alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 318 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

April 24, 2007. 

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 363) to authorize appropriations for basic research and research infrastructure in science and engineering, and for support of graduate fellowships, and for other 

purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. 

All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived 

except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed 

one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 

ranking minority member of the Committee on Science and 

Technology. After general debate the bill shall be considered 

for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be in 

order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature 

of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Science 
2 

•HRES 318 EH 

and Technology now printed in the bill. The committee 

amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered 

as read. All points of order against the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute are waived except those 

arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. Notwithstanding 

clause 11 of rule XVIII, no amendment to the committee 

amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be in order except those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules 

accompanying this resolution. Each such amendment may be 

offered only in the order printed in the report, may be offered 

only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the 

report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an 

opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not 

be subject to a demand for division of the question in the 

House or in the Committee of the Whole. All points of order 

against such amendments are waived except those arising 

under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise 

and report the bill to the House with such amendments as 

may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate 

vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous question 

shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments 
3 

•HRES 318 EH 

thereto to final passage without intervening motion except 

one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

SEC. 2. During consideration in the House of H.R. 363 

pursuant to this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of 

the previous question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the bill to such time as may be designated by the 

Speaker. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Glenn Little, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Intelimax Media Inc. for the year ended March 31, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Intelimax Media Inc.






Dated: June 28, 2011





/s/ Glenn Little
 Glenn Little
 President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, and Director
 (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
 Intelimax Media Inc.


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Intelimax Media Inc. and will be retained by Intelimax Media Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs

          - [234A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice publishes the approval of the Fifth Amendment to the Tribal-State Compact between the Nisqually Indian Tribe and the State of Washington.

# DATES:

The Amendment takes effect on September 27, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of Indian Gaming, Office of the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs, Washington, DC 20240, (202) 219-4066.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Under section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2701*et seq.,*                     the Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the                     **Federal Register**                     notice of approved Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming activities on Indian lands. As required by 25 CFR 293.4, all compacts and amendments are subject to review and approval by the Secretary. The Amendment permits the Tribe to offer Electronic Table Games, updates the Compact to reflect this change in various sections, and incorporates Appendix G, Electronic Table Games. The Amendment is approved.                

Bryan Newland,

Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2023-20968 Filed 9-26-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4337-15-P
DEPARTMEN T OF OFFIC E O F ECONOMI C ADJUSTMSNSPORTATIO N 40 0 ARM Y NAV

Y DRIVE , SUIT E ZOO^YS J OPERATION S ARLINGTON . V

A22202-470 4

^ AA , wAUG2.5ZQ1 0 Ms . Aloh aLe y Offic e o f Aviatio n Analysi s U S Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Ave , S E Washington , D C 2059 0 Dea r Ms . Ley : Th e Offic e o f

Economi c Adjustmen t

i s awar e o f

th e Fayettevill e Regiona l Airport applicatio n for

fundin g throug hth e Smal l Community Ai r Servic e Developmen t

Program . Th e Fayettevill e Regiona l Airport ha s bee n workin g i

n partnershi p wit

hloca l communitie s t o enhanc e ai r

service s t o th e For

t Brag g region . Assistanc e throug hyou r

programvdl l assis t

th e Fayettevill e community t o capabl y respon dt o th e deman dfor Washington , D.C . ai r

servic e a s aresul t

o f missio n growtha

t For t Bragg . Thi s growthincrease s th e numbe r o f trip s betwee n For

t Brag g an dWashington , D.C . b y military an dcivilian personne l a s wel l a s companie s doin g busines s wit hth e Departmen t

o f Defense . Question s pertainin g t o this matte r ma y b e directe dt o Mr . Michae l Wilson , Projec t Manager , a

t (703 ) 604-5146 , o r

vi aemai l a

t michael.wilson(g),wso.whs.mil . Sincerely ,

Patric k J . O'Brie n ^^f^^^/

y •^//^J<A ^ Directo r Offic e o f Economi c Adjustmen t
From: jobbink@centralwesleyan.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:42:40 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Joanne Obbink

Holland, MI 49424
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549








Form 8-K





Current Report





Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report  (Date of earliest event reported): October 8, 2013





Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation


(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)





001-11241


(Commission File Number)








Delaware37-1105865(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)(IRS Employer Identification Number)





2120 West End Avenue


Nashville, Tennessee 37203-0001


(Address of principal executive offices, with zip code)





(615) 341-1000


(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)








Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:











oWritten communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)oSoliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))










---




Item 8.01 Other Events.





In connection with the Cat Financial PowerInvestment Notes program, Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation executed a Distribution Agreement, dated October 8, 2013, with William Blair & Company, L.L.C., providing for the sale from time to time of up to $8,000,000,000 aggregate principal amount of its Variable Denomination Floating Rate Demand Notes through such firm as agent.  The Distribution Agreement is filed as an exhibit hereto and is incorporated by reference into the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-191626).





Item 9.01.  Financial Statements and Exhibits.








d)Exhibits:99.1Distribution Agreement dated October 8, 2013








SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.





Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation











Date:  October 8, 2013By:/s/ J. Wesley BlumenshineJ. Wesley BlumenshineSecretary





2


---







EXHIBIT INDEX








Exhibit No.Description99.1Distribution Agreement dated October 8, 2013














3
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7113

ERIC SAMUELS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BENJAMIN MONTGOMERY; JOSEPH BLACK; L. G.

ALLEN; WILLIAM D. CATOE, of the South Carolina

Department of Corrections,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-94-2320-3-6BC)

Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 11, 1996

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eric Samuels, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra J. Senn, STUCKEY &

KOBROVSKY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42

U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. Appellant's case was referred to a

magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1988). The

magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Appellant that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based

upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Appellant failed to

object to the magistrate judge's recommendation.

The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge's

recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the

substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned

that failure to object will waive appellate review. Wright v.

Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985). See generally Thomas

v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Appellant has waived appellate review

by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Before the Third Division,

February 20, 1967

No. P67/40.

#### United China & Glass Co. *v.*United States,

protest 59/8928 (Seattle).

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *W. Kay Com*pany, *Inc.*v. *United States*(53 Cust. Ct. 130, C.D. 2484), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: billsalpietro@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:17:43 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

William Salpietro

Palatine, IL 60074
22

 
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors:     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: November 14, 2008 /s/ Relland Winand   Relland Winand     Chief Financial Officer
23
ANNUAL
STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE





OFFICER'S
CERTIFICATION








Re:    
Banc of America Commercial Mortgage Inc.


Commercial
Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates


Series
2007-4








In
connection with the above-referenced transaction the undersigned officer, on
behalf of Bank of America, National Association, hereby certifies that (i) a
review of the Servicing activities, for the period ending December 31, 2008 and
of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of
November 1, 2007 has been made under my supervision, and (ii) to the best of my
knowledge, based on such review, Bank of America, National Association has
fulfilled all of its obligations under this agreement in all material respects
throughout the aforementioned period.








Bank of
America, National Association








/s/
Janice M. Smith


Janice M.
Smith


Managing
Director








/s/
H. Michael Lumadue


H.
Michael Lumadue


Principal
Before the Second Division,

November 29, 1965

No. 69636.

#### The Buhler Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 64/15810, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of parts of food preparing machines, which are dedicated to use therewith, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Standard Milling Co.*v. *United States*(50 Cust. Ct. 53, C.D. 2388), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: dianedearheart@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:33:11 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Diane Bowditch

Hillsdale, MI 49242