alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         218,991
<SECURITIES>                                   342,483
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               561,474
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 561,474
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           51,705
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     509,769
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   561,474
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              (10,390)
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (30,792)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (41,182)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (41,182)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 161 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 10
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 161

                          [Report No. 110-13]

      Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 14, 2007

    Mr. Arcuri, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
      Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

    Resolved,  That it shall be in order at any time on the legislative 
day of Friday, February 16, 2007, for the Speaker to entertain motions 
that the House suspend the rules relating to the bill (H.R. 976) to 
amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide tax relief for small 
businesses, and for other purposes.
                                                  House Calendar No. 10

110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 161

                          [Report No. 110-13]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

      Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           February 14, 2007

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY 

Department of Environmental Quality Post Office Box 97 

Sacaton, Arlzona 85247 

(520) 562-2234 . Fax (520) 562-2245 

June 22,2009 

Laura Yoshii /- 

Acting Regional Administrator 

United States Environmental Protection Agency 

75 Hawthorne Street (ORA-1) 

San Francisco, California 94 105-390 1 -- - -._ . I -, 

\ 

/ 

Re: Technic4 Corrections to the GRIC Mr Quality Management Plan \\ 

-1 

L" --- ..- - 

Dear ~s~d~~~' 

Please find attached, a list of three technical corrections that were made to the Gila River 

Indian Community, Air Quality Management Plan at the direction of EPA Region IX 

Legal Counsel. The Gila River Indian Community (GRIC) is requesting that EPA, 

~egion IX consider the attached technical corrections for integration into the GRIC Air - 

Quality Management Plan and proceed to approve the plan for Federal Enforceability 

under Section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA), 40 C.F.R., Part 51 and the Tribal 

Authority Rule (TAR). The Technical corrections were approved by the GRIC 

Community Council and ratified into tribal law under resolution # GR-06-08 

(attached) on August 27,2008. 

The Gila River Law Office, EPA Legal Counsel, EPA Region IX staff and GRIC Air 

Quality Program staff have been working together to finalize all documentation necessary 

to fulfill the requirements of Clean Air Act, Section 110 for full program approval. I 

have also attached, at the direction of Region IX Legal Counsel, a map of the northern 

boundary of the Community and a letter from the GRIC Law Office containing a legal 

description of the northern boundary of the Community. 

The Gila River Indian Community previously submitted to your ofice for approval an 

eligibility determination packet requesting Treatment as a State (TAS) for all sections of 

the Clean Air Act necessary for GRIC to implement the GRIC Air Quality Program on 

November 17,2006. GRIC also submitted the GRIC Air Quality Management Plan to 

Debra Jordan in a "hand off' ceremony during a GRIC Community Council meeting on 

February 21,2007. Additionally, GRIC submitted a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) 

between GRIC and EPA Region IX for Criminal Enforcement, an MOA requesting 

delegation of National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) and 

a letter requesting authority to implement the federal New Source Performance Standards 

on September 24,2008. 
The Gila River Indian Community is not requesting approval of the Part 70 requirements 

or definitions contained in the GRIC Air Quality Management Plan at this time. GRIC 

will continue to work with EPA Region IX staff on completion of the Part 70 regulations 

and submittal packet. GRIC is requesting that EPA review only the Non-Title V 

provisions of the GRIC AQMP for federal enforceability. 

Margaret gok, ExdutiJDirector, GRIC DEQ
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel, Thyroid Cancer and other Malignancies in Belarus, November 9, 2023, 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m., National Cancer Institute Shady Grove, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Room 7W608, Rockville, Maryland 20850 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on August 30, 2023, FR Doc. 2023-18703, 88 FR 59930.                

This notice is being amended to change the meeting title from National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel Thyroid Cancer and other Malignancies in Belarus to National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel Cancer and Other Health Effects Following Chernobyl Accident. The meeting location, date and time will stay the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: September 20, 2023.

Melanie J. Pantoja, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-20787 Filed 9-25-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

July 22, 2011

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting with Hino 

FROM: Angela Cullen, Mechanical Engineer

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0162

This memorandum documents a meeting held on January 14, 2011 between Hino, DOT, 

and EPA. The attendees of the meeting were:

Hino: Seiichi Yamaguchi, Dr. Yoshiinhide Takenaka, Sato Chikako, Richard Gezelle

DOT: Angel Jackson

EPA: Cle Jackson, James, Sanchez, Byron Bunker, Houshun Zhang

The meeting also discussed the evaluation of HILS test procedures.
(R.D. 11419)

#### Parsons & Whittemore, Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided December 12, 1967)

*Sharp, Solter & SutoMson*for the plaintiff.

*Hckom L. Weisl, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

.Rao, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court:

1. That the subject merchandise consists of hardboard exported from Sweden as to which the Secretary of the Treasury issued a find*799ing of dumping, published in 89 TD 197, TD 53567, made pursuant to the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C., 160, et seq.).

2. That pursuant to Section 168 of said Antidumping Act, the appraiser reported the purchase price (Sec. 162) and the foreign market value (Sec. 164) as to the merchandise listed on Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof.

3. That pursuant to Sections 500 and 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, the appraiser appraised all of the merchandise in the appeals for appraisement enumerated on Schedule A for regular duty purposes.

4. That the plaintiff duly filed appeals for reappraisement as to the values referred to in the above paragraphs Nos. 2 and 3.

5. That a* the times relevant herein the purchase price and the foreign market value under the said Antidumping Act are as specified in the aforesaid Schedule A attached hereto.

6. That as to all other items of merchandise not identified on Schedule A, the appraiser’s reports of purchase price and of foreign market value are correct.

7. That the appraiser’s findings of value under the provisions of Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, are correct.

8. That said appeals are submitted for decision upon this stipulation and said Schedule A.

Upon the agreed facts, I find foreign market value, as defined in section 164 of the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C. § 164), for the merchandise described in schedule A, annexed to this' decision- and made, a part hereof, and the purchase price thereof, within section 162 of said act (19 U.S.C. § 162), to be as indicated in said schedule. As to all other items of merchandise not identified in schedule A, Í find the foreign market values and purchase prices to be as reported by the appraiser. In all other respects, the values of all merchandise are as returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
H. Res. 171

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

May 22, 2007.

Whereas Marie-Joseph-Paul-Yves-Roch-Gilbert Du Motier, 

commonly known as the Marquis de Lafayette, was born 

on September 6, 1757, and occupies a considerable place 

in the history of the United States; 

Whereas Lafayette was a man of considerable military skill 

who expressed sympathy for American revolutionary 

fighters, decided to aid colonists in their struggle for 

independence, and was voted by Congress the rank and 

commission of major general in the Continental Army; 

Whereas Lafayette’s military service was invaluable to General George Washington during many Revolutionary War 

battles, earning him the reputation as ‘‘the soldier’s 

friend’’; 

Whereas Lafayette’s strategic thinking, military skill, and 

dedication as a general officer serve as a model for 

present day American military officers; 

Whereas Congress appropriated awards and honors in honor 

of Lafayette’s service to the American people, including 

the commissioning of a portrait that hangs in the House 

Chamber; 

Whereas because of Lafayette’s strong belief in freedom, he 

advocated the abolition of slavery in the Americas, fa-
2

•HRES 171 EH 

vored equal legal rights for religious minorities in France, 

and became a prominent figure in the French Revolution; 

Whereas, in 1824, at the invitation of President Monroe, Lafayette embarked upon a triumphant, 13-month tour of 

all 24 States of the then-United States, during which he 

became the first foreign dignitary to address the House 

of Representatives, and visited many Masonic bodies; 

Whereas because of America’s affection for Lafayette, many 

United States cities, towns, and counties have been 

named for him; 

Whereas Lafayette symbolizes the assistance America received from Europe in the struggle for independence; 

Whereas United States aid to France during the world wars 

of 1917-1918 and 1941-1945 stemmed in part from 

shared values of democracy and freedom, which Lafayette 

strongly supported; 

Whereas the friendship between the people of the United 

States and France has not diminished; and 

Whereas continued relationships between the United States 

and France are important to the success of our global 

partnerships: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) honors Marquis de Lafayette on the 250th anniversary of his birth; and 

(2) urges the cadets of the United States military 

academies and military officers participating in various 

professional military education courses to study Lafay-
3

•HRES 171 EH 

ette’s impact on the creation of the United States and 

on the United States military. 

Attest:

Clerk.
EX-33.6
(logo) WestLake
SETTLEMENT SERVICES

ANNUAL ASSESSMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

The Tax Outsourcing Service Agreement dated as of October 1, 2006 (together with
all amendments thereto, the "Agreement"), between Aurora Loan Services and
WestLake Settlement Services, LLC.

I, Debra D. Lewis, Director of WestLake Settlement Services, certify to Aurora
Loan Services, LLC ("Aurora"), with the knowledge and intent that it will rely
upon this certification, that:

(1) As of and for the year ended December 31, 2008, WestLake Settlement
Services, LLC has complied with the applicable servicing criteria set forth in
Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB applicable to WestLake (the "Applicable Servicing
Criteria"):

        1122(d)(4)(xi) Payments made on behalf of an obligor (such as tax or
        insurance payments) are made on or before the related penalty or
        expiration dates, as indicated on the appropriate bills or notices for
        such payments, provided that such support has been received by the
        servicer at least 30 calendar days prior to these dates, or such other
        number of days specified in the transaction agreements.

        1122(d)(4)(xii) Any late payment penalties in connection with any
        payment to be made on behalf of an obligor are paid from the servicer's
        funds and not charged to the obligor, unless the late payment was due
        to the obligor's error or omission.

(2) The transactions covered by this report include all loans in which WestLake
performs activities related to the Regulation AB criteria on behalf of Aurora.

(3) WestLake has complied, in all material respects, with the applicable
servicing criteria as of December 31, 2008 and for the Reporting Period with
respect to the Platform taken as a whole.

(4) Virchow, Krause & Company LLP, a registered public accounting firm, has
issued an attestation report on Aurora's assessment of compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria for the Reporting Period.

WESTLAKE SETTLEMENT SERVICES, LLC

/s/ Debra D. Lewis
Debra D. Lewis, Officer

Director of Operations
Title

March 20, 2009

1 First American Way, Westlake, TX, 76262
Mail Stop 6-4-100
#### John A. FREEMAN, II, Appellant, v. Glynis MORGAN, Case Management Specialist, U.S. Department of Justice, et al., Appellees.

No. 00-5157.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

May 29, 2001.

Rehearing En Bane Denied Sept. 25, 2001.

Before EDWARDS, Chief Judge; RANDOLPH and TATEL, Circuit Judges.

*JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 36; D.C.Cir. Rule 36(b). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s January 28, 2001 order and judgment be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein- until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. RApp. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
# CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

Registration No.  333-97047

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  355                                                               Trade Date:  11/03/03

(To Prospectus Supplement dated August 15, 2002 &

  Prospectus dated August  8, 2002)                                                                     Issue Date:   11/06/03

The Date of this Pricing SupplementNovember 3, 2003

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

  CUSIP                                                                                                                                Date and terms of redemption or

     or        Stated                                                                  Interest                                    repayment (including any

Common  Interest                      Price to  Discounts &        Payment  Survivors                  applicable regular or special

  Code      Rate (1)               Maturity                Public (2)                Commissions      Frequency      Option     Yes/No                record dates)

14911QQU8   3.2%                        05/15/08          100%                    0.9%                Semi-Annually                        YES                NO                                      

                       

                          

Principal                                                                                1st Payment Day         

Amount                   Proceeds                 Dealer                            Date                  Count

$1,112,000.00                $1,101,992.00         ABN AMROInc.                 05/15/04                 30/360    

Original Issue Discount Note:                                                                   Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes                X   No                                                                                   N/A

The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the effective date of the change.  Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $325.202 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (SM) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (SM) will be made under the Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated August 8,2002.

Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v George Miller, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 328]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Dunlop, J.), rendered October 22, 1993, convicting him of grand larceny in the fourth degree and criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the court improvidently exercised its discretion and committed reversible error by curtailing the cross-examination of the arresting officer with regard to paperwork filed in connection with the defendant’s accomplice is without merit. The scope and extent of cross-examination is within the sound discretion of the trial court *(see, People v Sorge,*301 NY 198; *People v Coleman,*195 AD2d 475). The trial court allowed an extensive attack on the officer’s credibility. Therefore, the limitations imposed by the court did not pose an improvident exercise of discretion *(see, People v Coleman, supra; People v Jones,*125 AD2d 414).

The defendant’s remaining contention regarding the prosecutor’s reference to portions of the People’s testimony as "uncontradicted”, is in part unpreserved for appellate review. In any event, any such reference was a proper rejoinder to the portion of the defense counsel’s summation, which attacked the arresting officer’s credibility. Balletta, J. P., Thompson, Ritter and Florio, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 21.1



CIG Wireless Corp. and Subsidiaries



List of Subsidiaries



As of December 31, 2014



|Subsidiary                               |  | State of Incorporation
|---------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|                                         |  |                       
|Communications Infrastructure Group, LLC |  | Delaware              
|                                         |  |                       
|CIG Properties, LLC                      |  | Delaware              
|                                         |  |                       
|CIG Services, LLC                        |  | Delaware              
|                                         |  |                       
|CIG Towers, LLC                          |  | Delaware              
|                                         |  |                       
|CIG BTS Towers, LLC                      |  | Delaware              
|                                         |  |                       
|CIG GA Holding, LLC                      |  | Delaware              
|                                         |  |                       
|CIG DT Holding, LLC                      |  | Delaware              
|                                         |  |                       
|CIG Comp Tower, LLC                      |  | Delaware              
|                                         |  |                       
|CIG Solutions, LLC                       |  | Delaware              
|                                         |  |                       
|Specialty Towers Management, LLC         |  | Delaware