alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
p130205.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0205 Focus Ready Draft 1/31/2013

ENGINEER: Choudhary \ EV PV (kg/yr):

SUBMITTER:

Page 1p130205.eng

SAT (concerns) (01/18/2013): Migration to groundwater: Slow PBT rating: P2B1T1 Health: 2 Dermal, Inhalation Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 2 ppb), XB Testing (No Testing desired)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1D

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS: P2 Claims:

Page 2p130205.eng

Page 3p130205.eng

Yes

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0205

Page 4p130205.eng

concentration.

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0205

Page 5p130205.eng

Page 6
---

---

EXHIBIT 23.1



Date:  28
  March, 2004 
  Our ref:  763629

Kesselman & Kesselman
  PricewaterhouseCoopers
  Trade Tower, 25 Hamered Street Tel Aviv 68125 Israel



CONSENT OF
  INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As the independent
  public accountants of AM-HAL LTD, we hereby consent to the incorporation of
  our report, included in Form 10K , into the Company's previously filed Registration
  Statement (Files No. 333-61895, and No. 333-55970).



Brightman Almagor
  & Co.
  Certified Public Accountants

---

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 19, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-10346

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

WILLIAM HENDERSON, also known as Keg,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:02-CR-00174-11 

Before JONES, BENAVIDES and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

William Henderson appeals his sentence following his

guilty-plea conviction of conspiracy to distribute more than 5

kilograms of cocaine and 50 grams or more of a mixture containing

cocaine base. He argues that the district court erred in refusing

to adjust his offense level downward by three levels for acceptance

of responsibility under U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1 because he refused to
2

discuss with the probation officer his offense conduct or criminal

history and because he timely pleaded guilty. 

Whether a defendant has sufficiently demonstrated

acceptance of responsibility is a factual question, and the

standard of review is even more deferential than “clear error.”

United States v. Spires, 79 F.3d 464, 467 (5th Cir. 1996). This

court will affirm a sentencing court’s decision not to award a

reduction under U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1 unless it is “without foundation.”

United States v. Hooten, 933 F.2d 293, 297-98 (5th Cir. 1991).

We have recognized the refusal to debrief a probation

officer as a factor in deciding whether to apply the adjustment for

acceptance of responsibility. See United States v. Solis, 299 F.3d

420, 458 (5th Cir. 2002); United States v. Chapa-Garza, 62 F.3d

118, 123 (5th Cir. 1995); United States v. Medina-Anicacio, 325

F.3d 638, 648 (5th Cir. 2003). Having reviewed the record in this

case, we hold that the district court’s refusal to grant the

adjustment was not without any foundation. See U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1,

comment (n.3); Hooten, 933 F.2d at 297-98. Henderson also has not

shown reversible error by arguing that U.S.S.G § 3E1.1 recognizes

his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent with the probation

officer. See United States v. Kleinebreil, 966 F.2d 945, 953 (5th

Cir. 1992). The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
-------------- ------- ------------------------------------------ - ---

-----'lit~&>~-~- --------------

----~=~---- ----------------------~--~er~ ~ ---

-----·---------------

----------------- -------·- ---------- ----------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------< 

------------- ·------- ----·--------------------------------------------- ----

---------------------------------·--··---- --------- -------------------------------

-- -------------------------- ·--- ---------------

---------------------------- ------ - ---------------------- --------- ---- -----------------------

------- ---- ----------------·----------- ---------------· -- SCANNED -------------- FEB Z 7 2015 - ' 

 RECEIVED IN 2nd COURT OF APPEALS FORT WORTH, TEXAS 02/27/2015 2:55:56 PM DEBRA SPISAK Clerk
# Gazzetta ufficiale C 53/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0944 |
| --- | --- |
| Gazzetta ufficiale
  dell'Unione europea | C 53 |
| | |
| Edizione in lingua italiana | Comunicazioni e informazioni | 58° anno13 febbraio 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0944

Gazzetta ufficiale

dell'Unione europea

C 53

Edizione in lingua italiana

Comunicazioni e informazioni

58° anno13 febbraio 2015

---

| Numero d'informazione | Sommario | pagina |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Avvisi |
| | PROCEDIMENTI AMMINISTRATIVI |
| | Parlamento europeo |
| 2015/C 053/01 | Decisione | 1 |

Numero d'informazione

Sommario

pagina

V   Avvisi

PROCEDIMENTI AMMINISTRATIVI

Parlamento europeo

2015/C 053/01

Decisione

1

---

| IT | |
| --- | --- |

IT

---

V Avvisi

PROCEDIMENTI AMMINISTRATIVI

Parlamento europeo

| 13.2.2015 | IT | Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea | C 53/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2015

IT

Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea

C 53/1

---

DECISIONE

(2015/C 53/01)

IL SEGRETARIO GENERALE DEL PARLAMENTO EUROPEO,

visto il regolamento (CEE, Euratom, CECA) n. 259/68 del Consiglio (1), modificato dal regolamento (CE, Euratom) n. 723/2004 del Consiglio (2) e da ultimo dal regolamento (UE, Euratom) n. 1023/2013 del Parlamento europeo e del Consiglio, del 22 ottobre 2013, che modifica lo statuto dei funzionari dell'Unione europea e il regime applicabile agli altri agenti dell'Unione europea (3), in particolare l'articolo 30 dello statuto,

vista la decisione dell'Ufficio di presidenza del Parlamento europeo del 13 gennaio 2014 relativa alla delega dei poteri dell'autorità che ha il potere di nomina (AIPN) e dell'autorità abilitata a concludere i contratti di assunzione (AHCC),

vista la data di scadenza, 31 dicembre 2014, dei seguenti elenchi di riserva del Parlamento europeo:

AD/4/08, AD/1/10, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/106/S, PE/107/S, PE/117/S, PE/118/S, PE/124/S, AST/4/11, AST/5/11, PE/96/S, PE/119/S, PE/110/S,

visto il parere della commissione paritetica emesso nella sua riunione del 22 ottobre 2014,

DECIDE:

Articolo 1

La durata di validità degli elenchi di riserva:

| | AD/4/08, PE/106/S, PE/117/S, PE/118/S, PE/124/S, AST/4/11, AST/5/11, PE/96/S, PE/110/S |
| --- | --- |

AD/4/08, PE/106/S, PE/117/S, PE/118/S, PE/124/S, AST/4/11, AST/5/11, PE/96/S, PE/110/S

è prorogata fino al 31 dicembre 2015.

Articolo 2

La durata di validità degli elenchi di riserva:

| | AD/1/10, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/107/S, PE/119/S |
| --- | --- |

AD/1/10, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/107/S, PE/119/S

non è prorogata.

Lussemburgo, il 12 dicembre 2014

Klaus WELLE

Segretario generale

---

(1)  GU L 56 del 4.3.1968, pag. 1.

1

(2)  GU L 124 del 27.4.2004, pag. 1.

2

(3)  GU L 287 del 29.10.2013, pag. 15.

3

---
H. Res. 335 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

November 13, 2007. 

Whereas lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death for 

both men and women, accounting for 28 percent of all 

cancer deaths; 

Whereas lung cancer kills more people annually than breast 

cancer, prostate cancer, colon cancer, liver cancer, melanoma, and kidney cancer combined; 

Whereas, since the National Cancer Act of 1971 (Public Law 

92–218; 85 Stat. 778), coordinated and comprehensive 

research has raised the 5-year survival rates for breast 

cancer to 88 percent, for prostate cancer to 99 percent, 

and for colon cancer to 64 percent; 

Whereas the 5-year survival rate for lung cancer is still only 

15 percent and a similar coordinated and comprehensive 

research effort is required to achieve increases in lung 

cancer survivability rates; 

Whereas 60 percent of lung cancer cases are now diagnosed 

in nonsmokers or former smokers; 

Whereas 2⁄3 of nonsmokers diagnosed with lung cancer are 

women; 

Whereas certain minority populations, such as Black males, 

have disproportionately high rates of lung cancer inci-
2 

•HRES 335 EH 

dence and mortality, notwithstanding their lower smoking 

rate; 

Whereas members of the baby boomer generation are entering their sixties, the most common age at which people 

develop cancer; 

Whereas tobacco addiction and exposure to other lung cancer 

carcinogens such as Agent Orange and other herbicides 

and battlefield emissions are serious problems among 

military personnel and war veterans; 

Whereas the August 2001 Report of the Lung Cancer 

Progress Review Group of the National Cancer Institute 

stated that funding for lung cancer research was ‘‘far 

below the levels characterized for other common malignancies and far out of proportion to its massive health 

impact’’; 

Whereas the Report of the Lung Cancer Progress Review 

Group identified as its ‘‘highest priority’’ the creation of 

integrated, multidisciplinary, multi-institutional research 

consortia organized around the problem of lung cancer 

rather than around specific research disciplines; and 

Whereas the United States must enhance its response to the 

issues raised in the Report of the Lung Cancer Progress 

Review Group: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) recognizes lung cancer as a public health priority and the importance of taking steps toward reducing 

the lung cancer mortality rate by at least half by 2015; 
3 

•HRES 335 EH 

(2) acknowledges the importance of the recommendations of the Lung Cancer Progress Review 

Group of the National Cancer Institute; 

(3) encourages increased investment for lung cancer 

research and other lung cancer-related programs; 

(4) supports efforts to develop a broad-based lung 

cancer screening and disease management program 

among members of the Armed Forces and veterans; and 

(5) recognizes the benefit of graduate medical education programs in thoracic medicine and cardiothoracic 

surgery. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
From: huntrunts@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:41:10 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Denise Hunt

Lexington, NC 27295
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549








FORM 8-K








CURRENT REPORT








Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the


Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): July 20, 2011











THE FIRST BANCORP, INC.


(Exact name of Registrant as specified in charter)





MAINE


(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)





0-26589
01-0404322(Commission file number)
(IRS employer identification no.)








Main Street, Damariscotta, Maine
04853(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)








(207) 563-3195


(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is


intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligations


of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





[_] Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





[_] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





[_] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





[_] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4 (c))











TABLE OF CONTENTS





Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition
Page 1Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits
Page 1Signatures
Page 2Exhibit Index
Page 3








Section 2 - Financial Information





Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition.





On July 20, 2011, the Registrant issued the press release filed herewith as Exhibit 99.1 with information regarding the results of operations and financial condition of The First Bancorp, Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2011.











Section 9 - Financial Statements and Exhibits





Item 9.01 Financial Statements, Pro Forma Financial Information and Exhibits.





(c) Exhibits.


--------





The following Exhibits are being furnished herewith:





99.1 Registrant's Press Release dated July 20, 2011.











SIGNATURE





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.











THE FIRST BANCORP, INC.








By: /s/ F. STEPHEN WARD


F. Stephen Ward


Executive Vice President &


Chief Financial Officer





Dated: July 20, 2011











Exhibit Index











Exhibit Number                            Description of Exhibit





99.1                            Registrant's Press Release dated July 20, 2011.
Exhibit
32.1








Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,


18
U.S.C. Section 1350











I, Michel
Lemoine, Chief Executive Officer, President and Treasurer of Dragon’s Lair
Holdings, Inc. (the “Corporation”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to my knowledge
that:




1.  the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Corporation for the year ended December 31,
2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.





Date:  March
31, 2009





By:           /s/ Michel
Lemoine


Michel
Lemoine


Chief
Executive Officer, President and Treasurer


(Principal Accounting
Officer)
From: carl.voorhees@lmco.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:48:19 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Carl Voorhees

Brielle, NJ 08730
From: sbell4@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:16:10 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Anita Bell

Torrance, CA 90503
DEPARTMENT OF 

T?:ANSPORTATION 

;;JCKE T OPERATIONS 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 7,^;; iij|,| oi; A !h i b 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

TRAVEL (iROUP, INC., D/B/A REPUBLIC AIR TRAVEL 

AND SCOT SPENCER 

AIRLIFT GROUP, INC. 

AND RICHARD BERNARD 

Unauthorized Air Transportation, Unfair and Deceptive 

Practices and Unfair Methods of Competition, and 

Violations of Public Charter Rules 

EXPRESS ONE INTERNATIONAL, INC. 

Unfair and Deceptive Practices and Unfair Methods of 

Competition, and Violations of Public Charter Rules 

Enforcement Proceeding 

DOT-OST-1995-272 

formerly 

Docket 49233 

STATUS REPORT 

The Office of the Assistant General Counsel tor Aviation Enforcement and 

Proceedings ("Enforcement Office"), pursuant to Your Honor's March 22, 2006, Order 

Slaying this proceeding, files this report detailing the current status of this proceeding and 

settlement negotiations. 

The Department has not ruled on the outstanding motions filed by Respondents 

and opposed by the Enforcement Office in Ascend Aviation Group. Docket OST-2004-

17486. 
There have been no further settlement discussions. 

Date: June 24. 2011. 

Respectfully submitted. 

Samuel Podberesky 

Assistant General Counsel for 

Aviation Enforcement and Proceedintis 

Dayton Lehman, Jr. 

Deputy Assistant General Coun.sel for 

Aviation Enforcement and Proceedinss 

William J. Wag 

Senior Trial Attorney 

United States Department of Transportation 

Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings 

1200 New Jersey Avenue. S.E. 

Room 96-429 

Washington. D.C. 20590 

TEL: 202-366-9342 

FAX: 202-366-7152 
Docket No. DOT-OST-1995-272 

I hereby certify that on this 24th day of June. 201 1. a true and correct copy of the 

t'oregoing Status Report was served in the following manner to the following: 

Original 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations. M-30 

West Building Ground Floor 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue. S.E. 

Washington. D.C. 20590 

By Personal Service 

The Honorable Ronnie A Yoder 

Ghief-Administrative Law-Judge— 

Office of Hearings. M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

East Building Ground Floor 

Room El2-320 

Washington. D.C. 20590 

TEL: 1202) 366-2142 

FAX: (202) 366-7536 

Bv First Class Mail 

Scot Spencer 

SBD Aircraft Services 

255 S Leiand Norton Way 

Sam Bernardino. CA 92408 

G/^/ I I
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Insight Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Elizabeth S.C.S Murray, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ Elizabeth S.C.S. Murray
|Elizabeth S.C.S. Murray    
|Chief Financial Officer    
|November 15, 2004          



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Digital Insight and will be retained by Digital Insight and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Before the Third Division,

February 5, 1959

No. 62725.

#### International Packers, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 274668-K/14670, etc. (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of meats, prepared or preserved, not specially provided for, similar in all material respects to the meat the subject of *United States*v. *Mercantil Distribuidora, S.A., et al.*(45 C.C.P.A. 20, C.A.D. 667), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.