Thiacloprid Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: 405299

Page 3 of 20

point of departure (POD, NOAEL, LOAEL, e.g.) divided by the required uncertainty or safety 

factors. For acute and non-cancer chronic exposures, HED is concerned when estimated dietary 

risk exceeds 100% of the PAD. HED is generally concerned when estimated cancer risk exceeds 

one in one million. References that discuss the acute and chronic risk assessments in more detail 

are available on the EPA/pesticides web site: “Available Information on Assessing Exposure 

from Pesticides, A User’s Guide,” 21-JUN-2000, web link: http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPAPEST/2000/July/Day-12/6061.pdf; or see SOP 99.6 (20-AUG-1999).

The most recent dietary risk assessment for thiacloprid was conducted by D. Soderberg (23-June2003, DP289292). As indicated previously, this assessment was partially refined using average 

residue field trial data and percent crop treated data. Recent changes in the toxicological 

endpoints and FQPA safety factor have made these refinements no longer required in the acute 

and non-cancer chronic assessments, but the refinements are still being utilized for the cancer 

analysis. 

II. Residue Information

Thiacloprid is a neonicotinoid insecticide that is currently approved for use on cotton and pome 

fruit (Group 11). The residue chemistry data supporting these crop uses were summarized by 

HED in a June 11, 2003 memo (DP# 279818, D. Soderberg). Tolerances are currently 

established [40 CFR §180.594] for the combined residues of the insecticide thiacloprid ([3-[(6-

chloro-3-pyridinyl)methyl]-2-thiazolidinylidene] cyanamide) and metabolites retaining the 

thiazolidine ring intact, measured and expressed in terms of thiacloprid, per se, in/on pome fruit, 

group 11 at 0.30 ppm; wet apple pomace at 0.60 ppm, cotton, undelinted seed at 0.02 ppm; 

cotton gin byproducts at 11.0 ppm; and animal commodities at 0.02-0.15 ppm. For the new uses 

on stone fruits and peppers, the HED-recommended tolerances are summarized in Table 1. 

Table 1. Tolerance Summary for Thiacloprid Proposed New Uses

Commodity Recommended 

Tolerance

(ppm)

Comments; Correct Commodity 

Definition

Pepper (bell and non-bell) 1.0 Pepper, recommended tolerance is 

harmonized with the Codex MRL.

Stone Fruit, except plum 0.5 Fruit, stone, group 12-12, except 

plum, recommended tolerance is 

harmonized with the Codex MRL.

Plum 0.05 Plum

The USDA Pesticide Data Program (PDP) monitored pesticide residues in catfish in 2008, 2009, 

and 2010. Over this 3-year period, PDP analyzed 1479 samples of catfish for thiacloprid

residues. None of the samples contained detectable residues. As a result, residues in fish were 

not included in the assessment.

Processing Factors
Thiacloprid Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: 405299

Page 4 of 20

For the existing uses on pome fruits, processing studies were previously reviewed and found to 

be adequate (D. Soderberg, DP279818, 11-June-2003). For this analysis, the same empirical 

processing factors were utilized as in the 2003 dietary exposure assessment for processed apple 

and pear commodities. For the new uses on stone fruit and peppers, processing studies on stone 

fruit were submitted and recently reviewed (M. Doherty, D378298, 01-Feb-2011). Empirically 

derived processing factors were calculated based on these studies on dried peaches and plums. 

For all other processed commodities, default processing factors were used. The processing 

factors utilized in this assessment (acute, chronic, and cancer) are summarized in Table 2. 

Table 2. Processing Factors for Thiacloprid 

Commodity Processing Factor Reference

Apple, dried 0.51x D289292

Pear, dried 0.51x D289292

Apple, juice 0.23x D289292

Pear, juice 0.87x D289292

Applesauce 0.68x D289292

Peeled apples 0.82x D289292

Peach, dried 3.6x D378298

Plum, prune 3.1x D378298

Plum, juice 1.4x Default (DEEM 7.81)

Apricot, dried 6.0x Default (DEEM 7.81)

Beef, meat, dried 1.92x Default (DEEM 7.81)

Cherry, juice 1.5x Default (DEEM 7.81)

Acute and Chronic Assessment Inputs

For the acute and chronic assessments, unrefined assessments were completed, with tolerancelevel residues and the assumption of 100% CT being made for all existing and proposed new 

uses. In addition, tolerance-level residues were used for the associated livestock tolerances. 

There are no livestock feedstuffs associated with the request to establish tolerances on peppers 

and stone fruit. Thus, these new uses have no impact on the existing livestock tolerances. 

Empirical or default processing factors were used as described above for processed commodities. 

Cancer Assessment Inputs

With the exception of cottonseed oil, the cancer assessment was partially refined to include 

average residue field trial data for the existing and proposed new uses. These average residues 

are summarized in Table 3. For cottonseed oil, the existing tolerance of 0.020 ppm for 

cottonseed was utilized, as there is no separate tolerance for cottonseed oil. Consistent with 

HED SOP 2000.1, the average residue from the pear field trial of 0.141 ppm was used as a 

conservative estimate of the anticipated residue from other pome fruits, including loquat and 

quince; the average apple field trial residue of 0.066 ppm was translated to crabapple. Similarly, 

the average residue from the peach field trial of 0.167 ppm was translated to other stone fruits, 

specifically apricot and nectarine. Default or empirical processing factors were used as 

described previously for processed commodities. In addition, PCT data was used as appropriate 

for the existing and proposed new uses, as discussed below in Section III. 
Thiacloprid Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: 405299

Page 5 of 20

Table 3. Average Residue Field Trial Data for Thiacloprid Cancer Assessment 

Commodity Average Residue (ppm) Reference

Apple

Crabapplea

0.066 D279818

Pear

Loquatb

Quinceb

0.141 D279818

Cherry 0.162 D279818

Peach

Apricotc

Nectarinec

0.167 D378298

Plum

Prune

0.016 D378298

Bell Pepper 0.053 D378298

Non-Bell Pepper 0.077 D378298

a Translated from apple.

b Translated from pear.

c Translated from peach. 

In the 2003 assessment, the anticipated dietary burden associated with livestock commodities 

was calculated. As there are no livestock commodities associated with the proposed new uses on 

stone fruit and peppers, the anticipated dietary burden remains unchanged. Therefore, the values 

from the 2003 assessment for the chronic anticipated dietary burden in cattle were used in this 

cancer assessment. These values are summarized in Table 4, with the values in cattle being 

translated to the appropriate tissues in goat and sheep. HED previously concluded that there is 

no reasonable expectation of residues in swine and poultry given current uses, per 40 CFR 

180.6(a)3. Therefore, residues are not applied to swine and poultry (i.e. are set to zero) in this 

assessment and no livestock tolerances have been established for swine and poultry 

commodities. For further information, including the details for these anticipated dietary burden 

calculations, please refer to D. Soderberg, D289292, 23-June-2003. 

Table 4. Chronic Anticipated Residues in Cattle for Thiacloprid Cancer Assessment

Tissue Chronic Anticipated Residue (ppm)

Muscle 0.0001

Liver 0.0006*

Kidney 0.0002

Fat 0.0001

Milk 0.0001

*Value also used for meat byproducts

III. Percent Crop Treated Information

The acute and chronic dietary risk assessments assumed 100% CT for all existing and proposed 

new uses. 
Thiacloprid Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: 405299

Page 6 of 20

The following average percent crop treated estimates (A. Grube, D372886, 02-Feb-2010) were 

used in the cancer dietary risk assessment for the following crops that are currently registered for 

thiacloprid: apples: 10%; and pears: 5%. 

The following projected percent crop treated estimates (J. Alsadek, D382568, 09-26-2012) were 

used in the cancer dietary risk assessments for the following crops that are the subject of this 

petition for residues of thiacloprid: peaches: 43%; and peppers: 45%.

IV. Drinking Water Data

The drinking water residues used in the dietary risk assessment were provided by the 

Environmental Fate and Effects Division (EFED) in the following memorandum: “Thiacloprid: 

Update of the Drinking Water Exposure Assessment for Section 3 New Uses on Stone Fruits and 

Peppers” (D376184, G. Orrick, 07/12/2012) and incorporated directly into this dietary 

assessment. Water residues were incorporated in the DEEM-FCID into the food categories 

“water, direct, all sources” and “water, indirect, all sources.” Table 5 summarizes the drinking 

water estimates for thiacloprid in surface water and groundwater, which are based on the highest 

use pattern scenario associated with the existing use on pome fruits. The surface water EDWCs 

were generated using the Pesticide Root Zone Model linked with the Exposure Analysis 

Modeling System (PRZM/EXAMS) and the ground water estimates are from the Screening 

Concentration In GROund Water (SCI-GroW) Model. The models and their descriptions are 

available at the EPA internet site: http://www.epa.gov/oppefed1/models/water/.

The surface water results from the PRZM/EXAMS models were entered in each case for the 

acute, chronic, and cancer assessments. For the acute point estimate, the 1-in-10-year annual 

maximum concentration estimate of 0.018 ppm was entered. For the chronic point estimate, the 

1-in-10-year annual mean concentration estimate of 0.0023 ppm was entered. For the cancer

assessment, the overall 30-year mean concentration estimate of 0.0012 ppm was entered. All of 

these PRZM/EXAMS surface water estimates are protective of the ground water exposure 

estimates from the SCI-GROW model. 

It is noted that the drinking water estimates used in this assessment have been refined to account 

for both percent cropped area and for the impact of drinking water treatment processes. 

Thiacloprid and its amide are the only residues of concern in untreated drinking water. 

Following drinking water treatment, thiacloprid is the only residue of concern expected to be 

potentially present. This is because the submitted drinking water treatment study data indicate 

that 1) coagulation does not remove thiacloprid or thiacloprid-amide from source water, 2) a 

typical oxidant (sodium hypochlorite) removes thiacloprid-amide (but not thiacloprid), and 3) 

HED has determined that the four major treatment products of thiacloprid-amide are not residues 

of concern. HED determined that the treatment products of thiacloprid-amide are not residues of 

concern due to the fact that they do not contain the thiazolidine ring. Because surface water 

sourced drinking water is typically treated, thiacloprid is the only compound of concern for the 

surface water estimates. The ground water estimates listed below include both thiacloprid and 

thiacloprid-amide as they will not always be treated, whereas the surface water estimates include 

only thiacloprid. 
Thiacloprid Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: 405299

Page 7 of 20

Table 5. Total Residue EDWCs in Surface Water and Ground Water for Use in Dietary Risk 

Assessment Based on the Use Pattern of Maximum Exposure, Pome Fruits.

Use (maximum 

rate) Source PCA (%)

1-in-10-year 

Peak Exposure 

(ppb)

1-in-10-year 

Annual Mean 

Exposure (ppb)

30-year Mean 

Exposure 

(ppb)

Pome fruits

(0.50 lbs a.i./A/year)

Surface water (treated) 91 18 2.3 1.2

Ground water (untreated) N/A 0.25 0.25 <0.25

V. DEEM-FCID Program and Consumption Information

Thiacloprid acute and chronic dietary exposure assessments were conducted using the Dietary 

Exposure Evaluation Model software with the Food Commodity Intake Database DEEM-FCID, 

Version 3.16, which incorporates consumption data from USDA’s NHANES/WWEIA. This 

dietary survey was conducted from 2003 to 2008. The data are based on the reported 

consumption of more than 20,000 individuals over two non-consecutive survey days. Foods “as 

consumed” (e.g., apple pie) are linked to EPA-defined food commodities (e.g., apples, peeled 

fruit - cooked; fresh or N/S; baked; or wheat flour - cooked; fresh or N/S, baked) using publicly 

available recipe translation files developed jointly by USDA/ARS and EPA. For chronic 

exposure assessment, consumption data are averaged for the entire U.S. population and within 

population subgroups. However, for acute exposure assessment, consumption data are retained 

as individual consumption events. Based on analysis of the 2003-2008 WWEIA consumption 

data, which took into account dietary patterns and survey respondents, HED concluded that it is 

most appropriate to report risk for the following population subgroups: the general U.S. 

population, all infants (<1 year old), children 1-2, children 3-5, children 6-12, youth 13-19, 

adults 20-49, females 13-49, and adults 50+ years old.

For a chronic dietary exposure assessment, an estimate of the residue level in each food or foodform (e.g., orange or orange juice) on the food commodity residue list is multiplied by the 

average daily consumption estimate for that food/food form to produce a residue intake estimate. 

The resulting residue intake estimate for each food/food form is summed with the residue intake 

estimates for all other food/food forms on the commodity residue list to arrive at the total 

average estimated exposure. Exposure is expressed in mg/kg body weight/day and as a percent 

of the cPAD. This procedure is performed for each population subgroup.

For an acute exposure assessment, individual one-day food consumption data are used on an 

individual-by-individual basis. The reported consumption amounts of each food item can be 

multiplied by a residue point estimate and summed to obtain a total daily pesticide exposure for a

deterministic exposure assessment, or “matched” in multiple random pairings with residue values 

and then summed in a probabilistic assessment. The resulting distribution of exposures is 

expressed as a percentage of the aPAD on both a user (i.e., only those who reported eating 

relevant commodities/food forms) and a per-capita (i.e., those who reported eating the relevant 

commodities as well as those who did not) basis. In accordance with HED policy, per capita 

exposure and risk are reported for analyses performed at all levels of refinement. However, for 

deterministic assessments, any significant differences in user vs. per capita exposure and risk are 

specifically identified and noted in the risk assessment.
Thiacloprid Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: 405299

Page 8 of 20

VI. Toxicological Information

Table 6 summarizes the toxicological endpoints for acute, chronic, and cancer dietary exposure 

assessments. For acute dietary exposure assessments (all populations), the NOAEL of 4.4 

mg/kg/day from the developmental neurotoxicity study in rats was used for risk assessment, 

based on offspring effects of altered performance in passive avoidance testing at a LOAEL of 

25.6 mg/kg/day. The acute neurotoxicity study in rats was selected as a co-critical study, based 

on reductions in motor and locomotor activity at the LOAEL of 11 mg/kg/day (NOAEL = 3.1 

mg/kg/day). For chronic dietary exposure, the NOAEL of 1.2 mg/kg/day from the combined 

chronic/carcinogenicity study in rats was used for risk assessment, based on liver and thyroid 

effects in males, and retinal degeneration in females at the LOAEL of 2.5 mg/kg bw/day. HED 

has concluded that the 10x FQPA Safety Factor (for the protection of infants and children) can 

be reduced to 1x. This decision was based on multiple factors, with the rationale described in 

detail in the forthcoming risk assessment associated with this new use petition (M. Doherty, 

D376178). 

Thiacloprid is classified as, “Likely to be Carcinogenic to Humans,” based on an increased 

incidence of uterine tumors in rats, thyroid follicular cell adenomas in rats (both sexes), and 

ovarian tumors in the mice. A linear low-dose approach for cancer risk was recommended for 

thiacloprid, a Q1* of 4.06 x 10-2 was calculated based on the incidence of combined uterine 

tumors in female rats. 

Table 6. Toxicological Doses and Endpoints for Thiacloprid for Use in Dietary Human Health Risk 

Assessments

Exposure/Scenario Point of 

Departure

Uncertainty/FQP

A Safety Factors

RfD, PAD/ Level of 

Concern for Risk 

Assessment

Study and Toxicological 

Effects

Acute Dietary

All Populations

NOAEL = 

4.4

mg/kg/day 

UFA=10x

UFH = 10x

FQPA SF =1x

aRfD=0.044

mg/kg/day

aPAD=0.044

mg/kg/day

Co-Critical Studies

Developmental Neurotoxicity 

Study-rat

LOAEL=25.6 mg/kg bw based 

on offspring effects of altered 

performance in passive 

avoidance testing.

Acute Neurotoxicity Study – rat

LOAEL = 22 mg/kg bw based 

on a reduction of motor and 

locomotor activity in females 

(NOAEL = 3.1 mg/kg bw).

Chronic

All Populations 

including

Infants/Children

NOAEL = 

1.2 

mg/kg/day

UFA=10x

UFH=10x

FQPA SF =1x

cRfD =0.012

mg/kg/day

cPaD =0.012

Chronic/Carcinogenicity Studyrat

LOAEL = 2.5/3.3 (M/F) mg/kg 

bw based on liver hypertrophy 

and cytoplasmic changes as 

well as induction of enzymes, 

thyroid epithelial hypertrophy 

in males and retinal 

degeneration in females.

Cancer “Likely to be Carcinogenic to Humans” based on thyroid tumors in male rats, uterine tumors 

in rats and ovarian tumors in mice. Quantification is Q1

*

(mg/kg/day)-1= 4.06 x 10-2
Thiacloprid Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: 405299

Page 9 of 20

Point of Departure (POD) = A data point or an estimated point that is derived from observed dose-response data and 

used to mark the beginning of extrapolation to determine risk associated with lower environmentally relevant human 

exposures. NOAEL = no observed adverse effect level. LOAEL = lowest observed adverse effect level. UF = 

uncertainty factor. UFA = extrapolation from animal to human (intraspecies). UFH = potential variation in 

sensitivity among members of the human population (interspecies). UFL = use of a LOAEL to extrapolate a 

NOAEL. UFS = use of a short-term study for long-term risk assessment. UFDB = to account for the absence of key 

data (i.e., lack of a critical study). FQPA SF = FQPA Safety Factor. PAD = population adjusted dose (a = acute, c 

= chronic). RfD -= reference dose. MOE = margin of exposure. LOC = level of concern. N/A = not applicable. 

HEC= human equivalent concentration; HED = human equivalent dose. 

VII. Results/Discussion 

As stated above, for acute and chronic assessments, HED is concerned when dietary risk exceeds 

100% of the PAD. The DEEM-FCID analyses estimate the dietary exposure of the U.S. 

population and various population subgroups. The results reported in Table 7 are for the general 

U.S. Population, all infants (<1 year old), children 1-2, children 3-5, children 6-12, youth 13-19, 

females 13-49, adults 20-49, and adults 50-99 years. Cancer risk is determined for the general 

U.S. population only.

Risk estimates are below HED’s level of concern for the U.S. population and all population 

subgroups for all acute and non-cancer chronic exposure scenarios. 

For the cancer dietary assessment (food and drinking water), the estimated exposure of the 

general U.S. population to thiacloprid is 0.000049 mg/kg/day. Applying the Q* of 4.06

(mg/kg/day)-1to the exposure value results in a cancer risk estimate of 2.0x10-6. It is noted that 

drinking water is the primary driver of this risk estimate. The cancer risk estimate is 9.7x10-7for 

food only. 

Table 7. Summary of Dietary (Food and Drinking Water) Exposure and Risk for Thiacloprid

Population Subgroup

Acute Dietary

(95th Percentile) Chronic Dietary Cancer

Dietary 

Exposure 

(mg/kg/day)

% aPAD*

Dietary 

Exposure

(mg/kg/day)

% cPAD*

Dietary 

Exposure

(mg/kg/day)

Risk

General U.S. Population 0.002745 6.2 0.000612 5.1 0.000049 2.0x10-6

All Infants (<1 year old)* 0.008329 19 0.001936 16

N/A N/A

Children 1-2 years old* 0.007996 18 0.003106 26

Children 3-5 years old 0.005457 12 0.001859 16

Children 6-12 years old 0.003399 7.8 0.000961 8.0

Youth 13-19 years old 0.001901 4.3 0.000444 3.7

Adults 20-49 years old 0.001852 4.2 0.000380 3.2

Adults 50+ years old 0.001768 4.0 0.000414 3.5

Females 13-49 years old 0.001867 4.2 0.000388 3.2

*The subpopulation(s) with the highest risk estimates are bolded. 

VIII. Characterization of Inputs/Outputs

As the exposure estimates to all population subgroups are below HED’s level of concern, it was 

not necessary to make refinements to the acute or non-cancer chronic dietary analysis. If it had 
Thiacloprid Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: 405299

Page 10 of 20

been necessary to refine these analyses, field trial values or monitoring data could have been 

used in place of tolerance-level residues. In addition, estimates of percent crop treated could 

have been used.

In the case of the cancer dietary assessment, a partially refined assessment was conducted, using 

average field trial data and percent crop treated data. This assessment could have been refined 

further using monitoring data for the existing uses, but as the drinking water is the primary risk 

driver, such refinements would likely not significantly lower the risk estimate. Monitoring data 

is not available for thiacloprid in drinking water. The drinking water residues used in this 

assessment have been partially refined to account for percent crop treated area and drinking 

water treatment processes. However, these drinking water estimates are still considered to be 

conservative and upper-bound. It is also noted that the earlier 2003 assessment for the existing 

uses on pome fruit and cotton had a cancer risk estimate for food + drinking water of 2.6 x 10-6. 

Refinements in the toxicological endpoints and drinking water estimates, as well as updated

percent crop treated data, have resulted in a lower cancer risk estimate in this assessment, while 

still adding the new uses on stone fruit and peppers. 

IX. Conclusions

With the exception of the utilization of empirical processing factors for available pome and stone 

fruit commodities, an unrefined tolerance-level residue assessment was conducted for the acute 

and non-cancer chronic dietary analysis. All risk estimates for the U.S. population and 

population subgroups were below HED’s level of concern in the acute and non-cancer dietary 

exposure assessment. The cancer dietary exposure assessment was partially refined, including 

the use of average field trial data, and percent crop treated data. Drinking water was the primary 

risk driver in the cancer assessment. HED is confident that the assessment does not 

underestimate risk to the general U.S. population or any population subgroup.

X. List of Attachments

• Attachment 1 - Acute Residue Input file

• Attachment 2 - Acute Results file

• Attachment 3- Chronic Residue Input file

• Attachment 4 - Chronic Results File

• Attachment 5- Cancer Residue Input file

• Attachment 6 - Cancer Results File

• Attachment 7 - Percent Crop Treated Data from BEAD
Thiacloprid Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: 405299

Page 11 of 20

Attachment 1 – Acute Residue Input File for Thiacloprid

Filename: F:\Thiacloprid\New dietary\THIACLOPRID ACUTE TOL.R08

Chemical: thiacloprid

RfD(Chronic): .012 mg/kg bw/day NOEL(Chronic): 0 mg/kg bw/day

RfD(Acute): .044 mg/kg bw/day NOEL(Acute): 0 mg/kg bw/day Q*= .0406

Date created/last modified: 09-28-2012/17:00:42 Program ver. 3.16, 03-08-d

Comment: THIS R98 FILE WAS GENERATED USING THE CONVERT TO R98 UTILITY VERSION 1.1.2.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 EPA Crop Def Res Adj.Factors Comment

 Code Grp Commodity Name (ppm) #1 #2 

---------- ---- ------------------------------- ---------- ------ ------ -------

0802270000 8B Pepper, bell 1.000000 1.000 1.000 

0802270001 8B Pepper, bell-babyfood 1.000000 1.000 1.000 

0802271000 8B Pepper, bell, dried 1.000000 1.000 1.000 

0802271001 8B Pepper, bell, dried-babyfood 1.000000 1.000 1.000 

0802272000 8BC Pepper, nonbell 1.000000 1.000 1.000 

0802272001 8BC Pepper, nonbell-babyfood 1.000000 1.000 1.000 

0802273000 8BC Pepper, nonbell, dried 1.000000 1.000 1.000 

1100007000 11 Apple, fruit with peel 0.300000 1.000 1.000 

1100008000 11 Apple, peeled fruit 0.300000 0.820 1.000 

1100008001 11 Apple, peeled fruit-babyfood 0.300000 0.820 1.000 

1100009000 11 Apple, dried 0.300000 0.510 1.000 

1100009001 11 Apple, dried-babyfood 0.300000 0.510 1.000 

1100010000 11 Apple, juice 0.300000 0.230 1.000 

1100010001 11 Apple, juice-babyfood 0.300000 0.230 1.000 

1100011000 11 Apple, sauce 0.300000 0.680 1.000 

1100011001 11 Apple, sauce-babyfood 0.300000 0.680 1.000 

1100129000 11 Crabapple 0.300000 1.000 1.000 

1100210000 11 Loquat 0.300000 1.000 1.000 

1100266000 11 Pear 0.300000 1.000 1.000 

1100266001 11 Pear-babyfood 0.300000 1.000 1.000 

1100267000 11 Pear, dried 0.300000 0.510 1.000 

1100268000 11 Pear, juice 0.300000 0.870 1.000 

1100268001 11 Pear, juice-babyfood 0.300000 0.870 1.000 

1100310000 11 Quince 0.300000 1.000 1.000 

1201090000 12A Cherry 0.500000 1.000 1.000 

1201090001 12A Cherry-babyfood 0.500000 1.000 1.000 

1201091000 12A Cherry, juice 0.500000 1.500 1.000 

1201091001 12A Cherry, juice-babyfood 0.500000 1.500 1.000 

1202012000 12B Apricot 0.500000 1.000 1.000 

1202012001 12B Apricot-babyfood 0.500000 1.000 1.000 

1202013000 12B Apricot, dried 0.500000 6.000 1.000 

1202014000 12B Apricot, juice 0.500000 1.000 1.000 

1202014001 12B Apricot, juice-babyfood 0.500000 1.000 1.000 

1202230000 12B Nectarine 0.500000 1.000 1.000 

1202260000 12B Peach 0.500000 1.000 1.000 

1202260001 12B Peach-babyfood 0.500000 1.000 1.000 

1202261000 12B Peach, dried 0.500000 3.600 1.000 

1202261001 12B Peach, dried-babyfood 0.500000 3.600 1.000 

1202262000 12B Peach, juice 0.500000 1.000 1.000 

1202262001 12B Peach, juice-babyfood 0.500000 1.000 1.000 

1203285000 12C Plum 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

1203285001 12C Plum-babyfood 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

1203286000 12C Plum, prune, fresh 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

1203286001 12C Plum, prune, fresh-babyfood 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

1203287000 12C Plum, prune, dried 0.050000 3.100 1.000 

1203287001 12C Plum, prune, dried-babyfood 0.050000 3.100 1.000 

1203288000 12C Plum, prune, juice 0.050000 1.400 1.000 

1203288001 12C Plum, prune, juice-babyfood 0.050000 1.400 1.000 

2003128000 20C Cottonseed, oil 0.020000 1.000 1.000 

2003128001 20C Cottonseed, oil-babyfood 0.020000 1.000 1.000 

3100044000 31 Beef, meat 0.030000 1.000 1.000 

3100044001 31 Beef, meat-babyfood 0.030000 1.000 1.000 

3100045000 31 Beef, meat, dried 0.030000 1.920 1.000 

3100046000 31 Beef, meat byproducts 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

3100046001 31 Beef, meat byproducts-babyfood 0.050000 1.000 1.000 
Thiacloprid Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: 405299

Page 12 of 20

3100047000 31 Beef, fat 0.020000 1.000 1.000 

3100047001 31 Beef, fat-babyfood 0.020000 1.000 1.000 

3100048000 31 Beef, kidney 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

3100049000 31 Beef, liver 0.150000 1.000 1.000 

3100049001 31 Beef, liver-babyfood 0.150000 1.000 1.000 

3200169000 32 Goat, meat 0.030000 1.000 1.000 

3200170000 32 Goat, meat byproducts 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

3200171000 32 Goat, fat 0.020000 1.000 1.000 

3200172000 32 Goat, kidney 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

3200173000 32 Goat, liver 0.150000 1.000 1.000 

3300189000 33 Horse, meat 0.030000 1.000 1.000 

3500339000 35 Sheep, meat 0.030000 1.000 1.000 

3500339001 35 Sheep, meat-babyfood 0.030000 1.000 1.000 

3500340000 35 Sheep, meat byproducts 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

3500341000 35 Sheep, fat 0.020000 1.000 1.000 

3500341001 35 Sheep, fat-babyfood 0.020000 1.000 1.000 

3500342000 35 Sheep, kidney 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

3500343000 35 Sheep, liver 0.150000 1.000 1.000 

3600222000 36 Milk, fat 0.030000 1.000 1.000 

3600222001 36 Milk, fat-baby food/infant formu 0.030000 1.000 1.000 

3600223000 36 Milk, nonfat solids 0.030000 1.000 1.000 

3600223001 36 Milk, nonfat solids-baby food/in 0.030000 1.000 1.000 

3600224000 36 Milk, water 0.030000 1.000 1.000 

3600224001 36 Milk, water-babyfood/infant form 0.030000 1.000 1.000 

3600225001 36 Milk, sugar (lactose)-baby food/ 0.030000 1.000 1.000 

8601000000 86A Water, direct, all sources 0.018000 1.000 1.000 

8602000000 86B Water, indirect, all sources 0.018000 1.000 1.000 
Thiacloprid Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: 405299

Page 13 of 20

Attachment 2- Acute Results File

U.S. EPA Ver. 3.16, 03-08-d

DEEM-FCID ACUTE Analysis for THIACLOPRID NHANES 2003-2008 2-Day

Residue file: THIACLOPRID ACUTE TOL.R08 Adjustment factor #2 NOT used.

Analysis Date: 09-28-2012/17:07:53 Residue file dated: 09-28-2012/17:00:42

RAC/FF intake summed over 24 hours

Run Comment: "THIS R98 FILE WAS GENERATED USING THE CONVERT TO R98 UTILITY VER

SION 1.1.2."

===============================================================================

Summary calculations--per capita:

 95th Percentile 99th Percentile 99.9th Percentile

Exposure % aRfD Exposure % aRfD Exposure % aRfD 

 ---------- -------- ---------- -------- ---------- --------

Total US Population:

 0.002745 6.24 0.005401 12.28 0.010510 23.89 

All Infants:

 0.008329 18.93 0.011574 26.30 0.016968 38.56 

Children 1-2:

 0.007996 18.17 0.012617 28.68 0.017068 38.79 

Children 3-5:

 0.005457 12.40 0.008438 19.18 0.012304 27.96 

Children 6-12:

 0.003399 7.72 0.005506 12.51 0.007247 16.47 

Youth 13-19:

 0.001901 4.32 0.002771 6.30 0.003752 8.53 

Adults 20-49:

 0.001852 4.21 0.002822 6.41 0.004273 9.71 

Adults 50-99:

 0.001768 4.02 0.002703 6.14 0.004499 10.22 

Female 13-49:

 0.001867 4.24 0.002772 6.30 0.004182 9.51 
Thiacloprid Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: 405299

Page 14 of 20

Attachment 3 – Chronic Residue Input File

Filename: F:\Thiacloprid\New dietary\THIACLOPRID CHRONIC TOL.R08

Chemical: thiacloprid

RfD(Chronic): .012 mg/kg bw/day NOEL(Chronic): 0 mg/kg bw/day

RfD(Acute): .044 mg/kg bw/day NOEL(Acute): 0 mg/kg bw/day Q*= .0406

Date created/last modified: 09-28-2012/16:59:08 Program ver. 3.16, 03-08-d

Comment: THIS R98 FILE WAS GENERATED USING THE CONVERT TO R98 UTILITY VERSION 1.1.2.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 EPA Crop Def Res Adj.Factors Comment

 Code Grp Commodity Name (ppm) #1 #2 

---------- ---- ------------------------------- ---------- ------ ------ -------

0802270000 8B Pepper, bell 1.000000 1.000 1.000 

0802270001 8B Pepper, bell-babyfood 1.000000 1.000 1.000 

0802271000 8B Pepper, bell, dried 1.000000 1.000 1.000 

0802271001 8B Pepper, bell, dried-babyfood 1.000000 1.000 1.000 

0802272000 8BC Pepper, nonbell 1.000000 1.000 1.000 

0802272001 8BC Pepper, nonbell-babyfood 1.000000 1.000 1.000 

0802273000 8BC Pepper, nonbell, dried 1.000000 1.000 1.000 

1100007000 11 Apple, fruit with peel 0.300000 1.000 1.000 

1100008000 11 Apple, peeled fruit 0.300000 0.820 1.000 

1100008001 11 Apple, peeled fruit-babyfood 0.300000 0.820 1.000 

1100009000 11 Apple, dried 0.300000 0.510 1.000 

1100009001 11 Apple, dried-babyfood 0.300000 0.510 1.000 

1100010000 11 Apple, juice 0.300000 0.230 1.000 

1100010001 11 Apple, juice-babyfood 0.300000 0.230 1.000 

1100011000 11 Apple, sauce 0.300000 0.680 1.000 

1100011001 11 Apple, sauce-babyfood 0.300000 0.680 1.000 

1100129000 11 Crabapple 0.300000 1.000 1.000 

1100210000 11 Loquat 0.300000 1.000 1.000 

1100266000 11 Pear 0.300000 1.000 1.000 

1100266001 11 Pear-babyfood 0.300000 1.000 1.000 

1100267000 11 Pear, dried 0.300000 0.510 1.000 

1100268000 11 Pear, juice 0.300000 0.870 1.000 

1100268001 11 Pear, juice-babyfood 0.300000 0.870 1.000 

1100310000 11 Quince 0.300000 1.000 1.000 

1201090000 12A Cherry 0.500000 1.000 1.000 

1201090001 12A Cherry-babyfood 0.500000 1.000 1.000 

1201091000 12A Cherry, juice 0.500000 1.500 1.000 

1201091001 12A Cherry, juice-babyfood 0.500000 1.500 1.000 

1202012000 12B Apricot 0.500000 1.000 1.000 

1202012001 12B Apricot-babyfood 0.500000 1.000 1.000 

1202013000 12B Apricot, dried 0.500000 6.000 1.000 

1202014000 12B Apricot, juice 0.500000 1.000 1.000 

1202014001 12B Apricot, juice-babyfood 0.500000 1.000 1.000 

1202230000 12B Nectarine 0.500000 1.000 1.000 

1202260000 12B Peach 0.500000 1.000 1.000 

1202260001 12B Peach-babyfood 0.500000 1.000 1.000 

1202261000 12B Peach, dried 0.500000 3.600 1.000 

1202261001 12B Peach, dried-babyfood 0.500000 3.600 1.000 

1202262000 12B Peach, juice 0.500000 1.000 1.000 

1202262001 12B Peach, juice-babyfood 0.500000 1.000 1.000 

1203285000 12C Plum 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

1203285001 12C Plum-babyfood 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

1203286000 12C Plum, prune, fresh 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

1203286001 12C Plum, prune, fresh-babyfood 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

1203287000 12C Plum, prune, dried 0.050000 3.100 1.000 

1203287001 12C Plum, prune, dried-babyfood 0.050000 3.100 1.000 

1203288000 12C Plum, prune, juice 0.050000 1.400 1.000 

1203288001 12C Plum, prune, juice-babyfood 0.050000 1.400 1.000 

2003128000 20C Cottonseed, oil 0.020000 1.000 1.000 

2003128001 20C Cottonseed, oil-babyfood 0.020000 1.000 1.000 

3100044000 31 Beef, meat 0.030000 1.000 1.000 

3100044001 31 Beef, meat-babyfood 0.030000 1.000 1.000 

3100045000 31 Beef, meat, dried 0.030000 1.920 1.000 

3100046000 31 Beef, meat byproducts 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

3100046001 31 Beef, meat byproducts-babyfood 0.050000 1.000 1.000 
Thiacloprid Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: 405299

Page 15 of 20

3100047000 31 Beef, fat 0.020000 1.000 1.000 

3100047001 31 Beef, fat-babyfood 0.020000 1.000 1.000 

3100048000 31 Beef, kidney 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

3100049000 31 Beef, liver 0.150000 1.000 1.000 

3100049001 31 Beef, liver-babyfood 0.150000 1.000 1.000 

3200169000 32 Goat, meat 0.030000 1.000 1.000 

3200170000 32 Goat, meat byproducts 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

3200171000 32 Goat, fat 0.020000 1.000 1.000 

3200172000 32 Goat, kidney 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

3200173000 32 Goat, liver 0.150000 1.000 1.000 

3300189000 33 Horse, meat 0.030000 1.000 1.000 

3500339000 35 Sheep, meat 0.030000 1.000 1.000 

3500339001 35 Sheep, meat-babyfood 0.030000 1.000 1.000 

3500340000 35 Sheep, meat byproducts 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

3500341000 35 Sheep, fat 0.020000 1.000 1.000 

3500341001 35 Sheep, fat-babyfood 0.020000 1.000 1.000 

3500342000 35 Sheep, kidney 0.050000 1.000 1.000 

3500343000 35 Sheep, liver 0.150000 1.000 1.000 

3600222000 36 Milk, fat 0.030000 1.000 1.000 

3600222001 36 Milk, fat-baby food/infant formu 0.030000 1.000 1.000 

3600223000 36 Milk, nonfat solids 0.030000 1.000 1.000 

3600223001 36 Milk, nonfat solids-baby food/in 0.030000 1.000 1.000 

3600224000 36 Milk, water 0.030000 1.000 1.000 

3600224001 36 Milk, water-babyfood/infant form 0.030000 1.000 1.000 

3600225001 36 Milk, sugar (lactose)-baby food/ 0.030000 1.000 1.000 

8601000000 86A Water, direct, all sources 0.002300 1.000 1.000 

8602000000 86B Water, indirect, all sources 0.002300 1.000 1.000 
Thiacloprid Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: 405299

Page 16 of 20

Attachment 4 – Chronic Results File

U.S. EPA Ver. 3.16, 03-08-d

DEEM-FCID Chronic analysis for THIACLOPRID NHANES 2003-2008 2-day

Residue file name: F:\Thiacloprid\New dietary\THIACLOPRID CHRONIC TOL.R08

 Adjustment factor #2 NOT used.

Analysis Date 09-28-2012/17:09:36 Residue file dated: 09-28-2012/16:59:08

Reference dose (RfD, Chronic) = .012 mg/kg bw/day

COMMENT 1: THIS R98 FILE WAS GENERATED USING THE CONVERT TO R98 UTILITY VERSION 1.1.2.

===============================================================================

 Total exposure by population subgroup

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Total Exposure

 -----------------------------------

 Population mg/kg Percent of 

 Subgroup body wt/day Rfd 

-------------------------------------- ------------- ----------------

Total US Population 0.000612 5.1%

Hispanic 0.000768 6.4%

Non-Hisp-White 0.000596 5.0%

Non-Hisp-Black 0.000502 4.2%

Non-Hisp-Other 0.000685 5.7%

Nursing Infants 0.001131 9.4%

Non-Nursing Infants 0.002296 19.1%

Female 13+ PREG 0.000508 4.2%

Children 1-6 0.002236 18.6%

Children 7-12 0.000872 7.3%

Male 13-19 0.000454 3.8%

Female 13-19/NP 0.000434 3.6%

Male 20+ 0.000387 3.2%

Female 20+/NP 0.000397 3.3%

Seniors 55+ 0.000422 3.5%

All Infants 0.001936 16.1%

Female 13-50 0.000389 3.2%

Children 1-2 0.003106 25.9%

Children 3-5 0.001859 15.5%

Children 6-12 0.000961 8.0%

Youth 13-19 0.000444 3.7%

Adults 20-49 0.000380 3.2%

Adults 50-99 0.000414 3.5%

Female 13-49 0.000388 3.2%

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thiacloprid Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: 405299

Page 17 of 20

Attachment 5- Cancer Residue Input File

Filename: F:\Thiacloprid\New dietary\THIACLOPRID CANCER.R08

Chemical: thiacloprid

RfD(Chronic): .012 mg/kg bw/day NOEL(Chronic): 0 mg/kg bw/day

RfD(Acute): .044 mg/kg bw/day NOEL(Acute): 0 mg/kg bw/day Q*= .0406

Date created/last modified: 10-16-2012/14:24:49 Program ver. 3.16, 03-08-d

Comment: THIS R98 FILE WAS GENERATED USING THE CONVERT TO R98 UTILITY VERSION 1.1.2.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 EPA Crop Def Res Adj.Factors Comment

 Code Grp Commodity Name (ppm) #1 #2 

---------- ---- ------------------------------- ---------- ------ ------ -------

0802270000 8B Pepper, bell 0.053000 1.000 0.450 Non-be

 Full comment: Non-bell pepper FT avg, avg %CT

0802270001 8B Pepper, bell-babyfood 0.053000 1.000 0.450 

0802271000 8B Pepper, bell, dried 0.053000 1.000 0.450 

0802271001 8B Pepper, bell, dried-babyfood 0.053000 1.000 0.450 

0802272000 8BC Pepper, nonbell 0.077000 1.000 0.450 Bell p

 Full comment: Bell pepper FT avg., avg. %CT

0802272001 8BC Pepper, nonbell-babyfood 0.077000 1.000 0.450 

0802273000 8BC Pepper, nonbell, dried 0.077000 1.000 0.450 

1100007000 11 Apple, fruit with peel 0.066000 1.000 0.100 Apple 

 Full comment: Apple FT avg., avg %CT

1100008000 11 Apple, peeled fruit 0.066000 0.820 0.100 

1100008001 11 Apple, peeled fruit-babyfood 0.066000 0.820 0.100 

1100009000 11 Apple, dried 0.066000 0.510 0.100 

1100009001 11 Apple, dried-babyfood 0.066000 0.510 0.100 

1100010000 11 Apple, juice 0.066000 0.230 0.100 

1100010001 11 Apple, juice-babyfood 0.066000 0.230 0.100 

1100011000 11 Apple, sauce 0.066000 0.680 0.100 

1100011001 11 Apple, sauce-babyfood 0.066000 0.680 0.100 

1100129000 11 Crabapple 0.066000 1.000 1.000 Transl

 Full comment: Translated Apple FT average

1100210000 11 Loquat 0.141000 1.000 1.000 Transl

 Full comment: Translated Pear FT average

1100266000 11 Pear 0.141000 1.000 0.050 Pear F

 Full comment: Pear FT average, avg %CT

1100266001 11 Pear-babyfood 0.141000 1.000 0.050 

1100267000 11 Pear, dried 0.141000 0.510 0.050 

1100268000 11 Pear, juice 0.141000 0.870 0.050 

1100268001 11 Pear, juice-babyfood 0.141000 0.870 0.050 

1100310000 11 Quince 0.141000 1.000 1.000 Transl

 Full comment: Translated pear FT average

1201090000 12A Cherry 0.162000 1.000 1.000 Cherry

 Full comment: Cherry FT avg. 

1201090001 12A Cherry-babyfood 0.162000 1.000 1.000 

1201091000 12A Cherry, juice 0.162000 1.500 1.000 

1201091001 12A Cherry, juice-babyfood 0.162000 1.500 1.000 

1202012000 12B Apricot 0.167000 1.000 1.000 Transl

 Full comment: Translated Peach FT avg. 

1202012001 12B Apricot-babyfood 0.167000 1.000 1.000 

1202013000 12B Apricot, dried 0.167000 6.000 1.000 

1202014000 12B Apricot, juice 0.167000 1.000 1.000 

1202014001 12B Apricot, juice-babyfood 0.167000 1.000 1.000 

1202230000 12B Nectarine 0.167000 1.000 1.000 Transl

 Full comment: Translated Peach FT avg. 

1202260000 12B Peach 0.167000 1.000 0.430 Peach 

 Full comment: Peach FT avg., avg. %CT

1202260001 12B Peach-babyfood 0.167000 1.000 0.430 

1202261000 12B Peach, dried 0.167000 3.600 0.430 

1202261001 12B Peach, dried-babyfood 0.167000 3.600 0.430 

1202262000 12B Peach, juice 0.167000 1.000 0.430 

1202262001 12B Peach, juice-babyfood 0.167000 1.000 0.430 

1203285000 12C Plum 0.016000 1.000 1.000 Plum F

 Full comment: Plum FT avg. 

1203285001 12C Plum-babyfood 0.016000 1.000 1.000 

1203286000 12C Plum, prune, fresh 0.016000 1.000 1.000 
Thiacloprid Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: 405299

Page 18 of 20

1203286001 12C Plum, prune, fresh-babyfood 0.016000 1.000 1.000 

1203287000 12C Plum, prune, dried 0.016000 3.100 1.000 

1203287001 12C Plum, prune, dried-babyfood 0.016000 3.100 1.000 

1203288000 12C Plum, prune, juice 0.016000 1.400 1.000 

1203288001 12C Plum, prune, juice-babyfood 0.016000 1.400 1.000 

2003128000 20C Cottonseed, oil 0.020000 1.000 1.000 Tolera

 Full comment: Tolerance level residue for cottonseed

2003128001 20C Cottonseed, oil-babyfood 0.020000 1.000 1.000 

3100044000 31 Beef, meat 0.000100 1.000 1.000 

3100044001 31 Beef, meat-babyfood 0.000100 1.000 1.000 

3100045000 31 Beef, meat, dried 0.000100 1.920 1.000 

3100046000 31 Beef, meat byproducts 0.000600 1.000 1.000 

3100046001 31 Beef, meat byproducts-babyfood 0.000600 1.000 1.000 

3100047000 31 Beef, fat 0.000100 1.000 1.000 

3100047001 31 Beef, fat-babyfood 0.000100 1.000 1.000 

3100048000 31 Beef, kidney 0.000200 1.000 1.000 

3100049000 31 Beef, liver 0.000600 1.000 1.000 

3100049001 31 Beef, liver-babyfood 0.000600 1.000 1.000 

3200169000 32 Goat, meat 0.000100 1.000 1.000 

3200170000 32 Goat, meat byproducts 0.000600 1.000 1.000 

3200171000 32 Goat, fat 0.000100 1.000 1.000 

3200172000 32 Goat, kidney 0.000200 1.000 1.000 

3200173000 32 Goat, liver 0.000600 1.000 1.000 

3300189000 33 Horse, meat 0.000100 1.000 1.000 

3500339000 35 Sheep, meat 0.000100 1.000 1.000 

3500339001 35 Sheep, meat-babyfood 0.000100 1.000 1.000 

3500340000 35 Sheep, meat byproducts 0.000600 1.000 1.000 

3500341000 35 Sheep, fat 0.000100 1.000 1.000 

3500341001 35 Sheep, fat-babyfood 0.000100 1.000 1.000 

3500342000 35 Sheep, kidney 0.000200 1.000 1.000 

3500343000 35 Sheep, liver 0.000600 1.000 1.000 

3600222000 36 Milk, fat 0.000100 1.000 1.000 

3600222001 36 Milk, fat-baby food/infant formu 0.000100 1.000 1.000 

3600223000 36 Milk, nonfat solids 0.000100 1.000 1.000 

3600223001 36 Milk, nonfat solids-baby food/in 0.000100 1.000 1.000 

3600224000 36 Milk, water 0.000100 1.000 1.000 

3600224001 36 Milk, water-babyfood/infant form 0.000100 1.000 1.000 

3600225001 36 Milk, sugar (lactose)-baby food/ 0.000100 1.000 1.000 

8601000000 86A Water, direct, all sources 0.001200 1.000 1.000 

8602000000 86B Water, indirect, all sources 0.001200 1.000 1.000 
Thiacloprid Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: 405299

Page 19 of 20

Attachment 6 – Cancer Results File

A. Food + Drinking Water

U.S. EPA Ver. 3.16, 03-08-d

DEEM-FCID Chronic analysis for THIACLOPRID NHANES 2003-2008 2-day

Residue file name: F:\Thiacloprid\New dietary\THIACLOPRID CANCER.R08

 Adjustment factor #2 used.

Analysis Date 10-16-2012/14:25:22 Residue file dated: 10-16-2012/14:24:49

Q* = 0.0406 

COMMENT 1: THIS R98 FILE WAS GENERATED USING THE CONVERT TO R98 UTILITY VERSION 1.1.2.

===============================================================================

 Total exposure by population subgroup

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Total Exposure

 -----------------------------------

 Population mg/kg Lifetime risk

 Subgroup body wt/day (Q*= .0406)

-------------------------------------- ------------- --------------

Total US Population 0.000049 1.99E-06

B. Food Only

U.S. EPA Ver. 3.16, 03-08-d

DEEM-FCID Chronic analysis for THIACLOPRID NHANES 2003-2008 2-day

Residue file name: F:\Thiacloprid\New dietary\THIACLOPRID CANCER No DW.R08

 Adjustment factor #2 used.

Analysis Date 10-16-2012/14:47:54 Residue file dated: 10-16-2012/14:47:14

Q* = 0.0406 

COMMENT 1: THIS R98 FILE WAS GENERATED USING THE CONVERT TO R98 UTILITY VERSION 1.1.2.

===============================================================================

 Total exposure by population subgroup

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Total Exposure

 -----------------------------------

 Population mg/kg Lifetime risk

 Subgroup body wt/day (Q*= .0406)

-------------------------------------- ------------- --------------

Total US Population 0.000024 9.68E-07
Thiacloprid Dietary Exposure and Risk Assessment DP Number: 405299

Page 20 of 20

Attachment 7 – BEAD PCT and PCTn Data 

A. New Uses on Stone Fruit and Peppers – PCTn Data (From BEAD Memo J. Alsadek, 

D382568, 09-26-2012)

B. Existing Uses (From BEAD SLUA, J. Alsadek, 04-Oct-2012)

October 4, 2012

Screening Level Estimates of Agricultural Uses of Thiacloprid (014019)

Sorted Alphabetically

Reporting Years: 2004-2011

Percent Crop Treated

Crop Lbs. A.I. Avg. Max.

1

Apples 10,000 10 20

2

Pears 1,000 5 10

All numbers are rounded.

SLUA data sources include: 

USDA-NASS (United States Department of Agriculture's National Agricultural Statistics Service) 

Private Pesticide Market Research

These results reflect amalgamated data developed by the Agency and are releasable to the public.