alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07-08-0033-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL B

	FEBRUARY 29, 2008

	______________________________

	DAVID SOLIS, APPELLANT

	V.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 137TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

	NO. 2007-417,788; HONORABLE CECIL G. PURYEAR, JUDGE

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

	ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND

	Appellant, David Solis filed a notice of appeal, on December 26, 2007, from his convictions for two counts of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and one count of domestic assault.  The trial court filed its certifications representing that appellant has the right of appeal.  However, the appellate record reflects that appellant failed to sign the certifications, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d), which requires the certifications to be signed by appellant and a copy served on him.  

	Consequently, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the 137th District Court of Lubbock County for further proceedings.   On remand, the trial court shall utilize whatever means it finds necessary to determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal and, if so, to obtain his signature on an amended trial court’s certification.

	  If necessary, the trial court shall execute findings of fact, conclusions of law, and any necessary orders it may enter regarding the aforementioned issues and cause its findings, conclusions, and orders, if any, to be included in a supplemental clerk’s record.  The trial court shall file the supplemental clerk’s record and the supplemental reporter’s record, if any, with the Clerk of this Court by March 28, 2008.  

								Per Curiam. 

Do not publish.
From: MomLovesLacey@gorge.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:10:25 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing beg that you rescind the unjust mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization

procedures be covered by private health insurance with no co-pay to patients. There are moral issues

involved and costs to employers that are far too burdensome for our people. We already do not have

enough jobs and our government is in too much debt, how can we afford another rule that will have to

be enforced?

If you do not reverse course I ask you to, at the very least, expand conscience protections for

organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objection to drugs

and devices intended to kill future Americans at their earliest stage of life.

I adamantly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs

and devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an *authentic* conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health coverage at all. This is especially repugnant in a country that was founded for religious freedom!

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers, and people like me, who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Meghan Mac-Rhyann

Carson, WA 98610
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSummary Report of Mission Acceleration Measurements for STS-73, Launched October 20, 1995The microgravity environment of the Space Shuttle Columbia was measured during the STS-73 mission using accelerometers from five different instruments: the Orbital Acceleration Research Experiment, the Space Acceleration Measurement System, the Three-dimensional Microgravity Accelerometer, the Microgravity Measuring Device, and Suppression of Transient Accelerations by Levitation Evaluation System. The Microgravity Analysis Workstation quasi-steady environment calculation and comparison of this calculation with Orbital Acceleration Research Experiment data was used to assess how appropriate a planned attitude was expected to be for one Crystal Growth Facility experiment sample. The microgravity environment related to several different Orbiter, crew, and experiment operations is presented and interpreted in this report. Data are examined to show the effects of vernier reaction control system jet firings for Orbiter attitude control. This is compared to examples of data when no thrusters were firing, when the primary reaction control system jets were used for attitude control, and when single vernier jets were fired for test purposes. In general, vernier jets, when used for attitude control, cause accelerations in the 3 x 10(exp -4) g to 7 x 10(exp -4) g range. Primary jets used in this manner cause accelerations in the 0.01 to 0.025 g range. Other significant disturbance sources characterized are water dump operations, with Y(sub b) axis acceleration deviations of about 1 x 10(exp -6) g; payload bay door opening motion, with Y(sub o) and Z(sub o) axis accelerations of frequency 0.4 Hz; and probable Glovebox fan operations with notable frequency components at 20, 38, 43, 48, and 53 Hz. The STS-73 microgravity environment is comparable to the environments measured on earlier microgravity science missions.Document ID19960048086Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsRogers, Melissa J. B.*(Tal-Cut Co. Beachwood, OH United States)*DeLombard, Richard*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland,OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1996Subject CategoryInstrumentation And PhotographyReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:107269E-10336NASA-TM-107269Accession Number96N33585Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 963-60-0DDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19960048086.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 35.2

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE OF THE SERVICER**

 

In compliance with Section 4.04 (g) of the Indenture of Trust by and between Nelnet Student Loan Trust 2008-4 and Zions First National Bank, as Trustee, dated as of May 1, 2008, I, Terry J. Heimes, certify that:

 

|   | 1. | A review of the activities of the Subservicer and of its performance under the Nelnet, Inc. Subservicing Agreement during the period from May 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008 has been made under my supervision; and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | Based on my knowledge of such review, the Subservicer has fulfilled in all material respects all its obligations under the Nelnet, Inc. Subservicing Agreement during such period. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

March 31, 2009

 

 

| By: | /s/ TERRY J. HEIMES______________ |
|-----|-----------------------------------|

|   | Terry J. Heimes, Chief Financial Officer |
|--------|------------------------------------------|

|   | Nelnet, Inc. |
|--------|--------------|
No. 59703.

#### Norman G. Jensen et al. *v.*United States,

protests 46409-K, etc. (Pembina).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the lumber is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *F. W. Myers & Co., Inc.*(24 C. C. P. A. 156, T. D. 48640) and *F. W. Myers & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(73 Treas. Dec. 714, T. D. 49530), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained as to certain of the protests in question. The collector was directed to reliquidate the entries on the basis of the actual number of board feet of planed, tongued, and/or grooved lumber imported, as shown on the invoices and/or the entries covered by the said protests. In all other respects and as to ail other merchandise, including that contained in the cars specifically enumerated in the last paragraph of the stipulation, as to which merchandise the protests were abandoned, said protests were overruled.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                              
<ARTICLE>                                          5
<CIK>                                              0001037189
<NAME>                               Smith Barney Westport Futures fund L.P.
                                                    
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                       JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                     115,703,663
<SECURITIES>                                                (3,247,701)
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  357,603
<ALLOWANCES>                                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           112,813,565
<PP&E>                                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             112,813,565
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        1,715,289
<BONDS>                                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                                 111,098,276
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               112,813,565
<SALES>                                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            (5,188,281)
<CGS>                                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             2,229,487
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             (7,417,768)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                (7,417,768)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                   (64.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 3RD QUARTER
10-Q CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH SCHEDULE S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001036629
<NAME> BIORELIANCE CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          10,881
<SECURITIES>                                    23,421
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,361
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,510
<PP&E>                                          14,617
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  69,149
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,555
<BONDS>                                          5,877
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            76
<OTHER-SE>                                      48,641
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    69,149
<SALES>                                         36,060
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,060
<CGS>                                           22,321
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,321
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,676
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 186
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,877
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,048
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,829
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,829
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .44
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         September 26, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 19, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 57 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2023-272, CP2023-275.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-20913 Filed 9-25-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
No. 67073.

protests 58/25490, etc. (Galveston).

#### Falcon Sales Co. et al. *v.*United States,

*239Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *Falcon Sales Company*and *J. J. Murphy & Co.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 129, C.D. 2292), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: jimpopke@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:13:14 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

James Popke

Oshkosh, WI 54904
From: sbrink@insight.rr.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:15:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Susan Brink

Pickerington, OH 43147
From: cbcpastorb@roadrunner.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:11:57 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

brad delp

Lockport, NY 14094