alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: roby164@cox.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:50:43 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Loren Roenhymer

Narragansett, RI 02882
Before the Second Division,

July 20, 1959

No. 63269.

protests 152074-K, etc. (New York).

#### Wm. Adams, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of candlesticks and candelabras similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 62036, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office

Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800

Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001

98–668 PDF 2016

S. HRG. 114–183 

[ERRATA] 

OVERSIGHT OF REGULATORY IMPACTS 

ANALYSES FOR U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL 

PROTECTION AGENCY REGULATIONS 

HEARING 

BEFORE THE

SUBCOMMITTEE ON SUPERFUND, WASTE 

MANAGEMENT, AND REGULATORY OVERSIGHT 

OF THE

COMMITTEE ON 

ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS 

UNITED STATES SENATE 

ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS 

FIRST SESSION 

OCTOBER 21, 2015 

Printed for the use of the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

( 

Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys 
2 

ERRATA 

Questions for the record and the witnesses’ responses were inadvertently omitted from the above hearing. Available in the committee’s records are questions and responses for the following witnesses: Ms. Diana Furchtgott-Roth, Mr. William L. Kovacs, Mr. 

Sam Batkins, and Dr. Mary B. Rice.
Exhibit 23.1






CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM







We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on Form S-3 of our reportdated February 22, 2011 relating to the financial statements, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.  We also consent to the reference to us under the heading “Experts” in such Registration Statement.









/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Peoria, IL


April 7, 2011
### Request for Information (FAA-2015-2733) 9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA)

Dear Mr. Caska:

This letter is to inform you that th e following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA-2015-2733). This information is necessary fo r the Federal Aviation Administrati on (FAA) to process your petition.

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Op erations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closedset filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date
listed below.

Please submit the additional informat ion (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov . Once your information has been submitted, pl ease also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary information), as well as your comment tracking number from regulations .gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. I f you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information de scribed above by November 5,
2015. If we do not receive the in formation, we will close the doc ket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999 .

Thank you for your interest in aviation safety. FAA Office of Rulemaking Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 11:36 AM

To: tom@aerolens.com.au
Before the Third Division,

August 14, 1959

No. 63297.

protests 85651-K, etc. (New York).

#### Park & Tilford Import Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 283 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to prohibit the 

consideration of conference reports on omnibus appropriation bills. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 29, 2007 

Mr. CHABOT (for himself, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, Mr. ISSA, Mr. SHADEGG, 

Mr. PENCE, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr. BARRETT of South Carolina, Mr. WALBERG, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. 

BRADY of Texas, Mrs. MUSGRAVE, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr. 

PITTS, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, and Mr. TERRY) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to 

prohibit the consideration of conference reports on omnibus appropriation bills. 

1 Resolved, That rule XXII of the Rules of the House 

2 of Representatives is amended by adding at the end the 

3 following new clause: 

4 ‘‘13. It shall not be in order to consider a conference 

5 report comprising text that would be within the jurisdic6 tion of more than one subcommittee of the Committee on 

7 Appropriations, except for a conference report on any 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HRES 283 IH 

1 measure continuing appropriations or on any bill making 

2 supplemental appropriations.’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
No. 63809.

protest 58/23579(B) (Los Angeles).

#### Frank P. Dow Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of chairs similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Davies Turner & Co.*v. *United States*(45 C.C.P.A. 39, C.A.D. 669), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 64536.

#### U.S.D. Importing Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 329567-K, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of diving masks similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 63864, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
NUMBER 13-13-00570-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

NUECES COUNTY, TEXAS, Appellant,

v.

VIRGINIA CANAS, Appellee. 

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Perkes, and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

This appeal was abated by this Court on December 2, 2014, and the parties were 

ordered to mediation. This cause is now before the Court on the parties’ amended joint 

motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds the parties have reached an agreement to 

compromise and settle their differences. The parties request that this Court dismiss the 

appeal. Accordingly, this appeal is hereby REINSTATED.
2

The Court, having considered the documents on file and the amended joint motion 

to dismiss, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

42.1(a). The joint motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. 

In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party 

incurring same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d). Having dismissed the appeal at the 

parties’ request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue 

forthwith.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

29th day of January, 2015.
EPA Meeting with Tank Tech February 9 , 2012
**Attendees:** EPA OUST: Li z McDermott, Linda Gerber, Tim Smith, Paul Miller, Tim Roberts, Cho Yi Kwan , Dave Hamnett Tank Tech: David Russell TR Consulting: Tony

Rieck At this meeting Tank Tech explained a tank they manufacture that has recently received a UL listing. They

are interested in how this new tank will fit into the UST regulations and plan to comment on some way s they believe it should be incorporated into the regulations.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 381 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 381

  Referring the bill (H.R. 2124), entitled ``A bill for the relief of 
  Adela and Darryl Bailor'', to the chief judge of the United States 
             Court of Federal Claims for a report thereon.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2007

 Ms. Carson submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Referring the bill (H.R. 2124), entitled ``A bill for the relief of 
  Adela and Darryl Bailor'', to the chief judge of the United States 
             Court of Federal Claims for a report thereon.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. REFERRAL.

    The bill (H.R. 2124), entitled ``A bill for the relief of Adela and 
Darryl Bailor'', now pending in the House of Representatives, together 
with all the accompanying papers, is referred to the chief judge of the 
United States Court of Federal Claims.

SEC. 2. PROCEEDINGS AND REPORT.

    Upon receipt of the bill under section 1, the chief judge shall--
    (1) proceed under sections 1492 and 2509 of title 28, United States 
Code; and
    (2) report back to the House of Representatives, at the earliest 
practicable date, providing--
            (A) such findings of fact and conclusions of law that are 
        sufficient to inform Congress of the nature, extent and 
        character of the compensation referred to in the bill as a 
        legal or equitable claim against the United States; and
            (B) the amount, if any, legally or equitably due from the 
        United States to Adela and Darryl Bailor.
                                 <all>
```
No. 60168.

protests 747944-G, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### W. X. Huber Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that 20 percent of the merchandise consists of rags used chiefly for papermaking, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained with respect to said 20 percent of the merchandise.
Exhibit 32.01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of State Auto Financial
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert P. Restrepo, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



| |  |  |  |  |  |                                                            
| |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------
| |  |  | 
| |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Robert P. Restrepo,
Jr.                                
| |  |  |  |  |  | Robert P. Restrepo, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer
May 6, 2011

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to State Auto Financial Corporation and will be retained by State Auto Financial Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
H. Res. 1430 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 26, 2008. 

Whereas there are approximately 73 million children in the 

United States; 

Whereas nine million children are without health insurance 

and do not receive timely or comprehensive medical attention; 

Whereas three million children are reported abused or neglected each year, thousands of whom are killed or severely injured; 

Whereas more than 13 million children and youth live below 

the poverty level; 

Whereas millions of children and youth are unsupervised at 

the end of the school day and would benefit from participation in quality after school programs; 

Whereas millions of infants, toddlers, and preschoolers lack 

access to affordable, high-quality early care, and education; 

Whereas safe, nurturing, and stimulating experiences in the 

first years of life promote school-readiness, future academic success, and other positive social outcomes; and 

Whereas the future success, health, prosperity, and security 

of our Nation depend on an educated, healthy, and secure 
2 

•HRES 1430 EH 

citizenry, all of which is founded in childhood: Now, 

therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) recognizes that wise investments in children will 

lead to a better-educated citizenry and a more competitive workforce in the United States; 

(2) supports the goals and ideals of the National 

Step Up For Kids Day; 

(3) recognizes that every child matters; and 

(4) encourages the citizens of the United States to 

make children, youth, and families a priority throughout 

the year. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CurrencySharesSMRussian Ruble Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-K for the
fiscal period ended October 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nick Bonos, Chief Executive Officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Trust, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

Date: January 14, 2010



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ NICK BONOS                                       
|Nick Bonos*                                          
|Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)



|* | The Registrant is
a trust and Nick Bonos is signing in his capacity as the principal executive officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Registrant.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6261

RONNIE L. SIMMONS, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

H. R. POWELL, Warden; W. COPELAND, Assistant

Warden; JAMES POPE, DCE Principal; J. DAVID,

DCE Regional Director,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. John A. MacKenzie, Senior District

Judge. (CA-95-1143)

Submitted: August 22, 1996 Decided: September 3, 1996

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronnie L. Simmons, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order overruling

his objections to the assessed partial filing fee and granting him

an additional thirty days to pay the fee. We dismiss the appeal for

lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This

court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28

U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial

Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is

neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral

order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 60972.

protests 103559-K, etc. (New York).

#### Mark Tarlow and W. J. Byrnes & Co. of N. Y., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of kidskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Kung Chen Fur Corpn.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480) or *Prime Fur Corp.*v. *United States*(37 Cust. Ct. 83, C. D. 1802) and lambskin plates similar to those the subject of *A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643) or C. D. 1802, *supra,*the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Mollison, J.,

dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinions in C. D. 1480 and C. D. 1643, *supra.*
OFFICERS

Arlanda Williams

- LA

Preside nt

Stephanie Lynch

– LA

1 st Vice President

Thomas Coley, Jr.

– AL

2 nd Vice President

– (Interim)

Andrea Harrison

- MD

Treasurer

Kenneth Burkhalter

E xecutive Secretary

REGIONAL DIRECTORS

NORTH

Helen L. Holton

– MD

SOUTH

Roderick Woullard

– MS

MIDWESTERN

Frank Stewart

– IL

WESTERN Grady Prestage

– TX

GENERAL COUNSEL

Patrick O. Jefferson

P ARLIAMENTARIAN Krystal L James

– TX

P RESIDENTS EMERITUS

Robert Steele

- IL

Immediate Past President

Shelia Smoot

- AL

Deborah Sims

– IL Thomas “TC” Coley

- AL

Joe Fuller

- LA James W. Scarborough

- LA

Bobbie Steele

– IL Roy Brooks

– TX

Edna Bell

– MI

Earline W. Parmon

– NC Donald M. Aytch, Ph.D

– LA

Thelma J. Moore

– CA

Hilda Pemberton

– MD Reginald Eaves

- GA Webster J. Guillory

– CA

Chuck Williams

– GA Harold Hayden

– MI Edward McIntyre

– GA 

## July 22, 2011

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Water Docket 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20460

ATTN: Docket ID No. EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 2008

- 0667

Dear Administrator Jackson:

On behalf of the National Association of Black County Officials, we write today in regards to EPA pending proposed “cooling water intake structure” rule under 316(b) of the Clean Water Act. We believe the proposed rule will have unwarranted negative economic and energy effects on our cities

and states.

The proposed rule would require most el ectric utility and some manufacturing facilities that use cooling water to meet an array of new technology, study, monitoring and reporting requirements, even though the facilities have been permitted to comply with for more than three decades

under the wa tchful eye of our state’s environmental regulatory agency.

EPA must modify the proposed rule to ensure that any new requirements imposed on a facility are necessary, feasible and will produce benefits that are at least commensurate with, if not greater than cost and ideally will produce the maximum benefits of the options available.

Our nation is still suffering from the effects of the current recession. We have lost jobs and income that put our citizens, companies, state and local governments in financial distress. Especially in such a climate the economy is in the EPA needs to ensure that any new regulations are thoroughly necessary and produce maximum benefits to each facility to which the regulations apply. The proposed 316(b) rule does not meet this

standard.

Sincerely, 

# Arlanda J. Williams

Arlanda J. Wi lliams

President National Association of Black County Officials

1090 Vermont Avenue, NW Suite 1290 Washington, DC 20005

202

- 3 50

- 6 696

- p 202

- 3 50

- 6 699

- f www.blackcountyofficials.com
From: rgcjr@earthlink.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:01:36 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Richard Crossley

Las Vegas, NV 89146