alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 436 

Recognizing the 100th anniversary of the University of Central Arkansas. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 23, 2007 

Mr. SNYDER (for himself, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. BERRY, and Mr. ROSS) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Education and Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 100th anniversary of the University of 

Central Arkansas. 

Whereas the University of Central Arkansas strives to maintain the highest academic standards and ensure that its 

programs remain current and responsive to the diverse 

needs of those it serves; 

Whereas the University of Central Arkansas now has more 

than 100 undergraduate courses of study, 33 masters degree programs, and 3 doctoral programs; 

Whereas the University of Central Arkansas serves over 

12,300 students, and recognized 1,008 graduates in the 

spring of 2007; 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HRES 436 IH 

Whereas the University of Central Arkansas serves students 

from all 75 counties in Arkansas, more than 35 States, 

and 55 foreign countries; 

Whereas the University of Central Arkansas has produced 

many successful alumni, including government officials, 

business and community leaders, and professional athletes; 

Whereas the University of Central Arkansas has graduated 

over 52,000 students in its history; 

Whereas many buildings at the University of Central Arkansas were constructed during the Great Depression, thus 

allowing the institution to play a pivotal role during 

World War II as it served as a temporary military base; 

Whereas the first Arkansas educational television station, 

now the Arkansas Educational Television Network, was 

established on the campus of the University of Central 

Arkansas in 1966; 

Whereas the University of Central Arkansas established one 

of the first honors colleges in the United States; 

Whereas State Senator Otis Wingo sponsored legislation to 

establish the Arkansas State Normal School, which was 

signed into law on May 14, 1907; 

Whereas the Arkansas State Normal School started as a 

teacher-training school with 105 students, and the first 

commencement ceremony recognized 10 graduates in 

1909; and 

Whereas, in 1975, the Arkansas State Normal School was 

granted university status and renamed the University of 

Central Arkansas: Now, therefore, be it 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
3 

•HRES 436 IH 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes the 100th anniversary of the University of Central 

3 Arkansas. 

Æ 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
#### Edward Tuck, Executor, Respondent, v. Albert Bierstadt, Appellant.

Order reversed, and motion granted, with directions that the deposition be suppressed, and that the commission be re-executed on due notice of thirty days to be given to defendant of the time and place of executing the same.
From: dorupat@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:06:49 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Donald and Ruth Patterson

Alma, MO 64001
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsNanoparticulate gellants for metallized gelled liquid hydrogen with aluminumGelled liquid hydrogen was experimentally formulated using sol-gel technology. As a follow-on to work with cryogenic simulants, hydrogen was gelled with an alkoxide material: BTMSE. Initial results demonstrated that gellants with a specific surface area of 1000 m(exp 2)/g could be repeatably fabricated. Gelled hexane and metallized gelled hexane (with 13.8-wt% Al) were produced. Propellant settling testing was conducted for acceleration levels of 2 to 10 times normal gravity and a minimum gellant percentage was determined for stable gelled hexane and metalized gelled hexane. A cryogenic capillary rheometer was also designed, constructed, and used to determine the viscosity of gelled hydrogen. Small volumes of liquid hydrogen were gelled with a 7- to 8-wt% gellant level. The gelled H2 viscosity was 1.5 to 3.7 times that of liquid hydrogen: 0.048 to 0.116 mPa-s versus 0.03 mPa-s for liquid H2 (at 16 K and approximately 1 atm pressure).Document ID19960048665Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsPalaszewski, Bryan*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland,OH United States)*Starkovich, John*(TRW Defense and Space Systems Group Redondo Beach, CA United States)*Adams, Scott*(TRW Defense and Space Systems Group Redondo Beach, CA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1996Subject CategorySpacecraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberE-10354NASA-TM-107280NAS 1.15:107280AIAA Paper 96-3234Meeting InformationMeeting: Joint Propulsion Conference and ExhibitLocation: Lake Buena Vista, FLCountry: United StatesStart Date: July 1, 1996End Date: July 3, 1996Sponsors:American Society for Electrical Engineers,Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc.,American Society of Mechanical Engineers,American Inst. of Aeronautics and AstronauticsAccession Number96N33886Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 252-50-01CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS3-26714Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19960048665.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Before the First Division,

February 20, 1957

No. 60500.

#### M. Pressner & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 268062-K (New York).

*412Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the articles in question are “not chiefly used for the amusement of children” and that they are composed in chief value of india rubber, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: seiceanua@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:01:07 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Angela Seiceanu

Wheeling, IL 60090
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of IX Energy Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven Hoffman, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.








April 16, 2010





/s/ Steven Hoffman


_________________________________




Steven Hoffman


Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 180 (Tuesday, September 19, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64416-64417]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20208]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XD369]


Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC); Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council's Summer Flounder, 
Scup, and Black Sea Bass Monitoring Committee will hold a public 
webinar meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Friday, October 6, 2023, from 9 a.m. 
until 11 a.m. EDT. For agenda details, see SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held via webinar. Connection information 
will be posted prior to the meeting at www.mafmc.org.
    Council address: Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N 
State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 674-2331; 
www.mafmc.org.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher M. Moore, Ph.D., Executive 
Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, telephone: (302) 
526-5255.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Summer Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea 
Bass Monitoring Committee will meet

[[Page 64417]]

via webinar, jointly with the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries 
Commission's Summer Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea Bass Technical 
Committee. The purpose of this meeting is for both groups to receive a 
detailed presentation on the data inputs and methodological framework 
of the Recreational Demand Model. The Monitoring and Technical 
Committees will meet again in November 2023 to use this model for 
projecting recreational harvest and for considering management measure 
recommendations for these three species.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aid should 
be directed to Shelley Spedden, (302) 526-5251, at least 5 days prior 
to the meeting date.
    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: September 14, 2023.
Diane M. DeJames-Daly,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2023-20208 Filed 9-18-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
! O+FICE OF THE A-ITORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

I 

AUSTIN 

I 

mar Senator D&emyt 

Your lettar oi Fe0 

abcm atated, La aa to11686 

trol to foil 

oonksaot8 have 

axlppooe that the 

the ea8e of .rpot 

the total amottat or znotwy imoltea 

traot or8.r er 8poQ pumh8me ordm 

1 mat to follow tam prowhremtoprnion would aasti -xtob mme 

al@uQt 5nYe~Yell. 

ytnufmble ToEDOI)B~~ - page 3 

a ONP frtrasr OpsniOn Oouldbe takea,d &ouliibe frlrarain 

ww OpM O$ d&aUlf, WI fhe crrfent Oh w reply &a the 

dd8ulting contractor (uhethar tm oontraot 8.m spot oont~aet) 

and tba paroba8t~by t&a I5cw-d efthe 5qpllss ~rdered~vtkero 

me #aa rsy ba ptlrcrhured on the mwket. Morewer, if wch 

~~plioe are oatuoll~ ls~rehsed by the Uoard, then yeU okmld 

f#&JAeP notify the~contr8atur of the ez6QSE toet if StmIl wpp&&ear if aq, an2 that the eontra.etcr vcmld be chr~ed rith 

mtoa esM88. Srmb proeedurewe~ldcppewtobootanWhu~ 

mt OBIly, ana shmald with propriety bb fOllcved Tin all otwbdl 

oi doaulf . 

Imar qa45tien 3 ia not 00 emSly amsverod, t@ 

XXI all inetanuas where maw b&de are t&an aul the 

~oxoo8sd5fference,if emyI hsaebee~~chnrged to the arzQ$nal 

6en$CMter, there arlsas 8 I.s.abiuty oa tha part es the OOOI 

tmaatw upcn his tarn cantreut or bin epot-yorobuso awtrwt 

for mauh ditYerwce, aad no alfioer c~.boamt of tha Gwernm8nt may roleaso su& liabil%ty. 

Xf,'$,n su& 6 caoe, however, the amwnt of uueh d&fimnce in uost of 8upplier by way or unwed lMdl%w ta 

the oentraotw~e liabU.%ty io 50 Owl1 86 that inuoprnwDl7 tb0 

co8tibso~wy tea preparatlcnrod onbmlapieo of them&&or te 

W Attorney Wmex'al f'~rOmthn wouZdes6eedthe amtW8thYOlYO8, 

tJmI* it is the opJaion efthis DepartmatyourBoanl dmuldtmt 

innrrr U&I cost, and uhc~l& rrOt mbdt the amtiter tc the AttorWy 

Peaeral for aathnat oil. DA thir aeuneotion, we vauld odd tWt 

whexw them B~YO been rerpertod &&au&to br 8 omtraoter8 and the+ 

wegate at ouch cuper-ulbod lllrbility wmld esooed t-ho coot of 

p*epar&g mid. uubudttf~ to tbs Attorney Uenewa1 a utatweat ef
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-19-00025-CR

Guillermo CAPETILLO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017-CRB-000381-D1

Honorable Joe Lopez, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED September 30, 2020.

_____________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
From: dbwomer@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:36:44 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

David Womer

Wimberley, TX 78676
(R.D. 11503)

#### J. Gerber & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 877483, etc.

(Decided March 21, 1968)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*Edwin L. Weisl, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Ford, Judge:

The proper value for dutiable purposes of certain electrical equipment covered by the appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in the schedule “A,” attached hereto and made a part hereof, is before the court for determination.

The parties hereto have entered into a stipulation of facts ivherein it has been agreed as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, as to the merchandise covered by the appeals for reap-praisement enumerated on the schedule attached hereto and made a part hereof:

> That on the dates of exportation thereof to the United States, the market values or the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Japan, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed, ready for shipment to the United States, were the appraised values, less the buying commission, as stated on the invoices.

> That all of the merchandise covered by all of the appeals for re-appraisement, the subject of this stipulation was entered subsequent *805to February 27,1958, and none of the merchandise is identified in the Final List published by the Secretary of the Treasury, T.D. 54521.

> That the appeals for reappraisement enumerated on the schedule attached hereto and made a part hereof may be deemed submitted upon this stipulation.

Upon the record before the court, I find and hold that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 91 Treas. Dec. 295, T.D. 54165, is the proper basis of value for the electrical equipment in issue and that said value is the appraised value, less buying-commissions as stated on the invoices.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. P66/12.

protest 64/25284 (New York).

#### Roto Bag Machine Corp. and Jung Forwarding Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of bag-making machines and parts thereof which parts are dedicated to use on or for said bag-making machines similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Roto Bag Machine Corp. and*Rohner, *Gehrig &*Co., *Inc.*v. *United States*(48 Cust. Ct. 401, Abstract 66656), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.