alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.01

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Mastech Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Steven J. Shangold, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                                                 
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 19, 2009 |  |                                                 
|                     | 
|                     |  | /S/ STEVEN J. SHANGOLD                          
|                     |  |                                                 
|                     |  | Steven J. Shangold                              
|                     |  | President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director
No. 62258.

#### Levin Bros. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 326976-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of shell water flowers the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 61346, except that the merchandise herein is in chief value of shell, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: jessupmail@cox.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:46:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Pamela Jessup

Wichita, KS 67219
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 89 (Friday, May 8, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 26522]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-11132]

========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 89 / Friday, May 8, 2015 / Notices

[[Page 26522]]

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Research Service

Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive License

AGENCY: Agricultural Research Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, intends to grant to 
Washington State Crop Improvement Association of Pullman, Washington, 
an exclusive license to the variety of field pea described in Plant 
Variety Protection Certificate Application Number 201500303, 
``HAMPTON,'' dated April 13, 2015.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 8, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 
5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Rm. 4-1174, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-5131.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mojdeh Bahar of the Office of 
Technology Transfer at the Beltsville address given above; telephone: 
301-504-5989.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Government's rights in this 
plant variety are assigned to the United States of America, as 
represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the public 
interest to so license this plant variety as Washington State Crop 
Improvement Association of Pullman, Washington has submitted a complete 
and sufficient application for a license. The prospective exclusive 
license will be royalty-bearing and will comply with the terms and 
conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The prospective exclusive 
license may be granted unless, within thirty (30) days from the date of 
this published Notice, the Agricultural Research Service receives 
written evidence and argument which establishes that the grant of the 
license would not be consistent with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 
and 37 CFR 404.7.

Mojdeh Bahar,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2015-11132 Filed 5-7-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3410-03-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                              51
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      788
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      8,817
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,842
<PP&E>                                          14,053
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,392
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,734
<BONDS>                                          8,865
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,677
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            60
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,946
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,392
<SALES>                                         12,980
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,980
<CGS>                                            7,035
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,037
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 228
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (320)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (93)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (227)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (227)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)


</TABLE>
From: christopher.n.goebel@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 10:01:50 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Christopher Goebel

Tucson, AZ 85756
ex10-27.htm


Exhibit 10.27


 


 


 


 



Employment Agreement Waiver:







Mr. Jeffrey Sisk, President and Chief Executive Officer of MedicalWork, LLC, hereby waives all salary and bonus compensation specified in the Employment Agreement dated February 1, 2011 between Mr. Sisk and MedicalWork, LLC, effective with the payroll beginning April 16, 2011 and to continue until future reinstatement.  All other terms of the employment agreement will remain in force as outlined.













/s/ Jeffrey E. Sisk                                              


Jeffrey E. Sisk,


President and Chief Executive Officer


MedicalWorks, LLC
No. 66008.

#### Georgia Peanut Co. and W. J. Byrnes & Co. of N. Y., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 301923-K(B) (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *The Best Foods, Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 163, C.A.D. 751), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 66499.

#### Air-Sea Forwarders, Inc., a/c Kanematsu, New York, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/16717 (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

At the trial, it was stipulated that the correct weight of the merchandise is 52 dozen of style No. 400 sweaters, at 4% pounds per dozen, and 65 dozen style No. 419 sweaters, at 4.1 pounds per dozen. The claim of the plaintiff was sustained and the collector was directed to reliquidate the entry accordingly.
From: bigbrojoe@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:17:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Joel Rivera

Flushing, NY 11367
35

12 8 7 8 9 10 11

31 32 33 34 35 36 31

3

33 34 36 31 32

6 2 1

3

4 5 2 1 6

7

6 5 4

7 10 11 12

10

9

9

8

7 8

7

11 12

18 13

13

14

14

15

15

16

16

17

17

18

18

23 24 19

23 24

22

22

21

21

20 19

19 20

25 30 26

26 25

27

27

29 28 30

30 29 28

35 36 31

36

31

35

34

34

32 33

31 32 33

6 2 1

1 6 3

2 3

4

4

5

5

6

7

10 11 12 9

Asotin Creek

Wenatchee Creek

WICKIUP CG

WENATCHEE

GUARD

STATION RC

CABIN SADDLE CG INDIAN

TOM TH

CLOVERLAND SP

South George Project Planning Area - Inventory of Potential Wilderness Areas

Map H-1: Project Planning Area

H-1

1 0.5 0 1 Miles

LEGEND

South George Project Planning Area

Washington State Fish and Wildlife

Pomeroy Ranger District

Inventoried Roadless Area (IRA)

Wenaha-Tucannon Wilderness

Recreation Feature

Forest Roads

Pomeroy RD, South George Project Planning Area

Existing Forest Plan Appendix C

Roadless Areas and 2001 Roadless Rule

Inventoried Roadless Areas

This product is reproduced from geospatial information prepared by the U.S. Department of

Agriculture, Forest Service. GIS data and product accuracy may vary. They may be: developed from

sources of differing accuracy, interpretation, incomplete while being created or revised, etc.

Using GIS products for purposes other than those for which they were created may yield inaccurate

or misleading results. The Forest Service reserves the right ot correct, update, modify, or replace GIS

products without notification. For more information contact the Umatilla National Forest Supervisors Office.

 ́

D.Dixon

GIS/Data Service Specialist

06/03/2011

4300

4304

4400
From: conniegnly@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:43:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Connie Shaffer

Artesia, NM 88210
ABRAHAM LINCOLN 

CAPITAL AIRPORT 

A T SPRINGFIEL D 

Mark E. Hanna, A.A.E., Executive Director 

Springfield Airport Authority 

March 9, 2010 

The Honorable Raymond H. LaHood 

Secretary 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: Docket DOT-OST-2010-00I8 

Dear Mr. Secretary: 

I respectfully ask you to approve American Airlines' request for allocation of two daily 

U.S.-Haneda slot pairs to operate year-round scheduled air transportation from New York 

and Los Angeles to Tokyo Haneda. American Airlines' proposed service represents the 

public's interest use for two of the four frequencies to be awarded in this proceeding, as 

New York and Los Angeles appear to be one of the largest travel markets between the 

U.S. mainland and Tokyo. 

Furthermore, American's proposed service will provide significant connecting 

opportunities, providing benefits to even more consumers. A total of 17 U.S. cities will 

enjoy on-line service beyond New York in one or both directions, and 20 beyond Los 

Angeles. All 10 of the largest U.S. mainland-Tokyo markets will gain on-line service to 

Haneda under American's proposal, including San Francisco, Chicago, Las Vegas, 

Seattle, Washington, Boston, Orlando, and Portland through roundtrip connections. 

I encourage the Department of Transportation to give American Airlines' application 

favorable consideration and approval, as it will benefit the broadest public interest and 

will have a positive impact on air travel by offering customers more service, scheduling 

and pricing options to choose from. 

Sincerely, 

\l\^Jcs^<^4^ ^ 

Mark E. Hanna 

Executive Director 

Springfield Airport Authority 

mhanna@flyspi.com 

1200 Capital Airport Drive • Springfield, Illinois 62707 

217-788-1060 • 217-788-8056 (Fax) • www.flyspi.com
Exhibit
31.1
  CERTIFICATIONS
UNDER SECTION 302
  I, David
Lichtenstein, certify that:
 
 1.  I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Lightstone Value Plus Real
Estate Investment Trust II, Inc. (the “Company”);
  2.  Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3.  Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;
  4.  The
Company’s other certifying officer and I have:
  a)  designed
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)), or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;
  b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
  c)
disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal
quarter (the Company's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Company's internal control over financial reporting; and
  5.  The
Company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s
auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
  a)  all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and
  b)  any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting.
  March 31,
2010
 
 /s/ David LichtensteinDavid
      LichtensteinChairman,
      President, and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)