alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: jallstaedt@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:48:00 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Julius Allstaedt

, 07860-1934
No. 65143.

#### Rohner Gehrig & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/6737 (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

There being nothing before the court tending in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the classification by the collector, the protest was overruled.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 185 (Tuesday, September 26, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 66061]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20924]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

National Institute of Corrections


Notice of Federal Advisory Committee Charter Renewal

AGENCY: National Institute of Corrections (NIC), Department of Justice.

ACTION: Notice of Federal advisory committee charter renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the 
purpose of this notice is to announce that the National Institute of 
Corrections has renewed the charter for the NIC Advisory Board for a 
two-year period through September 14, 2025.

DATES: Renewed through September 14, 2025.

ADDRESSES: National Institute of Corrections, 901 D Street SW, 3rd 
Floor, Washington, DC 20024.
    To Obtain a Copy of the Charter: A complete copy of the Charter is 
available from the NIC in electronic format. An electronic copy can be 
downloaded in PDF format on the NIC website, https://nicic.gov. To 
obtain a paper copy of the Charter, please mail your request to the 
National Institute of Corrections, 901 D Street SW, 3rd Floor, 
Washington, DC 20024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leslie S. LeMaster, Telephone: (202) 
305-5773, Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4a26262f272b393e2f380a28253a642d253c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e5898980888496918097a5878a95cb828a93">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NIC Advisory Board is a Federal advisory 
committee enacted pursuant to the authority provided at 5 U.S.C. 1001-
1014, the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), and 41 CFR 102-
3.50(a).
    In general, the NIC provides training, technical assistance, 
information services, and policy/program development assistance to 
Federal, State, and local corrections agencies; through cooperative 
agreements, awards funds to support program initiatives; and provides 
leadership to influence correctional policies, practices, and 
operations nationwide in areas of emerging interest and concern to 
correctional executives and practitioners as well as public 
policymakers. The NIC Advisory Board is a Federal advisory committee 
created by statute whose mandate is to advise the NIC on long-range 
plans, advise on program development, and recommend guidance to assist 
the NIC's efforts in these areas. The Advisory Board will also advise 
the Attorney General about the appointment of the Director of the NIC. 
In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-
463, as amended, this notice advises interested persons of the renewal 
of this charter.

Leslie S. LeMaster,
Designated Federal Official to the NIC Advisory Board, The National 
Institute of Corrections.
[FR Doc. 2023-20924 Filed 9-25-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
From: rdjj7@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:46:26 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Robert Johnson

Sheridan, OR 97378
Heated Umbillical 

SAMPLE BUILDING 

• Heated Pressure Regulation • Laminar Flow Element 

SAMPLE REFERENCE 

 

__________ 

ECOCHEM CEM(S) 

r--- CONDITIONER 

RE 6. ECOCHEM DYNAMIC SPIKING OVERVIEW J 09/23105 1 LILFIG6 1 020305
From: hheisey@kcnet.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:52:52 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Harriet Heisey

, 17740-1214
From: tfluhler@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:14:33 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Thomas Fluhler

Lake Zurich, IL 60047
From: davel@copper.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:47:14 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dave L

Vancouver, WA 98682
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 295 

Recognizing the strong alliance between the Republic of Korea and the United 

States and expressing appreciation to the Republic of Korea for its 

efforts in the global war against terrorism. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 30, 2007 

Mr. KING of New York (for himself, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. FOSSELLA, Mr. 

GILLMOR, Mr. MCCOTTER, Mr. MARIO DIAZ-BALART of Florida, Mr. 

TOWNS, and Mr. BISHOP of New York) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the strong alliance between the Republic of 

Korea and the United States and expressing appreciation 

to the Republic of Korea for its efforts in the global 

war against terrorism. 

Whereas for more than 50 years since the outbreak of the 

Korean War, a close relationship has existed between the 

United States and the Republic of Korea, which has been 

of enormous economic, cultural, and strategic advantage 

to both nations; 

Whereas President George W. Bush and President Roh Moo 

Hyun have demonstrated their mutual willingness to 

forge a deeper alliance between the United States and the 

Republic of Korea to enhance stability in East Asia; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 295 IH 

Whereas the 37,000 United States troops, who are stationed 

in the Republic of Korea, serve as a testament to the enduring strength of the 1953 U.S.–R.O.K. Mutual Defense Treaty; 

Whereas the foundation of the relationship between the 

United States and the Republic of Korea rests on a 

shared interest in and commitment to peace, democracy, 

and freedom on the Korean Peninsula, in Asia, and 

throughout the world; 

Whereas since February 2006, the Republic of Korea and the 

United States have been conducting negotiations to 

achieve a free trade agreement that would deepen economic ties and boost trade and investment for both nations; 

Whereas the Republic of Korea and the United States are 

both deeply committed to the Six Party Talks and have 

a mutual interest in keeping the Korean Peninsula free 

of nuclear weapons; 

Whereas the Republic of Korea has 2,300 personnel deployed 

in Iraq, constituting the third largest coalition contingent 

in Iraq behind the United States and the United Kingdom; 

Whereas the Republic of Korea has 200 troops deployed in 

Afghanistan; and 

Whereas the Republic of Korea has pledged $260,000,000 toward reconstruction and stabilization in postwar Iraq: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes the strong alliance between the Republic of Korea 

3 and the United States and expresses appreciation to the 


bajohnson on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 295 IH 

1 Republic of Korea for its efforts in the global war against 

2 terrorism. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
From: igranite1@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:23:54 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask that you rescind the unjust and coercive mandate that all "contraceptives" and

sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance with no co-pay to patients. I strongly

oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and devices

that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow that only churches

are included. There are many businesses and organizations that have conscience objections that will be

required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees health

insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I impel you to reverse course

and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mac and Iris Bergen

Sutton, NE 68979
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           108,319
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                       24,446
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 157,413
<PP&E>                                           812,509
<DEPRECIATION>                                   192,489
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   887,034
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            127,557
<BONDS>                                            1,433
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                             778
<OTHER-SE>                                       732,586
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     887,034
<SALES>                                          460,974
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 464,797
<CGS>                                            171,699
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    380,280
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   55,623
<INCOME-TAX>                                      19,857
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               35,766
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                      35,766
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.45


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries

# AGENCY:

Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries.

# ACTION:

Notice of Federal advisory committee meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries gives notice of a closed teleconference meeting of the Advisory Committee on Actuarial Examinations.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on October 27, 2023, from 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (EDT).

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Elizabeth Van Osten, Designated Federal Officer, Advisory Committee on Actuarial Examinations, at (202) 317-3648 or                         *elizabeth.j.vanosten@irs.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Notice is hereby given that the Advisory Committee on Actuarial Examinations will hold a teleconference meeting on October 27, 2023, from 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (EDT). The meeting will be closed to the public.

The purpose of the meeting is to discuss topics and questions that may be recommended for inclusion on future Joint Board examinations in actuarial mathematics, pension law and methodology referred to in 29 U.S.C. 1242(a)(1)(B).

A determination has been made as required by section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. 1009, that the subject of the meeting falls within the exception to the open meeting requirement set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B), and that the public interest requires that such meeting be closed to public participation.

Dated: September 19, 2023.

Thomas V. Curtin, Jr.,

Executive Director, Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries.

[FR Doc. 2023-20610 Filed 9-22-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P