alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
11

30

35

11

26

14

31

13

18

07

26

14 13

18

25

06

25

35 36

24

12

01

36

19

12

02

31

30

23 19

07

23

24

22

02 01

14 16

21

32

05 05

10 08

22

28

14 18 17

32

28 26

06

29

29

04 03

11

15

25

34

09

12 07

13

23 24

35

33

17 17

26

09

20 21

07 08

23

28

33

18 16

16

28

10

15

32 34

08

20

13 16

35 36

21

30

09

27

11 12 08

17

24

27

31

20

30

31 32

19

29

21 19

36 33

20

25

04

09

29

33

John Day 

Basin 

Planning Area

Map Area

Prineville 

District

O R E G O N

Kimberly

Bend

John Day

* Note: Access to some areas listed as open may

require landowner permission to cross private lands

1 0 1 2 3 Miles

1 0 1 2 3 Kilometers

Map 13C Errata: Alternative 4 and 5 Travel 

Management - Rudio Mountain

R 26 E R 27 E R 28 E

R 28 E

T

11

S

T

12

S

T

11

S

T

12

S

Bureau of Land Management

No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management as to the accuracy,

reliability, or completeness of these data for individual or aggregate use

with other data. Original data were compiled from various sources and may

be updated without notification. 

PRINEVILLE DISTRICT

John Day Basin

Resource Management Plan

Draft Environmental Impact Statement

2008

R 27 E

 LEGEND

Omitted Information

Transportation

Interim Road

Interim Road-Needs Rehabilitation

Open Road Seasonally

Open Road Seasonally- Needs Rehabilitation

Closed Road

Closed Road - Stream Function

Proposed New Road

US Highway

State Highway

County Road

Forest Service Primary Route

Forest Service Secondary Route

Private Road - Closed to public use or unknown

Administered Land

Bureau of Land Management

Private or Other

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

R 26 E

Last Modified Date: 1/5/2009 4:17:12 PM
From: timothy.korry@aurora.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:42:08 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Tim Korry

Kenosha, WI 53142
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1393 

Expressing support for designation of January 29, 2009, as ‘‘National Data 

Privacy Day’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 30, 2008 

Mr. PRICE of North Carolina submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of January 29, 2009, 

as ‘‘National Data Privacy Day’’. 

Whereas the Internet and the capabilities of modern technology cause data privacy issues to figure prominently in 

the lives of many people in the United States at work, 

in their interaction with government and public authorities, in the health field, in e-commerce transactions, and 

online generally; 

Whereas many individuals are unaware of data protection 

and privacy laws generally and of specific steps that can 

be taken to help protect the privacy of personal information online; 

Whereas ‘‘National Data Privacy Day’’ constitutes an international collaboration and a nationwide and statewide efVerDate Aug 31 2005 04:01 Jul 31, 2008 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR1393.IH HR1393

wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1393 IH 

fort to raise awareness about data privacy and the protection of personal information on the Internet; 

Whereas government officials from the United States and 

Europe, privacy professionals, academics, legal scholars, 

representatives of international businesses, and others 

with an interest in data privacy issues are working together on this date to further the discussion about data 

privacy and protection; 

Whereas privacy professionals and educators are being encouraged to take the time to discuss data privacy and 

protection issues with teens in high schools across the 

country; 

Whereas the recognition of ‘‘National Data Privacy Day’’ will 

encourage more people nationwide to be aware of data 

privacy concerns and to take steps to protect their personal information online; and 

Whereas January 29, 2009, would be an appropriate day to 

designate as ‘‘National Data Privacy Day’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of a ‘‘National 

3 Data Privacy Day’’; 

4 (2) encourages State and local governments to 

5 observe the day with appropriate activities that pro6 mote awareness of data privacy; 

7 (3) encourages privacy professionals and edu8 cators to discuss data privacy and protection issues 

9 with teens in high schools across the United States; 

10 and 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1393 IH 

1 (4) encourages individuals across the Nation to 

2 be aware of data privacy concerns and to take steps 

3 to protect their personal information online. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
_________________________________________ 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

April 4, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130859 Michael F. Cavanagh 

130860 Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

MONIKA MAZUMDER, Personal Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, Representative of the Estate of Justices Deepika S. Mazumder, Deceased, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 130859, 130860 

 COA: 261331; 261333 

Washtenaw CC: 04-001101-NM 

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN 

REGENTS, ROBERT A. KOEPKE,

PH.D., RAJIV TANDON, M.D.,

SATOSHI MINOSHIMA, M.D.,

WASHTENAW COUNTY 

COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH, 

JOSEPH YAROCH, M.D.,

MOONSON R. ELLIOTT ENINSCHE,

B.A., R.S.W., C.S.M., and RICHARD 

PFOUTZ, M.S.W., C.S.W., MOHAMED 

AZIZ, M.D., and STEPHAN F. TAYLOR,

M.D., 

 Defendants, 

and 

SRINIBAS MAHAPATRA, M.D.,

 Defendant-Appellant. 

____________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 23, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the 

case of Mullins v St. Joseph Mercy Hospital (Docket No. 131879) is pending on appeal 

before this Court and that the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the 

present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in 

ABEYANCE pending the decision in that case. 

l0328 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 4, 2007 

 Clerk
From: gmayer6793@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:24:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ghislaine Mayer

Henrico, VA 23228
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

**REQUIRED BY RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14 UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE**

**ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED**

I, Peter S. Garcia, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of MDRNA, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting tobe designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; 

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: March 23, 2010
From: vkkwilliams@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:50:53 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Victor Williams

Lone Tree, CO 80124
No. 61017.

protests 122234-K, etc. (Baltimore).

#### S. S. Kresge Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Olives, C. J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of figures or articles, composed wholly or in chief value of papier máché, the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 56975, the claim at 25 percent under paragraph 1403 as manufactures of papier máché was sustained. The items marked “B,” stipulated to consist of articles, composed wholly or in chief value of wood, the same as those involved in said Abstract 56975, were held dutiable at 33)4 percent under paragraph 412 as manufactures wholly or in chief value of wood, not specially provided for, as claimed.
From: sandra.c.anderson@usm.edu

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:24:06 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sandra Anderson

Purvis, MS 39475
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 367 

Commemorating the 25th anniversary of the construction and dedication 

of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 2, 2007 

Mr. SALI submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committees on Natural 

Resources and Veterans’ Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

RESOLUTION 

Commemorating the 25th anniversary of the construction 

and dedication of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial. 

Whereas 2007 marks the 25th anniversary of the construction and dedication of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial in 

Washington, the District of Columbia; 

Whereas the memorial displays the names of more than 

58,000 men and women who lost their lives between 1956 

and 1975 in the Vietnam combat area or are still missing 

in action; 

Whereas every year millions of people in the United States 

visit the monument to pay their respects to those who 

served in the Armed Forces; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 367 IH 

Whereas the Vietnam Veterans Memorial has been a source 

of comfort and healing for Vietnam veterans and the 

families of the men and women who died while serving 

their country; and 

Whereas the memorial has come to represent a legacy of healing and demonstrates the appreciation of the people of 

the United States for those who made the ultimate sacrifice: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) expresses its support and gratitude for all 

3 of the men and women who served honorably in the 

4 Armed Forces of the United States in defense of 

5 freedom and democracy during the Vietnam War; 

6 (2) extends its sympathies to all people in the 

7 United States who suffered the loss of friends and 

8 family in Vietnam; 

9 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

10 to remember the sacrifices of the Nation’s veterans; 

11 and 

12 (4) commemorates the 25th anniversary of the 

13 construction and dedication of the Vietnam Veterans 

14 Memorial. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
NO. 07-02-0266 -CR IN THE COU RT OF APP EALS FOR THE SEVENT H DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMA RILLO PANE L A AUGUST 8, 2002

______________________________ MICHAEL MOOM AW , APPELLANT

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________ FROM THE320 TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUN TY; NO. 32349-D; HO NORABL E DON E MERS ON, JUDGE

_______________________________ Before BOYD, C.J., and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ. Appellant M icha el M oomaw filed a Motion to Dism iss Appeal on August 2, 2002, averring tha t heno lo nge r w ishe s topro sec utehis app eal. TheMo tion to D is m is s is signed by both appellant and his attorney. W ithoutpassing on the m erits of t he case, appellant’s m otion for voluntary dismissal is granted and the appeal is hereby dism issed. Tex. R . App. P. 42.2. Having dismissed2

the appeal at ap pell ant’s personal request, no m otion for rehearing will be entertained and our ma ndate will issue forthwith.

Phil Johnson Justice

Do not publish.
**Exhibit 23.2**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors 

7 Days Group HoldingsLimited 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-164535) on Form S-8 of 7 Days Group HoldingsLimited of our report dated April 26, 2010, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of 7 Days Group Holdings Limited as of December 31, 2008 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations, equity (deficit) and comprehensiveincome (loss), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, which report appears in the December 31, 2009 annual report on Form 20-F of 7 Days Group Holdings Limited. 

/s/ KPMG 

Hong Kong, China 

April 26, 2010