alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. §1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of InfoTech USA, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jonathan F. McKeage, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | /s/ Jonathan F. McKeage                                            |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Jonathan F. McKeagePresident, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
|   |                                                               |
|   | Date:  August 3, 2007                                              |
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2011-0478 Directorate Identifier: 2010-NM-138-AD 

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell. 

Estimated Costs: 

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance) Action 

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement) 

Do not include oncondition costs here 

Work-hours 

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up) 

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our) 

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts) 

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet 

 6.0 $ 510.00 $0 $ 510.00 3 $1,530.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance: 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $1,530 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $ 

On-Condition Costs:

Action 

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement) 

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup) 

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour) 

Parts Cost Cost per Product 

 6.0 $ 510.00 $0 $ 510.00

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): 
Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         595103
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  76931
<ALLOWANCES>                                   27143
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         17775278
<DEPRECIATION>                                 7362741
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 14366946
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   14366946
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2456154
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1219206
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               575257
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            661691
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   661691
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
From: peppertoo@me.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:09:39 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Charles & Marietta Munster

Minneapolis, MN 55436
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs

          - [234A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice publishes the approval of the Fourth Amendment to the Tribal-State Compact between the Cowlitz Indian Tribe and the State of Washington.

# DATES:

The Amendment takes effect on September 27, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of Indian Gaming, Office of the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs, Washington, DC 20240, (202) 219-4066.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Under section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2701*et seq.,*                     the Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the                     **Federal Register**                     notice of approved Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming activities on Indian lands. As required by 25 CFR 293.4, all compacts and amendments are subject to review and approval by the Secretary. The Amendment authorizes the Tribe to offer Electronic Table Games at the Tribe's class III gaming facilities, establishes limitations on wagers, credit, gaming stations, and player terminals, and increases contributions to problem gaming resources. The Amendment is approved.                

Bryan Newland,

Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2023-20970 Filed 9-26-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4337-15-P
**Exhibit 33.1**

 

**John Deere Capital Corporation’sReport on Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing Criteria**

 

The undersigned hascaused an assessment to be made of John Deere Capital Corporation and itssubsidiaries’ compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in RegulationAB.

 

John Deere CapitalCorporation (the “Asserting Party”) is responsible for assessing compliance asof October 31, 2008 and for the period ending October 31, 2008 (the “ReportingPeriod”) with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d)of the Code of Federal Regulations, except for those portions of criteria229.1122(d)(2)(ii) and (d)(3)(ii) – (iii) pertaining to the actual disbursementor remittance of funds to investors (which disbursement is the responsibilityof a different party participating in the servicing function), and (d)(4)(ix) –(xiii) and (xv), which the Asserting Party has concluded are not applicable tothe servicing activities it and its subsidiaries perform with respect to theasset-backed securities transactions covered by this report (the “ApplicableServicing Criteria”).  The transactionscovered by this report include the asset-backed securities transactions forwhich the Asserting Party served as servicer and any of its subsidiaries servedas sub-servicer that are backed by the same asset type backing the asset backedsecurities issued by John Deere Owner Trust 2006 that were completed after January1, 2006 (being the John Deere Owner Trust 2006 securities issued June 20, 2006,the John Deere Owner Trust 2007 securities issued April 24, 2007 and the JohnDeere Owner Trust securities issued April 16, 2008) and registered with the SECpursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Platform”).

 

The Asserting Party hasassessed its and its subsidiaries’ compliance with the Applicable ServicingCriteria as of October 31, 2008 and for the Reporting Period and has concludedthat the Asserting Party and its subsidiaries have complied, in all materialrespects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria with respect to the Platformtaken as a whole.

 

Deloitte & ToucheLLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued anattestation report on the undersigned’s assessment of compliance with theApplicable Servicing Criteria as of October 31, 2008, and for the ReportingPeriod as set forth in this assessment.

 

 
| Date: January 15,  2009 | John Deere Capital  Corporation |
|------------------------------|---------------------------------|
|                         |                            |
|                         |                            |
|                         | By                              | /s/ Charles G. Dahl |
|                         |                            | Charles G. Dahl |
|                         |                            | Vice President and  Controller |
From: james@sflparkers.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:21:20 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

James Parker

Tracy, CA 95376
From: Allthigspossible@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:20:37 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Bernice Houston

Helotes, TX 78023
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 183 (Friday, September 22, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 65394]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20538]



[[Page 65394]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Determination Concerning a Petition To Add a Class of Employees 
to the Special Exposure Cohort

AGENCY: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of Health 
and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) gives notice 
of a determination concerning a petition to add a class of employees 
from the Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque, New Mexico to the 
Special Exposure Cohort (SEC) under the Energy Employees Occupational 
Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 (EEOICPA).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Grady Calhoun, Director, Division of 
Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational 
Safety and Health, 1090 Tusculum Avenue, MS C-45, Cincinnati, OH 45226-
1938, Telephone 1-877-222-7570. Information requests can also be 
submitted by email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a0e4e3e1f3e0e3e4e38ee7eff6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1d595e5c4e5d5e595e335a524b">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 8, 2023, the Secretary of HHS 
determined that the following class of employees does not meet the 
statutory criteria for addition to the SEC as authorized under EEOICPA:

    ``All personnel that worked in any area at Sandia National 
Laboratories in Albuquerque, New Mexico, for the period from January 
1, 1997, through May 21, 2011.''

    Authority: [42 U.S.C. 7384q].

John J. Howard,
Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and 
Human Services.
[FR Doc. 2023-20538 Filed 9-21-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Az Európai Unió C 64A/2017

| | ISSN 1977-0979 |
| --- | --- |
| Az Európai Unió
  Hivatalos Lapja | C 64A |
| | |
| Magyar nyelvű kiadás | Tájékoztatások és közlemények | 60. évfolyam2017. február 28. |

ISSN 1977-0979

Az Európai Unió

Hivatalos Lapja

C 64A

Magyar nyelvű kiadás

Tájékoztatások és közlemények

60. évfolyam2017. február 28.

---

| Közleményszám | Tartalom | Oldal |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Hirdetmények |
| | KÖZIGAZGATÁSI ELJÁRÁSOK |
| | Európai Parlament |
| 2017/C 64 A/01 | PE/195/S kiválasztási eljárás - Ideiglenes alkalmazott – Osztályvezető (AD 14) - Alkalmas jelöltek listája | 1 |

Közleményszám

Tartalom

Oldal

V   Hirdetmények

KÖZIGAZGATÁSI ELJÁRÁSOK

Európai Parlament

2017/C 64 A/01

PE/195/S kiválasztási eljárás - Ideiglenes alkalmazott – Osztályvezető (AD 14) - Alkalmas jelöltek listája

1

---

| HU | |
| --- | --- |

HU

---

V Hirdetmények

KÖZIGAZGATÁSI ELJÁRÁSOK

Európai Parlament

| 28.2.2017 | HU | Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja | CA 64/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.2.2017

HU

Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja

CA 64/1

---

PE/195/S KIVÁLASZTÁSI ELJÁRÁS

Ideiglenes alkalmazott – Osztályvezető (AD 14)

ALKALMAS JELÖLTEK LISTÁJA

(2017/C 064 A/01)

| 1. | BORDEZ, Emmanuel |
| --- | --- |

1.

BORDEZ, Emmanuel

Az alkalmas jelöltek listája a következő napon került elfogadásra: 2017. február 14.

---
EXHIBIT4.25


 


AMENDMENT


 


This Amendment (“Amendment”)
is entered into as of the 13th day of April 2012, by and between Eagleford Energy, Inc (“Company”) and Gottbetter
Capital markets, LLC (“Placement Agent”) and amends the Placement Agency Agreement (“Agreement”) dated
March 12, 2012.


 


The Parties to the Agreement hereby amend
Paragraph 3(a) Placement Compensation as follows:


 


		(a)	In connection with the Offering, the Company will pay a cash fee (the “Agent Cash Fee”)
to the Placement Agent at each Closing equal to Eight Percent (8%) of the gross sales price from the sale from the sale of the
Units sold to investors introduced by the Placement Agent, (“Markets Clients”) and Four Percent (4%) of the gross sales
prices from the sale of Units sold to investors referred by the Issuer (“Issuer Referrals”). Additionally, the Company
will deliver to the Placement Agent warrants exercisable for a period of three (3) years from the Closing Date, to purchase a number
of shares of Common Stock equaling Eight Percent (8%) of the number of Units sold to both Markets Clients and Issuer Referrals
with an exercise price per share of $0.25 (“Broker Warrants) for (“Agent Cash Fee” and “Broker Warrants”
are sometimes referred to collectively as “Brokers’ Fees”). The Brokers Warrants issued as compensation to the
Placement Agent will be issued as per the instructions of the Placement Agent.



 


This Amendment may be executed in multiple
counterparts, each of which may be executed by less than all of the parties and shall be deemed to be an original instrument which
shall be enforceable against the parties actually executing such counterparts and al of which together shall constitute one and
the same instruments. The exchange of copies of this Amendment and of signature pages by facsimile transmission or in a pdf format
shall constitute effective execution and delivery of this Amendment as to the parties and may be used in lieu of the original Amendment
for all purposes. Signatures of the parties transmitted by facsimile or in pdf format shall be deemed to be their original signature
for all purposes.


 


This Amendment is hereby made part of and
incorporated into the Placement Agency Agreement, with all the terms and conditions of the Agreement remaining in full force and
effect, except to the extent modified hereby. The Parties agree for and on behalf of their respective party this 13th
day of April 2012.


 


SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties
have duly executed this Amendment to the Agreement as of the date first set forth above.


 


	EAGLEFORD ENERGY INC.	 
	 	 
	/s/  James Cassina	 
	 	 
	By:	 	 
	James Cassina	 
	President	 
	 	 
	GOTTBETTER CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC	 
	 	 
	/s/  Julio A. Marquez	 
	 	 
	By: 	 	 
	Julio A. Marquez	 
	President