alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Jornal Oficial C 57A/17 d

| | ISSN 1977-1010 |
| --- | --- |
| Jornal Oficial
  da União Europeia | C 57A |
| | |
| Edição em língua portuguesa | Comunicações e Informações | 58.° ano17 de fevreiro de 2015 |

ISSN 1977-1010

Jornal Oficial

da União Europeia

C 57A

Edição em língua portuguesa

Comunicações e Informações

58.° ano17 de fevreiro de 2015

---

| Número de informação | Índice | Página |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Retificações |
| 2015/C 057A/01 | Retificação do anúncio de concurso geral EPSO/AST-SC/03/15 — Secretários/Escriturários (SC 1 e SC 2) nos seguintes domínios: 1) Apoio administrativo; 2) Apoio financeiro; 3) Apoio de secretariado ( JO C 3 A de 8.1.2015 ) | 1 |

Número de informação

Índice

Página

Retificações

2015/C 057A/01

Retificação do anúncio de concurso geral EPSO/AST-SC/03/15 — Secretários/Escriturários (SC 1 e SC 2) nos seguintes domínios: 1) Apoio administrativo; 2) Apoio financeiro; 3) Apoio de secretariado ( JO C 3 A de 8.1.2015 )

( JO C 3 A de 8.1.2015 )

1

---

| PT | |
| --- | --- |

PT

---

Retificações

| 17.2.2015 | PT | Jornal Oficial da União Europeia | CA 57/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.2.2015

PT

Jornal Oficial da União Europeia

CA 57/1

---

Retificação do anúncio de concurso geral EPSO/AST-SC/03/15 — Secretários/Escriturários (SC 1 e SC 2) nos seguintes domínios: 1) Apoio administrativo; 2) Apoio financeiro; 3) Apoio de secretariado

(
  «Jornal Oficial da União Europeia» C 3 A de 8 de janeiro de 2015
  )

(2015/C 057 A/01)

Na página 2, no título I, no ponto 3:

| onde se lê: | «Prazo (validação incluída): 10 de fevereiro de 2015 às 12 horas (meio-dia), hora de Bruxelas», |
| --- | --- |

onde se lê:

«Prazo (validação incluída): 10 de fevereiro de 2015 às 12 horas (meio-dia), hora de Bruxelas»,

| deve ler-se: | «Prazo (validação incluída): 17 de fevereiro de 2015 às 12 horas (meio-dia), hora de Bruxelas». |
| --- | --- |

deve ler-se:

«Prazo (validação incluída): 17 de fevereiro de 2015 às 12 horas (meio-dia), hora de Bruxelas».

---
No. 60144.

protest 527463-G (Los Angeles).

#### Guy B. Barham Co. for Standard Wiping Rags Co. *v.*United States,

*305Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that 20 percent of the merchandise consists of rags used chiefly for papermaking, the claim of the plaihtifl was sustained with respect to said 20 percent of the merchandise.
From: arlinkay@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:14:57 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Karlin Wiens

San Diego, CA 92106
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 237 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      October 23, 2007.
Whereas veterans of service in the United States Armed Forces have served the 
        Nation with honor and at great personal sacrifice;
Whereas the American people owe the security of the Nation to those who have 
        defended it;
Whereas on Memorial Day each year, the Nation honors those who lost their lives 
        in service to the Nation;
Whereas on Veterans Day each year, the Nation honors those who have defended 
        democracy by serving in the Armed Forces;
Whereas the observance of Memorial Day and Veterans Day is an expression of 
        faith in democracy, faith in American values, and faith that those who 
        fight for freedom will defeat those whose cause is unjust;
Whereas section 116(a) of title 36, United States Code, provides that ``The last 
        Monday in May is Memorial Day'' and section 116(b) of that title 
        requests the President to issue a proclamation each year calling on the 
        people of the United States to observe Memorial Day by praying, 
        according to their individual religious faith, for permanent peace, 
        designating a period of time on Memorial Day during which the people may 
        unite in prayer for a permanent peace, calling on the people of the 
        United States to unite in prayer at that time, and calling on the media 
        to join in observing Memorial Day and the period of prayer;
Whereas section 4 of the National Moment of Remembrance Act (Public Law 106-579) 
        provides, ``The minute beginning at 3:00 p.m. (local time) on Memorial 
        Day each year is designated as the `National Moment of Remembrance'''; 
        and
Whereas Section 6103(a) of title 5, United States Code, provides that ``Memorial 
        Day, the last Monday in May'' and ``Veteran's Day, November 11'' are 
        legal public holidays: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) encourages Americans to demonstrate their support for veterans 
        on Veterans Day each year by treating that day as a special day of 
        reflection;
            (2) encourages schools and teachers to educate students on the great 
        contributions veterans have made to the country and its history, both 
        while serving as members of the United States Armed Forces and after 
        completing their service; and
            (3) requests that the President issue a proclamation each year in 
        connection with the observance of Veterans Day calling on the people of 
        the United States to observe that day with appropriate ceremonies and 
        activities.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
No. 60177.

protest 285404-K (New York).

#### Durlacher & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk scarves or squares similar in all material respects to those subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: pat.eason@otelco.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:46:35 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Pat Eason

Laceys Spring, AL 35754
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 33 

Recognizing the thousands of Freemasons in every State in the Nation and 

honoring them for their many contributions to the Nation throughout 

its history. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 5, 2007 

Mr. GILLMOR submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the thousands of Freemasons in every State 

in the Nation and honoring them for their many contributions to the Nation throughout its history. 

Whereas Freemasons, whose long lineage extends back to before the Nation’s founding, have set an example of high 

moral standards and charity for all people; 

Whereas the Founding Fathers of this great Nation and signers of the Constitution, most of whom were Freemasons, 

provided a well-rounded basis for developing themselves 

and others into valuable citizens of the United States; 

Whereas members of the Masonic Fraternity, both individually and as an organization, continue to make invaluable 

charitable contributions of service to the United States; 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 33 IH 

Whereas the Masonic Fraternity continues to provide for the 

charitable relief and education of the citizens of the 

United States; 

Whereas the Masonic Fraternity is deserving of formal recognition of their long history of care-giving for the citizenry and their example of high moral standards; and 

Whereas Freemasons have always revered and celebrated St. 

John’s Day, June 24th, as dedicated to their patron 

saints: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes the thousands of Freemasons in every State in the 

3 Nation and honors them for their many contributions to 

4 the Nation throughout its history. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Integrated Circuit Systems,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 28, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission November 12, 2002, as amended
by Amendment No. 1 thereto filed on the date hereof (as amended, the "Report"),
I, Justine F. Lien, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Justine F. Lien
-----------------------------
Justine F. Lien
Chief Financial Officer
February 13, 2003
REVIEWS OF STATE REGULATIONS, STANDARDS, AND PRACTICES RELATED 

TO THE USE OF COAL COMBUSTION PRODUCTS 

Pennsylvania 

Florida 

Texas 

North Dakota 

The four attached state reviews are associated with file set EPA-HQ-RCRA-2009-0640-1739
From: conniebaker3@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:08:36 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Constance Baker

Berthoud, CO 80513
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 401 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 401

        Supporting the goals and ideals of National Trails Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 14, 2007

 Mr. Thompson of California submitted the following resolution; which 
           was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
        Supporting the goals and ideals of National Trails Day.

Whereas June 2, 2007, is observed as National Trails Day;
Whereas there are over 200,000 miles of trails in the United States, providing 
        access to public lands for recreational and educational opportunities;
Whereas trails enrich communities throughout the United States by helping to 
        protect habitats, watersheds, and cultural and historic artifacts;
Whereas 72.1 percent of all Americans age 16 and older participate in at least 
        one of twenty-two designated outdoor activities, including hiking, 
        backpacking, and trail running;
Whereas National Trails Day events take place in all 50 States, the District of 
        Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, and the United States Virgin Islands to 
        celebrate trails, recognize volunteers, and maintain local trails;
Whereas thousands of volunteers and event coordinators throughout the United 
        States make National Trails Day events possible; and
Whereas 2007 is the 15th Anniversary Celebration of National Trails Day: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of National Trails Day; 
        and
            (2) honors the contributions National Trails Day has made 
        to inspire the public and trail enthusiasts to discover, learn 
        about, maintain, and celebrate trails.
                                 <all>
```
From: walterstanton@clear.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:22:50 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

The above pre-written is all well and good and may I add there should not be ANY contraceptive

coverage on health plans just as no invitro inducements are not covered. NOR should the government

pay for any of these services regardless of what dollars your consultants tell you are the result of saving

such unwanted pregnancies. I believe you should spend the money on teaching the youths today on

how to make moral, sound decisions with their bodies and have avenues of programs and propaganda

equal to or greater than that steering them down the path of destruction of a moral society!!

Sincerely,

Walter F Stanton

Sincerely,

Walter Stanton

North Aurora, IL 60542
#### In the Matter of 53rd Street Restaurant Corp., Petitioner, v New York State Liquor Authority, Respondent.

[632 NYS2d 815]

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York State Liquor Authority, dated January 7, 1994, which, after a hearing, suspended the petitioner’s liquor license for a period of 10 days.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed, with costs.

The petitioner’s license to sell alcoholic beverages for on-premises consumption was suspended because the petitioner was found to have permitted gambling on the premises in violation of Alcoholic Beverage Control Law § 106 (6), and to have maintained a video gambling device on the premises in violation of 9 NYCRR 53.1 (t). These same charges led to a prior criminal prosecution which was terminated with an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal and the records were ordered sealed. Notwithstanding the sealing of the file, the arresting police officer retained copies of various official police documents to which, over the petitioner’s objections, he was permitted to refer to refresh his recollection during the administrative hearing. The petitioner contends that this constitutes an error of law which requires that the determination be annulled. We disagree.

It is uncontroverted that the file of the criminal prosecution was sealed. However, contrary to the petitioner’s contentions, the mere erroneous use of the sealed records, without more, does not compel vacatur of the determination *(see, Matter of Charles Q. v Constantine,*85 NY2d 571). The detective was free to testify from memory and the respondent was free to adduce "independent evidence of the conduct leading to the criminal charges” *(Matter of Skyline Inn Corp. v New York State Liq. Auth.,*44 NY2d 695, 696). Upon our review of the entire record, we find that substantial evidence of the petitioner’s conduct was adduced independent of the testimony which the detective admitted was the result of refreshing his recollection with documents he should not have possessed *(see, Matter of Charles Q. v Constantine, supra; Matter of Skyline Inn Corp. v New York State Liq. Auth., supra; Matter of K.C.B. Bakeries v Butcher,*144 AD2d 894).

Furthermore, the 10-day license suspension imposed for the *589instant violations was not shocking to one’s sense of fairness *(see, Matter of Tom’s Log Cabin v New York State Liq. Auth.,*214 AD2d 492; *Matter of Tom’s Log Cabin v New York State Liq. Auth.,*186 AD2d 203; *Matter of Roan Amber Inn v New York State Liq. Auth.,*184 AD2d 770; *Matter of 59 Corner Corp. v New York State Liq. Auth.,*175 AD2d 282).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit *(see, Matter of Plato’s Cave Corp. v State Liq. Auth.,*68 NY2d 791; *Matter of Tom’s Log Cabin v New York State Liq. Auth.,*186 AD2d 203, *supra).*Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Ritter and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1
                      [BAER MARKS & UPHAM LLP LETTERHEAD]


                               CONSENT OF COUNSEL

     We hereby consent to the inclusion of our opinion dated April 20, 1998 as
an exhibit to Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of The He-Ro Group, Ltd
for the fiscal quarter ended February 28, 1998 on Form 10-Q/A. In giving this
consent, we do not hereby concede that we are in the category of persons whose
consent is required, or that we are experts within the meaning of the federal
securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder.


                                             [BAER MARKS & UPHAM LLP]

New York, New York
April 23, 1998