alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: con22@fastmail.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:35:33 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Connie Augustine

Alexandria, LA 71302
From: dljsalina@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:37:24 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

D L Jones

Manhattan, KS 66503
The Effects of Ultra-Low Sulfur 


Gasoline on Emissions from Tier 2 


Vehicles in the In-Use Fleet 


Final Report
 

Appendix C
 

Additional Information on Emission 


Measurements
 

Assessment and Standards Division 

Office of Transportation and Air Quality 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

NOTICE 

This technical report does not necessarily represent final EPA decisions or 

positions. It is intended to present technical analysis of issues using data that 

are currently available. The purpose in the release of such reports is to facilitate the exchange of technical information and to inform the public of technical developments. 

EPA-420-R-14-002 

March 2014 
 

 

 

 

 

 

Appendix C. Additional Information on Emission Measurements 

Gaseo us e missio ns (THC, CH4, NOx, CO) were mea sured using a Ho riba MEXA 7200SLE 

ana lyzer syste m. The instrume nt manufacturer gives the mea surement accuracy as ±1% o f full 

sca le or ±2% o f the rele va nt calibratio n po int(s). 

Partic ulate matter (PM) was co llec ted b y trip licate 47 mm Te flo n filters for e ac h p hase (b ag) o f 

the test c ycle using a syste m co mp lia nt with 40 CF R Part 1065. The trip licate filter weights were 

ave raged to form a co mposite result for eac h test p hase. F ilters were eq uilibrated o vernig ht in a 

c lea n roo m e nviro nment b e fore tak ing p re- and post-test we ights. Weighing was do ne using a 

Mettler To ledo UMT2 microbalance.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2009 of Secure Window Blinds, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), I, Anthony Pizzacalla, Chairman, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





/s/ Anthony Pizzacalla


Anthony Pizzacalla


President, Secretary Treasurer, Principal Executive Officer,


Principal Financial Officer and Director





Date: August 18, 2011
Amanda Vincent 

<Amanda.Vincent@LA.GOV>

12/23/2013 10:00 AM

To OW-Docket@EPA

cc

Sanford Phillips <Sanford.Phillips@LA.GOV>, Scott 

Guilliams <Scott.Guilliams@LA.GOV>, Alex Prochaska 

<Alex.Prochaska@LA.GOV>

bcc

Subject Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2010-0606 WQS Regulatory 

Clarifications Proposed Rule

1 attachment

EPA-HQ-OW-2010-0606_LDEQ_Comments_12-20-2013.pdf

Please find attached comments from the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality (LDEQ)

regarding Docket ID No. EPA‐HQ‐OW‐2010‐0606.

Sincerely,

Amanda Vincent

Office of Environmental Services

Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality

P.O. Box 4313

Baton Rouge, LA 70821-4313
<PAGE>
 
EXHIBIT 11.1
 
                              PAMECO CORPORATION
 
                COMPUTATION OF HISTORICAL NET INCOME PER SHARE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                             THREE MONTHS ENDED              SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                                  AUGUST 31                     AUGUST 31
                                                            -----------------------     ------------------------
                                                               1997         1996           1997           1996
                                                            ----------    ---------     ----------     ---------
<S>                                                         <C>            <C>          <C>            <C> 
Primary and fully diluted:
     Weighted average common stock and common
     stock equivalents outstanding
     during the period....................................       8,634        6,250          6,853         6,250

Effect of common stock equivalents issued
      subsequent to March 26, 1996, computed in
      accordance with the treasury stock method
      as required by the SEC(1)...........................         330          348            330           348
                                                            ----------    ---------     ----------     ---------

              Total                                              8,964        6,598          7,183         6,598
                                                            ==========    =========     ==========     =========

Net income applicable to common stockholders                $    5,974    $   5,814     $    6,989     $   6,738
                                                            ==========    =========     ==========     =========

Net income per share                                        $     0.67    $    0.88     $     0.97     $    1.02
                                                            ==========    =========     ==========     =========
 
</TABLE> 
 
(1)   Pursuant to Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin
      No. 83, Common stock equivalents issued at prices below the Initial Public
      Offering price per share of $14 ("cheap stock") during the twelve month
      period immediately preceding the initial filing date of the Company's
      Registration Statement for its Initial Public Offering have been included
      as outstanding for all periods.
H. Res. 406 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 18, 2007. 

Whereas 35 years ago, on June 23, 1972, the Education 

Amendments of 1972 containing title IX was signed into 

law by the President; 

Whereas Representatives Patsy T. Mink and Edith Green led 

the successful fight in Congress to pass this legislation; 

Whereas title IX prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex 

in the administration of any education program receiving 

Federal financial assistance; 

Whereas remarkable gains have been made to ensure equal 

opportunity for women and girls under the inspiration 

and mandate of title IX; 

Whereas title IX serves as the nondiscrimination principle in 

education; 

Whereas title IX has moved this Nation closer to the fulfillment of access and opportunities for women and girls in 

all aspects of life; 

Whereas title IX has increased educational opportunities for 

women and girls, resulting in improved graduation rates, 

increased access to professional schools and nontraditional fields of study, and improved employment opportunities; 
2 

•HRES 406 EH 

Whereas title IX has increased opportunities for women and 

girls in sports, leading to greater access to competitive 

sports, and building strong values such as teamwork, 

leadership, discipline, work ethic, self-sacrifice, pride in 

accomplishment, and strength of character; 

Whereas on October 29, 2002, title IX was named the ‘‘Patsy 

Takemoto Mink Equal Opportunity in Education Act’’ in 

recognition of Representative Mink’s heroic, visionary, 

and tireless leadership in developing and winning passage 

of title IX; and 

Whereas 35 years of progress under title IX is widely acknowledged, but because women continue to earn less for 

work than men with the same educational background; 

sexual harassment remains pervasive in schools and on 

college campuses; women and girls face substantial barriers in pursuing high-wage fields such as science, technology, engineering, and math; and women and girls’ 

sports teams do not receive an equal share of resources, 

including fewer recruiting and scholarship dollars at the 

college level; and athletic participation opportunities still 

lag behind those provided for men, there is still much 

work to be done if the promise of title IX is to be fulfilled: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives celebrates— 

(1) the accomplishments of title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, also known as the Patsy 

Takemoto Mink Equal Opportunity in Education Act, in 

increasing opportunities for women and girls in all facets 

of education; and 
3 

•HRES 406 EH 

(2) the magnificent accomplishments of women and 

girls in sports. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
From: chimcarroll@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:18:37 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Chimene Carroll

Waconia, MN 55387
RCRA CLUSTERS XVIII, XIX AND XX REVISED AUTHORIZATION APPLICATION 

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

INTRODUCTION (Included in Application Letter Category) 

ADDENDUM TO PROGRAM DESCRIPTION (dated October 2011) 

APPE;'<IDICES 

I. REVISED ATTORNEY GENERAL'S STATEMENT (signed 10/14/11) 

II. RCRA CLUSTERS XVI AND XVII ADDENDUM TO PROGRAM DESCRIPTION 

III. 2011 IDEQ ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE CHART (program description) 

IV. THE 2011 ANNUAL RCRA GRANT WORKPLAN (program description) 

V. EXISTING RCRA MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT (signed 8/2/01) 

VI. MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT CLARIFICATIONS (8130110, 313/11) 

VII. RCRA DATA MANAGEMENT LETTER OF AGREEMENT(6/17!03)(program 

description) 

VIII. IDAHO HANDLER COUNT ACTIVITY REPORT (dated 711111) (program description) 

IX. IDAHO PERMITTING SIX QUARTER PLAN (compiled 5/18/11)(program description) 

X. HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT IN IDAHO - 2010 (program description) 

XI. RCRA CLUSTERS XVIII, XIX AND XX REGULATORY SUMMARIES(regulations) 

XII. IDAHO RULES AND STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE(417!Il)(regulations) 

XIII. IDAHO HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT ACT (2010 CPS) (statute) 

XIV. IDAHO ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND HEALTH ACT(2010 CPS)(statute) 

XV. IDAHO PUBLIC RECORDS ACT (2010) (statute)
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GriffinLand & Nurseries, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended August 28, 2010 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Periodic Report”), I, Frederick M.Danziger, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| ** **                            | /s/ FREDERICK M. DANZIGER |
|---------------------------------------|---------------------------|
| Frederick M. Danziger                 |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| October 6, 2010                  |

 

----
From: sweetpeagama@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:45:18 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Linda Goodman

Garyville, LA 70051
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Empire Asia Resources Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William Tay, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

|                                                               |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ William Tay                                                    |
|                                                                    |
| William Tay       Principal Financial Officer       March 16, 2010 |
EXHIBIT 32.0

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of First Savings Financial Group, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as added by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Larry W. MyersLarry W. Myers President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)




/s/ M. Sue JohnsonM. Sue Johnson Treasurer and Corporate Secretary (principal financial and accounting officer)


December 22, 2008
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                                   (Unaudited)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                            Three Months Ended December 31
                                                               1998              1997
<S>                                                       <C>                 <C>   

Weighted average shares outstanding
         Common stock                                       4,767,190            4,555,540
         Common stock equivalents                               - 0 -              440,704
                                                       


Weighted average common shares and equivalents              4,767,190            4,996,244
                                                       ==============       ==============


Net income                                              $     510,599         $    316,768
                                                       ===============      ==============

Net income per share:
         Basic                                         $        0.11        $        0.07
         Diluted                                       $        0.11        $        0.06
</TABLE>