alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jeffrey Dorant, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 326]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldman, J.), rendered May 5, 1992, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. By a decision and order of this Court dated September 12,1994, the appeal was held in abeyance and the matter was remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, to hear and report on the branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony on the ground that the defendant was deprived of his right to counsel at the lineups that were conducted in this case *(see, People v Dorant,*207 AD2d 797). The Supreme Court, Kings County (Owens, J.), has conducted a hearing and filed its report with this Court.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered.

This matter was remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for a new hearing on the issue of whether the defendant was deprived of his right to counsel at the lineups that were conducted in this case because the Judge who denied the branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony had retired prior to the appeal and had failed to make findings of fact which would permit appellate review of the issue. Following the hearing, the Supreme Court determined that the defendant’s right to counsel had been violated at the lineups and granted the branch of the defendant’s omnibus which was to suppress testimony about the identification of the defendant at the lineups. Since the admission at the defendant’s trial of such identification testimony cannot be considered harmless error, the defendant is entitled to a new trial *(see, People v Jackson,*74 NY2d 787; *People v Dodt,*61 NY2d 408). Moreover, if the People seek admission at the new trial of in-court identification testimony by the witnesses who viewed the lineups, they will be entitled to a hearing to establish that there is an independent source for such testimony *(see, People v Jackson, supra; People v Crandall,*69 NY2d 459; *People v Dodt, supra).*Sullivan, J. P., O’Brien, Santucci, Goldstein and Florio, JJ., concur.
From: jennieskaggs@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:12:54 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jennifer Skaggs

Oak Grove, MO 64075
**EXHIBIT  32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Adelphia Recovery Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dean A. Ziehl, Trustee of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

 

 
| /s/  Dean A. Ziehl |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
| Dean A. Ziehl                |   |
| Trustee                      |   |
|                         |   |
|                         |   |
| Date:   March 4, 2011   |   |

 

----
From: Greg@AC21DOJ.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:55:40 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Greg Williamson

Raleigh, NC 27609
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsFilm condensation in a horizontal rectangular ductCondensation heat transfer in an annular flow regime with and without interfacial waves was experimentally investigated. The study included measurements of heat transfer rate with condensation of vapor flowing inside a horizontal rectangular duct and experiments on the initiation of interfacial waves in condensation, and adiabatic air-liquid flow. An analytical model for the condensation was developed to predict condensate film thickness and heat transfer coefficients. Some conclusions drawn from the study are that the condensate film thickness was very thin (less than 0.6 mm). The average heat transfer coefficient increased with increasing the inlet vapor velocity. The local heat transfer coefficient decreased with the axial distance of the condensing surface, with the largest change at the leading edge of the test section. The interfacial shear stress, which consisted of the momentum shear stress and the adiabatic shear stress, appeared to have a significant effect on the heat transfer coefficients. In the experiment, the condensate flow along the condensing surface experienced a smooth flow, a two-dimensional wavy flow, and a three-dimensional wavy flow. In the condensation experiment, the local wave length decreased with the axial distance of the condensing surface and the average wave length decreased with increasing inlet vapor velocity, while the wave speed increased with increasing vapor velocity. The heat transfer measurements are reliable. And, the ultrasonic technique was effective for measuring the condensate film thickness when the surface was smooth or had waves of small amplitude.Document ID19920010007Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsLu, Qing*(Michigan Technological Univ. Houghton, MI, United States)*Suryanarayana, N. V.*(Michigan Technological Univ. Houghton, MI, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateFebruary 20, 1992Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:190044NASA-CR-190044Accession Number92N19249Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG3-711Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19920010007.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Form of PTO Waiver Agreement


 




EXHIBIT 10.7




PAID TIME OFF WAIVER AGREEMENT




This Paid Time Off Waiver Agreement (this "Waiver Agreement") is made and entered into as of [_____________] by and between Lightwave Logic, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company") and [_____________] (the "Executive"). 




WHEREAS, the Company has adopted an Employee Handbook dated November 1, 2014 (the "Employee Handbook”);




WHEREAS, the Company has entered into an employee agreement (the "Employee Agreement") dated [_____________], with the Executive, which incorporates certain provisions of the Employee Handbook, including provisions relating to the Executive’s right to accrue paid time off;




WHEREAS, the Executive and the Company desire to enter into this Waiver Agreement to waive any and all of the Executive's right or entitlement to accrue paid time off as described herein. 




NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises set forth above and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:




1.

To the extent permitted by [_____________] law, the Executive hereby irrevocably and unconditionally relinquishes any and all rights and entitlements that the Executive currently possesses or will possess with respect to all amounts related to Executive’s accrued paid time off for the period of [_____________] to [_____________] (the "Waived Amounts").




2.

This Waiver Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of [_____________].




3.

The Executive acknowledges that the Executive has been provided the opportunity to consult legal counsel, and has been advised by the Company to consult such counsel with respect to this Waiver Agreement and the payments waived herein, and by executing below waives any defense that the execution of this Waiver Agreement was neither knowing nor voluntary.




4.

This Waiver Agreement is binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of any successors of the Company. Any such successor of the Company will be deemed substituted for the Company under any terms of this Waiver Agreement for purposes of enforcing the rights of the Company hereunder.




5.

This Waiver Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and when taken together shall constitute one and the same document.




Signature Page Attached








 







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Waiver Agreement as of the [____] day of [_____________]. 










		
	Witness:

	Lightwave Logic, Inc.





	________________

	By: _____________________

Name:[_____________]

Title: [_____________]













		
	Witness:

	






	________________

	_____________________

Name: [_____________]












2
Before the First Division,

August 7, 1959

No. 63288.

protests 59/6865 and 59/6866 (Minneapolis).

#### Harry A. Brown Company by Robins, Davis & Lyons *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

The protests were dismissed.
galt_ex1022.htm


 


EXHIBIT 10.22


 





 




  





1











  






 





 




  





2











  






 





 


 



3
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 185 (Tuesday, September 26, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 66065]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20915]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: September 26, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 19, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 59 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2023-274, CP2023-277.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-20915 Filed 9-25-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-92053, 33-2171,33-17848 (Post-Effective Amendment No. 1), 33-33803, 33-33807, 33-39323, 33-36911, 33-45176,33-45231, 33-45233, 33-56952, 33-58708, 33-72158, 033-55265 (Post-Effective Amendment No. 1),033-60379, 033-63547, 333-11639, 333-15923, 333-29099, 333-70459, 333-74371, 333-34726, 333-44508,333-50992, 333-59504, 333-64988, 333-76764, 333-109983, 333-122441, 333-129785 and 333-134610 of3Com Corporation on Form S-8 of our reports dated August 11, 2006, relating to the financialstatements and financial statement schedule of 3Com Corporation and to management’s report on theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form10-K of 3Com Corporation for the year ended June 2, 2006./s/ Deloitte & Touche LLPBoston, Massachusetts
From: gabckmyr@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:56:03 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Andrea Beckmeyer

Flushing, MI 48433
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (i)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.
 Dated: December 1, 2005
    
    /s/ SETH R. JOHNSONSeth R. JohnsonChief Executive OfficerPacific Sunwear of California, Inc.(Principal Executive Officer)Dated: December 1, 2005
    
    /s/ GERALD M. CHANEYGerald M. ChaneySenior Vice Presidentand Chief Financial OfficerPacific Sunwear of California, Inc.(Principal Financial Officer)
Before the Second Division,

February 10, 1966

No. 69780.

protests 58/17975-10170, 62/10019-12587, and 61/4460-11980 (Chicago).

#### Tor, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of brass pole ends similar in all material respects to those the subject of *J. C. De Jong &*Co., *Inc.*v. *United States*(52 CCPA 26, C.A.D. 852), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
H. Res. 386

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

May 15, 2007.

Whereas recreational boating is one of our Nation’s most 

popular pastimes, with an estimated 78,000,000 recreational boaters in the United States and nearly 

13,000,000 recreational vessels registered; 

Whereas the number of recreational boating fatalities has declined by more than half since 1970, thanks to the increased use of life jackets, cooperative boating safety education, enforcement efforts between the Coast Guard and 

State governments, and safer vessels and equipment 

manufactured in accordance with Coast Guard standards; 

Whereas recreational boating accidents have nevertheless 

claimed the lives of 697 Americans in 2005, more than 

half of whose lives could have been saved with the proper 

use of a personal flotation device; 

Whereas a continued emphasis on accident prevention can reduce recreational boating fatalities still further, and in 

particular deaths by drowning, which remain the leading 

cause of recreational boating fatalities; and 

Whereas boating safety organizations, with the support of the 

Coast Guard and the Coast Guard Auxiliary, have proposed designating the week of May 19 through 25, 2007, 

as National Safe Boating Week: Now, therefore, be it 
2

•HRES 386 EH 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) supports initiatives for recreational boating safety education and accident prevention to minimize the 

number of annual recreational boating fatalities; 

(2) recognizes the Coast Guard, the Coast Guard 

Auxiliary, and other boating safety organizations for 

their efforts each year during May to highlight the importance of safe recreational boating; and 

(3) supports the goals of National Safe Boating 

Week. 

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 13.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Eric Haibing Wu,
Acting Chief Financial Officer of 7 Days Group Holdings Limited (the Company), hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the Companys annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 26, 2010



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|By:    |  | /s/    Eric Haibing Wu 
|Name:  |  | Eric Haibing Wu        
|Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer