alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Robm@coastfitness.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:30:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Robert Mendez

Newport Beach, CA 92663
EXHIBIT 32.2

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

(as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 (the “Report”), I, Jeffrey V. Burt, Chief Financial Officer of Legacy Housing Corporation (the “Company”) hereby certify that:

 

1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

|                       |                           |
|----------------------------|--------------------------------|
| Dated:  April 9, 2019 | /s/ Jeffrey V. Burt            |
|                       | Name: Jeffrey V. Burt          |
|                       | Title: Chief Financial Officer |

 

			 		

----
No. 65158.

#### United China & Glass Co. *v.*United States,

protests 60/22305-15894, etc. (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of decorative after-dinner cups and saucers the same in all material respects as those the subject of *United States*v. *The Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Company*(47 C.C.P.A. 1, C.A.D. 719), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (a) The items entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption prior to September 10, 1955, at 50 cents per dozen, but not less than 45 percent nor more 70 percent ad valorem, under paragraph 212, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 51802), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 51909), and (b) all items entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on and after September 10, 1955, at 45 percent under said paragraph, as modified by the Japanese Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 53865), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 53877).
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 23, 2014

No. 04-13-00662-CR

James Fuller FITZGERALD,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Bandera County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR-12-112

The Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. The 

Appellant’s brief is due on January 28, 2014.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 23rd day of January, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
From: kale.woods@tenethealth.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:13:10 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

Please rescind the unjust and coercive mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be

covered by private health insurance with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you

to expand conscience protections for any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and

have moral or religious objections. I strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on

Americans especially for drugs and devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion

(such as ella and Plan B).

This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which prohibit government

discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or religious grounds. The

definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include churches, but will still

mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections will be required to

choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees health insurance.

No Americans should be forced by the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object

to. I again urge you reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of

mandatory preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kale Woods

Plano, TX 75025
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Sinocom Pharmaceutical, Inc., formerly known as Tiger Acquisitions, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 (the "Report"), I, Tuck Wing Pang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  /s/Tuck Wing PangTuck Wing Pang, Chief Financial Officer March 19, 2009
Resignation Letter delivered by Emanuel Pearlman to Dune Energy, Inc.


 Exhibit 10.3 
 January 14, 2013 
 Dune Energy 
 Robert A. Schmitz 
 Chairman of the Board 
 777 Walker Street 
 Houston, TX 77002 
 Mr. Chairman: 
 I hereby confirm I am resigning from the Board of Dune Energy, Inc., and all
committees thereof upon which I serve as of the date hereof. 
  

			
	 Best Regards,
	 	
		
	 /s/ Emanuel Pearlman
	 	
	 Emanuel Pearlman
	 	


  

	cc:	James Watt 

 Frank Smith
CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

 

Registration No.  333-97047

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  238				Trade Date: 12/19/02
(To Prospectus Supplement dated August 15, 2002 & 

  Prospectus dated August 8,2002)					Issue Date:  12/24/02
The Date of this Pricing Supplement December 19, 2002
SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

  CUSIP									Date and terms of redemption or

     or	Stated				             Interest			repayment (including any

Common	Interest		  Price to	 Discounts &         Payment	Survivors		applicable regular or special

  Code	Rate (1)	Maturity	Public (2)	Commissions       Frequency	  Option	Yes/No	record dates)

14911QKX8  2.20%	12/15/04	     100%	        0.375%                Semi-Annually	     YES	    NO	

Principal						1st Payment	Day	

Amount		Proceeds		Dealer		      Date		Count

$1,463,000.00	$1,457,513.75	ABN AMRO Inc.	   6/15/03		30/360	
 

Original Issue Discount Note:					Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes	  X   No						N/A

 

 
- The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the effective date of the change.   Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $31.411 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (SM) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (SM) will be made under the Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated August 8, 2002.
- Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
No. 64539.

#### Traveler Trading Co. *v.*United States,

protest 58/19731 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of metal dime savings banks the same in all material respects as those the subject of *M. Pressner & Co.*v. *United States*(36 Cust. Ct. 262, C.D. 1784), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ambac Financial Group, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2010,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), David W. Wallis, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|       |  |                                      
|------ |  | -------------------------------------
|       |  | /s/ David W. Wallis                  
|Name:  |  | David W. Wallis                      
|Title: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|Date:  |  | May 17, 2010
From: rharbold@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:07:58 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

robert h harbold jr

Harrisburg, PA 17112
Case No. 13,520.

#### STRACHEN et al. v. CLYBURN et ux.

[3 McLean, 174.] *1*

Circuit Court, D. Illinois.

June Term, 1843.

Couhts — Following State Pkactice — Remedies.

The circuit courts of the United States adopt the local remedies of the respective states.

[This was an action at law by Strachen and Scott against Clyburn and wife.]

Mr. Spring, for plaintiffs.

Mr. Butterfield, for defendants.

OPINION OF

THE COURT.

This is a scire facias on a mortgage regulated by the act of the 17th of January, 1825 [Laws Ill. 1824-25. p. 157], A motion was made to strike this case from the docket, on the ground tlia.t the act referred to is local, and does not apply to the courts of the United States. The act named gives a remedy by sch fa. It provides that two nihils shall amount to a service, which shall authorise the plaintiff to proceed to judgment. This court under various acts of congress and by virtue of its own rules, adopts the remedies authorised in the state courts, though they may be local and peculiar in each state. In Kentucky, a writ of right, modified by statute, is a common remedy; and that remedy is used in the circuit court of the United States. Under the statute, the plaintiffs, had a right to issue a scire facias on the mortgage, and the motion is consequently overruled.
From: shumakes@att.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:30:09 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Krista Shumake

Grand Haven, MI 49417
From: bsl719@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:23:23 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Betty Lindsay

Birmingham, AL 35244
From: sta_pic@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:57:30 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Stanley Pickard

Sioux Falls, SD 57105
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1175 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.1175

                      One Hundred Seventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
          the twenty-third day of January, two thousand and two

                                 An Act

 
 To modify the boundary of Vicksburg National Military Park to include 
 the property known as Pemberton's Headquarters, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Vicksburg National Military Park 
Boundary Modification Act of 2002''.

SEC. 2. BOUNDARY MODIFICATION.

    The boundary of Vicksburg National Military Park is modified to 
include the property known as Pemberton's Headquarters, as generally 
depicted on the map entitled ``Boundary Map, Pemberton's Headquarters 
at Vicksburg National Military Park'', numbered 306/80015A, and dated 
August, 2001. The map shall be on file and available for inspection in 
the appropriate offices of the National Park Service.

SEC. 3. ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY.

    (a) Pemberton's Headquarters.--The Secretary of the Interior is 
authorized to acquire the properties described in section 2 and 3(b) by 
purchase, donation, or exchange, except that each property may only be 
acquired with the consent of the owner thereof.
    (b) Parking.--The Secretary is also authorized to acquire not more 
than one acre of land, or interest therein, adjacent to or near 
Pemberton's Headquarters for the purpose of providing parking and other 
facilities related to the operation of Pemberton's Headquarters. Upon 
the acquisition of the property referenced in this subsection, the 
Secretary add it to Vicksburg National Military Park and shall modify 
the boundaries of the park to reflect its inclusion.

SEC. 4. ADMINISTRATION.

    The Secretary shall administer any properties acquired under this 
Act as part of the Vicksburg National Military Park in accordance with 
applicable laws and regulations.

SEC. 5. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There is authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be 
necessary to carry out this Act.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```