alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Honorable Harlington Wood, Jr., Senior U.S. Circ uit Judge for the Seventh Circuit, sitting by designation. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Nos. 96-4810, 96-4988. Warren SECKLER, Warsec, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. STAR ENTERPRISE, a New York partnership, Defendant-Appellee. Warren SECKLER, Warsec, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v. STAR ENTERPRISE, a New York Partnership, Defendant-Appellant. Dec. 4, 1997. Appeals from the United States District Court fo r the Southern District of Florida (No. 94-8672-CVKLR), Kenneth L. Ryskamp, Judge. ON PETITION FOR CLARIFICATION (Opinion October 21, 1997, 11th Cir.1997). Before EDMONDSON, Circuit Judge, and KRAVITCH and WOOD * , Senior Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. Star's Petition for Clarification is GRANTED to the extent that we specifically confirm that we did not rule on the merits of Star's Motion to Dismiss the state law claims on any grounds other than preemption. The slip opinion, Seckler v. Star, 124 F.3d 1399 (11th Cir.1997)., should be amended as follows: On page 137, right column, line 32, the sentence reading "We hold that Seckler may proceed with his state law claims against St ar." should be deleted. In its place it should read as follows, "Since the district court dismissed Seckler's claims on preemption grounds, it did notconsider Star's alternative argument that Seckle r's Amended Complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted under state law. We do not consider that argument on appeal; instead, this issue is remanded to the district court for consideration on the merits."
No. P69/8.

protests 64/1558, etc. (Philadelphia).

#### Morris Friedman & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

*1061NewmaN, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of bulrush, corn husk, or maize baskets similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Carson M. Simon & Co.*v. *United States*(55 Cust. Ct. 103, C.D. 2558) and *Morris Friedman*v. *United States*(58 Cust. Ct. 456, C.D. 3019), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  In connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-K of Locan, Inc. for the period ending March 31, 2011, I, Ronald D. Long, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of Locan, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:  1.Such annual report of Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.The information contained in such annual report of Form 10-K for the year ending March 31, 2011, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Locan, Inc.  Date:  June 23, 2011LOCAN, INC.By: /s/   Ronald D. LongRonald D. Long
President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer,
Principal Accounting Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                         APR-03-2000
<PERIOD-END>                           JUL-02-2000
<CASH>                                         998
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                               33,731
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,104
<INVENTORY>                                 26,797
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            58,935
<PP&E>                                      17,051
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,122
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             103,348
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       45,132
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                    78,262
<OTHER-SE>                                 (43,275)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               103,348
<SALES>                                     33,555
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            33,555
<CGS>                                       26,006
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               26,006
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                97
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,885
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (4,958)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    20
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (4,978)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                (4,978)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (0.82)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (0.82)


</TABLE>
From: vrsecrist@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:37:29 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Randy Secrist

Glen Allen, VA 23060
No. 60479.

#### Zanadu Manufacturing Corp. and Gehrig Hoban & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 292010-K (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of essential oils the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Ungerer & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 152, C. D. 1647), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
EXHIBIT 11
                     Calculation of Weighted Average Shares
                   Outstanding for Net Income (Loss) Per Share
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                           March 31,            
                                                                                    1998               1999     
                                                                                -------------    ---------------
<S>                                                                             <C>              <C>
Earnings:
Net Income (Loss)..........................................................     $    (902,437)   $     (292,645)
                                                                                =============    ==============

Shares:
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares
   Outstanding.............................................................         6,103,522         5,983,457
                                                                                -------------    --------------
Average Common Shares Outstanding and Equivalents..........................         6,103,522         5,983,457
                                                                                =============    ==============

Net Income (Loss) Per Share................................................     $       (0.15)   $        (0.05)
                                                                                =============    ==============
</TABLE>

* -- Calculation would be antidilutive for 1998.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 155 (Friday, August 10, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 47797]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-19306]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 271

[EPA-R06-RCRA-2010-0307; FRL-9713-2]

Arkansas: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Management 
Program Revisions

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The State of Arkansas has applied to EPA for Final 
authorization of the changes to its hazardous waste program under the 
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). EPA proposes to grant 
Final authorization to the State of Arkansas. In the ``Rules and 
Regulations'' section of this Federal Register, EPA is authorizing the 
changes by a direct final rule. EPA did not make a proposal prior to 
the immediate final rule because we believe this action is not 
controversial and do not expect comments that oppose it. We have 
explained the reasons for this authorization in the preamble to the 
immediate final rule. Unless we get written comments which oppose this 
authorization during the comment period, the immediate final rule will 
become effective on the date it establishes, and we will not take 
further action on this proposal. If we receive comments that oppose 
this action, we will withdraw the immediate final rule and it will not 
take effect. We will then respond to public comments in a later final 
rule based on this proposal. You may not have another opportunity for 
comment. If you want to comment on this action, you must do so at this 
time.

DATES: Send your written comments by September 10, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Alima Patterson, Region 6, Regional 
Authorization Coordinator, (6PD-O), Multimedia Planning and Permitting 
Division, at the address shown below. You can examine copies of the 
materials submitted by the State of Arkansas during normal business 
hours at the following locations: Arkansas Department of Environmental 
Quality, 8101 Interstate 30, Little Rock, Arkansas 72219-8913, (501) 
682-0876, and EPA, Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-
2733, phone number (214) 665-8533; or Comments may also be submitted 
electronically or through hand delivery/courier; please follow the 
detailed instructions in the ADDRESSES section of the immediate final 
rule which is located in the Rules section of this Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alima Patterson (214) 665-8533.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For additional information, please see the 
immediate final rule published in the ``Rules and Regulations'' section 
of this Federal Register.

    Dated: July 10, 2012.
Samuel Coleman,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2012-19306 Filed 8-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
From: dvanpatten@iesi.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:40:02 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Darren VanPatten

Alexandria, LA 71303
From: dhferryfam@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:48:14 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Holly Ferry

Bonney Lake, WA 98391
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

CERTIFICATION 

 

I, Edgar M. (Mac) Bridger, Chief Executive Officer, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Collins & Aikman Floorcoverings, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
Exhibit 4.7



 Exhibit 4.7 
 CONSENT OF EXPERT 
 January 7, 2013 

I, Neil N. Gow, P. Geo., hereby consent to (1) the references to my name included or incorporated by reference in the registration statement on Form
F-80 of Denison Mines Corp. in connection with the report entitled “Technical Report on the Uranium Exploration Properties in Mongolia” dated February 27, 2007 and (2) all other references to the undersigned included or
incorporated by reference in the registration statement on Form F-80 of Denison Mines Corp. dated January 2013. 
  

					
			
	/s/ Neil N. Gow	 		 	 
	 Neil N. Gow, P.Geo.
# DOT-0 Sf-2003-1t/69tf

May 30,2014

U.S. Department ofTransportation .1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590 Re; Notice of Intent to Equalize Venture Travel, LLC dba Taquan Airoperates scheduled USPS Mail, passenger, and cargo service from Ketchikan, Alaska (KTN &WFB) toapproximately fifteen (15) outlying communities in Southeast Alaska. Our company has been providing this service as ascheduled commuter airline withe 401 GertifiGateferever 15years. We have been transporting the USPS Mail with eight (8) float equipped Dehavilland Beavers atthe Bush Seaplane (E) Rate. Ourcompany recently purchased an IFR Equipped Cessna 208 Caravan which has been certified bythe FAA and has been added to our FAA Part 135 Commuter Air Carrier Certificate. This aircraft will be used primarily between Ketchikan (KTN), Craig (CGA), and Klawock (KLWj, Alaska where we will continue to provide regularly scheduled mail, passenger, and cargo service. Effective June 1,2014 we would like equalize to the Bush 135 (0) Rate forthe Ketchikan (KTN) to Craiq (CGA) and Klawock (KLW) market segments only. Ifyou have any comments orquestions please contact Brien Salazar at brien@taquanair.com or 907-617-2923. ' Sincerely, 

# .1

.. 

# /~

. Brien Sala r President & CEO
From: bbatesfamily@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:39:39 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Beth Bates

Shelbyville, KY 40065