alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Before the First Division,

December 2, 1965

No. 69652.

#### Border Brokerage Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 61/4972, etc. (Seattle).

*492Opinion by

Oliver, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that tbe merchandise consists of plastic stir sticks similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 68090, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
H. Res. 261

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

March 22, 2007.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 1591) 

making emergency supplemental appropriations for the fiscal 

year ending September 30, 2007, and for other purposes. All 

points of order against consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The 

amendment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules 

accompanying this resolution shall be considered as adopted. 

The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. All points 

of order against the bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as 

amended, to final passage without intervening motion except: 

(1) four hours of debate equally divided and controlled by the 

chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 

Appropriations; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

SEC. 2. During consideration of H.R. 1591 pursuant to 

this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous 
2

•HRES 261 EH 

question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the 

bill to a time designated by the Speaker. 

Attest:

Clerk.
From: resalvag2@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:13:40 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Robert Salvagni

Syracuse, NY 13209
EXHIBIT 11
                     Calculation of Weighted Average Shares
                   Outstanding for Net Income (Loss) Per Share
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                         September 30,
                                                                                     1998              1999
                                                                                 -------------    ---------------
<S>                                                                             <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>    <C>

Earnings:
Net Income (Loss)..........................................................      $  (4,837,058)   $     (840,162)
                                                                                 =============    ==============

Shares:
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares
   Outstanding.............................................................          6,103,522         5,978,440
                                                                                 -------------    --------------
Average Common Shares Outstanding and Equivalents..........................          6,103,522         5,978,440
                                                                                 =============    ==============

Net Income (Loss) Per Share................................................      $       (0.79)   $        (0.14)
                                                                                 =============    ==============

* -- Calculation would be antidilutive for 1998.

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-35-2023]

On May 24, 2023, the LEGO Group submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board on behalf of LEGO Manufacturing Richmond, Inc., within FTZ 207, for its facilities in Chester and Colonial Heights, Virginia.

                    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (88 FR 35832, June 1, 2023). On September 21, 2023, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including section 400.14.                

Dated: September 21, 2023.

Elizabeth Whiteman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2023-20885 Filed 9-25-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the annual report of Dynamic Applications Corp. (the “Company”)on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the “Report”), as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, OriGoore, CEO of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Ori Goore

Ori GooreCEO Dated: April 15, 2013

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to Dynamic Applications Corp. and willbe retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.
No. 69239.

#### Max Mandel Laces, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 249454-K and 260526-K (NewYork).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise are not wholly or in chief value of cotton, rayon, or silk and that they are wholly or in chief value of a synthetic fiber (nylon), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
H. Res. 301

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

April 18, 2007.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 1257) to amend the Securities Exchange Act 

of 1934 to provide shareholders with an advisory vote on executive compensation. The first reading of the bill shall be 

dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of 

the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 

of rule XXI. General debate shall be confined to the bill and 

shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by 

the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee 

on Financial Services. After general debate the bill shall be 

considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall 

be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of 

amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the 

nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Financial Services now printed in the bill. The committee 
2

•HRES 301 EH 

amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered 

as read. Notwithstanding clause 11 of rule XVIII, no amendment to the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be in order except those printed in the portion 

of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in 

clause 8 of rule XVIII in a daily issue dated April 17, 2007, 

or earlier and except pro forma amendments for the purpose 

of debate. Each amendment so printed may be offered only 

by the Member who caused it to be printed or his designee 

and shall be considered as read. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise 

and report the bill to the House with such amendments as 

may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate 

vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous question 

shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments 

thereto to final passage without intervening motion except 

one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

SEC. 2. During consideration in the House of H.R. 1257 

pursuant to this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of 

the previous question, the Chair may postpone further consid-
3

•HRES 301 EH 

eration of the bill to such time as may be designated by the 

Speaker. 

Attest:

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 32.1




Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002






In connection with the Annual Report of GMS Capital Corp.. (the “Company”) on Form 10–K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, George Metrakos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:




1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ George MetrakosGeorge Metrakos

Chief Executive Officer






Dated: April 1, 2010
# 

# CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

Registration No.  333-97047

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  357                                                               Trade Date:  11/03/03

(To Prospectus Supplement dated August 15, 2002 &

  Prospectus dated August  8, 2002)                                                                                     Issue Date:   11/06/03

The Date of this Pricing SupplementNovember 3, 2003

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

  CUSIP                                                                                                                                Date and terms of redemption or

     or        Stated                                                                  Interest                                    repayment (including any

Common  Interest                      Price to  Discounts &        Payment  Survivors                  applicable regular or special

  Code      Rate (1)               Maturity                Public (2)                Commissions      Frequency      Option     Yes/No                record dates)

14911QQW4   5.25%                        11/15/15          100%                    1.2%                  Quarterly           YES            YES               Callable at 100% beginning 11/15/06                                                                                                                                                                                                                        and quarterly thereafter.          

                       

                          

Principal                                                                                1st Payment Day         

Amount                   Proceeds                 Dealer                            Date                  Count

$3,135,000.00                $3,097,380.00         ABN AMROInc.                 02/15/04                 30/360    

Original Issue Discount Note:                                                                   Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes                X   No                                                                                   N/A

The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the effective date of the change.  Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $326.894 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (SM) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (SM) will be made under the Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated August 8,2002.

Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 416 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         June 25, 2007.
Whereas Tony Blair has served as the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom for 
        more than a decade, winning three general elections as leader of the 
        Labour Party;
Whereas Mr. Blair played an instrumental role in achieving peace in Northern 
        Ireland and negotiating the Good Friday Agreement which brought all 
        communities into the political and governmental process and ended 
        centuries of division, conflict, and strife;
Whereas Mr. Blair committed himself to bringing devolved government to Northern 
        Ireland which was achieved with the recent decision of the Democratic 
        Unionist Party and Sinn Fein agreeing to form a power-sharing 
        government;
Whereas the United Kingdom and the United States have had a long-standing 
        alliance which was further strengthened during Tony Blair's tenure as he 
        and the United Kingdom stood side-by-side with the United States during 
        conflicts in Bosnia, Kosovo, Afghanistan, and Iraq;
Whereas Mr. Blair showed British solidarity with the United States after the 9/
        11 terrorist attacks by being the first foreign leader to visit Ground 
        Zero and attending President Bush's speech before a joint session of 
        Congress on September 20, 2001;
Whereas Mr. Blair displayed exemplary leadership as Prime Minister when the 
        United Kingdom suffered its own terrorist attacks on July 7, 2005, when 
        suicide bombers killed 52 people traveling on London's public 
        transportation system;
Whereas the United Kingdom has been a steadfast ally to the United States in the 
        Global War on Terror as it is the second largest contributor of 
        coalition forces in Iraq and Afghanistan; and
Whereas on July 17, 2003, Mr. Blair was awarded the Congressional Gold Medal 
        that declared ``Congress finds that Prime Minister Tony Blair of the 
        United Kingdom has clearly demonstrated, during a very trying and 
        historic time for our two countries, that he is a staunch and steadfast 
        ally of the United States of America.'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the remarkable public service of Tony Blair during 
        his tenure as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom; and
            (2) expresses appreciation to Mr. Blair for his steadfast support 
        for the United States and Britain's invaluable alliance to our Nation.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
No. 69658.

#### The Buhler Corp. and Gehrig, Hoban & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 64/8483, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of parts essential to and dedicated to use with food preparing machines similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Standard Milling Co.*v. *United States*(50 Cust. Ct. 53, C.D. 2388), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1629

HENDRA WIJAYA, Petitioner,

versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A79-349-295) Submitted: February 23, 2005 Decided: March 17, 2005 Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony M. Briggs, Jr., Springfield, Virginia, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Carl H. McIntyre, Jr., Senior Litigation Counsel, John L. Davis, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Wijaya raises no claims concerning the Board’s treatment of his Convention Against Torture claim with this court. Therefore, we deem the claim abandoned. See United States v. Al-Hamdi , 356 F.3d 564, 571 n.8 (4th Cir. 2004); Edwards v. City of Goldsboro , 178 F.3d 231, 241 n.6 (4th Cir. 1999). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Hendra Wijaya, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) affirming the immigration judge’s denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. * In his petition for review, Wijaya contends that he established his eligibility for asylum relief. The record reveals, however, that the Board found Wijaya’s asylum application untimely. 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(2)(B) (2000). We conclude that we lack jurisdiction to review this determination pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(3) (2000). See Zaidi v. Ashcroft , 377 F.3d 678, 680-81 (7th Cir. 2004) (collecting cases). Given this jurisdictional bar, we cannot review the underlying merits of Wijaya’s asylum claim. While we lack jurisdiction to consider the denial of Wijaya’s asylum claim, we can review denial of his request for withholding of removal, which is not subject to the one-year time limit on asylum claims. See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.4(a) (2004). “To qualify for withholding of removal, a petitioner must show that he faces a clear probability of persecution because of his race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or- 3 - political opinion.” Rusu v. INS , 296 F.3d 316, 324 n.13 (4th Cir. 2002) (citing INS v. Stevic , 467 U.S. 407, 430 (1984)). Based on our review of the record, we find that Wijaya has failed to meet this standard. We deny Wijaya’s petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T HO NG L I NG , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 11- 70657 A ge nc yN o. A 096- 349- 752 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r10, 2012 ** B efo re: W A R D L A W , C L IF T O N , an dN . R . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. H on g L i ng , a nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f C hi na, pet i t i on s f or re vi ew of the B oard of I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ ( “ B I A ” ) or de rde ny i ng he rm ot i on t o r e ope n pr oc e e di ngs b asedo n i n effecti v e assi st an ce o f co u n sel . O u r j u ri sd i ct i o n i s g o v ern edb y 8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w f orabus e of

di s c r e t i on am ot i on t o r e ope n, and de novo



# FI LED SEP 17 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 70657 2 q u e s tio n s o f

law an dc la im s o f

du e p r o c e s s v io la tio n s . R e y es v . A s h c r o

ft , 358 F . 3d 592, 595 ( 9th C i r . 2004) . W e de nyi n partand di s m i s s i n partthe pe t i t i on f or r e v i e w. T he B I A di d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng L i ng’ s m ot i on t o r e ope n f or fa i l ure t o sho w a due process vi ol at i on w here L i ng di d n otes t abl i sh thather f orm er a tt orne y ’ s a l l e ge d a c t i ons r e gar di ng he rbi rth c e rt i f i c a t e r e nde r e d he rpr oc e e di ngs u n f a ir . See D ent

v. H older , 62 7 F . 3d 36 5, 37 3 (9th C i r. 20 10 ). W e l a c k j ur i s di c t i on t o r e vi e w L i ng’ s c ont e nt i on tha tthe a tt orne yw ho re pres ent ed her before the B IA prov i ded i neff ec t i ve as si st ance because s he fa i l ed t o r a i s e the i s s ue be f

or e the B I A , and the r e byf a i l e d t o e xhaus the ra dm i ni s tr a t i ve r e m e d ie s . See T

i j an iv. H older , 628 F . 3d 1071, 1080 ( 9th C i r . 2010) ( no j uri sdi ct i on t o revi ew l egalcl ai m s notpres ent ed before the B IA ). L i ng’ s r e m a i ni ng c ont e nt i ons ar e una va i l i ng. P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D i n p art; D IS M IS S E D i n p art.