alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 185 (Tuesday, September 26, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 66012]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20754]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; T32/T35 Institute Training Grants Jan 2024.
    Date: November 6, 2023.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Kaitlyn Noel Lewis-Hardell, Ph.D., Scientific 
Review Officer, National Institute on Aging, Scientific Review 
Branch, 7201 Wisconsin Ave., Rm. 2E405, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 
555-1234, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9ef5fff7eaf2e7f0b0f6ffecfafbf2f2def0f7f6b0f9f1e8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="88e3e9e1fce4f1e6a6e0e9faecede4e4c8e6e1e0a6efe7fe">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 20, 2023.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-20754 Filed 9-25-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                             Chief Executive Officer

The undersigned, as the chief executive officer of Allied Healthcare Products,
Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
that (i) the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Company's fiscal
quarter ending March 31, 2005 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on April the 29th, 2005, fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.

                                 /s/ Earl R. Refsland
                                 -------------------------
                                     Earl R. Refsland, Chief Executive Officer

                                     April 29, 2005

                                       28
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 185 (Tuesday, September 26, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 66088]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20974]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 1:00 p.m. on Thursday, September 28, 2023.

PLACE: The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the 
Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, 
the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend 
the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the 
matters also may be present.
    In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting 
changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, 
and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website 
at https://www.sec.gov.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or her designee, has 
certified that, in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), 
permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.
    The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the 
following topics:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
    Resolution of litigation claims; and
    Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of 
adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information; please 
contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 
551-5400.
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

    Dated: September 21, 2023.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-20974 Filed 9-22-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
-79 -78 -77 -76 -75

 38

 39

 40

★

▲

▲ ▲

▲

★ ▲

▲ ▲ ▲ 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

07/20

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 20 Jul 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.92 N 77.01 W Meters AGL
Exhibit 4.6

 

FORM OF SENIOR UNSECURED BONDS CERTIFICATE

 

Certificate No

 

Nominal Amount of Bonds $

 

FIRSTCARIBBEAN INTERNATIONAL BANK (TRINIDAD & TOBAGO) LIMITED
  (A company incorporated under the laws of Trinidad and Tobago)

 

Senior Unsecured Bonds 2015 – 2018
 (in denominations of $10,000.00 or multiples of $10,000.00)

 

THIS IS TO CERTIFY that                   is/are the registered holder(s) of the above mentioned Senior Unsecured Bonds in the principal amount of $             which are constituted and secured by a Trust Deed dated the 20th day of October, 2015 (the “Trust Deed”) and made between FirstCaribbean International Bank (Trinidad & Tobago) Limited (the “Company”) of the One Part and First Citizens Trustee Services Limited of the Other Part as Trustee for the Bondholders. The Bonds are issued with the benefit of and subject to the provisions contained in the Trust Deed and the Conditions endorsed hereon.

 

Principal and interest are payable on the Bonds represented by this Certificate in accordance with the Conditions endorsed hereon.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Seal of the Company was affixed in accordance with a Resolution of the Company and in conformity with its Articles and by-laws and has been signed on behalf of the Company by the Director and the Secretary thereof.

 

DATED this           day of          2015

 

 

	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
DIRECTOR
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
SECRETARY
    


 











 

	
Countersigned   for the purpose of authentication only:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
as Paying   Agent
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Registered
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Dated
    	
 
    	
 
    
				


 

BOND:                                                       This Certificate must be surrendered before any transfer of the whole or any portion of the Bond to which it relates can be registered or a new Certificate issued in exchange. No fraction of $10,000.00 of Bonds can be transferred.
EXHIBIT
15


ACCOUNTANT’S
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
 
 
 To the
Board of Directors and Shareholders
 of
Mediware Information Systems, Inc.:
 
 We have
reviewed, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Oversight Board
(United States), the unaudited interim financial information of Mediware
Information Systems, Inc. for the three and six-month periods ended December 31,
2009 and 2008, as indicated in our report dated February 9, 2010; because we did
not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.
 
 We are
aware that Mediware Information Systems, Inc. has incorporated by reference in
Registration Statement Nos. 333-07591, No. 333-83016, No. 333-119503, No.
333-123496 and No. 333-130576 its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31,
2009, which includes our report dated February 9, 2010 covering the unaudited
interim financial information contained therein. Pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Act”), that report is not considered a part
of the registration statement prepared or certified by our firm or a report
prepared or certified by our firm within the meaning of Section 7 and 11 of the
Act. It should be noted that we have not performed any procedures subsequent to
February 9, 2010.
 
 
 Eisner
LLP
 New York,
New York
 February
9, 2010
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MINUTE ORDER – 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

DONNA ANDERSON, et al.,

Defendants.

CASE NO. C05-1576JLR

MINUTE ORDER

The following minute order is made by the direction of the court, the Honorable

James L. Robart:

The court is in receipt of Plaintiff’s motion to withdraw motion and file amended

motion for summary judgment (Dkt. # 28). The court DENIES the motion. 

This action is set for trial on February 20, 2007, with dispositive motions due by

November 22, 2006 (Dkt. # 22). The court issues scheduling orders setting trial dates and

related dates to provide a reasonable schedule for the resolution of disputes. First, the

court generally sets the discovery cut-off 30 days prior to the deadline for filing

dispositive motions in order to ensure that the court has before it a complete record when

it considers a motion that could potentially dispose of the case. Second, the schedule

generally provides 90 days between the deadline for filing dispositive motions and the

Case 2:05-cv-01576-JLR Document 29 Filed 12/18/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MINUTE ORDER – 2

trial date. This 90-day period takes into account: (a) an approximate 30-day lag between

the date a party files a motion and the date that motion becomes ripe for the court’s

consideration, see Local Rules W.D. Wash. CR 7(d)(3); and (b) an additional 30 days

during which the court endeavors to rule on the motion, id. at CR 7(b)(5). Anything short

of a 90-day period leaves inadequate time for the parties to consider the court’s ruling and

plan for trial or an alternate resolution. 

Here, Plaintiff’s motion to continue the dispositive motion deadline to January 4,

2007, would give the court approximately half the amount of time it requires to rule on

such motions before trial. 

Filed and entered this 18th day of December, 2006.

BRUCE RIFKIN, Clerk

s/Mary Duett

By

Deputy Clerk

Case 2:05-cv-01576-JLR Document 29 Filed 12/18/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BJs Wholesale Club, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended May 5, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, Frank D. Forward, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the undersigneds knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: June 12, 2007 |  | /S/ FRANK D. FORWARD   
|                     |  | Frank D. Forward       
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer
From: chrisphysed@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:32:18 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

CHris White

Culpeper, VA 22701
Before The Second Division,

March 15, 1967

No. P67/62.

#### Robert Bosch Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 65/7353(B), 65/7355, and 65/7370 (New York).

*871No. P67/63.

#### Henry Lutjen and Lodge Spark Plug Co. *v.*United States,

protest 65/20323 (New York).

Nao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of spark plugs similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Lodge Spark Plug Co.*v. *United States*(49 Cust. Ct. 158, C.D. 2379), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: wyndhurst@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:36:05 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kimberly Rodgers

Lynchburg, VA 24503
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MINUTE ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

MARKEL AMERICAN INSURANCE

CO.,

Plaintiff,

v.

MCCARRON CORPORATION et al.,

Defendants.

CASE NO. C05-1709JLR

MINUTE ORDER

The following minute order is made by the direction of the court, the Honorable

James L. Robart:

The court has received a notice of withdrawal and substitution of counsel from

Defendant Superior Marine Services, Inc. (Dkt. # 8). This pleading is improper, as it

does not comply with Local Rules W.D. Wash. GR 2(f)(4)(A). The court construes the

pleading as a motion for leave to withdraw as counsel and a notice of appearance for

substitute counsel. The court will consider any objection to the withdrawal and

substitution filed within ten days of the date of this order. Counsel are cautioned to

follow the Local Rules in the future.

Filed and entered this 2nd day of December, 2005.

BRUCE RIFKIN, Clerk

s/Mary Duett

By

Deputy Clerk

Case 2:05-cv-01709-JLR Document 9 Filed 12/02/05 Page 1 of 1
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 150 (Tuesday, August 5, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45423-45424]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-18484]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Delaware Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission) and the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) that a planning meeting of the 
Delaware Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 1:00 p.m. 
(EDT) on Friday, August 29, 2014, at the offices of Young Conaway 
Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, located at 1000 N. King Street, Wilmington, DE 
19801. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss and plan the 
Committee's civil rights project to review efforts by school districts 
in Delaware to address discriminatory school disciplinary policies and 
practices, with a special emphasis on the Christina School District.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The 
comments must be received in the regional office by Friday, September 
29, 2014. Comments may be mailed to the Eastern Regional Office, U.S. 
Commission on Civil Rights, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 1150, 
Washington, DC 20425, faxed to (202) 376-7548, or emailed to Evelyn 
Bohor at ero@usccr.gov. Persons who desire additional information may 
contact the Eastern Regional Office at 202-376-7533.
    Persons needing accessibility services should contact the Eastern 
Regional Office at least 10 working days before the scheduled date of 
the meeting.

[[Page 45424]]

    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Eastern Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, 
www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Eastern Regional Office at the above 
phone number, email or street address.
    The meetings will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated on July 31, 2014.
David Mussatt,
Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2014-18484 Filed 8-4-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
No. 67120.

protests 58/4735, etc. (New York).

#### Daiichi Bussan Kaisha, Ltd. *v.*United States,

*260Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of nylon handkerchiefs or woven mufflers similar in use to silk scarves, handkerchiefs, and woven mufflers and following the principles set forth in *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: thimbles7@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:32:29 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Marie Kittelberger

Columbia, MD 21044
Case 3:05-cv-05575-RBL Document 62-7 Filed 12/29/06 Page 1 of 1