alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: marion.munford@cdmgroup.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:59:12 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Marion Munford

District Heights, MD 20747
No. 59748.

#### Canada Packers, Inc., and International Packers Commercial Division of International Packers, Limited *v.*United States,

protests 198608-K and 218581-K (Philadelphia).

*361Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Swift & Company et al.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 212, C. D. 1655), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
H. Res. 451 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 5, 2007. 

Whereas on June 4, 2007, Representative William Jefferson 

was indicted on 16 criminal counts by a grand jury in the 

United States District Court for the Eastern District of 

Virginia; 

Whereas recent credible media accounts indicate that the Department of Justice is investigating the conduct of other 

Members of the House of Representatives, and these investigations may lead to further indictments; 

Whereas the One Hundred Tenth Congress, in its first day 

of session, strengthened the rules concerning the ethical 

behavior of Members of the House; 

Whereas the House has approved on an overwhelming and bipartisan basis H.R. 2316, the Honest Leadership and 

Open Government Act of 2007, to establish strict standards and penalties concerning the relationship between 

lobbyists and Members; and 

Whereas these actions by the One Hundred Tenth Congress 

demonstrate that illegal, unethical, or inappropriate conduct by Members of the House will not be tolerated: 

Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That whenever a Member of the House of Representatives, including a Delegate or Resident Commissioner 
2 

•HRES 451 EH 

to the Congress, is indicted or otherwise formally charged 

with criminal conduct in a court of the United States or any 

State, the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct shall, 

not later than 30 days after the date of such indictment or 

charge— 

(1) empanel an investigative subcommittee to review 

the allegations; or 

(2) if the Committee does not empanel an investigative subcommittee to review the allegations, submit a report to the House describing its reasons for not 

empaneling such an investigative subcommittee, together 

with the actions, if any, the Committee has taken in response to the allegations. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
No. 68424.

protests 62/18565-12970, etc. (Chicago).

#### Engis Equipment Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of microform grinders and parts similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 67391, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0603

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

TRENT MATTHEW LARSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including May 31, 2021, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 26 2021

04/26/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0603
From: goggansfamily@att.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:51:58 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Gary Goggans

Monticello, AR 71655
Before the First Division,

April 1, 1969

No. P69/83.

protests 67/55063, etc. (Los Angeles).

No. P69/84.

protests 67/70586, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### North Hollywood Mfg. Co. et al. *v.*United States, North Hollywood Mfg. Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Watson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of artificial flowers, trees, foliage, fruits, vegetables, grasses, or grains, and articles made of the foregoing, in chief value of plastic, assembled in the same manner as the merchandise the subject of *Armbee Corporation et al.*v. *United States*(60 Cust. Ct. 105, C.D. 3278) and *Zunold Trading Corporation et al.*v. *United States*(60 Cust. Ct. 112, C.D. 3279), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: hedfam8@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:05:01 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jason Hedlund

Helendale, CA 92342
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 410 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with respect to the 

increase in rates of postage for standard mail that went into effect 

on May 14, 2007. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 16, 2007 

Mr. BOOZMAN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with 

respect to the increase in rates of postage for standard 

mail that went into effect on May 14, 2007. 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the significant increase in the rates of 

3 postage for standard mail that went into effect on May 

4 14, 2007, has the possibility of a very detrimental impact 

5 on small and large businesses alike, but especially with 

6 respect to mail-order businesses. 

Æ 


cprice-sewell on PRODPC74 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                JUL-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                     APR-1-2000
<CASH>                                           15,593
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    27,962
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      216,772
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 267,006
<PP&E>                                           92,757
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   417,213
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            144,439
<BONDS>                                          173,536
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         122
<OTHER-SE>                                       79,947
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     417,213
<SALES>                                          976,909
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 976,909
<CGS>                                            791,236
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    791,236
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               14,110
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,363
<INCOME-TAX>                                     945
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,418
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  670
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,088
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.18


</TABLE>
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 359 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Sugar Ray Robinson should be recognized for his athletic achievements and commitment 

to young people. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 1, 2007 

Mr. RANGEL submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

Sugar Ray Robinson should be recognized for his athletic 

achievements and commitment to young people. 

Whereas Sugar Ray Robinson was born in Detroit, Michigan, 

on May 3, 1920; 

Whereas, in 1932, Robinson moved to New York City where 

he started boxing as an amateur, going undefeated in 89 

bouts, and winning the Golden Gloves featherweight title 

in 1939; 

Whereas, in 1940, he began boxing professionally and fought 

at New York City’s Madison Square Garden for the first 

time; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 359 IH 

Whereas, in 1946, he won his first world title as a 

welterweight, and then held the middleweight title for 5 

years between 1951 and 1960; 

Whereas after retiring for a time he returned to box a series 

of exciting matches before permanently retiring on December 10, 1965; 

Whereas in a career spanning 25 years, he won 175 of 202 

bouts with 109 knockouts; 

Whereas Robinson’s grace, speed, power, and mastery of the 

ring earned him international acclaim as one of the 

greatest fighters in boxing history; 

Whereas Sugar Ray Robinson was elected into the Boxing 

Hall of Fame in 1967; 

Whereas, in 1969, he established the Sugar Ray Robinson 

Youth Foundation; and 

Whereas Sugar Ray Robinson died in Culver City, California, 

on April 12, 1989, at the age of 68: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that Sugar Ray Robinson should be recog3 nized as one of history’s greatest professional boxers, 

4 whose dedication to boxing and commitment to young peo5 ple have earned him a permanent place in sports history. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report (the “Report”) on the Form 10-K/A of Imperial Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Josey Sajan, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date:      May 16, 2011





/s/ Mike MackeyMike MackeyChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
|   |   |
|--------|--------|

**Filed      Pursuant To Rule 433, Registration No. 333-124310**
** **

**$1,000,000,000**

**CATERPILLAR      FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION**

| **For                the Period: 3/5/2007 to 3/12/2007** |
|----------------------------------------------------------|
| **Coupon**                                               | **Interest** | **Maturity** | **Callable** | **Survivor's****Option** | **Price****1** | **Yield****2** | **Moody's** | **S&P** | **CUSIP** |
| 4.650%                                                   | Semi-Annual(†††) | 3/15/09 | NO | YES§  | 100.00 | 4.650% | A2 | A | 14912HBQ2 |
| 5.150%                                                   | Semi-Annual(†††) | 3/15/14 | 3/15/09***  | YES§  | 100.00 | 5.150% | A2 | A | 14912HBR0 |
| 5.500%                                                   | Monthly(†) | 3/15/22 | 3/15/10*  | YES§  | 100.00 | 5.563% | A2 | A | 14912HBS8 |
| 5.650%                                                   | Semi-Annual(†††) | 3/15/27 | 3/15/11***  | YES§  | 100.00 | 5.650% | A2 | A | 14912HBT6 |

*All      offerings are subject to prior sale.*
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BJs Wholesale Club, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended October 28, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, Frank D. Forward, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the undersigneds knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: December 7, 2006 |  | /S/ FRANK D. FORWARD   
|                        |  | Frank D. Forward       
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.1  Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  To the Shareholders of NSTAR:  We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balancesheetof NSTAR and its subsidiaries (the "Company")as of March 31, 2008, and the related consolidated statement of income, retained earnings and comprehensive income for each of the three-monthperiods ended March 31, 2008 and March 31, 2007and the condensedstatement of cash flows for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2008 and March 31, 2007.  These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.  We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters.  It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.  Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.  Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying consolidated interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  We previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, retained earnings, and of cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein), and in our report dated February 11, 2008, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements (our opinion contained an explanatory paragraph stating the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for uncertain tax positions effective January 1, 2007).  In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2007 is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.     /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Boston, MA May 2, 2008
1 

### Jones, Keira (FAA)

From: Ireland, Robert <RIreland@airlines.org>

Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 3:10 PM

To: Jones, Keira (FAA)

Cc: Rowe, Salli M (FAA); Thompson, Mary (FAA); Roberts, Brandon (FAA); Miller, Jeff

Subject: RE: Docket FAA-2015-0555, Cold Soaked Fuel Frost

Thanks Keira,

I was out of town last week and was no t aware that all five have submitted.

That being the case, please accept this email as A4A’s request to withdraw FAA-2015-0555.

Best Regards,

Bob Ireland

Robert L Ireland

Managing Director, Engineering and Maintenance

Airlines for America ®

1301 Pennsylvania Ave, NW, Suite 1100

Washington, DC 20004

202.626.4228 (office)

720.635.6193 (mobile)

rireland@airlines.org

From: Keira.Jones@faa.gov [ mailto:Keira.Jones@faa.gov ]

Sent: Monday,June 29, 2015 1507

To: Ireland, Robert

Cc: salli.m.rowe@faa.gov ; Mary.Thompson@faa.gov ; Brandon.Roberts@faa.gov

Subject: RE: Docket FAA

‐ 2015

‐ 0555, Cold Soaked Fuel Frost

Hello Bob....this is just a reminder that we need you to either send us an email or submit a comment to your docket

requesting to withdraw your petition now that everyone has submitted a petition. We have received petitions for

Southwest, United, American, Delta, and Alaska.



# Keira R. Jones

ARM Program Analyst

Office of Rulemaking, ARM

‐ 101

Work Phone: (202) 267

‐ 9677

Fax: (202) 267

‐ 5075

“A mistake repeated more than once is a decision!”

Paulo Coelho

From: Ireland, Robert [ mailto:RIreland@airlines.org ]

Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 8:38 AM

To: Jones, Keira (FAA)

Subject: RE: Docket FAA-2015-0555, Cold Soaked Fuel Frost

Thanks for the confirmation. When I see fi ve new dockets, I’ll withdraw 0555.

Bob

Robert L Ireland