alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: gleelee3@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:02:18 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Lynette Lee

Roach, MO 65787
EXHIBIT
32.1




Certification
Pursuant to


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


as
Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes -Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Auto Search Cars, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jonathan Martin,
President, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




April
      9, 2009
            /s/
      Jonathan MartinJonathan
      MartinPresident,
      Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
  Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-10265 

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANTHONY WAYNE ELROD,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:97-CV-903-G

 & 3:93-CR-377-1-G 

--------------------

January 14, 2000

Before KING, Chief Judge, and SMITH and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit

Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Anthony Wayne Elrod, federal prisoner # 24994-077, appeals

the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. He

argues that (1) he was coerced into entering a guilty plea by

threats, made in bad faith and without probable cause, to indict

his then-spouse; and (2) that the district court abused its

discretion by not holding an evidentiary hearing with respect to

this issue. 

A district court may deny a § 2255 motion without conducting
No. 98-10265

-2-

a hearing only "if the motion, files, and records of the case

conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief." 

United States v. Bartholomew, 974 F.2d 39, 41 (5th Cir. 1992). 

This court reviews a district court's denial of an evidentiary

hearing for abuse of discretion. Id.

We conclude, based upon our review of the parties’ briefs

and the record, that the record does not conclusively show that

the Government had probable cause to indict Elrod’s then-wife. 

United States v. Nuckols, 606 F.2d 566, 569-70 (5th Cir. 1979);

United States v. Diaz, 733 F.2d 371, 375 (5th Cir. 1984). The

district court’s judgment is therefore VACATED, and this case is

REMANDED to the district court for an evidentiary hearing to

develop the facts relating to Elrod’s claim that he was coerced

into entering a guilty plea by threats, made in bad faith and

without probable cause, to indict his then-spouse. If the

district court finds that the government’s threat to indict

Elrod’s spouse was made in bad faith and without probable cause,

it may still determine that this threat was not the motivating

factor in Elrod’s decision to plead guilty.

VACATED AND REMANDED.
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D23-2873

LT Case No. 2021-CF-001096-A

_____________________________

BONNIE HARTMANN,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Belated Appeal.

A Case of Original Jurisdiction.

Bonnie Hartmann, Ocala, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General Tallahassee, and Rebecca Rock 

McGuigan Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for 

Respondent.

December 1, 2023

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is granted. A copy of this 

opinion shall be filed with the trial court and be treated as the 

notice of appeal from the August 17, 2022 judgment and sentence 

rendered in Case No. 2021-CF-001096-A, in the Circuit Court in 

and for Hernando County, Florida. See Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(c)(6)(D). 
2

PETITION GRANTED.

JAY, HARRIS, and BOATWRIGHT, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
From: kreed68@juno.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:15:11 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Pete Reed

Shelby, NC 28150
No. 60528.

#### Porath & Magneheim, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 268707-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
HE A ORNEY GENERAL 

OFTEXAS 

February 15, 1962 

Mr. V. D. Housworth 

Executive Secretary 

State Board of,Barber Examiners 

Austin, Texas Opinion NO. WW- 1266 

Re: Whether an Assistant Class 

"B" barber is eligible for 

Dear Mr. Housworth: a teacher's certificate. 

You have requested an opinion from this office 

upon the question of: 

"In light of amendments made to Section 9 of the Texas Barber Law, would an 

Assistant Class 'B' barber be eligible for 

a Teacher's certificate?" 

Section g(f) of Article 734a, Vernon's Penal 

Code, as amended by House Bill.829, Acts of the 57th 

Legislature, Regular Session, 1961, Chapter 287, page 

601, sets forth the requirements which must be met for 

an applicant to obtain a teacher's certificate from the 

State Board of Barber Examiners. One of such requirements 

is set forth in Section 9(f)(2) of Article 734a and provides that the applicant must: 

"Hold a current certificate as a 

registered 'Class A' barber under this law." 

We are therefore of the opinion that in view of 

the express statutory requirements set forth in Section 

g(f) of Article 73&a, an Assistant Class "B" barber would 

not be eligible for a teacher's certificate unless or until such applicant holds a current certificate as a regis- 

;;gd Class ' A" barber pursuant to the provisions of Article 

SUMMARY 

An Assistant Class "B" barber is 

ineligible for the teaching certicate issued pursuant to Section g(f) 
Mr. V. D. Housworth, page 2 (~-1266) 

PB:kkc 

APPROVED: 

of Article 734a of Vernon's Penal 

Code. 

Yours very truly, 

WILL WILSON 

P.;FzGrqas 

Pat Bailey 

Assistant 

OPINION COMMITTEE 

W. V. Geppert, Chairman 

Riley Eugene Fletcher 

Elmer McVey 

L. P. Lollar 

Bill Allen 

REVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 

BY: Houghton Brownlee, Jr.
No. 68450.

protests 62/13711 and 62/16640 (New York).

#### Mitsubishi International Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of certain “photo lenses” similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Unimark Photo, Inc.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 75, C.D. 2283), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EX-34.13
(logo) Virchow Krause & company


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


We have examined WestLake Settlement Services, LLC's compliance with the
servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB applicable to
WestLake (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria") as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2008:

1122(d)(4)(xi) Payments made on behalf of an obligor (such as tax or insurance
payments) are made on or before the related penalty or expiration dates, as
indicated on the appropriate bills or notices for such payments, provided that
such support has been received by the servicer at least 30 calendar days prior
to these dates, or such other number of days specified in the transaction
agreements.

1122(d)(4)(xii) Any late payment penalties in connection with any payment to be
made on behalf of an obligor are paid from the servicer's funds and not charged
to the obligor, unless the late payment was due to the obligor's error or
omission.

Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with these servicing
criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion
about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our
examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining,
on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, WestLake Settlement Services, LLC complied with, in all material
respects, the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2008.


/s/ Virchow, Krause & Company, LLP
Virchow Krause & Company, LLP
February 25, 2009


Virchow, Krause & Company, LLP
Certified Public Accountants & Consultants
An Independent Member of Baker Tilly International
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

SUZANNE DOE,

Plaintiff,

v.

EEOC, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5720JKA

ORDER

Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 1) is incomplete. Local Civil Rule

CR 3 states the following:

(a) Civil Cover Sheet Required. Every complaint shall be accompanied by a Civil Cover Sheet,

Form JS-44 revised. Form JS-44 revised with instruction sheet may be obtained from the clerk.

(b) Proceedings In Forma Pauperis. At the time application is made under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 or

other applicable acts of Congress, for leave to commence any civil action or to file any petition

or motion without being required to prepay fees and costs or give security for them, each

petitioner, movant or plaintiff shall:

(1) Complete the in forma pauperis affidavit approved for use in this district; and

(2) File a written consent that the recovery, if any, in the action, to such amount as the

court may direct, shall be paid to the clerk who may pay therefrom all unpaid fees and costs

taxed against the plaintiff, and to his attorney the amount which the court allows or approves as

compensation for the attorney's services.

(3) In all proceedings in forma pauperis, for a writ of habeas corpus, or under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255, the marshal shall pay all fees of witnesses for the party authorized to proceed in forma

pauperis, upon the certificate of the judge.

Plaintiff has not filed her application on the court approved form, nor has she filed the appropriate consent for

payment form. 

Case 3:05-cv-05720-FDB Document 2 Filed 12/05/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 2

Accordingly, plaintiff shall complete and file the appropriate documentation to amend her

motion/application to proceed in forma pauperis by not later than December 31, 2005. Otherwise, the

matter may be dismissed by the court.

The clerk is directed to send a copy of this order to plaintiff along with the appropriate blank forms. 

DATED this 5th day of December, 2005.

/s/ J. Kelley Arnold J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:05-cv-05720-FDB Document 2 Filed 12/05/05 Page 2 of 2
THE JAPAN AGRICULTURAL EXCHANGE COUNCIL MERIDIAN NORTR-OFFIClfBUILDING 10740 MERIDIAN AVENUE NORTH, SUITE 209 SEATTLE, WA 98133 TEL (206) 622·8523 FAX (206) 621-0528

The Honorable Ray LaHood United States Department ofTransportation 1200 New JerseyAvenue SE Washington D.C. 20590

There are many Japanese Our business travelers look to the convenience of flying into On behalf ofThe Japan Agricultural Exchange Council, I am writing to express our strong support fur the application ofDelta 

### Air Lines for new nonstop service between Seattle and Haneda, 'lbkyo InternationalAirport. Approval of Delta's new service would be a major benefit for our region, where many**cor,porationshavestro~g,trage** andm:rrket presence with Japan.

. "'.- '-', "._' '-' , ,.\ ,,",( ! coJllpanie$l<X:ated 

### i-P,**W~shWgton,** and hUndreds more whose business models rely on access to**Jap~.and,:it'i3l113J;ket.** The growth ofour business ties with Japan has created demand for

### ~~~SE3dcap~citY to 'lbkyo. 'lbkyo's downtown Haneda airport. Seattle is proven and successful gateway to Asia, and as airports that can support trans'pacific routes. The addition ofHaneda as a destination is a natural fit thatwould clearly benefit ourtravelers. 

### Th.aD.k you for consideration 

### of this request. Sincerely,



# . .''fA;/ /..(

"**~**

### ashiYosinka~;'. ",', ;>. '.'

, ". ' " -_._'-. ,,}' t;.,: - : .**-~** Direct()r,**S~attle,Branchb:fflce** .:, The JapanAgriculturalExch.angeColillcil",
'.-' '-: -,> "',
APPENDIX A 

MAPS 

 
South George Vegetation and Fuels Management Project - DEIS 

A-1 

APPENDIX A 

The following maps are included in this appendix: 

1. Vicinity Map 

2. Management Area Map 

3. Subwatershed Area Map 

4. Alternative B – Silviculture Prescriptions and Logging System 

5. Alternative B – Fuel Treatment 

6. Alternative C – Silviculture Prescriptions and Logging System 

7. Alternative C – Fuel Treatments 

8. Alternative D – Silviculture Prescriptions and Logging System 

9. Alternative D – Fuel Treatments
*Harlington Wood, Jr., Circuit Judge of the Seventh Circuit,

sitting by designation.

**Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 99-20556

 con. w/ No. 99-20808

KATHERINE S. YOUNGBLOOD, Individually and on behalf

of Youngblood & Associates PLLC, formerly known 

as Youngblood & White PLLC,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 

VERSUS

THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA; MARY J. MILLER,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(H-98-CV-1794)

 

September 13, 2000

Before WOOD*, DAVIS and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:**
2

After reviewing the record, considering the briefs of the

parties and argument of counsel and, with the single exception

described below, we are persuaded that the district court committed

no error.

The parties agree that the record reflects that the costs

incurred by appellees were $27,645.77 instead of $30,000. The

judgment of the district court is MODIFIED to award appellee the

sum of $27,645.77 in costs instead of $30,000 awarded by the

district court. The judgment of the district court is in all other

respects affirmed.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, James A. Watt, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of RemingtonOil and Gas Corporation;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:
         (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;
         (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as ofthe end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and
         (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):
         (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and
         (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: October 28, 2004
/s/ James A. Watt
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Integrated Circuit Systems,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 28, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 12, 2002, as
amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto filed on the date hereof (as amended, the
"Report"), I, Hock E. Tan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Hock E. Tan
-----------------------------
Hock E. Tan
Chief Executive Officer
February 13, 2003
No. 68102.

#### Ohio Radio Mfg. Co. and Harper, Robinson & Co. *v.*United States,

protests 61/13644 and 61/13684 (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of testers or multitesters similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. G. *L. Electronics, Inc., Arrow Sales, Inc.*(49 CCPA 111, C.A.D. 804), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

 

 

 

January 3, 2013

 

 

 

**Consent of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

 

Gruber & Company, LLC, hereby consentsto the use in the Form 10-K/A of our report dated December 4, 2012, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Cemtrex,Inc. and Subsidiary as of and for the periods ending September 30, 2012 and 2011.

 

 

Sincerely,

 

*/s/ Gruber & Company, LLC*

Gruber & Company, LLC

Lake Saint Louis, Missouri