alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: JohnsonAnthonyK@JohnDeere.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:02:55 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organization that provides individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Anthony Johnson

Coffeyville, KS 67337
From: restingod@ec.rr.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:35:04 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am very concerned at the requirement that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered

by private health insurance with no co-pay to patients. This is an unhealthy policy for a nation. It

removes the strength of a nation of families as the true core of any society. Contraception is not the

remedy, but a bandaid on a social "dis-ease", a corruption of sexual health. Mandated insurance

procedure freebies is another government intrusion. Let the people decide for themselves.

If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for any organizations that

provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I strongly oppose the

government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and devices that I

oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Elizabeth DeLong

Jacksonville, NC 28546
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-14-00647-CR

Williamsburg Nat'l Ins. Co d/b/a El Padrino Bail Bonds

v.

The State of Texas

On appeal from the

County Court at Law No 3 of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 2012-CCL-1400-C

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

November 12, 2015
From: arthaud@ptsi.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:28:04 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Scott Arthaud

Keyes, OK 73947
From: mike.mysz@earthlink.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:04:45 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I strongly oppose the government mandate forcing insurance coverage on Americans for abortifacient

drugs and contraceptive devices.

I also demand that you to revise your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

abortifacient and contraceptive insurance plans to their employees.

- Michael Mysz

La Grange, IL

Sincerely,

Michael Mysz

La Grange, IL 60525
From: mikeculver@ieee.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:55:30 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Michael Culver

Prosper, TX 75078
From: g.knee@charter.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:56:37 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jean Murphy

Lawrenceville, GA 30043
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER ON UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONTINUE 

PRETRIAL MOTIONS FILING DATE AND TRIAL DATE - 1

(Julio Perez-Garcia; CR05-00325-JLR)

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 700

Seattle, Washington 98101

(206) 553-1100

JUDGE JAMES L. ROBART

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs.

JULIO PEREZ-GARCIA,

Defendant.

 

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. CR 05-325 JLR

ORDER ON UNOPPOSED MOTION 

TO CONTINUE PRETRIAL MOTIONS

FILING DATE AND TRIAL DATE

THE COURT having considered the unopposed motion of the defendant, the

records and files herein, the Court hereby makes the following findings:

1. The Court finds that a failure to grant the continuance would deny counsel

the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise

of due diligence, within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(B)(ii).

2. The Court further finds that the ends of justice will be served by ordering a

continuance in this case, that a continuance is necessary to insure effective trial

preparation and that these factors outweigh the best interests of the public in a more

speedy trial, within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A).

Case 2:05-cr-00325-JLR Document 16 Filed 10/12/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

ORDER ON UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONTINUE 

PRETRIAL MOTIONS FILING DATE AND TRIAL DATE - 2

(Julio Perez-Garcia; CR05-00325-JLR)

FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER

1601 Fifth Avenue, Suite 700

Seattle, Washington 98101

(206) 553-1100

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the time within which pretrial motions must

be filed in this case is extended from September 29, 2005 to November 3, 2005 and the

trial date is extended from November 7, 2005 to December 6, 2005.

DONE this 11th day of October, 2005.

A JAMES L. ROBART

United States District Judge

Presented by:

s/Nancy Tenney

 WSBA No. 35304

 Attorney for Julio Perez-Garcia

 Federal Public Defender’s Office

 1601 Fifth Ave., Suite 700

 Seattle, WA 98101

 206/553-1100

 206/553-0120

 Nancy_Tenney@fd.org 

Case 2:05-cr-00325-JLR Document 16 Filed 10/12/05 Page 2 of 2
From: PALAU001@AOL.COM

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:16:37 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

DONA GIBBONS

, 64015-4755
No. 58659.

protest 212314-K (San Francisco).

#### Hurricane Import Company *v.*United States,

*253Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the two classes of merchandise are the same in all material respects as those involved in *Calif-Asia Co., Ltd.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 133, C. A. D. 475). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the cited decision, the items marked “B” were held dutiable at *12)i*percent ad valorem under paragraph 412, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 51802), and the items marked “C” were held dutiable at 20 percent under said paragraph, as modified by said T. D. 51802.
H. Res. 385 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

May 14, 2007. 

Whereas the AmeriCorps national service program, since its 

inception in 1994, has proven to be an effective way to 

engage Americans in service to the Nation that meets a 

wide range of local and national needs and promotes the 

ethic of service and volunteerism; 

Whereas the AmeriCorps program, working closely with its 

Nationwide network of Governor-appointed state service 

commissions, has strengthened America’s nonprofit sector 

community nonprofit groups, in every State in our Nation; 

Whereas the AmeriCorps programs across our Nation have 

leveraged additional funds and in-kind donations from 

other sources to further service and volunteerism in 

America; 

Whereas each year AmeriCorps provides opportunities for 

75,000 citizens to serve in and work to improve communities in our Nation; 

Whereas since 1994 a total of 500,000 citizens across the 

Nation have taken the AmeriCorps pledge to ‘‘get things 

done for America’’ by becoming AmeriCorps members; 

Whereas those same individuals have served a total of more 

than 630,000,000 hours in service to our Nation, helping 
2 

•HRES 385 EH 

to improve the lives of our Nation’s most vulnerable citizens, protect our environment, contribute to our public 

safety, respond to disasters, and strengthen our educational system; 

Whereas AmeriCorps members last year recruited and supervised more than 1,400,000 community volunteers, serving 

as a powerful volunteer catalyst; 

Whereas AmeriCorps members, in return for their service, 

have earned nearly $1,300,000,000 to further their own 

education at our Nation’s colleges and universities; 

Whereas AmeriCorps members, after their terms of service 

end, remain engaged in our communities as volunteers, 

teachers, and nonprofit professionals in disproportionately high levels; and 

Whereas the inaugural National AmeriCorps Week, May 13– 

20, 2007, is an opportune time for the people of the 

United States to recognize current and former 

AmeriCorps members for their service to our Nation; 

thank AmeriCorps’ community partners who make the 

program possible; and bring more Americans into service: 

Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) encourages all citizens to join in a national effort to salute AmeriCorps members and alumni to raise 

awareness about the importance of national and community service; 

(2) acknowledges the significant accomplishments of 

the AmeriCorps members, alumni and community partners; 
3 

•HRES 385 EH 

(3) recognizes the important contribution to the 

lives of our citizens by AmeriCorps members; and 

(4) encourages citizens of all ages to participate in 

service opportunities in their communities, including in 

AmeriCorps programs. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF CCA PRISON REALTY TRUST AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          39,399
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         494,515
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,218
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 525,223
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,908
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         43
<COMMON>                                           216
<OTHER-SE>                                     514,056
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   525,223
<SALES>                                         13,465
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,901
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,553
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 622
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,726
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,726
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,726
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.33
        

</TABLE>
From: peekaboo46@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:35:35 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Alice Murphy

Warfield, KY 41267