alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: scott.vignassi@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:23:31 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Scott Vignassi

, 62226-6714
No. P67/42.

No. P67/43.

#### Simon International Corp *v.*United States,

protest 61/21565 (New York).

#### Simon International Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 62/17795, etc. (New York).

*867Nao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of rush bags similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Carson M. Simon & Co.*v. *United States*(55 Cust. Ct. 103, C.D. 2558), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 13 (Thursday, January 20, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3628-3629]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-1049]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Agency Information Collection Activities: Existing Collection; 
Emergency Extension

AGENCY: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

ACTION: Notice of Information Collection--Emergency Extension Without 
Change: Local Union Report (EEO-3).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, the Equal 
Employment Opportunity Commission

[[Page 3629]]

(EEOC or Commission) announces that it submitted to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) a request for a three-year extension of the 
Local Union Report (EEO-3), to be effective after the current January 
31, 2011 expiration date.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ronald Edwards, Director, Program 
Research and Surveys Division, 131 M Street, NE., Room 4SW30F, 
Washington, DC 20507; (202) 663-4958 (voice) or (202) 663-7063 (TTY).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The EEOC has collected information from 
local unions on the EEO-3 form since 1966 (biennially since 1985).

Overview of Information Collection

    Collection Title: Local Union Report (EEO-3).
    OMB Number: 3046-0006.
    Frequency of Report: Biennial.
    Type of Respondent: Referral local unions with 100 or more members.
    Description of Affected Public: Referral local unions and 
independent or unaffiliated referral unions and similar labor 
organizations.
    Responses: 1,399.
    Reporting Hours: 4,500 (including recordkeeping).
    Cost to Respondents: $85,000.
    Federal Cost: $60,000.
    Number of Forms: 1.
    Form Number: EEOC Form 274.
    Abstract: Section 709(c) of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 
1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-8(c), requires labor organizations to 
make and keep records relevant to a determination of whether unlawful 
employment practices have been or are being committed and to produce 
reports from the data. The EEOC issued regulations requiring referral 
local unions with 100 or more members to submit EEO-3 reports. The 
individual reports are confidential. The EEOC uses EEO-3 data to 
investigate charges of discrimination and for research.
    Burden Statement: The estimated number of respondents included in 
the biennial EEO-3 survey is 1,399 referral unions. The form is 
estimated to impose 4,500 burden hours biennially. In order to help 
reduce survey burden, respondents are encouraged to report data 
electronically whenever possible.

    Dated: December 22, 2010.

    For the Commission.
Jacqueline A. Berrien,
Chair.
[FR Doc. 2011-1049 Filed 1-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6570-01-P
```
<PAGE>
                                LNB Bancorp, Inc.

                             Exhibit to Form 10 - K/A

                  (for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002)

                         S - K Reference Number (23.2)



               Consent of Independent Accountants with respect to
               The Lorain National Bank 401(k) Plan (registration
               number 333-53210) for the plan year ended December 31,
               2002 filed as an amendment to the annual report on
               Form 10-K.


































<PAGE>
(LETTERHEAD)                                           Exhibit 23.2
(LOGO)
KPMG LLP
One Cleveland Center
1375 East Ninth Street, Suite 2600
Cleveland, Ohio 44114-1796





                        Consent of Independent Accountants
                        ----------------------------------


The Plan Administrator
LNB Bancorp, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
No. 333-53210 of LNB Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated May 30, 2003,
relating to the statements of assets available for plan benefits of The
Lorain National Bank 401(k) Plan as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the
related statements of changes in assets available for plan benefits for
the years then ended, and the related supplemental schedules, which report
appears in Amendment No. 2 to the 2002 annual report on Form 10-K of LNB
Bancorp, Inc.







/s/ KPMG LLP
Cleveland, Ohio
June 26, 2003

(LOGO)
Member Firm of
KPMG International
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

DARYL CURTIS GLENN,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-10270

D.C. No. 1:08-cr-00023-OWW

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Oliver W. Wanger, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 17, 2012** 

Before: LEAVY, PAEZ, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Daryl Curtis Glenn appeals from his jury conviction and 180-month

sentence for two counts of receipt or distribution of material involving the sexual

exploitation of minors, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2). Pursuant to Anders

FILED

APR 25 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-10270

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Glenn’s counsel has filed a brief stating there

are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. 

We have provided Glenn the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No

pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. 

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s

judgment is AFFIRMED.
No. 67517.

#### Calif. Radio & Electronics Co. *v.*United States,

protests 61/17228, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Eord, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of “S” meters similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Universal Foreign Service, Inc., Gonset Division et al.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 183, C.D. 2300), the claim at 12% percent under the provision in paragraph 353, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 52739), for parts of radios was sustained. The items marked “B,” stipulated to consist of “YU” meters the same in all material respects as those the subject of said C.D. 2300 or volt-ohm-milliampere meters similar to those the subject of *United States*v. *G. L. Electronics, Inc., Arrow Sales, Inc.*(49 CCPA 111, C.A.D. 804), were held dutiable at 13% percent under the provision in said paragraph 353, as modified, *supra,*for other articles, wholly or in chief value of metal, having as an essential feature an electrical element or device.
```

[114th Congress Public Law 160]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 130 STAT. 406]]

Public Law 114-160
114th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To designate the Federal building located at 99 New York Avenue, N.E., 
        in the District of Columbia as the ``Ariel Rios Federal 
           Building''. <<NOTE: May 20, 2016 -  [H.R. 4957]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 99 New York Avenue, N.E., in the 
District of Columbia shall be known and designated as the ``Ariel Rios 
Federal Building''.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Ariel Rios Federal 
Building''.

    Approved May 20, 2016.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4957:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 114-534 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016):
            May 10, considered and passed House.
            May 16, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsExperimental evaluation of the ignition process of carbon monoxide and oxygen in a rocket engineCarbon monoxide and oxygen ignition boundaries were determined in a spark torch igniter as a function of propellant inlet temperatures. The oxygen temperature was varied from ambient to -258 F, and the carbon monoxide temperature was varied from ambient to -241 F. With the oxygen and carbon monoxide at -253 F and -219 F, respectively, they successfully ignited between mixture ratios of 2.42 and 3.10. Analysis of the results indicated that the lower ignition boundary was more sensitive to oxygen temperature than to carbon monoxide temperature. Another series of tests was performed in a small simulated rocket engine with oxygen at -197 F and carbon monoxide at -193 F. An oxygen/hydrogen flame was used to initiate combustion of the oxygen and carbon monoxide. Tests performed at the optimum operating mixture ratio of 0.55 obtained steady-state combustion in every test.Document ID19960045922Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsLinne, Diane L.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland,OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1996Subject CategorySpacecraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberAIAA Paper 96-2943NASA-TM-107267NAS 1.15:107267E-10334Meeting InformationMeeting: Joint Propulsion ConferenceLocation: Lake Buena Vista, FLCountry: United StatesStart Date: July 1, 1996End Date: July 3, 1996Sponsors:Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc.,American Society for Electrical Engineers,American Society of Mechanical Engineers,American Inst. of Aeronautics and AstronauticsAccession Number96N32762Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 889-32-73Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19960045922.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
From: rwadsworth2@tx.rr.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:49:43 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ralph Wadsworth

, 75181-1084
Before the Second Division,

August 22, 1966

No. P66/197.

#### Kwan Yuen Co. *v.*United States, protest 59/21666 (Los Angeles).

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of harvest hats valued at less than $3 per dozen, which are not blocked, trimmed, or sewed, similar in all other material respects to those the subject of *Bailey-Mora Co., Inc., a/c Vera Lou, Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(54 Cust. Ct. 55, C.D. 2508), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: raydaniel@ix.netcom.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:18:47 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

james daniel

Cincinnati, OH 45241
No. 62758.

#### Manca, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 328852-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of parts of photographic cameras similar in all material respects to the merchandise involved in *Manca, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 271, C.D. 1874), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: crea256@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:06:55 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

George Folk II

Three Rivers, MI 49093
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of BJs Wholesale Club, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended July 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Michael T. Wedge, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |  |  |                                         
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------
|                       |  | 
|Dated: August 17, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    MICHAEL T. WEDGE                 
|                       |  |  |  | Michael T. Wedge Chief Executive Officer
No. 229, Misc.

#### Polites *v.*Sahli, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service.

*George W. Crockett, Jr.*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Cox,*Assistant *Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg*and *Jerome M. Feit*for respondent.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.
From: palvarez99@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:06:27 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Patricia Alvarez

Lake Stevens, WA 98258