alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         September 26, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 19, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 58 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2023-273, CP2023-276.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-20914 Filed 9-25-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
From: digraff@cox.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: contraceptives free?

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:09:56 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Diane Graff

Escondido, CA 92025
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 34 

Recognizing the 75th birthday of Desmond Mpilo Tutu, South African 

Anglican Archbishop of Cape Town, and Nobel Peace Prize recipient. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 5, 2007 

Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 75th birthday of Desmond Mpilo Tutu, 

South African Anglican Archbishop of Cape Town, and 

Nobel Peace Prize recipient. 

Whereas October 7, 2006, marked the 75th birthday of Archbishop Desmond Mpilo Tutu; 

Whereas in 1986, Desmond Tutu was the first black African 

to be elected Archbishop of Cape Town and head of the 

Anglican Church in South Africa; 

Whereas Desmond Tutu was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize 

in 1984 in recognition of his courage, heroism, and use 

of nonviolence in the struggle against apartheid; 

Whereas Desmond Tutu has been awarded, in addition to the 

Nobel Peace Prize, other prestigious awards including, 

the Order for Meritorious Award (Gold), the Archbishop 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 34 IH 

of Canterbury’s Award for Outstanding Service to the 

Anglican Communion, the Prix d’Athene, and the Martin 

Luther King Jr. Non-Violent Peace Prize; 

Whereas Desmond Tutu has received numerous honorary 

doctorates from several universities including Harvard, 

Kent, Colombia, Aberdeen, and Howard; 

Whereas Desmond Tutu became the first black African Dean 

of Mary’s Cathedral in Johannesburg; 

Whereas Desmond Tutu was the first black African to become the General Secretary of the South African Council 

of Churches; 

Whereas Desmond Tutu is an international lecturer, philosopher, author, and humanitarian; 

Whereas Desmond Tutu chaired South Africa’s Truth and 

Reconciliation Commission from April 1996 to July 1998 

to investigate crimes committed during the period of 

South Africa’s apartheid; and 

Whereas Desmond Tutu has fought for a democratic and just 

society without racial divisions, a common system of education, and a world which promotes the rights and opportunities of the marginalized, disadvantaged, and 

disenfranchised: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the 75th birthday of Desmond 

3 Mpilo Tutu, Archbishop of Cape Town, South Afri4 ca; 

5 (2) honors the accomplishments of Desmond 

6 Mpilo Tutu; and 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 34 IH 

1 (3) extols the contributions of Desmond Mpilo 

2 Tutu to South Africa, the United States, and the 

3 international community. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
No. 61493.

#### Burroughs Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 305549-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of key-driven calculating machines and metal parts..thereof similar in all material respects, except for having, in addition, an electric, motor as an essential feature, to the merchandise the subject of *Plus Computing Machines, Inc.*v. *United States*(44 C. C. P. A. 160, C. A. D. 655), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: voice.over@ymail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:48:41 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Robert Dolan

Clarendon Hills, IL 60514
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the annual report of Cemtrex, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Renato Dela Rama, principal financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ Renato Dela Rama





Renato Dela Rama


Principal Financial Officer


August 31, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
From: tracymet1@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:01:19 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Tracy Metivier

Billerica, MA 01821
cc: Hon. Valorie J. Vega, District Judge Keith E. Brooks Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2
(0) 1947A -4qC.
No. P67/35.

#### Gimbel Bros., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 66/535 (New York).

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of earthenware similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Justin Tharaud & Son, Inc.,*and *J. J. Murphey*& *Co.*v. *United States*(44 Cust. Ct. 216, C.D. 2177) and *United States*v. *M.*& *D. Miller, Inc.*(41 CCPA 226, C.A.D. 556), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
ttxp_ex102.htm


EXHIBIT 10.2


 





 




  





1











  






 





 




  





2











  






 


 





 




  





3











  






 





 




  





4











  






 





 




  





5











  






 






 




  





6











  








 






 




  





7











  








 






 




  





8











  








 






 




  





9











  








 






 




  





10











  








 






 




  





11











  








 






 




  





12











  








 






 




  





13











  








 






 




  





14











  








 






 




  





15











  






 





 




  





16











  






 


 





 




  





17











  






 





 




  





18











  






 





 




  





19











  






 






 




  





20











  








 






 


 

21
From: tmcdonough68@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:13:41 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mary McDonough

Saint Charles, MO 63304
From: maw7jdc@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:54:09 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Janice Crador

Lake Charles, LA 70607
U.S. Department of Transportation Office ofthe Secretary OfTransportation August 8, 2013 Ms. SusanB. Jollie Law Office ofSusanB. Jollie 7503 WaltonLane Annandale, VA 22003 Dear Susan: .--.'

___ , ;. ' 1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. Washington, DC 20590

In regard to the Department's financial review of Ultimate Jetcharters, please provide information for the following items: 1. Some of the applicant's financial statements are mixed with the parent's financial information which includes Ultimate Jet, LLC and Ultimate Real Estate, LLC. Please provide separate balance and income statements for Ultimate Jetcharters for calendar years 2010, 2011 and 2012 and the six months ending June 2013. Ifthe parent company intends to financially support the operations ofUltimate Jetcharters, please also provide separate balance and income statements for Ultimate Jet, LLC for the same years current to June 2013 and a letterfrom Ultimate Jet, LLC confirmingtheirfinancial support. 2. Has the line ofcredit for the expansion ofUltimate Jetcharters been drawn down? Ifso, please state how muchhas been drawn down and the remaining amount available.
3. Are there limitations on the line ofcredit? Ifso, please state the limitations. For example, aircraft purchase, etc. Please include a statement signed by a representative ofthe carrier [who shall be a principal owner, senior officer, or internal counsel of the carrier] indicating that, pursuant to Title 18 United States Code Section 1001, the information provided in response to this letter is true and correct and that the aforementioned individual has not knowingly and willfully falsified, concealed or failed to disclose any material fact or made any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statementinconnection with the preparation or filing ofthe material submitted. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. We would appreciate your responding within 30 days ofthe date ofthis letter. Ifyou have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 366-4834. Sincerely, i3t't{

# /J .-U..A

## J~d_JJ/v\____/. Barbara Snoden Air CarrierFitness DivisionOffice ofAviationAnalysis

cc: Thomas Leahy POI for Ultimate JetCharters LCC FAACleveland FSD0-25 25249 Country Club Blvd. North Olmsted, OH 44070 2
No. 59219.

Suit 4845.

#### United States *v.*C. J. Tower & Sons.

C. D. 1678. (Appeal dismissed May 4, 1955.)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-6736
EARNEST EUGENE DIXON, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus RON ANGELONE, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-94-645-R) Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 21, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Earnest Eugene Dixon, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Mary Elizabeth Shea, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversibleerror. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Dixon v. Angelone , No. CA-94-645-R (W.D. Va. May 4, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of Cemtrex, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Arun Govil, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Arun GovilArun
      GovilChief
      Executive Officerand
      principal executive officerJanuary
      13, 2009





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.