alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Zeferino CARLOS, a.k.a. Roberto Sanchez Miranda, a.k.a. Carlos Zeferino, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-14175

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Aug. 18, 2005.

Karin B. Hoppmann, Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Mark W. Ciaravella, Tampa, FL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before ANDERSON, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Mark W. Ciaravella, appointed counsel for Zeferino Carlos in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Carlos’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 21.01

                                91
<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
            SUBSIDIARIES OF RIO HOTEL & CASINO, INC.
                                

                                   STATE OF                  
            NAME                 INCORPORATION         PARENT COMPANY

<S>                              <C>             <C>
Rio Properties, Inc.             Nevada          Rio Hotel & Casino, Inc.
                                                 
Rio Development Company, Inc.    Nevada          Rio Hotel & Casino, Inc.
(formerly MarCor Development
    Company, Inc.)

Rio Resort Properties, Inc.      Nevada          Rio Hotel & Casino, Inc.
(formerly MarCor Resort
    Properties, Inc.)
                                                 
Cinderlane, Inc.                 Nevada          Rio Properties, Inc.

</TABLE>

                                        92
<PAGE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 39 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      January 16, 2007.
Whereas, on January 8, 2007, the University of Florida Gators won the 2006 Bowl 
        Championship Series national title with a stunning 41-14 defeat over the 
        Ohio State University Buckeyes;
Whereas the University of Florida is one of the premier academic institutions in 
        the State of Florida;
Whereas the University of Florida football program celebrated its 100th 
        Anniversary this season;
Whereas the University of Florida Gators captured the South Eastern Conference 
        (SEC) Championship title on December 2, 2006;
Whereas the University of Florida won the NCAA Championship title in basketball 
        in April 2006;
Whereas the University of Florida is the first Division I school to hold the 
        national championship title in both football and men's basketball 
        concurrently;
Whereas Florida football Head Coach Urban Meyer is only the 7th coach to win a 
        national championship in his first two seasons as a Division I college 
        football coach;
Whereas senior quarterback Chris Leak was the Most Valuable Player of the BCS 
        national championship game;
Whereas the Florida defense held Ohio State to only 82 yards of offense, the 
        lowest ever for a BCS game;
Whereas the University of Florida student athletes are among the most talented 
        in the Nation;
Whereas University of Florida fans worldwide supported and encouraged the Gators 
        throughout the football season;
Whereas J. Bernard Machen, President of the University of Florida, and Athletic 
        Director Jeremy N. Foley have shown great leadership in bringing success 
        and glory to the University of Florida; and
Whereas the University of Florida students, faculty, alumni, and all Gator fans 
        are deeply committed to bringing pride to the University of Florida and 
        the entire State of Florida: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives--
            (1) commends the Florida Gators for their victory in the 2006 Bowl 
        Championship Series and for winning the national college football 
        championship;
            (2) recognizes the achievements of the players, coaches, students, 
        and staff whose hard work and dedication helped the University of 
        Florida Gators win the championship; and
            (3) directs the Clerk of the House of Representatives to transmit a 
        copy of this resolution to University of Florida President J. Bernard 
        Machen, football Head Coach Urban Meyer, and Athletic Director Jeremy N. 
        Foley for appropriate display.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
No. 69785.

protests 60/30797-11586, etc. (Chicago).

#### Karl Schroff *&*Assoc. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of parts of hydaulic pumps, dedicated to use therewith, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 69245, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF**

**COLLINS & AIKMAN FLOORCOVERINGS, INC.**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Collins & Aikman Floorcoverings, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended October 29, 2005, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Edgar M. (Mac) Bridger, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies that: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Orbit/FR, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the three months ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Israel
Adan, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

August 13, 2004

/s/ Israel Adan
-------------------------
Israel Adan
President and Chief Executive Officer

                                       20
#### Edwin Groat, Appellant, v. Henry Deal and Mary C. Green, Respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Learned, P. J.
|   | 1.            The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2.            The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented. |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   By: |   /s/ Marco Bastidas                                             |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:     |  Marco Bastidas                                                       |
|  Title:    |  Principal Executive Officer,Principal Financial Officer and Director |
|  Date:     |  April 8, 2011                                                        |
September 28, 1962

No. 67086.

protests 60/30748, etc. etc.

#### A. Zerkowitz & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Plaintiff’s application for rehearing denied.
Case No. 13,493.

#### STORRS et al. v. ENGEL et al.

[Case reported under above title same as Case No. 12,053.]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Executive Officer of AGY
Holding Corp. (the Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:

1) the Companys annual report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) the information contained in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                                                                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Douglas J. Mattscheck                                                                                       
|Douglas J. Mattscheck Chief
Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer) 
Dated: March 31, 2011

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to AGY Holding Corp. and will be retained by AGY Holding Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
From: je_hopwood49@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:59:29 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Judy Reedy

Caldwell, ID 83605
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsMaterials Division research and technology accomplishments for FY 87 and plans for FY 88The research program of the Materials Division is presented as FY 87 accomplishments and FY 88 plans. The accomplishments for each Branch are highlighted and plans are outlined. Publications of the Division are included by Branch. This material will be useful in program coordination with other government organizations, universities, and industries in areas of mutual interest.Document ID19890009157Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsBrinkley, Kay L.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1988Subject CategoryChemistry And Materials (General)Report/Patent NumberNASA-TM-101506NAS 1.15:101506Accession Number89N18528Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-43-11-02Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19890009157.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Before the Third Division,

July 7, 1955

No. 59213.

protest 244338-K (New York).

#### Lansen-Naeve Corp. *v.*United States,

*212Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial, the collector’s memorandum was offered in evidence wherein it is stated that, following the customs regulations, the merchandise would now be liquidated free of duty under paragraph 1607 and that, the collector’s period of review having expired, he would have no objection to a stipulation to that effect. On the record presented, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: vernesa@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:04:57 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Vernesa Herbert

Shawnee, KS 66203
SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
  (a)
    
    A review of the Servicers activities and of its performance under the applicable servicing
agreement during the period from April 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008 has been made under my
supervision.
 (b)
    
    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its
obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the
aforementioned period.
  /s/ Daniel J. GardettoDaniel J. GardettoAssistant Treasurer of
Ford Motor Credit Company LLC,
as Servicer of Ford Credit Auto Owner
Trust 2008-B
From: believinghim@embarqmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:01:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Diane Reynolds

Troy, VA 22974
Exhibit 32

 

 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Sino-AmericanNet Media Corp (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer & Chief FinancialOfficer, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto his knowledge:

 

1. The report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

              Date:April 15, 2013                                                                                                                                                         /s/Zhong Fang

                                                                                                                                                                                          -------------------------------

                                                                                                                                                                                           Zhong Fang, CEO & CFO
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined th a t

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-10747

Summary Calendar

NATALIE F. HIMES,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

DALLAS/FORT WORTH MEDICAL CENTER-GRAND PRAIRIE; ET AL.,

Defendants,

DALLAS/FORT WORTH MEDICAL CENTER-GRAND PRAIRIE,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(4:98-CV-923-Y)

March 13, 2000

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Natalie F. Himes ("Himes") sued h er former employer,

Dallas/Fort Worth Medical Center-Grand Prairie ("DFWMC"), and other

health care providers alleging religious discrimination in

violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, defamation,

blacklisting in violation of Texas Labor Code § 52.031, violation

of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, and other state causes of action.2

DFWMC answered and moved to stay prosecution of the suit and compel

arbitration pursuant to a written arbitration agreement which Himes

signed at the time she was first employed by DFWMC. The district

court granted the motion to stay and compel arbitration and Himes

appeals.

We have care fully reviewed the briefs, the reply brief, the

record excerpts, and relevant portions of the record itself. We

read the order granting stay and compelling arbitration entered on

May 25, 1999, as amended by order entered July 23, 1999, as being

an interlocutory order compelling arbitration in a proceeding in

which arbitration is embedded with claims on other grounds against

other parties. Accordingly, we do not have appellate jurisdiction

to determine the propriety of the district court’s order of May 25,

1999. S ee McDermott Int’l, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyds

, 981

F.2d 744, 746 (5t h Cir. 1993), and A ltman Nursing, Inc. v. Clay

Capital Corp. , 84 F.3d 769, 770 (5th Cir. 1996).

APPEAL DISMISSED

.
No. 58210.

protests 186166-K and 214070-K (New York).

#### McCorquodale Process, Inc., and Barnett International Forwarders, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of McCorquodale machines or parts thereof similar in all material respects to the machine which was the subject of *United States*v. *Perry Byer & Co.*(41 C. C. P. A. 18, C. A. D. 524), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.