alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: trd16a@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:27:44 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to demand in the strongest way possible that you rescind the immoral, unjust and

coercive mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health

insurance in any fashion. If you do not reverse course I demand you to expand conscience protections

for any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections.

I strongly oppose the government forcing any insurance coverage on Americans, but especially for drugs

and devices that I morally oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan

B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an true, valid and authentic

conscience protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to

providing such insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience

laws which prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on

moral or religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to

only include churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have

conscience objections will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being

able to offer employees health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they morally object to. I again urge you in the

strongest way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of

mandatory preventive services.

Sincerely,

Terry Doherty

Jacksonville, FL 32223
SERVED: MARCH 13, 2013 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

CORNERSTONE AVIATION, INC. 

FAA DOCKET No. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Case) 

DMS FAA-2012-1293 

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR CONTINUANCE 

Respondent Cornerstone Aviation, Inc. ("Respondent") has requested that this matter, 

currently scheduled to be heard on Apri123, 2013, be continued to a date after May 6. In 

support, Respondent cites a previous commitment. Complainant Federal Aviation 

Administration ("Complainant") states that it has no objection to grant of the request. 

·For good cause shown, the request of Respondent for a continuance is GRANTED. The 

hearing date will be re-set for a date after May 6 by subsequent order. 

g-~C-~(J Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

ONE COPY 

Susan J. Horstman, Chief Executive Officer 

Cornerstone Aviation, Inc., Respondent 

337 North 2370 West #130 

Salt Lake City, UT 84116 

TEL: 801-355-2244 

FAX: 801-355-2754 

Kyle Lomazow, Complainant's c;ounsel 

Attorney, Office ofthe Regional Counsel 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, W A 98057 

TEL: 425-227-1847 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, 

Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2011-1293 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 

2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket (;Jerk, AGC-430. 

2
Before the First Division,

August 14, 1959

No. 63294.

protest 330319-K (New York).

#### Manca, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items designated as “Testing Devices” consist of metal articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. .
| 1.     | SuchAnnual Report of Form 10-K for the period ending May 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                              |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| 2.     | The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended May 31, 2010, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Zhong Sen International Tea Company. |

| Date:  July 16, 2010            |
|-------------------------------------------|
|                                      |
| Zhong Sen International Tea Company       |
|                                      |
| By: /s/ Binquan Zhang                |
| Binquan ZhangChief Financial Officer |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001037115
<NAME> ORBIT/FR, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          15,459
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,309
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,545
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,044
<PP&E>                                           2,533
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,235
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  27,511
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,005
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            60
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,440
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    27,511
<SALES>                                         10,220
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,220
<CGS>                                            6,281
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,281
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,261
<INCOME-TAX>                                       810
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,451
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.35
        


</TABLE>
### NUMBER 13 - 15 - 00 535 - C V COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN R E PETERSON CONSTRUCTION, INC.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

ORDER Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Perkes Order Per Curiam
Relator , Peterson Construction, Inc. , f iled a petition for writ of mandamus in the
above cause on November 12 , 2015

. Through this original pro ceeding, relator contends that the trial court abused its discretion in g ranting a new trial because its articulated reasons “lack substantive merit” and are neither valid nor correct. See In re Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. , 407 S.W.3d 746, 758 (Tex. 2013) (orig. proceeding). T his Court requests that the real part y in interest , Roberto Perez, or any others whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, including but not limited to Pharr

- San Juan

- Alamo Independent School District, f ile a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or2

before the expi ration of ten days from the date of this order. See T EX

. R

. A PP

. P. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8. IT IS SO ORDERED. PER CURIAM
D elivered and filed th e 13th day of November , 201 5

.
From: renewingthemindromans122@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:27:09 PM

JTo Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

chris connor

Hillsboro, OR 97124
From: will1952@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:11:26 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Linda Payne

Millersville, MD 21108
Exhibit 32.1 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Annual Report of Atlas Resources Public #18-2009 (B) L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Freddie M. Kotek, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership. |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|                                                             |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ FREDDIE M. KOTEK                                        |
| Freddie M. Kotek                                            |
| Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner |
| August 14, 2014                                             |
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 186 (Wednesday, September 27, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66493-66494]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-21011]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4720-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2023-0001]


Vermont; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Vermont (FEMA-4720-DR),

[[Page 66494]]

dated July 14, 2023, and related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued July 21, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Vermont is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration 
of July 14, 2023.

    Caledonia and Orange Counties for Individual Assistance (already 
designated for emergency protective measures [Category B], including 
direct federal assistance, under the Public Assistance program).
    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2023-21011 Filed 9-26-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
No. 59203.

protests 183943-K, etc. (Ogdensburg).

#### A. N. Deringer, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of -counsel that the merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Swift & Company et al.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 212, C. D. 1655), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
#### MOSS & CO. v. McCarthy.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

February 29, 1912.)

No. 2,064.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of California.

For opinion below, see 191. Fed. 202.

L. S. Melsted and Fabius T. Finch, for appellant.

C. M. Fickert and Aylett R. Cotton, Jr., for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to stipulation of counsel, under provisions of rule 20 of the rules of practice of this court (150 Fed. xxxi, 79 C. C. A. xxxi), cause dismissed by clerk.
Supplemental Agreement to the Share Pledge Agreement



 Exhibit 4.33 
 Supplemental Agreement to the Share Pledge Agreement 
 Ctrip Computer
Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (“Party A,” address: 3rd floor, Building 63, Hong Cao Road, Shanghai) and Mr. Min Fan (“Party B,” residence: [redacted], ID No.: [redacted]) hereby enter into this Supplemental Agreement as follows: 

Whereas 
 Whereas,
Party A and Party B entered into a Share Pledge Agreement (the “Agreement”) on November 5, 2003, 
 Whereas, both Parties
hereto wish to further amend the terms of the Agreement; 
 Therefore, upon consensus, the Parties hereto enter into the following: 

 

	7	In light of Party B’s increase in its capital contribution to Shanghai Ctrip Charming International Travel Agency Co., Ltd., the equity interest held by Party B in
Shanghai Ctrip Charming International Travel Agency Co., Ltd. will be changed from 66% formerly specified in the Agreement to currently 89.8%. All such equity interest Party B holds in Shanghai Ctrip Charming International Travel Agency Co., Ltd.
will be pledged to Party A as security. 

  

	8	Except for the amendment made hereinabove, all the remaining terms of the Agreement shall remain unchanged and continue to be legally binding. 


In witness whereof, this Supplemental Agreement has been executed by the Parties on July 15, 2006. 

 

	
	Party A: Ctrip.com (Hong Kong) Limited (seal)
	
	 Party B: /s/ Min Fan
  

Min Fan



  
 1 








 Schedule A 
 The following schedule sets forth all other currently effective supplement agreements to share pledge agreements the registrant entered with each of its affiliated Chinese entities and the material
differences between such other supplemental agreements and this exhibit. 
  

									
	 	  	 Version
	  	 Executing Parties
	  	 Summary
	  	 Differences compared with the
Form
Agreement

	Supplemental Agreement to Share Pledge Agreement	  	Form Agreement	  	 Pledgee: Ctrip Computer Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
 Pledgor: Min Fan
	  	Execution Date: January 15, 2004	  	No difference in format, while the parties to the agreements are different. The agreements were entered into to reflect the change of shareholding percentages that
were caused by change of registered capital.
	  	  	  
 Pledgee: Ctrip Computer Technology (Shanghai) Co.,
Ltd.
 Pledgor: Min Fan
	  	  
 Execution Date: July 15, 2006
	  
	  	  	  
 Pledgee: Ctrip Computer Technology (Shanghai) Co.,
Ltd.
 Pledgor: Min Fan
	  	  
 Execution Date: September 16, 2011
	  
	  	  	  
 Pledgee: Ctrip Computer Technology (Shanghai) Co.,
Ltd.
 Pledgor: Maohua Sun
	  	  
 Execution Date: September 16, 2011
	  
					
		  	  
  

Differences
	  	 Pledgee: Ctrip Computer Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
  

Pledgor: Maohua Sun Pledgee: Ctrip Computer Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Pledgor: Maohua Sun
	  	 Execution Date: September, 2011
  

Execution Date: September, 2011
	  	The Pledgor reduced its shareholding percentage in the relevant affiliate Chinese entity due to transfer of equity interest to other nominee shareholder. All the rest of the
Pledgor’s holding remains to be pledged.


  
 2
No. 68097.

#### Brylanwire, Ltd. *v.*United States,

protests 60/27846-11414, etc. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of steel tying wire similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Holdwire, Ltd.*v. *United States*(49 Cust. Ct. 19, C.D. 2355), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. P66/194.

#### E. Miltenberg, Inc. *v.*United States, protests 64/3651 and 64/607 (New York).

[Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of stethoscopes similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Empire Findings*Co., *Inc.*v. *United States*(51 Cust. Ct. 262, Abstract 68126), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of1934. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | To      my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in      all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of      Union National as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the      Report. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By     | /s/      Mark D. Gainer                                   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Chairman,      CEO, and President                         |
|   |                                                      |
|   | Date:      May 15, 2009                                   |
|   |                                                      |
| By     | /s/      Michael D. Peduzzi                               |
|   | Executive      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |                                                      |
|   | Date:      May 15,2009                                    |

----