alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MANAGEMENTS ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE

Management of the Agency and Trust division of Citibank, N.A. (or Company) is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Management has determined
that the servicing criteria in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB are applicable in regard to the servicing platform as of and for the period as follows:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e.,transaction-level reporting initially required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) securities backed by insurance-related funding
agreements issued on or after January 1, 2006, for which the Company provides the following servicing functions (the Platform): paying agent, calculation agent, trustee and registrar services.

Applicable Servicing Criteria: All servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d), to the extent required by Item 1122(d)
servicing criteria in regards to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform as to any transaction, except for the following servicing criteria: 1122(d)(l)(ii)-l122(d)(l)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(iii)-l122(d)(2)(iv),
1122(d)(2)(vi)-l122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities the Company performs with respect to the Platform (the Applicable Servicing Criteria).

Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2012 (the Period).

With respect to the Platform as of and for the Period, the Companys management provides the following assertion of compliance with respect to the
Applicable Servicing Criteria:



| |  |  | The Companys management is responsible for assessing the Companys compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The Companys management has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. In making this assessment, management used the criteria
set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Based on such assessment, the Company has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report with respect to managements assertion of compliance
with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Period.



CITIBANK, N.A.By:

LOGOIts:

LOGO


Dated: February 28, 2013
From: gene@bigredprinting.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:12:22 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

GENE WALTER

Norfolk, NE 68701
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. §1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of InfoTech USA, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jonathan F. McKeage, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | /s/ Jonathan F. McKeage                                            |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Jonathan F. McKeagePresident, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
|   |                                                               |
|   | May 15, 2007                                                       |
# Jurnalul Oficial C 53/2015

| | ISSN 1977-1029 |
| --- | --- |
| Jurnalul Oficial
  al Uniunii Europene | C 53 |
| | |
| Ediţia în limba română | Comunicări şi informări | Anul 5813 februarie 2015 |

ISSN 1977-1029

Jurnalul Oficial

al Uniunii Europene

C 53

Ediţia în limba română

Comunicări şi informări

Anul 5813 februarie 2015

---

| Informarea nr. | Cuprins | Pagina |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Anunțuri |
| | PROCEDURI ADMINISTRATIVE |
| | Parlamentul European |
| 2015/C 053/01 | Decizie | 1 |

Informarea nr.

Cuprins

Pagina

V   Anunțuri

PROCEDURI ADMINISTRATIVE

Parlamentul European

2015/C 053/01

Decizie

1

---

| RO | |
| --- | --- |

RO

---

V Anunțuri

PROCEDURI ADMINISTRATIVE

Parlamentul European

| 13.2.2015 | RO | Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene | C 53/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2015

RO

Jurnalul Oficial al Uniunii Europene

C 53/1

---

DECIZIE

(2015/C 53/01)

SECRETARUL GENERAL AL PARLAMENTULUI EUROPEAN,

având în vedere Regulamentul (CEE, Euratom, CECO) nr. 259/68 al Consiliului (1), modificat prin Regulamentul (CE, Euratom) nr. 723/2004 al Consiliului (2) și, ultima dată, prin Regulamentul (UE, Euratom) nr. 1023/2013 al Parlamentului European și al Consiliului din 22 octombrie 2013 de modificare a Statutului funcționarilor Uniunii Europene și a Regimului aplicabil celorlalți agenți ai Uniunii Europene (3), și în special articolul 30 al acestui statut,

având în vedere Decizia Biroului Parlamentului European din 13 ianuarie 2014 privind delegarea competențelor autorității împuternicite să facă numiri (AIPN) și ale autorității împuternicite să încheie contracte de muncă (AIICM),

având în vedere data de expirare, și anume 31 decembrie 2014, a listelor de rezervă ale Parlamentului European de mai jos:

AD/4/08, AD/1/10, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/106/S, PE/107/S, PE/117/S, PE/118/S, PE/124/S, AST/4/11, AST/5/11, PE/96/S, PE/119/S, PE/110/S,

având în vedere avizul Comisiei paritare, prezentat în cadrul reuniunii sale din 22 octombrie 2014,

DECIDE:

Articolul 1

Durata de valabilitate a listelor de rezervă:

| | AD/4/08, PE/106/S, PE/117/S, PE/118/S, PE/124/S, AST/4/11, AST/5/11, PE/96/S, PE/110/S |
| --- | --- |

AD/4/08, PE/106/S, PE/117/S, PE/118/S, PE/124/S, AST/4/11, AST/5/11, PE/96/S, PE/110/S

se prelungește până la 31 decembrie 2015.

Articolul 2

Durata de valabilitate a listelor de rezervă:

| | AD/1/10, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/107/S, PE/119/S |
| --- | --- |

AD/1/10, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/107/S, PE/119/S

nu se prelungește.

Luxemburg, 12 decembrie 2014.

Klaus WELLE

Secretar general

---

(1)  JO L 56, 4.3.1998, p. 1.

1

(2)  JO L 124, 27.4.2004, p. 1.

2

(3)  JO L 287, 29.10.2013, p. 15.

3

---
No. 69822.

protests 61/8907, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### W. J. Byrnes & Co., Inc., and Lefton Pacific, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Laotis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Company*(47 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 719), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
SERVED: DECEMBER 26, 2013 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF ENDLESS MOUNTAINS AIR, INC. FAA DOCKETNO: [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA- 2013-0848

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2012EA50008) has beenassigned to Administrative Law Judge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served onthe Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other persons onthe attached Service List.

# ~e~~~**by~~** ,Mt·y

# AJv•r
ChiefAdministrative Law Judge Attachment

- Service ListSERVICE LIST- BY 

### U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W1000 1



### William J. Dobitsch, Jr Endless Mountains Air, Inc., Respondent 

### Seamans Airport 727 Windsock Lane Factoryville, PA 18419 ONE COPY



### Zachary M. Berman, Complainant's Counsel 

### Attorney, Office ofRegional Counsel Eastern Region Federal Aviation Administration 1Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434

.TE:C: 718-553-3258.

FAX: 718-995-5699 Hon. J.E. Sullivan,Administrative LawJudge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2132 FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2013-0848 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:  | /s/ Kin Sun Sze-To            |
|--------|-----------|-------------------------------|
|   |      | Kin Sun Sze-To                |
|   |      | Chief Executive Officer       |
|   |      | (Principal Executive Officer) |

|   | By:  | /s/ Ho Leung Ning                 |
|--------|-----------|-----------------------------------|
|   |      | Ho Leung Ning                     |
|   |      | Chief Financial Officer           |
|   |      | (Principal Accounting Officer and |
|   |      | Principal Financial Officer)      |

----
| For      the Period: 3/10/2009 to 3/16/2008 |
|---------------------------------------------|

| Coupon | Interest                           | Maturity | Callable   | Survivor'sOption | Price1 | Yield2 | Moody's | S&P | CUSIP     |
|--------|------------------------------------|----------|------------|------------------|--------|--------|---------|---------|-----------|
| 4.750% | Semi-Annual(†††) | 3/15/11  | NO         | YES§        | 100.00 | 4.750% | A2      | A       | 14912HNT3 |
| 5.250% | Semi-Annual(†††) | 3/15/12  | NO         | YES§        | 100.00 | 5.250% | A2      | A       | 14912HNU0 |
| 6.500% | Semi-Annual(†††) | 3/15/16  | 3/15/11*** | YES§        | 100.00 | 6.500% | A2      | A       | 14912HNV8 |
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
   In connection with this Yearly Report of Energy and Technology, Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,  George M. Sfeir, Chief Executive Officer and Amer T. Salhi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  1.
Such Yearly Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2.
The information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Energy and Technology, Corp.
  By: /s/George M. Sfeir,
 George M. Sfeir
 President, Chief Executive Officer, Director
 
 By:/s/Amer T. Salhi
 Amer T. Salhi,
 Chief Financial Officer, Secretary
 April 20, 2011
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 185 (Tuesday, September 26, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 66066]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20918]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: September 26, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 20, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 62 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2023-277, CP2023-280.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-20918 Filed 9-25-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          1,065,793
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   4,098,521
<ALLOWANCES>                                    1,730,249
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                4,799,259
<PP&E>                                          3,191,154
<DEPRECIATION>                                  2,749,587
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  9,146,742
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           3,626,959
<BONDS>                                         3,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                          170,037
<OTHER-SE>                                      2,267,330
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    9,146,742
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               11,028,147
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   8,461,937
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                5,636,750
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                184,059
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,254,599)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (435,066)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,819,533)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,819,533)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.17)



</TABLE>
No. P69/41.

protests 66/8838 and 66/22459 (New York).

#### Associated Dry Goods Corp. (Lord & Taylor Div.) *v.*United States,

Maletz, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered 'by the foregoing protests consists of Christmas light strings similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Gallagher & Ascher Company*v. *United States*(57 Cust. Ct. 348, C.D. 2813), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with Amendment no. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Orbit/FR, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Relland Winand, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





August 22, 2011





/s/ Relland WinandRelland WinandChief Financial Officer
Date

Globe Highway 

Primary

Globe Highway 

Secondary

1/3/2011

1/9/2011

1/15/2011 0.01763 0.01993

1/21/2011 0.07925

1/27/2011 0.00524 0.00562

2/2/2011 0.02721

2/8/2011 0.41585

2/14/2011 0.1179 0.12122

2/20/2011 0.35015 0.36741

2/26/2011 0.22075 0.23624

3/4/2011 0.0352 0.0423

3/10/2011 0.0277 0.0277

3/16/2011 0.0624 0.0723

3/22/2011 0.0212 0.0223

3/28/2011 0.2688 0.2654

4/3/2011 0.3902 0.4499

4/9/2011 0.2915 0.2643

4/15/2011 0.0425

4/21/2011 0.2789 0.2944

4/27/2011 0.1447 0.1273

5/3/2011 0.0112 0.0199

5/9/2011 0.4957 0.5238

5/15/2011 0.4737 0.4016

5/21/2011 0.1778 0.184

5/27/2011 0.3765 0.3221

6/2/2011 0.2407 0.2666

6/8/2011 0.4028 0.4156

6/14/2011 0.3338 0.3528

6/20/2011 0.2018 0.2025

6/26/2011 0.1537 0.1476

ADEQ Lead Data for 2011
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0048

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

SKY M. LITTLECOYOTE,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including July 20, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 13 2022

06/13/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0048
From: beckybdaniel777@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:18:19 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Rebecca Daniel

Divide, CO 80814