`KPMG LOGO`

KPMG
LLP
 303
East Wacker Drive
 Chicago,
IL 60601-5212


Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




The Board of Directors of
American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.:




We have examined the
compliance of American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc., a Delaware corporation,
(the "Company") with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for publicly issued
residential mortgage-backed transactions and securities issued on or after
January 1, 2006. for which the Company provides primary servicing activities, as
defined and to the extent required in the related transaction agreements,
utilizing the MSP servicing system (the "Platform"), except for servicing
criteria 1122(d)(1)(i), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C), 1122(d)(3)(ii) and 1122(d)(4)(xv),
which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it
performed with respect to the Platform, as of December 31, 2008, and tor the
period May 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008. Appendices A and B to the
Company's Management Assertion of Compliance ("Management's Assertion") identify
the individual mortgage-backed transactions and securities defined by management
as constituting the Platform. With respect to servicing criterion 1122(d)(3)(i),
Management's Assertion indicates that this servicing criterion is applicable to
the activities the Company performs with respect to the Platform only as it
relates to the Company's obligation to report information to the Master
Servicers or Trustees, as applicable, as defined in the transaction
agreements.  Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with
those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
Company's compliance based on our examination.




Our examination was
conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test
basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria
specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessnry
in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selected asset-backed
transactions and securities that comprise the Plattorm, testing selected
servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the
Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected
activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our
procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities
performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our
procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred
either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances
or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by
this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe
that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our
examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria.




As described in the
accompanying Management Assertion of Compliance, for servicing criteria
1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), the Company has engaged
various vendors to perform the activities required by these servicing criteria.
The Company has determined that none of these vendors is considered a "servicer"
as defined in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB, and the Company has elected to take
responsibility for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria applicable
to each vendor as permitted by Interpretation 17.06 of the SEC Division of
Corporation Finance Manual of Publicly Available Telephone Interpretations
("Interpretation 17.06"). As permitted by Interpretation 17.06, the




KPMG LLP,
a U.S. limited liability partnership, is the U.S.
 member
firm of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative.












KPMG LOGO




Company has asserted that
it has policies and procedures in place designed to provide reasonable assurance
that the vendors' activities comply in all material respects with the servicing
criteria applicable to each vendor. The Company is solely responsible for
determining that it meets the SEC requirements to apply Interpretation 17.06 for
the vendors and related criteria as described in its assertion, and we performed
no procedures with respect to the Company's eligibility 10 apply
Interpretation 17.06.




Our examination disclosed
material noncompliance with servicing criteria 1122(d)(2)(vii)(D).
1122(d)(3)(i)(B), 1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(x)(A),
1122(d)(4)(x)(B), 1122(d)(4)(x)(C) and 1122(d)(4)(xiv), as applicable to the
Company during the period May 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008 as
follows:




·
              With
      respect to servicing criterion 1122(d)(2)(vii)(D), certain reconciling
      items were not resolved within 90 calendar days of their original
      identification or such other number of days specified in the transaction
      agreements.·
              With
      respect to servicing criterion 1122(d)(3)(i)(B), certain remittance
      reports sent to the Master Servicers or Trustees, as applicable, did not
      report the correct amounts.·
              With
      respect to servicing criterion 1122(d)(3)(i)(D), certain remittance
      reports sent to the Master Servicers or Trustees, as applicable, did not
      agree to the total unpaid principal balance and number of mortgage loans
      serviced by the Company.·
              With
      respect to servicing criterion 1122(d)(4)(v), certain unpaid principal
      balances of the investor pools remitted to the Master Servicers or
      Trustees, as applicable. did not agree to the unpaid principal balances
      per the obligor records.·
              With
      respect to servicing criterion 1122(d)(4)(x)(A), certain escrow accounts
      were not analyzed, in accordance with the transaction agreements, on at
      least an annual basis.·
              With
      respect to servicing criterion 1122(d)(4)(x)(B), interest on certain
      escrow accounts was not credited 10 borrowers in accordance with
      transaction agreements or state laws.·
              With
      respect to servicing criterion 1122(d)(4)(x)(C), certain amounts in escrow
      accounts were not returned to borrowers within 30 calendar days of full
      repayment of the loan.·
              With
      respect to servicing criterion 1122(d)(4)(xiv), certain charge-offs were
      not recognized and recorded in accordance with the transaction
      agreements.






In our opinion, except for
the material noncompliance described above, the Company complied, in all
material respects, with the aforementioned servicing criteria, including
servicing criteria 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii) for
which compliance is determined based on Interpretation 17.06 as described above,
as of December 31, 2008 and for the period May 1, 2008 through December 31,
2008.




We do not express an
opinion or any form of assurance on the sections entitled Management Response in
Appendix C to Management's Assertion.