alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549








FORM 8-K








CURRENT REPORT








Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the


Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): June 21, 2012











THE FIRST BANCORP, INC.


(Exact name of Registrant as specified in charter)





MAINE


(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)





0-26589
01-0404322(Commission file number)
(IRS employer identification no.)








Main Street, Damariscotta, Maine
04853(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)








(207) 563-3195


(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is


intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligations


of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





[_] Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





[_] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





[_] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





[_] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4 (c))











TABLE OF CONTENTS





Item 8.01 Other Events                                                                    Page 1





Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.                               Page 1





Signatures                                                                                         Page 2





Exhibit Index                                                                                     Page 3








Section 8 - Other Events





Item 8.01 Other Events.





On June 21, 2012, the Registrant issued the press release filed herewith as Exhibit 99.1


announcing the declaration of a cash dividend.








Section 9 - Financial Statements and Exhibits





Item 9.01 Financial Statements, Pro Forma Financial Information and Exhibits.





(c) Exhibits.


--------





The following Exhibits are being furnished herewith:





99.1 Registrant's Press Release dated June 21, 2012.











SIGNATURE





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the


Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the


undersigned hereunto duly authorized.











THE FIRST BANCORP, INC.





By: /s/ F. STEPHEN WARD


---------------------


F. Stephen Ward


Executive Vice President &


Chief Financial Officer





Dated: June 21, 2012











Exhibit Index


-------------





Exhibit


Number Description of Exhibit


------ ----------------------





99.1 Registrant's Press Release dated June 21, 2012.
No. 64502.

#### Equitable Trading Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 106419-K, etc. (Baltimore and Boston).

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States v. R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: thestreetsrhere@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:17:50 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

N. Street

Bothell, WA 98012
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Petitioner

 v.

JOHN M. MUSAU,

 Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 510 EAL 2013

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 10th day of June, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Coupon | Interest | Maturity | Callable | Survivor's Option | Price | CUSIP |   |
| 2.200% | Semi-Annual(†††) | 5/15/2021 | No | Yes § | 100.00 | 14912HRS1 |   |
| 3.000% | Semi-Annual(†††) | 5/15/2027 | No | Yes § | 100.00 | 14912HRT9 |   |

|                         |
|-------------------------|
|                         |  |  |
| (†††) | First Payment date 11/15/2015 |   |
|                    |   |
### IN THE COURT OF APP EALS OF TENNESS EE AT KNOXVI LLE CHRIS TY MICH ELL E BERRY v . LEST ER STE PHEN BERRY

Appeal f romthe Chancer y Court for K nox Coun ty No. 148677-2 Dar yl R. F ansler, Chancellor

No. E2004-01832-COA- R3-CV - F ILED MAY 31, 2005

C H A RLES D. S US ANO , J R . , co n cu rr i n g. I c on c ur in the ma jority ’s op ini on . I

write se pa

rate ly to s tr e ss that whic h is mis sin g in this case , i.e. , e vid e nc e , b e it i n th e fo rm of e xpe rt te sti mon y or oth e rw ise , sh ow ing that th e su bje c t c hil d ha s b e e n, or

c a n r e a so na

bly be e xpe c te d to be , a dv e rs e ly a ff e c te d b y his mothe r’ s li fe sty le . I n my opinion, the trial court’s judg ment must be reve rsed be cause of a lack of proof to support its critical fi nd ing of a dv e rs e e ff

e c t.



### _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ CHARLES D. S USANO, J R., JUDGE
Exhibit No.
32.1


Form
10-K


HPC
Acquisitions, Inc.


File
No.  000-53248








Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of HPC Acquisitions, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Craig S. Laughlin, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.









Date:
      December 31, 2009
                  
                  By:
      /s/ Craig S.
  LaughlinCraig
      S. LaughlinChief
      Executive andChief
      Financial Officer










A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
HPC Acquisitions, Inc. and will be retained by HPC Acquisitions, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
From: verashanks@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:53:09 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Vera Shanks

Puyallup, WA 98374
# Diario Oficial C 53/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0928 |
| --- | --- |
| Diario Oficial
  de la Unión Europea | C 53 |
| | |
| Edición en lengua española | Comunicaciones e informaciones | 58° año13 de febrero de 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0928

Diario Oficial

de la Unión Europea

C 53

Edición en lengua española

Comunicaciones e informaciones

58° año13 de febrero de 2015

---

| Número de información | Sumario | Página |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Anuncios |
| | PROCEDIMIENTOS ADMINISTRATIVOS |
| | Parlamento Europeo |
| 2015/C 053/01 | Decisión | 1 |

Número de información

Sumario

Página

V   Anuncios

PROCEDIMIENTOS ADMINISTRATIVOS

Parlamento Europeo

2015/C 053/01

Decisión

1

---

| ES | |
| --- | --- |

ES

---

V Anuncios

PROCEDIMIENTOS ADMINISTRATIVOS

Parlamento Europeo

| 13.2.2015 | ES | Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea | C 53/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2015

ES

Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea

C 53/1

---

DECISIÓN

(2015/C 53/01)

EL SECRETARIO GENERAL DEL PARLAMENTO EUROPEO,

VISTO el Reglamento (CEE, Euratom, CECA) no 259/68 del Consejo (1), modificado por el Reglamento (CE, Euratom) no 723/2004 del Consejo (2) y, en último lugar, por el Reglamento (UE, Euratom) no 1023/2013 del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 22 de octubre de 2013, por el que se modifica el Estatuto de los funcionarios de las Comunidades Europeas y el régimen aplicable a los otros agentes de las Comunidades (3), y, en particular, el artículo 30 de dicho Estatuto,

VISTA la Decisión de la Mesa del Parlamento Europeo de 13 de enero de 2014 sobre el ejercicio de los poderes de la Autoridad facultada para proceder a los nombramientos (AFPN) y de la Autoridad facultada para proceder a las contrataciones (AFPC),

VISTA la fecha de expiración, el 31 de diciembre de 2014, de las siguientes listas de reserva del Parlamento Europeo:

AD/4/08, AD/1/10, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/106/S, PE/107/S, PE/117/S, PE/118/S, PE/124/S, AST/4/11, AST/5/11, PE/96/S, PE/119/S, PE/110/S,

VISTO el dictamen de la Comisión paritaria, emitido en su reunión del 22 de octubre de 2014,

DECIDE:

Artículo 1

El plazo de validez de las listas de reserva:

| | AD/4/08, PE/106/S, PE/117/S, PE/118/S, PE/124/S, AST/4/11, AST/5/11, PE/96/S, PE/110/S |
| --- | --- |

AD/4/08, PE/106/S, PE/117/S, PE/118/S, PE/124/S, AST/4/11, AST/5/11, PE/96/S, PE/110/S

queda prorrogado hasta el 31 de diciembre de 2015.

Artículo 2

El plazo de validez de las listas de reserva:

| | AD/1/10, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/107/S, PE/119/S |
| --- | --- |

AD/1/10, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/107/S, PE/119/S

no se prorroga.

Luxemburgo, 12 de diciembre de 2014.

Klaus WELLE

Secretario General

---

(1)  DO L 56 de 4.3.1968, p. 1.

1

(2)  DO L 124 de 27.4.2004, p. 1.

2

(3)  DO L 287 de 29.10.2013, p. 15.

3

---
Before the Third Division,

February 14, 1967

No. P67/33.

#### Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 257664-K (Portland, Oreg.).

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of decorated porcelain after-dinner cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Company*(47 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 719), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before the First Division,

August 8, 1956

No. 60154.

protests 259806-K, etc. (New York).

#### Acme Imitation Stones, Ltd., and H. W. Robinson & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

*307Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 59105, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked with the letter “A” at 10 percent under the provision in paragraph 1528, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52739), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52836), for imitation semiprecious stones, faceted, and (2) the items marked “B” at 30 percent under the provision in said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 51802, supplemented by T. D. 51898, for imitation semiprecious stones, not faceted.
From: NOJUNK17@MSN.COM

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:47:45 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

MARYANN JACOBY

Perkasie, PA 18944
Exhibit
10.15.1


Pure
Earth, Inc.





Salary
Reduction Form




Company:
                                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                      Pure Earth, Inc.Employee:
                                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                      Brent KopenhaverBi-Weekly
      Current Salary @ 6/1/09:
                                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                      $8,278.9Salary
      Reduction (%):
                                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                      15%Bi-Weekly
      Reduced Salary Amount:
                                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                      $7,037.02/s/ Brent Kopenhaver
                                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                      Not applicableEmployee
                                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                      Manager/s/ Mark AlsentzerPure
      Earth, Inc. Corporate




Note:
            This is a voluntary
      salary reduction for 90 days and all other terms and conditions on my
      employment contract dated 6/1/08 remain in full
  effect.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Sun
Television and Appliances, Inc.'s quarter report on Form 10-Q for the six months
ended August 31, 1996.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000874690
<NAME> SUN TELEVISION AND APPLIANCES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-01-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-03-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                           7,140
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,863<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    149,137
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               192,353
<PP&E>                                         103,626
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 318,256
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          137,906
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           174
<OTHER-SE>                                     146,039
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   318,256
<SALES>                                        304,048
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               304,048
<CGS>                                          227,939
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  227,939
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                84,122
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (2,193)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,761)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,808)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,196)<F2>
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,149)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.41)
<FN>
<F1>Trade accounts receivable net allowance for doubtful accounts of $400,000 and
$325,000.
<F2>Represents the after tax effect of a $2,000,000 one-time restructure charge.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Steven Pettiford, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 83]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Tejada, J.) rendered December 8,1992, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of *Vh*to 3 years, unanimously reversed, on the law, the *262judgment vacated and the indictment dismissed. The matter is remitted to the trial court for the purpose of entering an order in favor of the accused pursuant to CPL 160.50, not less than 30 days after service of this order upon the respondent, with leave during this 30 day period to respondent to move and seek any further stay of the implementation of CPL 160.50 as in the interest of justice is required.

Defendant’s arrest, based on the arresting officer’s observation of defendant’s passing of a ziplock bag to another unapprehended party, was improper. Although such activity is evidence of an illicit drug transaction, the officer did not observe the contents of the bag, did not see any furtive behavior on the part of either the defendant or the other individual and saw no money change hands, other criteria which would have provided probable cause for defendant’s arrest *(People v McRay,*51 NY2d 594, 604-605). At best, activity as observed by the officer gave him a common-law right of inquiry into defendant’s activities *(People v De Bour,*40 NY2d 210, 223). Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Wallach, Ross, Asch and Mazzarelli, JJ.