alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 486 

Supporting the goals and ideals of the National Anthem Project, which 

has worked to restore America’s voice by re-teaching Americans to sing 

the national anthem. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 14, 2007 

Mr. HILL (for himself and Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 

Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of the National Anthem 

Project, which has worked to restore America’s voice 

by re-teaching Americans to sing the national anthem. 

Whereas a Harris Interactive Survey discovered that of men 

and women 18 years of age and older, 61 percent of 

those surveyed did not know all the lyrics of the first 

stanza of the national anthem, and of those who answered the question affirmatively, 58 percent had received at least 5 years of music education while growing 

up; 

Whereas an ABC News poll revealed that more than 1 in 3 

Americans (38 percent) do not know that the official 

name of the national anthem is ‘‘The Star-Spangled Banner’’, less than 35 percent of American teenagers can 


bajohnson on PRODPC60 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 486 IH 

name Francis Scott Key as the author of the national anthem, and as few as 15 percent of American youth can 

sing the words to the anthem from memory; 

Whereas the national anthem, ‘‘The Star-Spangled Banner’’, 

holds a special place in the hearts and minds of the 

American people as a symbol of national unity, resolve, 

and willingness to sacrifice in order to preserve the Nation’s sacred heritage of freedom; 

Whereas the National Anthem Project has inspired the American people to have a greater appreciation of their patriotic musical heritage while learning American history; 

Whereas music educators are the among the leading caretakers of this important piece of our Nation’s heritage, 

in that many students learn the national anthem in 

music class; 

Whereas our Nation’s future is enhanced by the quality of 

the historic knowledge and awareness provided to children of all ages through learning about the national anthem, and that high-quality music education represents a 

worthy commitment to our children and our Nation’s future; and 

Whereas the national anthem is the symbol of American 

ideals and freedom around the world: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of the Na3 tional Anthem Project; 

4 (2) commends the American citizens who have 

5 participated in this project; and 


bajohnson on PRODPC60 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 486 IH 

1 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

2 to learn the national anthem, ‘‘The Star-Spangled 

3 Banner’’, and its proud history. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PRODPC60 with BILLS
From: chaslie@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:35:12 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Charles Ammel

Lenexa, KS 66220
Befóse the Third Division,

March 25, 1963

No. 67529.

#### United China & Glass Co. *v.*United States,

protests 272148-K(S)/14620 and 273644-K(S)/14677 (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of decorated porcelain cups and saucers the same in all material respects as those the subject of *United States*v. *The Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United Ohina & Glass Company*(47 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 719), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: bkeckritz@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:20:55 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Brock Keckritz

Waterloo, IL 62298
To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:57:10 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Don and Glenda Darden

Knoxville, TN 37938
48 44

63 28

58 32

33 66

54 50 13 56 16

60

25 21 43

31

64 55 19

9

40

11

67

53

38

30

39

34

20

27

7

23

10

59

29

61 49

65

6

15

68

52

12

41 14

18

42 62

4

5

71

70

22

45

26

37

3

8

46

17

51 36

24

47

69

1

35

2

57 35

12 8 7 8 9 10 11

31 32 33 34 35 36 31

3

33 34 36 31 32

6 2 1

3

4 5 2 1 6

7

6 5 4

10 11 12 7

10

9

9

8

7 8

7

11 12

18 13

13

14

14

15

15

16

16

17

17

18

18

23 24 19

23 24

22

22

21

21

19 20

19 20

25 30 26

26 25

27

27

29 28 30

30 29 28

35 36 31

36

31

35

34

34

33 32

31 32 33

6 1

2

1 6 3

2 3

4

4

5

5 6

7

11 12 9 10

Asotin Creek

Wenatchee Creek

WICKIUP CG

WENATCHEE

GUARD

STATION RC

CABIN SADDLE CG INDIAN

TOM TH

CLOVERLAND SP

South George Project Planning Area - Inventory of Potential Wilderness Areas

H-4

1 0.5 0 1 Miles

Map H-4: Acres not containing Past Timber Harvest or Forest Roads

Depicts acres not containing past timber harvest

or forest roads. These acres will be examined

using inventory criteria at FSH 1909.12 ch. 71.

(Appendix H - South George DEIS)

This product is reproduced from geospatial information prepared by the U.S. Department of

Agriculture, Forest Service. GIS data and product accuracy may vary. They may be: developed from

sources of differing accuracy, interpretation, incomplete while being created or revised, etc.

Using GIS products for purposes other than those for which they were created may yield inaccurate

or misleading results. The Forest Service reserves the right ot correct, update, modify, or replace GIS

products without notification. For more information contact the Umatilla National Forest Supervisors Office.

D.Dixon

GIS/Data Service Specialist

06/03/2011

4300

4304

4400

LEGEND

South George Project Planning Area

Washington State Fish and Wildlife

Pomeroy Ranger District

Inventoried Roadless Area(IRA)

Wenaha-Tucannon Wilderness

Acres not Containing Past Harvest or Forest Roads

Recreation Feature

Forest Roads

1-71 Polygon identification numbers associated with

Tables H-1B in DEIS - Appendix H  ́
TS-CKHI01

Attachment #9

Physical and Chemical Properties Da ta on the New Chemical Substance

Molecular Weight DataPage 2 of 7

Simplified version for

1. Formula and molecular weight

1.1 Formula

1 .2 Molecular weight and distribution
To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:35:35 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Roy Andersen

Pittsfield, MA 01201
From: nagle.clan@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:04:45 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mary Beth Nagle

Bloomington, IL 61704
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
       
<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                       MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                   2,043
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                            5,551
<ALLOWANCES>                               188
<INVENTORY>                                119
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         7,965
<PP&E>                                   2,439
<DEPRECIATION>                           1,804
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          16,359
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   10,426
<BONDS>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                   496
<OTHER-SE>                               5,401
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            16,359
<SALES>                                 13,458
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        13,458
<CGS>                                    3,914
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           11,356
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         551
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          1,621
<INCOME-TAX>                                61
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      1,560
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                             1,560
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                              .27
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of the Hightower Acquisition Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2008 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James M. Cassidy
                                 President and Director and
                                 Chief Executivie Officer,
                                 Chief Financial Officer and
                                 Principal Accounting Officer
Date: March 30, 2009
### Reconnaissance for radioactive minerals in Washington, Idaho, and western Montana, 1952-1955

By: Paul L. WeisFrank C. ArmstrongSamuel Rosenblum

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1074B

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
From: lwlmw@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:44:30 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Libby Wilson

Pasadena, TX 77505
Before the Third Division,

September 12, 1960

No. 64495.

#### C. J. Tower *&*Sons et al. *v.*United States,

protests 321147-K, etc. (Buffalo).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of prepared or preserved pork similar in all material respects to that the subject of *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 36, C.D. 2100), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.