alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: tlw5171@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:51:16 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Teresa Wetzel

Carey, OH 43316
Before the Second Division,

November 12, 1963

No. 68094.

#### Ster-Wood Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 59/15329, etc. (New York).

*251Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of parts of electrical dishwashers the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 67196, the- claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: brysueramsey@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:37:34 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sue Ramsey

Greenfield, IN 46140
ex10_2.htm





Exhibit 10.2


 



AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AMENDED AND RESTATED


SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN AGREEMENT







THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AMENDED AND RESTATED SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN AGREEMENT (“Amendment”) is made as of the 1st day of January, 2013, by and between JUDITH A. HUNSICKER (“Executive”) and EMBASSY BANK FOR THE LEHIGH VALLEY, a Pennsylvania banking institution having its principal office in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania (the “Bank”).







WITNESSETH







WHEREAS, the Bank and the Executive entered into an Amended and Restated Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan Agreement dated November 19, 2010 (as the same may be amended from time to time, the “SERP”), and







WHEREAS, the Bank and the Executive desire to amend the SERP to increase the amount of the benefit thereunder.







NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound hereby, agree as follows:







1.           Paragraph 1(b) of the SERP is hereby amended to provide that the Normal Retirement Supplemental Pension (as defined in the SERP) shall be $178,500.







2.           In all other respects, the SERP, as amended above, is hereby ratified and confirmed by the Bank and the Executive. All other provisions of the SERP shall remain in full force and effect as amended hereby.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, each intending to be legally bound, have executed this Amendment as of the date, month and year first above written.








	
ATTEST:

	  	
EMBASSY BANK FOR THE LEHIGH VALLEY

	  
	  	  	  	  	  
	
/s/ Lynne M. Neel

	  	
By:

	
/s/ David M. Lobach

	  
	  	  	  	  	  
	
WITNESS:

	  	
EXECUTIVE

	  
	  	  	  	  	  
	
/s/ Lynne M. Neel

	  	
/s/ Judith A. Hunsicker
Exhibit 23.1
 
 SEALE AND BEERS, CPAs
 PCAOB & CPAB REGISTERED AUDITORS
 www.sealebeers.com
 
 
 
 
 
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 
 We have issued our report dated April 15, 2010, accompanying the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Nasus Consulting, Inc. for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statement of Nasus Consulting, Inc. on Form S-1 (File No. 333-150135, effective June 23, 2008).
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 /s/Seale and Beers, CPAs
 
 Seale and Beers, CPAs
 Las Vegas, Nevada
 April 15, 2010
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Seale and Beers, CPAs PCAOB & CPAB Registered Auditors
 50 S. Jones Blvd Suite 202 Las Vegas, NV 89107 Phone: (888)727-8251 Fax: (888)782-2351
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          9
<CIK>                              0001037249
<NAME>                             People's Community Capital Corporation

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                       JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                              1,703,681
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>             39,745,547
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                    5,220,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                            0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>        10,610,359
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        0
<LOANS>                            38,619,140
<ALLOWANCE>                           508,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     58,543,058
<DEPOSITS>                         47,741,265
<SHORT-TERM>                        1,008,749
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                   244,305
<LONG-TERM>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                9,983
<OTHER-SE>                          9,538,756
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>      9,548,739
<INTEREST-LOAN>                     1,722,505
<INTEREST-INVEST>                     338,838
<INTEREST-OTHER>                       73,360
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                    2,134,703
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                    788,719
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    805,725
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>               1,328,978
<LOAN-LOSSES>                         117,275
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                          0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                       974,916
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       405,976
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>            405,976
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                          251,369
<EPS-BASIC>                              0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0.24
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                           5.27
<LOANS-NON>                            18,049
<LOANS-PAST>                                0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                            0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                        18,049
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                      410,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                          19,275
<RECOVERIES>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                     508,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                        0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                         0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>               508,000


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          11,185
<SECURITIES>                                     7,092
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,835
<ALLOWANCES>                                       292
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               121,855
<PP&E>                                           5,990
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,883)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 127,819
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,383
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            17
<OTHER-SE>                                     114,298
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   127,819
<SALES>                                          4,572
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,572
<CGS>                                            2,206
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,206
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,305
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,939)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,939)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    190
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,749)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.28)
        

</TABLE>
From: knottrj@optimum.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:17:23 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Robert Knott

Bergenfield, NJ 07621
To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:44:23 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Garrett Butler

Ontario, CA 91762
----

| 1.   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| May      12, 2009                                 |
|---------------------------------------------------|
|                                              |
|                                              |
| /s/ Natalie Russell                               |
| Natalie      Russell                              |
| Chief      Financial Officer and Secretary        |
| (Principal      Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|                                              |
|                                              |
| /s/ James Winsor                                  |
| James      Winsor                                 |
| Chief      Executive Officer                      |
| (Principal      Executive Officer)                |

----
Exhibit 10.43  PROMISSORY NOTE   $100,000                                                                                                                                                  December 15, 2010   FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned (herein "Maker"), promises to pay to the order of Joseph W. Abrams (Payee), the principal sum of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) one (1) year from the date hereof (the "Maturity Date"), unless Payee consents to an extension of the Maturity Date, in lawful money of the United States of America unless Payee agrees to another form of payment. The unpaid principal amount shall bear interest at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum, which shall be payable on the one-year anniversary of the date hereof (or until the earlier date of payment if this Note is prepaid). 9. If the Maker shall make a general assignment for the benefit of creditors, or shall admit in writing its inability to pay its debts as they become due, or shall file a petition in bankruptcy, or shall be adjudicated a bankrupt or insolvent, then, and upon the happening of any such event, the Payee at its option, may declare the entire unpaid balance of the principal hereunder immediately due and payable with interest thereon as herein provided. 10. Presentment, demand, protest or notice of any kind are hereby waived by the Maker.  Maker may not set off against any amounts due to Payee hereunder any claims against Payee or other amounts owed by Payee to Maker. 11. In the case any one or more of the events of default specified in paragraph 1 above shall have happened and be continuing, the Payee may proceed to protect and enforce its rights either by suit in equity and/or by action at law, or by other appropriate proceedings. 12. The Maker agrees to pay all reasonable costs of collection, including attorneys fees which may be incurred in the collection of this Note or any portion thereof and, in case an action is instituted for such purposes, the amount of all attorneys' fees shall be such amount as the court shall adjudge reasonable. 13. This Note is made and delivered in, and shall be governed, construed and enforced under the laws of the State of California. 14. No delay or omission of the Payee to exercise any right hereunder, whether before or after the happening of any event of default, shall impair any such right or shall operate as a waiver thereof or of any event of default hereunder nor shall any single or partial exercise thereof preclude any other or further exercise thereof, or the exercise of any other right. 15. This Note shall be subject to prepayment, at the option of the Maker, in whole or in part, at any time and from time to time, without premium or penalty. 16. This Note or any benefits or obligations hereunder may not be assigned or transferred by the Maker.   MAKER:  PROPELL CORPORATION   By: s/Edward Bernstein Edward Bernstein, CEO    Acknowledged and agreed to by PAYEE:   By: /s/Joseph Abrams Joseph W. Abrams  Date:
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2013-0690

 Directorate Identifier: 2013NM088AD

737-32-1402 --- 8/6/08

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
From: christimunro@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:49:12 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Thank you,

Christine M Hamman

Sincerely,

Christine Hamman

Simi Valley, CA 93065