alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex10-1.htm


Exhibit 10.1




FIRST AMENDMENT


TO


JOHN BEAN TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION


AMENDED AND RESTATED EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE AGREEMENT


 







 


WHEREAS, John Bean Technologies Corporation (the “Company”) and  (the “Executive”) entered into the John Bean Technologies Corporation Amended and Restated Executive Severance Agreement (the “Agreement”) on December 15, 2011;


 


WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive mutually deem it necessary and desirable to amend the Agreement to clarify the timing of payment of severance benefits under the Agreement; and


 


WHEREAS, this First Amendment shall supersede the provisions of the Agreement to the extent those provisions are inconsistent with the provisions of the amendment;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, by virtue of the authority set forth in Section 12.4 of the Agreement, the Company and the Executive hereby mutually amend the Agreement effective January 1, 2012, as follows:


 



	
  

	
·

	
Section 4.1 of the Agreement is hereby amended to delete the first paragraph thereof and replace it with a new paragraph which shall read as follows:







 


Subject to the provisions of Section 10(d), the Severance Benefits described in Sections 3.3 (a), (b), (c) and (d) herein will be paid in cash to the Executive (or the Executive’s Beneficiary, if applicable) in a single lump sum as soon as practicable following the Effective Date of Termination, but in no event beyond thirty (30) days from such date; provided,  if any such Severance Benefits constitute deferred compensation under Section 409A of the Code and are payable within a period that spans two calendar years, such Severance Benefits shall be paid in the later calendar year; provided further that, if the Executive is deemed on the Effective Date of Termination to be a “specified employee” within the meaning of Section 409A(a)(2)(B) of the Code, any such Severance Benefits that constitute deferred compensation under Section 409A of the Code and would otherwise be payable prior to the earlier of (i) the 6-month anniversary of the Executive’s Qualifying Termination and (ii) the date of the Executive’s death (the “Delay Period”) shall instead be paid in a lump sum immediately upon (and not before) the expiration of the Delay Period.


 




  





  











  






 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment on this 27th day of December, 2012.


 


 



	JOHN BEAN TECHNOLOGIES 	EXECUTIVE:
	CORPORATION	 
	 	 
	 	 
	By: _________________________________ 	______________________________
	Name: Polly B. Kawalek	 
	Its: Compensation Committee Chairwoman	 
	 	 
	

By: _________________________________

	 
	

Name: Mark Montague

	 
	

Its: Vice President, Human Resource
From: etapio@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:44:44 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Erica Miller

New York, NY 10025
**Exhibit 32.3**

**CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,**

**AsAdopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/Afor the period ended May 31, 2004 (the “Report”) of Immucor, Inc. (the “Registrant”),as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, Icertify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1)       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| December 6, 2006 |   /s/ Gioacchino De Chirico |                                  |
|------------------|---------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|             |                                  | Gioacchino De Chirico                 |
|             |                                  | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                  |                                       |                                       |  |

 

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 29, 2011 

d0321 

Order 

 

March 29, 2011 

141842 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141842 

 COA: 298158 

Genesee CC: 04-013837-FC 

MALCOLM ERIC LANG, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 8, 2010 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
I I I

# rNovember 18, 2016 Federal Aviation Administration U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 Washington, DC 20590 Re : Exemption No. 10482 A Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2000-8190 Dear Sir or Madam: Atlas Air, Inc
. 2000 WestchesterAvenue Purchase, New Yor1< 10577-2543

Atlas Air, Inc respectfully requests an extension to Exemption No. 10482 A. This exemption will expire on 31 March 2017. This exemption will allow us to substitute a qualified and authorized check airman in place of an FAA Inspector to observe a qualifying PIC as specified in FAR 121.4234(c)(1 )(ii), subject to certain conditions and limitations. We respectfully request that the same conditions and limitations remain unchanged. Thank you for your consideration of this request. Sincerely,

# ~0#---J- Michael A Giordano Sr. Manager Regulatory Administration Atlas Air, Inc. 5600 NW 36th Street, 2nd Floor Miami, FL 33166 Mike
.Giordano@Atlasair
.com Phone:786-265-5827

02009. A iasM W OI1dwide Holdings, Inc
.
# Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali C 64A/28 t

| | ISSN 1977-0987 |
| --- | --- |
| Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali
  tal-Unjoni Ewropea | C 64A |
| | |
| Edizzjoni bil-Malti | Informazzjoni u Avviżi | Volum 6028 ta' Frar 2017 |

ISSN 1977-0987

Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali

tal-Unjoni Ewropea

C 64A

Edizzjoni bil-Malti

Informazzjoni u Avviżi

Volum 6028 ta' Frar 2017

---

| Avviż Nru | Werrej | Paġna |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Avviżi |
| | PROĊEDURI AMMINISTRATTIVI |
| | Il-Parlament Ewropew |
| 2017/C 64 A/01 | Proċedura ta’ selezzjoni PE/195/S — Aġent temporanju — Kap ta’ unità (AD 14) — Lista ta’ riżerva | 1 |

Avviż Nru

Werrej

Paġna

V   Avviżi

PROĊEDURI AMMINISTRATTIVI

Il-Parlament Ewropew

2017/C 64 A/01

Proċedura ta’ selezzjoni PE/195/S — Aġent temporanju — Kap ta’ unità (AD 14) — Lista ta’ riżerva

1

---

| MT | |
| --- | --- |

MT

---

V Avviżi

PROĊEDURI AMMINISTRATTIVI

Il-Parlament Ewropew

| 28.2.2017 | MT | Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea | CA 64/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.2.2017

MT

Il-Ġurnal Uffiċjali tal-Unjoni Ewropea

CA 64/1

---

PROĊEDURA TA’ SELEZZJONI PE/195/S

Aġent temporanju — Kap ta’ unità (AD 14)

LISTA TA’ RIŻERVA

(2017/C 064 A/01)

| 1. | BORDEZ, Emmanuel |
| --- | --- |

1.

BORDEZ, Emmanuel

Il-lista ta’ riżerva ġiet adottata fl-14 ta’ Frar 2017.

---
#### Daniel Cromwell, Plaintiff, v. John H. Hall, Defendant.

Appeal withdrawn.
Exhibit 10.4


 


ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF PURCHASE
AGREEMENT LETTER 


 


For good and valuable consideration
the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the undersigned Highwood Investments, LLC, an Illinois limited
liablility company (“Assignor”) hereby assigns to Inland Real Estate Acquisitions, Inc., an Illinois corporation
(“Assignee”) all of Assignor’s right, title and interest to purchase those properties leased to Dolgencorp, LLC
which are located at (i) 2956 Hamilton Road, LaGrange, Georgia, (ii) 112 Wares Cross Road, LaGrange, Georgia, (iii) 7768 Newnan
Road, Brooks, Georgia, (iv) 109 Sam Houston School Road, Maryville, Tennessee, (v) 4919 Lee Road 270, Valley, Alabama, (vi) 501
E. Main Street, Daleville, Alabama and (vii) 5475 Moffett Road, Mobile, Alabama (“Properties”) pursuant to that certain
Purchase Agreement Letter between Assignor, as purchaser, and The Broadway Group, LLC, as seller, dated July 30, 2012 (the “Purchase
Agreement Letter”).


 


By execution hereof by
Assignee, Assignee for itself and its successors and assigns hereby accepts the assignment and assumes all of the obligations of
Assignor under the Purchase Agreement with respect to the Properties.


 


This Assignment and Assumption
of Purchase Agreement Letter is effective as of the 28th day of December, 2012.


 


ASSIGNOR:Highwood
Investments, LLC, an Illinois limited liability company


 


By: /s Lawrence J. Starkman


 


Name: Lawrence J. Starkman


 


Title: Managing Member


 


ASSIGNEE:


 


Inland Real Estate Acquisitions, Inc., an Illinois corporation


 


By: /s G. Joseph Cosenza


 


Name: G. Joseph Cosenza


 


Title:  President
Exhibit 10.1

 

	
 
    	
 
    	
Effective   January 1, 2013
    


 

Mr. Andrew Rooke

[address]

 

Dear Mr. Rooke:

 

This will confirm our agreement to amend your employment agreement with Crown Media Holdings, Inc. (“Crown”) dated March 7, 2011 (the “Agreement”) as follows:

 

1.                                      The term of the Agreement and your employment by Crown as set forth in Paragraph 2 of the Agreement is extended until December 31, 2014, unless otherwise terminated in accordance with the terms of the Agreement.

 

2.                                      Effective March 1, 2013, your base salary as set forth in Paragraph 3(a) of the Agreement shall be Four Hundred Sixty Five Thousand Dollars ($465,000) annually.

 

3.                                      Commencing with calendar year 2013, (a) your performance bonus target set forth in Paragraph 3(b) of the Agreement shall be 50% of your annual base salary earned and (b) LTI (as defined in the Agreement) target set forth in Paragraph 3(c) shall be 50% of your annual base salary.

 

Except as amended herein, all other terms of the Agreement will remain in full force and effect.

 

 

	
 
    	
 
    	
Very truly   yours,
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Crown Media   Holdings, Inc.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/ William   Abbott
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Name:   William Abbott
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
Title:   President and Chief Executive Officer
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Agreed and   Accepted:
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/ Andrew   Rooke
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Andrew Rooke
From: berryjf68@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:26:52 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

John Berry

Kingsport, TN 37664
From: klassicklocks@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:53:27 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Charles Dinkel

Ijamsville, MD 21754
From: mwebbtaylor@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:30:38 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Martha Taylor

Baltimore, MD 21211
# U.S.-Egypt Strategic Relationship a Top Priority, Esper Says

/ Published July 30, 2019

Defense Secretary Dr. Mark T. Esper welcomed Egyptian Defense Minister Gen. Mohamed Zaki to the Pentagon for the secretary's first counterpart meeting since taking office.                U.S. Secretary of Defense Mark T. Esper meets with Egyptian Minister of Defense, Colonel Gen. Mohamed Ahmed Zaki Mohamed at the Pentagon, Washington, D.C., July 29, 2019. (DoD photo by U.S. Army Sgt. Amber I. Smith)                            190729-D-SV709-0023                            U.S. Secretary of Defense Mark T. Esper meets with Egyptian Minister of Defense, Colonel Gen. Mohamed Ahmed Zaki Mohamed at the Pentagon, Washington, D.C., July 29, 2019. (DoD photo by U.S. Army Sgt. Amber I. Smith)            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Amber I. SmithVIRIN: 190729-D-SV709-0023B

"The United States-Egypt strategic relationship is a top priority for this administration and department, and I look forward to continuing our militaries' close partnership across a wide range of issues," Esper said at the beginning of the Pentagon meeting.

Egypt is a key ally in the Middle East, the secretary said, adding that the two men will discuss a wide range of mutual interests, from counterterrorism to maritime security to capacity building. 

Esper wants to expand U.S. counterterrorism cooperation with Egypt, and the meeting will look down that road. He also wants the Egyptian leader's thoughts on the situation in Libya — where there is a civil war — and Iran. "Egypt has a powerful voice, and we welcome your efforts to support stability throughout the region," Esper said.

Zaki said through a translator that the discussions are appropriate given the "deteriorating security situation in the Middle East." He said he hopes the talks will lead to increased cooperation and coordination across a wide range of security issues and that the military talks help set the stage for the entire U.S.-Egyptian relationship.

The defense minister praised U.S. efforts to help Egypt build military capacity to "realize national security."  Egypt is uniquely positioned as an Arab country in Africa and the Middle East to spread "the culture of peace," he said. Egypt is a member of both the Arab League and the African Union, and it has the largest military on the African continent.

Egypt also can serve "as the cornerstone for regional security in addition to securing the U.S. interests," Zaki said.

On average, the United States provides $1.3 billion in military aid to Egypt each year. The nation operates American armored vehicles and flies American aircraft. There is an active exchange program between the countries.
f8k011013ex10i_biologix.htm





 


Exhibit 10.1


 


 





 


 




  





1











  






 





 




  





2











  











  





3











  






 





 




  





4











  











  





5











  











  





6











  









 




  





7











  






 





 


 




  





8











  










 







  





9











  











  





10











  









 




  





11











  








 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed by their dulv authorized agents as of the day and year first above written.


 




	 	BIOLOGIX HAIR SCIENCE LTD.	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	/s/ Sherene N. Blackett	 
	 	Name:	
Sherene N. Blackett

	 
	 	Title:	
Director

	 
	 	 	 	 







 



	 	CRANIUM TECHNOLOGIES (USA) INC.	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	/s/ Ron Holland	 
	 	Name: 	
Ron Holland

	 
	 	Title:	
President and Director









 


 


12