alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.38  AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE OF MARCH 3, 2008 The undersigned, Lanai Investments, LLC (Pay­ee), at 2120 Hidden Pine Lane, Apopka, Florida 32712, agrees to modify the terms of 13 Promissory Notes as listed in the table below (together termed the Original Notes) for a total of $203,180 made by Crystal Magic, Inc., a Florida corporation (Maker), with several dates as indicated below, as follows: The first paragraph of all 13 Original Notes shall now replaced with the following paragraph: FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Crystal Magic, Inc., a Florida corporation ("Maker"), promises to pay to the order of Lanai Investments, LLC (Pay­ee), at 2120 Hidden Pine Lane, Apopka, Florida 32712, the principal sum represented by each of the Original Notes simultaneous with the closing of any additional financing that exceeds $1.5 million that occurs after the Company has begun trading as a publicly trading company on the OTC bulletin board (the "Maturity Date"), unless Payee consents to an extension of the Maturity Date,­­ together with inter­est on the principal amount hereof at the rate of 6% per annu­m. Payments on both principal and interest are to be made in lawful money of the United States of America unless Payee agrees to another form of payment. All other terms of the Original Notes remain in force, unless superseded by this document. Note amountDate12/26/07$5,00012/28/07$11,0001/2/08  (incorrectly shown on original as 1/2/07)$10,1801/4/08$15,0001/23/08$5,0001/28/08$10,0001/31/08$20,0002/4/08$10,0002/13/08$25,0002/27/08$6,0002/20/08$21,0003/3/08$25,0003/21/08$40,000TOTAL$203,180  CRYSTAL MAGIC, INC.LANAI INVESTMENTSBy:/s/ Steven M. RhodesBy:/s/ Steven M. RhodesName:Steven M. RhodesName:Steven M. RhodesTitle:PresidentTitle:Manager     In the event that Crystal Magic, Inc. fails to make a payment under the Original Notes, as amended (the Amended Notes) when due, Propell Corporation hereby guarantees payment of the debt evidenced by the Amended Notes in accordance with the terms of the Amended  Notes, such guarantee to be effective only from and after the date that (i) the Option Agreement that provides Steve Rhodes with the option to purchase shares of Class A Preferred Stock of Crystal Magic, Inc, is terminated  without exercise, (ii) the financial statements of Crystal Magic, Inc are consolidated with the financial statements of Propell Corporation in compliance with accounting standards and principles, including, GAAP and all  SEC rules and regulations and (iii) the board of directors of Propell Corporation  is  comprised of five members, a majority of which are deemed to be independent under Item 407 of Regulation S-K.  Propell CorporationBy:/s/ Edward L. BernsteinName:Edward L. BernsteinTitle:CEO
From: John Palmer

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Friday, August 19, 2011 8:07:39 AM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

John Palmer
Portland, Oregon
AGREEMENT 


 


This Agreement is dated as of December
[ ], 2012 (the “Agreement”) is entered into between Universal Business Payment Solutions Acquisition Corporation,
a Delaware corporation (“UBPS”), and Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company, an New York corporation
(“Warrant Agent”).


 


WHEREAS, UBPS and Seller are parties
to that certain Warrant Agreement (the “Warrant Agreement”), dated May 13, 2011, by and between UBPS and Warrant
Agent;


 


WHEREAS, on December 11, 2012, a
majority of the issued and outstanding holders of the Warrants voted in favor of a proposal terminate the Warrant Agreement at
a special meeting of the warrantholders duly called, evidence of which is attached as Exhibit A hereto; and


 


WHEREAS, in accordance with Section
9.8 of the Warrant Agreement, UBPS and Warrant Agent desire to terminate the Merger Agreement.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration
of the mutual agreements contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


1. UBPS and Warrant Agent hereby terminate
the Warrant Agreement in accordance with 9 8 thereof.


 


2. This Agreement shall be governed
by and construed in accordance with the internal laws of the State of New York.


 


3. This Agreement shall inure to the
benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns.


 


4. This Agreement may be executed in
any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, and all of which together shall be deemed to be one
and the same instrument.


 


[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left
Blank] 


 






    	 



    	 



    
 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, and intending to
be legally bound, the undersigned have signed this Amendment as of the date first written above.


 


	 	
        Universal business payment
        solutions acquisition corporation

        

        

         

        By:/s/ Bipin C.
        Shah                                            

        Name:Bipin C. Shah
         Title:Chief Executive Officer

         

	 	
        CONTINENTAL STOCK TRANSFER
        & TRUST COmpany 

        

        

         

        By: /s/ John W. Comer                                         

        Name:John W. Comer

        Title:Vice President
INTHESUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFMONTANAPR21-0005INRETHEMOTIONOFRUBYS.REDSHAWFORADMISSIONTOTHEBAROFTHESTATEOFMONTANAIRLEDJANi92021BowenGreenwoodClerkofSupremeCourtORIYEIRubyS.RedshawhasfiledamotionforadmissiontotheBaroftheStateofMontanapursuanttoRuleVoftheRulesforAdmission,AdmissiononMotion.TheBarAdrnissionsAdministratoroftheStateBarofMontanahasinformedtheCourtthattheCornmissiononCharacterandFitnesshascertifiedthatRedshawhasprovidedthenecessarydocumentationandhassatisfiedtherequirementsprerequisitetoadrnissiononrnotionunderRuleV.Therefore,ITISHEREBYORDEREDthatuponpaymentofanyapplicationfeesandcompletionofanyotherprocessingrequirementsassetforthbytheBarAdrnissionsAdministrator,RubyS.RedshawmaybeswornintothepracticeoflawintheStateofMontana.ArrangementsforswearinginmaybemadebycontactingtheofficeoftheClerkoftheMontanaSupremeCourt,andmaybeconductedbyHon.LeslieHalligan.RuleX.D.,RulesofAdmission.TheClerkisdirectedtoprovidecopiesofthisordertoPetitionerandtotheStateBarofMontana.LYN--DATEDthisfgldayofJanuary,2021.01/19/2021Case Number: PR 21-00052Justices
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN THE INT. OF: A.E.L.L., A MINOR

PETITION OF: T.L., MOTHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 722 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

IN THE INT. OF: T.M.L., A MINOR

PETITION OF: T.L., MOTHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 723 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

IN THE INT. OF: A.E.L.L., A MINOR

PETITION OF: T.L., MOTHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 724 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

IN THE INT. OF: A.E.L.L., A MINOR

PETITION OF: T.L., MOTHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 725 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of February, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           6
<LEGEND>            The  schedule   contains   summary   financial   information
                    extracted  from  the  financial  statements  and  supporting
                    schedules  as of the end of the most  current  period and is
                    qualified in its  entirety by  reference  to such  financial
                    statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>               0000764901
<NAME>              Connecticut Daily Tax Free Income Fund, Inc.
<SERIES>
<NUMBER>            1
<NAME>              CLASS A
       
<S>                               <C>    
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 YEAR
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>         169039179
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>        169039179
<RECEIVABLES>                 941035
<ASSETS-OTHER>                0
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                169980214
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>      0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>       0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>     2196125
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>           2196125
<SENIOR-EQUITY>               0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>      167791987
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>         167810297
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>         136638142
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>     0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>        0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>       (7898)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>      0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>      0
<NET-ASSETS>                  167784089
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>             0
<INTEREST-INCOME>             4976187
<OTHER-INCOME>                0
<EXPENSES-NET>                1228504
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>       3747683
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>      (993)
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>     0
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>         3746690
<EQUALIZATION>                0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>     3747683
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>      0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>         0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>       296146762
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>   268450841
<SHARES-REINVESTED>           3476234
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>        31171162
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>       0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>     (6905)
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>       0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>    0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>         416312
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>               1228953
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>          139151773
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>         1.00
<PER-SHARE-NII>               0.03
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>       0
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>          0.03
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>     0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>          0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>           1.00
<EXPENSE-RATIO>               .89
<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING>        0
<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE>          0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of VTEX Energy,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending January 31, 2004 (the  "Report"),  We, Stephen
F. Noser,  Chief Executive Officer and Randal B. McDonald,  Jr., Chief Financial
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the  Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.



/s/Stephen F. Noser
--------------------------
Stephen F. Noser
Chief Executive Officer
March 19, 2004

/s/Randal B. McDonald, Jr.
--------------------------
Randal B. McDonald, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer
March 19, 2004
From: brigittehoward@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:47:24 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Brigitte Howard

Omaha, NE 68137
From: sfdem@juno.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:29:09 PM

Dear HHS:

On behalf of God, many churches & God-fearing Americans, we hereby redemptively but divinely warn

you to rescind the unjust and coercive mandate forcing all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures

be covered by private health insurance with no co-pay to patients! Should you unwisely refuse to heed

this warning, we implore you to merely expand conscience protections for any organizations that provide

individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. We deeply oppose the

government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and devices that God &

we Biblically oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

We also redemptively warn you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic

conscience protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to

providing such insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience

laws which prohibit govern-ment discrimination against those who object to various health services on

moral or religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to

only include church-es, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have

conscience objections will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being

able to offer employ-ees health insurance.

For your own spiritual welfare/blessing, protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people

like us who object to being forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contracep-tives and

sterilization services, especially when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No

Americans should be forced by the federal government to essentially subsi-dize services they object to.

At His instruction, I again Biblically warn you to reverse your course and remove contraceptives and

sterilizations from the list of mandatory preventive services.

Sincerely,

Stephen Forfer

Mandeville, LA 70448
From: onthegogogail@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:59:11 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Gail Redmond

Metropolis, IL 62960
From: eagolesh@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:50:59 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Amy Golesh

Arvada, CO 80005
From: go120@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:11:29 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Janice Goimarac

Sedona, AZ 86336