Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 87 / Friday, May 4, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 26441 

Name of source Permit No./type State effective 

date EPA approval date Additional explanation 

*******

GenOn Chalk Point Generating Station.The 2011 Consent Decree for Chalk Point.3/10/11 5/4/12 [Insert page 

number where the 

document begins].

Docket No. 52.1070(d). The SIP approval includes specific provisions of the 2011 Consent Decree for which the State of Maryland 

requested approval on October 12, 2011. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2012–10470 Filed 5–3–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R04–OAR–2012–0355(b); FRL–9666– 

7] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; North Carolina; 

Charlotte; Ozone 2002 Base Year 

Emissions Inventory 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final 

action to approve the ozone 2002 base 

year emissions inventory portion of the 

state implementation plan (SIP) revision 

submitted by the State of North Carolina 

November 12, 2009. The emissions 

inventory is part of the CharlotteGastonia-Rock Hill, North Carolina 

ozone attainment demonstration that 

was submitted for the 1997 8-hour 

ozone national ambient air quality 

standards (NAAQS). The CharlotteGastonia-Rock Hill, North CarolinaSouth Carolina 1997 8-hour ozone 

nonattainment area (hereafter referred to 

as the ‘‘bi-state Charlotte Area’’) is 

comprised of Cabarrus, Gaston, Lincoln, 

Mecklenburg, Rowan, Union and a 

portion of Iredell (Davidson and Coddle 

Creek Townships) Counties in North 

Carolina; and a portion of York County 

in South Carolina. This action is being 

taken pursuant to section 110 of the 

Clean Air Act (CAA or Act). EPA will 

take action on the South Carolina 

submission for the ozone 2002 base year 

emissions inventory for its portion of 

the bi-state Charlotte Area in a separate 

action. 

DATES: This direct final rule is effective 

July 3, 2012 without further notice, 

unless EPA receives adverse comment 

by June 4, 2012. If EPA receives such 

comments, it will publish a timely 

withdrawal of the direct final rule in the 

Federal Register and inform the public 

that the rule will not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04– 

OAR–2012–0355(b), by one of the 

following methods: 

1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. Email: R4-RDS@epa.gov. 

3. Fax: (404) 562–9019. 

4. Mail: ‘‘EPA–R04–OAR–2012– 

0355(b),’’ Regulatory Development 

Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, 

Pesticides and Toxics Management 

Division, U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street 

SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. 

5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Lynorae 

Benjamin, Regulatory Development 

Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, 

Pesticides and Toxics Management 

Division, U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street 

SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Such 

deliveries are only accepted during the 

Regional Office’s normal hours of 

operation. The Regional Office’s official 

hours of business are Monday through 

Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding federal 

holidays. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R04–OAR–2012– 

0355(b). EPA’s policy is that all 

comments received will be included in 

the public docket without change and 

may be made available online at www.

regulations.gov, including any personal 

information provided, unless the 

comment includes information claimed 

to be Confidential Business Information 

(CBI) or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute. Do 

not submit through www.regulations.gov 

or email, information that you consider 

to be CBI or otherwise protected. The 

www.regulations.gov Web site is an 

‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an email comment directly 

to EPA without going through www.

regulations.gov, your email address will 

be automatically captured and included 

as part of the comment that is placed in 

the public docket and made available on 

the Internet. If you submit an electronic 

comment, EPA recommends that you 

include your name and other contact 

information in the body of your 

comment and with any disk or CD–ROM 

you submit. If EPA cannot read your 

comment due to technical difficulties 

and cannot contact you for clarification, 

EPA may not be able to consider your 

comment. Electronic files should avoid 

the use of special characters, any form 

of encryption, and be free of any defects 

or viruses. For additional information 

about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA 

Docket Center homepage at http://www.

epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm. 

Docket: All documents in the 

electronic docket are listed in the www.

regulations.gov index. Although listed 

in the index, some information is not 

publicly available, i.e., CBI or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

is not placed on the Internet and will be 

publicly available only in hard copy 

form. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either 

electronically in www.regulations.gov or 

in hard copy at the Regulatory 

Development Section, Air Planning 

Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics 

Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA 

requests that if at all possible, you 

contact the person listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

schedule your inspection. The Regional 

Office’s official hours of business are 

Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, 

excluding federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sara 

Waterson, Regulatory Development 

Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, 

Pesticides and Toxics Management 

Division, U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street 

SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. The 

telephone number is (404) 562–9061. 

Ms. Waterson can be reached via 

electronic mail at waterson.sara@epa.

gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

II. Analysis of State’s Submittal 

III. Final Action 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 


erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
26442 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 87 / Friday, May 4, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 

1North Carolina withdrew a June 15, 2007, 

attainment demonstration SIP for its portion of the 

Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill 1997 8-hour ozone 

area on December 19, 2008, and committed to 

submit a revised SIP by November 30, 2009. On 

November 12, 2009, North Carolina resubmitted the 

attainment demonstration SIP for the North 

Carolina portion of the Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill 

1997 8-hour ozone area. 

I. Background 

On July 18, 1997, EPA promulgated a 

revised 8-hour ozone NAAQS of 0.08 

parts per million (ppm). Under EPA’s 

regulations at 40 CFR part 50, the 1997 

8-hour ozone NAAQS is attained when 

the 3-year average of the annual fourth 

highest daily maximum 8-hour average 

ambient air quality ozone 

concentrations is less than or equal to 

0.08 ppm (i.e., 0.084 ppm when 

rounding is considered) (69 FR 23857, 

April 30, 2004). Ambient air quality 

monitoring data for the 3-year period 

must meet a data completeness 

requirement. The ambient air quality 

monitoring data completeness 

requirement is met when the average 

percent of days with valid ambient 

monitoring data is greater than 90 

percent, and no single year has less than 

75 percent data completeness as 

determined in Appendix I of part 50. 

Upon promulgation of a new or 

revised NAAQS, the CAA requires EPA 

to designate as nonattainment any area 

that is violating the NAAQS, based on 

the three most recent years of ambient 

air quality data at the conclusion of the 

designation process. The bi-state 

Charlotte Area was designated 

nonattainment for the 1997 8-hour 

ozone NAAQS on April 30, 2004 

(effective June 15, 2004) using 2001– 

2003 ambient air quality data (69 FR 

23857, April 30, 2004). At the time of 

designation the bi-state Charlotte Area 

was classified as a moderate 

nonattainment area for the 1997 8-hour 

ozone NAAQS. In the April 30, 2004, 

Phase I Ozone Implementation Rule, 

EPA established ozone nonattainment 

area attainment dates based on Table 1 

of section 181(a) of the CAA. This 

established an attainment date six years 

after the June 15, 2004, effective date for 

areas classified as moderate areas for the 

1997 8-hour ozone nonattainment 

designations. Section 181 of the CAA 

explains that the attainment date for 

moderate nonattainment areas shall be 

as expeditiously as practicable, but no 

later than six years after designation, or 

June 15, 2010. Therefore, the bi-state 

Charlotte Area’s original attainment date 

was June 15, 2010. See 69 FR 23951, 

April 30, 2004. 

On November 12, 2009,1 North 

Carolina submitted an attainment 

demonstration and associated 

reasonably available control measures 

(RACM), a reasonable further progress 

(RFP) plan, contingency measures, a 

2002 base year emissions inventory and 

other planning SIP revisions related to 

attainment of the 1997 8-hour ozone 

NAAQS in the bi-state Charlotte Area 

(hereafter referred to as the ‘‘North 

Carolina’s nonattainment submissions 

for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS for 

the bi-state Charlotte Area’’). A 

supplement to the RFP was submitted 

on November 30, 2009. 

The bi-state Charlotte Area did not 

attain the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS by 

June 15, 2010 (the applicable attainment 

date for moderate nonattainment areas); 

however, the Area qualified for an 

extension of the attainment date. Under 

certain circumstances, the CAA allows 

for extensions of the attainment dates 

prescribed at the time of the original 

nonattainment designation. In 

accordance with CAA section 181(a)(5), 

EPA may grant up to 2 one-year 

extensions of the attainment date under 

specified conditions. On May 31, 2011, 

EPA determined that North Carolina 

met the CAA requirements to obtain a 

one-year extension of the attainment 

date for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS 

for the bi-state Charlotte Area. See 76 FR 

31245. As a result, EPA extended the bistate Charlotte Area’s attainment date 

from June 15, 2010, to June 15, 2011, for 

the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. 

Subsequently, on November 15, 2011 

(76 FR 70656), EPA determined that the 

bi-state Charlotte Area attained the 1997 

8-hour ozone NAAQS. The 

determination of attaining data was 

based upon complete, quality-assured 

and certified ambient air monitoring 

data for the 2008–2010 period, showing 

that the Area had monitored attainment 

of the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. The 

requirements for the Area to submit an 

attainment demonstration and 

associated RACM, RFP plan, 

contingency measures, and other 

planning SIP revisions related to 

attainment of the standard were 

suspended as a result of the 

determination of attainment, so long as 

the Area continues to attain the 1997 

8-hour ozone NAAQS. See 40 CFR 

52.1779(a). 

On December 21, 2011, North 

Carolina withdrew the bi-state Charlotte 

Area’s attainment demonstration, 

contingency measures, and associated 

RACM as allowed by 40 CFR 51.918 for 

its portion of this Area; however, the 

emissions inventory requirement found 

in CAA section 182(a)(1), which 

requires submission and approval of a 

comprehensive, accurate, and current 

inventory of actual emissions, is not 

suspended by a determination of 

attainment. Accordingly, North Carolina 

has not withdrawn its emission 

inventory for the 1997 8-hour ozone 

NAAQS, and EPA is now taking direct 

final action to approve this portion of 

the SIP revision submitted by the State 

of North Carolina on November 12, 

2009, as required by section 182(a)(1). 

II. Analysis of State’s Submittal 

As discussed above, section 182(a)(1) 

of the CAA requires areas to submit a 

comprehensive, accurate and current 

inventory of actual emissions from all 

sources of the relevant pollutant or 

pollutants in such area. North Carolina 

selected 2002 as base year for the 

emissions inventory pursuant to 40 CFR 

51.915. Emissions contained in North 

Carolina’s portion of the bi-state 

Charlotte attainment plan cover the 

general source categories of stationary 

point and area sources, non-road and 

on-road mobile sources, and biogenic 

sources. A detailed discussion of the 

emissions inventory development can 

be found in Appendix E of the North 

Carolina submittal. The 2002 nitrogen 

oxides (NOX) baseline emissions 

inventory, including partial county 

emissions for Iredell, can be found in 

Appendix P of the submittal. The 2002 

volatile organic compounds (VOC) 

baseline emissions inventory, including 

partial county emissions for Iredell, can 

be found in Appendix O of the 

submittal. The table below provides a 

summary of the emissions inventories. 

A detailed account of the point sources 

can be found in Appendix E of the 

November 12, 2009, submittal, which 

can be found in the docket for today’s 

action using Docket ID No. EPA–R04– 

OAR–2010–0504. 


erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 87 / Friday, May 4, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 26443 

TABLE 1—2002 POINT AND AREA SOURCES ANNUAL EMISSIONS FOR THE NORTH CAROLINA PORTION OF THE CHARLOTTE

AREA

[Tons per summer day] 

County 

Point Area Non-road Mobile 

NOX VOC NOX VOC NOX VOC NOX VOC 

Cabarrus .......................................................... 2.6 2.2 0.8 6.0 5.4 2.7 17.2 21.5 

Gaston .............................................................. 34.8 2.5 1.3 8.9 4.9 2.9 20.0 13.5 

Iredell (partial) * ................................................ 8.5 0.9 0.3 1.9 1.4 0.9 5.6 5.1 

Lincoln .............................................................. 0.3 2.1 0.5 3.1 1.9 1.3 6.1 7.1 

Mecklenburg ..................................................... 2.1 5.7 7.0 29.4 32.1 24.1 78.7 68.0 

Rowan .............................................................. 11.0 6.3 0.8 5.6 4.1 2.3 19.7 14.8 

Union ................................................................ 0.2 1.0 1.0 6.4 7.7 4.7 11.3 13.0 

* Only part of Iredell County is in the nonattainment area. 

The 182(a)(1) emissions inventory is 

developed by the incorporation of data 

from multiple sources. States were 

required to develop and submit to EPA 

a triennial emissions inventory 

according to the Consolidated Emissions 

Reporting Rule for all source categories 

(i.e., point, area, non-road mobile and 

on-road mobile). This inventory often 

forms the basis of data that are updated 

with more recent information and data 

that also is used in their attainment 

demonstration modeling inventory. 

Such was the case in the development 

of the 2002 emissions inventory that 

was submitted in the State’s attainment 

demonstration SIP for this Area. The 

2002 emissions inventory was based on 

data developed with the Visibility 

Improvement State and Tribal 

Association of the Southeast (VISTAS) 

contractors and submitted by the States 

to the 2002 National Emissions 

Inventory. Several iterations of the 2002 

inventories were developed for the 

different emissions source categories 

resulting from revisions and updates to 

the data. Data from many databases, 

studies and models (e.g., vehicle miles 

traveled, fuel programs, the NONROAD 

2002 model data for commercial marine 

vessels, locomotives and Clean Air 

Market Division, etc.) resulted in the 

inventory submitted in this SIP. The 

data were developed according to 

current EPA emissions inventory 

guidance ‘‘Emissions Inventory 

Guidance for Implementation of Ozone 

and Particulate Matter National 

Ambient Air Quality Standards 

(NAAQS) and Regional Haze 

Regulations’’ (August 2005) and a 

quality assurance project plan that was 

developed through VISTAS and 

approved by EPA. EPA agrees that the 

process used to develop this inventory 

was adequate to meet the requirements 

of CAA section 182(a)(1) and the 

implementing regulations. 

EPA has reviewed North Carolina’s 

emissions inventory for its portion of 

the bi-state Charlotte Area for the 1997 

8-hour ozone NAAQS and finds that it 

is adequate for the purposes of meeting 

section 182(a)(1) emissions inventory 

requirement. The emissions inventory is 

approvable because the emissions were 

developed consistent with the CAA, 

implementing regulations and EPA 

guidance for emission inventories. 

III. Final Action 

EPA is approving the 2002 base year 

emissions inventory portion of the 

North Carolina’s 1997 8-hour ozone 

attainment demonstration SIP revision 

for the bi-state Charlotte Area submitted 

by the State of North Carolina on 

November 12, 2009. This action is being 

taken pursuant to section 110 of the 

CAA. On March 12, 2008, EPA issued a 

revised ozone NAAQS. See 73 FR 

16436. The current action, however, is 

being taken to address requirements 

under the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. 

Requirements for the North Carolina 

portion of the Charlotte Area under the 

2008 ozone NAAQS will be addressed 

in the future. EPA is publishing this rule 

without prior proposal because the 

Agency views this as a noncontroversial 

submittal and anticipates no adverse 

comments. However, in the proposed 

rules section of this Federal Register 

publication, EPA is publishing a 

separate document that will serve as the 

proposal to approve the SIP revision 

should adverse comments be filed. This 

rule will be effective July 3, 2012 

without further notice unless the 

Agency receives adverse comments by 

June 4, 2012. 

If EPA receives such comments, then 

EPA will publish a document 

withdrawing the final rule and 

informing the public that the rule will 

not take effect. All public comments 

received will then be addressed in a 

subsequent final rule based on the 

proposed rule. EPA will not institute a 

second comment period. Parties 

interested in commenting should do so 

at this time. If no such comments are 

received, the public is advised that this 

rule will be effective on July 3, 2012 and 

no further action will be taken on the 

proposed rule. 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

Act and applicable federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves state law as meeting 

federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. For that 

reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act 

(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 


erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
26444 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 87 / Friday, May 4, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the State, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by July 3, 2012. Filing a petition 

for reconsideration by the Administrator 

of this final rule does not affect the 

finality of this action for the purposes of 

judicial review nor does it extend the 

time within which a petition for judicial 

review may be filed, and shall not 

postpone the effectiveness of such rule 

or action. Parties with objections to this 

direct final rule are encouraged to file a 

comment in response to the parallel 

notice of proposed rulemaking for this 

action published in the proposed rules 

section of today’s Federal Register, 

rather than file an immediate petition 

for judicial review of this direct final 

rule, so that EPA can withdraw this 

direct final rule and address the 

comment in the proposed rulemaking. 

This action may not be challenged later 

in proceedings to enforce its 

requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Dated: April 18, 2012. 

A. Stanley Meiburg, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4. 

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 

PART 52—[AMENDED] 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart II—North Carolina 

■ 2. Section 52.1770(e), is amended by 

adding a new entry for ‘‘North Carolina 

portion of bi-state Charlotte; 1997 

8–Hour Ozone 2002 Base Year 

Emissions Inventory’’ to read as follows: 

§ 52.1770 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(e) * * * 

EPA-APPROVED NORTH CAROLINA NON-REGULATORY PROVISIONS

Provision State effective 

date 

EPA approval 

date Federal Register citation 

*******

North Carolina portion of bi-state Charlotte; 1997 8-Hour Ozone 2002 Base Year 

Emissions Inventory.

11/12/2009 5/4/2012 [Insert citation of publication]. 

[FR Doc. 2012–10730 Filed 5–3–12; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–HQ–OAR–2011–0081; FRL–9660–5] 

RIN 2060–AR42 

Revisions to Final Response To 

Petition From New Jersey Regarding 

SO2 Emissions From the Portland 

Generating Station 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This action amends the 

preamble and regulatory text to the 

‘‘Final Response to Petition From New 

Jersey Regarding SO2 Emissions From 

the Portland Generating Station’’ 

published November 7, 2011, to revise 

minor misstatements. These revisions 

clarify the EPA’s finding that the 

Portland Generating Station (Portland) 

significantly contributes to 

nonattainment or interferes with 

maintenance of the 1-hour sulfur 

dioxide (SO2) national ambient air 

quality standard (NAAQS) in the State 

of New Jersey and remove the references 

to specific New Jersey counties 

identified in the EPA’s November 7, 

2011, final rule. These revisions have no 

impact on any other provisions of the 

rule. 

DATES: This final rule is effective on 

June 4, 2012. 

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket ID 

No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2011–0081. All 

documents in the docket are listed on 

the http://www.regulations.gov Web 

site. Although listed in the index, some 

information is not publicly available, 

e.g., confidential business information 

(CBI) or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available either electronically through 

http://www.regulations.gov or in hard 

copy at the Air and Radiation Docket 

and Information Center, EPA/DC, EPA 

West Building, Room 3334, 1301 

Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 

The Public Reading Room is open from 

8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, excluding legal holidays. The 

telephone number for the Public 

Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, and 

the telephone number for the Air Docket 

is (202) 566–1742. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

Todd Hawes (919) 541–5591, 

hawes.todd@epa.gov, or Ms. Gobeail 


erowe on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES