alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: bonnieparker25@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:59:02 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

John Parker

Milford, MA 01757
From: marvin.and.marilyn@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:39:28 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Marilyn Karlsen

Brush Prairie, WA 98606
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This financial data schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted
from the Consolidated Balance Sheet and related Consolidated Statement of Income
as of and for the three month  period  ending March 31, 2000 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                     MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                                41,420
<SECURITIES>                                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                         97,097
<ALLOWANCES>                                                           3,917
<INVENTORY>                                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                     205,933
<PP&E>                                                             4,003,586
<DEPRECIATION>                                                       804,857
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                     6,018,389
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                 90,788
<BONDS>                                                              796,598
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                                0
<COMMON>                                                               1,494
<OTHER-SE>                                                         2,874,732
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                       6,018,389
<SALES>                                                              299,104
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                     299,104
<CGS>                                                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                        171,824
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    24,453
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                      102,827
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          46,272
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                   56,555
<DISCONTINUED>                                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                                          56,555
<EPS-BASIC>                                                              .38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                            .38


</TABLE>
No. 59207.

protests 247421-K, etc. (New York).

#### Antolini & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Pecorino (sheep’s milk) cheese similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Fontana Hollywood Corp.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 98, C. D. 1503) and *Lekas & Drivas, Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 242, C. D. 1660), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: dawn.montgomery@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:08:29 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dawn Clark

Denver, CO 80222
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2156

ROSA LEE PRINGLE, Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. DANIEL H. MARTIN, JR., a/k/a Daniel E. Martin, Sr., a/k/a Former Judge Daniel E. Martin, Sr., Former Atty Daniel E. Martin, Sr., Nickname Atty Danny Jr, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (2:08-cv-02799-PMD)

Submitted: December 17, 2009 Decided: December 28, 2009

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rosa Lee Pringle, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM Rosa Lee Pringle seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying her Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for relief from judgment. We dismiss. Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). Pringle filed her notice of appeal more than thirty days after the entry of both the original judgment and the denial of reconsideration. Further, she failed to properly move for an extension of time or for reopening of the appeal period. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal of these orders as untimely. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 188 (Thursday, September 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59396-59397]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-23781]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES

[Public Notice 2012-0520]

Application for Final Commitment for a Long-Term Loan or 
Financial Guarantee in Excess of $100 Million; 25 Day Comment Period

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the United States.

[[Page 59397]]

ACTION: Notice of 25 day comment period regarding an application for 
final commitment for a long-term loan or financial guarantee in excess 
of $100 million.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Reason for Notice: This Notice is to inform the public, in 
accordance with Section 3(c)(10) of the Charter of the Export-Import 
Bank of the United States (``Ex-Im Bank''), that Ex-Im Bank has 
received an application for final commitment for a long-term loan or 
financial guarantee in excess of $100 million (as calculated in 
accordance with Section 3(c)(10) of the Charter). Comments received 
within the comment period specified below will be presented to the Ex-
Im Bank Board of Directors prior to final action on this Transaction.
    Reference: AP087476XX.

Purpose and Use

    Brief description of the purpose of the transaction:
    To support the export of U.S. manufactured aircraft being leased to 
an airline in Indonesia.
    Brief non-proprietary description of the anticipated use of the 
items being exported:
    To provide airline service between Indonesia and other countries.
    To the extent that Ex-Im Bank is reasonably aware, the item(s) 
being exported are not expected to produce exports or provide services 
in competition with the exportation of goods or provision of services 
by a United States industry.

Parties

    Principal Supplier: The Boeing Company.
    Obligor: BOC Aviation Pte. Ltd.
    Guarantor(s): N/A.

Description of Items Being Exported

    Boeing 737 aircraft.
    Information On Decision: Information on the final decision for this 
transaction will be available in the ``Summary Minutes of Meetings of 
Board of Directors'' on http://www.exim.gov/articles.cfm/board%20minute.
    Confidential Information: Please note that this notice does not 
include confidential or proprietary business information; information 
which, if disclosed, would violate the Trade Secrets Act; or 
information which would jeopardize jobs in the United States by 
supplying information that competitors could use to compete with 
companies in the United States.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 22, 2012 to be 
assured of consideration before final consideration of the transaction 
by the Board of Directors of Ex-Im Bank.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted through www.regulations.gov.

Sharon A. Whitt,
Agency Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-23781 Filed 9-26-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```
Before the Third Division,

January 29, 1958

No. 61512.

#### World Commerce Corp. and American Express Company et al. *v.*United States,

protests 270161-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, facts, and issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *R. J. Saunders & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(37 Cust. Ct. 267, C. D. 1834), the collector was directed to reliquidate the entries, assessing duty upon the basis of the unit appraised value per conditioned pound or kilo, multiplied by the total number of conditioned pounds or kilos, as set forth in the invoices.
From: bishoprl@earthlink.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 6:31:36 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Randall Bishop

Littleton, CO 80126
EXHIBIT
                                         32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the annual report of Cemtrex, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended September
30, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Saagar Govil,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | the
    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                            
| | (2) | the
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
    of the Company.



|Dated:
    January 28, 2020 | /s/
    Saagar Govil                                   
|--------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------
|                            | Saagar
    Govil,                                      
|                            | Chairman
    of the Board, CEO,                        
|                            | President
    & Secretary (Principal Executive Officer)



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

Schaeffer, John

To: John Schaeffer

Subject: FW: HPV 2 P/C Data received from Vertellus to satisfy req of test rule for CASRN 

68187-84-8. 

----- Forwarded by Bob Boethling/DC/USEPA/US on 08/23/2012 04:15 PM -----

From: Bob Boethling/DC/USEPA/US

To: Paul Campanella/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Chuantung Lin/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Kathryn Schechter/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 06/27/2012 10:55 PM

Subject: Re: HPV 2 P/C Data received from Vertellus to satisfy req of test rule for CASRN 68187-84-8. 

I reviewed the biodegradation study (OECD 301D method) submitted for this substance. The test was correctly run and 

the results are deemed reliable. The substance was partially degraded and did not meet the ready biodegradability pass 

criterion. Given the substance, this surprises me, but there's nothing more I can say to refute the data. Perhaps the 

oxidation (it's "castor oil, oxidized") oxidizes the double bonds to epoxides and this would, if anything, be expected to 

impart some resistance to biodegradation.

Robert Boethling, PhD 

Exposure Assessment Branch 

US EPA, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW (7406M) 

Washington, DC 20460 

202-564-8533 (P) 

202-564-8892 (F) 

[EPI Suite] http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/exposure/pubs/episuite.htm

 

[FatePointer] http://esc.syrres.com/fatepointer/search.asp

Paul Campanella---06/27/2012 01:12:14 PM---Daniel and Bob, I am providing the data submitted by Vertellus for your 

review. Below are the pdfs o

From: Paul Campanella/DC/USEPA/US

To: Chuantung Lin/DC/USEPA/US, Bob Boethling/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Kathryn Schechter/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 06/27/2012 01:12 PM

Subject: HPV 2 P/C Data received from Vertellus to satisfy req of test rule for CASRN 68187-84-8. 

Daniel and Bob, I am providing the data submitted by Vertellus for your review. Below are the pdfs of the test data 

and robust summaries. 

[attachment "RSS Ready Biodeg.pdf" deleted by Bob Boethling/DC/USEPA/US] [attachment "Final Submission - 31 May 

2012.pdf" deleted by Bob Boethling/DC/USEPA/US] [attachment "Oxidized Castor Oil - Biodegradation (Eurofins 

2012).pdf" deleted by Bob Boethling/DC/USEPA/US] [attachment "Oxidized Castor Oil - Melting Point (Siemens 

2012).pdf" deleted by Bob Boethling/DC/USEPA/US] [attachment "Oxidized Castor Oil BP.pdf" deleted by Bob 

Boethling/DC/USEPA/US] [attachment "RSS Boiling Point (OECD 103).pdf" deleted by Bob Boethling/DC/USEPA/US] 

[attachment "RSS Melting Pt (OECD 102).pdf" deleted by Bob Boethling/DC/USEPA/US] 

Paul J. Campanella, Ph.D. 
2

Chemical Information and Testing Branch 

Chemical Control Division 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Washington, D.C. 

202-564-8091