alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: greg_nan_goodman@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:23:23 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Nancy Goodman

Villa Ridge, MO 63089
Amendment No. 2 to Affiliation Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.61 
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO 
 AFFILIATION AGREEMENT 

This Amendment No. 2 (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of December     , 2012, by and between
Cancer Genetics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“CGI”), and Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation (“Mayo”), amends that certain Affiliation Agreement, dated as of November 7,
2011, as amended by Amendment No. 1, by and between CGI and Mayo (the “Affiliation Agreement”). To the extent not otherwise defined herein, the capitalized terms used herein shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Affiliation
Agreement. 
 WITNESSETH: 
 WHEREAS, Section 7.5 of the Affiliation Agreement provides that the Affiliation Agreement may be amended by the unanimous written consent of the Members which, as of the date hereof, are CGI
and Mayo; 
 WHEREAS, Section 5.1 of the Affiliation Agreement sets forth that the Closing shall take place on
December 15, 2012 or on such earlier date as the Parties mutually agree; and 
 WHEREAS, the Parties desire to enter
into this Amendment to extend the Closing Date to March 31, 2013 or such earlier date as the Parties mutually agree. 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and covenants hereafter contained, the parties hereto, intending to be legally
bound, hereby agree as follows: 
 1. The words “December 15, 2012” contained in Section 5.1 of the Affiliation
Agreement shall be replaced in their entirety by the words “March 31, 2013.” 
 2. Other than as specifically set
forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Affiliation Agreement are and will remain unchanged and in full force and effect. 
 3. This Amendment shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota without regard to conflicts of law principles. 

4. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts (facsimile or other electronic signatures shall be deemed acceptable and binding), each
of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each party has executed, or caused to be executed by a duly
authorized individual, this Amendment as of the date first set forth above. 
  

					
	CANCER GENETICS, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Panna L. Sharma
		 	Name:	 	Panna L. Sharma
		 	Title:	 	CEO & President

 MAYO FOUNDATION FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH 

					
		
	By:	 	/s/ James A. Rogers III
		 	Name:	 	James A. Rogers III
		 	Title:	 	Chair, Mayo Clinic Ventures

 [Signature Page to Amendment No. 2 to Affiliation Agreement]
From: eojala@zgf.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:23:58 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Erik Ojala

Beaverton, OR 97007
Report on
Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria
   Midland
Loan Services, Inc. ("Midland"), an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of The PNC
Financial Services Group, Inc., is responsible for assessing compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB of the
Securities and Exchange Commission ("Regulation AB") relating to its role in the
servicing of commercial mortgage-backed securities transactions.
  Midland
has assessed its compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of and for
the year ended December 31, 2008. In making this assessment, Midland used the
criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") in Item
1122(d) of Regulation AB. The transactions covered by this report include
commercial mortgage-backed securities that were issued on or after January 1,
2006 and that were registered with the SEC pursuant to the Securities Act of
1933 (the "Platform").
  Based on
such assessment, Midland believes that, as of and for the year ended December
31, 2008, Midland has complied in all material respects with the servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB relating to its role in the
servicing of commercial mortgage-backed securities transactions, except for
servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)(B), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C),
1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and
1122(d)(4)(xv), which Midland has determined as being inapplicable to the
activities it performs with respect to the commercial mortgage-backed securities
transactions being serviced (the "applicable servicing criteria").
  Deloitte
& Touche LLP, anindependent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation
report on Midland's assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing
criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008.
   MIDLAND
LOAN SERVICES, INC.
    /s/
      Steven W. Smith
              /s/
      Vincent E. Beckett
              /s/
      Bradley J. HaugerSteven W.
      Smith
              Vincent E.
      Beckett
              Bradley J.
      HaugerPresident
      and
              Executive Vice
      President
              Senior Vice
      PresidentChief Operating
      Officer
              Chief Administrative
      Officer
              Servicing
      Operations
   Date:
February 20, 2009
    A
      Member of the PNC Financial Services Group10851 Mastin P.O. Box
      25965 Shawnee Mission Kansas 66225-5965www.midlandls.com 
      913 253 9000 T   913 253 9709
F
Request for Information (FAA-2015-2733) 

9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA) 

Dear Mr. Caska:

 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA-2015-2733). 

This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 

8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closedset filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date 

listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov. Once your 

information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary 

information), as well as your comment tracking number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If

you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by November 5, 

2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999 .

 

Thank you for your interest in aviation safety. 

FAA Office of Rulemaking 

Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 11:36 AM 

To: tom@aerolens.com.au
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 466 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 466

Honoring and recognizing the achievements of Barbara Hillary, the first 
       African-American woman on record to reach the North Pole.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 6, 2007

Mr. Meeks of New York (for himself, Mr. Towns, Mrs. Jones of Ohio, Mr. 
  Payne, Ms. Clarke, Mr. Cummings, Mr. Davis of Alabama, Ms. Moore of 
Wisconsin, Mr. Ellison, Mr. Clay, Mr. Lewis of Georgia, Mr. Johnson of 
Georgia, Ms. Carson, Mr. Al Green of Texas, Mr. Cleaver, Mr. Watt, Mr. 
Scott of Georgia, Ms. Lee, Mr. Rush, Mr. Wynn, Ms. Waters, Mr. Scott of 
Virginia, Mr. Butterfield, Mr. Bishop of Georgia, Mrs. Christensen, Mr. 
    Davis of Illinois, Ms. Watson, and Mr. Jefferson) submitted the 
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight 
                         and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Honoring and recognizing the achievements of Barbara Hillary, the first 
       African-American woman on record to reach the North Pole.

Whereas Barbara Hillary, a retired nurse and community activist, has always had 
        an adventurous spirit;
Whereas after learning that no African-American woman had ever reached the North 
        Pole, Barbara Hillary hired a personal trainer, enrolled in cross-
        country skiing lessons, and raised money for the trek;
Whereas, on April 23, 2007, at 75 years old, Barbara Hillary, accompanied by 2 
        trained guides, became the first woman on record to reach the North 
        Pole;
Whereas, although not recognized for decades after accomplishing this feat in 
        1909, Matthew Henson was the first Black man to reach the North Pole;
Whereas Matthew Henson is a hero and an inspiration to Barbara Hillary;
Whereas, although such record-keeping is not perfect, there is no known record 
        of a Black woman reaching the North Pole before Barbara Hillary; and
Whereas, through her experience, Barbara Hillary has been inspired to become a 
        global warming activist, and she plans to lecture groups on the effects 
        of global warming that she personally witnessed and advise groups on 
        what they can do to help: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives honors and recognizes 
the achievements of Barbara Hillary.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.1

 STATEMENT UNDER OATH OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
 OFFICER REGARDING FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES RELATING TO EXCHANGE ACT FILINGS


I, M. David Schwartz, state and attest that:

(1)      To the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the covered reports
         of Phar-Mor, Inc., and except as corrected or supplemented in a
         subsequent covered report:

         o        no covered report contained an untrue statement of a material
                  fact as of the end of the period covered by such report (or in
                  the case of a report on Form 8-K or definitive proxy
                  materials, as of the date on which it was filed); and

         o        no covered report omitted to state a material fact necessary
                  to make the statements in the covered report, in light of the
                  circumstances under which they were made, not misleading as of
                  the end of the period covered by such report (or in the case
                  of a report on Form 8-K or definitive proxy materials, as of
                  the date on which it was filed).

(2)      I have reviewed the contents of this statement with the Company's audit
         committee.

(3)      In this statement under oath, each of the following, if filed on or
         before the date of this statement, is a "covered report":

         o        Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended June 30, 2001
                  of Phar-Mor, Inc. filed with the Commission.

         o        all reports on Form 10-Q, all reports on Form 8-K and all
                  definitive proxy materials of Phar-Mor, Inc. filed with the
                  Commission subsequent to the filing of the Form 10-K
                  identified above; and

         o        any amendments to any of the foregoing.


     /s/ M. David Schwartz                Subscribed and sworn to before me this
     ----------------------------         8th day of August 2002.
     M. David Schwartz, President
        and Chief Operating Officer

     Date:  August 8, 2002                /s/ Susan Senich
                                          -----------------------
                                          Notary Public

                                          My Commission Expires:
                                          August 12, 2002
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 185 (Tuesday, September 26, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 65950]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20885]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-35-2023]


Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 207; Authorization of Production 
Activity; LEGO Manufacturing Richmond, Inc. (LEGO[supreg] Bricks and 
Toy Sets), Chester and Colonial Heights, Virginia

    On May 24, 2023, the LEGO Group submitted a notification of 
proposed production activity to the FTZ Board on behalf of LEGO 
Manufacturing Richmond, Inc., within FTZ 207, for its facilities in 
Chester and Colonial Heights, Virginia.
    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations 
of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal 
Register inviting public comment (88 FR 35832, June 1, 2023). On 
September 21, 2023, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's 
decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this 
time. The production activity described in the notification was 
authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, 
including section 400.14.

    Dated: September 21, 2023.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-20885 Filed 9-25-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Exemption	Request	under	Section	333	of	the	FAA	Reform	Act	of	2012

I,	Shay	Moody,	Licensed	A&P	Mechanic (certificate #2854461),	of	29	Ben	West Dr.	

Cedartown,	GA	30125 am	petitioning	the	Federal	Aviation	Administration	(FAA)	for	

an	exemption	from	part	21,	subpart	H;	and	Sections	45.23(b),	91.9(b)(2),	91.119,	

91.121,	91.151(a),	91.203(a)	and	(b),	91.405(a),	91.407(a)(1),	91.409(a)(2),	and	

91.417(a)	and	(b)	of	Title	14,	Code	of	Federal Regulations	(14	CFR).	This	proposed	

exemption	would	allow	me	to	operate	a	DJI Inspire	1	Quad	Copter	Unmanned	Aerial	

System	(UAS) and	a	Quanum	Nova	Quad	Copter	Unmanned	Aerial	System	(UAS) for	

the	purpose	of	aerial inspection,	videography	and	photography.		This	proposed	

exemption	would	allow	me	to	operate	a	PrecisionHawk	Lancaster	Unmanned	Aerial	

System	(UAS)	and	a	MicroPilot	CropCam	Unmanned	Aerial	System	(UAS)	for	the	

purpose	of	aerial	mapping	and	agricultural	assessment. The	use	of	a	UAS	for	these	

activities will bring an overhead perspective that was previously only possible

through the prohibitively expensive use of rotorcraft and fixed wing aircraft with

expensive camera equipment. I would bring this service at an affordable price and

due	to the simple nature of the UAS, with substantial time savings	and	safety.

I	will utilize my knowledge as a Licensed	A&P of	20	years	and	my 25	years	of	

experience	as	an	R/C	pilot to maintain the highest level of safety during the

proposed use of the UAS. Flight would consist of three parts: preflight, flight and

post flight. The preflight will consist of extensive inspections of the area, the UAS

and the airspace in which it will be operating. A detailed inspection of the UAS will

be conducted and all major systems will be examined, including power plant,

airframe and controls. Any discrepancy will be noted and if the discrepancy affects

the safety of the flight, the flight will not commence. Operations will only commence

in reasonably safe environments that will be strictly controlled during the flight of

the UAS. The area will be surveyed for obstacles	that	could affect the safety of the

flight. There will be no flights within the proximity of active airports without first

contacting the appropriate agencies or	authorities to ensure the highest level of

safety and compliance with all regulations. Operations will also not commence

where there is a	reasonable possibility of inadvertent physical contact with the

populace. During the	flight portion of the operation, safety will be the primary

concern. Given the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area of the UAS; flight will

be inherently safe. The UAS will not be operated above individuals not associated with

its operation and care will be given to avoid property that was noted during the preflight

inspection of the area. All flights will be conducted using VLOS under 400’ AGL. The 

UAS models I will use all have GPS guidance and “return to home” safety feature 

installed. All flights will be conducted with a pilot and a safety observer.
No. 65170.

#### Pivar Goodman Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 248988-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of pile ribbons made of synthetic textile similar in use to pile ribbons, wholly or in chief value of silk, and following the principles set forth in *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: manofmissions@juno.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:06:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Terry Phillips

Springfield, OH 45504