alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GERARDO GARNICA-VARGAS,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-72576

Agency No. A097-707-983

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 11, 2013** 

Before: FERNANDEZ, TASHIMA, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges. 

Gerardo Garnica-Vargas, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s removal order. We dismiss the petition for review.

FILED

FEB 14 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 11-72576

Because Garnica-Vargas does not challenge that he was convicted of an

aggravated felony, we lack jurisdiction to review the contention that the agency

abused its discretion in denying his request for a continuance to seek postconviction relief, because it does not constitute a question of law or constitutional

claim that would establish our jurisdiction. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D); see also

Malilia v. Holder, 632 F.3d 598, 604 (9th Cir. 2011) (despite the 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1252(a)(2)(C) jurisdictional bar, under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D) the court retains

jurisdiction to review the denial of a continuance that is based on an error of law).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

No. 05-0245

IN RE COY BARGSLEY

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

**ORDERED:**

1.Relator’s motion for temporary, filed March 31, 2005, is granted.   The following provision of the Order Establishing Terms of Supersedeas, dated December 13, 2004, in Cause No. 27,291, styled *Pryor Petroleum Corporation, et al. v. Coy Bargsley, et al.*, in the 90th District Court of Stephens County, Texas, is stayed pending further order of this Court:  

“IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that during the pendency of appeal, Pryor Petroleum Corporation shall operate the leasehold estate working interest in and under the lands the subject of this suit being the South 1⁄2 of Section 80, Block 4, T. & P. R. R. Co. Survey, Stephens County, Texas containing 320 acres more or less.”

2.The real parties in interest are requested to respond to relator’s petition for writ of mandamus on or before 3:00 p.m., April 18, 2005.

Done at the City of Austin, this April 6, 2005.

Andrew Weber, Clerk

Supreme Court of Texas

By Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk
No. 69650.

#### Novelty Import Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 65/8124 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of plastic paperweights similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 67488, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before the Third Division,

July 3, 1967

No. P67/225.

#### Reliance Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States, protest 66/2869 (New York).

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of wall plaques similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Ross*Products, *Inc.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 74, C.D. 2106), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of First China Pharmaceutical Group, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date:  November 4, 2011By:
/s/ Zhen Jiang WangName:  Zhen Jiang WangTitle:  Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
From: zan@austian.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:22:49 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Zan Austian

Saint Paul, MN 55124
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant

To Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Intelsat Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, David McGlade, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |                                     
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------
|                      |  | 
|Date: August 14, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ David McGlade                   
|                      |  |  |  | David McGlade                       
|                      |  |  |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office

Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800

Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001

86–975 PDF 2016

[ERRATA] 

H.R. 3633, PROTECTING HEALTH 

CARE PROVIDERS FROM INCREASED 

ADMINISTRATIVE BURDENS ACT 

HEARING 

BEFORE THE

SUBCOMMITTEE ON WORKFORCE PROTECTIONS 

COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION 

AND THE WORKFORCE 

U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

ONE HUNDRED THIRTEENTH CONGRESS 

SECOND SESSION 

HEARING HELD IN WASHINGTON, DC, MARCH 13, 2014 

Serial No. 113–51 

Printed for the use of the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

( 

Available via the World Wide Web: www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/ 

committee.action?chamber=house&committee=education 

or 

Committee address: http://edworkforce.house.gov 

CEWDOCROOM with DISTILLER

ERRATA 

The referenced hearing held before the Committee on Education 

and the Workforce was inadvertently printed with the incorrect 

staffer’s name as James Martin on page 1. The correct name is 

John Martin. 

CEWDOCROOM with DISTILLER
From: jdknutsen@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:29:03 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

John Knutsen

Berkeley, CA 94709
JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.


                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
                         ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of John Hancock Financial
Services, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, to his knowledge, that:

      (1) the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2003, (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the periods presented in the Report.


Dated: March 5, 2004                 /s/ DAVID F. D'ALESSANDRO
                                     -------------------------------
                                     Name:  David F. D'Alessandro
                                     Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to John Hancock Financial Services, Inc. and will be retained by
John Hancock Financial Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

      It is intended that this Exhibit be treated as, and deemed to be,
"accompanying" this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and not "filed" as part of the
report.
From: anehls@kraftfoods.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:22:21 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Amy Nehls

Pardeeville, WI 53954
No. 269.

#### Humble Oil & Refining Co. *v.*Martin et al.

*M. M. Roberts*for petitioner.

*Landman Teller*for respondents.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 154 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 154

Recognizing Stax Records for enriching the Nation's Cultural life with 
                         ``50 years of soul''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 12, 2007

Mr. Cohen submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Recognizing Stax Records for enriching the Nation's Cultural life with 
                         ``50 years of soul''.

Whereas Stax Records of Memphis, Tennessee, is an icon of the American recording 
        industry;
Whereas Stax Records produced some of the earliest recordings by such soul music 
        legends as Isaac Hayes, Otis Redding, the Staple Singers, Wilson 
        Pickett, Luther Ingram, Albert King, the Bar-Kays, Booker T. and the 
        M.G.'s, Johnnie Taylor, Rufus, and Carla Thomas, and many other artists 
        whose work continues to exert a profound influence on popular music 
        today;
Whereas Stax Records also produced important recordings by, among others, the 
        Reverend Jesse Jackson, Bill Cosby, and Richard Pryor;
Whereas soul music is a uniquely American art form that continues to enrich the 
        Nation's cultural life; and
Whereas, in 2007, the Memphis Convention and Visitors Bureau, Concord Music 
        Group/Stax Records, and the Soulsville Foundation will be celebrating 
        both American soul music and the 50th anniversary of the founding of 
        Stax Records through their ``50 Years of Soul'' celebration: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the 50th anniversary of the founding of Stax 
        Records;
            (2) recognizes the important role played by Stax Records in 
        launching the careers of many legendary soul music artists; and
            (3) recognizes the continuing contributions and influence 
        of soul music to America's cultural life.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                EXHIBIT 3.3
                                        


                 AMENDED AND RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                                LOON REALTY CORP.
                           a New Hampshire corporation

          FIRST. The name of the corporation is LOON REALTY CORP. (hereinafter,
the "Corporation").

          SECOND. The total number of shares of capital stock which the
Corporation shall have authority to issue is 300 shares of common stock, no par
value.

          THIRD. The address of the Corporation's registered office in the State
of New Hampshire is CT Corporation System, 9 Capitol Street, in the City of
Concord, County of Merrimack, State of New Hampshire 03301. The name of its
registered agent at such address is CT Corporation System.

          FOURTH. The capital stock will be sold or offered for sale within the
meaning of RSA 421-B of the New Hampshire Securities Act.

          FIFTH. The nature of the business of or purpose to be conducted or
promoted by the Corporation is to engage in any lawful act or activity for which
corporations may be organized under the New Hampshire Business Corporation Act.

          SIXTH. The Board of Directors is authorized to make, alter or repeal
the By-Laws of the Corporation. Election of directors need not be by written
ballot unless the By-Laws so provide.

          SEVENTH. A director of the Corporation shall not be liable to the
Corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary
duty as a director, except to the extent such exemption from liability or
limitation thereof is not permitted under the New Hampshire Business Corporation
Act as the same exists or may hereafter be amended. Any repeal or modification
of the first sentence of this Article SEVENTH shall not adversely affect any
right or protection of a director of the Corporation existing hereunder with
respect to any act or omission occurring prior to such repeal or modification.

          EIGHTH. The Corporation reserves the right to amend, alter, change or
repeal any provision contained in these Articles of Incorporation in the manner
now or hereafter prescribed herein and by the New Hampshire Business Corporation
Act, and all rights conferred upon stockholders herein are granted subject to
this reservation.

                            [signature page follows]


<PAGE>   2




          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Amended and
Restated Articles of Incorporation this 26th day of February, 1998.

                                                LOON REALTY CORP.

                                                By: /s/ George N. Gillett, Jr.
                                                    --------------------------
                                                Name: George N. Gillett, Jr.
                                                Title: Chairman
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 03-704

________________________________________________________________________

INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT

Article 98

Agreement between the

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

and SRI LANKA

Agreement signed at Colombo November 22, 2002
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent

evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof

or authentication thereof.”
SRI LANKA

International Criminal Court: Article 98

Agreement signed at Colombo November 22, 2002;

 Entered into force July 4, 2003.
From: dmeiss@speednetllc.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:19:17 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Donald Meissner

Marlette, MI 48453