alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-13-0563

SAT Date: 6/28/2013

Print Date: 8/2/2013

Related cases:

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 2 1

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

1 1 1 PMN

3 1 1 Hyd Pdt

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Inhalation 

Ecotox: No releases to water

Fate: ; PMN negl; Hyd Pdt negl

Keywords:

 Keywords: LUNG; ONCO; MUTA; SENS-L,S; IRR-L,MM,S,E

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-13-0563

FATE: 

Liquid with MP < 25 C (E)

S = Reacts

Hydrolysis half-life = hr

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

POTW removal (%) = PMN 99 via hydrolysis; then Hyd Pdt 90 via sorption

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = Hyd Pdt >mo
Sorption to soils/sediments = PMN V.strong; Hyd Pdt v.strong

PBT Potential: PMN P1B1; Hyd Pdt P3B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = PMN negl; Hyd Pdt negl

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption of low molecular weight fraction 

is expected to be poor all routes (pchem); expected to react, especially in the lung. 

Concern for oncogenicity based on 

 mutagenicity based on espiratory and dermal sensitization and lung and 

mucous membrane irritation based on the isocyanate moiety. Also concern for lung toxicity and 

irritation to all tissues from the .

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 *

daphnid 48-h LC50 *

green algal 96-h EC50 *

fish _ chronic value *

daphnid _ chronic 

value

*

algal _ chronic 

value

*

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for nonionic polymers; SAR 

chemical class = polymer-nonionic-NCO; solid 

with unknown mp (P); S = reacts with water at 25 C (P); pH7; effective concentrations based 

on 100% active ingredients and nominal concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and 

TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

*

SARs nonionic polyemrs

SAR Class polymer-nonionic-NCO

Ecotox Category Nonionic Polymers

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BJ'S
WHOLESALE CLUB, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
SHEETS FILED WITH THE FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED APRIL 29, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-03-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-29-2000
<CASH>                                          52,578
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   42,243
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    462,258
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               576,867
<PP&E>                                         696,006
<DEPRECIATION>                                 216,537
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,067,985
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          418,947
<BONDS>                                          1,997
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           744
<OTHER-SE>                                     597,254
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,067,985
<SALES>                                      1,021,073
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,045,686
<CGS>                                          937,910
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  937,910
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                79,687
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,332)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,421
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,327
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,094
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,094
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.24


</TABLE>
---

---

# Exhibit 21

Subsidiaries of the Registrant

Ampal Financial Services
Ltd., an Israeli company

Ampal Development
(Israel) Ltd., an Israeli company

Nir Ltd., an Israeli company (in voluntary liquidation)

Ampal Realty Corporation,
a New York corporation

Ampal Communications,
Inc., a Delaware corporation

Ampal Enterprises Ltd, an
Israeli Company

Ampal Holdings (1991)
Ltd., an Israeli company

Ampal Industries, Inc., a Delaware
corporation

Ampal Industries (Israel) Ltd. an Israeli company (in voluntary liquidation)

Ampal International
Ventures (2000) Ltd., an Israeli company

Ampal (Israel) Ltd., an
Israeli company

Ampal Properties Ltd., an
Israeli company

Ampal Communication LP, an Israeli
limited partnership

Ampal Communication
Holdings Ltd., an Israeli company

Ampal Energy Ltd., an
Israeli company

Merhav-Ampal Energy Ltd.,
an Israeli company

Ampal Fuels Ltd., an
Israeli company

Country Club Kfar Saba
Ltd., an Israeli company

Merhav Ampal Energy
Limited Partnership, an Israeli limited partnership

Merhav Ampal I.I.F
General Partner Ltd, an Israeli company

Global Wind Energy Israel
Ltd., an Israeli company

Global wind Energy Cyprus
Limited, a Cyprus company

CL-AM Argithea Public Limited Energy Company, a Greek company

Gadot Chemicals Tankers
& Terminals Ltd., an Israeli company

Gadot Chemicals Terminals
(1985) Ltd., an Israeli company

Gadot Yam Chemical
Shipping Ltd., an Israeli company

GCT Ltd., a USA company

Shelah Chemical Haulage
Service Co. Ltd., an Israeli company

GCT Netherlands B.V., a Dutch company

Eurochem Maritime B.V., a
Dutch company

Gadot A.S.M Ltd., an
Israeli company

Gadot Lab Supplies Ltd.,
an Israeli company

Euro Gama
Properties Ltd., an Israeli company



---

---

GCT-EST B.V., a Dutch
company

GCT Holding B.V., a Dutch company

Gadot Storage &
Handling Limited Partnership, an Israeli limited partnership

Chemichlor (2005)
Chemicals Marketing Ltd., an Israeli company

Bax Chemicals B.V., a
Dutch company

Bax Chemicals France
S.A.R.L., a French company

Bax Chemicals Export Overseas
B.V., a Dutch company

Chyma Bulk Chemicals Shipping S.A. Greece,
a Greek company

Chyma Hellas S.A. Greece,
a Greek company

Finlog B.V. (Holding), a
Dutch company

VLS Group Germany GmbH, a
German company

Vopak Logistic Services
Pernis B.V., a Dutch company

Vopak Logistic Services Belgium
N.V., a Belgian company

VLS Dusseldorf GmbH, a
German company

VLS Netherlands.B.V. , a
Dutch company

VLS Moerdijk B.V., a Dutch company



---

---
<Page>
                                                                   Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

   The undersigned, Chester A. Piskorowski, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the managing general partner, Prudential-Bache Properties, Inc. (the
'Managing General Partner'), of Prudential-Bache/Watson & Taylor, Ltd.-2 (the
'Partnership'), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   (1) The Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending
       December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
       on the date hereof (the 'Annual Report'), fully complies with the
       requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
       1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
       the Partnership.

/s/ Chester A. Piskorowski
------------------------------------------------------
Chester A. Piskorowski
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Managing General Partner
March 18, 2003

   The undersigned, Steven Weinreb, Chief Financial Officer of the managing
general partner, the Managing General Partner, of the Partnership hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   (1) The Partnership's Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of
       Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
       the Partnership.

/s/ Steven Weinreb
------------------------------------------------------
Steven Weinreb
Chief Financial Officer of the Managing General Partner
March 18, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of E-Dispatch Inc. (the
"Company") for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Roderick Macutay, certify, to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) on
          78o(d)); and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: May 10, 2010                    By: /s/ Roderick Macutay
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Roderick Macutay, President, Treasurer
                                          and Director
                                          (Principal Executive Officer)
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1276 

CAF 15-01895 

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, DEJOSEPH, AND CURRAN, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF KELLY NEUPERT, 

PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JASON M. NEUPERT, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

 

DEBORAH J. SCINTA, ORCHARD PARK, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

DENIS A. KITCHEN, JR., WILLIAMSVILLE, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

KELLY L. BALL, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN, BUFFALO. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Mary G.

Carney, J.), entered October 16, 2015 in a proceeding pursuant to

Family Court Act article 6. The order denied respondent’s motion to

vacate an order entered upon his default. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Respondent father appeals from an order denying his

motion to vacate an order, entered upon his default, that awarded

petitioner mother sole custody of the parties’ children and ended the

father’s visitation with the children. 

We reject the father’s contention that he did not receive notice

of the default hearing. To the contrary, the record establishes that

the notice Family Court mailed to the father was not returned, and

that the father had actual knowledge of the hearing (see Matter of

Strumpf v Avery, 134 AD3d 1465, 1466; see also Matter of Geoffrey

Colin D. v Janelle Latoya A., 132 AD3d 438, 438). We further conclude

that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying the father’s

motion inasmuch as he failed to offer either a reasonable excuse for

his default or a meritorious defense (see Strumpf, 134 AD3d at 1466;

see also Matter of Roshia v Thiel, 110 AD3d 1490, 1491, lv dismissed

in part and denied in part 22 NY3d 1037).

The father’s remaining contentions are not properly before this

Court. “[I]t is well settled that no appeal lies from an order

entered on default” (Matter of Bradley M.M. [Michael M.—Cindy M.], 98 
-2- 1276 

CAF 15-01895 

AD3d 1257, 1258; see generally Hines v Hines, 125 AD2d 946, 946).

Entered: December 23, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
f

'.• Scot t rrankli n CHAIRMA

N 210S . H.ORIOAAVE . LACELAND . H.ORtOA) JSO l (863)fiS7-378 8 rAX(f63)68S-2'M l i'miiil:.«scnigi;i®bkflan.)f.lc.ci>n i v/w\v.1.il;i'l;mJsilc.i<) n . / 

## .ucj-ARTMENTOFv ^--^£ 1 OPERATIONS ••v." r V 

## MOOCI-u , A q:2Lj iJXKamVEnfRRCTO R

Th e Honorabl e Ra

yLaHood , Secretary U.S
. Departmen t o fTransportatio n 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenu e S £ Washington , D C 2059 0 Augus t 20 , 201 0

RE : Gran t Applicatio n fo rSmal l Communit yAi rServic e Developmen t Progra m Dea rSecretaryLaHood : Th e Lakelan d Economi cDevelopmen t Counci l endorse s Lakelan d Linde rRegiona l Airport' s gran t applicatio n fo rth e Departmen t o fTransportation' s Smal l Communit yAi rServic e Developmen t Program
. W e shar e th e Airport' s goa l o fattractin g lo wfar e commercia l servic e t o th e regio n t o foste reconomi c growt h an d improv e qualit yo flif e option s fo rth e citizen s i n ou rcommunity
. Th e presenc e o f a lo wfar e carrie rwoul d pla ya pivota l rol e i n th e futur e growt h an d economi cdevelopmen t o f ou rCit yan d County
. Bot h th e Cit yo fLakelan d an d th e Florid a Departmen t o f Transportatio n (FDOT ) hav e recognize d th e importanc e o fth e airpor t t o th e region
. Th e Cit yi s investin g ove r$1.4 M o n infrastructur e project s t o prepar e fo rcommercia l service
. Additionally , th e Cit yprovide s polic e an d fir e service s a t n o cos t t o th e airport , savin g ove r$450,00 0 annuall yfro m th e rat e bas e whic h carrier s woul d otherwis e hav e t o pay . I n Augus t 2010 , FDO

Tgrante d th e airpor t $2 M t o fun d th e improvement s necessar yt o accommodat e schedule d fligh t operations ; thes e includ e ticketin g areas , baggag e claim , baggag e make-u p areas , steril e areas , th e securit ycheckpoint , acces s controls , CCTV , additiona l facilit ysquar e footage , an d office s fo r T.S.A
. Lakelan d Linde rRegiona l Airpor t currentl yoperate s unde ra Part 13 9 Certificat e an d i s completin g it s wor k wit h T.S.A
. an d wil l b e i n a positio n t o launc h it s commercia l progra m i n th e beginnin g o f 2011
. Lo wfar e servic e t o Lakelan d woul d no t onl ybenefi t ou rregion , bu t als o t o th e smal l communitie s wher e th e flight s wil l operate , providin g thos e citie s wit h th e economi cbenefi t o f stimulate d ai rtrave l an d lowe rairfares
. W e reques t tha t yo u ac t favorabl yo n thi s applicatio n an d hel p ou rcommunit ygreatl yenhanc e transDortatlo n assets . ou r transportatio n asset s Sincerely , veScrugg s Executiv e Directo r
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CurrencyShares® Russian Ruble Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-K for the fiscal period ended October 31, 2010, as amended, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nick Bonos, Chief Executive Officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Trust.

Date: March 10, 2011

|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                 
|/s/ NICK BONOS                                                   
|Nick Bonos* Chief Executive
Officer (principal executive officer)



|* | The Registrant is a trust and Nick Bonos is signing in his capacity as the principal executive officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Registrant.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: anderson1@gotricounty.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:20:10 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Frank Anderson

Kinston, NC 28501
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Excel Global, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby
certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

                                 /s/ Betty Soumekh
                                 ----------------------
                                 Betty Soumekh
                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                 Chief Financial Officer

May 21, 2009
Case No. 8,173.

#### LEAVITT v. LOGAN.

[3 Wall. Jr. 184; 119 Leg. Int. 404.]

Circuit Court, W. D. Pennsylvania.

Nov. Term, 1855.

Construction or Will — Life Estate — Remainders.

A devise to A., for her maintenance and support during life, and at her decease to became the property of B., not to be subject to sale or mortgage, but to descend to his children free and unencumbered; but in case he has none living at his death, to become the property of C., in fee simple, or of her heirs, if she be not then living. *Mdd,*'to give 1st. A life estate to A. 2d. A similar estate to B. 3d. Remainder in fee to B.’s children, vested as to those born at the testator’s death, and opening to let in others as they were born. And 4th. *A*contingent remainder to C. in fee.

*132Logan made his will as follows: “X devise to my wife Julia Logan, for her maintenance and support, my house and lot, &c., during her life, and at her decease to become the property of Joshua Logan; the said property not to be subject to sale or mortgage, but to descend to his children, free and unencumbered; but in case he has no children living at his death, then and in that case to become the property of my daughter, Julia Richardson, in fee simple, or of her heirs, in case she be not then living.”

The question was, what estates did these parties take respectively in the premises?

•Mr. Shaler and Mr. Loomis, for complainant.

Mr. Williams, for defendant

GRIER, Circuit Justice.

If the will had made no farther provision, than that on the decease of Julia Logan, the premises should become the property of Joshua Logan, it might well be construed as a gift of the remainder in fee to Joshua. But such an intention is manifestly inconsistent with the provision that the property, while in his hands, was not to be subject “to sale or mortgage.” The words “descend to his children,” might seem to imply that according to their strict legal meaning his children were to take by inheritance from their father. But such a construction would not fulfil the intention of the testator. Unless the children take as purchasers a remainder in fee, their title would be liable to be defeated by the .father.

To fulfil the intention as clearly expressed, the will must be construed as giving, 1st. An estate for life toJuliaLogan. 2d. To Joshua for life. 3d. Remainder in fee to the children of Joshua; vested as to those then born, and opening to let in the other children as they shall successively come into existence. 4th. And lastly, a contingent remainder in fee in Julia Richardson. Decree accordingly.
No. 69657.

#### Montgomery Ward & Company *v.*United States,

protest 64/12678 (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Rao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 CCPA 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.