59–006 

114TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 114–650 

SAINT FRANCIS DAM DISASTER NATIONAL MEMORIAL 

ACT 

JULY 1, 2016.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of 

the Union and ordered to be printed 

Mr. BISHOP of Utah, from the Committee on Natural Resources, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H.R. 5244] 

[Including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office] 

The Committee on Natural Resources, to whom was referred the 

bill (H.R. 5244) to provide for the establishment of a national memorial and national monument to commemorate those killed by the 

collapse of the Saint Francis Dam on March 12, 1928, and for other 

purposes, having considered the same, report favorably thereon 

with an amendment and recommend that the bill as amended do 

pass. 

The amendment is as follows: 

Strike all after the enacting clause and insert the following: 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Saint Francis Dam Disaster National Memorial 

Act’’. 

SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

Congress finds the following: 

(1) On March 12, 1928, the Saint Francis Dam located in the northern portion 

of Los Angeles County, California, breached, resulting in a devastating flood 

that caused the death of approximately 425 individuals. 

(2) The residents of Santa Clarita Valley, San Francisquito Canyon, Castaic 

Junction, Santa Clara River Valley, Piru, Fillmore, Bardsdale, Saticoy, and 

Santa Paula were directly impacted and suffered greatly from the worst flood 

in the history of the State of California. 

(3) The disaster resulted in a tremendous loss of human life, property, and 

the livelihood of local residents, and was surpassed in the level of destruction 

in the 20th century only by the great San Francisco earthquake of 1906. 

(4) The collapse of the dam may represent America’s worst civil engineering 

failure in the 20th century. 

(5) The site of the disaster is subject to the theft of historic artifacts, graffiti, 

and other vandalism. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
2 

(6) It is right to pay homage to the citizens who were killed, injured, or dislocated due to the flood, and to educate the public about this important historical event. 

(7) It is appropriate that the site of the Saint Francis Dam and surrounding 

areas be specially designated and protected to commemorate this tragic event. 

SEC. 3. SAINT FRANCIS DAM DISASTER NATIONAL MEMORIAL. 

(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—The Secretary is authorized to establish a memorial at the 

Saint Francis Dam site in the County of Los Angeles, California, for the purpose 

of honoring the victims of the Saint Francis Dam disaster of March 12, 1928. 

(b) REQUIREMENTS.—The Memorial shall be— 

(1) known as the Saint Francis Dam Disaster National Memorial; and 

(2) managed by the Forest Service. 

(c) DONATIONS.—The Secretary is authorized to accept, hold, administer, invest, 

and spend any gift, devise, or bequest of real or personal property made to the Secretary for purposes of developing, designing, constructing, and managing the Memorial. 

SEC. 4. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MEMORIAL. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 3 years after the date of the enactment of this 

Act, the Secretary shall submit to Congress recommendations regarding— 

(1) the planning, design, construction, and long-term management of the Memorial; 

(2) the proposed boundaries of the Memorial; 

(3) a visitor center and educational facilities at the Memorial; and 

(4) ensuring public access to the Memorial. 

(b) CONSULTATION.—In preparing the recommendations required under subsection 

(a), the Secretary shall consult with— 

(1) appropriate Federal agencies; 

(2) State, tribal, and local governments, including the Santa Clarita City 

Council; and 

(3) the public. 

SEC. 5. ESTABLISHMENT OF SAINT FRANCIS DAM DISASTER NATIONAL MONUMENT. 

(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—There is established as a national monument in the State, 

certain National Forest System land administered by the Secretary in the County 

of Los Angeles comprising approximately 440 acres, as generally depicted on the 

map entitled ‘‘Proposed Saint Francis Dam Disaster National Monument’’, created 

on June 14, 2016, to be known as the Saint Francis Dam Disaster National Monument. 

(b) PURPOSE.—The purpose of the Monument is to conserve and enhance for the 

benefit and enjoyment of the public the cultural, archaeological, historical, watershed, educational, and recreational resources and values of the Monument. 

SEC. 6. DUTIES OF THE SECRETARY WITH RESPECT TO MONUMENT. 

(a) MANAGEMENT PLAN.— 

(1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 4 years after the date of the enactment of 

this Act, the Secretary shall develop a management plan for the Monument. 

(2) CONSULTATION.—The management plan shall be developed in consultation 

with— 

(A) appropriate Federal agencies; 

(B) State, tribal, and local governments; and 

(C) the public. 

(3) CONSIDERATIONS.—In developing and implementing the management plan, 

the Secretary shall, with respect to methods of protecting and providing access 

to the Monument, consider the recommendations of the Saint Francis Disaster 

National Memorial Foundation, the Santa Clarita Valley Historical Society, and 

the Community Hiking Club of Santa Clarita. 

(b) MANAGEMENT.—The Secretary shall manage the Monument— 

(1) in a manner that conserves and enhances the cultural and historic resources of the Monument; and 

(2) in accordance with— 

(A) the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act of 1974 

(16 U.S.C. 1600 et seq.) and the laws generally applicable to the National 

Forest System; 

(B) this Act; and 

(C) any other applicable laws. 

(c) USES.— 

(1) USE OF MOTORIZED VEHICLES.—The use of motorized vehicles within the 

Monument may be permitted only— 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
3 

1 Harrison, Scott. ‘‘St. Francis Damn Collapse Left a Trail of Death and Destruction.’’ Los Angeles Times, 19 Mar. 2016. 2 Blitz, Matt. ‘‘On Occasions Like This, I Envy the Dead: The St. Francis Dam Disaster.’’ 

Smithsonian, 12 Mar. 2015. 

(A) on roads designated for use by motorized vehicles in the management 

plan required under subsection (a); 

(B) for administrative purposes; or 

(C) for emergency responses. 

(2) GRAZING.—The Secretary shall permit grazing within the Monument, 

where established before the date of the enactment of this Act— 

(A) subject to all applicable laws (including regulations and Executive orders); and 

(B) consistent with the purpose described in section 5(b). 

SEC. 7. DEFINITIONS. 

In this Act: 

(1) MEMORIAL.—The term ‘‘Memorial’’ means the Saint Frances Dam Disaster 

National Memorial authorized under section 3(a). 

(2) MONUMENT.—The term ‘‘Monument’’ means the Saint Francis Dam Disaster National Monument established under section 5(a). 

(3) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ means the State of California. 

(4) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means the Secretary of Agriculture. 

PURPOSE OF THE BILL

The purpose of H.R. 5244 is to provide for the establishment of 

a national memorial and national monument to commemorate 

those killed by the collapse of the Saint Francis Dam on March 12, 

1928. 

BACKGROUND AND NEED FOR LEGISLATION

The Saint Francis Dam was one of several large infrastructure 

projects constructed in the early 20th century to help control the 

flow of water to southern California. On March 12, 1928, the dam 

breached, resulting in significant flooding that took more than 400 

lives in Los Angeles County, California.1 This failure is considered 

one of the worst civil engineering failures in the 20th century and 

resulted in the resignation of William Mulholland as head of the 

Los Angeles Bureau of Water Works and Water Supply.2 Beyond 

the loss of life, thousands of residents lost their homes and experienced significant property damage due to the flood. Today, the site 

of the dam collapse and the affected areas are often subject to theft 

and vandalism. 

H.R. 5244 recognizes the devastation of the flood and its impact 

on the residents of northern Los Angeles County by establishing a 

national memorial as well as a national monument to preserve the 

affected area for future generations. The bill authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture to establish the memorial via donation in consultation with the Santa Clarita City Council and the public. No 

taxpayer funds are authorized for the construction of the memorial. 

The bill also authorizes the creation of a 440 acre monument 

that will encompass the St. Francis Dam memorial. The boundaries 

of the monument were designated in consultation with interest 

groups in the community. Motorized access will be allowed within 

the monument and grazing will continue to be allowed on any land 

where it is already permitted. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
4 

COMMITTEE ACTION

H.R. 5244 was introduced on May 16, 2016, by Congressman Stephen Knight (R–CA). The bill was referred to the Committee on 

Natural Resources, and within the Committee, to the Subcommittee on Federal Lands. On May 24, 2016, the Subcommittee 

held a hearing on the bill. On June 14, 2016, the Natural Resources Committee met to consider the bill. The Subcommittee was 

discharged by unanimous consent. Congressman Bruce Westerman 

(R–AR) offered an amendment designated #1. The amendment was 

adopted by unanimous consent. No other amendments were offered, 

and the bill, as amended, was ordered favorably reported to the 

House of Representatives by unanimous consent on June 15, 2016. 

COMMITTEE OVERSIGHT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Regarding clause 2(b)(1) of rule X and clause 3(c)(1) of rule XIII 

of the Rules of the House of Representatives, the Committee on 

Natural Resources’ oversight findings and recommendations are reflected in the body of this report. 

COMPLIANCE WITH HOUSE RULE XIII

1. Cost of Legislation. Clause 3(d)(1) of rule XIII of the Rules of 

the House of Representatives requires an estimate and a comparison by the Committee of the costs which would be incurred in carrying out this bill. However, clause 3(d)(2)(B) of that rule provides 

that this requirement does not apply when the Committee has included in its report a timely submitted cost estimate of the bill prepared by the Director of the Congressional Budget Office under section 402 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974. Under clause 

3(c)(3) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives and 

section 403 of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, the Committee has received the following cost estimate for this bill from the 

Director of the Congressional Budget Office: 

U.S. CONGRESS, 

CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE, 

Washington, DC, June 28, 2016. 

Hon. ROB BISHOP, 

Chairman, Committee on Natural Resources, House of Representatives, Washington, DC. 

DEAR MR. CHAIRMAN: The Congressional Budget Office has prepared the enclosed cost estimate for H.R. 5244, the Saint Francis 

Dam Disaster National Memorial Act. 

If you wish further details on this estimate, we will be pleased 

to provide them. The CBO staff contact is Jeff LaFave. 

Sincerely, 

KEITH HALL, Director. 

Enclosure. 

H.R. 5244—Saint Francis Dam Disaster National Memorial Act 

H.R. 5244 would establish a national monument on 440 acres of 

land administered by the Forest Service. The bill also would require the agency to submit recommendations to the Congress for a 

memorial to the victims of the Saint Francis Dam failure and to 

complete a management plan for the monument. CBO expects that 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
5 

the construction of the memorial or any other structures or improvements within the monument would be funded by donations. 

Based on information provided by the Forest Service regarding 

the amount of staff time required to carry out the activities required under the bill, CBO estimates that implementing the legislation would cost less than $125,000 (the estimated cost of one 

year’s salary and benefits for a mid- to senior-level employee of the 

Forest Service in Los Angeles County) over the 2017–2021 period; 

such spending would be subject to the availability of appropriated 

funds. If, in accordance with the recommendations provided to the 

Congress from the Forest Service any improvements were made 

within the monument, including constructing a visitor center, the 

cost of managing the monument could exceed $125,000. However, 

CBO expects that any costs associated with those improvements 

would be incurred after 2021. 

Enacting H.R. 5244 could affect direct spending by increasing offsetting receipts from donations and the associated direct spending 

of those funds to construct a memorial; therefore, pay-as-you-go 

procedures apply. However, CBO estimates that any net effect on 

direct spending would be negligible. Enacting the bill would not affect revenues. CBO estimates that enacting H.R. 5244 would not 

increase net direct spending or on-budget deficits in any of the four 

consecutive 10-year periods beginning in 2027. 

HR. 5244 contains no intergovernmental or private-sector mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act and would 

impose no costs on state, local, or tribal governments. 

The CBO staff contact for this estimate is Jeff LaFave. The estimate was approved by H. Samuel Papenfuss, Deputy Assistant Director for Budget Analysis 

2. Section 308(a) of Congressional Budget Act. As required by 

clause 3(c)(2) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives and section 308(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, 

this bill does not contain any new spending authority, credit authority, or an increase or decrease in revenues or tax expenditure. 

According to the Congressional Budget Office, implementing H.R. 

5244 would cost less than $125,000, subject to appropriation, over 

the 2017–2012 period. In addition, ‘‘any net effect on direct spending would be negligible’’. 

3. General Performance Goals and Objectives. As required by 

clause 3(c)(4) of rule XIII, the general performance goal or objective 

of this bill is to provide for the establishment of a national memorial and national monument to commemorate those killed by the 

collapse of the Saint Francis Dam on March 12, 1928. 

EARMARK STATEMENT

This bill does not contain any Congressional earmarks, limited 

tax benefits, or limited tariff benefits as defined under clauses 9(e), 

9(f), and 9(g) of rule XXI of the Rules of the House of Representatives. 

COMPLIANCE WITH PUBLIC LAW 104–4

This bill contains no unfunded mandates. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING
6 

COMPLIANCE WITH H. RES. 5

Directed Rule Making. The Chairman does not believe that this 

bill directs any executive branch official to conduct any specific 

rule-making proceedings. 

Duplication of Existing Programs. This bill does not establish or 

reauthorize a program of the federal government known to be duplicative of another program. Such program was not included in 

any report from the Government Accountability Office to Congress 

pursuant to section 21 of Public Law 111–139 or identified in the 

most recent Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance published pursuant to the Federal Program Information Act (Public Law 95–220, 

as amended by Public Law 98–169) as relating to other programs. 

PREEMPTION OF STATE, LOCAL OR TRIBAL LAW

This bill is not intended to preempt any State, local or tribal law. 

CHANGES IN EXISTING LAW

This bill makes no changes to existing law. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with HEARING