alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended October 26, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-26-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-26-1997
<CASH>                                           2,339
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,558
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,033
<INVENTORY>                                     42,771
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                91,985
<PP&E>                                          79,020
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,952
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 181,468
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,535
<BONDS>                                        130,304
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,094
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,679
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   181,468
<SALES>                                         70,658
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                70,658
<CGS>                                           55,983
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   55,983
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    71
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,936
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,790
<INCOME-TAX>                                       751
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,039
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,039
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        



</TABLE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES ex rel. DANIEL

THOMPSON,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 14-55879

D.C. No. 2:12-cv-02214-JAK-JCG

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

John A. Kronstadt, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted May 3, 2016 

Pasadena, California

Before: KOZINSKI, W. FLETCHER, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

We affirm the district court’s dismissal with prejudice. “Under the False

Claim[s] Act’s scienter requirement, innocent mistakes, mere negligent

misrepresentations and differences in interpretations will not suffice to create

FILED

MAY 12 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
liability. Instead, Relators must allege that [the defendant] knew that its statements

were false, or that it was deliberately indifferent to or acted with reckless disregard

of the truth of the statements.” United States ex rel. Lee v. Corinthian Colls., 655

F.3d 984, 996 (9th Cir. 2011) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). 

“Because they involve allegations of fraud, qui tam actions under the [False Claims

Act] must meet not only the requirements of Rule 8, but also the particularity

requirements of Rule 9.” Id. at 992. Assuming arguendo that Honeywell is not

permitted to charge the United States a license fee for the software at issue, the

operative complaint does not specifically allege facts leading to the plausible

inference that Honeywell knew that it was not entitled to charge the fee or that it

was deliberately indifferent to or acted with reckless disregard of the truth. The

complaint therefore does not state a claim under the False Claims Act. The district

court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the case with prejudice because

Thompson failed to cure this pleading defect after the court gave him multiple

opportunities to do so.

AFFIRMED.
63

49

88

28

25

20

9

49

65

54

55

58

18

18

59

60

62

52

Canyon

City

Hamilton

Long

Creek

Fox

Mount

Vernon

Prairie

City

John

Day

Canyon

City

Beech Creek

Logdell

x

Little Canyon

Mountain

 MALHEUR

NATIONAL

FOREST

 MALHEUR NATIONAL FOREST

395

395

395

26

26

402

Fork

Middle

John

Day

3 0 3 6 Kilometers

3 0 3 6 Miles

W

N

E

S

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

PRINEVILLE DISTRICT

John Day Basin

Resource Management Plan

Draft Environmental Impact Statement

2008 No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these 

data for individual or aggregate use with other data. Original data were compiled from various sources. This 

information may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was developed through digital means 

and may be updated without notification.

Transportation 

 Open Existing Road

 Closed Road Year-round

 U.S. Highway

 State Highway

 County Road

 Forest Service Primary Route

 Forest Service Secondary Route

 Private Road- Closed to public use or unknown

 Off Highway Vehicle Designation

 Closed- Motorized Use Off Roads

 Probhibited

 Open- Motorized Vehicle Use

 Permitted Off Road

 

LEGEND

Administered Land

 Bureau of Land Management

 Forest Service

 State

 Private or Other

* Note: Access to some areas listed as open may require

 landowner permission to cross private lands

52

402

52

26

402 OREGON

Prineville 

District

John Day Basin

Planning Area

Map Area

M07-09-01:9-5-08

T

16

S

T

9

S

T

10

S

T

11

S

T

12

S

T

13

S

T

14

S

T

15

S

T

16

S

T

9

S

T

10

S

T

11

S

T

12

S

T

13

S

T

14

S

T

15

S

R 28 E R 29 E R 30 E R 31 E R 32 E R 33 E R 34 E

R 28 E R 29 E R 30 E R 31 E R 32 E R 33 E R 34 E

52

x Little Canyon

Mountain

Canyon

City

NorthPit

South Pit

Map 12E: Existing Travel Management and Off Highway Vehicle

Designations - Upper John Day
Silberstein Ungar, PLLC CPAs and Business Advisors





Phone (248) 203-0080


Fax (248) 281-0940


30600 Telegraph Road, Suite 2175


Bingham Farms, MI 48025-4586


www.sucpas.com




September 28, 2011





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





Board of Directors


DRC Ventures, Inc.


South Hempstead, NY





To Whom It May Concern:





Silberstein Ungar, PLLC hereby consents to the use in the Form 10-K, Annual Report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, filed by DRC Ventures, Inc. of our report dated September 27, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements of DRC Ventures, Inc., a Nevada Corporation, as of and for the years ending June 30, 2011 and 2010 and for the period from April 15, 2008 (inception) to June 30, 2011.





Sincerely,





/s/ Silberstein Ungar, PLLC





Silberstein Ungar, PLLC
AFFIRM; and Opinion Filed September 11, 2014.

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00912-CR

DARIN RAMONE THOMAS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F12-58074-H

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices O’Neill, Lang-Miers, and Brown

Opinion by Justice O’Neill

Darin Ramone Thomas waived a jury and pleaded guilty to aggravated robbery with a 

deadly weapon. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 29.03(a)(2) (West 2011). The trial court assessed 

punishment at fourteen years’ imprisonment. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in 

which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the 

requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional 

evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See 

High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–12 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a 
-2-

copy of the brief to appellant. See Kelly v. State, 2014 WL 2865901 (Tex. Crim. App. June 25, 

2014) (identifying duties of appellate courts and counsel in Anders cases).

Appellant filed a pro se response raising several issues After reviewing counsel’s brief, 

appellant’s pro se response, and the record, we agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. 

See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate 

court’s duty in Anders cases). We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the 

appeal.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

/Michael J. O'Neill/

MICHAEL J. O’NEILL

JUSTICE

Do Not Publish

TEX. R. APP. P. 47

130912F.U05
-3-

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT

DARIN RAMONE THOMAS, Appellant 

No. 05-13-00912-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Appeal from the Criminal District Court

No. 1 of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 

F12-58074-H).

Opinion delivered by Justice O’Neill, 

Justices Lang-Miers and Brown 

participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

Judgment entered September 11, 2014.
From: jmm69@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:54:19 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

IF WE DO NOT HAVE 'THE RIGHT TO LIFE' AS A BASELINE THEN OUR COUNTRY IS A JOKE; FOR

THEN EVERYTHING IS RELATIVE. LIFE BEGINS AT CONCEPTION! Check Elizabeth's encounter with the

Blessed Virgin Mary in Luke's Gospel. The baby in Elizabeth's womb jumped for joy at the presence of

the newly conceived Jesus in Mary's womb.

Sincerely,

Jay Michael Mullin

Harwich, MA 02645
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date:  June 4, 2008
    /s/ SALLY FRAME KASAKSSally Frame KasaksChief Executive Officer 2
### Swanson, Brian (OST) From:**Sent~** To: 

### Subject: re Air service to Visalia California Jim and Sue Fouch <jdf@sti.net> Sunday, July 29, 2012 6:35 PM Swanson, Brian (OST) DOT-OST-2004-19916

. Please continue necessary air service this small community.

.Our preferred carrier is Great Lakes Airline_s, the current carrier. This service has proved very valuable to ourfamily! Your help/support is appreciated. Susan Fouch 50584 Deer Run Trail Oakhurst, CA 93644

1 

# ..
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 13, 2015

No. 04-15-00066-CV

CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY,

Appellant

v.

VAQUILLAS UNPROVEN MINERALS, LTD.,

Appellee

From the 406th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CVQ000438-D4

Honorable Oscar J Hale, Jr., Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice 

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

The appellant’s unopposed petition for permission to appeal from an interlocutory order 

is GRANTED. TEX. R. APP. P. 28.3. “A separate notice of appeal need not be filed” as “a notice 

of appeal is deemed to have been filed on [the date of this order].” Id. at 28.3(k). This appeal is 

governed by the rules for accelerated appeals. Id.

The clerk’s record is due no later than February 23, 2015. Id. at 35.1(b). The clerk of 

this court is directed to file a copy of this order with the trial court clerk. Id. at 28.3(k).

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 13th day of February, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (i)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: September 2, 2009
    /s/  GARY H. SCHOENFELDGary H. SchoenfeldChief Executive Officer
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc.
(Principal Executive Officer)Dated: September 2, 2009
    /s/ MICHAEL L. HENRYMichael L. HenryChief Financial Officer
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc.
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 10-Q
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,441
<SECURITIES>                                   165,396
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               179,350
<PP&E>                                          41,273
<DEPRECIATION>                                (11,756)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 221,496
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,615
<BONDS>                                         24,968
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         23
<COMMON>                                           211
<OTHER-SE>                                     170,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   221,496
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,423
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,449
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,221
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 879
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,703)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,703)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,703)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.54)
        

</TABLE>
63

49

88

28

25

20

9

49

65

54

55

58

18

18

59

60

62

52

Canyon

City

Hamilton

Long

Creek

Fox

Mount

Vernon

Prairie

City

John

Day

Canyon

City

Beech Creek

Logdell

x

Little Canyon

Mountain

395

395

395

26

26

402

Fork

Middle

John

Day

River

3 0 3 6 Kilometers

3 0 3 6 Miles

W

N

E

S

Map 13E: Alternative 2, 4, & 5 Travel Management and Off 

Highway Vehicle Designations - Upper John Day 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

PRINEVILLE DISTRICT

John Day Basin

Resource Management Plan

Draft Environmental Impact Statement

2008 No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these 

data for individual or aggregate use with other data. Original data were compiled from various sources. This 

information may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was developed through digital means 

and may be updated without notification.

LEGEND

Road Density Prescription

 Zero Miles per Square Mile

 Two Miles per Square Mile

Administered Land

 Bureau of Land Management

 Forest Service

 State

 Private or Other

* Note: Access to some areas listed as open may require

 landowner permission to cross private lands

Transportation 

 Interim Road

 Open Road Seasonally

 Closed Road

 U.S. Highway

 State Highway

 County Road

 Forest Service Primary Route

 Forest Service Secondary Route

 Private Road- Closed to public use

 or unknown

Off Highway Vehicle Designation

 Closed- Motorized Use Off Roads

 Probhibited

 Limited- Motorized Vehicle Use Limited

 to Designated Roads and Trails,

 Seasonally, or by Type of Vehicle

 Seasonal Motor Vehicle Restrictions

 

 

52

26

402 19

OREGON

Prineville 

District

John Day Basin

Planning Area

Map Area

M07-09-01:9-5-08

T

16

S

T

9

S

T

10

S

T

11

S

T

12

S

T

13

S

T

14

S

T

15

S

T

16

S

T

9

S

T

10

S

T

11

S

T

12

S

T

13

S

T

14

S

T

15

S

R 28 E R 29 E R 30 E R 31 E R 32 E R 33 E R 34 E

R 28 E R 29 E R 30 E R 31 E R 32 E R 33 E R 34 E

OHV-Closed

OHV-Open

OHV-Limited

Parking Area 

OHV-Limited

Class II OHV Only

OHV-Closed

OHV-Closed

North

Pit

South Pit

North

Pit

South Pit

North

Pit

South Pit

52

52

52

x Little Canyon

Mountain

x Little Canyon

Mountain

x Little Canyon

Mountain

Canyon

City

Canyon

City

Canyon

City

Alternative 5

Alternative 4

Alternative 2

 MALHEUR NATIONAL FOREST

 MALHEUR

NATIONAL

FOREST
From: raynkayi@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:00:58 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ray Isbell

, 98383-9101