alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Specimen Common Stock certificate



 Exhibit 4.13 
  






 
  
 NUMBER 7204 
 SHARES 

OCLARO, INC. 
 SHARES 
 COMMON STOCK 

PAR VALUE $0.01 
 INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 THIS CERTIFICATE IS TRANSFERABLE CANTON, M.A. PITTSBURGH, PA. 
 JERSEY CITY, NJ; NEW YORK, NY. 
 NEW COMMON

 CUSIP/67555N/10/7 
 SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS 
 CUSIP 67555N
20 6 
 THIS CERTIFIES THAT 
 is the Owner of 
 FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE
SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK OF 
 OCLARO, INC. 

Transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender
of this Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar. 
 Witness the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers. 
 OCLARO, INC, 
 CORPORATE 

SEAL 
 2004 
 DELAWARE 

* 
 SECRETARY 
  
 PRESIDENT 







 



 
  
 The
corporation will furnish without charge to each stockholdcr who so requests a copy of the full text of the powers, designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights of each class of stock or series thereof and
the qualifications, limitations or restrictions of such preferences and/or rights. 
 The following
abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the luce of this Certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: 

TEN COM — as tenants in common UNIF GIFT MIN ACT Custodian 

(cust)(Minors) 
 TEN ENT —as tenants by the entireties under Uniform Gifts to Minors 
 JTTEN — as joint tenants with right of 

survivorship and not as tenants Act 
 in common (State) 
 Additional abbreviations may
also he used though not in the above list. 
 For value received, hereby sell, assign and transfer unto

 PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER 

IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE 
 (PLEASE PRINT OF TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE. OF ASSIGNEE) 
 Shares of the Stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint 
 Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. 

Dated: 
 NOTICE: THE S1GNATURE(S) TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND 
 WITH THE NAME(S) AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF 
 THE
CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR. WITHOUT 
 ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER. 

SIGNATURE(S) GUARANTEED: 
 THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE
GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM). PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15. 
 KEEP THIS CERTIFICATE IN A SAFE PLACE. IF IT IS
LOST, STOLEN, OR DESTROYED, THE CORPORATION WILL REQUIRE A BOND OF INDEMNITY AS A CONDITION TO THE ISSUANCE OF A REPLACEMENT CERTIFICATE.
From: co_gran2@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:51:10 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sandra Sells

Colorado Springs, CO 80909
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Orbit/FR, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Israel Adan, President
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

May 15, 2003

/s/ Israel Adan
-------------------------
Israel Adan
President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Orbit/FR, Inc. and will be retained by Orbit/FR, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Silberstein Ungar, PLLC CPAs and Business Advisors 

Phone (248) 203-0080

Fax (248) 281-0940

30600 Telegraph Road, Suite 2175

Bingham Farms, MI 48025-4586

www.sucpas.com

 

**** 

May 19, 2010

**** 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

Board of Directors

Western Ridge Minerals, Inc.

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

 

To Whom It May Concern:

 

Silberstein Ungar, PLLC hereby consents to the use in the Form 10-K, Annual Report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of1934, filed by Western Ridge Minerals, Inc. of our report dated May 17, 2010, relating to the financial statements of Western Ridge Minerals, Inc., a Nevada Corporation, as of and for the periods ending March 31, 2010 and 2009, and for the period from August 16, 2007 (inception) to March 31, 2010. 

 

Sincerely,

 

/s/ Silberstein Ungar, PLLC

 

Silberstein Ungar, PLLC

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

 

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER - 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT TACOMA

TYRONE WASHINGTON,

Plaintiff,

v.

WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS , et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-5630RBL

ORDER ON MOTION TO EXTEND

TIME FOR DISCOVERY AND FOR

SANCTIONS AND ON MOTION TO

USE DISCOVERY AT TRIAL

This Civil Rights action has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to

Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Plaintiff asks for an extension of the time allotted for discovery and

for possible sanctions, including default. Plaintiff makes this request because he was separated from

his legal work for approximately thirty eight days. (Dkt. # 26). Plaintiff also asks for permission to

use discovery material he has obtained at trial. (Dkt. # 27).

Defendants reply through counsel and explain that plaintiff was transferred from Mc Neil

Island to the Washington State Penitentiary and the actions he complains of were not taken by any

named defendant in this action. (Dkt. # 29). Defendants argue plaintiff lacks standing to seek

injunctive relief of any kind against them because he is no longer housed at the facility where any

named defendant works. (Dkt. # 29). Defendants contend no named defendant has control over the

Case 3:05-cv-05630-RBL Document 31 Filed 08/22/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 ORDER - 2

actions of persons at the Washington State Penitentiary. The named defendants in this action are

two correctional officers, the Mc Neil Island Corrections Center, and the Washington State

Department of Corrections. (Dkt. # 1). The defendants do not oppose plaintiff’s request for a thirty

day extension of time to conduct discovery. (Dkt. # 29). 

Plaintiff request for an extension of time to conduct discovery and for sanctions is DENIED. 

Plaintiff has not shown any need or reason for an extension of the discovery cutoff date in this case. 

In his second motion plaintiff asks for permission to use discovery at trial. (Dkt. # 27). The

motion is premature and therefore DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Prior to trial the court

would have the parties prepare a pretrial order and matters of this nature are specifically addressed in

that order. See, Local Rule 16 (h through n).

The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to plaintiff and counsel for defendants and

to remove (Dkt. # 26 and 27) from the court’s calendar.

DATED this 22nd day of August, 2005.

/S/ J. Kelley Arnold

J. Kelley Arnold

United States Magistrate Judge 

Case 3:05-cv-05630-RBL Document 31 Filed 08/22/06 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1534 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 290
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1534

                          [Report No. 110-922]

   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 7321) to authorize 
  financial assistance to eligible automobile manufacturers, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 10, 2008

  Ms. Slaughter, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 7321) to authorize 
  financial assistance to eligible automobile manufacturers, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 7321) to authorize 
financial assistance to eligible automobile manufacturers, and for 
other purposes. All points of order against the bill and against its 
consideration are waived. The bill shall be considered as read. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and any 
amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: 
(1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman 
and ranking minority member of the Committee on Financial Services; (2) 
the amendment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules 
accompanying this resolution, if offered by Representative LaTourette 
of Ohio or his designee, which shall be in order without intervention 
of any point of order, shall be considered as read, shall be separately 
debatable for 10 minutes equally divided and controlled by the 
proponent and an opponent, and shall not be subject to a demand for a 
division of the question; and (3) one motion to recommit with or 
without instructions.
    Sec. 2.  During consideration of H.R. 7321 pursuant to this 
resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the 
Chair may postpone further consideration of the bill to such time as 
may be designated by the Speaker.
                                                 House Calendar No. 290

110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 1534

                          [Report No. 110-922]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 7321) to authorize 
  financial assistance to eligible automobile manufacturers, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           December 10, 2008

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
# National Environmental Policy Act2 2 2 2
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of Forbes Energy Services Ltd.



|                                                                        |  |                                  |          | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------- | -------- | 
|Subsidiary Name                                                         |  | State or Countryof Incorporation |         
|Forbes Energy Services LLC                                              |  |                                  | Delaware | 
|Forbes Energy Capital Inc.                                              |  |                                  | Delaware | 
|TX Energy Services, LLC                                                 |  |                                  | Delaware | 
|C.C. Forbes, LLC                                                        |  |                                  | Delaware | 
|Superior Tubing Testers, LLC                                            |  |                                  | Delaware | 
|Forbes Energy International, LLC                                        |  |                                  | Delaware | 
|Forbes Energy Services México, S. de R.L. de C.V.                       |  |                                  | Mexico   | 
|Forbes Energy Services México Servicios de Personal, S. de R.L. de C.V. |  |                                  | Mexico   |
From: karmike4312@att.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:10:58 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

karla mccollum

Rutherfordton, NC 28139
From: ed@estimations.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:39:42 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Edgar Beach

Mount Vernon, TX 75457