alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   |   |
|--------|--------|

**Filed      Pursuant To Rule 433, Registration No. 333-124310**
** **

**$1,000,000,000**

**CATERPILLAR      FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION**

| **For                the Period: 5/7/2007 to 5/14/2007** |
|----------------------------------------------------------|
| **Coupon**                                               | **Interest** | **Maturity** | **Callable** | **Survivor's****Option** | **Price****1** | **Yield****2** | **Moody's** | **S&P** | **CUSIP** |
| 4.850%                                                   | Semi-Annual(†††) | 5/15/09 | NO | YES§  | 100.00 | 4.850% | A2 | A | 14912HCU2 |
| 5.400%                                                   | Semi-Annual(†††) | 5/15/17 | 5/15/09***  | YES§  | 100.00 | 5.400% | A2 | A | 14912HCV0 |
| 5.600%                                                   | Semi-Annual(†††) | 5/15/22 | 5/15/10***  | YES§  | 100.00 | 5.600% | A2 | A | 14912HCW8 |

*All      offerings are subject to prior sale.*
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report On Form 10-K
of EcoEmissions Solutions, Inc. for the Year Ended February 28, 2010, I Thomas
L. Crom, Chief Financial Officer of EcoEmissions Solutions, Inc. hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

|1. | Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year ended
      February 28, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                     
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|2. | The information contained in such Annual Report on Form
      10-K for the Year Ended February 28, 2010, fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      EcoEmissions Solutions, Inc.

By:       
 /s/Thomas L. Crom
            
 Thomas Crom
             
Chief Financial Officer

Dated:   June 10, 2010

---
# 

# CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

Registration No.  333-97047

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  359                                                               Trade Date:  11/10/03

(To Prospectus Supplement dated August 15, 2002 &

  Prospectus dated August  8, 2002)                                                                     Issue Date:   11/14/03

The Date of this Pricing SupplementNovember 10, 2003

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

  CUSIP                                                                                                                                Date and terms of redemption or

     or        Stated                                                                  Interest                                    repayment (including any

Common  Interest                      Price to  Discounts &        Payment  Survivors                  applicable regular or special

  Code      Rate (1)               Maturity                Public (2)                Commissions      Frequency      Option     Yes/No                record dates)

14911QQY0   4.05%                        05/15/10          100%                    1.1%                   Monthly            YES            NO                

                       

                          

Principal                                                                                1st Payment Day         

Amount                   Proceeds                 Dealer                            Date                  Count

$2,231,000.00                $2,206,459.00         ABN AMROInc.                 12/15/03                 30/360    

Original Issue Discount Note:                                                                   Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes                X   No                                                                                   N/A

The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the effective date of the change.  Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $333.711 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (SM) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (SM) will be made under the Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated August 8,2002.

Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
From: colli462@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:03:47 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Michelle Miller

Hopkins, MN 55305
Before the First Division,

July 31, 1958

No. 62226.

#### Manca, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 58/4838 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question is not an entirety, but is susceptible of use and is used separately. Following *John P. Herber & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 193, C. D. 1519), the *340protest was dismissed, and the matter was remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)).
From: slv@synergetics.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:28:57 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Susan LeVay

Fort Collins, CO 80524
Before the Second Division,

March 1, 1967

No. P67/53.

#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/16985 (Los Angeles).

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of blocked or trimmed palm leaf harvest hats similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Bailey-Mora Co., Inc., a/c Vera Lou, Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(54 Cust. Ct. 55, C.D. 2508), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 68417.

protest 60/11573 (A) (New York).

#### Antique Import Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 CCPA 15, C.A.D. 458), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: bnharmon@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:08:41 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Nancy Harmon

West Lafayette, IN 47906
No. 64514.

#### Chester K. Stoner *v.*United States,

protests 321429-K and 58/14067 (Tampa).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of carrizo baskets the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Chester K. Stoner*v. *United States*(42 Cust. Ct. 178, C.D. 2083), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 68422.

protest 63/6735 (Los Angeles).

#### National Silver Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, O.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the

merchandise consists of glass spice bottles similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 68042, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 329 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 329

Congratulating the Barton College men's basketball team for winning the 
     2007 NCAA Division II Men's Basketball National Championship.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 23, 2007

Mr. Jones of North Carolina (for himself and Mr. Butterfield) submitted 
   the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Congratulating the Barton College men's basketball team for winning the 
     2007 NCAA Division II Men's Basketball National Championship.

Whereas the Barton College Bulldogs of Wilson, North Carolina, defeated Winona 
        State University of Rochester, Minnesota, the undefeated and defending 
        NCAA Division II Men's Basketball National Champions, 77-75 on March 24, 
        2007, to become the 2007 NCAA Men's Basketball National Champions;
Whereas Anthony Atkinson of Barton College, the Elite Eight most valuable 
        player, scored 10 points in the final 39 seconds of the game, including 
        a layup at the buzzer, to give Barton College the NCAA Division II men's 
        basketball title and its first NCAA championship in any sport;
Whereas Barton College played and won 9 overtime games during the 2006-2007 
        season to finish the season 31-5, including winning its last 21 games, a 
        school record;
Whereas Barton College, a school with just 1,000 students, defeated teams during 
        the Elite Eight from schools with much larger student bodies (Grand 
        Valley State, Michigan, 23,000 students, Cal State San Bernardino, 17, 
        000 students, and Winona State University, 8,000 students);
Whereas Coach Ron Lievense of Barton College, who had served as a graduate 
        assistant at Winona State University, summed up the Barton College 
        victory: ``I don't see how any ending could be any better for any team--
        ever'';
Whereas Barton College continues the long tradition of North Carolina schools 
        winning NCAA basketball championships;
Whereas Barton College was founded in 1902 as Atlantic Christian College and 
        changed its name in 1990; and
Whereas Barton College was named a ``Best Southeastern College'' for 2006 by the 
        Princeton Review: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives congratulates the 
Barton College men's basketball team for winning the 2007 NCAA Division 
II Men's Basketball National Championship.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-Q
for the  thirteen  week period  ended  December 27, 1998 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             SEP-26-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                SEP-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-27-1998
<CASH>                                                1,271  
<SECURITIES>                                              0  
<RECEIVABLES>                                        30,928  
<ALLOWANCES>                                            816  
<INVENTORY>                                          34,299  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     79,991  
<PP&E>                                               77,666  
<DEPRECIATION>                                       22,320  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      175,384  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                28,053  
<BONDS>                                             121,608  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0  
<PREFERRED>                                               0  
<COMMON>                                                  0  
<OTHER-SE>                                           17,706  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        175,384  
<SALES>                                              68,992  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     68,992  
<CGS>                                                56,887  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        56,887  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         46  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    3,092  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         834  
<INCOME-TAX>                                            342  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     492  
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0  
<CHANGES>                                                 0  
<NET-INCOME>                                            492  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             0  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0  
                                                  




</TABLE>
No. 63314.

protest 311905-K(A) (New York).

#### Traveler Trading Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *John P. Herber & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 193, C.D. 1519), the protest was dismissed, and the matter was remanded to a single judge sitting in re-appraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U.S.C. § 2636(d)).
From: kristy.detwiler@hillsidewired.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:17:17 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kristy Detwiler

Dalhart, TX 79022
No. 60149.

protests 805727-G, etc. (Seattle).

#### W. A. Ballinger *&*Co. and J. T. Steeb & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

*306Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that 20 percent of the merchandise consists of rags used chiefly for papermaking, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained with respect to said 20 percent of the merchandise.
From: compositeboy@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:20:31 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Guy Miyamoto

Honolulu, HI 96813