alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: dcm959@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:25:44 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Doug Merwin

Whitefish, MT 59937
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. William W. Astor, Appellant, *v.*William D. Dickey et al., as Commissioners et al., Respondents.

*People ex rel. Astor*v. Dickey, 150 App. Div. — , affirmed.

(Argued May 1, 1912;

decided May 21, 1912.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 9, 1912, which dismissed a writ of certiorari and affirmed the proceedings of the defendant commissioners in awarding damages to relator arising from the change in grade of certain streets.

*Barclay E. V. McCarty, Ja/red G. Baldwin, Jr.,*and *John M. Harrington*for appellant.

*Archibald B. Watson, Corporation Counsel (Terence Farley*and *Charles J. Nehrbas*of counsel), for respondents.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., G-ray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Hiscock and Collin,JJ.
PUBLIC LAW 114–154—MAY 16, 2016 130 STAT. 387 

Public Law 114–154 

114th Congress 

An Act 

To provide the Department of Justice with additional tools to target extraterritorial 

drug trafficking activity, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Transnational Drug Trafficking 

Act of 2015’’. 

SEC. 2. POSSESSION, MANUFACTURE OR DISTRIBUTION FOR PURPOSES OF UNLAWFUL IMPORTATIONS. 

Section 1009 of the Controlled Substances Import and Export 

Act (21 U.S.C. 959) is amended— 

(1) by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as subsections 

(c) and (d), respectively; and 

(2) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘It shall’’ and all that 

follows and inserting the following: ‘‘It shall be unlawful for 

any person to manufacture or distribute a controlled substance 

in schedule I or II or flunitrazepam or a listed chemical 

intending, knowing, or having reasonable cause to believe that 

such substance or chemical will be unlawfully imported into 

the United States or into waters within a distance of 12 miles 

of the coast of the United States. 

‘‘(b) It shall be unlawful for any person to manufacture or 

distribute a listed chemical— 

‘‘(1) intending or knowing that the listed chemical will 

be used to manufacture a controlled substance; and 

‘‘(2) intending, knowing, or having reasonable cause to 

believe that the controlled substance will be unlawfully 

imported into the United States.’’. 

SEC. 3. TRAFFICKING IN COUNTERFEIT GOODS OR SERVICES. 

Chapter 113 of title 18, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) in section 2318(b)(2), by striking ‘‘section 2320(e)’’ and 

inserting ‘‘section 2320(f)’’; and 

(2) in section 2320— 

(A) in subsection (a), by striking paragraph (4) and 

inserting the following: 

‘‘(4) traffics in a drug and knowingly uses a counterfeit 

mark on or in connection with such drug,’’; 

(B) in subsection (b)(3), in the matter preceding 

subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘counterfeit drug’’ and 

inserting ‘‘drug that uses a counterfeit mark on or in 

connection with the drug’’; and 

Transnational 

Drug Trafficking 

Act of 2015. 

18 USC 1 note. 

May 16, 2016 

[S. 32] 


kgrant on DSKB33CYQ1 with PUBLAW
130 STAT. 388 PUBLIC LAW 114–154—MAY 16, 2016 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 32: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: 

Vol. 161 (2015): Oct. 7, considered and passed Senate. 

Vol. 162 (2016): May 10, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

(C) in subsection (f), by striking paragraph (6) and 

inserting the following: 

‘‘(6) the term ‘drug’ means a drug, as defined in section 

201 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 

321).’’. 

Approved May 16, 2016. 

Definition. 


kgrant on DSKB33CYQ1 with PUBLAW
EXHIBIT 11
                      Calculation of Weighted Average Shares
                    Outstanding for Net Income (Loss) Per Share
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                            September 30,
                                                                                        1996           1997
                                                                                    ------------   ------------
<S>                                                                                 <C>           <C>
Earnings:
Net Income (Loss)................................................................   $ (2,029,414) $     642,131
                                                                                    ============  =============

Shares:
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares
   Outstanding...................................................................      4,293,230      4,434,140
Additional Shares Under Treasury Stock Method
   from Warrants Issued 12 Months Prior to 9/30/97...............................        123,279        170,674
                                                                                    ------------  -------------
Average Common Shares Outstanding and Equivalents................................      4,416,509      4,604,814
                                                                                    ============  =============

Earnings (Loss) Per Share........................................................   $      (0.46) $        0.14
                                                                                    ============  =============
</TABLE>
From: PHERLYN@HOTMAIL.COM

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:29:52 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Thomas Frank

Mason City, IA 50401
```

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 27, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66499-66500]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20973]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs

[234A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900]

Indian Gaming; Approval of Tribal-State Class III Gaming Compact 
Amendment Between Suquamish Tribe and the State of Washington

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice publishes the approval of the Sixth Amendment to 
the Tribal-State Compact between the Suquamish Tribe and the State of 
Washington.

DATES: The Amendment takes effect on September 27, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of 
Indian Gaming, Office of the Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs, 
Washington, DC 20240, (202) 219-4066.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under section 11 of the Indian Gaming 
Regulatory Act (IGRA), Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq., the 
Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the Federal Register notice 
of approved Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class 
III gaming activities on Indian lands. As required by 25 CFR 293.4, all 
compacts and amendments are subject to review and approval by the 
Secretary. The Amendment permits the Tribe to offer Electronic Table 
Games, updates the Compact to reflect this change in various sections, 
and incorporates Appendix G, Electronic

[[Page 66500]]

Table Games. The Amendment is approved.

Bryan Newland,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2023-20973 Filed 9-26-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337-15-P
```
No. 60505.

#### Roden, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 224667-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of hoods the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *United States*v. *Accurate Millinery Co., Roberts, Reilly & Sons, et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 229, C. A. D. 599), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PACIFIC
SUNWEAR OF CALIFORNIA, INC'S FORM 10Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MAY 3,
1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-02-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-03-1998
<CASH>                                      18,520,729
<SECURITIES>                                 2,885,488
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,295,381
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 33,837,257
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            62,783,366
<PP&E>                                      73,888,592
<DEPRECIATION>                            (21,081,359)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             124,902,307
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,054,786
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       138,193
<OTHER-SE>                                 100,460,094
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               124,902,307
<SALES>                                     61,162,250
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            61,162,250
<CGS>                                       41,555,214
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,147,526
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (320,404)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,779,914
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,893,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,886,914
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,886,914
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.20
        

</TABLE>
From: lrqjohnston@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:35:04 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Lois Johnston

Moscow, ID 83843
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2010 of Secure Window Blinds, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), I, Anthony Pizzacalla, Chairman, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





/s/ Anthony Pizzacalla


Anthony Pizzacalla


President, Secretary Treasurer, Principal Executive Officer,


Principal Financial Officer and Director





Date: October 17, 2011
**EXHIBIT      32**

**CERTIFICATION      OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND **

**PRINCIPAL      FINANCIAL OFFICER **

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 **

**AS      ADDED BY SECTION 906 OF THE **

**SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of                1934. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | To                my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents,                in                all material respects the financial condition and results of operations                of                Union National as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the                Report. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By                                     | /s/                Mark D. Gainer                             |
|----------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                   |                                                          |
|                                   | Chairman/President/CEO                                        |
|                                   |                                                          |
| Date:                November 14, 2007 |
|                                   |                                                          |
|                                   |                                                          |
|                                   |                                                          |
| By                                     | /s/                Michael D. Peduzzi                         |
|                                   |                                                          |
|                                   | Senior                Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |
|                                   |                                                          |
| Date:                November 14, 2007 |

----
From: cw4him@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:13:07 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Cathy Wilson

Houston, TX 77070
From: pam_mullarkey@projectsos.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:03:38 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Pam Mullarkey

Daytona Beach, FL 32116