alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Almaymoon Mawji Principal Executive Officer of Easy CD Yearbook, Inc. (the
"Company"), certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes
of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company
for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in that Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: October 23, 2008        By: /s/ Almaymoon Mawji
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                              Name:  Almaymoon Mawji
                              Title: President, Treasurer and Director
                                     (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
H. Res. 47

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 10, 2007.

Resolved, That the following named Members and Delegate be, and are hereby, elected to the following standing 

committee of the House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE: Mr. Rahall, Mr. DeFazio, Mr. Costello, Ms. Norton, 

Mr. Nadler, Ms. Corrine Brown of Florida, Mr. Filner, Ms. 

Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas, Mr. Taylor of Mississippi, 

Ms. Millender-McDonald, Mr. Cummings, Mrs. Tauscher, Mr. 

Boswell, Mr. Holden, Mr. Baird, Mr. Larsen of Washington, 

Mr. Capuano, Ms. Carson, Mr. Bishop of New York, Mr. 

Michaud, Mr. Higgins, Mr. Carnahan, Mr. Salazar, Mrs. 

Napolitano, Mr. Lipinski, Mr. Lampson, Mr. Space, Ms. 

Hirono, Mr. Braley of Iowa, Mr. Altmire, Mr. Walz of Minnesota, Mr. Shuler, Mr. Arcuri, Mr. Mitchell, Mr. Carney, 
2

•HRES 47 EH 

Mr. Hall of New York, Mr. Kagen, Mr. Cohen, and Mr. 

McNerney. 

Attest:

Clerk.
From: jon@trejofuels.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:05:45 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jon Trejo

Gilbert, AZ 85234
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350





The
undersigned officer of ALLIED HEALTHCARE PRODUCTS, INC. (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the Company’s fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Earl R. RefslandEarl
      R. RefslandPresident
      & Chief Executive Officer


November
5, 2010
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Real Value Estates, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K A-1 for the period ended May 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



3.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:  April 19, 2010

By: /s/ DENNIS T. KUSHNER

________________________

Dennis T. Kushner

Chief Financial Officer







1
Before the Third Division,

February 6, 1961

No. 65139.

#### J. M. Sutton Sons & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/6690, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of wall plaques similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Ross*Products, *Inc.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 74, C.D. 2106), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 10-Q FOR
THE SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           4,666
<SECURITIES>                                    43,528
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                51,499
<PP&E>                                          14,349
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,150)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  62,187
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,371
<BONDS>                                         12,415
<COMMON>                                           184
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,042
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    62,187
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,502
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,556
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 610
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,733)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,733)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,733)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.54)
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

MILTON DOWELL, :

:

Plaintiff, :

:

v. : Civil Action No.: 10-0096 (RMU)

: 

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, : Re Document No.: 13

:

Defendant. :

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GRANTING THE DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AS CONCEDED; DENYING AS MOOT THE

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND HIS COMPLAINT

The plaintiff brought this action under the Privacy Act, see 5 U.S.C. § 552a, against the

Federal Bureau of Prisons. On April 5, 2010, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss. See

generally Def.’s Mot. to Dismiss. On April 6, 2010, the court issued an order advising the

plaintiff of his obligation under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the local rules of this

Court to file an opposition to the defendant’s motion by May 7, 2010. Order (Apr. 6, 2010). 

The plaintiff was expressly advised that his failure to file a timely opposition could result in

dismissal of the case. Id. To date, the plaintiff has neither filed an opposition nor requested an

extension of time to do so. Rather, on April 27, 2010, the plaintiff filed a motion to amend his

complaint, in which he failed to address the arguments for dismissal raised in the defendant’s

motion. See generally Pl.’s Mot. to Amend.

It is well settled that a plaintiff’s failure to respond to a motion to dismiss permits a court

to grant the motion as conceded. See Fox v. Am. Airlines, Inc., 389 F.3d 1291, 1294-95 (D.C.

Cir. 2004) (affirming the district court’s dismissal of a complaint based on the plaintiff’s failure

1
to file a timely response to the defendant’s motion to dismiss); Twelve John Does v. District of

Columbia, 117 F.3d 571, 577 (D.C. Cir. 1997) (observing that “[w]here the district court relies

on the absence of a response as a basis for treating the motion as conceded, [the Circuit will]

honor its enforcement of the rule”); see also Cooper v. Farmers New Century Ins. Co., 607 F.

Supp. 2d 175, 180 (D.D.C. 2009) (granting the defendant’s motion to dismiss as conceded based

on the plaintiff’s failure to respond to arguments raised in the motion). Because the plaintiff

failed to respond to the defendant’s motion to dismiss, the court grants the defendant’s motion as

conceded. Furthermore, because this case is dismissed, the court denies the plaintiff’s motion to

amend as moot.1

 An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is separately and

contemporaneously issued this 21st day of May, 2010.

 RICARDO M. URBINA

 United States District Judge

1 In the alternative, the plaintiff’s motion to amend, which seeks to add the United States

Probation Department as a party defendant, must be denied as futile. “United States

Probation Offices are units of the federal courts and therefore are not subject to the

Privacy Act.” Ramirez v. Dep’t of Justice, 594 F. Supp. 2d 58, 62 (D.D.C. 2009); see

also Bowles v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 2010 WL 23326, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 5, 2010);

Jefferson v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 657 F. Supp. 2d 43, 47 (D.D.C. 2009); Callwood v.

Dep’t of Prob., 982 F .Supp. 341, 342 (D.Vi.1997).

2
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: TheBull Mountain coal field, Musselshell and Yellowstone counties, Montana**
 
Report | Plate
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.3:647
Item Number:0620 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000955604
 
July 16, 2018
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 
 AMENDMENT TO 
 LETTER AGREEMENT DATED JULY 28, 2010 

BETWEEN 
 COBRA
ELECTRONICS CORPORATION 
 AND 
 SALLY WASHLOW 
 WHEREAS, Cobra Electronics Corporation, a Delaware Corporation
(the “Company”), and Sally Washlow (“Executive”) entered into a letter agreement dated July 28, 2010 (the “Agreement”); 
 WHEREAS, the Agreement sets for the terms and conditions of Executive’s employment with the Company; and 
 WHEREAS, the parties mutually desire to amend certain terms of Executive’s employment with the Company. 
 NOW THEREFORE, the Agreement shall be amended, effective as of January 4, 2013, as follows: 
 1. Paragraph 1 of the Agreement shall be amended to substitute the title “President” for the title “Senior Vice President, Marketing and Sales of the Company” as it appears in the
first sentence therein. 
 2. Paragraph 3 of the Agreement shall be amended to substitute the dollar amount “$285,000”
for the dollar amount “$220,000” as it appears in the second sentence therein. 
 3. Paragraph 4 of the Agreement
shall be amended to substitute the percentage “40%” for the percentage “35%” as it appears in the first sentence therein. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this instrument to be executed by its duly authorized officer this 4th day of January, 2013. 

 

			
	COBRA ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ James Bazet

		
	Name:	 	James Bazet
		
	Title:	 	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
		
	Date:	 	 January 4, 2013
EXHIBIT 11
               Calculation of Weighted Average Shares
             Outstanding for Net Income (Loss) Per Share
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                         September 30,          
                                                                                    1997               1998     
                                                                                -------------    ---------------
<S>                                                                             <C>              <C>
Earnings:
Net Income (Loss)..........................................................     $     642,131    $   (4,837,058)
                                                                                =============    ==============

Shares:
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares
   Outstanding.............................................................         4,434,140         6,103,522
Additional Shares Under Treasury Stock Method
   from Warrants Issued 12 Months Prior to 3/31/97*........................           170,674                --
                                                                                -------------    --------------
Average Common Shares Outstanding and Equivalents..........................         4,604,814         6,103,522
                                                                                =============    ==============
Net Income (Loss) Per Share................................................     $         .14    $         (.79)
                                                                                =============    ==============
</TABLE>

* -- Calculation would be antidilutive for 1998.
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT





Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934





DATE OF REPORT (Date of earliest event reported): December 4, 2012





CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION


(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)





Delaware (STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION)001-11241 (COMMISSION FILE NUMBER)37-1105865 (IRS EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER)





2120 West End Avenue, Nashville, Tennessee    37203-0001 (ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES)    (ZIP CODE)


Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (615) 341-1000





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:


o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))













---



I tem 8.01 Other Events .


Exhibits are filed herewith in connection with the issuance on December 4, 2012 by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation (the “Company”) of $250,000,000 aggregate principal amount of its Medium-Term Notes, Series G, Floating Rate Notes due 2014 (the “Notes”) pursuant to the Company’s previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-173364) (the “Registration Statement”) and the related Prospectus dated April 7, 2011, Prospectus Supplement dated April 7, 2011 and Pricing Supplements dated November 29, 2012 and December 3, 2012, relating to the Notes.





Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits .





(d) Exhibits . The following Exhibits are filed as part of this Report and as Exhibits to the Registration Statement:





ExhibitNumberDescription5.1Opinion of Sidley Austin LLP, as to the legality of the Notes.23.1Consent of Sidley Austin LLP (included as part of Exhibit 5.1).








2


---



SIGNATURE





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





Caterpillar Financial Services CorporationBy:J. Wesley BlumenshineName: J. Wesley Blumenshine Title:   Secretary





Date: December 4, 2012








3


---



EXHIBIT INDEX








ExhibitNumberDescription5.1Opinion of Sidley Austin LLP, as to the legality of the Notes.23.1Consent of Sidley Austin LLP (included as part of Exhibit 5.1).





4
No. 59734.

#### Garay & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 232755-K and 235239-K (New York).

Opinion by

Fobd, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of elastic fabrics of whatever material composed, braided, knit, or woven, in part of india rubber, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 65132.

#### United Mineral & Chemical Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 60/20727 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of vinyl plastic tape, not similar in use to any dutiable enumerated article, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**EXHIBIT**** ****13.2**

**PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION**** ****1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION**** ****906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF**** ****2002**

        I, Anthony Pagano, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Genmab A/S, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

        (1)   The Annual Report on Form 20-F of Genmab A/S for the period ended December 31, 2023 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

        (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Genmab A/S.

| x                       | ​ |
|-------------------------|---------|
| Date: February 14, 2024 | ​ |
| ​                 | ​ |
| /s/ Anthony Pagano      | ​ |

​

AMERICAS/2017215013.2

​

----
From: stroudgj@cox.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:45:08 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Glen Stroud

Lafayette, LA 70501
**;~**

## fJ~I(.**',~ ~:** **.~**

·f -,



# . 4 •.f ',' ,.**.~** 

### Revision Authorization Application to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

---"'""'-----
.............................**~-!** ........................... ----- .................. ...-, 

### State of Oregon's Hazardous Waste Management Program (Corrective Action)



## . • I 1-'

# ::~il::lll~![::::·~:·j:ll!·!!)!.I!·!.!I-l:~i\\:j::~::t:\:\1i~i:~:l

'.:' . ":::**:~~**

Department of Environmental Quality 

### July 28, 1995

1.0- I'·r. .-- ...**'-'-'---"-.~-** .... -,.::. ...**-.~.-** ",:-:---.-'.

# • Revision Authorization Authorization Application for Corrective Action 

### Table of Contents Cover Letter from DEQ Director



# •••



# • Part I. Part II. Part III. Part IV. Part V. Corrective Action Program Description Attorney General's Statement Memorandum of Agreement RCRA Revision Checklists Milestone Agreement and Milestone Completion