alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|     |                                                                                                                       |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|     |                                                                                                                                                       |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of  operations of the Company. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
| Date:  | August 3, 2016 | /s/Kent M. Adams |
|   |   | Kent M. Adams |
|   |   | President, Director and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   |   |
| Date:  | August 3, 2016 | /s/James A. Duensing |
|   |   | James A. Duensing |
|   |   | Executive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FILED AS PART OF
RIDDELL'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           1,601
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,635
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,234
<INVENTORY>                                     39,134
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                89,603
<PP&E>                                          18,750
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,389
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 205,769
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,550
<BONDS>                                        155,721
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            93
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,222
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   205,769
<SALES>                                         28,468
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,280
<CGS>                                           17,077
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,645
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   162
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,997
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (6,719)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (6,719)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (6,719)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.72)



</TABLE>
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 412 

Expressing gratitude to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II and His Royal 

Highness, Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, for their State Visit to 

the United States and reaffirming the friendship that exists between 

the United States and the United Kingdom. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 17, 2007 

Mr. BOOZMAN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing gratitude to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II 

and His Royal Highness, Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, for their State Visit to the United States and 

reaffirming the friendship that exists between the United 

States and the United Kingdom. 

Whereas Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II and His Royal 

Highness Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, traveled to 

the United States for a State Visit from May 3 to May 

8, 2007, celebrating the special relationship that exists 

between the United States and the United Kingdom; 

Whereas the United States and the United Kingdom enjoy a 

trans-Atlantic friendship sustained by a commitment to 

democratic traditions, liberty, and the spread of freedom, 

as well as common economic and cultural foundations; 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HRES 412 IH 

Whereas in a rapidly changing world, Queen Elizabeth II has 

been a force of stability and constancy and has provided 

inspiration to the world in times both peaceful and tumultuous; 

Whereas Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip serve as ambassadors for the British people and the goodwill engendered by their visit serves as a reminder, for the people 

of the United States and the United Kingdom alike, of 

our joint values and priorities; 

Whereas the United Kingdom, like the United States, has 

suffered loss of life on its own shores from terrorist elements; and 

Whereas thousands of British troops today fight side-by-side 

with United States forces on the War on Terror’s most 

dangerous battlefields: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives is deeply 

2 appreciative of the State Visit recently conducted by Her 

3 Majesty Queen Elizabeth II and His Royal Highness, 

4 Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, and celebrates the 

5 State Visit as having been an occasion to reaffirm the 

6 value and depth of the friendship that exists between the 

7 United States and the United Kingdom. 

Æ 


hmoore on PRODPC68 with HMBILLS
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-10-00865-CR

Lamar Lovett, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 299TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-DC-10-904094, HONORABLE CHARLES F. BAIRD, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

A jury convicted appellant Lamar Lovett of attempted capital murder, aggravated

assault with a deadly weapon, and two counts of aggravated sexual assault. See Tex. Penal Code

Ann. §§ 19.03(a)(2), 22.02(b)(1), 22.021(a)(1)(A)(i) (West 2011). The jury assessed punishment

at seventy years’ imprisonment for attempted capital murder, twenty years’ imprisonment for

aggravated assault with a deadlyweapon, and fiftyyears’ imprisonment for each count of aggravated

sexual assault.

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by

a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements

of Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why

there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967);

Garner v. State, 300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); see also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75,

86–87 (1988).
Appellant received a copy of counsel’s brief and was advised of his right to examine

the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Garner, 300 S.W.3d at 766.

We have received two written responses from the appellant—a pro se brief and a supplemental

pro se brief.

We have conducted an independent review ofthe record, including appellant counsel’s

brief and appellant’s written responses, and find no reversible error. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744;

Garner, 300 S.W.3d at 766; Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We

agree with counsel that the record presents no arguably meritorious grounds for review and the

appeal is frivolous. The points of error raised in appellant’s pro se briefs have no arguable merit.

See Garner, 300 S.W.3d at 766; Bledsoe, 178 S.W.3d at 827.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

_______________________________________

Diane M. Henson, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Henson and Goodwin

Affirmed

Filed: August 1, 2012

Do Not Publish

2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BJs Wholesale Club, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended October 28, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, Herbert J Zarkin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the undersigneds knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: December 7, 2006 |  | /S/ HERBERT J ZARKIN   
|                        |  | Herbert J Zarkin       
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 178 (Friday, September 15, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 63573]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19985]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL OP-OFA-086]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information 202-564-5632 or https://www.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)
Filed September 1, 2023 10 a.m. EST Through September 11, 2023 10 a.m. 
EST
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

    Notice: Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make 
public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's 
comment letters on EISs are available at: https://cdxapps.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-II/public/action/eis/search.

EIS No. 20230117, Draft, GSA, IL, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, 
The Buildings at 202, 214, and 220 South State Street, Chicago, 
Illinois, Comment Period Ends: 10/31/2023, Contact: Joseph Mulligan 
312-886-9593.
EIS No. 20230118, Final, FHWA, IN, Mid-States Corridor Tier 1, Contact: 
Michelle Herrell 317-226-5630.

    Pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 139(n)(2), FHWA has issued a single FEIS and 
ROD. Therefore, the 30-day wait/review period under NEPA does not apply 
to this action.

EIS No. 20230119, Final, BLM, NV, Gibellini Vanadium Mine Project, 
Review Period Ends: 10/16/2023, Contact: Scott Distel 775-635-4093.
EIS No. 20230120, Final, BOEM, NY, Empire Offshore Wind, Review Period 
Ends: 10/16/2023, Contact: Brandi Sangunett 703-787-1015.
EIS No. 20230121, Final, DOI, CO, Colorado Gray Wolf 10(j) Rulemaking, 
Review Period Ends: 10/16/2023, Contact: Liisa Niva 303-236-4779.

    Dated: September 11, 2023.
Cindy S. Barger,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2023-19985 Filed 9-14-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---
From: cmaart@newhopechurchmn.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:28:42 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Craig Maart

Minneapolis, MN 55427
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
BJs Wholesale Club, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended April 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Michael T. Wedge, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the undersigneds knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |                        
|------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: May 17, 2005 |  | /S/ MICHAEL T. WEDGE   
|                    |  | Michael T. Wedge       
|                    |  | Chief Executive Officer
06

11

32 31

19

13

19

33

30

17

17

09

20

20

01

24

06

16

34

25

29

14

16

07

31 35 36

12

15

18

21

24

25

23

07

32

22

30

13

20

15

22 23 24

10

18

30

30

13

24

17

03

25

02

19

28

19

18

18

13 17

27

14

04

26

08

28 26

36

21

01

29 25

29

12

29

05

27

08

20

05

16

21

07 08

09

28

09

33

12

16

08 11

11

04

10 07

26

14

21 23

12

02

28

35

26

23

14

36 31 32 33 34 35 36 31 32

11 09

35 33

* Note: Access to some areas listed as open may

require landowner permission to cross private lands

1 0 1 2 3 Miles

1 0 1 2 3 Kilometers

Map 12C Errata: Existing Travel 

Management - Rudio Mountain 

R 26 E R 27 E R 28 E

R 28 E

T

11

S

T

12

S

T

11

S

T

12

S

Bureau of Land Management

No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management as to the accuracy,

reliability, or completeness of these data for individual or aggregate use

with other data. Original data were compiled from various sources and may

be updated without notification. 

PRINEVILLE DISTRICT

John Day Basin

Resource Management Plan

Draft Environmental Impact Statement

2008

R 27 E

 LEGEND

Omitted Information

Transportation

Open Existing Road

Open Road Seasonally

Closed Road Year-round

US Highway

State Highway

County Road

Forest Service Primary

Forest Service Secondary

Private Road - Closed to public use or unknown

Administered Land

Bureau of Land Management

Private or Other

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

R 26 E

John Day 

Basin 

Planning Area

Map Area

Prineville 

District

O R E G O N

Kimberly

Bend

John Day

Last Modified Date: 1/5/2009 4:16:07 PM
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 379 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 379

  Congratulating Nicolas Sarkozy on his election to the presidency of 
                                France.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2007

 Mr. Poe submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Congratulating Nicolas Sarkozy on his election to the presidency of 
                                France.

Whereas the Marquis de Lafayette and the people of France offered unparalleled 
        friendship to the people of the United States in their pursuit of 
        freedom and democracy during the American Revolution;
Whereas Nicolas Sarkozy, upon winning the election to become the next President 
        of France, said that the United States can count on France as a friend; 
        and
Whereas the people of the United States support any effort by the Governments of 
        France and the United States to maintain and grow a spirit of friendship 
        and cooperation: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives congratulates Mr. 
Nicolas Sarkozy on his election to become the next President of France.
                                 <all>
```
PMN PROCESS FLOW DIAGRAM

 SANITIZED
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-60012 Conference Calendar

PAUL LEE TRIGGS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus C.C.A. CORPORATION; JODY BRADLEY; STEPHEN SPLATT; UNKNOWN CRANTS, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 5:00-CV-252-BrS

- - - - - - - - - - June 14, 2001 Before WIENER, DeMOSS and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Paul Lee Triggs, Mississippi prisoner #40312, appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint as frivolous. Triggs alleged that the defendants intentionally destroyed his personal property without his permission, thereby violating his due process rights. The district court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that Triggs’s claim for the deprivation of his personal property was frivolous. See Hudson v. Palmer , 468 U.S. 517, 533 (1984).No. 01-60012 -2- Mississippi has an adequate postdeprivation remedy for confiscation of prisoner property. See Nickens v. Melton , 38 F.3d 183, 185 (5th Cir. 1994). Triggs’s appeal is without arguable merit and is frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2. The dismissal of this appeal and the dismissal as frivolous by the district court each count as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). Triggs therefore has two “strikes” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). We caution Triggs that once he accumulates three strikes, he may not proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
From: saoirsephoto@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:17:01 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Stella Kaminski

Lompoc, CA 93436