alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In re Melanie D. Horton

Appellate case number: 01-21-00324-CV

Trial court case number: 2020-39175

Trial court: 80th District Court of Harris County

Real party in interest, Kafi, Inc., has filed an unopposed motion to extend the time 

to file its response to relator, Melanie D. Horton’s, petition for writ of mandamus. On 

July 1, 2021, the Court requested that real party in interest file a response to relator’s 

petition for writ of mandamus within twenty days of the date of the order, on or before July 

21, 2021. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.4. Real party in interest requests that the time to file its 

response be extended to August 11, 2021. 

The motion includes a certificate of conference representing that no party opposes 

the relief requested by real party in interest. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a)(2). The motion is 

granted.

Real party in interest, Kafi, Inc.’s, response to relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus is due to be filed no later than August 11, 2021.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: _____/s/ Amparo Guerra__________

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: ___July 20, 2021____
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 *Notice is Hereby Given*
                     that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC or Receiver), as Receiver for the institutions listed below, intends to terminate its receivership for said institutions. Notice of Intent To Terminate Receiverships
Fund
Receivership name
City
State
Date of
                             appointment 
                             of receiver10029
Bank of Clark County
Vancouver
WA
01/16/200910221
Lincoln Park Savings Bank
Chicago
IL
04/23/201010334
Firstier Bank
Louisville
CO
01/28/201110524
Seaway Bank and Trust
Chicago
IL
01/27/201710535
Ericson State Bank
Ericson
NE
02/14/202010538
Almena State Bank
Almena
KS
10/23/2020
 The liquidation of the assets for each receivership has been completed. To the extent permitted by available funds and in accordance with law, the Receiver will be making a final dividend payment to proven creditors. Based upon the foregoing, the Receiver has determined that the continued existence of the receiverships will serve no useful purpose. Consequently, notice is given that the receiverships shall be terminated, to be effective no sooner than thirty days after the date of this notice. If any person wishes to comment concerning the termination of any of the receiverships, such comment must be made in writing, identify the receivership to which the comment pertains, and be sent within thirty days of the date of this notice to: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Division of Resolutions and Receiverships, Attention: Receivership Oversight Section, 600 North Pearl, Suite 700, Dallas, TX 75201. No comments concerning the termination of the above-mentioned receiverships will be considered which are not sent within this timeframe. (Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1819) Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Dated at Washington, DC, on September 22, 2023. James P. Sheesley, Assistant Executive Secretary.


[FR Doc. 2023-21039 Filed 9-26-23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
From: huskey@bresnan.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:10:57 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Steven Huskey

Clifton, CO 81520
Exhibit 10(a)


 





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 


 


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Post-Effective
Amendment No. 270 to Registration Statement No. 33-26305 on Form N-1A of our reports dated November 21, 2012, relating to the financial
statements and financial highlights of BlackRock All-Cap Energy & Resources Portfolio, BlackRock Energy & Resources Portfolio,
BlackRock International Opportunities Portfolio, BlackRock Small Cap Growth Equity Portfolio, BlackRock U.S. Opportunities Portfolio,
BlackRock Managed Volatility Portfolio (formerly BlackRock Asset Allocation Portfolio), and BlackRock Global Opportunities Portfolio,
each a series of BlackRock Funds, appearing in the Annual Reports on Form N-CSR of BlackRock Funds for the year ended September
30, 2012, and to the references to us under the headings “Financial Highlights” and “Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm” in the Prospectuses, which are part of such Registration Statement.


	 
	/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
	 
	Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
 January 24, 2013
From: spencer.perkins@exac.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:08:39 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Spencer Perkins

Gainesville, FL 32653
# 

# CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

Registration No.  333-97047

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  358                                                               Trade Date:  11/10/03

(To Prospectus Supplement dated August 15, 2002 &

  Prospectus dated August  8, 2002)                                                                     Issue Date:   11/14/03

The Date of this Pricing SupplementNovember 10, 2003

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

  CUSIP                                                                                                                                Date and terms of redemption or

     or        Stated                                                                  Interest                                    repayment (including any

Common  Interest                      Price to  Discounts &        Payment  Survivors                  applicable regular or special

  Code      Rate (1)               Maturity                Public (2)                Commissions      Frequency      Option     Yes/No                record dates)

14911QQX2   3.25%                        11/15/07          100%                    0.8%                Semi-Annually                        YES                NO              

                       

                          

Principal                                                                                1st Payment Day         

Amount                   Proceeds                 Dealer                            Date                  Count

$3,682,000.00                $3,652,544.00         ABN AMROInc.                 05/15/04                 30/360    

Original Issue Discount Note:                                                                   Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes                X   No                                                                                   N/A

The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the effective date of the change.  Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $330.029 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (SM) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (SM) will be made under the Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated August 8,2002.

Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
From: Chelsea Johnson

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Friday, August 05, 2011 1:04:14 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Chelsea Johnson

4247 S. Soboba Street

Gilbert, AZ 85297
Exhibit 99.6





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR







We hereby consent to
the inclusion in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Sandstorm Gold Ltd. (the Company) our report dated February 21, 2017, relating
to the 2016 consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as at December
31, 2016.



We also consent to
the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form F-10 (No. 333-215009) of the Company of our report dated February
21, 2017 referred to above.







| | /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP    
| | ----------------------------------
| | Chartered Professional Accountants
| | Vancouver, Canada                 
| | March 29, 2017
O rder filed November 3, 2016



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

__ _ __ _ ______


### No. 11

- 1 6

- 00 242

- CV

___ _ __ _ _____


### FRANKLIN P. SHACKELFORD , Appellant

V.

STEPHENS COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT AND STEPHENS COUNTY, TEXAS , Appellee s

On Appeal from the 9 0 t h District Court Stephens County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. CV

- 31184

O R D E R

Frank lin P. Shackelford , the appellant in this cause, has filed in this court an
unopposed motion to abate the appeal

. In the motion, Shackelford states tha t the
parties have reached a tentative settlement agreement and that an abatement is sought

“to provide the parties time to negotiate, draft, and enter into a final agreement. ”

Shackelford also states that the motion is not opposed and that one month should be

sufficient time to resolve the matter

.2

The motion is granted, and the appeal is abated. The parties are instructed to
notify this court immediately if they enter into a final settlement agreement and to
file an appropriate motion in this court based upon any such agreement. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P. 42.1. If the parties have not notified this court that a final settlement
agreement has been reached on or before D ecember 2, 2016, we may reinstate the
appeal.

PER CURIAM

November 3, 2016

P anel consists of: Wright, C.J., Willson , J. , and Bailey, J.
Exhibit 32.1   SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER OF CENTAURUS DIAMOND TECHNOLOGIES, INC.  In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of Centaurus Diamond Technologies, Inc. for the year ended March 31, 2013, the undersigned, Alvin Snaper, President of Centaurus Diamond Technologies, Inc., does hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2013 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2013 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Centaurus Diamond Technologies, Inc.   Date: July 15, 2013/s/ Alvin SnaperAlvin SnaperPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer,
principal financial officer and
principal accounting officer)
No. 61517.

#### Newton Line Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 292509-K, etc. (Rochester).

*432Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of monofilament fishing lines the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 60183, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
STATE OF WYOMING 

ATTORNEY GENERAL'S STATEMENT 

FOR FINAL AUTHORIZATION FOR CHANGES 

TO THE FEDERAL HAZARDOUS WASTE PROGRAM 

PROGRAM REVISION 6 

I hereby ce1iify, pursuant to my authority as Attorney General and in accordance with Section 

3006(b) of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as amended by the Hazardous and Solid 

Waste Amendments of 1984 (42 USC 6901 et seq.), and 40 CFR 271, that in my opinion the laws 

of the State of Wyoming provide adequate authority to calTy out the hazardous waste program set 

fmih in the Revision 6 Program Description/Reauthorization Package submitted by the Wyoming 

Department of Environmental Quality on April 28, 2015, and to meet the requirements of 40 C.F.R. 

Part 271, Subpaii A. The specific authorities provided are contained in statutes or regulations 

lawfully adopted at the time this Statement is signed and which are in effect now. The statutory 

authmities for Wyoming are documented in the State's RCRA Statutory Checklist, dated April 28, 

2015, and attached to this statement (See Attachment A). In my opinion, statutes relied on in 

previously approved authorization applications have not been amended, modified, or revised by 

statute or judicial decision in a way that diminishes or interferes with the authority to carry out the 

previously authorized hazardous waste prograi11 to meet the requirements of 40 C.F.R. Part 271 , 

Subpaii A. 

The provisions for which Wyoming is seeking authorization are documented in the attached 

Revision Checklists. Differences between the State's provisions and the Federal provisions are 

noted on the Revision Checklists. The official State regulations may be found in Chapter 1 of the 

Wyoming Depaiiment of Enviromnental Quality Hazardous Waste Rules and Regulations, 

"General Provisions," effective March 18, 2015. This ce1iification supplements my or my 

predecessor's certifications of July 14, 1995, December 9, 1997, and September 14, 2011. 

The State of Wyoming is authmized to adopt federal regulations by reference. Authority for 

incorporation by reference is contained in W.S. § 16-3-103(h). However, the statute specifically 

prohibits prospective incorporation by reference. Under W.S. § 16-3-103(h)(ii), the incorporating 

agency must identify the location and date of the incorporated matter and the rule must not include 

any later amendments or editions of the incorporated matter. 

Seal of Office 

Name (Type or Print) 

W11o /lll1 ~, A l/~rn v &1t~i.- I Titl~ I
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose CARBAJAL-CRUZ, aka Jose Luis Cruz, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-50499.

D.C. No. CR 98-00717-DDP-1.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted June 7, 2001.

Decided June 19, 2001.

Before ALARCON, TROTT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Appellant Jose Luis Carbajal-Cruz was charged with one count of being found in the United States after having been deported, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He had been deported twice, in 1995 and in 1996. Carbajal-Cruz moved to dismiss the indictment on the ground that neither of his deportations was valid. The motion was denied; he then pled guilty and was sentenced to thirty-seven months in prison. Carbajal-Cruz’s guilty plea was conditional, reserving his right to appeal the denial of his motion to dismiss. He contends on appeal that the district court *521should have permitted him to challenge the validity of his deportations.

In order to be convicted under 8 U.S.C. § 1326, an alien must have been validly deported in the past. Appellant seeks to attack collaterally his two prior deportations as having violated his due process rights. Under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(d), an attack on a prior deportation is possible only if “(1) the alien exhausted any administrative remedies that may have been available to seek relief against the order; (2) the deportation proceedings at which the order was issued improperly deprived the alien of the opportunity for judicial review; and (3) the entry of the order was fundamentally unfair.”

The district court found that CarbajalCruz failed to move to reopen either of his deportation proceedings, and that he failed to appeal either deportation. CarbajalCruz therefore cannot satisfy the first requirement of § 1326(d) — that he have exhausted his administrative remedies — for either of his two prior deportations. Carbajal-Cruz is therefore barred by § 1326(d) from attacking those deportations.

AFFIRMED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and jnay not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1494 

Recognizing the 100th anniversary of The Christian Science Monitor 

newspaper. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2008 

Mr. SMITH of Texas (for himself, Mr. CAPUANO, Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia, 

Mr. GOODLATTE, Mr. KILDEE, Mr. DREIER, Mr. HOYER, Mr. SHAYS, 

Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mr. NEAL of Massachusetts, Mr. BERMAN, 

Mr. CALVERT, Mr. LEWIS of California, Mr. INGLIS of South Carolina, 

Mr. SHIMKUS, Mr. HOEKSTRA, Mr. SHADEGG, Mr. CARTER, Mr. 

HINOJOSA, Mr. BRADY of Texas, Mr. CULBERSON, Mr. WOLF, Mr. 

COHEN, Mr. YOUNG of Alaska, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr. COBLE, Mr. 

PETRI, Mr. MCKEON, Mr. DAVIS of Kentucky, Mr. PORTER, Mr. TIM

MURPHY of Pennsylvania, Mr. GOODE, Mr. DOOLITTLE, Mr. DUNCAN, 

Mr. DAVID DAVIS of Tennessee, Mr. WHITFIELD of Kentucky, Mr. FERGUSON, Mr. RADANOVICH, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. WEINER, Mr. CANNON, 

Mr. PICKERING, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, Mr. REHBERG, Mr. CONAWAY, 

Mr. MARCHANT, Mr. POE, Mr. BURGESS, Mr. RODRIGUEZ, Mr. MCCAUL

of Texas, Mr. GONZALEZ, Mr. SERRANO, Mr. REYES, Ms. WATERS, Mr. 

TOWNS, and Mr. PAUL) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 100th anniversary of The Christian Science 

Monitor newspaper. 

Whereas on November 25, 1908, the 1st edition of The 

Christian Science Monitor was printed in Boston’s Back 

Bay; 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1494 IH 

Whereas just over 100 days before The Monitor’s 1st edition, 

its founder, Mary Baker Eddy, then 87 years old, told officers of her church to ‘‘start a daily newspaper at once’’; 

Whereas Mrs. Eddy wanted The Monitor to blaze a path of 

unselfish service through journalism; 

Whereas Mrs. Eddy, who had been the subject of inaccurate 

stories in the press, set as The Monitor’s mission ‘‘to injure no man, but to bless all mankind’’; 

Whereas The Monitor followed the first editor’s request that 

the paper ‘‘cover the daily activities of the entire world’’ 

and ‘‘appeal to good men and women everywhere who are 

interested in the betterment of all human conditions’’; 

Whereas The Monitor’s focus was never local or denominational; 

Whereas The Monitor is distributed to readers in all 50 

States in print and online and has received worldwide respect for its international news coverage; 

Whereas Mrs. Eddy became the first American woman to 

launch a lasting, general interest newspaper; 

Whereas The Monitor has been honored with numerous major 

awards including seven Pulitzer Prizes for excellence in 

journalism; and 

Whereas since 1966 The Monitor has sponsored 3,600 Washington newsmaker breakfasts, whose guests have included 

countless cabinet officers and congressional leaders, four 

presidents, and five vice presidents: Now, therefore, be it 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1494 IH 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes the 100th anniversary of The Christian Science 

3 Monitor. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS