alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0001036848
<NAME>                        AeroCentury Corp.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>               1
<CASH>                        5,420,010
<SECURITIES>                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                   313,010
<ALLOWANCES>                          0
<INVENTORY>                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              6,151,510
<PP&E>                       62,086,220
<DEPRECIATION>               16,825,020
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               56,412,710
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>        29,118,590
<BONDS>                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<COMMON>                          1,610
<OTHER-SE>                   15,185,220
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 51,412,710
<SALES>                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              4,904,680
<CGS>                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              2,313,200
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              893,890
<INCOME-PRETAX>               1,697,590
<INCOME-TAX>                    596,680
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           1,100,910
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                  1,100,910
<EPS-BASIC>                      0.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                      0.70



</TABLE>
No. 69655.

#### Hershey Co. *v.*United States,

protest 64/18465 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of vinyl articles similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 67011, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: strinteg1@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:00:58 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

james magner

Okatie, SC 29909
cc: Hon. Michelle Leavitt, District Judge 

Ronald R. Santos 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) I947A
H. Res. 391 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 6, 2007. 

Whereas the residents of North Texas have greeted thousands of troops returning to the United States from Iraq 

and Afghanistan for Rest and Recuperation since the 

program’s inception in June of 2004; 

Whereas volunteers from North Texas welcome over 200 

troops each day who travel through Dallas-Fort Worth 

International Airport on their way home; 

Whereas these are the first people the troops see upon their 

return to the United States, and the support they give 

the troops on behalf of all Americans is invaluable and 

inspirational; 

Whereas citizens like Bert Brady, a veteran, spend 300 days 

a year at the airport thanking troops for their service 

and giving them a well deserved homecoming; 

Whereas thousands of young men from the Boy Scouts of 

America’s Circle Ten Council have also selflessly contributed to one of the largest and most respected community 

initiatives in North Texas; and 

Whereas these dedicated and selfless volunteers positively impact the morale and spirit of the men and women serving 

our country in Iraq and Afghanistan and demonstrate 
2 

•HRES 391 EH 

our appreciation for their sacrifice to the Country: Now, 

therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors the 

valuable work of the ‘‘Welcome Home a Hero’’ program and 

its volunteers and expresses gratitude for their efforts to support our troops proudly serving in Iraq and Afghanistan. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
From: tereskarodriguez@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: This is America! RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:44:13 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Teresa Rodriguez

Garland, TX 75044
From: jhagen8@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:13:43 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Juliet Cassell

Fayetteville, AR 72703
From: Anpasos@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:27:11 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Alexandra Pasos

Glendora, CA 91740
H. Res. 470 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 25, 2007. 

Whereas an estimated 12,400 children are diagnosed with 

cancer annually; 

Whereas cancer is the leading cause of death by disease in 

children under age 15; 

Whereas an estimated 2,300 children die from cancer each 

year; 

Whereas the incidence of cancer among children in the 

United States is rising by about one percent each year; 

Whereas 1 in every 330 Americans develops cancer before age 

20; 

Whereas approximately 8 percent of deaths of those between 

1 and 19 years old are caused by cancer; 

Whereas while some progress has been made, a number of 

opportunities for childhood cancer research still remain 

unfunded or underfunded; 

Whereas limited resources for childhood cancer research can 

hinder the recruitment of investigators and physicians to 

pediatric oncology; 

Whereas peer-reviewed clinical trials are the standard of care 

for pediatrics and have improved cancer survival rates 

among children; 
2 

•HRES 470 EH 

Whereas the number of survivors of childhood cancers continues to grow, with about 1 in 640 adults between ages 

20 to 39 who have a history of cancer; 

Whereas up to two-thirds of childhood cancer survivors are 

likely to experience at least one late effect from treatment, many of which may be life-threatening; 

Whereas some late effects of cancer treatment are identified 

early in follow-up and are easily resolved, while others 

may become chronic problems in adulthood and may have 

serious consequences; and 

Whereas 89 percent of children with cancer experience substantial suffering in the last month of life: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that the Congress should support— 

(1) public and private sector efforts to promote 

awareness about the incidence of cancer among children, 

the signs and symptoms of cancer in children, treatment 

options, and long-term follow-up; 

(2) increased public and private investment in childhood cancer research to improve prevention, diagnosis, 

treatment, rehabilitation, post-treatment monitoring, and 

long-term survival; 

(3) policies that provide incentives to encourage 

medical trainees and investigators to enter the field of 

pediatric oncology; 
3 

•HRES 470 EH 

(4) policies that provide incentives to encourage the 

development of drugs and biologics designed to treat pediatric cancers; 

(5) policies that encourage participation in clinical 

trials; 

(6) medical education curricula designed to improve 

pain management for cancer patients; and 

(7) policies that enhance education, services, and 

other resources related to late effects from treatment. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
From: young94590@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:22:28 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Carol Young

Vallejo, CA 94591
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FILED AS PART OF THE QUARTERLY REPORT
ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH REPORT
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             304
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,706
<ALLOWANCES>                                       564
<INVENTORY>                                     14,620
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,363
<PP&E>                                           7,396
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,975
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  79,494
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,069
<BONDS>                                         31,939
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            81
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,647
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    79,494
<SALES>                                         18,001
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,575
<CGS>                                           10,094
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,094
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   625
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    80
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 666
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (17)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (17)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (17)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
From: pat@coyne.us

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:46:24 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Patrick Coyne

Hays, KS 67601
No. 59231.

protest 254509-K (New York).

#### Geo. E. Athans Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the merchandise consisting of 14 barrels of black olives in brine, reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, was not in fact imported. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty is not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protest was sustained to this extent.
From: smithfr@earthlink.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:55:32 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Fred Smith

Southaven, MS 38672