alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Pacific
Sunwear of California, Inc's Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October
31, 1999, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                      12,122,777
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,632,903
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 66,630,894
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            90,864,095
<PP&E>                                     121,055,319
<DEPRECIATION>                            (34,423,751)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             189,252,388
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       31,637,080
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       312,699
<OTHER-SE>                                 147,079,877
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               189,252,388
<SALES>                                    124,043,858
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           124,043,858
<CGS>                                       78,507,789
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               25,873,696
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (291,265)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             19,953,638
<INCOME-TAX>                                 7,689,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         12,264,638
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                12,264,638
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.38


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 343 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                          May 15, 2007.
Whereas the citizens of the United States highly value recreation time and their 
        ability to access 1 of the greatest natural resources of the United 
        States, its waterways;
Whereas, in 1928, the word ``marina'' was used for the first time to define a 
        recreational boating facility;
Whereas the United States is home to over 12,000 recreational boating facilities 
        that contribute substantially to their local communities by providing 
        safe, reliable gateways to boating for members of their communities and 
        welcomed guests;
Whereas marinas of the United States also serve as stewards of the environment, 
        actively seeking to protect their surrounding waterways not only for the 
        enjoyment of the current generation, but for generations to come;
Whereas marinas of the United States also provide their communities and visitors 
        a place where friends and families, united by a passion for the water, 
        can come together for recreation, rest, and relaxation; and
Whereas marinas throughout the United States will be celebrating National Marina 
        Day on August 11, 2007: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives--
            (1) commemorates the marinas of the United States for providing 
        environmentally friendly gateways to boating for the citizens of, and 
        the visitors to the United States; and
            (2) supports designation of the sixth annual ``National Marina Day'' 
        in order--
                    (A) to honor the marinas of the United States for their many 
                contributions to their local communities; and
                    (B) to make citizens, policy makers, elected officials, and 
                employees more aware of the overall contributions marinas make 
                to their well-being.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
From: Laforgelasvegas@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:39:44 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Elise LaForge

, 89129
No. 60526.

#### Wynpo Trading Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 264325-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
Number of 

water-budget 

subareas

Area 

(square 

miles)

Mean recharge as 

a percentage of 

water input1

Number of 

water-budget 

subareas

Area 

(square 

miles)

Mean recharge as 

a percentage of 

water input1

Number of 

water-budget 

subareas

Area 

(square 

miles)

Mean recharge as 

a percentage of 

water input1

Open native forest (outside fog zone) 262 1.58 36.2 337 1.04 45.0 11,450 81.80 44.6

Closed native forest (outside fog zone) 3 <0.005 27.1 57 0.30 31.3 7,202 54.93 42.4

Alien and mixed forest (outside fog zone) 15 0.05 31.8 63 0.13 17.4 3,061 14.32 29.8

Open native forest (inside fog zone) 36 0.11 38.8 312 0.98 49.2 1,641 10.11 57.4

Closed native forest (inside fog zone) 0 – – 33 0.20 37.3 2,074 41.46 56.3

Alien and mixed forest (inside fog zone) 0 – – 103 0.25 33.7 432 2.39 44.4

Shrubland 938 18.73 61.3 1,655 38.27 66.0 10,566 63.54 67.8

Agriculture: Macadamia 0 – – 36 0.45 24.5 0 – –

Coffee 0 – – 0 – – 0 – –

Diversified 0 – – 175 1.46 43.9 3,330 14.47 70.4

Forest (eucalyptus) 0 – – 0 – – 0 – –

Fallow/Grassland 0 – – 0 – – 0 – –

Golf course 0 – – 0 – – 51 0.08 52.8

Low-intensity developed 0 – – 21 0.01 43.9 1,215 3.28 68.3

High-intensity developed 0 – – 303 0.35 60.1 1,224 0.91 61.3

Grassland 522 6.57 62.8 658 5.67 64.6 5,977 25.80 62.2

Sparsely vegetated 779 65.74 61.5 1,368 47.00 63.0 3,188 55.39 65.8

Wetland vegetation 0 – – 0 – – 0 – –

Water body2 0 – – 0 – – 20 0.03 –

2

Recharge was not calculated using the water-budget model (see USGS SIR 2011–5078, p. 28).

1

Recharge as a percentage of water input was calculated for each subarea using the formula: [(recharge - direct recharge)/(rainfall + fog + irrigation)] x 100. Values for each subarea in a particular land-cover category were then multiplied 

by the area and summed, and that sum was then divided by the total area of that category to obtain a mean. Direct recharge is described in USGS SIR 2011–5078.

Table S-9. Estimated mean annual groundwater recharge as a percentage of water input for baseline conditions in the Kīlauea aquifer sector of the Island of Hawai‘i, compiled by land-cover 

type and precipitation amount (refer to USGS SIR 2011–5078).

[<, less than; –, not applicable; water input is defined as the sum of mean annual rainfall, fog, and irrigation; baseline conditions are defined as 2008 land cover and mean annual rainfall for the period 1916–83; the 

Kīlauea aquifer sector consists of the Pähoa, Kalapana, Hilina, and Keaïwa aquifer systems and is defined by the Hawai‘i Commission on Water Resource Management (see 

http://www.state.hi.us/dlnr/cwrm/mapsillustrations/gwhu_hawaii.pdf); reported mean recharge is an area-weighted average; no distinction is made between fog and non-fog conditions for shrubland, coffee, and 

eucalyptus forest plantations]

Land-cover description

Mean annual rainfall plus fog equal to 40 

inches or less

Mean annual rainfall plus fog greater than 40 

inches and less than 80 inches

Mean annual rainfall plus fog equal to 80 

inches or greater
No. 62230.

#### Rene D. Lyon Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 240241-K (New York).

*341Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of table lighters similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 59275, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
(R.D. 11520)

#### Arnold, Schwinn & Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 25363, etc.

(Decided May 9, 1968)

*Spray, Price, Bough & Cushman*for the plaintiff.

*Edwin L. Weisl, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

*858Maletz, Judge:

The following appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, are before me for decision on a written stipulation reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Counsel for Plaintiff ARNOLD, Schwinn & Co. and the Assistant Attorney General for Defendant United States of America that the merchandise covered by the appeals for reappraisement set forth in “Schedule A” attached hereto consists of 'bicycle spokes more particularly described as follows:

> Spokes 15G (.072") Zinc

> Spokes 14G (.080") Zinc

> Spokes 12G (.105") Zinc

> Spokes 11G (.120") Zinc

> Spokes 15Gx 17G (0.72" x .056") Swaged

> Spokes 14G x 16G (0.80" x .060") Swaged

> Spokes 11G x 12G (.120" x .105") Swaged

> which were exported from Western Germany during the period from February 1,1963, to December 30,1965.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that bicycle spokes are specified on the Official Final List promulgated by the Secretary of the Treasury, T.D. 54521, and are subject to appraisement and were appraised under the provisions of 'Section 402a (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that on or about the respective dates of exportation of the subject bicycle spokes, such or similar merchandise was freely sold and offered for sale for exportation to the United States in the principal markets of West Germany to all purchasers, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, at the following prices, packed, plus copper price premium noted on invoices, for the following respective periods of time and that there was no higher foreign value for such or similar merchandise:

> Merchandise Period Price U.S. Currency

> 

> *859Merchandise Price U.S. Period Currency

> 

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the within appeals to reappraisement are abandoned as to any merchandise not exported within the f oregoing specified periods and as to any other merchandise listed on the invoices, and that the within appeals to re-appraisement may (be deemed submitted for decision on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question, as hereinabove identified, is export value, as defined in section 402a (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, and that the values set out above constitute such statutory value.

As to all other merchandise included on the invoices covered by the entries involved herein, the appeals for reappraisement are dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 65138.

#### Algemeene Kunstzijde Unie N.V. *v.*United States,

protests 59/13467, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise in question consists of nylon yarn similar in use to “thrown silk not more advanced than singles, tram, or organzine,” and following the principles set forth in *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BJs Wholesale Club, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended
October 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Frank D. Forward, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the undersigneds knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                                                     
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Dated: December 2, 2009 |  | /S/ FRANK D. FORWARD                                
|                        |  | Frank D. Forward                                    
|                        |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                        |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
No. 69227.

#### Stern & Stern Textiles, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 64/6431 (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise are not wholly or in chief value of cotton, rayon, or silk and that they are wholly or in chief value of a synthetic fiber (nylon), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Order entered December 17, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 01521
- CR LATOYA ROBINSON, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Auxiliary Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas Trial Cour t Cause No. TR
- 13
- 03619



### O RDER The clerk’s record and appellant’s brief have been filed in this appeal from appellant’s conviction for contributing to the truancy of her child. Although the record reflects the case was tried to a jury, no reporter’s reco rd has been filed. Accordingly, we ORDER the court reporter of the County Court Auxiliary Court No. 1 to file, within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order, either the reporter’s record of the proceedings in this case or written verification that the proce edings were not recorded.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the Honorable Larry Rayford, Magistrate, County Auxiliary Court No. 1, 7201 Polk Str., No. 182, Dallas, Texas 75232; court reporter, County Auxiliary Court No. 1, 7201 Polk Str., No. 182, Dallas, Texas 75232; and the Dallas County District Attorney’s Office.We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of the order, by first

- class mail, to Latoya

Robinson, 616 Lacewood Drive, Dallas, Texas 75224.

/s/ DAVID EVAN S JUSTICE
**Exhibit 32**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

I, Marc Angell, PrincipalExecutive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Music of Your Life, Inc. (the “Company”) certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed theannual report on Form 10-K of the Company;

 

2. Based on my knowledge,this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report; and

 

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the period presented in this annualreport.

 

Date: September 13, 2017

 

/s/ Marc Angell	

Marc Angell

Principal Executive Officer and Principal FinancialOfficer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7323

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JIMMY EARL CONARD, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CR-91-52, CA-96-305-1-MU) Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 7, 1999 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jimmy Earl Conard, Appellant Pro Se. Deborah Ann Ausburn, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Jimmy Earl Conard seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Conard ,Nos. CR-91-52; CA-96-305-1-MU (W.D.N.C. July 30, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. §1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of InfoTech USA, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, J. Robert Patterson, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and Director of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | /s/ J. Robert Patterson                                                                         |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | J. Robert Patterson, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and Director |
|   |                                                                                            |
|   | Date:  August 3, 2007                                                                           |
From: overcomers2@hughes.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:45:05 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sue Talley

Greensburg, LA 70441