alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-Q
for the  twenty-six  week Period  ended March 28, 1999 and is  qualified  in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             SEP-26-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                SEP-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAR-28-1999
<CASH>                                                3,097  
<SECURITIES>                                              0  
<RECEIVABLES>                                        28,837  
<ALLOWANCES>                                            618  
<INVENTORY>                                          38,992  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     85,932
<PP&E>                                               79,369  
<DEPRECIATION>                                       23,325  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      181,776  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                31,865  
<BONDS>                                             125,324  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0  
<PREFERRED>                                               0  
<COMMON>                                                  0  
<OTHER-SE>                                           16,653  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        181,776  
<SALES>                                             128,127  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    128,127  
<CGS>                                               107,934  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       107,934  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         76  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    6,246  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (1,781) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                           (732) 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (1,049) 
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0  
<CHANGES>                                                 0  
<NET-INCOME>                                         (1,049) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             0  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0  
        


</TABLE>
Searched for **http://www.cdc.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.cdc.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
Date 

8 August 2014 

Your Letter dated ~ Subject: 

Contact Person 

Your Reference: 

Operation of 7'h freedom charter flights by lnsel Air 

Dear Sirs, 

E·mail 

civilai~gobiemu cw Our reference 

CURCW/14/839 

Page(s) 

1/1 

The Undersigned, Director General of the Curac;ao Civil Aviation Authority, hereby 

confirms that Curac;ao will consider application by U.S. carriers for the approval to operate 

charter flights to and from Curac;ao in accordance with the provisions of the Air Transport 

Agreements between the Kingdom of the Netherlands with respect to Curac;ao and the 

United States of Amercia, signed July 14, 1998. 

Curac;ao will in addition grant approval for designated U.S. air carriers to operate 7111 

freedom charter flights on the understanding that the United States would grant similar 

flights to designated Curac;ao air carriers in accordance with the provisions of the abovementioned Air Transport Agreement for the period from 22 August 2014 to 21 January 2015. 

Sincerely, 

Oscar L. Derby 

Director General 

Curac;ao Civil Aviation Authority 

Edifisio Siegfried Francisco, Sen1 Mahuma dn I Willemstild, Cura<;ao I T. (5999) 839·3319 I F. (599<J) 86!1-9924 I civilairt/1'gobiernu.cw
Exhibit
      32.2








CERTIFICATIONS
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 UNITED STATES CODE SS. 1350





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Griffin Land & Nurseries, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 26, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Periodic
Report”), I, Anthony J. Galici, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1.
    The
      Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
    The
      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.











/s/
      ANTHONY J. GALICIAnthony
      J. GaliciVice
      President, Chief Financial Officer and SecretaryApril
      12, 2005
From: jackiedee_2000@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:43:11 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jacqueline Dickey

Chicago, IL 60619
Free Writing Prospectus
 Filed Pursuant to Rule 433
 Registration Number 333-234103
 
 CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION
 $8,000,000,000
 CAT FINANCIAL POWERINVESTMENT SM
 VARIABLE DENOMINATION FLOATING RATE DEMAND NOTES
 PowerInvestment SM
 
 Cat Financial PowerInvestment SM
 
 Financial strength means power. But when you invest in Cat Financial PowerInvestment notes, strength can mean so much more:
 
 Value –  Free checks for quick access to cash with no monthly fees.
 
 Convenience – An easy way to put your money to work and track it online.
 
 Reliability – Investing with a company you know and trust.
 
 Possibility – Earning power that could turn your dreams into realities.
 
 Return – Competitive interest rates based on current market conditions.
 
 Rates Effective for Variable Denomination Floating Rate Demand Notes
 as of March 9, 2020:
 
 Retail Investors
 Amount Invested        Rate    Yield
 $0 - $4,999.99        1.050%   1.05552%
 $5,000 - $49,999.99    1.100%     1.10606%
 $50,000 and Above*    1.200%     1.20721%
 
 Corporate Investors 1.200%   1.20721%
 
 
 *Total investments are subject to a maximum limit.  For further details, please reference the program prospectus.
 
 For more information call 1-800-233-2164, Monday through Friday, 7:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Central Time.
 
 Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation has filed a registration statement (including a prospectus) with the SEC for the offering to which this communication relates.  Before you invest, you should read the prospectus in that registration statement and the other documents that Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation has filed with the SEC for more complete information about Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation and this offering.  You may get these documents for free by visiting EDGAR on the web site at www.sec.gov. Alternatively, Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation will arrange to send you a prospectus if you request it by calling (800) 504-1114.
#### Terry L. HUTTO, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Gary MAYNARD, Director; South Carolina Department of Corrections; Henry McMaster, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents—Appellees.

No. 04-7998.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 29, 2005.

Decided: Aug. 18, 2005.

Terry L. Hutto, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, John William McIntosh, Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed in part; dismissed in part by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Terry L. Hutto appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition as untimely under the Antiterrorism and Ef*180fective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AED-PA”).

The district court granted a certificate of appealability with respect to Hutto’s claim that the district court erred in finding Hutto’s § 2254 petition untimely. We have reviewed the record and find that the district court correctly concluded that Hut-to’s petition was untimely filed. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s findings on this issue. *See Hutto v. Maynard,*No. CA-04-108 (D.S.C. Nov. 23, 2004).

The district court declined to issue a certificate of appealability on Hutto’s remaining claims. Hutto seeks to expand the certificate of appealability as to the claims rejected by the district court. In his motion to expand, Hutto reargues the claims he sought to raise in his untimely § 2254 petition. Hutto cannot obtain a certificate of appealability as to these claims absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Hutto has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Hutto’s motion to expand the certificate of appealability as to his remaining claims and dismiss the appeal as to these claims.

We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and deny Hutto’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART*
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of Smith Barney Westport Futures Fund L.P. (the"Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the periodending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, David J. Vogel, President and Director of Citigroup Managed FuturesLLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Partnership.

/s/ David J.Vogel

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

David J.VogelCitigroup Managed Futures LLC President andDirector     Date: August 9,2005

----
Before the First Division,

February 6, 1959

No. 62728.

#### Keff Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 321997-K (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of iron pictures the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Marshall Field & Co.*v. *United States*(45 C.C.P.A. 72, C.A.D. 676), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 182 (Thursday, September 21, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 65184]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20492]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, And Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group; 
NHLBI Mentored Transition to Independence Study Section.
    Date: November 16-17, 2023.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: The Canopy by Hilton, Washington, DC, Bethesda North, 940 
Rose Avenue, North Bethesda, MD 20892 (Hybrid Meeting).
    Contact Person: Giuseppe Pintucci, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and 
Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge 
Drive, Room 205-H, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 827-7969, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0a5a63647e7f6969636d4a646266686324646362246d657c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0d5d646379786e6e646a4d6365616f6423636465236a627b">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 18, 2023.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-20492 Filed 9-20-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A15A2088. BLUE CONGLOMERATION, LLC v. FLEETMATICS USA.

After default judgment was entered against defendant Blue Conglomeration,

LLC, it filed a motion to set aside the judgment under OCGA § § 9-11-60 (d) (1), (2),

and (3). The trial court denied the motion, and the defendant filed this direct appeal. 

We lack jurisdiction.

An appeal from the denial of a motion to set aside under OCGA § 9-11-60 (d)

must be taken by application for discretionary appeal. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (8); see

MMT Enterprises, Inc. v. Cullars, 218 Ga. App. 559, 561 (2) (462 SE2d 771) (1995).

The defendant’s failure to comply with the discretionary appeal procedure deprives

us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

07/16/2015

July 16, 2015
From: langforjc12@juno.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:17:15 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

James C. Langford

Richland, WA 99354
Exhibit 32.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Cover-All Technologies Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the Company), on Form 10- K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Ann F. Massey, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  March 24, 2011

/s/ Ann F. Massey

Name:

Ann F. Massey

Title:

Chief Financial Officer











---
MANAGEMENTS ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE

Management of the Agency and Trust division of Citibank, N.A. (or Company) is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Management has determined
that the servicing criteria in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB are applicable in regard to the servicing platform for the period as follows:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) securities backed by insurance-related funding
agreements issued on or after January 1, 2006, for which the Company provides the following servicing functions (the Platform); paying agent, calculation agent, trustee and registrar services.

Applicable Servicing Criteria: All servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) to the extent required by Item 1122(d)
servicing criteria in regards to the activities performed by the company with respect to the Platform as to any transaction, except for the following servicing criteria: 1122(d)(1)(ii)-1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(iii)-1122(d)(2)(iv),
1122(d)(2)(vi)-1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities the Company performs with respect to the Platform (the Applicable Servicing Criteria).

Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2011 (the Period).

With respect to the platform as of and for the period, the Companys management provides the following assertion of compliance with respect to
Applicable Servicing Criteria:



| |  |  | The Companys management is responsible for assessing the Companys compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The Companys management has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. In making this assessment, management used the criteria
set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 Regulation AB.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Based on such assessment, the Company has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report with respect to managements assertion of compliance
with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the period.



CITIBANK, N. A.LOGO


Dated: February 28, 2012
Before the Third Division,

March 19, 1963

No. 67519.

#### L. Batlin & Son, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 61/18344 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of wall plaques similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Ross Products, Inc.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 74, C.D. 2106), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.