alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Table 1. Stack Data From the 2013 CPT Report

Updated: 1/20/2015

Hg LVM SVM

1 0.00205 45.8 61.9 5,156 10.08

2 0.00206 47.3 61.7 5,081 10.38

3 0.00224 45.9 62 5,236 10.5

Average 0.00212 46.3 61.90 5,158 10.3

1 0.00221 46.3 62.1 5,319 11.19

2 0.00214 46.1 62.5 5,150 10.72

3 0.00227 45.7 62.2 5,414 10.87

Average 0.00221 46.1 62 5,294 10.9

1 0.0402 46.2 62.2 16,382 12.27

2 0.04 46.3 61.6 16,917 12.37

3 0.0403 46 62.2 16,723 12

Average 0.0402 46.2 62.0 16,674 12.2

Table 2. Feed Rate Data & Exhaust Data From Veolia's March 2010 Sig. Mod Application 

Updated: 6/1/2012

Hg LVM SVM

1 0.0023 46.82 62.06 5496 11.72

2 0.0017 46.52 63.46 5572 11.54

3 0.0016 47.17 63.27 5357 11.3

Average 0.0017 46.84 62.93 5475 11.52

1 0.0016 47.71 64.07 5665 11.99

2 0.0022 47.31 65 5719 10.96

3 0.0018 48.01 63.78 5890 11.98

Average 0.0018 47.68 64.28 5758 11.64

1 0.0257 50.61 63.51 17280 12.27

2 0.026 50.65 63.45 17255 12.13

3 0.0264 49.79 64.01 17189 11.63

Average 0.0214 50.35 63.66 17241 12.01

Unit #

Test Run 

#

Stack 

flow 

(dscfm)

O2 (Vol 

%)

3

4

Unit #

Test Run 

#

Feedrate (lb/hr)

2

3

4

Feedrate (lb/hr) Stack 

flow 

(dscfm)

O2 (Vol 

%)

2
Hg LVM SVM Hg LVM SVM Hg

90 2.8 1.1 0.0013557 4.218E-05 1.657E-05 33.866843

120 2.4 0.78 0.0017324 3.465E-05 1.126E-05 15.902556

95 2.5 1 0.0013974 3.677E-05 1.471E-05 37.617959

100 2.6 0.95 0.0014737 3.832E-05 1.4E-05 30.484169

59 8.6 20 0.0008237 0.0001201 0.0002792 62.730481

39 8.9 14 0.0005524 0.0001261 0.0001983 74.186539

46 11 12 0.000675 0.0001614 0.0001761 70.265905

48 9.4 15 0.0006849 0.0001341 0.000214 69.009505

7.1 12 8.6 0.0002717 0.0004592 0.0003291 99.324215

8.1 9.8 4.5 0.0003164 0.0003828 0.0001758 99.209041

15 7.5 10 0.000604 0.000302 0.0004027 98.50122

10.0 9.7 7.8 0.000392 0.0003802 0.0003057 99.024936

2010 Sig. Mod Application (2008 CPT)

Hg LVM SVM

65.61 99.99973 99.99936

51.65 99.99991 99.99977

50.06 99.99979 99.99952

55.50 99.99981 99.99955

53.25 99.99919 99.99875

57.36 99.99935 99.99842

54.56 99.99936 99.99897

54.47 99.99930 99.99871

94.05 99.99958 99.99858

96.17 99.99916 99.99795

95.91 99.99882 99.99819

95.30 99.99919 99.99824

Removal Efficiency (RE) 

Equivalent Feedrate at Stack 

Exit (lb/hr)

Stack Conc. (μg/dscm corrected 

to 7% O2)

Removal Efficiency (RE) (%)
LVM SVM

99.999908 99.99997

99.999927 99.99998

99.99992 99.99998

99.999917 99.99998

99.999741 99.99955

99.999727 99.99968

99.999647 99.99972

99.999709 99.99966

99.999006 99.99947

99.999173 99.99971

99.999343 99.99935

99.999177 99.99951

Removal Efficiency (RE) (%)
Average System Removal Efficiencies (%)

2008 2013 2008 2013 2008 2013

2 55.5 30.5 99.99981 99.99992 99.99955 99.99998

3 54.5 69.0 99.99930 99.99971 99.99871 99.99966

4 95.3 99.0 99.99919 99.99918 99.99824 99.99951

Unit #

Hg LVM SVM
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 308 

Remembering and honoring the life and achievements of Jackie Robinson 

on the 60th anniversary of integrated Major League Baseball. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 17, 2007 

Mr. DAVIS of Illinois submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Remembering and honoring the life and achievements of 

Jackie Robinson on the 60th anniversary of integrated 

Major League Baseball. 

Whereas 60 years ago this month, Jack Roosevelt ‘‘Jackie’’ 

Robinson, overcoming significant opposition, became the 

first African-American Major League Baseball player of 

the modern era in 1947; 

Whereas Jackie Robinson was inducted into the Baseball 

Hall of Fame in 1962; 

Whereas Jackie Robinson was a member of six World Series 

teams and earned six consecutive All-Star Game nominations; 

Whereas Jackie Robinson was a key figure in the establishment and growth of the Freedom Bank; 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 308 IH 

Whereas Jackie Robinson served honorably in the United 

States Army from 1942–1944 as a second lieutenant; 

Whereas Major League Baseball was not the only institution 

in which Jackie Robinson sought to challenge racially discriminatory barriers; 

Whereas Jackie Robinson faced court-martial charges of insubordination resulting from his refusal to obey an order 

to move to the back of a segregated military bus in 

Texas; 

Whereas President Ronald Reagan awarded Jackie Robinson 

the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 1984; and 

Whereas Jackie Robinson was awarded the Congressional 

Gold Medal during the 108th Congress: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives remem2 bers and honors the life and achievements of Jackie Rob3 inson on the 60th anniversary of integrated Major League 

4 Baseball. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
From: opie51@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:56:01 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Douglass Opie

Madera, CA 93636
No. 66507.

#### Engis Equipment Company *v.*United States,

protest 266281-K/7298 (Chicago).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of talyrond apparatus and equipment similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 64440, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 69220.

#### Max Eckardt & Sons Ornament Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 59/4476 (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of plastic paperweights similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 67488, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: mrsrosemiller@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:46:08 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Rose Miller

Whittier, CA 90604
From: leealton@cox.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: leealton@cox.net

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:50:07 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Stuart Alton

Scottsdale, AZ 85255
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk June 25, 2012

h0618 

# Order

June 25, 2012

144146

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 144146

COA: 301833

Wayne CC: 95

- 002061

- FC

P. J. KENNETH JEFFERSON

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 5 , 2011

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 183 (Friday, September 22, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 65405]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20594]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation Nos. 701-TA-570 and 731-TA-1346 (Review)]


Aluminum Foil From China

Determinations

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
reviews, the United States International Trade Commission 
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the 
Act''), that revocation of the antidumping and countervailing duty 
orders on aluminum foil from China would be likely to lead to 
continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the 
United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in Sec.  207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted these reviews on March 1, 2023 (88 FR 
12990) and determined on June 5, 2023 that it would conduct expedited 
reviews (88 FR 44155, July 11, 2023).
    The Commission made these determinations pursuant to section 751(c) 
of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its 
determinations in these reviews on September 19, 2023. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5459 (September 2023), 
entitled Aluminum Foil from China: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-570 and 
731-TA-1346 (Review).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: September 19, 2023.
Katherine Hiner,
Supervisory Attorney.
[FR Doc. 2023-20594 Filed 9-21-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Region ASBESTOS WORKERS BOILER MAKERS LAYERS BRICK CARPENT- ERS CEMENT MASONS CRANE OPERATOR ELECTR ICIAN ELEV. CONST IRON WORKERS 

## Region Averages CONSTRUCTION LABOR RESEARCH COUNCIL UNION WAGES ANDSUPPLEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD 07/01/2008-07/01/2013

26-Jun-13



### New England $52.80 $48.55 $49.15 $51.87 Rate - 07/01/08 $64.94 $60.90 $56.78 $52.95 $60.13 Rate - 07/01/13 $77.60 $8.10 $8.23 $3.80 $8.26 Increase $12.66 

### Middle Atlantic $40.45 $51.61 $46.76 $44.54 $35.88 $50.97 $51.30 $67.77 Rate - 07/01/08 $58.82 $48.25 $62.95 $53.88 $51.67 $42.49 $59.78 $59.42 $82.41 Rate - 07/01/13 $71.52 $7.80 $11.34 $7.12 $7.13 $6.61 $8.81 $8.12 $14.64 Increase $12.70 

### Southeast $31.99 $41.64 $28.76 $26.34 $32.83 $34.90 Rate - 07/01/08 $52.59 $36.18 $47.29 $31.38 $28.79 $35.96 $37.42 Rate - 07/01/13 $65.09 $4.19 $5.65 $2.62 $2.45 $3.13 $2.51 Increase $12.50 

### East North Central $56.48 $50.12 $47.20 $45.68 $44.42 $44.25 $56.39 $44.79 Rate - 07/01/08 $61.10 $65.16 $58.95 $52.98 $51.88 $50.04 $51.43 $64.86 $50.54 Rate - 07/01/13 $73.80 $8.68 $8.83 $5.78 $6.20 $5.62 $7.18 $8.47 $5.76 Increase $12.69 

### West North Central $50.37 $49.31 $41.47 $42.86 $40.04 $44.86 $44.97 Rate - 07/01/08 $57.60 $57.67 $58.57 $46.60 $49.73 $44.56 $52.64 $53.47 Rate - 07/01/13 $70.29 $7.30 $9.26 $5.13 $6.86 $4.51 $7.78 $8.51 Increase $12.69

1Region ASBESTOS WORKERS BOILER MAKERS LAYERS BRICK CARPENT- ERS CEMENT MASONS CRANE OPERATOR ELECTR ICIAN ELEV. CONST IRON WORKERS 

## Region Averages CONSTRUCTION LABOR RESEARCH COUNCIL UNION WAGES ANDSUPPLEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD 07/01/2008-07/01/2013

26-Jun-13



### South Central $39.12 $27.08 $26.77 $30.60 Rate - 07/01/08 $51.45 $44.34 $28.53 $27.37 $34.31 Rate - 07/01/13 $64.33 $5.22 $1.45 $0.60 $3.71 Increase $12.88 

### Mountain-Northern Plains $46.12 Rate - 07/01/08 $54.58 $56.59 Rate - 07/01/13 $67.61 $10.47 Increase $13.02 

### Southwest Pacific $53.18 $45.32 $51.62 $46.62 $53.13 $47.43 $54.55 Rate - 07/01/08 $67.14 $66.35 $52.98 $57.75 $54.49 $62.72 $53.46 $59.11 Rate - 07/01/13 $79.86 $13.17 $7.66 $6.13 $7.86 $9.59 $6.03 $4.56 Increase $12.72 

### Northwest $50.07 $45.52 $43.67 $48.38 $50.13 Rate - 07/01/08 $62.86 $61.34 $50.11 $47.95 $54.47 $56.09 Rate - 07/01/13 $75.53 $11.27 $4.59 $4.28 $6.09 $5.96 Increase $12.67 

### U.S. Average $47.69 $47.20 $46.42 $45.06 $43.87 $46.76 $50.53 $50.66 Rate - 07/01/08 $59.32 $54.85 $55.88 $52.78 $51.26 $49.77 $54.22 $57.71 $57.29 Rate - 07/01/13 $72.02 $7.16 $8.69 $6.36 $6.20 $5.89 $7.47 $7.18 $6.63 Increase $12.70

2
CERTIFICATION

The undersigned certify to the following with respect to the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (Mass DEP) public review process concerning the proposed Massachusetts State Implementation Plan To DemonstrateAttainment ofthe National AmbientAir Quality Standard "QS) for Ozone (the Ozone SIP) and the proposed Massachusetts State Implementation Plan Revision to Meet Clean AirAct Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) Interstate Air Pollution Transport Requirements (the Transport SIP)
. Notice ofthe Public Hearing on the Ozone SIP and the Transport SIPwas published at least 30days prior to the public hearing in the following newspapers on the following dates: Boston Globe December 17, 2007 The Republican (Springfield) December 19, 2007 The WorcesterTelegramand Gazette December 18, 2007 The Notice specified the date, time and place ofthe public hearings concerning the proposed Ozone SIP and proposed Transport SIP and that comments on them would be accepted until 5:00p.m . on January 28, 2008
. The Notice specified the locations at which the proposed Ozone SIP and Transport SIP were available for public inspection
. The proposed SIPs were available at the locations stated in the Notice when the Notice was published, as well as at the public hearings
. The Notice was given to the U .S
. Environmental Protection Agency, to any affected local or pollution control agencies, and to all known potentially interested parties on or before the date of the public hearings
. Public hearings were held on the following dates and at the following locations, pursuant to the above Notice and in conformance with M .G.L
. Chapter 30Aand the provisions of 40 CFR 51 .4(b) : January 18, 2008 at 10 a.m . MassDEP Boston Office One Winter Street Boston, MA02108 January 18, 2008 at 2

:00 p.m MassDEPWestern Regional Office 436 Dwight Street, Room B-42 Springfield, MA 01103ATTEST:

ATTEST: 

### Boston Hearing Officer

Eileen Hiney MassDEP

Springfield Hearing Officer MassD 

### i ~. ~ ~OtJB ave H land ate
From: DAA007@WIDEOPENWEST.COM

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:29:40 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

THOMAS APICELLA

Naperville, IL 60565
From: alexandkaryn@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:30:07 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Karyn Eitel

Gaithersburg, MD 20882
reviewletter.htm






  





  











  








Silberstein Ungar, PLLC


CPAs and Business Advisors


phone (248) 203-0080


fax (248) 281-0940


30600 Telegraph Road, Suite 2175


Bingham Farms, MI 48025


www.sucpas.com


 







 


January 9, 2013


 







 


Office of the Chief Accountant


Securities and Exchange Commission


100 F Street, NE


Washington, D.C. 20549


 


Dear Sir/Madam:


 


We have read the statements included under Item 4.01 in the Form 8-K dated January 9, 2013 of Ecology Coatings, Inc. (the "Company") to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and we agree with such statements insofar as they relate to our Firm.


 







 







 


/s/ Silberstein Ungar, PLLC


Silberstein Ungar, PLLC