alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Response to Harcos Chemicals regarding review for CASRN 31138-65-5 Paul Campanella to: Ann Marie Savini 10/20/2011 03:26 PM Cc: John Schaeffer, Mike Mattheisen, David Brooks, Chuantung Lin Dear Ann Marie: Regarding your letter of intent to test for D-gluco Heptonic acid , monsosdium salt (2.xi.)- [CASRN 31138-65-5] and the proposed modifications to the testing and test methods specified in the final rule, EPA has reviewed these and has made the following determinations: Physical / Chemical Properties 1. Regarding the required testing for melting point (A.1.): EPA agrees that OECD 102 in lieu of ASTM E 324-99 is acceptable. 2. Regarding the required testing for boiling point (A.2.): Your letter specifies no change of the required test method (ASTM E 1719-05 (Ebulliometry). 3. Regarding the required testing for n-octanol/water partition coefficient (A.4.): EPA accepts the estimated value provided in your letter in lieu of testing. 4. Regarding the required testing for water solubility (A.5.): Your letter specifies either of two of the specified test methods: Method A: ASTM E 1148-02 (Reapproved 2008)(shake flask) or Method B: (40 CFR 799.6784 (shake flask). Either of these two methods is acceptable. Biodegradation 1. Regarding the required testing for ready biodegradability: EPA agrees that either OECD 310 or OECD 301F in lieu of one of the (ASTM or ISO) methods specified in the final rule is acceptable. Additional Toxicity testing required : Aquatic Toxicity C 1 , Mammalian Toxicity D 1 , E 1 , E 2 and F 1

. The Protocol Review conducted by EPA’s Conractor and approved by the Risk Assessment Division is attached

. This review contains more explicit detail including stipulations for conducting the tests and reporting the results

.

Harcos CASRN 31138-65-5_Protocol Final 10.19.11.pd f 31138-65-5_Protocol 10.19.11.pd Compositional Analysis Please note that the test rule specifies 99% p urity. The substance used for testing must be 99% p ure. If that purity cannot be attained, p lease explain and make a request for a modificationspecifying what purity will be used.

Paul J. Campanella, Ph.D. Chemical Information and Testing Branch Chemical Control Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, D.C. 202-564-8091
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 *




In
connection with the Annual Report of DRC Ventures, Inc., (the “Company”), on
Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) pursuant to the
requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63
of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C.§ 1350), Ronald Williams,
the President, principal executive officer and principal financial officer of
the Company, hereby certifies that, to the best of my knowledge:




1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period
covered by the Periodic Report.




Date:
      September 28, 2009
              By:
              /s/ Ronald WilliamsRonald
      WilliamsPresident
      (Principal Executive Officer
                and
      Principal Financial Officer)





*  This
certification accompanies the Report to which it relates, is not deemed filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before
or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation
language contained in such filing.
From: wahuhi@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:48:13 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kim Myers

Elizabethtown, PA 17022
Due to the file size of the CALPUFF modeling files, they are not available from the electronic 

docket. These files are available upon request.

Please email your request to: Michael Feldman (feldman.michael@epa.gov) or call 

214-665-7200.

Thank you.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BJs Wholesale Club, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended August 2, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, Frank D. Forward, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the undersigneds knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |  |  |                                                     
|------------------------ |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Dated: September 3, 2008 |  |  |  | /S/ FRANK D. FORWARD                                
|                         |  |  |  | Frank D. Forward                                    
|                         |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                         |  |  |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         (1,566)
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  457,250
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               588,307
<PP&E>                                         282,532
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,816,823
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          865,848
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    820,281
<COMMON>                                        16,800
<OTHER-SE>                                   (409,983)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,816,823
<SALES>                                        143,167
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               143,167
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  176,751
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               176,751
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,988
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,955
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (33,584)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,955
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register: September 15, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 178)]
[Notices]               
[Page 56158]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr15se10-127]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7107]

 
Industry Advisory Panel: Notice of Open Meeting

    The Industry Advisory Panel of the Bureau of Overseas Buildings 
Operations will meet on Thursday, October 14, 2010 from 9:30 a.m. until 
3:30 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time. The meeting is open to the public and 
will be held in the Loy Henderson Conference Room of the U.S. 
Department of State, located at 2201 C Street, NW., (entrance on 23rd 
Street) Washington, DC. For logistical and security reasons, it is 
imperative that everyone enter and exit using only the 23rd Street 
entrance.
    The majority of the meeting will be devoted to an exchange of ideas 
between the Department's senior management and the panel members on 
design, operations, and building maintenance. There will be reasonable 
time provided for members of the public to provide comment.
    Entry to the building is controlled; to obtain pre-clearance, 
members of the public planning to attend should provide, by October 1, 
their name, professional affiliation, date of birth, citizenship, and a 
valid government-issued ID number (i.e., U.S. government ID, U.S. 
military ID, passport, or drivers license) via e-mail to: 
IAPR@state.gov. Requests for reasonable accommodation should be sent to 
the same e-mail address by October 1. Requests made after that date 
will be considered, but may not be able to be fulfilled.
    Personal data is requested pursuant to Public Law 99-399 (Omnibus 
Diplomatic Security and Antiterrorism Act of 1986), as amended; Public 
Law 107-56 (USA PATRIOT Act); and Executive Order 13356. The purpose of 
the collection is to validate the identity of individuals who enter 
Department facilities. The data will be entered into the Visitor Access 
Control System (VACS-D) database. Please see the Privacy Impact 
Assessment for VACS-D at http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/100305.pdf for additional information.
    Please contact Christy Foushee at FousheeCT@state.gov or (703) 875-
5751 with any questions.

    Dated: August 31, 2010.
Adam E. Namm,
Director, Acting, U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Overseas 
Buildings Operations.
[FR Doc. 2010-22989 Filed 9-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-24-P
```
No. 60155.

protests 191032-K, etc. (San Francisco).

#### Gold-Silver & Co. and Frank P. Dow Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of miniature pistols with ramrods the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 59618, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
(IMAGE)(ERNST & YOUNG LOGO)
    
    
    Ernst & Young LLP
Suite 3000
801 Grand Avenue
Des Moines, IA 50309-2764
Tel: +1 515 243 2727 
Fax: +1 515
362 7200 
www.ey.com
 Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




---



##### 



In our opinion, managements assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing
criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010 for the Principal Life Income Fundings
Trusts registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of
1933 on Registration Statement Nos. 333-147181 and 333-147181-01 platform is fairly stated, in all
material respects.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BJs Wholesale Club, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended August 1, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, Frank D. Forward, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the undersigneds knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |                                                     
|------------------------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Dated: September 2, 2009 |  | /S/ FRANK D. FORWARD                                
|                         |  | Frank D. Forward                                    
|                         |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                         |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
From: pottsjw@bardstowncable.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:50:08 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Marianp Potts

Bardstown, KY 40004
From: toma2z@netzero.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:24:01 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

George Amrozowicz

Gilbert, AZ 85295
From: velvetosborne@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:37:07 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Velvet Osborne

Murfreesboro, TN 37129
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 161 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     February 16, 2007.
    Resolved,  That it shall be in order at any time on the legislative day of 
Friday, February 16, 2007, for the Speaker to entertain motions that the House 
suspend the rules relating to the bill (H.R. 976) to amend the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986 to provide tax relief for small businesses, and for other purposes.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

 

Registration No.  333-97047

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  236				Trade Date: 12/12/02
(To Prospectus Supplement dated August 15, 2002 & 

  Prospectus dated August 8,2002)					Issue Date:  12/17/02
The Date of this Pricing Supplement December 12, 2002
SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

  CUSIP									Date and terms of redemption or

     or	Stated				             Interest			repayment (including any

Common	Interest		  Price to	 Discounts &         Payment	Survivors		applicable regular or special

  Code	Rate (1)	Maturity	Public (2)	Commissions       Frequency	  Option	Yes/No	record dates)

14911QKV2  2.25%	12/15/04	     100%	        0.325%                Semi-Annually	     YES	    NO	

Principal						1st Payment	Day	

Amount		Proceeds		Dealer		      Date		Count

$2,264,000.00	$2,256,642.00	ABN AMRO Inc.	   6/15/03		30/360	
 

Original Issue Discount Note:					Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes	  X   No						N/A

 

 
- The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the effective date of the change.   Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $28.398 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (SM) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (SM) will be made under the Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated August 8, 2002.
- Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.