alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 472 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

October 22, 2007. 

Whereas on April 21, 2007, the Wichita State University 

(WSU) women’s bowling team won the 2007 United 

States Bowling Congress (USBC) Intercollegiate Bowling 

National Championship Tournament in Wichita, Kansas; 

Whereas WSU, on the final day of the tournament, defeated 

Central Florida University 4 games to 1 in the semifinals and McKendree College (Illinois) 2 games to 0 in 

the finals to win the national championship; 

Whereas the WSU women’s bowling team has won eight 

Intercollegiate Bowling National Championships (1975, 

1977, 1978, 1986, 1990, 1994, 2005, and 2007) and has 

advanced to the national tournament a record 31 times; 

Whereas Head Coach Gordon Vadakin has coached the WSU 

bowling team since 1978, leading them to the Intercollegiate Bowling National Championship Tournament 29 

times and has coached the team to six national titles; 

Whereas Women’s Coach Mark Lewis and Assistant Women’s 

Coach Kristal Scott directly coached the 2007 WSU 

women’s bowling team to the national championship in 

Wichita, Kansas; 
2 

•HRES 472 EH 

Whereas both Head Coach Gordon Vadakin and Women’s 

Coach Mark Lewis are members of the USBC Hall of 

Fame; 

Whereas the 2007 national championship team is comprised 

of the following members: Daniela Alvarado, Ashley Cox, 

Elysia Current, Sandra Gongora, Melissa Hurst, 

Samantha Linder, Emily Maier, Rocio Restrepo, Ricki 

Williams, and Felicia Wong; and 

Whereas WSU Juniors Elysia Current and Emily Maier were 

named as First Team All-Americans, and Maier was 

named as a member of the All-Tournament Team of the 

2007 Intercollegiate Bowling National Championship 

Tournament: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) congratulates and commends the Wichita State 

University (WSU) women’s bowling team for winning 

the 2007 United States Bowling Congress (USBC) 

Intercollegiate Bowling National Championship Tournament; 

(2) recognizes the significant achievements of the 

players, coaches, students, alumni, and support staff 

whose dedication and hard work helped the WSU women’s bowling team win the national championship; and 

(3) respectfully requests the Clerk of the House of 

Representatives to transmit enrolled copies of this resolution to the following individuals for appropriate display— 
3 

•HRES 472 EH 

(A) Donald L. Beggs, President of Wichita 

State University; 

(B) Gordon Vadakin, Head Coach; 

(C) Mark Lewis, Women’s Coach; and 

(D) Kristal Scott, Assistant Women’s Coach. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH 

	NO. 2-04-267-CV

DAVID WELLS AND ALLEGHENY 	APPELLANTS

CASUALTY COMPANY, SURETY

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	APPELLEE

	----------

	FROM THE 16TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY  

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	----------

	On September 27, 2004, we notified appellants that this court may not have jurisdiction over this appeal because it appears a final judgment has not been signed by the trial court judge.  We further stated that if no final judgment was signed on or before October 18, 2004, we would dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).  We have not received a response, and it appears that no final judgment has been signed.  

	Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f). 

							PER CURIAM 			 		

PANEL D:	LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ. 

DELIVERED:  December 2, 2004
From: cindyanneharrison@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:33:23 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Cindy Harrison

Memphis, TN 38134
From: dessco1@att.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:06:16 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

David Lundy

Evansville, IN 47725
From: couponls@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:16:38 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

linda smith

Gilmer, TX 75644
No. 69201.

#### Pan American Trade Development Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 61/13311 (Savannah).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of galvanized field fencing, not over twenty one-hundredths and not under eight one-hundredths of an inch in diameter, similar in all material respects to that the subject of Amerlux *Steel Products Corp. et al.*v. *United States*(52 Cust. Ct. 83, C.D. 2441), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before the Second Division,

April 11, 1966

No. P66/27.

protests 64/22115, etc. (New York).

#### J. C. DeJong & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Rao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing -protests consists of pole ends similar in -all material respects to those the subject of *J. C. DeJong & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(52 CCPA 26, C.A.D. 852), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: stanford127@att.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:14:49 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Linda Stanford

Cedar Lake, IN 46303
From: clogg2232@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:22:44 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Lynne Letizio

Lenoir City, TN 37772
#### DAUGHERTY et al. v. BROWN.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

August 17, 1903.)

No. 1,972.

In Error to the Circuit Court of the-*1002United States for the Western District of Missouri. W. D. Tatlow, C. W. Hamlin, and John D. Porter, for defendant in error. Writ of error docketed and dismissed, with costs, pursuant to rule 1G, on motion of defendant in error.
From: jillcobb@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 8:34:52 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jill Cobb

Little Falls, NJ 07424
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 38 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
H. RES. 38

              To enhance intelligence oversight authority.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2007

 Mr. Dreier submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                         the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
              To enhance intelligence oversight authority.

    Resolved, That in clause 4(a) of rule X of the Rules of the House 
of Representatives, add the following new paragraph at the end:
    ``(5)(A) There is established a Select Intelligence Oversight Panel 
of the Committee on Appropriations (hereinafter in this paragraph 
referred to as the `select panel'). The select panel shall be composed 
of not more than 14 Members, Delegates, or the Resident Commissioner 
appointed by the Speaker (in consultation with the minority leader), of 
whom not more than seven may be from the same political party. The 
select panel shall include the chairman and ranking minority member of 
the Committee on Appropriations, the chairman and ranking minority 
member of its Subcommittee on Defense, six additional members of the 
Committee on Appropriations, and four members of the Permanent Select 
Committee on Intelligence.
    ``(B) The Speaker shall designate one member of the select panel as 
its chairman and one member as its ranking minority member.
    ``(C) Each member on the select panel shall be treated as though a 
member of the Committee on Appropriations for purposes of the select 
panel.
    ``(D) The select panel shall review and study on a continuing basis 
budget requests for and execution of intelligence activities; make 
recommendations to relevant subcommittees of the Committee on 
Appropriations; and, on an annual basis, prepare a report to the 
Defense Subcommittee of the Committee on Appropriations containing 
budgetary and oversight observations and recommendations for use by 
such subcommittee in preparation of the classified annex to the bill 
making appropriations for the Department of Defense.
    ``(E) Rule XI shall apply to the select panel in the same manner as 
a subcommittee (except for clause 2(m)(1)(B) of that rule).
    ``(F) A subpoena of the Committee on Appropriations or its 
Subcommittee on Defense may specify terms of return to the select 
panel.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Report, Grand Jury Exhibit 83 of June 1992 Special Grand Jury.

[632 NYS2d 971]

—Appeal by the subject of the June 1992 Special Grand Jury ID, Term VII of Suffolk County, as limited by his brief, from so much of (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Seidell, J.), dated December 10, 1993, as accepted for filing as a public record a report of the June 1992 Special Grand Jury ID, Term VII of Suffolk County pursuant to CPL 190.85 (1) (a); and (2) an order of the same court, dated October 24, 1994, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination to file the report as a public record.

Ordered that the appeal from the order dated December 10, 1993, is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as that order was superseded by the order dated October 24, 1994, made upon reargument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order dated October 24, 1994, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Special Grand Jury was adequately instructed with regard to the appellant’s duties and responsibilities as a public servant. Moreover, its findings are supported by a preponderance of the credible and legally admissible evidence *(see, Matter of Report of 1985-1986 Special Grand Jury,*150 AD2d 580). Sullivan, J. P., Miller, Copertino and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
From: ksgraylady@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:06:31 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Rose Newton

Saint Joseph, MO 64503