alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FORM 10-Q/A

Amendment No. 1



UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549





[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002

Commission File No.0-13295





CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)



|Delaware                 | 37-1105865                          
|------------------------ | ------------------------------------
|(State of incorporation) | (IRS Employer Identification Number)



|2120 West End Ave.
Nashville, Tennessee  | 37203-0001
|---------------------------------------- | ----------
|(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code)



Registrant's telephone number, including area code:(615) 341-1000



The Registrant complies with the conditions set forth in General Instruction (H)(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-Q, and is therefore filing this form with the reduced disclosure format.



Indicate by a check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

YesX No

At June 30, 2002, one share of common stock of the Registrant was outstanding.

EXPLANATORY NOTE

This Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 is being filed solely to include as Exhibit 99.1 and Exhibit 99.2, the certifications required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which became effective on July 30, 2002.  No revisions have been made to the Registrant's financial statements or any other disclosure contained in such Quarterly Report.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

(a) Exhibits:

99.1 Certification of President

99.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer

(b) Reports on Form 8-K:

None



Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation







|Date:August 5, 2002 | By:/s/    K.C. Springer                                   
|------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------
|                    | K.C. Springer, Controller and
Principal Accounting Officer





|Date:August 5, 2002 | By:/s/    J.S. Beard 
|------------------- | ---------------------
|                    | J.S. Beard, President
Exhibit 23.1


Consent of Leslie S. Zmugg, counsel to Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation (included as part of Exhibit 5.1).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000874787
<NAME> COASTAL PHYSICIAN GROUP INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1.000
<CASH>                                           7,453
<SECURITIES>                                     2,028
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,878
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                51,969
<PP&E>                                           8,879
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  71,392
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           65,967
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          4
<COMMON>                                           377
<OTHER-SE>                                    (72,445)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    71,392
<SALES>                                        245,961
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               245,961
<CGS>                                          252,435
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  252,435
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (983)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,662
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,153)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (13,153)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,153)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.35)
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R . 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.
1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-60660 Summary Calendar

SONS OF CONFEDERATE VETERANS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

CONFEDERATE INITIATIVE, INC. and JIMMY D. GILES, Defendants-Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

(3:97-CV-534-B)

April 13, 1999 Before DAVIS, DUHÉ and PARKER , Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Defendants-Appellants, Confederate Initiative, Inc. and JimmyD. Giles (“Defendants”), appeal the judgment for PlaintiffAppel lant, Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc. (“Plaintiff”), the dismissal of their counterclaim against Plaintiff and the $21,666.61 in attorney fees awarded to Plaintiff. We affirm.2

Defendants did not file a post-trial motion for judgment or

new trial based on insufficiency of the evidence. Further, Defendant did not order a transcript of the trial proceedings. Therefore, Defendants have failed to preserve any factual issue for determination in this appeal. Having reviewed the briefs, the portions of the record before

us and the applicable law, we discern no reversible err or. We therefore affirm the dismissal of Defendants' counterclaim, the final judgment for Plaintiff and the attorney fee award.
Because this disposit i on of the merits moots Plaintiff's motions to strike Defendants' briefs, we deny those motions as
moot. Defendants' motion to compel service of appellate documents at their street address is likewise denied as moot.
AFFIRMED. MOTIONS DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 216 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 216

  Commending the Juniata College volleyball team for winning the NCAA 
             Division III Women's Volleyball Championship.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 6, 2007

 Mr. Shuster submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Commending the Juniata College volleyball team for winning the NCAA 
             Division III Women's Volleyball Championship.

Whereas the Juniata College volleyball team is one of the great little-known 
        dynasties in college sports;
Whereas the Juniata College volleyball program has a remarkable 1,100 win and 
        172 loss record over 30 seasons;
Whereas Head Coach Larry Bock has the most wins of any coach in the history of 
        NCAA women's volleyball;
Whereas during this past season, senior Stephanie Kines was named the Division 
        III Women's Volleyball Player of the Year, just the second Juniata 
        player to earn that honor;
Whereas Juniata College did not lose a match in 2006 to a Division III opponent 
        all season, and the team's only 2006 loss was to Division I Princeton 
        University;
Whereas Juniata College's 41 win and 1 loss record during 2006 tied the program 
        record for the fewest losses in a season, and was the team's first 40-
        win season since 1997; and
Whereas Juniata defeated long-time rival Washington University-St. Louis in a 
        thrilling five-game championship match that many described as the best 
        championship match in the history of Division III volleyball: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives--
            (1) commends the Juniata College volleyball team for 
        winning the 2006 NCAA Division III Women's Volleyball National 
        Championship; and
            (2) recognizes the achievements of the players, coaches, 
        students, and staff whose hard work and dedication made the 
        Championship possible.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report
of Cemtrex, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A Amendment No. 1 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Renato Dela Rama, principal
financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:



(1)    	the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)    	the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|/s/ Renato Dela Rama        | 
|--------------------------- | 
|Renato Dela Rama            | 
|Principal Financial Officer | 
|January 3, 2013             | 



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 59225.

protest 228314-K (New York).

#### Shephard Steel Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

According to the consular invoice, the merchandise consisted of 1,153 bundles, weighing 176,913 kilos. The entered weight was 390,025 pounds, and duty was assessed on 400,000 pounds. At the trial, an employee of the Foreign-Trade Zone testified that when the steel involved came off the vessel, it was stored under a lot number and, according to the records, consisted of 1,153 bundles. The same lot of steel was subsequently put on 12 trucks or 12 loads, was weighed on a United States Customs scale, and was found to be 382,210 pounds. On the record presented, it was held that the weight of the merchandise was 382,210 pounds, and the collector was directed to reliquidate the entry and to refund all duties taken in excess.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 400 

Expressing the sympathy of the House of Representatives to the citizens 

of Greensburg, Kansas, over the devastating tornado of May 4, 2007. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 14, 2007 

Mr. MORAN of Kansas (for himself, Mr. TIAHRT, Mr. MOORE of Kansas, and 

Mrs. BOYDA of Kansas) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sympathy of the House of Representatives 

to the citizens of Greensburg, Kansas, over the devastating tornado of May 4, 2007. 

Whereas on the evening of Friday, May 4, 2007, a tornado 

struck the community of Greensburg, Kansas; 

Whereas this tornado was classified as an EF–5, the strongest possible type, with winds estimated at 205 miles per 

hour; 

Whereas 9 lives were lost; 

Whereas approximately 95 percent of Greensburg was destroyed, causing over 1,500 residents to be displaced 

from their homes; and 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 400 IH 

Whereas the strength, courage, and determination of the citizens of Greensburg, Kansas, have been evident following 

the tornado: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) expresses its deepest sympathies to the citi3 zens of Greensburg, Kansas, over the devastation 

4 caused by the powerful tornado that struck the com5 munity on May 4, 2007; and 

6 (2) expresses its support as the citizens of 

7 Greensburg continue their efforts to rebuild their 

8 community and their lives. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
Searched for **http://www.sec.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.sec.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
MOORE
& ASSOCIATES, CHARTERED


ACCOUNTANTS AND
ADVISORS


PCAOB
REGISTERED

















CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM











We
consent to the use, in the statement on Form 10K of Western Ridge Minerals,
Inc., of our report dated June 10, 2009 on our audit of the financial statements
of Western Ridge Minerals, Inc. as of March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008, and the
related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the
years ended March 31, 2009 and the period from August 16, 2007
through March 31, 2008 and since inception on August 16, 2007 through March
31, 2009, and the reference to us under the caption “Experts.”








/s/ Moore & Associates,
Chartered


Moore
& Associates Chartered


Las
Vegas, Nevada


June 24,
2009



























































6490 West Desert Inn Rd, Las
Vegas, NV 89146 (702)253-7499 Fax
(702)253-7501
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T I n r e : M A R T I N P A L O M I N O and E L I Z AB E T H P AL OMI NO , D eb t o rs. RI CH A RD H O Y T & A SSO CI A TES, A p p e llan t, v. M A R T I N P A L O M I N O ; e t a l., A p p el l ees. N o. 09- 60026 B AP No . AZ - 0 9 - 1 1 2 8 - Ju DM ME MOR AN DU M *

A p p e a l f r o m th e N in th C ir c u it B ankrup t cyA pp el l at e P anel Jury , D unn, and M ont a l i , B ankrupt c yJudge s , P r e s i di ng

S ubm i tt e d A ugus t11, 2011 ** B e f o r e : T H O M A S , S I L V E R M A N , an dC L I F T O N , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . R ic h ar dH o y t & A s s o c ia te s ( “H o y t” ) ap p e a ls f r o m th e B an k rup tc yA p p e lla te



# FI LED AU G 18 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 60026 2 P an e l’s ( “B A P ” ) o r d e rd is m is s in g H o y t’s la te - f ile dap p e a l f

o rla c ko f

ju r is d ic tio n . T o the ext entthatw e have j uri sdi ct i on , i ti s und er28 U . S . C . § 1 58 (d). W e r evi ew d e n o v o . W

i e rs m a v . B ank

of the W es t ( I n r e W i e rs m a) , 4 8 3 F .3 d9 3 3 , 9 3 8 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 7 ) . W e a f

f i rm. T h e B A P p ro p erl y d i sm i ssedH o yt ’ s ap p eal fo r l acko f j u ri sd i ct i o n b ecau se H o y t f a ile dto f ile atim e lyn o tic e o f

ap p e a l. See F e d. R . B ankr . P . 8001( f ) ( 1) ( c e rtif ic a tio n f o rd ir e c t ap p e a l to c o u rt o f ap p e a ls n o t e f

f e c tiv e w ith o u t tim e ly n o tic e o f ap p e a l) ; s e e a l

s o I n r e Wi e rs ma , 4 8 3 F .3 da t 9 3 8 ( “T h e f a ilu r e to tim e ly f ile an o tic e o f

ap p e a l is aju r is d ic tio n a l d e f e c t b arr in g ap p e lla te r e v ie w .” ) ( a lte r a tio n , c ita tio n , an din te rn a l q u o ta tio n m ark s o m itte d ) . B ec ause H oyt ’ s not i ce of appeal t o the B A P w as un t i m el y, w e l ac k ju risd icti o n to re v iew H o yt’s co n ten ti o n s a s to th e m er it s o f th e b an k ru p tcy c o u rt’s d e c is io n . Se e G r e e ne v . U ni te d States (

I n r e Souz a) , 79 5 F . 2d 85 5, 85 7 (9th C i r. 1986) ( not i ng tha tthi s c ourtl a c ks j ur i s di c t i on t o r e vi e w the m e r i t s w he r e the ap p e a l f r o m th e b an k rup tc yc o u rt w a s u n tim e ly ) . H o y t’s r e m a in in g c o n te n tio n s ar e u n p e r s u a s iv e . AF F I RME D.
No. P67/46.

#### H. R. Davi *&*Co. and H. B. Thomas & Co. *v.*United States,

protests 61/23091, etc. (San Francisco).

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of charcoal briquettes similar in all material respects to those the subject of A. *L. Farnsworth*v. *United States*(50 Cust. Ct. 62, C.D. 2389), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: mmcelroy1@cox.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:58:57 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Michael McElroy

Oceanside, CA 92054
No. 65146.

#### National Tea Co. *v.*United States,

protest 270894—K/7291 (Chicago).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *The Best Foods, Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 163, C.A.D. 751), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: rscarb76@optonline.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:17:58 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

RALPH SCARBOROUGH

Levittown, NY 11756
EXHIBIT 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Lester G. Manalo, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,
the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Adtomize Inc. for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Adtomize Inc.


Date February 18, 2010                By: /s/ Lester G. Manalo
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Lester G. Manalo, President, Treasurer
                                          and Director Principal Executive and
                                          Financial Officer

This certification accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the
liability of that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that Adtomize Inc. specifically incorporates
it by reference.
Grant of Extension of Time

 PAGE 1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0375

IN THE MATTER OF 

K.S.,

A Youth in Need of Care

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing therefore, Appellant, A.R.S., is granted an extension 

of time until October 6, 2022 to prepare, serve, and file the Opening Brief.

No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 24 2022

08/24/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0375