alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1















Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm’s Consent



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement of POET Technologies Inc. on Form F-10 (File No. 333-213422) of our report dated April 30, 2018, with respect to our
audits of the consolidated financial statements of POET Technologies Inc. as of December 31, 2017, December 31, 2016 and December
31, 2015 and for the years ended December 31, 2017, December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, which report is included in this Annual
Report on Form 20-F of POET Technologies Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2017.









Marcum llp

New Haven, CT

April 30, 2018
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
        
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                            36,721
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      8,424
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                       17,901
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  78,377
<PP&E>                                           615,915
<DEPRECIATION>                                   120,629
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   627,888
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             65,283
<BONDS>                                           39,224
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                             499
<OTHER-SE>                                       513,037
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     627,888
<SALES>                                          998,492
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,008,094
<CGS>                                            390,125
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    839,762
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 1,070
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  110,576
<INCOME-TAX>                                      39,255
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               71,321
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                          4,880
<NET-INCOME>                                      66,441
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       1.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       1.32
        


</TABLE>
No. 62787.

#### Hudson Shipping Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 58/1107 (New York).

*290Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Since the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           2,371
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,135
<ALLOWANCES>                                       884
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,474
<PP&E>                                          21,707
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,732
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  39,458
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,660
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            5,301
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,164
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    39,458
<SALES>                                         27,986
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,986
<CGS>                                           21,981
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,062
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   455
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  36
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,433
<INCOME-TAX>                                       973
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,460
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,460
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.22


</TABLE>
*No.*67134.

protests 315204-K, etc. (New York).

#### Gemsco, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of insignia similar in all material respects to those involved in Abstract 66583, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.0
 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF THE
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
  (1)
    
    The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Sections 78m(a) or 78o(d); and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: March 29, 2010
    By:
    /s/ A. Peyton Bush, IIIA. Peyton Bush, IIIPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate: March 29, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Donna T. GuerraDonna T. GuerraAssistant Secretary and Chief Financial
Officer Note:
    
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to
Hibernia Homestead Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

TIMOTHY B. WHITMORE,

Plaintiff,

v.

PIERCE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF

COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5265RBL

ORDER ADOPTING

REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION

 The Court, having reviewed Plaintiffs’ complaint, the Report and Recommendation of

Magistrate Judge J. Kelley Arnold, objections to the Report and Recommendation, if any, and the

remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) Plaintiff may not seek release from jail in a civil rights action. The motion for

injunctive relief is DENIED.. 

(3) Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to plaintiff, and to the Hon. J. Kelley

Arnold.

DATED this 28th day of June, 2005.

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:05-cv-05265-RBL Document 27 Filed 06/28/05 Page 1 of 1
From: chariotordavid@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:09:10 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Chariot Smith

Flatwoods, KY 41139
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

VINCENT DANIEL HOPPER,

Petitioner,

v.

NEIL CLARK,

Respondent.

___________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. C05-1812RSL

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S

MOTION TO COMPEL

PRODUCTION

This matter comes before the Court on petitioner’s “Motion for to [sic]

Compel Production of the Certified Birth Certificate of the Petitioner to this Court and

One Copy to the Petitioner.” Dkt. # 72. The above-captioned matter having been

dismissed, the motion to compel is DENIED as moot. 

DATED this 5th day of June, 2006.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-01812-RSL Document 74 Filed 06/05/06 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4720-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2023-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Vermont (FEMA-4720-DR), dated

July 14, 2023, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued July 26, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street  SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Vermont is hereby amended to include the following area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of July 14, 2023.

Orleans County for Individual Assistance (already designated for Public Assistance).

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050,  Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2023-21016 Filed 9-26-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
No. 65190.

#### Maryland Trading Company, Inc., and Mohegan International Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 327563-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise in question consists of preserved, edible berries, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: wselby@starpower.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:24:05 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Cindy Selby

Gaithersburg, MD 20877
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with
the Annual Report of The Connect Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michelle Pannoni, Principal
Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Sect. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sect. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that: (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 15th day of
April, 2010.  /s/
Michelle Pannoni Michelle Pannoni Principal Executive
Officer and Financial Officer
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T VA UG HN R AY B R AD F OR D, P e titio n e r- A p p e lla n t, v. D. K. SI ST O; PE OPLE OF THE S TATE OF C AL I F ORNI A, R esp o n d en t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 08- 15418 D . C . N o . C V - 0 7 - 0 0 6 8 1 - C MK ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia C r a i g K e l l i s on, M a gi s tr a t e J udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d A pr i l 5, 2010 ** B efo re: R Y M E R , M cK E O W N , an d P A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. C al i forni a s t at e pri soner V augh n R ayB ra dford app ea l s f rom the di stri ct c ourt ’ s j udgm e ntdi s m i s s i ng hi s 28 U . S . C . § 2254 habe a s pe t i t i on. W e ha ve 

# FI LED APR16 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 15418 2 ju r is d ic tio n p u r s u a n t to 2 8 U .S .C . § 2 2 5 3 , a n d w e a f f irm . B r a df or d c ont e nds tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourte rr e d bydi s m i s s i ng hi s s uc c e s s i ve p e titio n p u r s u an t to 2 8 U .S .C . § 2 2 4 4 ( b ) ( 2 ) , ( 4 ) b e c au s e th is c o u rt p r e v io u s ly gr a nt e d B r a df

or d’ s m ot i on t o author i z e the di s tr i c tc ourtt o c ons i de rhi s s uc c e s s i ve pet i t i on . H ow ever , thi s di d n otprec l ud e the di stri ctcourtfr om det erm i ni ng that B r a d f o r d h a d n o t m e t th e r e q u ir e m e n ts f o rc o n s id e r in g as u c c e s s iv e p e titio n . See U ni ted Stat es v. V

i l la-G on zalez , 20 8 F . 3d 11 60 , 11 64 -65 (9th C i r. 20 00 ) ( per c u r ia m ) . F urthe rm or e , the di s tr i c tc ourtc orr e c t l yc onc l ude d tha t , t aki ng a s true B rad fo rd ’ s n ew ev i d en ce o f j u ro r b i as, th e ev i d en ce w as n o t“ su ffi ci en tt o est ab l i sh b y c le a ra n d c o n v in c in g e v id e n c e th a t, b u t f o rc o n s titu tio n a l e rr o r , n o r e a s o n a b le f a ct f i n der w oul d ha ve f

ound the appl i c a ntgui l tyof the unde r l y i ng of

f e ns e . ” 28 U .S .C . § 2 2 4 4 ( b ) ( 2 ) ( B ) ( ii) ( e m p h a s is a d d e d ) ; cf . B a b b i t t v. W o o d f o rd , 177 F . 3d 744, 747- 48 ( 9th C i r . 1999) ( s t a t i ng tha tpe t i t i one r ’ s c l a i m of r a c i a l bi a s on pa rtof defe nse c ou nsel am ou nt i ng t o structural error w ou l d fai l un der the st andard ap p lic ab le to s u c c e s s iv e p e titio n s a t § 2 2 4 4 ( b ) ( 2 ) ( B ) ( ii) ) . B e c au s e th e d is tr ic t c o u rt d id n o t e rrin d is m is s in g th e p e titio n , w e d e c lin e to a ddr e s s B r a df

or d’ s c ont e nt i on tha tr e m and t o adi f f e r e ntj udge i s r e qui r e d. AF F I RME D.
Order entered December 17, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01521-CR

LATOYA ROBINSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Auxiliary Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. TR-13-03619

ORDER

The clerk’s record and appellant’s brief have been filed in this appeal from appellant’s 

conviction for contributing to the truancy of her child. Although the record reflects the case was 

tried to a jury, no reporter’s record has been filed.

Accordingly, we ORDER the court reporter of the County Court Auxiliary Court No. 1 

to file, within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order, either the reporter’s record of the 

proceedings in this case or written verification that the proceedings were not recorded.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the 

Honorable Larry Rayford, Magistrate, County Auxiliary Court No. 1, 7201 Polk Str., No. 182, 

Dallas, Texas 75232; court reporter, County Auxiliary Court No. 1, 7201 Polk Str., No. 182, 

Dallas, Texas 75232; and the Dallas County District Attorney’s Office.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of the order, by first-class mail, to Latoya 

Robinson, 616 Lacewood Drive, Dallas, Texas 75224.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 474 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         June 12, 2007.
Whereas fathers factor significantly in the lives of children;
Whereas fathers play an important role in teaching their children life lessons 
        and preparing them to succeed in school and in life;
Whereas children with involved fathers are more likely to do well in school, 
        have a better sense of well-being, and have fewer behavioral problems;
Whereas supportive fathers promote the positive physical, social, emotional, and 
        mental development of children;
Whereas promoting responsible fatherhood can help increase the chances that 
        children will grow up with two caring parents;
Whereas, when fathers are actively involved in the upbringing of children, the 
        children demonstrate greater self-control and a greater ability to take 
        initiative;
Whereas responsible fatherhood can help reduce child poverty;
Whereas responsible fatherhood strengthens families and communities; and
Whereas Father's Day is the third Sunday in June: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives--
            (1) commends the millions of fathers who serve as a wonderful, 
        caring parent for their children;
            (2) calls on fathers across the United States to use Father's Day to 
        reconnect and rededicate themselves to their children's lives, to spend 
        Father's Day with their children, and to express their love and support 
        for their children;
            (3) urges men to understand the level of responsibility fathering a 
        child requires, especially in the encouragement of the moral, academic, 
        and spiritual development of children; and
            (4) encourages active involvement of fathers in the rearing and 
        development of their children, including the devotion of time, energy, 
        and resources.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Before the First Division,

August 9, 1967

No. P67/264.

#### L. E. Coppersmith, Inc., a/c Joe Y. Nishimura *v.*United States, protest 65/2589 (Los Angeles).

Oliver, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of a photo typesetting machine and parts similar in all material respects to the photo typesetting machine the subject of *Lanston Industries, Inc.*v. *United States*(49 CCPA 123, C.A.D. 807), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.