alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 3.2

#### STATE OF DELAWARECERTIFICATE
OF AMENDMENT OF CERTIFICATE OF
INCORPORATION

| | First: | That at the annual meeting of the stockholders of SysComm International Corporationresolutions were duly
adopted setting forth a proposed amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation of said corporation. The
resolution setting forth the proposed amendment is as follows:
|- | ------ | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | Resolved,that the Certificate of Incorporation of this corporation be amended by changing the Article
thereof numbered Fourth so that, as amended, said Article shall be and read as follows:
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | The total number of shares of stock which the Corporation shall have the authority to issue is eighty-five
million (85,000,000) shares of common stock with a par value of One Cent ($0.01) per share consisting of
eighty million (80,000,000) shares of common stock and five million (5,000,000) shares of preferred stock.
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | Second: | That  thereafter,  such meeting of the  stockholders of said  corporation was duly called and held, at which
                           meeting the necessary number of shares as required by statute were voted in favor of the amendment.
|- | ------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | Third: | That said  amendment  was duly  adopted in  accordance  with the  provisions  of Section  242 of the General
                           Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.
|- | ------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | Fourth: | That the capital of said corporation shall not be reduced under or by reason of said amendment.
|- | ------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | By: | /s/ ANAT EBENSTEIN
| | --- | ------------------

| | Name:   Anat Ebenstein, as President
| | ------------------------------------

| | STATE OF DELAWARE
SECRETARY OF STATEDIVISION OF CORPORATIONSFILED 09:00 AM 03/22/2002020202879  2139479
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
### MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 12

- 00543

- CV

IN RE Paul and Margaret PACE

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 10, 2012

DIS MISSED AS MOOT

On August 24, 2012, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for

emergency relief. This court granted the motion for emergency relief and requeste d a response

which was timely filed.

On September 28, 2012, relators filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the petition for

writ of mandamus as moot, stating that actions taken by the probate court since the petition was

filed disposed of the issues that formed the basis for the mandamus proceeding. The motion is

granted , and the petition for writ of mandamus and this original mandamus proceeding are

dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2007PC3281 , styled Guardianship of A.M.P., An Incapacitated Person

, pending in the Probate Court No

. 1

, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Polly Jackson Spencer presiding.
September 2 3 , 2013

Dr. David Danielson Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW. Washington, DC 20585

Dear Assistant Secretary Danielson :

Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (“ Samsung ”) respectfully submits this Application for Interim Waiver and Petition for Waiver to the Department of Energy (“DOE” or “the Department”) for Samsung’s compressor refrigerator

- freezers with multiple defrost cycles.

Reasoning 10 CFR Part 430.27(a)(1) allows a person to submit a petition to waive for a particular basic model any requirements of §430.23 upon the grounds that the basic model contains one or more design characteristics which either prevent testing of the basic model according to the prescribed test procedures, or the prescribed test procedures may evaluate the basic model in a manner so unrepresentative of its true energy consumption characteristics as to provide materially in acc urate comparative data. Current test procedures as prescribed in Appendix A1 to Subpart B of Part 430 (“Appendix A1”) do not adequately provide a way for Samsung to accurately represent the

energy consumption of its refrigerator

- freezers with multiple defrost cycles

. DOE concurred with Samsung’s understanding in the interim waiver granted to Samsung in 76 FR 16760 1 and subsequently granted the waiver on January 10, 2012 (77 FR 1474). Additionally, DOE

communicated that all manufacturers planning on marketing refrigerator

- freezers with multiple defrost cycles must seek a waiver from the Department. 2
For the reasons that DOE described in its granting of waiver (77 FR 1474) f or Samsung refrigerator freezers with multiple defrost cycles , Samsung believes that the granting of Interim

Waiver and Waiver for the models listed below are warranted.

1 DOE understands, however, that absent an interim waiver, Samsung’s products would not be accurately tested and rated for energy consumption because the current energy test procedure does not include test procedures for products with multiple defrost cycle types.

2 Until these amendments are required in conjunction with the 2014 standards, manufacturers introducing products equipped with multiple defrost cycle types should, consistent with 10 CFR 430.27, petition for a waiver since the modified version of Appendix A1 set out in today’s notice will not include a specified method for capturing this energy usage.Request

Samsung requests that the a lternate t est p rocedure for refrigerators with multiple defrost cycles, as prescribed in the waiver (77 FR 1474) and in the interim waiver ( 77 FR 13109 ) granted to Samsung, be granted for the following basic Samsung refrigerator

- freezers with multiple defrost cycles models:

RS22HD*PN**

Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding this Petition for Waiver and Application for Interim Waiver

. I will be happy to discuss should any questions arise.

Sincerely,

Michael Moss

Director of Corporate Environmental Affairs
#### In re: Gary Lewis DAVIS, Petitioner.

No. 05-6137.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 27, 2005.

Decided Aug. 5, 2005.

Gary Lewis Davis, Petitioner pro se.

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM.

Gary Lewis Davis petitions for writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion for modification of sentence. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the docket sheet reveals that the district court denied Davis’s motion on June 9, 2005. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Davis’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*PETITION DENIED*
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 168 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 168

 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Education and 
                Labor in the One Hundred Tenth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 15, 2007

Mr. George Miller of California (for himself and Mr. McKeon) submitted 
the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Education and 
                Labor in the One Hundred Tenth Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on Education and Labor (hereafter 
in this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including the 
expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the 
applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for committee 
salaries and expenses, not more than $16,334,250 for the One Hundred 
Tenth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $8,025,500 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2007, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2008; and
            (2) not more than $8,308,750 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2008, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2009.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cellcom I Corp. on Form 10-KSB for
the year ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David A. Obal, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: March 16, 2007                    By: /s/ David A. Obal
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            David A. Obal
                                            Chief Financial Officer


                                       23
From: janvid23@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:09:01 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jan Vidmar

Baltimore, MD 21229
Case No. 13,491.

#### The STORM KING.

[Cited in The E. W. Gorgas. Case No. 4,585. Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible.]
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
BJs Wholesale Club, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended November 1, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Michael T. Wedge, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|       |  |                   | 
|------ |  | ----------------- | 
|Dated: |  | December 16, 2003 | 
|       |  |                   |
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 6 A1 41 6 . LEMONS v

. THE STATE.

Ap p el l an t R o b e r t Lem o n s

, ap p eari n g p ro s e, o ri g i nal l y was req u i red t o h av e

fi led an en u m erat io n o f erro rs an d b ri ef i n t h is Co u rt by Ap ri l 2 8

, 2 0 1 6

. OCGA § 5 -6

-

4 0 an d Co u rt o f Ap p eal s Ru l e 23 (a). Ap p el l an t w as g ran t ed an ex t en si o n o f t i m e to

fi le h i s en u m erat i o n o f erro rs an d b ri ef n o l at er t han M ay 9, 2 0 1 6

. N o fi l i n g h as b een

m ad e as o f t h e d a t e o f t h i s o rd er. T h erefo re, t h i s ap p eal i s h ereb y D ISM ISSED.

Ro wl a n d v. S t a t e

, 2 64 Ga. 8 7 2 (4 5 2 SE2 d 7 5 6 ) (1 9 9 5 ); W h i t t l e v. S t a t e

, 2 10 Ga. Ap p.

8 4 1 , 8 4 2 (4 3 7 SE2 d 84 2 ) (1 9 9 3 ).

M r. Lem o n s

, y o u r a p p e a l h as b een DISM ISSED b ecau s e y o u fai l ed t o fi l e a

b ri ef an d en u m erat io n of erro rs

. If y o u h av e d eci d ed y o u d o no t wan t t o ap p eal

, y o u

n eed no t d o an y th i n g m ore. If, h o wev er, y o u d o s t i l l wan t t o ap p eal

, y o u m ay h av e

t h e ri gh t t o an O UT-OF-TIM E APPEAL

-- b u t YOU M UST TAKE ACTION to

ex erci s e t h at ri g h t by m o v i n g fo r an o u t -o f- t i m e a p p eal i n th e t ri al co u rt

. If y o u r

m o ti o n fo r an o u t -o f-t i m e ap p eal i s g ran t ed

, t h e t ri al co u rt s h o u l d ap p oi n t an at t o rn ey

fo r y o u i f yo u wan t on e an d can n o t p ay fo r o ne. If y o u r m o ti o n fo r an o u t -o f-t i m e

ap p eal i s d en i ed , y o u m ay ap p eal t h at d en i al t o t h i s Co u rt wi t h i n t h i rt y (3 0 ) d ay s o f

t h e t ri al co urt ’ s d eci s i o n

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

.

W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 07/05/2016 July 05, 2016
From: r_rjohnson1962@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:48:53 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Russell and Rebecca Johnson

Indian Springs, NV 89018
No. 69638.

#### Joseph A. Paredes and Luro Products Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 59/6439 and 59/13360 (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Oliver, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of electric motors similar in all material respect to those the subject of Abstract 66961, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
EX-99.CERT 11(b)



This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, and 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, and accompanies the report on Form N-CSR for the
period ended February 29, 2008 of Florida Daily Municipal Income Fund (the
"Company").


Each of the undersigned officers of the Company hereby certify that, to the best
of such officer's knowledge:


         (i) the Form N-CSR fully complies with the requirements of Section
         13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
         U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and


         (ii) the information contained in the Form N-CSR fairly presents, in
         all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
         of the Company.


Date:   May 8, 2008                                        /s/Michael P. Lydon
                                                              Michael P. Lydon
                                                              President




Date:    May 8, 2008                                       /s/Anthony Pace
                                                              Anthony Pace
                                                              Treasurer
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 353 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         June 26, 2008.
Whereas the annual commemoration of Men's Health Week during the week preceding 
        Father's Day gives new reason to consider the critical need to improve 
        detection and treatment of prostate cancer;
Whereas prostate cancer now strikes at least one in six American men, with 
        African-American men having a 60 percent higher incidence rate than 
        Caucasian men and a mortality rate twice as high;
Whereas each year more than 230,000 American men are newly diagnosed with 
        prostate cancer, more than 1,500,000 men have biopsies, and around 
        30,000 men fall prey to this potential killer;
Whereas it is important for men to take advantage of prostate cancer screening 
        exams in order to detect the disease at the earliest opportunity, when 
        it is still curable;
Whereas a recent study funded by the National Cancer Institute demonstrated that 
        the most common available methods of detecting prostate cancer, the PSA 
        blood test and physical exams, are not foolproof--imaging would be 
        another beneficial factor in the diagnosis and treatment of prostate 
        cancer;
Whereas the use of advanced imaging technologies to detect and treat prostate 
        cancer could be beneficial for eliminating unnecessary and costly 
        medical procedures that increase psychological and emotional trauma for 
        American men and their families;
Whereas the lack of accurate imaging tools means that biopsies can miss cancer 
        even when multiple samples are taken, and current treatments--either 
        radical surgery or radiation--can leave 50 to 80 percent of men 
        incontinent or impotent or both; and
Whereas advanced imaging technologies could be combined with treatment tools to 
        perform image-guided, minimally invasive and precisely targeted 
        interventions, which will be performed in outpatient clinics with 
        minimal discomfort, complications and costs and which will end the fear, 
        pain, suffering and costs that prostate cancer causes men and their 
        families: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that there 
should be increased support for research and development of advanced imaging 
technologies for prostate cancer detection and treatment.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```