alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: millsm@central.edu

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:04:55 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mark Mills

Pella, IA 50219
No. 76-24.

#### Rosenbruch *v.*American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsHigh temperature brush seal tuft testing of metallic bristles versus chrome carbideThe tribology of brush seals is of considerable interest to turbine engine designers because bristle wear continues to limit long term seal performance and life. To provide better materials characterization and foster the development of improved seals, NASA Lewis has developed a brush seal tuft tester. In this test, a 'paintbrush' sample tuft is loaded under constant contact pressure against the outside diameter of a rotating journal. With this configuration a direct measurement of load and friction is made. Accurate wear rate measurements are possible due to the known contact pressure. Previously reported baseline research using this facility showed good data repeatability and wear morphology similar to published seal data. This paper extends and expands the database for candidate brush seal materials. A series of tuft tests were completed to evaluate the performance of five high temperature superalloy wires sliding against plasma sprayed nichrome-bonded chrome carbide. Wire materials were either nickel-chrome or cobalt-chrome based superalloys. Good corroboration of the tuft results with dynamic seal rig tests was observed; giving additional confidence in the tuft test as a screening and development tool.Document ID19960038251Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsFellenstein, James A.*(Ohio Aerospace Inst. Cleveland, OH United States)*DellaCorte, Christopher*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland,OH United States)*Moore, Kenneth D.*(Pratt and Whitney Aircraft West Palm Beach, FL United States)*Boyes, Esther*(Pratt and Whitney Aircraft East Hartford, CT United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1996Subject CategoryNonmetallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberE-10282NAS 1.15:107238NASA-TM-107238AIAA-96-2908Meeting InformationMeeting: Joint Propulsion ConferenceLocation: Lake Buena Vista, FLCountry: United StatesStart Date: July 1, 1996End Date: July 3, 1996Sponsors:American Inst. of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc.,American Society of Mechanical Engineers,American Society for Electrical EngineersAccession Number96N30731Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-63-5ADistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19960038251.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of PanAmSat Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael J. Inglese, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

                                                    /s/ MICHAEL J. INGLESE
                                                 ----------------------------
                                                      Michael J. Inglese
                                                 Executive Vice President and
                                                    Chief Financial Officer

Date: November 6, 2003

                                       35
No. 64515.

#### New York Merchandise Co. *v.*United States,

protests 59/9950, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of carrizo baskets the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Chester K. Stoner*v. *United States*(42 Cust. Ct. 178, C.D. 2083), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 215 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         March 8, 2007.
    Resolved,  That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the 
Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved 
into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for 
consideration of the bill (H.R. 700) to amend the Federal Water Pollution 
Control Act to extend the pilot program for alternative water source projects. 
The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order 
against consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 
or 10 of rule XXI. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not 
exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. After 
general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute 
rule. The bill shall be considered as read. Notwithstanding clause 11 of rule 
XVIII, no amendment to the bill shall be in order except those printed in the 
portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of 
rule XVIII and except pro forma amendments for the purpose of debate. Each 
amendment so printed may be offered only by the Member who caused it to be 
printed or his designee and shall be considered as read. At the conclusion of 
consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the 
bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to 
final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or 
without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
From: sainthealey@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:41:07 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

C Healey

Libertyville, IL 60048
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Cover-All Technologies Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the Company), on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, John W. Roblin, Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  March 24, 2011

/s/ John W. Roblin

Name:

John W. Roblin

Title:

Chief Executive Officer











---
**Exhibit 15.1**

​

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

​

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-253519, 333-232693 and 333-262970) of Genmab A/S of our report dated February 14, 2024 relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 20-F.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopersStatsautoriseret RevisionspartnerselskabHellerup, DenmarkFebruary 14, 2024

----

​

PricewaterhouseCoopers Statsautoriseret Revisionspartnerselskab, CVR-nr. 33 77 12 31Strandvejen 44, DK-2900 Hellerup T: 3945 3945, www.pwc.dk

----
H. Res. 159

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 14, 2007.

Resolved, That the House has heard with profound sorrow of the death of the Honorable Charlie Norwood, a Representative from the State of Georgia. 

Resolved, That a committee of such Members of the 

House as the Speaker may designate, together with such 

Members of the Senate as may be joined, be appointed to attend the funeral. 

Resolved, That the Sergeant-at-Arms of the House be 

authorized and directed to take such steps as may be necessary for carrying out the provisions of these resolutions and 

that the necessary expenses in connection therewith be paid 

out of applicable accounts of the House. 

Resolved, That the Clerk communicate these resolutions 

to the Senate and transmit a copy thereof to the family of 

the deceased. 
2

•HRES 159 EH 

Resolved, That when the House adjourns today, it adjourn as a further mark of respect to the memory of the deceased. 

Attest:

Clerk.
#### Frank A. Nordin, Respondent, *v.*Gould Coupler Company, Appellant.

*Nordin*v. *Gould Coupler Co.,*145 App. Div. 903, affirmed.

(Argued January 20, 1913;

decided February 4, 1913.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered May 11, 1911, affirming a judgment. in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through the negligence of defendant, his employer.

*Clinton B. Gibbs*for appellant.

*W. J. Wetherbee*and *Hamilton Ward*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Werner, Hiscock, Collin, Cuddeback and Miller, JJ.
From: johnc@foobox.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:16:52 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

John Cooklis

Madison, AL 35758
*,3 Lo=r4r UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105-3901



## MAY 1 9 

## 2011

Mr. Robert D. Fletcher Deputy Executive Officer California Air Resources Board 

### P. 0. Box2815 Sacrame alifornia 958 12

On April 22,201 1,the California Air Resources Board submitted revisions to the California State Implementation Plan. We have reviewed materials submitted with the following rules and found that they hlfill the completeness criteria in 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 51,Appendix V.

On January 5,2010, EPA found that California had failed to submit Clean Air Act Section 185 fee programs for certain 1-hour ozone nonattainment areas including Los Angeles - South Coast Air Basin (South Coast Air Quality Management District) and the Southeast Desert Nonattainment Area (Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District, Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District, and the Coachella Valley portion of South Coast Air Quality Management District). (75 FR 232). This finding of failure to submit started sanctions clocks under Clean Air Act section 179 (a) and (b), and 40 Code of Federal Regulations 52.31. Effective upon the date of this letter, our completeness finding on the submitted rules referenced above turns off the clocks for offset and highway sanctions under Clean Air Act section 179(b) and 40 Code of Federal Regulations 52.3 1 for South Coast Air Quality Management District, Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District, and Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District. Rule Title Federal Clean Air Act Section 185 Penalty Federal Clean Air Act Section 185 Penalty Clean Air Act Non-Attainment Fees APCDIAQMD Antelope Valley Mojave Desert South Coast Rule # 3 15 315 317

### This letter addresses all revisions in this submittal. In the coming months we will review the complete revisions for action pursuant to Clean Air Act section 

### 1 1O(k). Questions regarding our completeness review should be directed to Cynthia G. Allen at (41

### 5) 947-4120.

Director, Air Division

cc: Mr. Eldon Heaston Executive Director Antelope Valley AQMD Mr. Eldon Heaston Executive Director Mojave Desert AQMD Dr. 

### Barry Wallerstein Executive Officer South Coast AQMD Mr. Michael Guzzetta, Manager Rule Evaluation Section Stationary Source Division
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302(A)

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Kevin Farragher, certify that:

1. I have reviewed the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal period ended October 31, 2008 of CurrencySharesSMSingapore Dollar Trust;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The other certifying officer
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and PADCO Advisors II, Inc.s auditors and the board of directors
of PADCO Advisors II, Inc. and the board of directors of Rydex Fund Services, Inc. and the audit committee of Rydex Specialized Products LLCs board of managers (or persons performing equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves persons who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: January 29, 2009



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ KEVIN FARRAGHER          
|Kevin Farragher              
|Chief Executive Officer      
|(principal executive officer)