alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: andrea@jasonstern.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:32:15 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Andrea Stern

Walker, LA 70785
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.3

                                 DESCRIPTION OF
                          2004 CASH BONUS ARRANGEMENTS

Under the Pacific Sunwear 1999 Stock Award Plan, the Company may grant cash
performance awards. In 2004, the Company established criteria for
performance-based bonus awards for its Chairman and its President under the 1999
Stock Award Plan. In addition, the Company established a bonus plan for other
officers and certain other employees. In each case, the bonus awards payable are
based on the achievement of goals relating to the performance of the Company.

The Compensation Committee established the performance goals for the Chairman
and the President, and recommended to the Board of Directors for its approval
the performance goals for other officers and employees. This committee also
established the formulae for purposes of determining the actual award (if any)
payable to such officers and employees assuming the performance goals are
achieved.

The amount of the bonus payable to the Chairman (if any) is based on the
Company's level of earnings per share. For each of the other participants, 25%
of the bonus payable is discretionary and the remaining 75% is based on the
Company's level of earnings per share.
From: gvilt@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:51:10 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Gerald Vilt

, 60561-4709
Letter Agreement



 Exhibit 10.2 

 
 



 
 January 9, 2013 
 Mr. Paul Grinberg 
 3111 Camino Del Rio North 

San Diego, California 92108 
 Dear Paul:

 In connection with your new retention arrangements, Encore’s Compensation Committee of its Board of Directors has decided to guarantee
that your annual cash bonus with respect to FY 2013 will be paid at no less than your 2013 target amount. This correspondence further amends your Severance Protection Letter dated March 11, 2009, as amended. In addition, Encore’s
Compensation Committee of its Board of Directors has decided to cover certain relocation costs associated with your change in residence and to provide a monthly allowance for commuting expenses of $8,500.00. 

This correspondence has been duly authorized by Encore and the undersigned has been authorized to execute and deliver this correspondence on behalf of
Encore. 
  

	
	Sincerely,
	
	/s/ George Lund
	George Lund
	Executive Chairman
	Encore Capital Group, Inc.
Order entered July 30, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 15
- 00456
- CV
VILLAGE CRESTMONT HO USTON USA, L.L.C. AN D WEST CRESTMONT

HOUSTON USA, L.L.C., Appellant s

V. JOSE J. GAITAN, INDI VIDUALLY AND D/B/A E C & J REMOD ELING & PAINTING, Appellee s On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 14
- 08108



### O RDER
T he reporter’s record in this case is overdue. By postcard dated April 28, 2015, we
notified the official court re porter for the 191st Judicial District Court that the reporter’s record was overdue. We directed the court reporter to file the record within thirty days. To date, we have not received any response. Accordingly, we ORDER Court Reporter Melba Wright o f ile, within TEN DAYS of the date of this order, either (1) the reporter’s record; or (2) written verification that appellants have not requested, paid for, or made payment arrangements for the record. We notify appellants that if we receive verification t hat appellants have not requested, paid for, or made paymentarrangements for the reporter’s record, we will order the appeal submitted without the

reporter’s record

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3(c).
/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
From: cim@carolina.rr.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:25:21 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the most strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provides individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Thank you for considering my concerns and acting in a manner that supports in lieu of destroys the

family unit.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

David Haltom

Concord, NC 28025
From: toddmiller@bright.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:36:13 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Todd Miller

Portland, IN 47371
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-17-00791-CV

IN RE Glenn L. WILLIAMS

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 13, 2017

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On December 4, 2017, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for 

emergency stay. The court has considered the petition and motion and is of the opinion relator is 

not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition and motion are denied. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. CV-13-0000235, styled Williams v. Williams, pending in the 198th Judicial 

District Court, Bandera County, Texas, the Honorable Stephen B. Ables presiding.
Before the First Division,

March 14, 1963

No. 67510.

#### Dolliff & Company et al. *v.*United States,

protests 309088-K, etc. (Boston).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of mi,niature railroad equipment, which includes locomotives and other railroad cars, tracks, and accessories, similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *Polk's Model Graft Hobbies, Inc., et al.*(47 CCPA 137, C.A.D. 746), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: The items marked “A” or “B” at 22% percent under the provision in paragraph 397, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs a,nd Trade (T.D. 51802), for manufactures of metal; the items marked “O” at 13% percent under the provision in paragraph 353, as modified by T.D. 52739, for metal articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device; the items marked “D” at 12% percent under the provision in paragraph 353, as modified by T.D. 52739, for transformers; and the items marked “E” at 17% percent under the provision in paragraph 353, as modified by T.D. 52739, for electrical wiring apparatus, as claimed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3592-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2023-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for the State of California (FEMA-3592-EM), dated March 10, 2023, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued July 14, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the incident period for this emergency is closed effective July 10, 2023. 

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2023-20984 Filed 9-26-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
From: 16annfay@cox.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:52:27 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Shirley Fay

Sun City, AZ 85351
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Robert GALICIA-PENA, also known as Jose Roberto Galicia-Pena, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-50048.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Aug. 17, 2005.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Donna F. Coltharp, Federal Public Defender’s Office, San Antonio, TX, for-Defendant-Appellant.

*354Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jose Robert Galicia-Pena (“Galicia”) appeals following his conviction in a bench trial for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Galicia argues that the district court committed reversible plain error by increasing the maximum authorized Guidelines sentence based on facts neither admitted nor found by a jury, and by imposing a sentence under á mandatory Guidelines scheme. Galicia correctly concedes that he cannot carry his burden of showing that the district court’s error affected his substantial rights. *See United States v. Valenzuela-Quevedo,*407 F.3d 728, 733-34 (5th Cir.2005), *petition for cert. filed*(July 25, 2005) (No. 05-5556); *United States v. Mares,*402 F.3d 511, 521 (5th Cir.2005), *petition for cert. filed*(Mar. 31, 2005) (No. 04-9517).

Galicia also argues that because his indictment did not allege a prior felony conviction, he was subject to a maximum sentence of two years under U.S.C. § 1326(a). He correctly acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
EXHIBIT 31
CERTIFICATION OF SENIOR OFFICER IN CHARGE OF THE SERVICING FUNCTION OF THE SERVICER
PURSUANT TO Rule 15d-14(d)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D required to be
filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form10-K of Volkswagen Auto Loan
Enhanced Trust 2008-1 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information
required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included
in the Exchange Act periodic reports;4.
    
    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my
knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance
statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the
servicing agreement in all material respects; and5.
    
    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance
with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included
as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on
Form 10-K.
   /s/ Andrew StuartAndrew StuartExecutive Vice President & CFO
(senior officer in charge of the servicing function)