alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1  Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of China Media Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dean Li, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated:  September 28, 2017  By:          /s/Dean Li Dean Li President, Chief Executive Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 197 (Thursday, October 10, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 62002]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-24412]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8497]

In the Matter of the Designation of the Muhammad Jamal Network, 
Also Known as the Muhammad Jamal Group, Also Known as al-Qa'ida in 
Egypt, Also Known as the Jamal Network, as a Specially Designated 
Global Terrorist Pursuant to Section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224, as 
Amended

    Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) 
of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive 
Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, and Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 
2003, I hereby determine that the entity known as Muhammad Jamal 
Network, also known as the Muhammad Jamal Group, also known as al-
Qa'ida in Egypt, also known as the Jamal Network, committed, or poses a 
significant risk of committing, acts of terrorism that threaten the 
security of U.S. nationals or the national security, foreign policy, or 
economy of the United States.
    Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 
13224 that ``prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the 
Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States 
would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in 
the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously,'' I 
determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person 
subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence 
in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the 
measures authorized in the Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: August 28, 2013.
John F. Kerry,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-24412 Filed 10-9-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
Activity ID: jocero2

USGS CMG FACS Crew Log

Name Responsibility Affiliation
WANES Fiocks Chief Scig uit USGS
Dana Wise El\ectrowS Technician USGS |
Phil Toetass0n Cectronees  TeennNiciaa LE S
Memeo De Wyte Barkha Tee § ATA Proce SsiNG XS

laje Ke dso

Stismic

Tech / Sate Prong gsinG VS6%

one DB parison

Seismic

Tse / DATA Breese bins USL

Wey PEs eee

Por Sener tse. |p eas

Baty Tela
7
From: dtosborn97302@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:48:24 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

David Osborn

Salem, OR 97302
Exhibit
32.1 CERTIFICATION Pursuant to the requirement set
forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or
Exchange Act, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
Code (18 U.S.C. ss.1350), James P. Panek, Chief Executive Officer of VaxGen,
Inc. (the Company, and Matthew J. Pfeffer, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, each hereby certify that, to the best of their knowledge: 1.
The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
 ended June 30, 2007, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1
 (the Report, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
 section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
 in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
 of the Company. In Witness Whereof, the undersigned
have set their hands hereto as of the 3rd day of October, 2007. /s/ James P. Panek

/s/ Matthew J.
 PfefferChief Executive
 Officer

Chief Financial
 Officer This certification accompanies the
Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing
of VaxGen, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the
Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in
such filing. End
of Filing 1
No. 63796.

protest 59/5693 (Los Angeles).

#### Frank P. Dow Co., Inc., of L. A. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
Exhibit 32.1 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted),
James P. Panek, Chief Executive Officer of VaxGen, Inc. (the Company), and
Matthew J. Pfeffer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certify
that, to the best of their knowledge: 1. The
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004, to
which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. In Witness
Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 6th day of
February, 2007. /s/ James P.
  Panek

/s/ Matthew
  J. PfefferChief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer This
certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated
by reference into any filing of VaxGen, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing. End of Filing - 1 -
Exhibit 13.2




Certification by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Eric Haibing Wu, Chief Financial Officer of 7 Days Group Holdings Limited (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the Company’s annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: May 4, 2011





By:
/s/    Eric Haibing WuName:
Eric Haibing WuTitle:
Chief Financial Officer
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1519 

Honoring the important work of journalists covering the war in Iraq. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2008 

Ms. WATERS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on 

Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the important work of journalists covering the war 

in Iraq. 

Whereas the freedom of the press is guaranteed in the First 

Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; 

Whereas the press is essential to the preservation of freedom 

and liberty in a democratic society by playing a vital role 

in keeping the public informed; 

Whereas citizens of the United States are best served by a 

vigorous media that provides detailed, accurate, and unbiased news, particularly when it comes to matters of 

war; 

Whereas Iraq is recognized as the most dangerous place in 

the world to report and journalists working in Iraq have 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HRES 1519 IH 

had to endure extraordinarily harsh conditions to do their 

jobs; and 

Whereas, as of July 2008, at least 179 journalists and media 

assistants have been killed and 51 journalists have been 

kidnapped while covering the war in Iraq according to the 

Committee to Protect Journalists: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) honors the important work of journalists in 

3 providing the public with information regarding the 

4 war in Iraq; 

5 (2) pays tribute to the journalists who have 

6 been killed in Iraq; 

7 (3) encourages the media to honor the members 

8 of the United States Armed Forces who continue to 

9 serve and sacrifice bravely in Iraq by providing thor10 ough coverage of the war in Iraq; and 

11 (4) encourages the Department of Defense, the 

12 Department of State, and other Federal depart13 ments and agencies that carry on operations and 

14 other activities in Iraq to provide the highest pos15 sible level of openness, access, and transparency to 

16 the press covering the war in Iraq. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ALLEN PIPPEN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 545 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Unpublished Memorandum and

Order of the Superior Court at No.

2112 EDA 2016 entered on October
31, 2017, affirming the Judgment of Sentence of the Philadelphia County

Court of Common Pleas at No. CP

- 51

- CR

- 0009346

- 2014 entered on June
13, 2016

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 17th day of June, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED , the Superior Court’s order is VACATED , and this matter is REMANDED to

that court with instructions to remand to the trial court to grant Petitioner’s motion to

dismiss pursuant to this Co urt’s decision in Commonwealth v. Perfetto , __ A.3d __, 2019

WL 1866653 (Pa. Apr. 26, 2019).
July 26, 2014

To the Environmental Protection Agency On behalf of a local grassroots organization called Guardians of the Good Life, I urge you to adopt the strongest rules possible regarding greenhouse gas pollution from power plants. These companies have used our environment as a dumping ground for far too long, fouling our air and water and contributing to numerous health problems in the communities in which they operate. It is the people and the environment who pay the price for this pollution, and that is just plain wrong. Why should anyone be given a free pass to make others sick? Not only are these polluting greenhouse gases making people sick, they're making the planet sick -- climate change is a symptom of this. The Guardians support strong, robust rules to reign in greenhouse gas pollution and require these companies to do business in a responsible manner. Up to this point, they have not done so; therefore, we ask that you implement these regulations in spite of any arguments from the fossil fuel companies. We are at a crucial point in our history and every effort should be made to protect our environment and stave off catastrophic global climate change. Thank you.
Sincerely

Jane Wilson Guardians of the Good Life 603 N. 36 St. #4 Omaha, NE 68131
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6595

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff - Appellee, 

v. 

BARTON JOSEPH ADAMS, 

Defendant - Appellant, 

and 

JOSEPHINE ARTILLAGA ADAMS; B.A., 

Claimants. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, 

at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (3:08-cr-00077-JPB-RWT-1; 3:15-

cv-00111-JPB-RWT) 

Submitted: October 30, 2018 Decided: November 5, 2018

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Barton Joseph Adams, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Barton Joseph Adams seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of 

a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable 

jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a 

constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Adams has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny 

Adams’ motion to appoint counsel, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
From: majondahl@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:01:41 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Richard Jondahl

Waite Park, MN 56387
From: egb1234@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:12:29 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Elizabeth Biggs

Marietta, GA 30062
From: taylorsu@missouri.edu

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:55:14 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Susan Taylor

Columbia, MO 65203
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, James D. Palm, Chief Executive Officer of Gulfport Energy Corporation (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 6, 2010



/s/ James D. PalmJames D. PalmChief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.