alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF AUGUST 31, 1998, AND CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED AUGUST 31, 
1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL 
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,532,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   300,000
<INVENTORY>                                 15,656,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            19,058,000
<PP&E>                                       7,762,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,660,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              31,854,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,918,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       120,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,085,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                31,854,000
<SALES>                                     11,193,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,193,000
<CGS>                                        6,694,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,694,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,523,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             680,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (704,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (704,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (704,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.1  Silberstein Ungar, PLLC CPAs and Business Advisors Phone (248) 203-0080 Fax (248) 281-0940 30600 Telegraph Road, Suite 2175 Bingham Farms, MI 48025-4586 www.sucpas.com   April 14, 2010  To the Board of Directors of Propell Corporation Greenbrae, California   Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  Silberstein Ungar, PLLC, hereby consents to the use in the Form 10-K, Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, filed by Propell Corporation of our report dated April 14, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Propell Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, as of and for the years ending December 31, 2009 and 2008.  Sincerely,  /s/ Silberstein Ungar, PLLC  Silberstein Ungar, PLLC  Bingham Farms, Michigan
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BJs Wholesale Club, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended November 3, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, Frank D. Forward, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the undersigneds knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                         
|----------------------- |  | ------------------------
|Dated: December 4, 2007 |  | /s/ FRANK D. FORWARD    
|                        |  | Frank D. Forward        
|                        |  | Executive Vice President
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### SOUTHCO, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. S.P.E.P. ACQUISITIONS CORPORATION (also known as Sierra Pacific Engineering and Products) and Mark J. Des Marais, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 01-1085.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

June 6, 2001.

ORDER

The parties having so agreed, it is

ORDERED that the proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R.App. P. 42(b).
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 21

- 00064

- CR

M ICHAEL S AVAGE

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ O n Appeal from the 158th District

Court

of Denton County ( F

- 2004

- 1443

- B )

February 24, 2022

Memorandum Opinion by Justice

Bassel

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s order . It is ordered that the order of the trial court is

affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dabney Bassel

_ Justice Dabney Bassel
No. 67493.

#### Dan Brechner & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 61/3561, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawbence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bicycle horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of G. *Joannou Cycle Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(46 Cust. Ct. 172, C.D. 2253), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Insight Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Elizabeth S.C.S. Murray, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------
|                                                          
|/s/    Elizabeth S.C.S. Murray                            
|                                                          
|Elizabeth S.C.S Murray Chief Financial
Officer May 7, 2004



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Digital Insight and will be retained by Digital Insight and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 63291.

protests 170059-K, etc. (New York).

#### W. R. Keating & Co., Inc., and Antique Market, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion toy

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of candlesticks and candelabras similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 62036, except that the involved merchandise is not plated with silver on nickel silver or copper but is wholly or in chief value of metal which has been gold plated, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Before the Second Division,

March 25, 1963

No. 67527.

#### Mayar Silk Mills, Inc., and W. J. Byrnes & Co. of N.Y., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 153314-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of woven silk fabrics similar in- all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 64266, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 
 Schurman Fine Papers 
 500 Chadbourne Road 

Fairfield, CA 94533 

January 22, 2013 
 American Greetings
Corporation 
 One American Road 

Cleveland, Ohio 44144 
 Attn: Gregory Steinberg,
Treasurer 
 Re: Letter Agreement re: Termination of Loan Agreement with Schurman Fine Papers  

Dear Mr. Steinberg: 
 We
refer to that certain Loan Agreement dated as of April 17, 2009 (the “Loan Agreement”) and that certain Revolving Credit Note dated as of April 17, 2009 (the “Revolving Credit Note”), each between Schurman
Fine Papers d/b/a Papyrus (the “Company”) and American Greetings Corporation (the “Lender”). 

The Company and the Lender each confirm that no principal, interest, fees and other sums are due under the Loan Agreement and/or
Revolving Credit Note as of the date of this letter agreement, with the exception of the Unused Line Fee (as defined in the Loan Agreement) due under Section 2.8 of the Loan Agreement for the portion of the month January 2013 that the Loan
Agreement was in effect, which the Company agrees it will pay within 30 days of the date hereof. The Company and the Lender agree that effective immediately the Loan Agreement is hereby fully terminated and the Revolving Credit Note is cancelled.
Any and all liabilities, obligations and rights of each party under the Loan Agreement and the Revolving Credit Note are fully terminated, released and cancelled in their entirety, except with respect to the payment of the Unused Line Fee described
above and those other rights and obligations that expressly survive termination of the Loan Agreement, including those as set forth in Section 10 of the Loan Agreement. 
 This letter agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and by different parties on separate counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be deemed to be an original. All
such counterparts, taken together, shall constitute but one and the same letter agreement. This letter agreement shall become effective as of the date set forth above upon the execution of a counterpart of this letter agreement by each of the
parties hereto. 
 The validity of this letter agreement, the construction, interpretation and enforcement hereof, and the
rights of the parties hereto with respect to all matters arising hereunder or related hereto shall be determined under, governed by, and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York. 

[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank] 







 
	
	Very truly yours,
	
	/s/ Roxanne Prahser
	By: Roxanne Prahser
	Title: Chief Financial Officer


  

	
	Agreed to by:
	
	American Greeting Corporation
	
	/s/ Gregory M. Steinberg
	Name: Gregory M. Steinberg
	Title: Treasurer

 [Signature Page to Letter Agreement re: Termination of Loan Agreement with Schurman Fine Papers]
EXHIBIT 35.1
 VW Credit, Inc. Servicer Compliance Statement Under Item 1123 of Regulation AB
 
   1.
    
    A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from May 9, 2008 through
December 31, 2008, and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement was
conducted under my supervision.2.
    
    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has, fulfilled all of
its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout
such period, except that, with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criterion in Paragraphs
(d)(2)(i) and (d)(3)(i) of Item 1122:
 a.
    
    On October 21, 2008, an error was discovered in the Monthly Servicers
Certificate filed on October 20, 2008. Line 106, Beginning Net Principal Losses and
Line 108, Cumulative Net Principal Losses were incorrectly reported on the Monthly
Servicers Certificate. On October 22, 2008, a restated version of the monthly
Servicers Certificate was delivered to the Indenture Trustee. On October 28, 2008,
an amendment to the Form 10-D was filed in order to replace the exhibit 99.1.b.
    
    On November 1, 2008 a process control deficiency was identified when a
payment failed to transfer to the collection account within the two day requirement,
however, sufficient funds were being transferred on a daily basis resulting in no
impact to the Noteholders. A monthly reconciliation process is in place to identify
these types of deposits and the above mentioned deficiency was detected during our
monthly reconciliation process.c.
    
    On January 14, 2009, an error was discovered in the Monthly Servicers
Certificates filed on May 20, 2008, June 20, 2008, July 21, 2008, August 20, 2008,
September 22, 2008, October 20, 2008, November 20, 2008 and December 22, 2008. Line
101, the Actual Monthly Prepayment Speed, was incorrectly reported on the Monthly
Servicers Certificate. On January 28, 2009, restated versions of the Monthly
Servicers Certificates were delivered to the Indenture Trustee. On February 2,
2009, amendments to the Form 10-D were filed in order to replace the exhibit 99.1.
 3.
    
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate on behalf of the
Servicer this thirtieth day of March, 2009.
 /s/Andrew StuartAndrew StuartExecutive Vice President & CFO
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

 

         I, John Delaney, Chief Executive Officer ofHamptons Extreme, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), dohereby certify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of theCompany for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the "Report") fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.

 

                        

Hamptons Extreme, Inc.

Dated: March 23, 2009

By: 

/s/ John Delaney

  John Delaney

  Chief Executive Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHARLES E. TILLAGE; JOSEPH M.

LOOMIS, 

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

 v.

COMCAST CORPORATION;

COMCAST CABLE

COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, 

Defendants-Appellants.

No. 18-15288

D.C. No. 3:17-cv-06477-VC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Vince Chhabria, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 12, 2019

San Francisco, California

Before: McKEOWN, W. FLETCHER, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Comcast Corporation (“Comcast”) appeals the district court’s order denying

Comcast’s motion to compel arbitration. We have jurisdiction under 9 U.S.C.

§ 16(a)(1) and we affirm.

FILED

JUN 28 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
For the reasons set forth in our concurrently filed opinion in Blair v.

Rent-A-Center, Inc., No. 17-17221, we hold that California’s McGill rule is not

preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act.

In light of this holding, we hold that the arbitration agreement between

Comcast and plaintiffs Charles Tillage and Joseph Loomis is null and void in its

entirety. Section 13(h) of the parties’ subscriber agreement purports to waive

plaintiffs’ rights to pursue public injunctive relief in any forum and so is

unenforceable under California law. See McGill v. Citibank, 393 P.3d 85, 94 (Cal.

2017). Section 13(h) also provides that “THIS WAIVER OF CLASS ACTIONS

AND COLLECTIVE RELIEF IS AN ESSENTIAL PART OF THIS

ARBITRATION PROVISION AND CANNOT BE SEVERED FROM IT.” This

non-severability clause results in the invalidation of the entire arbitration

agreement.

Comcast argues that the opt-out clause of their subscriber agreement

removes it from McGill’s coverage because the subscriber agreement waives a

person’s right to pursue a public injunction only if he or she agrees to arbitrate. 

That argument fails, as McGill applies to any consensual waiver of public

injunctive relief, irrespective of how the parties choose to waive that relief. 393

P.3d at 93–94 (quoting Cal. Civ. Code § 3513).

2
AFFIRMED.

3
From: sadie308@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:45:13 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Erieka Raber

Houston, TX 77099
From: jmo9297@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:33:39 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Joshua Mosher

Castle Rock, CO 80104
304(m) CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2010-0824

DCN CBM00653 

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
From: RejoicePilot@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:18:02 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Catherine Paul

Escondido, CA 92027
|EXHIBIT 35.1
|------------



|OFFICERS CERTIFICATE
|---------------------

I, Karen Montbach, a Managing Director of Citibank, N.A. (the Company), hereby certify, with respect to the Standard Indenture Terms, dated as of September 8, 2006, which are incorporated by reference into the Indenture entered into by each ING USA Global Funding Trust and the Company, as paying agent, calculation agent, indenture trustee and registrar (the Agreement), the following:

1. A review of the Companys activities as paying agent, calculation agent, indenture trustee and registrar as of and for the period ending December 31, 2008 and its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, as of and for the period ending December 31, 2008, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.

This statement is given by the undersigned as an authorized officer of the Company and not in the undersigneds individual capacity.



|Date: February 27, 2009
|-----------------------



| | Citibank, N.A.
By:/s/ Karen MontbachName: Karen MontbachTitle: Managing Director
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---