alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: encourage1@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:37:10 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Richard Gierach

Richfield, WI 53076
From: Scottbighorncanyon@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:20:55 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Scott Craig

Rapid City, SD 57702
i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-09-00071-CR

Kurtis Eugene RUPERT,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law, No. 7, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 256962

Honorable Dick Alcala, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: May 13, 2009

DISMISSED

Pursuant to a plea-bargain agreement, Kurtis Eugene Rupert pled nolo contendere to the

offense of assault with bodily injury and was sentenced to eleven months, ten days in the Bexar

County Adult Detention Center in accordance with the terms of his plea-bargain agreement. On

December 19, 2008, the trial court signed a certification of defendant’s right to appeal stating that

this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P.
04-09-00071-CR

-2-

25.2(a)(2). After Kurtis Eugene Rupert filed a notice of appeal, the trial court clerk sent copies of

the certification and notice of appeal to this court. See id. 25.2(e). The clerk’s record, which includes

the trial court’s Rule 25.2(a)(2) certification, has been filed. See id. 25.2(d). 

“In a plea bargain case ... a defendant may appeal only: (A) those matters that were raised by

written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or (B) after getting the trial court’s permission to

appeal.” Id. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s record establishes the punishment assessed by the court does not

exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See id. The

clerk’s record does not include a written motion filed and ruled upon before trial; nor does it indicate

that the trial court gave Kurtis Eugene Rupert permission to appeal. See id. The trial court’s

certification, therefore, appears to accurately reflect that this is a plea-bargain case and that Kurtis

Eugene Rupert does not have a right to appeal. We must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that

shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” Id. 25.2(d). 

We, therefore, warned Kurtis Eugene Rupert that this appeal would be dismissed pursuant

to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d), unless an amended trial court certification showing

that Kurtis Eugene Rupert had the right to appeal was made part of the appellate record. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order).

No such amended trial court certification has been filed. This appeal is, therefore, dismissed pursuant

to Rule 25.2(d). 

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CurrencyShares® South African Rand Trust (the Trust) on Form 10-K for the fiscal period ended October 31, 2010, as amended, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nick Bonos, Chief Executive Officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Trust.

Date: March 10, 2011



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Nick Bonos                                       
|Nick Bonos*                                          
|Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)



|* | The Registrant is a trust and Nick Bonos is signing in his capacity as the principal executive officer of Rydex Specialized Products LLC, the Sponsor of the Registrant.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
breslow102512.htm






  





  











  













 


DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE


 


 







 


 



Exhibit 10.82









 







 


 


$300,000                                                                           Date:  October 25, 2012


 


 







 


 


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned jointly and severally promise to pay to the order of Warren Breslow, the sum of Three Hundred Thousand Dollars and no/100 ($300,000.00), together with interest of 10% per annum on the unpaid balance.


 


 


The entire principal and any accrued interest shall be fully and immediately payable UPON DEMAND of any holder thereof.


 


 







 


 


 

 


 


 


”Borrower”


 


Aura Systems, Inc.

















____________________


Melvin Gagerman


Chief Executive Officer







 


Dated: October 25, 2012
No. 277, Misc.

#### Burrow *v.*United States.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller*and *Beatrice Rosenberg*for the United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
|   |
|--------|

**Filed      Pursuant To Rule 433, Registration No. 333-124310**
** **

**$1,000,000,000**

**CATERPILLAR      FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION**

| **For                the Period: 7/31/2006 to                8/7/2006** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| **Coupon** | **Interest**                       | **Maturity** | **Callable**     | **Survivor's****Option** | **Price****1** | **Yield****2** | **Moody's** | **S&P** | **CUSIP** |
|------------|------------------------------------|--------------|------------------|--------------------------|----------------|----------------|-------------|-------------|-----------|
| 5.200%     | Semi-Annual(†††) | 8/15/09      | NO               | YES§           | 100.00         | 5.200%         | A2          | A           | 14911Q4L2 |
| 6.000%     | Semi-Annual(†††) | 8/15/18      | 8/15/08***  | YES§           | 100.00         | 5.999%         | A2          | A           | 14911Q4M0 |
| 6.100%     | Semi-Annual(†††) | 8/15/21      | 8/15/09***  | YES§           | 100.00         | 6.100%         | A2          | A           | 14911Q4N8 |
| 6.150%     | Semi-Annual(†††) | 8/15/26      | 8/15/10***  | YES§           | 100.00         | 6.150%         | A2          | A           | 14911Q4P3 |

*All      offerings are subject to prior sale.*
|                                                                         |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                         |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|                                                                    | 2012 |   | 2011 |   | 2010 |   | 2009 |   | 2008 |
|                                                                    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Profit                                                                  | $ | 432 |  |   | $ | 378 |  |   | $ | 278 |  |   | $ | 259 |  |   | $ | 385 |  |
|                                                                    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Add:                                                                    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Provision for income taxes                                              | 148 |  |   | 111 |  |   | 40 |  |   | 45 |  |   | 120 |  |
|                                                                    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Deduct:                                                                 |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Partnership income                                                      | — |  |   | — |  |   | — |  |   | — |  |   | (3 | ) |
|                                                                    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Profit before income taxes and partnership income                       | $ | 580 |  |   | $ | 489 |  |   | $ | 318 |  |   | $ | 304 |  |   | $ | 502 |  |
|                                                                    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Fixed charges:                                                          |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Interest expense                                                        | $ | 801 |  |   | $ | 827 |  |   | $ | 917 |  |   | $ | 1,048 |  |   | $ | 1,159 |  |
| Rentals at computed interest*                                           | 6 |  |   | 5 |  |   | 6 |  |   | 5 |  |   | 6 |  |
|                                                                    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Total fixed charges                                                     | $ | 807 |  |   | $ | 832 |  |   | $ | 923 |  |   | $ | 1,053 |  |   | $ | 1,165 |  |
|                                                                    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Profit before income taxes plus fixed charges                           | $ | 1,387 |  |   | $ | 1,321 |  |   | $ | 1,241 |  |   | $ | 1,357 |  |   | $ | 1,667 |  |
|                                                                    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Ratio of profit before income taxes plus fixed charges to fixed charges | 1.72 |  |   | 1.59 |  |   | 1.34 |  |   | 1.29 |  |   | 1.43 |  |
|                                                                    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with Amendment no. 2 to the Quarterly Report of Orbit/FR, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three months ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Relland Winand, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





October 26, 2011




/s/ Relland WinandRelland WinandChief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4691-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2023-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Tennessee (FEMA-4691-DR), dated March 8, 2023, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This change occurred on August 15, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Yolanda J. Jackson, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

This action terminates the appointment of Andrew D. Friend as Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2023-21001 Filed 9-26-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
U.S. Department of 

Transportation 

Office of the Secretary 

Of Transportation 

August 8, 2013 

Ms. Susan B. Jollie 

Law Office of Susan B. Jollie 

7503 Walton Lane 

Annandale, VA 22003 

Dear Susan: 

. --.' ___ , ;. ' 

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

In regard to the Department's financial review of Ultimate Jetcharters, please provide 

information for the following items: 

1. Some of the applicant's financial statements are mixed with the parent's financial 

information which includes Ultimate Jet, LLC and Ultimate Real Estate, LLC. Please 

provide separate balance and income statements for Ultimate Jetcharters for calendar 

years 2010, 2011 and 2012 and the six months ending June 2013. If the parent company 

intends to financially support the operations of Ultimate Jetcharters, please also provide 

separate balance and income statements for Ultimate Jet, LLC for the same years current 

to June 2013 and a letter from Ultimate Jet, LLC confirming their financial support. 

2. Has the line of credit for the expansion of Ultimate Jetcharters been drawn down? If so, 

please state how much has been drawn down and the remaining amount available. 

3. Are there limitations on the line of credit? If so, please state the limitations. For example, 

aircraft purchase, etc. 

Please include a statement signed by a representative of the carrier [who shall be a principal 

owner, senior officer, or internal counsel of the carrier] indicating that, pursuant to Title 18 

United States Code Section 1001, the information provided in response to this letter is true and 

correct and that the aforementioned individual has not knowingly and willfully falsified, 

concealed or failed to disclose any material fact or made any false, fictitious, or fraudulent 

statement in connection with the preparation or filing of the material submitted. 

Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. We would appreciate your responding within 30 

days of the date of this letter. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 

366-4834. 

Sincerely, 

i3t't{ /J .-U..A J~d_JJ/v \____/. 

Barbara Snoden 

Air Carrier Fitness Division 
Office of Aviation Analysis 

cc: Thomas Leahy 

POI for Ultimate JetCharters LCC 

FAA Cleveland FSD0-25 

25249 Country Club Blvd. 

North Olmsted, OH 44070 

2
January 20, 1958

No. 61499.

Suit4923.

#### United States *v.*Mercantil Distribuidora, S. A., et al.

C. D. 1879 affirmed November 22, 1957. C. A. D. 667.
1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required
to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Principal
Life Income Fundings Trust IMTN 37 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as whole, do
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information
required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is
included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;4.
    
    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this
report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act
periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing
agreement(s) in all material respects; and5.
    
    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of
compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included
in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.
   /s/ Dwight N. SoethoutDwight N. SoethoutVice President  Principal Life Insurance Company
From: t.mosley@stratusntx.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:40:06 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Thomas Mosley

Denton, TX 76205