alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Roderick Macutay, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,
the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of E-Dispatch Inc. for the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of E-Dispatch Inc.


Date October 29, 2009    By: /s/ Roderick Macutay
                             ---------------------------------------------------
                             Roderick Macutay, President, Treasurer and Director
                             Principal Executive and Principal Financial
                             and Accounting Officer


This certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-K pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the
liability of that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that E-Dispatch Inc. specifically
incorporates it by reference.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 JUL-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                      OCT-2-1999
<CASH>                                            15,867
<SECURITIES>                                      1,541
<RECEIVABLES>                                     31,775
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       231,979
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  287,495
<PP&E>                                            93,545
<DEPRECIATION>                                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    427,408
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             157,731
<BONDS>                                           171,819
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                          122
<OTHER-SE>                                        77,708
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      427,408
<SALES>                                           317,835
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  317,835
<CGS>                                             256,783
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     256,783
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                4,554
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (4,191)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (4,191)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (4,191)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.34)


</TABLE>
From: closornio@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:34:19 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am urging you to rescind the mandate to make private health insurance pay for all contraceptives and

sterilization procedures with no co-pay to patients. You are forcing organizations with moral and/or

religious objections to cover in their health plans drugs and devices that go against their beliefs and

can cause abortions.

Please redefine your term of "religious employer" to include groups that have moral objections and

expand the conscience protections to all who disprove of these intrusions. Americans should not have to

be forced by the government to pay for services they object to.

Thank you for your time.

Sincerely,

Catherine Osornio

Ontario, CA 91762
No. 59191.

protest 252169-K (New York).

#### Excel Shipping Corporation *v.*United States,

*206Opinion by

Wilson, J.

An examination of the papers in the case disclosing nothing that would tend in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the decision of the collector, the protest was overruled.
ATTACHMENT F 

MOVES Input/Output Files for 

2008 and 2022 Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets 

(Files available on accompanying CD.)
Case No. 13,496.

#### STORY et al. v. DERBY et al.

[4 McLean, 160; 14 Leg. Int. 39.]

Circuit Court, D. Ohio.

July Term, 1846.

Copyright — Injunction — Extent of Infringement.

Before granting an injunction on a charge of an infringement of copyright, the court will, generally, refer the matter to a master, with instructions to report the extent of the infringement, if any, that the court may act on the case.

[The master reported, and the complainants filed exceptions. The cause was argued and decided on its merits. Case No. 13,497.]

[This was a bill for an injunction by Sarah W. Story and others against H. W. Derby and others.]

Mr. Walker, for complainant.

Gholson & Holcomb, for defendant.

McLEAN, Circuit Justice.

This is an application for a preliminary injunction, which, having been argued, the court adopted the following order: This day came the parties, by their solicitors, and the motion on behalf of the complainants for a preliminary injunction to restrain the publication of the book of the respondent, named in the bill, and answers, and affidavits; and having heard the arguments of counsel, and deliberated on the same, do order that the injunction prayed for be not granted. And it is further ordered, that the case stand referred to Master Commissioner Mansfield, for examination and report — that is to say:

1. Whether the book of Mr. Holcombe contains any portion, and if so, what portion, of the commentaries of the late Justice Story, described in the bill, showing fully the similarities or coincidences of the book of the respondents, with the commentaries, as well in arrangement and plan as in matter; and whether, in the points of coincidence between the two books, in the matter, plan, or arrangement, in which the similarity, if any, is found, was original in the commentaries of Judge Story.

2. Whether the book of the defendants is a fair and bona fide abridgment of the commentaries of the complainant, or a colorable one, calculated to supersede the use of the commentaries to any considerable extent.

3. Upon such other matters, relating to the matters in controversy, as either party may request him to examine and report upon. And in making said report, the said master may use the original papers on file, or such as either party may place on file, and may, in aid of his examination, summon such persons as he may deem expedient, and report the testimony so taken, if any, to the next term of this court. The said master may proceed to said examination at any time agreed upon by the parties; or, in case no such agreement is entered into, then at such time as the said master may fix, giving the amount of the parties at least ten days’ notice of such time. Either party may proceed to take testimony for the final hearing of the cause, as they might do if this order of reference had never been made. And for the coming in of the report, and further proceedings in the premises, this cause stands continued.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2009 of Secure Window Blinds, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), I, Anthony Pizzacalla, Chairman, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





/s/ Anthony Pizzacalla


Anthony Pizzacalla


President, Secretary Treasurer, Principal Executive Officer,


Principal Financial Officer and Director





Date: May 4, 2011
TABLE 70. TURKEY FRESH MANURE CHARACTERISTICS*

======================================================================================

Parameter Unitsa Total Parameter Concentration Parameter Mass

No of ------------------------------------------------------------------ -------------lb/day/-----------

Observ minimum maximum median mean std dev bird 1000 lb

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Manureb lb/15 lb/day 18 0.32 0.96 0.65 0.68 0.15 0.68 45

Density lb/ft3 4 63 65 63 63 0.99 - -

TS %wb 21 19 31 25 25 2.6 0.17 11

TSS %db 1 57 57 57 57 - 0.10 6.5

VS %db 7 62 89 82 77 11 0.13 8.8

BOD5 mg/kg 7 35948 75980 56667 58668 12720 0.040 2.7

COD mg/kg 6 172667 282328 251741 235612 48499 0.16 11

OM mg/kg 1 22172 22172 22172 22172 - 0.015 1.0

pH 2 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 0 - -

TKN lb/ton 20 20 36 27 28 4.5 0.0095 0.63

NH3N %tkn 4 9.9 45 30 29 16 0.0027 0.18

P2O5 lb/ton 23 9.6 46 22 24 10 0.0083 0.55

K2O lb/ton 22 5.0 19 12 12 4.1 0.0041 0.27

B lb/ton estc - - - 0.055 - 0.000019 0.0012

Ca lb/ton 4 12 47 24 27 15 0.0092 0.61

Cd lb/ton est - - - 0.0012 - 0.00000041 0.000027

Cl lb/ton est - - - 20 - 0.0069 0.46

Cu lb/ton 3 0.025 0.035 0.032 0.031 0.0044 0.000010 0.00069

Fe lb/ton 2 2.0 4.4 3.2 3.2 1.2 0.0011 0.073

Mg lb/ton 3 2.8 3.5 3.0 3.1 0.30 0.0011 0.070

Mn lb/ton 2 0.089 0.12 0.10 0.10 0.014 0.000035 0.0023

Mo lb/ton est - - - 0.0092 - 0.0000031 0.00021

Na lb/ton 3 2.4 3.5 2.5 2.8 0.51 0.0010 0.063

Ni lb/ton est - - - 0.0076 - 0.0000026 0.00017

Pb lb/ton est - - - 0.023 - 0.0000078 0.00052

S lb/ton est - - - 3.1 - 0.0011 0.071

Zn lb/ton 3 0.23 1.4 0.26 0.62 0.53 0.00021 0.014

FC cols/100 gm 1 2.90E+07 2.90E+07 2.90E+07 2.90E+07 - 8.93E+07 5.95E+09

======================================================================================

* References:Biological & Agricultural Engineering Dept, North Carolina State University, Jan 1994.

Agronomic Division, North Carolina Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services.

a

 All concentrations as is or wet basis (wb) except as noted dry matter basis (db); all mass values wb.

b

 Feces and urine as voided.

c

 Mean value extrapolated from other data; measured values not available.

Turkery-Fresh Manure file:///G:/Share/EMRAD 2007-2011/2011/4-30/References/Biomass - M...

1 of 1 1/13/2011 11:58 AM
(a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial
reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding
the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 Date: March 31, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Nigel JamesNigel JamesPresident and Principal Executive Officer
Before the Second Division,

November 24, 1964

No. 68902.

#### Lafayette Brass Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 64/15927, 64/16019, and 64/13203 (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of rotary lawn sprinklers or metal parts thereof similar in all material respects to those the subject of *The Durst Mfg. Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(50 CCPA 56, C.A.D. 820), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Mayquest Ventures, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Roman Zherdytskyi, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

|                                                                     |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ Roman Zherdytskyi                                                    |
|                                                                          |
| Roman Zherdytskyi       Principal Executive Officer       March 31, 2010 |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          28,276
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,777
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (479)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,657
<PP&E>                                           4,327
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  47,085
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,362
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        34,626
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,486
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    47,085
<SALES>                                         13,507
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,507
<CGS>                                            6,260
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,260
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,353
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 170
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,120
<INCOME-TAX>                                       817
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,303
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,303
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .28
        

</TABLE>
From: igivemyall2jesus01@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:21:37 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Barbara Haynes

Bremerton, WA 98311
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsUsing Unmanned Air Systems to Monitor Methane in the AtmosphereMethane is likely to be an important contributor to global warming, and our current knowledge of its sources, distributions, and transport is insufficient. It is estimated that there could be from 7.5 to 400 billion tons carbon-equivalent of methane in the arctic region, a broad range that is indicative of the uncertainty within the Earth Science community. Unmanned Air Systems (UASs) are often used for combat or surveillance by the military, but they also have been used for Earth Science field missions. In this study, we will analyze the utility of the NASA Global Hawk and the Aurora Flight Sciences Orion UASs compared to the manned DC-8 aircraft for conducting a methane monitoring mission. The mission will focus on the measurement of methane along the boundaries of Arctic permafrost thaw and melting glaciers. The use of Long Endurance UAS brings a new range of possibilities including the ability to obtain long- term and persistent observations and to significantly augment methane measurements/retrievals collected by satellite. Furthermore, we discuss the future of long endurance UAS and their potential for science applications in the next twenty to twenty-five years.Document ID20160003620Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsClow, Jacqueline*(California Univ. Merced, CA, United States)*Smith, Jeremy Christopher*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredMarch 22, 2016Publication DateFebruary 1, 2016Subject CategoryEnvironment PollutionAircraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2016-219008NF1676L-22267L-20600Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 388496.04.04.01.03.01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20160003620.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N
NO. 03-13-00443- CV

Jeff rey T. Hanson, App ellant

v. NNN M et C enter15 5, LLC; NNN M et C enter15 6, LLC; NNN M et C enter15 7, LLC; NNN M et C enter15 8, LLC; NNN M et C enter15 10, LLC; NNN M et C enter15 11, LLC; NNN M et C enter15 16, LLC; NNN M et C enter15 18, LLC; NNN M et C enter15 19, LLC; NNN M et C enter15 21, LLC; NNN M et C enter15 22, LLC; NNN M et C enter15 23, LLC; NNN M et C enter15 25, LLC; NNN M et C enter15 26, LLC; NNN M et C enter15 27, LLC; NNN M et C enter15 28, LLC; NNN M et C enter15 29, LLC; NNN M et C enter15 30, LLC; NNN M et C enter15 31, LLC; NNN M et C enter15 32, LLC; NNN M et C enter15 33, LLC; NNN M et C enter15 35, LLC; NNN M et C enter15 36, LLC; NNN M et C enter15 38, LLC; NNN M et C enter15 39, LLC; and NNN 1 & 2 Met Cente r TIC, Appellees

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 201 ST JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -GN-1 2-0 0127 1, H ONO RAB LE AMY CLARK MEACH UM, J UDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant J ef

frey T. Hanson has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appea l, stating that the parties ha

ve re ache d a settlement a g ree ment and he no long er w ishes to pursue the appea l. We gr ant the motion and dismiss t he appe al. See Tex. R. App. P . 42.1(a) (1).__________________________________________ Cindy Olson Bour land, J ustice Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Pemberton, and B ourland Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion Filed: F ebrua

ry 11, 2015

2