alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: lsloan@wideopenwest.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:54:54 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Lynn Sloan

Rochester, MI 48306
#### Robert Cecil SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BANKERS LIFE & CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 00-15872.

D.C. No. CV-98-00761-DWH.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 11, 2001 *.

Decided June 21, 2001.

Before O’SCANNLAIN, SILVERMAN, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Robert Cecil Smith appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment in his diversity action alleging that defendant Bankers Life & Casualty Company (“Bankers Life”) breached their contract to pay him commissions after he was terminated. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s grant of summary judgment, *Margolis v. Ryan,*140 F.3d 850, 852 (9th Cir.1998), and we affirm.

Summary judgment in favor of Bankers Life is warranted because Smith failed to offer any “significant probative evidence tending to support the complaint” in opposition to Bankers Life’s properly supported motion for summary judgment. *See Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477*U.S. 242, 256, 106 S.Ct. 2505, 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986); *Margolis,*140 F.3d at 852.

We decline to address Smith’s contention that he failed to file an opposition to summary judgment because the judge’s secretary told him he did not have to file any further papers, or his disability claim, because the issues were not properly raised before the district court. *See Whittaker Corp. v. Execuair Corp.,*953 F.2d 510, 515 (9th Cir.1992).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Green Technology Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John Shearer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: May 10, 2011





By:
/s/ John ShearerJohn ShearerChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer)
| For      the Period: 5/12/2009 to 5/18/2009 |
|---------------------------------------------|

| Coupon | Interest                           | Maturity | Callable | Survivor'sOption | Price1 | Yield2 | Moody's | S&P | CUSIP     |
|--------|------------------------------------|----------|----------|------------------|--------|--------|---------|---------|-----------|
| 3.400% | Semi-Annual(†††) | 5/15/11  | NO       | YES§        | 100.00 | 3.400% | A2      | A       | 14912HPG9 |
| 4.400% | Semi-Annual(†††) | 5/15/13  | NO       | YES§        | 100.00 | 4.400% | A2      | A       | 14912HPH7 |
From: ckyoho@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:02:33 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Carole Yoho

, 22182-1865
#### Chrysanthe Edey, Appellant, v Helene Fuld School of Nursing, Respondent.

[632 NYS2d 914]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lowe, III, J.), entered June 20, 1994, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Lowe, J., without costs and disbursements. No opinion. Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Rubin, Kupferman, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-23-046]

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

 United States International Trade Commission.

# TIME AND DATE: 

October 2, 2023 at 11:00 a.m.

# PLACE: 

Room 101, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000.

# STATUS: 

Open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Agendas for future meetings: none.

2. Minutes.

3. Ratification List.

4. Commission vote on Inv. Nos. 701-TA-382 and 731-TA-800, 801 and 803 (Fourth Review) (Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip from Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan). The Commission currently is scheduled to complete and file its determinations and views of the Commission on October 16, 2023 .

5. Outstanding action jackets: none.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Sharon Bellamy, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer, 202-205-2595.

The Commission is holding the meeting under the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(b). In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting.

      ( print page 66052)    
By order of the Commission.

Issued: September 21, 2023.

Sharon Bellamy,

Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.

[FR Doc. 2023-20983 Filed 9-22-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CurrencySharesSMSingapore Dollar Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-K for the fiscal period ended October 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Nick Bonos, Chief Financial Officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

Date: January 29, 2009



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ NICK BONOS               
|Nick Bonos*                  
|Chief Financial Officer      
|(principal financial officer)



|* | The Registrant is a trust and Nick Bonos is signing in his
capacity as the principal financial officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Registrant.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: fhofstra.int@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:55:35 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Fred Hofstra

Traverse City, MI 49696
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BOOTH CREEK SKI
HOLDINGS, INC. AS OF JULY 28, 2000 AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED AND THE
NINE MONTHS THEN ENDED, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

<S>                                                <C>            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           OCT-27-2000   OCT-27-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              OCT-30-1999   JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                JUL-28-2000   JUL-28-2000
<CASH>                                            852             852
<SECURITIES>                                        0               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   1,262           1,262
<ALLOWANCES>                                       47              47
<INVENTORY>                                     2,001           2,001
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               11,395          11,395
<PP&E>                                        197,700         197,700
<DEPRECIATION>                                 53,252          53,252
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                204,463         204,463
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          44,285          44,285
<BONDS>                                       133,500         133,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           1,763           1,763
<PREFERRED>                                         0               0
<COMMON>                                            0               0
<OTHER-SE>                                     21,708          21,708
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  204,463         204,463
<SALES>                                             0               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              115,208           5,079
<CGS>                                               0               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  63,106           7,154
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               34,483           9,648
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             14,626           4,910
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 3,265         (16,340)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             3,265         (16,340)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0               0
<CHANGES>                                           0               0
<NET-INCOME>                                    3,124         (16,382)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0               0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0               0



</TABLE>
# C_2017104EN.01004202.xml

| 3.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/42

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 February 2017 — Novar v EUIPO

(Case T-726/14) (1)

1

((Non-contractual liability - Proof of the existence, validity and scope of protection of the earlier mark - International registration designating the European Union - Decision rejecting the opposition in the absence of proof of the earlier right - Rule 19(2)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 - Revision of the decision - Article 62(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Damage consisting in lawyers’ fees - Causal link))

(2017/C 104/59)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Novar GmbH (Albstadt, Germany) (represented by: R. Weede, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for material damage which the applicant allegedly sustained on account of lawyers’ fees that it incurred in an appeal against a decision of the Opposition Division allegedly adopted in breach of Rule 19(2)(a) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 of 13 December 1995 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark and of general legal principles.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Novar GmbH and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) each to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Novar GmbH and the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) each to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 7, 12.1.2015.

1

---
No. 65130.

#### Naumes Forwarding Service et al. *v.*United States,

protests 230990-K/5442, etc. (Chicago).

*329Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that involved in *Dalton Cooper, Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(41 Cust. Ct. 271, C.D. 2051), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Donlon, J.,

dissented for the reasons set forth in her dissenting opinion in C.D. 2051, *supra.*
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Baby Fox International,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mu
Zhang, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to my knowledge:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|Dated: September 27, 2011 | By: /s/ Mu
      Zhang                     
|------------------------- | -------------------------------------------
|                          | Mu Zhang                                   
|                          | Chief
      Executive Officer,             
|                          | Chief
      Financial Officer and Secretary
|                          | (Principal
      Executive Officer and     
|                          | Principal
      Financial Officer)         

---
EXHIBIT 10.10.2

June 1, 2006

To: Aurora Gold Corporation
3540 West 41st Avenue, Suite 204
Vancouver, BC V6N 3E6

Tel. 604-687-4432
Fax 604-687-4709

Attention: Cameron Richardson
Email: c.richardson@telus.net
       ----------------------


From: Tomas Almeida, Certified Translator

Re: Translation of Memorandum of Understanding regarding Santa Lucia Project


                            Translator's Declaration

I,  Tomas  Almeida,  Certified  Portuguese to English Translator, Member in good
standing  of  the  Society  of  Translators and Interpreters of British Columbia
(STIBC),  which  is  a  member  association  of  the  Canadian  Translators  and
Interpreters Council (CTIC), hereby attest that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, the above-mentioned document is a true, correct and complete translation
of  the  Portuguese  document  presented  to  me.


Tomas  Almeida


Tomas Almeida
19780 Honeydew Drive
Pitt Meadows, BC V3Y 2S6

Tel. 604-465-6128
Fax 604-465-6129
Cell.604-202-0031
Email: talmeida@telus.net
       ------------------