alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: moonbeenh@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:55:32 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Bambi DeFilippis

Newport, NH 03773
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as adopted Pursuant to
                 Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

In connection with the annual report of Feminique Corporation (the "COMPANY") on
Form 10-KSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the SEC on the
date hereof (the "REPORT"), I hereby certify, in my capacity as an officer of
the Company, for purposes of 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                  /s/ Max Khan
                                -----------------
                                  By: Max Khan
                            Chief Executive Officer,
                            Chief Financial Officer
                             DATE: DECEMBER 7, 2003


<PAGE>
February 15, 1996

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
450 Fifth Street, N. W.
Judiciary Plaza
Washington, DC. 20549

Re:  United Gold & Government Fund, Inc.
     Post-Effective Amendment No. 18

Dear Sir or Madam:

In connection with the filing of the above-referenced Post-Effective Amendment,
I hereby represent that the Amendment does not contain disclosures which would
render it ineligible to become effective pursuant to paragraph (b) of Rule 485.

Yours truly,



Sharon K. Pappas
General Counsel

SKP:sw
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 
 Schedule of Officers – Form of Change in Control Agreement, as Amended 
 Set forth
below is a list of Officers who have entered into (i) the form of Change in Control Agreement with Armstrong World Industries, Inc. filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 6, 2010 and (ii) the form of
Amendment to Change in Control Agreement with Armstrong World Industries, Inc. effective December 31, 2012 filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Current Report on Form 10-K on January 4, 2013: 

Victor D. Grizzle 
 Mark A. Hershey 

Thomas M. Kane 
 Donald R. Maier 

Thomas B. Mangas 
 Stephen F. McNamara

 Stephen H. Poole 
 Frank J. Ready
From: tragas4450@cox.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:22:45 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

theresa ragas

Chalmette, LA 70043
| Exhibit      32.2 |
|-------------------|

|   | 1. | The      Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or      15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;      and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ ANTHONY J.      GALICI                                 |
|------------------------------------------------------------|
| Anthony      J. Galici                                     |
| Vice      President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary |
| October 8,      2009                                  |
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|   | Title of Each Class of |   | Maximum Aggregate | Amount of |   |   |
|   | Securities Offered |   | Offering Price(1) | Registration Fee(2) |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | 2.250% PowerNotes®  Due December 15, 2022 |   | $5,505,000 | $750.88 |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | TOTAL |   |   | $750.88 |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |

|     |                                    |
|-----|------------------------------------|
| (1) | Excludes accrued interest, if any. |

|     |                                                                             |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | Calculated in accordance with Rule 457(r) under the Securities Act of 1933. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | CUSIP | Aggregate |   | Selling | Gross |   | Net | Coupon | Coupon |   | Coupon |   | Maturity |   | 1st Coupon | 1st | Survivor's | Product |
|   | Number | Principal |   | Price | Concession |   | Proceeds | Type | Rate |   | Frequency |   | Date |   | Date | Coupon | Option | Ranking |
|   |   | Amount |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Amount |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | 14912HQC7 | $5,505,000.00 |   | 100% | 1.800% |   | $5,405,910.00 | Fixed | 2.250% |   | Semi- |   | 12/15/2022 |   | 06/15/2013 | $11.37 | Yes | Senior Unsecured |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Annual |   |   |   |   |   |   | Notes |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
From: ironoxchan@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:38:13 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Gaylon Rust

Chanhassen, MN 55317
From: blessedvbpc@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:23:23 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Maria Bruckner

Simpsonville, SC 29681
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                          5
<MULTIPLIER>                                       1
<CURRENCY>                                         U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                       JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1
<CASH>                                                 280,096
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        1,812,146
<ALLOWANCES>                                          (302,679)
<INVENTORY>                                            245,995
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     3,578,292
<PP&E>                                               1,075,339
<DEPRECIATION>                                         583,904
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       4,127,753
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                3,565,086
<BONDS>                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                61,035
<OTHER-SE>                                            (383,521)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         4,127,753
<SALES>                                              3,690,891
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     3,690,891
<CGS>                                                2,584,096
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        2,584,096
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     1,609,365
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      97,775
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (605,618)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   (605,618)
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                          (605,618)
<EPS-BASIC>                                            (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                0



</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 2639-028]

                    On September 11, 2023, Northern States Power Company—Wisconsin submitted to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) a copy of its application for a Clean Water Act section 401(a)(1) water quality certification filed with the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (Wisconsin DNR), in conjunction with the above captioned project. Pursuant to section 401 of the Clean Water Act [1]                                          and section 4.34(b)(5) of the Commission's regulations,[2]                                          a State certifying agency is deemed to have waived its certifying authority if it fails or refuses to act on a certification request within a reasonable period of time, which is one year after the date the certification request was received. Accordingly, we hereby notify Wisconsin DNR of the following:                

*Date of Receipt of the Certification Request:*                     September 11, 2023.                

*Reasonable Period of Time to Act on the Certification Request:*                     One year (September 11, 2024).                

If Wisconsin DNR fails or refuses to act on the water quality certification request on or before the above date, then the agency certifying authority is deemed waived pursuant to section 401(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341(a)(1).

Dated: September 14, 2023.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             33 U.S.C. 1341(a)(1).                    
        Back to Citation      

2.                             18 CFR 4.34(b)(5) (2022).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2023-20358 Filed 9-19-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
No. 65978.

#### Howe Sales Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 211893-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issue is the same in all material respects as that the subject of *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), and the record showing that the merchandise consists of knit nylon gloves similar in use to silk gloves, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Case No. 8,161.

#### LEANING v. STANDISH.

[N. Y. Times.

May 4, 1864.]

District Court, S. D. New York.

1864.

Carriers — Delivery op Cargo — Shipping—De-murrage — Evidence of Party in Interest.

[1. The carrier fulfills his undertaking by bringing the cargo to the appointed port with notice to the consignee of that fact and the readiness of the ship to deliver it at a convenient and proper place.]

[2. The testimony of the clerk of the respondent will overcome that of libelant testifying for himself.]

[Libel by Matthew Leaning against William Standish for freight and demurrage.]

. Mr. Donovan and Judge Whiting, for libel-ant.

Mr. Lyons and Mr. Benedict, for respondent.

BETTS, District Judge.

This was a libel for freight and demurrage. The libelant was master of the barge Anthracite. The coal was shipped at Swatara Collier, to be •delivered at New York, “unto Hiram Tocht or his assigns, he or they paying freight at $2.70 per ton, and demurrage at the rate of $10 per day for any detention over three days after notice of arrival has been given to the consignee.” The libelant at New Brunswick received instructions to deliver his coal to the respondent at the foot of Delaney street. On the 18th of December the arrival of the vessel was reported, and on the 24th of December the libelant signed a receipt for “$25 of Hiram Tocht, on account of the freight.” The vessel was not able to get to a berth for several days. The respondent’s clerk testified that after the barge had arrived, he told the libelant the respondent would take the coal at the foot of Stanton street, where there was a berth; but this the libelant denied. He finally got a berth at the foot of Delaney street, and after that there was no delay in receiving the coal. The libelant claimed to recover the freight and demurrage for ten days. The respond-I ent did not contest the freight, but denied I his liability to pay demurrage.

HELD BY THE COURT. That the carrier fulfills his undertaking expressed in a bill of lading of the purport of this one by bringing the cargo to the appointed port, with notice to the consignee of that fact, and the readiness of the ship to deliver it at a convenient and proper place. The duty of the consignee is to designate the place of delivery, and to be ready to receive rhe cargo as it comes from the ship. Whether that shall be from her side in the stream, or landed on a quay, must be a matter depending upon the condition of the port in means and facilities of commercial accommodation, or arrangement between the parties. That in this case the delivery was to be made at a dock acceptable to the consignee. That the evidence of the claimant on the question of his readiness to receive the coal at Stanton street is the stronger; the libelant testifying for himself against the clerk. That the respondent is entitled to a decree on the claim for demurrage.
Exhibit 32.1

Statement





Pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of Luxemburg Bancshares, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that to the knowledge of the undersigned:



(1)

the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2)

the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  August 12, 2005





/s/ John A. Slatky

John A. Slatky

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Luxemburg Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by Luxemburg Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.  This statement accompanies the periodic report to which it relates and shall not be deemed as filed as part of the report or otherwise for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.