alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: bknman@planetkc.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:31:51 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

brian neely

Kansas City, MO 64113
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our report datedMarch 2, 2011, with respect to the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of GigOptix, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reportin the Registration Statements of GigOptix, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-153362, effective March 20, 2009; File No. 333-157291, effective February 12, 2009; File No. 333-164742, effective February 5, 2010; File333-171947, effective January 28, 2011). 

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP 

San Francisco, California 

March 2, 2011
From: tim1stclass@charter.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:24:30 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Tim Cutliff

Anderson, SC 29625
```

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 184 (Monday, September 25, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65656-65657]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20619]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID O648-XD375]

Fisheries of the South Atlantic; South Atlantic Fishery 
Management Council; Public Meetings

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of South Atlantic Fishery Management Council's (Council) 
Seminar Series presentation via webinar.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Council will host an oral history of the rock shrimp 
fishery off the southeastern United States via webinar.

DATES: The webinar presentation will be held on Tuesday, October 10, 
2023, from 1 p.m. until 2:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Meeting address: The presentation will be provided via 
webinar. The webinar is open to members of the public. Information, 
including a link to webinar registration will be posted on the 
Council's website at: https://safmc.net/safmc-seminar-series/ as it 
becomes available.
    Council address: South Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 4055 
Faber Place Drive, Suite 201, N Charleston, SC 29405.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kim Iverson, Public Information 
Officer, SAFMC; phone: (843) 302-8439 or toll free: (866) SAFMC-10; 
fax: (843) 769-4520; email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Council will host an oral history from a 
member of the South Atlantic Fishery Management Council on the 
southeastern rock shrimp fishery. The presentation will include 
information on her family's history in the fishery, development of the 
rock shrimp fishery off the coast of Florida, new innovations used in 
the fishery, and the effect of management regulations on the fishery. A 
question-and-answer session will follow the presentation. Members of 
the public will have the opportunity to participate in the discussion. 
The presentation is for informational purposes only and no management 
actions will be taken.

Special Accommodations

    These meetings are physically accessible to people with 
disabilities. Requests for auxiliary aids should be directed to the 
Council office (see ADDRESSES) 5 days prior to the meeting.

[[Page 65657]]

    Note: The times and sequence specified in this agenda are 
subject to change.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: September 19, 2023.
Rey Israel Marquez,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2023-20619 Filed 9-22-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
```
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Barry Wattenberg, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Potash America, Inc. for the year ended March 31, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Potash America, Inc.


|                     |  |                                                                                                |  | 
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Dated: June 29, 2011 |  |                                                                                               
|                     |  |                                                                                               
|                     |  |                                                                                               
|                     |  | /s/ Barry Wattenberg                                                                           | 
|                     |  | Barry Wattenberg                                                                              
|                     |  | President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and Director
|                     |  | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer)      
|                     |  | Potash America, Inc.                                                                          

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Potash America, Inc. and will be retained by Potash America, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
From: amccalli@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:52:17 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Amber McCallister

Spencer, IN 47460
San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control Di strict

FINAL STAFF REPORT

DRAFT AMENDMENTS TO RULE 3170

(FEDERALLY MANDATED OZONE NONATTAINMENT FEE)

May 19, 2011

Appendix A:

EPA’s Final Rule partially approving and partially disapproving

District Rule 3170

(8 pages)San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control Di strict

FINAL STAFF REPORT

DRAFT AMENDMENTS TO RULE 3170

(FEDERALLY MANDATED OZONE NONATTAINMENT FEE)

May 19, 2011

Appendix B:

EPA’s “Guidance on Developing Fee Programs Required by

Clean Air Act Section 185...”

(17 pages)San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control Di strict

FINAL STAFF REPORT

DRAFT AMENDMENTS TO RULE 3170

(FEDERALLY MANDATED OZONE NONATTAINMENT FEE)

May 19, 2011

Appendix C:

District Staff’s Report, October 21, 2010

(58 pages)San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control Di strict

FINAL STAFF REPORT

DRAFT AMENDMENTS TO RULE 3170

(FEDERALLY MANDATED OZONE NONATTAINMENT FEE)

May 19, 2011

Appendix D:

District’s ARB Findings Request, November 10, 2010, and

Signed Board Resolution from October 21, 2010

(6 pages)San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control Di strict

FINAL STAFF REPORT

DRAFT AMENDMENTS TO RULE 3170

(FEDERALLY MANDATED OZONE NONATTAINMENT FEE)

May 19, 2011

Appendix E:

Assembly Bill 2522

(3 pages)San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control Di strict

FINAL STAFF REPORT

DRAFT AMENDMENTS TO RULE 3170

(FEDERALLY MANDATED OZONE NONATTAINMENT FEE)

May 19, 2011

Appendix F:

ARB’s Executive Order G-10-126, making findings

required by AB 2522

(5 pages)San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control Di strict

FINAL STAFF REPORT

DRAFT AMENDMENTS TO RULE 3170

(FEDERALLY MANDATED OZONE NONATTAINMENT FEE)

May 19, 2011

Appendix G:

ARB’s request to the California Department of Motor Vehicles

(2 pages)San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control Di strict

FINAL STAFF REPORT

DRAFT AMENDMENTS TO RULE 3170

(FEDERALLY MANDATED OZONE NONATTAINMENT FEE)

May 19, 2011

Appendix H:

District’s Response to Comments on the

3/8/11 version of Rule 3170

(9 pages)

Note: In the Notice of Public Hearing for the prop osed

amendments to Rule 3170, there was a request for ad ditional

public comments. No comments were received during this

period which ended on May 2, 2011.San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control Di strict

FINAL STAFF REPORT

DRAFT AMENDMENTS TO RULE 3170

(FEDERALLY MANDATED OZONE NONATTAINMENT FEE)

May 19, 2011

Appendix I:

Sample Facility Fee Calculation Worksheet

(1 page)
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Acorn Products, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 29, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, A.
Corydon Meyer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



                                /s/  A. Corydon Meyer
                                --------------------------------------------
                                A. Corydon Meyer, Chief Executive Officer
                                November 13, 2002
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cellcom I Corp. on Form 10-KSB for
the year ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David A. Obal, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: March 16, 2007                    By: /s/ David A. Obal
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            David A. Obal
                                            Chief Financial Officer


                                       23
MARK ENGLISH , Appellant,

v. STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
CASE NO. 1D 16

- 2133

_____________________________/ Opinion filed November 15, 2017. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Hon. Kevin J. Carroll , Judge

. Michael J. Titus, Assistant Conflict Counsel , Tallahassee, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jason W. Rodriguez, Assistant Attorney General , Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM. Mark English challenges the trial court’s failur e to conduct a competency hearing , as well as his battery convictions under double jeopardy principles. Concerning the battery convictions , the batteries were predicated on distinct acts and occurred during different criminal episodes. As there is no double jeopardy violation , we affirm as to this issue.2 Concerning the failure to conduct a competency hearing, the trial court entered an order, which stated t hat the court had “reasonable grounds to believe that the Defendant may be incompetent to procee d,” appointed an expert for a competency evaluation, and scheduled a hearing on the issue . However, no competency hearing occurred on that date, and the court did not issue an order determining the defendant competent to proceed to trial

. After a trial, Ap pellant was convicted and sentenced. The State concedes error, if there were reasonable grounds to conduct a hearing. Here, there were reasonable grounds. Reynolds v. State , 177 So. 3d 296, 298 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) (where “the trial court apparently had r easonable grounds to believe that Appellant was not competent to proceed because the court appointed an expert to evaluate Appellant”). “[I]f a ‘reasonable ground to believe that the defendant is not mentally competent to proceed’ exists, then the requirem ent that the court hold a hearing is mandatory.” Trueblood v. State , 193 So. 3d 1060, 1061 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016). Accordingly, the trial court erred. On remand, the trial court shall conduct a nunc pro tunc evaluation of the defendant’s competency at the ti me of the original trial; if unable, a new trial is required. Dougherty v. State , 149 So. 3d 672, 6 79 (Fla. 2014) (stating that a new trial is unnecessary where a retroactive determination of competency is possible) ; see also Brooks v. State , 180 So. 3d 109 4, 1095 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) (“If the trial court fails to hold a competency hearing or enter a written order of competency, reversal3 is required; however, a new trial is required only if the trial court is unable to conduct

a nunc pro tunc evaluation of the defendant’s competency at the time of the original trial.”)

.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED in part with instructions

. WETHERELL , RAY , and MAKAR , J J

. , CONCUR.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Insight Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Paul J. Pucino, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|                                                    
|/s/    PAUL J. PUCINO                               
|Paul J. Pucino                                      
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|November 8, 2005                                    



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Digital Insight and will be retained by Digital Insight and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 182 (Thursday, September 21, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 65225]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20433]



[[Page 65225]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12186]


Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Objects Being 
Imported for Exhibition--Determinations: ``Transatlantic Bridges: 
Corrado Cagli, 1938-1948'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad 
pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for 
temporary display in the exhibition ``Transatlantic Bridges: Corrado 
Cagli, 1938-1948'' at the Center for Italian Modern Art, New York, New 
York, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be 
determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their 
temporary exhibition or display within the United States as 
aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public 
Notice of these determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6471; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#56253335223f39386462636f16252237223378313920"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c0b3a5a3b4a9afaef2f4f5f980b3b4a1b4a5eea7afb6">[email protected]</span></a>). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 
2021.

Nicole L. Elkon,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2023-20433 Filed 9-20-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>