alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 96-4716 JAMES G. HAYDEN, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert J. Staker, Senior District Judge. (CR-90-205) Submitted: January 21, 1997 Decided: February 10, 1997 Before ERVIN, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________ Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL Hunt L. Charach, Federal Public Defender, Edward H. Weis, First Assistant Federal Public Defender, Charleston, West Virginia, forAppellant. Rebecca A. Betts, United States Attorney, Ray M. Shepard, Assistant United States Attorney, Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________ OPINION PER CURIAM:James G. Hayden was sentenced to twenty-four months' imprisonment after a hearing to revoke his period of supervised release* following his conviction on state charges. Hayden argues that the imposition of a separate sentence as a consequence of violating theterms of his supervised release was multiplicious with his state sentence and a violation of his rights against double jeopardy. Finding no error, we affirm. Congress explicitly authorized punishment for violation of the terms of supervised release in 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) (1994) (the court may "revoke a term of supervised release, and require the defendantto serve in prison all or part of the term of supervised release"). Moreover, this issue has been resolved against Hayden in United States v. Woodrup , 86 F.3d 359 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , ___ U.S. ___, 65 U.S.L.W. 3294 (U.S. Oct. 15, 1996) (No. 96-6025). We therefore affirm the findings and sentence of the district court.We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED

_________________________________________________________________ *Hayden was serving a period of supervised release pursuant to a prior federal conviction when he committed the offenses in question. 2
No. 68874.

#### Panation Trade Co. and W. J. Byrnes & Co. of New York, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/17954 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of rosary bracelets the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 66761, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 08661

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name Description

x 08661\08661_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

08661\08661_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

08661\08661_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 08661\08661_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08661\08661_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08661\08661_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08661\08661_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08661\08661_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08661\08661_Part F.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08661\08661_Part G.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08661\08661_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08661\Belews Creek Follow Up Responses Final.docx Draft Questions for Follow Up

08661\Certification Statement Plant ID 08661.pdf Plant certification statement

x 08661\Quest08661.doc ?

x 08661\Supplemental Documents\08661_Belews Creek A5-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08661\Supplemental Documents\08661_Belews Creek D3-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08661\Supplemental Documents\08661_BELEWS CREEK F5-6.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08661\Supplemental Documents\08661_Belews Creek FGD WWTS Description.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08661\Supplemental Documents\08661_Final Design Report Belews Creek_7-14-05.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08661\Supplemental Documents\08661_GE ABMet Marshall Station Pilot Final Report.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08661\Supplemental Documents\08661_Treatability Report 041013.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08661\Supplemental Documents\BELEWS CREEK MAP 1 A5-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08661\Supplemental Documents\BELEWS CREEK MAP 2 A5-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08661\Supplemental Documents\BELEWS CREEK MAP-1G3-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08661\Supplemental Documents\BELEWS CREEK MAP-2 G3-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

08661\Supplemental Documents\CBI Substantiation\Duke Energy_EIP FOIA.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

08661\08661_Cover Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
From: elkrck@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:53:39 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Richard Kroepel

Arlington Heights, IL 60004
From: emsanders34@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:26:49 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course, I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly object to and strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans

especially for drugs and devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as

ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Evelyn Sanders

Ponchatoula, LA 70454
From: hupfons5@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:54:28 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dennis Hupp

The Villages, FL 32162
From: kybaboo@att.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:18:24 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

BettySue Petty

Wichita, KS 67217
From: marshah9@windstream.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:04:34 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Marsha Hamilton

Hudson, OH 44236
From: sid@ssivc.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:05:58 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sidney Medley

Menifee, CA 92584
From: shedrumm@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:07:50 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

sheila drum

Cave Creek, AZ 85331
From: daly0119@live.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: daly0119@live.com

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:53:19 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the OUTRAGEOUS unjust and

coercive mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health

insurance with no co-pay to patients.

If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for any organizations that

provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. In forcing free insurance

coverage on Americans, especially for drugs and devices that I oppose because some of these can

cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B), the government is intruding far beyond its authority and

actively violating citizens' freedom of conscience.

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates conscience laws which prohibit

government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or religious

grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children (and harm those who take them, to

boot). No American should be forced by the federal government to essentially subsidize services they

find unutterably repugnant. I again urge you in the strongest way possible to reverse course and

remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kerry Daly

Suquamish, WA 98392
H. Res. 520 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 27, 2007. 

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is 

hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE: Mr. Sullivan, 

to rank after Mrs. Myrick. 

Attest: 

Clerk.