alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, Chief Judge, United States 1

District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, adopting the

report and recommendation of the Honorable Mary Ann L. Medler,

United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of

Missouri.

___________

No. 95-3010

___________

Allen Coo, *

 *

Appellant, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * Eastern District of Missouri.

United States of America, *

 * [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: March 15, 1996

 Filed: March 19, 1996

___________

Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Allen Coo appeals the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. §

1

2255 motion. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties' briefs,

we conclude that no error of law or fact appears and that an opinion would

lack precedential value. 

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Xun Energy Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended May 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



3.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:   September 28, 2011



By: /s/ Jerry G. Mikolajczyk

Jerry G. Mikolajczyk

Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DATED AS OF JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                              28
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,061
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,615
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,278
<PP&E>                                           7,729
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,070
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,627
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,306
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              328
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           127
<OTHER-SE>                                     (7,812)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,627
<SALES>                                         24,699
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,699
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,307
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,784
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 459
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (851)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        75
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (926)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (926)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.10)
        

</TABLE>
Before the First Division,

December 3, 1968

No. P68/501.

protests 65/3556, etc. (Portland, Oreg.).

#### United China & Glass Co. *v.*United States,

Maletz, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of bobbing head figures similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Wilson's Customs*Clearance, *Inc.*v. *United States*(59 Cust. Ct. 36, C.D. 3061), and that said merchandise is wholly or in chief value of papier mache, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 58224.

protests 220126-K and 220122-K (New York).

#### Soverign Importers, Ltd., and Schenley Import Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the merchandise, issues, and facts herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners & Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the case of spirits reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, in each entry covered by the protests, was not in fact received by the importers. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty and internal revenue tax are not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protests were sustained to this extent.
H. Res. 354 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 11, 2007. 

Whereas the Congress of the United States authorized the 

creation of Lake Sidney Lanier and Buford Dam by official act in 1946 for flood control, power production, wildlife preservation and downstream navigation; 

Whereas construction on the Buford Dam project by the 

Army Corps of Engineers began in 1951; 

Whereas the Army Corps of Engineers constructed the dam 

and lake on the Chattahoochee and Chestatee Rivers at 

a cost of approximately $45,000,000; 

Whereas, in 1956, Jack Beachem and the Army Corps of Engineers signed a lease to create Holiday on Lake Sidney 

Lanier Marina as the lake’s first concessionaire; 

Whereas the first power was produced through Buford Dam 

at Lake Sidney Lanier on June 16, 1957; 

Whereas Holiday on Lake Sidney Lanier opened on July 4, 

1957; 

Whereas Buford Dam was officially dedicated on October 9, 

1957; 

Whereas nearly 225,000 people visited Lake Sidney Lanier to 

boat, fish and recreate in 1957; 
2 

•HRES 354 EH 

Whereas, in present times, more than 8,000,000 visitors 

enjoy the attributes and assets of Lake Sidney Lanier annually to boat, fish, swim, camp, and otherwise recreate 

in the great outdoors; 

Whereas Lake Sidney Lanier generates more than 

$5,000,000,000 in economic impact annually, according 

to a study commissioned by the Marine Trade Association of Metropolitan Atlanta; 

Whereas, Lake Sidney Lanier has won the prestigious Chief 

of Engineers Annual Project of the Year Award, the 

highest recognition from the Army Corps of Engineers 

for outstanding management, an unprecedented 3 times 

in 12 years—1990, 1997 and 2002; 

Whereas Lake Sidney Lanier hosted the paddling and rowing 

events for the 1996 Summer Olympics; 

Whereas marinas serve as the gateway to recreation for the 

public on America’s waterways; 

Whereas Lake Sidney Lanier is now home to 10 marinas 

—Aqualand Marina, Bald Ridge Marina, Gainesville Marina, Habersham Marina, Holiday on Lake Sidney Lanier, Lanier Harbor Marina, Lazy Days Marina, Port 

Royale Marina, Starboard Cove Marina, and Sunrise 

Cove Marina; 

Whereas Lake Sidney Lanier will join the Nation on Saturday, August 11 in celebration and commemoration of National Marina Day; and 

Whereas 2007 marks the 50th anniversary of Lake Sidney 

Lanier: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representative recognizes 

the 50th anniversary celebration of the beginnings of mari-
3 

•HRES 354 EH 

nas, power production, recreation, and boating on Lake Sidney Lanier, Georgia. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
No. 61509.

#### Sinaco Co., Inc., and H. W. Robinson & Co., Inc., *v.*United States,

protests 308028-K and 292931-K (New York).

*429Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of gift tags, composed wholly or in chief value of paper, lithographically printed, not over twelve one-thousandths of an inch in thickness, which are not gift or social cards, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: ldn_06@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:39:01 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services. 

Please please get your head out quick, before our Nation is doomed!

Sincerely,

Lynn Neighbors

Burleson, TX 76028
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 376 Agreed to House (ATH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 376

Recognizing annually a National Classified School Employee of the Year 
and honoring the valuable contributions of Classified School Employees 
                         in the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2007

  Ms. Woolsey (for herself, Mr. George Miller of California, and Mr. 
  Hare) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Education and Labor

                              May 7, 2007

 Committee on Education and Labor discharged; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Recognizing annually a National Classified School Employee of the Year 
and honoring the valuable contributions of Classified School Employees 
                         in the United States.

Whereas classified school employees provide valuable service to America's public 
        schools and community colleges;
Whereas classified school employees contribute to the establishment and 
        promotion of a positive instructional environment as paraeducators and 
        library aides;
Whereas classified school employees provide other essential educational services 
        such as transportation, facilities maintenance and operations, food and 
        support services, and health care;
Whereas classified school employees play a vital role in providing for the 
        welfare and safety of America's school children and students;
Whereas classified school employees strive for excellence in all areas relative 
        to the education community; and
Whereas in order that classified school employees are acknowledged for their 
        outstanding contribution to quality education across America, the 
        National Classified School Employee of the Year is recognized: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That The House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the recognition of the National Classified 
        School Employee of the Year and urges the United States 
        Department of Education, all States, State education agencies, 
        local education agencies, community colleges, and members of 
        the public to join in this observance;
            (2) congratulates the National Classified School Employee 
        of the Year; and
            (3) congratulates all classified school employees across 
        the Nation for their ongoing contributions to education, and 
        for the key role they play in promoting and ensuring student 
        achievement, student safety and well-being.
                                 <all>
```
No. 62746.

#### Coelho Brothers *v.*United States,

protest 107111-K (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of olives in brine similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Moscahlades Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 127, C.D. 1917), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: gbhamlin@juno.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:01:43 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Betsy (Bee) Hamlin

Clarksville, MD 21029
#### In the Matter of Christina V., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 72]

—Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Judith Sheindlin, J.), entered on or about July 18, 1994, which adjudicated respondent a juvenile delinquent upon a fact-finding that she committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of assault in the first degree and attempted robbery in the first degree, and placed her on probation for 2 years, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Respondent had a box cutter in her jacket pocket, blocked an escape route available to the complainant by standing on the subway stairs while one of her male companions stood behind the complainant and the other grabbed for his radio and then slashed and punched him. In addition, she quickly followed the two others as they left the scene, and picked up a bandanna that one of them dropped in flight, and was close enough to the slashing to get blood on her clothes. All this proof was sufficient to establish her in-concert liability notwithstanding that *234she never touched or spoke to the complainant *(Matter of Emerson D.,*189 AD2d 712; *see also, People v Taylor,*203 AD2d 77, *Iv denied*83 NY2d 915; *People v Davis,*186 AD2d 437, *Iv denied*81 NY2d 787).

Although it is possible to infer, as respondent asserts, that she moved to the stairs in order to distance herself from the impending attack, this possibility did not render the evidence legally insufficient, and Family Court’s resolution of the factual issue thereby raised was not against the weight of the evidence *(see, People v Patton,*184 AD2d 483). Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Ross and Tom, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (i)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: June 4, 2010
    /s/ GARY H. SCHOENFELDGary H. SchoenfeldPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc.
(Principal Executive Officer)Dated: June 4, 2010
    /s/ MICHAEL L. HENRYMichael L. HenrySr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc.
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### John A. Taylor, as Assignee, Respondent, v. Stephen R. Pinckney, Appellant.

Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs; order refusing new trial on account of newly-discovered evidence affirmed. Opinion by

Cullen, J.
From: jbarfair@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:19:14 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am pleading that you rescind the unjust and coercive mandate that all "contraceptives" and

sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance with no co-pay to patients. If you do not

reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for any organizations that provide individual

and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I strongly oppose the government forcing

free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and devices that I oppose because some of

these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches,

 Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to pay services they object to.

Sincerely,

Judy Fairbanks

Parsons, WV 26287
From: sasnakra@earthlink.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:38:31 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

please rescind the unjust and coercive mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be

covered by private health insurance with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course please

expand conscience protections for any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and

have moral or religious objections. the government should not force free insurance coverage on

Americans especially for drugs and devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion

(such as ella and Plan B).

please reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience protection for

any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such insurance to their

employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which prohibit government

discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or religious grounds. The

definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include churches, but will still

mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections will be required to

choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers, and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. please reverse course and

remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory preventive services.

Sincerely,

robert b mack

Burlingame, CA 94010
Before the First Division,

February 15, 1960

No. 63804.

protest 59/18783 (New York).

#### Sheffield Watch, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of watch bracelets and separate bezels, which are essential parts of watchcases, and that said bezels are manufactures of base metal, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. It was held that the assessment of duty shall be based on the values for said bezels, as shown on customs Form 4371 attached to the invoice covered by the entry in question.