alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       3,738,708
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         205,947
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             1,498,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 17,829,260
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     77,258,208
<ALLOWANCE>                                    844,623
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             105,288,209
<DEPOSITS>                                  92,806,311
<SHORT-TERM>                                   723,031
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            968,073
<LONG-TERM>                                     47,873
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       295,500
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,447,421
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             105,288,209
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              4,469,040
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              822,576
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               119,414
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             5,411,030
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,674,449
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,699,702
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        2,711,328
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   90,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,336,706
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,029,171
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,029,171
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   762,348
<EPS-BASIC>                                     2.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.93
<LOANS-NON>                                    200,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               773,116
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   40,039
<RECOVERIES>                                    21,546
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              844,623
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           792,077
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         52,546





</TABLE>
Albany

Atlanta

Brussels

Denver

Los Angeles

Miami

New York 1676 International Drive • Penthouse

McLean, VA 22102

Tel: 703.336.8800

mckennalong.com Northern Virgin ia

Orange County

Rancho Santa Fe

San Diego

San Francisco

Seoul

Washington, DC

MARK E. MCKINNON

703.336.8708 EMAIL ADDRESS

mmckinnon@mckennalong.com



### January 12 , 201 5

Jake J Troutman

Program Analyst | Rulemaking

FAA Office of Aviation Safety

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Re: Docket No. FAA

- 2014

- 0610: Supplement to Petition of Total Safety U.S.,

Inc. for Exemption Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and

Reform Act of 2012

Dear Mr. Troutman:

The following is a supplement to the docket to indicate that on November 20,

2014, a revised Operations Manual , marked confidential and proprietary

, was hand

delivered by peti tioner to the UAS Integration Office . This submission conta i ned the

a dditional in formation requested on November 14, 2014. It is our understanding th at

petitioner has answered all outstanding questions and requests for additional information.

If you have any further questions or need any additional information, please do not

hesitate to call.

MCKENNA LONG & ALDRIDGE

/s/

Mark E

. McKinnon
No. 63303.

protests 58/17590, etc. (New York).

#### Beer Stern Import Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Boed, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of narrow woven fabrics of cotton similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Beer Stern Import Corp.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 294, C.D. 1944), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001037115
<NAME> ORBIT/FR, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           9,586
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,715
<ALLOWANCES>                                       491
<INVENTORY>                                      2,008
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,688
<PP&E>                                           2,569
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,421
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,143
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,688
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            61
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,656
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,143
<SALES>                                          2,809
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,809
<CGS>                                            2,703
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,703
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,054)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (369)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (685)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (685)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.11)
        

</TABLE>
P.1 

OAR Box 1802 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

34) IV-E-29 

Docket Number: 

A-90-37 

Printed 11/4/200811:57:59 AM Sheet 34 of 117 
P.2 

Date: 12/8/98 A n _ _ 

To: Air and Radiation Docket # A-90-37 / / ) //( / / TTT — ^" _ "2^^ 

From: David Solomon, EPA's Office of Air Quality planning and Standards (MD-12) 

Re: Call with Henry Nickel 

On 12/8/98 there was a conference call between Mr. Henry Nickel representing the 

Utility Air Regulatory Group, Jon Devine of EPA's Office of General Counsel and myself. 

Henry Nickel had called with the utilities' reaction to the paper that EPA had sent to UARG on 

12/4/98 which attempted to summarize the kinds of "efficiency" improvements utilities might 

make, and to set out what information EPA felt was lacking to better demonstrate the 

environmental impacts of such projects. Mr Nickel felt that most, if not all, changes at a utility 

unit would in some way increase the unit's overall efficiency and that any change which restored 

lost efficiency, regardless of its effect on actual emissions, should be excluded from NSR, 

possibly as a routine change. However, he also pointed out that it would be virtually impossible 

to identify, quantify or enforce expected systemic environmental effects ~ to the extent that they 

exist -- of individual changes to utility units. The call concluded with Mr. Nickel indicating that 

he will get back to EPA on whether the issues discussed would be better_addressed-as-part of a 

pending effort to reevaluate the basic NSR program. 

cc: Pam Smith, (MD-12) 

Jon Devine, OGC 

-H,s AIR DOCKET
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-20504

Summary Calendar

Administrator-Benefits for the Exxonmobil Savings 

Plan, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Linda Janesko; Wendy Witterschein, 

Defendants—Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:20-CV-375

Before Haynes, Willett, and Ho, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Before considering an appeal’s merits, we must confirm that we have 

jurisdiction. Castaneda v. Falcon, 166 F.3d 799, 801 (5th Cir. 1999). Under 28 

U.S.C. § 1291, we are limited to reviewing “final decisions of the district 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 12, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-20504 Document: 00515859139 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/12/2021
No. 20-20504

2

courts.” In suits against multiple defendants, a decision is not final, and 

therefore not appealable, until “the district court has decided all claims 

against all parties.” Williams v. Seidenbach, 958 F.3d 341, 346 (5th Cir. 2020) 

(en banc); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b). This appeal contravenes the finaljudgment rule in two ways. First, it was filed before the DefendantsAppellants’ dispute with the other defendants was resolved. The notice of 

appeal was filed on September 22, 2020, but the Agreed Order of Dismissal 

was not entered until January 14, 2021. Second, it was filed before the other 

defendants’ counterclaim against the Plaintiff-Appellee was resolved. 

Indeed, the Agreed Order of Dismissal indicates that live counterclaims still 

exist against the Plaintiff-Appellee from both sets of defendants.

IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of 

jurisdiction.

Case: 20-20504 Document: 00515859139 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/12/2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                         1,000

<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                       OCT-02-1999
<CASH>                                   3,987
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                           77,456
<ALLOWANCES>                            17,046
<INVENTORY>                             78,140
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       149,212
<PP&E>                                  24,265
<DEPRECIATION>                           7,928
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         338,752
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   30,344
<BONDS>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                    68
<OTHER-SE>                             126,712
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           338,752
<SALES>                                 87,959
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        90,878
<CGS>                                   60,569
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           21,367
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           826
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       6,235
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          1,881
<INCOME-TAX>                               790
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      1,091
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                             1,091
<EPS-BASIC>                             0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0.16



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Dean
Witter Cornerstone Fund III and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      32,268,788
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  116,065<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              34,128,745<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                34,128,745<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,032,785<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,740,689
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,707,904)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,707,904)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,707,904)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include interest receivable of $116,065.
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net
unrealized gain on open contracts of $1,425,611 and net option
premiums of $318,281.
<F3>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $443,758, accrued
management fees of $112,924, and accrued administrative expenses of
$138,661.
<F4>Total revenues include realized trading revenue of $348,156, net
change in unrealized of $(677,199) and interest income of $1,361,828.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                            OF AMEN PROPERTIES, INC.
                           PURSUANT TO 18 USC ss.1350
                           --------------------------

In connection with the annual report of AMEN Properties, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Kris Oliver, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of
Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best
of my knowledge:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
     as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     at the dates and for the periods indicated.




                                            /s/ Kris Oliver
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Kris Oliver, Chief Financial Officer


Date: November 14, 2008


                                       43
|   | Exhibit 33.1 |
|--------|--------------|

 

**Management’s Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria**

The Board of Directors

National Education Loan Network, Inc.:

Management of National Education Loan Network, Inc. (the Company) is responsible for assessing compliance with the applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB of the Securities and Exchange Commission for publicly issued student loan-backed securities on or after January 1, 2006, for which the Company provides services as a master servicer and administrator (the            Platform) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008. Appendix A identifies the individual asset-backed transactions and securities defined by management as constituting the Platform.

The Company’s management has assessed the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.

Based on such assessment, management believes that, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008, the Company has complied in all material respects with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB of the Securities and Exchange Commission except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(4)(ii), 1122(d)(4)(iv),            1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(vi), 1122(d)(4)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(viii), 1122(d)(4)(ix), 1122(d)(4)(x), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii), 1122(d)(4)(xiii), and 1122(d)(4)(xiv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities the Company performs with respect to the Platform. 

KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report with respect to management’s assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008.

|  

March 31, 2009

 

 

  |  

National Education Loan Network, Inc.

 

 

 

 

/s/ TERRY J HEIMES |
|------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                           | Terry J. Heimes, CFO, Treasurer

National Education Loan Network, Inc.                            |
|                                           |                                                                                              |
|                                           |                                                                                              |
|                                           |                                                                                              |

 

 

----

 

 

**Appendix A**

 

 

Nelnet Student Loan Trust 2006-01

 

Nelnet Student Loan Trust 2006-02

 

Nelnet Student Loan Trust 2006-03

 

Nelnet Student Loan Trust 2007-01

 

Nelnet Student Loan Trust 2008-01

 

Nelnet Student Loan Trust 2008-02

 

Nelnet Student Loan Trust 2008-03

 

Nelnet Student Loan Trust 2008-04
To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:49:19 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Michael Kraemer

Tomah, WI 54660
Searched for **https://www.federalregister.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.federalregister.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001037330 
<NAME>                        ICON CMT CORP.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                          29,145
<SECURITIES>                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                    7,666
<ALLOWANCES>                       356
<INVENTORY>                        103
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                39,935
<PP&E>                          12,684
<DEPRECIATION>                     843
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  48,485
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           12,098
<BONDS>                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                0
<PREFERRED>                          0
<COMMON>                            15
<OTHER-SE>                      36,372
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    48,485
<SALES>                         17,716
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                17,716
<CGS>                           14,227
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   14,227
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                 7,899
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 127
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (4,283)
<INCOME-TAX>                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      0
<CHANGES>                            0
<NET-INCOME>                    (4,283)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                    (0.47)
        


</TABLE>