alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: dcswarrior15@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:51:07 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dustin Williams

Fairmont, NC 28340
CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

 

Registration No.  333-59540

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  191				Trade Date: 06/13/02
(To Prospectus Supplement & Prospectus dated

  June 1, 2001)							Issue Date:  06/18/02
The Date of this Pricing Supplement June 14, 2002
SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

  CUSIP									Date and terms of redemption or

     or	Stated				             Interest			repayment (including any

Common	Interest		  Price to	 Discounts &         Payment	Survivors		applicable regular or special

  Code	Rate (1)	Maturity	Public (2)	Commissions       Frequency	  Option	Yes/No	record dates)

14911QHY0   5.50%	06/15/010	     100%	       1.25%              Semi-Annually	     YES	    NO	

Principal						1st Payment	Day	

Amount		Proceeds		Dealer		      Date		Count

$5,411,000.00	$5,343,362.50	ABN AMRO Inc.	  12/15/02		30/360	
 

Original Issue Discount Note:					Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes	  X   No						N/A

 

 
- The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the effective date of the change.   Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $623.361 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (SM) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (SM) will be made under a Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated June 1, 2001.
Additionally, the total principal amount of PowerNotes(SM) offered by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation pursuant to its Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated June 1, 2001 has been increased from $500.0mm to $750.0mm.  $250.0mm principal amount of debt securities registered pursuant to Registration Statement No. 333-59540 originally offered by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation pursuant to its Prospectus Supplement dated June 15, 2001 and related Prospectus dated May 25, 2001 are being offered as PowerNotes(SM) by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation pursuant to its Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated June 1, 2001.
- Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Smith Barney Westport Futures Fund L.P. (the ‘‘Partnership’’) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Jerry Pascucci, President and Director of Citigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

/s/ Jerry PascucciJerry PascucciCitigroup Managed Futures LLCPresident and Director


Date: May 15, 2008

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF LOSS AND ACCUMULATED DEFICIT AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE  TO SUCH 10QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1997.
       
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                            3049
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  3049
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    3319
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              273
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                       8000
<COMMON>                                          1935
<OTHER-SE>                                       (6889)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      3319
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  2758
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (2758)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (2758)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

        

</TABLE>
No. 68883.

#### Hancock Gross Mfg. Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 63/5988, etc. (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of brass aerators similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 65882, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: starkenburg51@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:32:53 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jean Starkenburg

Palmyra, NY 14522
Exhibit 4.18



 Exhibit 4.18 
 CONSENT OF ENGINEER 
 Ladies and Gentlemen: 

The undersigned hereby consents to (1) the references to the undersigned’s name included or incorporated by reference in the registration
statement on Form F-80 of Denison Mines Corp. in connection with the report entitled “The NI 43-101 Technical Report Mutanga Project, Located in Southern Province, Republic of Zambia” dated March 19, 2009, and (2) all other
references to the undersigned included or incorporated by reference in the registration statement on Form F-80 of Denison Mines Corp. 
  

					
	Dated: January 7, 2013	 		 	
			
	/s/ Malcolm Titley	 		 	 
	 Malcolm Titley, B.Sc., MAusIMM, MAIG
 CSA Global (UK) Ltd.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsLoad-Following Power Timeline Analyses for the International Space StationSpacecraft are typically complex assemblies of interconnected systems and components that have highly time-varying thermal communications, and power requirements. It is essential that systems designers be able to assess the capability of the spacecraft to meet these requirements which should represent a realistic projection of demand for these resources once the vehicle is on-orbit. To accomplish the assessment from the power standpoint, a computer code called ECAPS has been developed at NASA Lewis Research Center that performs a load-driven analysis of a spacecraft power system given time-varying distributed loading and other mission data. This program is uniquely capable of synthesizing all of the changing spacecraft conditions into a single, seamless analysis for a complete mission. This paper presents example power load timelines with which numerous data are integrated to provide a realistic assessment of the load-following capabilities of the power system. Results of analyses show how well the power system can meet the time-varying power resource demand.Document ID19960048440Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsFincannon, James*(NASA Cleveland, OH United States)*Delleur, Ann*(NASA Cleveland, OH United States)*Green, Robert*(NASA Cleveland, OH United States)*Hojnicki, Jeffrey*(NASA Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1996Subject CategorySpacecraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:107263NASA-TM-107263E-10328Meeting InformationMeeting: Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering ConferenceLocation: Washington, DCCountry: United StatesStart Date: August 11, 1996End Date: August 16, 1996Sponsors:American Society of Mechanical Engineers,American Nuclear Society,American Inst. of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers,American Inst. of Chemical Engineers,Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc.Accession Number96N33760Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 478-29-10Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19960048440.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the annual report of Millstream Ventures, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned chief executive officer and chief financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:  May 28, 2010   /s/ Steven L. White Steven L. White Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-06-00121-CV

In re Roque Tercero-Aranda

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices B. A. Smith, Puryear and Waldrop

Filed: March 28, 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1508 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1508

   Honoring the 40th anniversary of the incorporation of the city of 
Carson, California, and recognizing the city for its rich contributions 
                         to California history.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 26, 2008

 Ms. Richardson submitted the following resolution; which was referred 
          to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Honoring the 40th anniversary of the incorporation of the city of 
Carson, California, and recognizing the city for its rich contributions 
                         to California history.

Whereas the area that is now the city of Carson, California, was inhabited by 
        Native Americans, including the Gabrielino and Suangna, more than 6,000 
        years ago;
Whereas the very first Spanish land grant in California encompassed today's 
        cities of Carson, Lomita, Redondo Beach, Torrance, Wilmington, and parts 
        of San Pedro;
Whereas the center of this land grant was the Dominguez Rancho homestead, which 
        is currently Dominguez Hills, located in the eastern portion of the city 
        of Carson;
Whereas the Battle of Dominguez Rancho was fought during the Mexican-American 
        War in 1846;
Whereas land was donated from the Dominguez Rancho homestead for the railroad 
        built between Los Angeles and the San Pedro Harbor in 1869;
Whereas nearly 10,000 registered voters cast their vote to incorporate the city 
        of Carson in 1968;
Whereas the city of Carson was named after John Manuel Carson, the grandson of 
        one of the area's first settlers;
Whereas the city of Carson now has more than 120 acres of park land, is home to 
        California State University Dominguez Hills, Carson Regional Library, 
        the Juanita Millender-McDonald Community Center, and the Home Depot 
        National Training Center;
Whereas the city of Carson is now the 8th largest city in the county of Los 
        Angeles and a leading center for international trade and commerce; and
Whereas the fathers of the city of Carson coined the motto, ``Future 
        Unlimited,'' which is fitting for this great city: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That Congress honors the 40th anniversary of the 
incorporation of the city of Carson, California, and recognizes the 
city for its rich contributions to California history.
                                 <all>
```
From: HBeverlyjane@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:37:55 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Beverly Hammock

Shreveport, LA 71105
### BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, SIXTH DISTRICT, AT TEXARKANA

No. 06

- 15

- 00026

- CV

Robert Yurik

v.

Ernestine Phillips

(No. 80896 IN 196TH DISTR ICT COURT OF HUNT CO UNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

INDIGENT

FILING

SUPREME COURT CHAPTE R 51 FEE

STATEWIDE EFILING FEE

CLERK'S RECORD $25.00
$100.00 $50.00
$20.00 $105.00 PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID

UNKNOWN ROBERT S. YURIK

ROBERT S. YURIK

ROBERT S. YURIK

ROBERT S. YURIK

ROBERT S. YURIK

Balance of costs owing to the Sixth Court of Appeals, Texarkana, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, DEBRA AUTREY, CLERK OF THE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of THE CO URT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of

the COURT OF APPEALS for

the Six th District of Texas, this
December 4, 2015

.

DEBRA AUTREY, CLERK

By ___

________________________ Deputy
Appendix A Policy and Memorandums
EXHIBIT
 32(b)



CERTIFICATION
 OFCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT
 TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
 connection with the report on Form 10-Q ofWWA
 Group, Inc. for thequarterly
 period endedSeptember 30,
 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
 Commission on the date hereof, I,Digamber Naswa, do
 hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
 best of my knowledge and belief:

| | (3) | Thisreport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (4) | The information contained in this report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the registrant at the end of the period covered by this report and results of operations of the registrant
for the period covered by this report.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:November
 13, 2009





/s/
 Digamber Naswa

Digamber
 Naswa

Chief
 Financial Officer



Thiscertification
 accompanies this report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
 except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the
 registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this report),
 irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.   A signed original of this written
 statement required by §906 has been provided to the registrant
 and will be retained by the registrant
 and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.