alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
48 44

63 28

58 32

33 66

54 50 13 56 16

60

25 21 43

31

64 55 19

9

40

11

67

53

38

30

39

34

20

27

7

23

10

59

29

61 49

65

6

15

68

52

12

41 14

18

42 62

4

5

71

70

22

45

26

37

3

8

46

17

51 36

24

47

69

1

35

2

57 35

12 8 7 8 9 10 11

31 32 33 34 35 36 31

3

33 34 36 31 32

6 2 1

3

4 5 2 1 6

7

6 5 4

7 10 11 12

10

9

9

8

7 8

7

11 12

18 13

13

14

14

15

15

16

16

17

17

18

18

23 24 19

23 24

22

22

21

21

19 20

19 20

25 30 26

26 25

27

27

29 28 30

30 29 28

35 36 31

36

31

35

34

34

33 32

31 32 33

6 1

2

1 6 3

2 3

4

4

5

5 6

7

10 11 12 9

Asotin Creek

Wenatchee Creek

WICKIUP CG

WENATCHEE

GUARD

STATION RC

CABIN SADDLE CG INDIAN

TOM TH

CLOVERLAND SP

South George Project Planning Area - Inventory of Potential Wilderness Areas

H-5

1 0.5 0 1 Miles

LEGEND

South George Project Planning Area

Washington State Fish and Wildlife

Pomeroy Ranger District

Inventoried Roadless Area (IRA)

Potential Wilderness Area

Wenaha-Tucannon Wilderness

Other Undeveloped Lands

Recreation Feature

Forest Roads  ́

Map H-5: Forest Service Inventory of Potential Wilderness Areas

Map displays Other Undeveloped Lands.

This product is reproduced from geospatial information prepared by the U.S. Department of

Agriculture, Forest Service. GIS data and product accuracy may vary. They may be: developed from

sources of differing accuracy, interpretation, incomplete while being created or revised, etc.

Using GIS products for purposes other than those for which they were created may yield inaccurate

or misleading results. The Forest Service reserves the right ot correct, update, modify, or replace GIS

products without notification. For more information contact the Umatilla National Forest Supervisors Office.

D.Dixon

GIS/Data Service Specialist

06/03/2011

4300

4304

4400
811 First Avenue, Suite 620

Seattle, WA 98104

Tel 206-264-8135

Fax 206-264-8144

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT MOTION REGARDING CASE DATES, 

AND ORDER - 1

The Hon. Robert S. Lasnik

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

JESSE McCUNE and BRIGITTE

McCUNE, on behalf of themselves and

others similarly situated,

 Plaintiffs,

 v.

WILSHIRE CREDIT CORPORATION, 

 Defendant.

 CASE NO. 2:05-1511RSL

 

 

JOINT MOTION REGARDING CASE

DATES, AND ORDER 

Plaintiffs McCune and Defendant Wilshire Credit Corporation jointly move for a

temporary suspension of the deadlines in this case, and in support thereof inform the Court as

follows:

1. The parties are currently engaged in settlement negotiations. 

2. Pursuant to the Court’s March 2, 2006 Minute Entry, Plaintiffs’ Motion for

Class Certification is to be filed on June 15, 2006; Defendant’s opposition and response to the

motion is due by July 3, 2006; and Plaintiffs’ reply papers are due by July 14, 2006.

3. In order to reduce the parties’ attorney’s fees and costs and to preserve the

Court’s resources during settlement negotiations, the parties request the Court to permit the

temporary suspension of all case deadlines, to permit them to defer filing papers pertaining to

class certification, and to permit the parties to file a joint status report to the Court on or by

Case 2:05-cv-01511-RSL Document 27 Filed 06/16/06 Page 1 of 2
811 First Avenue, Suite 620

Seattle, WA 98104

Tel 206-264-8135

Fax 206-264-8144

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT MOTION REGARDING CASE DATES, 

AND ORDER - 2

July 17, 2006 in which they suggest to the Court new deadlines which should be applicable for

the case.

DATED THIS ________ day of June, 2006.

BECKETT LAW OFFICES, PLLC DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 

 /s/ /s/

Guy W. Beckett, WSBA #14939 Curt R. Hineline, WSBA # 16317

 Attorneys for Defendant 

WILLIAMSON & WILLIAMS

KELLER ROHRBACK, L.L.P.

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

ORDER

THIS MATTER came on before the Honorable Robert S. Lasnik upon the foregoing joint

motion of the parties. The Court has considered the motion and is fully advised in the premises.

Now therefore, it is hereby 

ORDERED that the deadlines applicable to this case are temporarily suspended in order

to permit the parties to attempt to negotiate a settlement. The parties shall report to the Court

on or before July 17, 2006, in which report they shall suggest to the Court new deadlines which

they believe should be applicable to the case.

DONE THIS 16th day of June, 2006.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-01511-RSL Document 27 Filed 06/16/06 Page 2 of 2
From: miss_lady_bee@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:08:46 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

marianna santiago

Moreno Valley, CA 92551
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10Q for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 31, 2003 (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge:

 

(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

- The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

 

						/s/  James S. Beard
Date:  October 31, 2003			James S. Beard

						President

 

 

/s/  Kent M. Adams

Date:  October 31, 2003			Kent M. Adams

						Principal Financial Officer

 

 

 

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided by the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

The State of California; ex-rel; by and through

SHERWOOD THEODORE: RODRIGUES;

Relator; a living sovereign man resting upon the

soil; and a constantly expanding list of coplalintiff John and Jane Does, all suffering

similar Abuses by the same group of Corrupted

Public-Servants and Organized Crime

Racketeering Conspirators;,

Plaintiffs/Accusers,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, W. Scott

McGregor; J. Steven Lapham; Steven Franklyn

Helfand; Robert Joseph Peters; Marcus Daniel

Merchasin; James R. Greiner Acting in their

Personal, Business, and Official Capacities; and

in their Does 1 – 1,000; et al.,

Defendants/Accused.

Case No. MS05-5034FDB

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff Rodrigues, of Petaluma, California, purports to file a felony criminal complaint on

behalf of the state of California alleging, among other things, treason, racketeering, extortion,

barratry, and obstruction of justice. Rodrigues cites RCW 7.56.020, Quo Warranto for the

proposition that he is entitled to file such a cause of action because he “does claim an interest in each

Case 3:05-mc-05034-FDB Document 4 Filed 11/10/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 2

and all of these offices.” Rodrigues also submits an 18-page “Memorandum/Article in Support of

Common People Directly Prosecuting Quo-Warranto/State-Ex-Rel Criminal Complaints”; a 17-page

“Memorandum/Article Explaining an Artificial/DeFacto Over-Lay in the Government of the State of

Washington”; a “Libel of Review/Counterclaim in Admiralty” that indicates the cause of action in

United States District Court in Sacramento, California; and a document entitled “SovereigntyFinding of Facts” that concludes that Rodrigues “is natural, free, sovereign and born in Hawaii, a

Republic united by and under the Constitution for the United States of America. 

The documents are unintelligible and no cause of action within the jurisdiction of this Court

can be discerned. The documents filed are gibberish and bear no relation to the kind of action that is

usually filed as a miscellaneous case in this Court. This cause of action must be dismissed.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED: This cause of action is DISMISSED. 

DATED this 10th day of November, 2005.

AFRANKLIN D. BURGESS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-mc-05034-FDB Document 4 Filed 11/10/05 Page 2 of 2
From: miguelespinop@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:28:07 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Miguel Antonio Espino

, 0413
From: sundgrens@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:49:36 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Karen Sundgren

Hesperia, CA 92345
From: Sigpa@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:47:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

William Signorini

Weaverville, NC 28787
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PACIFIC
SUNWEAR OF CALIFORNIA, INC.'S FORM 10Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MAY 4,
1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-03-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-04-1997
<CASH>                                       7,196,956
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  803,367
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 22,461,924
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            35,161,567
<PP&E>                                      49,112,325
<DEPRECIATION>                            (17,419,688)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              68,338,419
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,747,384
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        81,352
<OTHER-SE>                                  49,143,469
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                68,338,419
<SALES>                                     38,932,736
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            38,932,736
<CGS>                                       27,225,628
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,942,532
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (95,702)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,860,278
<INCOME-TAX>                                   736,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,124,278
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,124,278
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 27, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 66467]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21026]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4726-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2023-0001]


Montana; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Montana (FEMA-4726-DR), dated August 12, 2023, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This change occurred on August 14, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Alana B. Kuhn, 
of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for 
this disaster.
    This action terminates the appointment of Jon K. Huss as Federal 
Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2023-21026 Filed 9-26-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
From: kjm1612@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:16:02 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kevin McCarty

Sandwich, IL 60548