alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: simonmom@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:57:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Donna Simoncelli

Downers Grove, IL 60516
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 21 

To honor and recognize the achievements of Craig Webre for his 15 years 

of dedicated service as Sheriff of Lafourche Parish, Louisiana. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mr. JINDAL submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

To honor and recognize the achievements of Craig Webre 

for his 15 years of dedicated service as Sheriff of 

Lafourche Parish, Louisiana. 

Whereas Craig Webre, a lifelong resident of Lafourche Parish, Louisiana, continues 15 years of service as Sheriff of 

Lafourche Parish; 

Whereas Craig Webre, elected as Sheriff of Lafourche Parish 

on July 1, 1992, ushered in a new era of accountable, responsible, and professional law enforcement in Lafourche 

Parish; 

Whereas in the past 15 years, Sheriff Webre enhanced first 

responder morale, equipment, and communication capability, and initiated or improved over 40 public service 

programs including Crimestoppers, Crisis Management 

Unit Team, and Police Social Services, a one-of-a-kind 


ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 21 IH 

comprehensive victim assistance program that serves approximately 1,400 crime victims per year; 

Whereas Sheriff Webre designed Meals on Wheels to lower 

the high cost of meals for the elderly in Lafourche Parish, and over 43,000 meals prepared at the Detention 

and Work Release Centers are annually distributed to the 

elderly; 

Whereas under Sheriff Webre’s leadership, the Lafourche 

Parish Sheriff’s Office became the second Sheriff’s office 

in the history of Louisiana to become nationally accredited, placing the Sheriff’s office in the top four percent 

of all the law enforcement agencies in the United States; 

Whereas Sheriff Webre coordinated the distribution of personnel, material, and supplies to storm damaged parishes 

during and after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, and 

worked to provide access for local, State, and national 

emergency responders to come to the aid of neighboring 

parishes in Louisiana; 

Whereas on September 22, 2005, under the leadership of 

Sheriff Webre, combined efforts of the United States 

Coast Guard and two members of the Sheriff’s Crisis 

Management Unit rescued a woman in her eighth month 

of pregnancy and her three-year-old son from the winds 

and floods caused by Hurricane Rita; and 

Whereas in 2006, as widely respected by his peers, Sheriff 

Webre was elected as First Vice-President of the National Sheriff’s Association, in line to become the National President of such association in 2007: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors 

2 and recognizes the achievements of Sheriff Craig Webre, 


ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 21 IH 

1 who exemplifies willingness, dedication, and sacrifice to 

2 ensure the security of the citizens of Lafourche Parish, 

3 Louisiana. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PRODPC75 with BILLS
Before the Second Division,

November 25, 1964

No. 68905.

#### Vanguard Military Equipment Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/13296, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of insignia, composed in chief value of bullions, similar in all material respects to those involved in Abstract 66583, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION




OF




PERIODIC
REPORT







I,
Alessandro Sodi, President and Chief Executive Officer of Diligent Board Member
Services, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1)           the  Annual
Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
May
13, 2009


/s/ Alessandro
      Sodi
              Alessandro
      Sodi
              President
      and Chief Executive
Officer





[A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Diligent Board Member Services, Inc. and will be retained by Diligent Board
Member Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.]
Motion Granted; Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 14, 2013.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-13-00136-CV

BONNIE ESPARZA, Appellant

V.

DOW CORNING CORPORATION, Appellee

On Appeal from the 157th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1992-25394ES

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from an order signed January 29, 2013. On March 5, 2013, 

appellant filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.1. The motion is granted.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Brown, and Busby.
Exhibit 10.44  PROMISSORY NOTE   $100,000                                                                                                                                                  February 15, 2011   FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned (herein "Maker"), promises to pay to the order of Joseph W. Abrams (Payee), the principal sum of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) one (1) year from the date hereof (the "Maturity Date"), unless Payee consents to an extension of the Maturity Date, in lawful money of the United States of America unless Payee agrees to another form of payment. The unpaid principal amount shall bear interest at the rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum, which shall be payable on the one-year anniversary of the date hereof (or until the earlier date of payment if this Note is prepaid). 17. If the Maker shall make a general assignment for the benefit of creditors, or shall admit in writing its inability to pay its debts as they become due, or shall file a petition in bankruptcy, or shall be adjudicated a bankrupt or insolvent, then, and upon the happening of any such event, the Payee at its option, may declare the entire unpaid balance of the principal hereunder immediately due and payable with interest thereon as herein provided. 18. Presentment, demand, protest or notice of any kind are hereby waived by the Maker.  Maker may not set off against any amounts due to Payee hereunder any claims against Payee or other amounts owed by Payee to Maker. 19. In the case any one or more of the events of default specified in paragraph 1 above shall have happened and be continuing, the Payee may proceed to protect and enforce its rights either by suit in equity and/or by action at law, or by other appropriate proceedings. 20. The Maker agrees to pay all reasonable costs of collection, including attorneys fees which may be incurred in the collection of this Note or any portion thereof and, in case an action is instituted for such purposes, the amount of all attorneys' fees shall be such amount as the court shall adjudge reasonable. 21. This Note is made and delivered in, and shall be governed, construed and enforced under the laws of the State of California. 22. No delay or omission of the Payee to exercise any right hereunder, whether before or after the happening of any event of default, shall impair any such right or shall operate as a waiver thereof or of any event of default hereunder nor shall any single or partial exercise thereof preclude any other or further exercise thereof, or the exercise of any other right. 23. This Note shall be subject to prepayment, at the option of the Maker, in whole or in part, at any time and from time to time, without premium or penalty. 24. This Note or any benefits or obligations hereunder may not be assigned or transferred by the Maker.   MAKER:  PROPELL CORPORATION   By: s/Edward Bernstein Edward Bernstein, CEO    Acknowledged and agreed to by PAYEE:   By: /s/Joseph Abrams Joseph W. Abrams  Date:
Before the Second Division,

February 14, 1967

No. P67/32.

#### Craig Panorama, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 64/3223, etc. (Los Angeles).

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of radio earphones similar in all material respects to those the subject of Motorola, *Inc., and International Expediters, Inc.*v. *United States*(54 Cust. Ct. 303, Abstract 69019), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# Eiropas Savienības C 53/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0952 |
| --- | --- |
| Eiropas Savienības
  Oficiālais Vēstnesis | C 53 |
| | |
| Izdevums latviešu valodā | Informācija un paziņojumi | 58. sējums2015. gada 13. februāris |

ISSN 1977-0952

Eiropas Savienības

Oficiālais Vēstnesis

C 53

Izdevums latviešu valodā

Informācija un paziņojumi

58. sējums2015. gada 13. februāris

---

| Paziņojums Nr. | Saturs | Lappuse |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Atzinumi |
| | ADMINISTRATĪVAS PROCEDŪRAS |
| | Eiropas Parlaments |
| 2015/C 053/01 | Lēmums | 1 |

Paziņojums Nr.

Saturs

Lappuse

V   Atzinumi

ADMINISTRATĪVAS PROCEDŪRAS

Eiropas Parlaments

2015/C 053/01

Lēmums

1

---

| LV | |
| --- | --- |

LV

---

V Atzinumi

ADMINISTRATĪVAS PROCEDŪRAS

Eiropas Parlaments

| 13.2.2015 | LV | Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis | C 53/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2015

LV

Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis

C 53/1

---

LĒMUMS

(2015/C 53/01)

EIROPAS PARLAMENTA ĢENERĀLSEKRETĀRS,

ŅEMOT VĒRĀ Padomes Regulu (EEK, Euratom, EOTK) Nr. 259/68 (1), kura grozīta ar Padomes Regulu (EK, Euratom) Nr. 723/2004 (2) un kurā jaunākie grozījumi izdarīti ar Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes 2013. gada 22. oktobra Regulu (ES, Euratom) Nr. 1023/2013, ar ko groza Eiropas Savienības Civildienesta noteikumus un Eiropas Savienības Pārējo darbinieku nodarbināšanas kārtību (3), un jo īpaši ņemot vērā šo noteikumu 30. pantu,

ŅEMOT VĒRĀ Eiropas Parlamenta Prezidija 2014. gada 13. janvāra Lēmumu par pilnvaru nodošanu struktūrvienībai, kas ir kompetenta iecelt amatā, un struktūrvienībai, kas ir pilnvarota slēgt darba līgumus,

ŅEMOT VĒRĀ, ka 2014. gada 31. decembrī beidzas derīguma termiņš turpmāk minētajiem Eiropas Parlamenta rezerves sarakstiem:

AD/4/08, AD/1/10, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/106/S, PE/107/S, PE/117/S, PE/118/S, PE/124/S, AST/4/11, AST/5/11, PE/96/S, PE/119/S, PE/110/S,

ŅEMOT VĒRĀ Apvienotās komitejas atzinumu, ko tā sniedza 2014. gada 22. oktobra sanāksmē,

IR NOLĒMIS ŠĀDI.

1. pants

Derīguma termiņš rezerves sarakstiem

| | AD/4/08, PE/106/S, PE/117/S, PE/118/S, PE/124/S, AST/4/11, AST/5/11, PE/96/S, PE/110/S |
| --- | --- |

AD/4/08, PE/106/S, PE/117/S, PE/118/S, PE/124/S, AST/4/11, AST/5/11, PE/96/S, PE/110/S

tiek pagarināts līdz 2015. gada 31. decembrim.

2. pants

Derīguma termiņš rezerves sarakstiem

| | AD/1/10, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/107/S, PE/119/S |
| --- | --- |

AD/1/10, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/107/S, PE/119/S

netiek pagarināts.

Luksemburgā, 2014. gada 12. decembrī

Ģenerālsekretārs

Klaus WELLE

---

(1)  OV L 56, 4.3.1968., 1. lpp.

1

(2)  OV L 124, 27.4.2004., 1. lpp.

2

(3)  OV L 287, 29.10.2013., 15. lpp.

3

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Edgeworth Investments, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William Tay, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

|                                                              |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ William Tay                                                   |
|                                                                   |
| William Tay       Principal Financial Officer       March 2, 2009 |
No. 59713.

#### Kollners, Inc., and Hudson Shipping Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 205824-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef or veal similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Swift & Company et al.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 212, C. D. 1655), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7172

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ALAN BOYD DONTA BARNETT, a/k/a Big Al,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at 

Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:12-cr-00188-FDW-DSC-2;

3:17-cv-00477-FDW)

Submitted: February 23, 2021 Decided: March 1, 2021

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, DIAZ, Circuit Judge, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alan Boyd Donta Barnett, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Alan Boyd Donta Barnett seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on

his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. 

Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. 

Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473,

484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Barnett has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
From: hulldt@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:51:39 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

David Hull

Plano, TX 75075
To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:35:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Roy Andersen

Pittsfield, MA 01201
**Attachment H Work Sheets used to Calculate EPA Labor Costs**  This attachm ent is available as part of the electronic docket for EPA IC R #0276.14 available at www.regulations.gov , D ocket ID No. **EP A**  **- HQ**  **- OPP**  **- 2013**  **- 0617**  . **NAICS: 999100 Federal Executive Br**  **a nch**  Labor Category : For m ula Managerial Technical Clerical Unloaded Hourl y Rat e 1 = W $55.66 $36.11 $20.59 Bene f its Pe r centag e 2 Lb = B / W 44% 44% 44% Benefits per hour B = W *Lb $24.74 $16.05 $9.15 Loaded Hourl y Rate Wb = W + B = W (1+Lb) $80.40 $52.16 $29.74 Overhead Perce ntage 3 Lo = OH / Wb 50% 50% 50% Overhead per hour OH = Wb*Lo $40.20 $26.08 $14.87 Fully L oaded Hourly Rate Wf = Wb + OH = W + B + OH $120.60 $78.24 $44.61 1. Data Source: BLS htt p ://www. b ls.g ov/ o es/curre nt/n aics4_ 9 99 1 00. htm May 2012 data NAI CS 999100 - Federal Executive Branch Standard Occupational Codes: Manage m ent: 11 - 0000, Manage m ent Occupations Technical: 19 - 0000, L ife, Phy sical, and Social Science Occupations Clerical: 43 - 0 000, Office and Adm i nistrative Support Occupations 2. Fringe benefits/wage per hour. 3. U. S. Environm ental Protection A gency , EPA Air Pollution Control Cost Manual, Sixth Edition , E P A - 452 - 02 - 001, January 2002, pg. 2 - 34. The loa d ing for indirect costs is within the range of 20 - 70% of the load labor rate ( w age + benefits) suggested in EPA guidance.
**Exhibit
      32**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Players Network (the “Company”) on Form
      10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark Bradley, in my
      capacity as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
                August 18, 2008/s/
                Mark BradleyMark
                BradleyPrincipal
                Executive and Principal
              Accounting
                Officer