alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER DISMISSING § 2254 

PETITION WITH PREJUDICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

ANDREA MELISANDE ALTHEIMER, )

)

Petitioner, ) CASE NO. C05-1580-RSM

)

v. )

)

BELINDA STEWART, ) ORDER DISMISSING § 2254 

) PETITION WITH PREJUDICE

Respondent. )

____________________________________)

The Court, having reviewed petitioner’s federal habeas petition, the Report and

Recommendation of Monica J. Benton, United States Magistrate Judge, the Objections thereto, and

the remaining record, does hereby find and Order:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation.

(2) Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED, with prejudice, under 

28 U.S.C. § 2244(d).

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to petitioner, to counsel for

respondent, and to Judge Benton.

DATED this 8th day of September, 2006.

A

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:05-cv-01580-RSM Document 33 Filed 09/08/06 Page 1 of 1
### Page 1 of 3 Disposition Comments

Docket No: 

### FAA

- 20 1 4

- 0338 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 

### 20 1 4

- CE

- 0 10

- AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.:

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM



### N o C omments/Only Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are

required.

No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes,

lis t latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues

from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA

- IR

- M

- 8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one o

f the following :

If other, explain :

Commenter(s):

What change to the AD action is requested?

Why is the change requested or how is it justified?

Do we agree?

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD:

If PARTIALLY AGREE

, we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD:

If NO

, we don’t agree because

ISSUE 2 : Select one of the following :

If other, explain :

Commenter(s):

What change to the AD action is requested?

Why is the change requested or how is it justified?

Do we agree?

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD:

If PARTIALLY AGREE

, we agree w ith because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If NO

, we don’t agree because

For additional issues, do uble

- click here

### Page 3 of 3 S ignature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.:

ASE Printed Name : Date

Branch M anager Date
p. 1


# OAR Box 1778 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 253 ) lll-A- 4 Docket Number: 

# A-90-0 6

Printed 10/28/2008 9:51:03 AM Sheet 253 of 276P. 2

1

SA<F \ PRO" t0 

## P M

UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA LPROTECTIO N AGENC Y Offic e ofAi rQualit yPlannin g an d Standard s Researc h Triangl e Park , Nort h Carolin a 2771 1

Decembe r 10 , 199 1

NOT E T O WEPC O COMMENTER : Attache d i s a cop

yo f th e Federa l Registe r notic e o n th e Extensio n o f Publi c Commen t Perio d fo r Propose d WEPC O Rulemaking , effectiv e Decembe r 10 , 1991 . During th e commen t perio d EPA receive d request s t o exten d th e commen t perio d fo r an additiona l amoun t o f time . A t thi s time , i n respons e t o thos e requests , th e EPAi s extending th e commen t perio d unti l Decembe r 17 , 1991 .

A i r QmAy*SZ4y

Joh n Calcagn i Directo r ualit yManagemen t Divisio n Attachmen t12/10/9 1 17: 2 3

v

ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO

NAGENC Y [4 0 CF R PART S 51 , 52 , AND 60 ]

[FRL

- ] REQUIREMENT S FO R PREPARATION , ADOPTION , AND SUBMITTAL O F IMPLEMENTATIO

NPLANS ; APPROVAL AND PROMULGATIONO F IMPLEMENTATIO

NPLANS ; STANDARD S O F PERFORMANC E FOR NE W STATIONAR

Y SOURCE S AGENCY : Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y(EPA) . ACTION : Extensio n o f Publi c Commen t Perio d fo r Propose d WEPC O Rulemaking . SUMMARY : O n Jun e 14 , 199 1 (5 6 F R 27630) , EPApropose d regulatio n clarifyin g th e ne wsourc e revie w(NSR ) requirement s o f Titl e I o f th e Clea n Ai r Ac t a s theypertai n t o electri c utilit ystea m generatin g units . Th e propose d rulemaking als o clarifie s th e Agency' s polic yregarding utilit ypollutio n contro l project s an d implement s change s mad e b yCongres s i n th e 199 0 Clea n Ai r Ac t Amendment s regarding clea n coa l technolog yan d repowering projects . I n th e las t fewweeks , EPAreceive d request s t o extend th e commen t perio d fo r an additiona l amoun t o f time . A t thi s time , an d i n respons e t o thos e requests , EP Ai s extending th e commen t perio d unti l Decembe r 17 , 1991 . DATES : Writte n comment s o n th e propose d rulemaking mus t b e receive d b

yDecembe r 17 , 1991 . ADDRESSEES : Submi t comment s o n th e propose d rul e (in duplicate , i f possible ) to : EPAAi r Docke t (LE-131) , Environmenta l P. 3 @00 2P. 4

^12/4,0/9 1 17:2 4 © 12)00 3

- 2 - Protectio n Agency , ATTN ; Docke t A-90-06 , 40 1 M Street , S.W. , Washington , D.C . 20460 . DOCKET : Supporting informatio n use d i n developing th e propose d rul e i s containe d i n Docke t A-90-06 . Thi s Docke t i s availabl e fo r inspectio n an

d copying betwee n 8:3 0 a.m . an d 3:3 0 p.m. , weekdays , a t EPA' s Ai r Docke t (LE-131) , Room M-1500 , 40 1 M Street , S.W. , Washington , D.C . 20460 . Areasonabl e fe e mayb e charge d fo r copying . FOR FURTHE R INFORMATIO NCONTACT : Wm . Larr yElmore , Offic e o f Ai r Qualit yPlanning an d Standard s (MD-15) , Researc hTriangl e Park , Nort hCarolin a 2771 1 (919 ) 541-5433 . 

### DE C I0 

### 199 1 Dat e .ia mG . Assistan t

Ad m fo r Ai r an d Rosenber g nistrato r Ridiatio n
H. Res. 531 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 11, 2007. 

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

2669) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to section 601 of 

the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2008. 

All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived 

except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The 

amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the 

Committee on Education and Labor now printed in the bill, 

modified by the amendment printed in part A of the report 

of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, 

shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be 

considered as read. All points of order against the bill, as 

amended, are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, to final passage 

without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate on 

the bill, as amended, equally divided and controlled by the 

chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 

Education and Labor; (2) the amendment in the nature of a 
2 

•HRES 531 EH 

substitute printed in part B of the report on the Committee 

on Rules, if offered by the gentleman from California, Mr. 

McKeon, or his designee, which shall be in order without 

intervention of any point of order except those arising under 

clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI, shall be considered as read, and 

shall be separately debatable for one hour equally divided and 

controlled by the proponent and an opponent; and (3) one 

motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

SEC. 2. During consideration of H.R. 2669 pursuant to 

this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous 

question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the 

bill to such time as may be designated by the Speaker. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ambac Financial Group, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), David W. Wallis, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|       |  |                                      
|------ |  | -------------------------------------
|       |  | /s/ David W. Wallis                  
|Name:  |  | David W. Wallis                      
|Title: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|Date:  |  | November 15, 2010
H. Res. 511 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 30, 2007. 

Whereas the men’s volleyball team of the University of California, Irvine (UC Irvine), known as the Anteaters, 

achieved many historic accomplishments during the 

2006–2007 season; 

Whereas the UC Irvine men’s volleyball team won the 

school’s first ever National Collegiate Athletic Association 

(NCAA) Division I Men’s Volleyball National Championship; 

Whereas Matt Webber, a senior on the UC Irvine men’s 

volleyball team, was selected as the tournament’s most 

valuable player with 22 kills in the championship match; 

Whereas UC Irvine men’s volleyball players Brian Thornton, 

Jayson Jablonsky, and David Smith were named to the 

All-Tournament Team; 

Whereas UC Irvine men’s volleyball coach John Speraw is 

only the third coach in history to win a NCAA volleyball 

championship as both a player and as a head coach; 

Whereas the UC Irvine men’s volleyball team finished with 29 

victories, the most victories in school history; 

Whereas the UC Irvine men’s volleyball team finished with 

the most wins in the Nation for the 2006–2007 season; 
2 

•HRES 511 EH 

Whereas the UC Irvine men’s volleyball team won the 2007 

Mountain Pacific Sports Federation Men’s Volleyball 

title; 

Whereas the UC Irvine men’s volleyball team had four players selected to the American Volleyball Coaches Association (AVCA) All-America Team, the most by any team in 

the Nation; 

Whereas middle blocker David Smith earned first-team accolades on the AVCA All-America Team; 

Whereas Matt Webber, Jayson Jablonsky, and Brian Thornton earned second-team accolades on the AVCA AllAmerica Team; 

Whereas the UC Irvine men’s volleyball team started the season as the preseason favorite in the CSTV/AVCA Division I Men’s Coaches Top 15 Poll; 

Whereas the UC Irvine men’s volleyball team finished first in 

the CSTV/AVCA Division I Men’s Coaches Top 15 Poll, 

released May 7, 2007; 

Whereas the UC Irvine men’s volleyball team accomplished 

these feats while playing a difficult schedule in the Mountain Pacific Sports Federation; 

Whereas the title is UC Irvine’s first Division I title since 

1989; and 

Whereas UC Irvine, under the leadership of Chancellor Michael V. Drake, M.D., has continued to establish itself as 

a world-class research university, and as one of the top 

universities in the Nation: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) congratulates the men’s volleyball team of the 

University of California, Irvine, and its Chancellor, Mi-
3 

•HRES 511 EH 

chael V. Drake, M.D., for winning the 2007 NCAA Division I Men’s Volleyball National Championship; and 

(2) recognizes the achievements of the players, 

coaches, students, alumni, and staff who were instrumental in helping the University of California, Irvine, 

win the national title. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,478

EX PARTE MARK EDWARD BERRY, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. F-0535245-LQ IN THE 204 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated sexual

assault of a child and sentenced to life imprisonment. 

Applicant contends that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he failed to

timely file a notice of appeal. 

The trial court has determined that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to timely file a

notice of appeal. We agree. We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file
2

an out-of-time appeal of the judgment of conviction in Cause No. F-0535245-LQ from the 204th

Judicial District Court of Dallas County. Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he may

give a written notice of appeal so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful

appeal. All time limits shall be calculated as if the sentence had been imposed on the date on which

the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he

must take affirmative steps to file a written notice of appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the

mandate of this Court issues.

Delivered: January 12, 2011

Do Not Publish
To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:49:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Henry Hamilton

Amarillo, TX 79118
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MINUTE ORDER – 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

DONNA ANDERSON, et al.,

Defendants.

CASE NO. C05-1576JLR

MINUTE ORDER

The following minute order is made by the direction of the court, the Honorable

James L. Robart:

The court is in receipt of Plaintiff’s notice of bankruptcy filing by Defendant

Donna Anderson a/k/a Donna Mary Anderson a/k/a Donna Bode Anderson (Dkt. # 30). 

The only other Defendant, The Opportunity Council, has not appeared in this matter. 

Plaintiff’s original application for clerk’s entry of default against The Opportunity

Counsel was withdrawn prior to Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. The

withdrawal of the application appears to have been made in error. Plaintiff informs the

court that it cannot renew its application for default against The Opportunity Counsel

because of the automatic stay provisions contained in the United States Bankruptcy Code. 

Essentially, Plaintiff contends that because Defendant Donna Anderson filed for

Case 2:05-cv-01576-JLR Document 31 Filed 01/23/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MINUTE ORDER – 2

bankruptcy in December 2006, it cannot move for judgment against her creditor, The

Opportunity Counsel. Based on Plaintiff’s representations to the court regarding the

scope of the automatic stay provisions, and pursuant to those same provisions, the court

hereby strikes Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. # 25) and stays the matter

pending resolution of the bankruptcy proceeding. See 11 U.S.C. § 362.

Filed and entered this 23rd day of January, 2007.

BRUCE RIFKIN, Clerk

s/Mary Duett

By

Deputy Clerk

Case 2:05-cv-01576-JLR Document 31 Filed 01/23/07 Page 2 of 2
No. 67109.

protests 330857-K, etc. (New York).

#### Gemsco et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Eord, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of insignia similar in all material respects to those involved in Abstract 66583, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: donandteresa@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:53:28 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Teresa Fellows

Sargent, NE 68874
From: mbradley825@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:57:32 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Megan Althouse

Lebanon, PA 17042