alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: ggerber@meyerbuilding.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:05:20 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Gene Gerber

Bluffton, IN 46714
# 

# CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

Registration No.  333-97047

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  338                                                                   Trade Date:  09/15/03

(To Prospectus Supplement dated August 15, 2002 &

  Prospectus dated August  8,2002)                                                                Issue Date:   09/18/03

The Date of this Pricing SupplementSeptember 15, 2003

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

 CUSIP                                                                                                                                   Date and terms of redemption or

     or       Stated                                                                   Interest                                       repayment (includingany

Common  Interest                      Price to  Discounts &        Payment     Survivors                  applicable regular or special

  Code      Rate (1)   Maturity  Public (2) Commissions       Frequency       Option  Yes/No     record dates)

14911QQB0   5.25%        09/15/15           100%              1.7%                   Quarterly                      YES          YES               Callable at 100% beginning 09/15/06

                                                                                                                                                                                                                       and quarterly thereafter.  

                       

                          

Principal                                                                                 1st Payment             Day         

Amount                  Proceeds                  Dealer                           Date                   Count

$3,068,000.00         $3,015,844.00         ABN AMRO Inc.        12/15/03                               30/360    

Original Issue DiscountNote:                                                                          Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes                X   No                                                                                  N/A

The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the effective date of the change.  Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $275.268 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (SM) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (SM) will be made under the Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated August 8,2002.

Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

 

Registration No.  333-59540

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  217				Trade Date: 09/05/02
(To Prospectus Supplement & Prospectus dated

  June 1, 2001)							Issue Date:  09/10/02
The Date of this Pricing Supplement September 6, 2002
SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

  CUSIP									Date and terms of redemption or

     or	Stated				             Interest			repayment (including any

Common	Interest		  Price to	 Discounts &         Payment	Survivors		applicable regular or special

  Code	Rate (1)	Maturity	Public (2)	Commissions       Frequency	  Option	Yes/No	record dates)

14911QKA8    3.00%	09/15/05	     100%	        .675%                Monthly	     YES	    NO	

Principal						1st Payment	Day	

Amount		Proceeds		Dealer		      Date		Count

$2,502,000.00	$2,485,111.50	ABN AMRO Inc.	   10/15/02		30/360	
 

Original Issue Discount Note:					Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes	  X   No						N/A

 

 
- The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the effective date of the change.   Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $701.938 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (SM) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (SM) will be made under a Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated June 1, 2001.
Additionally, the total principal amount of PowerNotes(SM) offered by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation pursuant to its Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated June 1, 2001 has been increased from $500.0mm to $750.0mm.  $250.0mm principal amount of debt securities registered pursuant to Registration Statement No. 333-59540 originally offered by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation pursuant to its Prospectus Supplement dated June 15, 2001 and related Prospectus dated May 25, 2001 are being offered as PowerNotes(SM) by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation pursuant to its Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated June 1, 2001.
- Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
Exhibit
32.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection
with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Sunrise Energy Resources,  Inc. (the Company)
for the period ended September 30, 2005 as  filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the  Report), I, Konstantin Tsirulnikov, President
and Chief Financial Officer  of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1)     The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of  the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2)     The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,  the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 14,
2005

| | By:
 /s/ Konstantin Tsirulnikov
      Konstantin Tsirulnikov
      Chief Financial Officer
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
No. 59205.

protests 171690-K, etc. (Ogdensburg).

#### A. N. Deringer, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Swift & Company et al.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 212, C. D. 1655), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Safe Bulkers, Inc. (the Company) for
the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned officer
of the Company certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for,
the periods presented in the report.

The foregoing
certification is provided solely for purposes of complying with the provisions
of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not intended to be used
or relied upon for any other purpose.

|                         |                                                                      | 
|------------------------ | -------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Date:
 February 29, 2012 | /s/ POLYS
 HAJIOANNOU                                               
|                         |                                                                     
|                         | Polys Hajioannou                                                    
|                         | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 
 (Principal Executive Officer)

---
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





Form 8-K





Current Report





Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report  (Date of earliest event reported): October 23, 2013





Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation


(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)





001-11241


(Commission File Number)





Delaware37-1105865(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)(IRS Employer Identification Number)





2120 West End Avenue


Nashville, Tennessee 37203-0001


(Address of principal executive offices, with zip code)





(615) 341-1000


(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)








Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:








 ̈Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) ̈Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) ̈Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) ̈Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))







---




Item 2.02. Results of Operations and Financial Condition.





On October 23, 2013, Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation issued a press release reporting financial results for the quarter ended September 30, 2013.  A copy of the press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated into this Item 2.02 by reference.





The information in this Current Report on Form 8-K, including Exhibit 99.1, is being furnished in accordance with the provisions of General Instruction B.2 of Form 8-K.








Item 9.01.  Financial Statements and Exhibits.





d)Exhibits:99.1Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation press release dated October 23, 2013








SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.





Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation








Date:  October 23, 2013By:/s/ J. Wesley BlumenshineJ. Wesley BlumenshineSecretary





2


---




EXHIBIT INDEX





Exhibit No.Description99.1Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation press release dated October 23, 2013














3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4720-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2023-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS. 

# ACTION: 

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster for the State of Vermont (FEMA-4720-DR), dated July 14, 2023, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued July 21, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the incident for this disaster has been expanded to include landslides and mudslides.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidential Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidential Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidential Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2023-21013 Filed 9-26-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
#### Regina Castano et al., Appellants, v Lindenhurst Eye Physicians and Surgeons, P. C., et al., Defendants, and Otto *478Campos, Respondent.

[632 NYS2d 167]

—In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (D’Emilio, J.), dated April 7, 1994, which granted the motion of the defendant Dr. Otto Campos pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) to dismiss the complaint as time-barred insofar as it is asserted against him.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated insofar as it is asserted against the defendant Dr. Otto Campos.

In this medical malpractice action the plaintiff Regina Castaño (hereinafter Regina), was a patient of Dr. Otto Campos and underwent eye surgery performed by Dr. Campos on June 12, 1986. At the time of the operation Dr. Campos was practicing under the professional corporation known as Otto Campos, M.D., P. C. Thereafter, on September 30, 1986, Dr. Campos retired from the practice of medicine. Regina was subsequently treated by Dr. Richard Nattis, who had practiced with Dr. Campos until his retirement and then joined Lindenhurst Eye Physicians and Surgeons, P. C. (hereinafter Lindenhurst). Dr. Campos came out of retirement and also joined Lindenhurst as an employee from June 1, 1987, until his resignation on September 30, 1988. His last treatment of Regina occurred on September 26, 1988, although she continued to be treated at Lindenhurst until April 1992.

Dr. Campos was served with a summons and complaint on March 2,1993, and subsequently brought this motion to dismiss the action insofar as it is asserted against him on the theory that the action was time-barred pursuant to CPLR 214-a because the Statute of Limitations had expired on March 26, 1991, two years and six months after he last treated Regina on September 26, 1988. The plaintiffs contended, *inter alia,*that the medical treatment of Regina rendered by Dr. Richard Nattis and others employed by Lindenhurst after the resignation of Dr. Campos was sufficient to toll the Statute of Limitations period through April 1992, pursuant to the continuous treatment doctrine. The Supreme Court granted the motion of Dr. Campos pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) to dismiss the complaint as time-barred insofar as it is asserted against him.

Contrary to the determination of the Supreme Court, there is a question of fact as to whether the medical treatment of Regina rendered by Dr. Nattis and others employed by Lindenhurst after the date on which Dr. Campos last treated her was sufficient to toll the Statute of Limitations on the claim against him pursuant to the continuous treatment doctrine *(see,*
      *479
      *Watkins v Fromm,*108 AD2d 233). Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.
#### Mary Finley, Respondent, v. Ann Finley, Apellant.

— Judgment reversed, with costs and judgment ordered for the defendant, dismissing the complaint. Opinions by

Follett, J., and Kennedy, J.;

dissenting opinion by Hardin, P. J.,
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: JEFFREY GRAY THOMAS,

attorney disciplinary matter,

______________________________

JEFFREY GRAY THOMAS,

Appellant. No. 21

- 55462

D.C. No. 2:20

- ad

- 00779

- PSG

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Philip S. Gutierrez, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 14, 2021 * *

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Jeffrey Gray Thomas, an attorney, appeals pro se from the district court’s

order imposing reciprocal discipline following his involuntary inactive enrollment

by the State Bar of California. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. W e

review for an abuse of discretion, in re Corrinet , 645 F.3d 1141, 1145 (9th Cir.

2011), and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

SEP 21 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 21

- 55462

The district court did not abuse its discretion in disbarring Thomas in the

Central District of California because Thomas did not meet his burden to s how that

he was deprived of due process, that proof of misconduct was insufficient, or that

grave injustice would result from the imposition of reciprocal discipline. See In re

Kramer , 282 F.3d 721, 724

- 25 (9th Cir. 2002) (setting forth the limited

circum stances in which an attorney can avoid a federal court’s imposition of

reciprocal discipline and setting forth attorney’s burden of proof).

Thomas’ request for judicial notice (Docket Entry No. 6) and motion to file

a late brief (Docket Entry No. 7) are g ranted. The C lerk will file the opening brief

submitted on August 7, 2021 (Docket Entry No. 4).

AFFIRMED.
F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

JUL 24 1997

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

CHARLES W. CHESTER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

LEE GREEN, Disciplinary Hearing

Officer, Federal Bureau of Prison, North

Central Region; KATHLEEN HAWKS,

Director, Federal Bureau of Prison,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 97-1064

(D.C. No. 96-WM-1544)

(District of Colorado)

ORDER

Before SEYMOUR, PORFILIO, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court dismissing without prejudice

appellant’s pro se civil rights case for failure to obtain service within 120 days after the

filing of the complaint. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Mr. Chester claims to have established

proof of service because he filed with the district court “certified mail receipts” which the

district court did not recognize. The “receipts” in the record purport to show payment of

postage for certified mail sent to Kathleen Hawks and Lee Green and delivery of certified

mail to Ms. Hawks. There is no authenticating post office stamp on any receipt showing

they actually passed through the mails, nor is there a receipt or acknowlegment showing
- 2 -

actual delivery of the complaint to the purported defendants. Moreover, there is nothing

in the record indicating compliance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i) pertaining to service upon

officers of the United States. Because the action was dismissed without prejudice, Mr.

Chester can file again and obtain proper service. We can find nothing erroneous in the

disposition made by the district court.

Mr. Chester faults the district court for making no effort to “arbitrate the case” or

“get the parties together on the phone to resolve the issue.” Having chosen to file a civil

action in the district court, Mr. Chester assumed the responsibility for complying with the

rules of civil procedure. The first requirement of those rules is to obtain service on the

defendants so the court would have jurisdiction over them. In the absence of such

jurisdiction, the court had no authority over the defendants, even to the extent of

“get[ting] the parties together.”

Mr. Chester has failed to comply with this court’s order to show cause why the

appeal should not be dismissed for failure to pay the assessment of fees made by the

clerk. In view of that failure the appeal is DISMISSED.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

John C. Porfilio

Circuit Judge