alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tony Lamont JONES, a/k/a Tony, a/k/a Tony Rome, a/k/a Uncle Moe, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-7249.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 5, 2001.

Decided June 20, 2001.

James O. Broccoletti, Zoby & Broccoletti, P.C., Norfolk, VA, for appellant. Helen F. Fahey, United States Attorney, Arenda L. Wright Allen, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, VA, for appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and KING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Tony Lamont Jones seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000) and a subsequent motion to alter or amend judgment. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Jones’ claim, raised for the first time on appeal, that his sentence violates *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), is foreclosed by this Court’s decision in *United States v. Sanders,*247 F.3d 139 (4th Cir.2001). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the. reasoning of the district court. *See United States v. Jones,*Nos. CR-97-102; CA-99-2024-2 (E.D. Va. filed June 27, entered June 28, 2000, & Aug. 1, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
No. 61473.

#### Continental Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 301898-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
No. 69626.

#### Weather-Rite Sportswear Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 65/5442, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Nichols, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of articles of synthetic rubber similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Weather-Rite Sportswear Co., Inc.*(52 CCPA 7, C.A.D. 848), the claim of 'the plaintiff was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 185 (Tuesday, September 26, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 66058]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20766]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--AI Infrastructure Alliance, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on July 3, 2023, pursuant to section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), AI Infrastructure Alliance, Inc. 
(``AIIA'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in 
its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Artefact, Paris, FRANCE; Comet ML, Inc., New York, NY; 
and Aporia, Tel Aviv, ISRAEL, have withdrawn as parties to this 
venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and AIIA intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On January 5, 2022, AIIA filed its original notification pursuant 
to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a 
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on 
March 10, 2022 (87 FR 13759).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on April 18, 
2023. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on August 14, 2023 (88 FR 55069).

Suzanne Morris,
Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2023-20766 Filed 9-25-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
From: tdb916@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:03:03 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Terri Bradley

North Chicago, IL 60064
LANE CO

DOUGLAS CO~

Source: Bureau of Land Management Corporate
Data revised for WOPR Analysis. No warranty is
made by the Bureau of Land Management as to the
accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data
for individual or aggregate use with other data.

coos CO

COOS

Coos Bay

MAP 9
Western Oregon Plan Revisions

20 25 Miles

5 0 5 10 15 20

Albers Equal Area Projection
North American Datum of 1983

25 Kilometers

Coos Bay and Roseburg Districts
Klamath Falls Resource Area
No Action Alternative
Land Use Allocations

Forest Excluded from
Harvest Land Base

71% HE orest Included in

Harvest Land Base

Roseburg

LANE CO
DOUGLAS CO

Roseburg

Coos Bay

Legend

Coos Bay

Planning

Forest Excluded
from Harvest

Land Use Allocations
Congressionally Withdrawn

Late-Successional Reserve

Adaptive Management Area

Administratively Withdrawn*

Riparian Reserve

Land Base ;
a ROSEBURG Matrix
DISTRICTS MAP AREA .
BLM Office
7.9°/0) | Forest Included i
in Harvest BLM Administrative Boundary

Land Base

CURRY CO

OREGON
CALIFORNIA

Western Oregon Plan Revisions

Draft Environmental

Vv
Impact Statement

ae

KLAMATH FALLS
RESOURCE AREA
MAP AREA

Wild and Scenic River
Eligible Wild and Scenic River

a Lie

1% 1%

ORE

GON

<
4
1
—_=
=
is)
Ba
Forest Excluded xa}
—
from Harvest a
Land Base S to
o
y
| Forest Included
in Harvest
Land Base

*Includes Non-Forest in Klamath Falls Resource Area

t \,
‘ \
i \
. a
beg ~
1 =)
ro
fe} je} : Pal
Olo !
ale at § -
Ore ~ TE o am
Olz ec ige eS
eq el so o &
sys oO ee
€ 1230 7 ty}
GS 3 3et io.
<I 3g |
x uw ;
x '
aan q
Saat) . Nan 1
\ oe, VN . /.
‘ 2 VGN Nice mee - on
vo. a :
‘. iS

OREGON
CALIFORNIA

KEL A MAT BR FAL

a

|

LS$

vy Re
ee Le
Viet 4 i=
Klamath . Bes \. Lap ie
Falls iz iS il

ag RS

RES QURCE A REA Ge
Psat We =X.

Wi pet hing aay.
ee rs

—“ ge or

MO06-12-02
Before the Third Division,

February 13, 1959

No. 62753.

#### Rosenthal Block China Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 295636-K (New York).

*283Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the 10%-inch cake plates covered by items 4575 and 4576 are dutiable, as claimed, *supra,*the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: thalinwb@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:31:38 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Aaron Howard

West Henrietta, NY 14586
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 290 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                           May 7, 2007.
Whereas in 1978 the Colorado Senior Sports Development Council (CSSDC) began 
        hosting athletic competitions for individuals 50 years of age and older;
Whereas the city of Greeley, Colorado, worked with CSSDC to bring this popular 
        athletic competition and social opportunity to the Rocky Mountain 
        region;
Whereas the Rocky Mountain Senior Games originated as a 1-day event featuring 
        swimming, basketball, and track and field;
Whereas the Rocky Mountain Senior Games now features a variety of sports and 
        recreational activities during the week-long competition, including 
        archery, badminton, basketball, billiards, bowling, cycling, golf, 
        horseshoes, dancing, pickleball, race walking, racquetball, running, 
        shuffleboard, swimming, table tennis, tennis, track and field, 
        triathlon, trap and skeet shooting, and weight lifting;
Whereas the Rocky Mountain Senior Games encourages athletes of all abilities to 
        participate in the competition by creating age categories with 5-year 
        increments;
Whereas the competition is also divided into male and female divisions, as well 
        as mixed divisions in several doubles events;
Whereas athletes who qualify at the State level are eligible to compete at the 
        biennial National Senior Games;
Whereas Colorado is always well represented at the National Senior Games by 
        athletes who pay their own expenses to attend and compete, such as the 
        640 Colorado athletes who have already qualified for the 2007 National 
        Senior Games in Louisville, Kentucky;
Whereas participants in the Rocky Mountain Senior Games experience the friendly 
        fellowship, comradery, and exhilaration of competition, as well as the 
        enjoyment of associated social events;
Whereas participants in the Rocky Mountain Senior Games experience highly 
        beneficial effects on both their physical and mental health, leading to 
        the ultimate goal of the Games of promoting ``Fitness as a Lifestyle'';
Whereas volunteers and event coordinators of all ages make the week's events 
        possible; and
Whereas the 30th annual Rocky Mountain Senior Games will be held from June 6-10, 
        2007: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives honors the contributions of the 
Rocky Mountain Senior Games on its 30th anniversary for significantly improving 
the health and well-being of older Americans.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
No. 68912.

#### Arthur J. Fritz & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 62/3217 (Seattle).

Ford, Judge:

This case was originally tried in conjunction with the case of *Arthur J. Fritz & Co., Inc.*v. *United States,*52 Cust. Ct. 61, C.D. 2437.

The merchandise consists of wool rag carpeting, classified as articles in part of fringe under the provisions of paragraph 1529(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Sixth Protocol of Supplementary Concessions to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 91 Treas. Dec. 150, T.D. 54108, and claimed to be properly subject to classification as floor coverings in chief value of wool under the provisions of paragraph 1117(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec. 305, T.D. 51802.

The court, *sua sponte,*severed this case and ordered it placed on the next docket of the court to be held at Seattle, Wash., for the purpose of establishing the component material of chief value. Counsel for the respective parties have stipulated that the merchandise is in chief value of wool. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in our opinion and based upon the record in the *Fritz*case, *supra,*we hold the imported merchandise to be properly subject to duty at the rate of 15 per centum ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 1117(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified, *supra,*as claimed by plaintiff herein.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
From: ebfrizzell@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:56:42 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private <a

href="http://lwken.com/click/?s=63452&c=149579" style="color:#006600;font-weight:bold;textdecoration:underline;background:none;padding:0;margin:0;">health insurance</a> with no co-pay to

patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for any organizations

that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I strongly oppose

the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and devices that I

oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

<a href="http://lwken.com/click/?s=63452&c=149579" style="color:#006600;font-weight:bold;textdecoration:underline;background:none;padding:0;margin:0;">health insurance</a>.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ed Frizzell

Pisgah Forest, NC 28768
No. 67072.

protests 58/25351, etc. (Tampa).

#### Biddle Purchasing Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *Falcon Sales Company*and *J. J. Murphy & Co.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 129, C.D. 2292), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 534.

#### Morris Plan Co. of California *v.*Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

*Julian 0. Von Kalinowski*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorjer*and *Joseph Kovner*for respondent.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
From: nmmurray@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:25:49 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Nancy Murray

Richland, WA 99354
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Office of Justice Programs

          - [OJP (BJA) Docket No. 1815]

# AGENCY:

Office of Justice Programs (OJP), Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA).

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

This is an announcement of a meeting (via WebEx/conference call-in) of the Public Safety Officer Medal of Valor Review Board to consider nominations for the 2022-2023 Medal of Valor, and to make a limited number of recommendations for submission to the U.S. Attorney General to be cited. Additional issues of importance to the Board may also be discussed.

# DATES:

October 12, 2023, 12:30 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. EDT.

# ADDRESSES:

This meeting will be held virtually using web conferencing technology. The public may hear the proceedings of this virtual meeting/conference call by registering with Gregory Joy at last seven (7) days in advance with Gregory Joy (contact information below).

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Gregory Joy, Policy Advisor, Bureau of Justice Assistance, Office of Justice Programs, by telephone at (202) 514-1369, or by email at                         *Gregory.joy@usdoj.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Public Safety Officer Medal of Valor Review Board carries out those advisory functions specified in 42 U.S.C. 15202. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 15201, the President of the United States is authorized to award the Public Safety Officer Medal of Valor, the highest national award for valor by a public safety officer.

This virtual meeting/conference call is open to the public to participate remotely. For security purposes, members of the public who wish to participate must register at least seven (7) days in advance of the meeting/conference call by contacting Mr. Joy.

Access to the virtual meeting/conference call will not be allowed without prior registration. Please submit any comments or written statements for consideration by the Review Board in writing at least seven (7) days in advance of the meeting date.

Gregory Joy,

Policy Advisor/Designated Federal Officer, Bureau of Justice Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2023-19918 Filed 9-13-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-18-P