alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: mikeeckhardt@live.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:26:11 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Michael Eckhardt

Broomfield, CO 80023
From: fischerrc@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:26:37 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Raymond Fischer

Mendota, IL 61342
EXHIBIT 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Insight
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John Dorman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



/s/ John Dorman

| | 
| | 

John Dorman

Chief Executive Officer

May 13, 2003



A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Digital Insight and will be retained by Digital Insight and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IV 

House Calendar No. 72 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 464 

[Report No. 110–179] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 5) to amend the Public Health 

Service Act to provide for human embryonic stem cell research. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 6, 2007 

Ms. MATSUI, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 5) to amend the 

Public Health Service Act to provide for human embryonic stem cell research. 

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (S. 

3 5) to amend the Public Health Service Act to provide for 

4 human embryonic stem cell research. All points of order 

5 against the bill and against its consideration are waived 

6 except those arising under clause 10 of rule XXI. The bill 

7 shall be considered as read. The previous question shall 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

HRES 464 RH 

1 be considered as ordered on the bill to final passage with2 out intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate 

3 equally divided and controlled by the chairman and rank4 ing minority member of the Committee on Energy and 

5 Commerce; and (2) one motion to commit. 

6 SEC. 2. During consideration of S. 5 pursuant to this 

7 resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous 

8 question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of 

9 the bill to such time as may be designated by the Speaker. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS

pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 72 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 464 

[Report No. 110

–179] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 5) to 

for human embryonic stem cell research. amend the Public Health Service Act to provide 

JUNE 6, 2007 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
No. 65122.

#### A. N. Deringer, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 269383-K (Ogdensburg).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and. issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *The Best Foods, Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 163, C.A.D. 751), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
H. Res. 415 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 30, 2008. 

Whereas soldiers of Asian and Pacific Islander descent fought 

bravely and honorably during the United States Civil 

War; 

Whereas Edward Day Cohota was among the soldiers of 

Asian descent who fought in the Civil War; 

Whereas as a small child, Mr. Cohota stowed away in the 

ship Cohota, leaving Shanghai, China, in 1845; 

Whereas Mr. Cohota enlisted in the 23rd Regiment, Massachusetts Volunteer Infantry; 

Whereas during the Civil War, Mr. Cohota fought valiantly 

in the fog-bound Battle of Drury’s Bluff; 

Whereas Mr. Cohota proved his courage at Cold Harbor; 

Whereas Mr. Cohota served in the United States Army for 

30 years; 

Whereas Joseph L. Pierce was also among the soldiers of 

Asian descent who fought in the Civil War; 

Whereas Mr. Pierce enlisted in the 14th Regiment, Connecticut Volunteer Infantry, in 1862; 

Whereas Mr. Pierce fought at Antietam and in the Battle of 

Gettysburg; and 
2 

•HRES 415 EH 

Whereas many of the soldiers of Asian and Pacific Islander 

descent who fought in the Civil War, including Edward 

Day Cohota and Joseph L. Pierce, were denied rightful 

recognition of their service: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) recognizes and expresses its appreciation for the 

courageous and loyal contributions made by soldiers of 

Asian and Pacific Islander descent during the United 

States Civil War; and 

(2) recognizes and honors the 2 most documented 

of those soldiers, Edward Day Cohota and Joseph L. 

Pierce, for their distinguished and dedicated service to 

preserving and maintaining the Union. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
|               | (1)                                  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|          |        |                                                                              |
|          | (2)                                  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the dates and periods covered by the Report. |

|  Date: May 12, 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |                      |                     | /s/ Dirk A. Montgomery                            |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                                                              |                      |      | Dirk A. Montgomery                                |
|                                                         |                      |      | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
STZ EX 10.5_11.30.2012


             
Exhibit 10.5                        


 October 2012




EXHIBIT B


PRICING FOR PRODUCT LINE


New Product Amendment, effective [****]


Prices




[****]            
		
	A.
	[****]       Per Case


[****]     [****]


MODELO ESPECIAL (packaged in cans)            
		
	A.
	[****]       Per Case


[****]     [****]























[****] Confidential treatment has been requested for portions of this exhibit. The copy filed herewith omits information subject to the confidentiality request. Omissions are designated with brackets containing asterisks. As part of our confidential treatment request, a complete version of this exhibit has been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.








                                                                                 - 2 -                                                                         
 October 2012






IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this New Product Amendment to Exhibit B to the January 2, 2007 Crown Imports LLC Importer Agreement to be effective on and after November 1, 2012.


EXTRADE II, S.A. DE C.V.                    CROWN IMPORTS LLC




By: /s/ José Parés  Emilio Fullaondo                By: /s/ W. Hackett        


Name: José Parés  Emilio Fullaondo                Name: W. Hackett        


Title: Vice President / Chief Sales and             Title: President        
Marketing Officer
Contacts. With whOm outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

OyanizaOOn p""", Cootac!OO I Date Res.poru;e I

"'slim:lll B"'i~ .':\'(I"Jil 'U5.VCi;uitm Eli <:4n1 It/rllu -

Hq.;iiH1Ul..\irli'l\" A,y,,-i:l:irm I (}>l'~Lntll'fer (/do --

, ,

,\in·r~n Owner. & I'llu\> '\.',oci:Hit,n I R"tWrT l-l"damon

;)17 In. ~

.- • ·L

7 ; ;

it ,,in IIi'< -

I

-\ 1.-\ \1 L"rH:·~

t U1/ //(; I

- ,
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Julio Cesar FLORES, also known as Julio Cervantes-Martinez, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-51453.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Aug. 17, 2005.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Donna F. Coltharp, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Julio Cesar Flores appeals the 46-month sentence he received following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He argues that the district court committed reversible plain error by increasing the maximum authorized guidelines sentence based on facts neither admitted nor found by a jury and by imposing a sentence under a mandatory guidelines scheme. Flores correctly concedes that he cannot carry his burden of showing that the district court’s error affected his substantial rights. *See United States v. Valenzuela-Quevedo,*407 F.3d 728, 733-34 (5th Cir.2005), *petition for cert. filed*(July 25, 2005) (No. 05-5556); *United States v. Mares,*402 F.3d 511, 521 (5th Cir.2005), *petition for cert. filed*(Mar. 31, 2005) (No. 04-9517).

Flores also argues that because his indictment did not allege a prior felony conviction, he was subject to a maximum sentence of only two years under U.S.C. § 1326(a). He correctly acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 306 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 306

   Offering heartfelt condolences to the victims and their families 
    regarding the horrific violence at Virginia Tech in Blacksburg, 
 Virginia, and to the students, faculty, administration and staff and 
their families who have been deeply affected by the tragic events that 
                            occurred there.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 17, 2007

    Mr. Boucher (for himself, Mr. Wolf, Mr. Moran of Virginia, Mr. 
Goodlatte, Mr. Scott of Virginia, Mr. Tom Davis of Virginia, Mr. Goode, 
Mr. Cantor, Mrs. Jo Ann Davis of Virginia, Mr. Forbes, and Mrs. Drake) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                         on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Offering heartfelt condolences to the victims and their families 
    regarding the horrific violence at Virginia Tech in Blacksburg, 
 Virginia, and to the students, faculty, administration and staff and 
their families who have been deeply affected by the tragic events that 
                            occurred there.

    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives--
            (1) offers its heartfelt condolences to the victims and 
        their families regarding the horrific violence at Virginia Tech 
        in Blacksburg, Virginia, and to the students, faculty, 
        administration and staff and their families who have been 
        deeply affected by the tragic events that occurred there;
            (2) expresses its hope that losses from the mass shooting 
        will lead to a shared national commitment to take steps that 
        will help our communities prevent such tragedies from occurring 
        in the future; and
            (3) recognizes that Virginia Tech has served as an 
        exemplary institution of teaching, learning, and research for 
        well over a century, and that the University's historic and 
        proud traditions will carry on.
                                 <all>
```
ACTIO N



# rji K m\/CTk v SIOM00330-03 0 

# € % CRYSTA

t KJK JCRUISE S CONTRO LNO
. Marc h 18 , 201 0 Th e Honorabl e Ra

yLaHoo d
. : ! Secretary Unite d State s Departmen t o fTransportatio n 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenue , S E Washington , D.C
. 2059 0 Subject : Haned a Combinatio n Service s Allocatio n Proceedin g DOT-OST-2010-001 8 Dea rSecretaryLaHood : A s a dedicate d trave l partne ro fAmerica n Airlines , I a m writin g i n suppor to fAmerican' s applicatio n t o provid e ne wservic e fro m Lo s Angele s Internationa l Airpor tt o Toky o Internationa l Airpor t a t Haneda
. I recogniz e an d applau d yo u an d th e Obam a administratio n fo ryou rsucces s las tDecembe rI n reachin g a landmar k

Ope n Skie s agreemen twit h Japan , whic h open s u p Haned a t o servic e by U.S
. airlines
. I encourag e you rselectio n o fAmerica n Airline s t o provid e nonsto p servic e fro m Los Angele s t o Haned a i n orde rt o provid e a n essentia l connectio n betwee n tw o o fth e world' s mos tdynami c commercia l centers
. Recen t events , includin g th e successfu l preservatio n o fJapa n Airlines ' oneworl d Allianc e membership , hav e underscore d American' s stron g commitmen tt o th e trans-Pacifi cmarket
. America n i s likewis e committe d t o Los Angele s - a worl d cente ro fbusiness , trade , entertainmen t an d technolog y- an d ha s provide d th e cit ywit h unsurpasse d ai rservic e fo r man ydecades
. Lo s Angeles , as wel l as th e entir e Souther n Californi a regio n wil l gai n a significan teconomi c benefi t fro m thes e propose d ne wflights , as wil l American' s customer s an d employees
. However , w e nee d you rhel p t o mak e th e LAX/Haned a connectio n a reality
. Therefore , I strongl yurg e yo u t o sa yye s t o America n Airline s an d it s reques tfo rslot s t o fl yfro m Los Angele s t o Haneda ! Sincerely ,

Barbar a Gillia m Vic e President , Passenge rService s Crysta l Cruise s 204 9 Centur y Par k East , Suit e140 0 • Lo s Angeles , C A9006 7
No. P67/64.

No. P67/65.

#### The Durst Mfg. Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 61/6043, etc. (New York).

#### Hancock Gross Mfg. Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 61/12151, etc. (Philadelphia).

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of. brass strainers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Davies Turner & Company*v. *United States*(55 Cust. Ct. 488, Abstract 69651), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 62765.

#### Castle Distributing Corp. and Rohner Gehrig & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 32549-K(B) (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

At the trial, it was established that the merchandise contained in cases 1 and 3, to which the claim was limited, was made entirely of wood and consisted of crucifixes having wooden crosses. On the record presented, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|   | Title of Each Class of |   | Maximum Aggregate |   | Amount of |   |   |
|   | Securities Offered |   | Offering Price(1) |   | Registration Fee(2) |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | 2.700% PowerNotes® | Due March 15, 2021 |   | $5,478,000 |   | $705.57 |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | 3.450% PowerNotes® | Due March 15, 2026 |   | $3,317,000 |   | $427.23 |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | TOTAL |   |   |   |   | $1,132.80 |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |

|     |                                    |
|-----|------------------------------------|
| (1) | Excludes accrued interest, if any. |

|     |                                                                             |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | Calculated in accordance with Rule 457(r) under the Securities Act of 1933. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | CUSIP | Aggregate |   | Selling | Gross |   | Net | Coupon | Coupon |   | Coupon |   | Maturity |   | 1st Coupon | 1st | Survivor's | Product |   |   |
|   | Number | Principal |   | Price | Concession |   | Proceeds | Type | Rate |   | Frequency |   | Date |   | Date | Coupon | Option | Ranking |   |   |
|   |   | Amount |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Amount |   |   |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | 14912HQZ6 | $5,478,000.00 |   | 100% | 1.450% |   | $5,398,569.00 | Fixed | 2.700% |   | Semi- |   | 03/15/2021 |   | 09/15/2014 | $13.20 | Yes | Senior Unsecured |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Annual |   |   |   |   |   |   | Notes |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | CUSIP | Aggregate |   | Selling | Gross |   | Net | Coupon | Coupon |   | Coupon |   | Maturity |   | 1st Coupon | 1st | Survivor's | Product |   |   |
|   | Number | Principal |   | Price | Concession |   | Proceeds | Type | Rate |   | Frequency |   | Date |   | Date | Coupon | Option | Ranking |   |   |
|   |   | Amount |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Amount |   |   |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | 14912HRA0 | $3,317,000.00 |   | 100% | 2.000% |   | $3,250,660.00 | Fixed | 3.450% |   | Semi- |   | 03/15/2026 |   | 09/15/2014 | $16.87 | Yes | Senior Unsecured |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Annual |   |   |   |   |   |   | Notes |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |

----