee, to file a supplemental report to accompany H.R. 3093. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
February 14, 1966

No. 69801.

Appeal 5219.

#### United States *v.*Engelhard Hanovia, Inc.

Appeal dismissed October 18, 1965.
From: bjrehill@lyteservices.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:53:20 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Basil Rehill

Brownfield, ME 04010