alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Silver Hill Mines, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lisa Logan, President and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: April 11, 2011

| |                                                                          
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | By:   /s/ Lisa Logan
_____________________________
President and Director





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
**Exhibit      32.1**

|   |      (1)     The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |      (2)     The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company.  |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:    |                  /s/ Konstantin Tsirulnikov |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Konstantin                Tsirulnikov            |
|   |   | Chief                Executive Officer           |

----
No. 69669.

#### Gillespie & Co. of New York et al. *v.*United States,

protests 63/16330, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of miniature motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 66961, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: tmk000@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:04:04 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you proceed without delay to implement

your mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health

insurance with no co-pay to patients. I strongly support the government requiring free insurance

coverage for Americans especially for drugs and devices that help women and families control their

reproductive lives (such as ella and Plan B).

I also think that your definition of religious employer is defensible and appropriate. This legal mandate

clearly complies with the spirit of conscience laws which prohibit government discrimination against

those who object to various health services on moral or religious grounds. The definition of "religious

employer" in the regulation is completely appropriate.

Please do not shrink from well-founded principles just because narrow-minded zealots insist on

imposing their misguided mythology on the entire society.

Sincerely,

Thom Kuhn

Arlington, VA 22202
## IN THE COU RT O F CR IM IN AL AP PE ALS OF TE XAS
N O . A P - 76, 393

EX PA R TE ER I C LO FT O N , A ppl i c ant
ON AP P LI CAT I ON F OR A W RI T OF HABE AS CORP US CAUS E N O. F 0 4 - 1 5 0 3 3 - R I N T HE 2 6 5 DI S TR I CT COURT TH FROM DALLAS CO UNTY P er cur i am . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11. 0 7 o f t h e Tex as Code of Criminal Proce dure, the cler k of t he trial court transmitt ed to this Court this application for wr it of habea s corpus. Ex pa rte Y oung , 4 18 S.W. 2d 82 4, 82 6 (T e x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 67 ). Ap pli c ant w a s c onvic te d o f ind e c e nc y wi th a child and sente nced to six y ear s’ imprisonment. Ap pli c ant c onte nd s th at his a pp e llate c ouns e l r e nd e re d in e ff e c tiv e a ssi sta

nc e be c a us e he did not file a brie f on his behalf . The trial c ourt has dete rmined that trial counse l was ineffe ctive and that counsel’s de ficient pe rfor mance prejudice d Appli ca n t by denying him a me aning ful appe al. The State a g re e s. We fi nd

tha t c ouns e l w a s in e ff

e c tiv e and Ap pli c ant i s e nti tle d to the op po rt un ity to f ile2

an out-of- time appea l of the judg ment of convic tion in C ase N o. F04- 15033-R from the 265 th J udicial District C ourt of Dallas County . Applicant is order ed re turned to that time at which he may g ive a wr i t t en notice of a ppeal so that he may

then, with the aid of c ounsel, obtain a mea ningf ul appea l. All tim e limits shall be calculated a s if the sentenc e had be en imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. W e hold that, should A pplicant desire to prosecute an appe al, he must take aff

irmative steps to file a written notice of appea l in the t rial cour t within 30 day s after

the
mand ate of

thi s Co ur t is su e s.

Deliver ed: August 25, 2010 Do No t Pu

bli sh
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The undersigned officer of ALLIED HEALTHCARE PRODUCTS, INC. (the "Company"),
hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the Company's fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2005
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

                                      /s/ Daniel C. Dunn
                                           Daniel C. Dunn
                                           Vice President, Chief Financial
                                           Officer & Secretary
November 2, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 543 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 543

 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United 
   States Postal Service should issue a semipostal stamp to support 
           medical research relating to Alzheimer's disease.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 12, 2007

  Mr. Markey (for himself and Mr. Smith of New Jersey) submitted the 
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight 
 and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and 
Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United 
   States Postal Service should issue a semipostal stamp to support 
           medical research relating to Alzheimer's disease.

    Resolved,  That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that the United States Postal Service should, in accordance with 
section 416 of title 39, United States Code--
            (1) issue a semipostal stamp to support medical research 
        relating to Alzheimer's disease; and
            (2) transfer to the National Institutes of Health for that 
        purpose any amounts becoming available from the sale of such 
        stamp.
                                 <all>
```
From: eands73@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:23:55 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Shirley Deller

Lancaster, PA 17603
# Diario Oficial C 57A/17 d

| | ISSN 1977-0928 |
| --- | --- |
| Diario Oficial
  de la Unión Europea | C 57A |
| | |
| Edición en lengua española | Comunicaciones e informaciones | 58° año17 de febrero de 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0928

Diario Oficial

de la Unión Europea

C 57A

Edición en lengua española

Comunicaciones e informaciones

58° año17 de febrero de 2015

---

| Número de información | Sumario | Página |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Corrección de errores |
| 2015/C 057A/01 | Corrección de errores de la Convocatoria de oposición general EPSO/AST-SC/03/15 — Personal de secretaría/oficina (SC 1 y SC 2) en los siguientes ámbitos: 1) Apoyo administrativo 2) Apoyo financiero 3) Apoyo de secretaría ( DO C 3 A de 8.1.2015 ) | 1 |

Número de información

Sumario

Página

Corrección de errores

2015/C 057A/01

Corrección de errores de la Convocatoria de oposición general EPSO/AST-SC/03/15 — Personal de secretaría/oficina (SC 1 y SC 2) en los siguientes ámbitos: 1) Apoyo administrativo 2) Apoyo financiero 3) Apoyo de secretaría ( DO C 3 A de 8.1.2015 )

( DO C 3 A de 8.1.2015 )

1

---

| ES | |
| --- | --- |

ES

---

Corrección de errores

| 17.2.2015 | ES | Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea | CA 57/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.2.2015

ES

Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea

CA 57/1

---

Corrección de errores de la Convocatoria de oposición general EPSO/AST-SC/03/15 — Personal de secretaría/oficina (SC 1 y SC 2) en los siguientes ámbitos: 1) Apoyo administrativo 2) Apoyo financiero 3) Apoyo de secretaría

(
  Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea C 3 A de 8 de enero de 2015
  )

(2015/C 057 A/01)

En la página 2, en el título I, en el punto 3:

| donde dice: | «Plazo (incluida la validación): 10 de febrero de 2015 a las 12.00 del mediodía, hora de Bruselas.», |
| --- | --- |

donde dice:

«Plazo (incluida la validación): 10 de febrero de 2015 a las 12.00 del mediodía, hora de Bruselas.»,

| debe decir: | «Plazo (incluida la validación): 17 de febrero de 2015 a las 12.00 del mediodía, hora de Bruselas.». |
| --- | --- |

debe decir:

«Plazo (incluida la validación): 17 de febrero de 2015 a las 12.00 del mediodía, hora de Bruselas.».

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 PAGE 1 PROPOSED ORDER [05-5669-RBL]

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

PAMELA SHERMAN,

Plaintiff,

vs.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART,

Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant

Civil No. C05-5669-RBL

ORDER OF REMAND

Based on the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that the Commissioner’s final

decision be reversed and remanded for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 

42 U.S.C. §405(g). Upon remand to the Commissioner of Social Security, the Appeals Council

will remand this case to the administrative law judge to (1) fully consider and evaluate the entirety

of the opinions of Barry Carlaw, Ph.D. and William Kelly, M.D.; (2) reevaluate Plaintiff’s

residual functional capacity, including any assessed mental limitations and limitations related to

Crohn’s disease; (3) further evaluate Plaintiff’s past relevant work considering whether work was

Case 3:05-cv-05669-RBL Document 17 Filed 02/16/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 PAGE 2 PROPOSED ORDER [05-5669-RBL]

performed at substantial gainful activity levels; and (4) reevaluate Plaintiff’s ability to perform her

past relevant work considering the exertion level of the jobs. Plaintiff may present new arguments

and further medical evidence, if such evidence becomes available. 

This case is reversed and remanded on the above grounds pursuant to sentence four of 

42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Upon proper presentation, this Court will consider Plaintiff’s application for

costs and attorney’s fees under 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).

DATED this 16th day of February, 2006.

A

RONALD B. LEIGHTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Recommended for Entry:

____s/ Karen L. Strombom______________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Presented by:

s/ JOANNE E. DANTONIO WSB # 23623

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Office of the General Counsel

701 Fifth Ave, Ste 2900, M/S 901

Seattle, WA 98104-7075

Phone: 206-615-2730

Fax: 206-615-2531

joanne.dantonio@ssa.gov

Case 3:05-cv-05669-RBL Document 17 Filed 02/16/06 Page 2 of 2
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |            |   |   | RIDGEWOOD ENERGY Y FUND, LLC               |
|--------|-----------------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated: | August 23, 2010 | By:    | /s/    | ROBERT E. SWANSON                                    |
|   |            |   | Name:  | Robert E. Swanson                                    |
|   |            |   | Title: | Chief Executive Officer                              |
|   |            |   |   | (Principal Executive Officer)                        |
|   |            |   |   |                                                 |
|   |            |   |   |                                                 |
| Dated: | August 23, 2010 | By:    | /s/    | KATHLEEN P. MCSHERRY                                 |
|   |            |   | Name:  | Kathleen P. McSherry                                 |
|   |            |   | Title: | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |            |   |   | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)         |
|   |            |   |   |                                                 |
|   |            |   |   |                                                 |

----
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: April 30, 2015     | By:    | /s/ Joseph Dwyer   |   |
|----------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|                                         |   | Joseph Dwyer            |   |
|                                         |   | Chief Financial Officer |   |

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER

Page - 1 -

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

IN RE: PHENYLPROPANOLAMINE

(PPA) PRODUCTS LIABILITY 

LITIGATION,

______________________________

MDL NO. 1407

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND STRIKING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

This document relates to:

Christy v. Bayer Corp., C02-

1707

On May 23, 2005 defendant Wyeth, on behalf of itself and

defendant Bayer, moved for summary judgment on plaintiff Ronald

Christy’s claims. According to Wyeth, Christy has produced no

medical evidence of having suffered a stroke, a required element

for recovery under Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc., 509 U.S.

579 (1993) and this court’s June 8, 2003 Order Granting in Part

and Denying in Part MDL Defendants’ Motion to Preclude Plaintiffs’ Expert Opinions. Plaintiff has not filed a response,

thereby conceding defendants’ position.

Several weeks earlier, on May 2, 2005, plaintiff Christy

filed a motion for voluntary dismissal. Nevertheless, given the

un-refuted evidence that plaintiff’s claims are not viable, as

noted above, the court hereby GRANTS Wyeth’s motion for summary

Case 2:02-cv-01707-BJR Document 53 Filed 07/11/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER

Page - 2 -

judgment and STRIKES plaintiff’s motion for voluntary dismissal

as moot. This matter is DISMISSED with prejudice.

DATED at Seattle, Washington this 11th day of July, 2005.

ABARBARA JACOBS ROTHSTEIN

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:02-cv-01707-BJR Document 53 Filed 07/11/05 Page 2 of 2
From: gdomeny@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:57:47 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Gilbert Domeny

Richmond Hill, GA 31324