alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 06-2671

___________

Michael Terrell, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Missouri.

Steven Schwerb; Eric Lingard; Michael *

Marks, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: August 10, 2007

Filed: August 16, 2007

___________

Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Michael Terrell appeals the district court’s1

 adverse grant of summary judgment

in his civil rights lawsuit. We agree with the district court that Terrell failed to

counter defendants’ evidence showing their actions did not violate his constitutional

rights, see Parks v. City of Horseshoe Bend, Ark., 480 F.3d 837, 839 (8th Cir. 2007)

(to survive summary judgment motion, nonmovant must present more than scintilla

of evidence and must advance specific facts to create genuine trialworthy issue);
-2-

Johnson v. Blaukat, 453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th Cir. 2006) (summary judgment standard

of review); and we reject as meritless Terrell’s arguments for reversal. Further, to the

extent he was attempting to bring criminal charges for kidnaping and abduction, he

cannot do so, see Linda R.S. v. Richard D., 410 U.S. 614, 619 (1973). Finally, to the

extent he challenges the district court’s denial of his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

60(b) motion, we find no abuse of discretion. See Brooks v. Ferguson-Florissant Sch.

Dist., 113 F.3d 903, 905 (8th Cir. 1997) (standard of review). 

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

______________________________
January 17, 1952 

Hon. R.*OQara Lanler, President 

Texas Southern University " 

Houston 4, Texas opinion MO. v-1388 

Re: Length of time a citizen 

of Spain may be employed 

aS an instructor in Spanish, construing the appropriation bill rider 

respecting employment of 

Dear Sir: aliens. 

We refer to your request for an opinion of 

this office on the following question: 

Are we correct in interpreting the 

phrase "for other than inatrnatlonal service" appsarin in Section 44, Article V 

of House Bill $ 26, to mean that a time 

limit does not obtain in referencetoour 

aylng here at Texas Southern University, 

an instructor in Spanish, an alien exchange 

student at the University of Houston from 

Spain? 

Sdction 44, Art. V of H.B. 426, Acts 52nd 

bf', R.S. 1951, ch. 499, p. 1446, at p. 1476; applicab e to State institutions of higher learning, provides 

a8 follows: 

"Employment of Allens.~ Bo money ehall 

be paid out of any appropriation made herein 

for other than instructional eervices for a 

longer period than ninety (90) clays, to any 

person who is not a citizen of the United 

States unless tituralizatlon proceedings have 

been instituted; provided that this limitation shall not prevent the em loyment POP a 

longer period than ninety (90 P days of regular 

students, who are not citizens, as student 

assistants or minor employees in the educational institutions of this State. 
Hoh. R. O%ara Lanier, page 2 (V-1388) 

The alien employment or services referred 

to in Section 44, 8, ~8x8 services "other than 

instructional services . There is here no ambiguity 

necessitating statutory construction. Qenerallg, 

Section 44 prohibits the expenditure of moneys appropriated in Article V of Rouse Bill 426, su ra 

as compensation to an alien employee for serv -+- ces 

in excessof ninety days, "other than instructional 

services", where naturalization proceedings have not 

been instituted in behalf of the alien. 

You state that Texas Southern University 

has employed an alien as an *instructor" in Spanish; 

that he is an exchange student at the University of 

Houston from Spain. We agree that Section 44, su ra 

does not preclude the use of the appropriations -+- o 

the University in payment for his services for a 

period of time which may exceed ninety days. 

SDWMARY 

Section 44, 'Article'V 0f~R.B. 426, Acts 

52&l Leg., R.S. 1951, ch. 499, p. 1446, which 

places limitations on the use of approprlatlons of State institutions of higher learning 

in their employment of aliens in services 

"other than Instructional services”, expressly 

excepts from Its application alien employments 

Involving instructional services. 

Yours very truly, 

APPROVED: 

J. C. Davis, Jr. 

County Affairs Division 

Charles D. Mathews 

First Asslstant 

CEO:mh 

PRICE DARIgL 

Attorney General 

By4=-rChester E. Ollison 

Assistant
Exhibit 12.2
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Group
Holdings, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b)
    
    [omitted in accordance with the guidance of SEC Release 33-8760];c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; andd)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the
audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect


the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Isamu EndoBy:
    
    Isamu EndoSenior Managing Director
Exhibit
32.1


Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
 Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 I, Lars
Pearl, President and Chief Executive Officer of Aurora Gold Corporation (the
“Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to my knowledge:
 
 1.
              The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended
      September 30, 2007 which this certification accompanies fully complies
      with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934: and
 
 2.
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 Date:  February 13,
      2008
              BY:
              /s/ Lars
      PearlLars
      PearlPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
 
 
 
 This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
ex10_1.htm





Exhibit 10.1


 



AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO


SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN AGREEMENT







THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN AGREEMENT (“Amendment”) is made as of the 1st day of January, 2013, by and between DAVID M. LOBACH, JR. (“Executive”) and EMBASSY BANK FOR THE LEHIGH VALLEY, a Pennsylvania banking institution having its principal office in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania (the “Bank”).







WITNESSETH







WHEREAS, the Bank and the Executive entered into a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan Agreement dated November 19, 2010 (as the same may be amended from time to time, the “SERP”), and







WHEREAS, the Bank and the Executive desire to amend the SERP to increase the amount of the benefit thereunder.







NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements set forth herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound hereby, agree as follows:







1.           Section 1(b) of the SERP is hereby amended such that the Normal Retirement Supplemental Pension (as defined in the SERP) shall be $127,000.







2.           In all other respects, the SERP, as amended above, is hereby ratified and confirmed by the Bank and the Executive. All other provisions of the SERP shall remain in full force and effect as amended hereby.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, each intending to be legally bound, have executed this Amendment as of the date, month and year first above written.









	
ATTEST:

	  	
EMBASSY BANK FOR THE LEHIGH VALLEY


	  	  	  	  	  
	
/s/ Lynne M. Neel

	  	
By:

	
/s/ Judith A. Hunsicker

	  
	  	  	  	  	  
	
WITNESS:

	  	
EXECUTIVE

	  
	  	  	  	  	  
	
/s/ Lynne M. Neel

	  	
/s/David M. Lobach
----

| i.     | A review      of the activities of Capmark Finance Inc. as Subservicer during the      period, and of its performance under this Subservicing Agreement, has been      made under my supervision.                            |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
| ii.    | To the      best of my knowledge, based on such review, Capmark Finance Inc. as      Subservicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Subservicing      Agreement in all material respects throughout the      period. |

|                                                  |  Capmark Finance      Inc. |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------|--------|
|                                                  |  116 Welsh      Road       |   |
|  Real Estate      Finance, Investments, Services |  Horsham, Pa      19044    |   |

----
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements for year ended June 30, 1992 which statement is dated May
24, 1997 by Michael B. Johnson & Co.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1992
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1992
<CASH>                                             100
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   100
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,055
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,825
<OTHER-SE>                                      65,707
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  (26,955)
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





Form 8-K





Current Report





Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report  (Date of earliest event reported): July 24, 2013





Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation


(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)





001-11241


(Commission File Number)





Delaware37-1105865(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)(IRS Employer Identification Number)





2120 West End Avenue


Nashville, Tennessee 37203-0001


(Address of principal executive offices, with zip code)





(615) 341-1000


(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)








Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





oWritten communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)oSoliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---






Item 2.02. Results of Operations and Financial Condition.





On July 24, 2013, Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation issued a press release reporting financial results for the quarter ended June 30, 2013.  A copy of the press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated into this Item 2.02 by reference.





The information in this Current Report on Form 8-K, including Exhibit 99.1, is being furnished in accordance with the provisions of General Instruction B.2 of Form 8-K.








Item 9.01.  Financial Statements and Exhibits.





d)Exhibits:99.1Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation press release dated July 24, 2013








SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.





Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation








Date:  July 24, 2013By:/s/ J. Wesley BlumenshineJ. Wesley BlumenshineSecretary





2


---






EXHIBIT INDEX





Exhibit No.Description99.1Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation press release dated July 24, 2013





3
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSolar wind observations with the ion composition instrument aboard the ISEE-3 ICE spacecraftThe principal observations obtained by the Ion Composition Instrument (ICI) flown on the ISEE-3/ICE spacecraft, which was in the solar wind from September 1978 to the end of 1982, before being directed to the far magnetotail of the Earth are discussed. Almost continuous observations were made of the abundances of 3He++, 4He++, O6+, O7+, Ne, Si and Fe in various charge states, and of their bulk speeds and temperatures. The results show that there is a strong tendency in the collisionless solar wind for the ionic temperatures to be proportional to the masses. For heavier ions these temperatures exceed typical coronal electron temperatures. 4He++, especially in high speed streams, moves faster than H+, and travels at the same speed as heavier ions. The mechanism leading to this heating and rapid streaming is still not entirely clear.Document ID19890006481Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsOgilvie, K. W.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD., United States)*Coplan, M. A.*(Maryland Univ. College Park., United States)*Bochsler, P.*(Bern Univ. Greenbelt, MD, United States)*Geiss, J.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1989Subject CategorySolar PhysicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-101252NAS 1.15:101252Accession Number89N15852Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG5-579Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19890006481.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
M otion Granted ; Order filed February 15 , 2018

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14 - 17 - 00520 - CV

____________ FORT BEND COUNTY , Appellant

V. MELISSA ANN NORSWORT HY , Appellee On Appeal from the 268th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 14 - DCV - 213052B



### ORDER On July 3, 2017 , appellant filed a notice of appeal from an order signed April 21, 2017 , and the appeal was assigned to this court under our appellate number 14 - 17 - 00 520 - CV. On July 28, 2017 , appellant filed a second notice of appeal from the same order , which was assigned to this court under our appellate number 14 - 17 - 00 633 - CV. On December 12, 2017 , appellant filed a motion to consolidate the related appeals. The motion is granted in part and we issue the following order:We order all records and documents filed in cause number 14 - 17 - 00633 - CV

transferred and filed into cause number 14 - 17 - 00520 - CV. We order the record and brief filed in our appellate case number 14 - 17 - 00 633 - CV transferred to app ellant ca u se number 14 - 17 - 00520 - CV. Appellate ca u se number 14 - 17 - 00633 - CV will be dismissed and this case will proceed under t he existing filing deadlines in ca u se number 14 - 1 7 - 00 520 - CV styled Fort Bend County v. Melissa Ann Norsworthy . PER CURIAM
From: dobo4@tampabay.rr.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:07:18 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Doris Boll

Inverness, FL 34450