alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: brucetmcleod@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:04:09 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Bruce McLeod

Birmingham, AL 35216
RHODE ISLAND 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 

235 Promenade Street, Providence, R102908-5767 TDD 401-222-4462 

7 August 2009 

David Conroy 

EPA - New England, Region I 

1 Congress Street, Suite 1100 

Boston, MA 02114-2023 

Dear Mr. Conroy: 

The Office of Air Resources (OAR) is hereby submitting the "Rhode Island Regional Haze State 

Implementation Plan Revision" as a formal revision to the Rhode Island State Implementation 

Plan (SIP). 

SIP Revision addresses Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requirements that states that 

contribute to visibility impairment in one or more Federal Class I Areas (national parks and 

wilderness areas) prepare plans consistent with the national goal of restoring visibility in those 

areas to natural conditions . Although Rhode Island does not have any Class I Areas, the EPA has 

determined that emissions from sources in the State contribute to visibility impairment in Class I 

areas in nearby states . 

As required by the EPA rule (40 CFR 51 .300-309), the proposed SIP revision includes a longterm strategy with emissions control measures that constitute Rhode Island's share of the 

emission reductions needed to meet visibility goals in the region . The measures included in 

Rhode Island's strategy include participation in a regional low-sulfur fuel oil program and, if 

approved by the Rhode Island General Assembly, adoption of restrictions on outdoor wood 

boilers. 

A public notice announcing a public comment period and hearing on the proposed adoption of 

the SIP Revision was published in the Providence Journal-Bulletin on 30 June 2009. The 

hearing was held on 30 July 2009. 

The following support documents are included in this submittal package : 

1 . A Notice of Public Hearing, Mailing List, and Affidavit of Publication for the hearing 

notice, which was published on 30 June 2009; 

2 . A transcript of the Public Hearing; 

3 . A copy of the hearing officer's Decision; and 

S~." 30% post-consumer fiber 
4 . A copy of the final SIP Revision, including revisions noted in the Decision. 

If you have any questions about this submittal, please contact Barbara Morin of my staff at (401) 

222-2808 ext. 7012. 

Very truly yours, 

Douglas McV a j , ~ (cting Chief 

Office of Air Resources
No. 69210.

#### Magnesium Elektron, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 64/8687, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of magnesium alloys similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Magnesium Elektron, Inc.*v. *United States*(50 Cust. Ct. 71, C.D. 2391), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: Marshasam@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:13:30 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Marsha Samuelsen

Glendale, CA 91206
**Exhibit
      32.2**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
      OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report
      on Form 10-QSB of Sunrise Energy Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the
      period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Roman Livson, Chief Financial
      Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)     The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and








(2)     The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








Date:
      November 14,
      2007





By:
            /s/
                Roman LivsonRoman
                LivsonChief
                Financial
                Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Green Earth Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, William J. Marshall, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Greg D. Adams, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 that:




(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.






Date: September 28, 2010
By:
/s/ William J. MarshallWilliam J. MarshallChairman and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)


Date: September 28, 2010
By:
/s/ Greg D. AdamsGreg D. AdamsChief Financial Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
Scudder Variable Life Investment Fund
       Supplement to Statement of Additional Information dated May 1, 1996

The  following   paragraph  is  inserted  after  the  sixth  full  paragraph  of
"Investment  Objective  and  Policies" on page 2 of the  Statement of Additional
Information:

     The Bond Portfolio may invest in special purpose trust  securities  ("Trust
Preferred Securities").

The following paragraph is inserted under "Policies and Techniques Applicable to
the Portfolios"  before the paragraph titled "Zero Coupon Securities" on page 16
of the Statement of Additional Information:

     Trust  Preferred  Securities.  The  Bond  Portfolio  may  invest  in  Trust
     Preferred  Securities,  which are  hybrid  instruments  issued by a special
     purpose trust (the "Special Trust"), the entire equity interest of which is
     owned by a single issuer. The proceeds of the issuance to the Fund of Trust
     Preferred  Securities are typically used to purchase a junior  subordinated
     debenture,  and  distributions  from the  Special  Trust are  funded by the
     payments of principal and interest on the subordinated debenture.

          If payments on the underlying junior  subordinated  debentures held by
     the Special  Trust are deferred by the  debenture  issuer,  the  debentures
     would be treated as original issue  discount  ("OID")  obligations  for the
     remainder  of  their  term.  As  a  result,   holders  of  Trust  Preferred
     Securities, such as the Fund, would be required to accrue daily for Federal
     income tax purposes,  their share of the stated interest and the de minimis
     OID on the  debentures  (regardless  of whether the Fund  receives any cash
     distributions  from the Special  Trust),  and the value of Trust  Preferred
     Securities would likely be negatively  affected.  Interest  payments on the
     underlying junior subordinated debentures typically may only be deferred if
     dividends are  suspended on both common and preferred  stock of the issuer.
     The  underlying  junior  subordinated  debentures  generally  rank slightly
     higher  in terms  of  payment  priority  than  both  common  and  preferred
     securities of the issuer, but rank below other subordinated  debentures and
     debt  securities.  Trust  Preferred  Securities may be subject to mandatory
     prepayment  under  certain  circumstances.   The  market  values  of  Trust
     Preferred  Securities may be more volatile than those of conventional  debt
     securities.  Trust  Preferred  Securities may be issued in reliance on Rule
     144A under the  Securities Act of 1933, as amended,  and,  unless and until
     registered, are restricted securities;  there can be no assurance as to the
     liquidity of Trust Preferred Securities and the ability of holders of Trust
     Preferred Securities, such as the Fund, to sell their holdings.


December 23, 1996
H. Res. 292 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

April 25, 2007. 

Whereas individuals in the United States desire a healthy environment for the future; 

Whereas teaching children to appreciate, respect, and protect 

the environment will have long-term benefits because children are the next generation of environmental stewards; 

Whereas greater exposure to nature through outdoor learning 

and play is recognized as essential to the physical, emotional, and mental development and health of children; 

Whereas gardening exposes children to the outdoors while increasing their knowledge of plant cultivation and soil ecosystems; 

Whereas research has shown that gardening positively impacts not only environmental attitudes, but also nutritional attitudes, interpersonal skills, and self-esteem; and 

Whereas the National Gardening Association recognizes April 

as National Garden Month: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that schools throughout the United States should cele-
2 

•HRES 292 EH 

brate National Garden Month through a curriculum that includes outdoor learning through gardening. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Exhibit 10.1

                              AMENDMENT NO. 3
                          TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT



     Amendment No. 3 to Employment Agreement dated as of February 1, 1995 as
amended May 15, 1995 and September 11, 1997 (the "Employment Agreement")
between Riddell, Inc., an Illinois corporation (the "Company"), and Dan
Cougill.

     WHEREAS, the Employment Agreement, unless extended, expires on May 15,
1999 and the Company wishes to provide Mr. Cougill incentive to continue
providing excellent leadership to the Company and to extend the term of the
Employment Agreement.

     NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration receipt of which is
hereby acknowledged the parties hereto agree as follows:

 (1) Section 2 of the Employment Agreement be and hereby is amended
     to provide in full as follows:
 
    "2. Term.  This Agreement is for a term ("Term") commencing on
               the date of this Agreement and terminating on May
               15, 2000, or upon the Executive's earlier death,
               disability or other termination of employment
               pursuant to Section 11."

 (2) All other provisions on the Employment Agreement shall remain
     n full force and effect.

Dated: May 28, 1998                      RIDDELL, INC.  

                                    By:  DAVID MAUER
                                         --------------------------
                                         David Mauer
                                   Its:  Chief Executive Officer

                                         EXECUTIVE                 

                                         DAN COUGILL
                                         --------------------------
                                         Dan Cougill
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 22 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 22

   Expressing the disapproval of the House of Representatives of the 
 Social Security totalization agreement between the United States and 
                                Mexico.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2007

Mr. King of Iowa submitted the following resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing the disapproval of the House of Representatives of the 
 Social Security totalization agreement between the United States and 
                                Mexico.

    Resolved,  That, pursuant to section 233(e)(2) of the Social 
Security Act, the House of Representatives hereby disapproves the 
agreement establishing totalization arrangements between the social 
security system established by title II of such Act and the social 
security system of Mexico, signed by the Commissioner of Social 
Security and the Director General, Mexican Social Security Institute, 
on June 29, 2004.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 399 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 399

            Supporting the goals and ideals of Mother's Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 14, 2007

  Mr. Fortenberry (for himself, Mr. Terry, and Mr. Smith of Nebraska) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                   on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
            Supporting the goals and ideals of Mother's Day.

Whereas Mother's Day is celebrated the second Sunday of each May;
Whereas mothers have made immeasurable contributions toward building strong 
        families, thriving communities, and ultimately a strong nation;
Whereas the services rendered to the children of the United States by their 
        mothers have strengthened and inspired the Nation throughout its 
        history;
Whereas we honor ourselves and mothers in the United States when we revere and 
        emphasize the role of the home and the family as the true foundations of 
        the Nation;
Whereas mothers continue to rise to the challenge of raising their families with 
        love, understanding, and compassion, while overcoming the challenges of 
        modern society; and
Whereas May 13, 2007, is being recognized as Mother's Day: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives celebrates the role of 
mothers in the United States and supports the goals and ideals of 
Mother's Day.
                                 <all>
```
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 0**  **9 -**  **1 2**  **4 3** 

EDDIE E. SUTHERLAND ,
P laintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (4:08

- cv - 00006

- jlk

- bwc)

Submitted : April 26, 2010 Decided: May 5 , 2010

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curi am opinion

.
Joel C. Cunningham, Jr., JOEL C. CUNNINGHAM , JR., P.C., Halifax, Virginia , for Appellant. Eric P. Kressman, Brian O’Donnell, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Beverly H. Zuckerman, Special Assistant United States A ttorney, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Julia C. Dudley, United States Attorney, Sara Bugbee Winn, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Eddie Sutherland appeals the district court ’s order granting summary judgment to the Commissioner and upholding the denial of disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income . We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible err or. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sutherland v. Commissioner , No. 4:08

- cv 00006

- jlk

- bwc (W.D. Va. Feb. 10, 2009) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in t he materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

A FFIRMED
From: peppertoo@me.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:13:39 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Marietta Munster

Minneapolis, MN 55436
Before the Second Division,

August 26, 1959

No. 63315.

protests 184235-K, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### Axel Zacho and James Loudon & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consist of candlesticks and eandelahras similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 62036, except that they are not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, nor colored with gold lacquer, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 10.4








Venturetek, LP


c/o David Selengut, Esq.


Ellenoff Grossman & Schole


150 East 42nd Street


New York, NY  10017








March 14, 2011








Chocolate Candy Creations, Inc.


130 Shore Road, Suite 238


Port Washington, NY  11050





Gentlemen:





On March 15, 2010, we agreed to lend you, from time to time, up to a maximum of $25,000 outstanding at any time (“Maximum Amount”) upon your written request to us.  We hereby agree to increase the Maximum Amount to $50,000.  As previously agreed to, any such loan or loans shall bear interest at the rate of prime plus 2% per annum and shall be  repayable at such time as shall be agreed by us at the time of the drawdown of the applicable loan.








Very truly yours,








Venturetek, LP


Taurus Max LLC, general partner





BY:  /s/ David Selengut


_____________________________


David Selengut


Manager