alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 521 

Celebrating the 75th Anniversary of the 1932 Winter Olympic Games in 

Lake Placid, New York. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 27, 2007 

Mrs. GILLIBRAND (for herself, Mr. MCHUGH, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. ARCURI, 

Mr. CROWLEY, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. HIGGINS, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. KUHL of 

New York, Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York, Mr. MCNULTY, Mrs. 

MALONEY of New York, Mr. MEEKS of New York, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. 

REYNOLDS, Mr. SERRANO, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Mr. WALSH of New York, 

Mr. FILNER, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. TANNER, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. BRADY

of Pennsylvania, Mr. KLEIN of Florida, Mr. LANTOS, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. 

MILLER of North Carolina, Mr. HINOJOSA, and Ms. LINDA T. SA ́NCHEZ

of California) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Celebrating the 75th Anniversary of the 1932 Winter 

Olympic Games in Lake Placid, New York. 

Whereas Lake Placid, New York, was the site of the 1932 

and 1980 Winter Olympic Games; 

Whereas Lake Placid is the only site in North America to 

have hosted the Winter Olympic Games more than once; 

Whereas the 1980 Winter Olympic Games featured one of the 

greatest triumphs in sports history with the men’s United 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 521 IH 

States hockey team victory over the Soviet team in the 

‘‘Miracle on Ice’’; 

Whereas Lake Placid, New York, has a population of under 

2,700 residents, yet welcomes over 2.2 million visitors 

each year; 

Whereas the residents of Lake Placid were wonderful ambassadors of the United States for the 1,324 Olympic athletes that participated in the 1932 and 1980 Winter 

Olympic Games; 

Whereas the residents of Lake Placid take great pride in 

their place in Olympic history; 

Whereas Lake Placid and the towns of North Elba and Wilmington have world class sports facilities that serve as an 

excellent training location for athletes and sports enthusiasts; 

Whereas Lake Placid is the home of one of the three U.S. 

Olympic Committee’s national training centers; 

Whereas Lake Placid continues to successfully host international sports competitions on a regular basis; and 

Whereas 2007 marks the 75th anniversary of the 1932 Winter Olympic Games: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) congratulates the Village of Lake Placid, 

3 New York, as it celebrates its 75th anniversary of 

4 hosting the 1932 Winter Olympic Games; 

5 (2) encourages all Americans to visit the state6 of-the-art Olympic facilities in Lake Placid; 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 521 IH 

1 (3) recognizes Lake Placid’s important place in 

2 Olympic history; and 

3 (4) encourages the United States Olympic Com4 mittee to select Lake Placid to represent the United 

5 States in a future bid for the Olympic and 

6 Paralympic Winter Games. 

Æ 


cnoel on PRODPC60 with BILLS
Before the First Division,

March 29, 1967

No. P67/83.

#### Morris Friedman & Co. *v.*United States,

protests 65/60, etc. (Philadelphia).

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of bulrush baskets similar in all material respects to the rush baskets the subject of *Carson M. Simon*& *Co.*v. *United States*(55 Cust. Ct. 103, C.D. 2558), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

(Note : The following protests were decided by a special first division consisting of Oliver, Watson, and Rao, Judges.)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7771

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

AROZ KENYON BRIDGES, a/k/a Ken,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, 

District Judge. (5:01-cr-00016-BO-2; 5:12-cv-00506-BO)

Submitted: April 29, 2014 Decided: May 2, 2014

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, G. Alan DuBois, 

First Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North 

Carolina, for Appellant. Thomas G. Walker, United States 

Attorney, Jennifer P. May-Parker, Shailika K. Shah, Assistant 

United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Aroz Kenyon Bridges appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion as untimely. We 

have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record and conclude 

that the district court lacked jurisdiction to consider what is 

Bridges’ second § 2255 motion absent prefiling authorization 

from this court. United States v. Winestock, 340 F.3d 200, 205 

(4th Cir. 2003). Accordingly, we affirm the dismissal of the 

motion on that ground. See United States v. Smith, 395 F.3d 

516, 519 (4th Cir. 2005). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Before ti-ie Second Division,

March 22, 1967

No. P67/71.

#### Bloomfield Industries, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 65/15755-15079 (Chicago).

Rao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of battery-powered mixers or swizzle sticks similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Bloomfield*Industries, *Inc.*v. *United States*(54 Cust. Ct. 287, Abstract 68974), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: ben_gaye@juno.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:55:30 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ben Kent

Quincy, FL 32351
BEFORE JUDGE WILSON,

NOVEMBER 27, 1968

No. R68/42.

reappraisement 288587-A (Chicago).

#### Dorf International, Inc., and American Foreign Industries, Inc. *v.*United States,

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues are the same in all material respects as those involved in *Stockheimer & Harder*and *American Foreign*Industries, *Inc.*v. *United States*(58 Cust. Ct. 801, A.R.D. 218), the court found and held that cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402(f), Tariff Act of 3930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the *679involved, fish, hooks and that such value was the invoiced unit value, packed, or plus packing where not included in the invoice unit price.
Exhibit 10.7 - Renuell Regenetech Agreement

  

 EXHIBIT 10.7
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Renuell Intl, Inc. Distribution Agreement
 

 Amendment Two
 

 THIS Amendment Two to that certain Distribution Agreement, ("Agreement") of December 29, 2011 by and between Regenetech, Inc., a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Texas, U.S.A., (hereinafter known as "RGT"), and Renuell Intl Inc. a Florida Corporation duly organized under the laws of State of Florida, U.S.A., (hereinafter known as "RII"), for and in the consideration expressed in the Agreement, and in this Amenment Two, agree as follows:
 Use of AMA Laboratories, Inc., Final Report, dated February 22, 2012; AMA Ref. No.: MS11INUSE.M3547.REP.REG (hereinafter known as the "Report") . RGT hereby grants non-exclusive rights to RII to use the Report. RII shall submit, in writing, all uses of the Report to RGT for approval or rejection, prior to any uses of the Report. RGT may terminate this Amendment Two, at any time, and within its sole discretion by giving RII written notice. The Report may only be used by RII to further the purposes of the Agreement, and upon termination of the Agreement, RII shall cease and desist from any use of the Report in any manner. RII shall indemnify RGT, and its directors, officers, employees and agents, and defend and hold each of them, individually, or collectively, harmless from and against any and all claims, losses, damages, liabilities, costs, or expenses of any kind or nature (including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses) in connection with RII’s use of, or reliance upon the Report, and from any and all claims, losses, damages, liabilities, costs, or expenses of any kind or nature (including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses) arising out of, or related to this Amendment Two. RGT may supply AMA Laboratories, Inc. a copy of this Amendment Two. 
 

 There are no other changes to the Agreement.
 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment Two to the Agreement to be executed and effective as of May 7, 2012.
 "RGT"
Regenetech, Inc. 

By: _____________________
Name: Kyle Shanks
Title: President
---

Exhibit 32.1

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
|-------------------------------------------------
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906               
|OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002                

The undersigned, Anson Yiu Ming Fong, the Chairman of the Board
of SINO GREEN LAND CORPORATION (the Company), DO HEREBY CERTIFY that:

|1. | The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal
      year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report), fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|2. | Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
      the Company.                                                               

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this
statement this 29th day of April 2010.

| | /s/ Anson Yiu Ming Fong      
| | -----------------------------
| | Anson Yiu Ming Fong          
| | Chairman of the Board        
| | (Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Sino Green Land Corporation and will be retained by
Sino Green Land Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to §18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.

---
Before the Third Division,

February 26, 1957

No. 60516.

#### Canada Dry Ginger Ale Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 219388-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams*& *Co., Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 130, C. A. D. 508) and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
STATE OF DELAWARE 

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
 

AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL
 

OFFICE OF THE 89 KINGS HIGHWAY	 PHONE: (302) 739-9000

SECRETARY	 DOVER, DELAWARE 19901 FAX: (302) 739-6242

June 15,2009 

Mr. William C. Early (3RAOGI
 

Acting Regional Admimstrator
 

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
 

Region III
 

1650 Arch Street
 

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029
 

Dear Mr. Early: 

I am pleased to submit the enclosed revisions to the State of Delaware State Implementation Plan 

(SIP) for the Attainment and Maintenance of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for 

Ozone. The revisions are to 36 regulations, which have already been approved by EPA, and include 

making administrative and non-substantive changes to all Delaware SIP Regulations and to make the 

regulations consistent with the 2006 Delaware Manual for Drafting Regulations. The effective date of 

these revisions is September 11, 2008. 

The requirements of the CAA Section 11 0(a)(2)(A) have been met through the normal public 

hearing process established by the State of Delaware with proper notification (30 days) prior to the 

convening of the public hearing. A public hearing was held on July 31,.2008. Attachments A and Bare 

copies of affidavits as proof of proper notification. It is the position of the State of Delaware that all 

minimum requirements set forth in the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments have been met. 

We look forward to continuing the cooperative effort between Delaware and EPA in this 

important work. As always, feel free to contact me or Ali Mirzakhalili, Administrator, (302) 739-9402, if 

you have any questions concerning the enclosed documents. 

Sincerely, _. 

/"/;~'..--,~ /	 _ ,?, ".--/-r;~ .;)/ l

/ . --- ::.------ -C -<.­ '­

~e-(jllin P. O'Mara 

Secretary 

cc:	 Diana Esher, EPA w/encl.
 

James Werner, Director, DAWM
 

Ali Mirzakhalili
p130205.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0205

Focus Ready Draft 1/31/2013

ENGINEER: Choudhary \ EV

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 1
p130205.eng

 

SAT (concerns) (01/18/2013):

Migration to groundwater: Slow

PBT rating: P2B1T1

Health: 2 Dermal, Inhalation

Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 2 ppb), XB

Testing (No Testing desired)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1D

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

P2 Claims: 

 

Page 2
p130205.eng

 

 

 

Page 3
p130205.eng

 

 

 

Yes

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0205

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 4
p130205.eng

 

 

concentration.

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0205

 

Page 5
p130205.eng

 

 

 

Page 6
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2013-0514 Directorate ID: 2012-SW-068-AD

Helicopter Model: Sikorsky Model S-76A, B, and C Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 181 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are intended to prevent failure of a spindle cuff assembly or 

blade fold cuff assembly, loss of a rotor blade, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter – If it is 

necessary to replace a spindle 

or blade cuff assembly, it 

would take 2.5 work hours at 

$85/work-hour and an 

estimated $54,000 for a part.

$54,212

Labor per Helicopter

(2.5 work-hours to do a 

nondestructive test 

inspection, 2 work hours to 

apply the white paint x 

$85/work-hour)

$383

Other Cost to apply white 

paint

$15

Total Cost per Helicopter $398

Total US Fleet Cost $72,038

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Nicoholas Faust
Exhibit 10.7

 

Dear Ron Cogburn:

 

You are a highly-valued executive, and we consider your continued service and dedication to SourceHOV, and its affiliates (“SourceHOV”) essential to our business.

 

In lieu of a bonus for services you provided to SourceHOV to incentivize you to remain employed from April 1, 2017 through March 31, 2018 (the “Retention Period”), assuming you satisfy the eligibility criteria set forth below, you will earn a bonus in the amount of $350,000, less all applicable withholdings and deductions (the “Bonus”). The Bonus will be paid in the form of an advance on or before July 31, 2017.

 

You earn this Bonus if all of the following eligibility criteria are satisfied, to the maximum extent permitted by applicable law:

 

a)                                     You are actively employed by SourceHOV on the last day of the Retention Period;

 

b)                                     You have not given notice of your intent to resign or before the last day of the Retention Period; and

 

c)                                      SourceHOV has not given you notice of its intent to terminate your employment for Cause on or before the last day of the Retention Period.

 

By signing below, you agree that if your employment with SourceHOV ends before the close of the Retention Period and/or if you fail to satisfy all of the other eligibility criteria set forth above,  SourceHOV may deduct the entire amount of the unearned, advanced Bonus from your final paycheck, to the maximum extent permitted by applicable law. Additionally, to the extent such deduction is not permitted by applicable law and/or it is not possible to deduct the entire amount of the unearned, advanced Bonus in full from your final paycheck, you agree to re-pay to SourceHOV the remainder of the unearned, advanced Bonus within fifteen (15) business days after the termination of your employment, to the extent permitted by applicable law. If your employment is terminated (i) due to your death or disability, (ii) by you for Good Reason or (iii) for any reason by SourceHOV other than for Cause prior to the end of the Retention Period, you shall not be required to repay any amount of the unearned, advanced Bonus.

 

This letter agreement is intended to comply with, or be exempt from, Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Section 409A”) and shall be construed and administered in accordance with Section 409A.

 

This letter agreement encompasses the entire agreement of the parties relating to the Bonus, and supersedes all previous understandings and agreements between the parties with respect to the Retention Period. This letter agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties and their successors and assigns. This letter agreement, for all purposes, shall be construed in accordance with the laws of Delaware without regard to conflicts-of-law principles that would result in the application of the laws of another jurisdiction.

 

	
Agreed and accepted
    	
Compensation Committee
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/ Ron Cogburn
    	
 
    	
/s/ James G. Reynolds
    
	
Ron Cogburn
From: libertyhillcabotar@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 7:13:10 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Patricia McDonald

Cabot, AR 72023