alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

     

In connection with the Quarterly Report of **Great Walll Builders Ltd.,**(the "Company")on Form 10-K/A for the period ended **June 30, 2010**as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), I, **Tian Jia,** Chief Executive Officer/ Chief Financial Officer/ Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Dated this date: June 24, 2011

 

/s/ Tian Jia

 Tian Jia

 

Chief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer
From: josephmilch@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:09:51 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Joseph Milch

, 02368-5033
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Patrick Olajide Akinwamide v. Transportation Insurance Company, CNA Insurance Company, and Automatic Data Processing Inc.

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 5

- 00 066

- CV

Trial court case number: 1997

- 48526

Trial court: 80th District Court of Harris County

On July 9, 2015, this Court granted the motion by appellant, Patrick Olajide Akinwamide, proceeding pro se , to supplement the clerk’s record and to abate the case to settle the dispute over inaccurac ies in the reporter’s record for the show cause hearing, held on October 24, 2014. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 34.5(c)(1), 34 .6(e)(3). On July 23, 2015, a compliant supplemental clerk’s record with all Exhibits A

- K to “Plaintiff’s Motion to Set Aside the Final Judgment” was filed in this Court

. See id. (c) (3). On September 16

, 2015, appellant filed a motion to compel the tria l court and court coordinator to comply with our July 9, 2015 Order of Abatement

. On October 5, 2015, a compliant supplemental reporter’s record containing the complete show cause hearing and a separate exhibit volume for that hearing, held on October 24, 2014, w ere filed in this

Court

. See id. 34.6(d), (e)(2).

Accordingly, we REINSTATE this case on this Court’s active docket. Appellant’s motion to compel is DISMISSED AS MOOT

. Furthermore, a ppellant’s brief is ORDERE D to be filed no later than 30 days

from the date of this order. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 2, 38.6( a ) (2) , (d)

. A ppellee’s brief, if any, is ORDERED to be filed no later than 30 days f rom the filing of appellant’s brief.

See id. 38.6(b )

.
It is so ORDERED

. Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes



Date: October 20 , 2015
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ALEJANDRO FIERRO, §

§ No. 08

- 13

- 00274

- CR

Appellant,

§ Appeal from the

v.

§ 120th District Court

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§ of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20120D00748)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal, and

concludes the motion should be granted and the appeal should be dismissed, in accordance with

the opinion of this Court. We therefore dismiss the appeal. This decision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2014.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.

Rivera, J. (Not Participating)
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 8, 2018

No. 04-18-00421-CV

Pedro MARTINEZ, Superintendent of San Antonio Independent School District, et al.,

Appellants

v.

SAN ANTONIO ALLIANCE OF TEACHERS AND SUPPORT PERSONNEL,

Appellee

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018-CI-08318

Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellants’ reply brief in this accelerated appeal is currently due October 11, 2018.

Appellants have filed a motion for extension of time asking for an additional twenty days in 

which to file their reply brief. The motion is unopposed. After review, we GRANT appellants’ 

motion and ORDER appellants to file their reply brief in this court on or before October 31, 

2018.

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel.

It is so ORDERED on October 8, 2018.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ___________________________________

 KEITH E. HOTTLE,

 Clerk of Court
From: gwenl48@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:37:12 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

laurie yates

Headland, AL 36345
i MAP 4
, * ; Western Oregon Plan Revisions
5 0 5 10 15 20 25 Miles Salem District
5 0 5 10 15 20 25 Kilometers

Alternative 3
Albers Equal Area Projection .
North American Datum of 1983 Land Use Allocations

Source: Bureau of Land Management Corporate
Data revised for WOPR Analysis. No warranty is
made by the Bureau of Land Management as to the
accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data
for individual or aggregate use with other data.

CLATSOP CO

Legend

Land Use Allocations
National Land Conservation System

COLUMBIA CO

Administratively Withdrawn

Riparian Management Area
General Landscape Area
BLM Office
BLM Administrative Boundary
Wild and Scenic River
-_——-—-—- Eligible Wild and Scenic River

TILLAMOOK CO

—.- WASHINGTON CO

YAMHILL CO

MARION CO

POLK CO

LINN CO

BENTON CO

—|
SALEM
DISTRICT
C7 H hf MAP
Planning P AREA
Forest Excluded from
Harvest Land Base
| Forest Included in
Harvest Land Base
Vv
Impact Statement
MO06-12-02
Exhibit 10.5


 


February 9, 2018


 


Golden Metropolis International Limited


278 Suxi Road, Binhu District, Wuxi


Jiangsu Province, People’s Republic of China 214123


+86 0510-85407636


 


Board Candidate – Liang Qian


Re: Offer to Join the Board of Directors of Golden
Metropolis International Limited


Dear Mr. Qian:


I am pleased to extend you an offer to join the Board of Directors
(the “Board”) of Golden Metropolis International Limited (“Golden Metropolis”). Your appointment
to the Board is subject to the approval of Golden Metropolis International Limited Board of Directors, and the following outlines
certain of your responsibilities as a member of the Board, which responsibilities will commence at the Board meeting held as soon
thereafter as Board of Director approval is obtained:


Generally: You shall have all responsibilities of a Director
of the Company imposed by the British Virgin Islands or applicable law, the Certificate of Incorporation, as may be amended from
time to time, and Bylaws, as may be amended from time to time, of Golden Metropolis International Limited These responsibilities
shall include, but shall not be limited to, the following:


		1.	Role: Compensation Committee Chairperson & Independent Director



		2.	Attendance: Use best efforts to attend scheduled meetings of the Board;



		3.	Act as a Fiduciary: Represent the shareholders and the interests of Golden Metropolis International Limited as a fiduciary;



		4.	Participation: Participate as a full voting member of the Board in setting overall objectives, approving plans and programs
of operation, formulating general policies, offering advice and counsel, serving on Board Committees, and reviewing management
performance.



As a member of the Board, you agree to execute an acknowledgement
in the form attached hereto. In addition, upon your joining the Board, Golden Metropolis International Limited will enter into
a customary indemnification agreement with you.


In consideration for your joining the Board, the Company will
grant cash compensation of $23,000 USD annually, paid in arrears.


I trust that this offer is satisfactory to you and look forward
to you joining the Company as a member of the Board. Please indicate your acceptance of this offer by signing below and returning
one copy of this offer to me by February 16, 2018. By signing below, you acknowledge that you have read this agreement and fully
understand the nature and effect of it and the terms contained herein and that the said terms are fair and reasonable and correctly
set out your understanding and intention.


Mr. Liang Qian, I look forward to having you on board with
Golden Metropolis International Limited and trust your relationship with Golden Metropolis International Limited will be challenging
and exciting.


Yours very truly,


 


	/s/ Minpei Zha	 







Mr. Minpei Zha


President and Chief Executive Officer


Golden Metropolis International Limited


 


I, Liang Qian, accept the offer as stated above.


 


	Signature:	 	
        /s/ Liang Qian

	Date: February 9, 2018
Before the Second Division,

April 13, 1966

No. P66/34.

protests 59/17373, etc. (New York).

#### W. T. Grant Company et al. *v.*United States,

Bao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consists of bicycle horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Sherwin International, Inc. v. United States*(54 Cust. Ct. 466, Abstract 69382), and that the merchandise marked “B” covered by the foregoing protests -consists of bicycle horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of *G. Joannou Cycle Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(46 Cust. Ct. 172, C.D. 2253), the claims of the plaintiffs were sustained.
From: wsbethea@bellsouth.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:30:09 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

shelley bethea

Latta, SC 29565
From: kml52@netzero.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:55:09 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Keith Lucy

Delta, CO 81416
No. 63821.

protest 58/24657 (New York).

#### Henry C. Schaerf Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

An examination of the protest disclosing that it was untimely filed under section 514, Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1514), the protest was dismissed as untimely.
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

MILDRED MILLER,

Plaintiff,

v.

CENTER FOR DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING,

et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. C05-1495-RSL-JPD

ORDER

The Court, having reviewed Plaintiff’s Motion to Exclude Mildred Miller’s Medical

Negligence Settlement from Any Potential Medicare Repayment of Lien, all papers and

exhibits in support and in opposition to that motion, the Report and Recommendation of the

Honorable James P. Donohue, United States Magistrate Judge, and the remaining record, does

hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation;

(2) Plaintiff’s motion (Dkt. No. 39) is GRANTED. The parties’ proposed

settlement is not subject to any medicare repayment or lien.

Case 2:05-cv-01495-RSL Document 42 Filed 03/12/07 Page 1 of 2
01 

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

-2-

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to the parties and to Judge

Donohue.

DATED this 12th day of March, 2007.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-01495-RSL Document 42 Filed 03/12/07 Page 2 of 2
From: Jillsie2@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:57:30 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jill Hine

Fort Wayne, IN 46808
From: trpaige001@att.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:31:09 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as Ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Joan Paige

Shakopee, MN 55379