alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.2:  Section 906 Certification of the Chief Financial
Officer





CERTIFICATION
OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the
undersigned officer of ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company") certifies
that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the
year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.





Date:  March
      8, 2010
              By
              /s/WILLIAM M. FOSHEEChief
      Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement has been provided to the registrant and will
be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsFinite Difference Time Marching in the Frequency Domain: A Parabolic Formulation for Aircraft Acoustic Nacelle DesignAn explicit finite difference iteration scheme is developed to study harmonic sound propagation in aircraft engine nacelles. To reduce storage requirements for large 3D problems, the time dependent potential form of the acoustic wave equation is used. To insure that the finite difference scheme is both explicit and stable, time is introduced into the Fourier transformed (steady-state) acoustic potential field as a parameter. Under a suitable transformation, the time dependent governing equation in frequency space is simplified to yield a parabolic partial differential equation, which is then marched through time to attain the steady-state solution. The input to the system is the amplitude of an incident harmonic sound source entering a quiescent duct at the input boundary, with standard impedance boundary conditions on the duct walls and duct exit. The introduction of the time parameter eliminates the large matrix storage requirements normally associated with frequency domain solutions, and time marching attains the steady-state quickly enough to make the method favorable when compared to frequency domain methods. For validation, this transient-frequency domain method is applied to sound propagation in a 2D hard wall duct with plug flow.Document ID19970001340Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsBaumeister, Kenneth J.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Kreider, Kevin L.*(Akron Univ. Akron, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 1996Subject CategoryAcousticsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:106839NASA-TM-106839E-9403Meeting InformationMeeting: International Mechanical Engineering Congress and ExpositionLocation: San Francisco, CACountry: United StatesStart Date: November 12, 1995End Date: November 17, 1995Sponsors:American Society of Mechanical EngineersAccession Number97N11159Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-62-52Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970001340.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
From: wellslogan@usa.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:39:12 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

John Logan

Sunnyvale, TX 75182
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsEffects of Planetary Gear Ratio on Mean Service LifePlanetary gear transmissions are compact, high-power speed reductions which use parallel load paths. The range of possible reduction ratios is bounded from below and above by limits on the relative size of the planet gears. For a single plane transmission, the planet gear has no size at a ratio of two. As the ratio increases, so does the size of the planets relative to the sizes of the sun and ring. Which ratio is best for a planetary reduction can be resolved by studying a series of optimal designs. In this series, each design is obtained by maximizing the service life for a planetary with a fixed size, gear ratio, input speed power and materials. The planetary gear reduction service life is modeled as a function of the two-parameter Weibull distributed service lives of the bearings and gears in the reduction. Planet bearing life strongly influences the optimal reduction lives which point to an optimal planetary reduction ratio in the neighborhood of four to five.Document ID19970018785Acquisition SourceHeadquartersDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsSavage, M.*(Akron Univ. Akron, OH United States)*Rubadeux, K. L.*(Hendrickson Co. Canton, OH United States)*Coe, H. H.*(Army Research Lab. Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1996Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:107275NASA-TM-107275AD-A318693NASA-E-10343ARL-TR-1150Meeting InformationMeeting: Power Transmission and GearingLocation: San Diego, CACountry: United StatesStart Date: October 6, 1996End Date: October 9, 1996Sponsors:American Society of Mechanical EngineersAccession Number97N20720Funding Number(s)OTHER: 505-62-36CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG3-1047PROJECT: DA Proj. 1L1-62211-A-47ADistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970018785.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
ex10-2.htm










RESIGNATION







To the Members of the Board of Directors of Bassline Productions, Inc.:







I, Lisa Rubin do hereby agree and acknowledge that effective upon the appointment of Tamio Stehrenberger as director and officers of Bassline Productions, Inc. (the “Company”), I hereby resign in all capacities as Director of the Company, and from any and all other positions as an officer or employee of the Company which I hold, and agree that any and all powers associated with my former positions of the Company are hereby terminated effective as of the date hereof.












Dated: January 3, 2012












/s/ Lisa Rubin      


Lisa Rubin
The State of TexasAppellee



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

April 21, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00069

- CR

Charles Arthur WARREN

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 379th Judic ial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR9856B Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

On April 16, 2014, appellant filed a motion to stay the terms of his community supervision. The State may file a response to the motion on or before May 2, 2014

. See Humphries v. State , 261 S.W.3d 144, 145 (Tex. App

. --- San Antonio 2008, no pet.).

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 21st day of April, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Docket No: FAA - 2015 - 3628 Dir ID: 2015 - NM - 025 - AD
From: pastorglen@thecrossingchurch.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:31:09 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Glen Douglas

Port Angeles, WA 98362
From: hbreedy@bellsouth.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:04:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

H.B. Reedy

Richmond, KY 40475
From: jess89@rocketmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:10:20 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jessica Smith

Lexington, NC 27292
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection
with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Collins & Aikman Floorcoverings, Inc. (the Corporation) for the quarterly period ended May 1, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certifies that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Edgar M. (Mac) BridgerEdgar M. (Mac) BridgerChief Executive Officer
```

[House Document 114-140]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

                                     

114th Congress, 2d Session - - - - - - - - - House Document 114-140
 
                      VETO MESSAGE ON H.J. RES. 88

                               __________

                                MESSAGE

                                  from

                     THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

                              transmitting

   NOTIFICATION OF THE VETO OF H.J. RES 88, A RESOLUTION THAT WOULD 
   NULLIFY THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR'S FINAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST RULE

[GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT]

                  June 9, 2016.--Ordered to be printed
                                  ______

                         U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 

59-011                         WASHINGTON : 2016 

To the House of Representatives:
    I am returning herewith without my approval H.J. Res. 88, a 
resolution that would nullify the Department of Labor's final 
conflict of interest rule. This rule is critical to protecting 
Americans' hard-earned savings and preserving their retirement 
security.
    The outdated regulations in place before this rulemaking 
did not ensure that financial advisers act in their clients' 
best interests when giving retirement investment advice. 
Instead, some firms have incentivized advisers to steer clients 
into products that have higher fees and lower returns--costing 
America's families an estimated $17 billion a year.
    The Department of Labor's final rule will ensure that 
American workers and retirees receive retirement advice that is 
in their best interest, better enabling them to protect and 
grow their savings. The final rule reflects extensive feedback 
from industry, advocates, and Members of Congress, and has been 
streamlined to reduce the compliance burden and ensure 
continued access to advice, while maintaining an enforceable 
best interest standard that protects consumers. It is essential 
that these critical protections go into effect. Because this 
resolution seeks to block the progress represented by this rule 
and deny retirement savers investment advice in their best 
interest, I cannot support it. I am therefore vetoing this 
resolution.

                                                      Barack Obama.
    The White House, June 8, 2016.

                                  [all]
```
Exhibit 10.58.1



                                    EXTENSION
                                    ---------

                                       TO
                                       --

                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
                              --------------------


         Pursuant to Section 6 of the Employment Agreement, dated as of April 1,
1999 by and between  PanAmSat  Corporation  (the  "Company") and R. Douglas Kahn
(the  "Executive")  (the "Employment  Agreement"),  the Company hereby gives its
notification  to Executive  that it desires to extend the  Employment  Agreement
until March 31, 2002. This extension shall be effective as of March 31, 2000.

                                            PANAMSAT CORPORATION


                                            By:   /s/ Michael T. Smith
                                               --------------------------------
                                               Michael T. Smith
                                               Chairman of the Board
                                               Dated:  March 31, 2000



ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:


By:   /s/ R. Douglas Kahn
    --------------------------------
    R. Douglas Kahn
    Dated:  March 31, 2000
No. 268.

#### Maddox *v.*Shroyer et al.

*Luther Robinson Maddox,*petitioner, *pro se.*

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1350
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Griffin Land & Nurseries, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 27, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Periodic Report”), I, Frederick M. Danziger, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.
The Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2.
The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 /s/ FREDERICK M. DANZIGERFrederick M. DanzigerPresident and Chief Executive OfficerApril 8, 2010