alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 188 (Friday, September 29, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 67378]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21201]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Notice of Availability of Final Supplemental Environmental Impact 
Statement for Next Generation Delivery Vehicles Acquisitions

    Pursuant to the requirements of the National Environmental Policy 
Act (NEPA) of 1969, its implementing regulations at 39 CFR part 775, 
and the Council on Environmental Quality's regulations (40 CFR parts 
1500-1508), the U.S. Postal Service announces availability of the Final 
Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) which analyzes the 
environmental impacts of a range of alternatives for a modification to 
the Postal Service's February 23, 2022, Record of Decision (ROD) to 
purchase, over ten years, 50,000 to 165,000 purpose-built, right-hand 
drive vehicles--the Next Generation Delivery Vehicle (NGDV)--to replace 
existing delivery vehicles nationwide that are beyond the end of their 
service life. A minimum of 10 percent of those vehicles would be 
battery electric vehicles (BEVs).
    The Postal Service has identified Alternative 1 as its Preferred 
Alternative, which is the purchase and deployment of a mixed fleet of 
Commercial Off-the-Shelf and NGDV vehicles. Of the total quantity of 
106,480 vehicles to be procured under this SEIS, 62 percent would be 
BEV. Interested parties may view the Final SEIS and all prior NEPA 
documents related to this procurement at http://uspsngdveis.com/.

References

1. U.S. Postal Service, Notice of Availability of Record of 
Decision, Next Generation Delivery Vehicles Acquisitions (87 FR 
14588; Mar. 15, 2022).
2. U.S. Postal Service, Notice of Intent to Prepare a Supplement to 
the Next Generation Delivery Vehicles Acquisitions Final 
Environmental Impact Statement (87 FR 35581; June 10, 2022).
3. U.S. Postal Service, Notice to Postpone Public Hearing and Extend 
Public Comment Period for Supplement to the Next Generation Delivery 
Vehicles Acquisitions Final Environmental Impact Statement (87 FR 
43561; July 21, 2022).
4. U.S. Postal Service, Notice of Availability of Draft Supplemental 
Environmental Impact Statement for Next Generation Delivery Vehicles 
Acquisitions (88 FR 125; June 30, 2023).

Sarah Sullivan,
Attorney, Ethics & Legal Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2023-21201 Filed 9-28-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 17

- 00228

- CV

ULLJA KUNTZE

, Appellant

v.

SANDRA COWAN

, Appellee

From the 335th District Court

Burleson County, Texas

Trial Court No. 26,129

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Ullja Kuntze appeals the trial court’s granting of a summary judgment against

Kuntze

. Following our standard policies and procedures , the Clerk of this Court notified

Kuntze by letter dated February 27, 2019 , that her appellant’s brief had not been filed. In

the same letter, the Clerk warned Kuntze that this appeal would be dismissed for want

of prosecution unless, within 21 days from the date of the letter, a brief was filed

. See T EX

.

R. A PP . P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3

.Kuntze v. Cowan Page 2

More than 21 days have passed and no brief has been filed . Accordingly, this

appeal is dismissed. Id

.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Neil l

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed April 3 , 2019

[CV06]
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 528 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 23, 2007.
Whereas New Milford is located in Litchfield County, on the western border of 
        Connecticut, in the Housatonic Valley;
Whereas the settlement of New Milford began in 1706, when John Noble, Sr., 
        purchased a portion of land known as Weantinogue;
Whereas in 1707, Noble and his daughter settled in New Milford, followed by 12 
        other families;
Whereas beginning in 1774, New Milford demonstrated its support for the 
        Revolutionary War by providing financial support to the servicemen and 
        sending 285 of its 2,700 inhabitants to battle;
Whereas New Milford was a center of Underground Railroad work in Connecticut, 
        with many of its residents offering their homes as places for slaves to 
        take refuge on their journey to freedom;
Whereas the late 1800s marked the arrival of many new industries and businesses 
        in New Milford, including the manufacturing of furniture, paints, and 
        pottery;
Whereas in 1902, New Milford's worst disaster occurred when a raging fire 
        completely destroyed the town's main business district on Bank Street;
Whereas the population of New Milford stood at 3,000 in 1880 and has grown to 
        nearly 30,000 today;
Whereas at 64 square miles, New Milford is the largest town in Connecticut; and
Whereas New Milford has been modernized through commercial and industrial 
        growth, while retaining its deep sense of history, scenic beauty, and 
        traditional New England character throughout the past 300 years: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) congratulates the Town of New Milford, Connecticut, on the 
        occasion of its 300th anniversary; and
            (2) honors the Town of New Milford for its significant history, 
        impressive growth, and considerable contributions to the State of 
        Connecticut and the United States.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                            32,240
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      5,555
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                       18,074
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  69,562
<PP&E>                                           590,857
<DEPRECIATION>                                   111,325
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   600,105
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             69,549
<BONDS>                                           28,958
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                             747
<OTHER-SE>                                       491,207
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     600,105
<SALES>                                          660,285
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 666,007
<CGS>                                            257,152
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    554,417
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   924
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   73,075
<INCOME-TAX>                                      26,161
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               46,914
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                          4,880
<NET-INCOME>                                      42,034
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.56


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Osteotech,  Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 1998
and the Condensed  Consolidated Statement of Operations for the six months ended
June 30, 1998 and is qualified  in its  entirety by reference to such  financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          16,872,000
<SECURITIES>                                     3,469,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,822,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                       146,000
<INVENTORY>                                      1,209,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,827,000
<PP&E>                                          23,175,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,756,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  50,625,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,424,000
<BONDS>                                             21,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            89,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,692,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    50,625,000
<SALES>                                            521,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,729,000
<CGS>                                              352,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,653,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  50,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,677,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,142,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,535,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,535,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .48
                                                
                                             

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 188 (Friday, September 29, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 67385]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21428]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-423, OMB Control No. 3235-0472]

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; Extension: Rule 15c1-
6

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: U.S. Securities and 
Exchange Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, 
Washington, DC 20549-2736

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995 (``PRA'') (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management 
and Budget (``OMB'') a request for approval of extension of the 
existing collection of information provided for in Rule 15c1-6 (17 CFR 
240.15c1-6) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et 
seq.).
    Rule 15c1-6 states that any broker-dealer trying to sell to or buy 
from a customer a security in a primary or secondary distribution in 
which the broker-dealer is participating or is otherwise financially 
interested must give the customer written notification of the broker-
dealer's participation or interest at or before completion of the 
transaction. The Commission estimates that approximately 350 
respondents will collect information annually under Rule 15c1-6 and 
that each respondent will spend approximately 10 hours annually 
complying with the collection of information requirement for a total 
burden of approximately 3,500 hours per year in the aggregate.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to, a collection of information under the PRA unless it 
displays a currently valid OMB control number.
    The public may view background documentation for this information 
collection at the following website: www.reginfo.gov. Find this 
particular information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day 
Review--Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function. 
Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent by October 30, 2023 to (i) www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain and (ii) David Bottom, Director/Chief Information 
Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o John Pezzullo, 100 F 
Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, or by sending an email to: 
[email protected].

    Dated: September 26, 2023.
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-21428 Filed 9-28-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
```
From: hopesimon67@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:57:40 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Hope Simon

Sulphur, LA 70665
From: Julia Brymer

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Thursday, August 04, 2011 2:28:25 AM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Julia Brymer

17205 e flora pl

aurora, co 80013
From: ttunich@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:00:56 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ted Tunich

Clinton Township, MI 48035
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF AMERISERVE FOOD DISTRIBUTION, INC. FOR THE
THIRD QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 27, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001042743
<NAME> AMERISERVE FOOD DISTRIBUTION, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                          74,651
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   29,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,122
<INVENTORY>                                    153,578
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               434,572
<PP&E>                                         136,895
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,910
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,284,574
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          395,596
<BONDS>                                        725,273
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                     124,803
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,284,574
<SALES>                                      1,973,589
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,973,589
<CGS>                                        1,778,643
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,778,643
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               160,936
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,712
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (17,774)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       606
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (45,313)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  2,156
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (47,469)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Before the Third Division,

May 4, 1966

No. P66/49.

protest 64/9014 (New York).

#### J. M. Sutton Sons & Co. *v.*United States,

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of wall plaques similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Ross*Products, *Inc.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 74, C.D. 2106), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 11.2

                        OSTEOTECH, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                COMPUTATION OF FULLY DILUTED NET INCOME PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                Three Months                                 Six Months
                                                               Ended June 30,                              Ended June 30,
                                                    --------------------------------- --- ----------------------------------
                                                         1997                1996             1997                   1996
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<S>                                                      <C>                   <C>               <C>                    <C>     
   Net income                                            $1,403,000            $202,000          $2,235,000             $373,000
                                                   ==============================================================================

   Shares used in computing net income per share:

     Weighted average Common shares
      outstanding                                         7,950,510            7,760,941          7,926,274            7,662,884

     Weighted average Common shares
      issuable upon the exercise of
      outstanding stock options and
      warrants                                            1,705,928            1,587,724          1,738,652            1,693,852

     Application of assumed
      proceeds towards repurchase
      of outstanding Common shares
      using the Treasury Stock
      method                                                (803,962)(a)        (998,966)(a)     (817,282)(b)        (1,002,573)(b)
                                                   ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Shares used in computation                       8,852,476            8,349,699      8,847,644                8,354,163
                                                   ==============================================================================

   Net income per share
        assuming full dilution                                 $.16                  $.02              $.25                 $.04
   ==============================================================================================================================
</TABLE>


     a) Computed using assumed proceeds of $8,441,602 and a closing market value
of $10.50 in 1997 and proceeds of $7,242,503 and a closing market value of $7.25
in 1996.

     b) Computed using assumed proceeds of $8,581,460 and a closing market value
of $10.50 in 1997 and  proceeds of  $7,322,793  and an average  market  value of
$7.30 in 1996.

                                      E-42