alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Laidlaw International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to such officer's knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
          Report.

Date: November 9, 2006


                                        /s/ Kevin E. Benson
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name: Kevin E. Benson
                                        Title: President and Chief Executive
                                               Officer


                                        /s/ Jeffrey W. Sanders
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name: Jeffrey W. Sanders
                                        Title: Vice President and Chief
                                               Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed as a part of this report or on a separate
disclosure document
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the accompanying Report of Henry County Plywood
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2008, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Michael Friess, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fully presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



By:  /s/ Michael Friess
     ----------------------------------------
     Michael Friess
     Chief Executive Officer
     August 28, 2008
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (i)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.
 Dated: June 1, 2006
    /s/  SETH R. JOHNSONSeth R. JohnsonChief Executive Officer
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc.
(Principal Executive Officer)Dated: June 1, 2006
    /s/  GERALD M. CHANEYGerald M. ChaneySenior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc.
(Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Insight Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Jeffrey E. Stiefler, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                            
|/s/    JEFFREY E.
STIEFLER                                  
|Jeffrey E. Stiefler                                         
|Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
|November 8, 2005                                            



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Digital Insight and will be retained by Digital Insight and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATIONS
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and
the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date: August 29, 2008
    
    /s/ MICHAEL L. HENRY

Michael L. HenryChief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-5022
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. DAVID MCCLEOD, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:03-cr-843-TLW) Submitted: May 22, 2008 Decided: May 27, 2008 Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael A. Meetze, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellant. Arthur Bradley Parham, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: David McCleod appeals the district court’s order revoking his supervised release and sentencing him to ten months’ imprisonment. McCleod’s attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), stating that there are no meritorious issues for appeal, but suggesting that the district court erred in ordering revocation and sentencing McCleod based on supervised release violations. McCleod has been informed of his right to file a pro se supplemental brief, but has not done so. Pursuant to Anders , we have examined the entire record and find no meritorious issues for appeal. McCleod admitted to violations of his supervised release, and his sentence, which was within the advisory guidelines range, was reasonable. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. This court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that such a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
#### James Arthur BRAXTON, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Gene M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 05-6454.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 18, 2005.

Decided Aug. 24, 2005.

James Arthur Braxton, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

James Arthur Braxton, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Braxton that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation would result in waiver of appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, and an extension by the magistrate judge of the time in which to do so, Braxton failed to timely file objections to the magistrate judge’s recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. *See Wright v. Collins,*766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir.1985); *see also Thomas v. Arn,*474 U.S. 140, 106 S.Ct. 466, 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985). Braxton has waived appellate review by failing to file timely objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
**AMENDMENT NO. 7**

**TO THE**

**RESTATED BYLAWS OF**

**DIGITAL INSIGHT CORPORATION**

**(as adopted on August 5, 2003)**

 

Section 3.2 of Article III of the Bylaws of the Company shall be amended toread as follows: 

 

 

Subject to any contrary provisions in the certificate of incorporation, the authorized number of directors shall be seven (7). This numbermay be changed by a duly adopted amendment to the certificate of incorporation or by an amendment to this bylaw adopted by the vote or written consent of the holders of a majority of the stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote or byresolution of a majority of the board of directors. 

 

No reduction of the authorized number of directors shall have the effect of removing any director before that director’s term of office expires.” 

**CERTIFICATE OF ADOPTION**

**OF AMENDMENT NO. 7**

**TO THE**

**RESTATED BYLAWS OF**

**DIGITAL INSIGHTCORPORATION**

 

**Certificate by Secretary of Adoption**

**By Board of Directors**

 

The undersigned hereby certifies that he is the duly elected, qualified, and acting Secretary of Digital Insight Corporation and that the foregoingAmendment No. 7 to the Restated Bylaws, comprising of one (1) page, was adopted by the Board of Directors pursuant to Section 3.2 of the Restated Bylaws by unanimous written consent in lieu of a meeting on August 5, 2003. 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto set his hand and affixed thecorporate seal this 5th day of August, 2003 

 

/s/    TAE J.RHEE        
**Tae J. Rhee, Secretary**
Exhibit 10.2 Demerger Agreement

May 29, 2002

Stratesec Incorporated and Kamran Hashemi agree to settle the outstanding
Stratesec lawsuit and any existing or potential claims against Stratesec,
Incorporated by Kamran Hashemi based on the following conditions: Stratesec/SFT
will:

1.   Drop its lawsuit and all legal  action  against you, and release Les Pendis
     liens against your property and your stock in Stratesec Incorporated.

2.   Convey to you or your entity the SSI GSA schedule and the Army BPA.

3.   Convey title and ownership to you or your entity all physical assets of the
     former SSI such as:

o    Dump trucks, forklift, ditch witch, boring machine, cable, etc.

4.   Forgive the $327,000 plus accrued  interest note between you and SSI, which
     conveyed to Stratesec Incorporated.

5.   Convey: All contracts completed under the former SSI name.

6.   SFT will drop its  lawsuit  and will  relieve you from any and all past and
     current claims and causes of action.

In return for the above, you agree to the following:

1.   You return 2 million shares of Stratesec (SFT) and all outstanding  options
     to purchase stock will be cancelled.

2.   You resign from the Board

3.   You  release  Stratesec  from any past and  current  claims  and  causes of
     action.

Your signature below confirms this agreement:
Accepted:
/s/ BARRY MCDANIEL
-------------------
Barry McDaniel
/s/ KAMRAN HASHEMI
-------------------
Kamran Hashemi
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Hughes, 137 Ohio St.3d 1204, 2013-Ohio-4355.] 

DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. HUGHES. 

[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Hughes, 137 Ohio St.3d 1204, 

2013-Ohio-4355.] 

(No. 2005-1156—Submitted September 30, 2013—Decided October 2, 2013.) 

ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. 

____________________ 

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an 

application for reinstatement by respondent, Jennifer Krieger Hughes, Attorney 

Registration No. 0063961, last known business address in Miamisburg, Ohio. 

{¶ 2} The court, coming now to consider its order of March 22, 2006, 

wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a 

period of two years, with one year stayed on conditions, finds that respondent has 

substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. 

V(10)(A). 

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to 

the practice of law in the state of Ohio. 

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies 

of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made 

as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of 

publication. 

O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY,

FRENCH, and O’NEILL, JJ., concur. 

________________________
Exhibit
31.2





Section
302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer





I, Max
Kern, certify that:





1.   I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Sears Oil and Gas
Corporation.





2.   Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances   under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;





3.   Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations  and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.   The
registrant's other certifying officers and I; are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:





a)   designed
such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure


that
material information relating to the registrant, including its


consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within


those
entities, particularly during the period in which this


report
is being prepared;





b)   evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure


controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to


the
filing date of this report (the  "Evaluation


Date");
and





c)   presented
in this report our conclusions about the


effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on


our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;





5.   The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):





a)   all
significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of


internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's


ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial data


and
have identified for the registrant's auditors any material


weaknesses
in internal controls; and





b)   any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management


or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's


internal
controls.


1


6.   The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this report
whether or not there were significant changes in  internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant efficiencies and material weaknesses.








Date:
March 31, 2009








/s/ Max
Kern


----------------------------------


Max
Kern


Chief
Financial Officer








2
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1468 

Congratulating the U.S. Equestrian Team on winning the Gold Medal in 

team show jumping in the Games of the XXIX Olympiad. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2008 

Mr. HALL of New York (for himself, Mr. MCHUGH, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, 

Mr. GALLEGLY, Mr. MAHONEY of Florida, and Mr. WEXLER) submitted 

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the U.S. Equestrian Team on winning the 

Gold Medal in team show jumping in the Games of 

the XXIX Olympiad. 

Whereas McLain Ward and Beezie Madden have each won 

two Olympic Gold Medals; 

Whereas McLain Ward’s fast and clean leadoff ride played a 

significant role in the Gold Medal victory of the U.S. 

Equestrian Team over the Canadian team; 

Whereas McLain Ward had the best individual ride of any 

competitor during the team round of competition; 

Whereas Beezie Madden returns home from Beijing as one of 

the world’s greatest equestrian jumpers; 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1468 IH 

Whereas Beezie Madden also won a Bronze Medal in the individual jumping competition, astride her horse, Authentic; 

Whereas Beezie Madden has earned many accolades throughout her career, including being named the U.S. Equestrian Federation Equestrian of the Year in consecutive 

years, the American Grand Prix Association Rider of the 

Year, and the U.S. Olympic Committee’s Equestrian of 

the Year; 

Whereas the U.S. Equestrian Team defeated the Canadian 

team in a dramatic, timed jump off; 

Whereas the U.S. Equestrian Team won the Gold Medal in 

show jumping on August 18, 2008; and 

Whereas this was the second Gold Medal in a row for the 

United States in the team show jumping event: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes Laura Kraut of Wellington, Flor3 ida, Beezie Madden of Cazenovia, New York, Will 

4 Simpson of Thousand Oaks, California, and McLain 

5 Ward of Brewster, New York, of the U.S. Eques6 trian Olympic Team on its Gold Medal in team show 

7 jumping; and 

8 (2) recognizes the achievements of the U.S. 

9 Equestrian Olympic Team and all the members of 

10 the 2008 U.S. Olympic Team. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
#### Mary F. Davis, Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. The Chautauqua Lake Sunday School Assembly, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed. Opinion by

Barker, J.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the annual report
of  Millstream Ventures, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year
ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“Report”), the undersigned principal executive and financial officer of the
Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:  June
29, 2009








/s/ Steven L.
White


Steven L.
White, President


(Principal
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
No. 63306.

protests 58/8613, etc. (New York).

#### Stern & Stern Textiles, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of point d’esprit net the same in all material respects as that the subject of *E. C. Carter & Son, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 368, C.D. 1889), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 38

 40

 42

 44

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

07/07

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 07 Jul 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.81 N 76.74 W Meters AGL
No. 69223.

#### Toyoshima & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 64/17693 (New York).

Opinion by

Nichols, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of plastic cases permanently fitted and furnished with traveling sets similar in use to leather cases and that the principles are the same as those involved in Abstract 64484, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 21

- 00013

- CR

J OSEPH E UGENE H UNT

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from

County Criminal Court No. 4

of Tarrant County ( 1527354 )

May 13, 2021

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of

jurisdiction

.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM