alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: marianna@beatyconstruction.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:30:24 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Marianna Klein

Albuquerque, NM 87109
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |
|   | Title of Each Class of | Maximum Aggregate | Amount of |   |   |
|   | Securities Offered | Offering Price(1) | Registration Fee(2) |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | 2.000% PowerNotes®  Due June 15, 2019 | $18,543,000 | $2,149.13 |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | TOTAL |   | $2,149.13 |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |

|     |                                    |
|-----|------------------------------------|
| (1) | Excludes accrued interest, if any. |

|     |                                                                             |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | Calculated in accordance with Rule 457(r) under the Securities Act of 1933. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | CUSIP |   | Aggregate | Selling | Gross |   | Net | Coupon |   | Coupon |   | Coupon | Maturity | 1st Coupon | 1st | Survivor's | Product |   |   |
|   | Number |   | Principal | Price | Concession |   | Proceeds | Type |   | Rate |   | Frequency | Date | Date | Coupon | Option | Ranking |   |   |
|   |   |   | Amount |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Amount |   |   |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | 14912HSX9 |   | $18,543,000.00 | 100% | 0.825% |   | $18,390,020.25 | Fixed |   | 2.000% |   | Semi- | 06/15/2019 | 06/15/2017 | $9.17 | Yes | Senior |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Annual |   |   |   |   | Unsecured |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Notes |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
Registration No. 333-73083 424 (b)(2)
                                     Pricing Supplement No:245 Cusip:14912LF63
                                     Dated:  July 01,1999

	Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation
	Medium-Term Notes, Series F
	(Fixed Rate)
	With Maturities of 9 Months or More from Date of Issue
	Interest payable each April 1 and October 1 and at Maturity

Principal Amount:       Interest Rate:                Proceed Amount:
$50,000,000                 5.716%                       $49,962,500

Original Issue Date:    Commission Fee:               Maturity Date:
07/07/1999                $37,500                       07/07/2000

Dealer:
Merrill Lynch


Specified Currency:     Option to Elect Payment       Authorized Denominations
x U.S. dollars          in U.S. dollars               (only applicable if
_ Other:___________     (only applicable if           Specified Currency is
                        Specified Currency is         other than U.S.
                        other than U.S. dollars):      N/A
                           N/A

The Note is a:                                        Exchange Rate Agent
    X Global Note                                     (if other than First
      Certificated Note                                Trust New York): N/A
      (only applicable if
       Specified Currency
       is other than U.S. dollars)

Original Issue           Total Amount of OID: N/A    Terms of Amortizing
Discount Note:                                       Notes:  N/A
   Yes     x No          Issue Price (expressed
                         as a percentage of
                         aggregate principal
                         amount): 100%


Redemption Date(s) (including                        Redemption Price(s): N/A
any applicable regular or
special record dates): N/A

Repayment Date(s) (including                         Repayment Price(s): N/A
any applicable regular or
special record dates):  N/A

Interest Rate Reset Option:  _ Yes    X No

Optional Reset Dates (only applicable if option to reset interest rate):  N/A

Basis for Interest Rate Reset (only applicable if option to reset interest
rate): N/A

Stated Maturity Extension Option:  _ Yes    x No

Extension Period(s) and Final Maturity Date (only applicable if option to
extend stated maturity): N/A

Basis for Interest Rate During Extension Period (only applicable if option to
extend stated maturity): N/A



Historical Exchange Rate (only applicable if Specified Currency other than
U.S. dollars): N/A

     The interest rates on the Notes may be changed by Caterpillar Financial
Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect
the interest rate on any Note ordered prior to the effective date of the
change.  Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $1,174.80MM principal
amount of the Notes had been sold at interest rates then in effect.

	_________________________________

	Pricing Supplement to Prospectus Supplement dated March 25, 1999
	and Prospectus dated March 25, 1999
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #18187 and #18188; GEORGIA Disaster Number GA-00162]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of Georgia dated 09/20/2023. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms and Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         08/29/2023.
 DATES: Issued on 09/20/2023. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         11/20/2023. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         06/20/2024.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Gordon. *Contiguous Counties:*( print page 66119) *Georgia*: Bartow, Cherokee, Floyd, Gilmer, Murray, Pickens, Walker, Whitfield. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere
5.000Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere
8.000Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.375Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.375*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.375
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 18187 6 and for economic injury is 18188 0. The State which received an EIDL Declaration # is Georgia. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Isabella Guzman, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2023-20836 Filed 9-25-23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
From: akgibson@windstream.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:23:54 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

AMANDA GIBSON

Dawsonville, GA 30534
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 442 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 442

 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that a National 
                Youth Sports Week should be established.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 24, 2007

Mr. McIntyre (for himself, Mr. Aderholt, Mr. Shimkus, Mr. Cummings, Mr. 
Bishop of Georgia, Mr. Hulshof, Mr. Boren, Mr. Cramer, Ms. Carson, Ms. 
 Waters, Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas, Mr. Lincoln Diaz-Balart of Florida, 
Mr. Chandler, Mr. McGovern, Mr. Etheridge, and Mr. Doyle) submitted the 
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight 
                         and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that a National 
                Youth Sports Week should be established.

Whereas about 42 million children participate in organized sports each year;
Whereas children participating in organized sports tend to perform better in 
        school, develop excellent interpersonal skills, and lead healthier 
        lives;
Whereas organized youth sports help children increase their self-esteem, develop 
        an appreciation of health and fitness, and become leaders within the 
        community;
Whereas organized youth sports provide for regular physical activity and help 
        combat increasing rates of childhood obesity;
Whereas the Congressional Caucus on Youth Sports was created, with great help 
        and support from the Citizenship Through Sports Alliance, Positive 
        Coaching Alliance, and National Recreation and Park Association, to 
        restore the focus in youth sports on the child's experience and 
        character development;
Whereas far too many children quit participating in youth sports at a young age, 
        many telling coaches and parents, ``It just wasn't fun anymore'';
Whereas the National Recreation and Park Association has designated July as 
        Parks and Recreation Month;
Whereas many youth sports organizations gather at local parks and recreation 
        facilities across the country; and
Whereas designating the fourth week in July as National Youth Sports Week would 
        raise awareness of the important physical and emotional benefits of 
        participating in youth sports and the need to promote sportsmanship 
        among players, parents, coaches, and officials: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that a National Youth Sports Week should be established to promote 
awareness of the importance of youth sports and the need to restore the 
focus in youth sports on the child's experience and character 
development.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the accompanying Report of Henry County Plywood
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, David Lilja, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



By:  /s/ David Lilja
     ----------------------------------------
     David Lilja
     Chief Financial Officer
     August 28, 2008
From: maryellenhatcher@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 5:20:27 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mary Ellen Hatcher

Long Valley, NJ 07853
From: Believer.lee@gmAil.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:52:43 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Elizabeth Lee

Cocoa, FL 32926
(R.D. 11430)

#### Parsons & Whittemore, Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided December 18, 1967)

*Sharp, Bolter & Hutchison*for the plaintiff.

*Edwin L. Weisl, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court:

1. That the subject merchandise consists of hardboard exported from Sweden as to which the Secretary of the Treasury issued a finding of dumping, published in 89 TD 197, TD 53567, made pursuant to the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C., 160, et seq.).

2. That pursuant to Section 168 of said Antidumping Act, the appraiser reported the purchase price (Sec. 162) and the foreign market value (Sec. 164) as to the merchandise listed on Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof.

3. That pursuant to Sections 500 and 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, the appraiser appraised all of the merchandise in the appeals for appraisement enumerated on Schedule A for regular duty purposes.

*8124. That the plaintiff duly filed appeals for reappraisement as to the values referred to in the above paragraphs Nos. 2 and 3.

5. That at the time relevant herein the purchase price and the foreign market value under the said Antidumping Act are as specified in the aforesaid Schedule A attached hereto.

6. That as to all other items of merchandise not identified on Schedule A, the appraiser’s reports of purchase price and of foreign market value are correct.

7. That the appraiser’s findings of value under the provisions of Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, are correct.

8. That said appeals are submitted for decision upon this stipulation and said Schedule A.

Upon the agreed facts, I find foreign market value, as defined in section 164 of the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19.U.S.C. § 164), for the merchandise described in schedule A, annexed to this decision and made a part hereof, and the purchase price thereof, within section 162 of said act (19 U.S.C. § 162), to be as indicated in said schedule. As to all other items of merchandise not identified in schedule A, I find the foreign market values and purchase prices to be as reported by the appraiser. In all other respects, the values of all merchandise are as returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
AEROSPACE Bombardier Inc. 200 chemin de la Côte-Vertu West Dorval, Québec, Canada H4S 2A3 www.bombardier.com

TEL 514-420-4000

Ref: AW-BCC/15/729 01 December, 2015

Subject: BD-700-2B12 Global 7000 and BD-700-2B13 Global 8000 – Petition for Grant of

Exemption from Requirements of 14 CFR 25.813(e) for Installation of Doors Between Passenger Seats and Emergency Exits

Dear Mr Sinclair: Bombardier was recently made aware of the fact that a partial grant of exemption was granted to Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation (reference exemption number 13281) and that publication in the Federal Register for public comment had been waived. Bombardier submits that the conditions proposed by Gulfstream and in our own petition for grant of exemption (docket number FAA-2015-3836) differ substantially from those specified in SFAR 109 for aircraft operated under FAR 91 and for this reason a period of public comment would be appropriate. In light of the above, it is kindly requested that notification of our petition for grant of exemption be published in the Federal Register so that interested parties have an opportunity to submit comments. Sincerely,

Mike Gillis Senior Engineering Specialist, Airworthiness Bombardier Aerospace Alan Sinclair Transport Airplane Directorate Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Avenue SW Renton, WA 98057