alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Orbit/FR, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Israel Adan, President
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Israel Adan
-------------------------
President and Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2002
RAI Jets LLC 29 OCT 2012 

1 Airport Rd

Sturgis, MI 49091

RAI Jets, LLC certificate # 7RJA529M

RAI Jets, LLC siteseeing 91 ID # RIFJ1234

1 Airport Rd

Sturgis, MI 49091

269-651-2821

269-651-9164 fax

brianr@flyrai.com

Seeking relief from 14 CFR part 120, 120.117 and 120.225 by combining both above 

certificates to one drug testing program. 

The combination to one drug testing program will have no effect on safety do to the 

fact that the same pilots and mechanics are on the work for RAI Jets, LLC. and are 

enrolled in its drug testing program. RAI Jets, LLC 7RJA529M has an active drug 

testing program there is no need for the same people to be tested twice by requiring 

RAI Jets Site seeing 91 ID#RIFJ1234 to have a separate program.

Respectfully,

Brian Riley 

Chief Pilot

RAI Jets LLC

800 247 2834
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 185 (Tuesday, September 26, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 66000]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20842]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[FR ID 173776]


Deletion of Item From September 21, 2023 Open Meeting

    The following item was adopted by the Commission on September 18, 
2023 and deleted from the list of items scheduled for consideration at 
the Thursday, September 21, 2023, Open Meeting. The item was previously 
listed in the Commission's Sunshine Notice on Thursday, September 14, 
2023.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4..................  MEDIA.................  TITLE: Updating Obsolete TV
                                              Broadcasting Rules (MB
                                              Docket No. 22-227)
                                             SUMMARY: The Commission
                                              will consider a Report and
                                              Order which would amend
                                              Part 73 of the
                                              Commission's Rules to
                                              update Television and
                                              Class A Television
                                              Broadcast Station Rules as
                                              well as certain rules
                                              applicable to all
                                              broadcast stations. This
                                              would ensure the FCC's
                                              rules better reflect the
                                              current broadcast TV
                                              operating environment
                                              including changes related
                                              to major developments like
                                              the transition from analog
                                              to digital-only operations
                                              and the post-incentive
                                              auction transition to a
                                              smaller television band
                                              with fewer channels.
------------------------------------------------------------------------


Federal Communications Commission.

    Dated: September 19, 2023.
Marlene Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-20842 Filed 9-25-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 257 

Supporting the goals and ideals of Pancreatic Cancer Awareness Month. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 20, 2007 

Mr. PLATTS (for himself and Mr. CUMMINGS) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government 

Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of Pancreatic Cancer 

Awareness Month. 

Whereas over 37,170 people will be diagnosed with pancreatic 

cancer this year in the United States; 

Whereas pancreatic cancer is the fourth most common cause 

of cancer death in the United States; 

Whereas 75 percent of pancreatic cancer patients die within 

the first year of their diagnosis, and only 5 percent survive more than 5 years, making pancreatic cancer the 

deadliest of any cancer; 

Whereas there has been no significant improvement in survival rates in the last 25 years, and pancreatic cancer research is still in the earliest scientific stages; 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 257 IH 

Whereas there are no early detection methods and minimal 

treatment options for pancreatic cancer; 

Whereas when symptoms of pancreatic cancer generally 

present themselves, it is too late for an optimistic prognosis, and the average survival rate of those diagnosed 

with metastasis disease is only 3 to 6 months; 

Whereas the incidence rate of pancreatic cancer is 40 to 50 

percent higher in African Americans than in other ethnic 

groups; 

Whereas the Pancreatic Cancer Action Network (PanCAN) is 

the first and only national patient advocacy organization 

that serves the pancreatic cancer community by focusing 

its efforts on public policy, research funding, patient 

services, and public awareness and education related to 

developing effective treatments and a cure for pancreatic 

cancer; and 

Whereas the Pancreatic Cancer Action Network has requested that the Congress designate November as Pancreatic Cancer Awareness Month in order to educate 

communities across the Nation about pancreatic cancer 

and the need for research funding, early detection methods, effective treatments, and prevention programs: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 the goals and ideals of Pancreatic Cancer Awareness 

3 Month. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
Exhibit 33.2
 MANAGEMENTS ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE
 Company
  Platform i e
 Applicable Servicing Criteria
 Period
  
    
    The Companys management is responsible for assessing the Companys compliance with
the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
    
    The Companys management has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the
Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.
    
    Based on such assessment, the Company has complied, in all material respects, with
the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
  CITIBANK, N.A.By:
    
    /s/Karen MontbachKaren MontbachIts:
    
    Managing Director
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Harvey Lee MOXLEY, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 05-6579.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Aug. 18, 2005.

Decided: Aug. 25, 2005.

Harvey Lee Moxley, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Office of the United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

*227PER CURIAM:

Harvey Lee Moxley seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *See Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Moxley has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
From: jan.bennett@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:23:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jan Bennett

Shelton, WA 98584
From: teresabrubaker@ymail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:00:15 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Teresa Brubaker

Eden Prairie, MN 55347
No. 60474.

#### Arthur J. Humphreys *v.*United States,

protest 291278-K (Seattle).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise actually consisted of dowels of fir and that the importation consisted of 31,443.23 board feet, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained accordingly.
H. Res. 2

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 4, 2007.

Resolved, That the Senate be informed that a quorum of 

the House of Representatives has assembled; that Nancy 

Pelosi, a Representative from the State of California, has 

been elected Speaker; and Karen L. Haas, a citizen of the 

State of Maryland, has been elected Clerk of the House of 

Representatives of the One Hundred Tenth Congress. 

Attest:

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                               8,477
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        9,182
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    17,659
<PP&E>                                              93,070
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     134,760
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               26,926
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            11,288
<OTHER-SE>                                          96,546
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       134,760
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   119,462
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (119,462)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (119,462)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (119,462)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.01)
        


</TABLE>
Relief from 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), and (a)(2), And 91.417(a) and (b) is

requested to the extent that allows the Operator to operate the Phantom 3 Professional Quad-Copter as necessary.

These sections are all related to airworthiness certificates of aircraft. There is not currently an airworthiness certificate for small UAS's. The Operator would comply in full to any conditions and limitations the Administrator would place in order to receive an approved Grant of Exemption.

Public Interest: - Aerial photography has been around for many years. As a current licensed Real Estate Agent in the State of Texas, agents are looking for a way to have pictures/videos taken in a more cost effective manner. This exemption would allow me to offer my services to real estate agencies at a fraction of the costs as compared to use of a helicopter or small manned aircraft. There is essentially no carbon foot print left from these UAS'. Aerial photography from a UAS, leaves no emissions, and minimal ecological damage. These items listed, will help my community, not only with finding local businesses a new location, but also with finding the people in my community a beautiful place to call home.

Conclusion: As set forth herein, the Operator seeks an exemption pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 11.61 and Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), which will permit safe operation of the DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAS commercially within the Real Estate markets. The Administrator will be assisting small business and local residents, by granting this petition. In accordance with the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, The Operator respectfully requests that the FAA Administrator grants this petition for exemption from TITLE 14 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS SECTIONS 61.113 (a) and (b); 91.7 (a); 91.119 (c); 91.121; 91.151 (a); 91.405 (a); 91.407 (a) (1); 91.409 (a) (1) and (2); 91.417 (a) and (b)

Res` ectfully Submitted,

Brian J. McCall
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 185 (Tuesday, September 26, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66066-66067]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20916]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: September 26, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C.

[[Page 66067]]

3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 19, 2023, it filed with the Postal 
Regulatory Commission a USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 60 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2023-275, CP2023-278.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-20916 Filed 9-25-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
No. 62197.

#### Manca, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 326547-K and 58/1157 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of parts of photographic cameras similar in all material *330respects to the merchandise involved in *Manca, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 271, C. D. 1874), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: jesusaveddave@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:05:10 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

David Elam

Rockwall, TX 75032
No. P69/37.

protests 60/20938 and 60/30179 (New York).

#### Consolidated International Equipment & Supply Co. *v.*United States,

FoRD, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered 'by the foregoing protests consists of paper cutters and parts, dedicated for use therewith, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Consolidated International Equipment & Supply Co.*v. *United States*(56 Cust. Ct. 442, C.D. 2671), wherein the court held that the paper cutters and the motors for said paper cutters were separate entities rather than an entirety, the protests were dismissed and the matter remanded for further proceedings to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the separate value of the paper cutters and motors in the manner provided by law (28 U.S.C. § 2636(d)).