alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com 

2518 Auburn Drive, Cocoa, FL 32926 (321)-261-2547

uasolutionsgroup@uasolutionsgroup.com

April 8, 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Amendment to Section 333 Petition for Exemption pursuant to Section 

333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations 

in Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-0433-0001 

Dear Sir or Madam:

Leptron Industrial Robotics Helicopters, Inc. (Leptron), filed for a Petition For 

Exemption/Rulemaking, Pursuant to Section 333 of the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA) Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, for the 

purposes of low-risk, precision aerial mapping, surveying, and topography recording. The 

Petition for Exemption is contained within Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-0433-0001. 

Leptron hereby requests an amendment to Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-0433-0001 

to allow an additional type of small Unmanned Aircraft System (sUAS) that fully complies 

with the terms and conditions of the previous exemption request. 

Leptron wishes to operate the RDASS electrically powered 4 rotor system, under 

the same terms and conditions contained in the Petition for Exemption in Regulatory 

Docket No. FAA-2015-0433-0001. Leptron products in general already have a long 

standing proven operational history with the FAA. The RDASS platform is currently being 

reviewed under the Public COA process for the following list of agencies, either updating 

or requesting new COAs. 

 Central Michigan University - Updating the Avenger and modifying for an RDASS

 Texas A&M University - Adding an RDASS

 Austin Texas Police Department and Fire - New for an RDASS, currently with the 

FAA’s Flight Standards Office completing a safety assessment

 Arlington Texas Police Department - Updating the Avenger and adding a new one 

for RDASS

All confidential manuals previously submitted to the FAA by Leptron are also 

applicable to the safe operation of the RDASS. Additionally, the required manuals specific 

to the RDASS accompany this Amendment and are also considered Proprietary and 

Confidential. All operations of the additional RDASS sUAS will be in full compliance with 

the terms and conditions of the original Petition for Exemption in Regulatory Docket No. 

FAA-2015-0433-0001. 
UASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com 

2518 Auburn Drive, Cocoa, FL 32926 (321)-261-2547

uasolutionsgroup@uasolutionsgroup.com

As this is an amendment asking for only the addition of another type of sUAS, 

Leptron respectfully submits that good cause exists so that notice does not need to be 

published in the Federal Register for the requested amendment.

Please contact the undersigned should you have any question concerning this 

request for an amendment. 

cc:

Jim Williams

Joe Morra

Robert Papas

Jake Troutman

Dean Griffith, Esq.
From: gerijo3@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:55:07 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Geri Johnson

Fairfield, TX 75840
Exhibit 32   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of Sino-American Investment Holdings Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:  1. The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date:  May 14, 2011                 /s/ Zhong Fang ------------------------------- Zhong Fang, CEO & CFO
From: dave.botma@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:51:53 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dave Botma

South Holland, IL 60473
No. 60492.

#### Herzman Scarfs, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 269950-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk scarves or squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136,|C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:40:59 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ben Taylor

Mount Juliet, TN 37122
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 218 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require that, as 

of the date of adoption of this resolution, a proportional distribution 

of committee seats, staff, and financial resources be made. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 7, 2007 

Mr. ISSA submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to 

require that, as of the date of adoption of this resolution, 

a proportional distribution of committee seats, staff, and 

financial resources be made. 

Whereas the Constitution provides for citizens of the several 

states to be equally represented in the House of Representatives; 

Whereas the Constitution provides for each citizen to receive 

equal protection of the laws; 

Whereas the majority of substantive lawmaking in the House 

of Representatives occurs through the Committee process; 

Whereas the access to financial and staff resources in the legislative process equates to the ability to collect and analyze information essential to lawmaking; and 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 218 IH 

Whereas the Supreme Court of the United States ruled in 

Buckley v. Valeo that expenditure of financial resources 

was so essential to the exercise of free speech that the 

protections of the first amendment must apply to expenditure of financial resources: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That (a) the Rules of the House of Rep2 resentatives are amended by redesignating rule XXVIII as 

3 rule XXIX and by adding after rule XXVII the following 

4 new rule: 

5 ‘‘RULE XXVIII

6 ‘‘PROPORTIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF COMMITTEE SEATS, 

7 STAFF, AND FINANCIAL RESOURCES

8 ‘‘1. Notwithstanding any provision of these rules, for 

9 each Congress the ratio of majority party to minority 

10 party members of each committee, the ratio of majority 

11 party staff to minority party staff of each committee, and 

12 the ratio of funds made available for majority party staff 

13 salary and expense accounts to minority party staff salary 

14 and expense accounts of each committee shall be the same 

15 as the ratio of majority party membership to minority 

16 party membership of the House at the beginning of that 

17 Congress. 

18 ‘‘2. Clause 1 shall apply to all standing, select, spe19 cial, ad hoc, and other committees of the House except 

20 the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct.’’. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 218 IH 

1 (b) This resolution may be cited as the ‘‘American 

2 Citizens Equal Representation Rule’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
From: hislove3815@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:22:21 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

george hinojosa

Albuquerque, NM 87114
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99-2

                    CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PanAmSat Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael J. Inglese,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.


August 13, 2002                         /s/ Michael J. Inglese
                                        _____________________________________
                                        Michael J. Inglese
                                        Executive Vice President and
                                        Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-4208

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DAVID WEAVER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,

District Judge. (5:02-cr-00102-BO)

Submitted: July 25, 2007 Decided: August 15, 2007

Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, G. Alan DuBois,

Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellant. George E. B. Holding, United States Attorney, Jennifer

P. May-Parker, Anne M. Hayes, Assistant United States Attorneys,

Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

David Weaver appeals the district court’s order revoking

his supervised release and sentencing him to sixty months’

imprisonment. We affirm.

We note that while the sentence Weaver received is above

the advisory sentencing guideline range of eighteen to twenty-four

months, see U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 7B1.4(a) (2006), it

is within the applicable statutory maximum sentence. Moreover, our

review of the record leads us to conclude that the district court

sufficiently considered the statutory factors and explained its

reasons for imposing a sentence above the advisory guideline range.

We therefore find that the sentence imposed upon revocation of

supervised release is not plainly unreasonable. See United States

v. Crudup, 461 F.3d 433, 437, 439-40 (4th Cir. 2006), cert. denied,

127 S. Ct. 1813 (2007). We further grant the Government’s motion

to strike Weaver’s reply brief. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

 AFFIRMED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

SUSQUEHANNA RHEEMS HOLDINGS, 

LLC; 155 BROAD STREET, LLC AND 

RHEEMS OPERATOR, LLC,

Petitioners

v.

WEST DONEGAL TOWNSHIP ZONING 

HEARING BOARD, WENGER'S FEED 

MILL, INC. AND WEST DONEGAL 

TOWNSHIP,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 660 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of April, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
From: ohmitt1@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:34:23 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

O. H. Mittelberg

Minot, ND 58703
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsFast Risetime Reverse Bias Pulse Failures in SiC PN Junction DiodesSiC-based high temperature power devices are being developed for aerospace systems which will require high reliability. One behavior crucial to power device reliability. To date, it has necessarily been assumed to date is that the breakdown behavior of SiC pn junctions will be similar to highly reliable silicon-based pn junctions. Challenging this assumption, we report the observation of anomalous unreliable reverse breakdown behavior in moderately doped (2-3 x 10(exp 17) cm(exp -3)) small-area 4H- and 6H-SiC pn junction diodes at temperatures ranging from 298 K (25 C) to 873 K (600 C). We propose a mechanism in which carrier emission from un-ionized dopants and deep level defects leads to this unstable behavior. The fundamental instability mechanism is applicable to all wide bandgap semiconductors whose dopants are significantly un-ionized at typical device operating temperatures.Document ID19960047115Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsNeudeck, Philip G.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Fazi, Christian*(Army Research Lab. Adelphi, MD United States)*Parsons, James D.*(Oregon Graduate Inst. of Science and Technology Beaverton, OR United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1996Subject CategoryElectronics And Electrical EngineeringReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:107256NASA-TM-107256E-10317Meeting InformationMeeting: International High Temperature Electronics ConferenceLocation: Albuquerque, NMCountry: United StatesStart Date: June 9, 1996End Date: June 14, 1996Sponsors:Sandia National Labs.Accession Number96N32882Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-62-5ODistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19960047115.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024