alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| Exhibit      32.2 |
|-------------------|

|   | 1. | The      Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;      and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ ANTHONY J.      GALICI                                 |
|------------------------------------------------------------|
| Anthony      J. Galici                                     |
| Vice      President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary |
| October 8,      2008                                  |
1

Sutton, Lisa

From: Mastro, Donna

Sent: Monday, May 25, 2015 7:06 AM

To: Brachtl, Megan; Sutton, Lisa; Johansen, Amy

Subject: FW: SSM SIP Call Final Rule

Attachments: McCabe letter to air directors final SSM SIP call 05-22-15.pdf; SSM SIP final rule_Fact 

Sheet.pdf

Delaware

Donna L. Mastro - EPA Region III – ORC - Air Branch Chief - (215) 814-2777 

From: Esher, Diana  

Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 2:09 PM

To: Mirzakhalili, Ali (DNREC); ronald.amirikian@state.de.us

Cc: Arnold, David; Johansen, Amy; Mastro, Donna; Fernandez, Cristina

Subject: SSM SIP Call Final Rule

I’m writing to inform you that earlier today, the Administrator signed a final action to ensure states have in 

place air pollution rules that apply to sources at all times, including periods of startup, shutdown, or 

malfunction (SSM). 

EPA is calling for 36 states, including your state, to make changes to their State Implementation Plans (SIPs), to 

protect public health and ensure consistency with the Clean Air Act and EPA’s current SSM Policy. In 

response to this action, your state will need to correct specific SSM provisions in your state plan as indicated in 

the final action. 

The Clean Air Act allows a maximum of 18 months from the issuance of the final action to submit a SIP 

revision. Therefore your revised SIP submission is due to EPA by November 22, 2016. 

For your information, here is the link to the pre-publication version of the final action signed today. 

http://www.epa.gov/airquality/urbanair/sipstatus/emissions.html

SSM provisions for Delaware are addressed in final action’s prepublication version, under section IX, at 

subsection D. 1 (p. 453). 

I have also attached a copy of a notification letter signed by Acting Assistant Administrator Janet McCabe and a 

copy of the SSM Fact Sheet for your information. 

We will continue to work closely with you to ensure this SIP revision process is as efficient as possible. Please 

let me know if your have any questions. 

Diana Esher 

Director, Air Protection Division 

EPA Region 3 

215-814-2706 

esher.diana@epa.gov
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Innovative Wireless Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Pavel Alpatov, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Pavel AlpatovPavel AlpatovPrincipal Executive OfficerMarch 8, 2011
No. P68/491.

protests 67/8136, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### Standard Brands Paint Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Newman, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of wooden doors similar in all material respects to those the subject of *B. A. McKenzie & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(58 Cust. Ct. 460, C.D. 3020) and that the items of merchandise marked “B” covered by the foregoing protests consists of folding doors similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Gitkin Co.*v. *United States*(58 Cust. Ct. 383, C.D. 2997), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: Lmyers2@kc.rr.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:21:24 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Bernadette Myers

Mission, KS 66202
#### Donald L. BENGE; Michael Benge; Robert Anderes; Roxan Anderes, Plaintiffs—Appellants, v. WESTERN COATING, INC., an Oregon corporation; ABC Coating Company, Incorporated of Colorado, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 04-35141

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Aug. 4, 2005.

Decided Aug. 18, 2005.

Paul J. Dayton, Esq., Short Cressman & Burgess, PLLC, Seattle, WA, Scott L. Jensen, Esq., Brownstein, Rask, Sweeney, Kerr, Grim, DeSylvia & Hay, LLP, Portland, OR, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

K. Patrick Neill, Esq., Hershner, Hunter, Moulton, Andrews, Eugene, OR, Barnes H. Ellis, Esq., James N. West-wood, Esq., Beverly C. Pearman, Esq., Stoel Rives, LLP, Portland, OR, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: THOMPSON, T.G. NELSON, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

ORDER *

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED for the reasons set forth in its order filed on December 18, 2003.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Before the First Division,

November 20, 1968

No. P68/495.

protest 67/81188 (New York).

#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

*668Maletz, J.

In accordance with, stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of nodding head animals similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Wilson’s Customs Clearance, Inc.*v. *United States*(59 Cust. Ct. 36, C.D. 3061), and that said merchandise is wholly or in chief value of iron or steel, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
H. Res. 401 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 5, 2007. 

Whereas June 2, 2007, is observed as National Trails Day; 

Whereas there are over 200,000 miles of trails in the United 

States, providing access to public lands for recreational 

and educational opportunities; 

Whereas trails enrich communities throughout the United 

States by helping to protect habitats, watersheds, and 

cultural and historic artifacts; 

Whereas 72.1 percent of all Americans age 16 and older participate in at least one of twenty-two designated outdoor 

activities, including hiking, backpacking, and trail running; 

Whereas National Trails Day events take place in all 50 

States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, and 

the United States Virgin Islands to celebrate trails, recognize volunteers, and maintain local trails; 

Whereas thousands of volunteers and event coordinators 

throughout the United States make National Trails Day 

events possible; and 

Whereas 2007 is the 15th Anniversary Celebration of National Trails Day: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 
2 

•HRES 401 EH 

(1) supports the goals and ideals of National Trails 

Day; and 

(2) honors the contributions National Trails Day 

has made to inspire the public and trail enthusiasts to 

discover, learn about, maintain, and celebrate trails. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of PanAmSat Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph
R. Wright, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the issuer.

                                               /s/   Joseph R. Wright
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                                  Joseph R. Wright
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 6, 2003
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1067 PLATE 2

EXPLANATION

.
Scales of 1:50,000 and larger

Scales of 1:50,000 to 1:100,000
Seales of 1:100,000 to 1:600,000

Scales of 1:600,000 and smaller

WL,

Based only on traverse lines

Compiled by
Geographic Branch, Division of Charts INTERIOR-GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, WASHINGTON, D.C
Coast and Geodetic Survey, Washington, D.C. MRi9a9

APPRAISAL OF WORLD NAUTICAL CHART COVERAGE
From: piquetwalters@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44 in the Land of the Free??

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:03:47 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Paul Walters

Mountain Top, PA 18707
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Air Transport Group Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending April 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Arnold
Leonora, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of April
15, 2009.


/s/ Arnold Leonora
------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
From: angies710@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:59:55 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Angela Selgren

Fort Collins, CO 80525
From: dtharden3@netzero.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:14:55 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

David Harden

Delray Beach, FL 33444
No. 69250.

#### Louis Marx *&*Co. *v.*United States,

protest 63/19002 (San Francisco).

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of paperweights or snow scenes similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 67488, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 32.01    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Media Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bryant D. Cragun, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.     /s/ Bryant D. Cragun  __________________________________________ By: Bryant D. Cragun Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  Dated: March 31, 2011  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| RATES      EFFECTIVE for Variable Denomination Floating Rate Demand      Notesas of July 20, 2009: |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)   | Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                 |   |                                                           |   |
|----------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date: March 31, 2011 | By:    | /s/ David J. Corcoran                                     |   |
|                 |   | David J. Corcoran                                              |   |
|                 |   | Principal Accounting OfficerCuraxis Pharmaceutical Corporation |   |
|                 |   |                                                           |   |