alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: lawtinman@att.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:49:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

LAWRENCE WEIGUM SR

Saint Joseph, MO 64506
From: drew@chipdemoss.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:41:41 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Please be aware that those who make this decision will be responsible to God for their decision. Both

natural law and divine positive law (as revealed by God through the Catholic Church) condemn

contraception as violating the primary purpose of marriage, which is the procreation and education of

children. Forcing insurance companies to provide free coverage for contraceptives will increase the HHS

decision makers' burden of responsibility before God.

Please do not take this burden upon yourselves. I will pray that you make the moral and ethical

decision. God bless you.

Sincerely,

Drew DeMoss

Basehor, KS 66007
From: conniejgill@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:56:31 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Connie Gill

Running Springs, CA 92382
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Orbit/FR, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dave Lubbe, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Dave Lubbe
------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2002
From: Suedurango@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:38:46 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mary Sue Barr

Elmhurst, IL 60126
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-14-0001036

29-JAN-2018

09:21 AM
# Strategic planning

## Introduction

The Office of Strategic Planning supports the Postmaster General and senior management in assessing the future of the Postal ServiceTM.

The following links contain the Delivering for America strategic plan, Annual Report to Congress and archived publications.

Delivering for America
*Our Vision and Ten-Year Plan to Achieve Financial Sustainability and Service Excellence.*Learn more

## Publications

            - Delivering for America: Our vision and 10-year plan to achieve service excellence and financial stability
            - Annual Report to Congress FY 2023

Please visit the archive to access older strategic planning publications.
From: nrosed@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:29:24 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Nancy Davis

Norcross, GA 30092
NEW YORK, NY 

TYSONS CORNER , VA 

CHICAGO, IL 

STAMFORD,C T 

PARS'PPANY, NJ 

BRUSSELS, BELGIUM 

AFFILIATE OFFICES 

MUMBAI , INDIA 

KELLEY DRYE S WARRE N LLP 

A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP 

305 0 K STREET, N.W. 

SUITE 40 0 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20007 

(202 ) 3-42-340 0 

FACSIMILE 

(202> 342-S45 I 

Vi/w\A/. kelleydrye.com 

DIREC T LINE : (202 ) 342-852 8 

EMAIL : dfisher@ke))eydrye . co m 

January 15, 2010 

By Hand Delivery ;ll. 

Ms. Dorothy Y. Beard 

Director, Office of Information Services 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE -. 

M-30,RoomW12-140 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Re: Application of UPS Europe SA and UPS International, Inc. for 

Exemption Authority (Netherlands-Sudan), Docket OST-2010-0007 

Dear Ms. Beard: 

On January 8, 2010, UPS Europe SA and UPS International, Inc. (the 

"Applicants") filed an Application for an exemption from the provisions of the Department's 

Order No. 98-2-5 ("Sudan Order") so as to permit the Applicants to operate a single one-way air 

freight forwarding movement transporting items of laboratory equipment to analyze and treat 

tuberculosis from Amsterdam, Netherlands to USAID, St. Luke's Hospital, Juba, Sudan. The 

Applicants polled all persons served with the Application and hereby inform the Department that 

no party has any objection to the Application. Accordingly, the Applicants request that the 

Department grant the Application as soon as possible. 

Thank you very much for your assistance. 

Sii;icerely 

fm^t ^ 

Danielle K. Fisher 

Attorney for United Parcel Service 

cc: All parties (via e-mail) 

Esta Rosenberg (via e-mail) 

DCOl/FISHD/404079.1
From: joepeg11@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:04:57 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Joseph Judge

Champlin, MN 55316
No. P67/60.

#### Rettrain Imports, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 66/6364, etc. (New York).

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of articles of synthetic rubber similar in all material respect to those the subject of *United States*v. *Weather-Rite Sportswear Co., Inc.*(52 CCPA 7, C.A.D. 848), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 423 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 423

Commending the Poudre High School science bowl team on winning the 2007 
            United States Department of Energy Science Bowl.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 21, 2007

Mrs. Musgrave submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Commending the Poudre High School science bowl team on winning the 2007 
            United States Department of Energy Science Bowl.

Whereas on April 30, 2007, Poudre High School placed first in the 17th annual 
        United States Department of Energy Science Bowl;
Whereas Poudre High School became the first team from Colorado to win this 
        prestigious competition;
Whereas team members Patrick Chaffey, Sam Elder, Winston Gao, Sam Sun, and Logan 
        Wright exhibited extraordinary understanding of the sciences and 
        mathematics;
Whereas team coach and science teacher Jack Lundt was instrumental in Poudre 
        High School's success in the competition;
Whereas Poudre High School and the Poudre School District provide the students 
        of Fort Collins and Larimer County a world class education; and
Whereas academic excellence in the sciences and mathematics is a crucial element 
        in maintaining the preeminence of American ingenuity: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives--
            (1) commends the Poudre High School science bowl team on 
        winning the 2007 United States Department of Energy Science 
        Bowl;
            (2) recognizes the academic achievements of Patrick 
        Chaffey, Sam Elder, Winston Gao, Sam Sun, and Logan Wright;
            (3) recognizes the significant dedication and guidance of 
        coach Jack Lundt; and
            (4) directs the Clerk of the House of Representatives to 
        transmit a copy of this resolution to Poudre School District 
        Superintendent Jerry Wilson and coach Jack Lundt for 
        appropriate display.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the annual report of Cemtrex, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K
for the year ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Arun Govil, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 (1)
              the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 (2)
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
 
 /s/ Arun GovilArun
      GovilChief
      Executive Officerand
      principal executive officerJanuary
      14, 2011
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 64513.

#### R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 59/31337 (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of valances similar in all material respects to those the subject of *D. N. & E. Walter & Co. et al.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 26, C.D. 2098), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
July 1, 1955

No. 59218.

Suit 4800.

#### United States *v.*Esso Standard Oil Company.

C. D. 1562 reversed March 22, 1955. C. A. D. 587.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 22 

Expressing the disapproval of the House of Representatives of the Social 

Security totalization agreement between the United States and Mexico. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mr. KING of Iowa submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Ways and Means 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the disapproval of the House of Representatives 

of the Social Security totalization agreement between 

the United States and Mexico. 

1 Resolved, That, pursuant to section 233(e)(2) of the 

2 Social Security Act, the House of Representatives hereby 

3 disapproves the agreement establishing totalization ar4 rangements between the social security system established 

5 by title II of such Act and the social security system of 

6 Mexico, signed by the Commissioner of Social Security and 

7 the Director General, Mexican Social Security Institute, 

8 on June 29, 2004. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
1The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District

of Nebraska.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 99-3870

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Nebraska.

German Escorcia, also known as *

Herman, also known as German * [UNPUBLISHED]

Perez Escorcia, *

*

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: July 5, 2000

 Filed: July 21, 2000

___________

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, BEAM, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

German Escorcia was found guilty of conspiring to distribute and possess with

intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, and the district

court1 sentenced him to 121 months imprisonment and five years supervised release.

On appeal, Escorcia’s counsel has filed a brief and moved to withdraw pursuant to
-2-

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Although Escorcia was granted permission

to file a pro se supplemental brief, he has not done so.

After review of counsel’s Anders brief, along with our independent review of the

record in accordance with Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we conclude that there

are no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the

district court, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.