alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                                     SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           14,797
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    30,055
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      224,733
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 278,953
<PP&E>                                           88,505
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   414,911
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            145,151
<BONDS>                                          193,288
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                         122
<OTHER-SE>                                       58,335
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     414,911
<SALES>                                          308,187
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 308,187
<CGS>                                            255,278
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    255,278
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,022
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (8,502)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (8,502)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (8,502)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.77)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.77)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Collins & Aikman Floorcoverings, Inc. (the
Corporation) for the quarterly period ended July 26, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Corporation, certify that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ EDGAR M. (MAC) BRIDGEREdgar M. (Mac) BridgerChief Executive Officer/s/ DARREL V. MCCAYDarrel V. McCayVice-President andChief Financial Officer




36
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 20, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-10725

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RICHARD WILLIAM CORDER,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:05-CR-71-4

--------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Counsel appointed for Richard William Corder has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Corder has not filed a

response. Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the

record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly,

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Failure of Penn Square Bank

              																	United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, 1970-					 and 	Ninety-Seventh Congress, 1981-1983. 						*Failure of Penn Square Bank : Hearing Before the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, United States Senate, Ninety-Seventh Congress, Second Session, December 10, 1982*,												Washington: 								U.S. Government Printing Office, 										December 10, 1982,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/774,			accessed on September 10, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
Before the Third Division,

January 30, 1957

No. 60463.

#### International Packers Commercial Div. of International Packers, Ltd. *v.*United States,

protest 242018-K (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef which would now be advisorily classified at 3 cents per pound under paragraph 701, as modified, *supra,*the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: jmckelvy@robson.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:10:15 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jean McKelvy

Chandler, AZ 85224
* Judge, U.S. Court of International Trade, sitting by

designation.

** Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R.
47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 00-20693

__________________

EDGAR MORALES; LAIQUE REHMAN; NOUHAD K. BASSILA;
GEORGE BRECKENRIDGE; WILLIAM JEFFREY VAN FLEET,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

DON EVANS, U.S. Secretary of Commerce; KENNETH PREWITT, Director of the United States Bureau of the Census,

Defendants-Appellees.

______________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Texas, Houston

H-00-CV-1010

______________________________________________

October 10, 2001

Before DUHÉ and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI *

, Dis trict Judge.

PER CURIAM: **

Edgar Morales, Laique Rehman, Nouhad Bassila, George

Breckenridge and William Van Fleet, Plaintiffs-Appellants, appeal

from an adverse summary judgment dismissing their challenge to the2

constitutionality of the forms used to conduct the decennial census

for the year 2000. We review de novo the summary judgment of the

district court. Specifically, appellants claimed that questions on

their census forms asking them to identify their race and ethnicity

violate the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and that those

questions and others also contained in the census violate the Equal

P rotection provision of the Fifth Amendment. In addition,

appellant Van Fleet claimed that the long form questionnaire sent

to him constituted another violation of the Fou rth and Fifth

Amendments. After careful review of the record and briefs on

appeal and giving due consideration to the oral argument presented

upon submission, we find no error in the district court's judgment

nor in its stated reasons for its judgment. No error having been

shown, the judgment of the district court is affirmed in all

things.

AFFIRMED
----

| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Signatures                         |   | Title                                                                |   | Date           |
|------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------|
|                               |   |                                                                 |   |           |
| /s/ Natalie RussellNatalie Russell |   | Chief Financial OfficerPrincipal Accounting OfficerSecretaryDirector |   | March 22, 2011 |

----
Amendment to Employment Agreement with Elliot S. Orol



 Exhibit 10.2 
 AMENDMENT TO 
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

THIS AGREEMENT, dated as of November 6, 2012 (the “Agreement”), is made by and between Tower Group, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”), and Elliot S. Orol (the “Executive”). 
 WITNESSETH THAT 

WHEREAS, the Executive and the Company are the parties to that certain Employment Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2008 (the
“Employment Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Executive and the Company wish to amend the Employment Agreement as set
forth below. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants contained herein, the Company and the
Executive hereby agree as follows: 
 1. Section 6 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as
follows: 
 “Certain Tax Consequences. 
 (a) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Agreement, if any of the benefits and payments provided under this Agreement, either alone or together with other benefits and payments which the Executive
has the right to receive either directly or indirectly from the Company or any of its Affiliates, would constitute an excess parachute payment (the “Excess Payment”) under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
(the “Code”), the Executive hereby agrees that the benefits and payments provided under this Agreement shall be reduced (but not below zero) by the amount necessary to prevent any such benefits and payments to the Executive from
constituting an Excess Payment; provided, however, that such reduction shall be made only if, by reason of such reduction, the Executive’s net after-tax economic benefit shall exceed the net after-tax economic benefit to the Executive if such
reduction were not made. 
 (b) All determinations required to be made under clause (a) of this Section 6, and the
assumptions to be utilized in arriving at such determination, shall be made by the certified public accounting firm used for auditing purposes by the Company immediately prior to the date of termination or, if the parties determine that the
certified public accounting firm used for auditing purposes by the Company immediately prior to the date of termination cannot make such determination because of legal restrictions, the parties shall agree on a different certified public accounting
firm (such certified public accounting firm is hereinafter referred to as the “Accounting Firm”), which shall promptly provide detailed supporting calculations both to the Company and the Executive. The Company shall pay all fees and
expenses of the Accounting Firm.” 

  
 1 








 2. Except as expressly amended above, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force
and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive has hereunto set his hand and, pursuant to the authorization of the Board, the
Company has caused this Agreement to be executed, all as of the day and year first above written. 
  

			
	TOWER GROUP, INC.
		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ William E. Hitselberger

	 Title:
	 	   Executive Vice President and Chief
   Financial Officer

	
	ELLIOT S. OROL
	
	           /s/ Elliot S.
Orol




  
 2
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsBenchmarking Model Variants in Development of a Hardware-in-the-Loop Simulation SystemDistributed engine control architecture presents a significant increase in complexity over traditional implementations when viewed from the perspective of system simulation and hardware design and test. Even if the overall function of the control scheme remains the same, the hardware implementation can have a significant effect on the overall system performance due to differences in the creation and flow of data between control elements. A Hardware-in-the-Loop (HIL) simulation system is under development at NASA Glenn Research Center that enables the exploration of these hardware dependent issues. The system is based on, but not limited to, the Commercial Modular Aero-Propulsion System Simulation 40k (C-MAPSS40k). This paper describes the step-by-step conversion from the self-contained baseline model to the hardware in the loop model, and the validation of each step. As the control model hardware fidelity was improved during HIL system development, benchmarking simulations were performed to verify that engine system performance characteristics remained the same. The results demonstrate the goal of the effort; the new HIL configurations have similar functionality and performance compared to the baseline C-MAPSS40k system.Document ID20160004952Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsAretskin-Hariton, Eliot D.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Zinnecker, Alicia M.*(N and R Engineering and Management Services Parma Heights, OH, United States)*Kratz, Jonathan L.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Culley, Dennis E.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Thomas, George L.*(N and R Engineering and Management Services Parma Heights, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredApril 8, 2016Publication DateApril 1, 2016Subject CategoryAircraft Stability And ControlAir Transportation And SafetyReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2016-219089GRC-E-DAA-TN29895AIAA Paper 2016-1425Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NNC12BA01BWBS: WBS 109492.02.03.02.11Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.KeywordsPropulsion SimulationNetworked SystemsDistributed ControlAvailable DownloadsNameType20160004952.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsIDRelationTitle20160010269See AlsoBenchmarking Model Variants in Development of a Hardware-in-the-Loop Simulation Systemvisibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Signatures                         |   | Title                                                                |   | Date              |
|------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------|
|                               |   |                                                                 |   |              |
| /s/ Natalie RussellNatalie Russell |   | Chief Financial OfficerPrincipal Accounting OfficerSecretaryDirector |   | November 30, 2010 |

----
**EXHIBIT  32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of Adelphia Recovery Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-K forthe year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeffrey A. Brodsky a member ofQuest Turnaround Advisors, LLC, Trust Administrator of the Trust, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theTrust.

 

 
| By: Quest Turnaround  Advisors, LLC                    |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| as Trust Administrator of  the Adelphia Recovery Trust |   |
|                                                   |   |
| /s/ Jeffrey A. Brodsky                                 |   |
| Jeffrey A. Brodsky                                     |   |
| Member                                                 |   |
|                                                   |   |
|                                                   |   |
| Date: March 10, 2010                              |   |

 

----
H. Res. 300

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

April 18, 2007.

Whereas under head coach C. Vivian Stringer the Rutgers 

University Scarlet Knights women’s basketball team finished their extraordinary 2006–2007 season with a 27–

9 record; 

Whereas after losing four of their first six games the Lady 

Knights refused to give up and spent their Winter Break 

in the gym honing their skills and working to become a 

better team for the rest the season; 

Whereas on March 6, 2007, Rutgers upset top-seeded University of Connecticut for their first-ever Big East Championship title; 

Whereas the young women displayed great talent in their run 

to the Final Four of the women’s National Collegiate 

Athletic Association (NCAA) tournament; 

Whereas five freshmen played an integral role in the team’s 

march to the championship game;

Whereas the Lady Knights showed enormous composure with 

tournament wins against teams playing in their home 

States; 

Whereas through hard work and determination this young 

team fought through improbable odds to reach the NCAA 

title game; 
2

•HRES 300 EH 

Whereas the team was just the 3d number 4 seed in history 

to reach the championship; 

Whereas the Lady Knights made school history as the first 

athletic team from Rutgers to play for any national 

championship; 

Whereas during those 3 weeks, the Scarlet Knights brought 

excitement to the NCAA tournament and captured the 

hearts of basketball fans throughout New Jersey and 

across the Nation; 

Whereas Rutgers students, alumni, faculty, and staff, along 

with countless New Jerseyans are immensely proud of 

what the team accomplished this past season; 

Whereas the members of the team are excellent representatives of Rutgers University and of the State of New Jersey; 

Whereas these young women are outstanding individuals who 

are striving to reach lifetime goals both on and off the 

basketball court; 

Whereas the Lady Knights epitomize the term student-athlete 

with a combined B+ grade point average; 

Whereas by excelling in academics, music, and community 

service, Katie Adams, Matee Ajavon, Essence Carson, 

Dee Dee Jernigan, Rashidat Junaid, Myia McCurdy, 

Epiphanny Prince, Judith Brittany Ray, Kia Vaughn, 

and Heather Zurich are great role models for young 

women across the Nation; and 

Whereas the Lady Knights embody integrity, leadership and 

class: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—
3

•HRES 300 EH 

(1) commends the amazing performance of Rutgers 

University women’s basketball team in the NCAA tournament; and 

(2) expresses its admiration for the achievements 

and character of this team of remarkable young women; 

Attest:

Clerk.