alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ACTIO N 

rjiK m\/CTkv SIOM00330-030 € % CRYSTAt 

KJK J CRUISE S 

CONTROL NO. 

March 18, 2010 

The Honorable Ray LaHood . : ! 

Secretary 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, D.C. 

20590 

Subject: Haneda Combination Services Allocation Proceeding DOT-OST-2010-0018 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

As a dedicated travel partner of American Airlines, I am writing in support of American's 

application to provide new service from Los Angeles International Airport to Tokyo International 

Airport at Haneda. 

I recognize and applaud you and the Obama administration for your success last December In 

reaching a landmark Open Skies agreement with Japan, which opens up Haneda to service by 

U.S. airlines. 

I encourage your selection of American Airlines to provide nonstop service from Los Angeles to 

Haneda in order to provide an essential connection between two of the world's most dynamic 

commercial centers. 

Recent events, including the successful preservation of Japan Airlines' oneworld Alliance 

membership, have underscored American's strong commitment to the trans-Pacific market. 

American is likewise committed to Los Angeles - a world center of business, trade, 

entertainment and technology - and has provided the city with unsurpassed air service for 

many decades. 

Los Angeles, as well as the entire Southern California region will gain a significant economic 

benefit from these proposed new flights, as will American's customers and employees. 

However, we need your help to make the LAX/Haneda connection a reality. 

Therefore, I strongly urge you to say yes to American Airlines and its request for slots to fly from 

Los Angeles to Haneda! 

Sincerely, 

Barbara Gilliam 

Vice President, Passenger Services 

Crystal Cruises 

2049 Century Park East, Suite 1400 • Los Angeles, CA 90067
No. 66477.

#### Joseph Markovits, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/4800, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of glass balls similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Joseph Markovits, Inc.*v. *United States*(45 Cust. Ct. 151, C.D. 2216), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: karel@custertel.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:51:53 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

I don't feel we should have to help anyone with their medical costs. Nobody should be forced by the

government to do anything that they don't feel is right--or fair. No one ever paid for any of my health

care costs or insurance and I don't feel that I should have to pay for any of theirs.

Sincerely,

karel fisher

Salmon, ID 83467
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT





Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): August 15, 2014








COMMUNITYONE BANCORP


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





North Carolina000-1382356-1456589


(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)(Commission File Number)(IRS Employer Identification Number)








1017 East Morehead Street, Charlotte North Carolina 28204


(Address of principal executive offices)





Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (336) 626-8300





N/A


(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)








Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





[]Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)[]Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)[]Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))[]Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




















---




Item 5.02       Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers





(d)  John C. Redett, who was elected to the Board of Directors of CommunityOne Bancorp (the “Company”) at the 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, has now been qualified to serve in that capacity, having received supervisory non-objection to serve from the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond.  Mr. Redett assumed his position effective August 15, 2014.  As disclosed in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, filed on April 8, 2014, Mr. Redett will serve on the Strategic Planning Committee and the Compensation and Nominating Committee of the Board.





As previously disclosed, Mr. Redett is a Managing Director of The Carlyle Group, LP (“Carlyle”) and is the director designated by Carlyle to serve on the Company’s Board pursuant to Section 3.5(b) of the Investment Agreement, dated as of April 26, 2011, between the Company and Carlyle.
































---




SIGNATURE


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


August 15, 2014COMMUNITYONE BANCORP(Date)(Registrant)/s/ David L. NielsenDavid L. NielsenChief Financial Officer
#### Zamri Bin AHMAD, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 03-73448.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 1, 2005.*

Decided Aug. 4, 2005.

Martin Resendez Guajardo, Esq., Law Office of Martin Resendez Guajardo, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Regional Counsel, Western Region Immigration & Naturalization Service, Laguna Niguel, CA, OIL, U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

*596Before: O’SCANNLAIN, CALLAHAN and BEA, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Zamri Bin Ahmad, a native and citizen of Malaysia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) denial of his second motion to reopen in absentia removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, *Varela v. INS,*204 F.3d 1237, 1239 (9th Cir.2000), and we deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Ahmad’s second motion to reopen as numerically barred. *See*8 C.F.R. §§ 1003.2(c)(2), 1003.23(b)(4)(ii) (limiting party to one motion to reopen). Although we have recognized equitable tolling of the numerical limits where a petitioner’s first motion to reopen was wasted through no fault of his own, Ahmad does not allege any such facts. *Cf. Varela,*204 F.3d at 1240 (applying equitable tolling where fraudulent counsel filed “worthless” first motion).

We do not reach the underlying merits of Ahmad’s second motion to reopen. To the extent Ahmad seeks review of an immigration judge’s prior determination that he received proper notice of his November 1998 hearing, we lack jurisdiction because he failed to file a timely petition for review of the BIA’s September 2002 order. *See Martinez-Serrano v. INS,*94 F.3d 1256, 1258 (9th Cir.1996).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

**

**This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
PROPOSED DEFINITIONS FOR CERTAIN FLUORESCENT LAMPS

AND INCANDESCENT LAMPS

Docket No. EE-RM-94-220-NOPR

AGENDA

9:30 a.m.

9:45 a.m.

Opening Remarks - Terry Logee

Peter A. Bleasby

Director, Industry Relations & Standards

OSRAM Sylvania Inc.

10:00 a.m. ..... .... . Irving E. Stine

Chief Engineer

Hytron Electric Products

10:15 a.m.. ........... A. C. Rousseau

Manager, Technical Relations

Philips Lighting Company

10:30 a.m. Steven L. Martel

Commercial Engineer

Duro-Test

10:45 a.m. .......... Russell D. Churchill

Manager, GE Lighting Institute

and Worldwide Technology Standards

11:00 a.m. ....... Walk-in Speakers

11:15 a.m. ........ . . Written Questions from Audience

11:30 a.m. ........ Closing Remarks

EE-RM-94-220-NOPR COMMENT 0B
No. 63325.

protests 298966-K/8407, 300250-K/8617, and 309893-K/8844 (Chicago).

#### Naumes Forwarding Service *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fried herring similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Richter Bros., Inc. v. United States*(44 C.C.P.A. 128, C.A.D. 649), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: mary.cowin@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:32:53 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mary Cowin

Lynnwood, WA 98036
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 23, 2012 

t0416 

Order 

 

April 23, 2012 

144335 

WOLVERINE ENGINEERS AND 

SURVEYORS, INC., 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 144335 

 COA: 299988 

Ingham CC: 10-000179-CK 

CITY OF LESLIE, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 17, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
|                                                                         |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                         |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|                                                                    | Three Months EndedMarch 31, |
|                                                                    | 2014 |   | 2013 |
|                                                                    |   |   |   |
| Profit                                                                  | $ | 136 |  |   | $ | 141 |  |
|                                                                    |   |   |   |
| Add:                                                                    |   |   |   |
| Provision for income taxes                                              | 49 |  |   | 43 |  |
|                                                                    |   |   |   |
| Profit before income taxes                                              | $ | 185 |  |   | $ | 184 |  |
|                                                                    |   |   |   |
| Fixed charges:                                                          |   |   |   |
| Interest expense                                                        | $ | 162 |  |   | $ | 191 |  |
| Rentals at computed interest*                                           | 1 |  |   | 1 |  |
|                                                                    |   |   |   |
| Total fixed charges                                                     | $ | 163 |  |   | $ | 192 |  |
|                                                                    |   |   |   |
| Profit before income taxes plus fixed charges                           | $ | 348 |  |   | $ | 376 |  |
|                                                                    |   |   |   |
| Ratio of profit before income taxes plus fixed charges to fixed charges | 2.13 |  |   | 1.96 |  |
|                                                                    |   |   |   |
****Exhibit32.1** **CertificationPursuant to****18U.S.C. §1350,****AsAdopted Pursuant to****Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002** Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of InfoTech USA, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Sebastian Perez, ChiefOperating Officer and acting President and Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:  (1)The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company.  /s/ Sebastian F.PerezSebastianF. Perez, Chief Operating Officer and actingPresidentand Chief Executive Officer Date: May13, 2005 **
H. Res. 438

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

May 24, 2007.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to take from the Speaker’s table the bill (H.R. 

2206) making emergency supplemental appropriations and 

additional supplemental appropriations for agricultural and 

other emergency assistance for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2007, and for other purposes, with the Senate 

amendment thereto, and to consider in the House, without 

intervention of any point of order, a motion offered by the 

chairman of the Committee on Appropriations or his designee 

that the House concur in the Senate amendment with the 

House amendments printed in the report of the Committee 

on Rules accompanying this resolution. The Senate amendment and the motion shall be considered as read. The motion 

shall be debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled 

by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the motion to its adoption without intervening motion or demand for division of the question ex-
2

•HRES 438 EH 

cept that the Chair shall divide the question of adoption of 

the motion between the two House amendments. 

SEC. 2. If both portions of the divided question specified 

in the first section of this resolution are adopted, the action 

of the House shall be engrossed as a single amendment to the 

Senate amendment to H.R. 2206. 

SEC. 3. During consideration of the motion to concur 

pursuant to this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of 

the previous question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of such motion to such time as may be designated by 

the Speaker. 

SEC. 4. (a) During consideration in the Committee of 

the Whole of a bill making supplemental appropriations for 

military operations in Iraq or Afghanistan for fiscal year 

2008, before consideration of any other amendment, it shall 

be in order to consider an amendment only proposing to add 

to the bill the text of H.R. 2451. Such amendment shall be 

considered as read, shall not be subject to amendment, and 

shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question 

in the House or the Committee of the Whole. All points of 

order against such amendment are waived except those arising under clause 9 of rule XXI. 
3

•HRES 438 EH 

(b) Subsection (a) shall not apply to a bill making regular appropriations for the Department of Defense for the 

fiscal year ending September 30, 2008. 

Attest:

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 49 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        April 29, 2008.
Whereas the commercial activity and economic vitality of the Nation is 
        significantly enhanced by the timely and efficient service of letter 
        carriers of the United States Postal Service;
Whereas letter carriers of the United States Postal Service provide mail 
        delivery service to over 144,000,000 households across the Nation;
Whereas letter carriers of the United States Postal Service deliver more than 43 
        tons of mail per year, averaging approximately 2,300 letters, cards, 
        magazines, and circulars per carrier a day;
Whereas letter carriers of the United States Postal Service delivered 
        approximately 212,000,000,000 pieces of mail in 2005;
Whereas letter carriers of the United States Postal Service handle over 44 
        percent of the world's mail volume, more than any other national postal 
        service; and
Whereas the United States Postal Service employs over 705,000 career letter 
        carriers and 98,000 noncareer employees, making it the 3rd largest 
        employer in the Nation; Now, therefore be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports the goals and ideals of 
a National Letter Carriers Appreciation Day to recognize the unique 
contributions made by letter carriers of the United States Postal Service to the 
well-being and prosperity of the Nation.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
OMB Control No. 2060-0347

The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average up to 2.5 hours per response. Send comments 

on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for 

minimizing respondent burden, including through the use of automated collection techniques to the Director, Collection Strategies 

Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2822T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20460. Include the OMB 

control number in any correspondence. Do not send the completed form to this address.

EPA Form 5900-198
|   |      (1)     The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;    and |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |      (2)     The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   | By:  |   /s/ Roman Livson                              |
|--------|--------|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |      | Roman      Livson       Chief      Financial Officer |

----
No. 61525.

#### The Best Foods, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 301901-K (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

Plaintiff having raised no objection, the motion was granted on the ground that the protest was prematurely filed.
#### READEY et al. *v.*ST. LOUIS COUNTY WATER CO. et al.

No. 105.

Decided October 8, 1962.

*J. L. London*for appellants.

*Richard E. Crowe, Dan D. Weiner*and *William J. Becker*for appellees.

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.