alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: kgutschick@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:56:08 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

kim gutschick

Kensington, MD 20895
**Exhibit
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
      OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report
      on Form 10-QSB of Sunrise Energy Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the
      period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Konstantin Tsirulnikov,
      President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)     The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and








(2)     The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








Date:
      November 14,
      2007




By:
            /s/
                Konstantin TsirulnikovKonstantin
                TsirulnikovChief
                Executive
                Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BJs Wholesale Club, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended May 2, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, Frank D. Forward, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the undersigneds knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |  |  |                                                                                   
|------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: June 3, 2009 |  |  |  | /S/ FRANK D. FORWARD                                                              
|                    |  |  |  | Frank D. Forward                                                                  
|                    |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
<PAGE>


Exhibit 99.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002,
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Alkermes,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, James M. Frates, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. section 1350 that, to
my knowledge:

     1. Amendment No. 1 to the Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.


                                        /s/ James M. Frates
                                        ----------------------------
                                        James M. Frates
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        November 14, 2002
From: hde1425@rhtc.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44 RESCIND free birth control!!!!!!!!!

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:57:52 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you RESCIND the UNJUST and COERCIVE

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. THIS IS OUTRAGEOUS!!!!!! If you do not reverse course I ask you to

expand conscience protections for any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and

have moral or religious objections. I VERY STONGLY oppose the government forcing free insurance

coverage on Americans especially for drugs and devices that I oppose because some of these can cause

an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience RIGHTS of insurers, providers and people like me who STONGLY object to

being forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services,

especially when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. NO AMERICANS should

be forced by the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in

the strongest way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list

of mandatory preventive services.

Sincerely,

Doug and Lynda Elliott

Rock Hill, SC 29730
From: loretz.2@buckeyemail.osu.edu

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:33:39 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Hadassah Loretz

Columbus, OH 43220
From: maryvwalker@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:42:32 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mary Veatch Walker

Friendswood, TX 77546
Before the Second Division,

April *21,*1965

No. 69258.

#### Heeksuede, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/25334 (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cotton cloth similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *D. H. Grant & Co., Inc.*(47 CCPA 20, C.A.D. 723), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 462 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 70
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 462

                          [Report No. 110-177]

       Dismissing the election contest relating to the office of 
  Representative from the Fourth Congressional District of Louisiana.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 6, 2007

Mr. Brady of Pennsylvania, from the Committee on House Administration, 
  reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House 
                   Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
       Dismissing the election contest relating to the office of 
  Representative from the Fourth Congressional District of Louisiana.

    Resolved,  That the election contest relating to the office of 
Representative from the Fourth Congressional District of Louisiana is 
dismissed.
                                                  House Calendar No. 70

110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 462

                          [Report No. 110-177]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

       Dismissing the election contest relating to the office of 
  Representative from the Fourth Congressional District of Louisiana.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              June 6, 2007

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
From: gnitsihrg@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:50:33 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Robert Histing

Mobile, AL 36693
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 181 (Wednesday, September 20, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 64982]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20299]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


National Research Advisory Council, Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. ch. 10, that the National 
Research Advisory Council will hold a meeting on Wednesday, October 11, 
2023, by Teams conference call system. The meeting will convene at 11 
a.m. and end at 2 p.m. eastern daylight time. This meeting is open to 
the public.
    The purpose of the National Research Advisory Council is to advise 
the Secretary on research conducted by the Veterans Health 
Administration, including policies and programs targeting the high 
priority of Veterans' health care needs.
    On October 11, 2023, the agenda will include updates on the 
Research Enterprise Initiative to include Investigators, and Scientific 
Review Management and Brain Health; VA Shield and the Air Force Health 
Study; and VA as an Academic Health System.
    For anyone interested in attending the meeting, the teleconference 
number is 1-872-701-0185, conference ID 369 055 026# or the meeting 
link is https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_Y2Q5MTg2NGQtMTA2OS00YTMyLWExODAtYjg5MTlmMzlhODlj%40thread.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%22e95f1b23-abaf-45ee-821d-b7ab251ab3bf%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%22121a3c2b-ae37-46ab-a12a-fa7b555533ae%22%7d.
    No time will be allocated at this meeting for receiving oral 
presentations from the public. Members of the public wanting to attend, 
have questions or presentations to present may contact Rashelle 
Robinson, Designated Federal Officer, Office of Research and 
Development (14RD), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20420, at 202-443-5768, or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#366457455e535a5a53184459545f5845595876405718515940"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9dcffceef5f8f1f1f8b3eff2fff4f3eef2f3ddebfcb3faf2eb">[email protected]</span></a> 
no later than close of business on September 30, 2023. All questions 
and presentations will be presented during the public comment section 
of the meeting. Any member of the public seeking additional information 
should contact Rashelle Robinson at the above phone number or email 
address noted above.

    Dated: September 14, 2023.
LaTonya L. Small,
Federal Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2023-20299 Filed 9-19-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Before the First Division,

April 13, 1966

No. P66/32.

protests 63/8315-13458, 63/19283-13822, and 63/19293-13837 (Chicago).

#### Imported Merchandise Company *v.*United States,

Nichols, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of rattancore paper plate holders, wheelbarrows, or napkin holders similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Imported Merchandise Company*v. *United States*(52 Cust. Ct. 313, Abstract 68437), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
ttoo-ex1041_513.htm




			
	
 
	
 
	
EXHIBIT 10.41




 

AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO COMMERCIAL LEASE BETWEEN COLUMBUS DAY REALTY, INC., AND T2 BIOSYSTEMS, INC.

 

 

This Amendment No. 3 is to a Commercial Lease dated May 6, 2013, by and between Columbus Day Realty, Inc. (LESSOR), and T2 Biosystems, Inc. (LESSEE), which lease relates to the premises at 231 Andover Street, Wilmington, Massachusetts.

 

WHEREAS, the Commercial Lease is dated May 6, 2013;

 

 

WHEREAS, the parties signed Amendment No. 1 to the Commercial Lease on September 24, 2013;

 

WHEREAS, the parties signed Amendment No. 2 to the Commercial Lease on September 21, 2015;

 

WHEREAS, the parties are desirous of amending the Commercial Lease for the purpose of extending the term of the Lease to December 31, 2018;

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in accordance with the covenants, considerations and conditions contained herein, the parties agree to further amend the Commercial Lease as follows:

 


	
 
	
3.
	
TERM.




 

 

This paragraph of the Commercial Lease is hereby amended by extending the expiration date to December 31, 2018.

 


	
 
	
4.
	
RENT.




 

 

The base rent for the period of January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 shall be at the rate of Ten Dollars ($10.00) per square foot.

 

 

 

 



1
 



			
	
 
	
 
	
 




 

 

Except as modified by this Amendment, all other terms of the Commercial Lease and Amendments No. 1 and No. 2 shall remain in full force and effect for the remaining term of the Lease.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the LESSOR and LESSEE have set their hands and

seals this10th day of August, 2017.

 

 

 

 

COLUMBUS DAY REALTY, INC.T2 BIOSYSTEMS, INC.

 

By:  _[Illegible]____________________By:  /s/ John McDonough_____

 

Its PresidentIts President & CEO

 

By:  __[Illegible]____________________

 

Its Treasurer

 

 

 

 

 

 



2
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 284 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to strengthen the point 

of order against the consideration of legislation that contains congressional earmarks. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2007 

Mr. FLAKE (for himself, Mr. BILBRAY, Mr. LAMBORN, and Mr. PITTS) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to 

strengthen the point of order against the consideration 

of legislation that contains congressional earmarks. 

1 Resolved, That clause 9 of rule XXI of the Rules of 

2 the House of Representatives is amended as follows: 

3 (1) Before the period at the end of paragraph 

4 (c), add the following: ‘‘, or any inaccuracy in the 

5 list required by paragraph (a) or any inaccuracy in 

6 such statement’’. 

7 (2) At the end, add the following new para8 graph: 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 284 IH 

1 ‘‘(g) For the purposes of this clause, any provision 

2 or report language that is inserted by the chairman of a 

3 standing committee or any subcommittee thereof with sub4 ject matter jurisdiction over the measure containing such 

5 provision or report language and that would be a congres6 sional earmark, limited tax benefit, or limited tariff benefit 

7 but for the fact that it was not requested by any Member, 

8 Delegate, Resident Commissioner, or Senator, and that is 

9 either targeted to the congressional district of such chair10 man or unrelated to the purpose of the underlying meas11 ure shall be required to be included in the applicable list 

12 of congressional earmarks, limited tax benefits, or limited 

13 tariff benefits.’’. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS