alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 11-2272

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Missouri.

David D. Ingram, also known as L. A. *

Ingram, also known as Elroy, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: January 4, 2012

Filed: January 9, 2012 

___________

Before LOKEN, BYE, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

David Ingram brings this appeal following entry of judgment by the district

court1

 revoking his supervised release and sentencing him to serve two years in prison. 

For reversal, he argues that the court lacked jurisdiction to revoke his supervised

release after the term had expired; that the court clearly erred in finding that he

violated his supervised release; and that he received ineffective assistance of counsel.

1

The Honorable Nanette K. Laughrey, United States District Judge for the

Western District of Missouri.
We reject these arguments. The district court had jurisdiction to revoke

supervised release, because the court issued a warrant to arrest Ingram for alleged

violations of his supervised release before his term had expired. See 18 U.S.C.

§ 3583(i). Further, upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not

clearly err in finding by a preponderance of the evidence presented at the revocation

hearing that Ingram illegally possessed a firearm and distributed a controlled

substance, which violated his supervised release conditions. See United States v.

Tyndall, 521 F.3d 877, 882 (8th Cir. 2008). Finally, the ineffective-assistance claim

is undeveloped and not properly before us. See United States v. Hughes, 330 F.3d

1068, 1069 (8th Cir. 2003).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court, and we grant

counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________

-2-
From: bobnpam@windstream.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:52:35 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

bob johnston

, 164335
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OC TOBER 23 , 2013

NO. 03

- 13

- 00514

- CR

Craig Rainey Walker, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF COMAL COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR , ROSE AND GOODWIN

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE ROSE

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the written motion of the appellant to dismiss the appeal and

the same being considered, it is the opinion of this Court that the same should be granted

. IT IS

THEREFORE ORDERED that the appellant be allowed to withdraw his notice of appeal and

that the appeal be dismissed; that the appellant pay all costs relating to this appeal; and that this

decision be certified below for observance.
July 21, 2015

Dear Yovani Linares:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA-2015-1656). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Your petition references the material listed below, however the material were not submitted for the record. Please provide a copy of the following referenced materials:

o Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM)

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information desc ribed above by 8/4/15. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst
From: mikea1949@nc.rr.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:48:08 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Carl Anderson

Wake Forest, NC 27587
Before the First Division,

March 13, 1963

No. 67506.

#### Agency Tile Supply Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/25103, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of opal glass tiles or tiling, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 60194.

protests 287851-K, etc. (New York).

#### K. Ginsburg, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 59105, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked with the letter “A” at 10 percent under the provision in paragraph 1528, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 52739), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52836), for imitation semiprecious stones, faceted, and (2) the items marked with the letter “B” at 30 percent under the provision in said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 51802, supplemented by T. D. 51898, for imitation semiprecious stones, not faceted.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order Directing Action by Plaintiff’s Attorney

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

KENNETH HALDEMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

SHIN-ETSU HANDOTAI AMERICA, INC.,

and DOES 1 - 10, inclusive,

Defendants.

Case No. 05-5713 KLS

ORDER DIRECTING ACTION BY

PLAINTIFF’S ATTORNEY

This matter is before the undersigned based on the consent of the parties. No trial date has yet

been set in light of the fact that the plaintiff’s attorney has filed a Motion to Withdraw. This motion,

however, does not comply with the rules. The court is, therefore, directing the attorney to properly note

the motion in accordance with GR 2(f)(4)(A) and to include a certification that the motion was served on

the plaintiff as well as opposing counsel and is further directing that these steps be accomplished no later

than March 17, 2006. Failure to comply may result in denial of the motion to withdraw. 

DATED this 27th day of February, 2006.

 /s/ Karen L. Strombom 

Karen L. Strombom

U.S. Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:05-cv-05713-KLS Document 10 Filed 02/27/06 Page 1 of 1
From: mary.reeves@co.minidoka.id.us

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:59:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mary Reeves

Rupert, ID 83350
SUNNYSIDE
FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION OF IRVINGTON


 


SUNNYSIDE
BANCORP, INC.


 





 



 








AMENDMENT
NUMBER THREE


TO
THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT WITH TIMOTHY D. SULLIVAN


 


 









 


This
Amendment Number Three(the “Amendment”) to the Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”) entered
into between Sunnyside Federal Savings and Loan Association of Irvington (the “Association”) and Timothy D.
Sullivan (the “Executive”) is made by the Association and the Executive, effective as of March 20, 2018
(the “Effective Date”).


 


WHEREAS,
the Agreement was entered effective as of July 15, 2013; and


 


WHEREAS,
Sunnyside Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) is a signatory to the Agreement for the purpose of guaranteeing the
Association’s performance under the Agreement; and


 


WHEREAS,
upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committees of the Association and the Company, the Association and the Executive
desire to amend the Agreement to provide for the automatic renewal of the term of the Agreement upon a Change in Control; and


 


WHEREAS,
pursuant to Section 15(a) of the Agreement, the Agreement may be amended by an instrument in writing signed by the parties.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, this Amendment is hereby adopted as follows:


 


	 	1.	Section 2of the Agreement is hereby amended to add
a new Section 2(f) to read in its entirety as follows:






 


“(f) Automatic
Renewal of Term upon Change in Control. Notwithstanding the foregoing, upon the legal closing date of a Change in
Control, as such term is defined in this Agreement, the term of this Agreement shall be automatically extended, without any
further action, so that it shall terminate thirty-six months following the legal closing date on which the Change in Control
occurs.”


 


	 	2.	Section 5(c) of the Agreement is hereby amended to add
the following sentence immediately after the end of Section 5(c) of the Agreement:






 


“(c)
In addition, upon the occurrence of a Change in Control, Executive shall be fully vested in all restricted stock awards
granted to Executive under the Company’s 2014 Equity Incentive Plan or other benefit plans.”


 




    	 



     


    

 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, a duly authorized officer of the Association and the Company has executed this Amendment as of the Effective
Date.


 


	 	SUNNYSIDE
                                         FEDERAL SAVINGS AND 

        LOAN
        ASSOCIATION OF IRVINGTON

	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ William
    Boeckelman                
	 	Name:	William
Boeckelman
	 	Title:	Director
	 	 	 
	 	SUNNYSIDE
    BANCORP, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    William Boeckelman
	 	Name:	William Boeckelman
	 	Title:	Director



 





	 	EXECUTIVE
	 	 
	 	/s/
     Timothy D. Sullivan
	 	Timothy
    D. Sullivan
	 	President
    and Chief Executive Officer










 




    	 	2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 ORDER

Page - 1

HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Petitioner,

v.

CHRISTA FRIEDLANDER,

Respondent.

Case No. C05-5714 RBL/JKA

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE:

UNITED STATES’ MOTION FOR

CONTEMPT

Upon the motion of the United States and the Declaration of Revenue Agent Paul R. Shipley,

including the exhibits attached thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED that respondent Christa Friedlander appear before United States District Judge Ronald

B. Leighton in Courtroom B of the United States District Court located at 1717 Pacific Avenue, Tacoma,

Washington, on the 7th day of September, 2006, at 8:30 a.m., to show cause why she should not be held in

contempt of this Court’S Order of February 9, 2006.

It is further ORDERED that:

1. A copy of this Order, together with the United States’ Motion for Contempt and the

Declaration of Revenue Agent Paul R. Shipley with attached exhibits, shall be served upon respondent in

accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 5, as soon as practicable after this Order is served upon counsel for the

United States.

2. Proof of any service done pursuant to paragraph 1, above, shall be filed with the Clerk of

Court as soon as practicable.

3. If respondent has any defense to present or opposition to the petition, such defense or

opposition shall be made in writing and filed with the Clerk of Court and copies served on counsel for the

Case 3:05-cv-05714-RBL Document 37 Filed 08/10/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 ORDER

Page - 2

United States in Washington D.C., on or before August 25, 2006. The United States may file and serve a

reply memorandum to any opposition on or before September 1, 2006. 

4. At the show cause hearing, the Court will consider all issues raised by respondent. Only

those issues brought into controversy by the responsive pleadings and supported by affidavit will be

considered. Any uncontested allegation in the petition will be considered admitted.

RESPONDENT CHRISTA FRIEDLANDER IS HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT IF SHE FAILS TO

APPEAR AND SHOW CAUSE AS DIRECTED HEREIN, A BENCH WARRANT SHALL BE ISSUED

FOR HER ARREST FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT.

IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerk shall forward copies of this Order to counsel for the United

States, at the address indicated on its pleadings.

DATED: August 10, 2006 

ARONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Submitted by:

JOHN MCKAY

United States Attorney

ROBERT BROUILLARD

Assistant United States Attorney

s/ Jennifer D. Auchterlonie 

JENNIFER D. AUCHTERLONIE, WSBA 29481

Trial Attorney, Tax Dividion\

U.S. Department of Justice

Post Office Box 683

Ben Franklin Station

Washington, D.C. 20044

Telephone: (202) 514-9593

Facsimile: (202) 307-0054

E-mail: Jennifer.D.Aucheterlonie@USDOJ.gov

Case 3:05-cv-05714-RBL Document 37 Filed 08/10/06 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 8.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF SAFE BULKERS, INC.

The
following companies are subsidiaries of Safe Bulkers, Inc. as of February 20,
2011.

|                                        |  |                              
|--------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Subsidiary                              |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
|                                        |  |                              
|Avstes Shipping Corporation             |  | Liberia                      
|Efragel Shipping Corporation            |  | Liberia                      
|Eniadefhi Shipping Corporation          |  | Liberia                      
|Eniaprohi Shipping Corporation          |  | Liberia                      
|Eptaprohi Shipping Corporation          |  | Liberia                      
|Kerasies Shipping Corporation           |  | Liberia                      
|Marathassa Shipping Corporation         |  | Liberia                      
|Marindou Shipping Corporation           |  | Liberia                      
|Marinouki Shipping Corporation          |  | Liberia                      
|Maxdeka Shipping Corporation            |  | Liberia                      
|Maxdekatria Shipping Corporation        |  | Liberia                      
|Maxdodeka Shipping Corporation          |  | Liberia                      
|Maxeikosi Shipping Corporation          |  | Liberia                      
|Maxeikosiena Shipping Corporation       |  | Liberia                      
|Maxeikositria Shipping Corporation      |  | Liberia                      
|Maxeikositessera Shipping Corporation   |  | Liberia                      
|Maxeikosipente Shipping Corporation     |  | Liberia                      
|Maxeikosiexi Shipping Corporation       |  | Liberia                      
|Maxeikosiepta
     Shipping Corporation |  | Liberia                      
|Maxenteka Shipping Corporation          |  | Liberia                      
|Maxpente Shipping Corporation           |  | Liberia                      
|Maxtessera Shipping Corporation         |  | Marshall Islands             
|Pelea Shipping Ltd.                     |  | Liberia                      
|Pemer Shipping Ltd.                     |  | Liberia                      
|Petra Shipping Ltd.                     |  | Liberia                      
|Shikoku Friendship Shipping Company     |  | Liberia                      
|Soffive Shipping Corporation            |  | Liberia                      
|Staloudi Shipping Corporation           |  | Liberia                      

---
ck0001325740-ex103_8.htm



EXHIBIT 10.3

 

Construction and Term Loan NOTE

$5,000,000Fargo, North Dakota

March 13, 2018

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, ABE SOUTH DAKOTA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Borrower”), hereby promises to pay to the order of AgCountry Farm Credit Services, PCA (together with any subsequent holder hereof, “Lender”) or its successors and assigns, at Post Office Box 6020, 1900 44th Street South, Fargo, North Dakota 58108, (a) on the Construction and Term Loan Maturity Date (as defined in the Master Credit Agreement among Borrower and Lender, dated December 29, 2015, and the Fourth Supplement to the Master Credit Agreement (Construction and Term Loan Facility) between Borrower and Lender dated the same date (as the same may be amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time), collectively known as the “Credit Agreement”), the principal sum of Five Million and No/100 Dollars ($5,000,000.00) or so much of the unpaid principal amount of the Construction and Term Loan (as defined in the Credit Agreement) as has advanced by Lender to Borrower pursuant to the Credit Agreement, and (b) on each date specified in the Credit Agreement prior to the Construction and Term Loan Maturity Date, the principal amount of the Construction and Term Loan payable to Lender on such date as specified therein, in lawful money of the United States of America in immediately available funds, and to pay interest on the unpaid principal amount thereof from time to time outstanding, in like funds, at said office, at the rate or rates per annum and payable on such dates as provided in the Credit Agreement.  Borrower also promises to pay Default Interest (as defined in the Credit Agreement), on demand, on the terms and conditions set forth in the Credit Agreement.  In addition, should legal action or an attorney-at-law be utilized to collect any amount due hereunder, Borrower further promises to pay all costs of collection, including the reasonable attorneys’ fees of Lender.

All borrowings evidenced by this Construction and Term Loan Note and all payments and prepayments of the principal hereof and the date thereof shall be recorded by Lender in its internal records; provided, that the failure of Lender to make such a notation or any error in such notation will not affect the obligations of Borrower to make the payments of principal and interest in accordance with the terms of this Construction and Term Loan Note and the Credit Agreement.

This Construction and Term Loan Note is issued in connection with, and is entitled to the benefits of, the Credit Agreement which, among other things, contains provisions for the acceleration of the maturity hereof upon the happening of certain events, all upon the terms and conditions therein specified.

THIS CONSTRUCTION AND TERM LOAN NOTE SHALL BE CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH AND GOVERNED BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA AND ANY APPLICABLE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

ABE SOUTH DAKOTA, LLC

 

By:/s/ Richard R. Peterson

Name:  Richard R. Peterson

Title:    President and Chief Executive Officer