alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsElectric Propulsion Applications and ImpactsMost space missions require on-board propulsion systems and these systems are often dominant spacecraft mass drivers. Presently, on-board systems account for more than half the injected mass for commercial communications systems and even greater mass fractions for ambitious planetary missions. Anticipated trends toward the use of both smaller spacecraft and launch vehicles will likely increase pressure on the performance of on-board propulsion systems. The acceptance of arcjet thrusters for operational use on commercial communications satellites ushered in a new era in on-board propulsion and exponential growth of electric propulsion across a broad spectrum of missions is anticipated. NASA recognizes the benefits of advanced propulsion and NASA's Office of Space Access and Technology supports an aggressive On-Board Propulsion program, including a strong electric propulsion element, to assure the availability of high performance propulsion systems to meet the goals of the ambitious missions envisioned in the next two decades. The program scope ranges from fundamental research for future generation systems through specific insertion efforts aimed at near term technology transfer. The On-Board propulsion program is committed to carrying technologies to levels required for customer acceptance and emphasizes direct interactions with the user community and the development of commercial sources. This paper provides a discussion of anticipated missions, propulsion functions, and electric propulsion impacts followed by an overview of the electric propulsion element of the NASA On-Board Propulsion program.Document ID19960036978Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsCurran, Frank M.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland,OH United States)*Wickenheiser, Timothy J.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland,OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1996Subject CategorySpacecraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberE-10295NASA-TM-107246IAF-95-S.3.02NAS 1.15:107246Meeting InformationMeeting: International Astronautical CongressLocation: OsloCountry: NorwayStart Date: October 2, 1995End Date: October 6, 1995Sponsors:International Astronautical FederationAccession Number96N30654Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 242-70-02Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19960036978.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Before the Third Division,

October 1, 1962

No. 67093.

protests 269378-K, etc. (Laredo).

#### Sidney Freidin et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *The Best Foods, Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 163, C.A.D. 751), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

SUMMER M. STILES
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 2 1

- 1908

[ January 6, 2022 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County ; Dan L. Vaughn

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 312013 CF 000883 A

.

Antony P. Ryan, Director

, and Paul O’Neil, Assistant Regional Counsel

of the Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regio nal Counsel, West Palm Beach, for appellant

.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kimberly T. Acu ña

, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee

.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

M AY
, F ORST and A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
##### 



Exhibit 32

WRITTEN STATEMENT
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, Greg H. Weaver, the Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer of Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. (the Company), and
Carl W. Womack, the Chief Executive Officer of Pacific Sunwear of California,
Inc., pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, hereby certify that:



| | (i) |  | the Quarterly Report of the Company, on Form
10-Q for the period ended November 1, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: December 4, 2003
    
    /s/ Greg H. WeaverGreg H. WeaverChairman of the Boardand Chief Executive OfficerPacific Sunwear of California, Inc.Dated: December 4, 2003
    
    /s/ Carl W. WomackCarl W. WomackSenior Vice President,Chief Financial Officer and SecretaryPacific Sunwear of California, Inc.


This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. and will be retained by Pacific
Sunwear of California, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
From: dowlingkp@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:22:28 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kevin Dowling

Carlisle, PA 17015
Registration No. 333-73083 424 (b)(2)
                                     Pricing Supplement No:234 Cusip:14912LE31
                                     Dated:  June 03,1999

	Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation
	Medium-Term Notes, Series F
	(Fixed Rate)
	With Maturities of 9 Months or More from Date of Issue
	Interest payable each April 1 and October 1 and at Maturity

Principal Amount:       Interest Rate:                Proceed Amount:
$17,000,000                 6.50%                       $16,957,500

Original Issue Date:    Commission Fee:               Maturity Date:
06/08/1999                $42,500                       12/02/2002

Dealer:
Salomon Smith Barney


Specified Currency:     Option to Elect Payment       Authorized Denominations
x U.S. dollars          in U.S. dollars               (only applicable if
_ Other:___________     (only applicable if           Specified Currency is
                        Specified Currency is         other than U.S.
                        other than U.S. dollars):      N/A
                           N/A

The Note is a:                                        Exchange Rate Agent
    X Global Note                                     (if other than First
      Certificated Note                                Trust New York): N/A
      (only applicable if
       Specified Currency
       is other than U.S. dollars)

Original Issue           Total Amount of OID: N/A    Terms of Amortizing
Discount Note:                                       Notes:  N/A
   Yes     x No          Issue Price (expressed
                         as a percentage of
                         aggregate principal
                         amount): 100%


Redemption Date(s) (including                        Redemption Price(s): N/A
any applicable regular or
special record dates): N/A

Repayment Date(s) (including                         Repayment Price(s): N/A
any applicable regular or
special record dates):  N/A

Interest Rate Reset Option:  _ Yes    X No

Optional Reset Dates (only applicable if option to reset interest rate):  N/A

Basis for Interest Rate Reset (only applicable if option to reset interest
rate): N/A

Stated Maturity Extension Option:  _ Yes    x No

Extension Period(s) and Final Maturity Date (only applicable if option to
extend stated maturity): N/A

Basis for Interest Rate During Extension Period (only applicable if option to
extend stated maturity): N/A



Historical Exchange Rate (only applicable if Specified Currency other than
U.S. dollars): N/A

     The interest rates on the Notes may be changed by Caterpillar Financial
Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect
the interest rate on any Note ordered prior to the effective date of the
change.  Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $668.80MM principal
amount of the Notes had been sold at interest rates then in effect.

	_________________________________

	Pricing Supplement to Prospectus Supplement dated March 25, 1999
	and Prospectus dated March 25, 1999
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1685

BARBARA SCHWARZ,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION; FEDERAL

BUREAU OF PRISONS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA98-154-PJM)

Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 22, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Barbara Schwarz, Appellant Pro Se. Larry David Adams, Assistant

United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Barbara Schwarz appeals a district court order granting Defendants summary judgment in an action filed under the Freedom of

Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552 (1994). We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Schwarz v. United States Parole Comm’n, No. CA-98-154-PJM

(D. Md. May 1, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
From: crwad63@morrisbb.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:28:15 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Patricia Deaver

Etowah, NC 28729
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


and
Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b)











My name
is Dr. Jaiju Maliakal and I am the Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
Treasurer of Sweetwater Resources, Inc. (the “Company”).





I hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002 that to the best of my knowledge and
belief:





(1)
            the
      Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2009, filed with
      the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on May 7,
      2009 (“Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended;
      and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of
      Sweetwater Resources, Inc. as of, and for, the periods presented in the
      Report.














JAIJU
MALIAKAL


Jaiju
Maliakal


Chief
Financial Officer and


Secretary
Treasurer


Sweetwater
Resources, Inc.





Date:  May
7, 2009





1
July 18, 2014 confidential deliberative draft

New Hampshire’s List of Questions for 7/22 call with EPA on 111(d)

1. The “Alternative Renewable Energy Approach” based upon technical and economic potential 

supported by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory study as described in EPA’s Technical 

Support Document posted on EPA’s website seems to be more reasonable. Can EPA quickly 

recalculate the individual state goals using that approach and make the results available for 

review before the close of the comment period?

2. EPA included updated RGGI in the base case, awarding no credit for reducing from 91 million ton 

2014 cap to 78.2 million 2020 cap, in addition to no credit for 40+% reduction from 2005 to 

2012. Why isn’t credit being given to the RGGI States for 14% reduction that is anticipated to be 

achieved from 2014 to 2020?

3. EPA’s building block #2 for NH assumes that all coal-fired generation is re-dispatched to gas, 

resulting in projected NH 2020-2030 annual emissions of 3,644,062 tons, providing an incentive 

for increased operation of existing lower-emitting (878 lb/MWh) Natural Gas Combined Cycle 

(NGCC) plants. Building blocks #3 & #4 add MWh to the denominator of the lb/MWh rate-based 

goal. They achieve no further mass reductions. Would EPA agree that NH’s mass-based goal 

should be at least 3,644,062 tons? If not, why not? If the 4-block goal of 486 lbs/MWh is used 

to convert from rate-based to mass-based, may NH include the total MWh (NGCC, RE, 6% 

nuclear, and EE) that EPA used to set the goal in the calculation? Alternatively, may the 2-block

goal be used for the conversion and the NGCC + 6% nuclear + existing 2012 non-hydro 

generation be used in the calculation? If not, wouldn’t this result in the perverse incentive of 

decreased operation of NGCC in NH? 

4. Taking all of the above into consideration, if the States were to ask, how quickly can EPA provide 

RGGI States with EPA’s presumptive translation of the rate-based goal to the mass-based goal, 

for all 49 States?
MEMORANDUM

FROM: Anita Lee, EPA Region 9

TO: Docket Number EPA-R09-OAR-2016-0339, Revisions to the Source-Specific Federal 

Implementation Plan for Four Corners Power Plant, Navajo Nation 

DATE: December 22, 2016

On December 21, 2016, representatives from Arizona Public Service (APS), Navajo Nation EPA, and EPA 

Region 9 held a conference call at the request of APS to discuss APS’s questions related to the Proposed 

Rule titled “Revisions to the Source-Specific Federal Implementation Plan for Four Corners Power Plant, 

Navajo Nation” at EPA-R09-OAR-2016-0339. The proposed rule published in the Federal Register on 

December 2, 2016 and the public comment period closes on January 3, 2017.

Attendees:

Navajo Nation EPA: Tenille Begay and Prashanth Subburam

APS: Eric Massey, Chas Spell, and Mark Hajduk

EPA Region 9: Colleen McKaughan, Ann Lyons, and Anita Lee
Exhibit 32.2 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Annual Report of Atlas Resources Public #18-2009 (C) L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Sean P. McGrath, Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|                                                |
|------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ SEAN P. MCGRATH                            |
| Sean P. McGrath                                |
| Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner |
| September 11, 2015                             |
EXHIBIT 31.02

Certification of Robert M. Kline, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to

Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended



I, Robert M. Kline, certify that:



1. I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K of Gold Star Tutoring Services, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



March 25, 2008

/s/Robert M. Kline__________________

Robert M. Kline, Treasurer

Chief Financial Officer

Principal Accounting and Financial Officer