alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required
to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Principal
Life Income Fundings Trust 2008-040 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, do
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information
required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is
included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;4.
    
    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this
report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act
periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing
agreement(s) in all material respects; and5.
    
    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of
compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included
in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.
   /s/ Dwight N. SoethoutDwight N. SoethoutVice President  Principal Life Insurance Company
From: abrigham@bresnan.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:05:11 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

A Brigham

Belgrade, MT 59714
From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov> 

To: Raj Rao/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc: Anna Wood/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Howard Hoffman/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Paul Balserak/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 08/09/2010 01:07 PM 

Subject: RE: Call in # 1-866-299-3188 Code 202 564 1664 

-----Original Message----- 

From: Rao.Raj@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Rao.Raj@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 1:03 PM 

To: Kymn, Christine J. 

Cc: Wood.Anna@epamail.epa.gov; hoffman.howard@epamail.epa.gov; 

Balserak.Paul@epamail.epa.gov 

Subject: Call in # 1-866-299-3188 Code 202 564 1664 

Please call 1-866-299-3188 Code 202-564-1664 asap. Anna, can you open the line 

please. if you can't i will. 

Raj Rao, P.E. 

Group Leader, NSRG 

OAQPS/AQPD(MD- C504-03) 

109 TW Alexander Drive 

RTP, NC 27709 

919-541-5344 

919-541-5509 fax 

Note: Positions or views expressed here do not represent official EPA policy. 

Interagency deliberative and Confidential. 

 

 From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov> 

 

 To: Raj Rao/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

 

 Cc: Anna Wood/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Howard Hoffman/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Paul 

Balserak/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

 

 Date: 08/09/2010 12:43 PM 

 

 Subject: RE: Status of package 

 

I am available at 1pm as well. 

As I explained to you on Friday evening when we received EPA's redline and the 

language negotiated external to our review process, we needed to be able to 

review EPA's proposed edits and the language we had not yet seen. Still, even 

with those time constraints, I was able to work with the external reviewer on 

the externally negotiated language, both of us reviewing over the weekend. In 

addition, as I said I would do on Friday evening, I spent the weekend 

reviewing EPA's language but I also needed to check with interagency reviewers 

today on responses to edits. 

I continue to support a constructive and respectful review process and am 

hoping this call will remain true to that underlying directive. 

-----Original Message----- 

From: Rao.Raj@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Rao.Raj@epamail.epa.gov] 
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 12:29 PM 

To: Kymn, Christine J. 

Cc: Wood.Anna@epamail.epa.gov; hoffman.howard@epamail.epa.gov; 

Balserak.Paul@epamail.epa.gov 

Subject: Status of package 

Christine, 

I was hoping that you would be clear the packages early today but now I 

understand from your VM that you have edits on both the CEQ language and other 

language too. we have been extremely patient and accommodating and it is 

frustrating that you still seem to be raising issues with the packages. You 

suggested a call. Please let me know ASAP if you all are available at 1pm 

and I will send out a scheduler. (I need Anna and Christine at least on the 

call) . 

Hopefully if these are minor tweaks, we can make quick edits and send official 

files through ROCIS later today for clearance. 

raj 

Raj Rao, P.E. 

Group Leader, NSRG 

OAQPS/AQPD(MD- C504-03) 

109 TW Alexander Drive 

RTP, NC 27709 

919-541-5344 

919-541-5509 fax 

Note: Positions or views expressed here do not represent official EPA policy. 

Interagency deliberative and Confidential. 

SIP-Fix write-up2.doc
|EXHIBIT 33.1
|------------



|MANAGEMENTS ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE
|------------------------------------

Management of the Agency and Trust division of Citibank, N.A. (or Company) is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria specified in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Management has determined that the following servicing criteria in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB are applicable in regard to the servicing platform for the period as follows:

Platform: publicly-issued(i.e.,transaction-level reporting initially required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) securities backed by insurance-related funding agreements issued on or after January 1, 2006, for which the Company provides the following servicing functions (the Platform): paying agent, calculation agent, trustee and registrar services.

Applicable Servicing Criteria: All servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d), to the extent required by Item 1122(d) servicing criteria in regards to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform as to any transaction, except for the following servicing criteria: 1122(d)(l)(ii)-1122(d)(l)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(vi)-1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities the Company performs with respect to the Platform (the Applicable Servicing Criteria).

Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2008 (the Period).

With respect to the Platform as of and for the Period, the Companys management provides the following assertion of compliance in respect of the Applicable Servicing Criteria:

|· | The Companys management is responsible for assessing the Companys compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.                                                                                                                              
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 
|· | The Companys management has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.
| 
|· | Based on such assessment, the Company has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.                                                                                                                               
| 

KPMG LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report with respect to managements assertion of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Period.



|CITIBANK, N.A.
|--------------



| | By: /s/ Karen MontbachIts: Managing Director
| | --------------------------------------------



|Dated: February 27, 2009
|------------------------

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of Ambac Financial Group, Inc. (the Company) for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
Diana N. Adams, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of her knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                   |  |                                      
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|/s/ Diana N. Adams
|Name:              |  | Diana N. Adams                       
|Title:             |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|Date:              |  | August 9, 2012
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ambac Financial Group, Inc.
(the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), David W. Wallis, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|/s/    David W. Wallis
|Name:                  |  | David W. Wallis                      
|Title:                 |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|Date:                  |  | August 10, 2009
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D16-5670

_____________________________

JOHN A. RAMOS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Linda F. McCallum, Judge.

December 3, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, MAKAR, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Wm. J. Sheppard, Elizabeth L. White, Matthew R. Kachergus, 

Bryan E. DeMaggio, Jesse B. Wilkison, and Camille E. Sheppard 

of Sheppard, White, Kachergus & DeMaggio, P.A., Jacksonville,

for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jennifer J. Moore, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
From: dg-foss@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:54:30 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dana Foss

Woodway, TX 76712
H. Res. 416 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 25, 2007. 

Whereas Tony Blair has served as the Prime Minister of the 

United Kingdom for more than a decade, winning three 

general elections as leader of the Labour Party; 

Whereas Mr. Blair played an instrumental role in achieving 

peace in Northern Ireland and negotiating the Good Friday Agreement which brought all communities into the 

political and governmental process and ended centuries of 

division, conflict, and strife; 

Whereas Mr. Blair committed himself to bringing devolved 

government to Northern Ireland which was achieved with 

the recent decision of the Democratic Unionist Party and 

Sinn Fe ́in agreeing to form a power-sharing government; 

Whereas the United Kingdom and the United States have 

had a long-standing alliance which was further strengthened during Tony Blair’s tenure as he and the United 

Kingdom stood side-by-side with the United States during conflicts in Bosnia, Kosovo, Afghanistan, and Iraq; 

Whereas Mr. Blair showed British solidarity with the United 

States after the 9/11 terrorist attacks by being the first 

foreign leader to visit Ground Zero and attending President Bush’s speech before a joint session of Congress on 

September 20, 2001; 
2 

•HRES 416 EH 

Whereas Mr. Blair displayed exemplary leadership as Prime 

Minister when the United Kingdom suffered its own terrorist attacks on July 7, 2005, when suicide bombers 

killed 52 people traveling on London’s public transportation system; 

Whereas the United Kingdom has been a steadfast ally to the 

United States in the Global War on Terror as it is the 

second largest contributor of coalition forces in Iraq and 

Afghanistan; and 

Whereas on July 17, 2003, Mr. Blair was awarded the Congressional Gold Medal that declared ‘‘Congress finds that 

Prime Minister Tony Blair of the United Kingdom has 

clearly demonstrated, during a very trying and historic 

time for our two countries, that he is a staunch and 

steadfast ally of the United States of America.’’: Now, 

therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) recognizes the remarkable public service of Tony 

Blair during his tenure as Prime Minister of the United 

Kingdom; and 

(2) expresses appreciation to Mr. Blair for his 

steadfast support for the United States and Britain’s invaluable alliance to our Nation. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
No. 62767.

#### F. W. Myers & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 282114-K (Detroit).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the correct weights of the transit pipe are gross, 131,580 pounds; tare, 54,100 pounds; and net, 77,480 pounds. The protest was sustained and the collector was directed to reliquidate on the basis of the above weights.
From: pastor_ls@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:58:57 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Larry Speelman

Wilmington, OH 45177
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K
of EcoEmissions Solutions, Inc for the Year Ended February 28, 2010, I, Larry
Lorenz, President and Chief Executive Officer of EcoEmissions Solutions, Inc.
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:

|1. | Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year ended
      February 28, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                     
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|2. | The information contained in such Annual Report on Form
      10-K for the Year ended February 28, 2010, fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      EcoEmissions Solutions, Inc.

By: /s/Larry N. Lorenz
             
Larry N. Lorenz      
       President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated:   June 10, 2010

---
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 1 4

- 00 118

- CR

JOSE GONZALO FERMAN

A/K/A JOSE GONZALEZ FERMAN APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 4 OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------



### MEMORAN DUM OPINION 1

----------

Appellant Jose Gonzalo Ferman a/k/a Jose Gonzalez Ferman attempts to

appeal from his conviction for driving while intoxicated with a child passenger

.

See Tex. Pen al Code Ann. § 49.045 (West 2011 ). Ferman pleaded guilty

pursuant t o a plea bargain, and in accordance with the plea bargain, the trial

co urt sentenced him to two years’ confinement in state jail. The trial court’s

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

certification of his right to appeal states that this “ is a plea

- bargain case , and the

defendant has NO rig ht of appeal. ” See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).

On March 31 , 201 4

, we notified Ferman that th is appeal could be

dismissed based on the trial court’s certification unless he or any party desiring to

continue the appeal file d a response on or before April 10, 2014

, showing

grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f). No

response has been filed.

In accordance with the trial court’s certification, we therefore dismiss this

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f).

PER CURI AM

PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App

. P. 47.2(b )

DELIVERED: May 15, 2014
No. 69781.

protests 60/23449, etc. (New York).

#### Ottavia, Inc. *v.*United States,

*867Opinion by

Nao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of pole ends similar in all material respects to those the subject of *J. C. De Jong & Co., Inc.*v. *United .States*(52 CCPA 26, C.A.D. 852), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before the Third Division,

January 28, 1960

No. 63755.

protests 89820-K, etc. (New York).

#### Capitol Wine & Spirit Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.