alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: bwrs26@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:34:01 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Brandon Schroeter

Herington, KS 67449
Case No. 10,168.

#### In re NEW LAMP CHIMNEY CO.

District Court, S. D. New York.

Bankruptcy — Counsel Fees — Disbursement.-..

[A memorandum in 2 Alb. Law J. (Oct. 29, 1870) 343, states that BLATCHFORD. District Judge, refused to allow $250 out of the assets of the bankrupt estate as counsel fees to the bankrupt’s attorney, on the ground that no such allowance was authorized in the bankruptcy act. or in analogous practice; and referred a question of allowing the attorney $90 for disbursements to the register for proofs and opinion.]

J. W. Martin, for bankrupt.

S. B. Hingenbotam, for assignees and creditors.

[Nowhere reported. Opinion of BLATCHRD, J., and report of referee not now accessible.]
LV Final Negotiations 

Summary of Shipments Data, Schneider proposal and work group member reactions 

Shipments Data 

KvA Shipments (MVA) Percent of Total LVDT 

15 263 1.6 % 

30-500 15, 292 93.1 % 

750-2500 213 1.3 % 

Schneider proposal 

DL7 (15* to 150kVA) 

 Would support a EL4 rule if we could have implemented in 2017 

 *15 Kva scaled at 0.62 instead of 0.75) 

DL8 (225 to 1000kVA) 

 Would support a EL3.5 rule and support having implemented in 2015 

 Can not support the EL4 due to the unproven ability to use M3 as Miter.

kVA Efficiency Date Improvement 

DL7 (EL 4): 

15* 97.81% Jan-2017 27.4% 

30 98.49% Jan-2017 40.4% 

45 98.64% Jan-2017 41.4% 

75 98.80% Jan-2017 40.5% 

112.5 98.91% Jan-2017 40.1% 

150 98.99% Jan-2017 40.9% 

DL 8 (EL 3.5): 

225 99.14% Jan-2015 43.1% 

300 99.20% Jan-2015 43.2% 

500 99.30% Jan-2015 46.1% 

750 99.36% Jan-2015 47.2% 

1000 99.41% Jan-2015 46.3% 

*scaling on 15 kvA of 0.62 

Responses of other industry participants 

Dhiru Patel (Hammond Power) 

“We can meet CSL 4 from 30 kVA to 500 kVA, using M4 material and cost increases are reasonable. 

We can meet CSL4 for 15, and 600 to 1000 kVA using M3 material. We had tough time even after 

using M3 and material costs were doubled compared to base efficiency level. If we drop this to CSL3 

for 15 kVA and 600-1000kVA, costs were again in line. 
In conclusion, for LVDT, we would be OK if negotiating team proposed CSL4 from 30kVA to 600 

kVA and CSL3 for 15 kVA & from 601 kVA to 1000 kVA.” 

Eduardo Robles (Eaton): 

“I completed several designs on the representative specification for DL7, and sure enough after 

several tries I got to an EL4-compliant design using M4, I should say that in order to exceed with 

limited manufacturing margin EL4 I had to use hybrid windings to make M4 work, you no longer will 

be able to use 100% Aluminum windings if you want to stretch the M4 performance and of course it 

had to be a mitered construction. Moving down on the rating scale I believe you can do the same but 

on the opposite direction the 150 kVA rating may present problems. 

 

As you know the representative unit it is probably the least complex of the potential universe of 

designs, once manufacturers start trying to make low rise, k-rated transformers or transformers with 

primaries ranging from 208 to 380, M4 will run out of gas and we will have to consider M3, H0 or 

H1 for those specs. 

 

I do have concerns regarding destruction factors as we move to thinner gage steel grades, I believe 

this parameter was underestimated on the OPS simulations.”
From: arlen@theirhouse.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:54:25 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Arlen Williams

Tulsa, OK 74133
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF TRUSTEE

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned Trustee of FSP East Wacker Tenth Street Corp. Liquidating Trust
(the “Liquidating Trust”) hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:



(i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the
Liquidating Trust for the year ended December 31, 2019 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Liquidating Trust.



Date: March 30, 2020





|By: | /s/ John G. Demeritt                                     | 
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------- | 
|    | John G. Demeritt                                         | 
|    | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer     | 
|    | FSP PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC                              | 
|    | Trustee of FSP East Wacker Drive Corp. Liquidating Trust | 









The foregoing certification is being furnished with the Liquidating Trust’s
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Liquidating
Trust, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general information language in such filing.
No. 65153.

#### Aut Customs Brokers, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/15424 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Since the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
EXHIBIT 32.02



Certifying Statement of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act





In connection with the Annual Report of Gold Star Tutoring Services, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert M. Kline, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Gold Star Tutoring Services, Inc. and will be retained by Gold Star Tutoring Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







March 25, 2008

/s/Robert M. Kline__________________

Robert M. Kline, Treasurer

Chief Financial Officer

Principal Accounting and Financial Officer
From: justinbrandl1@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:38:06 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Justin Brandl

Humphrey, NE 68642
#### Eva M. WRIGHT, Widow of Clarence M. Wright, Petitioner, v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, United States Department of Labor; Sea “B” Mining Company, Respondents.

No. 00-2083.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 20, 2001.

Decided June 18, 2001.

Eva Wright, pro se. Christian P. Barber, Sarah Marie Hurley, United States Department of Labor, Washington, DC; Timothy Ward Gresham, Penn, Stuart & Eskridge, Abingdon, VA, for respondents.

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Eva Wright seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 2000). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of • the Board. *See Wright v. DOWCP,*Nos. 99-976-BLA; 99-176-BLA. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before *77the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
March 31, 1965

No. 69215.

Appeal 5158.

#### United States *v.*Weather-Rite Sportswear Co., Inc.

affirmed December 17,1964. C.A.D. 848.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20 22

- 2433

_____________________________
T ERRANCE H ARTLEY , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Coleman Lee Robinson , Judge

. January 30, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
B ILBREY , W INOKUR , and T ANENBAUM , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Terrance Hartley, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
| Company Name                             |   | State or country ofincorporation ororganization |   | Voting percent owneddirectly or indirectlyby registrant |   | Notes |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------|
| Kuong U Science & Technology (Group) Ltd. |   | Macau, People’s Republic of China                             |   |                                                                             | 100    | %     | 1% held in trust byWensheng Chen forpurposes of registrationin Macau |
| Nanyang Universal Solar Technology Co., Ltd.  |   | People’s Republic of China                                    |   |                                                                             | 100    | %     |   |

----
**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

** **

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-200836) and on Form S-8 (FileNo. 33-222416) of Marina Biotech, Inc. of our report dated April 17, 2018, relating to the consolidated financial statements ofMarina Biotech, Inc., appearing in this annual report on Form 10-K of Marina Biotech, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2017.

 

*/s/SQUAR MILNER LLP*

* *

LosAngeles, California

April17, 2018
MANAGEMENTS ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE
   Platform (i.e.,
 Applicable Servicing Criteria
 Period
  
    
    The Companys management is responsible for assessing the Companys
compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
    
    The Companys management has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the
Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.
    
    Based on such assessment, the Company has complied, in all material respects, with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria.
  CITIBANK, N.A.By:
    
    /s/ Karen MontbachIts:
    
    Managing Director citiDated: February 26, 2010
    
    Karen Montbach, Managing DirectorCiti Issuer Services388 Greenwich Street, 14th FloorNew York, NY 10013212-816-5716
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FILED AS PART OF THE
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH REPORT
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,546
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,301
<ALLOWANCES>                                       928
<INVENTORY>                                     28,246
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                97,621
<PP&E>                                          13,610
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,812
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 216,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,020
<BONDS>                                        144,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            91
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,976
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   216,100
<SALES>                                         68,814
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                89,987
<CGS>                                           39,314
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   53,537
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   370
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,331
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3,115)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,870)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,245)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,245)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.14)
        


</TABLE>
From: richardjhogan@mchsi.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:23:03 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Richard Hogan

Sturgeon Lake, MN 55783
### Surficial geology of the Kingston quadrangle, Rhode Island

By: Clifford A. Kaye

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1071I

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (6489 pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.