alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: rstanleybridges@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:57:59 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Robert Bridges

Rutherfordton, NC 28139
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of HALL TEES, INC. on Form 10-K for the
periods ending December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his
knowledge:




1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





/s/ WILLIAM LEWIS
              William
      Lewis CEO
              Dated:
      March 15, 2010
              
              /s/ WILLIAM
      LEWIS
              William
      Lewis
              CFO
              Dated:
      March 15, 2010




This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
No. *P66/199.*—

#### J. M. Sutton Sons & Co. *v.*United States, protest 60/27089 (New York).

LaNdis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of plaques similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Amart*Imports, *Inc.*v. *United States*(54 Cust. Ct. 187, C. D. 2531), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: marthanix@cbgundaker.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:22:09 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Martha Nix

Ballwin, MO 63011
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-60544 Conference Calendar

__________________
CHRISTOPHER CARBIN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus UNITED STATES NAVY ET AL. Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 1:94CV60-S-D

- - - - - - - - - - (October 19, 1995) Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and REAVLEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Christopher Carbin appeals the district court's dismissal of his $20 million suit against the Board for Corrections of Military Records and other defendants. The Board is immune from suit for monetary damages. See Gochnour v. Marsh , 754 F.2d 1137, 1138 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 471 U.S. 1057 (1985). Carbin has not alleged any involvement by any of the other named defendants. The defendants cannot be liable without some personal involvementNo. 95-60544 -2- or their implementation of a constitutionally deficient policy. Thompkins v. Belt , 828 F.2d 298, 303-04 (5th Cir. 1987). To the extent that Carbin's request for mandamus to speed the proceedings may be construed as a request for injunctive relief, that claim was properly dismissed as the Board had ruled during the pendency of the suit, rendering the issue moot. The appeal is without arguable merit and is thus frivolous. Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
EXHIBIT 31.01

Certification of Mindy Kline, Chief Executive Officer pursuant to

Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



I, Mindy Kline, certify that:



1. I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K of Gold Star Tutoring Services, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



March 25, 2008



___/s/Mindy Kline_____________

Mindy Kline

Chief Executive Officer

Principal Executive Officer
No. 61488.

#### Hudson Shipping Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 301992-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
From: coraleez@ymail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:19:36 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Coralee Zdeb

Sherman, TX 75092
From: weldon@adair-texans.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:10:59 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Weldon Adair

Round Rock, TX 78665
No. 68425.

protests 63/6665 and 63/6668 (Los Angeles).

#### Suncoast Merchandise Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of wide-angle and telephoto lenses similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Unimark Photo, Inc.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 75, C.D. 2283), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
exh10_1.htm


 










 


Exhibit 10.1







Crystal Rock Holdings, Inc.


1050 Buckingham Street


Watertown, CT  06795







December 21, 2012


 


Henry E. Baker


514 Northfield Road


Litchfield, CT  06759







Peter K. Baker


118 Gray Rock Road


Southbury, CT  06488


 


John B. Baker


20 Hardscrabble Road


Warren, CT  06754







Gentlemen,


 


I refer to $13,000,000 in aggregate principal amount of subordinated notes (“Notes”) of Crystal Rock Holdings, f/k/a Vermont Pure Holdings, Ltd. (“Company”) payable to the following individuals in the amount set forth opposite the individual’s name:


 



	 	Henry E. Baker 	$4,600,000
	 	John B. Baker                                             	$4,200,000
	 	Peter K. Baker	$4,200,000





                                            


As you know, the Company is considering payment to each of you of $500,000 to decrease the principal amount of the Notes.


 


By signing the enclosed extra copy of this letter below and returning it to Bruce MacDonald, CFO of the Company, please confirm that you (a) consent to this payment, (b) waive the requirement in the Notes for 30 days’ prior written notice of prepayments, and (c) waive any objection to the fact that this payment, if made, will not be made pro-rata among the three holders of the Notes, but will be paid in equal amounts to each of you.  The Company will rely on your consent and waivers.


 


This letter may be signed in counterpart copies, and all of the signed copies will together constitute a single letter.


 




  





  











  











 




	 	Very truly yours,
	 	CRYSTAL ROCK HOLDINGS, INC.





 



	 	By:	/s/ Martin Dytrych
	 	 	Martin Dytrych
	 	 	Chair, Audit Committee







 




The undersigned hereby consent and waive as


set forth above.












/s/ Henry E. Baker


Henry E. Baker


 


Dated:  December 21, 2012


 







/s/ Peter K. Baker


Peter K. Baker


 


Dated:  December 21, 2012


 


/s/ John B. Baker


John B. Baker


 


Dated:  December 12, 2012
No. P68/488.

protests 67/14838, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### The May Dept. Stores Co. et al. *v.*United States,

*666Newman, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests is the same in all material respects as the rattancore sleighs, modem shaped trays, serving trays, snack trays, hanging planters, and suitcases the subject of either *Royal Cathay Trading Co. et al.*v. *United States*(45 Cust. Ct. 99, C.D. 2206) or *Same*v. *Same*(56 Cust. Ct. 371, C.D. 2662), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 181 (Wednesday, September 20, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 64902]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20357]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 3133-000]


Brookfield White Pine, LLC, Errol Hydroelectric Co., LLC; Notice 
of Authorization for Continued Project Operation

    The license for the Errol Hydroelectric Project No. 3133 was issued 
for a period ending July 31, 2023.
    Section 15(a)(1) of the FPA, 16 U.S.C. 808(a)(1), requires the 
Commission, at the expiration of a license term, to issue from year-to-
year an annual license to the then licensee(s) under the terms and 
conditions of the prior license until a new license is issued, or the 
project is otherwise disposed of as provided in section 15 or any other 
applicable section of the FPA. If the project's prior license waived 
the applicability of section 15 of the FPA, then, based on section 9(b) 
of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 558(c), and as set forth 
at 18 CFR 16.21(a), if the licensee of such project has filed an 
application for a subsequent license, the licensee may continue to 
operate the project in accordance with the terms and conditions of the 
license after the minor or minor part license expires, until the 
Commission acts on its application. If the licensee of such a project 
has not filed an application for a subsequent license, then it may be 
required, pursuant to 18 CFR 16.21(b), to continue project operations 
until the Commission issues someone else a license for the project or 
otherwise orders disposition of the project.
    If the project is subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is 
hereby given that an annual license for Project No. 3133 is issued to 
Brookfield White Pine Hydro, LLC and Errol Hydroelectric Co., LLC for a 
period effective August 1, 2023, through July 31, 2024, or until the 
issuance of a new license for the project or other disposition under 
the FPA, whichever comes first. If issuance of a new license (or other 
disposition) does not take place on or before July 31, 2024, notice is 
hereby given that, pursuant to 18 CFR 16.18(c), an annual license under 
section 15(a)(1) of the FPA is renewed automatically without further 
order or notice by the Commission, unless the Commission orders 
otherwise.
    If the project is not subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is 
hereby given that Brookfield White Pine Hydro, LLC and Errol 
Hydroelectric Co., LLC are authorized to continue operation of the 
Errol Hydroelectric Project under the terms and conditions of the prior 
license until the issuance of a new license for the project or other 
disposition under the FPA, whichever comes first.

    Dated: September 14, 2023.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-20357 Filed 9-19-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
ACCEPTED 12-14-00025-CR TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS 4/9/2015 9:55:10 AM CATHY LUSK CLERK
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, James P. Panek, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of diaDexus, Inc.; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                                          
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------
|Date: August 15, 2011 |  | /s/ James P. Panek                       
|                      |  | James P. Panek                           
|                      |  | Principal Executive and Financial Officer