alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 1313 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 10, 2008. 

Whereas Sally K. Ride of Los Angeles, California, a physicist 

by training and an accomplished athlete, was selected as 

a National Aeronautics and Space Administration 

(NASA) astronaut candidate in 1978, as part of the 

eighth class of NASA astronauts and one of only six 

women in the class; 

Whereas on June 18, 1983, Dr. Ride was lofted into space 

aboard the Space Shuttle Challenger as part of the STS– 

7 crew, making her the first American woman in space; 

Whereas the STS–7 crew launched two communications satellites from the Shuttle and accomplished many first 

steps for the United States space program, including the 

first release and capture of a satellite using the Shuttle’s 

robotic arm, the first demonstration of a Shuttle’s flight 

in formation with a free-flying satellite, and the first 

United States-German cooperative material science experiments aboard the Shuttle, as well as the conduct of 

other science experiments; 

Whereas on October 5, 1984, Dr. Ride made her second 

spaceflight as a mission specialist on STS 41–G, a mission that demonstrated the ability to refuel satellites in 

orbit and launched NASA’s Earth Radiation Budget Satellite, which spent over 20 years providing valuable sci-
2 

•HRES 1313 EH 

entific data on the Earth’s absorption and re-radiation of 

solar energy; 

Whereas when training for Dr. Ride’s third spaceflight assignment ceased after the tragic loss of the Space Shuttle 

Challenger and her crew in 1986, Dr. Ride was called to 

serve on the Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident; 

Whereas Dr. Ride has continued to serve the Nation’s space 

program with distinction, authoring the 1987 report, 

Leadership and America’s Future in Space, and serving 

on the Columbia Accident Investigation Board; 

Whereas, as an educator, author of children’s books, and advocate for the next generation of women in science, mathematics, and technology, Dr. Ride’s work has contributed 

to the wellbeing of our youth; and 

Whereas Dr. Ride has worked tirelessly and passionately to 

encourage young women to follow the sciences, mathematics, and technology by promoting science festivals, 

camps, and other opportunities through which young 

women can acquire hands-on learning about science: 

Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) celebrates the 25th anniversary of Dr. Sally K. 

Ride as the first American woman in space; and 

(2) extends its appreciation and gratitude for Dr. 

Ride’s excellence in service to the Nation as an astro-
3 

•HRES 1313 EH 

naut, educator, and advocate for the next generation of 

women scientists and engineers. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Exhibit 34.3

 

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

To the Board of Directors of 

SLM Corporation:

 

We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Assertion on Compliance with Regulation AB Criteria, dated March 30, 2009, that Sallie Mae, Inc. (the “Corporation”), a direct wholly owned subsidiary of SLM Corporation, complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the SLM Reg AG            Student Loan Platform (the “Platform”), as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008, excluding (1) criteria 1122 (d)(1)(iii), 1122 (d)(2)(iii), 1122 (d)(2)(vi), 1122 (d)(3)(iii), 1122 (d)(4)(x), 1122 (d)(4)(xi), 1122 (d)(4)(xii) and 1122 (d)(4)(xiii), which the Corporation has determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform and (2) criteria 1122 (d)(2)(ii) which the Corporation has determined is applicable to the            Platform but are excluded from the scope of management’s assertion and are not reported on herein. Appendix B to management’s assertion identifies the individual asset-backed transactions and securities defined by management as constituting the Platform. Management is responsible for the Corporation’s compliance with the servicing criteria. Out responsibility is to express an opinion on the management’s assertion based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Corporation’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected            asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Corporation processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Corporation during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not            designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Corporation during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Corporation’s compliance with the servicing criteria. 

 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Corporation complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008 for the SLM Reg AB Student Loan Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

/s/ Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLC

 

March 30, 2009
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 8, 2010 

d0908 

Order 

 

September 8, 2010 

141468 & (16) 

 

GLENN WILHELMI and 

SHERRI WILHELMI, 

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

v SC: 141468 

 COA: 297931 

Macomb CC: 2008-004167-NI 

MARK ANTHONY BRADFORD and 

J & H TRANSPORTATION, INC., 

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the June 11, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented 

should now be reviewed by this Court.
Case No. 8,773.

#### In re MACDONNELL.

[See Case No. 8,772.]
No. 383.

#### Coppolla et al. *v.*United States.

*Jerome Lewis*for petitioners.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg*and *Jerome M. Feit*for the United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
From: dannyhidalgo@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:37:47 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Daniel Hidalgo

Lockport, IL 60441
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 329 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         June 12, 2007.
Whereas the Barton College Bulldogs of Wilson, North Carolina, defeated Winona 
        State University of Rochester, Minnesota, the undefeated and defending 
        NCAA Division II Men's Basketball National Champions, 77-75 on March 24, 
        2007, to become the 2007 NCAA Men's Basketball National Champions;
Whereas Anthony Atkinson of Barton College, the Elite Eight most valuable 
        player, scored 10 points in the final 39 seconds of the game, including 
        a layup at the buzzer, to give Barton College the NCAA Division II men's 
        basketball title and its first NCAA championship in any sport;
Whereas Barton College played and won 9 overtime games during the 2006-2007 
        season to finish the season 31-5, including winning its last 21 games, a 
        school record;
Whereas Barton College, a school with just 1,000 students, defeated teams during 
        the Elite Eight from schools with much larger student bodies (Grand 
        Valley State, Michigan, 23,000 students, Cal State San Bernardino, 17, 
        000 students, and Winona State University, 8,000 students);
Whereas Coach Ron Lievense of Barton College, who had served as a graduate 
        assistant at Winona State University, summed up the Barton College 
        victory: ``I don't see how any ending could be any better for any team--
        ever'';
Whereas Barton College continues the long tradition of North Carolina schools 
        winning NCAA basketball championships;
Whereas Barton College was founded in 1902 as Atlantic Christian College and 
        changed its name in 1990; and
Whereas Barton College was named a ``Best Southeastern College'' for 2006 by the 
        Princeton Review: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives congratulates the Barton 
College men's basketball team for winning the 2007 NCAA Division II Men's 
Basketball National Championship.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
From: Elainejoy6@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:49:29 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Elaine Macomber

Palm City, FL 34990
No. 68913.

#### J. J. Boll et al. *v.*United States,

protests 58/8620, etc. (New York).

*320Opinion, by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of insignia, composed in chief value of bullions, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 66583, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
H. Res. 412 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 5, 2007. 

Whereas Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II and His Royal 

Highness Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, traveled to 

the United States for a State Visit from May 3 to May 

8, 2007, celebrating the special relationship that exists 

between the United States and the United Kingdom; 

Whereas the United States and the United Kingdom enjoy a 

trans-Atlantic friendship sustained by a commitment to 

democratic traditions, liberty, and the spread of freedom, 

as well as common economic and cultural foundations; 

Whereas in a rapidly changing world, Queen Elizabeth II has 

been a force of stability and constancy and has provided 

inspiration to the world in times both peaceful and tumultuous; and 

Whereas Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip serve as ambassadors for the British people and the goodwill engendered by their visit serves as a reminder, for the people 

of the United States and the United Kingdom alike, of 

our joint values and priorities: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives is deeply 

appreciative of the State Visit recently conducted by Her 

Majesty Queen Elizabeth II and His Royal Highness, Prince 
2 

•HRES 412 EH 

Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, and celebrates the State Visit as 

having been an occasion to reaffirm the value and depth of 

the friendship that exists between the United States and the 

United Kingdom. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
No. P69/54.

protests 63/23025, etc. (Honolulu).

#### Fujii Shoji, Ltd., and American Customs Brokerage Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Bosenstein, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of Iso peanuts, peanut crackers, and Japanese rice crackers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Hilo Rice Mill Co., Ltd., American Customs Brokerage Company et al.*v. *United States*(52 CCPA 106, C.A.D. 866), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: nfeuerbacher@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:28:53 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Nicholas Feuerbacher

Horse Shoe, NC 28742
| **Other Assets (Tables)**   | 12 Months Ended                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|-----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
||
| **Other Assets [Abstract]** |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
| Schedule of other assets    | The components of other assets as of December 31, were as follows: (Millions of dollars)      2015 2014Collateral held for resale, at net realizable value $560 $321Customer and other miscellaneous receivables 421 428Other 224 252Total other assets $1,205 $1,001      |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_OtherAssetsAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Tabular disclosure of the carrying amounts of other assets. This disclosure includes other current assets and other noncurrent assets.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_ScheduleOfOtherAssetsTableTextBlock**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**nonnum:textBlockItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
1 The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United St ates District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 05-2424

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. Terry Cross, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: November 30, 2006 Filed: December 14, 2006

___________ Before SMITH, MAGILL and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Terry Cross appeals the sentence the district court 1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to possessing methamphetamine with in tent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), and being a felon and unlaw ful drug user in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), (3), and 924(a)(2). His counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967).-2- Cross’s plea agreement contains a valid appeal waiver. SeeUnited States v. Andis , 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (e n banc) (discussing enforceability of appeal waiver); see also United States v. Estrada-Bahena , 201 F.3d 1070, 1071 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (enfor cing appeal waiver in Anders case). Having reviewed the record independently pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues not covered by the appeal waiver. Accordingly, we enforce the waiver and dismiss the appeal. We also grant counsel leave to withdraw.

______________________________
No. 283.

#### Lane, Warden, *v.*Brown.

*Edwin K. Steers,*Attorney General of Indiana, and *William D. Ruckelshaus,*Assistant Attorney General, for petitioner.

*Nathan Levy*for respondent.

Motion of respondent for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit granted.