alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: kchaffin1957@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:42:30 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kathleen Burnett-Chaffin

Columbus, MS 39705
From: ianandfloy@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:25:05 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ian Mackay

Santa Ana, CA 92705
From: al1112008@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:23:24 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

al perreault

Manchester, NH 03105
No. 1999-IA-00845-SCT
From: Harrisws@charter.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:31:31 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

William Harris

Jackson, MO 63755
IV 

House Calendar No. 262 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1419 

[Report No. 110–834] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3667) to amend the Wild and 

Scenic Rivers Act to designate a segment of the Missisquoi and Trout 

Rivers in the State of Vermont for study for potential addition to 

the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2008 

Mr. WELCH of Vermont, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 

resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3667) to amend 

the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate a segment 

of the Missisquoi and Trout Rivers in the State of 

Vermont for study for potential addition to the National 

Wild and Scenic Rivers System. 

1 Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this 

2 resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of 

3 rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee 

4 of the Whole House on the state of the Union for considerVerDate Aug 31 2005 22:41 Sep 09, 2008 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR1419.RH HR1419

jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1419 RH 

1 ation of the bill (H.R. 3667) to amend the Wild and Sce2 nic Rivers Act to designate a segment of the Missisquoi 

3 and Trout Rivers in the State of Vermont for study for 

4 potential addition to the National Wild and Scenic Rivers 

5 System. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed 

6 with. All points of order against consideration of the bill 

7 are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of 

8 rule XXI. General debate shall be confined to the bill and 

shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled
Exhibit No. 32.1


HPC Acquisitions, Inc.


File No.  000-53248


Form 10-K


For the year ended December 31, 2010





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of HPC Acquisitions, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Craig S. Laughlin, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   
 Dated: March 3, 2011

By: /s/ Craig S. LaughlinCraig S. LaughlinChief Executive andChief Financial Officer
 
  
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to HPC Acquisitions, Inc. and will be retained by HPC Acquisitions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 59216.

protest 217067-K (New York).

#### Wilbur-Ellis Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the issues and facts herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the merchandise, consisting of 90 cartons of solid tuna fish in lot No. 158, covered by entry 745569, reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, was in fact not received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited, it was held that duty is not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise 'as were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protest was sustained to this extent.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CurrencyShares® Russian Ruble Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-K for the fiscal period ended October 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Nick Bonos, Chief Executive Officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Trust.

Date: January 14, 2011



|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/ NICK BONOS                                                   
|Nick Bonos* Chief Executive
Officer (principal executive officer)



|* | The Registrant is a trust and Nick Bonos is signing in his capacity as the principal executive officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Registrant.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. 260.

#### North Carolina Natural Gas Corp. *v.*McJunkin Corporation.

*Eugene Gressman*for petitioner.

*John H. Anderson, Willis Smith, Jr., Arthur G. Stone*and *Donald O. Blagg*for respondent.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted in this case because the petitioning North Carolina Natural Gas Corporation has been denied its right to a trial by jury guaranteed by the Seventh Amendment to the Constitution.
[No. 3590.]

#### Evans v. Howell.

*Limitations*— Color *of Title*— Payment *of Taxes.*The seven years statute (Rev. Stat., see. 4090) is'not available as a defense to an action to recover vacant land unless seven full years elapse between the first payment of taxes under color of title and the institution of the action.

*Appeal from. Kit Carson District Court.*Hon. J. W. Sheaeor, Judge.

Mr. Louis Vogt, Mr. P. R. G-odsman, for appellant.

Mr. John P. Mail, for appellee.

Hurlbut, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This action was commenced January 1st, 1907, by plaintiff (appellee) against defendant (appellant) to recover possession of land which had been sold for taxes. The answer pleaded seven separate defenses, the first of which was a denial of plaintiff’s title and a plea of ownership in defendant. The appellant has abandoned all defenses except that respecting the seven years statute of limitations relative to the payment of taxes on vacant and unoccupied land for seven successive years under color of title (sec. 4090, Revised Statutes 1908). The case was tried to the court without a jury and the findings and decree were in favor of plaintiff.

The only question discussed in the briefs is that relating to the defense just mentioned. This identical question was before this court and full argument had thereon in the case of *Empire R. & C. Co. v. Howell,*126 Pac., 1096, and determined adversely to appellant’s position. In that opinion the point was fully discussed and authorities reviewed, and the court held that the statute pleaded-was not available to defendant as a defense unless it appeared that seven full years had elapsed between the first *220payment of tases under color of title and the date suit was begun to recover the land. Under authority of that case the judgment upon which this appeal is founded will0 be affirmed.

*Judgment Affirmed.*
<page>        EXHIBIT 32.02


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Cornerstone
Fund II L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Christian
Angstadt, Chief Financial Officer of Demeter Management
Corporation, the general partner of the Partnership, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.








By:     /s/ Christian Angstadt

Name:       Christian Angstadt
Title:      Chief Financial Officer

Date:       March 28, 2008
Exhibit 32

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Players Network (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (“Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: 

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Dated: May 22, 2006 | /s/ Mark Bradley                                          |
|---------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                | Mark Bradley                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |  
 

Chief Executive Officer

 
 

Principal Accounting Officer

  |
No. 60165.

protests 661635-G, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### W. X. Huber Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In aceordan ce with stipulation of counsel that 20 percent of the merchandise consists of rags used chiefly for papermaking, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained with respect to said 20 percent of the merchandise.
From: believer823@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:50:01 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Cheryl Swanson

Tujunga, CA 91042
Exhibit
      32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Griffin Land & Nurseries, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended February 28, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Periodic Report”), I, Frederick M. Danziger,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.
                The
      Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
      and
 
 2.
                The
      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.
 
 
 
 /s/ FREDERICK M.
      DANZIGERFrederick
      M. DanzigerPresident
      and Chief Executive OfficerApril
      9, 2009