alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form  S‐3  (Nos.  333-170652 and 333-173364) of Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation of our report  dated February 21, 2012, except with respect to our opinion on the consolidated financial statements insofar as it relates to the change in reportable segments discussed in Note 14, as to which the date is August 7, 2012, relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Current Report on Form 8‐K.














/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Peoria, Illinois


August 7, 2012
```

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 185 (Tuesday, September 26, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 66012]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20875]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; International Centers of Excellence 
for Malaria Research (U19 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).
    Date: November 13-15, 2023.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G53, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Caitlin A. Brennan, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G53, 
Rockville, MD 20852, (301) 761-7792, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 20, 2023.
Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-20875 Filed 9-25-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
Plant Actual Clinker 

(White Report)

(yr) Actual Nox Actual Sox Projected 

Clinker Projected NOx Projected NOx Projected SOx Projected SOx NOx 

Reductions

SO2 

Reductions

(000 TPY) (TPY) (TPY) (000 TPY) (TPY) lb/tcli (TPY) lb/tcli

Bessemer K3 254.39

Bessemer K4 369.79

Bessemer Total 624.20 2005 1647.00 919.00 1,647.0 919.0

Logansport K1 191.72 1150.31 671.01 243.00 364.50 3.00 425.25 3.50

Logansport K2 192.51 1347.56 924.04 224.00 784.00 7.00 537.60 4.80

Logansport Total 384.20 2005 2497.87 1595.06 467.00 1148.50 962.85 1,349.4 632.2

Martinsburg K7-9 615.50 2006 4088.16 7007.21

Martinsburg K1 Permit Limits 2013.00 1404.00 1776.00 1909.20 2.15 1332.00 1.50 103.8 72.0

Permit Limits 2.65 lb/ton 1.873 lb/ton

Nazareth K1 1076.10 2006 1963.00 1502.00 1347.00 1549.05 2.30 1212.30 1.80 414.0 289.7

Speed K1 285.83 1000.40 285.83 325.00 568.75 3.50 162.50 1.00

Speed K2 588.29 1235.41 1000.09 651.00 683.55 2.10 553.35 1.70

Speed Total 874.10 2004 2235.81 1285.92 976.00 1252.30 715.85 983.5 570.1

San Juan K3 581.40 2005 1221.00 348.00 528.00 607.20 2.30 264.00 1.00 613.8 84.0

Total 4155.50 13652.84 12657.19 5094.00 6466.25 4487.00

actual - projected 7186.59 8170.19 5,111.4 2,567.0

Total reduction Actual 15356.78

7,678.4
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CCA PRISON REALTY TRUST FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,020
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      308
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,782
<PP&E>                                         781,531
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (18,271)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 775,762
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,699
<BONDS>                                        237,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         43
<COMMON>                                           216
<OTHER-SE>                                     510,004
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   775,762
<SALES>                                         48,727
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                49,387
<CGS>                                           13,183
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,658
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,750
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,010
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             23,010
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    23,010
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.05
        

</TABLE>
| Name                 |   | Title                 |
|----------------------|--------|-----------------------|
|                 |   |                  |
| /s/Stanley M. Brock  |   | Chairman of the Board |
| Stanley M. Brock     |   |                  |
|                 |   |                  |
| /s/Joseph R. Cashio  |   | Director              |
| Joseph R. Cashio     |   |                  |
|                 |   |                  |
| /s/James J. Filler   |   | Director              |
| James J. Filler      |   |                  |
|                 |   |                  |
| /s/Michael D. Fuller |   | Director              |
| Michael D. Fuller    |   |                  |
|                 |   |                  |
| /s/Hatton C.V. Smith |   | Director              |
| Hatton C.V. Smith    |   |                  |

----
From: lcichos@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:39:46 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Lawrence Cichos

Bennett, CO 80102
From: rdsranch@midstatesd.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:26:37 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Carla Sybesma

Platte, SD 57369
From: slypig@cfl.rr.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:28:49 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ron Cunningham

Melbourne, FL 32935
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
BJs Wholesale Club, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended November 1, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Frank D. Forward, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|       |  |                   | 
|------ |  | ----------------- | 
|Dated: |  | December 16, 2003 | 
|       |  |                   | 
|       |  |                   |
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2014-0145 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2013-NM-183-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 2013-0162

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes,

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                              
<ARTICLE>                          5
<CIK>                              0001037189
<NAME>                             Smith Barney Westport Futures Fund L.P.
                                    
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                       JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                   2,000
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         2,000
<PP&E>                                      0
<DEPRECIATION>                              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           2,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       0
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                               2,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             2,000
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            0
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             0
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         0
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0
        

</TABLE>
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 1 MONICA BOEHMER and STEVE KEMP, 2 Plaintiffs-Appellants, 3

v. No. A-1-CA-37164 4 PROJECT MANAGEMENT & 5 DEVELOPMENT, INC., and MICHAEL 6 S. NEAS, 7 Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellees, 8 and 9 BOTTOM DRAWER, LLC; C.M. LATH AND 10 PLASTER, INC.; PIONEER PAVING & 11 GRADING, INC.; STOREFRONT SPECIALTIES 12 & GLAZING, LLC; VILLANUEVA GRANITE & 13 TILE, INC.; ROBERT UFFER d/b/a WHOLESALE 14 MIRROR - EASTERNGATE GLASS, INC.; 15 H. GLENN MURRAY and JANE DOE MURRAY; 16 H. GLENN MURRAY & ASSOC.; JOHN DOES 17 I-X; JANE DOES I-X; WHITE CORPORATIONS 18 I-X; BLACK PARTNERSHIPS I-X; and GRAY 19 LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES I-X, 20 Third-Party Defendants. 21 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY 22 Clay Campbell, District Judge 232 Crowley & Gribble, PC 1 Clayton E. Crowley 2 Albuquerque, NM 3 for Appellants 4 Resnick & Louis, P.C. 5 Emily Dotson 6 Albuquerque, NM 7 for Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellees 8 Rodey, Dickason, Sloan, Akin & Robb, P.A. 9 David W. Buntin 10 Edward Ricco 11 Albuquerque, NM 12 for Third-Party Defendant C. M. Lath and Plaster, Inc. 13 Eaton Law Office, P.C. 14 Michael G. Smith 15 Albuquerque, NM 16 for Third-Party Defendants H. Glenn Murray and Jane Doe Murray; and H. Glenn 17 Murray & Assoc. 18 MEMORANDUM OPINION 19 VANZI, Chief Judge. 20
{1} Plaintiffs Monica Boehmer and Steve Kemp appeal from the district court’s 21 order denying their motion for reinstatement and order denying their motion to recuse. 22 In this Court’s notice of proposed disposition, we proposed to summarily dismiss for 23 lack of a final order. Plaintiffs filed a concurrence to proposed summary disposition, 243 stating that they “concur with the Notice, Proposed Summary Disposition[.]” [MIS 1] 1 Accordingly, for the reasons stated in our notice of proposed disposition and herein, 2 we dismiss the appeal for lack of a final order. 3
{2} IT IS SO ORDERED. 4

______________________________ 5 LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge 6

WE CONCUR: 7

___________________________ 8 M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge 9

___________________________ 10 STEPHEN G. FRENCH, Judge 11
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with Amendment no.  3 to the Quarterly Report of Orbit/FR, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Relland Winand, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:   November 30, 2011




/s/ Relland WinandRelland WinandChief Financial Officer