alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC



### RL.S. Rental Company, Inc,. d/b/a Mizzou Aviation Complainant, 

### v. City ofJoplin, Missouri Respondent. FAADocketNo. 16-13-06

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME
This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based onthe abovereferenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules ofPractice for Federally-Assisted AirportEnforcement Proceedings, 14 CFRPart 16. Pursuant to 14 CFR Part 16, subpart B, the date by whichthe Director's Determinationwill be issued in this matter is hereby extended to September 30, 2015. An extension oftime is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this case.

Randall S. Fiertz Director, Airport Compliance and Management Analysis Date' 'CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFYthat on July 31, 2015, I caused to be placed in the United States mail (first class mail, postage paid) a true copy ofthe Notice ofExtension ofTime addressed to: Counsel for Complainant: Shelley A. Ewalt McBreen & Kopko 500 North Broadway Jericho, NY 11753 Respondent: Mr. PeterEdwards 602 South Main Street Joplin, MO 64801 Copyto: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket, AGC-610 FAA Airport Compliance and Field Operations, AC0-100



# ~Pit.~/

Claudia Rol:ierts ?/ Office ofAirport Compliance

and ManagementAnalysis
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549



FORM 8-K



CURRENT REPORT



Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934



Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): June 18, 2009





THE FIRST BANCORP, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in charter)



MAINE

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)



0-26589 01-0404322

(Commission file number) (IRS employer identification no.)



Main Street, Damariscotta, Maine 04853

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)



(207) 563-3195

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)



Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is

intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligations

of the registrant under any of the following provisions:



[_] Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)



[_] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)



[_] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))



[_] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4 (c))










TABLE OF CONTENTS



Item 8.01 Other Events

        Page 1




Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.

        Page 1




Signatures

        Page 2




Exhibit Index

        Page 3









Section 8 - Other Events



Item 8.01 Other Events.



On June 18, 2009, the Registrant issued the press release filed herewith as Exhibit 99.1

announcing the declaration of a cash dividend.



Section 9 - Financial Statements and Exhibits



Item 9.01 Financial Statements, Pro Forma Financial Information and Exhibits.



(c) Exhibits.

--------



The following Exhibits are being furnished herewith:



99.1 Registrant's Press Release dated June 18, 2009.








SIGNATURE



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the

Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the

undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





THE FIRST BANCORP, INC.



By: /s/ F. STEPHEN WARD

---------------------

F. Stephen Ward

Executive Vice President &

Chief Financial Officer



Dated: June 18, 2009








Exhibit Index

-------------



Exhibit

Number Description of Exhibit

------ ----------------------



99.1 Registrant's Press Release dated June 18, 2009.
From: jhoyt@waltonemc.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:39:52 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Janie Hoyt

Monroe, GA 30655
No. 60507.

#### W. J. Bush & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 169239-K, etc. (New York).

*414Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of camphor oil the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Orbis Products Corp.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 244, C. D. 1527), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: pscannura@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:51:58 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Patricia Scannura

Los Gatos, CA 95032
Exhibit 23.01


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





The Board of Directors


CommunityOne Bancorp and Subsidiaries


Charlotte, North Carolina








We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on Amendment No. 1 of Form S-3 of CommunityOne Bancorp and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) of our reports dated March 6, 2015, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of CommunityOne Bancorp and Subsidiaries and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which reports are included in the Company’s 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.





We also consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Experts” in the Registration Statement.





/s/ Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP





Charlotte, North Carolina


March 30, 2015
From: boyles_mccoy@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:16:08 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Bonnie McCoy

Delaware, OH 43015
From: cammfam@att.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:47:23 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Andy Cammenga

Midland, MI 48640
(R.D. 11477)

#### H. A. Bohm & Company *v.*United States

Entry No. 812608, etc.

(Decided January 30, 1968)

*Kaplan & Kaplan*for the plaintiff.

*Edwin L. Weisl, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Watson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, as to the merchandise covered by the entries the subject of the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the following Cases:

> R66-8438

> R66-7051

> R66-7050

> 1. That on the dates of exportation thereof to the United States, the market value or the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or in the absence of sales freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, was $60.70 plus packing as indicated on each invoice.

> *7682. That the merchandise the subject of the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached schedule is not identified in the Final List published by the Secretary of the Treasury in T.D. 54521, pursuant to the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, effective February 27, 1958.

> 3. That all the merchandise covered by the appeals for reappraisement was entered for consumption subsequent to February 27, 1958.

> 4. Appeal for reappraisement fío. R66-8437 is hereby abandoned by the plaintiff, H. A. Boi-im & Company, a Corporation.

> 5. That these appeals for reappraisement may be deemed submitted for decision on this stipulation.

> 6. This stipulation is being submitted before the Honorable Judge James L. Watson, 10-18-67.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here in question, and that such value was $60.70 plus packing as indicated on each invoice.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
From: jandevro@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:03:55 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

jan devereaux

Idaho Falls, ID 83404
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                            6456
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  1250
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      35417
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           17059
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             17040
<LOANS>                                         126633
<ALLOWANCE>                                       1330
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  194458
<DEPOSITS>                                      158069
<SHORT-TERM>                                      3148
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               1312
<LONG-TERM>                                      10176
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           600
<OTHER-SE>                                       21153
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  194458
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   8327
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 2131
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    83
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 10541
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                4284
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                4698
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             5843
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       98
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   4409
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1918
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        1918
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1644
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .69
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.77
<LOANS-NON>                                         56
<LOANS-PAST>                                       450
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   2170
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  1265
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       49
<RECOVERIES>                                        16
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 1330
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              1330
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            654
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit31.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONS

 

I, Joseph R. Wright,President and Chief Executive Officer of PanAmSatCorporation, certify that:

 

1.     Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of PanAmSatCorporation;

 

2.     Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.     Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
| Date: July 29, 2004 | /s/ Joseph R. Wright                  |   |
|--------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                     | Joseph R. Wright                      |
|                     | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----