alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Michael G. Moore, Chief Financial Officer of Gulfport Energy Corporation (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
that, to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13 (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: November 5, 2010



/s/ Michael G. MooreMichael G. MooreChief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
From: BMILLERX4@MSN.COM

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:31:47 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

ROBERT MILLER

Charleston, WV 25312
# FILED Feb. 21, 1997 Cecil Crowson, Jr

. Appellate Court Clerk IN THE COUR T OF AP PEALS OF

TENNESSEE WESTERN SECTION AT JACKSON

BRIAN WOLNEY and WIFE, ) MELISSA WOLN

EY ) ) Plaintiff s/Appella nts, ) Shelby Circuit No. 56764

) vs. ) ) Appeal No. 02A01-9508-CV-00169 LISA M. EMM ONS and WELLS ) FARG O ARMORED

SERVICE ) CORPORATION, ) ) Defend ants/ Appe

llees. )

ORDER

The petition for rehearing filed in beha lf of the Appellants is denied.
Entered this day of , 1997.

HOL LY KI RBY LI LL ARD , J.

AL AN E . HI GHE RS, J

.

DAV ID R. F ARM ER, J.
Exhibit 99.1







The First Bancorp Declares Dividend







DAMARISCOTTA, Maine – (BUSINESS WIRE) – June 21, 2012 – The Board of Directors of The First Bancorp (NASDAQ: FNLC), today declared a quarterly dividend of 19.5 cents per share. This second-quarter dividend, which is payable July 31, 2012, to shareholders of record as of July 6, 2012, is equal to the 19.5 cents per share declared in the previous fourteen quarters.




“As we discussed at the Company’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders in late April, our financial results have been very consistent over the past six to eight quarters,” stated Daniel R. Daigneault, the Company’s President & Chief Executive Officer. “A major benefit of these consistent results is our ability to maintain the quarterly dividend at 19.5 cents per quarter or 78 cents per year. Our dividend yield also remains very attractive, currently at 4.85%, based on the closing price of $16.07 per share on Wednesday, June 20.”




The First Bancorp, headquartered in Damariscotta, Maine, is the holding company for The First, N.A. Founded in 1864, The First is an independent community bank serving Mid-Coast and Down East Maine with 14 offices in Lincoln, Knox, Hancock and Washington Counties. The Bank provides a full range of consumer and commercial banking products and services. First Advisors, a division of The First, provides investment advisory, private banking and trust services from two offices in Lincoln and Hancock Counties.




Forward-looking and cautionary statements: except for the historical information and discussions contained herein, statements contained in this release may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results and events to differ materially, as discussed in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.




For more information, please contact F. Stephen Ward, the First Bancorp’s Treasurer & Chief Financial Officer, at 207.563.3272.
SHERMAN COUNTY

GILLIAM COUNTY

GRANT CO

BAKER CO 

WASHINGTON 

OREGON 

PA

C I F I C

O

C

E

A

N 

Boardman

Heppner

Junction

Maryhill Arlington

Rufus

Biggs

Cecil

Wasco

Morgan

Ione Olex

Moro

Lexington

Grass

Valley

Heppner La Grande

Condon Ruggs

Kent

Hardman

Ukiah

Mayville

Shaniko

Fossil Dale

Clarno Antelope

Spray Service Monument Creek

Sumpter Kimberly Kimberly Hamilton

Long Creek Richmond

Fox

Beech Creek Austin

Mitchell Bates

Prairie City Dayville

Mount John

Vernon Day Unity

Canyon City

Prineville

Logdell

Post

Paulina

Seneca

Izee

Suplee Silvies

UMITILLA COUNION CO

MORROW COUNTY 

GRANT COUNTY 

 WASCO COUNTY 

JEFFERSON COUNTY 

Deschutes River 

River
 

Rive
r 

Columbia 

Fork 

hSout	

Fork 

John 

North 

Fork

Middle 

North 

Fork 

John 

Day 

Rive

Day 

r 

10 0 10 20 Miles 

10 0 10 20 Kilometers 

N
 

W E
 

S
 

OREGON Astoria 

30 

26 101	 Pendleton Portland 84 The Tillamook Dalles 

197	 395 84 5	 97 

Salem 26 Baker 

John Day Basin John Day Basin City Newport Albany	 Planning Planning Madras 26 Area

20 John 

Prineville Day 26 

Eugene Florence Bend Prineville Vale 

District 20 395 

Coos Bay Burns
 

Roseburg
 

5 

395 95 97 

Grants Pass 

Medford 101 Klamath 

Falls Lakeview 199 

BOARDMAN 

AREA 

LOWER NORTH FORK

JOHN DA JOHN DAY

RIVER JOHN 

DAY

RIVER NORTH FORK
 NORTH FORK

JOHN DAY JOHN D Y


RIVER


PICTURE GORGE -
 PICTURE GORGE -

JOHN DA Y RIVER
AY RIVER

MIDDLE FORK

JOHN DA JOHN DAY

RIVER

OCHOCO
 

MOUNTAINS
 

AREA
 

NORTH FORK

MALHEUR ­ MALHEUR -

MONUMENT

BEAR FORK AREA

 VALLEY 

LOGAN 

VALLEY 

SILVER CREEK ­

EMIGRANT CREEK
 

112 

GRANT COUNTY
 

HARNEY COUNTY
 

LEGEND

Interior Columbia Basin Ecological

 Management Plan Low Ecological Integrity 

Prineville District BLM Subbasin

 Assessment for Priority Restoration 

Bonneville Power Administration Subbasin

 Assessment for Priority Restoration 

Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife

 Conservation Opportunity Areas 

Planning Area Boundary 

Administered Land

 Bureau of Land Management

 Forest Service

 John Day Fossil Beds

 National Monument

 Other Federal


 State


 Private or Other
 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
 

Bureau of Land Management
 

PRINEVILLE DISTRICT 

John Day Basin
 

Resource Management Plan
 

Draft Environmental Impact Statement
 

2008 

No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management as to the accuracy, 

reliability, or completeness of these data for individual or aggregate use with other 

data. Original data were compiled from various sources. This information may not 

meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was developed through 

digital means and may be updated without notification. 

M07-09-01:4-08-08 

Millican

Brothers

84 

74 

19 

97 

206 

206 244 

97 

293 

218 

218 19 

207 

207 

19 

402 

395 

7 

26 

26 

26 

395 

26 

380 

27 

395 

20 

63 

Map 6 : Priority Watershed Assessments and 

Conservation Opportunity Areas
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Vincent Figliolo, Respondent.

[633 NYS2d 940]

—Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Patricia Williams, J.), entered December 19, 1994 and April 24, 1995, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Patricia Williams, J. No opinion. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Rubin, Kupferman and Williams, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1080 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1080

  To amend chapter 84 of title 5, United States Code, to provide that 
 employees who retire as registered nurses under the Federal Employees 
Retirement System shall have unused sick leave used in the computation 
                 of annuities, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 21, 2001

  Mr. Cleland introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
           referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend chapter 84 of title 5, United States Code, to provide that 
 employees who retire as registered nurses under the Federal Employees 
Retirement System shall have unused sick leave used in the computation 
                 of annuities, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. UNUSED SICK LEAVE INCLUDED IN ANNUITY COMPUTATION OF 
              REGISTERED NURSES.

    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Registered 
Nurse Retirement Adjustment Act of 2001''.
    (b) Annuity Computation.--Section 8415 of title 5, United States 
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(i) In computing an annuity under this subchapter, the total 
service of an employee who retires from the position of a registered 
nurse on an immediate annuity or dies while employed in that position 
leaving any survivor entitled to an annuity includes the days of unused 
sick leave to the credit of that employee under a formal leave system, 
except that such days shall not be counted in determining average pay 
or annuity eligibility under this subchapter.''.
    (c) Deposit Not Required.--Section 8422(d) of title 5, United 
States Code, is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(1)'' before ``Under such regulations''; 
        and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(2) Deposit may not be required for days of unused sick leave 
credited under section 8415(i).''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act and apply to 
individuals who separate from service on or after that effective date.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 27, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66477-66478]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20986]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4486-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2023-0001]


Florida; Amendment No. 8 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Florida (FEMA-4486-DR), dated March 25, 2020, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This change occurred on June 29, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Robert D. 
Samaan, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer 
for this disaster.
    This action terminates the appointment of Gracia B. Szczech as 
Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance

[[Page 66478]]

(Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation 
Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2023-20986 Filed 9-26-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
#### BEATRICE JOURNEY, ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF EDWARD WIERBICKI, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. DANIEL ZAWISH, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Submitted January 27, 1933

Decided June 21, 1933.

Before Justices Bodies and Donges.

Eor the defendant-appellant, *Holmwood <& Creighton (William E. Holmwood).*

Eor the plaintiff-appellee, *Kessler ■& Kessler (Samuel I. Kessler).*

Per Curiam.

The sole ground of appeal in this case is that the court erred in charging the plaintiff’s request respecting the doctrine of *res ipsa loquitur.*It is conceded that the request was flawless as a statement of law, but it is said that the doctrine was inapplicable to the facts proved and, therefore, the defendant was prejudiced.

*483The plaintiff’s intestate, with the defendant and another friend, had been to a rabbit dinner. On their return, the defendant’s ear, in which the three young men were riding, was wrecked and the plaintiff’s intestate killed. The plaintiff’s proofs indicated that the defendant once said he had lost consciousness and control of the wheel. Of course, as a witness, he testified he was struck by another motorist and had never made the admission testified to. The issue of negligence was obviously for the jury. The circumstance that plaintiff’s intestate was riding with the defendant, when the defendant’s car overturned might result in a presumption of negligent operation. *Mackenzie*v. *Oakley,*94 *N. J. L.*66.

The trial court properly charged that the burden of proof never shifted and that the plaintiff must establish his case by the fair preponderance of evidence. Obviously there was no prejudicial error in charging the doctrine of. *res ipsa loquitur.*The charge, as a whole, was a well balanced exposition of the law.

The judgment will be affirmed, with costs.
No. P68/438.

protests 67/25846, etc. (New York).

#### Inter Maritime Fwdg. Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Watson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of sheepskin coats or jackets similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Abercrombie & Fitch Co.*v. *United States*(59 Cust. Ct. 122, C.D. 3093), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

This financial data schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the Consolidated Balance Sheet and related Consolidated Statement of Income
as of and for the six month period ending June 30, 1999 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000


<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           6,748
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   76,522
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,645
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               448,293
<PP&E>                                       3,583,097
<DEPRECIATION>                                 645,306
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,016,551
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          165,828
<BONDS>                                        835,056
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,492
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,749,142
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,016,551
<SALES>                                        393,891
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               393,891
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  233,184
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              52,684
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                108,023
<INCOME-TAX>                                    46,990
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             61,033
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    61,033
<EPS-BASIC>                                    $ .41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $ .41


</TABLE>
From: suezeiner@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:20:29 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Susan Zeiner

Windsor, CT 06095
Date: June 29, 2011

Subject: Telephone Call with Valspar Regulatory Affairs Manager – Wood Coatings 

Wood Furniture Manufacturing RTR

RTI Project No. 0212783.013

From: Dave Reeves, RTI International

To: Nick Swanson

OAQPS/SPPD/NRG (D243-02)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

I. Contact

Ms. Sherry Stookey

Regulatory Affairs Manager - Wood Coatings 

High Point, NC (336) 802 – 4305

II. Summary of Information

N. Swanson and I made a follow-up telephone call to Ms. Stookey to ask about 

specific coating information related to Kitchen Kompact. Ms. Stookey indicated that she 

had reviewed the information as part of the public comments provided by Kitchen 

Kompact and also American Coatings Association (ACA). She stated that the main 

coatings used by Kitchen Kompact are a conversion varnish topcoat and sealer and they 

were developed/formulated specifically for Kitchen Kompact’s high volume/high speed 

panel production line: 

Coating Formaldehyde Content Density

Topcoat 0.2% by wt 7.9 lb/gal

Sealer 0.17% by wt 7.8 lb/gal

Ms. Stookey commented that quick-cure coatings typically require resins with 

higher free formaldehyde content. Performance requirements are the driving criteria for 

kitchen cabinet coating systems. When asked about the time frame to commercialize a 

new coating, she responded “6 months to a year.” 

Her thoughts on what is generally referred to as low- and no- formaldehyde 

coatings: low-formaldehyde is less than 0.1% (by weight); ultra-low-formaldehyde is 0.0 -

0 049% (takes into account rounding). Ms. Stookey emphasized that these are merely her 

interpretation and that these are constantly changing based on the current state of coating 

technology.
2

Ms. Stookey could not provide any specific cost information for the new conversion 

varnish coatings that Valspar has developed beyond stating that they would be more expensive. 

She also stated that a facility like Kitchen Kompact may have to install longer conveyer lines and 

add more heat to their ovens to utilize the new conversion varnish coatings. 

Ms. Stookey stated that based on her calculations, there are 3 other wood furniture 

customer sites that exceeded 400 pounds of formaldehyde emissions last calendar year. Her 

calculations involved formaldehyde content and the purchased volumes of Valspar coatings in 

2010. She indicated that these three other facilities are much closer to the 400 pounds than Kitchen 

Kompact.