alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-30808

Conference Calendar

 

ANGELA M. BOUTTE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

GEORGE W. BUSH, Jr., President of the United States;

RICHARD B. CHENEY, Vice President of the United States; 

MARY LANDRIEU, U.S. Senator; MARC H. MORIAL, Mayor; CITY OF NEW

ORLEANS; MICHELLE M. MORIAL; WWL TELEVISION STATION; T. LAMAR

TEAFORD, Dr.; LAKELAND MEDICAL CENTER; KAMRAN ZAHERI, M.D.; TENET

HEALTH SYSTEM MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC.; UNIDENTIFIED

PARTIES,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 01-CV-661-R

--------------------

October 25, 2001

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Angela Boutte has filed a motion to proceed in forma

pauperis (IFP) and a motion to expedite her appeal of the

district court’s dismissal of her civil complaint as frivolous. 

A district court may deny a motion for leave to appeal IFP

by certifying that the appeal is not taken in good faith and by

providing written reasons for the certification. See Baugh v.

Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997); 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. P. 24(a). The appellant may challenge

the district court's certification decision by filing in this
O R D E R

No. 01-30808

- 2 -

court a motion for leave to proceed IFP. Id. at 202; Fed.

R. App. P. 24(a)(5). The motion, however, "must be directed

solely to the trial court's reasons for the certification

decision." See Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202. 

Boutte’s motion does not challenge the district court’s

certification that the appeal was not taken in good faith, as is

required. It is therefore DENIED.

If the merits of the appeal are "inextricably intertwined

with the certification decision," we may determine both issues. 

Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202. Our inquiry into an appellant's good

faith" is limited to whether the appeal involves `legal points

arguable on their merits (and therefore not frivolous).'" Howard

v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983) (citation omitted). 

Probable success on the merits is not required. Id. 

Boutte has failed to show that her appeal involves

nonfrivolous legal issues. Her claims are “inextricably

intertwined” with the district court’s certification decision,

and, therefore, we dismiss the appeal as frivolous in the

interest of judicial economy. See Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202; 5th

Cir. R. 42.2. Boutte’s motion to expedite appeal is DENIED as

moot. 

Motion for IFP status DENIED; motion to expedite appeal

DENIED; all other motions are DENIED; appeal DISMISSED.
February 25, 1997

  United Funds, Inc. (United Bond Fund, Class A shares; United Bond Fund, Class
  Y shares; United Income Fund, Class A shares; United Income Fund, Class Y
  shares; United Accumulative Fund, Class A shares; United Accumulative Fund,
  Class Y shares; United Science and Technology Fund, Class A shares and United
  Science and Technology Fund, Class Y shares)
6300 Lamar Avenue
P. O. Box 29217
Shawnee Mission, Kansas  66201-9217

Dear Sir or Madam:

In connection with the public offering of shares of Capital Stock, par value
$1.00 per share, of United Funds, Inc. (United Bond Fund, Class A shares; United
Bond Fund, Class Y shares; United Income Fund, Class A shares; United Income
Fund, Class Y shares; United Accumulative Fund, Class A shares; United
Accumulative Fund, Class Y shares; United Science and Technology Fund, Class A
shares and United Science and Technology Fund, Class Y shares), I have examined
such corporate records and documents and have made such further investigation
and examination as I deemed necessary for the purpose of this opinion.

It is my opinion that the 94,202,956 shares of Capital Stock of United Funds,
Inc., registration of which the notice makes definite in number, were legally
issued, fully paid and nonassessable.

I hereby consent to the filing of this opinion with the Rule 24f-2 Notice.

Very truly yours,



Sharon K. Pappas
Attorney at Law
Kent

Mayville

Antelope

Fossil

Mitchell

Clarno

Service

Creek

Richmond

WASCO CO

JEFFERSON CO

JEFFERSON COUNTY

CROOK COUNTY

SHERMAN COUNTY

WASCO COUNTY

GILLIAM COUNTY

WHEELER COUNTY

26

97

26

19

19

218

218

207

402

Day

John

River

3 0 3 6 Kilometers

3 0 3 6 Miles

W

N

E

S

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

PRINEVILLE DISTRICT

John Day Basin

Resource Management Plan

Draft Environmental Impact Statement

2008 No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these 

data for individual or aggregate use with other data. Original data were compiled from various sources. This 

information may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was developed through digital means 

and may be updated without notification.

LEGEND

Transportation 

 Interim Road

 Interim Road - Needs Rehabilitation

 Open Road Seasonally

 Closed Road

 Closed Road - Hydro

 U.S. Highway

 State Highway

 County Road

 Forest Service Secondary Route

 Private Road- Closed to public use

 or unknown

Off Highway Vehicle Designation

 Closed- Motorized Use Off Roads

 Probhibited

 Limited- Motorized Vehicle Use Limited

 to Designated Roads and Trails,

 Seasonally, or by Type of Vehicle

 Seasonal Motor Vehicle Restrictions 

Road Density Prescription

 Zero Miles per Square Mile

 Two Miles per Square Mile

Planning Area Boundary

Administered Land

 Bureau of Land Management

 Forest Service

 John Day Fossil Beds

 National Monument

 State

 Private or Other

* Note: Access to some areas listed as open may require

 landowner permission to cross private lands

4

218

26

19

OREGON

Prineville 

District

John Day Basin

Planning Area

Map

Area

M07-09-01:9-4-08

T

12

S

T

11

S

T

10

S

T

9

S

T

8

S

T

7

S

T

6

S

T

5

S

T

4

S

T

12

S

T

11

S

T

10

S

T

9

S

T

8

S

T

7

S

T

6

S

T

5

S

T

4

S

R 17 E R 18 E R 19 E R 20 E R 21 E R 22 E R 23 E

R 17 E R 18 E R 19 E R 20 E R 21 E R 22 E R 23 E

26

207

Mitchell

Alternative 4

Map 13B: Alternative 2, 4, and 5 Travel Management and Off

Highway Vehicle Designations - Sutton Mountain
From: maggie88cj@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:57:27 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

margaret austin

Greene, NY 13778
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PanAmSat Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael J. Inglese, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|Date: November 9, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/MICHAEL J. INGLESEMichael J. Inglese Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov >

To: Raj Rao/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Anna Wood/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Howard Hoffman/DC/USEPA/ US@EPA, Paul Balserak/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 08/09/2010 01:07 PM Subject: RE: Call in # 1-866-299-3188 Code 202 564 1664

-----Original Message----- From: Rao.Raj@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Rao.Raj@epama il.epa.gov] Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 1:03 PM To: Kymn, Christine J. Cc: Wood.Anna@epamail.epa.gov; hoffman.howard@epama il.epa.gov; Balserak.Paul@epamail.epa.gov Subject: Call in # 1-866-299-3188 Code 202 564 1664

Please call 1-866-299-3188 Code 202-564-1664 asap. Anna, can you open the line please. if you can't i will. Raj Rao, P.E. Group Leader, NSRG OAQPS/AQPD(MD- C504-03)
109 TW Alexander Drive
RTP, NC 27709

919-541-5344

919-541-5509 fax

Note: Positions or views expressed here do not rep resent official EPA policy. Interagency deliberative and Confidential.

From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn @omb.eop.gov>

To: Raj Rao/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Anna Wood/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Howard Hof fman/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Paul
Balserak/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 08/09/2010 12:43 PM

Subject: RE: Status of package

I am available at 1pm as well.

As I explained to you on Friday evening when we rec eived EPA's redline and the language negotiated external to our review process, we needed to be able to review EPA's proposed edits and the language we had not yet seen. Still, even with those time constraints, I was able to work wit h the external reviewer on the externally negotiated language, both of us revi ewing over the weekend. In addition, as I said I would do on Friday evening, I spent the weekend reviewing EPA's language but I also needed to check with interagency reviewers today on responses to edits.

I continue to support a constructive and respectful review process and am hoping this call will remain true to that underlyin g directive.

-----Original Message----- From: Rao.Raj@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Rao.Raj@epama il.epa.gov]Sent: Monday, August 09, 2010 12:29 PM

To: Kymn, Christine J. Cc: Wood.Anna@epamail.epa.gov; hoffman.howard@epama il.epa.gov; Balserak.Paul@epamail.epa.gov Subject: Status of package

Christine,

I was hoping that you would be clear the packages e arly today but now I understand from your VM that you have edits on both the CEQ language and other language too. we have been extremely patient and a ccommodating and it is frustrating that you still seem to be raising issue s with the packages. You suggested a call. Please let me know ASAP if you all are available at 1pm and I will send out a scheduler. (I need Anna and Christine at least on the
call) .

Hopefully if these are minor tweaks, we can make qu ick edits and send official files through ROCIS later today for clearance.

raj

Raj Rao, P.E. Group Leader, NSRG OAQPS/AQPD(MD- C504-03)

109 TW Alexander Drive
RTP, NC 27709

919-541-5344

919-541-5509 fax

Note: Positions or views expressed here do not rep resent official EPA policy. Interagency deliberative and Confidential.

SIP-Fix write-up2.doc
From: kaypriddy@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:24:33 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kathryn Priddy

Evans, GA 30809
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Matech Corp. (the Company”) on Form 10-Q
for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Robert M. Bernstein, Chief Executive
Officer, President, and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





1.      The
report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.      The
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date:
November 13, 2008






/s/
Robert M.
Bernstein


Robert M.
Bernstein,


Chief
Executive Officer, President, and


Chief
Financial Officer
CAPMARK FINANCE INC.
Logo






Annual
Statement as to Compliance
 For the
Year Ended December 31, 2008
 
 
 JP
Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust
 Series
2008-C2
 
 Westlin
Portfolio Pari Passu Loan Serviced under JPMC Series 2007-C1 (the “C1
 Transaction”)
 
 Pursuant to the
Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the C1 Transaction (the Lead Servicing
Agreement), dated as of December 20, 2007, by and among, J.P. Morgan Chase
Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc., as Depositor, Capmark Finance Inc., as
Master Servicer (in such capacity, the Lead Servicer), and the other parties
party thereto, I hereby attest that:
 i.
                A review of the
      activities of the Lead Servicer during the above referenced period, and of
      its performance under the Lead Servicing Agreement, has been made under my
      supervision.ii.
                To the best of my
      knowledge, based on such review, the Lead Servicer, has fulfilled in all
      material respects its obligations under the Lead Servicing Agreement
      throughout such period.
 Capmark
Finance Inc.
 
 /s/ Mark
E. McCool
 
 
 By:    
Mark E. McCool
 Title: 
Managing Director
 Date: 
February 20, 2009
 
 
  .inv  872
Westlin Portfolio lib A
    Capmark Finance
      Inc.116 Welsh
      RoadReal Estate
      Finance, Investoments, Services
              Horsham, Pa
      19044
# ALL INSPECTION DOUBLERS AND COVERS TO BE INSTALLED IN BOTTOM WING SKINS ONLY WING FORWARD MAIN BEAMWING LEADING EDGE
BURL'S AIRCRAFT, LLC PO BOX 671487 CHUGIAK, ALASKA 99567 (907)688-3715 burl@biginalaska.com 

# NOTE: VIEW IS LOOKING DOWN ON BOTTOM OF LEFT WING 2-1272 DOUBLER

END OF -4L & -3L SKINS

STA. END OF -5L & -6L SKINS END OF -7L & -8L SKINS END OF -5L & -6L SKINS
2-1285 PLATE ASSEM.

0.00

REF.; 4.97" FROM RIVET CENTERLINE TO CENTER OF HOLE

6.845 6.845 7.100

4.970 4.970 8.825

8.825 5.310 4.970 4.970

6.385 4.970 8.980 4.970 2.72" TYPICAL ALL AFT LOCATIONS

2.72" TYPICAL ALL FORWARD LOCATIONS 4.97 6.845 4.970

4.970 4.970

NOTE: THIS DOUBLER TO BE MOVED TO NEXT OUTBOARD PANEL IF WING IS FITTED WITH STC/FIELD APPROVAL EXTENDED RANGE FUEL TANK 

### (EXISTING) (EXISTING) END OF -9L & -10L SKINS END OF -7L & -8L SKINS 121.00



### STA 171.00 L.H. ONLY WINDOW

### -18

### STA 153.04 STA STA STA 137.02 124.25 110.20 STA STA STA STA 99.58 88.96 71.31 57.62 1.00 15.52 29.72 43.93 

### THIS DOUBLER AND COVER TO BE INSTALLED ON RIGHT WING ONLY 

# SKETCH NO. SB 15AC06-08-10, INSTALLATION OF 2-1272 DOUBLERS AND 2-1285 INSPECTION COVER IN ROGERS (AERONCA) 15AC/S15AC SEDAN SERIES AIRPLANES. SEE INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS NO. "SB 15AC06-08-10 INSTALLATION PROCEDURES" FOR DETAILED INFORMATION. ALL RIVETS IN EXTERNAL SKINS ARE TO BE MS20470AD4 RIVETS. SEPT. 09 2011

AILERON PUSH-PULL ROD EXIT SLOT

STA STA STA STA 11.90 9.80 7.70 5.60



### REMOVE THESE RIVETS REMOVE IF NECESSARY; REINSTALL ALL RIVETS AFTER DOUBLERS ARE LOCATED IN THEIR BAYS 

### END OF -4 L/R SKIN END OF -3 L/R SKIN END OF -4 L/R SKIN END OF -5 L/R SKIN END OF -6 L/R SKIN END OF -5 L/R SKIN END OF -6 L/R SKIN END OF -7 L/R SKIN
From: mlparkey@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:36:04 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Martha Parkey

Carrollton, TX 75006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                        5
<LEGEND>

     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED   BALANCE   SHEET,   CONSOLIDATED   STATEMENT  OF  OPERATIONS   AND
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE
PERIOD  ENDING JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                               0001037417
<NAME>      SYSCOMM INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                        OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                    758,438
<SECURITIES>                              112,500
<RECEIVABLES>                          19,684,234
<ALLOWANCES>                             (167,489)
<INVENTORY>                             7,788,675
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       28,356,364
<PP&E>                                  1,618,597
<DEPRECIATION>                           (859,264)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         29,309,802
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  18,845,828
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                   48,822
<OTHER-SE>                             10,338,313
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           29,309,802
<SALES>                                63,877,540
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       63,877,540
<CGS>                                  55,991,555
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          55,991,555
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        4,501,904
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          110,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        778,702
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         2,684,662
<INCOME-TAX>                            1,132,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     1,552,662
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                            1,552,662
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 .45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 .45


        



</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.8

CONSENT OF LEAH MACH

I, Leah Mach, hereby
consent to the references to, and the use of any information derived from, the technical report titled “NI 43-101 Technical
Report, Mineraçăo Aurizona S.A., Aurizona Mine” dated January 23, 2012 and “NI 43-101 Technical Report,
Aurizona Resource and Reserve Update, Brazil” dated April 29, 2013, but having an effective date of January 29, 2013 (the
“Reports”) in the annual report on Form 40-F of Sandstorm Gold, Ltd. for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2013 and any amendments thereto (the “Annual Report”) being filed with United States Securities and Exchange Commission,
which Annual Report incorporates by reference and attaches as an exhibit the Sandstorm Gold Ltd. Annual Information Form for
the year ended December 31, 2013 which refers to information contained in the Reports.

I also consent to
the use of my name, including as an expert or “qualified person,” in connection with the Annual Report.

Date: March 11, 2014



| | /s/ Leah Mach                       
| | ------------------------------------
| | Name:  Leah Mach, M.Sc. Geology, CPG
| | Title: Principal Resource Geologist