alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Jim Steele

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:11:52 PM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Jim Steele
San Antonio, Texas
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 14, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00072

- CV

JMI CONTRACTORS, LLC

,

Appellant

v.

Jose Manuel MEDELLIN

, Appellee

From the 285t h Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018

- CI

- 05983

Honorable Aaron Haas , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The reporter’s record was originally due March 10, 2022, but it was not filed. On March 10, 2022, the court reporter filed a notification of late record, stating the reporter’s record was not filed because appellant had failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the court reporter’s fee for preparing the record and appellant was not entitled t o appeal without paying the fee.

We therefore ORDER appellant provide written proof to this court showing either (1) the reporter’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the reporter’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitle d to appeal without paying the reporter’s fee by M arch 24, 2022

. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, appellant’s brief will be due within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, and the court will consider on ly those issues or points raised in appellant’s brief that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(c).

___ ______________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 14th day of March, 2022

.

_________________ __________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 423 

Commending the Poudre High School science bowl team on winning the 

2007 United States Department of Energy Science Bowl. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 21, 2007 

Mrs. MUSGRAVE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Commending the Poudre High School science bowl team on 

winning the 2007 United States Department of Energy 

Science Bowl. 

Whereas on April 30, 2007, Poudre High School placed first 

in the 17th annual United States Department of Energy 

Science Bowl; 

Whereas Poudre High School became the first team from 

Colorado to win this prestigious competition; 

Whereas team members Patrick Chaffey, Sam Elder, Winston 

Gao, Sam Sun, and Logan Wright exhibited extraordinary understanding of the sciences and mathematics; 

Whereas team coach and science teacher Jack Lundt was instrumental in Poudre High School’s success in the competition; 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HRES 423 IH 

Whereas Poudre High School and the Poudre School District 

provide the students of Fort Collins and Larimer County 

a world class education; and 

Whereas academic excellence in the sciences and mathematics 

is a crucial element in maintaining the preeminence of 

American ingenuity: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) commends the Poudre High School science 

3 bowl team on winning the 2007 United States De4 partment of Energy Science Bowl; 

5 (2) recognizes the academic achievements of 

6 Patrick Chaffey, Sam Elder, Winston Gao, Sam 

7 Sun, and Logan Wright; 

8 (3) recognizes the significant dedication and 

9 guidance of coach Jack Lundt; and 

10 (4) directs the Clerk of the House of Represent11 atives to transmit a copy of this resolution to 

12 Poudre School District Superintendent Jerry Wilson 

13 and coach Jack Lundt for appropriate display. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
Before the First Division,

March 17, 1969

No. P69/76.

protests 66/77276-2824, etc. (Chicago).

No. P69/77.

protests 67/79083 and 67/79025 (Baltimore).

#### Naumes Forwarding Service *v.*United States, Import Assoc. of America, Inc. *v.*United States,

Watson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of artificial flowers, trees, foliage, fruits, vegetables, grasses, or grains, and articles made of the foregoing, in chief value of plastic, assembled in the same manner as the merchandise the subject of *Armbee Corporation et al.*v. *United States*(60 Cust. Ct. 105, C.D. 3278) and *Zunold Trading Corporation et al*v. *United States*(60 Cust. Ct. 112, C.D. 3279), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: peppertoo@me.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:14:55 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Charles G. Munster

Minneapolis, MN 55436
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting of the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering Special Emphasis Panel.

The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering Special Emphasis Panel; Career Development (Ks) and Conference Support (R13) Review.                    

*Date:*                         November 9, 2023.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Democracy II, Suite 920, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20817 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Alexander O. Komendantov, Ph.D., MS, Scientific Review Officer, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 451-3397,                         *alexander.komendantov@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, National Institutes of Health.)

Dated: September 20, 2023.

Victoria E. Townsend,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-20756 Filed 9-25-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 469 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 469

  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Iraqi 
   National Assembly should cancel or postpone its planned two-month 
    recess scheduled to begin in July 2007 and work toward meeting 
              political, social, and military benchmarks.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 6, 2007

 Mr. Stearns submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Iraqi 
   National Assembly should cancel or postpone its planned two-month 
    recess scheduled to begin in July 2007 and work toward meeting 
              political, social, and military benchmarks.

Whereas the Iraqi National Assembly plans to take its regular summer break, a 
        two-month recess scheduled to begin in July 2007;
Whereas such an extended break demonstrates a lack of will and urgency to reach 
        reconciliation among rival factions by the Iraqi National Assembly;
Whereas the United States Congress and President George W. Bush have set out 18 
        benchmarks for the Iraqi Government;
Whereas United States aid and military support could be conditioned on the Iraqi 
        Government meeting these benchmarks;
Whereas many of these benchmarks call for the Iraqi National Assembly to enact 
        and implement legislation to carry out ``de-Baathification'' measures; 
        to ensure the equitable distribution of hydrocarbon resources of the 
        people of Iraq without regard to the sect or ethnicity of recipients; to 
        ensure that the energy resources of Iraq benefit Sunni Arabs, Shia 
        Arabs, Kurds, and other Iraqi citizens in an equitable manner; to 
        establish an Independent High Electoral Commission, provincial elections 
        law, provincial council authorities, and a date for provincial 
        elections; and to establish a strong militia disarmament program to 
        ensure that the security forces of Iraq are accountable only to the 
        central government and loyal to the Constitution of Iraq;
Whereas United States Armed Forces continue to fight and give their lives to 
        stabilize Iraq; and
Whereas every member of the United States Armed Forces in Iraq deserves the 
        utmost respect and support from Congress: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that the Iraqi National Assembly should cancel or postpone its planned 
two-month recess scheduled to begin in July 2007 and work toward 
meeting political, social, and military benchmarks.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Sunrise Energy Services, Inc. a Delaware
corporation (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), David A. Melman, Principal Executive
Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of
his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The
information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the
financial  condition and  result of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Sunrise Energy Services, Inc., and will be retained by Sunrise
Energy Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

|                       | 
|---------------------- | 
|                       | 
|Date: December 2, 2004 | 
|                       | 
|                       | 
|                       | 
|                       | 

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

ANTONIO COLBERT, ) 

) 

Plaintiff, ) 

) 

v. ) 

) 

OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL ) 

ruCHARDCORDRAY, ) 

) 

Defendant. ) 

Civil Action No. 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

FILED 

FEB _. 8 2011 

Clerk. U.S. District & Bankruptcy 

Courts tor the District of Columbia 

11 OJlf1 

This matter is before the Court upon consideration of plaintiff' s application to proceed in 

forma pauperis and his pro se complaint. The application will be granted, and the complaint 

will be dismissed. 

Plaintiff, who currently resides in the District of Columbia, alleges that he has "been 

kidnapped by the State of Ohio," a matter which "the state has kept ... consealed [sic]." CompI. 

at 2. That plaintiff was "put injail for telling the truth ... is one of a hundred reasons [he is] 

sueing [the defendant]." ld. In addition to damages of$100 million, plaintiff demands that 

"[t]his matter ... go to President Obama's desk." Id. 

In Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319 (1989), the Supreme Court states that the trial court 

has the authority to dismiss not only claims based on an indisputably meritless legal theory, but 

also claims whose factual contentions are clearly baseless. Claims describing fantastic or 

delusional scenarios fall into the category of cases whose factual contentions are clearly baseless. 

ld. at 328. The trial court has the discretion to decide whether a complaint is frivolous, and such 

finding is appropriate when the facts alleged are irrational or wholly incredible. Denton v. 

Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 33 (1992). The Court deems the instant complaint frivolous, and 
accordingly, dismisses this action under 28 U.S.c. § 1915(a)(2)(B)(i). 

An Order consistent with this Memorap1nion is ·ssued separately . 

.... /<
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 27, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 66494]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21017]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4720-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2023-0001]


Vermont; Amendment No. 7 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Vermont (FEMA-4720-DR), dated July 14, 2023, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued August 11, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this disaster is closed effective July 17, 2023.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2023-21017 Filed 9-26-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of Adjudication 

U.S. Mail and FAX 

September 20,2016 

J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

800 Independence Ave., S.W., Suite 2W1000 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Re: In the Matter of Joseph Maridon, Sr., FDMS No. FAA-2014-0116 

Dear Judge Sullivan: 

The FAA Hearing Docket received by FAX today Respondent's Show Cause Statement Pursuant to 

Order of August 29, 2016 and Reservation of Rights. In this document, Respondent's counsel, William 

Ayers, Esq., questions the validity of the date-stamp affixed to the parties' Joint Status Report. Mr. Ayers 

asserts that the document, mailed on August 10, 2016, should have been received by the FAA Hearing 

Docket by August 12,2016. 

Preliminarily, it is the practice of the FAA Hearing Docket to date-stamp as received documents sent to us 

by U.S. Mail on the same day that the documents are delivered to our office. During the month of 

August, I checked the mail each day to ensure that incoming mail was date-stamped properly by office 

personnel, and if no support staff were present, I date-stamped documents myself on the same day that the 

office received them. 

I have checked the file of this case. The envelope in which the Joint Status Report was sent to the FAA 

Hearing Docket by U.S. Mail is postmarked August 10, 2016. (Copy attached.) The Joint Status Report 

was date-stamped as received on August 25, 2016. The envelope and the paper document are yellowed 

and have a musty smell, indicating that the envelope and the document were irradiated for security 

purposes before the envelope and document were delivered from the FAA mail room to the FAA Hearing 

Docket. It is not unusual for documents sent to the FAA Hearing Docket by regular mail to be delayed 

several days as a result of security procedures. 

';?;~~ Vicki S. Leemon 

Senior Attorney, AGC-70 

Cc: David F. Shayne, Esq., FAA (by U.S. Mail and email) 

Walter Ayers, Esq. (by U.S. Mail and email) 
U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

l~orthwest Mountain Region 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, WA 98057-4099 

OFFICIAL BUSINESS 

Penalty for Private Use $300 

,-., 

I 

:C.~F:.•:HTILE 

·~ii

W~i~4 S'li30 

:1JJ> ,il<,lJG ':16 

lf<'l;l ·'l L 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building, Suite 2W1000 

800 Independence Ave., S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

:~ C.:.E: ::~ _7:, .. _ in) 1 i!~ i i' iV111 i: :lJ-i 1!, ~ llf'1! il !~~_,:•_,i!l.j! i;llll~l! !