alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on July 11, 2023, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Senior Healthcare Innovation Consortium (“Senior Healthcare Innovation Consortium”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, CarePredict, Inc., Plantation, FL; International Consulting Associates, Inc., Arlington, VA; Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-Shreveport, Shreveport, LA; Novare Products LLC, Bryant, AR; and The Diabetes Resistance LLC, Clawson, MI, have been added as parties to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Senior Healthcare Innovation Consortium intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On November 02, 2022, Senior Healthcare Innovation Consortium filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on November 23, 2022 (87 FR 71677).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on April 12, 2023. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on June 13, 2023 (88 FR 38533).                

Suzanne Morris,

Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2023-20782 Filed 9-25-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 262 

Honoring Ellen May Tower who, while an United States Army nurse during 

the Spanish-American War, became the first Army nurse to die on 

foreign soil. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 22, 2007 

Mr. ROGERS of Michigan (for himself, Mr. STUPAK, Mr. WALBERG, and Mr. 

MCCOTTER) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring Ellen May Tower who, while an United States 

Army nurse during the Spanish-American War, became 

the first Army nurse to die on foreign soil. 

Whereas Ellen May Tower was born on May 8, 1868, in 

Byron, Michigan; 

Whereas Ellen May Tower volunteered for service with the 

United States Army as a nurse in 1898 and served as 

a nurse during the Spanish-American War; 

Whereas Ellen May Tower contracted typhoid fever and became the first Army nurse to die on foreign soil while 

serving her country; and 

Whereas Ellen May Tower was the first women to receive a 

military burial in the State of Michigan and only the 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 262 IH 

third woman in United States history to receive such a 

burial: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the spirit of service and dedica3 tion that Ellen May Tower displayed for her coun4 try; 

5 (2) honors Ellen May Tower as a great Amer6 ican in recognition of her contributions to the State 

7 of Michigan and the United States Army; and 

8 (3) honors Ellen May Tower during Women’s 

9 History Month. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
Docket Number FAA-2013-0705
Exhibit 23.2





Consent of Erika Ruiz (included as part of Exhibit 5.2).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           6,177
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,033
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (48)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,417
<PP&E>                                           6,759
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,485)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,903
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,311
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           20,847
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             6
<OTHER-SE>                                    (11,739)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,903
<SALES>                                         11,796
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,796
<CGS>                                            7,489
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,451
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (111)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,033)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,033)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,033)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    $(1.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  $(1.10)


</TABLE>
(R.D. 11411)

#### Parsons & Whittemore, Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided December 5, 1967)

*Sharp, Bolter & Hutchison*for the plaintiff.

*Edwin L. "Weisl, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Bao, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

. IT IS HEBEBY STIPULATED AND AGBEED by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court:

1. That the subject merchandise consists of hardboard exported from Sweden as to which the Secretary of the Treasury issued a finding of dumping, published in 89 TD 197, TD 53567, made pursuant to the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C., 160, et seq.).

2. That pursuant to Section 168 of said Antidumping Act, the appraiser reported the purchase price (Sec. 162) and the foreign market value (Sec. 164) as to the merchandise listed on Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof.

3. That pursuant to Sections 500 and 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, the appraiser appraised all of the merchandise in the appeals for appraisement enumerated on Schedule A for regular duty purposes.

4. That the plaintiff duly filed appeals for reappraisement as to the values referred to in the above paragraphs Nos. 2 and 3.

5._ That at the times relevant herein the purchase price and the foreign market value under the said Antidumping Act are as specified in the aforesaid Schedule A attached hereto.

*7826. That as to all other items of merchandise not identified on Schedule A, the appraiser’s reports of purchase price and of foreign market value are correct.

7. That the appraiser’s findings of value under the provisions of Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, are correct.

8. That said appeals are submitted for decision upon this stipulation and said Schedule A.

Upon the agreed facts, I find foreign market value, as defined in section 164 of the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C. § 164), for the merchandise described in schedule A, annexed to this decision and made a part hereof, and the purchase price thereof, within section 162 of said act (19 U.S.C. § 162), to be as indicated in said schedule. As to all other items of merchandise not identified in schedule A, I find the foreign market values and purchase prices to be as reported by the appraiser. In all other respects, the values of all merchandise are as returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered1 accordingly.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

N OTICE

Appellate case name: Michelle Heinrich, Mandy So and Naim El

- Aswad, M.D., Individually and Derivatively as Members of Victory's Bioethical Anatomics, LLC and Victory's Advanced Centers for Surgical Education, LLC v. Strasburger & Price, L.L.P., Stuart Farrell Miller and Jana H. Woelfel

Appellate case number: 01

- 15

- 00473

- CV

Trial court case number: 2013

- 74218

Trial court: 164th District Court of Harris County

The Court’s records indi cate that Appellants’/Plaintiffs’ Petition for Permission to Appeal Interlocutory Order filed with this Court on May 27, 2015 may not have been timely. See, e.g., Inliner Americas, Inc. v. MaComb Funding Group, L.L.C. , 244 S.W.3d 427 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1 4th Dist.] 2007, no pet). Accordingly, the Court has directed me to notify you that the Court may dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction unless you file a written response to this notice, providing a detailed explanation, citing relevant portions of the record, statue, rules, and case law to show this Court has jurisdiction over the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.3(a).

Any response must be filed within 10 days of the date of this notice. You must respond in writing even if you have previously claimed your petition for permissive appeal was timely

filed.

If a meritorious response is not received in the form described above by the deadline, the Court may dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction without further notice.

Clerk’s signature:

Date : June 18, 2015
No. 61490.

#### Damrak Trading Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 302152-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
Case No. 10,193.

#### NEWTON v. WEAVER et al.

[2 Cranch, C. C. 685.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

May Term, 1826.

Practice at Lav — Joint Action — Amendment or Declaration after Judgment against One Defendant — Service of Process.

In a joint action against two defendants, if one only be taken on the first writ, and the other be taken on a subsequent writ, and the plaintiff. not knowing that this other had been taken, niters his declaration by stating that he had not been taken, and proceeds to judgment against the defendant first taken: the court will, at a subsequent term, permit the judgment to he set aside and the declaration to be restored to its original form, and the cause to proceed as a joint action against both.

1

 [Reported by Hon. William Cranch, Chief Judge.]

This was originally a joint action against Weaver and Burdick. Burdick was first taken, and the writ returned non est as to "Weaver; but the latter was taken on the second or third writ before May, 1825.

At the last term, namely, December term, 1825, Mr. Wallach, for plaintiff, supposing that Weaver had not at that time been taken, altered his declaration by inserting that fact, and by declaring against Burdick alone, who thereupon confessed judgment.

Mr. Wallach. now, upon motion, was per-mited by THE COURT (CRANCH. Chief Judge, contrh) to restore his declaration to its original form, as a declaration against both defendants, and ordered the judgment to be set aside and the cause brought back to this term and consolidated with this, against Weaver.

CRANCH, Chief Judge, .thought that the court ought not now to permit any alteration of the record of the last term for the purpose of making the judgment erroneous, merely because the counsel of the party was so negligent as erroneously to state a fact upon the record, the truth of which he had the means, by ordinary attention, of ascertaining. The judgment was correct according to the record.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of BJs Wholesale Club, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended July 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Michael T. Wedge, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the undersigneds knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: August 16, 2005 |  | /S/ MICHAEL T. WEDGE   
|                       |  | Michael T. Wedge       
|                       |  | Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 33.2
 MANAGEMENTS ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE
 Company
  Platform i e
 Applicable Servicing Criteria
 Period
  
    
    The Companys management is responsible for assessing the Companys compliance with
the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
    
    The Companys management has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the
Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.
    
    Based on such assessment, the Company has complied, in all material respects, with
the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
  CITIBANK, N.A.By:
    
    /s/ Karen MontbachIts:
    
    Managing Director
EX-35.2
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


Ace Securities Corporation
6525 Morrison Boulevard
Suite 318
Charlotte, NC 28211

RE: Annual Statement as to Compliance

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells
Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows for the calendar year 2008:

(a) a review of Wells Fargo's activities as Master Servicer and/or Securities
Administrator under the servicing agreement(s) listed on Schedule A hereto (the
"Servicing Agreement(s)") has been made under my supervision; and

(b) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review Wells Fargo has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material respects
throughout the reporting period.


February 24, 2009

/s/ Kristen Ann Cronin

KRISTEN ANN CRONIN
Vice President


(page)


(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC N2702-011
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
410 884-2000
410 715-2380 Fax

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


To: Ace Securities Corporation

Schedule A

List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series

1 Sale and Servicing Agreement for PHH Mortgage Trust, Series 2008-CIM1
  Mortgage-Backed Notes, Series 2008-CIM1, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Master
  Servicer and Securities Administrator, as applicable.
Number of 

water-budget 

subareas

Area 

(square 

miles)

Mean recharge as 

a percentage of 

water input1

Number of 

water-budget 

subareas

Area 

(square 

miles)

Mean recharge as 

a percentage of 

water input1

Number of 

water-budget 

subareas

Area 

(square 

miles)

Mean recharge as 

a percentage of 

water input1

Open native forest (outside fog zone) 2,695 8.61 23.5 2,135 6.69 21.7 221 1.25 37.0

Closed native forest (outside fog zone) 36 0.09 11.7 653 3.01 20.7 337 2.13 35.8

Alien and mixed forest (outside fog zone) 2 <0.005 13.0 751 1.60 11.1 146 0.64 10.7

Open native forest (inside fog zone) 1,335 8.73 27.5 2,756 24.70 32.0 195 0.92 51.9

Closed native forest (inside fog zone) 159 0.63 11.4 1,429 5.88 26.4 197 1.11 51.9

Alien and mixed forest (inside fog zone) 33 0.29 2.1 83 0.15 12.9 13 0.12 26.5

Shrubland 3,927 47.82 45.4 902 6.88 55.5 54 0.09 61.6

Agriculture: Macadamia 0 – – 240 0.69 49.6 19 0.09 58.5

Coffee 0 – – 300 0.82 49.4 1 <0.005 65.9

Diversified 0 – – 15 0.09 25.0 0 – –

Forest (eucalyptus) 0 – – 0 – – 0 – –

Fallow/Grassland 0 – – 0 – – 0 – –

Golf course 0 – – 713 1.65 26.1 0 – –

Low-intensity developed 4,002 3.07 36.7 8,064 8.39 32.5 9 0.02 57.7

High-intensity developed 1,347 1.89 61.0 694 0.26 59.3 0 – –

Grassland 5,884 46.26 34.8 5,088 25.60 43.9 242 3.16 60.9

Sparsely vegetated 6,686 90.36 53.9 2,482 6.05 51.8 182 1.56 63.9

Wetland vegetation 12 0.02 61.6 0 – – 0 – –

Water body2 98 0.20 – 18 0.01 – 5 0.01 –

2

Recharge was not calculated using the water-budget model (see USGS SIR 2011–5078, p. 28).

1

Recharge as a percentage of water input was calculated for each subarea using the formula: [(recharge - direct recharge)/(rainfall + fog + irrigation)] x 100. Values for each subarea in a particular land-cover category were then multiplied 

by the area and summed, and that sum was then divided by the total area of that category to obtain a mean. Direct recharge is described in USGS SIR 2011–5078.

Table S-10. Estimated mean annual groundwater recharge as a percentage of water input for baseline conditions in the Hualālai aquifer sector of the Island of Hawai‘i, compiled by land-cover 

type and precipitation amount (refer to USGS SIR 2011–5078).

[<, less than; –, not applicable; water input is defined as the sum of mean annual rainfall, fog, and irrigation; baseline conditions are defined as 2008 land cover and mean annual rainfall for the period 1916–83; the 

Hualälai aquifer sector consists of the Keauhou and Kiholo aquifer systems and is defined by the Hawai‘i Commission on Water Resource Management (see 

http://www.state.hi.us/dlnr/cwrm/mapsillustrations/gwhu_hawaii.pdf); reported mean recharge is an area-weighted average; no distinction is made between fog and non-fog conditions for shrubland, coffee, and 

eucalyptus forest plantations]

Land-cover description

Mean annual rainfall plus fog equal to 40 

inches or less

Mean annual rainfall plus fog greater than 40 

inches and less than 80 inches

Mean annual rainfall plus fog equal to 80 

inches or greater
From: jstancliffe@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:14:59 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jason Stancliffe

Port Orchard, WA 98366
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CurrencyShares® South African Rand Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-K for the fiscal period ended October 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nick Bonos, Chief Executive Officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Trust.

Date: January 14, 2011



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ NICK BONOS                                       
|Nick Bonos*                                          
|Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)



|* | The Registrant is a trust and Nick Bonos is signing in his capacity as the principal executive officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Registrant.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------