alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: tolson8@tds.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:24:29 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Elese Tolson

Lawton, OK 73507
H. Res. 1441 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 18, 2008. 

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 3036) to amend the Elementary and Secondary 

Education Act of 1965 regarding environmental education, 

and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be 

dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of 

the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 

of rule XXI. General debate shall be confined to the bill and 

shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by 

the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee 

on Education and Labor. After general debate the bill shall 

be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It 

shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Education and Labor now printed in the bill. The 
2 

•HRES 1441 EH 

committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be 

considered as read. All points of order against the committee 

amendment in the nature of a substitute are waived except 

those arising under clause 10 of rule XXI. Notwithstanding 

clause 11 of rule XVIII, no amendment to the committee 

amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be in order except those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules 

accompanying this resolution. Each such amendment may be 

offered only in the order printed in the report, may be offered 

only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the 

report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an 

opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not 

be subject to a demand for division of the question in the 

House or in the Committee of the Whole. All points of order 

against such amendments are waived except those arising 

under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise 

and report the bill to the House with such amendments as 

may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate 

vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous question 

shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments 
3 

•HRES 1441 EH 

thereto to final passage without intervening motion except 

one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

SEC. 2. During consideration in the House of H.R. 3036 

pursuant to this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of 

the previous question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the bill to such time as may be designated by the 

Speaker. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 11

                                       Calculation of Weighted Average Shares
                                     Outstanding for Net Income (Loss) Per Share
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                     Three Months Ended
                                                                                          March 31,
                                                                                    1999               2000
                                                                                -------------    --------------
<S>                                                                             <C>              <C>
Earnings:

Net Income (Loss)..........................................................     $   (292,646)    $      119,702
                                                                                ============     ==============

Shares:

Weighted Average Number of Common Shares

   Outstanding.............................................................         5,983,457         7,240,861
                                                                                -------------    --------------
Average Common Shares Outstanding and Equivalents..........................               n/a         7,547,893
                                                                                =============    ==============

Net Income (Loss) Per Share-Basic..........................................     $      (0.05)    $         0.02
                                                                                ============     ==============
Net Income (Loss) Per Share-Diluted........................................     $         n/a    $         0.02
                                                                                =============    ==============
</TABLE>

* -- Calculation would be antidilutive for 1998.
Exhibit 32.1

# Certification Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350,As Adopted Pursuant toSection
 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of InfoTech USA, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Sebastian Perez, Chief Operating Officer and
acting President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/ Sebastian F. Perez
| | ----------------------

| | Sebastian F. Perez
                                                     Chief Operating Officer and acting President and Chief
 Executive Officer  InfoTech USA, Inc.May 13, 2004
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Intelsat Corporation (the
Company) hereby certifies that to such officers knowledge, the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |                        
|------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                   |  | 
|Date: May 15, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/    JEFFREY FREIMARK
|                   |  |  |  | Jeffrey Freimark       
|                   |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
From: lindakfrank@cox.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:33:52 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Linda Frank

Oklahoma City, OK 73112
Before the First Division.

June 29, 1955

No. 59189.

protest 229760-K (New York).

#### S. E. Laszlo *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *John P. Herber & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 193, C. D. 1519), the protest was dismissed, and the matter was remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)).
Exhibit
      32.1





AEROCENTURY
      CORP.





CERTIFICATION








In
      connection with this quarterly report of AeroCentury
      Corp. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Neal D. Crispin, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely
      for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,
      that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
      and for the periods indicated.





This
      Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission.




Date: May
              15,
              2007
            By:
            /s/ **Neal
              D. Crispin**Title: 
              President & Chairman
**Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONI, Larry J. Matheson, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Acorn Holding Corp.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this annual report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and have:a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report isbeing prepared;b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as ofa date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “EvaluationDate”); andc. presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which couldadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses ininternal controls; andb. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and 6. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual reportwhether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors thatcould significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recentevaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses.Date:November 17, 2005              /s/ Larry J. Matheson   Person performing the functions   of Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 334 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                           May 1, 2007.
Whereas there are more than 1,200 community colleges in the United States;
Whereas there are more than 11 million students enrolled in for-credit and not-
        for-credit programs at community colleges nationwide;
Whereas in 2007, community colleges in the United States will award more than 
        500,000 associate's degrees and 270,000 associate's certificates;
Whereas community colleges have educated more than 100,000,000 people in the 
        United States since the first community college was founded in 1901;
Whereas community college students are a more diverse group in terms of age, 
        income, race, and ethnicity than students attending traditional colleges 
        and universities, making community colleges essential to providing 
        access to postsecondary education;
Whereas community colleges enrich and enhance communities across the country, 
        socially, culturally, and politically;
Whereas community colleges are affordable and close to home for most people in 
        the United States;
Whereas community colleges allow many older students to take courses part-time 
        while working full-time, creating opportunities that otherwise would not 
        be available;
Whereas community colleges provide job training for workers who have lost their 
        jobs or are hoping to find better jobs, helping millions of people in 
        the United States support themselves and their families;
Whereas community colleges contribute more than $31,000,000,000 annually to the 
        Nation's economic growth and, by helping to provide a skilled workforce, 
        are critical to our Nation's continued success and prosperity in the 
        global economy of the 21st century; and
Whereas the American Association of Community Colleges, the Association of 
        Community College Trustees, and more than 1,200 community colleges 
        nationwide recognize April as National Community College Month: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of National Community College 
        Month; and
            (2) congratulates the Nation's community colleges, and their 
        students, governing boards, faculty, and staff, for their contributions 
        to education and workforce development, and for their vital role in 
        ensuring a brighter, stronger future for the Nation.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Forms S-3 and S-8) of Alliance Pharmaceutical Corp. of our report dated July
31, 1998 (except Note 8, as to which the date is August 14, 1998 and the second
paragraph of Note 1, as to which the date is April 12, 1999) with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Alliance Pharmaceutical Corp. included in
the Annual Report (Form 10 K/A) for the year ended June 30, 1998.

                                                 /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


San Diego, California
April 12, 1999
From: hurleys@centurytel.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:39:52 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mike Hurley

Eastsound, WA 98245
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Stratesec,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10QSB for the period  ending March 31, 2003,  as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Barry McDaniel,
President  and Chief  Executive of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002 that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) of
          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


May 20, 2003                              /s/  Barry McDaniel
                                         -----------------------------------
                                         President/Chief Executive Officer