alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDING JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         144,147
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   90,589
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,990
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               287,302
<PP&E>                                       4,055,729
<DEPRECIATION>                                 870,233
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,162,953
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          107,556
<BONDS>                                        796,598
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,496
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,940,076
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,162,953
<SALES>                                        621,353
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               621,353
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  354,279
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              56,557
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                210,517
<INCOME-TAX>                                    94,733
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            115,784
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   115,784
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.77


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BJs Wholesale Club, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended
May 1, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Frank D. Forward, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the undersigneds knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |                                                                                   
|------------------ |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 28, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ FRANK D. FORWARD                                                              
|                   |  |  |  | Frank D. Forward                                                                  
|                   |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
From: cdavison@juno.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:22:20 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Candace Davison

North East, MD 21901
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 234 

Congratulating Wyclef Jean for being named the ‘‘Roving Ambassador’’ for 

Haiti. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 9, 2007 

Ms. WATERS (for herself and Ms. LEE) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating Wyclef Jean for being named the ‘‘Roving 

Ambassador’’ for Haiti. 

Whereas, on January 4, 2007, hip-hop star Wyclef Jean, who 

was born in Haiti, was officially named ‘‘Roving Ambassador’’ of Haiti by Haitian President Rene Preval; 

Whereas Wyclef Jean was given this distinguished honor to 

enable him to improve the image of Haiti, an impoverished country that has struggled to restore stability and 

democracy after a violent coup d’etat in 2004; 

Whereas Wyclef Jean, 34 years old, has been instrumental in 

the music industry for over 10 years and has gained fame 

as a member of the hip-hop trio the Fugees, who won 

Grammy awards in 1996; 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 234 IH 

Whereas Wyclef Jean, who moved to the United States at age 

9, has long been active in supporting his native country 

and regularly wears the Haitian flag on his clothing at 

public events and performances; 

Whereas Wyclef Jean recognizes the importance of involvement by the global community in Haiti’s development; 

Whereas President Rene Preval chose Wyclef Jean for this 

honorary position, in part, for the purpose of engaging 

with U.S. government leaders to support policies that will 

promote economic development, humanitarian assistance, 

and other relief for Haiti’s needy citizens; 

Whereas Wyclef Jean established a nonprofit charitable foundation, Yele Haiti, which is changing lives in Haiti by 

supporting projects that are making a difference in education, health, environment, and community development; 

and 

Whereas the ‘‘Roving Ambassador’’ position will help Wyclef 

Jean to improve the perception and image of Haiti in the 

global community, stimulate support for increased economic opportunities for its citizens, and facilitate its 

growth and development: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives con2 gratulates Wyclef Jean for being named ‘‘Roving Ambas3 sador’’ for Haiti. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
From: joyjeck@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:37:52 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Joy Jeck

Saint Paul, MN 55106
From: kathy.edmonston@apsb.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:27:13 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

kathy edmonston

Gonzales, LA 70737
Before the Second Division,

July 18, 1967

No. P67/240.

No. P67/241.

#### Durex Hardware Mfg. Corp. *v.*United States, protest 62/7023 (New York). Steelcraft Tool Corp. *v.*United States, protest 64/18013 (New York).

Bao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of brass hose noz*870zles similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Lipman's*(52 CCPA 59, C.A.D. 859), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 33.3 

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH 

REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

Principal Life Insurance Company (the “Asserting Party”) is responsible for assessing compliance as of and for the fiscal yearended December 31, 2011 (the “Reporting Period”) with the servicing criteria set forth in Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Regulations (the “CFR”), except for criteria 229.1122(d)(1), (d)(2), (d)(3)(ii) through(iv) and (d)(4) of the CFR, which the Asserting Party has concluded are not applicable to the servicing activities it performs with respect to the asset-backed securities transactions covered by this report (“Applicable ServicingCriteria”). The transactions covered by this report include all asset-backed securities transactions that were conducted by the Principal Life Income Fundings Trusts registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”)pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 on Registration Statement Nos. 333-147181 and 333-147181-01 (the “Platform”), as listed on Appendix A. 

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and notes a material instance of non-compliance with Regulation ABItem 1122(d)(3)(i) with respect to the Platform (as defined in the Exhibits). In one instance, a distribution report on Form 10-D was not filed within in the required 15 day period after the applicable interest payment date Except for theinstances of non-compliance noted above, the Asserting Party has concluded that it has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period. 

Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as ofDecember 31, 2011 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this report. 

Principal Life Insurance Company 

 

Name: Kevin P. Farley 

Title: Vice President, Chief Financial Officer 

Retirement and Investor Services

Date: March 27, 2012                 

 
1 

APPENDIX A 

Principal Life Income Fundings Trust 36 

 
2
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 351 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Federal authorities 

should strengthen and vigorously enforce all existing immigration laws. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 1, 2007 

Mr. SULLIVAN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

Federal authorities should strengthen and vigorously enforce all existing immigration laws. 

Whereas the failure of the Federal Government to enforce existing immigration laws has led to a 20-year influx of 

aliens unlawfully crossing the borders of the United 

States without the proper documentation; 

Whereas such failure strains the economy, imposes additional 

burdens on Federal, State, and local law enforcement officials, and puts public safety in communities across the 

country at risk; 

Whereas it is irresponsible for the Congress to consider amnesty legislation while our existing immigration laws are 

not being enforced; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 351 IH 

Whereas the policy of granting amnesty to illegal aliens is a 

proven failure in our country; 

Whereas the amnesty granted in the Immigration Reform 

and Control Act of 1986 did nothing to stem the tide of 

illegal aliens coming across our borders and contributed 

to the explosion of illegal immigration our Nation faces 

today; 

Whereas granting amnesty to the millions of illegal aliens residing in our country is fiscally irresponsible and would 

place heavy financial burdens on American taxpayers and 

Federal social programs alike; and 

Whereas granting amnesty to the millions of illegal aliens residing in our country is not in the national security or 

economic interests of the United States: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of House of Representa2 tives that— 

3 (1) Federal authorities should use all tools at 

4 their disposal to strengthen and vigorously enforce 

5 all existing immigration laws; 

6 (2) the policy of certain cities and other polit7 ical subdivisions of providing sanctuary to illegal 

8 aliens encourages illegal immigration to the United 

9 States; 

10 (3) State and local law enforcement officials 

11 should report all immigration violations to officials 

12 of the Department of Homeland Security; 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 351 IH 

1 (4) the Federal Government should encourage 

2 and support the efforts of State and local law en3 forcement agencies to enforce existing immigration 

4 laws; 

5 (5) the Congress should reject legislative con6 sideration of any legislation which would grant am7 nesty to illegal aliens currently residing in the 

8 United States until all existing immigration laws are 

9 enforced; and 

10 (6) the United States is a nation of laws; there11 fore all existing Federal immigration laws must be 

12 vigorously enforced to ensure the integrity of our im13 migration system and the sovereignty of our great 

14 Nation. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
H. Res. 382

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

May 9, 2007.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 1684) to authorize appropriations for the Department of Homeland Security for fiscal year 2008, and for 

other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the 

bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of 

rule XXI. General debate shall be confined to the bill and 

shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by 

the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee 

on Homeland Security. After general debate the bill shall be 

considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall 

be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of 

amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the 

nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on 

Homeland Security now printed in the bill. The committee 
2

•HRES 382 EH 

amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered 

as read. All points of order against the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute are waived except those 

arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. Notwithstanding 

clause 11 of rule XVIII, no amendment to the committee 

amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be in order except those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules 

accompanying this resolution. Each such amendment may be 

offered only in the order printed in the report, may be offered 

only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the 

report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an 

opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not 

be subject to a demand for division of the question in the 

House or in the Committee of the Whole. All points of order 

against such amendments are waived except those arising 

under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise 

and report the bill to the House with such amendments as 

may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate 

vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous question 

shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments 
3

•HRES 382 EH 

thereto to final passage without intervening motion except 

one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

SEC. 2. During consideration in the House of H.R. 1684 

pursuant to this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of 

the previous question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the bill to such time as may be designated by the 

Speaker. 

Attest:

Clerk.
Footnote addressing possibl ie use of monitoring alone Lydia Wegman

to: j ames_a._laity, dmancini 06/01/2010 08:00 PM Cc: Richard Wayland, Scott Mathias, Sara Schneeber g, Kevin McLean, James Hemby, Larry Wallace, Tricia Crabtree Show Details

Jim and Dom,

Please find attached a footnote we would add to Section III that addresses the possibility that in some areas we could rely on monitoring alone, rather than monitoring and modeling, to determine attainment. This addresses the issue we discussed this morning. The attached language would go on page 7 of section III, in the first full paragraph that includes footnote 2. In the complete FRM from May 4, it would go at the top of page 115. We hope this addresses your concern.

Lydia Page 1 of 1

6/2/2010 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\tcrabtre\Local Settin g s\Tem p \notesFCBCEE\~web0279.htm
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 278 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 278

         Recognizing the 125th anniversary of Payson, Arizona.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 27, 2007

Mr. Renzi submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
         Recognizing the 125th anniversary of Payson, Arizona.

Whereas in 2007 Payson, Arizona, will celebrate the 125th anniversary of its 
        founding;
Whereas in 1882 community leaders surveyed the town site of Payson;
Whereas in 1884 Payson held its first rodeo, which has been held every year 
        since to become the ``World's Oldest Continuous Rodeo'';
Whereas Payson and its surrounding area were written about by western author 
        Zane Grey in books such as Code of the West, Under the Tonto Rim, and To 
        the Last Man;
Whereas Payson, incorporated in 1973, has grown to become a dynamic, thriving 
        community that anchors an area known as Rim Country; and
Whereas on October 5-7, 2007, Payson will celebrate its achievements and history 
        with a great celebration: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives recognizes the 125th 
anniversary of Payson, Arizona.
                                 <all>
```