alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: jeangafford@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:33:42 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jean Gafford

, 30041-1232
No. 59685.

#### Inter-Maritime Forwarding Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 217818-K and 227416-K (New York).

Opinion by

Molmson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of essential oils the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Ungerer & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 152, C. D. 1647), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: renacarter84@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:13:38 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Rena Carter

Alva, OK 73717
From: Jeanne Lewis

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:05:58 PM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Jeanne Lewis
Brandon, Florida
# Eiropas Savienības C 57A/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0952 |
| --- | --- |
| Eiropas Savienības
  Oficiālais Vēstnesis | C 57A |
| | |
| Izdevums latviešu valodā | Informācija un paziņojumi | 58. sējums2015. gada 17. februāris |

ISSN 1977-0952

Eiropas Savienības

Oficiālais Vēstnesis

C 57A

Izdevums latviešu valodā

Informācija un paziņojumi

58. sējums2015. gada 17. februāris

---

| Paziņojums Nr. | Saturs | Lappuse |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Labojumi |
| 2015/C 057A/01 | Labojums paziņojumā par atklāto konkursu EPSO/AST-SC/03/15 – Sekretāri/kancelejas darbinieki (SC 1 un SC 2) šādās jomās: 1) administratīvais atbalsts; 2) atbalsts finanšu jautājumos; 3) sekretariāta pakalpojumi ( OV C 3 A, 8.1.2015. ) | 1 |

Paziņojums Nr.

Saturs

Lappuse

Labojumi

2015/C 057A/01

Labojums paziņojumā par atklāto konkursu EPSO/AST-SC/03/15 – Sekretāri/kancelejas darbinieki (SC 1 un SC 2) šādās jomās: 1) administratīvais atbalsts; 2) atbalsts finanšu jautājumos; 3) sekretariāta pakalpojumi ( OV C 3 A, 8.1.2015. )

( OV C 3 A, 8.1.2015. )

1

---

| LV | |
| --- | --- |

LV

---

Labojumi

| 17.2.2015 | LV | Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis | CA 57/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.2.2015

LV

Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis

CA 57/1

---

Labojums paziņojumā par atklāto konkursu EPSO/AST-SC/03/15 – Sekretāri/kancelejas darbinieki (SC 1 un SC 2) šādās jomās: 1) administratīvais atbalsts; 2) atbalsts finanšu jautājumos; 3) sekretariāta pakalpojumi

(
  “Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis” C 3 A, 2015. gada 8. janvāris
  )

(2015/C 057 A/01)

2. lappusē I sadaļas 3. punktā:

| tekstu: | “Termiņš (ieskaitot apstiprināšanu): 2015. gada 10. februāris līdz plkst. 12.00 (dienā) pēc Briseles laika” |
| --- | --- |

tekstu:

“Termiņš (ieskaitot apstiprināšanu): 2015. gada 10. februāris līdz plkst. 12.00 (dienā) pēc Briseles laika”

| lasīt šādi: | “Termiņš (ieskaitot apstiprināšanu): 2015. gada 17. februāris līdz plkst. 12.00 (dienā) pēc Briseles laika”. |
| --- | --- |

lasīt šādi:

“Termiņš (ieskaitot apstiprināšanu): 2015. gada 17. februāris līdz plkst. 12.00 (dienā) pēc Briseles laika”.

---
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo 

 

No. 07-22-00006-CV 

 

BIANCA M. WOODS, APPELLANT 

V. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 

 Travis County, Texas 

Trial Court No. C-1-CV-20-001267, Honorable Todd T. Wong, Presiding 

July 1, 2022 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and DOSS, JJ. 

Appellant Bianca M. Woods, proceeding pro se, appeals from the trial court’s Final 

Summary Judgment.

1

 Woods’s brief was originally due March 21, 2022, but was not filed. 

We subsequently granted Woods three extensions to file a brief. By letter of May 23, 

2022, we notified Woods that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution, 

1 Originally appealed to the Third Court of Appeals, this appeal was transferred to this Court by the 

Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalizations efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001. 
2

without further notice, if a brief was not received by June 20. To date, Woods has not 

filed a brief nor had any further communication with this Court.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P.

38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).

Per Curiam
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsCompressive Testing of Stitched Frame and Stringer Alternate ConfigurationsA series of single-frame and single-stringer compression tests were conducted at NASA Langley Research Center on specimens harvested from a large panel built using the Pultruded Rod Stitched Efficient Unitized Structure (PRSEUS) concept. Different frame and stringer designs were used in fabrication of the PRSEUS panel. In this report, the details of the experimental testing of single-frame and single-stringer compression specimens are presented, as well as discussions on the performance of the various structural configurations included in the panel.Document ID20160006306Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsLeone, Frank A., Jr.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Jegley, Dawn C.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredMay 17, 2016Publication DateApril 1, 2016Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberL-20631NASA/TM-2016-218974NF1676L-22999Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 338881.02.22.07.01.01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20160006306.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PACIFIC
SUNWEAR OF CALIFORNIA, INC.'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER
29, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-04-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-29-2000
<CASH>                                      18,325,742
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,506,894
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 91,654,935
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           125,011,035
<PP&E>                                     163,318,291
<DEPRECIATION>                            (47,941,340)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             254,471,674
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       45,392,916
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       321,381
<OTHER-SE>                                 194,957,668
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               254,471,674
<SALES>                                    163,733,234
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           163,733,234
<CGS>                                      108,745,739
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               34,792,054
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (309,191)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             20,504,632
<INCOME-TAX>                                 7,956,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         12,548,632
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                12,548,632
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.39


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, James A. Watt, certify that:     1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Remington Oil and GasCorporation;     2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;     3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;     4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and     5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditorsand the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:November 1, 2005        /s/ James A. Watt James A. Watt *Chief Executive Officer*
From: lornah77@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:57:46 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Lorna Heikkinen

Oakland, CA 94619
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4699-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2023-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of California (FEMA-4699-DR), dated April 3, 2023, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued July 24, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of California is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of April 3, 2023.

Alameda, Imperial, San Joaquin, Stanislaus, and Ventura Counties for Public Assistance.

San Bernardino County for Public Assistance (already designated for Individual Assistance).

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2023-21004 Filed 9-26-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 21, 2011 

t0914 

Order 

 

September 21, 2011 

143043 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 143043 

 COA: 295863 

Wayne CC: 09-019100-FC 

LEKISHA DANIELLE HINES, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 15, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.