alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov>

To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, "Mancini, Dominic J." <Dominic_J._Mancini@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Bridgid Curry/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Marta Montoro/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Joseph-J Dougherty/DC/USEPA/US@

Date: 01/22/2010 10:36 PM

Subject: RE: Updated version of the NO2 final notice

Lydia, does EPA want to retain "economically significant" designation 

in

Section VIII? As strange as it seems to say this about a NAAQS, I 

don't

believe this rule meets the definition.

h

-----Original Message-----

From: Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov 

[mailto:Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov]

Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 10:33 PM

To: King, Heidi R.; Mancini, Dominic J.

Cc: Curry.Bridgid@epamail.epa.gov; Montoro.Marta@epamail.epa.gov;

Dougherty.Joseph-J@epamail.epa.gov; Jenkins.Scott@epamail.epa.gov;

Crabtree.Tricia@epamail.epa.gov

Subject: Fw: Updated version of the NO2 final notice

Here's the track changes version.

(See attached file: NO2 primary NAAQS-final (1-22-2010 track

changes).doc.docx)
Before the Second Division,

August 30, 1961

No. 66009.

#### Gellman Brothers *v.*United States,

protest 60/31166 (Minneapolis).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

At the trial, it was stipulated that the merchandise was liquidated on April 22, 1960, and reliquidated on October 19, 1960, more than 60 days after liquidation. The reliquidation was, therefore, void, and the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: loupat.winter@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:29:10 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Louis Winter

Orlando, FL 32809
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of SINOCOM PHARMACUETICAL, INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 (the "Report"), I, Tuck Wing PANG, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.    By: /s/ Tuck Wing PANG, Chief Financial Officer  Date: April 15, 2011
From: spjordan47@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:17:16 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Susan Jordan

Oak Park, IL 60302
No. 64538.

#### Healthways, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 59/7717 and 59/7718 (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of diving masks similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 63864, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Lifestyle Intervention for Late-midlife Adults.                    

*Date:*                         October 13, 2023.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Janetta Lun, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 827-4588,                         *janetta.lun@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 14, 2023.

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-20247 Filed 9-18-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
No. 65149.

#### International Packers, Ltd. *v.*United States,

protest 60/4704 (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of prepared or preserved pork similar in all material respects to that the subject of *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 36, C.D. 2100), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 303 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 24, 2007.
Whereas each year tens of thousands of people go missing in the United States;
Whereas, on any given day, there are as many as 100,000 active missing persons 
        cases in the United States;
Whereas the Missing Persons File of the National Crime Information Center (NCIC) 
        was implemented in 1975;
Whereas, in 2005, 109,531 persons were reported missing to law enforcement 
        agencies nationwide, of whom 11,868 were between the ages of 18 and 20;
Whereas section 204 of the PROTECT Act, known as Suzanne's Law and passed by 
        Congress on April 10, 2003, modifies section 3701(a) of the Crime 
        Control Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 5779(a)), so that agencies must enter 
        records into the NCIC database for all missing persons under the age of 
        21;
Whereas Kristen's Act (42 U.S.C. 14665), passed in 1999, has established grants 
        for organizations to, among other things, track missing persons and 
        provide informational services to families and the public;
Whereas, according to the NCIC, 48,639 missing persons were located in 2005, an 
        improvement of 4.2 percent from the previous year;
Whereas many persons reported missing may be victims of Alzheimer's disease or 
        other health-related issues, or may be victims of foul play;
Whereas, regardless of age or circumstances, all missing persons have families 
        who need support and guidance to endure the days, months, or years they 
        may spend searching for their missing loved ones; and
Whereas it is important to applaud the committed efforts of families, law 
        enforcement agencies, and concerned citizens who work to locate missing 
        persons and to prevent all forms of victimization: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that--
            (1) a day ought to be established to bring awareness to the issue of 
        missing persons; and
            (2) the people of the United States should be encouraged to--
                    (A) observe the day with appropriate programs and 
                activities; and
                    (B) support worthy initiatives and increased efforts to 
                locate missing persons.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
Pursuant

To Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Intelsat Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David McGlade, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                                     
|----------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|                        | 
|Date: November 17, 2006 |  | /s/ David McGlade                   
|                        |  | David McGlade                       
|                        |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Annual Report of Atlas Resources Public #18-2009 (B) L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Freddie M. Kotek, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|                                                                                       |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ FREDDIE M. KOTEK                                                                  |
| Freddie M. Kotek                                                                      |
| Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner |
| September 11, 2015                                                                    |
William C. Herz 

 Vice President, 

Scientific Programs 

Capitol View 202.962.0490 

425 Third Street, S.W., Suite 950 202.962.0577 fax 

Washington, DC 20024 www.tfi.org 

October 1, 2010 

VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL 

Ms. Susan Sharkey 

Chemical Control Division (7405M) 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, DC 20460 

sharkey.susan@epa.gov 

Document Control Office (7407M) 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, DC 20460 

http://www.regulations.gov

RE: The Fertilizer Institute’s Request for an Extension to File Comments on EPA’s 

Proposed Rule Entitled “TSCA Inventory Update Reporting Modifications,” 75 

Fed. Reg. 49,656 (August 13, 2010); Docket No. EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0187 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

The Fertilizer Institute (TFI), on behalf of its member companies, submits this request for a 30-

day extension of the comment period for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) 

Proposed Rulemaking entitled TSCA Inventory Update Reporting Modifications (hereinafter 

referred to as the “TSCA IUR proposal”), published in the Federal Register on August 13, 2010, 

and appearing at 75 Fed. Reg. 49,656. 

Statement of Interest

TFI represents the nation’s fertilizer industry including producers, importers, retailers, 

wholesalers and companies that provide services to the fertilizer industry. Its membership is 

served by a full-time Washington, D.C., staff in various legislative, educational and technical 

areas as well as with information and public relations programs. 

Many TFI members manufacture and/or import chemical substances identified on the TSCA 

Inventory and, in prior years, have been subject to TSCA IUR reporting. Thus, TFI and its 

members have a substantial interest in this rulemaking. 
Ms. Susan Sharkey (7405M) 

Document Control Office (7407M) 

Docket: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0187 

October 1, 2010 

Page 2 

TFI Comments 

TFI and its members are evaluating EPA’s proposal and will be submitting comments on the 

rulemaking. However, due to the significant proposed changes to the IUR, the majority of which 

are contemplated (if adopted as proposed) for the current reporting cycle, TFI needs an 

additional 30 days to provide meaningful comment on EPA’s IUR proposal. 

Conclusion 

TFI appreciates your consideration of our request for a 30-day extension of the comment period. 

We trust that EPA is interested in receiving thorough comments on the proposal and, as such, 

will grant TFI’s request. Please contact me at (202) 515-2706 if you would like to further 

discuss our comments. 

Sincerely yours, 

 

William C. Herz 

Vice President, Scientific Programs
From: jtether@localnet.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:28:16 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust mandate that all

"contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance with no co-pay to

patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for any organizations

that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I strongly oppose

the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and devices that I

oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to

only include churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have

conscience objections will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being

able to offer employees health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

John Tether

Queensbury, NY 12804
From: Kimhorne@catt.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:00:59 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kim Horne

Ringgold, GA 30736