alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Registration No. 333-73083 424 (b)(2)
                                     Pricing Supplement No:236 Cusip:14912LE56
                                     Dated:  June 03,1999

	Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation
	Medium-Term Notes, Series F
	(Fixed Rate)
	With Maturities of 9 Months or More from Date of Issue
	Interest payable each April 1 and October 1 and at Maturity

Principal Amount:       Interest Rate:                Proceed Amount:
$14,000,000                 6.57%                       $13,965,000

Original Issue Date:    Commission Fee:               Maturity Date:
06/08/1999                $35,000                       03/03/2003

Dealer:
Salomon Smith Barney


Specified Currency:     Option to Elect Payment       Authorized Denominations
x U.S. dollars          in U.S. dollars               (only applicable if
_ Other:___________     (only applicable if           Specified Currency is
                        Specified Currency is         other than U.S.
                        other than U.S. dollars):      N/A
                           N/A

The Note is a:                                        Exchange Rate Agent
    X Global Note                                     (if other than First
      Certificated Note                                Trust New York): N/A
      (only applicable if
       Specified Currency
       is other than U.S. dollars)

Original Issue           Total Amount of OID: N/A    Terms of Amortizing
Discount Note:                                       Notes:  N/A
   Yes     x No          Issue Price (expressed
                         as a percentage of
                         aggregate principal
                         amount): 100%


Redemption Date(s) (including                        Redemption Price(s): N/A
any applicable regular or
special record dates): N/A

Repayment Date(s) (including                         Repayment Price(s): N/A
any applicable regular or
special record dates):  N/A

Interest Rate Reset Option:  _ Yes    X No

Optional Reset Dates (only applicable if option to reset interest rate):  N/A

Basis for Interest Rate Reset (only applicable if option to reset interest
rate): N/A

Stated Maturity Extension Option:  _ Yes    x No

Extension Period(s) and Final Maturity Date (only applicable if option to
extend stated maturity): N/A

Basis for Interest Rate During Extension Period (only applicable if option to
extend stated maturity): N/A



Historical Exchange Rate (only applicable if Specified Currency other than
U.S. dollars): N/A

     The interest rates on the Notes may be changed by Caterpillar Financial
Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect
the interest rate on any Note ordered prior to the effective date of the
change.  Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $740.80MM principal
amount of the Notes had been sold at interest rates then in effect.

	_________________________________

	Pricing Supplement to Prospectus Supplement dated March 25, 1999
	and Prospectus dated March 25, 1999
From: ron.barton@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:00:12 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ron Barton

Littleton, CO 80122
From: unclelarry1@me.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:47:06 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I'm not the shiniest nickel in the bag but even I can figure out this is one terrible idea.

First, it is crazy from an economic standpoint. People who do not want a service will be forced to pay

for the service for someone else who may not know they want it until they find it is free.

Second, it puts the sociological and moral choice of birth control and abortions that are favored by the

present administration in the legally mandated position.

This is just one example of President Obama's liberal team run amock with the will of the people.

Larry

Sincerely,

Larry Stephens

North Palm Beach, FL 33408
From: vmackimd@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:45:18 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients.

If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for any organizations that

provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I strongly oppose the

government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and devices that I

oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Victoria Macki

Ellensburg, WA 98926
From: lgilde@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:23:21 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Lothar Gilde

Mc Cook, NE 69001
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   1-MO
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          829282
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   830326
<ALLOWANCES>                                     42000
<INVENTORY>                                     929375
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2588983
<PP&E>                                         2387441
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2106380
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3222464
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1438832
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         59004
<OTHER-SE>                                     1404905
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3222464
<SALES>                                         746889
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                746889
<CGS>                                           423161
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   423161
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                486824
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                163096
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                9832
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (146064)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (146064)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (146064)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of E-Dispatch Inc. (the
"Company") for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Roderick Macutay, certify, to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) on
          78o(d)); and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: May 10, 2010                    By: /s/ Roderick Macutay
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Roderick Macutay, President, Treasurer
                                          and Director
                                          (Principal Financial Officer and
                                          Principal Accounting Officer)
From: bev4him@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:36:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Beverly Wood

Spokane, WA 99206
#### Claudia Goldman, Appellant, v Allstate Insurance Companies et al., Respondents.

[631 NYS2d 893]

—In an action to *382recover proceeds due under an insurance policy, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from stated portions of (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Owen, J.), dated April 14, 1994, which, *inter alia,*granted the motion of the defendant Allstate Insurance Companies for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against it, and (2) an order of the same court, dated November 23, 1994, which, *inter alia,*denied the plaintiff’s motion to vacate an order of the same court, dated May 25, 1994.

Ordered that the order dated April 14, 1994, is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it it further,

Ordered that the order dated November 23, 1994, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, for reasons stated by Justice Owen at the Supreme Court; and it is further,

Ordered that the defendants are awarded one bill of costs.

With respect to the order dated April 14, 1994, it is well settled that a claimant’s failure to file sworn proof of loss within 60 days after the demand therefor constitutes an absolute defense to an action to recover damages under an insurance policy absent a waiver of the requirement by the insurance carrier or conduct on its part estopping its assertion of the defense *(see, Marino Constr. Corp. v INA Underwriters Ins. Co.,*69 NY2d 798; *Igbara Realty Corp. v New York Prop. Ins. Underwriting Assn.,*63 NY2d 201; *Litter v Allstate Ins. Co.,*208 AD2d 602). Contrary to the plaintiff’s contention, the court did not err in granting the motion of Allstate Insurance Companies (hereinafter Allstate) for summary judgment. The plaintiff failed to file proof of loss within the 60-day deadline and the evidence does not support the allegation that Allstate waived the proof of loss requirement or that it should be estopped from asserting the defense *(see, Marino Constr. Corp. v INA Underwriters Ins. Co., supra; Maleh v New York Prop. Ins. Underwriting Assn.,*64 NY2d 613; *Brostowin v Hanover Ins. Co.,*154 AD2d 418; *Hindi v New York Prop. Ins. Underwriting Assn.,*120 AD2d 566). Bracken, J. P., Rosenblatt, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Search Help More Search Options

Printable Version 

### Fluorescent and Incandescent Lamps Energy Conservation Standard Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Analytical Spreadsheets The Department of Energy prepared the analytical spreadsheets below for the Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking stage of its energy conservation standards rulemaking on fluorescent and incandescent lamps. ANOPR Analytical Spreadsheets

z Life-Cycle Cost Spreadsheet ( Excel 17 MB )

z General Service Fluorescent Lamp National Impact Analysis Spreadsheet ( Excel 2.7 MB )

z Incandescent Reflector Lamp National Impact Analysis Spreadsheet ( Excel 5.7 MB )

Printable Version EERE Information Center Pa g e 1 of 2 A pp liances and Commercial E q ui p ment Standards: Fluorescent and Incandescent Lam p s En...

10/7/2008 htt p ://www1.eere.ener gy
. g ov/buildin g s/a pp liance

_ standards/residential/ g s

_ fluorescent

_ incan...Building Technologies Program Home | EERE Home | U.S. Department of Energy Webmaster | Web Site Policies | Security & Privacy | USA.gov Content Last Updated: 06/13/2008 Pa g e 2 of 2 A pp liances and Commercial E q ui p ment Standards: Fluorescent and Incandescent Lam p s En...

10/7/2008 htt p ://www1.eere.ener gy
. g ov/buildin g s/a pp liance

_ standards/residential/ g s

_ fluorescent

_ incan...
From: emhess@heritagewifi.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:46:30 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Edward Hess

Nampa, ID 83687
To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:41:43 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Tori Gravlee

Climax, GA 39834