alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,**				 **AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**				 **OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of Material Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert M. Bernstein, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:				          (1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and				          (2)       Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| Dated:  May 21, 2007 | /s/ Robert M. Bernstein                     |
|---------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                           | By:  Robert M. Bernstein                                                                                                                   |
|                           | Its:  Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                              |

----
H. Res. 488 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 30, 2007. 

Whereas this is the 10th American League Pennant won by 

the Detroit Tigers; 

Whereas Manager Jim Leyland is a 3 time Manager of the 

Year and 1 of 7 managers in the history of baseball to 

win the pennant in both the National and American 

Leagues; 

Whereas the manager and coaching staff have done a remarkable job guiding this team to victory; 

Whereas General Manager Dave Dombrowski and Owner 

Mike Ilitch have assembled and led a team that has revitalized the Tigers franchise; 

Whereas all 25 players on the playoff squad contributed to 

their remarkable postseason victories over the New York 

Yankees and the Oakland Athletics, including American 

League Rookie of the Year Justin Verlander, as well as 

Magglio Ordo ́n ̃ez, Iva ́n Rodrı ́guez, Jeremy Bonderman, 

Kenny Rogers, Sean Casey, Carlos Guille ́n, Alexis Go ́mez, 

Omar Infante, Pla ́cido Polanco, Brandon Inge, Craig 

Monroe, Marcus Thames, Curtis Granderson, Ramo ́n 

Santiago, Neifi Pe ́rez, Nate Robertson, Todd Jones, 

Jason Grilli, Zach Miner, Wilfredo Ledezma, Fernando 

Rodney, Joel Zumaya, Jamie Walker, and Vance Wilson; 
2 

•HRES 488 EH 

Whereas the Detroit Tigers have a history of great players 

and managers, including Ty Cobb, Al Kaline, Hank 

Greenberg, and Sparky Anderson; 

Whereas Detroit has a vibrant sports tradition because Michigan fans have faithfully supported their teams; and 

Whereas the New York Yankees and Oakland Athletics 

proved worthy and honorable opponents during the postseason: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) congratulates the Detroit Tigers on winning the 

2006 American League Pennant; and 

(2) commends the players, coaches, management, 

and all the other personnel of the Detroit Tigers, as well 

as the fans, on this great victory. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
From: lLeAnnDavidson@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:25:36 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

LeAnn Davidson

Muskegon, MI 49445
**Exhibit      32.2**

|   | (1)     The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)     The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company.  |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:    |                    /s/ Roman Livson                              |   |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Roman                  LivsonChief                  Financial Officer |   |

----
From: fwa@suddenlink.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:10:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Eric Williams

New Braunfels, TX 78132
Exhibit
      32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Griffin Land & Nurseries, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended August 29, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Periodic Report”), I, Frederick M. Danziger,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.
                The
      Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
      and
 
 2.
                The
      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.
 
 
 
 /s/ FREDERICK M.
      DANZIGERFrederick
      M. DanzigerPresident
      and Chief Executive OfficerOctober
      8, 2009
From: mrt@ptville.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:30:37 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Margaret Todd

Sparta, TN 38583
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4726-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2023-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Montana (FEMA-4726-DR), dated August 12, 2023, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This change occurred on August 14, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street  SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Alana B. Kuhn, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

This action terminates the appointment of Jon K. Huss as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2023-21026 Filed 9-26-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

        <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND THE STATEMENT
OF EARNINGS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           5,717,000
<SECURITIES>                                     7,723,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,916,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,085,000
<PP&E>                                          12,236,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 105,801,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          132,019,000
<BONDS>                                          3,215,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         12,000
<COMMON>                                           244,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    (29,177,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   110,669,000
<SALES>                                         99,595,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                99,595,000
<CGS>                                           84,903,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  112,491,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,954,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                119,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (16,969,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,400,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (15,569,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,569,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



        

</TABLE>
#### Richard HINOJOSA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Doug DRETKE, Director, Texas, Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 04-70048.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Aug. 25, 2005.

Michael Clark Gross, San Antonio, TX, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Ellen Stewart-Klein, Office of the Attorney General for the State of Texas, Austin, TX, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

*ORDER DENYING APPELLEE’S PETITION FOR A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY*

PER CURIAM: *

Appellant Richard Hinojosa petitions the court for a certificate of appealability to appeal the district court’s denial of his application for habeas corpus relief under *39628 U.S.C. § 2254. After reviewing the briefs, the decision below, and the record, we find that Hinojosa is not entitled to a GOA as to any issue. As this is a death penalty case, it deserves the most exacting scrutiny from this court, which typically involves a written opinion. The district court in this case, however, wrote a thoroughly detailed and well-reasoned 88-page opinion and order denying Hinojosa’s petition for habeas relief and a COA. Were we to write a lengthy opinion affirming that court, we would be exalting formalism and scrupulosity over substance and judicial economy, adding nothing but repetition and doing nothing more than filling innumerable pages with synonyms and paraphrases. In this exceptional case, therefore, we decline to do so and simply deny Hinojosa’s COA for the reasons well and fully explicated in the district court’s writing.

PETITION DENIED.

*

 Under 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be publish*396ed and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
From: amelia.gilliland.ak@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:31:54 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Amelia Gilliland

Sincerely,

Amelia Gilliland

Eagle River, AK 99577
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 TAXATION OF COSTS -- 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

AT SEATTLE

THE ESTATE OF JAMES FREDERICK

BRUTSCHE, by and through LEO C.

BRUTSCHE, Personal Representative of the

Estate, and LEO CHANNING BRUTSCHE,

Father of James Frederick Brutsche, and NORMA

JEAN BRUTSCHE, Mother of James Frederick

Brutshce.,

Plaintiffs,

v.

THE CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, et. al,

Defendants.

Case No. C05-1538JLR

TAXATION OF COSTS

Having considered briefs in support of, and in opposition to, the cost bill herein, costs in the cause

indicated above are hereby taxed against PLAINTIFFS , and on behalf of DEFENDANTS in the amount

of $4,899.63 as follows:

Requested Disallowed Allowed

I. DEPOSITION COSTS $5,627.94 $1,292.11 $3,920.05

Clerk did not allow costs incurred for trial attendance of named party to the action and for costs

incurred for depositions of persons not listed as witnesses.

II. COPY COSTS $420.48 0 $420.48

Costs for obtaining criminal records of plaintiff’s witnesses are taxable.

Case 2:05-cv-01538-JLR Document 240 Filed 05/30/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Requested Disallowed Allowed

TAXATION OF COSTS -- 2

III. TRIAL TRANSCRIPT $559.10 0 $559.10

Dated this 30th day of MAY, 2007 .

A

Bruce Rifkin

Clerk, U.S. District Court

Case 2:05-cv-01538-JLR Document 240 Filed 05/30/07 Page 2 of 2