alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 1471 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 22, 2008. 

Whereas in May 1958 Jack St. Clair Kilby joined Texas Instruments because it was the only company that would 

permit him to work full-time on miniaturization of electronics; 

Whereas just four months later on September 12, 1958, Jack 

Kilby demonstrated the first integrated circuit by combining a transistor, several resistors, and a capacitor on 

a half inch piece of germanium in an attempt to reduce 

transistor costs; 

Whereas Jack Kilby spent his career at Texas Instruments, 

a productive engineering career that resulted in over 60 

patents and seminal inventions, including the electronic 

calculator; 

Whereas Jack Kilby received the National Medal of Science 

in 1969 and the National Medal of Technology in 1990, 

and shared the Nobel Prize in Physics in 2000, for his 

invention of and contributions to the development of the 

integrated circuit; 

Whereas during Kilby’s lifetime integrated circuits provided 

a million fold decrease in the costs of electronics; 
2 

•HRES 1471 EH 

Whereas Kilby’s achievement revolutionized electronics and 

permitted it to grow to over $1,500,000,000,000 in annual sales world wide; 

Whereas the integrated circuit revolutionized computing and 

made possible getting a man to the moon and modern 

space exploration; 

Whereas the integrated circuit led to a revolution in communications, transportation, and medical industries; and 

Whereas the future will inevitably bring equally far-reaching 

integrated circuit-based advances in many fields: Now, 

therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) recognizes and honors the research and development efforts of Jack Kilby and his contemporaries, who 

by inventing and perfecting the integrated circuit 

brought us modern electronics and changed the world; 

and 

(2) recognizes the importance of continued advancements in electronics to the well-being of America. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Respondent Burden

average of state submissions

June 2008

Page 1 of 2

123456789

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

ABCDEFGH I JKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ AA AB AC AD

Information 

Collection Activity

Total Avg.

RI TX OK VA TN OH Avg. RI TX OK VA TN OH Avg. RI TX OK VA TN OH Avg. RI TX OK VA TN OH Avg.

1. Pre-review and Offsite 

metrics

Review elements and 

metrics and prepare data 

discrepency response

0 12 1500 12 6.5 24 124 28 44 27 90 56.17 72 124 40 98 205.5 42 96.920000000

Train/brief state staff & 

managers on review 

substance and process

00 120002 48 32 208 26.56 23.42 48 36 28 24 510 31.170000000

collect files, policies, data 

sets, reports, etc.

0

0 10000 1.6674 43 1044 60 20.83 16 144 20 16 23.5 60 46.580 100 12700 19.83

2. Onsite Review

Participate in multi-media 

kick-off meeting

0

08009 2.833 12 42 20 3629 20.17 12 328040 9.3330006000

Assist/facilitate EPA review 

of files and data sets

004000 0.6676 124 28 16 10.5 18 33.75 48 136 35 70 44.5 12 57.580007000

Participate in discussion of 

program with EPA

0

630032 16 62 15 16 13 12 22.33 24 52 20 16 246 23.670000000

3. Report Review

Review and comment on 

draft report

0

63000 1.5 24 947 85 26 36 45.33 48 405 60 41 18 35.330005000

4. Coordination of Parts 

1, 2 & 3

Coordination of review 

within the state agency

0

000000 12 528 60 186 12 12 120 60 260 18.33000 16000

Coordination of review with 

EPA

0

000000 12 266 40 11 12 8.231 12 102 40 190 13.830000000

Total hours 17.17 242.2 332.8 19.83 612

Legal: Manag.: Tech.: Clerical:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 20, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-50203 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RAFAEL RODRIGUEZ-HOLGUIN, also known as Rafael Olguin Rodriguez, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-02-CR-431-ALL

-------------------- Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Rafael Rodriguez-Holguin appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Rodriguez contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have beenNo. 03-50203 -2- alleged in his indictment. Rodriguez maintains that he pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the maximum term of imprisonment and supervised release which may be imposed for that offense.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Rodriguez acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
Mr. Keith Anderson, Interim DirectorDistrict Department ofthe Environment

51 N Street, NE, 5th Floor

Washington, DC 20002

Dear Mr. Anderson:

On January 29, 2010, the United States Environmental Protection Agency received a

revision to the District of Columbia State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the District

Department of.the Environment. This SIP revision consists of a State Implementation Plan

Revision: Transportation Conformity Regulations.

The project officer for this submission will be Mr. Martin Kotsch, Office of Air Program

Planning.

If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me or have your staff contact

Mr. Kotsch at (215) 814-3335.

Sincerely,

David Arnold, Acting Director

Air Protection Division

cc: Cecily Beall, (DDOE)

Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474
From: naviscb@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:43:02 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Diane Navis

Cedar Grove, WI 53013
Exhibit 99.3


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Booth Creek Ski Holdings,  Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 2, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  as the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company,  hereby  certifies  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


June 16, 2003


                                          By:     /s/ ELIZABETH J. COLE
                                            ------------------------------------
                                                      Elizabeth J. Cole
                                                 Executive Vice President and
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the
annual report of American Sands Energy Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K as amended by this Form 10-K/A for the year
ended March 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned principal
financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: July 29, 2015



/s/ David B. Hardman

David B. Hardman, Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)
No. 334, Misc.

#### Barmore *v.*Bannan, Warden.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
From: kollectorkhan@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:23:14 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Steven Craig

Houston, TX 77072
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 21, 

2020.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-19-00280-CR

ORLANDO MARTINEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 212th District Court

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 17-CR-2251

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Orlando Martinez and his attorney have signed and filed a written 

amended motion to withdraw his notice of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). 

Because this court has not delivered an opinion, we grant appellant’s motion.
2

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We direct the clerk of the court to issue 

mandate immediately. See Tex. R. App. P. 2.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Spain.

Do Not Publish – Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
MMP INC. INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND MANUFACTURING


 


December 19, 2011


 


Marc McLAUGHLIN


President


IMMUDYNE, Inc.


7453 Empire Drive, suite 300


Suite ̀


Florence, KY 41042 U.S.A.


 


Dear Marc:


 


As agreed, Immudyne, Inc. consents to wholesale the product
listed on Attachment B (herein referred to as “Product”) to Michel Mercier Products, Inc. (d/b/a M.M.P., Inc.) for
cosmetic and healthcare resale to customers as listed on Attachment A (provided by MMP). Attachment A and Attachment B may be modified
during the term of this agreement by mutual written consent. Immudyne, Inc. agrees not to commercially compete with MMP for sales
to those customers listed on Attachment A. Moreover, and subject to an appropriate confidentiality agreement, Immudyne agrees,
when requested, to discuss with MMP’s customers listed on Attachment A technical and quality information, including safety
issues. Furthermore, Immudyne agrees to refrain from discussing process, costs, and pricing with those customers listed. With respect
to customers listed on Attachment A, MMP will purchase the Product on a sole and exclusive basis from Immudyne and Immudyne appoints
MMP as its sole and exclusive reseller to the listed customer. This agreement will remain in full effect for a period of 5 (five)
years, and shall be automatically renewed for continuous one-year periods unless either party gives notice of its intent to terminate
at least ninety (90) days prior to the expiration of any renewal term thereof.


 


If you agree to the terms cited herein, please affix your signature
below. Retain 1 (one) copy for your files and return the other copy to my attention.


 


	For M.M.P., Inc.:	For Immudyne, Inc.
	 	 
	Signature /s/ Michael Mercier	Signature /s/ Mark McLaughlin
	Name: Michel Mercier	Name: Marc McLaughlin
	Title: President	Title: President
	Date 12/20/2011	Date 12/20/2011


 





 



3470 South Clinton Ave., South Plainfield,
NJ 07080      908 561-4435


 




    	 



    	 



    

 


MMP INC. INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND MANUFACTURING


 


Attachment A


 


**This attachment has been omitted pursuant
to a request for confidential treatment and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 


 





 



3470 South Clinton Ave., South Plainfield,
NJ 07080      908 561-4435


 


MMP INC. INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND MANUFACTURING


 


Attachment B


 


**This attachment has been omitted pursuant
to a request for confidential treatment and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
From: IPelillo@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:14:19 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ingrid Pelillo

Concord, NH 03301
Schedule of Grants Made Pursuant to the Performance Stock Unit Agreement



 Exhibit 10.4 
 Schedule of Grants Made Under Form of Performance Stock Unit Agreement 
  

							
	 Name
	  	 Title
	  	 Units
	 
	 John Gilbert
	  	Chief Executive Officer	  	 	5,050	  
	 Christopher O’Donnell
	  	President and Chief Operating Officer	  	 	5,050	  
	 Diana Purcel
	  	Chief Financial Officer and Secretary	  	 	2,730
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, E. Todd Whittemore, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of Structured Adjustable Rate Mortgage Loan Trust, Series
    2008-1 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
    servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
    conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
    this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
    in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled
    their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material
    respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    Newport Management Corporation as Sub-Contractor for Aurora Loan
    Services LLC, U.S. Bank National Association as Custodian, Wells Fargo
    Bank, N.A. as Trustee and Westlake Settlement Services, LLC as
    Sub-Contractor for Aurora Loan Services LLC.

    Dated:   March 27, 2009


    /s/ E. Todd Whittemore
    Signature

    E. Todd Whittemore, Executive Vice President
    (Senior Officer in charge of the servicing function of Aurora Loan
    Services LLC, in its capacity as master servicer)

    Aurora Loan Services LLC, as Master Servicer
0.G. 8.

«/06
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 4 e 7 A ?
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

BULLETIN 1067 PLATE 1

EXPLANATION

HEB 75000 oF uncer

17501 10 1:300,000 {

[7] 300001 10 11900000 |

NOTE: CHARTS SMALLER THAN 1,000.00 &
ARE AVAILABLE FOR OCEAN AREAS \

U.S. NAVY HYDROGRAPHIC OFFICE

HYDROGRAPHIC CHART HOLDINGS

AS OF 1 JANUARY 1955