SUMMARY REPORT OF U.S. MAGISTRATE 

JUDGE AS TO ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF 

SUPERVISED RELEASE - 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 

AT SEATTLE 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

COREY P. CLAIRMONT, 

 Defendant. 

NO. CR05-404-RSL 

SUMMARY REPORT OF 

U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE AS 

TO ALLEGED VIOLATIONS 

OF SUPERVISED RELEASE 

An initial hearing on a petition for violation of supervised release was held before the 

undersigned Magistrate Judge on April 20, 2011. The United States was represented by 

Assistant United States Attorney Andrew Colasurdo, and the defendant by Thomas Hillier. 

 The defendant had been charged and convicted of Possession of an Unregistered 

Firearm, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 5861(d). On or about April 20, 2006, defendant was 

sentenced by the Honorable Robert S. Lasnik, to a term of 60 months in custody, to be 

followed by 3 years of supervised release. 

 The conditions of supervised release included the requirements that the defendant 

comply with all local, state, and federal laws, and with the standard conditions. Special 

conditions imposed included, but were not limited to, participation in a substance abuse 

program, financial disclosure, possess no firearms, submit to search, cooperate with DNA 

Case 2:05-cr-00404-RSL Document 33 Filed 04/21/11 Page 1 of 3
SUMMARY REPORT OF U.S. MAGISTRATE 

JUDGE AS TO ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF 

SUPERVISED RELEASE - 2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

JAMES P. DONOHUE 

United States Magistrate Judge 

collection as directed, and provide the probation officer with access to any requested financial 

information. 

 In a Petition for Warrant or Summons, dated April 12, 2011, U.S. Probation Officer 

Andrew J. Lorenzen asserted the following violation by defendant of the conditions of his 

supervised release: 

1. Failing to notify the probation officer ten days prior to any change in residence 

or employment, on or about March 25, 2011, in violation of standard condition 

6. 

2. Using methamphetamine on or before March 29, April 6 and 8, 2011, in 

violation of standard condition 7. 

3. Failing to participate in a substance abuse treatment program as directed on or 

about April 8, 2011, in violation of the special condition that he participate in 

drug treatment and urinalysis testing as directed. 

4. Failing to report to the probation officer as directed on or about April 22, 2011, 

in violation of standard condition 2. 

 The defendant was advised of his rights, acknowledged those rights, and admitted to 

alleged violation numbers 1, 2, 3 and 4. 

 I therefore recommend that the Court find the defendant to have violated the terms and 

conditions of his supervised release as set forth in violation numbers 1, 2, 3 and 4, and that the 

Court conduct a hearing limited to disposition. A disposition hearing on these violations has 

been set before the Honorable Robert S. Lasnik on May 5, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. 

 Pending a final determination by the Court, the defendant has been detained. 

 DATED this 20th day of April, 2011. 

A

Case 2:05-cr-00404-RSL Document 33 Filed 04/21/11 Page 2 of 3
SUMMARY REPORT OF U.S. MAGISTRATE 

JUDGE AS TO ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF 

SUPERVISED RELEASE - 3 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

cc: District Judge: Honorable Robert S. Lasnik 

 AUSA: Andrew Colasurdo 

 Defendant’s attorney: Thomas Hillier 

 Probation officer: Andrew J. Lorenzen 

Case 2:05-cr-00404-RSL Document 33 Filed 04/21/11 Page 3 of 3