alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# 

# CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

Registration No.  333-97047

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  378                                                               Trade Date:  01/09/04

(To Prospectus Supplement dated August 15, 2002 &

  Prospectus dated August  8, 2002)                                                                     Issue Date:   01/15/04

The Date of this Pricing SupplementJanuary 09, 2004

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

  CUSIP                                                                                                                                Date and terms of redemption or

     or        Stated                                                                  Interest                                    repayment (including any

Common  Interest                      Price to  Discounts &        Payment  Survivors                  applicable regular or special

  Code      Rate (1)               Maturity                Public (2)                Commissions      Frequency      Option     Yes/No                record dates)

14911QRT0   4.1%                        07/15/10          100%                    1.05%                  Quarterly           YES                       NO                                        

 

Principal                                                                                1st Payment Day         

Amount                   Proceeds                 Dealer                            Date                  Count

$4,031,000.00                $3,988,674.50         ABN AMROInc.                 04/15/04                 30/360    

Original Issue Discount Note:                                                                   Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes                X   No                                                                                   N/A

The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the effective date of the change.  Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $389.313 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (SM) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (SM) will be made under the Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated August 8,2002.

Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
Exhibit 32.2


                                  CERTIFICATION


     In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Booth Creek Ski Holdings,  Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned, as the President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

March 15, 2004


                                  By:/s/ CHRISTOPHER P. RYMAN
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                         Christopher P. Ryman
                                  President and Chief Operating Officer
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 
 AMENDMENT TO REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT 
 This AMENDMENT TO REGISTRATION
RIGHTS AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”), dated as of January 2, 2013, is entered into by and between Cereplast, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and Ironridge Technology Co., a division of
Ironridge Global IV, Ltd., a British Virgin Islands business company (“Purchaser”). 
 WHEREAS, the parties
entered into that certain Registration Rights Agreement dated as of August 24, 2012 (the “RR Agreement”), in connection with the parties entry into that certain Stock Purchase Agreement which provides for the issuance and sale of
$5,000,000.00 in shares of convertible, redeemable Series A Preferred Stock of the Company; and 
 WHEREAS, the parties wish to
amend the RR Agreement as set forth herein. 
 AGREEMENT 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which
are hereby acknowledged, Company and Holder hereby agree as follows: 
  

	1.	Definitions; Interpretation. Unless otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms used herein and defined in the RR Agreement shall have the respective
meanings given to those terms in the RR Agreement. 

  

	2.	Amendment. The definition of “Effectiveness Date” in Section 1 of the RR Agreement is hereby amended and restated to read in its entirety as
follows: 

 “Effectiveness Date” means, with respect to the initial
Registration Statement required to be filed hereunder, the 150th calendar day following Filing Date. 
  

	3.	Effect of Agreement. Except as expressly provided hereunder, the execution, delivery and effectiveness of this Agreement shall not operate as a waiver of any
right, power, or remedy of Holder, nor constitute a waiver of any provision of the RR Agreement. Except as amended above, the RR Agreement remains in full force and effect. 


 

	4.	Headings. Headings in this Agreement are for convenience of reference only and are not part of the substance hereof. 


 

	5.	Governing Law. All questions concerning the construction, validity, enforcement and interpretation of this Agreement will be governed by and construed and
enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, without regard to the principles of conflicts of law that would require or permit the application of the laws of any other jurisdiction. 









	6.	Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, including by electronic or facsimile transmission, each of which when so delivered
shall be deemed an original, but all such counterparts taken together shall constitute but one and the same instrument. 

 [Remainder of page intentionally left blank] 

  
 - 2 -









 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Agreement as of the date first-above written.

  

			
	CEREPLAST, INC.
		
	By:    	 	/s/ Frederic Scheer
		 	Name: Frederic Scheer
		 	Title: Chief Executive Officer

  

			
	IRONRIDGE TECHNOLOGY CO.,
	a division of IRONRIDGE GLOBAL IV, LTD
		
	By:    	 	/s/ Peter Cooper
		 	Name: Peter Cooper
		 	Title: Director


  
 - 3 -
From: fran.howard@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:14:30 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Fran Howard

Salem, OR 97305
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mauricio MESA-FRANCO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-41155.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Aug. 17, 2005.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for PlaintiffAppellee.

Timothy William Crooks, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Southern District of Texas, Houston, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

*386PER CURIAM: *

Mauricio Mesa-Franco appeals his sentence following his guilty-plea conviction of illegal reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b). The district court sentenced him to 24 months of imprisonment, two years of supervised release, and a $100 special assessment.

For the first time on appeal, Mesa-Franco argues that, under *United States v. Booker,*-U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), this court must vacate his sentence and remand for resentencing because the mandatory guideline regime was in place at the time of his sentencing. An unpreserved challenge to the application of the formerly mandatory sentencing guidelines is reviewed for plain error. *United States v. Valenzuela-Quevedo,*407 F.3d 728, 733 (5th Cir.2005), *petition for cert. filed*(July 25, 2005) (No. 05-5556).

The district court’s application of the guidelines in their mandatory form constituted error that is “plain” for purposes of satisfying the first two prongs of the plain error analysis. *Id.*However, Mesa-Franco bears the burden of demonstrating “that the sentencing judge — sentencing under an advisory scheme rather than a mandatory one — would have reached a significantly different result.” *See United States v. Mares,*402 F.3d 511, 521 (5th Cir.2005), *petition for cert. filed*(Mar. 31, 2005) (No. 04-9517). Mesa-Franco has not made such a showing.

Mesa-Franco also argues that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is unconstitutional under *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), because it does not require the fact of a prior felony or aggravated-felony conviction to be charged in the indictment and proved beyond a reasonable doubt. As Mesa-Franco concedes, this argument is foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), and *Almendarez-Torres*was not overruled by *Apprendi. See United States v. Izaguirre-Flores,*405 F.3d 270, 277 (5th Cir.2005), *petition for cert. filed*(July 22, 2005) (No. 05-5469). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 267 

Calling for the immediate and unconditional release of British marines and 

sailors held captive by Iran, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 26, 2007 

Mr. KIRK (for himself, Mr. ANDREWS, Mr. SCOTT of Georgia, Mr. TIM MURPHY of Pennsylvania, Mr. SESTAK, Mr. KLEIN of Florida, Mr. CROWLEY, 

Mr. ENGEL, Mr. WEXLER, Mr. SIRES, Ms. LINDA T. SA ́NCHEZ of California, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. CHABOT, Mr. MACK, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, 

Mr. MCCOTTER, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Mr. BOUSTANY, Mr. PATRICK

J. MURPHY of Pennsylvania, Mr. SHIMKUS, Mr. CANTOR, Mr. ENGLISH

of Pennsylvania, Mr. ISRAEL, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr. CARNAHAN, 

Ms. BEAN, Mr. BARROW, Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Mr. MELANCON, 

Mr. LOBIONDO, Mr. CONAWAY, Mr. LYNCH, Mr. MAHONEY of Florida, 

Mr. MCNERNEY, Mr. FOSSELLA, Mr. KUHL of New York, Mr. SESSIONS, 

Mr. PENCE, Mr. GARRETT of New Jersey, Mr. LINCOLN DIAZ-BALART

of Florida, Mr. PLATTS, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. BUCHANAN, Mr. SHUSTER, Mr. PORTER, Mr. KNOLLENBERG, Mr. FEENEY, Mr. CANNON, Mr. 

MARIO DIAZ-BALART of Florida, Mr. CAMPBELL of California, Mr. 

GOODLATTE, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. CULBERSON, Mr. CRENSHAW, Mrs. 

TAUSCHER, Mrs. MILLER of Michigan, Mr. RENZI, Mr. YOUNG of Florida, Ms. GIFFORDS, and Mr. JORDAN of Ohio) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Calling for the immediate and unconditional release of British marines and sailors held captive by Iran, and for 

other purposes. 

Whereas on March 23, 2007, the Iranian Revolutionary 

Guard Navy seized 15 British marines and sailors; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 267 IH 

Whereas the British Navy personnel were engaged in routine 

boarding operations of merchant shipping in Iraqi territorial waters when they were accosted by Iranian vessels; 

Whereas Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons in defiance of the 

international community continues to threaten America’s 

national security and Middle East regional stability; 

Whereas the seizure of the British sailors came on the same 

day the United Nations Security Council introduced a 

new resolution to sanction the Government of Iran for its 

continued defiance of the International Atomic Energy 

Agency and its noncompliance with the Treaty on the 

Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons; and 

Whereas Great Britain remains one of the strongest allies of 

the United States and a partner in the war on terrorism: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) condemns the Islamic Republic of Iran for 

3 the seizure of 15 British marines and sailors and de4 mands their unconditional release; and 

5 (2) calls on the United Nations Security Coun6 cil to condemn this seizure and explore new sanc7 tions against the Islamic Republic of Iran, including 

8 the restriction of the supply of gasoline, to prevent 

9 further Iranian hostile action, deny Iran’s ability to 

10 militarize the Persian Gulf, and enforce Iran’s non11 proliferation commitments. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that
the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2010 of
International Development and Environmental Holdings (the “Company”) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Michael T. WilliamsMichael T. WilliamsChief
      Financial Officer




Date:  June
15, 2010




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
International Development and Environmental Holdings and will be retained by
International Development and Environmental Holdings and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
From: 7greenmoose@sandynet.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:17:24 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Robin Kilpatrick

Sandy, OR 97055
EX-34.6
(logo) Virchow Krause & company


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


We have examined WestLake Settlement Services, LLC's compliance with the
servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB applicable to
WestLake (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria") as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2008:

1122(d)(4)(xi) Payments made on behalf of an obligor (such as tax or insurance
payments) are made on or before the related penalty or expiration dates, as
indicated on the appropriate bills or notices for such payments, provided that
such support has been received by the servicer at least 30 calendar days prior
to these dates, or such other number of days specified in the transaction
agreements.

1122(d)(4)(xii) Any late payment penalties in connection with any payment to be
made on behalf of an obligor are paid from the servicer's funds and not charged
to the obligor, unless the late payment was due to the obligor's error or
omission.

Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with these servicing
criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion
about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria based on our
examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining,
on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, WestLake Settlement Services, LLC complied with, in all material
respects, the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2008.


/s/ Virchow, Krause & Company, LLP
Virchow Krause & Company, LLP
February 25, 2009


Virchow, Krause & Company, LLP
Certified Public Accountants & Consultants
An Independent Member of Baker Tilly International
From: sdsmithmd@woh.rr.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:27:08 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sharon Smith

Belle Center, OH 43310