alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Other data used in the MATS MACT floor analyses

To: Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov

Cc: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cortney --

Attached is the file of the data used for the MACT floor analyses. The data are listed by facility (ORIS) code. Note, for filterable PM (fPM), one needs to look to the new columns to the right of the main data columns for the updated values. To make it easier to review, we have placed all fpm data in the green columns even if those data stayed the same as in the main data columns for easier review. Also, note that these
data are all data for which we could determine an emission factor. This does not mean that the data were used in a floor (e.g., zinc).

You also requested a listing of the numbers of units in the coal-fired population and the number of units in the respective MACT floor pools.

Those numbers are:

Total coal-fired population: 1,082 EGUs Low rank virgin coal-fired EGUs: 36 EGUs Number in the "non-low rank virgin coal" Hg MACT floor pool: 47 EGUs Number in the "low rank virgin coal" Hg MACT floor pool: 2 EGUs Number in the HCl MACT floor pool: 130 EGUs Number in the PM MACT floor pool: 130 EGUs

Thank you.

Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt

Bill Maxwell Energy Strategies Group Sector Policies and Programs Division
U.S. EPA Mail Code D243-01
109 T.W. Alexander Drive Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Phone: 919-541-5430
FAX: 919-541-5450

OMB_all data used_12_5_11.xlsx
From: mrkenpalmer@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:43:21 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ken Palmer

Placentia, CA 92870
From: we2akkings@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:16:06 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dale King

Anchorage, AK 99507
First Amendment to Executive Severance Agreement



 Exhibit 10.60 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE SEVRANCE AGREEMENT 
 This First Amendment to
Executive Severance Agreement (the “Amendment”) is entered into on this 30 day of July, 2012, by and between ModusLink Global Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and Scott R. Crawley (“Executive”);

 WHEREAS, the parties have entered into an Executive Severance Agreement dated as of August 29, 2011 (the
“Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, the parties mutually desire to further amend the Agreement; 

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows, effective as of the date hereof: 

Unless the context indicates otherwise, capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment shall have the respective meanings
assigned to them in the Agreement; 
 Section 3(a) of the Agreement is amended to read as follows: 

“(a) In the event the employment of the Executive is terminated by the Company for a reason other than for Cause (as defined below)
then the Executive shall be entitled to receive the following as severance (i) his then current base salary, and (ii) his target annual bonus for the year in which the Termination Date occurs (the “Severance Pay”), payable in
installments over a period of twelve (12) months following the Termination Date. In the event that the Executive is entitled to severance benefits under Section 3(b) below, this Section 3(a) shall not apply and shall have no further
force or effect.” 
 The Agreement is affirmed, ratified and continued as amended by the Amendment and as further amended hereby.

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have signed their names as of the day and year first written above. 

 

							
	MODUSLINK GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, INC.	 		 	EXECUTIVE
				
	By:	 	 /s/ Peter L. Gray
	 		 	 /s/ Scott R. Crawley

	Its:	 	 EVP, CAO & General Counsel
	 		 	Scott R. Crawley
EXHIBIT 31.02

Certification of Robert M. Kline, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to

Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended



I, Robert M. Kline, certify that:



1. I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K/A-2 of Gold Star Tutoring Services, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



October 5, 2009

/s/Robert M. Kline__________________

Robert M. Kline, Treasurer

Chief Financial Officer

Principal Accounting and Financial Officer
No. 63304.

protest 59/10763 (New York).

#### Hat Corp. of America *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Boed, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of straw hats similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Pollak Industrial Corp. et al.*v. *United States*(40 Cust. Ct. 251, C.D. 1991), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: ltblack@juno.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:34:35 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Lil Black

Melbourne, FL 32935
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 6 A0 02 8 . MI TCHELL SMI TH v

. THE STATE.

Fo l l owi n g h i s cri m in al co n v i ct i o n , M i t ch el l Sm i t h f i l e d a p ro s e “ Mo t i o n to Cu re a Su b s t an t iv e-Vo i d M erg er Vi o l a t i o n

. ” Th e t ri al co u rt d en i ed t h e m o t i o n o n Ap ri l 1 7

, 2 0 1 5

, an d M i t ch el l fi l ed b ot h an ap pl i cat i o n fo r d is cret i o n ary ap p eal an d a d i rect ap p eal

. 1 T h e a p p l i cat i o n was d en i ed o n t h e m eri t s

. See Cas e Nu m b er A1 5 D0 41 0 , d eci d ed J u n e 3 , 2 0 1 5 . W e h av e b efo re u s t h e d irect ap p eal

.

“ It i s ax i o m at ic t hat t h e s am e i s s u e can no t b e rel i t i g at ed a d in f i n i t u m

. Th e

s am e is t ru e o f ap p eal s o f th e s am e i ss u e o n t h e s am e g ro u n d s.” Ech o l s v. S t a t e , 2 4 3
Ga. Ap p

. 7 7 5

, 7 7 6 (5 3 4 SE2 d 4 6 4 ) (2 0 00 ); s ee al s o Jo rd a n v. S t a te
, 2 5 3 Ga. Ap p. 5 1 0 , 5 1 1 (2 ) (5 5 9 SE2 d 5 2 8) (2 0 0 2 ). Ou r ru l i n g s i n t h e p ri o r ap p l i cat i o n act s as res ju d i cat a. See Ho o k v. Ber g en , 2 8 6 G a. A p p

. 2 5 8

, 2 6 1 ( 1 ) ( 6 4 9 SE2 d 3 1 3) (2 0 0 7 ).
Th u s, Sm i t h i s es t o p p ed fro m s eek i n g fu rt h er ju d i ci al rev i ew o n t h es e i s s u es

. See i d;

s ee al s o Ro s s v. S t a t e , 3 1 0 Ga. Ap p

. 3 2 6

, 3 2 8 (7 1 3 SE2 d 4 3 8 ) (2 0 1 1 ) (l aw o f t h e cas e

ru l e b ars s u cces s i v e v o i d s en t en ce ap p eal s )

. A c c o rd i n g l y , t h i s ap p eal i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia
C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

.

1 M i t ch el l fi l ed h i s d i rect ap p eal wi t h t he Su p rem e Co u rt
, wh i ch tran s ferred t h e

m at t er t o t h i s Co u rt

. 09/04/2015 September 04, 2015
No. 60480.

#### Rambusch Decorating Co. and General Shipping & Trading Co. *v.*United States,

protests 191258-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of wood figures similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 58592, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 32.1

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of MayquestVentures, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Roman Zherdytskyi, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ Roman Zherdytskyi

 

Roman Zherdytskyi

Principal Executive Officer

January 24, 2011

 

 

/s/ Roman Zherdytskyi

 

Roman Zherdytskyi

Principal Financial Officer

January 24, 2011
To: Robin Dunkins/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

From: "Frey, Nathan J." <Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov>

Date: 07/27/2012 09:42AM 

Cc: John Bradfield/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Bill Schrock/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Karen 

Thundiyil/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Scott Jordan/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Steve 

Fruh/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Amy Cole/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject: Re: Package For OMB

=======================

Thanks Robin. Please upload the final clean version to ROCIS. It is open for amendment. We'll 

be in touch about next steps.
From: damarpoo@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:31:22 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

david day

Marysville, WA 98270
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #18022 and #18023; OKLAHOMA Disaster Number OK-00171]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 2.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Oklahoma (FEMA-4721-DR), dated 07/19/2023.

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms, Straight-line Winds, and Tornadoes.                    

*Incident Period:*                         06/14/2023 through 06/18/2023.                    

# DATES:

Issued on 09/07/2023.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         09/18/2023.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         04/19/2024.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of Oklahoma, dated 07/19/2023, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

*Primary Counties:*                     Choctaw, Pawnee.                

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Francisco Sánchez, Jr.,

Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.

[FR Doc. 2023-20039 Filed 9-14-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
Exhibit
32.1


Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
 Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 I, Lars
Pearl, President, Chief Executive Officer and  Chief Financial Officer
of Aurora Gold Corporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 
 1.
              The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March
      31, 2009 which this certification accompanies fully complies with the
      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934: and
 
 2.
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 Date:January 27,
      2010
              BY:
              /s/ Lars
      PearlLars
      PearlPresident,
      CEO and CFO
 
 This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.