alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Players
Network Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      141,276
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   314,363
<PP&E>                                             459,685
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,088,264
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              641,637
<BONDS>                                            121,173
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             8,328
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,325,454
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,088,264
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   506,116
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,040,186
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  11,713
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (545,783)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (0.068)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.068)



</TABLE>
June 30, 1955

No. 59211.

Suit 4823.

#### United States *v.*R. J. Saunders & Co., Inc.

C. D. 1610 reversed and remanded February 8, 1955. C. A. D. 584.
No. 66482.

#### Andrew Fisher Cycle Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 59/9031 and 60/28078 (Seattle).

Opinion by

Lawrence, *3.*

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the *347subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
|  |  | **TradeData****TradeAnalysis****Industry Information****Resources and References****.****.****  Contact**Send comments and suggestions to:MetroExports**  An Export Performance Report On Over 250 U.S. Cities**For county definitions of metro areas:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/OMB/inforeg/msa99.pdf
- Introduction MetroArea Export Highlights 1999
 
- Alphabetical Listing of Metropolitan Exports   (PDF )  Metro Exports Ranked by '99 Value (PDF )Metro Exports Ranked by '93-99 Dollar Change
 
(PDF )
- Metro Exports Ranked by '93-99 Percent Change   (PDF )  Metro Exports Ranked by '98-99 Dollar Change (PDF )Metro Exports Ranked by '98-99 Percent Change
 
(PDF )
Metropolitan Export Totals to Selected Destinations
  
  1993 - 1999 (181 Tables)
Metropolitan Export Sales to World by Industry Sector
 1993 - 1999 (43 Tables)
Technical Notes on Data Usage
 
76 Metro Areas For Which No Export Sales Data Are Available Due to Disclosure Regulations
Guide to State and Substate Export Data
 

The  symbol indicates files that require the free Adobe Acrobat Reader.

	     
  |
|--|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
H. Res. 378 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 16, 2007. 

Whereas World Red Cross Red Crescent Day was observed 

on May 8, 2007; 

Whereas May 8 marks the birth of Henry Dunant, the founder of the International Committee of the Red Cross, who 

began advocating for the humane treatment of the wartime sick and wounded after witnessing the atrocities at 

the Battle of Solferino in 1859; 

Whereas World Red Cross Red Crescent Day is celebrated by 

many of the 185 Red Cross, Red Crescent, and Magen 

David Adom National Societies throughout the world and 

more than 750 chapters throughout the United States; 

Whereas through the motivation and action of its volunteers 

and donors, the American Red Cross and its partners 

worldwide pay tribute to Henry Dunant’s legacy by helping those in need and protecting human dignity for all; 

Whereas the American Red Cross helps vulnerable people and 

communities around the world to prevent, prepare for, respond to, and recover from disasters, complex humanitarian emergencies, and life-threatening health conditions; 

Whereas the American Red Cross is uniquely positioned to 

save lives through the Red Cross, Red Crescent, and 
2 

•HRES 378 EH 

Magen David Adom National Societies network of 

97,000,000 volunteers located in nearly every country in 

the world; 

Whereas in 2006, the American Red Cross responded to 23 

international disasters, contributing more than $16.1 million in financial support, deploying delegates and providing relief supplies and other emergency assistance to 

millions affected by disasters; 

Whereas the American Red Cross continues to help affected 

communities recover from the tsunami that resulted from 

the earthquake that occurred off the west coast of northern Sumatra, Indonesia, on December 26, 2004, by providing assistance to more than 3.3 million people through 

long-term recovery programs and more than 80 million 

people through disease control activities in the tsunamiaffected countries; 

Whereas since 2001, the American Red Cross and its partners in the Measles Initiative have vaccinated more than 

372 million children in 48 countries against measles; and 

Whereas World Red Cross Red Crescent Day will honor the 

efforts of Red Cross, Red Crescent, and Magen David 

Adom employees and volunteers who work tirelessly to alleviate human suffering: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives commends 

the humanitarian efforts of Red Cross, Red Crescent, and 
3 

•HRES 378 EH 

Magen David Adom National Societies worldwide on the occasion of World Red Cross Red Crescent Day. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
From: hnrygjes@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:33:36 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Henry Vedder

Hudson, NY 12534
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 302 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 302

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        April 18, 2007.
    Resolved,  That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the 
Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved 
into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for 
consideration of the bill (H.R. 1361) to improve the disaster relief programs of 
the Small Business Administration, and for other purposes. The first reading of 
the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of 
the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. 
General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour 
equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 
the Committee on Small Business. After general debate the bill shall be 
considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. The amendment in the nature 
of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Small Business now printed in 
the bill, modified by the amendment printed in part A of the report of the 
Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, shall be considered as adopted 
in the House and in the Committee of the Whole. The bill, as amended, shall be 
considered as the original bill for the purpose of further amendment under the 
five-minute rule and shall be considered as read. All points of order against 
provisions in the bill, as amended, are waived. Notwithstanding clause 11 of 
rule XVIII, no further amendment to the bill, as amended, shall be in order 
except those printed in part B of the report of the Committee on Rules. Each 
such further amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the report, 
may be offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as 
read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided 
and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to 
amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question in 
the House or in the Committee of the Whole. All points of order against such 
further amendments are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule 
XXI. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee 
shall rise and report the bill, as amended, to the House with such further 
amendments as may have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered 
as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without 
intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
    Sec. 2. During consideration in the House of H.R. 1361 pursuant to this 
resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the Chair 
may postpone further consideration of the bill to such time as may be designated 
by the Speaker.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
No. 68390.

protest 63/12047 (El Paso).

#### Joseph H. Brown & Son *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

An examination of the official papers showing that the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
Exhibit
13


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Transition Report of GSME Acquisition Partners I (the
“Company”) on Form 20-F as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and
on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Dated:
May 24, 2010


By:
              /s/ Eli D. ScherEli
      D. ScherChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)





Dated:
May 24, 2010


By:
              /s/ Zhong Wen LinZhong
      Wen LinChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Accounting Officer andPrincipal
      Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         294,589
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       8,232,464
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    731,874
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    104,578,380
<ALLOWANCE>                                    201,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             119,341,457
<DEPOSITS>                                  83,033,746
<SHORT-TERM>                                14,260,715
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,906,822
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,424
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,123,750
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             119,341,457
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              2,100,016
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               22,212
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               110,558
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             2,232,786
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,099,583
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,265,756
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          967,030
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   15,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                536,276
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                429,528
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     255,028
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   255,028
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.03
<LOANS-NON>                                    338,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                    79,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               290,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               186,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              201,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           201,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         78,550
        

</TABLE>
No. 63791.

protests 88062-K, etc. (New York).

#### W. A. Taylor & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40. C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 68901.

#### Aristo-Craft Miniatures and Air Clearance Assoc. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 63/12827(B), etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, O.X

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of miniature motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 66961, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 220 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 220

   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 511) to pledge the 
  faithful support of Congress to members of the United States Armed 
                     Forces serving in harm's way.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 2007

Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas submitted the following resolution; which was 
                   referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 511) to pledge the 
  faithful support of Congress to members of the United States Armed 
                     Forces serving in harm's way.

    Resolved,  That immediately after the adoption of this resolution 
the Speaker shall, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the 
House resolved into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of 
the Union for consideration of the bill (H.R. 511) to pledge the 
faithful support of Congress to members of the United States Armed 
Forces serving in harm's way. The first reading of the bill shall be 
dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill 
are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not 
exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Armed Services. After 
general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the 
five-minute rule. During consideration of the bill for amendment, the 
Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in 
recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment 
has caused it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record 
designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so 
printed shall be considered as read. At the conclusion of consideration 
of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill 
to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 
amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except 
one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
    Sec. 2. If the Committee of the Whole rises and reports that it has 
come to no resolution on the bill, then on the next legislative day the 
House shall, immediately after the third daily order of business under 
clause 1 of rule XIV, resolve into the Committee of the Whole for 
further consideration of the bill.
                                 <all>
```
(R.D. 11487)

#### Leslie B. Canion *v.*United States

Entry 10753-H, etc.

(Decided February 6, 1968)

*Stein & Shostak*for the plaintiff.

*Edwin L. Weisl, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

*782E,ao, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in the schedule of cases, annexed to this decision and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court:

> 1. That the merchandise covered by the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of cases, consists of handbags manufactured by Kishimoto & Co. and exported on or after November 1, 1961, and that, at the time of exportation thereof to the United States., the market value or the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or, in the absence of sales freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the invoice unit prices, ex factory, net, plus cost of packing as invoiced.

> 2. That all the merchandise covered by the appeals for reappraisement was entered subsequent to February 27, 1958.

> 3. That as to any of the merchandise on the invoices covered by the entries the subject of the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of cases which is included in the list of articles designated by the Secretary of the Treasury in T.D. 54521 as provided for in Sec. 6(a) of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, Public Law 927, 84th Congress which is subject to appraisement under Sec. 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, that there were no higher foreign values for such or similar merchandise on the dates of exportation involved herein.

> 4. That these appeals for reappraisement may be deemed submitted for decision on this stipulation.

Upon the agreed facts, I find export value as that value is defined in section 402a(d) or section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise covered by said appeals for reappraisement and that such values are the invoice unit prices, ex-factory, net, plus cost of packing as invoiced.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.