Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [Release No. 34-98504; File No. SR-MRX-2023-17]

                    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”),[1]                                          and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,[2]                                          notice is hereby given that on September 14, 2023, Nasdaq MRX, LLC (“MRX” or “Exchange”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III, below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.                

## I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change

The Exchange proposes to amend its Pricing Schedule at Options 7 to specify pricing related to unrelated market or marketable interest.

                    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's website at                     *https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/​rulebook/​mrx/​rules,*                     at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.                

## II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

### A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

#### 1. Purpose

                    The Exchange proposes to amend the Exchange's Pricing Schedule at Options 7 to specify pricing related to unrelated market or marketable interest. Specifically, the Exchange proposes to specify the current manner in which the Exchange assesses fees and rebates with respect to unrelated market or marketable interest received prior to the commencement of an auction in the Facilitation Mechanism (“FAC”),[3]                                          Solicited Order Mechanism (“SOL”),[4]                                          and Price Improvement Mechanism (“PIM”),[5]                                          and during such auctions. In addition, the Exchange also proposes a number of non-substantive amendments to Options 7 that will bring more clarity to the Exchange's Pricing Schedule. Each change is discussed below.                
      ( print page 67382)    

#### Unrelated Interest

                    As a general rule, today, if an order executed in FAC (“FAC Order”), SOL (“SOL Order”), or PIM (“PIM Order”) executes against unrelated market or marketable interest received during an auction, the Exchange would assess the applicable Crossing Order [6]                                          pricing in Section 3, Table 2 and Section 3.A of its Pricing Schedule. If the FAC, SOL, or PIM Order executes against unrelated market or marketable interest received prior to an auction, the Exchange would assess applicable order book pricing in its Pricing Schedule. As discussed below, the Exchange applies these concepts to unrelated market or marketable interest in line with Member expectations and to treat similarly situated Members in a uniform manner. The Exchange notes that it currently denotes in the Pricing Schedule that it would apply separate Crossing Order pricing for any contra-side interest submitted after the commencement of an auction in FAC, SOL, or PIM (which includes unrelated market and marketable interest received during the auction) by grouping such interest as Responses to Crossing Orders.[7]                                          The Exchange further notes that today, it specifies throughout Options 7 how it will price Responses to Crossing Orders.[8]                                          While the Exchange has delineated the treatment of unrelated market and marketable interest received by the Exchange during a FAC, SOL, and PIM auction in its Pricing Schedule, the Exchange believes that further clarity would be beneficial to Members as to how the Exchange currently assesses pricing for such interest received prior to the commencement of the auction. As such, the Exchange proposes to memorialize these concepts in its Pricing Schedule by adding new paragraph (d) to Options 7, Section 1, titled “Unrelated Market or Marketable Interest Pricing.” Proposed paragraph (d) would state that the following concepts would apply to FAC, SOL, and PIM Orders.                

                    Specifically, under proposed new paragraph (d), when the FAC Order or SOL Order executes against unrelated market or marketable interest received during an auction, the FAC Order or SOL Order will be assessed the applicable Fee for Crossing Orders in Options 7, Section 3, Table 2 (for regular FAC Orders and SOL Orders) [9]                                          and applicable Complex Order fees in Options 7, Section 4 (for complex FAC Orders and SOL Orders).[10]                                          The unrelated market or marketable interest received during an auction will be assessed the applicable fees for Responses to Crossing Order in Options 7, Section 3, Table 2 (for regular interest) [11]                                          and applicable Complex Order fees in Options 7, Section 4 (for complex interest).[12] 

                    When the order executed in PIM (“PIM Order”) executes against unrelated market or marketable interest received during an auction, the PIM Order will be assessed the applicable PIM Originating Order fees [13]                                          or Break-up Rebates [14]                                          in Options 7, Section 3.A (for regular and complex PIM Orders). The unrelated market or marketable interest received during an auction will be assessed the applicable fees for Responses to PIM Orders in Options 7, Section 3.A (for regular and complex interest).[15] 

                    In contrast, today, when the FAC Order, SOL Order, or PIM Order executes against unrelated market or marketable interest received prior to the commencement of an auction, the FAC Order, SOL Order, or PIM Order would be subject to the applicable taker pricing in Options 7, Section 3, Table 1 (for regular FAC Orders, SOL Orders, and PIM Orders) [16]                                          and the applicable Complex Order fees in Options 7, Section 4 (for complex FAC Orders, SOL Orders, and PIM Orders).[17]                                          The unrelated market or marketable interest received prior to the commencement of an auction will be assessed the applicable maker pricing in Options 7, Section 3, Table 1 (for regular interest),[18]                                          and the applicable Complex                           ( print page 67383)                        Order fees in Options 7, Section 4 (for complex interest).[19] 

Unrelated market or marketable interest resting on the Exchange's order book, whether received prior to the commencement of a FAC, SOL, or PIM auction or during such auction, would be allocated in accordance with Options 3, Section 11(b)(4) and (c)(7) (for regular and complex FAC), Section 11(d)(3) and (e)(4) (for regular and complex SOL), and Section 13(d) and (e)(5) (for regular and complex PIM).

                    The Exchange applies order book pricing in accordance with Options 7, Sections 3 and 4 to interest received prior to a FAC, SOL, and PIM auction that subsequently trades with a FAC, SOL, or PIM Order (which is considered unrelated market or marketable interest for purposes of the auction) because the Exchange seeks to treat the Member who submitted such interest in a similar manner as any other Member who submits interest to the order book. The Member that submitted such interest would not have been aware at the time that a FAC, SOL, or PIM auction was in progress, and therefore would not have expected to be assessed separate Crossing Order pricing.[20]                                          In such instances, for regular interest, the unrelated market or marketable interest that posted to the order book prior to the commencement of the auction would be treated as posting liquidity to the order book (makers of liquidity) and assessed maker pricing in accordance with Options 7, Section 3, Table 1. The FAC, SOL, and PIM Order that trades against the unrelated interest would be considered as removing liquidity from the order book (takers of liquidity) and assessed taker pricing in accordance with Options 7, Section 3, Table 1. This is consistent with taker pricing assessed to any Member that removes liquidity from the order book. For complex interest, the Exchange currently assesses uniform complex order fees for similarly situated market participants as set forth in Options 7, Section 4, regardless of maker/taker. As such, both the unrelated market or marketable interest that posted to the complex order book prior to the commencement of the complex FAC/SOL/PIM auction and the complex FAC/SOL/PIM Order would be assessed the applicable complex order fee, consistent with any complex order submitted to the complex order book.                

                    In contrast, the Exchange applies Crossing Order pricing in Options 7, Sections 3 and 4 to the unrelated market or marketable interest when the interest arrived during a FAC, SOL, and PIM auction. Members submitting interest to the order book during one of these auctions are aware that they may be allocated in the auction.[21]                                          The Exchange assesses the applicable response fee in Options 7, Section 3 and Section 4 to Members submitting such interest in the same manner that responders to the FAC, SOL, and PIM auction are assessed fees for their auction responses. In other words, the unrelated market or marketable interest that received an allocation within the FAC, SOL, or PIM auction would be uniformly subject to the same fees as those Members that submitted auction responses and were allocated.                

The Exchange's pricing models for the regular/complex order book and FAC/SOL/PIM auctions each seek to attract liquidity to the Exchange and reward Members differently for the different types of order flow. To this end, the Exchange's pricing considers the manner in which orders interact with the FAC/SOL/PIM auction based on the timing of when the order entered which order book. The Exchange's pricing is consistent with its current practice of assigning the applicable pricing for auctions versus order book pricing depending on how and when the order was submitted to the Exchange.

#### Technical Amendments

The Exchange proposes a few technical, non-substantive amendments throughout Options 7. First, the Exchange proposes to title paragraph (b) in Options 7, Section 1 as “Fee Disputes” and paragraph (c) as “Definitions” to more clearly identify the applicable rules within the Pricing Schedule. The Exchange also proposes to fix a typo in note 5 of Options 7, Section 3, Table 1.

                    The Exchange further proposes to amend Table 2 of Options 7, Section 3 by specifying that regular Responses to PIM Orders are subject to separate pricing in Part A of Section 3.[22]                                          As discussed above, PIM pricing is set forth separately in Options 7, Section 3.A. However, Crossing Orders and Responses to Crossing Orders are defined to cover PIM Orders and Responses to PIM Orders.[23]                                          The Exchange therefore believes that the proposed change will avoid potential confusion by market participants and investors in how Responses to PIM Orders are assessed. The Exchange notes that it already specifies in note 1 of Options 7, Section 3, Table 2 that regular PIM Orders are subject to separate pricing in Part A of Section 3. Lastly, the Exchange proposes to fix a punctuation error in note 1 of Options 7, Section 3, Table 2.                

#### 2. Statutory Basis

                    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act,[24]                                          in general, and furthers the objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,[25]                                          in particular, in that it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among members and issuers and other persons using any facility, and is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. Further the proposal is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general to protect investors and the public interest.                

#### Unrelated Interest

                    The Exchange believes that its proposal to specify how the Exchange currently prices unrelated market or marketable interest received is consistent with the Act because memorializing these concepts in new paragraph (d) of Options 7, Section 1 will promote greater clarity and transparency in the rules and make the Pricing Schedule easier to navigate for market participants. As discussed above, the Exchange already denotes how unrelated market or marketable interest received during a FAC, SOL, and PIM auction is priced by grouping such interest as Responses to Crossing Orders and Responses to PIM Orders today. How the Exchange prices unrelated market or marketable interest received prior to a FAC, SOL, and PIM auction, however, is not currently                           ( print page 67384)                        detailed in the Exchange's Pricing Schedule. As such, the Exchange believes that by consolidating and describing these concepts in one place in the Pricing Schedule, Members can more easily locate the related rules and avoid any potential investor confusion.                

                    As discussed above, the Exchange will memorialize that it will assess book pricing for unrelated market or marketable interest received prior to the commencement of a FAC, SOL, or PIM auction by stating that such interest would be assessed the applicable maker pricing (for regular interest) and applicable Complex Order fees (for complex interest).[26]                                          The FAC, SOL and PIM Order that such interest executes against would be assessed applicable taker pricing (for regular FAC, SOL, and PIM Orders) and applicable Complex Order fees (for complex FAC, SOL, and PIM Orders).[27]                                          The Exchange applies order book pricing in this scenario because at the time the unrelated market or marketable interest was submitted and posted to the order book, Members would not have been aware of an ongoing FAC/SOL/PIM auction and therefore would not expect to be subject to Responses to Crossing Order fees in Section 3, Table 2 and Responses to PIM Order fees in Section 3.A.[28]                                          In contrast, the Exchange applies Responses to Crossing Order fees in Section 3, Table 2 and Responses to PIM Order fees in Section 3.A [29]                                          to the unrelated market or marketable interest when it arrives during the FAC/SOL/PIM auction because Members submitting interest to the order book at that time would be aware that they may be allocated in the FAC/SOL/PIM auction.[30]                                          Additionally, the Exchange's pricing models for the regular/complex order book and FAC/SOL/PIM auctions each seek to attract liquidity to the Exchange and reward Members differently for different types of order flow. To this end, the Exchange's pricing considers the manner in which interest interacts with the FAC/SOL/PIM auction based on the timing of when such interest entered which order book. The Exchange's pricing is consistent with its current practice of assigning the applicable pricing for auctions versus order book pricing depending on how and when the order was submitted to the Exchange.                

                    Further, the Exchange's proposal to memorialize current practice that unrelated market or marketable interest received prior to the commencement of a FAC/SOL/PIM auction would be assessed the applicable maker pricing (for regular interest) and applicable Complex Order fees (for complex interest) [31]                                          is reasonable, equitable, and not unfairly discriminatory because all Members who submitted such interest that posted to the order book prior to the commencement of the auction (and executes against the FAC/SOL/PIM Order) would be uniformly assessed the same pricing as any other Member who posted liquidity on the order book. Further, all Members who submitted a FAC/SOL/PIM Order that executed against such interest would be uniformly assessed the same pricing as any other Member who removed liquidity from the order book.                

Similarly, the Exchange believes that its proposal to specify current practice that unrelated market or marketable interest received during a FAC/SOL/PIM auction would be assessed the applicable Crossing Order pricing as described above is reasonable, equitable, and not unfairly discriminatory because all Members who submitted such interest would be uniformly assessed the same pricing as any other Member who submitted responses into the FAC/SOL/PIM auction.

#### Technical Amendments

The Exchange believes that adding titles to paragraphs (b) and (c) of Options 7, Section 1 is consistent with the Act because they will promote clarity so that market participants can more easily locate the relevant rules in the Pricing Schedule. The Exchange likewise believes that fixing the typo in note 5 of Options 7, Section 3, Table 1 and punctuation error in note 1 of Options 7, Section 3, Table 2 will promote clarity in the rules and avoid any potential investor confusion. Similarly, the Exchange believes that specifying in proposed note 2 of Options 7, Section 3, Table 2 that regular Responses to PIM Orders are subject to separate pricing in Part A of Section 3 will avoid any potential investor confusion.

### B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

The Exchange does not believe that its proposal would impose an undue burden on intra-market competition. The pricing of unrelated interest in the manner described above uniformly treats similarly situated market participants. Specifically, all Members who submitted unrelated market or marketable interest that posted to the order book prior to the commencement of the auction (and executes against the FAC/SOL/PIM Order) would be uniformly assessed the same pricing as any other Member who posted liquidity on the order book. All Members who submitted a FAC/SOL/PIM Order that executed against such interest would be uniformly assessed the same pricing as any other Member who removed liquidity from the order book. Additionally, all Members who submitted unrelated market or marketable interest to the order book during the FAC/SOL/PIM auction (which ends up participating and executing against the auction order) would be uniformly assessed the same pricing as any other Member who submitted responses into the FAC/SOL/PIM auction.

In terms of inter-market competition, the Exchange continues to believe that the way that it prices unrelated market or marketable interest remains competitive with other options markets given that the Exchange's current pricing models for the regular and complex order books and for FAC/SOL/PIM auctions are all designed to attract order flow to the Exchange. The Exchange notes that it operates in a highly competitive market in which market participants can readily favor competing venues if they deem fee levels at a particular venue to be excessive, or rebate opportunities available at other venues to be more favorable. In such an environment, the Exchange must continually adjust its fees to remain competitive with other exchanges. Because competitors are free to modify their own fees in response, and because market participants may readily adjust their order routing practices, the Exchange believes that the degree to which fee changes in this market may impose any burden on competition is extremely limited.

### C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

                    No written comments were either solicited or received.                          ( print page 67385)    

## III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action

                    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.[32]                                          At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i) necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.                

## IV. Solicitation of Comments

Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:

### Electronic Comments

    - Use the Commission's internet comment form ( https://www.sec.gov/​rules/​sro.shtml ); or                
    - Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov.                      Please include file number SR-MRX-2023-17 on the subject line.                

### Paper Comments

    - Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

                    All submissions should refer to file number SR-MRX-2023-17. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's internet website (                    *https://www.sec.gov/​rules/​sro.shtml*). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All submissions should refer to file number SR-MRX-2023-17 and should be submitted on or before October 20, 2023.                

                        For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.[33] 

Sherry R. Haywood,

Assistant Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).                    
        Back to Citation      

2.                             17 CFR 240.19b-4.                    
        Back to Citation      

3.                             The Facilitation Mechanism is a process by which an Electronic Access Member can execute a transaction wherein the Electronic Access Member seeks to facilitate a block-size order it represents as agent, and/or a transaction wherein the Electronic Access Member solicited interest to execute against a block-size order it represents as agent. Electronic Access Members must be willing to execute the entire size of orders entered into the Facilitation Mechanism.                         *See*                         Options 3, Section 11(b). Additionally, Electronic Access Members may use the Facilitation Mechanism to execute block-size Complex Orders at a net price.                         *See*                         Options 3, Section 11(c) for the rules governing complex Facilitation Mechanism.                    
        Back to Citation      

4.                             The Solicited Order Mechanism is a process by which an Electronic Access Member can attempt to execute orders of 500 or more contracts it represents as agent (the “Agency Order”) against contra orders that it solicited. Each order entered into the Solicited Order Mechanism shall be designated as all-or-none.                         *See*                         Options 3, Section 11(d). Additionally, Electronic Access Members may use the Solicited Order Mechanism to execute Complex Orders at a net price.                         *See*                         Options 3, Section 11(e) for the rules governing complex Solicited Order Mechanism.                    
        Back to Citation      

5.                             The Price Improvement Mechanism is a process by which an Electronic Access Member can provide price improvement opportunities for a transaction wherein the Electronic Access Member seeks to facilitate an order it represents as agent, and/or a transaction wherein the Electronic Access Member solicited interest to execute against an order it represents as agent.                         *See*                         Options 3, Section 13. Additionally, Electronic Access Members may use the Price Improvement Mechanism to execute Complex Orders at a net price.                         *See*                         Options 3, Section 13(e) for the rules governing complex Price Improvement Mechanism.                    
        Back to Citation      

6.                             A “Crossing Order” is an order executed in the Exchange's Facilitation Mechanism, Solicited Order Mechanism, Price Improvement Mechanism (“PIM”) or submitted as a Qualified Contingent Cross order. For purposes of this Pricing Schedule, orders executed in the Block Order Mechanism are also considered Crossing Orders.                    
        Back to Citation      

7.                             “Responses to Crossing Order” is any contra-side interest (                        *i.e.,*                         orders & quotes) submitted after the commencement of an auction in the Exchange's Facilitation Mechanism, Solicited Order Mechanism, Block Order Mechanism or Price Improvement Mechanism. Contra-side interest in this context therefore includes both contra-side interest submitted specifically in response to an auction notification, and unrelated market and marketable contra-side interest submitted to the order book during the auction.                    
        Back to Citation      

8.                                                     *See*                         Section 3, Table 2 (setting forth regular order fees for Responses to Crossing Orders except PIM Orders); Section 3.A (setting forth regular and complex order fees for Responses to PIM Orders) and Section 4 (setting forth complex order fees for Responses to Crossing Orders except PIM Orders).                    
        Back to Citation      

9.                             Thus the regular FAC and SOL Order would be assessed the current regular Penny and Non-Penny Symbol fee for Crossing Orders as follows: $0.20 per contract for a Market Maker, Non-Nasdaq MRX Market Maker (FarMM), Firm Proprietary/Broker-Dealer, and Professional Customer, and $0.00 per contract for a Priority Customer.                    
        Back to Citation      

10.                             Thus the complex FAC and SOL Order would be assessed the current complex Penny Symbol fee of $0.35 per contract and complex Non-Penny Symbol fee of $0.85 per contract for all market participants except Priority Customers, which do not get assessed a complex fee.                    
        Back to Citation      

11.                             Thus, unrelated interest would be assessed the current regular Penny Symbol fee for Responses to Crossing Orders of $0.50 per contract for all market participants. Further, they would be assessed the current regular Non-Penny Symbol fee for Responses to Crossing Orders of $1.10 per contract for all market participants.                    
        Back to Citation      

12.                             As stated in Options 7, Section 4, the complex order fees apply to responses to complex FAC and SOL Orders, except complex PIM Orders, which are subject to separate PIM response fees in Options 7, Section 3.A. Thus, unrelated interest would be assessed the current complex Penny Symbol fee of $0.35 per contract and complex Non-Penny Symbol fee of $0.85 per contract for all market participants except Priority Customers, which do not get assessed a complex fee.                    
        Back to Citation      

13.                             Thus both regular and complex PIM Orders would be assessed the current Penny and Non-Penny Symbol PIM pricing as follows: $0.20 PIM originating order fee for all market participants except Priority Customers, who do not get assessed this fee, and $0.02 PIM contra-side order fee for all market participants.                    
        Back to Citation      

14.                             Break-up Rebates only apply to regular PIM Orders of 500 or fewer contracts and to complex PIM Orders where the largest leg is 500 or fewer contracts, and are provided for an originating Priority Customer PIM Order that executes with any response (order or quote) other than the PIM contra-side order. The Penny Symbol Break-up Rebate is currently $0.25 per contract for a Priority Customer originating PIM Order. The Non-Penny Symbol Break-up Rebate is currently $0.60 per contract for a Priority Customer originating PIM Order.                    
        Back to Citation      

15.                             Thus, unrelated interest would be assessed the current regular and complex Penny Symbol fee for Responses to PIM Orders of $0.50 per contract for all market participants. Further, they would be assessed the current regular and complex Non-Penny Symbol fee for Responses to PIM Orders of $1.10 per contract for all market participants.                    
        Back to Citation      

16.                             Thus the regular FAC, SOL, and PIM Order would be assessed the current regular Penny Symbol Taker Fees as follows: $0.50 per contract for a Market Maker, Non-Nasdaq MRX Market Maker (FarMM), Firm Proprietary/Broker-Dealer, and Professional Customer (regardless of tier achieved), $0.15 per contract for a Priority Customer (Tiers 1-3), and $0.10 per contract for a Priority Customer (Tier 4). Further, they would be assessed the following regular Non-Penny Taker Fees: $1.10 per contract for a Market Maker, Non-Nasdaq MRX Market Maker (FarMM), Firm Proprietary/Broker-Dealer, and Professional Customer (regardless of tier achieved), $0.35 per contract for a Priority Customer (Tier 1), $0.25 per contract for a Priority Customer (Tier 2), $0.15 per contract for a Priority Customer (Tier 3), and $0.10 per contract for a Priority Customer (Tier 4).                    
        Back to Citation      

17.                             Thus the complex FAC, SOL, and PIM Order would be assessed the current complex Penny Symbol fee of $0.35 per contract and complex Non-Penny Symbol fee of $0.85 per contract for all market participants except Priority Customers, which do not get assessed a complex fee.                    
        Back to Citation      

18.                             Thus, unrelated interest would be assessed the current regular Penny Symbol Maker Fees/Rebates as follows: $0.10 per contract fee for a Market Maker (Tier 1), $0.00 per contract fee for a Market Maker (Tier 2), $0.05 per contract rebate for a Market Maker (Tier 3), $0.10 per contract rebate for a Market Maker (Tier 4), $0.47 per contract fee for a Non-Nasdaq MRX Market Maker (FarMM), Firm Proprietary/Broker-Dealer, and Professional Customer (regardless of tier achieved), and $0.00 per contract fee for a Priority Customer (regardless of tier achieved). Further, they would be assessed the following regular Non-Penny Maker Fees: $0.35 per contract for a Market Maker (Tier 1), $0.20 per contract for a Market Maker (Tier 2), $0.15 per contract for a Market Maker (Tier 3), $0.10 per contract for a Market Maker (Tier 4), $0.90 per                                                 contract for a Non-Nasdaq MRX Market Maker (FarMM), Firm Proprietary/Broker-Dealer, and Professional Customer (regardless of tier achieved), and $0.00 per contract for a Priority Customer (regardless of tier achieved).                    
        Back to Citation      

19.                             Thus, unrelated interest would be assessed the current complex Penny Symbol fee of $0.35 per contract and complex Non-Penny Symbol fee of $0.85 per contract for all market participants except Priority Customers, which do not get assessed a complex fee.                    
        Back to Citation      

20.                             Members become aware of ongoing FAC, SOL, and PIM auctions as the Exchange disseminates an auction notification in the form of a “broadcast message” when the Exchange receives a FAC, SOL, and PIM Order for auction processing. The broadcast message is sent by the Exchange to all Members and includes the series, price, side, and size of the Agency Order.                         *See*                         Options 3, Sections 11(b)(2), 11(d)(2), and 13(c).                    
        Back to Citation      

21.                                                     *See supra*                         note 20.                    
        Back to Citation      

22.                                                     *See*                         proposed note 2 of Options 7, Section 3, Table 2.                    
        Back to Citation      

23.                                                     *See supra*                         notes 6 and 7.                    
        Back to Citation      

24.                             15 U.S.C. 78f(b).                    
        Back to Citation      

25.                             15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).                    
        Back to Citation      

26.                             As discussed above, the Exchange currently assesses uniform complex fees for similarly situated market participants, regardless of maker/taker.                         *See*                         Options 7, Section 4.                    
        Back to Citation      

27.                                                     *Id.*
        Back to Citation      

28.                                                     *See supra*                         note 20.                    
        Back to Citation      

29.                                                     *See supra*                         note 12 for discussion of complex FAC/SOL/PIM response fees.                    
        Back to Citation      

30.                                                     *See supra*                         note 20.                    
        Back to Citation      

31.                             As discussed above, the Exchange currently assesses uniform complex fees for similarly situated market participants, regardless of maker/taker.                         *See*                         Options 7, Section 4.                    
        Back to Citation      

32.                             15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).                    
        Back to Citation      

33.                                 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).                        
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2023-21343 Filed 9-28-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P