alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: jones315@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:06:24 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jim Jones

Steamboat Springs, CO 80487
From: dgnordstrom@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:42:47 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Danial Nordstrom

Oak Harbor, WA 98277
IV 

House Calendar No. 44 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 331 

[Report No. 110–109] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 249) to restore the prohibition 

on the commercial sale and slaughter of wild free-roaming horses and burros. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 24, 2007 

Ms. SUTTON, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 249) to restore 

the prohibition on the commercial sale and slaughter 

of wild free-roaming horses and burros. 

1 Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this 

2 resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of 

3 rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee 

4 of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consider5 ation of the bill (H.R. 249) to restore the prohibition on 

6 the commercial sale and slaughter of wild free-roaming 

7 horses and burros. The first reading of the bill shall be 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

HRES 331 RH 

1 dispensed with. All points of order against consideration 

2 of the bill are waived except those arising under clause 

3 9 or 10 of rule XXI. General debate shall be confined to 

4 the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 

5 controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member 

6 of the Committee on Natural Resources. After general de7 bate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the 

8 five-minute rule. The bill shall be considered as read. Not9 withstanding clause 11 of rule XVIII, no amendment to 

10 the bill shall be in order except those printed in the portion 

11 of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose 

12 in clause 8 of rule XVIII and except pro forma amend13 ments for the purpose of debate. Each amendment so 

14 printed may be offered only by the Member who caused 

15 it to be printed or his designee and shall be considered 

16 as read. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for 

17 amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill 

18 to the House with such amendments as may have been 

19 adopted. The previous question shall be considered as or20 dered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage 

21 without intervening motion except one motion to recommit 

22 with or without instructions. 

23 SEC. 2. During consideration in the House of H.R. 

24 249 pursuant to this resolution, notwithstanding the oper25 ation of the previous question, the Chair may postpone 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
3 

HRES 331 RH 

1 further consideration of the bill to such time as may be 

2 designated by the Speaker. 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
House Calendar No. 44 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 331 

[Report No. 110

–109] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 249) 

burros. and slaughter of wild free-roaming horses and to restore the prohibition on the commercial sale 

APRIL 24, 2007 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
1500 Perimeter Road, - Suite A5, West Palm Beach, FL 33406 Phone: 561.687.7967 

 

January 17, 2012

Sapphire Aviation, Inc.

1500 Perimeter Road, Suite A5

West Palm Beach, FL 33406

Federal Aviation Administration

Campus Building 2-110

1701 Columbia Ave

College Park, GA 30337

Dear Sir:

In accordance with the deviation provisions set forth in FAR 119.71 (f), Sapphire 

Aviation, Inc. is requesting a deviation to allow us to operate with Wallace McClellan as 

our Chief Pilot in our On Demand Part 135 Air Carrier Operation (see the attached 

resume of his qualifications). Captain McClellan is a retired airline Captain, who retired 

from USAirways in 2007, after an almost 30 year long and flawless career at the highest 

level of commercial aviation. Prior to his career as a PIC in the Part 121 environment, 

Captain McClellan served a distinguished career as an aircraft commander in service to 

the country in the U.S. Air Force, including highly decorated combat tours in South East 

Asia during the Vietnam conflict. Since his retirement from USAirways in 2007, Captain 

McClellan has been serving as the training manager for Boeing Aircraft Company and 

leading their training effort on the most technologically advance airplane they have 

brought to the market to date. In addition to his aviation experience Mr. McClellan has 

both a Bachelors and Master Degree the later specifically dealing with Management.

The reason we are requesting this deviation, is that Captain McClellan’s current position 

at Boeing and the time that has elapsed since his retirement from USAirways does not 

allow him to meet the recency of experience requirement set forth in FAR 119.71 (d). But 

surely you will agree his vast experience, education, personal standards, and participation 

to date at the very highest level of civil aviation makes him an exceptional candidate for 

the position in our limited scope of operations. 

We consider ourselves lucky that someone of Captain McClellan caliber is willing to 

relocate permanently to south Florida to serve in this capacity and clearly his full time 

commitment to serving as our chief pilot, will allow us to achieve the highest possible 

level of safety and allow us to maintain our reputation as a benchmark in the industry. I

sincerely hope that you will approve a deviation to FAR 119.71 (d) for Captain 

McClellan, with the utmost haste. 
1500 Perimeter Road, - Suite A5, West Palm Beach, FL 33406 Phone: 561.687.7967 

Anxiously awaiting a response...

Sincerely,

David O’Donnell

Director of Operations, Sapphire Aviation, Inc.

cc. Wally McClellan

Larry Hazel, FSDO 19 et. Al.

Enclosures
## MEMORANDUM

**DATE:** 7 /29/15 **FROM:** Ken Mitchell/EPA Region 4 **TO:** Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR – 2013 - 0602 **SUBJECT:** Discussion of the Clean Power Plan with R4 State and Local Air Directors
**SUMMARY :**  

### Region 4 provided information on the Clean Power Plan to participants at Metro4 SESARM Fall meeting in Chattanooga, TN on October 29, 2014 . The Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014. **ATTENDEES: EPA**  Ken Mitchell /EPA R4 Beverly Banister/EPA R4 Other Region 4 Air Program Management and Staff **External Stakeholders** John Hornback/Metro4 SESARM Chris Howard (ADEM) John Myers (TVA) Jenah Zweig (SEEA) Jeremy Tarr (Duke Nicholas Institute) Approximately 50 Region 4 State and Local Air Directors and Staff

**ATTACHMENTS**
Case No. 13,474.

#### In re STOKES.

[1 Ben. 341.) 1

District Court, S. D. New York.

Aug., 1867.

Army — Enlistment of Minor — Evidence.

On a habeas corpus to inquire into the enlistment of an alleged minor, who had sworn, on his enlistment, that he was twenty-one years of age and upwards, evidence may be given as to whether he understood what he was swearing to.

[Cited in Seavey v. Seymour, Case No. 12,596; Re Davison, 4 Fed. 509.)

[In the matter of James Stokes, Jr., on ha-beas corpus.)

BLATCHFORD, District Judge.

This case is substantially the same as that of In re Cline, just decided by me [Case No. 2,896). Stokes is a private soldier, who enlisted in the army of the United States, at New York, July 23, 1867. His enlistment papers are, in substance, of the same character as those of Cline. His age is stated in them as being twenty-one years and four months, and he swears, in his oath of enlistment, “that he is over twenty-one years old.” On the hearing, on the return to the writ, it was alleged that Stokes had, in fact, on his enlistment, stated his age to be only eighteen years, and had not understood that he was swearing he was twenty-one years old, and that the oath which he signed and swore to was not read or explained to him. I allowed evidence to be given on that point, and am entirely satisfied that the proceedings in enlisting him were carefully conducted, and that he stated that he was twenty-one years and four months old, and was willing to swear to it, and that he understood fully that he was required to swear to his age, and knew that he was swearing that he was over twenty-one years of age. For the reasons stated in the Case of Cline, the oath taken by Stokes on his enlistment, as to his age, is conclusive on that point. As his enlistment was, in all respects, regular, he must be remanded to service.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 18, 2022

No. 04-22-00579-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF D.J.R., A CHILD

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020PA02365

Honorable Nicole Garza, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal of an order terminating appellant’s parental rights which 

must be disposed of by this court within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. TEX. R.

JUD. ADMIN. 6.2. The reporter’s record was originally due September 19, 2022, but was not filed.

On October 3, 2022, we ordered the court reporter, David J. Laurel, to file the reporter’s record 

by October 13, 2022, but it was not filed. On October 18, 2022, we ordered Mr. Laurel to file the 

reporter’s record by October 28, 2022. On October 27, 2022, Mr. Laurel notified this court that 

the reporter’s record was not filed because appellant failed to pay or make arrangements to pay 

the fee for preparing the record and appellant is not entitled to appeal without paying the fee for 

preparation of the reporter’s record. 

On October 28, 2022, we advised Mr. Laurel that appellant is entitled to appeal without 

paying the fee for preparation of the reporter’s record and we ordered Mr. Laurel to file the 

reporter’s record by November 7, 2022. Again, the reporter’s record was not filed.

On November 16, 2022, Mr. Laurel filed a second notice of late record explaining 

“Notice of appeal was delivered to me within the past month; it remains unpaid.” Appellant is 

entitled to appeal without paying the fee for preparation of the reporter’s record. 

It is ORDERED that David J. Laurel file the reporter’s record in this court no later than 

November 28, 2022. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c). If the record is not received by such date, an 

order will be issued directing Mr. Laurel to appear before this court in person and show cause 

why he should not be held in contempt for failing to file the record. The clerk of this court shall 

cause a copy of this order to be served on Mr. Laurel by certified mail, return receipt requested, 

or give other personal notice of this order with proof of delivery. Because “[t]he trial and 

appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed,” 

TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c), the clerk of the court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the 

Honorable Nicole Garza, Judge of the 37th Judicial District Court.
It is so ORDERED on November 2022.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

 CLERK OF COURT
Before the First Division,

July 19, 1967

No. P67/245.

#### Polk’s Model Craft Hobbies, Inc. *v.*United States, protests 63/7846(B) and 63/7848(C) (New York). Davies Turner Co. *v.*United States, protests 64/1326-13920 (Chicago).

No. P67/246.

Oliver, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of miniature motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of *James G. Wiley Co., a/c Ungar Electric Tools, Inc.*v. *United States*(49 Cust. Ct. 199, Abstract 66961), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ambac Financial Group, Inc.
(the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Sean T. Leonard, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |                                                  
|------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Sean T. Leonard
|Name:               |  | Sean T. Leonard                                  
|Title:              |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|Date:               |  | May 15, 2009
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

MARY MARINA MURPHY, )

)

Plaintiff, ) CASE NO. C05-1663-RSL

)

v. ) ORDER

)

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, )

Commissioner of Social Security, )

)

Defendant. )

____________________________________)

Plaintiff has filed a motion for attorney’s fees, expenses and costs to be paid by the

Defendant pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (the “EAJA”) and 28

U.S.C. § 1920 in the amount of $5,364.86 in attorney’s fees, $23.00 in expenses, and $66.85 in

costs, for a total amount of $5,454.71. Defendant filed a response, stating that she has no

objection to Plaintiff’s request. (Dkt. #25).

The Court finds that Plaintiff’s request for attorney’s fees, costs and expenses in the

amount of $5,454.71 pursuant to the EAJA is reasonable in light of the work performed and the

result achieved.

//

//

Case 2:05-cv-01663-RSL-MJB Document 26 Filed 08/02/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 ORDER - 2

It is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion (Dkt. #23) is GRANTED and

Plaintiff’s counsel is awarded attorney’s fees in the amount of $5,364.86, expenses in the amount

of $23.00, and costs in the amount of $66.85 pursuant to the EAJA.

DATED this 2nd day of August, 2006.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge 

RECOMMENDED FOR ENTRY

this 1st day of August, 2006:

 /s/Monica J. Benton 

MONICA J. BENTON

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:05-cv-01663-RSL-MJB Document 26 Filed 08/02/06 Page 2 of 2
From: sarahnjoe@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:06:18 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Joseph Bogusz

Naperville, IL 60565
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                             5
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     May-31-1997         
<PERIOD-START>                        Jun-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                          Feb-28-1997
<CASH>                                $457,000
<SECURITIES>                          $0
<RECEIVABLES>                         $7,892,000
<ALLOWANCES>                          $350,000
<INVENTORY>                           $13,946,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      $22,915,000
<PP&E>                                $7,378,000
<DEPRECIATION>                        $6,243,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        $25,444,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 $21,504,000
<BONDS>                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<COMMON>                              6,717,000
<OTHER-SE>                            0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          $25,444,000
<SALES>                               $35,129,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      $35,129,000
<CGS>                                 $21,632,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         $21,632,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      $15,864,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      $0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    $1,720,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       ($4,087,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                          $0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   ($4,087,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                        $0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       $0
<CHANGES>                             $0
<NET-INCOME>                          ($4,087,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         ($0.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                         ($0.61)
        


</TABLE>
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

   
We consent to the incorporation by reference in previously filed registration
statements of Dental/Medical Diagnostic Systems, Inc., including, without
limitation, registration statements on Form S-3 (Registration Nos. 333-42865,
333-51775, 333-68271) and Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-42867, 333-66441) of
our report dated February 5, 1999 except for subsequent events described in Note
19, as to which the date is March 18, 1999, on our audits of the consolidated
financial statements of Dental/Medical Diagnostic Systems, Inc. as of December
31, 1998 and 1997 and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 1998 and 1997 and
the ten-month period ended December 31, 1996, which report is included in this
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP



PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP
Woodland Hills, CA
April 19, 1999
No. 65173.

#### L. E. Kriener-Hopkins *v.*United States,

protest 202289-K (Cleveland).

*345Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *J. S. Brown*et al. (46 C.C.P.A. 1, C.A.D. 686), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.