alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: bates07701@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:26:30 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

John Bates

Naples, FL 34105
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 339 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                          May 21, 2008.
Whereas approximately 7,000,000 motorcyclists ride on our Nation's roads and 
        highways to commute, travel, and recreate;
Whereas motorcycles are a valuable component of the transportation mix;
Whereas motorcycles are fuel-efficient and decrease congestion while having 
        little impact on our Nation's transportation infrastructure;
Whereas the United States is the world leader in motorcycle safety, promoting 
        education, licensing, use of protective gear, and motorcycle awareness;
Whereas the motorcycling community is committed to decreasing motorcycle crashes 
        through licensing, training, education, enforcement, personal 
        responsibility, and increased public awareness;
Whereas, according to a comprehensive study conducted on motorcycle crash 
        causation in the United States the ``Motorcycle Accident Cause Factors 
        and Identification of Countermeasures'' (Hurt Report), in approximately 
        two-thirds of fatal car-motorcycle crashes, the driver of the car was at 
        fault;
Whereas motorcycle awareness is beneficial to all road users and will help to 
        decrease car-motorcycle crashes;
Whereas May is designated as ``Motorcycle Safety Awareness Month''; and
Whereas National Highway Traffic Safety Administration promotes Motorcycle 
        Safety Awareness Month to encourage riders to always wear helmets and 
        other protective gear, never drink and ride, be properly licensed, and 
        get training and to remind all riders and motorists to always share the 
        road: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the contribution motorcycles make to the 
        transportation mix;
            (2) encourages all road users to be more aware of motorcycles and 
        motorcyclists' safety;
            (3) encourages all riders to receive appropriate training and 
        practice safe riding skills; and
            (4) supports the goals of Motorcycle Safety Awareness Month.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Source: Bure:
Data revised

made by the Bureau of Land Management as to the
accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data

for individual

Wester

au of Land Management Corporate
for WOPR Analysis. No warranty is

or aggregate use with other data

CLATSOP CO

TILLAMOOK CO

n Oregon Plan Revisions
Draft Environmental

Vv
Impact Statement

POLK CO

BENTON CO

COLUMBIA CO

WASHINGTON CO

YAMHILL CO

DISTRICT

i MAP 1
aa Western Oregon Plan Revisions
to 18 25 Mes Salem District
ie No Action Alternative
Nort American Datum of 1863 Land Use Allocations
Legend

Land Use Allocations
Congressionally Withdrawn

Late-Successional Reserve

Adaptive Management Area

Administratively Withdrawn

Riparian Reserve

Matrix
BLM Office
BLM Administrative Boundary
Wild and Scenic River
Eligible Wild and Scenic River

oH

MARION CO

LINN CO

86770)

Forest Excluded from

Harvest Land Base

| Forest Included in

Harvest Land Base

SALEM
DISTRICT
h MAP

fF AREA

Planning

OREGON

MO06-12-02
Before the First Division,

January 13, 1969

No. P69/10.

protests 67/26820-4223, etc. (Chicago).

No. P69/11.

protests 67/51061, etc. (Mobile).

No. P69/12.

protests 67/79010, etc. (Baltimore).

No. P69/13.

protests 67/80811-5495,etc. (Chicago).

No. P69/14.

protests 68/31375-7835,etc. (Chicago).

No. P69/15.

protests 66/8164, etc. (Boston).

No. P69/16.

protests 67/62237, etc. (Boston).

No. P69/17.

protests 66/78386-2643, etc. (Chicago).

No. P69/18.

protests 66/77278-2841, etc. (Chicago).

#### E. Besler *&*Company et al. *v.*United States, City Products Corporation *v.*United States, City Products Corporation et al. *v.*United States Keen Industries, Inc. *v.*United States, Keen Industries, Inc. *v.*United States, Nancy Sales Company, Inc. *v.*United States, National Silver Company *v.*United States Reliance Trading Corporation of Illinois *v.*United States, Karl Schroff & Assoc., Inc. *v.*United States, *1062Karl Schroff & Assoc., Inc. *v.*United States, Karl Schroff & Assoc., Inc. *v.*United States, Karl Schroff & Assoc., Inc. *v.*United States, Karl Schroff & Assoc., Inc. *v.*United States,

No. P69/19.

protests 66/78623-3037, etc. (Chicago).

No. P69/20.

protests 67/26828-4232, etc. (Chicago).

No. P69/21.

protests 67/66707-5209, etc. (Chicago).

No. P69/22.

protests 68/7995-6486 and 68/8944-6563 (Chicago).

WatsoN, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of artificial flowers, trees, foliage, fruits, vegetables, grasses, or grains, and articles made of the foregoing, in chief value of plastic, assembled in the same manner as the merchandise the subject of *Armbee Corporation et al.*v. *United States*(60 Cust. Ct. 105, C.D. 3278) and *Zunold Trading Corporation et al.*v. *United States*(60 Cust. Ct. 112, C.D. 3279), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

DANIEL J. COYLE,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D22-1209 

LT Case No. 2009-CF-039657-AX 

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

 Appellee. 

________________________________/ 

Decision filed August 23, 2022 

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Brevard County, 

Stephen G. Henderson, Judge.

Jason T. Forman , of Law Offices of 

Jason T. Forman, P.A., Fort 

Lauderdale, for Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, 

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona 

Beach, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED. 

LAMBERT, C.J., EVANDER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
August 8, 2016

Mr. William Beever

Aerial Agriculture Inc

710 N Tucker Boulevard

St. Louis, MO 63101

Re: FAA–2016–2407

Dear Mr. Beever:

This letter is to provide notification that we have reviewed your petition for exemption, and 

have determined that we will continue to process your petition. 

As referenced in the June 22, 2016, letter posted to your docket at www.regulations.gov, we 

are reviewing pending Section 333 petitions to determine if the recently-issued regulation, 

Operation and Certification of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations, Part 107 (www.faa.gov/uas) will satisfy your request. We have determined that 

your request requires further regulatory relief (Tier 3), and we will continue working on your 

petition for exemption. 

We have found that your petition, if granted, would set a precedent. Therefore, we will 

publish a summary of your petition in the Federal Register for public comments, if we have 

not done so already.

We will advise you of the agency’s final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If you 

have any questions regarding your petition, please contact me at 333exemptions@faa.gov. 

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                            5639
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   630
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      54433
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           26124
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             26413
<LOANS>                                         167398
<ALLOWANCE>                                       1794
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  261280
<DEPOSITS>                                      206617
<SHORT-TERM>                                       293
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               1662
<LONG-TERM>                                      28949
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           658
<OTHER-SE>                                       23101
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  261280
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   3497
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 1101
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    62
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  4660
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                1742
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2138
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             2522
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       42
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   1858
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    957
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         957
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       758
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.41
<LOANS-NON>                                        130
<LOANS-PAST>                                       896
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   2350
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  1743
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       17
<RECOVERIES>                                        26
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 1794
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              1794
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            671
        

</TABLE>
Docket Number FAA-2014-0585
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          49,310
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   46,238
<ALLOWANCES>                                    16,795
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               135,923
<PP&E>                                       3,847,785
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,391,126
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,629,769
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           62,502
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,629,769
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               461,734
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               363,844
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             184,319
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (86,429)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (86,429)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (86,429)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 14.1  CODE OF ETHICS FOR PROPELL CORPORATION FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT  Propell Corporation (Propell) mission includes the promotion of professional conduct in the practice of its financial management.  Those persons responsible for financial management at Propell hold an important and elevated role in corporate governance in that they are uniquely capable and empowered to ensure that the interests of all those involved with Propell  including shareholders, employees, customers, and the public - are appropriately balanced, protected and preserved.  This Code of Ethics provides principles for those persons responsible for Propells financial management.  These persons are expected to adhere to these principles and advocate them.  These principles embody rules regarding individual and peer responsibilities, as well as responsibilities to other employees, the public and shareholders.  Any violations of this Code of Ethics may result in disciplinary action.  All those persons responsible for financial management at Propell will:  · Act with honesty and integrity, avoiding actual or apparent conflicts of interest in personal and professional relationships. · Provide public disclosure of information that is accurate, complete, objective, relevant, timely and understandable. · Comply with rules and regulations of federal, state and local governments, and other appropriate private and public regulatory agencies. · Act in good faith, responsibly, with due care, competence and diligence, without misrepresenting material facts or allowing ones independent judgment to be subordinated. · Respect the confidentiality of information acquired in the course of ones work except when authorized or otherwise legally obligated to disclose. · Confidential information acquired in the course of ones work will not be used for personal advantage. · Share knowledge and maintain skills important and relevant to Propell · Proactively promote and be an example of ethical behavior as a responsible partner among peers, in the work environment and the community. · Achieve responsible use of and control over all assets and resources employed or entrusted. * * * * *
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                           CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Vera Vechera; Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Midex
Gold Corp. (the "Registrant"), do hereby certify pursuant to Rule 15d-l4(b) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter
63 of Title 18 of the United States Code that:

     (1)  the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant for the
          fiscal year ended March 31, 2009 (the "Report"), to which this
          statement is filed as an exhibit, fully complies with the requirements
          of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
          amended; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Registrant.


Dated: June 26, 2009                         By: /s/ Vera Vechera
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Vera Vechera
                                                Chief Executive Officer
                                                Chief Financial Officer
No. P68/459.

protest 63/13814 (Philadelphia).

#### Seedman International Corp. *v.*United States,

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of inner tubes ■similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Seedman International Corp. et al.*v. *United States*(60 Cust. Ct. 127, C.D. 3285), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6149

MICKEY L. PHILLIPS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DARNELY R. HODGE, Superintendent; WALTER J. MINTON, Assistant Superintendent; CHARLES DAVIS, Captain, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-569) Submitted: April 11, 2002 Decided: May 10, 2002 Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mickey L. Phillips, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Mickey L. Phillips appeals from the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. The district court assessed an initial partial filing fee in accordance with 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(b)(1) (West Supp. 2001), and directed that Phillips submit evidence that he exhausted his administrative remedies, and either pay the fee or submit a statement under penalty of perjury that he had insufficient assets to pay the fee. When Phillips failed to respond to this order, the district court dismissed the case without prejudice. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 63790.

protests 53098-K, etc. (New York).

#### Bloomingdale Bros., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc. (40*C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

November 21, 2011 

t1114 

Order 

 

November 21, 2011 

143639 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 143639 

 COA: 289692 

Wayne CC: 08-005690-FC 

JASON BLAKE AGNEW, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 19, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Before the Third Division,

February 1, 1967

No. P67/29.

#### Fusek’s et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/3079, etc. (Los Angeles).

Bichardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of wood statuary similar in all material respects to that of the subject of *Fusek's*v. *United States*(53 Cust. Ct. 109, C.D. 2480), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: carol64golden@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:55:14 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Carol Dorsey

Fairfax Station, VA 22039