alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. 1001-1014), the Director, National Institutes of Health (NIH) announces the establishment of the Applied Therapeutics for Cancer Integrated Review Group (IRG) as authorized by 42 U.S.C. 282(b)(16), section 402(b)(16) of the Public Health Service Act, as amended.

The Director, NIH, has determined that the Applied Therapeutics for Cancer IRG is in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed on NIH by law, and that these duties can best be performed through the advice and counsel of the committee.

The committee provides advice and recommendations on funding applications and proposals, including but not limited to, the scientific and technical merit of applications for grants-in-aid for research, research training, or research-related grants and cooperative agreements, or contract proposals relating to scientific areas relevant to translational and clinical investigations that encompass cancer therapeutic development and cancer treatment.

                    Inquiries may be directed to Claire Harris, Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy, Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 1000, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 (Mail code 4875), Telephone (301) 496-2123, or                     *Claire.Harris@nih.gov.*

      ( print page 66860)    
Dated: September 21, 2023.

Lawrence A. Tabak,

Acting NIH Director, National Institutes of Health.

[FR Doc. 2023-21233 Filed 9-27-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 4.1


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


March 16, 2018


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust 372 (the “Fund”)


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for the Fund, consisting of the unit investment trust (the “Trust”) included in
the Registration Statement relating to the Fund. We enclosed a list of the securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date
hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our evaluation of such securities as of close of business on March 15, 2018, in accordance
with the valuation method set forth in the applicable Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreement. We consent to
the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing the evaluations of the Trust securities in the Registration
Statement (No. 333-222462) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the registration of the sale of the
Units of the Trust and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


Very truly yours,


 


/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO                                 


Gerardo Cipriano


Vice President
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 384 

Congratulating the University of Wyoming Cowgirls for winning the Women’s 

National Invitational Tournament for the first time and for their most 

successful season in school history. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2007 

Mrs. CUBIN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the University of Wyoming Cowgirls for winning the Women’s National Invitational Tournament for 

the first time and for their most successful season in 

school history. 

Whereas on March 31, 2007, the University of Wyoming 

Cowgirls defeated the University of Wisconsin Badgers 

by a score of 72–56 in the championship basketball game 

of the Women’s National Invitation Tournament; 

Whereas the victory of these 14 very accomplished young 

women and their coach, Joe Legerski, was witnessed by 

over 15,000 fans at the University of Wyoming’s sold out 

Arena-Auditorium; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 384 IH 

Whereas the Cowgirls won 21 games in their regular season 

and tied for second in the Mountain West Conference 

(MWC); 

Whereas Jodi Bolerjack scored 16 points in the championship 

game and earned Third Team All-MWC honors; 

Whereas Elisabeth Dissen scored the last shot for the Cowgirls of the first half, giving the team a 39–26 lead; 

Whereas Megan McGuffey scored back-to-back layups in the 

second half, totaling 10 points for the game, and received 

the MWC Newcomer of the Year honor; 

Whereas Justyna Podziemska scored 16 points in the championship game, had 10 rebounds, and 8 assists; 

Whereas Dominique Sisk scored 5 points, had 2 assists, and 

7 rebounds for the Cowgirls; 

Whereas Rebecca Vanderjagt scored 4 points and had 1 block 

during the championship game; 

Whereas Aubrey Vandiver brought a strong end to the first 

half, shooting or assisting the last seven points; 

Whereas Hanna Zavecz scored 12 points and earned the 

award of the Women’s National Invitation Tournament 

Most Valuable Player; 

Whereas Amy Bolerjack, Mallory Cline, Annie Gorenstein, 

Angiah Harris, Gemma Koehler, and Megan Mordecai 

also contributed to the team’s top season; and 

Whereas these top athletes are also dedicated to academic 

achievement, and serve as the standard of excellence, 

scholarship, and sportsmanship for the entire Nation: 

Now, therefore, be it 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 384 IH 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives con2 gratulates the University of Wyoming women’s basketball 

3 team for their championship victory in the 2007 National 

4 Invitational Tournament. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         September 26, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 19, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 59 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2023-274, CP2023-277.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-20915 Filed 9-25-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
## U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC In the Matter of: Facility Solutions, Inc. Respondent ) ) ) ) ) 

## DocketNo. FAA-2013-0047 Case No. 2012NE700128 Judge J.E. Sullivan**--------------------------------------------~/** Roy J. Transit rovtransit@comcasl.net Attorney for Respondent: Facility Solutions, Inc. P.O. BOX 1578 Royal Oak, 

### MT 48068-1578 586-491-6822 Fax: 248-564-0940 Brian K. Kha11 Federal Aviation Administration Office ofRegional Counsel 2300 EastDevon Ave., AGL-7H Des Plains, fllinois 60018 847-294-7652 Fax: 847-294-7498 

# RECEIVED MAR 18**201~** 

# HE.AiRING DOCKET

________________________________________________ ! RESPONDENT'S WITHDRAWAL OF REQUEST FORHEARING Now comes Facility Solutions, Inc., by and through their attorney, Roy J. Transit and hereby withdraw their request for hearing before the U.S. Department oC Transportation, Office ofHearings, for the reason that the Respondent and the Federal Aviation Administration haveresolved the above captioned controversy and that there is no longer a need for a hearing. The Respondent therefore requests that the matter be dismissed.

Respectfully submitted,

# ~~;··················**·········~~** RoyJ.,·T ansit



### PROOF OF SERVICE A copy ofthis: Respondent's Withdrawal ofRequest for Hearing was servedupon, Federal Aviation Administration 600 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, DC 2059l Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbm Wright Building- Suite 2W1 000 By Federal Express Courier, and upon the following: Judge J. E. Sullivan U.S. Administrative Law Judge Oflicc ofHearing, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Ave, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 On March 13, 2014, by US Mail, postage prepaid, by the undersigned. Brian K. Khan Federal Aviation Administration Office ofRegional Counsel 2300 East Devon Ave., AGL-7H Des Plains, Illinois 60018 Dated: March l3, 2014
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





Form 8-K





Current Report





Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report  (Date of earliest event reported): July 25, 2017





Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation


(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)





001-11241


(Commission File Number)


Delaware37-1105865(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)(IRS Employer Identification Number)





2120 West End Avenue


Nashville, Tennessee 37203-0001


(Address of principal executive offices, with zip code)





(615) 341-1000


(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:


oWritten communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)oSoliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).





Emerging growth company o





If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o








---







Item 2.02. Results of Operations and Financial Condition.





On July 25, 2017, Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation issued a press release reporting financial results for the quarter ended June 30, 2017.  A copy of the press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated into this Item 2.02 by reference.





The information in this Current Report on Form 8-K, including Exhibit 99.1, is being furnished in accordance with the provisions of General Instruction B.2 of Form 8-K.








Item 9.01.  Financial Statements and Exhibits.





d)Exhibits:99.1Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation press release dated July 25, 2017








SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.





Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation








Date:  July 25, 2017By:/s/ Leslie S. ZmuggLeslie S. ZmuggSecretary








2


---







EXHIBIT INDEX





Exhibit No.Description99.1Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation press release dated July 25, 2017

















3
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dontae Eugene MATHIS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-30014.

D.C. No. CR-99-000526-HA.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 11, 2001.*

Decided June 25, 2001.

*553Before O’SCANNLAIN, SILVERMAN, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).

MEMORANDUM **

Dontae Eugene Mathis appeals the sentence imposed after his entering of a guilty plea for the charge of being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1).

Mathis objected prior to sentencing to certain paragraphs included within the presentencing report. The paragraphs contained allegations of past criminal behavior which Mathis controverted. Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(c)(1) requires that the district court “rule on any unresolved objections to the presentence report” and either make “a finding on the allegation or a determination that no finding is necessary because the controverted matter will not be taken into account in, or will not affect, sentencing.” Although the district court denied Mathis’ motion to strike the controverted information from the presentencing report, it neither made a finding regarding the controverted issue nor declared that a finding was unnecessary. The United States Attorney agrees that the district court violated 32(c)(1). Therefore, we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing. *See United States v. Carter,*219 F.3d 863, 866 (9th Cir.2000) (citing *United States v. Fernandez-Angulo,*897 F.2d 1514, 1516 (9th Cir.1990) (en banc)).

SENTENCE VACATED AND REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
No. 62218.

#### Heinemann Electric Company *v.*United States,

protests 215724-K and 245411-K (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

The protests were dismissed.
From: lyslecarm@juno.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:12:51 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Carma Johnson

Wyoming, MI 49509
(October 19, 1995)

#### In the Matter of Frederick K. Brewington et al., Appellants-Respondents, v Stephen J. Sabbeth, Respondent, *634and Seretta C. McKnight, Respondent-Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 978]

—Appeal by the petitioners from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winick, J.), dated October 10, 1995. Cross appeal by the respondent Seretta C. McKnight from stated portions of the same judgment.

Ordered that the cross appeal from the judgment is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as Seretta C. McKnight is not aggrieved thereby; and it is further,

Ordered that on the appeal by the petitioners the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, for reasons stated by Justice Winick at the Supreme Court. Thompson, J. P., Ritter, Santucci and Krausman, JJ., concur.
From: jagille3@vt.edu

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:32:56 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jason Gillespie

Irwin, PA 15642
From: knuteski@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:41:01 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Knut E. Laurritzen

, 5630-565