alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 408 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 16, 2007. 

Whereas in 1977 the Cathedral Church of St. Paul, the Cathedral of the Episcopal Diocese of Vermont, recognized 

the need to provide safe and affordable housing for its 

low-income seniors, organized the Cathedral Square Corporation, and began construction of a single project; 

Whereas since that small beginning Cathedral Square Corporation has grown into one of the largest and most innovative nonprofit housing developers in Vermont; 

Whereas the work of Cathedral Square Corporation has been 

groundbreaking, both literally and figuratively; 

Whereas Cathedral Square Corporation has developed housing for persons with mental health challenges, and operates the housing in partnership with mental health agencies; 

Whereas Cathedral Square Corporation has developed housing for younger adults with severe mobility impairments, 

and operates the housing in partnership with the Visiting 

Nurse Association; 

Whereas Cathedral Square Corporation completed one of the 

first assisted living conversion projects in the country for 

very low-income seniors who otherwise would be in nursing homes; 
2 

•HRES 408 EH 

Whereas Cathedral Square Corporation saved the historic 

Ruggles House, a property on the National Register of 

Historic Places, converting it to shared housing; 

Whereas Cathedral Square Corporation developed an 

intergenerational community, serving the elderly, teenage 

parents, and parents returning to college; 

Whereas Cathedral Square Corporation created Whitcomb 

Terrace, a housing development for persons of any age, 

income, or disability, which is a truly integrated, barrierfree community; 

Whereas Cathedral Square Corporation recently completed 

construction of an innovative mixed-financing project, 

which is one of few such projects in the Nation and will 

be home to 63 senior households and 4 nonprofit organizations; 

Whereas Cathedral Square Corporation currently manages 

housing for 837 seniors, 79 young adults with special 

needs, and 24 low-income children, and every property 

managed by the Corporation provides as many services as 

possible to enable independent living by the residents; 

Whereas not only has Cathedral Square Corporation made 

possible 40 affordable housing communities throughout 

Vermont, but the Board of Directors and staff of the 

Corporation are always looking to the future, anticipating 

the housing and service needs of those Vermonters who 

otherwise would have few housing options; and 

Whereas Cathedral Square Corporation does not just build 

housing, they provide homes: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes 

and honors the tremendous accomplishments and dedication 
3 

•HRES 408 EH 

of Cathedral Square Corporation, a Vermont nonprofit housing development organization, on the occasion of its 30th anniversary. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
From: mmagnif@new.rr.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:39:44 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mary Bloomer

Appleton, WI 54913
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 401 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                          June 5, 2007.
Whereas June 2, 2007, is observed as National Trails Day;
Whereas there are over 200,000 miles of trails in the United States, providing 
        access to public lands for recreational and educational opportunities;
Whereas trails enrich communities throughout the United States by helping to 
        protect habitats, watersheds, and cultural and historic artifacts;
Whereas 72.1 percent of all Americans age 16 and older participate in at least 
        one of twenty-two designated outdoor activities, including hiking, 
        backpacking, and trail running;
Whereas National Trails Day events take place in all 50 States, the District of 
        Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, and the United States Virgin Islands to 
        celebrate trails, recognize volunteers, and maintain local trails;
Whereas thousands of volunteers and event coordinators throughout the United 
        States make National Trails Day events possible; and
Whereas 2007 is the 15th Anniversary Celebration of National Trails Day: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of National Trails Day; and
            (2) honors the contributions National Trails Day has made to inspire 
        the public and trail enthusiasts to discover, learn about, maintain, and 
        celebrate trails.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
NO. 07-11-00295-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL E

JULY 26, 2011

IN RE: JASON MIEARS

Before CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. and BOYD, S.J.1

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before the Court are a motion to stay proceedings and a petition for “writ 

of audita querela” filed as an original proceeding on July 14, 2011, by Jason Miears. 

Miears, who is acting pro se, asks us to stay all “appellate proceedings” in four criminal 

cases which, according to his pleadings, are pending against him in the 397th District 

Court of Bexar County. In the body of his petition, Miears asks for an “order by 

estoppel” enjoining the Fourth Court of Appeals “from deciding” the four cases. Also by 

the petition, Miears asks us to assume appellate jurisdiction “as if [he] had been 

convicted in the City of Amarillo,” and then to review a plea agreement.

At the outset, we note that no record accompanies Miears’ petition, and in other 

respects it falls considerably short of meeting the requirements of a petition in an 

original proceeding. Tex. R. App. P. 52.3. More fundamentally, however, his petition 

 

1

 John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Ret.), Seventh Court of Appeals, sitting by 

assignment. 
2

demonstrates no basis for this court’s jurisdiction to grant the relief he requests. Tex. R. 

App. P. 52.7. Miears has not supplied, nor do we find, any authority for the recognition 

of the writ of audita querela in Texas practice or its availability in a court of appeals.2 

Even more importantly, however, Bexar County is not located within the Seventh Court 

of Appeals District. Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.201(e),(h) (West Supp. 2010). This 

court’s appellate jurisdiction has not been invoked with regard to any of the criminal 

cases mentioned in Miears’ pleadings.3 We see no reason to believe we have authority 

to interfere with the judicial action of a Bexar County district court as Miears’ requests, 

nor that of our sister appellate court. Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221(a) (writ power to 

enforce court’s jurisdiction), (b) (mandamus against certain judges of court of appeals’ 

district) (West 2004). 

Accordingly, we dismiss for want of jurisdiction Miears’ motion for stay, his 

petition for writ of audita querela, and, to the extent intended as a separate motion, his 

request for an order by estoppel. If, in his pleadings now before us, Miears has 

requested any additional relief, that request also is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 

James T. Campbell

Justice

Do not publish.

 

2

“The common law writ of audita querela permitted a defendant to obtain relief 

against a judgment or execution because of some defense or discharge arising 

subsequent to the rendition of the judgment.” Massey v. United States, 581 F.3d 172, 

174 (3d Cir. 2009) (per curiam). In light of the Federal All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651, 

the writ of audita querela is said to have availability in federal criminal cases “to the 

extent that it fills gaps in the current system of post-conviction relief.” Id. 

3 Nor, for that matter, is Miears a party to any other proceeding pending in this 

court.
From: greenjs461@att.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:41:02 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

susan green

Peru, IN 46970
No. 68882.

#### Baldwin Hardware Mfg. Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 61/12204, etc. (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of brass articles similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Zanin & Son, Inc.*v. *United States*(50 Cust. Ct. 37, C.D. 2385), and Abstract 67834, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. §1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of InfoTech USA, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, J. Robert Patterson, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Director of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ J. Robert Patterson                                                                         |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | J. Robert Patterson, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and Director |
|   |                                                                                            |
|   | Date:  February 14, 2006                                                              |
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Propell Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the Company), on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edward Bernstein, President, Chief Executive Officer  and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Edward Bernstein President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer) April 15, 2010
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549



FORM 8-K



CURRENT REPORT



Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934



Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): July 22, 2009





THE FIRST BANCORP, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in charter)



MAINE

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)



0-26589 01-0404322

(Commission file number) (IRS employer identification no.)



Main Street, Damariscotta, Maine 04853

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)



(207) 563-3195

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)



Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is

intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligations

of the registrant under any of the following provisions:



[_] Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)



[_] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)



[_] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))



[_] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4 (c))










TABLE OF CONTENTS



Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition

        Page 1




Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits

        Page 1




Signatures

        Page 2




Exhibit Index

        Page 3









Section 2 - Financial Information



Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition.



On July 22, 2009, the Registrant issued the press release filed herewith as Exhibit 99.1 with information regarding the results of operations and financial condition of The First Bancorp, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2009.





Section 9 - Financial Statements and Exhibits



Item 9.01 Financial Statements, Pro Forma Financial Information and Exhibits.



(c) Exhibits.

--------



The following Exhibits are being furnished herewith:



99.1 Registrant's Press Release dated July 22, 2009.








SIGNATURE



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





THE FIRST BANCORP, INC.



By: /s/ F. STEPHEN WARD

F. Stephen Ward

Executive Vice President &

Chief Financial Officer



Dated: July 22, 2009








Exhibit Index





Exhibit Number

        Description of Exhibit




99.1

        Registrant's Press Release dated July 22, 2009.
Exhibit 10.14 AMENDMENT
TO THE
PANAMSAT CORPORATION
1999 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS COMPENSATION DEFERRAL PLAN WHEREAS, PanAmSat
Corporation (the Company) has
adopted the PanAmSat 1999 Non-Employee Directors Compensation Deferral Plan, as
may be amended from time to time (the Plan); WHEREAS, the Company has
entered into the Transaction Agreement dated as of April 20, 2004 among
Constellation, LLC, PanAmSat Corporation, The DIRECTV Group, Inc., and PAS
Merger Sub, Inc.; WHEREAS, Section 7(a) of the
Plan provides that the Board of Directors of the Company (the Board) may amend the Plan from time to
time; and WHEREAS, the Board desires
to amend, and has approved the amendment of, the Plan; NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is
amended, effective July 28, 2004, as follows: 1.             A new sentence is hereby added to Section 5(f) of the
Plan at the end thereof to read as follows: Notwithstanding any
provision in this Plan to the contrary, payment of a Non-Employee Directors
Deferred Benefit shall commence as soon as practicable following the Merger
Closing Date, as such term is defined in the Transaction Agreement dated as of
April 20, 2004 among Constellation, LLC, PanAmSat Corporation, The DIRECTV
Group, Inc., and PAS Merger Sub, Inc. (the Transaction
Agreement). 2.             A new Section 7(c) is hereby added to the Plan to read
as follows: (c)         Termination of Plan. The Plan shall terminate in all
respects and no Non-Employee Directors will be eligible to participate in the
Plan effective as of the Stock Purchase Closing Date, as such term is defined
in Transaction Agreement.  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this
Amendment to the Plan has been executed the 17th day of August, 2004.  PANAMSAT
  CORPORATIONBy:
  JAMES
  W. CUMINALE
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 249 Introduced in House (IH)]

  1st Session
H. RES. 249

 Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to limit gifts to 
  Members, officers, and employees of the House from State and local 
                              governments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 15, 2007

Mr. Flake (for himself, Mr. Boehner, Mr. Sensenbrenner, Mr. Herger, Mr. 
 Shadegg, Mr. Franks of Arizona, Mr. Pence, Mr. Garrett of New Jersey, 
Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Mr. Hensarling, Mr. Fortuno, Mrs. Blackburn, 
 Mrs. Bachmann, Mr. Pitts, Mr. Marchant, Mr. Pearce, Mr. Fortenberry, 
 Mrs. Myrick, Mr. King of Iowa, Mr. McCotter, and Mr. Sali) submitted 
 the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to limit gifts to 
  Members, officers, and employees of the House from State and local 
                              governments.

    Resolved, That (a) clause 5(a)(3)(O) of rule XXV of the Rules of 
the House of Representatives is amended by striking ``, by a State or 
local government,''.
    (b) Clause 5(b)(1)(A) of rule XXV of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended by inserting ``a State or local government 
or'' before ``a private source''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.3

MINERAL PROPERTY OPTION AGREEMENT AMENDMENT NO. 2

This Mineral Property Option Agreement Amendment No. 2 (this "Agreement") is dated for reference the 23rd day of April, 2009, between Starfire Minerals Inc. (the "Owner") and Santos Resource Corp. ("Santos").

WHEREAS the parties to this Agreement entered into a mineral property option agreement dated the 25th day of June, 2007, which was amended by amending agreement dated as of the 29th day of May, 2009 (collectively, the "Mineral Property Agreement").

AND WHEREAS the parties desire to amend the Mineral Property Agreement to amend the terms to exercise the Option, as more particularly as described herein.

NOW THEREFORE in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein, the parties agree on the following terms:

1.         Definitions.  Capitalized terms not defined herein shall havethe meaning defined in the Mineral Property Agreement.

2.         Amendment to Terms to Exercise Options.  Paragraph 2.2(c)(ii)of the Mineral Property Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced withthe following:

(ii)         an additional twenty-five thousand ($25,000) dollars to beincurred as follows:

(A)       ten thousand two hundred sixty ($10,260) dollars on or before May 11,2009; and

(B)       fourteen thousand seven hundred forty ($14,740) dollars on or beforeApril 30, 2010.

3.         Continuing Effect.  The Mineral PropertyAgreement shall remain in full force and effect and unamended in all respectsexcept as amended by this Agreement, and this Agreement and the Mineral PropertyAgreement shall hereafter be read as one agreement.

4.         Enurement.  This Agreement and the MineralProperty Agreement shall enure to the benefit of and be binding upon the partieshereto and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, representatives,successors, and permitted assigns.

5.         Conflict.  In the event of a conflictbetween this Agreement and the Mineral Property Agreement, the terms andconditions of this Agreement shall govern.

6.         Execution by Counterparts.  This Agreementmay be executed by the parties hereto in as many counterparts as may benecessary, and each such agreement so executed shall be deemed to be an originaland, provided that all of the parties have executed a counterpart, suchcounterparts together shall constitute a valid and binding agreement, andnotwithstanding the date of execution shall be deemed to bear the date as setforth above.  Such executed copy may be transmitted by telecopied facsimile orother electronic method of transmission, and the reproduction of signatures byfacsimile or other electronic method of transmission will be treated as bindingas if originals.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have entered into this Agreement as of the date hereinbefore set out.