alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BJs Wholesale Club, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended
October 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Laura J. Sen, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that to the undersigneds knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: December 2, 2009 |  | /S/ LAURA J. SEN                     
|                        |  | Laura J. Sen                         
|                        |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                        |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00331-CV

WILLIAM MAYO APPELLANT

V.

TECHNICAL TRANSPORTATION APPELLEE

------------

FROM THE 352ND DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

We have considered the parties’ “Agreed Motion For Remand.” The 

motion is GRANTED. We set aside, without regard to the merits, the trial court=s 

judgment and remand this case to the trial court for further proceedings in 

accordance with the parties’ agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B); 

Innovative Office Sys., Inc. v. Johnson, 911 S.W. 2d 387, 388 (Tex. 1995); In re 

Ortega, 225 S.W.3d 610, 610–11 (Tex. App.––El Paso 2006, no pet.).

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which 

let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ. 

DELIVERED: March 15, 2012
No. 63771.

protest 58/16286 (New York).

#### The Danwill Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bicycle tires similar in all material respects to those the subject of *A. N. Deringer, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 327, C.D. 1882), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: cfrey@whisperitloud.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:33:56 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Chad Frey

Evansville, IN 47710
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.20

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                       TO
                       NASTECH PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY INC.
                             2002 STOCK OPTION PLAN

     Pursuant to the resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors of Nastech
Pharmaceutical Company Inc. (the "Company") on January 23, 2006, the following
amendments to the Nastech Pharmaceutical Company Inc. 2002 Stock Option Plan are
hereby adopted effective as of January 23, 2006:

1.   Paragraph 8(c)(ii) is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the
     following:

          "(c) upon the prior approval of the Company's compliance officer,
     which officer shall have sole discretion whether or not to give, in shares
     of Common Stock, valued at Fair Market Value on the date of exercise, or a
     combination of cash and shares of Common Stock, which shares may be
     previously owned shares or the shares that are being acquired upon exercise
     of the stock option; provided, however, that any person who is a reporting
     person for purposes of Section 16 of the 1934 Act may only deliver shares
     that are being acquired upon exercise of the stock option in this manner if
     at least six months has elapsed from the date on which the option was
     granted to such person."

2.   Paragraph 12 is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the
     following:

          "12. Elective Share Withholding. Subject to the provisions of this
     Section 12, a Grantee may, with the prior approval of the Company's
     compliance officer, which officer shall have sole discretion whether or not
     to give, elect the withholding by the Company of a portion of the Shares
     otherwise deliverable to such Grantee upon the exercise of an Option (a
     "Taxable Event") having a Fair Market Value equal to the minimum amount
     necessary to satisfy the Required Withholding liability attributable to the
     Taxable Event."
NEMS is a model of U.S. energy economy developed and maintained by the 
US Energy Information Administration (EIA) of the US Department of Energy (DOE). 
NEMS is used to produce the Annual Energy Outlook, a reference publication 
that provides detailed forecasts of the energy economy from the current 
year to 2040.  DOE first developed NEMS in the 1980s, and the model has 
undergone frequent updates and expansion since.  DOE uses the modeling 
system extensively to produce issue reports, legislative analyses, and
respond to Congressional inquiries.  

US EPA docketed two 2014 National Energy Modeling System (NEMS) files 
that EPA modified in order to use NEMS to estimate the national energy system
impacts of the Proposed New Source Performance Standards.  
 
These codes are part of the larger set of source codes and input files that constitute NEMS.  
Interested parties should contact the US Energy Information for more information 
on NEMS or obtaining the complete source code.

The files are:

1. wllow48_docket.txt (input file for the Oil and Gas Supply Module)
2. ngitm_docket.f (part of the Natural Gas Transmission and Distribution Module) 

For more detail, the reader should consult Section 7 of the Regulatory Impact 
Analysis which is also available in the Docket.
From: rwynings@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:20:30 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

This system failed in 1919 with the GWP (German Workers Party) and failed miserably until 1946 when

sanity again took it's rightful place with populations of the world. You offer nothing new, all you have

done is repacakege the product.

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Richard Wynings

Berwick, PA 18603
H. Res. 131

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 7, 2007.

Whereas a native of Santiago de Cuba, Rafael Jose ́ DiazBalart completed his studies at the University of Havana 

with a law degree in 1919; 

Whereas soon after joining the Bar, he became a municipal 

judge in the city of Palma Soriano, where he served with 

distinction for four years until, by civil service examination, he obtained the post of civil law notary in the town 

of Banes in eastern Cuba; 

Whereas, while maintaining his law practice, Rafael Jose ́

Diaz-Balart was elected City Council President and 

Mayor of Banes; 

Whereas he was later elected Congressman and transferred 

his law practice to the city of Holguı ́n and subsequently 

to Havana, where he founded the law firm of DiazBalart, Diaz-Balart and Amador, with his son, Rafael 

Lincoln, and Rolando Amador; 

Whereas, years later, also by examination, Rafael Jose ́ DiazBalart assumed the post of Land Registrar, a prominent 

achievement for lawyers in many civil law countries, including Cuba; 

Whereas Rafael Jose ́ Diaz-Balart lived in exile after 1959, 

and became a proud citizen of the United States; 
2

•HRES 131 EH 

Whereas along with his son, Rafael Lincoln Diaz-Balart, 

Rafael Jose ́ Diaz-Balart commenced law school at the 

University of Madrid, Spain, and in 1965, at age 66, 

earned a second Law Degree; 

Whereas Rafael Jose ́ Diaz-Balart died in Miami, Florida in 

1985; 

Whereas Rafael Jose ́ Diaz-Balart instilled not only in his son, 

but in his four grandsons a sense honor and service, 

which led them to become prominent members of American society; 

Whereas his son, Rafael Lincoln, was a prominent member 

of the Cuban House of Representatives, and his 

grandsons, Lincoln Diaz-Balart and Mario Diaz-Balart 

were elected to the United States House of Representatives in 1992 and 2002, respectively, Jose Diaz Balart 

became a prominent journalist as the Washington bureau 

chief for Telemundo Network and was the first United 

States journalist to host daily Spanish and English language newscasts, and Rafael Diaz Balart became a 

prominent Miami investment banker; 

Whereas, on February 10, 2007, Florida International University will dedicate the Rafael Diaz-Balart Hall as the 

new home of the College of Law; 

Whereas Rafael Diaz-Balart Hall will provide a state-of-theart facility for teaching, research, and study, as well as 

scholarly and social interaction; and 

Whereas the Rafael Diaz-Balart Hall was designed by the 

internationally renowned architect Robert A. M. Stern, 

Dean of the School of Architecture at Yale University: 

Now, therefore, be it 
3

•HRES 131 EH 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors the 

lifetime accomplishments and legacy of Rafael Jose ́ DiazBalart for his numerous contributions to democracy, and recognizes the Florida International University dedication of the 

Rafael Diaz-Balart Hall at the College of Law as an appropriate tribute in his memory. 

Attest:

Clerk.
From: NORDRUM2001@YAHOO.COM

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:29:47 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Marjory nORDRUM

Woodsboro, MD 21798
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 257 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 10, 2007.
Whereas over 37,170 people will be diagnosed with pancreatic cancer this year in 
        the United States;
Whereas pancreatic cancer is the fourth most common cause of cancer death in the 
        United States;
Whereas 75 percent of pancreatic cancer patients die within the first year of 
        their diagnosis, and only 5 percent survive more than 5 years, making 
        pancreatic cancer the deadliest of any cancer;
Whereas there has been no significant improvement in survival rates in the last 
        25 years, and pancreatic cancer research is still in the earliest 
        scientific stages;
Whereas there are no early detection methods and minimal treatment options for 
        pancreatic cancer;
Whereas when symptoms of pancreatic cancer generally present themselves, it is 
        too late for an optimistic prognosis, and the average survival rate of 
        those diagnosed with metastatic disease is only 3 to 6 months;
Whereas the incidence rate of pancreatic cancer is 40 to 50 percent higher in 
        African Americans than in other ethnic groups;
Whereas the Pancreatic Cancer Action Network (PanCAN) is a national patient 
        advocacy organization that serves the pancreatic cancer community by 
        focusing its efforts on public policy, research funding, patient 
        services, and public awareness and education related to developing 
        effective treatments and a cure for pancreatic cancer; and
Whereas the Pancreatic Cancer Action Network has requested that the Congress 
        designate November as Pancreatic Cancer Awareness Month in order to 
        educate communities across the Nation about pancreatic cancer and the 
        need for research funding, early detection methods, effective 
        treatments, and prevention programs: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports the goals and ideals of 
Pancreatic Cancer Awareness Month.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit 99.1




Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549

Commissioners:


We are aware that our report dated November 14, 2001 on our
review of the condensed consolidated interim financial
information of NSTAR for the period ended September 30, 2001 and
included in NSTAR's quarterly report on Form
10-Q for the quarter then ended is incorporated by reference in
the NSTAR registration statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-78285)
and Form S-8 (File No. 333-85559).



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
November 14, 2001
From: cograndma@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:04:57 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Patricia Wright

Littleton, CO 80121
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 300 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 300

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        April 18, 2007.
Whereas under head coach C. Vivian Stringer the Rutgers University Scarlet 
        Knights women's basketball team finished their extraordinary 2006-2007 
        season with a 27-9 record;
Whereas after losing four of their first six games the Lady Knights refused to 
        give up and spent their Winter Break in the gym honing their skills and 
        working to become a better team for the rest the season;
Whereas on March 6, 2007, Rutgers upset top-seeded University of Connecticut for 
        their first-ever Big East Championship title;
Whereas the young women displayed great talent in their run to the Final Four of 
        the women's National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) tournament;
Whereas five freshmen played an integral role in the team's march to the 
        championship game;
Whereas the Lady Knights showed enormous composure with tournament wins against 
        teams playing in their home States;
Whereas through hard work and determination this young team fought through 
        improbable odds to reach the NCAA title game;
Whereas the team was just the 3d number 4 seed in history to reach the 
        championship;
Whereas the Lady Knights made school history as the first athletic team from 
        Rutgers to play for any national championship;
Whereas during those 3 weeks, the Scarlet Knights brought excitement to the NCAA 
        tournament and captured the hearts of basketball fans throughout New 
        Jersey and across the Nation;
Whereas Rutgers students, alumni, faculty, and staff, along with countless New 
        Jerseyans are immensely proud of what the team accomplished this past 
        season;
Whereas the members of the team are excellent representatives of Rutgers 
        University and of the State of New Jersey;
Whereas these young women are outstanding individuals who are striving to reach 
        lifetime goals both on and off the basketball court;
Whereas the Lady Knights epitomize the term student-athlete with a combined B+ 
        grade point average;
Whereas by excelling in academics, music, and community service, Katie Adams, 
        Matee Ajavon, Essence Carson, Dee Dee Jernigan, Rashidat Junaid, Myia 
        McCurdy, Epiphanny Prince, Judith Brittany Ray, Kia Vaughn, and Heather 
        Zurich are great role models for young women across the Nation; and
Whereas the Lady Knights embody integrity, leadership and class: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives--
            (1) commends the amazing performance of Rutgers University women's 
        basketball team in the NCAA tournament; and
            (2) expresses its admiration for the achievements and character of 
        this team of remarkable young women;
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
March 30, 1964

No. 68406.

protest 61/19141.

Protest abandoned February 18, 1964.

#### National Silver Co. *v.*United States,

(Not published.) (Initial No. 321459-K.) Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.