alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: tsteinhauer2008@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:33:11 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

DO NOT MANDATE THIS ITEM!!

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Gertrude Steinhauer

Marietta, GA 30060
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 13 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 13

Encouraging increased public awareness of eating disorders and expanded 
                   research for treatment and cures.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2007

Mrs. Biggert submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Encouraging increased public awareness of eating disorders and expanded 
                   research for treatment and cures.

Whereas an estimated 5,000,000 to 10,000,000 people in the United States suffer 
        from eating disorders, including anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and 
        binge eating disorder;
Whereas eating disorders are more common among women, but an increasing number 
        of men also suffer from these disorders;
Whereas an estimated 0.5 to 3.7 percent of women in the United States will 
        suffer from anorexia nervosa in their lifetimes, an estimated 1.1 to 4.2 
        percent of women in the United States will suffer from bulimia nervosa, 
        and an estimated 2 to 5 percent of people in the United States 
        experience binge eating disorder during any given 6-month period;
Whereas anorexia nervosa has the highest premature mortality rate of any mental 
        illness;
Whereas eating disorders are associated with serious physical health 
        consequences, including irregular heartbeats, heart disease and heart 
        failure, kidney failure, osteoporosis, gastric rupture, peptic ulcer, 
        tooth decay, obesity, gall bladder disease, diabetes, and death;
Whereas eating disorders are also associated with substantial psychological 
        problems, including depression, substance abuse, and suicide; and
Whereas shame, guilt, and misunderstanding often afflict a person who suffers 
        from an eating disorder, and prevent the treatment of the disorder: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives encourages--
            (1) increasing public awareness of eating disorders;
            (2) expanding research for treatment and cures;
            (3) broadening access to treatment; and
            (4) promoting healthful eating habits and a healthy body 
        image.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA
No. 3 15 A 1 4 11 June 2015

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

v. EDDIE DANIEL BERRY

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A

- 30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C. App. ___, 7 61 S.E.2d 700 (201 4 ), finding no error in part and dismissing defendant’s appeal in part from judgment s entered o n 28 February 201 3 by Judge James E. Hardin , Jr. in Superior Court, Alamance County. Heard in the Supreme Court on 20 April 2015

.
Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Sarah Y. Meacham and Mary Carla Babb , Assistant Attorney s General, for the State

. Staples S. Hughes, Appellate Defender, by Nicholas C. Woo mer - Deters, Assistant Appellate Defender, for defendant

- appellant

.

PER CURIAM

.
For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the opinion of the Court of Appeals is reversed.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BJs Wholesale Club, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended November 1, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, Frank D. Forward, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the undersigneds knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                              
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Dated: December 3, 2008 |  | /S/ FRANK D. FORWARD         
|                        |  | Frank D. Forward             
|                        |  | Executive Vice President     
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|                        |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
December 14, 2017



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ALI RASSOULI , Appellant

NO. 14

- 15

- 00353

- CV V.

NATIONAL SIGNS HOLDI NGS, LLC, NATIONAL S IGNS, LLC, AND LOUIS GIRARD , Appellee s

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment confirming the arbitration award, signed December 5, 2016, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment . We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED

. We order appellee s , National Signs Holdings, LLC, National Signs, LLC, and Louis Girard, jointly and severally, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Exhibit



                              Peter D. Aquino 
President & CEO
Internap Corporation 
(703) 919-0237
        



October 28, 2016


Mr. R. M. Dennerlein;
Bob, 
To follow through on our discussions and interviews, I am pleased to offer you on behalf of Internap Corporation, the position of SVP & Chief Financial Officer. This offer has the support of our Compensation Committee and Board of Directors, but will be subject to a background check, and final board approval.    I will advance this process once you accept our offer.  
A summary of the offer is as follows:
		
	•
	Role and Responsibilities will include all aspects of the position of a public company CFO, as well as Corporate IT. Section 16 Officer. 


		
	•
	Reporting to the President & CEO


		
	•
	Primary location will be our Secaucus datacenter in NJ.


		
	•
	Base Salary of $275K


		
	•
	Target Cash Bonus of 50%


		
	•
	Potential for additional cash bonus up to 100% subject to Compensation Committee discretion


		
	•
	Annual Equity Grant at a value of your base salary, or $275K to start. This value will be converted into Restricted Stock, subject to a 3-year vest.  50% of the grant will be subject to time, and 50% will be subject to performance as part of the Compensation Committee’s approve metrics – TBD.


		
	•
	12 months severance, subject to clearing the first 90 days.  The Company will pay COBRA for the period under severance. The severance Amount will be paid over 12 months in the normal payroll cycle.  


		
	•
	Participation in Company benefits plans, including medical, dental, 401K, etc.


		
	•
	4 weeks vacation 
















If these terms are acceptable to you, we will proceed expeditiously to work towards a November 14th start date. I appreciate your reply in the next couple of days.


/s/ Robert Dennerlein                     Date: 10/28/16
Robert M. Dennerlein 


/s/ Peter Aquino                     Date 10/28/16
Peter D. Aquino




















CC: Chairman of the Compensation Committee – Charles B. Coe
       And the Board of Directors 


Private & Confidential – Internap Corporation
Before the Second Division,

August 1, 1967

No. P67/257.

#### Chadwick-Miller Importers, Inc. *v.*United States, protest 62/18542 (Boston).

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of battery-operated manicure sets; that said merchandise contains as an essential feature - an electrical element or device without which said articles would not operate, and does not contain an electrical heating element; and that the principles involved are the same as those in *Bruce Duncan Com*pany, *a/c Sims-Worms*v. *United States*(45 Cust. Ct. 85, C.D. 2202), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: lannym@ku.edu

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:20:57 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Lanny Maddux

Lawrence, KS 66046
No. 60197.

protests 239257-K, etc. (New York).

#### R. J Saunders Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Angora rabbit hair similar in all material respects to that the subject of *W. N. Proctor Company*v. *United States*(35 Cust. Ct. 89, C. D. 1727), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 62213.

#### Fabry Associates, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 306008-K (A) and 301008-K (B) (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of chairs similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Davies Turner & Co.*v. *United States*(45 C. C. P. A. 39, C. A. D. 669), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: cindyking35@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:51:38 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Lucenda King

Lufkin, TX 75901
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-83,850-01

EX PARTE FRANCISCO JAVIER HERNANDEZ, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

 CAUSE NO. W13-57851-Y (A) IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NUMBER

SEVEN

FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of driving while

intoxicated and sentenced to fifty years’ imprisonment. 

Applicant contends that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance because she failed to

timely file a notice of appeal. 

The trial court, after obtaining a responsive affidavit from counsel, has determined that

counsel failed to timely file a notice of appeal. We find that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity
2

to file an out-of-time appeal of the judgment of conviction in Cause No. F13-57851-Y from the

Criminal District Court No. Seven District Court of Dallas County. Applicant is ordered returned

to that time at which he may give a written notice of appeal so that he may then, with the aid of

counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal. Within ten days of the issuance of this opinion, the trial court

shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented

by counsel, the trial court shall immediately appoint an attorney to represent Applicant on direct

appeal. All time limits shall be calculated as if the sentence had been imposed on the date on which

the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he

must take affirmative steps to file a written notice of appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the

mandate of this Court issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department ofCriminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division. 

Delivered: September 23, 2015

Do not publish
Searched for **https://www.carboncyclescience.us/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.carboncyclescience.us/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
From: degroot.evelyn@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:11:36 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Evelyn DeGroot

Manteca, CA 95336
From: gywhit@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:39:46 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Gerald Whitmarsh

Edmonds, WA 98020