alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: llee6@hvc.rr.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:14:03 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Lynda Lee

Poughkeepsie, NY 12603
From: n6rjo2000@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:36:05 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Joel Davis

San Antonio, NM 87832
Rudy s



# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

June 26, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00365

- CV

Raul (Roy) MORALES

, Appellant

v.
Rudy SEGURA

, Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Atascosa County, Texas Trial Court No. 14

- 12

- 1070

- CVA Honorable David Peeples, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The reporter’s record was due on June 22, 2015 . T he court reporter responsible for preparing the reporter’s record filed a notification of late record stating that appellant had failed to designate and pay for, or make payment arrangements for, the preparation of the reporter’s record. On June 24, 2015, we ordered appellant to provide written proof that the reporter’s record had been requested and that payment, or payment arrangements, had been made with the court reporter. Appellant timely submitted written proof of payment

. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the reporter’s record is due no later than ten ( 1 0) days from the date of this order.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 26th day of June, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
From: llarry1@citlink.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:42:10 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Larry Larson

, 96137-6522
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roberto OCHOA-SILVA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 99-10088.

D.C. No. CR-98-01386-RCC.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 9, 2001.*

Decided July 19, 2001.

Before KOZINSKI, T.G. NELSON and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Roberto Ochoa-Silva appeals his single count conviction, pursuant to a guilty plea, and sentence for illegal reentry after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a) and 1326(b)(2).

Ochoa-Silva’s attorney has filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and has moved to withdraw as counsel of record. Ochoa-Silva did not file a pro se supplemental brief.

Because our independent review of the record pursuant to *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), indicates that the plea agreement, including the waiver of the right to appeal, was entered knowingly and voluntarily, *United States v. Aguilar-Muniz,*156 F.3d 974, 976 (9th Cir.1998) (waiver of right to appeal is valid if knowing and voluntary), we enforce the waiver, grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and dismiss the appeal.

We REMAND to the district court with directions to correct the judgment of conviction to exclude the reference to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2), consistent with *United States v. Riverar-Sanchez,*222 F.3d 1057 (9th Cir.2000). *United States v. Herreras-Blanco,*232 F.3d 715, 719 (9th Cir.2000).

DISMISSED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Silberstein Ungar, PLLC CPAs and Business
      AdvisorsPhone
      (248) 203-0080Fax
      (248) 281-094030600
      Telegraph Road, Suite 2175Bingham
      Farms, MI 48025-4586www.sucpas.com





October
7, 2010





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





To the
Board of Directors of


Bethesda
C0801, Inc.


Clearwater,
Florida





To Whom
It May Concern:





Silberstein
Ungar, PLLC hereby consents to the use in the Form 10-K, Annual Report under
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, filed by Bethesda
C0801, Inc. of our report dated September 28, 2010, relating to the financial
statements of Bethesda C0801, Inc., a Nevada Corporation, as of and for the
years ending June 30, 2010 and 2009 and for the period from January 22, 2008
(inception) to June 30, 2010.





Sincerely,





/s/ Silberstein Ungar,
  PLLCSilberstein
      Ungar, PLLC


1
_________________

_________________ 

## 1 (Slip Opini o n) 

## Cite as: 54 7 U
. S. ____ (2006) Per Curiam NOTICE: This op i n ion is subjec t to f o rmal revi si on bef o r e publicat ion in the p r eli m in ary p rin t of th e U n it edS t at es R e p o rts . R e ad ers ar e r e qu es ted to n o tif yth e R e p o r t e rof D e c i s i on s , Su p r em e C o u r t of th e U n ited St at es , Wa s h

ington, D. C. 2054 3, of any typ o gra p hical or other f o rmal err o rs , in or der th atc o rr ect i on sm a y b e mad eb e f o r e th ep r e lim in aryp rin t go es t o p r es s . 

# SUPREME CO URT O F THE UNI TED STATES No. 05–4 65 

# MOHAWK INDU STRI ES, INC., P E TITION E R v. SHIR LEY WILLIAMS ET AL 

# . ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEAL S FOR THE ELEV ENTH CIRC U I T [Ju n e 5, 2006] 

# P ER 

# C UR IAM 

# . The writ of certiorari limited to Question 1 presented by the petition, granted a t546 U. S. _ __ (2005), i s dismissed as improvidently grant ed. The pet i tion for a writ of certi o rari is gran ted. The judgment is v a cated, andthe case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for fur t her consideration in light of Anza v. Ideal Steel Supply Corp., ante, p. ___. It is so orde red.
In the matter ofadopting the Infrastructure SIP Certification for the 2008 Lead National Ambient Air Quality Standard into the Washington State Implementation Plan 

### SIP ADOPTION ORDER

The Washington State Department ofEcology (Ecology) offered the public an oppmtunity to request a hearing and comment on the draft Infrastructure SIP Certification for the 2008 Lead National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). We did not receive a request to hold a public hearing. We accepted comments fi:om February 14, 2014, through March 24,2014. The SIP Certification details Washington's capacity to implement, enforce, and maintain the 2008 NAAQS for lead, and will revise the Washington State Implementation Plan. Ecology met all state and federal procedural requirements for public outreach by taking the following actions: • :Published a legal notice in one newspaper on February 14, 2014
. This allowed Ecology to meetthe requirement for 31 days ofadvance notice to request a hearing. • Issued a news release on February 14, 20 14
. • Announced the public comment period and public hearing date on our online public involvement calendar. • Published notice on our website. • Provided and opportunity for the public to request a hearing by March 17,2014
. We did not receive a request for a hearing, so we did not hold one, as allowed by 40 CPR Section 51.102. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the referenced document, constituting the revision, is approved and adopted by the Depal1ment ofEcology as part ofthe Washington State Implementation Plan. All provisions ofthe Washington State Implementation Plan inconsistent with the attached documents are superseded.

Maia D. Bellon, Director Department ofEcology

# ~/L 

# /L4 Date r 

### I
No. 66000.

#### Catholic Manufacturing Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 60/332 and 60/662 (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of rosary bracelets the same in all material respects as those the subject of *The J. Orlando Co., Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 115, C.D. 2114), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         176,406
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  979,765
<ALLOWANCES>                                    30,000
<INVENTORY>                                    827,823
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,983,994
<PP&E>                                       2,306,199
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,046,597
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,463,706
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,496,054
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        55,654
<OTHER-SE>                                     598,340
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,463,706
<SALES>                                      2,651,030
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,651,030
<CGS>                                        2,009,976
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,009,976
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               551,456
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                37,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              41,545
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 54,140
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             54,140
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    54,140
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 413 

Recognizing the service of United States Merchant Marine veterans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 17, 2007 

Mr. FILNER submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the service of United States Merchant Marine 

veterans. 

Whereas the United States Merchant Marine served as the 

Nation’s first Navy and helped George Washington’s 

Continental Army defeat the British Navy; 

Whereas since 1775, United States Merchant Mariners have 

served valiantly in times of peace and in every war; 

Whereas after the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, 

29 United States Merchant Marine Academy cadets operated a fleet of boats in New York Harbor, transporting 

firefighters and other emergency equipment workers, 

medical supplies, and food; 

Whereas today, more than 8,000 Merchant Mariners serve in 

the Military Sealift Command, most of them working in 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HRES 413 IH 

support of Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom; 

Whereas the United States Merchant Marine Academy is the 

only one of the five service academies that sends its cadets into war, and 142 undergraduates of the Academy 

were lost during World War II; 

Whereas during World War II, Merchant Mariners served 

honorably in combat but were denied veterans benefits 

and recognition at the end of the war despite sustaining 

the highest rate of casualties of any of the armed services; 

Whereas more than 95 percent of the Allied Forces and materiel that was transported during World War II was 

transported by Merchant Marine ships; 

Whereas the Merchant Mariners of World War II were denied 

the unprecedented benefits of the Servicemen’s Readjustment Act of 1944 (known as the ‘‘GI Bill of 1944’’); 

Whereas the story of the United States Merchant Mariners 

of World War II is one of patriotism, of youthful exuberance, of dedication to duty, of bravery in the midst of 

battle, and of a Nation that forgot these heroes after the 

end of the war for more than 40 years until 1988, when 

they were given veteran status; 

Whereas by that time, over 125,000 of those Merchant Mariners had died and many had lost out on opportunities 

and benefits they greatly deserved; and 

Whereas, on National Maritime Day, Congress recognizes the 

tremendous sacrifices and contributions of the Merchant 

Marine and its veterans and the entire maritime industry 

to the Nation: Now, therefore, be it 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
3 

•HRES 413 IH 

1 Resolved, That on National Maritime Day, the House 

2 of Representatives recognizes the heroic and invaluable 

3 sacrifices that the United States Merchant Marine vet4 erans have made to help ensure our Nation’s prosperity 

5 and safety. 

Æ 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
Before the Third Division,

June 29, 1955

No. 59202.

protests 175544-K, etc. (Ogdensburg).

#### A. N. Deringer, Inc. *v.*United States,

*208Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Swift & Company et al.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 212, C. D. 1655), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Mr. James D. Giattina, Director 

Water Protection Division 

Georgia Department of Natural Resources 

2 Martin Luther King Jr. Dr., S.E., Suite 1152 East, Atlanta, Georgia 30334-9000 

Mark Williams, Commissioner 

Judson H. Turner, Director 

Environmental Protection Division 

404/656-4 713 

FAX: 404/651-5778 

September 10, 2012 

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 4 

Atlanta Federal Center 

61 Forsyth Street SW 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960 

Dear Mr. Giattina: 

RE: Proposed NPDES Vessel General Permit (VGP) 

and Small Vessel General Permit (sVGP) 

Georgia 401 Water Quality Certification 

The Georgia Environmental Protection Division (EPD) has reviewed the proposed 

NPDES Vessel General Permit (VGP) and Small Vessel General Permit (sVGP) for the purpose 

of providing State certification in accordance with Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (CWA). 

The permits comply with the applicable provisions of CWA Sections 208(e), 301, 302, 303, 306, 

and 307. To be consistent with Georgia law, the following requirement must be added to the 

permits, or the language of the permits modified appropriately: 

1. All discharges from vessels covered by these permits will be conducted in a manner 

so as not to violate Georgia's water quality standards. 

2. Except for ocean going vessels of 20 tons displacement or more, the discharge of 

graywater shall be through a marine sanitation device that is in compliance with the 

Federal standards of performance and regulations for marine sanitation devices 

promulgated pursuant to Section 312 of the Clean Water Act. Georgia DNR or EPD 

personnel, or other duly authorized agents, shall have access to any vessel at 

reasonable times for the purposes of determining compliance with these rules. 

Georgia Rules for Water Quality Control, 391-3-6-.04. 

This certification does not relieve vessel operators of any obligation or responsibility for 

complying with the provisions of any other laws or regulations of other federal, state or local 

authorities, nor does it obviate the necessity of obtaining any other permits or approvals as may 

be required by law. 

Finally, EPA currently provides information regarding nutrient and copper impairment 

listings to permit holders via their website, http://cfpub.epa.gov/npdes/vessels/ 

permitresources.cfm. This information is out of date, and does not reflect Georgia's latest 

approved 303( d) listings. These listings are available on Georgia EPD's website at 

http://qeorqiaepd.org/Documents/305b.html. We ask that EPA provide this updated information 

as a resource to all VGP/sVGP permittees. 

Should you have any questions, please contact Gigi Steele at (404) 675-6000. 

Judson H. Turner 

Director
Exhibit 32.2

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SEC.1350

(SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002)

 

In connection with the Annual Report of, Sears Oil and GasCorporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, G. Reed Petersen, Treasurer, Secretary Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

     (1)  The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

     (2)  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated:  February 13, 2013

 

By:  /s/ G. Reed Petersen

     -----------------------------------------------

     G. Reed Petersen, Treasurer,Secretary

    Chief Financial Officer