alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: aokaye13@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:31:45 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kaye Slimp

, 20110-4926
No. 68384.

protests 63/10613, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### Standard Commodities Import & Export Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of rayon labels similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Bruce Duncan Co., Inc., a/e Standard Commodities Import & Export Corp.*v. *United States*(51 Oust. Ct. 27, C.D. 2409), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**Exhibit
      32.1**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
      OF 2002






In
      connection with the Quarterly Report
      on Form 10-QSB of Sunrise Energy Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the
      period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Konstantin Tsirulnikov, President and
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:






(1)     The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and






(2)     The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.






Date:
                August 14, 2007By:
            /s/ Konstantin TsirulnikovKonstantin
                TsirulnikovChief
                Executive
                Officer
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 358 

Recognizing the significance of the contribution of the Brotherhood of the 

Badge to the Global War on Terror through its provision of surplus 

law enforcement equipment to Iraqi police forces. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 1, 2007 

Mr. RADANOVICH (for himself, Mr. NUNES, Mr. COSTA, and Mr. CARDOZA) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the significance of the contribution of the Brotherhood of the Badge to the Global War on Terror 

through its provision of surplus law enforcement equipment to Iraqi police forces. 

Whereas Mike Harris and Brian Burry of the Fresno City 

Police Department and Ken Shockley of the Fresno City 

Fire Department founded the Brotherhood of the Badge 

in Fresno, California, an organization to help supply 

Iraqi police forces with much-needed surplus body armor, 

including bulletproof vests, and other vital law enforcement equipment; 

Whereas over 100 law enforcement agencies from across the 

United States have donated surplus equipment to the 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 358 IH 

Brotherhood of the Badge in order to help supply Iraqi 

police forces; 

Whereas private donations of more than $2.7 million to the 

Brotherhood of the Badge have financed the purchase of 

new bulletproof vests distributed to Iraqi police forces; 

Whereas the Brotherhood of the Badge has supplied Iraqi police forces with over 20,000 bulletproof vests to date; 

Whereas bulletproof vests have proven to be an invaluable 

piece of equipment for Iraqi police forces and have saved 

a significant number of lives; 

Whereas well-equipped, trained, and prepared Iraqi police 

forces are in the best interest of United States military 

personnel serving in Iraq; 

Whereas the departure of the United States military from 

Iraq largely depends on the ability of Iraqi police forces 

to enforce laws, defend the people of Iraq, and keep the 

peace; 

Whereas Iraqi police forces that can enforce laws, defend the 

people of Iraq, and keep the peace will greatly contribute 

to a self-sustainable Iraqi government and general stability in the Middle East; 

Whereas the Brotherhood of the Badge expresses a desire to 

expand its operation to include assistance to Iraqi firefighter services; and 

Whereas the Brotherhood of the Badge encourages and invites all police and fire departments in the United States 

to contribute any and all surplus law enforcement and 

firefighter equipment in order to help supply Iraqi police 

forces and Iraqi firefighter services: Now, therefore, be it 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 358 IH 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes the significance of the contribution of the Brother3 hood of the Badge to the Global War on Terror through 

4 its provision of surplus law enforcement equipment to 

5 Iraqi police forces. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
From: carmenhood@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:45:57 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Carmen Hood

Hamilton, OH 45015
No. 63316.

protests 157239-K, etc. (New York).

#### Henry Black, Ltd., Inc., and American Shipping Co. et al. *v.*United States,

*328Opinion, by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of candlesticks and candelabras similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 62036, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 69643.

#### E. F. Clements Co., Inc., and Frank P. Dow Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 63/7445, etc. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Oliver, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of plastic paperweights similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 67488, the claim of the plantiffs was sustained.
i MAP 2
, * ; Western Oregon Plan Revisions
5 0 5 10 15 20 25 Miles Salem District
5 0 5 10 15 20 25 Kilometers

Alternative 1
Albers Equal Area Projection .
North American Datum of 1983 Land Use Allocations

Source: Bureau of Land Management Corporate
Data revised for WOPR Analysis. No warranty is
made by the Bureau of Land Management as to the
accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data
for individual or aggregate use with other data.

CLATSOP CO

Legend

COLUMBIA CO Land Use Allocations

National Land Conservation System

Administratively Withdrawn

Late-Successional Management Area
Riparian Management Area
Timber Management Area
BLM Office
BLM Administrative Boundary
-—-—- Wild and Scenic River
: Eligible Wild and Scenic River

TILLAMOOK CO — J WASHINGTON CO

YAMHILL CO

MARION CO

POLK CO

DISTRICT

LINN CO

BENTON CO

|
SALEM
DISTRICT
C7 H hf MAP
Planning P AREA
Forest Excluded from
Harvest Land Base
TPL | Forest Included in
Harvest Land Base
Western Oregon Plan Revisions
Draft Environmental O R E G O N
Vv
Impact Statement
MO06-12-02
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title
18, United States Code)



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Excelsior Private Equity Fund II, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers
knowledge, that:



The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July
31, 2005 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                         |  |                          |  |                           
|------------------------ |  | ------------------------ |  | --------------------------
|Date: September 14, 2005 |  | /s/ Timothy Leach       
|                         |  | Name:                    |  | Timothy Leach             
|                         |  | Title:                   |  | Co-Chief Executive Officer
|                         | 
|Date: September 14, 2005 |  | /s/ Raghav V. Nandagopal
|                         |  | Name:                    |  | Raghav V. Nandagopal      
|                         |  | Title:                   |  | Co-Chief Executive Officer
|                         | 
|Date: September 14, 2005 |  | /s/ Robert F. Aufenanger
|                         |  | Name:                    |  | Robert F. Aufenanger      
|                         |  | Title:                   |  | Treasurer                 



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### Geology of the Thomas Range fluorspar district, Juab County, Utah

By: Mortimer Hay StaatzFrank W. Osterwald

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1069

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (8584 pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (8095 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 2**                            (1290 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 3**                            (2025 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 4**                            (1565 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 9**                            (252 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 10**                            (299 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 11**                            (302 pdf)                        
  - **Plate 12**                            (225 pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
From: riedellc@amc.af.mil

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:18:39 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Christopher M. Riedell

Vacaville, CA 95687
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPlume dispersion of the exhaust from a cryogenic wind tunnelAn analytical model was developed to predict the behavior of the plume exhausting from the cryogenic National Transonic Facility. Temperature, visibility, oxygen concentration, and flow characteristics of the plume are calculated for distance downwind of the stack exhaust. Negative buoyancy of the cold plume is included in the analysis. Compared to photographic observations, the model predicts the centerline trajectory of the plume fairly accurately, but underpredicts the extent of fogging. The diffusion coefficient is revised to bring the model into better agreement with observations.Document ID19870016112Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsLassiter, William S.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1987Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-89148NAS 1.15:89148Accession Number87N25545Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-61-01-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19870016112.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARDO TULIO RIVAS-GARCIA,

Petitioner,

 v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney

General,

Respondent.

No. 15-73022

Agency No. A200-199-446

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 7, 2022** 

Pasadena, California

Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and GRABER and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Mardo Tulio Rivas-Garcia, a native and citizen of Guatemala,

seeks review of a final order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”),

dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision that denied his

FILED

APR 12 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the

Convention Against Torture. We review the agency’s factual findings for

substantial evidence, Guo v. Sessions, 897 F.3d 1208, 1212 (9th Cir. 2018), and we

review a due process challenge de novo, Padilla-Martinez v. Holder, 770 F.3d 825,

830 (9th Cir. 2014). We deny the petition.

1. Petitioner asserts that he fears harm because he is a member of a

particular social group—land-owning coffee growers or his family. But the IJ

found, and the BIA affirmed as not clearly erroneous, that Petitioner fails to show

that either the threats he received or the murders of two of his siblings were “on

account of” his membership in either purported social group. Rather, Petitioner

was the unfortunate victim of random criminal activity. The evidence does not

compel a contrary conclusion. Because Petitioner fails to establish nexus, the BIA

permissibly denied his applications for asylum and withholding of removal.

1

 See

Zetino v. Holder, 622 F.3d 1007, 1016 (9th Cir. 2010) (holding that an alien’s

desire to be free from random criminal activity bears “no nexus” to a protected

ground).

1

 Petitioner does not challenge the denial of protection under the Convention

Against Torture, so we do not address that issue.

2
2. Petitioner argues that the IJ violated his right to due process by

threatening to make an adverse credibility finding if Petitioner reviewed his written

declaration during the hearing. It would have been premature for the IJ to make

such a finding before the hearing had concluded. See Kaur v. Gonzales, 418 F.3d

1061, 1066 (9th Cir. 2005) (When assessing an alien’s credibility “it is incumbent

upon the IJ to view each portion of an alien’s testimony . . . in light of all of the

evidence presented.”). But the BIA correctly held that, even assuming that the IJ

violated his right to due process by cutting off a material line of inquiry, Petitioner

fails to show that he was prejudiced. See Padilla-Martinez, 770 F.3d at 830 (“To

prevail on a due-process claim, a petitioner must demonstrate both a violation of

rights and prejudice.”).

PETITION DENIED.

3
Before the Second Division,

March 11, 1963

No. 67504.

#### Adorence Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/28226, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of nylon gloves and mittens similar in use to cotton gloves and mittens and that the issues are the same in all material respects as those in *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 CCPA 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained, with the exception of the items of merchandise in protest 60/218 contained in cases 31, 47, and 48, which were withdrawn from warehouse subsequent to the enactment of Public Law 85-645 (T.D. 54676), effective September 13, 1958.