alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: kyparson@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:35:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all

"contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance with no co-pay to

patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for any organizations

that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I strongly oppose

the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and devices that I

oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Larry Eaton

, 42348-2635
No. 61037.

protests 212525-K, etc. (New York).

#### Elvic Import Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of veils or veilings similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Elvic Import Corp.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 13, C. D. 1837), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                       Remington Oil and Gas Corporation
                        Computation of Income per Share
                    (In thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                       For the Three Months Ended
                                                                                March 31,
                                                                       --------------------------
                                                                         2001              2000
                                                                       --------          --------

<S>                                                                    <C>               <C>
Net income available for basic income per share                        $ 14,657          $  3,784
   Interest expense on the Notes (net of tax) (1)                            77                --
                                                                       --------          --------
Net income available for diluted income per share                      $ 14,734          $  3,784
                                                                       ========          ========

Basic income per share                                                 $   0.68          $   0.18
                                                                       ========          ========

Diluted income per share                                               $   0.60          $   0.18
                                                                       ========          ========

Weighted average common stock                                            21,587            21,304
Dilutive stock options outstanding (treasury stock method) (1)            1,535                --
Restricted common stock grant (1)                                           663                --
Shares assumed issued by conversion of the Notes (1)                        534                --
Dilutive warrant outstanding (1)                                             53                --
                                                                       --------          --------
Total common shares for diluted income per share                         24,372            21,304
                                                                       ========          ========

(1) Non dilutive in 2000

Potential increase to net income for diluted income per share
   Interest expense on Notes (net of tax)                                    --          $     80

Potential issues of common stock for diluted income per share
   Weighted average stock options outstanding                                --                 5
   Weighted average warrant outstanding                                      --               200
   Weighted average shares issued assuming conversion of Notes               --               541
</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4492-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2023-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of South Carolina (FEMA-4492-DR), dated March 27, 2020, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This change occurred on June 29, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Robert D. Samaan, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

This action terminates the appointment of Gracia B. Szczech as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2023-20988 Filed 9-26-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
From: kym@souchet.us

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:51:49 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kymberly Souchet

Brunswick, ME 04011
From: hjmalandain@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:40:23 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Helen Malandain

Mountain View, CA 94043
From: tommcdsr@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:49:07 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

TOM MCDONNELL SR

Apple Valley, CA 92307
From: champaca1@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:37:11 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sharon Devin

, 86939
FIRST AMENDMENT TO DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT

     THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT is made as of June 7,
2007, by and between DELAFIELD FUND, INC., a Maryland corporation (the "Fund")
and IXIS ASSET MANAGEMENT DISTRIBUTORS, L.P. (the "Distributor").

                              W I T N E S S E T H:

     WHEREAS, the Fund and Distributor are parties to that certain Distribution
Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2005 (the "Distribution Agreement"),
pursuant to which the Distributor serves as distributor for the shares of the
Fund; and

     WHEREAS, the Fund and Distributor desire to amend the Distribution
Agreement to modify the term of the Distribution Agreement.

     NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree as follows:

     1. Article 15 of the Distribution Agreement is hereby amended by modifying
the annual expiration date to June 30 of each successive contract year (each
twelve-month period computed from July 1); and

     2. The Distribution Agreement, as expressly amended hereby, shall continue
in full force and effect.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this FIRST AMENDMENT
TO THE DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT as of the day and year first above written.


          DELAFIELD FUND, INC.


          By: /s/ Steven W. Duff
          Name:   Steven W. Duff
          Title:  Principal Executive Officer

          IXIS ASSET MANAGEMENT DISTRIBUTORS, L.P.
          By: IXIS ASSET MANAGEMENT DISTRIBUTION Corp., its general partner.

          By: /s/ John Pelletier
          Name:
          Title:
No. 66498.

#### George A. Abood Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/7267 (New York).

*353Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of sodium phosphate similar in all material respects to that the subject of *George A. Abood Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 1, C.D. 2270), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: rma0830@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:21:05 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Robert Albracht

Fairfax, VA 22032
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1523 

Recognizing Filipino American Heritage Month and celebrating the heritage 

and culture of Filipino Americans and their immense contributions to 

the Nation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 2, 2008 

Mr. FILNER (for himself, Mr. HONDA, Mr. ISSA, and Mr. SCOTT of Virginia) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing Filipino American Heritage Month and celebrating the heritage and culture of Filipino Americans 

and their immense contributions to the Nation. 

Whereas the first Filipinos to set foot in North America arrived in the Morro Bay area, of what is now known as 

San Luis Obispo, California, on board the Manila-built 

galleon ship Nuestra Senora de Esperanza under the 

command of Spanish Captain Pedro de Unamuno; 

Whereas the first permanent Filipino settlement in North 

America was established in 1763 in Saint Malo, Louisiana; 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1523 IH 

Whereas Filipino Americans have been a part of the American experience and have remained resolute and steadfast 

in the face of many difficult times and challenges; 

Whereas four million Americans of Philippine Ancestry currently live in the United States and more than 250,000 

American citizens live in the Philippines; 

Whereas Filipino Americans have made substantial contributions to American society in the arts, sciences, music and 

literature; 

Whereas brave and courageous Filipinos and Filipino Americans such as the 250,000 Filipinos fought under the 

United States flag during World War II to protect and 

defend this country; 

Whereas the values and traditions of Filipino Americans have 

had a positive impact upon American society; and 

Whereas it is essential to promote the understanding, education, and appreciation of the history and culture of Filipino Americans in the United States: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the celebration of Filipino Amer3 ican Heritage Month; 

4 (2) honors the heritage and culture of Filipino 

5 Americans and their immense contributions to the 

6 life of this Nation; and 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1523 IH 

1 (3) urges the people of the United States to ob2 serve Filipino American Heritage Month with appro3 priate programs and activities. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS