alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

# Certification Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350,As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of InfoTech USA, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sebastian Perez, Chief
Operating Officer and acting President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/ Sebastian F. Perez
| | ----------------------

| | Sebastian F. Perez
                                                     Chief Operating Officer and acting President and Chief
                                                     Executive Officer
                                                     InfoTech USA, Inc.
                                                     February 13, 2004
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: freddasamuel@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:31:51 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Fredda Samuel

, 94605-2643
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### August 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 130922 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STAT E OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 130922 COA: 261414 Wayne CC: 03-013143-01 VICTORIA YVETTE JONES, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 9, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0821 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 29, 2006

Clerk
Exhibit 99.4

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with
the annual report of Sandstorm Gold Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the period ended December 31, 2014
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Nolan Watson, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)	the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: March 17, 2015 | /s/ Nolan Watson       
|-------------------- | -----------------------
|                     | Nolan Watson           
|                     | Chief Executive Officer



A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sandstorm Gold Ltd. and will be retained by Sandstorm
Gold Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification
accompanies the annual report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Registrant for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.









CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with
the annual report of Sandstorm Gold Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the period ended December 31, 2014
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Erfan Kazemi, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)	the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)	the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: March 17, 2015 | /s/ Erfan Kazemi       
|-------------------- | -----------------------
|                     | Erfan Kazemi           
|                     | Chief Financial Officer



A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Sandstorm Gold Ltd. and will be retained by Sandstorm
Gold Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification
accompanies the annual report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Registrant for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.
Before the Second Division,

August 16, 1966

No. P66/189. —

#### Empire Findings Co., Inc. *v.*United States, protest 65/23020 (New York).

Bao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of parts of stethoscopes similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Empire Findings Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(51 Cust. Ct. 262, Abstract 68126), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

IN RE PREMA JYOTHI LIGHT

______________________ 

2014-1598

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in No. 

76/293,327.

______________________ 

ON MOTION

______________________ 

O R D E R

Prema Jyothi Light moves for an extension of time, 

until November 5, 2014, to file her opening brief.

Upon consideration thereof,

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

(1) The motion is granted.

(2) The revised official caption is reflected above.

Case: 14-1598 Document: 9 Page: 1 Filed: 09/03/2014
2 IN RE LIGHT

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

Daniel E. O’Toole 

Clerk of Court

s21

Case: 14-1598 Document: 9 Page: 2 Filed: 09/03/2014
H. Res. 328 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

April 23, 2007. 

Resolved, That the House has heard with profound sorrow of the death of the Honorable Juanita Millender-McDonald, a Representative from the State of California. 

Resolved, That a committee of such Members of the 

House as the Speaker may designate, together with such 

Members of the Senate as may be joined, be appointed to attend the funeral. 

Resolved, That the Sergeant-at-Arms of the House be 

authorized and directed to take such steps as may be necessary for carrying out the provisions of these resolutions and 

that the necessary expenses in connection therewith be paid 

out of applicable accounts of the House. 

Resolved, That the Clerk communicate these resolutions 

to the Senate and transmit a copy thereof to the family of 

the deceased. 
2 

•HRES 328 EH 

Resolved, That when the House adjourns today, it adjourn as a further mark of respect to the memory of the deceased. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
No. 67522.

#### Seedman International Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 60/22170 (Tampa).

*243Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 CCPA 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 31.02

Certification of Robert M. Kline, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to

Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended



I, Robert M. Kline, certify that:



1. I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K of Gold Star Tutoring Services, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



March 25, 2009

/s/Robert M. Kline__________________

Robert M. Kline, Treasurer

Chief Financial Officer

Principal Accounting and Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the amended Annual Report of Calibert Explorations, Ltd.(the "Company") on Form 10-K/A-2 for the year ended November 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, David Saltrelli, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated this 26th day of August, 2010.





DAVID SALTRELLIDavid SaltrelliChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
MANAGEMENTS
ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE
   Platform (i.e.,
 Applicable
Servicing Criteria
 Period
  
    
    The Companys management is responsible for assessing the Companys
compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria.
    
    The Companys management has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria. In
making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Securities and
Exchange
Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.
    
    Based on such assessment, the Company has complied, in all material respects,
with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria.
  CITIBANK, N.A.By:
    
    /s/ Karen MontbachIts:
    
    Karen MontbachDated: February 28, 2011
Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation



 Exhibit 10.9 
 AEP Industries Inc. 
 Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation

 The non-employee directors of AEP Industries Inc. receive the following compensation for service on the Company’s Board of
Directors: 
  

					
	 Annual retainer:
	  			
	 Board
	  	$	50,000	  
	 Additional retainer:
	  			
	 Audit Committee-Chair
	  	 	15,000	  
	 Audit Committee-Member
	  	 	8,000	  
	 Compensation Committee-Chair
	  	 	10,000	  
	 Nominating and Corporate Governance-Chair
	  	 	7,500	  
	 Committee attendance fees per meeting (in person)
	  	 	1,500	  
	 Annual grant of restricted stock ($ value)
	  	 	55,000	  

 The restricted stock will vest upon the first anniversary of the grant date. The restricted stock will be
issued generally on the date of the annual stockholders meeting, which historically has occurred in April.
Exhibit 32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Griffin Land & Nurseries, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 26, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Periodic Report”), I, Frederick M. Danziger, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.
The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2.
The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 /s/ FREDERICK M. DANZIGERFrederick M. DanzigerPresident and Chief Executive OfficerApril 7, 2011
#### SUSIE Y. WONG; Edward K. Wong, Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 00-70745.

U.S. Tax Court No. 6918-99.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 30, 2001 *.

Decided July 5, 2001.

*639Before WALLACE, SNEED, and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Taxpayers Edward and Susie Wong appeal the tax court’s dismissal of their petition for a redetermination of a tax deficiency. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7482, and we affirm.

DISCUSSION

The Wongs failed to petition the tax court within 90 days of the issuance of their notice of tax deficiency as required by 26 U.S.C. § 6213(a). The filing of a timely petition is a jurisdictional requirement. *See Correia v. Commissioner,*58 F.3d 468, 469 (9th Cir.1995). We do not agree with the Wongs that their correspondence with the Internal Revenue Service extended or renewed the 90-day filing period. In fact, the Wongs were repeatedly informed by the IRS that the correspondence did not extend or stay the filing period. Finally, there is nothing in the record to support the Wongs’ contention that the notice of deficiency was either defective or rescinded. *See Powell v. Commissioner,*T.C. Memo.1998-108, 75 T .C.M. (CCH) 1994 (1998).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED   BALANCE   SHEET,   CONSOLIDATED   STATEMENT  OF  OPERATIONS   AND
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE
PERIOD  ENDING  MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

<ARTICLE>   5
<CIK>       0001037417
<NAME>      SYSCOMM INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
       
<S>                                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                         OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                           MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                                 1,941,765
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          3,095,729
<ALLOWANCES>                                             147,393
<INVENTORY>                                              681,853
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       6,159,813
<PP&E>                                                 4,374,084
<DEPRECIATION>                                           990,513
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        19,907,076
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  6,056,782
<BONDS>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                  55,152
<OTHER-SE>                                            12,136,040
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          19,907,076
<SALES>                                               41,683,897
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      41,683,897
<CGS>                                                 36,923,683
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         36,923,683
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       3,437,503
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          39,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       181,215
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        1,141,496
<INCOME-TAX>                                             459,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      682,496
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                             682,496
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                               0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               0.14
        

</TABLE>
From: tcole72@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:27:37 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Traci Cole

Pentress, WV 26544