alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

 v.

VANESSA MARIA BISHOP,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-50058

D.C. No. 3:13-cr-00775-JLS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Janis L. Sammartino, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 14, 2017** 

Before: GOODWIN, FARRIS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

Vanessa Maria Bishop appeals from the district court’s order denying her

motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

FEB 21 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

 
Bishop contends that she is entitled to a sentence reduction under

Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. Contrary to Bishop’s contention,

the district court properly calculated her amended Guidelines range without

considering the four-level fast-track departure that the court granted at her original

sentencing. See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10 cmt. n.1(A); United States v. Ornelas, 825 F.3d

548, 555 (9th Cir. 2016). Because Bishop received a 70-month sentence, which is

below the amended Guidelines range, the district court properly denied her motion

for a sentence reduction. See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(b)(2)(A) (“[T]he court shall not

reduce the defendant’s term of imprisonment under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and this

policy statement to a term that is less than the minimum of the amended guideline

range.”). 

AFFIRMED.

2 16-50058
EXHIBIT 23.1











CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








The Board of Directors


FNB United Corp. and Subsidiaries


Asheboro, North Carolina





We consent to the use of our reports dated March 8, 2013, with respect to our audits of the consolidated balance sheets of FNB United Corp. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2012, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, incorporated herein by reference.








/s/ Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP





Charlotte, North Carolina


March 29, 2013
_________________ 

_________________ 

(Slip Opinion) Cite as: 547 U. S. ____ (2006) 1 

Per Curiam 

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the

preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to

notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order

that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press. 

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 

No. 05–465 

MOHAWK INDUSTRIES, INC., PETITIONER v.

SHIRLEY WILLIAMS ET AL. 

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF

APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

[June 5, 2006]

 PER CURIAM. 

The writ of certiorari limited to Question 1 presented by

the petition, granted at 546 U. S. ___ (2005), is dismissed 

as improvidently granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated, and the case is 

remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the

Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of Anza 

v. Ideal Steel Supply Corp., ante, p. ___. 

It is so ordered.
Exhibit 32.2
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with the Annual Report of Innovative Wireless Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Pavel Alpatov, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/ Pavel AlpatovPavel Alpatov

Principal Financial Officer

April 15, 2011
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
Pursuant

To Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Intelsat Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies that to such officers
knowledge, the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |                                         
|------------------ |  | ----------------------------------------
|                   | 
|Date: May 15, 2008 |  | /s/ JEFFREY FREIMARK                    
|                   |  | Jeffrey Freimark Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
### 0 12 4 Cherry , J. A writ of mandamus is the appropriate vehicle for challenging a district court order denying a motion to disqualify a judge. 

### Towbin Dodge, LLC v. Dist. Ct., 121 Nev. 251, 254-55, 112 P.3d 1063, 1066 (2005). Having reviewed this petition and the supporting documents, we are not persuaded that the district court's order warrants reversal. Accordingly, petitioner has not demonstrated that our intervention by way of extraordinary relief is warranted, NRAP 21(b)(1); 

### Smith, 107 Nev. at 677, 818 P.2d at 851, and we

ORDER the petition DENIED. 1


## e-6,7t 1. Hardesty ' J.

Parraguirre

cc: Hon. Patrick Flanagan, District Judge Carl M. Hebert Lemons, Grundy & Eisenberg Washoe District Court Clerk

'We express no opinion regarding the district court's discovery and summary judgment orders. In light of this order, we deny petitioner's March 28, 2013, motion for a temporary stay.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 49?0 2
Exhibit 99.1


                                AEROCENTURY CORP.

                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
                  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted
            pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with this quarterly report of AeroCentury Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report"), I, Neal D.
Crispin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date
hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United
States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

              (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
              13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
              1934, and

              (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
              all material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
              indicated.



Date: May 14, 2003                  /s/  Neal D. Crispin
                                    ----------------------------
                                    Neal D. Crispin
                                    Chief Executive Officer
April 6, 1965

No. 69235.

#### Rifkin Textiles Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 64/15031.

Protest dismissed December 29, 1964.

Plaintiff’s application for rehearing denied.
Before the Second Division,

March 13, 1963

No. 67507.

#### American Pecco Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 59/18160, 60/16356, and 60/19204 (Boston).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of form supports similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Universal Builders Supply Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(48 Cust. Ct. 99, C.D. 2319), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #18185 and #18186; Oklahoma Disaster Number OK-00172]
 AGENCY: Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative disaster declaration of a rural area for the State of Oklahoma dated 09/20/2023. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms, Straight-Line Winds and Tornadoes. *Incident Period:*
                         06/14/2023 through 06/18/2023.
 DATES: Issued on 09/20/2023. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         11/20/2023. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         06/20/2024.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration of a rural area, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: Primary Counties: Harper. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere
5.000Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere
8.000Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.375Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.375*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.375
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 18185 B and for economic injury is 18186 0. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Isabella Guzman, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2023-20740 Filed 9-22-23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
No. 64518.

#### Frank P. Dow Co., Inc., and R. C. C. Trading Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/17838, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Shoji panels similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United Enterprises et al.*v. *United States*(41 Cust. Ct. 73, C.D 2023), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                        5
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                               52,706
<SECURITIES>                                        110,127
<RECEIVABLES>                                        64,075
<ALLOWANCES>                                          5,813
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    149,417
<PP&E>                                               67,616
<DEPRECIATION>                                       10,122
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      435,961
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               128,351
<BONDS>                                             300,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                              93
<COMMON>                                                 55
<OTHER-SE>                                          (14,423)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        435,961
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    192,604
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       171,203
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     64,627
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      5,065
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   29,310
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (67,654)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            405
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (68,059)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (68,059)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (2.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (2.16)
        

</TABLE>
No. 60136.

protests 266405-K, etc. (New York).

#### Murmac Importing Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# Helicopter Raid in Northern Syria Captures ISIS Official

/ Published Sept. 30, 2023

Sept. 30, 2023

Release Number 20230930-01

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**TAMPA, Fla.**– U.S. Central Command forces conducted a successful helicopter raid in northern Syria on September 28, 2023, capturing Mamduh Ibrahim al-haji Shaykh, an ISIS Facilitator.

No civilians were injured or killed during this operation.

“USCENTCOM remains committed to the enduring defeat of ISIS,” said Lt. Col. Troy Garlock, CENTCOM spokesperson.

-30-
From: jerbeth@q.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:23:34 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Beth Richards

Saint Paul, MN 55107
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the BJ's
Wholesale Club, Inc. combined statements of income and consolidated balance
sheets filed with the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 26, 1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-26-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,320
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    317,056
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               350,874
<PP&E>                                         499,558
<DEPRECIATION>                                 116,481
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 744,336
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          255,576
<BONDS>                                          2,553
<COMMON>                                           329
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     282,335
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   744,336
<SALES>                                        665,922
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               678,947      
<CGS>                                          612,199          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  612,199
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                51,374
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,882
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,492
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,435
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,057
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,057
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 34 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 34

  Recognizing the 75th birthday of Desmond Mpilo Tutu, South African 
   Anglican Archbishop of Cape Town, and Nobel Peace Prize recipient.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 5, 2007

Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas submitted the following resolution; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Recognizing the 75th birthday of Desmond Mpilo Tutu, South African 
   Anglican Archbishop of Cape Town, and Nobel Peace Prize recipient.

Whereas October 7, 2006, marked the 75th birthday of Archbishop Desmond Mpilo 
        Tutu;
Whereas in 1986, Desmond Tutu was the first black African to be elected 
        Archbishop of Cape Town and head of the Anglican Church in South Africa;
Whereas Desmond Tutu was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1984 in recognition of 
        his courage, heroism, and use of nonviolence in the struggle against 
        apartheid;
Whereas Desmond Tutu has been awarded, in addition to the Nobel Peace Prize, 
        other prestigious awards including, the Order for Meritorious Award 
        (Gold), the Archbishop of Canterbury's Award for Outstanding Service to 
        the Anglican Communion, the Prix d'Athene, and the Martin Luther King 
        Jr. Non-Violent Peace Prize;
Whereas Desmond Tutu has received numerous honorary doctorates from several 
        universities including Harvard, Kent, Colombia, Aberdeen, and Howard;
Whereas Desmond Tutu became the first black African Dean of Mary's Cathedral in 
        Johannesburg;
Whereas Desmond Tutu was the first black African to become the General Secretary 
        of the South African Council of Churches;
Whereas Desmond Tutu is an international lecturer, philosopher, author, and 
        humanitarian;
Whereas Desmond Tutu chaired South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Commission 
        from April 1996 to July 1998 to investigate crimes committed during the 
        period of South Africa's apartheid; and
Whereas Desmond Tutu has fought for a democratic and just society without racial 
        divisions, a common system of education, and a world which promotes the 
        rights and opportunities of the marginalized, disadvantaged, and 
        disenfranchised: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the 75th birthday of Desmond Mpilo Tutu, 
        Archbishop of Cape Town, South Africa;
            (2) honors the accomplishments of Desmond Mpilo Tutu; and
            (3) extols the contributions of Desmond Mpilo Tutu to South 
        Africa, the United States, and the international community.
                                 <all>
```
### Coal resources of Colorado

By: Edwin R. Landis

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1072C

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.