alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

Gurdoglanyan, Nicole

From: Harris, Cheryl J MAJ MIL NG NGB ARNG [Cheryl.J.Harris@us.army.mil]

Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 12:54 PM

To: GovernmentAffairs

Subject: Re: Docket No. DOT-OST-2012-0029 (UNCLASSIFIED)

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED

Caveats: FOUO

Dear Secretary LaHood:

I am writing today to express my strong support for JetBlue's application to offer new

beyond‐perimeter service at Reagan National and link the nation's capital to two other

important capital cities: San Juan, Puerto Rico (connecting onward to St. Thomas, the capital

of the U.S. Virgin Islands) and Austin, Texas.

JetBlue's application will provide much‐needed low‐fare, high‐quality service from the

capital's downtown airport to the capital of our closest territory, and to the capital of the

largest of the contiguous 48 states. Both San Juan and Austin are crying out for new JetBlue

service to DCA, being two of the ten largest markets without nonstop air service to the

airport. Their application will bring tremendous public benefit and much‐needed low‐fare

competition to DCA.

MAJ Cheryl J. Harris

Manassas, VA

Cheryl.j.harris@us.army.mil

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED

Caveats: FOUO
From: mimimcleod@dslextreme.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:08:44 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Diane & Ross McLeod

Covina, CA 91724
From: vrpentecost@woh.rr.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:27:22 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Vivian Pentecost

Dayton, OH 45432
#### Jean A. GARDNER, Appellant, v. Anthony J. PRINCIPI, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs,1 Appellee.

No. 00-3635.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted May 22, 2001.

Filed June 13, 2001.

Before BOWMAN, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

1

. Anthony J. Principi has been appointed to serve as Secretaiy of Veterans Affairs, and is substituted as appellee pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c)(2).

PER CURIAM.

Jean A. Gardner, a former employee of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), alleged that the VA discriminated and took adverse employment action against her on various occasions between 1987 and 1999. The District Court2 granted summary judgment for the VA in Gardner’s action alleging age, race, and sex discrimination and retaliation. Gardner appeals.

Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs, we affirm for the reasons stated by the District Court, and because Gardner did not exhaust her administrative remedies by timely pursuing her administrative complaint. *See*29 C.F.R. §§ 1614.105-.106 (administrative requirements); *Briley v. Carlin,*172 F.3d 567, 571 (8th Cir.1999) (holding that “an employee cannot bring a discrimination claim without first exhausting his or her administrative remedies”); *McAlister v. Sec’y of Dep’t of Health and Human Servs.,*900 F.2d 157, 158 (8th Cir.1990) (“[Administrative remedies must be exhausted before a federal employee may bring an employment discrimination claim against federal employer.”).

2

. The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAn Investigation of Proposed Techniques for Quantifying Confidence in Assurance ArgumentsThe use of safety cases in certification raises the question of assurance argument sufficiency and the issue of confidence (or uncertainty) in the argument's claims. Some researchers propose to model confidence quantitatively and to calculate confidence in argument conclusions. We know of little evidence to suggest that any proposed technique would deliver trustworthy results when implemented by system safety practitioners. Proponents do not usually assess the efficacy of their techniques through controlled experiment or historical study. Instead, they present an illustrative example where the calculation delivers a plausible result. In this paper, we review current proposals, claims made about them, and evidence advanced in favor of them. We then show that proposed techniques can deliver implausible results in some cases. We conclude that quantitative confidence techniques require further validation before they should be recommended as part of the basis for deciding whether an assurance argument justifies fielding a critical system.Document ID20160006526Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsGraydon, Patrick J.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Holloway, C. Michael*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredMay 24, 2016Publication DateMay 1, 2016Subject CategoryQuality Assurance And ReliabilityStatistics And ProbabilityReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2016-219195NF1676L-23680L-20670Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 999182.02.50.07.02Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20160006526.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
We consent to the  incorporation  by reference  in  Registration  Statement  No.
333-30895 of Phar-Mor,  Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated  September 26, 2000
appearing  in the Annual  Report on Form 10-K of  Phar-Mor,  Inc. for the fiscal
year ended July 1, 2000.

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

September 28, 2000
CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

 

Registration No. 333-59540

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO. 091				Trade Date: 06/21/01
(To Prospectus Supplement & Prospectus dated

June 1, 2001)						Issue Date: 06/26/01
The Date of this Pricing Supplement June 21, 2001
SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

CUSIP									Date and terms of redemption or

or	Stated				 Interest			repayment (including any

Common	Interest		 Price to	 Discounts & Payment	Survivors		applicable regular or special

Code	Rate (1)	Maturity	Public (2)	Commissions Frequency	 Option	Yes/No	record dates)

14911QDU2 6.1%	06/15/09	100%	 1.25% Semi-Annually YES	 NO	

Principal						1st Payment	Day	

Amount		Proceeds		Dealer		 Date		Count

$5,264,000.00	$5,198,200.00	ABN AMRO Inc.	12/15/01		30/360	
 

Original Issue Discount Note:					Total Amount of OID:

____ Yes	 X No						N/A

 

 
- The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the effective date of the change.Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $[20.135]mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (SM) were sold at interest rates then in effect. Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (SM) will be made under a Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated June 1,2001.
- Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount. Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Insight Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul J. Pucino, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|                                                                                
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                
|/s/ Paul J. Pucino                                                              
|Paul J. Pucino Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer May 10, 2005



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Digital Insight and will be retained by Digital Insight and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Mark Bradley, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Players Network, a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The report on Form 10-Q of Players Network. (the "Registrant") for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the "Report") which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: May 23, 2011





/s/ Mark Bradley


Name:  Mark Bradley


Title: Chief Executive Officer


Principal Executive Officer and Principal


Financial Officer
Before the Second Division,

August 10, 1966

No. P66/183. —

No. P66/184. —

No. P66/185. —

#### California Radio & Electronics Co. et al. *v.*United States, protests 59/17753, etc. (Los Angeles). Bruce Duncan Co., Inc., a/c Lloyd Trading Co. et al. *v.*United States, protests 61/13534, etc. (Los Angeles). Nomura (America) Corp. et al. *v.*United States, protests 63/17193, etc. (Los Angeles).

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered -by the foregoing protests consists of radio earphones similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Motorola, Inc., and International Expediters, Inc.*v. *United States*(54 Cust. Ct. 303, Abstract 69019), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES 1, 2, AND 3 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE YEAR-TO-DATE, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             216
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,289
<ALLOWANCES>                                        95
<INVENTORY>                                      4,529
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,205
<PP&E>                                           1,237
<DEPRECIATION>                                     453
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  19,590
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,964
<BONDS>                                          5,417
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            49
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,599
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    19,590
<SALES>                                          8,572
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,572
<CGS>                                            3,900
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,900
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,017
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 393
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (738)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (788)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 50
<DISCONTINUED>                                   1,231
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,281
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D

.C

. 20460



### September**22, 2015** 

**MEMORANDUM** OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY AND POLLUTION PREVENTION



### SUBJECT: **Audrey** 

### III **Terrestrial Plant**  **Modeling for**  **Sulfonylurea Chemicals** 

**FROM:** Margaret Hathaway, Chemical Review Manager Cathryn Britton, Team Leader Risk Management and Implementation Branch 2 Pesticide Re-evaluation Division



### THRU: Kevin Costello, Branch Chief Risk Management and Implementation Branch 2 and 4 Pesticide Re-evaluation Division



### TO: SulfonylureaRegistration Review Public Dockets: Bensulfuron-methyl (EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0663) Chlorimuron-ethyl (EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0478) Chlorsulfuron (EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0878) Flazasulfuron (EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0994) Foramsulfuron (EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0387) Halosulfuron-methyl (EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0745) Imazosulfuron (EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0625) Iodosulfuron-methyl-sodium (EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0717) Mesosulfuron-methyl (EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0833) Metsulfuron-methyl (EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0375) Nicosulfuron (EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0372) Orthosulfamuron (EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0438) Primisulfuron-methyl (EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0844) Prosulfuron (EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-1010) Rimsulfuron (EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0178) Sulfometuron-methyl (EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0433) Sulfosulfuron (EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0434) Thifensulfuron-methyl (EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0171) Triasulfuron (EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0115) Tribenuron-methyl (EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0626) Trifloxysulfuron-Sodium (EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0409) Triflusulfuron-methyl (EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0605)The Office ofPesticide Programs is developing a model for estimating exposure to terrestrial plants called Audrey III. Audrey III is based on a newconceptual model and uses EPA's Pesticide RootZone Model (PRZM) to estimate runoffofa treated field onto a Plant Exposure Zone (PEZ) where it is combined with loading from spray drift.

The current, provisional version ofAudrey III is run in a spreadsheet using the equations described in Appendices G and HofEPA's ecological risk assessment for sulfonylurea chemicals ("Preliminary Ecological Risk Assessment for Registration Review of22 Sulfonylurea Herbicides" August 26, 2015). This document is publically available in the 22 sulfonylurea chemical dockets listed above.

Due to file size, this collection ofmodelling runs is not available directly through Regulations.gov. Members ofthe public interested in obtaining the Audrey III data files should
contactthe OPP Docketto receive them via CD-ROM at (703) 305-5805.

Kevin Costello Branch Chief RiskManagement andImplementation Branches 2and4 Pesticide Re-evaluation Division Office ofPesticide Programs
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Innovative Wireless Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Pavel Alpatov, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Pavel AlpatovPavel Alpatov

Principal Executive Officer

May 4, 2011
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Insight Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeffrey E. Stiefler, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operation of the Company.



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                            
|/s/ Jeffrey E. Stiefler                                     
|Jeffrey E. Stiefler                                         
|Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
|May 9, 2006                                                 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Digital Insight and will be retained by Digital Insight and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 62707.

#### S. Berger Co. *v.*United States,

protests 58/5779 and 58/6615 (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of iron pictures the same as those the subject of *Marshall Field & Co.*v. *United States*(45 C.C.P.A. 72, C.A.D. 676), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IV 

House Calendar No. 279 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1503 

[Report No. 110–888] 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 

consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2008 

Ms. CASTOR, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with 

respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported 

from the Committee on Rules. 

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule 

2 XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the 

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to 

4 the House is waived with respect to any resolution re5 ported on the legislative day of September 26, 2008, pro6 viding for consideration or disposition of a measure mak7 ing supplemental appropriations for job creation and presVerDate Aug 31 2005 01:47 Sep 26, 2008 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR1503.RH HR1503

rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1503 RH 

1 ervation, infrastructure investment, and economic and en2 ergy assistance for the fiscal year ending September 30, 

3 2009, and for other purposes. 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS

rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 279 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1503 

[Report No. 110–888] 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII 

tions reported from the Committee on Rules. with respect to consideration of certain resoluSEPTEMBER 25, 2008 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS