alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         September 26, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 18, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 56 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2023-271, CP2023-274.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-20912 Filed 9-25-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
From: jbaggs@rochester.rr.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:58:47 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Joseph Baggs

Rochester, NY 14615
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

Page - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

MONTE C. HOISINGTON,

Petitioner,

v.

HENRY RICHARDS,

Respondent.

Case No. C05-5642RBL

ORDER GRANTING I.F.P.

 APPLICATION

Petitioner's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Petitioner does not

appear to have funds available to afford the $5.00 filing fee.

The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this Order to petitioner.

DATED this 31st day of October, 2005.

_/s/ J. Kelley Arnold_______ J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:05-cv-05642-RBL Document 7 Filed 10/31/05 Page 1 of 1
From: karenspillman@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:19:32 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Karen Spillman

Cleburne, TX 76033
|               | (1)                                  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|          |        |                                                                              |
|          | (2)                                  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the dates and periods covered by the Report. |

|  Date: August 13, 2010                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |                      |                     | /s/ Dirk A. Montgomery                            |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                                                              |                      |      | Dirk A. Montgomery                                |
|                                                         |                      |      | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
H. Res. 244

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

March 14, 2007.

Resolved,

SECTION 1. ELECTION OF MEMBERS TO JOINT COMMITTEE ON 

PRINTING AND JOINT COMMITTEE OF CONGRESS 

ON THE LIBRARY. 

(a) JOINT COMMITTEE ON PRINTING.—The following 

Members are hereby elected to the Joint Committee on Printing, to serve with the chair of the Committee on House Administration: 

(1) Mr. Brady of Pennsylvania. 

(2) Mr. Capuano. 

(3) Mr. Ehlers. 

(4) Mr. McCarthy of California. 

(b) JOINT COMMITTEE OF CONGRESS ON THE LIBRARY.—The following Members are hereby elected to the 

Joint Committee of Congress on the Library, to serve with 

the chair of the Committee on House Administration: 

(1) Ms. Zoe Lofgren of California.
2

•HRES 244 EH 

(2) Mr. Ehlers. 

(3) Mr. Daniel E. Lungren of California. 

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATIONI, EARL R. REFSLAND, certify that:1. I have reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ALLIED HEALTHCARE PRODUCTS, INC.2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) omitted as not yet applicable;c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.Date: February 7, 2007              /s/ EARL R. REFSLAND   Earl. R. Refsland   President & Chief Executive Officer  
19
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   		          1-MO
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          	SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               	MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      690816
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               778380
<ALLOWANCES>                                42000
<INVENTORY>                                 802097
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            2271293
<PP&E>                                      2481498
<DEPRECIATION>                              2131461
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              3027673
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       1202447
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    60004
<OTHER-SE>                                  1330208
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                3027673
<SALES>                                     1526281
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            1526281
<CGS>                                       873469
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               873469
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            1217041
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            564229
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          45817
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             423252
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       	 423252
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                423252
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0
        


</TABLE>
From: Teacherman1@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:39:07 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ryan Johnson

Sitka, AK 99835
From: rondatchr@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:26:06 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ronda Slawinski

Montrose, CO 81403
Before the First Division,

January 8, 1969

(Note: The following protests were decided by a special first division consisting of Watson, Maletz, and Newman, Judges.)

No. P69/6.

protest 66/45619 (Ogdensburg).

#### F. W. Myers & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Newman, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of wood flooring similar in all material respects to that the subject of *D. B. Frampton & Company*and *Dorf*International, *Inc.*v. *United States*(60 Cust. Ct. 4, C.D. 3243), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: rbsybert@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:47:36 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Rosalie Sybert

Alpharetta, GA 30005
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                               AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Orbit/FR, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Israel Adan, President
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

August 14, 2003

/s/ Israel Adan
-------------------------
Israel Adan
President and Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Orbit/FR, Inc. and will be retained by Orbit/FR, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Memorandum U.s.Departmentof Transportation OfficeoftheSecretary ofTransportation
Subject: Essential Air Service at Glasgow, Glendive, Havre, Lewistown, Miles City, Sidney, and WolfPoint, Montana (Docket No. DOT-OST-1997-2605)

# From:i~~;J.i~d~fChi~**~'Y3~** EAS & DomesticAnalysis Division, X-53
To: Dockets Operations, M-30 Date: December 30,2010

Reply to Brian Swanson, Attn. of: X-53 Ext. 65392

The Montana Department ofTransportation, Aeronautics Division, with support ofthe seven communities noted above, has requested an extension, from January 5, 2011, until January 17, 2011, to evaluate the Essential Air Serviceproposals received in response to Order 2010-11-6. This is to advise all parties that we have decided to grant the requested extensionto submit recommendations and comments. January 17this a federal holiday; therefore, all community comments must be received byno later than January 18,2011.Swanson, Brian (OST) From: Sent: To: Subject: Alke, Debbie [dalke@mt.gov] Wednesday, December 29,20103:26 PM Devany, Dennis (OST); Swanson, Brian (OST) comment period
As discussed during the telecon this morning the Montana Essential Air Service Task Force is requesting an extension to the comment period for Order 2010-11-6 to COB on Monday, January 17, 2011. Thank you. Debbie

1