alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: shi-lan@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:47:33 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

shi-lan chen

Covina, CA 91722
From: rcurtis52@cox.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:02:20 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

rod curtis

Virginia Beach, VA 23462
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Swift Energy
Managed Pension Assets Partnership 1991-A, Ltd.'s balance sheet and statement of
operations  contained in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended  September 30, 1997
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         1,245
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  28,025
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               29,270
<PP&E>                                         1,611,453
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,352,014)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 288,709
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          276,820
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     11,889
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   288,709
<SALES>                                        68,475
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               68,512
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  69,871<F1>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,498)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,498)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,498)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<FN>
<F1>Includes lease operating expenses, production taxes and depreciation,
depletion and amortization expense.  Excludes general and administrative and
interest expense.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
10.32 Offer Letter-TimGuertin




Chiron Holdings GP, Inc. 
12930 IH 10 West 
San Antonio, Texas 78249
October 12, 2012


Mr. Tim Guertin 
By electronic mail
Dear Tim:
The sponsors, Funds advised by Apax Partners, controlled affiliates of CPP Investment Board and PSP Investments, are pleased to extend an offer to you to join the Board of Directors of Chiron Holdings GP, Inc., the general partner of the parent holding company for Kinetic Concepts, Inc. and LifeCell Corporation.  As a Non- Executive Director, your responsibilities will be as follows:
		
	•
	To attend and contribute to 4 to 5 meetings of the Board of Directors annually, and possibly join certain Committees of the Board. The Board meetings are typically 1 to 2 days each.


		
	•
	To be available to attend ad hoc meetings, either telephonically or face-to-face as necessary.  For example, you will probably want to attend 1-2 hour, monthly telephonic update meetings.


		
	•
	To serve as a sounding board and mentor to the CEOs.




Your cash compensation for this engagement will be $100,000 per year, payable quarterly in advance.  You will also be eligible for an equity component, or profits interest award, valued at approximately $400,000.  This program will described to you in more detail, and will be provided to you on the same terms and conditions as those that apply to all executives of the company.
We look forward to your participation in the Board Meeting next week.  As we have previously discussed, all materials and information made available to you during the Board Meeting and our interactions are to be held in strict confidence.  We will be sure to devote time to answering any questions that you may have as well as help you understand the profits interests program.  If the terms of this letter are acceptable, please sign in the space indicated below and we will direct Company counsel to finalize definitive documentation regarding your engagement as a non-executive director.
Sincerely yours, 
Erik Levy 
/s/ Erik Levy




AGREED AND ACCEPTED
/s/ Tim Guertin        10/14/2012    
Tim Guertin    Date
From: gilbertmramirez58@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:22:44 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Gilbert Ramirez

Ontario, CA 91762
United States
Securities and Exhange Commission
Washington, D.C.   20549

Form 12b-25

Notification of Late Filing

(Check one):
___ Form 10-K    __ Form 20-F   __ Form 11-K    ___ Form 10-Q    X  Form N-SAR

For the Period Ended:

12/31/96          

Part I - Registrant Information

Full Name of Registrant

Scudder Municipal Trust
  Scudder Managed Municipal Fund
  Scudder High Yield Tax Free Fund
        
Former Name if Applicable


Address of Principal Executive Office (Street & Number)

Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
        

Part II - Rules 12b-25(b) and (c)

If the subject report could not be filed without  unreasonable effort or expense
and the registrant seeks relief pursuant to Rule 12b-25(b), the following should
be completed.

(a)  the resons  described in  reasonable  detail in Part III of this form could
     not be eliminated without unreasonable effort or expense.
                                           
(b)  The subject annual report,  semi-annual  report,  transition report on Form
     10-K, Form 20-F, 11-K, Form N-SAR, or portion thereof,  will be filed on or
     before the fifteenth calendar day following the prescribed due date; or the
     subject quarterly report transition report on form 10-Q, or portion thereof
     will be filed on or before the fifth  calendar day following the prescribed
     due date (XX)

(c)  The accountant's  statement or other exhibit required by Rule 12b-25(c) has
     been attached if applicable

Part III - Narrative

State below in  reasonable  detail the reasons  why the Form 10-K,  11-K,  10-Q,
N-SAR, or the transition  report or portion  thereof,  could not be filed within
the prescribed time period.

The registrant requests additional time to file form NSAR so that it can compile
the necessary information to file a complete and accurate document. (XX)

Part IV - Other Information

(1)  Name  and  telephone  number  of  person  to  contact  in  regard  to  this
     notification

     Thomas F. McDonough, Assistant Secretary
     (617) 295-2567

       
(2)  Have all other periodic  reports  required under Section 13 or 15(d) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or Section 30 of the Investment Company Act
     of 1940 during the preceeding 12 months been filed?

     Yes   


(3)  Is it anticipated that any significant change in results of operations from
     the corresponding  period for the last fiscal year will be reflected by the
     earnings  statements  to be  included  in the  subject  report  or  portion
     thereof?

     No 



(Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter) Scudder Municipal Trust

has caused this notification to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned 
hereunto duly authorized.

Date:   2/5/97                                  By: John Lumbard
                                                /s/:John Lumbard
From: kgch7@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:21:54 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kim Heiden

Garland, TX 75040
From: susan_davis@ferris.edu

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:55:22 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sharon Davis

Spartanburg, SC 29307
From: sh2rose@cox.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:23:55 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sh Paavola

Lakeside, CA 92040
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER GRANTING

MOTION FOR INSPECTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff,

v.

RAJINDER JOHAL, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. CR05-334L

ORDER GRANTING 

MOTION FOR INSPECTION

This matter comes before the Court on “Defendant Maninder Singh Khatkar’s Motion for

Inspection of Personnel Files of Law Enforcement Officers and Memorandum in Support

Thereof” (Dkt. # 59). Upon review of the briefs, this motion is HEREBY GRANTED subject to

the following qualifications detailed in the government’s brief: (1) the government will initially

request a review of the files of the top ten primary federal agent witnesses, including the three

lead federal agents and key federal surveillance witnesses, (2) if defense counsel wishes a

specific agent’s file reviewed, he is asked to provide that agent’s name to the government, (3)

the government will either provide reportable material to the defense, or notify counsel that it

has been submitted to the Court for review not later than one week prior to trial, and (4) the

government will not review files of state, local, or foreign law enforcement officers.

DATED this 15th day of March, 2006.

A

Robert S. Lasnik

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cr-00334-RSL Document 91 Filed 03/15/06 Page 1 of 1
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

GARY JOHNSON,

Appellant,

v.

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, not in its individual capacity but 

solely as trustee for the RMAC Trust Series 2016-CTT, and THE 

UNKNOWN HEIRS, DEVISEES, GRANTEES, ASSIGNEES, LIENORS, 

CREDITORS, TRUSTEES, OR OTHER CLAIMANTS, CLAIMING BY, 

THROUGH, UNDER OR AGAINST, SCOTT E. MAXWELL, a/k/a

SCOTT MAXWELL, deceased,

Appellees.

No. 4D18-2901

[June 27, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Howard K, Coates, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2013CA010254.

Gary Johnson, Loxahatchee, pro se, for appellant.

David Rosenberg, Cynthia L. Comras and Jarrett Cooper of Robertson, 

Anschutz & Schneid, P.L., Boca Raton, for appellee U.S. Bank National 

Association.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER and CIKLIN, JJ., and SINGHAL, RAAJ, Associate Judge, concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellantt, v Francisco Olivares and Sonia Olivares, Respondents.

[632 NYS2d 488]

—Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Corrado, J.), dated October 15, 1993, which granted those branches of the defendants’ omnibus motions which were to suppress physical evidence and statements made by them to law enforcement officials.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, for reasons stated by Justice Corrado at the Supreme Court, in her memorandum decision dated October 15, 1993. O’Brien, J. P., Joy, Altman and Florio, JJ., concur.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 14

- 00647

- CR
Williamsburg Nat'l Ins. Co d/b/a El Padrino Bail Bonds v. The State of Texas

On a ppeal from the County Court at Law No 3 of Cameron County , Texas

Trial Cause No. 2012

- CCL

- 1400

- C

JUDGMENT
THE THIRTEENT H COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. Novemb er 12, 2015