alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Worcester Insurance Company, Plaintiff, v Hempstead Farms Fruit Corp., Doing Business as Hempstead Farms, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. Aaron Grober Agency, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

[633 NYS2d 66]

—In an action to recover additional insurance premiums, the defendant third-party plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Collins, J.), entered July 1, 1994, which granted the third-party defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In the main action the plaintiff, Worcester Insurance Company, sought to recover unpaid audit premiums from the defendant third-party plaintiff, Hempstead Farms Fruit Corp. (hereinafter Hempstead Farms). Hempstead Farms commenced a third-party action to recover any premiums it owed to the plaintiff, alleging that the third-party defendant, Aaron Grober Agency (hereinafter AGA), misrepresented that the insurance policies at issue were fixed premium policies.

In its motion for summary judgment, AGA made a prima facie showing that an independent insurance broker made the alleged misrepresentation and that there was no employer/ employee or principal / agent relationship between it and the *660independent insurance broker. AGA thus met its initial burden of demonstrating that there was no triable factual issue of its liability under the theory of respondeat superior for the additional premiums assessed under the "premium audit” provisions of the policies. The evidence submitted by Hempstead Farms on the motion, did not rebut AGA’s prima facie entitlement to summary judgment *(see, e.g., Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320; *Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557, 562; *Friends of Animals v Associated Fur Mfrs.,*46 NY2d 1065, 1067-1068).

AGA’s entitlement to judgment as a matter of law was buttressed by the admissions of Hempstead Farms’ president and bookkeeper that, although they had received copies of the policies at issue, they had not read them. The policies clearly provided for increases in Hempstead Farms’ insurance premiums, subject to periodic audits showing increases in the corporation’s business and sales. A party who enters into a written contract is bound by its stipulations and conditions whether or not he or she reads the contract. "Ignorance through negligence or inexcusable trustfulness will not relieve a party from his [or her] contract obligations” *(Metzger v Aetna Ins. Co.,*227 NY 411, 416; *see also, American Motorists Ins. Co. v Salvatore,*102 AD2d 342, 344-345; *Rogers v Urbanke,*194 AD2d 1024). Balletta, J. P., Rosenblatt, Pizzuto, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 187 (Thursday, September 28, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 66859]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21146]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group; 
Heart, Lung, and Blood Program Project Study Section.
    Date: December 1, 2023.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: DoubleTree by Hilton McLean Tysons, 1960 Chain Bridge 
Rd., McLean, VA 22102.
    Contact Person: Melissa H. Nagelin, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and 
Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge 
Drive, Room 208-R, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 827-7951, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f49a959391989d9a999cc6b49a9c98969dda9a9d9cda939b82"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="355b545250595c5b585d07755b5d59575c1b5b5c5d1b525a43">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 22, 2023.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-21146 Filed 9-27-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
From: roskelley1@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:34:23 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Cody Roskelley

Missouri City, TX 77459
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002,
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Alkermes, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Richard F. Pops, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that, to my
knowledge:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                                    /s/ Richard F. Pops
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Richard F. Pops
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                                    November 13, 2003
#### Douglas Alan JARVIS, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Vanessa P. ADAMS, Warden, FCC Petersburg, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 05-6280.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 18, 2005.

Decided Aug. 12, 2005.

Douglas Alan Jarvis, Appellant Pro Se.

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Douglas Alan Jarvis seeks to appeal from the district court’s orders construing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion and transferring it to the Southern District of Florida, and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Jarvis’ motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. *See Jarvis v. Adams,*No. CA-05-36-2 (E.D. Va. Feb. 2, 2005; Feb. 17, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
Before the Second Division,

March 14, 1963

No. 67511.

#### Seedman International Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 60/12481 (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the *240subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 OCPA 152, O.A.D. 750), tbe claim of tbe plaintiff was sustained.
Registration No. 333-73083 424 (b)(2)
                                     Pricing Supplement No:229 Cusip:14912LD65
                                     Dated:  June 01,1999

	Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation
	Medium-Term Notes, Series F
	(Fixed Rate)
	With Maturities of 9 Months or More from Date of Issue
	Interest payable each April 1 and October 1 and at Maturity

Principal Amount:       Interest Rate:                Proceed Amount:
$18,800,000                 6.59%                       $18,753,000

Original Issue Date:    Commission Fee:               Maturity Date:
06/04/1999                $47,000                       05/01/2003

Dealer:
Goldman Sachs


Specified Currency:     Option to Elect Payment       Authorized Denominations
x U.S. dollars          in U.S. dollars               (only applicable if
_ Other:___________     (only applicable if           Specified Currency is
                        Specified Currency is         other than U.S.
                        other than U.S. dollars):      N/A
                           N/A

The Note is a:                                        Exchange Rate Agent
    X Global Note                                     (if other than First
      Certificated Note                                Trust New York): N/A
      (only applicable if
       Specified Currency
       is other than U.S. dollars)

Original Issue           Total Amount of OID: N/A    Terms of Amortizing
Discount Note:                                       Notes:  N/A
   Yes     x No          Issue Price (expressed
                         as a percentage of
                         aggregate principal
                         amount): 100%


Redemption Date(s) (including                        Redemption Price(s): N/A
any applicable regular or
special record dates): N/A

Repayment Date(s) (including                         Repayment Price(s): N/A
any applicable regular or
special record dates):  N/A

Interest Rate Reset Option:  _ Yes    X No

Optional Reset Dates (only applicable if option to reset interest rate):  N/A

Basis for Interest Rate Reset (only applicable if option to reset interest
rate): N/A

Stated Maturity Extension Option:  _ Yes    x No

Extension Period(s) and Final Maturity Date (only applicable if option to
extend stated maturity): N/A

Basis for Interest Rate During Extension Period (only applicable if option to
extend stated maturity): N/A



Historical Exchange Rate (only applicable if Specified Currency other than
U.S. dollars): N/A

     The interest rates on the Notes may be changed by Caterpillar Financial
Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect
the interest rate on any Note ordered prior to the effective date of the
change.  Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $535.00MM principal
amount of the Notes had been sold at interest rates then in effect.

	_________________________________

	Pricing Supplement to Prospectus Supplement dated March 25, 1999
	and Prospectus dated March 25, 1999
From: leslinger@cox.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:57:30 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

LoReece Eslinger

Sand Springs, OK 74063
No. 65983.

#### Florea & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 311230-K (New York).

*288Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with the stipulation of counsel that the issue is the same in all material respects as that the subject of *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), and the record showing that the merchandise consists of knit nylon gloves similar in use to cotton gloves, the claim of the plaintiff: was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of CEO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ambac Financial Group, Inc.
(the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), David W. Wallis, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |                                      
|------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|/s/ David W. Wallis
|Name:               |  | David W. Wallis                      
|Title:              |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|Date:               |  | May 15, 2009
EXHIBIT 32.2

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Judy A. Schmeling, certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to
my knowledge:

(1) the Annual Report of HSN, Inc. on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 of HSN, Inc. (the
Report), which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HSN, Inc.



|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: February 21, 2013 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Judy A. Schmeling  
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | Judy A. Schmeling      
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
DESIGNATION OF AGENT FOR 

SERVICE OF NOTICE, PROCESS, ORDERS 

DECISIONS AND REQUIREMENTS 

ATTENTION DOCKET SECTION, C-55 

_______ T!..-'r~a~n~sA~s!.!:iaC-'A~ir..!.w!.ta!..tv..:o?.s~C~o~r-l'p~o:!.!ra!!.!t!.!io~n!...._ ______________ , having its principal 

(Name of Company, please print) 

Office at ----'N~o'""""'. 9"-'''-'S"-'e"'c"- . .!.1 ,_. T~id""in"'g"-"'B.!.Iv'-'d!..>.,_,_N~e~h~uc...!D~is!.t....!T~a!lJip~e<..!.i'-. T~ai..!.w!.ta~n'-'IC-'lc:J4~9 4,_, ~R~.O~-~C"'-.---------­

(address) 

Hereby designates, pursuant to section 46103 of Title 49 of the U.S. Code (formerly section 1005(b) ofthe Federal Aviation Act 

of 1958, as amended) the person named below as its Agent upon whom service of all notices processes and all orders, decision, 

and requirements of the Department of Transportation may be made for and on behalf of said carrier, hereby canceling all 

previous designations of agents made by it to the DOT. 

NameofAgent __________ ~Jo~s~h~R~o~m!.!:a~n~o.!.w~--------------------------

Address Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP. 2300 N Street, NW, Washington, DC 20037 

The Agent so designated has written his name and also his initials in the following space: 

Name ~,L:__j~lk:::=::::::::_ _________ (lnitials). ___ OJL ________ _ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, __!T.!.ra!!!n~s:!:A~s.!.£ia~A~i!!..rw!:!..!!.ayt,;s!....!C:eo~rp.!L!Lor!..!!a!!!ti~on!..!..... _________________ has caused these 

(Name of Company) 

presents to be signed in its name by _____ __!Y~e~e~C,:!!h!.!do:!!.on!..!Jg~C:!..!h!£oo>!..!i ______ , President 

(Please Print) 

of said company, and to be attested under its corporate seal by -----"R"'-o!£be"'-rt-'-"-'H~. ""L"'ou"'------

Chief Legal Officer 

(Secretary, or other Title) 

On this , I ..... day of &just. 2011-

TransAsia Airways Corporation 

(Name of Company) 

By:_(Yee Choo______.:____, ng Chooi..,Pr'ls_ jdent) 

ATTEST: 

(Robert H. Lou, Chief Legal Officer) 

OST F 1010.5 (1-98) 

•
No. 62233.

#### Applicator Enterprises, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 325283-K (New York).

*342Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of sponges similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 61191, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: pccafc@juno.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:26:47 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Alan Colton

Escondido, CA 92026
**Exhibit 15.1**

​

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

​

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-253519, 333-232693 and 333-262970) of Genmab A/S of our report dated February 22, 2023 relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 20-F.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopersStatsautoriseret RevisionspartnerselskabHellerup, DenmarkFebruary 22, 2023

----

​

PricewaterhouseCoopers Statsautoriseret Revisionspartnerselskab, CVR-nr. 33 77 12 31Strandvejen 44, DK-2900 Hellerup T: 3945 3945, www.pwc.dk

----
FIT F COPY OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS ^A/I P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

11/24/2015 COA No. 12-13-00241-CR 

### FRELS, JAMES SCOTT Tr. Ct. No. 9953 PD-0601 -15 

### Pursuantto Rule 69.4(a) T.R.A.P., the record isreturned to the court ofappeals. Abel Acosta, Clerk 12TH COURT OF APPEALS CLERK CATHY LUSK 

### 1517 W. FRONT, ROOM 354 TYLER, TX 75701 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *