alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-7076

RUDY BULLOCK,

Claimant-Appellant,

v.

ERIC K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs,

Respondent-Appellee.

Sean A. Ravin , of Washington, DC, argued for claimant-appellant.

Dawn E. Goodman , Trial Attorney, Commercial Li tigation Branch, Civil Division,

United States Department of Ju stice, of Washingt on, DC, argued for re spondent-appellee.

With her on the brief were Tony West , Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson

, Director, and Brian M. Simkin , Assistant Director. Of counsel on the brief were Michael J.

Timinski , Deputy Assistant General Counsel, and Michael G. Daugherty , Attorney, Office of

the General Counsel, United Stat es Department of Veterans A ffairs, of Washington, DC.

Appealed from: United States Cour t of Appeals for Veterans ClaimsNOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-7076

RUDY BULLOCK,

Claimant-Appellant,

v.

ERIC K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs,

Respondent-Appellee.



## Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States Court of Appeals

for Veterans claims

in CASE NO(S). 06-2004

This CAUSE having been hear d and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (LINN, PLAGER, and DYK, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED March 8, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly, Clerk
From: mercersan@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:08:59 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sandra Braun

Antioch, TN 37013
Exhibit
23.1





MOORE
& ASSOCIATES, CHARTERED


ACCOUNTANTS AND
ADVISORS


PCAOB
REGISTERED








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
consent to the use, in the report on Form 10-K of Dragon’s Lair Holdings,
Inc. (A Development Stage Company), of our report dated March 25, 2009 on our
audit of the financial statements of Dragon’s Lair Holdings, Inc. (A Development
Stage Company) as of December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for
the year ended December 31, 2008, from inception on October 4, 2007 through
December 31, 2007 and cumulative from October 4, 2007 through December 31, 2008,
and the reference to us under the caption “Experts.”











/s/ Moore & Associates,
Chartered


Moore
& Associates Chartered


Las
Vegas, Nevada


March 30,
2009
# Memorandum· U.S.Department of Transportation Office ofthe Secretary ofTransportation Subject:

From: To: Notice ofCommunication in Docket: Date: DOT-OST-OST-2013-0072 2013/2014 U.S.-Brazil Combination Frequency ·Proceeding Secretary Ray LaHood Chief, Dockets In accordance with D artment rules (14 CF Part 300), I am reporting the following communication. OnApril19, 2013, during a telephone conversation withMayor Antonio Villaraigosa ofLos Angeles, the Mayor raised the subject ofthe Department's proceeding to allocate new frequencies between the U.S. and Brazil. The Mayor expressed his support for American Airlines' application to provide daily service between Los Angeles and Sao Paulo beginning inNovember, 2013. I informed theMayor that, while I appreciated his interest inthis case, I could not comment onits merits because the proceeding was under active consideration by the Department. Please place this memorandum in the appropriate Docket.

cc: Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa
CONSENT OF PLANTE & MORAN, PLLCINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of DirectorsLNB Bancorp, Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements No. 33-65034 No. 333-125288, No. 333-115385, No. 333-133621, and No. 333-53210 on Form S-8 and No. 333-43441 and No. 333-58414 on Form S-3 of LNB Bancorp, Inc. of our reports dated February 23, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of LNB Bancorp, Inc. as of December 31, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders equity and cash flows for the year then ended, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, which reports appear in the December 31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K of LNB Bancorp, Inc.



/s/ Plante Moran PLLC


Auburn Hills, MichiganMarch 2, 2007

---
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 187 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Agriculture in 

the One Hundred Tenth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2007 

Mr. PETERSON of Minnesota submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

Agriculture in the One Hundred Tenth Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Agriculture 

4 (hereafter in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Com5 mittee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries, there 

6 shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the House 

7 of Representatives for committee salaries and expenses, 

8 not more than $12,398,755 for the One Hundred Tenth 

9 Congress. 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 187 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $5,954,462 shall be available 

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

5 noon on January 3, 2007, and ending immediately 

6 before noon on January 3, 2008; and 

7 (2) not more than $6,444,293 shall be available 

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

9 noon on January 3, 2008, and ending immediately 

10 before noon on January 3, 2009. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
Exhibit
32.2






CERTIFICATION




OF




PERIODIC
REPORT







I, Hunter
Cohen, Chief Financial Officer of Diligent Board Member Services, Inc. (the
“Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1)           the  Annual
Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the


financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.







Dated:
March 27, 2009




/s/ Hunter
      Cohen
              Hunter
      Cohen,
              Chief
      Financial Officer





[A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Diligent Board Member Services, Inc. and will be retained by Diligent Board
Member Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.]
Case No. 12,877.

#### SIMONTON v. BOUCHER et al.

[2 Wash. C. C. 473.] 1

Circuit Court, D. Pennsylvania.

Jan. Term, 1811.

Principal and Surety — -Evidence —Award— Book Entries — Partnership.

1. S. and B. entered into a partnership, and it was agreed that the separate debts of B. should be assumed by the firm; and a bond was given by B. with sureties, to indemnify S. against loss by the said assumption.

2. In an action against the sureties by S., after the dissolution, an award given in favour of S., in a reference entered into between S. and B.; the award having been founded on the acknowledgments of B., and not confined to the assumed debts, cannot be given in evidence.

3. Entries made by S. or B. in the partnership books, after the dissolution, cannot be given in evidence against the sureties, but evidence of the confessions of B. may be given.

[Cited in Garland v. Agee, 7 Leigh, 364.]

4. Entries made after the dissolution, may be given in evidence against the party who made them.

Upon the formation of a partnership between Simonton & Boucher, in 1801, Simon-ton agreed that the separate debts of Boucher, then due by him, should be assumed and paid by the house of Simonton & Boucher; and for securing Simonton for such payments, a bond was executed by the defendants, in which Boucher was bound for the whole of such payments, and Smith and Wood, as his sureties, for one-half. After the dissolution of the partnership, Simonton *&*Boucher bound themselves to submit their accounts to arbitration, and an award was made, finding a balance due from Boucher to Simonton, of upwards of six thousand dollars. This award is founded on the acknowledgments of Boucher, and a view of the partnership books, but appears not to be confined altogether to the assumed debts, and is only made upon part of the accounts. This action is brought on the bond given by Boucher, Smith, and Wood. Smith and Wood were no parties to the submission, and did not attend the referees.

The plaintiff [assignee of Simonton] offered the award in evidence, and also the accounts annexed to it, and evidence of the confessions of Boucher, which were objected to.

1

 [Originally published from the MSS. of Hon. Bushrod Washington, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, under the ¡supervision of Richard Peters, Jr., Esq.]

BY

THE COURT.

The award cannot be read, either as prima facie, or as conclusive evidence in this action. But evidence of the confessions of Boucher may be given.

THE COURT also decided that entries made by Simonton or Boucher, made in the partnership books after the dissolution, might be given in evidence against the party who made them, but not otherwise.
#            

# CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (R)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

Registration No.  333-109182

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  517                                                                   Trade Date:  12/13/04

(To Prospectus Supplement dated November 6, 2003 &

  Prospectus dated October 15,2003)                                                              Issue Date:   12/16/04

The Date of this Pricing SupplementDecember 13, 2004

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

 CUSIP                                                                                                                                   Date and terms of redemption or

     or       Stated                                                                   Interest                                       repayment (includingany

Common  Interest                      Price to  Discounts &        Payment     Survivors                  applicable regular or special

  Code      Rate (1)   Maturity  Public (2) Commissions       Frequency       Option  Yes/No     record dates)

14911QXN6  4.25%         12/15/11        100%                1.21%                 Monthly                       YES         NO                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

Principal                                                                                 1st Payment             Day         

Amount                  Proceeds                  Dealer                           Date                   Count

$2,597,000.00         $2,565,576.30         ABN AMRO Inc.        01/15/05               30/360    

Original Issue DiscountNote:                                                                          Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes                X   No                                                                                  N/A

The interest rates on the PowerNotes (R) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (R) offered prior to the effective date of the change.  Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $256.540 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (R) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (R) will be made under the Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated October 15,2003.

Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
breslow090612.htm







 


DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE


 


 







 


 







 


 


$500,000                                                                           Date:  September 6, 2012


 


 







 


 


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned jointly and severally promise to pay to the order of Warren Breslow, the sum of Five Hundred Thousand Dollars and no/100 ($500,000.00), together with interest of 10% per annum on the unpaid balance.


 


 



Exhibit 10.79









 


The entire principal and any accrued interest shall be fully and immediately payable UPON DEMAND of any holder thereof.


 


 







 


 


 

 


 


 


”Borrower”


 


Aura Systems, Inc.

















____________________


Melvin Gagerman


Chief Executive Officer







 


Dated: September 6, 2012
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Signature Eyewear, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Michael Prince, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Michael Prince
---------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
July 9, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-01-1999
<CASH>                                              7,415
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       5,590
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   13,005
<PP&E>                                             99,070
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    135,531
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              39,218
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           11,319
<OTHER-SE>                                        (18,868)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      135,531
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        0
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  257,934
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (257,934)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (257,934)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (257,934)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.02)



</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Brian Stafford, certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Diligent Corporation; and

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

Date: April 12, 2016

 

 
|   | /s/ Brian Stafford                                                                      |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Brian Stafford *President and Chief Executive Officer    (Principal Executive Officer)* |

 

1

----
From: karenp@kirschnergroup.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:41:26 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Karen Parham

Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739
No. 61503.

#### F. H. Hillel Company et al. *v.*United States,

protests 167837-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

-In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of goatskins and sheepskins the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Nawi Noonoo & Co. et al.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 57, C. D. 1904), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
- 01-SCPLAN-Cover.PDF
- 02-SCPLAN-ROD&DM-Letter.PDF
- 03-SCPLAN-Contents.PDF
- 04-SCPLAN-Summary.PDF
- 05-SCPLAN-Ch1-Introduction.PDF
- 06-SCPLAN-Ch2-Land-Use-Decisions.PDF
- 07-SCPLAN-Map2-1.PDF
- 08-SCPLAN-Ch2-cont.PDF
- 09-SCPLAN-Map2-5.PDF
- 10-SCPLAN-Map2-6.PDF
- 11-SCPLAN-Ch2-Beauty-Mtn.PDF
- 12-SCPLAN-Map2-7.PDF
- 13-SCPLAN-Ch2-LA-OC-Mgmt.PDF
- 14-SCPLAN-Map2-8.PDF
- 15-SCPLAN-Map2-9.PDF
- 16-Glossary.PDF
- 17-Appendix-A-BLM-Lands.PDF
- 18-Appendix-B-Species.PDF
- 19-Appendix-C-ACEC.PDF
- 20-Appendix-D-Oil&Gas.PDF
- 21-Appendix-E-WSRivers.PDF
- 22-Appendix-F-Withdrawals.PDF
- 23-Appendix-G-Grazing.PDF
- 24-Appendix-H-Visual.PDF
- 25-Appendix-I-Utilities.PDF
- 26-Appendix-J-Land-Tenure.PDF
- 27-Appendix-K-RPP-Leases.PDF
- 28-Appendix-L-Bio-Opinion.PDF
### Chemical and biological indicators of nutrient enrichment in the Yellowstone River basin, Montana and Wyoming, August 2000: Study design and preliminary results

By: D. A. PetersonS. D. PorterS. M. Kinsey

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wri014238

#### Links

- More information:  **Publisher Index Page**                            (html)
- NGMDB Index Page:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

No abstract available.

#### Study Area