LucasAdinDOERepresentative,PumpsWGPumpsWorkingGroupOverviewWorkingGroupResponsibilitiesandInteractionswithDOEandtheASRAC2Agenda•Welcome•EthicsDiscussion(DOEGeneralCounsel)•WGMemberIntroductions•IntroductionofFacilitator•DescriptionofNegotiatedRulemakings•EstablishmentofGroundRulesforNegotiations•DiscussionofObjectiveandScopeforNegotiations•DiscussionofIssuesSurroundingCommercialandIndustrialPumps(timepermitting)•ConfirmMeetingSchedule•EstablishNeedsforNextMeeting3Background•DOEformedtheApplianceStandardsandRulemakingFederalAdvisoryCommittee(ASRAC)in2012tofurtherimprovetheDOEprocessofestablishingefficiencystandards•ASRACisanadvisorycommitteechartedbyDOE•ASRACissolelyadvisoryinnature,withfocusonappliancestandardsrulemakingissuesandsolutions•CommitteetasksoriginatefromdiscussionbetweenDOEandASRACmembers,definingcleargoals,timeframefortaskcompletion,andtargetdateforpresentingtheCommittee’sformalrecommendationstoDOE4DOEandASRAC•Asneeded,ASRACwillvotetoformworkinggroupstoinvestigateeachtaskindetailandgatheradditionalinputfromstakeholders–InsuchcaseswhereASRACvotestoformaworkinggroup,DOEwillpublishaFederalRegisternoticesolicitingnominationsformembers–WorkinggroupeffortsarepresentedtoASRACandASRACdeliberatesandformsrecommendationstoDOE(workinggroupsneverpresentrecommendationsdirectlytoDOE)•DOEmaywithdrawataskfromASRACatanytime•Intheeventaconsensusrecommendationisnotreachedforaparticulartaskwithinagiventimeframe,ASRACwillletDOEknowthatnorecommendationswillbemadeanditisdeterminedtowithdrawtaskorgivetheworkinggroupmoretime–WithoutaconsensusrecommendationfromtheworkinggroupandaffirmationfromASRAC,DOEwillproceedwithits“normal”rulemakingactivities5ASRAC’sProcessFlowASRACASRAC/DOEformWorkingGroupsWG“TaskBriefMeeting”WGPresentsUpdate/ConsensustoASRACUpdate/ConsensusASRACDeliberationTaskDiscussionRecommendationWGUpdate/ConsensusWGDeliberationsAsDecidedAdditionalDecided‐AdditionalWorkfromWGAsDecided–DissolveWG123456788a8b6FormationofPumpsWG•EPCAdirectsDOEtoadoptenergyconservationstandardsforcommercial/industrialpumpsforwhichstandardswouldbetechnologicallyfeasibleandeconomicallyjustified•ThearecurrentlynoFederalenergyconservationstandardsforpumps•OnJune13,2011DOEpublishedaRequestforInformation(RFI)togatherinformationonvariousissuesrelatedtocommercial/industrialpumps•DOEpublishedaFrameworkdocumentonFebruary1,2013describingaprospectivescopeforacommercial/industrialpumpsrulemaking•DOEsubsequentlydeterminedthatanegotiatedprocessmaybemoreeffectiveforthisrulemaking•TheASRACapprovedtheformationofaWGandanoticeofintentwaspublishedJuly23,2013toannouncethegroupandsolicitmembers•MembersandfirstmeetingsannouncedNovember12,20137NegotiationProcess•Asprovidedinthenoticeofintent,thefollowingarethebasicunderlyingissuesandconcerns:–DOE’sneedforfullcompliancewithstatutorymandates.CongresshasmandatedthatDOEestablishminimumenergyefficiencystandardsthataretechnologicallyfeasibleandeconomicallyjustified.–BalancingthegoalsandprioritiesofStateregulatoryprogramsandDOE'sprogramforenergyefficiencystandards.–Manufacturersdesirethatstandardsnotdiminishorconstraininnovationfortheseproducts.–Environmentaladvocatesseektoensurethatstandardsachievethemaximumenergysavingsthataretechnologicallyfeasibleandeconomicallyjustifiable•AllparticipantswillneedtoprovideDOEwithdataandananalyticframeworktosupportdeliberations•DOEwillalsoperformanalysistosupportthenegotiations•Goodfaithnegotiationrequired•SpecificsofWGendgoalsanddeadlineswillbeestablishedingroundrules8EPCACriteriaforStandardsRulemakings•GeneralcriteriaaredescribedinEPCAat42U.S.C.6295(o)•DOEmaynotprescribeanamendedstandardthatincreasesthemaximumallowableenergyuseofacoveredproduct•AnyneworamendedstandardmustbedesignedtoachievethemaximumsavingsthatDOEdeterminesaretechnologicallyfeasibleandeconomicallyjustifiable•Indeterminingwhetherastandardiseconomicallyjustified,DOEmustdeterminewhetherthebenefitswouldexceedtheburdens,considering:–Theeconomicimpactofthestandardonmanufacturersandconsumersoftheproductsubjecttothestandard–Thesavingsinoperatingcoststhroughouttheestimatedaveragelifeoftheproductcomparedtoanyincreaseinthepriceormaintenanceexpensesoftheproduct–Thetotalprojectedenergysavingsthatwouldresultfromthestandard–Anylesseningoftheutilityorperformanceofthecoveredproductslikelytoresultfromtheimpositionofthestandard–Theimpactofanylesseningofcompetition,asdeterminedinwritingfromtheAttorneyGeneral,thatislikelytoresultfromtheimpositionofthestandard–Theneedfornationalenergyconservation–OtherfactorsDOEconsidersrelevant9DOERulemakingProcessRulemakingProcessStepsFrameworkDocumentPreliminaryAnalysisNoticeofProposedRulemaking(NOPR)FinalRule• DOEpublishedaFederalRegisternoticeonFebruary1,2013announcingtheavailabilityoftheframeworkdocument• Preliminaryanalysisexaminestheissuesintheframeworkdocumentandprovidestheunderlyinganalyticalbasisforproposedstandardlevels• IftheWGreachesagreementonproposedstandards,thesewouldbepresentedtotheASRACand,ifaccepted,publishedinaNOPR• AfterreceivingpubliccommentsontheNOPR,DOEmaypublishafinalrule10RulemakingAnalysisMarket&TechnologyScreeningAnalysisEngineeringAnalysisEnergyUseCharacterizationShipmentsAnalysisNationalImpactAnalysisMarkupsforEquipmentPriceDeterminationLife‐CycleCostandPaybackPeriodAnalysisFrameworkDocumentPreliminaryAnalysisNOPRFinalRule