alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
January 22, 1958

No. 61500.

Suit 4912.

#### Star-Kist Foods, Inc. *v.*United States (Bruno Scheidt, Inc., party in interest).

C. D. 1819 reversed and remanded November 22, 1957. (Case restored to docket of trial court.) C. A. D. 666.
No. 609.

#### Abernathy et al. *v.*Sullivan.

*I. H. Wachtel, Charles S. Conley, Benjamin Spiegel*and *Raymond S. Harris*for petitioners.

*Sam Rice Baker, M. Roland Nachman, Jr.*and *Calvin Whitesell*for respondent.

Supreme Court of Alabama. Certiorari granted.
No. 60173.

protests 60646-K, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### Cotton Products Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that 20 percent of the merchandise consists of rags used chiefly for papermaking, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained with respect to said 20 percent of the merchandise.
Exhibit 32.2

Statement





Pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of Luxemburg Bancshares, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that to the knowledge of the undersigned:



(1)

the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2)

the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  November 10, 2004





/s/ Sheri L. Knope

Sheri L. Knope

Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Luxemburg Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by Luxemburg Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.  This statement accompanies the periodic report to which it relates and shall not be deemed as filed as part of the report or otherwise for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
EXHIBIT 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY



|1. | Forbes Energy Services LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | C.C. Forbes, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------



|3. | TX Energy Services, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------



|4. | Superior Tubing Testers, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------



|5. | Forbes Energy International, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------



|6. | Forbes Energy Services México, S. de R.L. de C.V., a Mexican company
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------



|7. | Forbes Energy Capital Inc., a Delaware corporation
|-- | --------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Roderick Macutay, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of E-Dispatch Inc. for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of E-Dispatch Inc.


Date July 2, 2009                     By: /s/ Roderick Macutay
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Roderick Macutay, President, Treasurer
                                          and Director Principal Executive and
                                          Financial Officer

This certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-K pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the
liability of that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that E-Dispatch Inc. specifically
incorporates it by reference.
No. 66450.

#### Artiflor Manufacturing Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 61/10332, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of glass balls similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Joseph Markovits, Inc.*v. *United States*(45 Cust. Ct. 151, C.D. 2216), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
**EXHIBIT**** ****13.1**

**PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION**** ****1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION**** ****906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF**** ****2002**

I, Jan G. van de Winkel, President and Chief Executive Officer of Genmab A/S, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

        (1)   The Annual Report on Form 20-F of Genmab A/S for the period ended December 31, 2023 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

        (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Genmab A/S.

| ​                  | ​ |
|--------------------------|---------|
| Date: February 14, 2024  | ​ |
| ​                  | ​ |
| /s/ Jan G. van de Winkel | ​ |

​

AMERICAS/2017215013.2

​

----
February 13, 1959

No. 62756.

Suit 4951.

#### Albert Mottola, an individual doing business under the name and style of Atlas Shipping Co. *v.*United States.

A.R.D. 81 affirmed November 5, 1958. C.A.D. 689.
From: miss.clozano@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:23:19 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Christy Lozano

Chino, CA 91708
****Exhibit31.1** **Certificationof the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to****Section302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002** I,Sebastian F. Perez, certify that: 1. I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of InfoTech USA, Inc.;  2. Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;  4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared; b) [Reserved.] c) Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and d) Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent function): a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting. Date: May13, 2005                                    /s/Sebastian F. Perez              Sebastian F. Perez, ChiefOperating Officer and acting              President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer              (Principal ExecutiveOfficer)  **
Exhibit 31.2






Credex Corporation


Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)


Section 302 Certification






I, Arunkumar Rajapandy, the Chief Financial Officer) of Credex Corporation, certify that:




1.      I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Credex Corporation;




2.      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, the results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4.      The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the issuer and have:




(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;




(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and




(c) disclosed in this report any change in the issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and




5.      The issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and




(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal control over financial reporting.




Date: April 19, 2012




Credex Corporation




By: __/S/ Arunkumar Rajapandy


Arunkumar Rajapandy,


Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
32.1






CERTIFICATION




OF




PERIODIC
REPORT







I,
Alessandro Sodi, President and Chief Executive Officer of Diligent Board Member
Services, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1)           the  Annual
Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the


financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
March 27, 2009




/s/
      Alessandro Sodi
              Alessandro
      Sodi
              President
      and Chief Financial Officer





[A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Diligent Board Member Services, Inc. and will be retained by Diligent Board
Member Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.]
No. 64516.

#### Chester K. Stoner *v.*United States,

protests 59/14579, 58/18131, and 59/14584 (Laredo).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of carrizo baskets the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Chester K. Stoner*v. *United States*(42 Cust. Ct. 178, C.D. 2083), that claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Spray

Monument

Kimberly Hamilton

Dayville

WHEELER COUNTYGRANT COUNTY

 UMATILLA

NATIONAL

FOREST

OCHOCO NATIONAL FOREST

207

207

402

19

19

19

1

6

4

15

3

5

6

7

9

26

26

40 6

John

Day

River

Fork

North

3 0 3 6 Kilometers

3 0 3 6 Miles

W

N

E

S

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

PRINEVILLE DISTRICT

John Day Basin

Resource Management Plan

Draft Environmental Impact Statement

2008

No warranty is made by the Bureau of Land Management as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these 

data for individual or aggregate use with other data. Original data were compiled from various sources. This 

information may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This product was developed through digital means 

and may be updated without notification.

OREGON

John Day 

Basin 

Planning Area

Prineville 

District

Map Area

M07-09-01:9-5-08

Transportation LEGEND

 Interim Road

 Interim Road - Needs Rehabilitation

 Open Road Seasonally

 Open Road Seasonally - Needs Rehabilitation

 County Road - Open Seasonally

 Closed Road

 Closed Road - Stream Function

 Proposed Road

 U.S. Highway

 State Highway

 County Road

 Forest Service Primary Route

 Forest Service Secondary Route

 Private Road- Closed to public use or unknown

Off Highway Vehicle Designation

 Open- Motorized Vehicle Use Permitted Off Road

 Closed- Motorized Use Off Roads Probhibited

 Limited- Motorized Vehicle Use Limited

 to Designated Roads and Trails,

 Seasonally, or by Type of Vehicle

 Seasonal Motor Vehicle Restrictions

4

26

207 19

Road Density Prescription

 Zero Miles per Square Mile

 Two Miles per Square Mile

 No Limit

Planning Area Boundary

Administered Land

 Bureau of Land Management

 Forest Service

 John Day Fossil Beds

 National Monument

 State

 Private or Other

* Note: Access to some areas listed as open may require

 landowner permission to cross private lands

T

14

S

T

13

S

T

12

S

T

11

S

T

10

S

T

9

S

T

8

S

T

7

S

T

14

S

T

13

S

T

12

S

T

11

S

T

10

S

T

9

S

T

8

S

T

7

S

R 23 E R 24 E R 25 E R 26 E R 27 E R 28 E R 29 E

R 23 E R 24 E R 25 E R 26 E R 27 E R 28 E R 29 E

Alternative 4 & 5

Map 13C: Alternative 2, 4, and 5 Travel Management and Off

Highway Vehicle Designations - Rudio Mountain
MONTEREY BAY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT REGULATION II PERMITS

10/16/02 Rule 203 (Application) 1 RULE 203. APPLICATION (Adopted 1-19-70; Revised 12-21-83, 12-13-84, and 3-21-2001; and 10-16-02.) CONTENTS PART 1 GENERAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.1 Purpose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.2 Applicability ........................................................1 1.3 Exemptions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.4 Effective Dates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.5 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 PART 2 DEFINITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 PART 3 REQUIREMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3.1 Application . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 3.2 Separate Application for each Permit Unit .................................2

PART 1 GENERAL 1.1 Purpose The purpose of this Rule is to establish provisions for permit applications. 1.2 Applicability The provisions of this Rule shall apply to any person who applies for a District Permit. 1.3 Exemptions Reserved.MONTEREY BAY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT REGULATION II PERMITS

10/16/02 Rule 203 (Application) 2 1.4 Effective Dates This Rule, as most recently revised, is effective on October 16, 2002. 1.5 References The requirements of this Rule arise from the provisions of California Health and Safety Code Sections 40702 and 42300. Referenced or related District Rules include: 101 (Definitions); 200 (Permits Required); 201 (Sources Not Requiring Permits); 206 (Standards for Issuing Authorities to Construct and Permits to Operate); and 207 (Review of New or Modified Sources).

PART 2 DEFINITIONS Reserved.
PART 3 REQUIREMENTS 3.1 Application Every application for an Authority to Construct or Permit to Operate required under Rule 200 shall be filed in the manner and form prescribed by the District, and shall give all the information necessary to enable the District to make determinations required by Rules 206 and 207 hereof. 3.2 Separate Application for each Permit Unit A separate application must be submitted to the District for each permit unit. After reviewing an application, the District may require additional applications to be filed if more than one permit unit is contained in the original application. * * * * *
From: krmoney@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:56:42 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ken Money

Greenville, TX 75401