alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: dcc-glc@satx.rr.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:21:13 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

DC Carlson

San Antonio, TX 78216
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF VOLUNTARY

DISMISSAL - 1

CASE NO. C05-5644 JKA

LAW, LYMAN, DANIEL,

KAMERRER & BOGDANOVICH, P.S. ATTORNEYS AT LAW

2674 RW JOHNSON RD., TUMWATER, WA 98512

PO BOX 11880, OLYMPIA, WA 98508-1880

(360) 754-3480 FAX: (360) 357-3511

J. KELLEY ARNOLD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

D. SCOTT BABBIT and SHARON

ALEXANDER,

Plaintiffs,

v.

TOWN OF STEILACOOM, a Municipal

Corporation,

Defendant.

NO. C05-5644 JKA

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF

VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between plaintiffs and

defendants, acting by and through their respective attorneys, that the above-entitled

action may be dismissed with prejudice and without attorneys' fees and costs to either

party, this matter having been fully settled and compromised between the parties.

Date Jon Cushman, WSBA No. 16547

Attorney for Plaintiffs

Date Jeffrey S. Myers WSBA No. 16390

Attorney for Defendant

Case 3:05-cv-05644-JKA Document 17 Filed 05/16/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF VOLUNTARY

DISMISSAL - 2

CASE NO. C05-5644 JKA

LAW, LYMAN, DANIEL,

KAMERRER & BOGDANOVICH, P.S. ATTORNEYS AT LAW

2674 RW JOHNSON RD., TUMWATER, WA 98512

PO BOX 11880, OLYMPIA, WA 98508-1880

(360) 754-3480 FAX: (360) 357-3511

ORDER

THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the foregoing stipulation, it is

hereby

ORDERED that the above-entitled action be dismissed with prejudice and

without attorneys' fees and costs to either party.

DATED this 16th day of May, 2006.

/s/ J. Kelley Arnold Hon. J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge

Presented by:

LAW, LYMAN, DANIEL, 

KAMERRER & BOGDANOVICH, P.S.

Jeffrey S. Myers, WSBA No. 16390

Attorney for Defendant

Approved for entry:

Jon Cushman, WSBA No. 16547

Attorney for Plaintiffs

Case 3:05-cv-05644-JKA Document 17 Filed 05/16/06 Page 2 of 2
From: helensharvest@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:20:19 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Helen Simon

Sulphur, LA 70663
PATRICK R. COX

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 1843

_________ ____________________/

Opinion filed October 7, 2015.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Columbia County

. Wesley R. Douglas , Judge

.

M. Blair Payne, Public Defender, and Ryan A. Terry, Assistant Public Defender,

Lake City; Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant

Public Defender, Tallahassee , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, C.J., MARSTILLER, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
МИНИСТЕРСТВО ТРАНСПОРТАРОССИЙСКОЙ ФЕДЕРАЦИИФЕДЕРАЛЬНОЕ АГЕНТСТВОВОЗДУШНОГО ТРАНСПОРТА MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

FEDERAL AIR TRANSPORT AGENCY

Our ref

_ Наш No Date



# ■гг. i>r^t
Mr. Paul L. Gretch Director, Office of International Aviation Office of the Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs U.S. Department of Transportation 400 Street, S.W., Room 6402 Washington DC, 20590

Dear Mr. Gretch, In connection with the U.S. Department of Transportation requirements related to foreign air carriers operation of charter flights the Federal Air Transport Agency of the Russian Federation would like to inform you of the following. Taking into account the type of fifth-freedom operations conducted by Russian cargo carriers to/from the US, the Federal Air Transport Agency of the Russian Federation is ready to accord reciprocal treatment to similar U.S. carrier requests for fifth-freedom authority to transport outsized cargo (as currently defined by DOT) to/from Russia. With kind regards,

Deputy Head Oleg O. Ю1тРоссийская Федерация Ленинградский проспект, д. 37, Москва, ГСП-3,125993, Телетайп: 111495 Тел.: (+7 499) 231-53-95, факс: (+7 499) 231-55-35

E-mail: rusavia@scaa.ru 37, Leningradsky prospect, 125993, Moscow, Russian Federation, Teletype: 111495 Tel.: (+7 499) 231-53-95, fax: (+7 499) 231-55-35

E-mail: rusavia@scaa.ru
No. 66504.

#### Italian Drugs Importing Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 60/25410 and 61/10080 (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of samples similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Italian Drugs Importing Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(46 Cust. Ct. 243, C.D. 2263), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: starrtrix@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:07:31 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

rick simon

Bowling Green, OH 43402
EXHIBIT 32



In connection with the Annual Report of United Cannabis Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), Earnest Blackmon, the Principal Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects the financial condition and results of the Company.





|                   |     |                                                            
|------------------ | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------
|September 22, 2016 | By: | /s/ Earnest Blackmon                                       
|                   |     | Earnest Blackmon, Principal Executive and Financial Officer
From: cjrand@windstream.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:06:31 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Carol Rand

Sweeny, TX 77480
From: andyscreations@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:11:32 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Andy Miglin

Lafayette, NJ 07848
35

12 8 7 8 9 10 11

31 32 33 34 35 36 31

3

33 34 36 31 32

6 2 1

3

4 5 2 1 6

7

6 5 4

7 10 11 12

10

9

9

8

7 8

7

11 12

18 13

13

14

14

15

15

16

16

17

17

18

18

23 24 19

23 24

22

22

21

21

20 19

19 20

25 30 26

26 25

27

27

29 28 30

30 29 28

35 36 31

36

31

35

34

34

32 33

31 32 33

6 2 1

1 6 3

2 3

4

4

5

6 5

7

11 12 9 10

Asotin Creek

Wenatchee Creek

WICKIUP CG

WENATCHEE

GUARD

STATION RC

CABIN SADDLE CG INDIAN

TOM TH

CLOVERLAND SP

South George Project Planning Area - Inventory of Potential Wilderness Areas

Map H-1A: Project Planning Area

H-1A

1 0.5 0 1 Miles

LEGEND

South George Project Planning Area

Washington State Fish and Wildlife

Pomeroy Ranger District

Inventoried Roadless Area (IRA)

Wenaha-Tucannon Wilderness

Recreation Feature

Forest Roads

Pomeroy RD, South George Project Planning Area

Existing Forest Plan Appendix C 

Roadless Areas and 2001 Roadless Rule 

Inventoried Roadless Areas

This product is reproduced from geospatial information prepared by the U.S. Department of 

Agriculture, Forest Service. GIS data and product accuracy may vary. They may be: developed from 

sources of differing accuracy, interpretation, incomplete while being created or revised, etc. 

Using GIS products for purposes other than those for which they were created may yield inaccurate 

or misleading results. The Forest Service reserves the right ot correct, update, modify, or replace GIS 

products without notification. For more information contact the Umatilla National Forest Supervisors Office. 

 ́

D.Dixon

GIS/Data Service Specialist

06/03/2011

4300

4304

4400
From: freds@hkusa.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:35:05 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Fred Starbird

Champaign, IL 61822
Case No. 12,910.

#### The SIREN.

[9 Ben. 194.] 1

District Court, E. D. New York.

July, 1877.

Admiralty — Costs—Final Record — Notice or Trial.

Fees in an admiralty suit for various services performed by the clerk, considered.

In admiralty.

J. J. Allen, for libellant.

Huntley & Adams, for claimant.

BENEDICT. District Judge.

The charge for making final record is correct. The legality of the charge was decided by Blatchford, J.. in the case of The Alice Tainter [Case No. 19(5]. The charge for filing the record, making the docket and indexes, for the order to cancel stipulations, for taxing the costs, for receiving and paying out the money, entering order check, entries in ledger and for filing clerk’s costs are all in accordance with the statute, if the services have been or must be performed, as to which there has been no dispute.

The charge of $2 for notices of trial is for the services of the clerk in making up the calendar and in sending notice to the proctor of the fact that the cause is upon the calendar, and its number. This service is required by rule 88 of this court, and by the practice the proctors are saved the labor of noticing causes for trial or preparing notes of issue, and are always informed as to the locality of a cause upon the calendar. The practice has met with favor, and this is the first time that objection has been made to the charge of two dollars for the services rendered.

The fact that the charge has gone unquestioned for twelve years is evidence that it is reasonable. It therefore falls within the principle of the case of the charge for making calendars considered by Judge Blatch-ford in The Alice Tainter [supra], and must be allowed.