alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: magicgraduate@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:32:29 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Laurie Elliott

Coldwater, MS 38618
No. 58652.

protest 230131-K (New York).

#### Bluefries New York, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

An examination of the papers in this case disclosed nothing which would tend in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the decision of the collector. The protest was therefore overruled.
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report On Form 10-K/A
of Resource Group Inc. for the Year Ended February 28, 2009, I, Ken Greenlaw,
Chief Financial Officer of Resource Group, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



|1. | Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year ended
      February 28, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                             
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|2. | The information contained in such Annual Report on Form
      10-K for the Year Ended February 28, 2009, fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      Resource Group, Inc.



|By:    | /s/ Ken
      Greenlaw 
|------ | -----------------------
|       | Ken Greenlaw           
|       | Chief Financial Officer
|       |                        
|       |                        
|Dated: | June 16, 2008          

---
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 401 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Trails Day. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 14, 2007 

Mr. THOMPSON of California submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Trails Day. 

Whereas June 2, 2007, is observed as National Trails Day; 

Whereas there are over 200,000 miles of trails in the United 

States, providing access to public lands for recreational 

and educational opportunities; 

Whereas trails enrich communities throughout the United 

States by helping to protect habitats, watersheds, and 

cultural and historic artifacts; 

Whereas 72.1 percent of all Americans age 16 and older participate in at least one of twenty-two designated outdoor 

activities, including hiking, backpacking, and trail running; 

Whereas National Trails Day events take place in all 50 

States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, and 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 401 IH 

the United States Virgin Islands to celebrate trails, recognize volunteers, and maintain local trails; 

Whereas thousands of volunteers and event coordinators 

throughout the United States make National Trails Day 

events possible; and 

Whereas 2007 is the 15th Anniversary Celebration of National Trails Day: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of National 

3 Trails Day; and 

4 (2) honors the contributions National Trails 

5 Day has made to inspire the public and trail enthu6 siasts to discover, learn about, maintain, and cele7 brate trails. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
From: ddbarmore@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:42:21 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Deb Barmore

Omaha, NE 68135
No. 67095.

protests 61/6818 and 61/6819 (Buffalo).

#### Falcon Sales Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation .of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *Falcon Sales Company*and *J. J. Murphy & Co.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 129, C.D. 2292), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Case No. 6,474.

#### The HIGHLANDER.

[See Case No. 12,604.]
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76

 36

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲

▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

08/25

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 25 Aug 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.44 N 77.04 W Meters AGL
H. Res. 1502 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 26, 2008. 

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

7060) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide incentives for energy production and conservation, to extend certain expiring provisions, to provide individual income 

tax relief, and for other purposes. All points of order against 

consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under 

clause 10 of rule XXI. The bill shall be considered as read. 

All points of order against the bill are waived. The previous 

question shall be considered as ordered on the bill to final 

passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of 

debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 

ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and 

Means; and (2) one motion to recommit. 

SEC. 2. During consideration of H.R. 7060 pursuant to 

this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous 

question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the 

bill to such time as may be designated by the Speaker. 
2 

•HRES 1502 EH 

SEC. 3. House Resolutions 1489 and 1501 are laid on 

the table. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
From: michelleh@oilcity.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:22:31 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Michelle Hoovler

Oil City, PA 16301
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 379 

Congratulating Nicolas Sarkozy on his election to the presidency of France. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2007 

Mr. POE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating Nicolas Sarkozy on his election to the 

presidency of France. 

Whereas the Marquis de Lafayette and the people of France 

offered unparalleled friendship to the people of the 

United States in their pursuit of freedom and democracy 

during the American Revolution; 

Whereas Nicolas Sarkozy, upon winning the election to become the next President of France, said that the United 

States can count on France as a friend; and 

Whereas the people of the United States support any effort 

by the Governments of France and the United States to 

maintain and grow a spirit of friendship and cooperation: 

Now, therefore, be it 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 379 IH 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives con2 gratulates Mr. Nicolas Sarkozy on his election to become 

3 the next President of France. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
From: duffy-mary@cooperhealth.edu

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:13:01 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mary Duffy

Norwood, PA 19074
**EXHIBIT 11**

 

**Statement of Computation of Per ShareEarnings**

 

Set forth below are the bases for thecomputation of earnings per share for the periods shown.

 
| ** **                                                               | ** ** | **Three Months Ended** | ** ** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|----------------------------------|------------|
| ** **                                                               | ** ** | **December  31**       | ** ** |
| ** **                                                               | ** ** | **2008**                         | ** ** | **2007** | ** ** |
| Earnings Per Common Share                                                |       |                             |       |   |   |
| Basic                                                                    |       | $                                | 0.03       |   | $ | 0.12 |   |
| Average Shares Outstanding - Basic                                       |       | 7,660,526                        |       | 7,606,506 |   |
| Diluted                                                                  |       | $                                | 0.03       |   | $ | 0.12 |   |
| Average Shares Outstanding (including  dilutive effect of stock options) |       | 7,723,711                        |       | 7,727,570 |   |

 
| ** **                                                               | ** ** | **Fiscal Year Ended**       | ** ** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------|---------------------------------------|------------|
| ** **                                                               | ** ** | **December  31, 2008** | ** ** |
| ** **                                                               | ** ** | **2008**                              | ** ** | **2007** | ** ** |
| Earnings Per Common Share                                                |       |                                  |       |   |   |
| Basic                                                                    |       | $                                     | 0.27       |   | $ | 0.53 |   |
| Average Shares Outstanding- Basic                                        |       | 7,642,775                             |       | 7,364,681 |   |
| Diluted                                                                  |       | $                                     | 0.27       |   | $ | 0.52 |   |
| Average Shares Outstanding (including  dilutive effect of stock options) |       | 7,733,881                             |       | 7,524,505 |   |

 

----
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Grains.**
 
PDF | ePub
 
SuDoc Number:A 98.9:474 C
Item Number: 0074-A-02(online)
CGP systemNumber:
 
September 27, 2018
From: dehavenphoto@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:53:10 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jack & Betty DeHaven

Martinsburg, WV 25403
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 181 (Wednesday, September 20, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 64921]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20322]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Investigator Initiated 
Program Project Applications (P01 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).
    Date: October 26, 2023.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G76, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Marci Scidmore, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G76, 
Rockville, MD 20852, (240) 627-3255, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fc919d8e9f95d28f9f959891938e99bc929594d29b938a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5f323e2d3c36712c3c363b32302d3a1f31363771383029">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 14, 2023.
Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-20322 Filed 9-19-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>