alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
School of Aviation 

500 College Terrace 

Homestead, Florida 33030-6009 

~ ft Miami Dade 

~I' College 

Homestead Campus 

April 30, 2015 

US Dept. of Transportation 

Docket Operations 

West Building Ground Floor 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Ave. S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: Petition of Miami Dade College, School of Aviation, for an Exemption Pursuant to 

Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 

To Whom it May Concern: 

Enclosed is the petition for exemption, pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform 

Act of 2012. 

Please contact me if you have any questions in regard to this submittal. 

Tom Jargiello, Esq. 

Director 

Eig-Watson School of Aviation 

Miami Dade College 

(305) 237 - 5080 

Cc: Daniel le Corbett 

Aviation Safety Inspector 

South Florida FSD0-19
Before the Third Division,

January 23, 1958

No. 61496.

#### Davies, Turner & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 301889-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
#### Michael R. OLSEN; Sheila Olsen, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Norman H. WOLFE, Commissioner of Internal Revenue; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 00-17198.

D.C. No. CV-00-00499-FCD.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 11, 2001.*

Decided June 21, 2001.

*541Before O’SCANNLAIN, SILVERMAN, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Michael and Sheila Olsen appeal pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing their action against the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, a Tax Court judge and clerk. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s dismissal based on judicial immunity, *see Moore v. Brewster,*96 F.3d 1240, 1243 (9th Cir.1996), and dismissals for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, *Clinton v. Babbitt,*180 F.3d 1081, 1086 (9th Cir.1999) (sovereign immunity), and affirm for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations adopted by the district court in its order entered on September 28, 2000.

We have considered and rejected the Olsens’ remaining contentions.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
(October 5, 1995)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jeffrey Moolenaar, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 859]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Rothwax, J.), rendered September 22, 1993, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of burglary in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to a term of 8 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Probable cause for defendant’s arrest was established by evidence that the police, responding to a radio run of a burglary in process, were met by several people who confirmed the report and directed them to the building’s second floor where a face had been seen in a window; that the officers there discovered an unlocked apartment that was in complete disarray; that defendant was seen trying to hide on the roof of the *230building by several people who had gone into building and onto the roof; and that defendant was arrested after being identified by a witness who informed one of the officers that he had seen defendant climb the fire escape and enter an apartment window *(see, People v Alston,*178 AD2d 153, *Iv denied*80 NY2d 827; *People v Rivera,*67 AD2d 867). Defendant’s other claim that he was wrongly adjudicated a persistent violent felony offender on the basis of an unconstitutionally obtained 1985 conviction was waived when he failed to challenge that conviction at the sentencing for his 1987 conviction. Concur— Murphy, P. J., Ellerin, Kupferman, Asch and Mazzarelli, JJ.
Contacts. With whOm outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? 

### OyanizaOOn 

# p""", Cootac!OO 

# I Date Res.poru;e 

# I "'slim:lll B"'i~ .':\'(I"Jil 'U5.VCi;uitm 

### Eli <:4n1 

# It/rllu
- Hq.;iiH1Ul

.. \irli'l\" A,y,,-i:l:irm 

# I (}>l'~ Lntll'fer 

# (/do

-

# - , 

# , ,\in·r~nOwner. & I'llu\> '\.',oci:Hit,n I R"tWrT l-l"damon 

# ;)17

# In. ~ 

# .- • ·L 7 ; ; it 

# ,,in IIi'< 

# - I -\ 1.-\ \1 L"rH:·~ 

### t

# U 1///(; 

# I
- 

# ,
From: revyouwon@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:05:20 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Wong Young

Absecon, NJ 08205
From: mauricepentico@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Public Comments on RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:42:59 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Maurice Pentico

Wake Forest, NC 27587
From: miller17cu94@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:35:51 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Christopher C Miller

Covington, GA 30014
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 187 (Thursday, September 28, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66927-66928]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21189]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #18016 and #18017; Vermont Disaster Number VT-
00046]


Presidential Declaration of a Major Disaster for the State of 
Vermont

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 6.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of Vermont (FEMA-4720-DR), dated 07/14/
2023.

[[Page 66928]]

    Incident: Severe Storms, Flooding, Landslides, and Mudslides.
    Incident Period: 07/07/2023 through 07/21/2023.

DATES: Issued on 09/19/2023.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/12/2023.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 04/15/2024.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the State of Vermont, dated 07/14/2023, is hereby 
amended to re-establish the incident period for this disaster as 
beginning 07/07/2023 through 07/21/2023. All other information in the 
original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Francisco S[aacute]nchez, Jr.,
Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.
[FR Doc. 2023-21189 Filed 9-27-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BJ'S
WHOLESALE CLUB, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
SHEETS FILED WITH THE FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MAY 1, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-01-1999
<CASH>                                          10,850
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,445
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    399,930
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               467,405
<PP&E>                                         624,610
<DEPRECIATION>                                 181,797
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 921,581
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          377,620
<BONDS>                                          7,202
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           740
<OTHER-SE>                                     493,664
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   921,581
<SALES>                                        858,761
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               879,724
<CGS>                                          786,930
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  786,930
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                69,534
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (413)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,673
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,303
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,370
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,370
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.19


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4643-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2023-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the Commonwealth of Kentucky (FEMA-4643-DR), dated February 27, 2022, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This change occurred on July 31, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, John E. Brogan, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

This action terminates the appointment of Myra M. Shird as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2023-20997 Filed 9-26-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
No. 68900.

#### Polk’s Model Craft Hobbies, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 60/24993, etc. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of miniature motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 66961, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Coupon | Interest | Maturity | Callable | Survivor's Option | Price | CUSIP |   |
| 1.850% | Semi-Annual(†††) | 6/15/2021 | 12/15/2016 * |   | Yes § | 100.00 | 14912HRZ5 |   |
| 2.250% | Semi-Annual(†††) | 6/15/2023 | 12/15/2016 * |   | Yes § | 100.00 | 14912HSA9 |   |

|                         |
|-------------------------|
|                         |  |  |
| (†††) | First Payment date 12/15/2016 |   |
|                    |   |
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2013-0826 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2011-SW-046-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
From: ndhabecker@liberty.edu

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:14:55 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Nathan Habecker

Lynchburg, VA 24502
EXHIBIT 10.3(b)







SCHEDULE A TO EXHIBIT 10.3(a)







The following individuals entered into director retirement agreements with The Ohio Valley Bank Company which are identical to the Third Amended and Restated Director Retirement Agreement, dated December 18, 2012, between Jeffrey E. Smith and The Ohio Valley Bank Company filed herewith.







	
Name

	 	
Date of Agreement


	 	 	 
	
Harold A. Howe

	 	
December 18, 2012


	 	 	 
	
David W. Thomas

	 	
December 18, 2012


	 	 	 
	
Thomas E. Wiseman

	 	
December 18, 2012