alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 410 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 410

 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with respect to 
   the increase in rates of postage for standard mail that went into 
                        effect on May 14, 2007.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 16, 2007

 Mr. Boozman submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
            the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with respect to 
   the increase in rates of postage for standard mail that went into 
                        effect on May 14, 2007.

    Resolved,  That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that the significant increase in the rates of postage for standard mail 
that went into effect on May 14, 2007, has the possibility of a very 
detrimental impact on small and large businesses alike, but especially 
with respect to mail-order businesses.
                                 <all>
```
From: mbriscoe@insightbb.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:05:56 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

May Briscoe

Lexington, KY 40502
From: bclbaker@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:19:11 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

George Baker

Brevard, NC 28712
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Surface Transportation Board

          - [Docket No. EP 290 (Sub-No. 5) (2023-4)]

# AGENCY:

Surface Transportation Board.

# ACTION:

Approval of rail cost adjustment factor.

# SUMMARY:

The Board has approved the fourth quarter 2023 Rail Cost Adjustment Factor (RCAF) and cost index filed by the Association of American Railroads. The fourth quarter 2023 RCAF (Unadjusted) is 1.012. The fourth quarter 2023 RCAF (Adjusted) is 0.401. The fourth quarter 2023 RCAF-5 is 0.384.

# DATES:

*Applicability Date:*                         October 1, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Pedro Ramirez at (202) 245-0333. If you require an accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act, please call (202) 245-0245.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Additional information is contained in the Board's decision, which is available at                     *www.stb.gov.*

Decided: September 18, 2023.

By the Board, Board Members Fuchs, Hedlund, Oberman, Primus, and Schultz.

Tammy Lowery,

Clearance Clerk.

[FR Doc. 2023-20683 Filed 9-22-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
No. 62255.

#### Ira Furman Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 150981-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of kidskins or lambskins the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Joseph Rotberg & Co., Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(40 *347Cust. Ct. 22, C. D. 1952), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.
Exhibit 10.65












PROMISSORY NOTE AMENDMENT AGREEMENT












THIS PROMISSORY NOTE AMENDMENT AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is entered into as of the first day of October, 2017 by and between Uniroyal Global Engineered Products, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and Howard R. Curd, an individual residing at 1111 Ritz Carlton Drive, Apartment 1703, Sarasota, Florida 34236 (“Lender”).







WHEREAS, the Company issued a Senior Secured Promissory Note dated December 31, 2014 to Lender in the aggregate principal amount of One Million Four Hundred Seventy Thousand Fifty-Seven and 27/100 Dollars ($1,470,057.27) (the “Note”), any capitalized terms not defined in this Agreement having the meanings set forth in the Note; and







WHEREAS, Lender holds the Note; and







WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Note on the terms set forth in this Agreement;







NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the terms of this Agreement and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:







1.    Section 2 of the Note is hereby amended by adding at the end the following sentence, all other terms of the Note continuing unchanged:







Lender agrees to the Company’s deferral until October 1, 2018 of payments of principal, but not interest.  Payments of principal and interest after October 1, 2018 shall be amortized over the original term (December 31, 2014 to January 1, 2020).







2.    Except as hereby amended, all other terms of the Note shall continue in full force and effect.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this Agreement as of the date first set forth above.












       UNIROYAL GLOBAL ENGINEERED


            PRODUCTS, LLC


             (the “Company”)








	 By:	 	
 \s\ George Sanchez

	 	
\s\ Howard R. Curd


	 	 	
George Sanchez

	 	
Howard R. Curd (“Lender”)


	 	 	
Executive Vice President
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 

GERMAN XINGU-GUTIERREZ,

Defendant.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 05-528M

DETENTION ORDER 

Offense charged: 

Illegal Reentry After Deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a).

Date of Detention Hearing: November 2, 2005.

The Court, having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f), and

based upon the factual findings and statement of reasons for detention hereafter set forth, finds:

FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR DETENTION

(1) A detainer has been placed on defendant by Immigration and Customs

Enforcement.

(2) Defendant has stipulated to detention, due to the immigration detainer lodged

against him, but reserves the right to contest his continued detention if there is a change in

circumstances.

Case 2:05-cr-00398-JLR Document 9 Filed 11/03/05 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

DETENTION ORDER 15.13

18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) Rev. 1/91

PAGE 2

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

(1) Defendant shall be detained pending trial and committed to the custody of the

Attorney General for confinement in a correction facility separate, to the extent

practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody

pending appeal;

(2) Defendant shall be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with

counsel;

(3) On order of a court of the United States or on request of an attorney for the

government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant

is confined shall deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose

of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding; and

(4) The Clerk shall direct copies of this Order to counsel for the United States, to

counsel for the defendant, to the United States Marshal, and to the United States

Pretrial Services Officer.

DATED this 3rd day of November, 2005.

AJAMES P. DONOHUE

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 2:05-cr-00398-JLR Document 9 Filed 11/03/05 Page 2 of 2
From: scshepler@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:50:21 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

sylvia shepler

Noblesville, IN 46060
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-1354

In re: KEVIN HOLLAND,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:16-cv-06000)

Submitted: April 25, 2017 Decided: April 28, 2017

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin Holland, Petitioner Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Holland petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has 

unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. He seeks an order from 

this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal 

undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
cdna-ex106_701.htm



Exhibit 10.6

 

OFFER LETTER

October 20, 2017

Sasha King

[...]

 

Dear Sasha,

It is my pleasure to officially offer you the title of Chief Commercial Officer, reporting to Peter Maag, President & CEO. 

This is a full-time role at the Company with an annualized wage of $240,000.00 paid on a semi-monthly basis on our regular paydays. Deductions required by law or authorized by you will be taken from each paycheck. You will continue to be eligible to participate in our target incentive compensation at a new rate of 50% ($120,000.00) of base salary at 100% of plan. This increase will be effective October 20, 2017.

Subject to the approval of the Board of Directors of the Company, you will be granted an option to purchase 40,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock. If the company achieves 1,000 AlloSure patient results by Q4 2017 you will also be eligible to earn an additional bonus of 10,000 Restricted Stock Units. These options shall vest, subject to your continued employment with Company, as to one fourth (1/4) of the shares on the one year anniversary of your start date, and as to an additional one forty-eighth (1/48th) of the total number of shares subject to the option at the end of each calendar month thereafter. Details of the price of these options will be provided in your respective stock option and RSU grants and determined by the board of directors.

I am excited about this opportunity, and look forward to your continued contributions!

 

Sincerely,

/s/ Peter Maag

Peter MaagPresident & CEO

 

ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO this

26 day of October 2017,

/s/ Sasha King

Sasha King
From: projectcontrol@optonline.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:13:26 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Micahael Burke

, 07747-2123
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

SUZANNE CAREY,

Plaintiff,

v.

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY

COMMISSION (EEOC)– SEATTLE FIELD

OFFICE; VALERIE JOHNSON, RODERICK

USTANIK,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5720FDB

ORDER DENYING RELIEF FROM

JUDGMENT and DENYING

MOTION FOR TWO MINUTE

ORDERS

Plaintiff moves for relief from Judgment in this case. The Court finds no reason for such

relief, and the motion will be denied. 

Plaintiff also moves for two minute orders, evidently referring to the initial orders the Court

enters when a new case is filed in order to set trial and pretrial dates, among other things. This case,

however, is closed, and Plaintiff’s motion is inappropriate. 

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED: 

1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Relief from Judgment [Dkt. # 36] is DENIED;

2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Two Minute Orders [Dkt. # 39] is DENIED;

3.. Plaintiff’s Miscellaneous Motion [Dkt. # 35] to put document # 25 back on the PACER

Case 3:05-cv-05720-FDB Document 40 Filed 08/23/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 2

website is STRICKEN as Plaintiff may inquire of the Clerk’s office if there is a problem with the

PACER system. 

4. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file no further documents in this closed case, and failure to abide

by this Order may result in monetary sanctions against Plaintiff. 

DATED this 23rd day of August, 2006.

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-05720-FDB Document 40 Filed 08/23/06 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

-----------------

 

**FORM 8-K**

 

**CURRENT REPORT**

 

Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): October 26, 2005

 

----------------

 

**FIRST NATIONAL LINCOLN CORPORATION**

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in charter)

 

MAINE

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)

 

0-26589                      01-0404322

(Commission file number)   (IRS employer identification no.)

 

Main Street, Damariscotta, Maine        04853

(Address of principal executive offices)  (Zip Code)

 

(207) 563-3195

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

 

 

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously 

satisfy the filing obligations of the registrant under any of the following provisions:

 

[_]  Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

 

[_]  Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

 

[_]  Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

 

[_]  Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4 (c))

 

 

 

 

 

**Table of Contents**

 

| Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition | Page 1 |
|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|

 

| Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits | Page 1 |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|

 

| Signatures | Page 2 |
|------------|--------|

 

| Exhibit Index | Page 3 |
|---------------|--------|

 

 

 

 

 

**Section 2 - Financial Information**

 

Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition.

 

On October 26, 2005, the Registrant issued the press release filed herewith as Exhibit 99.1 with information regarding the results of operations and financial condition of First National Lincoln Corporation for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2005.

 

 

**Section 9 - Financial Statements and Exhibits**

 

Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.

 

(c)  Exhibits.

 

The following Exhibits are being furnished herewith:

 

99.1 Registrant's Press Release dated October 26, 2005.

 

 

 

 

 

**Signatures**

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

 

 

FIRST NATIONAL LINCOLN CORPORATION

 

By:  /s/ F. STEPHEN WARD

 

F. Stephen Ward

Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

 

Dated:  October 26, 2005

 

 

 

 

 

**Exhibit Index**

 

Exhibit Number            Description of Exhibit

 

| 99.1 | Registrant's Press Release dated October 26, 2005. |
|------|----------------------------------------------------|
No. P66/196.

#### Wm. Shaland Corp. *v.*United States, protest 64/8935 (New York).

Oliver, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of camera viewers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *M. Pressner & Co.*v. *United States*(46 Cust. Ct. 316, Abstract 65082), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.