alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: rklock@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:22:19 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Rick Klock

Vancouver, WA 98664
Exhibit 32.2

      Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Cameron Richardson, Chief Financial Officer of Aurora Gold Corporation (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to my knowledge:

1.   The  Quarterly  Report  on  Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended
     March 31, 2006 which this certification accompanies fully complies with the
     requirements  of  section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
     1934:  and

2.   The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:     April19,  2006                BY:  /s/  Cameron Richardson
          --------------                     -----------------------
                                             Cameron  Richardson
                                             Chief Financial Officer


This  certification  accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002  and  shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes  of  Section  18  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A
signed  original  of  this  written  statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears  in  typed  form within the electronic version of this written statement
required  by  Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by  the  Company  and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff  upon  request.
Exhibit 10.2  (W0558692.DOC;1)


Exhibit 10.2




Wausau Paper Corp.

Long-Term (2015) Equity Incentive Compensation Plan




Grants of performance units under the Long-Term (2015) Equity Incentive Compensation Plan will vest upon the Company’s attainment of certain targeted levels of “total shareholder return.”  The calculation of total shareholder return is measured over a three year period (ending December 31, 2015), and is calculated by reference to a “target” and a “maximum” total shareholder return.  If total shareholder return is at the target (7% per year return, or 22.5% over the three-year performance period), grant recipients will receive 50% of the total potential award.  If total shareholder return is at or above the maximum (14% per year, or 48.2% over the three-year performance period), grant recipients will receive 100% of the total potential award.  At total shareholder return levels that are less than the maximum, the award is prorated based on the actual level of total shareholder return that is achieved.  The maximum potential award for the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and each of the other named executive officers, as well as the levels that would be achieved at the target for total shareholder return, is described in the table below.




					
	 
	Performance Units Granted


	 
	Total Opportunity

	 

	 
	(Award at Max. TSR)

	Award at Target TSR


	 
	 
	 

	Chief Executive Officer

	108,214

	 
	54,107

	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Chief Financial Officer

	21,643

	 
	10,822

	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Senior Vice President, Operations

	22,292

	 
	11,146

	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Senior Vice President, Paper

	23,952

	 
	11,976

	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Senior Vice President, Tissue

	21,643

	 
	10,822

	 






Under the Long-Term (2015) Equity Incentive Compensation Plan, “total shareholder return” is determined by dividing (1) the sum of (a) the average closing share price for the Company’s common stock over the last 60 trading days of the period immediately prior to the end of the three-year performance period (the “Maturity Date FMV”); and (b) cash dividends paid during the three-year performance period; by (2) the average closing share price for the Company’s common stock over the last 60 trading days preceding the date of grant (the “Grant Date FMV”).  The formula for calculating TSR is as follows:




			
	(Maturity Date FMV + Cash Dividends Paid)

	– 1

	=  Total Shareholder Return


	Grant Date FMV







Total shareholder return is calculated to the closest tenth of a percent, and vested performance units are rounded to the next highest whole unit.
EXHIBIT
 32(a)



CERTIFICATION
 OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT
 TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
 connection with the report on Form 10-Q ofWWA
 Group, Inc. for thequarterly
 period endedSeptember 30,
 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
 Commission on the date hereof, I,Eric Montandon, do
 hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
 best of my knowledge and belief:

| | (1) | Thisreport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in this report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the registrant at the end of the period covered by this report and results of operations of the registrant
for the period covered by this report.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:November
 13, 2009





/s/
 Eric Montandon

Eric
 Montandon

Chief
 Executive Officer



Thiscertification
 accompanies this report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
 except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the
 registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this report),
 irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.   A signed original of this written
 statement required by §906 has been provided to the registrant
 and will be retained by the registrant
 and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

30
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 262 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 262

Honoring Ellen May Tower who, while an United States Army nurse during 
the Spanish-American War, became the first Army nurse to die on foreign 
                                 soil.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 22, 2007

 Mr. Rogers of Michigan (for himself, Mr. Stupak, Mr. Walberg, and Mr. 
McCotter) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Honoring Ellen May Tower who, while an United States Army nurse during 
the Spanish-American War, became the first Army nurse to die on foreign 
                                 soil.

Whereas Ellen May Tower was born on May 8, 1868, in Byron, Michigan;
Whereas Ellen May Tower volunteered for service with the United States Army as a 
        nurse in 1898 and served as a nurse during the Spanish-American War;
Whereas Ellen May Tower contracted typhoid fever and became the first Army nurse 
        to die on foreign soil while serving her country; and
Whereas Ellen May Tower was the first women to receive a military burial in the 
        State of Michigan and only the third woman in United States history to 
        receive such a burial: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the spirit of service and dedication that 
        Ellen May Tower displayed for her country;
            (2) honors Ellen May Tower as a great American in 
        recognition of her contributions to the State of Michigan and 
        the United States Army; and
            (3) honors Ellen May Tower during Women's History Month.
                                 <all>
```
From: gawilliams@grandecom.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:42:31 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Gail Williams

Mckinney, TX 75069
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CurrencySharesSMSouth African Rand Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-K for
the fiscal period ended October 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nick Bonos, Chief Executive Officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Trust,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.

Date:
January 14, 2010



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/S/ NICK BONOS               
|Nick Bonos*                  
|Chief Executive Officer      
|(principal executive officer)



|* | The Registrant is
a trust and Nick Bonos is signing in his capacity as the principal executive officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Registrant.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Before the First Division,

February 23, 1956

No. 59727.

#### Dalsheim Accessories Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 133264-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the beads represented by items 10023, 10024, and 10025 consist of beads in imitation of precious or semiprecious stones, the claim at 45 percent under paragraph 1503 was sustained as to said items. Items 11/0 and 18/0, stipulated to consist of beads, loosely strung, were held dutiable at 35 percent under said paragraph as beads, not specially provided for.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                            5729
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  1280
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      34259
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           16690
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             16555
<LOANS>                                         124677
<ALLOWANCE>                                       1309
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  190379
<DEPOSITS>                                      156807
<SHORT-TERM>                                      3131
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               1201
<LONG-TERM>                                       7805
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           599
<OTHER-SE>                                       20836
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  190379
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   5503
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 1362
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    50
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  6915
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                2807
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                3047
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             3868
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       49
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   2
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   2944
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   1271
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        1271
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1099
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .46
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.83
<LOANS-NON>                                         74
<LOANS-PAST>                                       337
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   1846
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  1265
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       19
<RECOVERIES>                                        14
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 1309
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              1309
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            654
        

</TABLE>
From: dnlgrff1@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:28:40 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kathy Groff

Bloomington, IN 47404
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #18179 and #18180; Vermont Disaster Number VT-00049]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative disaster declaration of a rural area for the State of Vermont dated 09/14/2023. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms, Flooding, Landslides, and Mudslides. *Incident Period:*
                         07/07/2023 through 07/17/2023.
 DATES: Issued on 09/14/2023. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         11/13/2023. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         06/14/2024.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration of a rural area, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Addison. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere
5.000Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere
8.000Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.375Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.375*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.375
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 18179 6 and for economic injury is 18180 0. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Isabella Guzman, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2023-20498 Filed 9-20-23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
Searched for **https://www.uscis.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.uscis.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
#### Albin B. Curtice, Appellant, v. Mary J. Fairchild and another, Respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with coats, on the opinion of Dwight, J., at Special Term.