alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUPREME COURT.

#### Hennessey agt. Hennessey.

*Divorce —'Mow far parties competent as witnesses*— *Code of OMl Procedure, section*831.

Under the provisions of Rule 78, a defendant in an action for divorce cannot he permitted to testify in her own hehalf, to contradict the plaintiff, in respect to the matters as to which that rule allows the plaintiff to testify.

Although the amendment made to section 831 of the Code of Civil Pro*305cedure, in 1879, is very broad, *it seems*such amendment has not removed the restriction heretofore imposed by statute, as to parties to an action for a divorce testifying in their own behalf.

Lawrence, *J.*—

I am not aware that it has ever been held that, under the provisions of Buie 78, a defendant in an action for divorce can be permitted to testify in her own behalf to contradict the plaintiff, in respect to the matters as to which that rule allows the plaintiff to testify. Bor am I prepared to hold that, under the existing provisions of the Code, either party may testify in their own behalf without restriction. The amendment made to section 831 of the Code of Civil Procedure, in 1879, is very broad, but until it has been determined by an appellate court that such amendment has removed the restriction heretofore imposed by statute, as to parties to an action for divorce testifying in their own behalf, I shall adhere to the former practice and exclude the testimony of the defendant, and only receive that of the plaintiff as to those matters in regard to which the statute and rules permit her to testify. I think that the referee erred, therefore, in receiving the testimony of the defendant. But if I entirely reject the testimony of the defendant, there is still sufficient evidence of condonation by the plaintiff to sustain the report of the referee. Such condonation, by subsequent cohabitation with the defendant, is clearly shown by the evidence adduced by the defendant. Against this evidence there is the uncorroborated statement of the plaintiff himself. The preponderance of the proof is with the defendant on this point, and the report of the referee must, therefore, be confirmed.
No. 68093.

#### Estes Sales Company *v.*United States,

protest 62/18609-12825 (Chicago).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 63321, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
'''Ylr," ".t 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH &. HUMAN SERVICES Office of Inspector General 

MemorandulT 

Date SE I 8 199 


Richard P. Kusserow From Inpector General 


U Ject
 " OIG Management Adviory Report: "Medicae Prepayment Review - Pre ayment

Utiltion Savigs," OEI-07-89-01681


Gail R. Wilensky, Ph.


Admtrator 

Health Cae Financing Admtration 

The Offce of Inspector General (OIG) recently conducted a program inpection 


the prepayment review process for Medicae Par B clai. One area of focu


during the revew was the verication of savigs claied to have been achieved by 

the caers as a result of conducting medica reviews. The inpection was 

determe if an audit tr exited for those clai resultig in prepayment medical 

review savigs and whether the savigs were correctly reported in the caers 

quarerly Medica Review Report for Fisca Year (F 1989. Th management 

advisory report conveys the fiding identifed durg the inpection. 

BACKGROUND 

In December 1989; the Health Care Financing Admtration (HCF A) required 

caers to establih an audit trai for al servces denied or reduced as a result of 

medica review. Ths requirement followed a study of prepayment medica review 

screens by HCFA in November 1988. Caer savigs due to prepayment controls 

for front end medica necessity denials (Category 1) and HCFA mandated and caer 

intiated screens (Category n) are maintaied and reported to HCFA on the 

quarerly Medical Review Report as provided for in the Medicae Carers Manual 

Section 7529. The HCF A uses the savigs data from the quarerly Medical Review 

Report and the cost benefit ratios resulting from review activities to identif effective 

prepayment screens and as a source for contractor evaluations. 

METODOLOGY 

We conducted on-site reviews at seven caers in early 1990. We asked caers 


provide a liting of all the Category I and Category n claims used to prepare the


Medica Review Report for the fourth quarer FY 1989. One carrer provided a


claims liting for the fist quarter FY 1990 instead, because data for the FY 1989


period was not available at the time of our review. A random sample of 30 claims


were selected for review from each carrer s listing. The savings resulting from the


sampled claims were then tracked to the Medical Review Report. 
Page 2 - Gail R. Wilensky, Ph. 

FIING 

Ca have establihe relible system for reportg meal rev savi&f. 

Based on the carrers' control sheets , the review team was able to verify the accuracy 

of the carrers' reported savigs for 192 of 195 claims. We limited our sample to 

claims, instead of 30 claims at one carrer, because the carrer could not provide a 

universe of claims. Twenty-nine of the 195 sampled claims had insuffcient 

information in the control sheets to readily establish the validity of the savings. 

However, upon further investigation, these claims proved to be valid. 

Should there be any questions, please have your staff contact Barr Steeley at 

FTS 646-3138.
Before the Second Division,

March 19, 1963

No. 67514.

#### Corrigan Dispatch Company *v.*United States,

protest 61/24769 (Laredo).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

It was stipulated that only specified percentages of the merchandise have a staple of 1% inches or more in length, subject to the additional duty. As to the remainder of the merchandise, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 99.9

CONSENT OF PASCAL HAMELIN

I, Pascal Hamelin,
hereby consent to the references to, and the use of any information derived from, the technical report titled “Technical
Report on the Bachelor Lake Gold Project Prepared for Metanor Resources” dated February 17, 2011 (the “Report”)
in the annual report on Form 40-F of Sandstorm Gold, Ltd. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 and any amendments
thereto (the “Annual Report”) being filed with United States Securities and Exchange Commission, which Annual Report
incorporates by reference and attaches as an exhibit the Sandstorm Gold Ltd. Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31,
2013 which refers to information contained in the Report.

I also consent to
the use of my name, including as an expert or “qualified person,” in connection with the Annual Report.

Date: March 11, 2014



| | /s/ Pascal Hamelin               
| | ---------------------------------
| | Name:  Pascal Hamelin, P. Eng.   
| | Title: Vice President, Operations
QUEME LA MADERA CORRECTA, DE LA FORMA CORRECTA, EN EL EQUIPO CORRECTO

Sabía usted que al cambiar la 

forma en que quema la leña 

puede ahorrar dinero, reducir la 

contaminación del aire y proteger su 

salud?

Hay varias formas de hacer que el 

fuego queme más caliente, el dinero 

se mantenga en su bolsillo y el aire 

sea más limpio y saludable.

Seque toda la madera. Toda madera debe 

de ser picada, cubierta o almacenada, y 

curada por al menos seis meses. La madera seca 

quema más caliente, disminuye la cantidad de 

combustible y reduce la cantidad de humo que 

los enseres producen.

Escoja la madera correcta. La madera noble 

es la mejor. Nunca queme basura o madera 

tratada la cual emite contaminantes tóxicos al 

aire.

Limpie las cenizas de su equipo. Un exceso 

de cenizas puede tapar los conductos del 

los ventiladores de aire y reducen su efi ciencia. 

Asegúrese de botar las cenizas en un envase 

de metal lejos de la casa o cualquier material 

infl amable, esto reducirá el riego de comenzar 

un fuego. 

No deje que el fuego arda. Muchos piensan 

que se debe de dejar el fuego ardiendo toda 

la noche. Sin embargo, el reducir el suministro 

de aire no ayuda a que la lumbre arda más y 

aumenta la contaminación del aire.

Mantenga su chimenea limpia. Una chimenea 

limpia produce buenas corrientes de aire para 

su equipo y reduce el riesgo de un fuego en la 

chimenea. Haga que un profesional certifi cado 

inspeccione su chimenea anualmente.

Actualice su equipo. Las estufas de quema 

de leña certifi cadas por EPA y los insertos de 

chimeneas queman más limpio y más efi ciente, 

emitiendo menos contaminación particulada 

que los modelos anteriores.

Sea un buen vecino. Siga las mejores prácticas 

para quemar leña. Siempre recuerde de 

cumplir con las leyes locales y estatales y coteje 

el pronóstico de calidad de aire local. Para más 

información vaya a www.airnow.gov.

Para información sobre el programa Burn Wise visite a www.epa.gov/burnwise 

Comience correctamente. Utilice solamente 

periódicos limpios o astillas secas para 

encender el fuego. Nunca use gasolina, 

queroseno, combustible para carbón, o una 

antorcha de propano.

Siga las instrucciones. La mejor manerade 

operar y dar mantenimiento al equipo de 

quemar leña es siguiendo las instrucciones del 

fabricante.

Tamaño importa. Escoja el tamaño correcto 

para su equipo según sus necesidades. Si 

su equipo es más grande de lo que necesita su 

habitación, se creará mayor contaminación de 

aire.

Burn Wise

?

Un Programa de U.S. EPA

EPA-456/F-11-006
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Steven Daval JONES, a/k/a Steven Duval Jones, Appellant.

No. 01-3044.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

June 13, 2001.

Before WILLIAMS, GINSBURG, and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and the memoranda filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. *See*D.C.Cir. Rule 36(b). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s ruling on April 10, 2001, denying appellant’s motion to revoke the pretrial detention order be affirmed. The findings of the district court regarding appellant’s dangerousness to the community are supported by clear and convincing evidence and are not clearly erroneous. *See United States v. Smith,*79 F.3d 1208 (D.C.Cir.1996) (per curiam).

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





Form 8-K





Current Report





Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report  (Date of earliest event reported): April 24, 2019





Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation


(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)





001-11241


(Commission File Number)





Delaware37-1105865(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)(IRS Employer Identification Number)





2120 West End Avenue


Nashville, Tennessee 37203-0001


(Address of principal executive offices, with zip code)





(615) 341-1000


(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:


oWritten communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)oSoliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).





Emerging growth company o





If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o





---










Item 2.02. Results of Operations and Financial Condition.





On April 24, 2019, Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation issued a press release reporting financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2019.  A copy of the press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated into this Item 2.02 by reference.





The information in this Current Report on Form 8-K, including Exhibit 99.1, is being furnished in accordance with the provisions of General Instruction B.2 of Form 8-K.








Item 9.01.  Financial Statements and Exhibits.





d)Exhibits:The following is furnished as an exhibit to this report:99.1Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation press release dated April 24, 2019














2


---




SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.





Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation








Date:  April 24, 2019By:/s/ Michael G. SposatoMichael G. SposatoSecretary











3
H. Res. 1276 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 20, 2008. 

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 5876) to require certain standards and enforcement provisions to prevent child abuse and neglect in residential programs, and for other purposes. The first reading of 

the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against 

consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under 

clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. General debate shall be confined 

to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 

controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 

the Committee on Education and Labor. After general debate 

the bill shall be considered for amendment under the fiveminute rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original 

bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule 

the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by 

the Committee on Education and Labor now printed in the 
2 

•HRES 1276 EH 

bill. The committee amendment in the nature of a substitute 

shall be considered as read. All points of order against the 

committee amendment in the nature of a substitute are 

waived except those arising under clause 10 of rule XXI. Notwithstanding clause 11 of rule XVIII, no amendment to the 

committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be 

in order except those printed in the report of the Committee 

on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each such amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the report, 

may be offered only by a Member designated in the report, 

shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time 

specified in the report equally divided and controlled by the 

proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of 

the question in the House or in the Committee of the Whole. 

All points of order against such amendments are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. At the 

conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the 

Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with 

such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member 

may demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment 

adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the 

committee amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 

amendments thereto to final passage without intervening mo-
3 

•HRES 1276 EH 

tion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

SEC. 2. During consideration in the House of H.R. 5876 

pursuant to this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of 

the previous question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the bill to such time as may be designated by the 

Speaker. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
No. P69/50.

protest 67/45318 (New York).

#### Riviera Trading Corp. *v.*United States,

'Maletz, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of hair ornaments similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Brier Manufacturing Company*(52 CCPA 35, C.A.D. 854), except that the instant merchandise is in chief value of cellulose acetate, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
|   | (1) | Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                             |   |                                                 |   |
|----------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date: March 31, 2011   | By:    | /s/ Berge Abajian                          |   |
|                             |   | Berge Abajian                                        |   |
|                             |   | Principal Executive OfficerBergio International Inc. |   |
|                             |   |                                                 |   |
# Exhibit 32

Section 1350
Certifications

---

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Peoples Community Capital Corporation
(the Company), each certify that, to his or her knowledge on the date of this
certification:

| | 1. | The quarterly report of the Company for the period ending September 30, 2004 as
          filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the
          Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | /s/ Tommy B. Wessinger
Tommy B. WessingerChief Executive OfficerNovember 10, 2004
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | /s/ Jean H. Covington
Jean H. CovingtonChief Financial OfficerNovember 10, 2004
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Europos Sąjungos C 53/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0960 |
| --- | --- |
| Europos Sąjungos
  oficialusis leidinys | C 53 |
| | |
| Leidimas lietuvių kalba | Informacija ir pranešimai | 58 tomas2015m. vasario 13d. |

ISSN 1977-0960

Europos Sąjungos

oficialusis leidinys

C 53

Leidimas lietuvių kalba

Informacija ir pranešimai

58 tomas2015m. vasario 13d.

---

| Pranešimo Nr. | Turinys | Puslapis |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Nuomonės |
| | ADMINISTRACINĖS PROCEDŪROS |
| | Europos Parlamentas |
| 2015/C 053/01 | Sprendimas | 1 |

Pranešimo Nr.

Turinys

Puslapis

V   Nuomonės

ADMINISTRACINĖS PROCEDŪROS

Europos Parlamentas

2015/C 053/01

Sprendimas

1

---

| LT | |
| --- | --- |

LT

---

V Nuomonės

ADMINISTRACINĖS PROCEDŪROS

Europos Parlamentas

| 13.2.2015 | LT | Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys | C 53/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2015

LT

Europos Sąjungos oficialusis leidinys

C 53/1

---

SPRENDIMAS

(2015/C 53/01)

EUROPOS PARLAMENTO GENERALINIS SEKRETORIUS,

Atsižvelgdamas į Tarybos reglamentą (EEB, Euratomas, EAPB) Nr. 259/68 (1), iš dalies pakeistą Tarybos reglamentu (EB, Euratomas) Nr. 723/2004 (2) ir paskutinį kartą iš dalies pakeistą 2013 m. spalio 23 d. Europos Parlamento ir Tarybos reglamentu (ES, Euratomas) Nr. 1023/2013, kuriuo iš dalies keičiami Europos Sąjungos pareigūnų tarnybos nuostatai ir kitų Europos Sąjungos tarnautojų įdarbinimo sąlygos (3), ypač į Tarnybos nuostatų 30 straipsnį,

Atsižvelgdamas į 2004 m. sausio 13 d. Europos Parlamento biuro sprendimą dėl skiriančiojo subjekto ir darbo sutartis sudaryti įgalioto subjekto įgaliojimų suteikimo,

Atsižvelgdamas į tai, kad 2014 m. gruodžio 31 d. baigia galioti šie Europos Parlamento rezervo sąrašai:

AD/4/08, AD/1/10, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/106/S, PE/107/S, PE/117/S, PE/118/S, PE/124/S, AST/4/11, AST/5/11, PE/96/S, PE/119/S, PE/110/S,

Atsižvelgdamas į Jungtinio komiteto nuomonę, pateiktą per 2014 m. spalio 22 d. posėdį,

NUSPRENDĖ:

1 straipsnis

Rezervo sąrašų:

| | AD/4/08, PE/106/S, PE/117/S, PE/118/S, PE/124/S, AST/4/11, AST/5/11, PE/96/S, PE/110/S |
| --- | --- |

AD/4/08, PE/106/S, PE/117/S, PE/118/S, PE/124/S, AST/4/11, AST/5/11, PE/96/S, PE/110/S

galiojimo laikas pratęsiamas iki 2015 m. gruodžio 31 d.

2 straipsnis

Rezervo sąrašų:

| | AD/1/10, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/107/S, PE/119/S |
| --- | --- |

AD/1/10, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/107/S, PE/119/S

galiojimo laikas nepratęsiamas.

Priimta Liuksemburge 2014 m. gruodžio 12 d.

Klaus WELLE

Generalinis sekretorius

---

(1)  OL L 56, 1968 3 4, p. 1.

1

(2)  OL L 124, 2004 4 27, p. 1.

2

(3)  OL L 287, 2013 10 29, p. 15.

3

---