alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|     |                                                                                                                             |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1) |  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|     |                                                                                                                                                            |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) |  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
| Date:  | August 6, 2012 | /s/ Kent M. Adams |
|   |   | Kent M. Adams |
|   |   | President, Director and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   |   |
| Date:  | August 6, 2012 | /s/ James A. Duensing |
|   |   | James A. Duensing |
|   |   | Executive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer |
From: es_burns@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:10:54 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Eric Burns

Albany, OR 97322
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,665,360
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         160,733
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             1,657,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 14,508,203
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     60,100,231
<ALLOWANCE>                                    644,791
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              82,655,624
<DEPOSITS>                                  70,979,608
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,655,681
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            987,444
<LONG-TERM>                                    709,467
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        45,083
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,278,341
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              82,655,624
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              3,912,117
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              632,284
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                34,379
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             4,578,780
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,122,710
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,198,457
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        2,380,323
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   90,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,992,446
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                944,457
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     664,825
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   664,825
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.74
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.40
<LOANS-NON>                                    246,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   369,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               653,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  128,000
<RECOVERIES>                                    30,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              645,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            38,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        607,000
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Smith Barney  Westport  Futures Fund
L.P. (the  "Partnership")  on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Daniel R. McAuliffe,  Jr., Chief Financial Officer and Director of
Smith Barney Futures Management LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Partnership.

/s/ Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.
Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.
Smith Barney Futures Management LLC
Chief Financial Officer and Director
November 14, 2002
112

63

Austin

Paterson

Rufus

Plymouth

Biggs

Touchet

Irrigon

Umatilla

Garrett

Boardman

Walla Walla College Place

Arlington

Umapine

Hermiston

Wasco

Milton-Freewater

Stanfield

Helix

Moro

Cecil

Echo

AthenaWeston

Olex

Adams

Grass

Valley

Ione

Rieth PendletonMission Cayuse

Gibbon

Lexington

Kent

Pilot Rock

Heppner

Condon

Meacham

Kamela

Shaniko

Mayville

Hardman

Antelope

Fossil

La Grande

Ukiah

Dale

Spray Monument

Kimberly Hamilton

Mitchell

Long Creek

Fox

Prineville

Sumpter

Dayville

Bates

Mount

Vernon

Post

Prairie City

John

Day

Canyon City

Unity

Paulina

Izee

Seneca

Brothers

Silvies

Holdman

Heppner

Junction

Clarno

Service

Creek

Richmond

Beech Creek

Logdell

Suplee

Millican

Morgan

Vinson Nye

Lena

Ruggs

McNary

Kooskooskie

Lowden

Maryhill

SHERMAN COUNTY

GILLIAM COUNTY

 WASCO COUNTY

JEFFERSON COUNTY

WHEELER COUNTY

CROOK COUNTY

MORROW COUNTY

GRANT COUNTY

UMITILLA COUNION CO

GRANT CO

BAKER CO

GRANT COUNTY

HARNEY COUNTY

WASHINGTON

OREGON

84

395

395

395

26

26

26

26

20

97

97

207

244

402

380

207

218

218

293

206

206

19

19

27

19

74

7

10 0 10 20 Kilometers

10 0 10 20 Miles

W

N

E

S

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

PRINEVILLE DISTRICT

John Day Basin

Resource Management Plan

Draft Environmental Impact Statement

2008

No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management as to the accuracy, 

reliability, or completeness of these data for individual or aggregate use with other 

data. Original data were compiled from various sources. This information may not 

meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was developed through 

digital means and may be updated without notification.

Large Structure Trees

Known Weed Location

 (incomplete coverage)

Forested

Potential for Old Growth Juniper

Juniper Expansion

Agriculture

Greater then 25% Annual Grass

LEGEND

Planning Area Boundary

Administered Land

 Bureau of Land Management

 Forest Service

 John Day Fossil Beds

 National Monument

 Other Federal

 State

 Private or Other

OREGON

84

84 5

5

101

101

395

395

395

199

26

26

26

20

97 197

97

20

95

26

30

Coos Bay

Florence

Newport

Portland The

Dalles

Albany

Bend

Salem

Tillamook

Eugene

Madras

Roseburg

Medford

Lakeview

Burns

Vale

Pendleton

Baker

City

Klamath

Falls

Grants Pass

Astoria

PA

C I F I C

O

C

E

A

N

Prineville 

District

John Day Basin

Planning

Area

John Day Basin

Planning

Prineville

John

Day

Map 18: Key Vegetation Elements M07-09-01:3-5-08
RECORD OF CONFERENCE CALL

DATE: May 28, 2011

EPA PARTICIPANTS: OAQPS/SLPG and OTAQ

OUTSIDE EPA PARTICIPANTS: None

SUBJECT: Presentation of Regulatory Support Document final results and discussion on Proposed Rule 

for Determining Widespread Use of ORVR and Stage II Vapor Recovery Waiver.

DISCUSSION:

Conference call held to discuss final edits to preamble and to prepare for presentation to OMB on the 

final analysis of the financial benefits for facilities that are electing to decommission their system once 

States eliminate the Stage II requirements.

Also checked the draft language to include in the preamble indicating the results of the analysis.

Marked up copies of proposed rule and regulatory support document transmitted via email.
Before the Second Division,

November 3, 1965

No. 69609.

#### C. M. Import & Export Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 63/14403, etc. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of earphones similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 69019, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
EXHIBIT 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Insight
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Elizabeth S.C.S Murray, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



/s/ Elizabeth S.C.S. Murray

| | 
| | 

Elizabeth S.C.S Murray

Chief Financial Officer

May 13, 2003



A signed original
of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Digital Insight and will be retained by Digital Insight and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of First Keystone Corporation
(the “Corporation”) for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Diane C.A. Rosler, Chief
Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:





1.
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Corporation as of and for the period covered by the
  Report.





/s/
      Diane C.A. RoslerDiane
      C.A. RoslerSenior
      Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer





December
16, 2010
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the annual report of Dynamic Applications Corp. (the “Company”)on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the “Report”), as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, AsherZwebner, CFO of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ AsherZwebner

Asher ZwebnerCFO Dated: April 15, 2013

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to Dynamic Applications Corp. and willbe retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 13, 2016

No. 04

- 15

- 00791

- CV

TALISMAN ENERGY USA, INC

. ,

Appellant

v.

MATRIX PETROLEUM, LLC , Matrix Petroleum Holdings, LLC, and JAR Resources Holdings, L.P., Appellees

From the 218th Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14

- 08

- 00158

- CVL

Honorable Russel Wilson, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The appellee ’ s unoppo sed motion for extension of time to file brief is hereby GRANTED. Time is extended to July 26, 2016.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 13th day of July, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Case No. 12,867.

#### SIMMONS v. GIRD.

[2 Cranch, C. C. 100.] 3

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

April Term, 1814.

Slavery — Suit fob Freedom — One Tear’s Resi dence.

The time of a slave's sailing on a voyage from Alexandria, is not' to be considered as a part of his year’s residence so as to entitle .him to freedom, under the Virginia law of December 17, 1792, § 2.

[This was an action by negro Robert Simmons against John Gird.]

The plaintiff was a slave, brought into Alexandria, whence he sailed on a voyage, and returned to Alexandria, but was not “kept therein one whole year together, or so long, at different times, as amounted to one year,” unless the time of his sailing on the voyage should be included.

This being stated in a special verdict, THE COURT rendered judgment for the defendant.
From: buoytrucking@nctc.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:59:12 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Shari Buoy

, 68823-4208
Before the Second Division,

November 24, 1965

No. 69627.

#### Polk’s Model Craft Hobbies, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 64/10624 (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of meters similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *G. L. Electronics, Inc., Arrow Sales, Inc.*(49 CCPA 111, C.A.D. 804), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**Exhibit 31.3**

 

**Certification**

 

I, John A. Galea, certify that:

 

1.                                      I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2017 of ILG, Inc.;

 

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 
| Dated: April 30, 2018 | /s/ JOHN A. GALEA                       |
|----------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                       | John A. Galea*Chief Accounting Officer* |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form
10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended April 26, 1998 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   4-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-26-1998
<CASH>                                           3,655
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,320
<ALLOWANCES>                                       569
<INVENTORY>                                     38,450
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                82,843
<PP&E>                                          69,355
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,448
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 178,674
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,806
<BONDS>                                        122,443
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,381
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   178,674
<SALES>                                        203,597
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               203,597
<CGS>                                          167,520
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  167,520
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   113
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,151
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,489
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,406
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,083
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,083
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        




</TABLE>
Order entered October 23, 2019

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 00877

- CR

MICHAEL GLEN GARZA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 354th Judicial District Court

Hunt County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 31429



### O RDER

Before the Court is the State’s October 21, 2019 motion for extension of time to file its

brief. We GRANT the motion to the extent we ORDER the State’s brief due by November 2 7,

2019.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
United States Court of Appeals 

For the First Circuit 

No. 17-1059 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Appellant, 

v. 

KENDALL ROSE, 

Defendant, Appellee. 

No. 17-1064 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Appellant, 

v. 

IKE WEEMS, a/k/a True, 

Defendant, Appellee. 

No. 17-1066 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Appellant, 

v. 

ANTHONY SABETTA, 

Defendant, Appellee. 

No. 17-1067 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Appellant, 

v. 

ALBERTO RODRÍGUEZ, 

Defendant, Appellee. 

ERRATA SHEET 
The opinion of this Court, issued on July 18, 2018, is amended 

as follows: 

On page 5, note 1, line 1, replace "ADW" with "A/BDW"