alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: cblank@technomedllc.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:34:13 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Carol Blank

Gilbert, AZ 85298
H. Res. 219

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

March 8, 2007.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order 

to consider in the House the resolution (H. Res. 202) providing for the expenses of certain committees of the House 

of Representatives in the One Hundred Tenth Congress. The 

amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the 

Committee on House Administration now printed in the resolution, modified by the amendment printed in the report of 

the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, shall 

be considered as adopted. The resolution, as amended, shall 

be considered as read. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the resolution, as amended, to final adoption without intervening motion or demand for division of the 

question except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and 

controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 
2

•HRES 219 EH 

the Committee on House Administration; and (2) one motion 

to recommit which may not contain instructions. 

Attest:

Clerk.
No. 66473.

#### May Dept. Stores Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/13087, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of vacuum brush cleaners similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Bruce Duncan Company, a/c Sims-Worms*v. *United States*(45 Cust. Ct. 85, C.D. 2202), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          55,523
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,643
<ALLOWANCES>                                       745
<INVENTORY>                                      5,144
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                71,247
<PP&E>                                          13,684
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,286
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  79,645
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,300
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            22
<OTHER-SE>                                      68,323
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    79,645
<SALES>                                         13,563
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,563
<CGS>                                            3,782
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,782
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 468
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    667
<INCOME-TAX>                                        34
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                633
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       633
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03


</TABLE>
# GILARIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY Department of Environmental Quality Post Office Box 97 Sacaton, Arlzona 85247 (520)562-2234
.Fax (520)562-2245

June 22,2009 Laura Yoshii /- Acting Regional Administrator United States Environmental Protection Agency 75 Hawthorne Street (ORA-1) San Francisco, California 94105-390 1 -- 

### - -._


### . I -, \ / Re: Technic4 Corrections to the GRIC Mr Quality Management Plan \\ -1 L" --- ..- - Dear 

### ~s~d~~~' Please find attached, a list of three technical corrections that were made to the Gila River Indian Community, Air Quality Management Plan at the direction ofEPA Region IX Legal Counsel. The Gila River Indian Community (GRIC) is requesting that EPA, ~egion IX consider the attached technical corrections for integration into the GRIC Air

- Quality Management Plan and proceed to approve the plan for Federal Enforceability under Section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA), 40 C.F.R., Part 51 and the Tribal Authority Rule (TAR). The Technical corrections were approved by the GRIC Community Council and ratified into tribal law under resolution # GR-06-08 (attached) on August 27,2008. The Gila River Law Office, EPA Legal Counsel, EPA Region IX staff and GRIC Air Quality Program staff have been working together to finalize all documentation necessary to fulfill the requirements of Clean Air Act, Section 110for full program approval. I have also attached, at the direction of Region IX Legal Counsel, a map of the northern boundary of the Community and a letter from the GRIC Law Office containing a legal description of the northern boundary of the Community. The Gila River Indian Community previously submitted to your oficefor approval an eligibility determination packet requesting Treatment as a State (TAS) for all sections of the Clean Air Act necessary for GRIC to implement the GRIC Air Quality Program on November 17,2006. GRIC also submitted the GRIC Air Quality Management Plan to Debra Jordan in a "hand off' ceremony during a GRIC Community Council meeting on February 21,2007. Additionally, GRIC submitted a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between GRIC and EPA Region IX for Criminal Enforcement, an MOA requesting delegation ofNational Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) and a letter requesting authority to implement the federal New Source Performance Standards on September 24,2008.The Gila River Indian Community is not requesting approval ofthe Part 70 requirements or definitionscontained in the GRIC Air Quality Management Plan at this time. GRIC will continue to work with EPA Region 

### IX staff on completionofthe Part 70 regulations and submittalpacket. GRIC isrequesting that EPA review only the Non-Title V provisions ofthe GRIC AQMP for federal enforceability.

Margaret gok,ExdutiJDirector, GRIC DEQ
Before the Third Division,

February 9, 1961

No. 65152.

#### Tronomatic Machine Mfg. Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 60/15142 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Since the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
Before the First Division,

April 9, 1964

No. 68426.

protests 61/14017, etc. (New York).

#### Devon Tape Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of vinyl tape, coated on one side with an adhesive, similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 67888, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 60488.

#### Schroeder Bros., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 276795-K (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of herring similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 57760, the daim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: lscaffidi@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:15:27 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Lorraine Scaffidi

Medford, NJ 08055
H. Res. 323 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

April 19, 2007. 

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are 

hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS: Mr. Gene Green of 

Texas (to rank immediately after Mr. Tanner), Mr. Crowley 

(to rank immediately after Mr. Hinojosa). 

Attest: 

Clerk.
МИНИСТЕРСТВО ТРАНСПОРТА

РОССИЙСКОЙ ФЕДЕРАЦИИ

ФЕДЕРАЛЬНОЕ АГЕНТСТВО

ВОЗДУШНОГО ТРАНСПОРТА

MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT

OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

FEDERAL

AIR TRANSPORT AGENCY

Our ref

_ Наш No

Date

■гг. i>r^t

Mr. Paul L. Gretch

Director, Office of International Aviation 

Office of the Assistant Secretary for 

Aviation and International Affairs 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

400 Street, S.W., Room 6402 

Washington DC, 20590

Dear Mr. Gretch,

In connection with the U.S. Department of Transportation requirements 

related to foreign air carriers operation of charter flights the Federal Air Transport 

Agency of the Russian Federation would like to inform you of the following.

Taking into account the type of fifth-freedom operations conducted by 

Russian cargo carriers to/from the US, the Federal Air Transport Agency of the 

Russian Federation is ready to accord reciprocal treatment to similar U.S. carrier 

requests for fifth-freedom authority to transport outsized cargo (as currently 

defined by DOT) to/from Russia.

With kind regards,

Deputy Head Oleg O. Ю1т

Российская Федерация

Ленинградский проспект, д. 37, Москва,

ГСП-3,125993, Телетайп: 111495

Тел.: (+7 499) 231-53-95, факс: (+7 499) 231-55-35

E-mail: rusavia@scaa.ru

37, Leningradsky prospect, 125993,

Moscow, Russian Federation, Teletype: 111495

Tel.: (+7 499) 231-53-95, fax: (+7 499) 231-55-35

E-mail: rusavia@scaa.ru
No. 62711.

#### Joseph Markovits, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 312168-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial, it was stipulated that if the certificate of exportation had been filed prior to the liquidation of the entry or the expiration of the collector’s review period provided for in section 515, the merchandise would have been liquidated free of duty under paragraph 1615, as amended, *supra.*In view of the stipulation and following Abstract 57104, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1)   | The              Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)              of              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the              Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                                  |   |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Mark              Bradley                                                                                                                    |   |   |   |
| Mark                BradleyPrincipal                Executive OfficerAnd                Principal Accounting Officer May                15, 2007 |   |   |        |

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 10, 2010 

p0910 

Order 

 

September 10, 2010 

141595 

In re T.V.C. FRY, Minor. 

_________________________________________ DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, 

Petitioner-Appellee, 

v SC: 141595 

 COA: 295682 

St. Joseph CC 

 Family Div: 2007-001105-NA 

TRINA HERINGTON, 

Respondent-Appellant 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 20, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 35 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                       January 9, 2007.
    Resolved,  That in clause 4(a) of rule X of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives, add the following new paragraph at the end:
    ``(5)(A) There is established a Select Intelligence Oversight Panel of the 
Committee on Appropriations (hereinafter in this paragraph referred to as the 
`select panel'). The select panel shall be composed of not more than 13 Members, 
Delegates, or the Resident Commissioner appointed by the Speaker, of whom not 
more than eight may be from the same political party. The select panel shall 
include the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Appropriations, the chairman and ranking minority member of its Subcommittee on 
Defense, six additional members of the Committee on Appropriations, and three 
members of the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.
    ``(B) The Speaker shall designate one member of the select panel as its 
chairman and one member as its ranking minority member.
    ``(C) Each member on the select panel shall be treated as though a member of 
the Committee on Appropriations for purposes of the select panel.
    ``(D) The select panel shall review and study on a continuing basis budget 
requests for and execution of intelligence activities; make recommendations to 
relevant subcommittees of the Committee on Appropriations; and, on an annual 
basis, prepare a report to the Defense Subcommittee of the Committee on 
Appropriations containing budgetary and oversight observations and 
recommendations for use by such subcommittee in preparation of the classified 
annex to the bill making appropriations for the Department of Defense.
    ``(E) Rule XI shall apply to the select panel in the same manner as a 
subcommittee (except for clause 2(m)(1)(B) of that rule).
    ``(F) A subpoena of the Committee on Appropriations or its Subcommittee on 
Defense may specify terms of return to the select panel.''.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Before the Third Division,

March 25, 1965

No. 69184.

#### F. W. Woolworth Co. *v.*United States,

protest 63/7606 (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of charcoal briquettes the same in all material respects as those the subject of *A. L. Farnsworth*v. *United States*(50 Cust. Ct. 62, C.D. 2389), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Response to Harcos Chemicals regarding review for CASRN 31138-65-5

Paul Campanella to: Ann Marie Savini 10/20/2011 03:26 PM

Cc: John Schaeffer, Mike Mattheisen, David Brooks, Chuantung Lin

Dear Ann Marie:

Regarding your letter of intent to test for D-gluco Heptonic acid , monsosdium salt (2.xi.)- 

[CASRN 31138-65-5] and the proposed modifications to the testing and test methods specified 

in the final rule, EPA has reviewed these and has made the following determinations:

Physical/Chemical Properties

1. Regarding the required testing for melting point (A.1.): EPA agrees that OECD 102 in lieu of 

ASTM E 324-99 is acceptable.

2. Regarding the required testing for boiling point (A.2.): Your letter specifies no change of the 

required test method (ASTM E 1719-05 (Ebulliometry).

3. Regarding the required testing for n-octanol/water partition coefficient (A.4.): EPA accepts 

the estimated value provided in your letter in lieu of testing. 

4. Regarding the required testing for water solubility (A.5.): Your letter specifies either of two of 

the specified test methods: Method A: ASTM E 1148-02 (Reapproved 2008)(shake flask) or 

Method B: (40 CFR 799.6784 (shake flask). Either of these two methods is acceptable.

Biodegradation

1. Regarding the required testing for ready biodegradability: EPA agrees that either OECD 310 

or OECD 301F in lieu of one of the (ASTM or ISO) methods specified in the final rule is 

acceptable.

Additional Toxicity testing required:

Aquatic Toxicity C1, Mammalian Toxicity D1,E1,E2 and F1. The Protocol Review conducted

by EPA’s Conractor and approved by the Risk Assessment Division is attached. This review

contains more explicit detail including stipulations for conducting the tests and reporting the

results.

Harcos CASRN 31138-65-5_Protocol 31138-65-5_Protocol Final 10.19.11.pd 10.19.11.pdf

Compositional Analysis

Please note that the test rule specifies 99% purity. The substance used for testing must be 99% 

pure. If that purity cannot be attained, please explain and make a request for a modification 
specifying what purity will be used.

Paul J. Campanella, Ph.D.

Chemical Information and Testing Branch

Chemical Control Division

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Washington, D.C. 

202-564-8091
No. 68896.

#### Dan Brechner & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 64/10075 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of glass paperweights similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 64185, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 65136.

#### Beer Stern Import Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 272750-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issue is the same in all material respects as that the subject of *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), and the record showing that the merchandise consists of nylon ribbons similar in use to fabrics with fast edges, wholly or in chief value of silk, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.