alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BOX ENERGY
CORPORATION'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000874992
<NAME> BOX ENERGY CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           13049
<SECURITIES>                                     28622
<RECEIVABLES>                                     6795
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 49885
<PP&E>                                          184521
<DEPRECIATION>                                  106628
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  144937
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            12145
<BONDS>                                         555077
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         20803
<OTHER-SE>                                       56912
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    144955
<SALES>                                          49273
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 52757
<CGS>                                            45065
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    55682
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                3676
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (6601)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (2407)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (4194)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4194)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.20)
        

</TABLE>
Case Mo. 18,524.

#### STRANGE v. REDFIELD.

[Cited in Hutton v. Schell, Case No. 6.961. Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible.]
No. 58244.

protests 173548-K, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### Acrow, Incorporated, and Frank P. Dow Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of building shores similar in all material respects to those involved in Abstract 57727, the claim' of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: lkwfam@cox.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:01:51 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mary Wilkinson

Wichita, KS 67218
EXHIBIT 35.2

CERTIFICATION OF SERVICER PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF
REGULATION AB

March 27,
2009

CIT Funding
Company, LLC
1 CIT Drive
Livingston, NJ 07039

Manufacturers
and Traders Trust Company
25 S. Charles Street, 16th Floor
Baltimore, Maryland 21201Attn.: Corporate Trust Services

M&T Trust
Company of Delaware
1220 N. Market Street, Suit 200
Wilmington, Delaware 19801

| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     | 
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
| | Re: | Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as
 of April 1, 2008,
 among CIT Equipment Collateral 2008-VT1, as Trust, CIT
 Funding Company, LLC, as Depositor, and CIT Financial USA,Inc., in its individual capacity and as Servicer (the Agreement). | 

I,
Kiran R. Kapur, Executive Vice President of CIT Communications Finance
Corporation (the Sub-Servicer), hereby certify that:

A
review of the activities of the Sub-Servicer during the period from May 14,
2008 through December 31, 2008 (the Reporting Period) and of the performance
of the Sub-Servicer under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

To
the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Sub-Servicer has fulfilled
its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the
Reporting Period.

| |                                                          |                                     | 
| | -------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------- | 
| | CIT Communications Finance Corporation,
 as Sub-Servicer |                                    
| |                                                          |                                     | 
| | By:                                                      | /s/
 Kiran R. Kapur                 | 
| |                                                          |                                     | 
| |                                                          | Name:  Kiran
 R. Kapur              | 
| |                                                          | Title:    Executive
 Vice President | 

-57-

---
# Iris Oifigiúil C NaN/16 A

| | ISSN 1977-107X |
| --- | --- |
| Iris Oifigiúil
  an Aontais Eorpaigh | Eagrán Speisialta (
  1
  ) |
| | |
| An t-eagrán Gaeilge | Faisnéis agus Fógraí | 5816 Aibreán 2015 |

ISSN 1977-107X

Iris Oifigiúil

an Aontais Eorpaigh

Eagrán Speisialta (
  1
  )

1

An t-eagrán Gaeilge

Faisnéis agus Fógraí

5816 Aibreán 2015

---

| | Clár | Leathanach |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Ceartúcháin |
| 2015/C /01 | Ceartúchán ar an bhfógra comórtais oscailte – Riarthóirí (AD 5/AD 7) a bhfuil speisialtóireacht acu sa taighde dlí – EPSO/AD/295/15 – Dlíodóirí a bhfuil oiliúint acu ar dhlí na Bulgáire (BG) – EPSO/AD/296/15 – Dlíodóirí a bhfuil oiliúint acu ar dhlí na Gearmáine (DE) – EPSO/AD/297/15 – Dlíodóirí a bhfuil oiliúint acu ar dhlí na Cróite (HR) – EPSO/AD/298/15 – Dlíodóirí a bhfuil oiliúint acu ar dhlí na hÉireann (IE) – EPSO/AD/299/15 – Dlíodóirí a bhfuil oiliúint acu ar dhlí na Liotuáine (LT) – EPSO/AD/300/15 – Dlíodóirí a bhfuil oiliúint acu ar dhlí na Slóvaice (SK) — ( IO C 68 A, 26.2.2015 ) | 1 |

Clár

Leathanach

Ceartúcháin

2015/C /01

Ceartúchán ar an bhfógra comórtais oscailte – Riarthóirí (AD 5/AD 7) a bhfuil speisialtóireacht acu sa taighde dlí – EPSO/AD/295/15 – Dlíodóirí a bhfuil oiliúint acu ar dhlí na Bulgáire (BG) – EPSO/AD/296/15 – Dlíodóirí a bhfuil oiliúint acu ar dhlí na Gearmáine (DE) – EPSO/AD/297/15 – Dlíodóirí a bhfuil oiliúint acu ar dhlí na Cróite (HR) – EPSO/AD/298/15 – Dlíodóirí a bhfuil oiliúint acu ar dhlí na hÉireann (IE) – EPSO/AD/299/15 – Dlíodóirí a bhfuil oiliúint acu ar dhlí na Liotuáine (LT) – EPSO/AD/300/15 – Dlíodóirí a bhfuil oiliúint acu ar dhlí na Slóvaice (SK) — ( IO C 68 A, 26.2.2015 )

( IO C 68 A, 26.2.2015 )

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Faoin tagairt C 122 A a foilsíodh ábhar an eagráin seo i dteangacha oifigiúla eile an Aontais Eorpaigh. |

---

(1)   Faoin tagairt C 122 A a foilsíodh ábhar an eagráin seo i dteangacha oifigiúla eile an Aontais Eorpaigh.

1

| GA | |
| --- | --- |

GA

---

Ceartúcháin

| 16.4.2015 | GA | Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh | 1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2015

GA

Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh

1

---

Ceartúchán ar an bhfógra comórtais oscailte – Riarthóirí (AD 5/AD 7) a bhfuil speisialtóireacht acu sa taighde dlí – EPSO/AD/295/15 – Dlíodóirí a bhfuil oiliúint acu ar dhlí na Bulgáire (BG) – EPSO/AD/296/15 – Dlíodóirí a bhfuil oiliúint acu ar dhlí na Gearmáine (DE) – EPSO/AD/297/15 – Dlíodóirí a bhfuil oiliúint acu ar dhlí na Cróite (HR) – EPSO/AD/298/15 – Dlíodóirí a bhfuil oiliúint acu ar dhlí na hÉireann (IE) – EPSO/AD/299/15 – Dlíodóirí a bhfuil oiliúint acu ar dhlí na Liotuáine (LT) – EPSO/AD/300/15 – Dlíodóirí a bhfuil oiliúint acu ar dhlí na Slóvaice (SK)

(
  Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh C 68 A Eagrán Speisialta Gaeilge an 26 Feabhra 2015
  )

Leathanach 2, Roinn I, pointe 3:

In ionad:

“Sprioc-am (an bailíochtú san áireamh): 31 Márta 2015 ar 12 a chlog (meán lae), am na Bruiséile.”,

Léitear:

“Sprioc-am (an bailíochtú san áireamh): 9 Aibreán 2015 ar 12 a chlog (meán lae), am na Bruiséile.”.

---
From: garbageghost@mchsi.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:23:03 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Robert LaCombe

Ridgecrest, CA 93555
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE
NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           7,144
<SECURITIES>                                    31,374
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,941
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                48,994
<PP&E>                                          21,481
<DEPRECIATION>                                (15,663)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  54,812
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,598
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,322
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    54,812
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,905
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,442
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 348
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (16,637)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,637)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (16,637)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.83)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.83)
        

</TABLE>
No. 68939.

#### J. C. Penney Purchasing Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 63/8894, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Pord, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of rayon labels similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Bruce Duncan Co., Inc., a/c Standard Commodities Import & Export Corp.*v. *United States*(51 Cust. Ct. 27, C.D. 2409), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
#### Bertin OLVERA SALDANA; Lorena Olvera Memije; Esmeralda Olvera Memije, Petitioners, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

Nos. 04-71910, [ AXX-XXX-XXX ], [ AXX-XXX-XXX ], [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 1, 2005.*

Decided Aug. 4, 2005.

*597Bertin Olvera Saldana, Santa Ana, CA, pro se.

Lorena Olvera Memije, Santa Ana, CA, pro se.

Esmeralda Olvera Mimije, Santa Ana, CA, pro se.

Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, OIL, Anthony W. Nor-wood, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Before O’SCANNLAIN, CALLAHAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM**

Bertin Olvera Saldana and his minor daughters Lorena Olvera Memije and Esmeralda Olvera Memije (“Petitioners”), natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of their motion to reopen removal proceedings to permit them to renew their application for cancellation of removal. We review the denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion, *Ordonez v. INS,*345 F.3d 777, 782 (9th Cir.2003), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying reopening because Petitioners failed to establish their prima facie eligibility for cancellation of removal. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(1) (providing that a motion to reopen “shall be supported by affidavits or other evidentiary material”); *Ordonez,*345 F.3d at 785 (holding that prima facie eligibility is demonstrated by a showing that there is a reasonable likelihood that the statutory requirements for relief have been satisfied); *see also INS v. Wang,*450 U.S. 139, 143-45, 101 S.Ct. 1027, 67 L.Ed.2d 123 (1981) (per curiam) (upholding BIA’s authority to make hardship determinations in context of motions to reopen).

Petitioners’ remaining contentions lack merit.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

Nos. 06-1210, 06-1211, 06-1212, 06-1851, 06-1852, 06-1918, 06-2094

VANESSA DIXON,

Plaintiff, Appellee/Cross-Appellant,

v.

INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF POLICE OFFICERS; INTERNATIONAL

BROTHERHOOD OF POLICE OFFICERS, LOCAL 382; JOHN LEARY,

Defendants, Appellants/Cross-Appellee,

KENNETH T. LYONS,

Defendant, Cross-Appellee.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on September 28, 2007, is

amended as follows:

On the coverpage, line 23, replace "Lint" with "Lunt"

Page 8, footnote 1: "National Association of Governance

Employees" is corrected to "National Association of Government

Employees"

Page 17, second paragraph: The citation to Bain is amended to

read "Bain, 678 N.E.2d at 161"
Before the Second Division,

April 5, 1966

No. P66/19.

#### Rohde & Schwarz Sales Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 65/7231 and 65/7232 (New York).

Rao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of instruments in chief value of metal having essential electrical elements, designed to measure the amperage of electricity, not wattage, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *G. L.*Electronics, *Inc.,*
      *897
      *Arrows*Sales, *Inc.*(49 CCPA 111, C.A.D. 804), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 64517.

#### American Customs Brokerage Co. and International Factors, Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 58/25326, etc. (Honolulu).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Shoji panels similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United Enterprises et al.*v. *United States*(41 Cust. Ct. 73, C.D. 2023), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel;  NIHAI75N93023R00003: Pre-clinical Models of Infectious Diseases-Task Area D.                    

*Date:*                         October 30, 2023.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G74, Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Hailey Petersen Weerts, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G74, Rockville, MD 20852, (240) 669-5931,                         *hailey.weerts@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 25, 2023.

Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-21361 Filed 9-28-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
No. 67563.

#### Charles C. Merzbach Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 59/26317 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of “Faller Houses” similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Polk’s Model Craft Hobbies, Inc., et al.*(47 CCPA 137, C.A.D. 746), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before the First Division,

March 25, 1969

No. P69/81.

protests 67/83103, etc. (Los Angeles).

No. P69/82.

protests 68/18488-6704, etc. (Chicago).

#### Moskatel’s, Inc., et al. *v.*United States, Adler Enterprises, Inc. *v.*United States,

Watson, J.

In accordance witli stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of artificial flowers, trees, foliage, fruits, vegetables, grasses, or grains, and articles made of the foregoing, in chief value of plastic, assembled in the same maimer as the merchandise the subject of *Armbee Corporation et al.*v. *United States*(60 Cust. Ct. 105, C.D. 3278) and *Zunold Trading Corporation et al.*v. *United States*(60 Cust. Ct. 112, C.D. 3279), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.