alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: dollhousesbyjudy@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:52:54 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Judy Hammond

Frederic, MI 49733
IV 

House Calendar No. 68 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 459 

[Report No. 110–175] 

Dismissing the election contest relating to the office of Representative from 

the Twenty-first Congressional District of Florida. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 6, 2007 

Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania, from the Committee on House Administration, 

reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Dismissing the election contest relating to the office of Representative from the Twenty-first Congressional District 

of Florida. 

1 Resolved, That the election contest relating to the of2 fice of Representative from the Twenty-first Congressional 

3 District of Florida is dismissed. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

House Calendar No. 68 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 459 

[Report No. 110

–175] 

RESOLUTION 

Dismissing the election contest relating to the office 

sional District of Florida. of Representative from the Twenty-first CongresJUNE 6, 2007 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
Exhibit 31.1

 

Section 302 Certification of Chief ExecutiveOfficer

 

I, G. Reed Petersen, certify that:

 

1.   I have reviewed this annual report onForm 10-K of Sears Oil and Gas Corporation.

 

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances   under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period coveredby this report;

 

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations  and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.   The registrant's other certifying officersand I; are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

 

    a)   designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this  report is being prepared;

 

    b)   evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filingdate of this report (the  "Evaluation Date"); and

 

    c)   presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluationas of the Evaluation Date;

 

5.   The registrant's other certifying officersand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant'sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

    a)   all significant  deficienciesin the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material

    weaknesses in internal controls;and

 

    b)   any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internalcontrols.

 

6.   The registrant's other certifying officersand I have indicated in this report whether or not there were significant changes in  internal controls or in other factorsthat could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any correctiveactions with regard to significant efficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

 

Date: February 13, 2013

 

 

/s/ G. Reed Petersen

----------------------------------

G. Reed Petersen

Chief Executive Officer
From: nverbeek@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:26:01 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Noelle VerBeek

Lake Elmo, MN 55042
From: tjd1944@att.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:42:03 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Thomas Davis

Greenwood, IN 46143
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
Pursuant

To Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Intelsat Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies that to such officers
knowledge, the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |                                          
|------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------
|Date: May 13, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ MICHAEL MCDONNELL                    
|                   |  |  |  | Michael McDonnell Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY

WASHINGTON D.C., 20460

OFFICE OF 

CHEMICAL SAFETY AND 

POLLUTION PREVENTION

September 14, 2012 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: Summary of Meeting With Alkylphenols & Ethoxylates Research Council 

 (APERC) 

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2011-0516 

FROM: Leslie Cronkhite, Chief 

 Existing Chemical Branch (7405M) 

 On September 14, 2012, staff from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of 

Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) met with members of the Alkylphenols & Ethoxylates 

Research Council (APERC) at APERC’s request concerning 4-tert-octylphenol (CASRN 140-

66-9), a TSCA Work Plan chemical slated for risk assessment during 2013-2014. APERC had 

submitted comments and additional information to the Work Plan docket, EPA-HQ-OPPT-2011-

0516, on August 31, 2012, and requested the opportunity to present those comments and obtain 

further clarification on the Work Plan risk assessment process. 

 OPPT clarified that information provided to the docket will be used in the upcoming risk 

assessment rather than in any reconsideration of the process used to identify the Work Plan 

chemicals. OPPT welcomed the submission of additional information, including use and 

exposure data, noting that such information would be particularly useful during the problem 

formulation and scoping phase of the risk assessment process. OPPT emphasized that 

information should be furnished to the docket as soon as possible in order to inform that process, 

ideally within the next four to six weeks. 

 In response to questions about the risk assessment and peer review process, OPPT 

indicated that the peer review plans already posted on the first round of Work Plan chemicals 

being assessed in 2012 (http://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_pr_agenda.cfm) described in detail the 

process currently being followed, including defining the periods for public comment and the 

third-party process to be used in assembling the panels and conducting the peer reviews. OPPT 

also noted that the plans specify that this process will be reviewed after the completion of the 

initial round of assessments, and lessons learned will be applied to future rounds of Work Plan 

assessment activities. 

 The agenda, sign-in sheet, and pre-meeting list of APERC attendees are attached. 

Attachments
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76

36 38 40 42



### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 08/25 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 25 Aug 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.44 N 77.04 WMeters AGL
From: evac.casas@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:01:54 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Eva Casas

Dover, DE 19901
Case No. 10,309.

#### In re NEW YORK MAIL STEAMSHIP CO.

[2 N. B. R. 74 (Quarto, 26).] 1

District Court, S. D. New York.

Aug. 12, 1868.

Bankruptcy — Removal op Assignee.

[NOTE. The case was subsequently heard upon the question of allowance of counsel fees. Case No. 10,210. Counsel for the company before its bankruptcy claimed lien on papers in their hands for fees. Id. 10,211. This last claim, together with others, was referred to register to examine proofs. Id. 10,212. The case is finally reported as heard upon the matter of allowances for fees paid by petitioning creditor. This matter was heard by the circuit court upon certificate of interest in the subject-matter by the district judge. Id. 10,208.]

In bankruptcy.

1

 [Reprinted by permission.]

BLATCHPORD, District Judge.

Upon the application made in this matter for the removal of Robert J. Hubbard, one of the assignees of the bankrupts, I have come to the conclusion, on an examination of the petition, answer and affidavits, that the case is a proper one for the granting of an order under section 18 of the act, according to form No. 42, calling a meeting of the creditors of the bankrupt, to consider the question of the removal of Mr. Hubbard. If at such meeting the greater part in value and in number of the creditors who shall have proved their debts, ^hall vote in favor of Mr. Hubbard, the court will not consent to his removal. If the vote at such meeting shall be in favor of his removal, a successor will be elected at the same meeting.
No. 58658.

protests 200912-K and 205559-K (Los Angeles).

#### Fong Brothers and W. J. Byrnes & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the two classes of merchandise are the same in all material respects as those involved in *Calif-Asia Co., Ltd.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 133, C. A. D. 475). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the cited decision, the items marked “A” were held dutiable at 20 percent ad valorem under paragraph 412, as modified by the Gen- ' eral Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 51802), and the items marked “B” were held dutiable at 12)4 percent under said paragraph, as modified by said T. D. 51802.
CONSENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP



 Exhibit 4.1 
 AUDITOR’S CONSENT 
 We hereby consent to the use in this Registration Statement on
Form F-80 of First Quantum Minerals Ltd. of our report dated March 6, 2012 relating to the financial statements of First Quantum Minerals Ltd., which comprise the consolidated balance sheets as at December 31, 2011, December 31,
2010 and January 1, 2010 and the consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income, cash flows and changes in shareholders’ equity for the years ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, incorporated by reference in
such Registration Statement. 
 /s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP 

Vancouver, British Columbia 
 January 9,
2013
Erin B. Marston Law Offices ofMarston & Cole, P.C. 821 N Street, Suite 208 Anchorage, AK 99501 (907) 277-8001 

# l·r<ECEIVE JUN 12 20\2 

## HEARING DOCKE Attorneys for Copper Valley Air Service, Inc. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C.
In the matter of: ) ) Case No. 2011AL030090 ) (Civil Penalty Action) Copper Valley Air Service, Inc. )

______________ ) FAADocketNo.
_______ _ REQUEST FORHEARING Copper Valley Air Service, Inc., by and through its attorneys ofrecord, the Law Offices of Marston & Cole, P.C., pursuant to Subpart G of Part 13 of the Federal Aviation Regulations, requests a hearing in this matter to be held in Anchorage, Alaska, because a civil penalty is inappropriate.**-~** 

### ' DATED**this~** day ofJune, 2012, at Anchorage, Alaska.

Request for Hearing LAW OFFICES OF MARSTON & COLE, P.C.**Attorney~JorCopperValley** Air Service, Inc.

.**~**

# ~~'···Lfj~···

# ..... By:
. Erin B. Marston AK State BarNo. 8511177

In re: Copper ValleyAirService, Inc., Case No. 2011AL0300909 Page I of2CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This is to certify that on this C.7l{ day of June, 2012, a true and correct copy ofthe foregoing document was 

### l2fMailed D Hand-delivered D Faxed to the following: Original and one copy: Attention: HearingDocket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W!OOO Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591 One copy: Glenn H. Brown, Esq. Office ofthe Regional Counsel 222 West 7th Avenue, #14 Anchorage, AJS39ejl3-7587 Fax:**27~}l!OO** /' 

## / , (j/ / 

### , ,./ !**~-**

Request for Hearing In re: Copper ValleyAirService, Inc., CaseNo. 2011AL0300909 Page 2 of2
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





Form 8-K





Current Report





Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report  (Date of earliest event reported): October 24, 2017





Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation


(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)





001-11241


(Commission File Number)


Delaware37-1105865(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)(IRS Employer Identification Number)





2120 West End Avenue


Nashville, Tennessee 37203-0001


(Address of principal executive offices, with zip code)





(615) 341-1000


(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:


oWritten communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)oSoliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).





Emerging growth company o





If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o








---







Item 2.02. Results of Operations and Financial Condition.





On October 24, 2017, Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation issued a press release reporting financial results for the quarter ended September 30, 2017.  A copy of the press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated into this Item 2.02 by reference.





The information in this Current Report on Form 8-K, including Exhibit 99.1, is being furnished in accordance with the provisions of General Instruction B.2 of Form 8-K.








Item 9.01.  Financial Statements and Exhibits.





d)Exhibits:99.1Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation press release dated October 24, 2017








2


---




EXHIBIT INDEX





Exhibit No.Description99.1Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation press release dated October 24, 2017











3


---




SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.





Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation








Date:  October 24, 2017By:/s/ Leslie S. ZmuggLeslie S. ZmuggSecretary














4