alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: seg17h@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:35:35 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sherman Goff

Belleville, IL 62221
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the WESTERN DISTRICT of WASHINGTON

MICHELLE R. WILLIAMS,

 Plaintiff,

 vs.

)

)

)

)

) C05-1536 RSL

JO ANN B. BARNHART, Commissioner

of Social Security,

 

 Defendant.

)

)

) MINUTE ORDER

)

)

This action has been reassigned to the Honorable Robert S. Lasnik, United

States District Judge. All future documents filed in this case must bear the cause

number C05-1536 RSL and bear the Judge’s name in the upper right hand corner of

the document.

It appearing from the files and records herein that this is an appropriate

proceeding to refer to a full-time United States Magistrate Judge for the purposes

hereinafter set forth, pursuant to Local Rule MJR 4(A)(4) and as authorized by

Mathews, Secretary of HEW vs Weber, 432 US 261 (1976), now therefore,

Pursuant to the General Order entered by the Chief Judge on 30 April 2004, IT

IS ORDERED that the above entitled action is hereby referred to the Honorable James

P. Donohue, United States Magistrate Judge, who is directed and empowered to 

Case 2:05-cv-01536-RSL Document 12 Filed 12/15/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated this 15th day of December , 2005

Bruce Rifkin, Clerk of Court

 /S/ PETER H. VOELKER

Peter H. Voelker, Deputy Clerk

review the administrative record, and to submit proposed findings and conclusions, and

recommended disposition. The procedure for review of those recommendations shall

be in accordance with FRCP 72(b) and with Local Rule MJR 4(c).

Case 2:05-cv-01536-RSL Document 12 Filed 12/15/05 Page 2 of 2
From: tweetnanny@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:12:00 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Nancy Schaub

Wapakoneta, OH 45895
From: rontaylor503@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:26:12 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services. This is important!

Sincerely,

Ron Taylor

Albany, OR 97321
BUTTE COUNTY AQMD RULES AND REGULATIONS

Rule 434 April 25, 2013 434-1

Rule 434 Emissions Statements

(Adopted April 25, 2013)

RULE 434 CONTENTS

1 PURPOSE

2 APPLICABILITY

3 REQUIREMENTS

4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
BUTTE COUNTY AQMD RULES AND REGULATIONS

Rule 434 April 25, 2013 434-2

Rule 434

1 PURPOSE: This Rule establishes the requirements for the submittal from specified 

stationary sources in accordance with the requirements of the 1990 Clean Air Act 

[Section 182(a)(3)(B)].

2 APPLICABILITY: The requirements of this Rule are applicable to any stationary 

source which emits or may emit oxides of nitrogen (NOx) or reactive organic 

compounds (ROCs).

3 REQUIREMENTS

3.1 The owner or operator of any stationary source that is subject to this Rule 

shall provide the Butte County Air Quality Management District (DISTRICT)

with a written emissions statement showing actual emissions or operational 

data allowing the DISTRICT to estimate actual emissions from that source. 

Emissions calculations shall be based on emission factors approved by the Air 

Pollution Control Officer (APCO).

 

3.2 The emissions statement shall be on a form or in a format specified by the 

APCO and shall contain emissions data for the time period specified by the 

APCO. Emissions statements shall be submitted annually.

4 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS

4.1 The APCO may waive the requirements of Section 3 of this Rule to any class 

or category of stationary sources which emit less than 25 tons per year of 

NOx or ROCs if the DISTRICT provides the California Air Resources Board 

with an emissions inventory of sources emitting greater than 10 (ten) tons per 

year of NOx or ROCs.

4.2 All official documents submitted to the DISTRICT shall contain a 

certification signed and dated by a responsible official of the company 

attesting that the information contained in the submitted documents is 

accurate to the best knowledge of the individual certifying the submission. 

The requirements of this Section apply to, but are not limited to, the 

emissions statement required in Section 3 of this Rule.
Number of 

water-budget 

subareas

Area 

(square 

miles)

Mean recharge as 

a percentage of 

water input1

Number of 

water-budget 

subareas

Area 

(square 

miles)

Mean recharge as 

a percentage of 

water input1

Number of 

water-budget 

subareas

Area 

(square 

miles)

Mean recharge as 

a percentage of 

water input1

Open native forest (outside fog zone) 356 1.34 22.9 2,701 20.00 26.1 20 0.08 29.2

Closed native forest (outside fog zone) 7 0.02 32.7 2,048 11.62 21.9 17 0.04 30.0

Alien and mixed forest (outside fog zone) 25 0.03 1.5 1,044 3.89 9.3 12 0.02 6.6

Open native forest (inside fog zone) 2,392 53.52 25.4 5,317 56.30 40.4 100 0.96 47.5

Closed native forest (inside fog zone) 247 0.99 35.4 2,998 37.95 39.0 75 0.42 43.0

Alien and mixed forest (inside fog zone) 0 – – 101 0.61 28.9 0 – –

Shrubland 4,290 62.53 56.1 5,352 37.00 56.3 1 <0.005 51.7

Agriculture: Macadamia 0 – – 732 8.94 31.0 3 0.02 51.5

Coffee 0 – – 389 1.07 42.0 3 0.02 49.2

Diversified 0 – – 258 0.77 41.7 10 0.20 51.7

Forest (eucalyptus) 0 – – 0 – – 0 – –

Fallow/Grassland 0 – – 0 – – 0 – –

Golf course 0 – – 68 0.21 17.6 0 – –

Low-intensity developed 28 0.03 14.1 1,737 1.51 41.4 6 0.01 49.4

High-intensity developed 14 0.03 42.1 1,066 0.73 53.1 0 – –

Grassland 1,877 23.94 37.0 5,578 42.16 43.6 48 0.53 52.8

Sparsely vegetated 3,272 211.66 52.4 4,365 42.31 56.1 2 <0.005 48.8

Wetland vegetation 0 – – 25 0.22 54.9 0 – –

Water body2 0 – – 0 – – 0 – –

2

Recharge was not calculated using the water-budget model (see USGS SIR 2011–5078, p. 28).

1

Recharge as a percentage of water input was calculated for each subarea using the formula: [(recharge - direct recharge)/(rainfall + fog + irrigation)] x 100. Values for each subarea in a particular land-cover category were then multiplied 

by the area and summed, and that sum was then divided by the total area of that category to obtain a mean. Direct recharge is described in USGS SIR 2011–5078.

Table S-7. Estimated mean annual groundwater recharge as a percentage of water input for baseline conditions in the Southwest Mauna Loa aquifer sector of the Island of Hawai‘i, compiled by 

land-cover type and precipitation amount (refer to USGS SIR 2011–5078).

[<, less than; –, not applicable; water input is defined as the sum of mean annual rainfall, fog, and irrigation; baseline conditions are defined as 2008 land cover and mean annual rainfall for the period 1916–83; the 

Southwest Mauna Loa aquifer sector consists of the Manukä, Kaÿapuna, and Kealakekua aquifer systems and is defined by the Hawai‘i Commission on Water Resource Management (see 

http://www.state.hi.us/dlnr/cwrm/mapsillustrations/gwhu_hawaii.pdf); reported mean recharge is an area-weighted average; no distinction is made between fog and non-fog conditions for shrubland, coffee, and 

eucalyptus forest plantations]

Land-cover description

Mean annual rainfall plus fog equal to 40 

inches or less

Mean annual rainfall plus fog greater than 40 

inches and less than 80 inches

Mean annual rainfall plus fog equal to 80 

inches or greater
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 12, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 62574]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19668]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 1009(d), notice is hereby given of the 
following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended, and the Determination of the Director, Office of 
Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, 
CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463. The grant applications and the 
discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial 
property such as patentable material, and personal information 
concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.
    Name of Committee: Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and 
Control Special Emphasis Panel (SEP)--RFA-OH-22-005, Commercial Fishing 
Occupational Safety Research Cooperative Agreement; and RFA-OH-22-006, 
Commercial Fishing Occupational Safety Training Project Grants.
    Date: November 14, 2023.
    Time: 1 p.m.-5 p.m., EST.
    Place: Video-Assisted Meeting.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    For Further Information Contact: Dan Hartley, Ed.D., Scientific 
Review Officer, Office of Extramural Programs, National Institute for 
Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention, 1095 Willowdale Road, Morgantown, West Virginia 26505. 
Telephone: (304) 285-5812; Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5f1b173e2d2b333a261f3c3b3c71383029"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b2f6fad3c0c6ded7cbf2d1d6d19cd5ddc4">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Office of Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of 
the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention, has been delegated the authority to sign Federal Register 
notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee 
management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Kalwant Smagh,
Director, Office of Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of the Chief 
Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2023-19668 Filed 9-11-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER – 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

STEVEN A. KERZMAN, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

NCH CORPORATION,

Defendant.

CASE NO. C05-1820JLR

ORDER

This matter comes before the court on Defendant’s motion for sanctions (Dkt.

# 24). Defendant filed the motion after Plaintiffs failed to timely file expert disclosures

under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2). 

The court GRANTS the motion in part and DENIES it in part. Plaintiffs may not

file rebuttal expert reports. Discovery in this action will close on December 4, 2006, but

Defendant may conduct discovery of Plaintiffs’ expert witnesses until December 11,

2006. The court extends the deadline for filing dispositive motions until January 10,

2007. 

David Heimbach and Kristi Stack may testify at trial as treating healthcare

providers, but may not testify as expert witnesses.

//

//

Case 2:05-cv-01820-JLR Document 50 Filed 11/21/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER – 2

Dated this 21st day of November, 2006.

A 

JAMES L. ROBART

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-01820-JLR Document 50 Filed 11/21/06 Page 2 of 2
January 7, 2014 Patrick Au State of California Antelope Valley Air Quality Management Di strict 43301 Division St., Suite 206 Lanc ast er, CA 93535-4649

Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board P. 

### 0 . Box 2815 Sacramento, California 95812 661.723.8070 Fax 661.723.3450 E ldon Heaston, Executive Director

Project: Amendment of AVAQMD Rule 1130 - 

### Graphic Arts and Rescission of Rule 1128 - 

### Paper, Fabric, and Film Coating Operations Dear Mr. Au: The Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District (AVAQMD) requests that the California Air Resources Board submit amended Rule 1130 - 

### Graphics Arts to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) for inclus ion in the State Imp lementation Plan (SIP), and Rule 1128 

### - Paper, Fabric, and Film Coating Operations for removal from the SIP. The AVAQMD has incorpora ted the provis ions of Rule 1128 into Ru le 1130, as the basis for the rules were similar and there were many redundancies . The amendment of Rule 1130 satisfies the provisions of former Ca li fornia Health & Safet y (H&S) Code §39614(d) which required the adoption of readily available, feasible and cost- effective control measures for particulate matter, and satisfies 42 U . S.C. §§751 la (Federal Clean Air Act (FCAA) §182) which requires that ozone nonat t ainment areas implement Reasonably Available Control Techno logy (RACT) for sources that are subject to Control Technology Guidelines (CTGs) for major sources of ozone. If you have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact me at (760) 245-1661, extension 6726, or Tracy Walters at extension 6122. Please note that alJ documents required for a complete submission were sent elec t ronically on January 7, 2014.

# ~ ManJ.~ Supervising Air Quality Engineer AJD/tw CARB SIP Submittal Request Rule 1130 1128 

# €1fJmi C ities A n telope Valley
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 184 Filed 09/23/04 Page 1 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 184 Filed 09/23/04 Page 2 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 184 Filed 09/23/04 Page 3 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 184 Filed 09/23/04 Page 4 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 184 Filed 09/23/04 Page 5 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 184 Filed 09/23/04 Page 6 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 184 Filed 09/23/04 Page 7 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 184 Filed 09/23/04 Page 8 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 184 Filed 09/23/04 Page 9 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 184 Filed 09/23/04 Page 10 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 184 Filed 09/23/04 Page 11 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 184 Filed 09/23/04 Page 12 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 184 Filed 09/23/04 Page 13 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 184 Filed 09/23/04 Page 14 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 184 Filed 09/23/04 Page 15 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 184 Filed 09/23/04 Page 16 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 184 Filed 09/23/04 Page 17 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 184 Filed 09/23/04 Page 18 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 184 Filed 09/23/04 Page 19 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-01683-TSZ-MAT Document 184 Filed 09/23/04 Page 20 of 20
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

MINUTE ORDER

PAGE -1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

MICHAEL A. BURNHART,

Petitioner,

v.

SNOHOMISH SUPERIOR COURT, et al,

Respondent.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C05-1603-JLR-JPD

MINUTE ORDER

The following minute order is made at the direction of the Court, the Honorable James

P. Donohue, United States Magistrate Judge:

(1) On October 13, 2005, this Court issued an Order For Service and Answer in

petitioner’s § 2254 petition. However, petitioner improperly named James Thatcher as

respondent. 

(2) Petitioner is referred to the Court’s order of September 29, 2005, (Dkt. No. 5),

and is again directed to amend his petition to reflect the proper respondent, either the warden

of his facility, the Regional Justice Center in Kent, or else the director of the Department of

Adult and Juvenile Detention. Although petitioner named additional respondents, only his

Case 2:05-cv-01603-JLR Document 8 Filed 10/13/05 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

MINUTE ORDER

PAGE -2

custodian is the proper party in this case. The amended petition must be filed no later than

the original date of October 31, 2005. If no amended petition is timely filed, or if petitioner

fails to correct the deficiencies identified in this Order, the petition will be subject to dismissal. 

(3) Petitioner’s concerns about “P#1420” (Dkt. No. 6) appear to reference a case that

has already been dismissed and which does not have any bearing on this suit.

DATED this _____ day of _______________, 2005.

Bruce Rifkin

Clerk of the Court

/s/ Peter H. Voelker 

Peter H. Voelker

Deputy Clerk

Case 2:05-cv-01603-JLR Document 8 Filed 10/13/05 Page 2 of 2