alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Edmund Markowski

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:05:59 PM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Edmund Markowski
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Arab Boycott

              																	United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, 1970-					 and 	Ninety-Fifth Congress, 1977-1979. 						*Arab Boycott : Hearings Before the Subcommittee on International Finance of the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, United States Senate, Ninety-Fifth Congress, First Session, on S. 69 and S. 92, February 21, 22, and 28; and March 15, 1977*,												Washington: 								U.S. Government Printing Office, 										February 21, 22, and 28; and March 15, 1977,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/218,			accessed on September 21, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
Statement





Pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of Luxemburg Bancshares, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that:



(1)

the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2)

the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  August 8, 2002





/s/ Sheri L. Knope

Sheri L. Knope

Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
From: deanosth@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: deanosth@gmail.com

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:42:15 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dean Sutherland

, 89103-4326
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350


(SECTION
906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





In
connection with the Annual Report of,Sears Oil and Gas Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, William Sears, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  March
31, 2009





By:  /s/
William Sears


-----------------------------------------------


William
Sears, President,


Chief
Executive Officer,


and
Director








1
From: cstennisgirl@fuse.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:06:58 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

connie schultz

Fairfield, OH 45014
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                          5
<MULTIPLIER>                                       1
<CURRENCY>                                         U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                       JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1
<CASH>                                                 430,811
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        8,202,048
<ALLOWANCES>                                          (131,877)
<INVENTORY>                                            706,940
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     9,223,200
<PP&E>                                               1,109,796
<DEPRECIATION>                                         554,808
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       9,856,314
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                5,810,711
<BONDS>                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                86,284
<OTHER-SE>                                            (612,814)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         9,856,314
<SALES>                                              4,746,773
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     4,746,773
<CGS>                                                3,380,586
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        3,380,586
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     1,013,373
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     115,527
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        242,692
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    242,692
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                           242,692
<EPS-BASIC>                                               0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0.03



</TABLE>
#### Xing JIANG, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.

No. 05-1199.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 25, 2005.

Decided Aug. 12, 2005.

*153Gary J. Yerman, New York, New York, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, Terri J. Scadron, Assistant Director, Robbin K. Blaya, Office of Immigration Litigation, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Xing Jiang, a native and citizen of China, seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reconsider the Board’s denial of his motion to reopen his removal proceedings. We have reviewed the administrative record and conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying Jiang’s motion. *See*8 C.F.R. § 1003.2 (2005).

We accordingly deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED*
From: jib@q.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:06:04 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Judy Brown

Montrose, CO 81403
1 C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Thor Kirby 3 Group, LLC v. Frances H. Pengra, et al.

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 3

- 00 22 9

- CV

Trial court case number: 20 11

- 2 0 5 2 3

Trial court: 215 th District Court of Harris County

On August 5, 2013, t he parties to this appeal fi led a n A greed A mended M otion to S et

B riefing Schedule . Appellant’s and cross

- appellants’ briefs were due on June 21, 2013. Appellees Frances H. Pengra, et al., trial court plaintiffs, previously filed an unopposed motion to set briefing schedule, which requested an August 20, 2013 deadline for filing the initial appellant’s brief

. The parties also filed an agreed motion to extend the deadline for the

a ppellant ’s and c ross

- a ppellants ’ br iefs by 30 days pending a ruling on the u nopposed m otion to

s et b riefing s chedule

. The agreed amended motion to set briefing schedule requests that the filing date for the initial appellant’s brief be extended to September 20, 2013.

We grant t he agreed ame nded motion to set briefing schedule. We therefore order t h at:

Thor Kirby 3 Group, LLC’s appellant’s brief is due no later than September 20, 2013.

Frances H. Pengra, et al.’s combined appellees ’ and cross

- appellants’ brief is due no later than October 21, 2013.

GWV Kirby LLC’s combined appellee’s and cross

- appellant’s brief is due no later than

November 21 , 2013.

Thor Kirby 3 Group, LLC’s combined appellant’s reply and cross

- appellee’s brief is due no later than December 20, 2013.

Frances H. Pengra, et al.’s cross

- appellants’ reply brief is due no later than January 9

, 2014.

GWV Kirby LLC’s cross

- appellant’s reply brief is due no later than January 9 , 201 4

.
No further extension s will be granted.2

We dismiss Appellee’s Unopposed Motion to Set Briefing Schedule, filed on June 3, 2013, and the Agree d Motion to Extend Time to File Appellant’s and Cross

- Appellants’ Briefs, filed on June 19, 2013, as moot.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: / s/ Jim Sharp

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: August 14, 2013
From: happy2camp@charter.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:10:58 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Martin Maciejewski

Berlin, WI 54923
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|   | Title of Each Class of |   | Maximum Aggregate |   | Amount of |   |   |
|   | Securities Offered |   | Offering Price(1) |   | Registration Fee(2) |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | 3.300% PowerNotes®  Due March 15, 2024 |   | $3,210,000 |   | $413.45 |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | TOTAL |   |   |   | $413.45 |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |

|     |                                    |
|-----|------------------------------------|
| (1) | Excludes accrued interest, if any. |

|     |                                                                             |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | Calculated in accordance with Rule 457(r) under the Securities Act of 1933. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | CUSIP | Aggregate | Selling | Gross | Net |   | Coupon | Coupon | Coupon | Maturity | 1st Coupon | 1st |   | Survivor's |   | Product |   |   |
|   | Number | Principal | Price | Concession | Proceeds |   | Type | Rate | Frequency | Date | Date | Coupon |   | Option |   | Ranking |   |   |
|   |   | Amount |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Amount |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | 14912HRB8 | $3,210,000.00 | 100% | 1.800% | $3,152,220.00 |   | Fixed | 3.300% | Semi- | 03/15/2024 | 09/15/2014 | $15.40 |   | Yes |   | Senior Unsecured |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Annual |   |   |   |   |   |   | Notes |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |