alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7
<CIK>                                      0001037559
<NAME>                 American Public Holdings, Inc.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                                0
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                      34,004,971
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                        32,993,885
<EQUITIES>                                          0
<MORTGAGE>                                    608,258
<REAL-ESTATE>                                 606,556
<TOTAL-INVEST>                             35,494,545
<CASH>                                        479,069
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                  0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                      8,594,476
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             48,507,559
<POLICY-LOSSES>                            32,496,766
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                           802,170
<POLICY-OTHER>                              1,559,059
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                         413,915
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       52,347
<OTHER-SE>                                 12,129,021
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               48,507,559
<PREMIUMS>                                  7,613,746
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                           608,042
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                            (13,878)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  1,972
<BENEFITS>                                  4,855,032
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                   830,238
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                        1,420,847
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               426,740
<INCOME-TAX>                                   70,233
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           356,507
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  356,507
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                      0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                 0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                  0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                    0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                     0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                             0




</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Brinks Holding Company, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2009 (the Report), I, Stephen C. Yevich, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DATED this 6th day of April 2010



/s/ Stephen C. YevichStephen C. YevichExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Brinks Home Security Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Brinks Home Security Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



41
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 27, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 66438]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21110]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 3211-010]


Power Authority of the State of New York; Notice of Revised 
Procedural Schedule for Final Environmental Assessment for the Proposed 
Project Relicense

    On July 31, 2020, the Power Authority of the State of New York 
(NYPA) filed an application with the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission (Commission or FERC) for a new license to continue to 
operate and maintain the Hinckley (Gregory B. Jarvis) Hydroelectric 
Project No. 3211 (Jarvis Project). On June 27, 2022, Commission staff 
issued a notice of intent to prepare a draft and final Environmental 
Assessment (EA) to evaluate the effects of relicensing the Jarvis 
Project. The notice of intent included a schedule for preparing a draft 
and final EA.
    On September 6, 2023, Commission staff issued the draft EA. By this 
notice, Commission staff is updating the procedural schedule for 
completing a final EA. The revised schedule is shown below. Further 
revisions to the schedule may be made as appropriate.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Milestone                           Target date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issue Final EA............................  March 2024.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Any questions regarding this notice may be directed to Andy Bernick 
at (202) 502-8660, or by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#04656a607661732a6661766a6d676f44626176672a636b72"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e5848b81978092cb8780978b8c868ea583809786cb828a93">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: September 21, 2023.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-21110 Filed 9-26-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the WESTERN DISTRICT of WASHINGTON

NATIONAL SPECIALTY

UNDERWRITERS, INC,

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

GEORGE and LOIS BENNETT,

 Defendant.

 C05-1492 JPD

 

 MINUTE ORDER

The above referenced case has been initially assigned to the Honorable James P.

Donohue, United States Magistrate Judge, subject to the consent of the parties pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. 636(c)(1)(C).

On August 31, 2005, notice of the parties rights with regard to consenting to the

case being assigned to Magistrate Judge Donohue for all purposes was filed by the Clerk

of Court. The parties were advised they had until October 12, 2005, to consent, if they

wished.

Case 2:05-cv-01492-JLR Document 14 Filed 10/07/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

In the interim, a Motion for Protective Order (dkt #9) has been filed and noted

for October 18, 2005. Accordingly, pending dates are adjusted as follows:

Consent to Assignment to Magistrate Judge Donohue .............. October 14, 2005

In the event the parties (or any party) choose not to consent, the case will be

reassigned to a District Judge.

Dated this 7th day of October, 2005

Bruce Rifkin

Clerk of Court

by: /s/ PETER H. VOELKER Peter H. Voelker, Deputy Clerk

Case 2:05-cv-01492-JLR Document 14 Filed 10/07/05 Page 2 of 2
From: Aruralgirl1@cs.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:45:34 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Amy Harke-Moore

Old Monroe, MO 63369
No. 68153.

#### Buegeleisen & Jacobson, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/17075, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, O.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of chord organs and parts thereof similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Excelsior Accordions, Inc.*v. *United States*(48 Cust. Ct. 148, C.D. 2328), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
----

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Mediware. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  May 4, 2010 | /s/ T. Kelly Mann                                      |   |
|-------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                          |       T. Kelly Mann           |   |
|                          |       Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                          |                                                   |   |
| Dated:  May 4, 2010 | /s/ Michael Martens                                    |   |
|                          |       Michael Martens    |   |
|                          |       Chief Financial Officer |   |

----
ORDER ALLOWING WITHDRAWAL Page 1 Glenn K. Carpenter, Jr., P.S.

AND SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL 24730 36th Avenue S. 

 Kent, Washington 98032 

 Tel: (253) 839-8449 

 gcarpenter@gkcarpenter.com 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

 JUDGE FRANKLIN D BURGESS 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT TACOMA 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

CHRISTOBAL CARDENAS-AVILA 

 Defendant. 

No. CR05-5678FDB 

ORDER ALLOWING WITHDRAWAL AND 

SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL 

 HAVING REVIEWED the court file and pleadings on this matter, this Court HEREBY 

ORDERS: Roger A. Hunko is permitted to withdraw as counsel, and Glenn K. Carpenter, Jr., is 

substituted as counsel of record in the above-referenced matter. 

 DATED this 6th day of October 2005 

 ____/s/ Franklin D Burgess _______________ 

 JUDGE FRANKLIN D BURGESS 

Presented by: 

 

s/Glenn K. Carpenter, Jr.

Case 3:05-cr-05678-FDB Document 31 Filed 10/06/05 Page 1 of 2
ORDER ALLOWING WITHDRAWAL Page 2 Glenn K. Carpenter, Jr., P.S.

AND SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL 24730 36th Avenue S. 

 Kent, Washington 98032 

 Tel: (253) 839-8449 

 gcarpenter@gkcarpenter.com 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

Glenn K. Carpenter, Jr., WSBA #18301 

Attorney for CHRISTOBAL CARDENAS-AVILA 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Glenn K. Carpenter, Jr., hereby certify that on October 5th 2005 I electronically filed the 

foregoing ORDER ALLOWING WITHDRAWAL AND SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL with 

the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF System, which will send notification of such filing to 

counsel. 

S/ Glenn K. Carpenter, Jr.

Glenn K. Carpenter, Jr., WSBA #18301 

Attorney for Defendant (Substituting) 

Law Office Of Glenn K. Carpenter, Jr., P.S. 

24730 – 36th Avenue S. 

Kent, WA 98032 

Telephone (253) 839-8449 

FAX (253) 839-8486 

gcarpenter@gkcarpenter.com 

Case 3:05-cr-05678-FDB Document 31 Filed 10/06/05 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Osteotech,  Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30,
1996 and the Condensed  Consolidated Statement of Operations for the nine months
ended  September  30, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000874734
<NAME>                        Osteotech, Inc.
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   9-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          5,615,000
<SECURITIES>                                    2,973,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   6,330,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    163,000
<INVENTORY>                                     944,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,462,000
<PP&E>                                          15,093,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  6,457,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  30,799,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           5,883,000
<BONDS>                                         1,008,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                        78,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,096,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    30,799,000
<SALES>                                         1,877,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,794,000
<CGS>                                           1,746,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,061,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                13,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              321,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 2,279,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    1,655,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             624,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    624,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   .08
        


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
  CERTIFICATION
  PURSUANT
        TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
  (AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)
  In
        connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Mediware Information
        Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed
        with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
        and Mediware pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
        906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, James F. Burgess, as Chief Executive
        Officer of Mediware, and Jill H. Suppes, as Chief Financial Officer of Mediware,
        hereby certify that:
 1.
                The
                    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                    or 15(d) of
                    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  2.
                The
                    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                    Mediware.
   Dated:
                    October 25, 2005
                /s/  
                    James F. BurgessJames
                    F. Burgess
                  Chief
                    Executive OfficerDated:
                    October 25, 2005
                /s/  
                    Jill H. SuppesJill
                    H. Suppes
                  Chief
                    Financial Officer
  A
          signed
          original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
          authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
          appears
          in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
          by Section 906, has been provided to Mediware Information Systems, Inc.
          and will
          be retained by Mediware Information Systems, Inc. and furnished to the
          Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Mark Bradley, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Players Network, a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The report on Form 10-Q of Players Network. (the "Registrant") for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 (the "Report") which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: August 15, 2011





/s/ Mark BradleyName:  Mark BradleyTitle: Chief Executive OfficerPrincipal Executive Officer and Principal

Financial Officer
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### APPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT
RICHARD A. OLIVER, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 2D22-3393 February 2, 2024 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Philippe Matthey, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Tosha Cohen, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Elba Caridad Martin, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. SLEET, C.J., and LaROSE and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.2

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
## THE ATTBRNEY GENERAL
OFTEXAS

Hon. 0. N. Humphreys, Jr. Administrator,Texas OpinionNo. H-l Alcoholic Beverage Commission Re: Whether the provisions Sam Houston State Office Bldg. of Article 666-17(2) Austin, Texas 78711 b& V;;;;;'E,;;n;; PackAge Stores that were in existence prior to its effective Dear Mr. Humphreys: date? Article 666-17(2)(a),Vernon's Penal Code, as amended In 1951, provides:

"Wherea major,ity of the ownership in each of more than one '(1)legal entity, holding Package Store Permits under thisAct, is owned by one (1)person, or by persons related within the first degree of consanguinity,the businesses thereofmay be consolidatedunder one (1) legal entity and the permits shall be issued to such entitynotwithstandingany other provision of thisAct and furtherprovided that after such consolidationit shall be illegal to transfer any of such permits to any other county."
Your request for an opinion asks whether this provision applies

only to those Package Store Permits that were in exiStence on its effective date.
You advise that the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission has permitted consolidation since the effective date of the original enactment of the provision in 1949. Except for the use of "isowned" instead of "shallbe owned' or some similar Ilanguage, we see nothing in the statute to indicate an intention .thatIt be limited to those Package Store Permits 4n effect at the date of ,i,ts enactment.

-6334-Hon. 0. N. Humphreys, Jr., page 2 (H-1)

Since, in 1951 and thereafterprior to the amendmentof the Texas Liquor ControlAct by Acts 1971, 62nd Legislature, R.S. Ch. 65, p.681, all permits automaticallyexpired on August 31 of each year, such a restricted construction would render the statute virtuallymeaningless. Generally a statute is held to operate prospectively unless a contrary constructionis requiredby its plain and unequivocal language. Article 1, Section 16, Constitution of the State of Texas; Life Insurance Co. v. Rey 50 Tex. 511 (1878);Cox v. Robleon105 Tex. 42b 150 S W 1149(1912). Interestingly this rule is stated s~ecificaliyin the Code ConstructionAct, Art. 51129b-2, V.A.C.S., Section 3.02. Finally, the constructionplaced upon theAct by the Commission is entitled to considerableweight.
We therefore conclude that the "consolidation"provision of Article 666-17(2)(a) is not limited to Package Store Permits in existence on its effective date and we answer your question in the negative.
-SUMMARYArticle 666-17(2)(a),Vernon's Texas Penal Code,which provides for consolidationof entities holding Package Store Permits into one (1)entity under certain conditions, is prospective in application and is not limited to those entitiesholding Package Store Permits at the time of its effective date. *rs very truly,

APPROVED: Attorney General of Texas

bAVID M KENDALL Chairman Opinion'C!ommitte& -6:j35-
BEFORE THE SECOND DIVISION,

November 27, 1963

No. 68143.

#### Crown Curtis Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 61/11841, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of steel bandsaws similar in all material respects to those the subject of *J. E. Bernard & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(50 Cust. Ct. 41, C.D. 2386), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.