alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Karen@mymarco.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:11:35 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Karen Adams

Marco Island, FL 34145
No. 60167.

protests 747925-G, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### W. X. Huber Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that 20 percent of the merchandise consists of rags used chiefly for papermaking, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained with respect to said 20 percent of the merchandise.
##### 



Exhibit 12.1
 NII HOLDINGS, INC.
STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS
TO FIXED CHARGES
(dollars in thousands)
 Three Months EndedMarch 31,2007

    2006Income from continuing operations before income tax
    
    $
    126,816
    
    
    $
    99,791Add:Fixed charges
    
    
    34,806
    
    
    
    31,414Amortization of capitalized interest
    
    
    1,351
    
    
    
    889Less:Interest capitalized
    
    
    1,702
    
    
    
    3,166Equity in (losses) gains of unconsolidated affiliates
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Losses attributable to minority interests
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Earnings as adjusted
    
    $
    161,271
    
    
    $
    128,928Fixed charges:Interest expense on indebtedness (including
amortization of
debt expense and discount)
    
    $
    24,329
    
    
    $
    21,415Interest capitalized
    
    
    1,702
    
    
    
    3,166Portion of rent expense representative of interest (30%)
    
    
    8,775
    
    
    
    6,834Fixed charges
    
    $
    34,806
    
    
    $
    31,414Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    4.63
    
    
    
    4.10Deficiency of earnings to cover fixed charges
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
From: jadxtreme@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:28:06 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

James Davis

Bladenboro, NC 28320
| **Derivative Financial Instruments and Risk Management (Details 3) - USD ($) $ in Millions** | Dec. 31, 2015 | Dec. 31, 2014 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|---------------|
| **Derivative**                                                                               |          |          |
| Derivative instruments, notional amount                                                      | $ 3,540       | $ 5,250       |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Aggregate notional amount specified by the derivative(s). Expressed as an absolute value.
+ References
Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Regulation S-X (SX) -Number 210 -Article 12 -Section 13 -Sentence Column B
+ Details**Name:**invest_DerivativeNotionalAmount**Namespace Prefix:**invest_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**instant |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Line items represent financial concepts included in a table. These concepts are used to disclose reportable information associated with domain members defined in one or many axes to the table.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_DerivativeLineItems**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
From: tony48@Rochester.RR.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:14:49 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Anthony Stockus

Attica, NY 14011
Dismissed and Opinion Filed July 23, 2024 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-24-00272-CV 

IN RE M.C., Relator 

Original Proceeding from the 302nd Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DF-21-17924 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Partida-Kipness, Nowell, and Miskel 

Opinion by Justice Partida-Kipness 

In his petition for writ of mandamus, relator challenges temporary orders 

issued in the underlying suit to modify the parent–child relationship. Those 

temporary orders (1) named Mother as the person with the exclusive right to 

designate the child’s primary residence and (2) set a geographic restriction on the 

child’s residence. 

It came to our attention the trial court has set a Dallas County Local Rule 8.02 

“Dismissal/Entry of Final Order” hearing. Because this suggested the parties have 

announced settlement in the underlying matter, we questioned our jurisdiction over 

this mandamus proceeding. We directed relator to file a letter brief addressing our 
 –2– 

concern and providing an update as to the status of the underlying case. We 

cautioned him that failure to comply by July 12, 2024, could result in dismissal of 

the original proceeding without further notice. To date, he has not filed the requested 

letter brief. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus. Additionally, 

based on our review, relator’s mandamus record contains unredacted sensitive 

data—such as the minor’s full birthdate—in violation of the Texas Rules of 

Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.9. Accordingly, we strike the mandamus 

record. 

240272F.P05 

/Robbie Partida-Kipness/

ROBBIE PARTIDA-KIPNESS 

JUSTICE
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsEffects of Inlet Flow Conditions on Crossflow Jet MixingAn experimental investigation of the effects of mainstream turbulence, mainstream swirl and non-symmetric mass addition has been conducted for the isothermal mixing of multiple jets injected into a confined rectangular crossflow. Jet penetration and mixing in the near field was studied using planar Mie scattering to measure time-averaged mixture fraction distributions. Orifice configurations were used that were optimized for mixing performance based on previous experimental and computational results for a homogeneous approach flow. Mixing effectiveness, determined using a spatial unmixedness parameter based on the variance of the mean jet concentration distributions, was found to be minimally affected by free-stream turbulence but significantly influenced by the addition of swirl to the mainstream. The results for non-symmetric mass addition indicate that the concentration distribution of the flowfield can be tailored if desired.Document ID19960049849Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsLiscinsky, D. S.*(United Technologies Corp. East Hartford, CT United States)*True, B.*(United Technologies Corp. East Hartford, CT United States)*Holdeman, J. D.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland,OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1996Subject CategoryAircraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-107258NAS 1.15:107258AIAA Paper 96-2881E-10319Meeting InformationMeeting: Joint Propulsion ConferenceLocation: Lake Buena Vista, FLCountry: United StatesStart Date: July 1, 1996End Date: July 3, 1996Sponsors:Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc.,American Society for Electrical Engineers,American Society of Mechanical Engineers,American Inst. of Aeronautics and AstronauticsAccession Number96N34068Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 537-02-20Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19960049849.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 332 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        April 25, 2007.
    Resolved,  That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 1591) making 
emergency supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
2007, and for other purposes. All points of order against the conference report 
and against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be 
considered as read.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EX-99.CERT 11(b)

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, and 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, and accompanies the report on Form N-CSR for the
period ended March 31, 2008 of Daily Income Fund (the "Company").

Each of the undersigned officers of the Company hereby certify that, to the best
of such officer's knowledge:

         (i) the Form N-CSR fully complies with the requirements of Section
         13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
         U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

         (ii) the information contained in the Form N-CSR fairly presents, in
         all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
         of the Company.


Date:  June 12, 2008
                                                      /s/Michael P. Lydon
                                                      Michael P. Lydon
                                                      President

Date:  June 12, 2008
                                                      /s/Joseph Jerkovich
                                                      Joseph Jerkovich
                                                      Treasurer
**MPD** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 0
- 0 119 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JOHN LEO STEGER,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 3 0
- day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is gran ted an extension of time to and including Septe mber 10 , 202 1 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 6 2021

08/06/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0119
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.15


Non-Employee Director Compensation


We currently pay our non-employee directors the following:


•annual retainer of $93,500 for the Lead Director  
•annual retainer of $97,000 for the Chairperson of the Audit Committee
•annual retainer of $87,500 for the Chairperson of the Compensation Committee
•annual retainer of $85,000 for the Chairperson of the Nominating and Governance Committee


The equity component of the director's compensation is valued at $170,000.  The annual equity package consists of 50% in stock options and 50% in restricted stock units.   The options become exercisable one year after the grant date and expire ten years after the grant date.  The restricted stock units vest one year from the grant date.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement on Form N-1A of our report dated March 28, 2008, relating to the
financial statements and financial highlights which appears in the January 31,
2008 Annual Report to Shareholders of New Jersey Daily Municipal Income Fund,
Inc., which is also incorporated by reference into the Registration Statement.
We also consent to the references to us under the headings "Financial
Highlights", "Counsel and Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" and
"Financial Statements" in such Registration Statement.

/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New York, New York
May 30, 2008
Exhibit
      32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Griffin Land & Nurseries, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended May 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Periodic Report”), I, Frederick M. Danziger, President
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:
 
 1.
              The
      Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
      and
 
 2.
              The
      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.
 
 
 
 /s/ FREDERICK M.
      DANZIGERFrederick
      M. DanzigerPresident
      and Chief Executive OfficerJuly 10,
      2008
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF


CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350






In
connection with this Yearly Report of Zhong Sen
International Tea Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year
ending May 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Nie Pin, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




1. Such
Yearly Report on Form 10-K for the year ending May 31, 2009, fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-K for the year
ending May 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Zhong Sen
International Tea Company.




Date: 
July 23, 2009




/s/
Nie
Pin


Nie
Pin


Chief
Executive Officer
ex10-1.htm












Magnum Hunter Resources Corporation 8-K


 


Exhibit 10.1







 


AMENDMENT THREE TO THE


MAGNUM HUNTER RESOURCES CORPORATION


AMENDED AND RESTATED STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


 


Whereas, Magnum Hunter Resources Corporation (the “Company”) has heretofore adopted the Magnum Hunter Resources Corporation Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”); and


 


Whereas, the Company desires to amend the Plan in certain respects.


 


Now, therefore, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of the date set forth below, but subject to the approval of the Company’s common stockholders, by restating Section 4.1 of the Plan in its entirety to read as follows:


 


4.1     Maximum Number of Shares Available; Certain Restrictions on Awards. Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4.3 of the Plan, the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that will be available for issuance under the Plan will be 27,500,000, of which 7,500,000 shares may be available for use in connection with Incentive Options.  No more than 11,250,000 shares of Common Stock may be the subject of Awards that are not Options or Stock Appreciation Rights.  The aggregate number of shares with respect to which an Award or Awards may be granted to any one Participant in any one taxable year of the Company may not exceed 6,875,000 shares of Common Stock.  The shares available for issuance under the Plan may, at the election of the Committee, be either treasury shares or shares authorized but unissued, and, if treasury shares are used, all references in the Plan to the issuance of shares will, for corporate law purposes, be deemed to mean the transfer of shares from treasury.


 


In witness whereof, the undersigned, acting pursuant to authority granted to him by the Board of Directors of the Company, has caused this Amendment to the Plan to be executed this 17th day of January, 2013.



 



	  	Magnum Hunter Resources Corporation
	  	  	  
	
 

	By:	
/s/ Gary C. Evans 


	  	  	
Gary C. Evans,


	  	  	
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer