alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Avalon International Trading Corp., Respondent, v GST Receivables Management Corp., Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 95]

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Salvador Collazo, J.), entered March 22, 1995, which denied defendant’s motion to compel arbitration, unanimously reversed, on the law, the motion is granted, and this action is stayed pending completion of the arbitration proceeding, without costs.

The financial services contract between the parties, which contained a broad arbitration clause, provided in part that defendant, a factoring agent, could withhold credit approval on any customer of plaintiff until plaintiffs shipment of goods to *249that buyer. A dispute arose concerning the timeliness of notification of the disputed creditworthiness of a particular buyer, and defendant’s alleged failure to arrange a meeting for plaintiff to negotiate a settlement with the buyer. When plaintiff refused to pay defendant its service charges under the factoring agreement, defendant terminated the agreement, resulting in the commencement of this action. Defendant’s motion to compel arbitration was denied, trial term indicating that where a contract drawn by one of the parties is permeated by fraud, the arbitration clause contained therein is no more enforceable than the rest of the contract.

This record is devoid of any facts supporting the allegation that the contract was permeated by fraud. In the absence of such evidence, the question of fraudulent inducement of the contract is one for the arbitrators, not for the court *(Matter of Weinrott [Carp],*32 NY2d 190, 198-199; *Dolomite, S.p.A. v Beconta, Inc.,*129 Misc 2d 857, 860).

Plaintiff’s claim that the obligation to arbitrate did not survive defendant’s termination of the contract is without merit. The issue of termination of a contract is itself arbitrable under a broad arbitration clause *(Matter of Cassone,*63 NY2d 756; *Brown v V&R Adv.,*112 AD2d 856, 861, *affd*67 NY2d 772), and the arbitrator is free to determine damages under such a terminated contract *(Matter of Bill of Fare [King],*191 AD2d 344). The fact that the contract may no longer be in existence is immaterial *(Matter of Lane [Endicott Johnson Corp.],*274 App Div 833, *affd*299 NY 725, *cert denied*338 US 892); the arbitrability of such a grievance survives expiration of the agreement *(Matter of Allen v Grand Is. Cent. School Dist.,*56 AD2d 131).

Finally, we reject trial term’s erroneous conclusion that the New York choice-of-law provision in the agreement was somehow inconsistent with the provision for arbitration, thus rendering the contract ambiguous in this regard. The parties to a contract are free to invoke New York law—which happens to favor arbitration—in governance of that proceeding. Concur—Wallach, J. P., Kupferman, Ross, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.
### Reconnaissance geology of the Birney-Broadus coal field, Rosebud and Powder River Counties, Montana

By: Walter Cyrus Warren

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1072J

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 19 East**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 19 West**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 20**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 21**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 22**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 23**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 24**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 25**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 26**                            (pdf) 
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
No. 67535.

#### Kent International *v.*United States,

protest 62/9857 (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 CCPA 152, c.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

 

         I, Brien Reidy, Chief Financial Officer of HamptonsExtreme, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), do herebycertify, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of theCompany for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the "Report") fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.

 

                        

Hamptons Extreme, Inc.

Dated: March 23, 2009

By: 

/s/ Brien Reidy

 Brien John Delaney

  Chief Financail Officer
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**First National Lincoln Corporation Declares Dividend**

 

DAMARISCOTTA, Maine--(BUSINESS WIRE) -- September 16, 2005 -- The Board of Directors of First National Lincoln Corporation (NASDAQ NM: FNLC), yesterday declared a quarterly dividend of 13.5 cents per share. This third-quarter dividend, which is payable October 28, 2005, to shareholders of record as of October 7, 2005, represents an increase of 17.4% or 2.0 cents per share over the third-quarter dividend declared in 2004 of 11.5 cents per share.

"With this increase of 0.5 cents per share over this year's second-quarter dividend of 13.0 cents per share, the Company has now raised its dividend for 40 consecutive quarters," noted Daniel R. Daigneault, FNLC's President & Chief Executive Officer. "This translates into an annual dividend of 54.0 cents per share, and based on yesterday's closing price of $19.43 per share, our dividend yield is 2.78%.

"The recent rise in our stock price shows, in my opinion, the value that investors place on strong performance results and a healthy dividend payout," President Daigneault went on. "This is evidenced by the combination of excellent operating results posted in the second quarter of 2005 and the continued trend of increasing our dividend each quarter. For these reasons, I continue to view First National Lincoln Corporation as an extremely attractive investment alternative."

First National Lincoln Corporation, headquartered in Damariscotta, Maine, is the bank holding company for The First, N.A. and First Advisors. The First is an independent community bank serving Midcoast and Downeast Maine with fourteen offices in Lincoln, Knox, Hancock and Washington Counties that provide consumer and commercial banking products and services. First Advisors provides investment advisory and trust services from four offices in Damariscotta, Bar Harbor, Boothbay Harbor and Brunswick, Maine.

 

 

 

 

Forward-looking and cautionary statements: except for the historical information and discussions contained herein, statements contained in this release may constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially, as discussed in the company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
ALL INSPECTION DOUBLERS AND COVERS TO BE 

INSTALLED IN BOTTOM WING SKINS ONLY

WING FORWARD

MAIN BEAM

WING LEADING EDGE

BURL'S AIRCRAFT, LLC

PO BOX 671487

CHUGIAK, ALASKA 99567

(907)688-3715 

burl@biginalaska.com

NOTE: VIEW IS LOOKING DOWN ON BOTTOM OF LEFT WING

2-1272 DOUBLER

END OF -4L & -3L SKINS

STA.

END OF -5L & -6L SKINS

END OF -5L & -6L SKINS END OF -7L & -8L SKINS

2-1285 PLATE ASSEM.

0.00

REF.; 4.97" FROM RIVET

CENTERLINE TO 

CENTER OF HOLE

6.845 6.845

7.100

4.970 4.970

8.825

5.310 8.825

4.970

4.970

6.385

4.970

8.980

4.970

2.72" TYPICAL ALL 

 AFT LOCATIONS

2.72" TYPICAL ALL

 FORWARD LOCATIONS

4.97

6.845

4.970

4.970

4.970

NOTE: THIS DOUBLER TO BE

MOVED TO NEXT OUTBOARD

PANEL IF WING IS FITTED

WITH STC/FIELD APPROVAL

EXTENDED RANGE FUEL TANK

(EXISTING)

(EXISTING)

END OF -7L & -8L SKINS END OF -9L & -10L SKINS

STA.

121.00

STA

171.00

L.H. ONLY

WINDOW -18

STA

153.04

STA STA STA

137.02 124.25 110.20

STA STA STA STA

99.58 88.96 71.31 57.62 43.93 29.72 15.52 1.00

THIS DOUBLER AND COVER TO 

BE INSTALLED ON RIGHT

WING ONLY

SKETCH NO. SB 15AC06-08-10, INSTALLATION OF 2-1272 DOUBLERS AND 2-1285 INSPECTION

COVER IN ROGERS (AERONCA) 15AC/S15AC SEDAN SERIES AIRPLANES. SEE INSTALLATION

INSTRUCTIONS NO. "SB 15AC06-08-10 INSTALLATION PROCEDURES" FOR DETAILED INFORMATION.

ALL RIVETS IN EXTERNAL SKINS ARE TO BE MS20470AD4 RIVETS. SEPT. 09 2011

AILERON PUSH-PULL ROD EXIT SLOT

STA STA STA STA

11.90

9.80

7.70

5.60

REMOVE THESE 

RIVETS

REMOVE IF

NECESSARY;

REINSTALL ALL

RIVETS AFTER

DOUBLERS ARE

LOCATED IN 

THEIR BAYS

END OF 

-4 L/R

SKIN END OF 

-3 L/R 

SKIN

END OF 

-4 L/R

SKIN END OF 

-5 L/R 

SKIN

END OF

-6 L/R

SKIN

END OF 

-5 L/R 

SKIN END OF

-6 L/R 

SKIN

END OF

-7 L/R

SKIN
From: sking@cherrydale.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:38:21 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Steve King

Arlington, VA 22207
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the
annual report of American Sands Energy Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K as amended by this Form 10-K/A for the year
ended March 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned principal
executive officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: July 29, 2015



/s/ William C. Gibbs

William C. Gibbs, Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
From: davmarwils@carolina.rr.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:23:05 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Marianne Wilson

Landis, NC 28088
Exhibit 12.1
 NII HOLDINGS, INC.
STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS
TO FIXED CHARGES
(dollars in thousands)
 Three Months EndedMarch 31,2009
    
    
    2008Income from continuing operations before income tax
    
    $
    111,345
    
    
    $
    157,027Add:Fixed charges
    
    
    58,646
    
    
    
    66,481Amortization of capitalized interest
    
    
    2,148
    
    
    
    1,745Less:Interest capitalized
    
    
    2,260
    
    
    
    2,128Equity in (losses) gains of unconsolidated affiliates
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Losses attributable to minority interests
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Earnings as adjusted
    
    $
    169,879
    
    
    $
    223,125Fixed charges:Interest expense on indebtedness (including
amortization of
debt expense and discount)
    
    $
    44,596
    
    
    $
    51,954Interest capitalized
    
    
    2,260
    
    
    
    2,128Portion of rent expense representative of interest (30%)
    
    
    11,790
    
    
    
    12,399Fixed charges
    
    $
    58,646
    
    
    $
    66,481Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    2.90
    
    
    
    3.36Deficiency of earnings to cover fixed charges
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 470 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 25, 2007.
Whereas an estimated 12,400 children are diagnosed with cancer annually;
Whereas cancer is the leading cause of death by disease in children under age 
        15;
Whereas an estimated 2,300 children die from cancer each year;
Whereas the incidence of cancer among children in the United States is rising by 
        about one percent each year;
Whereas 1 in every 330 Americans develops cancer before age 20;
Whereas approximately 8 percent of deaths of those between 1 and 19 years old 
        are caused by cancer;
Whereas while some progress has been made, a number of opportunities for 
        childhood cancer research still remain unfunded or underfunded;
Whereas limited resources for childhood cancer research can hinder the 
        recruitment of investigators and physicians to pediatric oncology;
Whereas peer-reviewed clinical trials are the standard of care for pediatrics 
        and have improved cancer survival rates among children;
Whereas the number of survivors of childhood cancers continues to grow, with 
        about 1 in 640 adults between ages 20 to 39 who have a history of 
        cancer;
Whereas up to two-thirds of childhood cancer survivors are likely to experience 
        at least one late effect from treatment, many of which may be life-
        threatening;
Whereas some late effects of cancer treatment are identified early in follow-up 
        and are easily resolved, while others may become chronic problems in 
        adulthood and may have serious consequences; and
Whereas 89 percent of children with cancer experience substantial suffering in 
        the last month of life: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that the 
Congress should support--
            (1) public and private sector efforts to promote awareness about the 
        incidence of cancer among children, the signs and symptoms of cancer in 
        children, treatment options, and long-term follow-up;
            (2) increased public and private investment in childhood cancer 
        research to improve prevention, diagnosis, treatment, rehabilitation, 
        post-treatment monitoring, and long-term survival;
            (3) policies that provide incentives to encourage medical trainees 
        and investigators to enter the field of pediatric oncology;
            (4) policies that provide incentives to encourage the development of 
        drugs and biologics designed to treat pediatric cancers;
            (5) policies that encourage participation in clinical trials;
            (6) medical education curricula designed to improve pain management 
        for cancer patients; and
            (7) policies that enhance education, services, and other resources 
        related to late effects from treatment.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
December 3, 1964

No. 68919.

Appeal 5188.

#### Andrew Fisher Cycle Co., Inc. *v.*United States.—

— C.D. 2460. Appeal dimissed September 14, 1964.
Exhibit 32.1
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with the annual report of Sino Green Land Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Xiong Luo, chief executive officer of the Company, and Huasong Sheena Shen, chief financial officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2.
Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
 
 October 27, 2010
/s/ Xiong LuoXiong LuoChief Executive Officer and President(Principal Executive Officer)
 
 /s/ Huasong Sheena ShenOctober 27, 2010
Huasong Sheena ShenChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
 
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sino Green Land Corporation and will be retained by Sino Green Land Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
  The forgoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to §18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
From: debbieaharris@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:25:31 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Debbie Harris

East Wareham, MA 02538