alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 293 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 293

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        April 18, 2007.
Whereas National Volunteer Week began in 1974 when President Nixon signed an 
        Executive order establishing the week as an annual celebration of 
        volunteering, and since then, every United States President has signed a 
        proclamation promoting National Volunteer Week;
Whereas National Volunteer Week will be observed during the week of April 15 
        through 21, 2007;
Whereas the National Volunteer Week theme, ``Inspire By Example'', truly 
        reflects the power volunteers have to inspire the people they help and 
        to inspire others to serve;
Whereas about 61.2 million people volunteered through or for an organization at 
        least once between September 2005 and September 2006, according to a 
        recent survey by the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, and the 
        proportion of people who volunteered was 26.7 percent, more than a 
        quarter of the total United States population;
Whereas the estimated dollar value of volunteer time was $18.04 in 2005, 
        according to the latest information provided by Independent Sector, a 
        nonpartisan leadership forum, and the coalition estimates the value of 
        volunteer time for 2005 to be $280 billion;
Whereas volunteers have contributed to the enhancement and improvement of 
        communities across the United States, especially with respect to the 
        aftermath of the hurricanes on the Gulf Coast; and
Whereas National Volunteer Week will continue to build awareness of the role 
        that volunteers play in local, national, and international communities, 
        and their commitment and dedication to improving lives, strengthening 
        communities, and fostering civic engagement through service and 
        volunteering: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals highlighted through National 
        Volunteer Week;
            (2) acknowledges the diligent efforts of our major federally funded 
        community service and volunteer programs;
            (3) recognizes with gratitude the contributions of the millions of 
        dedicated and caring individuals who have chosen to serve others through 
        volunteerism; and
            (4) encourages all American people, of any age and background, to 
        seek out opportunities to serve through volunteerism.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2013 - 0826 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2011 - SW - 046 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
From: lizatt@sisna.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:08:34 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Layne Izatt

Orem, UT 84057
Ex. 10.3 Assignmetn of PSA HG


EXHIBIT 10.3


ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF PURCHASE AGREEMENT




For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, STEADFAST ASSET HOLDINGS, INC., a California corporation (“Assignor”), hereby assigns to SIR HILLIARD GRAND, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Assignee”), all of Assignor’s rights and obligations under and in regard to that certain Purchase and Sale Agreement and Joint Escrow Instructions dated November 2, 2012, (as may have been amended or may hereafter be amended, the “Purchase Agreement”), between Gary L. Schottenstein, an individual and Brett Kaufman, an individual (collectively, the “Seller”) and Assignor for the purchase and sale of that membership interest relating to that certain real property located in Dublin, Ohio, as more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto (the “Property”).


Assignee hereby agrees to and shall assume, perform and be fully responsible for the performance of all of the obligations of Assignor under the Purchase Agreement.


All of the provisions, covenants and agreements contained in the Assignment shall extend to and be binding upon the respective legal representatives, successors and assigns of Assignor and Assignee.  This Assignment represents the entire agreement between Assignor and Assignee with respect to the subject matter of the Assignment, and all prior or contemporaneous agreements regarding such matters are hereby rendered null and void and of no force and effect. 


(SIGNATURES APPEARS ON FOLLOWING PAGE)



















WITNESS THE EXECUTION HEREOF, as of this December 31, 2012. 


          	
		
	 
	ASSIGNOR:

	 
	 

	 
	STEADFAST ASSET HOLDINGS, INC., 

	 
	a California corporation

	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ Ana Marie del Rio

	 
	Ana Marie del Rio,

	 
	Secretary and Vice President






                    
ASSIGNEE:


SIR HILLIARD GRAND, LLC
a Delaware limited liability company


By:     Steadfast Income Advisor, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability         
company, its Manager
                            
                            	
		
	By:
	/s/ Ella S. Neyland

	 
	Ella S. Neyland,  President
January 7, 2016

EXAMPLES OF BMPs IN PESTICIDE PRODUCT FIFRA LABELS TO ADDRESS

WATER QUALITY

Product (Active 

Ingredient) 

Relevant 

Use-pattern

Text on Label

Anvil 10+10 

(Sumithrin)

Adult 

mosquito, 

midges, 

black flies

This product is toxic to aquatic organisms, including fish and aquatic invertebrates.Runoff

from treated areas or deposition of spray droplets into a body of water may be hazardous to 

fish and aquatic invertebrates. Do not apply over permanent bodies of

water (lakes, rivers, permanent streams, natural ponds, commercial fish ponds,swamps, 

marshes or estuaries), except when necessary to target areas where adult mosquitoes are 

present, and weather conditions will facilitate movement of applied material beyond the 

body of water in order to minimize incidental deposition into the water body. Do not 

contaminate bodies of water when disposing of equipment rinsate or wash waters.

Copper sulfate 

crystals

Aquatic 

weeds and 

algae

Element 3A 

(triclopyr)

Aquatic 

weeds
January 7, 2016

EXAMPLES OF BMPs IN PESTICIDE PRODUCT FIFRA LABELS TO ADDRESS

WATER QUALITY

Aquamaster 

(Glyphosate) 

Aquatic 

weeds

Captain XTR 

(copper complex)

Aquatic 

weeds and 

algae

Magnacide H

(Acrolein)

Aquatic 

weeds and 

algae 

(irrigation 

canals)

Earthtec (copper 

sulfate)

Aquatic 

weeds and 

algae, 

molluscicide
January 7, 2016

EXAMPLES OF BMPs IN PESTICIDE PRODUCT FIFRA LABELS TO ADDRESS

WATER QUALITY

Weedestroy (2-4, 

D)

Aquatic 

weeds

Verbanone Forest 

Canopy

Krenite

(ammonium salt 

of fosamine)

Forest 

Canopy

MCH Bubble 

Caps (3-methyl-2-

cyclohexen-1-

one*)

Forest 

Canopy

MCM 60 

(Metsulfuron 

methyl) 

Forest 

Canopy

Tordon K 

(picloram)

Forest 

Canopy
January 7, 2016

EXAMPLES OF BMPs IN PESTICIDE PRODUCT FIFRA LABELS TO ADDRESS

WATER QUALITY

Prentox Fish 

Toxicant (5% 

rotenone)

Animal

Diazinon AG600 

(Diazinon) 

Animal?
35

12 8 7 8 9 10 11

31 32 33 34 35 36 31

3

33 34 36 31 32

6 2 1

3

4 5 2 1 6

7

6 5 4

10 11 12 7

10

9

9

8

7 8

7

11 12

18 13

13

14

14

15

15

16

16

17

17

18

18

23 24 19

23 24

22

22

21

21

20 19

19 20

25 30 26

26 25

27

27

29 28 30

30 29 28

35 36 31

36

31

35

34

34

32 33

31 32 33

6 2 1

1 6 3

2 3

4

4

5

5

6

7

11 12 9 10

CLOVERLAND SP

WICKIUP CG

WENATCHEE

GUARD

STATION RC

CABIN SADDLE CG INDIAN

TOM TH

Wenatchee Creek

Asotin Creek

South George Project Planning Area - Inventory of Potential Wilderness Areas

H-8

1 0.5 0 1 Miles

LEGEND

South George Project Planning Area

Washington State Fish and Wildlife

Pomeroy Ranger District

Inventoried Roadless Area (IRA)

Potential Wilderness Area

Wenaha-Tucannon Wilderness

Other Undeveloped Lands

Recreation Feature

Forest Roads  ́

Map H-8: Interaction between Other Undeveloped Lands and Alternative D

Map depicts Other Undeveloped Areas

within the South George project planning boundary.

Also depicts project activities for Alternative D.

This product is reproduced from geospatial information prepared by the U.S. Department of

Agriculture, Forest Service. GIS data and product accuracy may vary. They may be: developed from

sources of differing accuracy, interpretation, incomplete while being created or revised, etc.

Using GIS products for purposes other than those for which they were created may yield inaccurate

or misleading results. The Forest Service reserves the right ot correct, update, modify, or replace GIS

products without notification. For more information contact the Umatilla National Forest Supervisors Office.

D.Dixon

GIS/Data Service Specialist

06/03/2011

Non-Commercial Thinning

Fuel Treatments

Harvest Units

Temporary Roads

4300

4304

4400
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Remington Oil and Gas
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Frank T. Smith, Jr., Senior Vice President/Finance
(Principal Financial Officer) of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, and not for any other purpose. /s/ Frank T. Smith, Jr. 
 Senior Vice President/Finance
(Principal Financial Officer)
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Remington Oil and Gas Corporation and will be retained by
Remington Oil and Gas Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
From: gracehapens@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:31:08 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kevin Cruse

, 11747-3025
è

èè

èèèèè èè èèèè

èèèèèèèèèèèè

èè

èè

èè

èèèèèèèè

è

èèèèèèèèèè

èè èè

è èèè

èè

è èè è èèè è èèè èèèèèèèèèè

èè

èèèè è

èèè èèè

èè èèèè

è èè

è èèèè è

èè

è èèèè èèèèèèèèèèèè

èèè

èèè èè

èèèèèèè

èè

èèèèè

è

èèèèèèèèèè

èèè

èèèèè è

è

è

èèèè èè

èè èèèèèèèè

èèèè

èèè

è è

è èèèè

è

èèèèèèè èèèè èè

èè è

èèèè èè èèèèèèèèèèèèèèèèèèè èèèè èè èè è èè

è èè

èèèèèèè

èèè

èè èèèèèèèè

èèè è

èèèèèèèèèèèèè

èèèèèèèèèèèèèèèèèèèè

èèèèè

èè èèèè

èèèèèèèèèèèèèè èèèè

è

èèè èè èèèè

èèèèè

èèèèèèè èèèèèè èè èèèèèèè èèè èèèèèè

èè

èè èèèèèèèè èèè

èèèè

èèè èè

èèèè

èèèèè èèè

èèèèèè èèè

è èèè è

èèè èèèèèèèèèèèèè è èèèèè

èèèèèèè èè è

èèèèèè

èèèèèè èèèèèèè

èèèèè èèèè èèèèèèèè

è

èè

èèèè

èèèèèèèèè èè èèè

èèèèèèè èèèèèèèèèè

èèèèèèèèèèèè

èèèèèèèèèèèèèèèè

èèèèèèèèèèèèèèèèèèèèèèèèèèèèèèèèèèè è è

èè

èèèèèèèè èè

èèè

èèè è èè è

èèèèèèèèèèèèèè èèèèèèèèèèèèèèè èèèè

èèèèèèè è

èèèèèè èèèèèèè èèè èèèèè

èèè

è

è èèèèè

35

12 8 7 8 9 10 11

31 32 33 34 35 36 31

3

33 34 36 31 32

6 2 1

3

4 5 2 1 6

7

6 5 4

10 11 12 7

10

9

9

8

7 8

7

11 12

18 13

13

14

14

15

15

16

16

17

17

18

18

23 24 19

23 24

22

22

21

21

19 20

19 20

25 30 26

26 25

27

27

29 28 30

30 29 28

35 36 31

36

31

35

34

34

33 32

31 32 33

6 2 1

1 6 3

2 3

4

4

5

5 6

7

10 11 12 9

CLOVERLAND SP

WICKIUP CG

WENATCHEE

GUARD

STATION RC

CABIN SADDLE CG INDIAN

TOM TH

Wenatchee Creek

Asotin Creek

South George Project Planning Area - Inventory of Potential Wilderness Areas

I-OW-AltC

1 0.5 0 1 Miles

LEGEND

South George Project Planning Area

Washington State Fish and Wildlife

Pomeroy Ranger District

Inventoried Roadless Area (IRA)

Potential Wilderness Area

Wenaha-Tucannon Wilderness

Other Undeveloped Lands

Oregon Wild's Polygon

Recreation Feature

Forest Roads  ́

Map depicts Other Undeveloped Areas

within the South George project planning boundary.

Also depicts project activities for Alternative C.

This product is reproduced from geospatial information prepared by the U.S. Department of

Agriculture, Forest Service. GIS data and product accuracy may vary. They may be: developed from

sources of differing accuracy, interpretation, incomplete while being created or revised, etc.

Using GIS products for purposes other than those for which they were created may yield inaccurate

or misleading results. The Forest Service reserves the right ot correct, update, modify, or replace GIS

products without notification. For more information contact the Umatilla National Forest Supervisors Office.

D.Dixon

GIS/Data Service Specialist

08/18/2011

4300

4304

4400

Non-Commercial Thinning

Fuel Treatments

Harvest Units

èèèèèèèè

Decommissioned Roads

Map I-OW-AltC: Oregon Wild's Polygon in relation to Inventoried Roadless Areas, Potential Wilderness Areas, Forest Roads and Alternative C activities
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 02-1356

___________

United States of America, *

*

Plaintiff - Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Southern District of Iowa.

*

Greg Allen Johnson, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Defendant - Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: June 11, 2002

Filed: August 16, 2002

___________

Before WOLLMAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Greg Allen Johnson appeals his conviction for conspiring to distribute

methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(b)(1)(A) and 846. We affirm.

The superseding indictment charged Johnson with participating in a conspiracy

to distribute methamphetamine from July 1997 to September 2000. At trial, the

government presented testimony by numerous witnesses that Johnson was engaged

in distributing methamphetamine during this entire period, though his suppliers and

customers varied over time. Focusing on the change of suppliers that occurred when
1

The HONORABLE HAROLD D. VIETOR, United States District Judge for

the Southern District of Iowa.

-2-

Johnson’s initial supplier was arrested in August 1998, Johnson argues that the

evidence at trial established the existence of multiple conspiracies, a fatal variance

in the government’s proof. We disagree. “[T]he fact that there may have been

multiple sources of [methamphetamine] does not create multiple conspiracies, and the

evidence here supports the view that those charged in this case were members of a

single conspiracy, even though there may have been other drug conspiracies in the

community.” United States v. Cabbell, 35 F.3d 1255, 1262 (8th Cir. 1994). In

addition, a claim of fatal variance requires proof of prejudice, and “it is difficult to

see how the defendant was prejudiced given that he was the sole defendant on trial

and was . . . implicated in any other conspiracy the evidence could prove.” United

States v. Lopez-Arce, 267 F.3d 775, 781 (8th Cir. 2001).

Johnson further argues that the district court1

 erred in giving the multiple

conspiracy instruction approved by this court in United States v. Adipietro, 983 F.2d

1468, 1475 (8th Cir. 1993), rather than a longer instruction requested by the defense.

This contention is without merit. “If the evidence supports a single conspiracy, the

failure to give a multiple conspiracy instruction is not reversible error.” United

States v. Roach, 164 F.3d 403, 412 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 845 (1999).

The judgment of the district court is affirmed. 

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Karamvir Singh, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 489]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Friedmann, J.), rendered May 14,1991, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. This appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of those branches of the defendant’s omnibus motion which were to suppress physical evidence and a statement to law enforcement officials.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered.

*546The hearing court properly determined that the defendant was not in custody at the time he made statements to the police *(see, People v Centano,*76 NY2d 837; *People v Yukl,*25 NY2d 585, *cert denied*400 US 851; *People v Tyce,*160 AD2d 1033; *People v Bailey,*140 AD2d 356) and there is no reason to disturb that determination on this record.

However, the People correctly concede that reversal of the defendant’s conviction is required because the trial court submitted a verdict sheet to the jury which listed a statutory element of each murder count *(see, People v Spivey,*81 NY2d 356; *People v Kelly,*76 NY2d 1013; *People v Taylor,*76 NY2d 873; *People v Percinthe,*200 AD2d 773; *People v Vargas [Raymond],*199 AD2d 291). In addition, the conviction for criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree must be reversed because this count is factually related to the murder counts and therefore may have been affected by the notations under the murder counts *(see, People v Kelly, supra; People v Vargas [Raymond], supra).*

The defendant’s remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review. Balletta, J.P., Rosenblatt, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.