alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: spsheehy@frontier.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:56:34 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Paul Sheehy

Hobart, IN 46342
1

Jones, Keira (FAA)

From: Ireland, Robert <RIreland@airlines.org>

Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 3:10 PM

To: Jones, Keira (FAA)

Cc: Rowe, Salli M (FAA); Thompson, Mary (FAA); Roberts, Brandon (FAA); Miller, Jeff

Subject: RE: Docket FAA-2015-0555, Cold Soaked Fuel Frost

Thanks Keira, 

I was out of town last week and was not aware that all five have submitted. 

That being the case, please accept this email as A4A’s request to withdraw FAA-2015-0555. 

Best Regards, 

Bob Ireland 

Robert L Ireland 

Managing Director, Engineering and Maintenance 

Airlines for America®

1301 Pennsylvania Ave, NW, Suite 1100 

Washington, DC 20004

202.626.4228 (office) 

720.635.6193 (mobile) 

rireland@airlines.org

From: Keira.Jones@faa.gov [mailto:Keira.Jones@faa.gov]  

Sent: Monday,June 29, 2015 1507

To: Ireland, Robert

Cc: salli.m.rowe@faa.gov; Mary.Thompson@faa.gov; Brandon.Roberts@faa.gov

Subject: RE: Docket FAA‐2015‐0555, Cold Soaked Fuel Frost

Hello Bob....this is just a reminder that we need you to either send us an email or submit a comment to your docket

requesting to withdraw your petition now that everyone has submitted a petition.  We have received petitions for

Southwest, United, American, Delta, and Alaska.

Keira R. Jones 

ARM Program Analyst

Office of Rulemaking, ARM‐101

Work Phone:  (202) 267‐9677

Fax: (202) 267‐5075

“A mistake repeated more than once is a decision!” 

                                                                             Paulo Coelho

From: Ireland, Robert [mailto:RIreland@airlines.org] 

Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 8:38 AM 

To: Jones, Keira (FAA) 

Subject: RE: Docket FAA-2015-0555, Cold Soaked Fuel Frost 

Thanks for the confirmation. When I see five new dockets, I’ll withdraw 0555. 

Bob 

Robert L Ireland
From: d5kitzmanns@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:25:06 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sheila Kitzmann

Saint Charles, MO 63301
**Exhibit 32.1**

**STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906****OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned is the Chief Executive Officer of Material Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"). This Certificate is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the "10-Q Report").

The undersigned certifies that the 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.

Date: August 11, 2005                                     /s/ ROBERT M. BERNSTEIN                                                                                       Robert M. Bernstein			                                                                        Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Material Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Material Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
No. 68932.

#### J. C. Penney Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 61/14708, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of rayon labels similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Bruce Duncan Co., Inc., a/c Standard Commodities Import & Export Corp.*v. *United States*(51 Cust. Ct. 27, C.D. 2409), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
STATE OF DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL
89 KINGS HIGHWAY PHONE: (302) 739-9000 OFFICE OF THE FAX: (302) 739-6242

SECRETARY DOVER, DELAWARE 19901

June 15,2009

Mr. William C. Early 

### (3RAOGI Acting Regional Admimstrator 

### U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Region III 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029
Dear Mr. Early:
I am pleased to submit the enclosed revisions to the State ofDelaware State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the Attainment and Maintenance ofthe National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for Ozone. The revisions are to 36 regulations, which have already been approved by EPA, and include making administrative and non-substantive changes to all Delaware SIP Regulations and to make the regulations consistent with the 2006 Delaware Manual for Drafting Regulations. The effective date of these revisions is September 11, 2008.
The requirements ofthe CAA Section 110(a)(2)(A) have been met through the normal public hearing process established by the State ofDelaware withproper notification (30 days) prior to the convening ofthe public hearing. A public hearing was held on July 31,.2008. Attachments A and Bare copies ofaffidavits as proofofproper notification. It is the position ofthe State ofDelaware that all minimum requirements set forth in the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments have been met.
We look forward to continuing the cooperative effortbetween Delaware and EPA in this important work. As always, feel free to contact me or Ali Mirzakhalili, Administrator, (302) 739-9402, if you have any questions concerning the enclosed documents. Sincerely, _.

### /"/;~'..--,~

/	 _ ,?,".--/-

### r;~ 

### .;)/ l 

## / .

--- ::.------ -C
'­ -<.­**~e-(jllin** P. O'Mara Secretary

cc: DianaEsher, EPA w/encl. James Werner, Director, DAWM Ali Mirzakhalili
### Stratigraphy of the area between Hernando and Hardee Counties, Florida

By: Keith Brindley KetnerLawrence J. McGreevy

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1074C

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 3**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 4**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 5**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
From: dwand@gpatelecom.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:41:43 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

David Wand

Damascus, OR 97089
EX-10.5



 Exhibit 10.5 

THIRD AMENDMENT TO 
 REAL
ESTATE PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT 
 THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO REAL ESTATES PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) is
made as of June 9, 2017, by and between MONTGOMERY STERLING, L.L.C., an Illinois limited liability company, as Seller, and S.R. JACOBSON DEVELOPMENT CORP., a Michigan corporation on behalf of an entity to be named, as Purchaser. 

WHEREAS, Seller and Purchaser entered into a certain Real Estates Purchase And Sale Agreement, dated as of January 10, 2017, as amended
by a certain Amendment To Real Estates Purchase And Sale Agreement, dated April 7, 2017, and further amended by a certain Second Amendment To Real Estates Purchase And Sale Agreement, dated April 25, 2017 (together the
“Agreement”), pursuant to which Seller agreed to sell, and Purchaser agreed to purchase, that certain real property located in the Village of Montgomery (“Village”), County of Kendal and State of Illinois with Parcel
Identification Numbers 03-02-203-002, 03-02-202-001, 03-02-204-001 and 03-02-100-028 (the “Property”). 
 WHEREAS, the
parties agree to amend the Agreement to adjust a critical date pursuant to the terms of this Amendment. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, for good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree the Agreement is hereby amended as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Paragraph 3.D. of the Agreement is hereby amended to increase the Inspection Period by thirty (30) days and therefore it will expire on July 9, 2017. 


 

	 	2.	Balance of Terms. Except as set forth herein, the Agreement remains unmodified and in full force and effect. 

  

	 	3.	Miscellaneous. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, and by separate parties hereon on separate counterparts, and all of such counterparts taken together shall constitute one and the same
Amendment. This Amendment may be executed and delivered by facsimile or electronic mail in PDF format. The section headings set forth in this Amendment are for convenience of reference only, and do not define, limit or construe the contents of such
sections. 

 The parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above. 

 

									
	SELLER:	 		 	  PURCHASER:
			
	 MONTGOMERY STERLING, L.L.C., an Illinois

limited liability company
	 		 	 S.R. JACOBSON DEVELOPMENT CORP.

on behalf of an entity to be named

	By:	 	Inland Land Appreciation Fund II, L.P.	 		 		 	
	A Delaware limited partnership, its sole member	 		 		 	
	By:	 	IREIC, A Delaware corporation, its general partner	 		 		 	
					
	/s/	 	   GUADALUPE GRIFFIN
	 		 	/s/	 	   S.R. JACOBSON DEVELOPMENT CORP.

	By:	 	  Guadalupe Griffin	 		 	By:	 	  Emmanuel Kniahynycky
	Its:	 	  Senior Vice President	 		 	Its:	 	  Vice President

   [3rd Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement for Montgomery}
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Cemtrex, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Renato Dela Rama, principal financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Renato Dela RamaRenato Dela RamaPrincipal Financial OfficerSeptember 8, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-30246

Summary Calendar

 

NEIL BUNTYN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

POLICE JURY OF QUACHITA PARISH;

LAYMON GODWIN, Sheriff; CLARENCE BRITTON,

Defendants-Appellees.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Louisiana

(95-CV-1339)

 

September 3, 1996

Before GARWOOD, JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.*

PER CURIAM:

Neil Buntyn, a Louisiana pretrial detainee incarcerated at

Quachita Parish Correctional Center, appeals the district court’s

denial of his motion for a temporary restraining order and/or

preliminary injunction. This Court has jurisdiction to review the
2

district court’s denial of Buntyn’s motion for a preliminary

injunction. Lakedreams v. Taylor, 932 F.2d 1013, 1107 (5th Cir.

1991).

Buntyn requested a temporary injunction requiring the

authorities to “immediately install [free] non-collect phone lines

to attorneys, bail bondsmen and government agencies in the local

area and making lines accessible to 800 numbers, and . . .

requiring the defendants [to] maintain the non-collect lines.” We

have reviewed the record, the magistrate judge’s report, and the

district court’s order and find no abuse of discretion. See id.

Accordingly, we affirm for essentially the reasons stated by the

magistrate judge and adopted by the district court. Buntyn v.

Police Jury of Quachita Parish, No. 95-CV-1339 (W.D. La. March 6,

1996).

AFFIRMED
From: lollie317707@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:34:41 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Agueda Williams

Milpitas, CA 95035
From: elizabethcasto@ymail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:28:22 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Elizabeth Casto

Lakeland, FL 33810