alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 6
<CIK> 0000764842
<NAME> UNITED GOLD & GOVERNMENT FUND, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                                0
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ASSETS-OTHER>                                       0
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                             0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                              0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                            0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                                  0
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                                      0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                             0
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                                0
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                                0
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                            0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                               0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                              0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                             0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                             0
<NET-ASSETS>                                         0
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                               37,603
<INTEREST-INCOME>                              111,597
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<EXPENSES-NET>                               (202,811)
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                       (53,611)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                   (3,001,073)
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                            0
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                      (3,054,684)
<EQUALIZATION>                                       0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                            0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                             0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                                0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                        148,375
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                (2,221,045)
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                                  0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                    (12,764,421)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                            0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                              0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                           0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                           39,523
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                                202,811
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                        11,535,641
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                             6.16
<PER-SHARE-NII>                                  (.03)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                         (6.13)
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                                 0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                            0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                                 0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                                  0
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                                   1.76


</TABLE>
No. 58660.

protests 178493-K, 178494-K, and 178495-K (New York).

#### Donalds, Ltd., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the holders of the vapex inhalers are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Donalds Ltd., Inc.*v. *United States*(32 Cust. Ct. 310, C. D. 1619), it was held that the holders are not subject to the additional duties under section 504, and that said holders, together with their containers, are properly dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 5.
From: sherryrn1@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:35:36 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sherry Leonard

, 6787
Before the First Division,

February 26, 1957

No. 60515.

#### Kaufman & Vinson Co. *v.*United States,

protest 250258-K (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of marble onyx slabs similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Mutual Lamp Mfg. Co.*v. *United States*(21 C. C. P. A. 231, T. D. 46702), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: perclark@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:16:07 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kenneth Clark

Commerce Township, MI 48382
NE W YORK , N Y

TYSON S CORNER , V A CHICAGO , I L STAMFORD,C T PARS'PPANY , N J BRUSSELS , BELGIU M AFFILIAT E OFFICE S MUMBAI , INDI A KELLE Y DRY E S WARRE N LL P ALIMITE D LIABILIT Y PARTNERSHI P 305 0 KSTREET , N.W . SUIT E 40 0 WASHINGTON , D.C . 2000 7

(202 ) 3-42-340 0 FACSIMIL E (202 > 342-S45 I Vi/w\A/ . kelleydrye.co m

DIREC T LINE : (202 ) 342-852 8 EMAIL : dfisher@ke))eydrye . co m

January 15 , 201 0 B y Han dDeliver y ;ll . Ms . Doroth y Y . Bear d Director , Offic e o f

Informatio n Service s Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S E - . M-30,RoomW12-14 0 Washington , D.C . 2059 0 Re : Applicatio n o f

UP S Europ e S A an dUP S International , Inc . for Exemptio n Authorit y (Netherlands-Sudan) , Docke t OST-2010-000 7 Dea r Ms . Beard :

O n Januar y 8 , 2010 , UP S Europ e S A an dUP S International , Inc . (th e "Applicants" ) file da

n Applicatio n for

a n exemptio n fromth e provision s o f th e Department' s Orde r No . 98-2-5 ("Suda n Order" ) s o a s t o permi t th e Applicant s t o operat e asingl e one-way ai r freight forwardin g movemen t

transportin g item s o f

laboratory equipmen t

t o analyz e an dtreat tuberculosi s fromAmsterdam , Netherland s t o USAID , St . Luke' s Hospital , Juba , Sudan . Th e Applicant s polle dal l person s serve dwithth e Applicatio n an dhereb y informth e Departmen t that n o party ha s an y objectio n t o th e Application . Accordingly , th e Applicant s reques t that th e Departmen t

gran t th e Applicatio n a s soo n a s possible . Than k yo u very muc hfor

you r assistance . Sii;icerely 

## fm^t ^ Daniell e K . Fishe r Attorne y for

Unite dParce l Servic e cc : Al l partie s (vi ae-mail ) EstaRosenber g (vi ae-mail )

DCOl/FISHD/404079. 1
|   |      (1)     The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;    and |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |      (2)     The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/ Roman Livson             |
|--------|------------------------------|
|   | Roman      Livson            |
|   | Chief      Financial Officer |

----
April 14, 1965

No. 69247.

Appeal 5159.

#### Gallagher & Ascher Company *v.*United States.

reversed December 23,1964. C.A.D. 849.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 27, 2014

p0519 

# Order

Clerk May 27, 2014

148225

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

P laintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148225

COA: 317374

Wayne CC: 07

- 011179

- FC

JARRHOD STEVEN WILLIAMS

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 24, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
No. 62235.

#### The Mirror House, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 312201-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

The protest was dismissed.
Before the First Division,

January 29, 1958

No. 61502.

#### S. S. Kresge Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 297340-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of aquarium sea moss similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Westchester Aquarium Supply Co.*v. *United States*(36 Cust. Ct. 146, C. D. 1767), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
EXHIBIT 10.1


 


 





 


January 10, 2013


 


Armada Oil Inc.


10777 Westheimer Rd. Suite 1100


Houston, TX 77042


 


	Attn: David Moss & Jim Cerna


 


	 	RE:	
        Amendment and Extension

        Purchase and Option Agreement 

Bear Creek Prospect & Overland Trail
Prospect


Carbon County, Wyoming









 


Dear Mr. Moss and Mr. Cerna:


 


Whereas in a Letter Agreement dated February
7, 2012 and amended September 25, 2012, TR Energy, Inc. (TR), and Armada Oil, Inc. (Armada) did enter into a Purchase and Option
Agreement covering certain lands in Carbon County, Wyoming; and whereas, both TR and Armada agree that certain terms of the original
agreement need to be amended;


 


Now, therefore, both TR and Armada agree to
the following terms:


 


1. Armada acknowledges that
it has executed the option to pay the $736,000 to TR for the Unit acreage. The Unit acreage shall remain as described in the original
agreement. Armada shall pay the $736,000 to TR in three installments, as follows:


 


(a) The first installment
of $250,000 is due and payable on or before February 28, 2013


(b) The second installment
of $243,000 is due and payable on or before April 30, 2013


(c) The third and final
installment of $243,000 is due and payable on or before May 1,


2013


 


All outstanding verified expenses will be paid
in full upon merger close. All other terms of the original and amended agreement remain in place.


 


Regards,


 


W.L. Sudderth


Vice President of TR Energy, Inc.


 


Accepted this l0th day of January, 2013.


 


ARMADA OIL INC.


 


James J Cerna Jr.


CEO
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No . FAA - 2011 - 0454 Directorate ID : 2009 - SW - 54 - AD Helicopter Model: Eurocopter France (ECF) M odel SA - 365C, SA - 365C1, SA - 365C2, SA - 365N, SA - 365N1, AS - 365N2, AS 365 N3, and SA - 366G1 Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 37 Helicopters in the US Registry . Reason : The actions of this AD are intended to modify the main rotor frequency adapters to reduce the temperature in the area, to prevent failure of the star arm end, severe vibration, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $ 960 Labor per Helicopter ( 12 x $ 8 5 /work-hour) $ 1,020 Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $ 1,980 Total US Fleet Cost $ 73,260 Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a subs tantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : Gary

Roach
| **Derivative Financial Instruments and Risk Management (Details 3) - USD ($) $ in Millions** | Sep. 30, 2017 | Dec. 31, 2016 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|---------------|
| **Derivative**                                                                               |          |          |
| Derivative instruments, notional amount                                                      | $ 3,560       | $ 2,630       |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Aggregate notional amount specified by the derivative(s). Expressed as an absolute value.
+ References
Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Regulation S-X (SX) -Number 210 -Article 12 -Section 13 -Sentence Column B
+ Details**Name:**invest_DerivativeNotionalAmount**Namespace Prefix:**invest_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**instant |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Line items represent financial concepts included in a table. These concepts are used to disclose reportable information associated with domain members defined in one or many axes to the table.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_DerivativeLineItems**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation No. 731-TA-893 (Fourth Review)]

                    On the basis of the record [1]                                          developed in the subject five-year review, the United States International Trade Commission (“Commission”) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (“the Act”), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on honey from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.                

## Background

The Commission instituted this review on March 1, 2023 (88 FR 12992) and determined on June 5, 2023 that it would conduct an expedited review (88 FR 44841, July 13, 2023).

                    The Commission made this determination pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determination in this review on September 22, 2023. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5461 (September 2023), entitled                     *Honey from China: Investigation No. 731-TA-893 (Fourth Review).*

By order of the Commission.

Issued: September 22, 2023.

Sharon Bellamy,

Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.

# Footnotes

1.                             The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2023-21091 Filed 9-26-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 137 (Monday, July 18, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 42118]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-18203]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Tuesday August 9, 2011.

PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Rule Enforcement Review Meeting.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-18203 Filed 7-14-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
From: ix4800@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:12:57 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

James Sarp

Houston, TX 77062