alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rodney Walton, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 212]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dunlop, J.), rendered December 22, 1993, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and theft of services, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

On appeal, the defendant asserts that the court committed error in its preliminary instructions and in its final charge to the jury regarding the burden of proof. The defendant failed to object to the instructions or charges now claimed to have been improper, and thus his arguments regarding these instructions and charges are unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, a review of the record demonstrates that the court adequately instructed and charged the jury in the fundamentals of the law and the burden of proof. The jury, hearing the whole charge, "would gather from its language the correct rules which should be applied in arriving at [a] deci*549sion” *(People v Russell,*266 NY 147, 153; *People v Canty,*60 NY2d 830).

Finally, the sentence imposed was neither harsh nor excessive under the circumstances *(see, People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80). Balletta, J. P., Rosenblatt, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.
No. 61044.

protest 284177-K (New York).

#### Hammel, Riglander & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of unset jewels, suitable for use in any watch movement, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. P67/268.

#### Irving W. Rice Co., Inc. *v.*United States, protests 66/45869 and 66/47669 (New York).

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of finished glass atomizer bases and that the merchandise in its imported condition possesses no independent function and is solely used when attached to and assembled with other substantial components thereby comprising a complete atomizer and following the principles set forth in *William*Adams, *Inc.*v. *United States*(56 Cust. Ct. 429, C.D. 2670), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before the First Division,

July 25, 1967

No. P67/250.

#### Eldon Industries, Inc. *v.*United States, protests 63/23076, 64/14258, and 63/10988 (Los Angeles).

Oliver, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of *James G. Wiley Co., a/c Ungar Electric Tools, Inc.*v. *United States*(49 Cust. Ct. 199, Abstract 66961), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: Dcn.Mike@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:23:35 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mike Landaiche

Tyrone, GA 30290
From: cocoabdad@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:24:52 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I call upon you to remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory preventive

services. Such a requirement tramples on the conscience and convictions of countless Americans and

violates every principle of decency and freedom.

Thank you for considering my strong opposition.

Sincerely,

Steven Muzio

Millbrook, AL 36054
Exhibit 10.9.5



                                             Mr Frederick Landman,
                                             PanAmSat Coporation
                                             One Pickwick Plaza - Suite 270
                                             Greenwich, CT 06830
                                             U.S.A.


                                              Evry, 9 March 1998



Re:      PAS 6 Satellite (LSA 94.5.918 "Pas 6 LSA")


This letter will confirm our agreement  that,  notwithstanding  the terms of the
Pas    6    LSA,     PanAmSat     agrees    to     [****************************
********************************************************************************
***********************************************************************]

[*******************************************************************************
********************************************************************************
************************************************]

This letter  formally  constitutes  an  amendment  to the PAS 6 LSA. In order to
signify  your  approval,  could you kindly  return an executed  original of this
letter to my attention.


Best Regards,



Michele FRANCI

                                          ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED TO BY PANAMSAT




[***]  Filed  separately  with  the  Commission   pursuant  to  a  request  for
       confidential treatment.


                                       1


<PAGE>


                                     Annex A

                             ARIANESPACE LETTERHEAD


                                             Mr Frederick Landman,
                                             PanAmSat Coporation
                                             One Pickwick Plaza - Suite 270
                                             Greenwich, CT 06830
                                             U.S.A.


                                             (DATE)


Re: [********************************************]

Dear Mr. Landman,

[*******************************************************************************
********************************************************************************
******************]





Sincerely,



ARIANESPACE S.A.


By:__________________________________


Title:_________________________________



[***]  Filed  separately  with  the  Commission   pursuant  to  a  request  for
       confidential treatment.
From: dldbass@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:32:19 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dann Bass

Bandera, TX 78003
From: mfbaum@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:34:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Muriel Baum

Antioch, IL 60002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          25,047
<SECURITIES>                                    32,420
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,189
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (214)
<INVENTORY>                                        409
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                68,830
<PP&E>                                          18,879
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,479)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  84,751
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,398
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,347
<OTHER-SE>                                      63,008
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    84,751
<SALES>                                         10,420
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,420
<CGS>                                            6,089
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,809
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,001)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   7
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (20,395)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (20,395)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,395)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
01 03

08

16

11

30

35

28 27

05

11

26

34

14

31

33 36

27

20

15

22

13

18

08 07

26

09

14 13

32

18

31

06

28

25

33

06

09

15 17

30

25

35 36

05 04

16

21

25 29

32

04

24

28

12

17

01

36

21 19

03

12

29

32

26

20

02

22

27

35

10

31

10

29 30

23 19

34

34

02

07

23

33

24

20 21 22 23 24 19 20 21 22 24 19 20 21 22 23

25

22

02 01

14 16

21

32

28

06

22

05 05

10 08

22

28

27

14 18 17

32

26

05

28 26

06

29

29

04 03 03

11

15

22

25

34

35

04

09

12 07

13

23 24

35

33

17 17

26

02 03

09

20 21

27

31

07 08

23

28

33

18 16

34

16

15

28

30 29

01 03 05

10

15

32 34

08

20

29 27 28

04

13 16

35 36

27

32

10

21

30

34

09

27

33 33

11 12 08

17 15

24

27

31

10

20

30

31 32

36 32 34

19

29

21 19

36 33

20

25

04

09

29

33 34

John Day 

Basin 

Planning Area

Map Area

Prineville 

District

O R E G O N

Kimberly

Bend

John Day

* Note: Access to some areas listed as open may

require landowner permission to cross private lands

1 0 1 2 3 Miles

1 0 1 2 3 Kilometers

Map 13C Errata: Alternative 2 Travel 

Management - Rudio Mountain

R 26 E R 27 E R 28 E

R 28 E

T

11

S

T

12

S

T

11

S

T

12

S

Bureau of Land Management

No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management as to the accuracy,

reliability, or completeness of these data for individual or aggregate use

with other data. Original data were compiled from various sources and may

be updated without notification. 

PRINEVILLE DISTRICT

John Day Basin

Resource Management Plan

Draft Environmental Impact Statement

2008

R 27 E LEGEND

Seasonal Availability(Corrections) 

Omitted Information

Transportation

Interim Road

Interim Road-Needs Rehabilitation

Open Road Seasonally

Open Road Seasonally- Needs Rehabilitation

Closed Road

Closed Road - Stream Function

Proposed New Road

US Highway

State Highway

County Road

Forest Service Primary Route

Forest Service Secondary Route

Private Road - Closed to public use or unknown

Administered Land

Bureau of Land Management

Private or Other

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

R 26 E

Last Modified Date: 1/5/2009 4:17:12 PM

T

10

S

T

10

S
**Docket Number FAA -**  **2014 -**  **0585**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                            7333
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  1925
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      45894
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           16741
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             16624
<LOANS>                                         133239
<ALLOWANCE>                                       1375
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  212657
<DEPOSITS>                                      165761
<SHORT-TERM>                                       664
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               1308
<LONG-TERM>                                      22491
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           629
<OTHER-SE>                                       21804
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  212657
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   2908
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  851
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    45
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  3804
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                1495
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1744
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             2060
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       11
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   1580
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    706
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         706
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       567
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .23
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.57
<LOANS-NON>                                        170
<LOANS-PAST>                                       401
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   2141
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  1371
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       15
<RECOVERIES>                                         8
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 1375
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              1375
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            653
        

</TABLE>
June 9, 2016

In accordance with the enclosed Memorandum Opinion, below is the judgment in the numbered cause set out herein to be entered in the Minutes of this Court as of the 9th day of June, 2016.

10-16-00111-CV	IN THE INTEREST OF H.L.H. AND A.H., CHILDREN - ON APPEAL FROM THE 413TH DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY - TRIAL COURT NO. DC-D201500336 – DISMISSED - Memorandum Opinion by Justice Davis:

“This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record, and the same being considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that the appeal should be dismissed; it is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the appeal be, and hereby is, dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  It is further ordered that Appellant pay all costs in this behalf expended and that this decision be certified below for observance.”

# image1.png
From: stampwithliesl@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:02:56 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I don't understand why you would choose to mandate "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures but

make mamograms 'not necessary' until you're 50 and then only every now and then instead of every

year.

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

liesl marmon

Atlanta, GA 30360
From: dwp1955a@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:27:12 PM

The federal government IE; HHS is mandating that all private health insurance plans cover

contraceptives and sterilization services free of charge. Organizations that provide insurance to their

employees will be forced to cover such services, even if they object.

This is an outrage.

It is the purpose of this legislation to put the burden of proof on the entity involved. It is incumbent on

them to verify that they have a religious affiliation that meets the government?s requirements in order

to maintain abstention. The truth is that is the government?s responsibility to claim otherwise should a

group claim exemption.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise

thereof; This is the law of the land and it stands firmly in the way of over reaching legislation of this

nature. Any and all persons who claim religious exemption are indeed exempt. If the government

wishes to challenge their assertions, they can do so on a public forum. In the meantime, this needs to

stop.

Sincerely,

David Perrego

Oldsmar, FL 34677