alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: wasc@ptd.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:40:23 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Edward L. Wascavage

Frackville, PA 17931
No. 62236.

#### Selig Manufacturing Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 58/1873, etc. (Boston).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of chairs or parts thereof similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Davies Turner & Co.*v. *United States*(45 C. C. P. A. 39, C. A. D. 669), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Before the First Division,

March 2, 1966

No. 69812.

protests 63/3669(B), etc. (New York).

#### De Luxe Reading Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of electric motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 66961, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
|                                                                    |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                    |  |  |  |  |
| Delaware                                                           |   | 001-11241 |   | 37-1105865 |
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)                     |   | (Commission File Number) |   | (IRS Employer Identification Number) |
|                                                               |   |   |   |   |
| 2120 West End Avenue, Nashville, Tennessee                         |   |   |  37203-0001 |
| (Address of principal executive offices)                           |   |   |   | (Zip Code) |
|                                                               |   |   |   |   |
| Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (615) 341-1000 |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | o | Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
|   |   |   |
|   | o | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
|   |   |   |
|   | o | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
|   |   |   |
|   | o | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |

|                                                             |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                             |  |  |
| Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: |
| Title of each class                                         | Trading Symbol(s) | Name of each exchange on which registered |
| Medium-Term Notes, Series H,3.300% Notes Due 2024           | CAT/24 | New York Stock Exchange |

----

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |
| d)     | Exhibits: |   |
|   | The following is furnished as an exhibit to this report: |
|   |   |   |   |
|   |   | 99.1 | Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation press release dated July 31, 2020 |
|   |   |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |

----

|                                |
|--------------------------------|
|                                |  |
| Date:  July 31, 2020 |           By:  /s/ Michael G. Sposato |
|                           |                       Michael G. Sposato |
|                           |                       Secretary |
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Darryl Bannister, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 585]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Quinones, J.), rendered April 25, 1994, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The ap*521peal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of the branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Officer Ryan’s actions in pinning the defendant’s hand to his jacket while simultaneously conducting a limited pat-down of that same area were proper within the context of the developing circumstances within which he and his fellow officers found themselves *(see, People v Benjamin,*51 NY2d 267). There was no need for Officer Ryan to wait and see the glint of steel before he was permitted to take those limited actions needed to insure his safety and that of his fellow officers *(see, People v Allen,*73 NY2d 378). Moreover, unlike the search in *People v Andrades*(219 AD2d 656) the limited search conducted here was undertaken only in response to the defendant’s prior overt acts. O’Brien, J. P„ Joy, Altman and Florio, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of PanAmSat Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
J. Inglese, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the issuer.

                                               /s/   Michael J. Inglese
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                                  Michael J. Inglese
                                             Executive Vice President and
                                                Chief Financial Officer

Date: August 6, 2003
No. 59192.

protest 252479-K (New York).

#### The Neuwirth Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

An examination of the papers in this case disclosing nothing that would tend in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the decision of the collector, the protest was overruled.
|EXHIBIT 33.3
|------------



|Management Assessment
|---------------------

Management of ING USA Annuity and Life Insurance Company (the Company) is responsible for assessing compliance with applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB of the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to the servicing of ING USA Global Funding Trust 6.

The Companys management has assessed the effectiveness of the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of December 31, 2008 and for the period from January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.

Based on such assessment, management believes that, as of December 31, 2008 and for the period from January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008, the Company has complied in all material respects with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)(3)(i) of Regulation AB of the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to the servicing of the ING USA Global Funding Trust 6.

The Company has determined that all other requirements listed in Item 1122(d) as being inapplicable to the activities it performs with respect to the asset-backed securities transactions being serviced.

Ernst & Young LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report with respect to managements assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of December 31, 2008 and for the period from January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008.



| | /s/ Michellen A. WildinVice PresidentMarch 31, 2009
| | ---------------------------------------------------

---
The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, United States District Judge for the Eastern 1

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-2309

___________

Ernest Sam Kojo-Kwarteng, *

 *

Appellant, *

 *

v. * Appeal from the United States

 * District Court for the

Washington University; Washington * Eastern District of Missouri.

University Police Department; Denise *

Doner; Robert Browning; Otha * [UNPUBLISHED]

Overholt, *

 *

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: December 7, 1998

 Filed: December 16, 1998

___________

Before McMILLIAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and MORRIS SHEPPARD 

ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. 

___________

PER CURIAM.

Ernest Sam Kojo-Kwarteng appeals from the final judgment entered in the

District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri granting summary judgment in

1

favor
-2-

of his former employer, Washington University, in Kwarteng&s employment

discrimination suit. Upon a thorough review of the record and the parties& briefs, we

conclude that the grant of summary judgment was warranted. Accordingly, the

judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Dayville

Mount

Vernon

Izee

Beech

Creek

Logdell

Suplee

WHEELER COUNTY GRANT COUNTY

 CROOK COUNTY

HARNEY COUNTY

 GRANT COUNTY

HARNEY COUNTY

 MALHEUR NATIONAL FOREST

 MALHEUR 

NATIONAL

FOREST

OCHOCO

NATIONAL

FOREST

 MALHEUR 

NATIONAL

FOREST

 MALHEUR NATIONAL FOREST

OCHOCO

NATIONAL

FOREST

112

69

69

63

63

63

68

42

6

40

26

26

19

395

John

Fork

Day

River

South

2 0 2 4 Kilometers

2 0 2 4 Miles

W

N

E

S

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

PRINEVILLE DISTRICT

John Day Basin

Resource Management Plan

Draft Environmental Impact Statement

2008 No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these 

data for individual or aggregate use with other data. Original data were compiled from various sources. This 

information may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was developed through digital means 

and may be updated without notification.

OREGON

Prineville 

District

John Day Basin

Planning Area

Map Area

M07-09-01:9-5-08

LEGEND

Road Density Prescription

 Zero Miles per Square Mile

 Two Miles per Square Mile

Planning Area Boundary

Administered Land

 Bureau of Land Management

 Forest Service

 John Day Fossil Beds

 National Monument

 State

 Private or Other

* Note: Access to some areas listed as open may

 require landowner permission to cross private lands

Transportation 

 Interim Road

 Interim Road - Needs Rehabilitation

 Open Road Seasonally

 Closed Road - Stream Function

 Proposed Road

 U.S. Highway

 State Highway

 County Road

 Forest Service Primary Route

 Forest Service Secondary Route

 Private Road- Closed to public use or unknown

Off Highway Vehicle Designation

 Closed- Motorized Use Off Roads Probhibited

 Limited- Motorized Vehicle Use Limited

 to Designated Roads and Trails,

 Seasonally, or by Type of Vehicle

63

26

19

T

18

S

T

17

S

T

16

S

T

15

S

T

14

S

T

13

S

T

12

S

T

11

S

T

18

S

T

17

S

T

16

S

T

15

S

T

14

S

T

13

S

T

12

S

T

11

S

R 24 E R 25 E R 26 E R 27 E R 28 E R 29 E R 30 E

R 24 E R 25 E R 26 E R 27 E R 28 E R 29 E R 30 E

Map 14D: Alternative 3 Travel Management and Off Highway Vehicle

Designations - South Fork John Day
From: dclarkchem@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:21:42 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

DAN CLARK

West Lafayette, IN 47906
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 399 

Supporting the goals and ideals of Mother’s Day. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 14, 2007 

Mr. FORTENBERRY (for himself, Mr. TERRY, and Mr. SMITH of Nebraska) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of Mother’s Day. 

Whereas Mother’s Day is celebrated the second Sunday of 

each May; 

Whereas mothers have made immeasurable contributions toward building strong families, thriving communities, and 

ultimately a strong nation; 

Whereas the services rendered to the children of the United 

States by their mothers have strengthened and inspired 

the Nation throughout its history; 

Whereas we honor ourselves and mothers in the United 

States when we revere and emphasize the role of the 

home and the family as the true foundations of the Nation; 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 399 IH 

Whereas mothers continue to rise to the challenge of raising 

their families with love, understanding, and compassion, 

while overcoming the challenges of modern society; and 

Whereas May 13, 2007, is being recognized as Mother’s Day: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives cele2 brates the role of mothers in the United States and sup3 ports the goals and ideals of Mother’s Day. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 392 

Urging Americans and people of all nationalities to visit the American 

Cemeteries, Memorials and Markers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 10, 2007 

Mr. LAMBORN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Urging Americans and people of all nationalities to visit 

the American Cemeteries, Memorials and Markers. 

Whereas the United States has fought in wars outside of its 

borders to restore freedom and human dignity; 

Whereas the United States has spent its national treasure 

and shed its blood in fighting those wars; 

Whereas many of those who died on the battlefield were laid 

to rest exactly where they fell; 

Whereas those plots of ground are now known as American 

Cemeteries, Memorials and Markers, and they exist in 10 

foreign countries on four continents; 

Whereas these cemeteries exist as the final resting place for 

American servicemembers who fought valiantly in battles 

across the globe, including Ardennes and Flanders, Belmstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HRES 392 IH 

gium; Manila, the Philippines; North Africa, Tunisia; 

Florence, Italy; and Normandy, France; 

Whereas each year millions of American and foreign citizens 

visit the American Cemeteries, Memorials and Markers; 

Whereas these overseas sites annually recognize Memorial 

Day with speeches, a reading of the Memorial Day Proclamation, wreath laying ceremonies, military bands and 

units, and the decoration of each grave site with the flag 

of the United States and that of the host country; and 

Whereas the splendid commemorative sites inspire patriotism, 

evoke gratitude, and teach history: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That House of Representatives strongly 

2 urges Americans and people of all nationalities to visit the 

3 American Cemeteries, Memorials and Markers abroad, 

4 where the spirit of American generosity, sacrifice, and 

5 courage are displayed and commemorated. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
No. 68115.

#### John S. Connor *v.*United States,

protest 296739-K (Baltimore).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of plastic articles similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 6748S, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: December 9, 2008
    /s/ SALLY FRAME KASAKSSally Frame KasaksChief Executive Officer
Amendment No. 1 to the ING Americas Severance Pay Plan



 Exhibit 10.64 
 AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE TO THE ING AMERICAS SEVERANCE PAY 
 PLAN, AS AMENDED
AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE AS OF JANUARY 1, 2008 
 WHEREAS, Section 4.2 of the ING Americas Severance Pay Plan, as
amended and restated effective as of January 1, 2008 (the “Plan”) reserves to ING North America Insurance Corporation (the “Company”) the power to amend the Plan; and 

WHEREAS, the Company has decided to amend the Plan, effective October 1, 2008, to modify the definition of “Highly
Leveraged Employee” as it applies to certain employees of ING Investment Management, LLC. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED the Company hereby amends the Plan effective October 1, 2008, as follows: 
 1. Effective October 1, 2008,
Section 1.12, definition of Highly Leveraged Employee is hereby amended to read as follows: 
 Section 1.12, Highly
Leveraged Employee means generally those employees who are not eligible for participation in a regular broad-based annual Company incentive bonus program for salaried employees and are eligible for a “production” or performance-based
bonus that is payable on a regular basis throughout the year (bi-weekly, semi-monthly, monthly, quarterly, semi-annually), when the performance-based bonus program is designed to represent a significant portion of the Eligible Employee’s
compensation. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the only employees of ING Investment Management, LLC who shall be considered a “highly leveraged” employee are (a) those employees who hold positions of internal
wholesaler, external wholesaler, hybrid wholesaler, business development employees, and distribution management staff, and (b) who otherwise meet the foregoing guidelines in this Section 1.12. No other employee of ING Investment
Management, LLC shall be considered a “highly leveraged” employee, irrespective of how that Eligible Employee is compensated. The Company, in its sole discretion, shall designate which employees are “highly leveraged” pursuant to
the foregoing guidelines. 
 2. Except as expressly amended by this Amendment Number One, the provisions of the Plan shall
remain in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment Number One to be signed by
its duly authorized officer effective as of the date last executed below. 
  

			
	 ING North America Insurance
 Corporation

		
	By:	 	/s/ W. Delahanty
		 	W. Delahanty
		 	Head of Rewards and Operations
		
	 Date:    
	 	October 20, 2008
No. 67520.

#### Van Oppen & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 62/12169 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Since the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.