alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: dziemnguyen@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:55:49 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dziem Nguyen

Garland, TX 75044
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the annual report of American Power Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Johannes Petersen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/ Johannes PetersenJohannes PetersenChief Financial Officer
 
 Date:  February 3, 2011
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to American Power Corporation and will be retained by American Power Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Brinks Home Security Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2009 (the Report), I, Robert B. Allen, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DATED this 6th day of April 2010.



/s/ Robert B. AllenRobert B. AllenPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Director


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Brinks Home Security Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Brinks Home Security Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.



40
PUBLIC LAW 114–149—APR. 29, 2016 130 STAT. 365 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 719: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016): 

Mar. 16, considered and passed Senate. 

Apr. 18, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 114–149 

114th Congress 

An Act 

To rename the Armed Forces Reserve Center in Great Falls, Montana, the Captain 

John E. Moran and Captain William Wylie Galt Armed Forces Reserve Center. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. RENAMING OF THE ARMED FORCES RESERVE CENTER 

IN GREAT FALLS, MONTANA, AS THE CAPTAIN JOHN 

E. MORAN AND CAPTAIN WILLIAM WYLIE GALT ARMED 

FORCES RESERVE CENTER. 

(a) RENAMING.—The Armed Forces Reserve Center in Great 

Falls, Montana, shall hereafter be known and designated as the 

‘‘Captain John E. Moran and Captain William Wylie Galt Armed 

Forces Reserve Center’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, map, regulation, 

map, document, paper, other record of the United States to the 

facility referred to in subsection (a) shall be considered to be a 

reference to the Captain John E. Moran and Captain William 

Wylie Galt Armed Forces Reserve Center. 

Approved April 29, 2016. 

Apr. 29, 2016 

[S. 719] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
Wachovia
Securities


201 South College
Street


CP9


Charlotte, NC
28244-1075




WACHOVIA
      BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION Logo
            Wachovia
      Securities






1123
SERVICER’S CERTIFICATE
 
 
 Reference
is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April
11, 2008, by and among Structured Asset Securities Corporation II, as Depositor,
Wachovia Bank National Association, as Master Servicer, CW Capital Asset
Management LLC, as Special Servicer, LaSalle Bank National Association, as
Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series
2008-C1 (the "Agreement").  Capitalized terms used herein not
otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the
Agreement.
 
 Pursuant
to Section 3.13 of this Agreement, Marilyn Addison and David J Shay, Director of
Compliance and Third Party Oversight and Director of Strategic Initiatives do
hereby certify that:
 
 1.
              A
      review of the activities of  the  Master Servicer
      during the period from April 11, 2008 to December 31, 2008 (the
      reporting period) and of its performance under the Agreement during
      such period has been made under our supervision;
  and
 
 2.
              To
      the best of our knowledge, based on such review,  the Master
      Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all
      material respects throughout the period reporting
  period.
 IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Certificate as of the
11th
day of March 2009.
    /s/ Marilyn
      Addison
              
              /s/ David J
      ShayMarilyn
      Addison, Director
              
              David J Shay,
      DirectorWachovia Bank
      National Association
              
              Wachovia Bank
      National Association
No. 66471.

#### Carlyle Fabrics *v.*United States,

protests 302968-K, etc. (New Fork).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of waterproof cotton cloth similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *D. H. Grant & Co., Inc. (47*C.C.P.A. 20, C.A.D. 723), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Deferred Compensation Plan Amendment No. 1



 Exhibit 10.1 
 PIER 1 IMPORTS, INC. DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1

 This Amendment No. 1 is made to the Pier 1 Imports, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”). The Plan
was made effective January 1, 2011 by Pier 1 Imports, Inc. a Delaware corporation (the “Company”). This Amendment No. 1 is made effective January 1, 2013 by the Company. 

WHEREAS, the Company desires to (i) amend the eligibility service requirement for Discretionary Contributions, and (ii) amend
the valuation date for all key employee distributions under Section 7.08 of the Plan; and 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to
Section 12.04 of the Plan, the Company may amend the Plan at any time, in whole or in part. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is
hereby amended as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Section 3.01 of the Plan is amended to add the following sentence to the end of Section 3.01: 


“Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything else to the contrary in this Plan, an Executive selected for participation is not
required to meet the eligibility service requirement of the 401(k) Plan to receive a Discretionary Contribution.” 
  

	 	2.	Any distribution that is required to be delayed under Section 7.08 of the Plan will be valued as of the last business day of the calendar month preceding the
actual date of distribution. 

  

	 	3.	This Amendment No. 1 shall not operate or be construed to alter, modify or amend the Plan except as expressly set forth herein. All capitalized terms used in this
Amendment No. 1, unless specifically defined herein, have the same meanings attributed to them in the Plan. The terms and provision of the Plan, as expressly amended hereby, shall remain in full force and effect. 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment No. 1 to be executed effective January 1, 2013. 

 

	
	PIER 1 IMPORTS, INC.
	
	  

	Gregory S. Humenesky
	Executive Vice President - Human Resources
	October 11, 2012
From: jeanemily@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:16:44 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

JeanEmily Penta

Madison, CT 06443
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                            OF AMEN PROPERTIES, INC.
                           PURSUANT TO 18 USC ss.1350
                           --------------------------

In connection with the annual report of AMEN Properties, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"),  I, Kris Oliver,  Chief Financial Officer of
the Company,  hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title
18, Chapter 63,  Section 1350 of the United States Code,  that to the best of my
knowledge:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
     as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(1)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     at the dates and for the periods indicated.



                                            /s/ Kris Oliver
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Kris Oliver, Chief Financial Officer


Date: May 22, 2008


                                       38
No. 69193.

#### Gunze New York, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 61/11774 (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of pongee silk piece goods, over 30 inches in width, similar in *363all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 64266, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before the Second Division,

August 24, 1966

No. P66/206. —

#### Ercona Corp. *v.*United States, protest 60/1435 (New York).

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of echo sounders similar in all material respects to those the subj ect of *Kelvin & Hughes America Corp.*v. *United States*(53 Cust. Ct. 21, C.D. 2468), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: krslager@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:27:21 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kenneth Slager

,
H. Res. 463 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 12, 2007. 

Resolved, That the election contest relating to the office 

of Representative from the Fifth Congressional District of 

Florida is dismissed. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
From: saxman1993@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:50:55 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mark Warda

, 48183-3702
From: artyapoah100@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:58:29 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Arthur Williams

Eugene, OR 97401
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S AUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF FEBRUARY 1998 AND
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE  NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDING
FEBRUARY 28, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                         121,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,155,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 14,144,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,702,000
<PP&E>                                       7,555,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,440,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,090,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,478,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       120,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,744,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,090,000
<SALES>                                     21,339,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            21,339,000
<CGS>                                       15,767,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,767,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,514,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             642,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (584,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   149,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (733,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (733,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.11)
        

</TABLE>