alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: deb714206@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:16:10 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Debra Canfield

Waterloo, IA 50702
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-11421-01-OA]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

# ACTION:

Notice; establishment of the Historically Black Colleges and Universities and Minority Serving Institutions Advisory Council.

# SUMMARY:

As required by the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is giving notice that it is establishing the Historically Black Colleges and Universities and Minority Serving Institutions Advisory Council. The purpose of this committee is to provide advice and recommendations to the EPA Administrator on critical policy and technical issues to advance equity in economic and social opportunities for all Americans and strengthen the capacity of HBCUs and MSIs to provide the highest-quality education, participate in and benefit from federal programs, and support key Administration policies. The EPA has determined that this federal advisory committee is necessary and in the public interest to provide critical advice and recommendations to assist the EPA in increasing outreach to underrepresented and underserved communities by developing a stronger partnership with HBCUs and MSIs.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Pradnya Bhandari, Designated Federal Officer, U.S. EPA, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW (Mail code 1448K), Washington, DC 20460, at 202-564-0381 or by email to                         *bhandari.pradnya@epa.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Historically Black Colleges and Universities and Minority Serving Institutions Advisory Council will be established for a two-year period. Copies of the committee charter will be filed with the appropriate congressional committees and the Library of Congress.

Kathryn Jakob,

Director, Office of Public Engagement.

[FR Doc. 2023-20878 Filed 9-25-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
USGS CMSC FACS EQUIPMENT LOG

ACTIVITY ID: 10CCT02

EQUIPMENT 

SYSTEM

EQUIPMENT 

TYPE

EQUIPMENT 

CODE

EQUIPMENT 

BRAND

EQUIPMENT 

MODEL

EQUIPMENT 

MEDIA COMMENTS

Swath system Interferometric 

sonar

SW SEA, Inc. 

SWATHplus-H 

468-kHz 

Interferometric 

system

digital Swath Processor Software v. 3.06

Chirp system High resolution 

seismic CH EdgeTech SB424 Chirp Subbottom Profiler digital Discover Software v. 3.51

Side scan system Side scan sonar SS Klein L3900 Side Scan 

Towfish digital SonarPro v. 11.3

Navigation system IMU/GPS DGPS CodaOctopus

Octopus F190 

Precision Attitude 

and Positioning 

System

digital

OmniSTAR High Performance 

(HP) correction; 20-cm accuracy 

used for Chirp, swath, and ship

navigation

Navigation system Navigation DGPS HYPACK, Inc. HYPACK v. 9 digital Ship navigation

Speed of Sound SOS velocity 

probe SOS Valeport Mini SVP digital SOS at swath sonar head

Speed of Sound SOS velocity 

probe SOS Valeport Mini SVP analog SOS profile casts / manual recording

Speed of Sound SOS velocity 

profiler SOS Valeport SV Profiling Unit digital SOS profile casts
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1484 

Recognizing Project HOPE for 50 years of exceptional service in improving 

and saving the lives of millions of children and adults in developing 

nations through humanitarian assistance and health education. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 23, 2008 

Mr. COOPER (for himself, Ms. BORDALLO, Mr. COHEN, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. 

MCDERMOTT, Mr. WOLF, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, Ms. LORETTA

SANCHEZ of California, Mr. JACKSON of Illinois, Mr. CROWLEY, and Ms. 

JACKSON-LEE of Texas) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing Project HOPE for 50 years of exceptional service in improving and saving the lives of millions of children and adults in developing nations through humanitarian assistance and health education. 

Whereas the mission of Project HOPE (Health Opportunities 

for People Everywhere) is to achieve sustainable advances 

in health care around the world by implementing health 

education programs and providing humanitarian assistance in areas of need; 

Whereas Project HOPE pioneered medical diplomacy in 1958 

by developing relationships with health professionals and 

people of different cultures in developing nations through 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1484 IH 

the sharing of medical knowledge and the care of patients 

both young and old; 

Whereas Project HOPE works across a variety of health levels, from the family and community levels to the tertiary 

care level, and provides training to a broad scope of 

health professionals from traditional birth attendants and 

community health volunteers to cardiac surgeons and biomedical engineers; 

Whereas Project HOPE has trained more than 2,000,000 

health care workers and distributed nearly 

$2,000,000,000 of pharmaceuticals and medical supplies 

to people in need; 

Whereas Project HOPE has vaccinated hundreds of thousands of children and delivered health education and care 

to people in nearly 100 countries worldwide; 

Whereas over the past 5 decades, Project HOPE has demonstrated its ability to develop and institute long-term solutions to pressing health problems, the true essence of 

helping people help themselves; and 

Whereas Project HOPE continues to address new health 

threats to the world by playing a leadership role in forging new alliances among those on the front lines of health 

care and health education: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes Project HOPE for 50 years of exceptional service 

3 in improving and saving the lives of millions of children 

4 and adults in developing nations through humanitarian as5 sistance and health education. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
From: heybubb@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:05:55 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Beverly Bubb

Walled Lake, MI 48390
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of
Universal Acquisitions Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anna Lo, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Anna LoAnna
      LoPrincipal
      Financial OfficerApril
      16,
2009
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

DR. SUSAN KEGERISE,

Respondent

v.

KATHY L. DELGRANDE, JOHN F. DIETRICH, CLIFTON D. EDWARDS, CAROL L. KARL, JESSE RAWLS, SR., DR. PETER J. SAKOL, HELEN D. SPENCE, AND MARK Y. SUSSMAN, IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITY,

Petitioners :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 877 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 17th day of May, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED . The issues, as stated by Petitioner, are:

a. Whether the Commonwealth Court majority’s holding that a claim of constructive discharge does not require actual resignation conflicts with the United State Supreme Court’s holdings in Green v.

Brennan , 136 S.Ct. 1769 (2016) and Pennsylvania State Police v

. Suders , 124 S.Ct. 2342 (2004)[?]

b. Whether the Commonwealth Court majority’s holding that a claim of constructive discharge does not require actual resignation conflicts

with this Court’s decision in Pennsylvania Labor Relations Bd. v. Sand’s Ret. Corp.

, 240 A.2d 801 (Pa. 1968) or the Superior Court’s

decisions in Kroen v. Bedway Sec. Agency, Inc. , 633 A.2d 628 (Pa. Super 1993) and its progeny[?][ 877 MAL 2016 ]

- 2

c. Whether the Commonwealth Court majority erred as a matter of law

and so abused its discretion as to call for this Court’s review in concluding that Kegerise had a clear right to relief in mandamus pursuant to Section 1080 of the Public School Code, even though Section 1080 is silent as to the District’s obligations in the face of a superintendent’s resignation[?]
EXHIBIT 23

                 CONSENT OF INDEPENDANT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 33-
59267) of Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation of our report
dated January 21, 1997 appearing on page 14 of this Form 10-K.





PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP

New York, New York
February 27, 1997
Scudder Variable Life Investment Fund
       Supplement to Statement of Additional Information dated May 1, 1996

The  following   paragraph  is  inserted  after  the  sixth  full  paragraph  of
"Investment  Objective  and  Policies" on page 3 of the  Statement of Additional
Information:

     The  Balanced  Portfolio  may invest in special  purpose  trust  securities
("Trust Preferred Securities").

The following paragraph is inserted under "Policies and Techniques Applicable to
the Portfolios"  before the paragraph titled "Zero Coupon Securities" on page 16
of the Statement of Additional Information:

     Trust Preferred Securities.  The Bond Portfolio and Balanced Portfolio
     may each  invest  in Trust  Preferred  Securities,  which  are  hybrid
     instruments  issued by a special purpose trust (the "Special  Trust"),
     the entire equity  interest of which is owned by a single issuer.  The
     proceeds  of  the  issuance  to  the  Portfolios  of  Trust  Preferred
     Securities  are  typically  used to  purchase  a  junior  subordinated
     debenture,  and distributions from the Special Trust are funded by the
     payments of principal and interest on the subordinated debenture.

          If payments on the underlying junior subordinated debentures held
     by the  Special  Trust  are  deferred  by the  debenture  issuer,  the
     debentures  would  be  treated  as  original  issue  discount  ("OID")
     obligations  for the remainder of their term. As a result,  holders of
     Trust Preferred Securities, such as the Portfolios,  would be required
     to accrue daily for Federal  income tax  purposes,  their share of the
     stated  interest and the de minimis OID on the debentures  (regardless
     of  whether  a  Portfolio  receives  any cash  distributions  from the
     Special  Trust),  and the value of Trust  Preferred  Securities  would
     likely be negatively  affected.  Interest  payments on the  underlying
     junior  subordinated  debentures  typically  may only be  deferred  if
     dividends  are  suspended  on both common and  preferred  stock of the
     issuer. The underlying junior subordinated  debentures  generally rank
     slightly  higher in terms of  payment  priority  than both  common and
     preferred  securities of the issuer, but rank below other subordinated
     debentures  and debt  securities.  Trust  Preferred  Securities may be
     subject to  mandatory  prepayment  under  certain  circumstances.  The
     market values of Trust Preferred  Securities may be more volatile than
     those of conventional debt securities.  Trust Preferred Securities may
     be issued in reliance on Rule 144A under the  Securities  Act of 1933,
     as  amended,   and,  unless  and  until  registered,   are  restricted
     securities;  there can be no  assurance  as to the  liquidity of Trust
     Preferred  Securities  and the  ability of holders of Trust  Preferred
     Securities, such as the Portfolios, to sell their holdings.

February 10, 1997
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement on Form N-1A of our report dated March 28, 2008, relating to the
financial statements and financial highlights which appears in the January 31,
2008 Annual Report to Shareholders of California Daily Tax Free Income Fund,
Inc., which is also incorporated by reference into the Registration Statement.
We also consent to the references to us under the headings "Financial
Highlights", "Counsel and Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" and
"Financial Statements" in such Registration Statement.

/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New York, New York
May 30, 2008
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Excel Global, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

                                 /s/ Betty Soumekh
                                 ----------------------
                                 Betty Soumekh
                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                 Chief Financial Officer

April 15, 2009
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (i)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 Dated: August 31, 2005
    
    /s/ SETH R. JOHNSONSeth R. JohnsonChief Executive OfficerPacific Sunwear of California, Inc.(Principal Executive Officer)Dated: August 31, 2005
    
    /s/ GERALD M. CHANEYGerald M. ChaneySenior Vice Presidentand Chief Financial OfficerPacific Sunwear of California, Inc.(Principal Financial Officer)
From: gegerboth@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:04:26 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Glenn Gerboth

Stony Point, NY 10980
From: herbertborr@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:23:23 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Herbert Orr

Mobile, AL 36695