alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsBladeCAD: An Interactive Geometric Design Tool for Turbomachinery BladesA new metthodology for interactive design of turbomachinery blades is presented. Software implementation of the meth- ods provides a user interface that is intuitive to aero-designers while operating with standardized geometric forms. The primary contribution is that blade sections may be defined with respect to general surfaces of revolution which may be defined to represent the path of fluid flow through the turbomachine. The completed blade design is represented as a non-uniform rational B-spline (NURBS) surface and is written to a standard IGES file which is portable to most design, analysis, and manufacturing applications.Document ID19960047133Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsMiller, Perry L., IV*(Iowa State Univ. of Science and Technology Ames, IA United States)*Oliver, James H.*(Iowa State Univ. of Science and Technology Ames, IA United States)*Miller, David P.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Tweedt, Daniel L.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1996Subject CategoryAircraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-107262E-10327NAS 1.15:107262Meeting InformationMeeting: Gas Turbine and Aeroengine CongressLocation: BirminghamCountry: United KingdomStart Date: June 10, 1996End Date: June 13, 1996Sponsors:American Society of Mechanical EngineersAccession Number96N32896Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG3-1318PROJECT: RTOP 505-62-10Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19960047133.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Karen Thundiyil/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Nick Hutson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 11/29/2011 07:48 PM Subject: FW: E.O. 12866 Meeting on the EGU MACT Rule

Hi all, Here are the handouts from this meeting today.

Regards, Cortney

-----Original Appointment----- From: Echols, Mabel E. Subject: E.O. 12866 Meeting on the EGU MACT Rule When: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 2:30 PM-3:00 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada). Where: Room 10103 NEOB

This meeting was requested by Scott Segal, Bracewell & Giuliani LLP on behalf of ERCC.
**Exhibit 99.1**

**Exhibit 99.1. Certificate of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, asadopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.**

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Insight Corporation(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John Dorman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

| /s/  John Dorman |
|----------------------------|
| John Dorman                |
| Chief Executive Officer    |
| August 14, 2002            |
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. No. 02-6951



#  H AYWOOD W ILLIAMS , J R .,

Defendant-Appellant. 

# 
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge.

(CR-44-71-N) Submitted: September 20, 2002 Decided: October 10, 2002 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL Haywood Williams, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION PER CURIAM: Haywood Williams, Jr., alleges that he filed a timely notice of appeal from the denial of his motion for release of his sealed medical records and his motion for reconsideration. However, the districtcourt docket sheet reflects only the filing of a later letter from Williams inquiring about his appeal. Because, under Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988), a notice of appeal is considered filed as of the date Williams delivered it to prison officials for mailing to the court, the district court docket sheet is not conclusive on this issue. Thus, we remand the case for the district court to determine whether Williams filed a timely notice of appeal. The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration. REMANDED 2 U NITED S TATES v. W ILLIAMS
(R.D. 11421)

#### Parsons & Whittemore, Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided December 12, 1967)

*Sharp, Solter & Hutchison*for the plaintiff.

*Edwin L. Weisl, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement lias been submitted for decision upon tbe following stipulation:

_ IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by tbe undersigned, subject to tbe approval of tbe Court:

1. That the subject merchandise consists of hardboard exported from Sweden as to which the Secretary of the Treasury issued a finding of dumping, published in 89 TD 197, TD 53567, made pursuant to the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C., 160, et seq.).

2. That pursuant to Section 168 of said Antidumping Act, the appraiser reported the purchase price (Sec. 162) and the foreign market value (Sec. 164) as to the merchandise listed on Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof.

3. That pursuant to Sections 500 and 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, the appraiser appraised all of the merchandise in the appeals for appraisement enumerated on Schedule A for regular duty purposes.

4. That the plaintiff duly filed appeals for reappraisement as to the values referred to in the above paragraphs Nos. 2 and 3.

5. That at the times relevant herein the purchase price and the foreign market value under the said Antidumping Act are as specified in the aforesaid Schedule A attached hereto.

6. That as to all other items of merchandise not identified on Schedule A, the appraiser’s reports of purchase price and of foreign market value are correct.

7. That the appraiser’s findings of value under the provisions of Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, are correct.

8. That said appeals are submitted for decision upon this stipulation and said Schedule A.

Upon the agreed facts, I find foreign market value, as defined in section 164 of the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C. § 164), for the merchandise described in schedule A, annexed to this decision and made a part hereof, and the purchase price thereof, within section 162 of said act (19 U.S.C. § 162), to be as indicated in said schedule. As to all other items of merchandise not identified in schedule A, I find the *802foreign market values and purchase prices to be as reported by the appraiser. In all other respects, the values of all merchandise are as returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
From: cindy@highlandwestmonroe.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:23:42 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B). I also do

not appreciate your offering services that will require my insurance rates to go. They are already

extremely high and soon I will not be able to afford it. 

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Cindy Taylor

West Monroe, LA 71291
ACXIO N 

Pettiford, Marie (OST) 

J -

SlO-f10124-004 

COIJTROLUO 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

January 21, 2011 

TO: The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Jerry Blackler [docblack@ak.net] 

Friday, January 21, 2011 8:24 PM 

LaHood. Ray (OST) 

Cordova Air Service 

"0 —'—Z, o o o 

As business owners in Cordova Alaska we are writing this letter to express our support for the selection of Alaska Airlines 

to continue to provide essential air service to the community of Cordova. 

V^e rely on Alaska Airlines to bring in everything from a package of nuts & bolts to transmissions and engines for the 

customers we service through our business. Alaska's twice daily jet service is vital to the economic well being of our 

company and that of the community. 

We request that DOT select Alaska Airlines to continue to provide air service to Cordova and the other Southeast 

communttres that they serve. 

Sincerely, 

Jerry & Vicki Blackler 

Alpine Diesel & Shipyard Rental LLC
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 277 

Expressing support for the designation and goals of ‘‘National Hispanic 

Media Week’’ in honor of the Hispanic media of the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 27, 2007 

Mr. GRIJALVA submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation and goals of ‘‘National Hispanic Media Week’’ in honor of the Hispanic 

media of the United States. 

Whereas, for almost 470 years, the United States has benefitted from the work of Hispanic writers and publishers; 

Whereas more than 600 Hispanic publishers circulate more 

than 20,000,000 copies of publications every week in the 

United States; 

Whereas 1 out of every 8 citizens of the United States is 

served by a Hispanic publisher; 

Whereas the Hispanic press informs many citizens of the 

United States about the great political, economic, and social issues of the day; 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 277 IH 

Whereas the Hispanic press of the United States particularly 

focuses on informing and promoting the well-being of the 

Hispanic community of the United States; 

Whereas, by commemorating the achievements of the Hispanic press, the House of Representatives acknowledges 

the important role that the Hispanic press has played in 

the history of the United States; and 

Whereas the second week of October has previously been designated as ‘‘National Hispanic Media Week’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the importance of the Hispanic 

3 press of the United States in informing and pro4 moting the well-being of the Hispanic community of 

5 the United States; 

6 (2) supports the designation of an appropriate 

7 week as ‘‘National Hispanic Media Week’’ in honor 

8 of the Hispanic media of the United States; and 

9 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

10 to observe the week with appropriate programs and 

11 activities. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
EXHIBIT 21.1


SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

     NEMA Properties, LLC, ("NEMA") is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Registrant.
NEMA is organized under the laws of the State of Nevada and is doing business
under the name NEMA Properties, LLC.

     Amen Minerals, L.P., is owned 99% by NEMA as the sole limited partner and
1% by Amen Properties, Inc., as the sole general partner, and is organized under
the laws of the State of Delaware and the Limited Partnership is doing business
under the name Amen Minerals, L.P.

     Amen Delaware, L.P. is owned 99% by NEMA as the sole limited partner and 1%
by Amen Properties, Inc., as the sole general partner, and is organized under
the laws of the State of Delaware and the Limited Partnership is doing business
under the name Amen Delaware, L.P.

     W Power and Light, L.P. is owned 99% by NEMA as the sole limited partner
and 1% by Amen Properties, Inc., as the sole general partner, and is organized
under the laws of the State of Delaware and the Limited Partnership is doing
business under the name W Power and Light, L.P.

     Priority Power Management, Ltd. is owned 99% by NEMA as the sole limited
partner and 1% by Amen Properties, Inc., as the sole general partner, and is
organized under the laws of the State of Texas and the Limited Partnership is
doing business under the name W Power and Light, L.P.

                                       34
| 1.     | Such Annual Report of Form 10-K/A for the period ending May 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| 2.     | The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended May 31, 2010, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Zhong Sen International Tea Company. |

| Date: May 23, 2011             |
|-------------------------------------|
|                                |
| Zhong Sen International Tea Company |
|                                |
| By: /s/ Nie Pin                     |
| Nie PinChief Executive Officer      |
Kent

Mayville

Antelope

Fossil

Mitchell

Clarno

Service

Creek

Richmond

WASCO CO

JEFFERSON CO

JEFFERSON COUNTY

CROOK COUNTY

SHERMAN COUNTY

WASCO COUNTY

GILLIAM COUNTY

WHEELER COUNTY

26

97

26

19

19

218

218

207

402

Day

John

River

3 0 3 6 Kilometers

3 0 3 6 Miles

W

N

E

S

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

PRINEVILLE DISTRICT

John Day Basin

Resource Management Plan

Draft Environmental Impact Statement

2008

Map 14B: Alternative 3 Travel Management and Off Highway Vehicle

Designations - Sutton Mountain

No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these 

data for individual or aggregate use with other data. Original data were compiled from various sources. This 

information may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was developed through digital means 

and may be updated without notification.

LEGEND Transportation 

 Interim Road

 Interim Road - Needs Rehabilitation

 Open Road Seasonally

 Closed Road

 Closed Road - Stream Function

 U.S. Highway

 State Highway

 County Road

 Forest Service Secondary Route

 Private Road- Closed to public use

 or unknown

Off Highway Vehicle Designation

 Open- Motorized Vehicle Use Permitted Off Road

 Closed- Motorized Use Off Roads Probhibited

 Limited- Motorized Vehicle Use Limited

 to Designated Roads and Trails,

 Seasonally, or by Type of Vehicle

4

218

26

19

Road Density Prescription

 Zero Miles per Square Mile

 Two Miles per Square Mile

 No Limit

Planning Area Boundary

Administered Land

 Bureau of Land Management

 Forest Service

 John Day Fossil Beds

 National Monument

 State

 Private or Other

* Note: Access to some areas listed as open may

 require landowner permission to cross private lands

OREGON

Prineville 

District

John Day Basin

Planning Area

Map

Area

M07-09-01:9-5-08

T

12

S

T

11

S

T

10

S

T

9

S

T

8

S

T

7

S

T

6

S

T

5

S

T

4

S

T

12

S

T

11

S

T

10

S

T

9

S

T

8

S

T

7

S

T

6

S

T

5

S

T

4

S

R 17 E R 18 E R 19 E R 20 E R 21 E R 22 E R 23 E

R 17 E R 18 E R 19 E R 20 E R 21 E R 22 E R 23 E
No. 62759.

#### Judson Sheldon Division National Carloading Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 58/728 (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

The protest was dismissed.
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT

United Gold & Government Fund, Inc.:

We consent to the use in Post-Effective Amendment No. 19 to Registration
Statement #2-96520 of our report dated February 7, 1997 appearing in the
Statement of Additional Information, which is a part of such Registration
Statement, and to the reference to us under the caption "Financial Highlights"
appearing in the Prospectuses, which also are a part of such Registration
Statement.



Deloitte & Touche LLP
Kansas City, Missouri
March 26, 1997
From: clarencedog@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:07:39 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Michael Vetter

Albany, OR 97322
From: cham624@earthlink.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:37:15 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Christopher Hamilton

Woodway, TX 76712
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Insight Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeffrey E. Stiefler, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|                                                                                             
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                             
|/s/ Jeffrey E. Stiefler                                                                      
|Jeffrey E. Stiefler Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer May 10, 2005



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Digital Insight and will be retained by Digital Insight and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.