alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 293

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

April 18, 2007.

Whereas National Volunteer Week began in 1974 when President Nixon signed an Executive order establishing the 

week as an annual celebration of volunteering, and since 

then, every United States President has signed a proclamation promoting National Volunteer Week; 

Whereas National Volunteer Week will be observed during 

the week of April 15 through 21, 2007; 

Whereas the National Volunteer Week theme, ‘‘Inspire By 

Example’’, truly reflects the power volunteers have to inspire the people they help and to inspire others to serve; 

Whereas about 61.2 million people volunteered through or for 

an organization at least once between September 2005 

and September 2006, according to a recent survey by the 

United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, and the proportion of people who volunteered was 26.7 percent, more 

than a quarter of the total United States population; 

Whereas the estimated dollar value of volunteer time was 

$18.04 in 2005, according to the latest information provided by Independent Sector, a nonpartisan leadership 

forum, and the coalition estimates the value of volunteer 

time for 2005 to be $280 billion; 
2

•HRES 293 EH 

Whereas volunteers have contributed to the enhancement and 

improvement of communities across the United States, 

especially with respect to the aftermath of the hurricanes 

on the Gulf Coast; and 

Whereas National Volunteer Week will continue to build 

awareness of the role that volunteers play in local, national, and international communities, and their commitment and dedication to improving lives, strengthening 

communities, and fostering civic engagement through 

service and volunteering: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) supports the goals and ideals highlighted 

through National Volunteer Week; 

(2) acknowledges the diligent efforts of our major 

federally funded community service and volunteer programs; 

(3) recognizes with gratitude the contributions of 

the millions of dedicated and caring individuals who have 

chosen to serve others through volunteerism; and 

(4) encourages all American people, of any age and 

background, to seek out opportunities to serve through 

volunteerism. 

Attest:

Clerk.
#### In the Matter of the Application of Angelo Pellegrino, Appellant. The People of the State of New York, Respondent.

*Matter of Pellegrino, 152*App. Div. 482, affirmed.

(Submitted March 3, 1913;

decided March 18, 1913.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered September 10, 1912, which reversed an order of the Kings County Court granting a motion for the remission in part of the forfeiture of an undertaking of bail.

*Peter P. Smith*for appellant.

*James C. Cropsey, District Attorney (Harry G. Anderson*and *Hersey Egginton of*counsel), for respondent.

Order affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Chase, Collin and Hogan, JJ.
From: sjbrown@dishmail.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:33:24 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Shauni Brown

Freetown, IN 47235
From: calangie@att.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:51:45 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Angie Fairbanks

Marysville, WA 98270
Exhibit 10.4 [millstream10k033111ex104001.jpg]   [millstream10k033111ex104002.jpg]   [millstream10k033111ex104003.jpg]   [millstream10k033111ex104004.jpg]   [millstream10k033111ex104005.jpg]   [millstream10k033111ex104006.jpg]   [millstream10k033111ex104007.jpg]   [millstream10k033111ex104008.jpg]   [millstream10k033111ex104009.jpg]   [millstream10k033111ex104010.jpg]   [millstream10k033111ex104011.jpg]   [millstream10k033111ex104012.jpg]   [millstream10k033111ex104013.jpg]   [millstream10k033111ex104014.jpg]   [millstream10k033111ex104015.jpg]   [millstream10k033111ex104016.jpg]   [millstream10k033111ex104017.jpg]   [millstream10k033111ex104018.jpg]   [millstream10k033111ex104019.jpg]   [millstream10k033111ex104020.jpg]   [millstream10k033111ex104021.jpg]   [millstream10k033111ex104022.jpg]   [millstream10k033111ex104023.jpg]   [millstream10k033111ex104024.jpg]   [millstream10k033111ex104025.jpg]   [millstream10k033111ex104026.jpg]   [millstream10k033111ex104027.jpg]   [millstream10k033111ex104028.jpg]   [millstream10k033111ex104029.jpg]   [millstream10k033111ex104030.jpg]   [millstream10k033111ex104031.jpg]   [millstream10k033111ex104032.jpg]   [millstream10k033111ex104033.jpg]   [millstream10k033111ex104034.jpg]   [millstream10k033111ex104035.jpg]   [millstream10k033111ex104036.jpg]   [millstream10k033111ex104037.jpg]   [millstream10k033111ex104038.jpg]   [millstream10k033111ex104039.jpg]   [millstream10k033111ex104040.jpg]   [millstream10k033111ex104041.jpg]   [millstream10k033111ex104042.jpg]
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that
the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 of
Flurida Group, Inc. (the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Dated:4/7/2009
              By:
              /s/ Yaru
      HangYaru
      HangChief
      Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Flurida Group, Inc. and will
be retained by Flurida Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 303 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that a day ought 

to be established to bring awareness to the issue of missing persons. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 17, 2007 

Mrs. GILLIBRAND submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

a day ought to be established to bring awareness to 

the issue of missing persons. 

Whereas each year tens of thousands of people go missing in 

the United States; 

Whereas, on any given day, there are as many as 100,000 

active missing persons cases in the United States; 

Whereas the Missing Persons File of the National Crime Information Center (NCIC) was implemented in 1975; 

Whereas, in 2005, 109,531 persons were reported missing to 

law enforcement agencies nationwide, of whom 11,868 

were between the ages of 18 and 20; 

Whereas section 204 of the PROTECT Act, known as 

Suzanne’s Law and passed by Congress on April 10, 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 303 IH 

2003, modifies section 3701(a) of the Crime Control Act 

of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 5779(a)), so that agencies must enter 

records into the NCIC database for all missing persons 

under the age of 21; 

Whereas Kristen’s Act (42 U.S.C. 14665), passed in 1999, 

has established grants for organizations to, among other 

things, track missing persons and provide informational 

services to families and the public; 

Whereas, according to the NCIC, 48,639 missing persons 

were located in 2005, an improvement of 4.2 percent 

from the previous year; 

Whereas many persons reported missing may be victims of 

Alzheimer’s disease or other health-related issues, or may 

be victims of foul play; 

Whereas, regardless of age or circumstances, all missing persons have families who need support and guidance to endure the days, months, or years they may spend searching for their missing loved ones; and 

Whereas it is important to applaud the committed efforts of 

families, law enforcement agencies, and concerned citizens who work to locate missing persons and to prevent 

all forms of victimization: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that— 

3 (1) a day ought to be established to bring 

4 awareness to the issue of missing persons; and 

5 (2) the people of the United States should be 

6 encouraged to— 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 303 IH 

1 (A) observe the day with appropriate pro2 grams and activities; and 

3 (B) support worthy initiatives and in4 creased efforts to locate missing persons. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
**EXHIBIT      32**

**CERTIFICATION      OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND **

**PRINCIPAL      FINANCIAL OFFICER **

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 **

**AS      ADDED BY SECTION 906 OF THE **

**SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of                1934. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | To                my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents,                in                all material respects the financial condition and results of operations                of                Union National as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the                Report. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By                                     | /s/                Mark D. Gainer                                |
|----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                   | Chairman,                CEO, and President                      |
|                                   |                                                             |
| Date:                November 14, 2008 |
|                                   |                                                             |
|                                   |                                                             |
| By                                     | /s/                Michael D. Peduzzi                            |
|                                   | Senior                Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|                                   |                                                             |
| Date:                November 14, 2008 |

----
Case No. 6,470.

#### HIGGINS et al. v. WATSON et al.

[43 Hunt, Mer. Mag. 69.]

District Court, S. D. New York.

1860.

Freight — Loss of Cargo — Charter-Party.

[1. The vessel owner is not liable for the loss by sea perils of goods laden on deck with the shipper’s consent, in the absence of culpable neglect or misconduct in their destruction or jettison.]

[2. As between the charterer and the owner, the charter-party, and not the bills of lading, controlls the contract of shipment, and governs the rights of the parties, where their terms are conflicting.]

[This was a libel by N. Poster Higgins and others against Barron C. Watson and others for freight under a charter-party.]

The libellants were the owners of the schooner B. S. Johnson, which was chartered on August 6, 1858, to the respondents by her master, for a voyage from two ports in North Carolina to New York, the respondents engaging to provide the vessel with a full cargo of resin and spirits of turpentine in barrels under deck, and with a deck load of resin in barrels, and to pay the master or agent a certain freight for resin and spirits of turpentine under deck, and another rate of freight for resin on deck. The master signed two clean bills of lading for resin shipped on board, and one deliverable to the respondents or their assigns, and the other deliverable to a third party. The vessel arrived in New York, September 24, 1858, and delivered to the respondents 10C barrels of resin less than the number of barrels called for by the bills of lading, that number having been swept from the deck or jettisoned by reason of sea perils. The master duly assigned the charter-party to the libelants, who brought this action to recover the freight according to the charter, while the respondents claimed that as the bills of lading were clean bills, the libelants were responsible for the loss of the resin shipped on deck.

Before BETTS, *District*Judge.

HELD

BY THE COURT:

That the owner of a vessel is not liable for the loss by sea perils of goods laden on deck with the consent of the shipper, when no culpable neglect or misconduct is attributed to him in their destruction or jettison. [Lawrence v. Minturn] 17 How. [58 U. S.] 100. That the charter-party in this case, and not the bills of lading, forms the controlling contract of shipment, and governs the rights of the parties, which are not changed by specifying a different rate of freight in the bills of lading. That the objection that an action upon a charter-party is not within the jurisdiction of the court, cannot be maintained. Decree for libelants, with a reference to ascertain the amount of the charter-money due.
2013 Executive Compensation Information



 EXHIBIT 10.39 

Named Executive Officer Compensation Information – 2013 Salaries and Target Bonus Percentages 

The table below provides information regarding the annual base salaries and target bonus percentages for the Company’s 2012 named executive officers
currently employed by the Company for the 2013 performance period: 
  

									
	 Named Executive Officer
	  	2013 Annual Base Salary	 	  	2013 Target Bonus
Percentage (1)	 
	 Ronald W. Barrett, PhD

Chief Executive Officer
	  	$	500,000	  	  	 	90	% 
	 William G. Harris

Senior Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
	  	$	369,195	  	  	 	40	% 
	 Vincent J. Angotti

Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer
	  	$	426,409	  	  	 	60	% 
	 Kenneth C. Cundy, PhD

Chief Scientific Officer
	  	$	371,501	  	  	 	40	% 
	 David R. Savello, PhD

Senior Vice President of Development Operations
	  	$	367,931	  	  	 	40	% 

  

	(1)	Represents a percentage of 2013 annual base salary pursuant to the terms and conditions of the XenoPort, Inc. Corporate Bonus Plan.
No. 371.

#### Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. *v.*Milstead; and Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen et al. *v.*Milstead.

No. 382.

*John W. We Idon*and *Peyton D. Bibb*for petitioner in No. 371.

*Harold C. Heiss, Russell B. Day, Erie Pettus, Jr., Luden D. Gardner, Jr.*and *Harold N. McLaughlin*for petitioners in No. 382. *William M. Acker, Jr.*for respondent.

Supreme Court of Alabama. Certiorari denied.
---

Exhibit 21

Subsidiaries of Henry County Plywood Corporation

|Name of Subsidiary                                   | Jurisdiction of Organization | % Owned                 
|---------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------- | ------------------------
|                                                     |                              |                         
|Organic Region Group
      Limited                   | BVI                          | 100%                    
|HK Organic Region Limited                            | Hong Kong                    | 100%                    
|Fuji Sunrise
      International Enterprises Limited | BVI                          | 100%                    
|Southern International Develop Limited               | BVI                          | 100%                    
|Zhuhai Organic Region
      Modern Agriculture Ltd   | PRC                          | 100%                    
|Guangzhou Organic Region Agriculture
      Ltd.      | PRC                          | 100%                    
|Guangzhou Greenland                                  | PRC                          | Variable interest entity

---
----

----

| (1)   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |                                             |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                             |   |
|   |   | /s/ John      C. Jordan                     |   |
|   |   | John      C. Jordan                              |   |
|   |   | Chief      Executive OfficerMarch 31, 2009  |   |
|   |   |                                             |   |

|   |   |   |                                       |   |
|--------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |   | /s/      John C. Jordan                    |   |
|   |   |   | John      C. Jordan                        |   |
|   |   |   | Chief      Financial OfficerMarch 31, 2009 |   |

----

----
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2011 - 1169 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2010 -NM - 050 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**