alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: dbaldwin@san.rr.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:55:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Diana Baldwin

San Diego, CA 92130
From: BKLCarman.Family@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:10:13 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kandi Carman

Holland, MI 49423
From: simonmom@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:55:01 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Donna Simoncelli

Downers Grove, IL 60516
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

Thursday, September 14, 2023 at 10:30 a.m.

# PLACE: 

Hybrid meeting: 1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC (12th Floor) and Virtual.

**Note:**                         For those attending the meeting in person, current COVID-19 safety protocols for visitors, which are based on the CDC COVID-19 hospital admission level in Washington, DC, will be updated on the Commission's contact page by the Monday before the meeting. See the contact page at                         *https://www.fec.gov/​contact/​.*                         If you would like to virtually access the meeting, see the instructions below.                    

# STATUS: 

                        This meeting will be open to the public, subject to the above-referenced guidance regarding the COVID-19 hospital admission level and corresponding health and safety procedures. To access the meeting virtually, go to the Commission's website                         *www.fec.gov*                         and click on the banner to be taken to the meeting page.                    

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Proposed Directive Regarding Investigations Conducted by the Office of General Counsel

Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on Citizens for Waters (A21-01)

Management and Administrative Matters

      ( print page 62359)    

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

                        Individuals who plan to attend in person and who require special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Laura E. Sinram, Secretary and Clerk, at (202) 694-1040 or                         *secretary@fec.gov,*                         at least 72 hours prior to the meeting date.                    

(Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b)

Vicktoria J. Allen,

Deputy Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2023-19692 Filed 9-7-23; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 UNITED STATES CODE SS. 1350**

** **

**In connection with the Quarterly Report of GriffinLand & Nurseries, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedAugust 28, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Periodic Report”), I, Frederick M. Danziger, President andChief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:**

** **

**1.**               The Periodic Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

** **

**2.**               The information contained in the PeriodicReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | **/s/ FREDERICK M. DANZIGER**              |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | **Frederick M. Danziger**                  |
|   | **President and Chief Executive  Officer** |
|   | **October 11, 2004**                       |

 

1

----
| Exhibit                32.2 |
|-----------------------------|

|   | 1. | The                Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                or                15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as                amended; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in                all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                ANTHONY J. GALICI                                 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Anthony                J. Galici                                     |
| Vice                President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary |
| July                18, 2006                                         |
RICK SCOTT

Governor KEN DETZNER Secretary of State

R. A. Gray Building • 500 South Bronough Street • Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250

Telephone: 850.245.6300 • www.flheritage.com Commemorating 500 years of Florida history www.fla500.com DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES Mr. David A. Buff, P.E. December 4, 2013

Golder Associates Inc.

6026 NW 1 st

Place Gainesville, FL 32607

Re: SHPO Project #: 2013-5297/ Received by SHPO: November 22, 2013 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Proposed Natural Gas-Fired Boiler- Greenhouse Gas Emiss ions Notification New Hope Power Company 8001 U.S. Highway 27 South South Bay, Palm Beach County

Dear Mr. Buff:

Our office reviewed the referenced project for possible impact to historic properties listed, or eligible for listing, in the National Register of Historic Places , or otherwise of historical, architectural or archaeological value. The review was conducted in accor dance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 , as amended and 36 CFR Part 800: Protection of Historic Properties

.

Our review of the Florida Master Site File indicates t hat no archaeological or historical resources are recorded within the project area. Furthermore, because of the location and/or nature of this project it is unlikely that historic properties will be affected.

If you have any questions concerning our comments, please conta ct Katherine Shelfer at Katherine.Shelfer@dos.myflorida.com , or at 850-245-6333.

Sincerely,

Robert F. Bendus, Director

Division of Historical Resources

and State Historic Preservation Officer
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

 NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

ZACHARY LINVILLE,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 5D18-1975

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

________________________________/

Opinion filed August 24, 2018

Petition for Belated Appeal,

A Case of Original Jurisdiction.

Zachary Linville, Wewahitchka, pro se, 

Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Kaylee D. Tatman, 

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona 

Beach, for Respondent.

EDWARDS, J.

The petition for belated appeal is denied. The record before this Court shows that 

Petitioner, Zachary Linville, failed to comply with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 

9.110(b). That rule requires the notice of appeal to be filed with the clerk of the court 

whose order or judgment is being appealed within thirty days of rendition. If a pro se

inmate relies upon the institution in which the inmate is incarcerated to mail the inmate’s 

notice of appeal, the inmate must clearly state in writing that the original notice of appeal 
2

is to be mailed to and filed with the clerk of the court whose order or judgment is being 

appealed, and should include the name and address of that clerk of the court on the 

certificate of service. 

Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.420(a)(2) governs the procedure for a notice 

of appeal that is addressed to the clerk of the lower court and placed in the hands of the 

inmate’s institution for mailing. However, filing of the notice of appeal does not occur

when an inmate, as Petitioner did here, places in the hands of the institution a notice of 

appeal with a certificate of service that lists the State Attorney and/or the Attorney 

General, but which does not affirmatively direct mailing of the original notice of appeal to 

the clerk of the lower court.1 

In this case, the time for filing the original notice of appeal with the clerk of the 

lower court has expired; therefore, this Court has no jurisdiction to entertain Petitioner’s 

appeal, and there is no legal basis for granting Petitioner’s request for a belated appeal. 

PETITION DENIED.

SAWAYA and TORPY, JJ., concur.

 

1 The Appellate Rules Committee should consider whether it would be desirable to 

amend rule 9.420(d)(1) and/or Form 9.900(a) by including language in a model pro se

inmate certificate of service for notices of appeal, to the effect that “the original notice of 

appeal is to be mailed to and filed with the Clerk of the Circuit/County Court for ____ 

County” to clarify the requirement that the inmate affirmatively direct that the original 

notice of appeal is to be mailed to the clerk of the lower tribunal for filing.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

O'BRIAN OAKLEY , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 1800

[ October 30, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit ; Broward County, Edward Harold Merrigan , Judge; L.T. Case No. 12

- 011456CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender and Erika Follmer, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allan R. Geesey

, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

D AMOORGIAN , J.

This appeal arises out of proceedings on remand following this Court’s decision in Oakley v. State , 237 So. 3d 396 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018)

. Appellant, O’Brian Oakley, argues that on remand t he trial court erred in failing to resentence him on the charge of aggravated fleeing and eluding using a correctly scored and calcu l ated scoresheet

. We affirm in all aspects without further comment. We w rite only to address the scoresheet error

.
Following this Court’s instruction in Oakley , the trial court vacated the
two counts of vehicular homicide/failure to render aid but left the victim injury points attributable to those offenses on Appellant’s n ew scoresheet. A ll other non

- capital counts and sentences remained in effect. As the trial court did not rely on the scoresheet when it originally sentenced Appellant but instead imposed the statutory maximum, Appellant was not resentenced on the remaining non

- capital counts using a new scoresheet

. See Zelaya v. State , 257 So. 3d 493, 497 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018) (holding that a defendant is not entitled to resentencing with a corrected scoresheet when “ the record conclusively shows that the trial cour t would have2 imposed the same sentence using a correct scoresheet ” (quoting Brooks v. State , 9 69 So. 2d 238, 241 (Fla. 2007)) ) ; see also Moreno v. State , 266 So. 3d 1246, 1247 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019) (same). For much of the same reason, the trial court’s fail ure to enter a correct ly calculated scoresheet on remand is harmless. See Zelaya , 257 So. 3d at 497. Recognizing there is a scoresheet error, Ap p ellant is entitled to have th at error corrected and the victim injury points removed from the scoresheet

. Accordingly, we affirm Appellant’s sentence, but remand for the entry of a corrected scoresheet

.
Affirmed and remanded.

C IKLIN and G ERBER , JJ., concur

.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 63793.

protests 113844-K, etc. (New York).

#### Capitol Wine & Spirit Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: skidmarks2heaven@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:59:31 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Cecilia Marks

Goleta, CA 93117
***EXHIBIT 32(b)***

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the report on Form 10-Q of WWA Group, Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“Report”), I, Digamber Naswa, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

|   | (3) | This Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (4) | The information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the registrant at the end of the period covered by this Report and results of operations of the registrant for the period covered by this Report. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Date: May 14, 2008

 

/s/ Digamber Naswa

Digamber Naswa, Chief Financial Officer 

 

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

 

 

36