alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FILED AS PART OF THE
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH REPORT
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,263
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,450
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,227
<INVENTORY>                                     34,894
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                77,144
<PP&E>                                          15,810
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,833
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 195,809
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,113
<BONDS>                                        149,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            93
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,001
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   195,809
<SALES>                                         23,813
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,259
<CGS>                                           14,104
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,486
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   373
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,648
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (6,357)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (6,357)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (6,357)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.69)
        


</TABLE>
From: fp@kurios.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:40:53 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Frank Pratt

Manchester, TN 37355
No. 66019.

#### Gellman Brothers *v.*United States,

protest 326172-K (Minneapolis).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise described on the invoice as “40 grs. Art. #4237 *6%"*Pirate Sword, Good quality rubber with silver color blade and black handle and shield,” does not consist of toys and is in chief value of rubber, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Case No. 13,499.

#### STOUGH v. HATCH.

[16 Blatcnf. 233;1 8 Reporter, 7; 20 Alb. Law J. 78.]

Circuit Court, E. D. New York.

May 1, 1879.

Removal or Causes — When Removable.

A cause was noticed for trial by the plaintiff, at a term of the state court, and a note of issue for that term was filed by the plaintiff. Both parties consented that the cause go off for the term, and it was not tried. After the term expired the defendant removed the cause into this court, under the act of March 3, 1875, (38 Stat. 470:) *Held,*that the removal was not in time, not having been made before or at “the term at which said cause coiild be first tried.”

[Cited in Forrest v. Edwin Forrest Home, 1 Fed. 462; Wheeler v. Liverpool, L. & G. Ins. Co., 8 Fed. 198; Johnson v. Johnson, 13 Fed. 193.]

[Cited in Eldred v. Becker, 60 Wis. 45, 18 N. W. 642; First Nat. Bank v. Conway, 67 Wis. 218, 30 N. W. 218.]

[This was a motion by Charles J. Stough against Asa L. Hatch. Heard on motion to remand.]

Theodore Hinsdale, for plaintiff.

Turner, Lee *&*McClure, for defendant.

BENEDICT, District Judge.

This cause was upon the calendar of causes for trial, at the circuit of the supreme court of the state, at the January term, 1879. It was noticed for trial at that term, by the plaintiff, and a note of issue for that term was tiled by the plaintiff. It was not tried at that term, both sides having consented that the cause go off for the term. After the expiration of that term, application was made to the state court to remove the cause to this court, which application was granted. The plaintiff now’ moves this court to remand the cause to the state court, on the ground that the application to remove was made too late. This motion must be granted. The January term, 1879, was “the term at which said cause could be first tried.” within the meaning of the act of March 3, 1875 (18 Stat. 470,) for the cause was at issue, duly noticed for trial, and subject to be tried on its merits at that term. That the parties were not prepared for a trial at that term, and consented that the cause go off the calendar for that term, are facts that do not affect the question here.

Motion granted.
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT





Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934





DATE OF REPORT (Date of earliest event reported): November 13, 2015





CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION


(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)





Delaware (STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION)001-11241 (COMMISSION FILE NUMBER)37-1105865 (IRS EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER)





2120 West End Avenue, Nashville, Tennessee    37203-0001 (ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES)    (ZIP CODE)


Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (615) 341-1000





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:


o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

















---




I tem 8.01 Other Events .


Exhibits are filed herewith in connection with the issuance on November 13, 2015 by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation (the “Company”) of (i) $500,000,000 aggregate principal amount of its Medium-Term Notes, Series H, 1.800% Notes due 2018 (the “2018 Notes”) and (ii) $250,000,000 aggregate principal amount of its Medium-Term Notes, Series H, 2.500% Notes due 2020 (the “2020 Notes” and, together with the 2018 Notes, the “Notes”) pursuant to the Company’s previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-195039) (the “Registration Statement”) and the related Prospectus dated April 4, 2014, Prospectus Supplement dated April 4, 2014 and Pricing Supplements, each dated November 9, 2015, relating to the 2018 Notes and the 2020 Notes, respectively.





Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits .





(d) Exhibits . The following Exhibits are filed as part of this Report and as Exhibits to the Registration Statement:





ExhibitNumberDescription5.1Opinion of Sidley Austin LLP, as to the legality of the Notes.23.1Consent of Sidley Austin LLP (included as part of Exhibit 5.1).








2


---




SIGNATURE





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





Caterpillar Financial Services CorporationBy:/s/ Leslie S. ZmuggName: Leslie S. Zmugg Title:   Secretary





Date: November 13, 2015








3


---




EXHIBIT INDEX








ExhibitNumberDescription5.1Opinion of Sidley Austin LLP, as to the legality of the Notes.23.1Consent of Sidley Austin LLP (included as part of Exhibit 5.1).








4
No. 58208.

protest 224033-K (New York).

#### Atlantic Bead Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

The motion to dismiss was granted.
From: mjectrust@aol.co

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:36:47 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

James Murphy

Naples, FL 34110
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-14-00696-CV

Columbia Valley Healthcare System L.P. d/b/a Valley Regional Medical Center

v.

Maria Zamarripa, as Guardian of the Estates of Rey Francisco Ramirez and Rammy 

Justin Ramirez, Minors

On appeal from the

445th District Court of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2014-DCL-00910-I

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August 31, 2015.
No. 63797.

protest 59/11525 (New York).

#### Rohner Gehrig & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
From: phyllslogan@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:14:14 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Phylllisl Logan

Oak Grove, MO 64075
Exhibit 32.01

Certification of Periodic Financial Report Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of 1stFinancial Services Corporation (the Company) certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
the Company for the year ended December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |  |  |                              
|--------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------
|Dated: March 30, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ MICHAEL G. MAYER         
|                      |  |  |  | Michael G. Mayer             
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                      |  | 
|Dated: March 30, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ MARY K. DOPKO            
|                      |  |  |  | Mary K. Dopko                
|                      |  |  |  | Controller                   
|                      |  |  |  | (Principal Financial Officer)



|* | This certificate is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION





Washington, D.C. 20549


_______________





FORM 8-K


_______________





CURRENT REPORT





Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of


The Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): March 31, 2015


_______________





COMMUNITYONE BANCORP


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





North Carolina000-1382356-1456589


(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)(Commission File Number)(IRS Employer Identification Number)





1017 East Morehead Street, Charlotte North Carolina 28204


(Address of principal executive offices)





Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (336) 626-8300





N/A


(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





[]Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)[]Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)[]Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))[]Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

















---







Item 8.01.    Other Events.


CommunityOne Bancorp (the "Company") announced today that the Company's primary subsidiary,  CommunityOne Bank, N.A., has agreed to acquire the Lenoir, North Carolina branch of CertusBank, N.A. and assume the customer deposits of CertusBank from its Lenoir and Granite Falls branches in western North Carolina.  This purchase, which is expected to close in the second quarter, and is subject to regulatory approval, will expand CommunityOne Bank’s branch network to 12 branches in the Caldwell/Catawba area, and cement its position as the second largest community bank there.





A copy of the press release announcing the transaction is attached and is incorporated herein by reference.





Item 9.01.     Financial Statements and Exhibits.


(d) Exhibits


Exhibit No.     Description


99.1         Press Release, dated March 31, 2015, announcing Purchase of Branch in Lenoir, NC from


CertusBank, N.A., and assumption of deposits in the western North Carolina area.




















---




SIGNATURE


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


March 31, 2015COMMUNITYONE BANCORP(Date)(Registrant)/s/ David L. NielsenDavid L. NielsenChief Financial Officer
From: chaukuui@juno.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:17:20 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Michael Pham

Hillsboro, OR 97123
From: Tradesman76@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:53:15 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Arnold Epstein

Uniondale, NY 11553