72608 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 3, 2013 / Proposed Rules 

with a written determination that the 

route is open for public use and that 

such bicycle use is consistent with the 

protection of the park area’s natural, 

scenic and aesthetic values, safety 

considerations and management 

objectives, and will not disturb wildlife 

or park resources. Notice may be 

provided by posting signs and 

identifying routes on maps which shall 

be available in the office of the 

Superintendent and on the park’s Web 

site. 

(3) The Superintendent may open or 

close designated bicycle routes, or 

portions thereof, or impose conditions 

or restrictions for bicycle use after 

taking into consideration public health 

and safety, natural and cultural resource 

protection, carrying capacity, and other 

management activities and objectives. 

(i) The Superintendent will provide 

public notice of all such actions through 

one or more of the methods listed in 

§ 1.7 of this chapter. 

(ii) Violating a closure, condition, or 

restriction is prohibited. 

Dated: November 20, 2013. 

Rachel Jacobson, 

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Fish 

and Wildlife and Parks. 

[FR Doc. 2013–28894 Filed 12–2–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312–EJ–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R07–OAR–2013–0698; FRL–9903–73– 

Region 7] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; State of 

Missouri 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve 

a revision to the State Implementation 

Plan (SIP) submitted by the State of 

Missouri which revises the written 

reporting requirements for maintenance, 

start-up, or shutdown activities; updates 

the information a source operator must 

provide to the department when a 

notice of excess emissions is received; 

and corrects references in the reporting 

and record keeping section. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before January 2, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07– 

OAR–2013–0698, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. Email: bhesania.amy@epa.gov. 

3. Mail or Hand Delivery or Courier: 

Amy Bhesania, Environmental 

Protection Agency, Air Planning and 

Development Branch, 11201 Renner 

Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R07–OAR–2013– 

0698. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through www.regulations.gov 

or email. The www.regulations.gov Web 

site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, 

which means EPA will not know your 

identity or contact information unless 

you provide it in the body of your 

comment. If you send an email 

comment directly to EPA without going 

through www.regulations.gov, your 

email address will be automatically 

captured and included as part of the 

comment that is placed in the public 

docket and made available on the 

Internet. If you submit an electronic 

comment, EPA recommends that you 

include your name and other contact 

information in the body of your 

comment and with any disk or CD–ROM 

you submit. If EPA cannot read your 

comment due to technical difficulties 

and cannot contact you for clarification, 

EPA may not be able to consider your 

comment. Electronic files should avoid 

the use of special characters, any form 

of encryption, and be free of any defects 

or viruses. 

Docket. All documents in the 

electronic docket are listed in the 

www.regulations.gov index. Although 

listed in the index, some information is 

not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

will be publicly available only in hard 

copy. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either 

electronically in www.regulations.gov or 

in hard copy at the Environmental 

Protection Agency, Air Planning and 

Development Branch, 11201 Renner 

Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219. EPA 

requests that you contact the person 

listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT section to schedule your 

inspection. The interested persons 

wanting to examine these documents 

should make an appointment with the 

office at least 24 hours in advance. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Amy Bhesania, Environmental 

Protection Agency, Air Planning and 

Development Branch, 11201 Renner 

Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at 

(913) 551–7147, or by email at 

bhesania.amy@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ 

or ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. This section 

provides additional information by 

addressing the following: 

I. What is being addressed in this document? 

II. Have the requirements for approval of a 

SIP revision been met? 

III. What action is EPA taking? 

I. What is being addressed in this 

document? 

EPA is proposing to approve revisions 

to the Missouri SIP submitted to EPA on 

July 8, 2010 which amend 10 CSR 10– 

6.050 Start-up, Shutdown, and 

Malfunction Conditions. Specifically, 

Missouri amended subsection 3(B) to 

remove the option for verbal notification 

and therefore only written notification 

is allowed for any maintenance, startup, or shutdown activity which is 

expected to cause an excess release of 

emissions that exceeds one hour. This 

change makes the written notification 

requirements consistent for subsections 

3(B) which covers maintenance, start-up 

and shutdown, and 3(A) which covers 

malfunctions. Subparagrah 3(B)3 was 

removed because the requirement was 

only applicable to malfunctions which 

is addressed in subsection 3(A). 

The remaining revisions to the rule 

are administrative changes which revise 

the rule to be consistent with the state’s 

standard rule format or make other 

minor clarifying changes. 

Subparagraphs 3(B)3 through 3(B)9 were 

renumbered to adjust for the removal of 

item 3(B)3. Subparagraph 3(C)2 includes 

minor administrative changes to meet 

the state’s standard rule format. 

Subparagraph 3(C)2A and 3(C)2B were 

removed because they were redundant 

and replaced with references to the 

appropriate applicable subsections of 

the rule. Subsection 4(B) was revised to 

be consistent with the state’s standard 

rule format. 

In a separate action on February 22, 

2013, EPA has proposed to address a 

petition by Sierra Club related to SSM 

provisions, including 10 CSR 10– 

6.050(3)(C) (78 FR 12459). In this 

separate action, EPA proposed to deny 

the petitioner’s request that EPA take 

action under Clean Air Act (CAA) 

section 110 (k)(5) or (6) to direct the 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 3, 2013 / Proposed Rules 72609 

state to revise this provision. The 

revisions proposed in today’s action do 

not address the sections of the 

regulation challenged by the Sierra Club 

in its petition. The revisions proposed 

in today’s action clarify and strengthen 

the Missouri SIP. By removing the 

option for oral notification in 10 CSR 

10–6.050(3)(B), and requiring written 

notification, the Missouri SIP is more 

stringent. The revision in 10 CSR 10– 

6.050(3)(C)2. A. clarifies the notification 

requirements for malfunctions by 

referring to section 10 CSR 10– 

6.050(3)(A). The revision in 10 CSR 10– 

6.050 (3)(C)2.B. clarifies the general 

notification requirements for 

maintenance, startup, or shutdown 

activities by referring to the general 

notification requirements set forth in 10 

CSR 10–6.050(3)(B). 

The revisions proposed in today’s 

action are consistent with CAA 

requirements for SIP provisions and do 

not violate the anti-backsliding 

provisions in section 110(l) or section 

193 of the CAA because they are SIP 

strengthening and do not interfere with 

any applicable requirements concerning 

attainment or reasonable further 

progress nor do they affect control 

measures in effect prior to the 1990 

CAA Amendments related to 

nonattainment areas. Further, these 

proposed revisions are consistent with 

the action proposed by EPA on February 

22, 2013 as mentioned above (78 FR 

12459). 

II. Have the requirements for approval 

of a SIP revision been met? 

The state submission has met the 

public notice requirements for SIP 

submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 

51.102. The submission also satisfied 

the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 

51, appendix V. In addition, as 

explained above, the revision meets the 

substantive SIP requirements of the 

CAA, including section 110 and 

implementing regulations. 

III. What action is EPA taking? 

EPA is proposing to approve the 

request to amend the Missouri SIP by 

approving the state’s request to amend 

10 CSR 10–6.050 Start-Up, Shutdown, 

and Malfunction to update written 

reporting requirements, correct 

references, and other minor clarifying 

changes. Approval of these revisions 

will ensure consistency between state 

and Federally-approved rules. EPA has 

determined that these changes will not 

relax the SIP or adversely impact air 

emissions. 

We are processing this as a proposed 

action because we are soliciting 

comments on this proposed action. 

Final rulemaking will occur after 

consideration of any comments. 

Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

Act and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this proposed 

action merely approves state law as 

meeting Federal requirements and does 

not impose additional requirements 

beyond those imposed by state law. For 

that reason, this proposed action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Public Law 104–4); 

• does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the state, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 

Incorporation by reference, 

Intergovernmental relations, Lead, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate 

matter, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Dated: November 20, 2013. 

Karl Brooks, 

Regional Administrator, Region 7. 

[FR Doc. 2013–28947 Filed 12–2–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 62 

[EPA–R03–OAR–2013–0164; FRL–9903–75– 

Region 3] 

Approval and Promulgation of State 

Air Quality Plans for Designated 

Facilities and Pollutants; 

Commonwealth of Virginia; Control of 

Emissions From Existing Sewage 

Sludge Incineration Units 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve 

a section plan submitted by the 

Commonwealth of Virginia for sewage 

sludge incineration (SSI) units. The 

section plan contains a state rule for 

existing SSI units and was submitted as 

a result of the March 21, 2011 

promulgation of Federal new source 

performance standards (NSPS) and 

emission guidelines for SSI units. This 

action is being taken under sections of 

the Clean Air Act (CAA). 

DATES: Written comments must be 

received on or before January 2, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID Number EPA– 

R03–OAR–2013–0164 by one of the 

following methods: 

A. www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

B. Email: cox.kathleen@epa.gov. 

C. Mail: EPA–R03–OAR–2013–0164, 

Kathleen Cox, Associate Director, Office 

of Air Permits and Toxics, Mailcode 

3AP10, U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. 

D. Hand Delivery: At the previouslylisted EPA Region III address. Such 

deliveries are only accepted during the 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS