alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 332 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 45
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 332

                          [Report No. 110-110]

 Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the 
 bill (H.R. 1591) making emergency supplemental appropriations for the 
     fiscal year ending September 30, 2007, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 24, 2007

  Ms. Slaughter, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the 
 bill (H.R. 1591) making emergency supplemental appropriations for the 
     fiscal year ending September 30, 2007, and for other purposes.

    Resolved,  That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
1591) making emergency supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year 
ending September 30, 2007, and for other purposes. All points of order 
against the conference report and against its consideration are waived. 
The conference report shall be considered as read.
                                                  House Calendar No. 45

110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 332

                          [Report No. 110-110]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the 
 bill (H.R. 1591) making emergency supplemental appropriations for the 
     fiscal year ending September 30, 2007, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 24, 2007

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
**EXHIBIT  32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of AdelphiaRecovery Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Dean A. Ziehl, Trustee of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that to the best of my knowledge:

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theTrust.

 

 
| /s/  Dean A. Ziehl |   |
|------------------------------|--------|
| Dean A. Ziehl                |   |
| Trustee                      |   |
|                         |   |
|                         |   |
| Date:  March 10, 2010   |   |

 

----
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1392 

Supporting the goals and ideals of ‘‘National Life Insurance Awareness 

Month’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 30, 2008 

Mr. KANJORSKI (for himself, Mrs. BIGGERT, Mr. BACHUS, and Mr. 

HINOJOSA) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of ‘‘National Life Insurance 

Awareness Month’’. 

Whereas life insurance is an essential part of a sound financial plan; 

Whereas life insurance provides financial security for families 

by helping surviving members meet immediate and longterm financial obligations and objectives in the event of 

a premature death in their family; 

Whereas approximately 68,000,000 United States citizens 

lack the adequate level of life insurance coverage needed 

to ensure a secure financial future for their loved ones; 

Whereas life insurance products protect against the uncertainties of life by enabling individuals and families to 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1392 IH 

manage the financial risks of premature death, disability, 

and long-term care; 

Whereas individuals, families, and businesses can benefit 

from professional insurance and financial planning advice, including an assessment of their life insurance 

needs; and 

Whereas numerous groups supporting life insurance have designated September 2008 as ‘‘National Life Insurance 

Awareness Month’’ as a means to encourage consumers 

to— 

(1) become more aware of their life insurance needs; 

(2) seek professional advice regarding life insurance; 

and 

(3) take the actions necessary to achieve financial 

security for their loved ones: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of ‘‘National 

3 Life Insurance Awareness Month’’; and 

4 (2) calls on the Federal Government, States, lo5 calities, schools, nonprofit organizations, businesses, 

6 and the citizens of the United States to observe the 

7 month with appropriate programs and activities. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
Before the First Division,

April 8, 1965

*No.*69228.

#### Micro Auto Imports and Mini Auto of California *v.*United States,

protests 64/3022(A) and 64/7371 (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of electric motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 66961, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsDevelopment of a Flight Simulation Data Visualization WorkstationToday's moderm flight simulation research produces vast amounts of time sensitive data. The meaning of this data can be difficult to assess while in its raw format . Therefore, a method of breaking the data down and presenting it to the user in a graphical format is necessary. Simulation Graphics (SimGraph) is intended as a data visualization software package that will incorporate simulation data into a variety of animated graphical displays for easy interpretation by the simulation researcher. Although it was created for the flight simulation facilities at NASA Langley Research Center, SimGraph can be reconfigured to almost any data visualization environment. This paper traces the design, development and implementation of the SimGraph program, and is intended to be a programmer's reference guide.Document ID19970012040Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsKaplan, Joseph A.*(National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Chen, Ronnie*(National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Kenney, Patrick S.*(Unisys Corp. Hampton, VA United States)*Koval, Christopher M.*(Unisys Corp. Hampton, VA United States)*Hutchinson, Brian K.*(Unisys Corp. Hampton, VA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1996Subject CategoryComputer Programming And SoftwareReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-110308NAS 1.15:110308Accession Number97N16679Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970012040.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
​

**EXHIBIT**** ****13.1**

**PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION**** ****1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION**** ****906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF**** ****2002**

I, Jan G. van de Winkel, President and Chief Executive Officer of Genmab A/S, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

        (1)   The Annual Report on Form 20-F of Genmab A/S for the period ended December 31, 2021 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

        (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Genmab A/S.

| ​                  | ​ |
|--------------------------|---------|
| Date: February 16, 2022  | ​ |
| ​                  | ​ |
| /s/ Jan G. van de Winkel | ​ |

​

AMERICAS/2017215013.2

​

----
#### Medad El MUHAMMAD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Commonwealth of VIRGINIA, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 05-6525.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 18, 2005.

Decided Aug. 25, 2005.

*218Medad El Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Andrew Witmer, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. -

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Medad El Muhammad, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Muhammad has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny his motions for appointment of counsel and for a certificate of appealability, and we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
From: tom_wor@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:20:58 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Thomas Worthington

Cranston, RI 02920
(V.D. 137)

#### The Garcia Corp. *v.*United States

(Decided July 26, 1967)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*Carl Bardley,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

FoRd, Judge:

This matter is before me on remand from classification proceedings decided by this court in *The Garcia Corp.*v. *United*States, 55 Cust. Ct. 428, Abstract 69544, wherein the matter was remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement. It has been submitted on a written stipulation reading as follows:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States:

1. That the involved fishing line was imported prior to the effective date of Section 2 of the Customs Simplification Act (Public Law 927, 84th Cong., T.D. 54165).

*8592. That the invoiced merchandise consists-of nylon fishing line-and plastic boxes which were held by the Court in Abstract 69544 to-be subject to appraisement separately according to the value of each class of articles.

3. That on or about the date of exportation, such or similar fishing line was not freely offered to all purchasers for home consumption in the country of exportation or for exportation to the United *States;*and on or about said date of exportation, such or similar imported merchandise was not freely offered to all purchasers for domestic consumption in the United States.

4. That the cost of production of the involved fishing line as defined in Section 402 (f) of the Tariff Aot of 1930, as amended, is equal to:

The appraised values less 140 each, net packed.

5. That the cost of production of the involved plastic boxes, as defined in Section 402(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, is equal to 14 cents each, net packed, the same value returned by the Appraiser theref or, as an unusual container.

6. That the remand of protest enumerated above may be submitted on this stipulation, the same being limited to the merchandise and issues described hereinabove.

Upon the agreed facts, I find and hold that cost of production as that value is defined in section 402 (f), Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the involved fishing lines and that said value is the appraised values, less 14 cents each, net packed, and that cost of production as that value is defined in section 402(f), Tariff Act of 1930, *supra,*is the proper basis of value for the determination of the value of the involved plastic boxes, and that said value is the appraised value equal to 14 cents each, net packed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 206 

Honoring the life, legacy, and contributions of Fannie Lou Townsend Hamer 

on the 30th anniversary of her death for her dedication to freedom 

and justice. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 28, 2007 

Ms. LEE (for herself and Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the life, legacy, and contributions of Fannie Lou 

Townsend Hamer on the 30th anniversary of her death 

for her dedication to freedom and justice. 

Whereas Fannie Lou Townsend Hamer dedicated her life to 

the fight against racial and social injustice and worked 

to guarantee the right to vote for every citizen of the 

United States; 

Whereas Fannie Lou Hamer was born on October 6, 1917, 

in Montgomery County, Mississippi, and died on March 

15, 1977; 

Whereas Fannie Lou Hamer was an important civil rights organizer who registered African Americans in the Deep 

South to vote; 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 206 IH 

Whereas Fannie Lou Hamer was falsely arrested and beaten 

savagely by police almost to the point of death on June 

9, 1963; 

Whereas Fannie Lou Hamer survived this ordeal and continued to advocate for full civic participation, empowering 

people to change their own lives as she accepted the dangerous task of registering voters; 

Whereas at the time of the voter registration drives in Mississippi in 1964, known as ‘‘Freedom Summer’’, 6.7 percent of African Americans in Mississippi were registered 

to vote; 

Whereas Fannie Lou Hamer was a founding member and 

served as the vice-chairperson of the Mississippi Freedom 

Democratic Party; 

Whereas Fannie Lou Hamer’s eloquent testimony before the 

credentials committee at the 1964 National Democratic 

Convention as the Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party’s delegate informed the American public of the atrocities and horrors African Americans faced during attempts to register to vote; 

Whereas Fannie Lou Hamer was the Mississippi Freedom 

Democratic Party’s candidate for the House of Representatives in 1965; 

Whereas by 1969, 66.5 percent of African Americans in Mississippi were registered to vote; 

Whereas Fannie Lou Hamer was a teacher, an activist scholar, a stateswoman, and a mother, and she had a clear vision and unwavering love for her people and hope for her 

country; and 

Whereas March 15, 2007, marks the 30th anniversary of 

Fannie Lou Hamer’s death: Now, therefore, be it 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 206 IH 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) honors the life, legacy, and contributions of 

3 Fannie Lou Townsend Hamer for her dedication to 

4 freedom and justice; 

5 (2) reaffirms its commitment to protecting the 

6 fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution; 

7 and 

8 (3) applauds the efforts of grassroots orga9 nizers to preserve the sacred principles of democracy 

10 by respecting the rights and will of the people. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
From: jneal@fwna-eng.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:47:11 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

jane neal

Burleson, TX 76028
From: cap121@q.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:58:16 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Cathy Parisi

Tucson, AZ 85704
No. 62195.

#### E. Leitz, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 287636-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of parts of photographic cameras similar in all material respects to the merchandise involved in *Manca, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 271, C. D. 1874), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.