May 21

, 2015

Exemption No. 11650 Regulatory Docket No. FAA

– 20 15

– 0672

Mr. Peter A. Monette Trinity Aeroimaging LLC P .O . Box 1175 Aztec, NM 87 410

Dear Mr. Monette :

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

By letter dated March 11, 2015 , you petitio ned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Trinity Aeroimaging LLC ( hereinafter petitioner or operator ) for an exemption . The petitioner requested to operate an unmanned ai rcraft system (UAS) to conduct v ideography of real estate, area service providers, business enterprises, including construction and utilities

. See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA des cribing the proposed operations and the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption

.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the petitioner

.

Airworthiness Certification

The UAS proposed by the petitioner are the DJI Phantom and a DJI Vision 2+

.

I n accordance with the statutory criteria provided in Section 333 of P ublic Law 112

− 95 in reference to 49 U

. S

. C

. § 44704, and in consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with the aircraft and its operation, the Secretary of Transportation has determined that this aircraft meets the conditions of Section 333. Therefore, the FAA2

finds that relief from 14 CFR part 21

, C ertification procedure s for products and parts, Subpart H

— Airworthiness Certificates , and any associated noise certification and testing requirements of part 36, is not necessary.

The Basis for Our Decision

You have requested to use a UAS for aerial data collection 1

. The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grants of Exemption No s

. 11062 to Astraeus Aerial ( see Docket No. FAA−2014−0352), 11109 to Clayco, Inc. ( see Docket No. FAA

− 20 14

− 0507), 11112 to VDOS Global, LLC ( see Docket No. FAA−2014−0382), and 11213 to Aeryon Lab s , Inc. ( see Docket No. FAA−2014−0642), the FAA found that the enhanced safety achieved using an unmanned aircraft (UA) with the specifications described by the peti tioner and carrying no passengers or crew, rather than a manned aircraft of significantly greater proportions, carrying crew in addition to flammable fuel, gives the FAA good cause to find that the UAS operation enabled by this exemption is in the public i nterest.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that

—

 They are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in Grant of Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, and 11213 ;

 The reasons stated by the FAA for granting Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, and 11213 also apply to the situation you present; and

 A grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

In consideration of the foregoing, I find that a grant of exemption is in the public interest. Therefore, pursuant to the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, Trinity Aeroimaging LLC is granted a n exemption from 14 CFR §§ 61.23(a) and ( c ), 61.101(e)(4 ) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a) , 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b), to the extent necessary to allow the petitioner to oper ate a UAS to perform aerial data collection

. This exemption is subject to the conditions and limitations listed below.

Conditions and Limitations

In this grant of exemption, Trinity Aeroimaging LLC is hereafter referred to as the operator.

1 Aerial data collection includes any remote sensing and measuring by an instrument(s) aboard the UA. Examples include imagery (photography, video, infrared, etc.), electronic measurement (precision surveying, RF analysis, etc.), chemical measurement (particulate measurement, etc.), or any other gathering of data by instruments aboard the UA.3

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption.

1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption are limited to the DJI Phantom and DJI Vision 2+ wh en weighing less than 55 pounds including payload. Proposed operations of any other aircraft will require a new petition or a petition to amend this exemption

.

2. Operations for the purpose of closed

- set motion picture and television filming are
not permitted.

3. The UA may not be operated at a speed exceeding 87 knots (100 miles per hour). The exemption holder may use either groundspeed or calibrated airspeed to determine compliance with the 87 knot speed restriction. In no case will the UA be operated at airspeeds greater than the maximum UA operating airspeed recommended by the aircraft manufacturer.

4. The UA must be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet above ground level (AGL). Altitude must be reported in feet AGL.

5. The UA must b e operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC at all times. This requires the PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by any device other than corrective lenses, as specified on the PIC’s FAA

- issued airman medical certificate or U.S. driver’ s license.

6. All operations must utilize a visual observer (VO). The UA must be operated within the visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC and VO at all times. The VO may be used to satisfy the VLOS requirement as long as the PIC always maintains VLOS
cap ability. The VO and PIC must be able to communicate verbally at all times ;

e lectronic messaging or texting is not permitted during flight operations. The PIC must be designated before the flight and cannot transfer his or her designation for the duratio n of the flight. The PIC must ensure that the VO can perform the duties required of the VO.

7. This exemption and all documents needed to operate the UAS and conduct its operations in accordance with the conditions and limitations stated in this grant of

ex emption, are hereinafter referred to as the operating documents. The operating documents must be accessible during UAS operations and made available to the Administrator upon request. If a discrepancy exists between the conditions and limitations in this exemption and the procedures outlined in the operating documents, the conditions and limitations herein take precedence and must be followed. Otherwise, the operator must follow the procedures as outlined in its operating documents. The operator may upd ate or revise its operating documents. It is the operator’s responsibility to track such revisions and present updated and revised4

documents to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request. The operator must also present updated and rev ised documents if it petitions for extension or amendment to this grant of exemption. If the operator determines that any update or revision would affect the basis upon which the FAA granted this exemption, then the operator must petition for an amendment to its grant of exemption. The FA A’s UAS Integration Office (AFS− 80) may be contacted if questions arise regarding updates or revisions to the operating documents.

8. Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the UAS operation or fl ight characteristics, e.g.

, replacement of a flight critical component, must undergo a functional test flight prior to conducting further operations under this exemption. Functional test flights may only be conducted by a PIC with a VO and must remain at least 500 feet from other people. The functional test flight must be conducted in such a manner so as to not pose an undue hazard to persons and property.

9. The operator is responsible for maintaining and inspecting the UAS to ensure that it is in a condit ion for safe operation.

10. Prior to each flight, the PIC must conduct a pre

- flight inspection and determine the UAS is in a condition for safe flight. The pre

- flight inspection must account for all potential discrepancies, e.g.

, inoperable components, items , or equipment. If the inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of the UAS, the aircraft is prohibited from operating until the necessary maintenance has been performed and the UAS is found to be in a condition for safe flight.

11. The operator must follow the UAS manufacturer’s maintenance, overhaul, replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements for the aircraft and aircraft components.

12. Each UAS operated under this exemption must comply with all manufacturer safety bulletins.

13. Under this grant of exemption, a PIC must hold either an airline transport, commercial, private, recreational, or sport pilot certificate. The PIC must also hold a current FAA airman medical certificate or a valid U.S. driver’s license issued by a state, the District of Col u mbia, Puerto Rico, a territory, a possession, or the Federal government. The PIC must also meet the flight revi ew requirements specified in 14 CFR § 61.56 in an aircraft in which the PIC is rated on his or her pilot certificate.

14. The o perator may not permit any PIC to operate unless the PIC demonstrates the ability to safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be operated under this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from persons, vessels, vehicles and structures. PIC qualification flight hours and currency must be logged in a manner consistent with5

14 CFR § 61.51(b). Flights for the purposes of training the operator’s PICs and VOs (traini ng, proficiency, and experience

- building) and determining the PIC’s ability to safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be operated under this exemption are permitted under the terms of this exemption. However, training operations may only be co nducted during dedicated training sessions. During traini ng, proficiency, and experience

- building flights, all persons not essential for flight operations are considered nonparticipants, and the PIC must operate the UA with appropriate distance from nonpa rticipants in accordance with 14 CFR § 91.119.

15. UAS operations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 CFR § 1.1. All operations must be conducted under visual meteorological conditions (VMC). Flights under special visual flight rules (SVFR) are not authorized.

16. The UA may not operate within 5 nautical miles of an airport reference point (ARP) as denoted in the current FAA Airport/Facility Directory (AFD) or for airports not denoted with an ARP, the center of the airport symbo l as denoted on t he current FAA

- published aeronautical chart, unless a letter of agreement with that airport’s management is obtained or otherwise permitted by a COA issued to the exemption holder. The letter of agreement with the airport management must be made available to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request.

17. The UA may not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the PIC.

18. If the UAS loses commun ications or loses its GPS sign al, the UA must return to a
pre

- determined location within the pr ivate or controlled

- access property.

19. The PIC must abort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies.

20. The PIC is prohibited from beginning a flight unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough available power for the UA to conduct the intended operation and to operate after that for at least five minutes or with the reserve power recommended by the manufacturer if greater.

21. Air Traffic Organization (ATO) Certificate of Waiver or Authorization (COA). All operations shall be cond ucted in accordance with an ATO

- issued COA. The exemption holder may apply for a new or amended COA if it intends to conduct operations tha t cannot be conducted under the terms of the attached COA

.

22. All aircraft operated in accordance with this exemption must be identified by serial number, registered in accordance with 14 CFR part 47, and have identification (N− Number) markings in accordance with 14 CFR part 45, Subpart C. Markings must be as large as practicable.6

23. Documents used by the operator to ensure the safe operation and flight of the UAS and any documents required under 14 CFR §§ 91.9 and 91.203 must be available to the PIC at the Ground Control Station of the UAS any time the aircraft is operating. These documents must be made available to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request.

24. The UA must remain clear a nd give way to all manned aviation operations and activities at all times.

25. The UAS may not be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle.

26. All Flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonparticipating persons, vessels, v ehicles, and structures unless:

a. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently protect nonparticipating persons from the UA and/or debris in the event of an accident. The operator must ensure that nonparticipating persons remain under such protectio n. If a situation arises where nonparticipating persons leave such protection and are within 500 feet of the UA, flight operations must cease immediately in a manner ensuring the safety of nonparticipating persons ; and b. The owner/controller of any vessels, vehicles or structures has granted permission for operating closer to those objects and the PIC has made a safety assessment of the risk of operating closer to those objects and determined that it does not present an undue hazard.

The PIC, VO, operator t rainees or essential persons are not considered nonparticipating persons under this exemption.

27. All operations shall be conducted over private or control led

- access property with permission from the property owner/controller or authorized representative. P ermission from property owner/controller or authorized representative will be obtained for each flight to be conducted.

28. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or vertical boundaries of the operational area as defined by the applicable COA must be reported to the FA A's UAS Integration Office (AFS− 80) within 24 hours. Accidents must be reported to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) per instructions contained on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov

. If this exemption permits operations for the purpose of closed

- set motion picture and television filming and production, the following additional conditions and limitations apply.

29. The operator must have a motion picture and television operations manual (MPTOM) as documented in this grant of exemption.7

30. At least 3 days before aerial filming, the operator of the UAS affected by this exemption must submit a written Plan of Activities to the local Flight Standards District Office (FSDO) wi th jurisdiction over the a rea of proposed filming. The 3

- day notification may be waived with the concurrence of the FSDO. The plan of activities must include at least the following:

a. Dates and times for all flights; b. Name and phone number of the operator f or the UAS aerial filming conducted under this grant of exemption;

c. Name and phone number of th e person responsible for the on

- scene operation of the UAS; d. Make, model, and serial or N− Number of UAS to be used;

e. Name and certificate number of UAS PICs involve d in the aerial filming; f. A statement that the operator has obtained permission from property owners and/or local officials to conduct the filming production event; the list of those who gave permission must be made available to the inspector upon request;
g. Signature of exemption holder or representative; and h. A description of the flight activity, including maps or diagrams of any area, city, town, county, and/or state over which filming will be conducted and the altitudes essential to accomplish the operation

.

31. Flight operations may be conducted closer than 500 feet from participating persons consenting to be involved and necessary for the filming production, as specified in the exemption holder’s MPTOM.

Unless otherwise specified in this grant of exemption, the UAS, the UAS PIC, and the UAS operations must comply with all applicable parts of 14 CFR including, but not limited to, parts 45, 47, 61, and 91.

This exemption terminates on May 31, 2017 , unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/ John S. Duncan Director, Flight Standards Service

Enclosures\ ) 

## PETITION FOR EXEMPTION

March 11, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations West Building Ground Floor, Room Wl2-140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

CONTACT INFORMATION: Peter A. Monette Trinity Aeroimaging LLC P .0. Box 1175 Aztec, NM 87 410 505-330-6511 Email pzzoom@gmail.com -
.**~** ..

RE: Request for Exemption, Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act pertaining to Federal Aviation Regulations: 14 CFR 61.56(a)(1) and (2); 91.7(a); 91.119(c); 91.121; 91.151(a)(l) 91.405(a); 91.407(a)(l); 91.409(a)(l) and (2); 91.417(a) & (b)

Dear Sir or Madam,

In accordance with the guidelines for submitting a Petition for Exemption under Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of2012, I, Peter A. Monette, DBA Trinity Aeroimaging LLC, a Native American owned company, hereafter referred as "Petitioner", respectfully submit my exemption request.

The Petitioner requests exemptions in order to legally operate two Unmanned Aircraft Systems, (UAS) a DJI Phantom UAS with GoPro Hero 3 camera, and a DJI Vision 2+, with integral

camera system in the National Airspace System, for the purpose of commerce relating to Videography of real estate, area service providers, business enterprises, including construction and utilities while providing and enhancing the beneficial uses ofUAS operations.

The Petitioner conveys the use of the DJI Phantom is more economical and safer than using manned aircraft for similar purposes. In addition, this growing aspect of aviation is a benefit to

commerce as a whole by allowing individuals and businesses to participate in this unique facet of aviation technology in an affordable manner.

### PETITION FOR EXEMPTION

The Petitioner, Peter A. Monette, submitting this exemption request, is a FAA certificated Airline Transport Pilot, Commercial Pilot, Single and Multi Engine Instrument Airplane. In addition, the petitioner has graduated with honors from an accredited college, obtaining a degree in Aviation Technology. The Petitioner has operated a DJI Phantom for the past 15 months as a hobby, acquiring 40 plus flight hours.

,l The petitioner is submitting the following:

1. Exemption requests by Part and Sub Part of the FAA Regulations. 2. Relief request from Airport Proximity and Limitations.

a. Aerial Maps 3. Public Interest 4. Operations Manual

The petitioner shall reference prior exemptions: 1. January 6, 2015 to Douglas Trudeau, Exemption No. 11138, Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2014-0481. 2. Clayco Inc, Exemption No. 11109



### 1. EXEMPTION REQUEST BY PART AND SUBPART OF THE FAA REGULATIONS.

14 CFR 61.56(a)(l) and (2)(c)(l) and (2)

FLIGHT REVIEW: (a) Consists of 1 hour flight training and 1 hour of ground training. (1) Review of current general operating and flight rules of this chapter. (2) Review of those maneuvers and procedures that are necessary for the pilot to demonstrate the safe exercise of the privileges of the pilot certificate. (c) No person may act as pilot in command of an aircraft unless, since the beginning of the 24th calender month before the month in which that pilot acts as pilot in command, that person has- (1) Accomplished a flight review given in an aircraft for which that pilot is rated by an authorized instructor; and (2) A logbook endorsement from an authorized instructor who gave the review certifying that the person has satisfactorily completed the review.) 

### PETITION FOR EXEMPTION

The petitioner, a certificated Airline Transport Pilot, is aware through previous training, curriculum and aeronautical training the necessity of Federal Aviation Regulations pertinent for safe operations in the National Airspace System. With reference given to Exemption 11138, the petitioner believes he is in compliance with the "two reasons" set forth regarding Pilot in Command of the UAS. First, the petitioner meets the statutory requirement by holding an airman certificate, as prescribed in 49 USC 44 711. Second, as a certificated airman, the petitioner meets the requirements established by the Department of Homeland Security for security screening. 

### It is the position of the petitioner that a flight review, as outlined above, does not pertain to the use of a UAS, and is not applicable in this instance.

14 CFR 91.7(a)

Civil Aircraft Airworthiness: (a) No person may operate a civil aircraft unless it is in an airworthy condition

Based on the exemption No. 11138, the petitioner requests an exemption from 14 CFR 91.7(a). The FAA has determined this make and model does not require an airworthiness certificate. \ The petitioner, pilot in command, will ensure airworthiness through the combined use and ) application of the company Operations Manual, Flight Log/Preflight and Maintenance Form.

14 CFR 91.119(c)

Minimum Safe Altitudes:( c) Over other than congested areas. An altitude of 500 feet above the surface, except over open water or sparsely populated areas. In those

cases, the aircraft may not be operated closer than 500 feet to any person, vessel, vehicle or structure.

Based on the exemption No. 11138 and 11109, the petitioner requests an exemption from 14 CFR 91.119( c). The petitioner request consistent relief as granted in those exemptions. The petitioner will adhere to policy and practices outlined in the Flight Operations Manual.

14 CFR 91.121

Altimeter Settings:

Based on the exemption granted, No. 11138, the petitioner requests an exemption from 14 CFR 91.121. The petitioner, UAS, does not incorporate a barometric altimeter, but instead, GPS derived altitude capabilities. The petitioner will limit flights to a maximum altitude of 250 feet above ground level (AGL ), with any altitude reports to ATC in AGL.) 

### PETITION FOR EXEMPTION

14 CFR 91.151(a)(l)

Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions:( a) No person may begin a flight in an airplane under VFR conditions unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed- ( 1) During the day, to fly after that for at least 30 minutes.

The petitioner, requests relief consistent with exemption No. 11138. The petitioner will be utilizing the same make and model ofUAS.

14 CFR 91.405(a)

Maintenance required: Each owner or operator of an aircraft- (a) Shall have that aircraft inspected as prescribed in Subpart E of this part and shall between required inspections,except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, have discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 43 of this chapter.

The petitioner, pilot in command, shall inspect the aircraft prior to every flight. Reference given to the Flight Log/Preflight and Maintenance Form in the Operations Manual. The petitioner requests an exemption similar to Exemption No. 11138.

14 CFR 91.407(a)(l)

Operation after maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding, or alteration. (a) No person may operate any aircraft that has undergone maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding, or alteration unless- ( 1 )It has been approved for returned to service by a person authorized under 43.7 of this chapter

The petitioner, pilot in command, who has final authority and responsibility for the operation and safety of the UAS flight, shall insure through the use of protocols and procedures listed in the Maintenance Form, Operations Manual, proper maintenance and subsequent approval for
return to service. The petitioner requests an exemption, reference Exemption No. 1113 8.**~\** ) 

### PETITION FOR EXEMPTION

14 CFR 91.409(a)(l) and (2)

Inspections: (a) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, no person may operate an aircraft unless, within the preceding 12 calender months, it has had- (1) An annual inspection in accordance with part 43 of this chapter and has been approved for return to service by a person authorized by 43.7 of this chapter; or (2) An inspection for the issuance of an airworthiness certificate in accordance with part 21 of this chapter. No inspection performed under paragraph (b) of this section may be substituted for any inspection required by this paragraph unless it is performed by a person authorized to perform annual inspections and is entered as an "annual" inspection in the required maintenance records.

The petitioner, in accordance with the Operations Manual will ensure that the UAS is in a condition for safe flight. The petitioner requests exemption from 14 CFR 91.409 (a)(l) and (2). Reference given to Exemption No.lll38.

14 CFR 91.417(a) and (b)

Maintenance Records: (a) Except for work performed in accordance with 91.411 and 91.413, each registered owner or operator shall keep the following records (l)(i) (ii)(iii) (2)(i)(ii)(iii)(iv)(v)( vi) for the periods specified in paragraph (b) of this section: ( 1 )(2)(3)

The petitioner, through the use of diligent record keeping as outlined in the Operations Manual and Maintenance Form will adhere to 14 CFR 91.417(a) and (b) in accordance and relation to the operation of a UAS. The petitioner request an exemption based on variables associated with the operation of a UAS in the NAS, similar to Exemption No. 11138.



### 2. RELIEF REQUEST FROM AIRPORT PROXIMITY AND LIMITATIONS

The Petitioner, a certificated pilot, understands the concerns associated with the operation ofUAS aircraft in the vicinity of airports. The Petitioner believes relief can be granted when facts relating to a particular airports geographic location are considered. The Petitioner, through the use of the Trinity Aerolmaging Operations Manual and criteria established by the Administrator, will operate the UAS with safety and common sense directives. The Petitioner requests relief relating to two airports: Farmington Regional Airport, (FMN) and Aztec Municipal Airport (Nl9). The Petitioner foresees 35 %of commerce within 5 miles ofthese airports.

### PETITION FOR EXEMPTION

Both airports are situated on bluffs, with an airport elevation higher than much of the surrounding rural area and properties. This being the case, the Petitioner is confident that operations conducted in many situations can be below actual airport elevation. It is the intent of the Petitioner to offer services covering larger parcels, while avoiding congested areas altogether.

The Petitioner requests relief from the 5 Nautical Mile limitation concerning the proximity to the 2 airports based on the following restrictions:

1. Altitude of 50 feet AGL of the particular airport runway elevation within 1 to 5 Nautical Miles of the airport. The Pilot in Command, shall combine the actual elevation of the airport (FMN) 5503, (N19) 5877, plus 50 feet to determine the ceiling of operations. If safe UAS operations require a flight level of 15 0 feet, then the operator may operate at an A GL of 5403 feet (FMN) and 5777 (N19) Therefore, the operation can be conducted at those operational areas and those elevations, or less. The elevation at the place of operations shall be measured using GPS equipment. 2. No flight on the extended center lines, or 5 degrees to either side of any active or runway in use, out to 1 Nautical mile from the airport reference point. 3. Communicate with airport. Date, time, location and heading from airport ofUAS operation. 4. Communicate with traffic if necessary, or required, using air band transceiver. 5. Obtain a Certificate of Authorization (COA) 6. Issue NOTAM for activities to be conducted. 7. Keep nonessential persons at safe distances from the operation. 8. Use the on-board programmable altitude restriction system to prevent inadvertent altitude deviation. 9. Post notification of operation signs at appropriate locations.

The Petitioner has provided aerial maps to depict locations and elevations in the area. Given the location of these airports and the rural nature of the area, unless an exemption is granted, much commercial opportunity would be lost. Due to the unique characteristics and topography of the area, the Petitioner is confident UAS operations could coexist in this environment. The Petitioner would ensure that safety and communication would be paramount in this operation.

### PETITION FOR EXEMPTION

3. PUBLIC INTEREST

The public interest is safety. The Petitioner through the use of the exemption process contained in Section 333, requests safe and legal entry into the NAS. The public will benefit wholeheartedly knowing the national airspace is operated in an organized

manner with open dialog. Through this process, illegal operations will be minimized and legal commerce will thrive. The full benefits of this new facet of Aviation is yet to be realized.

Peter A. Monette Trinity Aeroimaging LLC. P.O. Box 1175 Aztec, NM 87410