### SERVED: APRIL 27, 2012

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF 

### RZEWUSKI, CONRAD FAA DOCKET No. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Case) DMS FAA-2012-0021

ORDER TO RESPONDENT TO SHOW CAUSE 

## ?l
.::...

The Federal Aviation Administration ("Complainant") has filed a Motion to DeemAllegations Admitted or Limit the Issues to Sanction ("Motion") dated April10, 2012. 1 The basis for the Motion is Complainant's assertion that Conrad Rzewuski ("Respondent") has failed to file an Answer to the Complaint. Respondenthas not answered the Motion. WHEREFORE, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. On or before May 11, 20 12, Respondent shall file a response to this Order stating why the reliefrequested in Complainant's Motion should notbe granted;

1The full title ofthe Motion is "Complainant'sMotion to Deem Allegations Admitted and Motion for Decision, or, in the Alternative, Motionto Limit the Issues at Hearing to Sanction."2
2. On orbefore May 11, 2012, Respondent shall file an Answer to the Complaint 2; 3. On or before May 11, 2012, Respondent shall fully comply with our Procedural Order dated February 16, 2012; and 4. Absent full and complete responses to Orderingparagraphs 1, 2 and 3, Respondent may be sanctioned, including, but not limited to, allegations in the Complaint maybe deemed admitted; Respondentmay be precluded from introducing any evidence atthe hearing otherthan personal testimony; Respondent's Request for Hearing may be dismissed; and/or a DefaultJudgment may be entered against Respondent in the full amount ofthe fine requested by the Complainant in its Complaint. 

# rL·c&i;J 0**~ ~(k**  Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment

- Service List

2 The Rules ofPractice for this proceeding are set forth in 14 C.F.R. Part 13, Subpart G, ofthe Federal Aviation Regulations. Those rules provide, inter alia, that the Respondent must file a written Answer or motion within thirty (30) days after service ofthe Complaint (14 C.F.R. § 13.209(a)) and that failure to file an Answer without good cause is deemed an admission ofeach allegation in the Complaint(§13.209(f)). More specifically, 14 C.F.R. § 13.209 (e) states: A person filing an answer shall admit, deny, or state that the person is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny, eachnumberedparagraph ofthe complaint. Any statement or allegation contained in the complaintthat is not specifically denied in the answer maybe deemed an admission ofthe truth ofthat allegation. A general denial ofthe complaint is deemed a failure to file an answer.

### SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 WilburWright Building-Suite 2W1000 1

Conrad Rzewuski, 

### Respondent 7360 W. Via DelSol Glendale, AZ 85310 TEL: 623-451-6384 Adam Runkel, 

### Complainant's Counsel · ONE COPY

Attorney, Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AWP-7.12 Western-Pacific Region Federal Aviation Administration P.O. Box 92007 Los Angeles, CA90009-2007 TEL: 310-725-7142 F)L[: 3i0-725-6816 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,

### AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S,.:e. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121StaffAssistant F)L[: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2012-:0021 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service inperson orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., WilburWrightBuilding-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.


### -2-·