alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsRationale and Methods for Archival Sampling and Analysis of Atmospheric Trace Chemical Contaminants On Board Mir and Recommendations for the International Space StationCollection and analysis of spacecraft cabin air samples are necessary to assess the cabin air quality with respect to crew health. Both toxicology and engineering disciplines work together to achieve an acceptably clean cabin atmosphere. Toxicology is concerned with limiting the risk to crew health from chemical sources, setting exposure limits, and analyzing air samples to determine how well these limits are met. Engineering provides the means for minimizing the contribution of the various contaminant generating sources by providing active contamination control equipment on board spacecraft and adhering to a rigorous material selection and control program during the design and construction of the spacecraft. A review of the rationale and objectives for sampling spacecraft cabin atmospheres is provided. The presently-available sampling equipment and methods are reviewed along with the analytical chemistry methods employed to determine trace contaminant concentrations. These methods are compared and assessed with respect to actual cabin air quality monitoring needs. Recommendations are presented with respect to the basic sampling program necessary to ensure an acceptably clean spacecraft cabin atmosphere. Also, rationale and recommendations for expanding the scope of the basic monitoring program are discussed.Document ID19970022132Acquisition SourceMarshall Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsPerry, J. L.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL United States)*James, J. T.*(NASA Johnson Space Center Houston, TX United States)*Cole, H. E.*(Boeing Defense and Space Group Huntsville, AL United States)*Limero, T. F.*(Krug Life Sciences, Inc. Houston, TX United States)*Beck, S. W.*(Krug Life Sciences, Inc. Houston, TX United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1997Subject CategoryMan/System Technology And Life SupportReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-108534NAS 1.15:108534Accession Number97N22738Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970022132.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
BEFORE THE SECOND DIVISION,

February 23, 1967

No. P67/44.

#### O. B. Distributors, Inc., and A. U. T. Customs Brokers, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 61/21674 (New York).

Bao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of brass pole ends similar in all material respects to those the subject of *J. C. DeJong & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(52 CCPA 26, C.A.D. 852), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
EXHIBIT 24
 DIRECTORS OF HOME FEDERAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION
 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
POWER OF ATTORNEY
  Signature
    
    Title
    
    Date/s/ William G. Bagwell

William G. Bagwell
    
    Director
    
    April 16, 2009/s/ John K. Bailey

John K. Bailey
    
    Director
    
    April 16, 2009/s/ John W. Bailey

John W. Bailey
    
    Director
    
    April 16, 2009/s/ Randall L. Crow

Randall L. Crow
    
    Chairman of the Board
    
    April 16, 2009/s/ Ricky D. Davis

Ricky D. Davis
    
    Director and Secretary
    
    April 16, 2009/s/ Lawrence R. Dunn

Lawrence R. Dunn
    
    Director
    
    April 16, 2009/s/ Trent P. Gaites

Trent P. Gaites
    
    Director
    
    April 16, 2009/s/ Rita B. Gray

Rita B. Gray
    
    Director and Assistant Secretary
    
    April 16, 2009/s/ Sidney A. Howell

Sidney A. Howell
    
    Director
    
    April 16, 2009/s/ Daniel Olejnik

Daniel Olejnik
    
    Director
    
    April 16, 2009/s/ Henry C. Schmerler

Henry C. Schmerler
    
    Director
    
    April 16, 2009/s/ H. Phillip Wilburn

H. Phillip Wilburn
    
    Director
    
    April 16, 2009
Before the Third Division,

February 2, 1956

No. 59709.

#### Lep Transport, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 260759-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Since plaintiff failed to introduce evidence of compliance with the regulations covering free entry of American merchandise, which compliance is mandatory, the protest was overruled. *(Maple Leaf Petroleum, Lid.*v. *United States,*25 G. C. P. A. 5, T. D. 48976, followed.)
H. Res. 295 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 11, 2007. 

Whereas for more than 50 years since the outbreak of the 

Korean War, a close relationship has existed between the 

United States and the Republic of Korea, which has been 

of enormous economic, cultural, and strategic advantage 

to both nations; 

Whereas President George W. Bush and President Roh Moo 

Hyun have demonstrated their mutual willingness to 

forge a deeper alliance between the United States and the 

Republic of Korea to enhance stability in East Asia; 

Whereas the 29,000 United States armed services personnel 

who are stationed in the Republic of Korea serve as a 

testament to the enduring strength of the 1953 U.S.– 

R.O.K. Mutual Defense Treaty; 

Whereas the foundation of the relationship between the 

United States and the Republic of Korea rests on a 

shared interest in and commitment to peace, democracy, 

and freedom on the Korean Peninsula, in Asia, and 

throughout the world; 

Whereas the Republic of Korea and the United States are 

both deeply committed to the Six Party Talks and have 

a mutual interest in keeping the Korean Peninsula free 

of nuclear weapons; 
2 

•HRES 295 EH 

Whereas the Republic of Korea has more than 1,200 armed 

services personnel deployed in Iraq, constituting the third 

largest coalition contingent in Iraq behind the United 

States and the United Kingdom; 

Whereas the Republic of Korea has more than 200 armed 

services personnel deployed in Afghanistan; and 

Whereas the Republic of Korea has pledged $460,000,000 toward reconstruction and stabilization in postwar Iraq: 

Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes 

the strong alliance between the Republic of Korea and the 

United States and expresses appreciation to the Republic of 

Korea for its contributions to international efforts to combat 

terrorism. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Material Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert M. Bernstein, Chief Executive Officer, President and Principle Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

\s\         Robert M. BernsteinRobert M. BernsteinChief Executive Officer and President

August 12, 2003

----
### DEPARTMENTAL

----

## ADMINISTRATIVE & CIVIL LAW DESKBOOKS****Administrative Law Topic/Reference Index (2022)Federal Litigation Deskbook (2020)General Administrative Law Deskbook (2022)Government Information Practices Deskbook (2022)LOFE Deskbook (2020)Professional Responsibility Deskbook (2022)Standards of Conduct Deskbook (2017)CLAMO DESKBOOKS****Polish/United States Interoperability Handbook2024 Pandemic Response HandbookCOVID-19 Key Leader Guide And Senior Leader Smart BooksDomestic Disaster Response (2017)2024 Domestic Operational Law HandbookForged in the Fire (2008)Lessons Learned in the Balkans (1995-1998)Operation Allies Welcome After Action Report (2022)Rule of Law Handbook (2015)Multinational Legal Interoperability SmartbookCONTRACT & FISCAL LAW DESKBOOKS****Contract Attorney Deskbook (2024)Fiscal Law Deskbook (2024)CRIMINAL LAW DESKBOOKS****Criminal Law Online DeskbookCriminal Law Deskbook 2019Criminal Law Deskbook 2018Electronic Benchbook InstructionsElectronic Benchbook (v. 18.01).zip (2018)LAW OFFICE MANAGEMENT DESKBOOKS****Legal Administrator Deskbook (CAC/EAMS-A only) (2021)LEGAL ASSISTANCE DESKBOOKS****Client Services Deskbook (2022)Consumer Law Deskbook (2022)Estate Planning Deskbook (2016)(Filing Year 2021) Tax Deskbook (2022)NATIONAL SECURITY LAW DESKBOOKS****LOAC Documentary Supplement (2024)Operational Law Handbook (2024)PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATIONS PROGRAM****Military Citation Guide (25th ed. 2022)SPECIAL EMPHASIS2024 Pandemic Response Handbook Field Manual 3-84 (Legal Support to Operations)(Sep 2023) Commander's Legal HandbookMultinational Legal Interoperability Smartbook******The Judge Advocate General's Legal Center & School
600 Massie Rd Charlottesville, VA 22903

Accessibility/Section 508FOIAExternal Links DisclaimerNo FEAR ActPrivacy Program
Contact Us- Main Reception Desk:
-  (434) 971-3300 
-  Lodging:  
-  (434) 972-6450 
-  ** 
School Departments-  Administrative & Civil Law 
-  Criminal Law 
-  Contract & Fiscal Law 
-  National Security Law 
-  Leadership 
-  Warrant Officer Education 
Legal Center-  Future Concepts Directorate 
-  Training Developments Directorate 
-  Center for Law and Military Operations 
NCOA & 27D AIT-  Resident NCOA 
-  Online Paralegal 
-  27D AIT
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Easy Care Acupuncture, PC, a/a/o Jonathan Nuamah, Plaintiff-Appellant, <br><br>against<br><br>The Hartford Ins. Co., Defendant-Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Plaintiff, as limited by its briefs, appeals from so much of an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Gerald Lebovits, J.), dated July 9, 2014, as granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and denied plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment, in an action to recover no-fault benefits in the sum of $2,255.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Order (Gerald Lebovits, J.), dated July 9, 2014, modified to the extent of denying defendant's motion for summary judgment and reinstating the complaint; as modified, order affirmed, with $10 costs. (<i>see Easy Care Acupuncture, PC v The Hartford Ins. Co.</i>, appeal numbered 17-179, decided herewith.)</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><p>I concur I concur I concur </p><br>Decision Date: November 01, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

 

I, Jeffrey A. Brodsky,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K of Adelphia Recovery Trust;

 

2. Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e))****for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in thisreport any changes in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,****the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: March 9, 2009

 

By:  Quest Turnaround Advisors, L.L.C. as TrustAdministrator of the Adelphia Recovery Trust

 
| /s/ Jeffrey A. Brodsky |   |
|------------------------|--------|
|                   |   |
| Jeffrey A. Brodsky     |   |
|                   |   |
| Member                 |   |

 

----
10-6BBT_425MM_SEP_Loan_Addendum


Exhibit 10-6


Loan Agreement Addendum
9660933120/00007




This Loan Agreement Addendum to a loan agreement dated the 17th of September, 2012 for account number 9660933120 note 00007, in the original principal amount of $4,250,000 by and between BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY (“Bank”), a North Carolina banking corporation and Southeast Power Corporation, a State of Florida corporation (“Borrower”), having its executive offices at Melbourne, Florida is made this 15th day of January 2013 by and between BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, a North Carolina banking corporation (“Bank”) and Southeast Power Corporation, a State of Florida corporation (“Borrower”), having its executive offices at Melbourne, Florida.


Section V. FINANCIAL COVENANTS is amended as follows:
 
The paragraph beginning Tangible Net Worth is deleted and replaced with the following:


Tangible Net Worth. A minimum tangible net worth of not less than $18,000,000.00 as evidenced by Borrower’s consolidated annual audited financial statement as included in the Form 10-K beginning with its fiscal year ending December 31, 2012.  Tangible Net Worth is defined as net worth, plus obligations contractually subordinated to debts owed to Bank, minus goodwill, contract rights, and assets representing claims on stockholders or affiliated entities. 


All other conditions of the loan agreement are to remain unchanged including the paragraph beginning Debt to Tangible Net Worth following the section replaced in this addendum. 











SIGNATURE PAGE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Bank, Borrower and Guarantor(s) have caused this Agreement to be duly executed under seal all as of the date first above written.
	
				
	Witness:
	 
	BORROWER:

	 
	 
	 

	





	 
	Southeast Power Corporation, a Florida corporation



	John H. Sottile
	 
	By:  /s/ Stephen R. Wherry

	Print Name:
	/s/ John H. Sottile
	 
	Stephen R. Wherry

	

/s/ Mary Manger
	 
	Title: Treasurer

	Print Name:
	Mary Manger
	 
	 






	
				
	Witness:
	 
	GUARANTORS:

	 
	 
	 

	





	 
	The Goldfield Corporation, a Delaware corporation



	John H. Sottile
	 
	By:  /s/ Stephen R. Wherry

	Print Name:
	/s/ John H. Sottile
	 
	Stephen R. Wherry

	

/s/ Mary Manger
	 
	Title: Senior Vice President

	Print Name:
	Mary Manger
	 
	 

	 
	 
	

Pineapple House of Brevard, Inc., a Florida corporation



	John H. Sottile
	 
	By: /s/ Stephen R. Wherry

	Print Name:
	/s/ John H. Sottile
	 
	Stephen R. Wherry

	

/s/ Mary Manger
	 
	Title: Vice President

	Print Name:
	Mary Manger
	 
	 




	
				
	 
	 
	Bayswater Development Corporation, a Florida corporation



	John H. Sottile
	 
	By: /s/ Stephen R. Wherry

	Print Name:
	/s/ John H. Sottile
	 
	Stephen R. Wherry

	

/s/ Mary Manger
	 
	Title: Treasurer

	Print Name:
	Mary Manger
	 
	 















	
				
	Witness:
	 
	BANK:

	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	Branch Banking and Trust Company



	John H. Sottile
	 
	By:  /s/ Barry Forbes

	Print Name:
	/s/ John H. Sottile
	 
	 

	

/s/ Mary Manger
	 
	Name: Barry Forbes

	Print Name:
	Mary Manger
	 
	Title: Sr. Vice President
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Green Earth Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Walter Raquet, Chief Executive Officer and principal financial officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 that:




(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




A signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Date: October 26, 2015



By:

/s/ Walter RaquetWalter RaquetChief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
No. 95, Misc.

#### Anderson *v.*California.

Supreme Court of California. Certiorari denied.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jermaine Johnson, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 107]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Steven Barrett, J.), rendered August 4,1993, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 25 years to life, and order of the same court and Justice, entered on or about August 10, 1994, denying his motion to vacate the judgment of conviction, unanimously affirmed.

Since defendant failed to raise his contention that there was insufficient proof to establish that he intended to rob the victims in his motion to dismiss in the trial court, the issue has not been preserved for this Court’s review as a matter of law (CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Gray,*86 NY2d 10). In any event, viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the People *(People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620, 621), the proof was legally sufficient to establish his guilt of murder in the second degree. Upon an independent review of the facts, the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. *(People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490). The surviving victim properly testified as to his understanding of defendant’s words and that they indicated to him that defendant wanted him to turn over his property. It was for the jury to determine the appropriate weight to be accorded to the victim’s interpretation of these words. Defendant’s statement and his act of pointing a gun in the victim’s face constituted sufficient evidence to permit the jury to infer that he specifically intended to commit the crime of robbery *(see, People v Bracey,*41 NY2d 296).

Defendant’s contention that the audiotape of the autopsy performed on one of the victims constituted *Rosario*material has not been preserved for this Court’s review as a matter of law (CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Rogelio,*79 NY2d 843) and, in any event, has been rejected by the Court of Appeals *(People v Washington,*86 NY2d 189).

*278We perceive no abuse of discretion in sentencing. Concur— Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach and Tom, JJ.
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atrium Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Jeff L. Hull, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|      |  |                   |  |     |  |                                                                                                           
|----- |  | ----------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: |  | November 14, 2002 |  | By: |  | /s/ Jeff L. HullJeff L. Hull
President, Chief Executive Officer and
Director (Principal Executive Officer)
March 26, 1997

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
450 Fifth Street, N. W.
Judiciary Plaza
Washington, DC. 20549

Re:  United Gold & Government Fund, Inc.
     Post-Effective Amendment No. 19

Dear Sir or Madam:

In connection with the filing of the above-referenced Post-Effective Amendment,
I hereby represent that the Amendment does not contain disclosures which would
render it ineligible to become effective pursuant to paragraph (b) of Rule 485.

Yours truly,



Sharon K. Pappas
General Counsel

SKP:fr
##### 



Exhibit 32 WRITTEN STATEMENT
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 The undersigned, Greg H. Weaver, the Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer of Pacific Sunwear of California, Inc. (the Company), and
Gerald M. Chaney, the Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, hereby certify
that:  (i)
    
    the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form
10-Q for the period ended October 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company. Dated: December 7, 2004
    
    /s/ Greg H. WeaverGreg H. WeaverChairman of the Boardand Chief Executive OfficerPacific Sunwear of California, Inc.Dated: December 7, 2004
    
    /s/ Gerald M. ChaneyGerald M. ChaneySenior Vice President,Chief Financial Officer and SecretaryPacific Sunwear of California, Inc.
 This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.