alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(R.D. 11466)

#### Manhattan Novelty Co. *v.*United States

Entry 1014468.

(Decided on rehearing [Reap. Dec. 10919] January 16, 1968)

*Lane, Young & Eow*for the plaintiff.

*Edwin L. Weisl, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

FoRd, Judge:

The proper basis for dutiable purposes of certain radios or radio sets covered by the appeal for a reappraisement in the above case is before the court for determination.

The parties hereto have entered into a stipulation of fact wherein it has been agreed as follows:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court:

> 1. That the merchandise covered by the above appeals for reap-praisement consists of radios or radio sets exported from Japan on or about April 1961 (Vessel: Havana Maru).

> 2. That radios or radio sets are not listed in the Final List published by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54521, effective February 27, 1958; and, that the said merchandise was entered for consumption subsequent to February 27,1958.

> 3. That on or about the date of exportation of said merchandise, the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold, or, in the absence of sales, offered for sale in the principal markets of Japan, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all con-*747tamers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, was the appraised value, 'less the buying commission, as stated on the invoices.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the above appeal for reappraisement may be submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

Upon the record before the court, I find and hold that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1980, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956,91 Treas. Dec. 295, T.D. 54165, is the proper basis of value and that said value is the appraised value, less buying commission, as stated on the invoice.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
From: blfiscus@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:10:31 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Betty Fiscus

Scottsdale, AZ 85257
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Booth Creek Ski Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 28, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



March 18, 2005

By:

/s/ GEORGE N. GILLETT, JR.George N. Gillett, Jr.Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. §  1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Signature Eyewear, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Michael Prince, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










/s/Michael Prince


Chief Executive Officer


Chief Financial Officer


June 20, 2011
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 180 (Tuesday, September 19, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64432-64433]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20217]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD


Notice of Board Meeting

DATES: September 26, 2023 at 9 a.m.

ADDRESSES: Telephonic. Dial-in (listen only) information: Number: 1-
202-599-1426, Code: 726 107 825#; or via web: https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_OGI3OTFlOGItOWM2YS00Y2FmLWI1NmYtZTUwM2IwNGNkMjU4%40thread.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%223f6323b7-e3fd-4f35-b43d-1a7afae5910d%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%221a441fb8-5318-4ad0-995b-f28a737f4128%22%7d.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kimberly Weaver, Director, Office of 
External Affairs, (202) 942-1640.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Board Meeting Agenda

Open Session

1. Approval of the August 22, 2023, Board Meeting Minutes
2. Monthly Reports
    (a) Participant Report

[[Page 64433]]

    (b) Investment Report
    (c) Legislative Report
3. Quarterly Reports
    (d) Vendor Risk Management Report
4. Enterprise Risk Management Update

Closed Session

5. Information Covered Under 5 U.S.C. 552b (c)(6) and (c)(10)
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b (e)(1).

    Dated: September 14, 2023.
Dharmesh Vashee,
General Counsel, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.
[FR Doc. 2023-20217 Filed 9-18-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
EXHIBIT 12
                                  
                                  
                                  
                                  
             CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION
                                  
               STATEMENT SETTING FORTH COMPUTATION OF
                  RATIO OF PROFIT TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (Unaudited)
                        (Dollars in Millions)
                                  
          
                                           Years ended December 31,
          
                                      1996      1995      1994
                                                          
Net Income                         $  75.6   $  65.2   $  32.2
                                                              
Add:                                                          
  Provision for income taxes          40.2      38.5      19.3
                                                              
Deduct:                                                       
  Equity in profit of                (2.2)     (1.4)     (1.7)
partnerships
                                                              
Profit before taxes                $ 113.6   $ 102.3   $  49.8
                                                              
Fixed charges:                                                
  Interest on borrowed funds       $ 315.4   $ 298.4   $ 212.1
  Rentals at computed interest*        2.5       1.8       1.3
                                                              
Total fixed charges                $ 317.9   $ 300.2   $ 213.4
                                                              
Profit before taxes plus fixed     $ 431.5   $ 402.5   $ 263.2
charges
                                                              
Ratio of profit before taxes                                  
plus                                  1.36      1.34      1.23
  fixed charges to fixed charges
     
*Those portions of rent expense that are representative of interest
cost.
July 3, 2012

ELECTRONICALLY FILED

Dennis DeVany

Chief, EAS & Domestic Analysis Division

Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E.

Washington, DC 20590

RE: Spirit Airlines

– DCA

- FLL Service

D ocket DOT

- OST

- 2000

- 7182

Dear Mr. DeVany :

By Order 2008

- 2

- 28 Spirit Airlines was granted two slot exemptions to provide service from

Reagan National Airport to Fort Lauderdale, Florida

. Effective August 11, 2012 Spirit is

terminating all DCA service, including service to Fort Lauderdale

, and returns these slots to the

Department for reallocation.

Due to the access constraints at DCA, Spirit has found it difficult to operate its limited DCA slots

profitably . Accordingly, it is moving all of its Washington, DC area service to Baltimore

Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport. Spirit is co mmitted to providing robust,

low fare service to the D.C. Metropolitan area from its new loc ation at BWI.

Sincerely,

Joanne Young

Counsel for Spirit Airlines, Inc.

cc: Brian Meehan

Docket OST

- 2000

- 7182
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 23

- 00480

- CV

IN THE GUARDIANSHIP OF Javier J. TREVINO

From the County Court at Law No. 2

, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2022PB6000079L2

Honorable Victor Villar r eal , Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. Each party

shall bear its own costs of appeal.

SIGNED December 6, 2023.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez

, Chief Justice
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Warren S. Hoffman,
Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of the managing general partner, Prudential-Bache Properties, Inc. (the Managing General Partner), of Prudential-Bache/Watson & Taylor, Ltd.-2 (the Partnership), hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Partnerships Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Warren S. Hoffman                                                                                                        
|Warren S. Hoffman Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of the Managing General Partner of the Partnership April 2, 2007
Exhibit 11

                             WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
                       COMPUTATION RE: EARNINGS PER SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            Three Months Ended                 Six Months Ended
                                                                 June 30,                           June 30,
                                                           1999             2000            1999              2000

<S>                                                     <C>             <C>                 <C>              <C>
Net income                                              $ 3,065           $ 1,915           $ 5,916         $ 4,265
                                                        =======           =======           =======         =======

Weighted average number of common shares
  issued and outstanding - Basic                         13,761            13,858            13,632          13,850

Common stock equivalents
  Options for common stock                                  363               489               363             489
                                                        -------           -------           -------         -------

Weighted average common stock equivalents                14,124            14,347            13,995          14,348
Less treasury shares to be repurchased                        -              (249)                -            (241)
                                                        -------           -------           -------         -------

Weighted average shares outstanding - Diluted            14,124            14,098            13,995          14,107

Basic earnings per share                                  $0.22             $0.14             $0.43           $0.31
                                                        =======           =======           =======         =======

Diluted earnings per share                                $0.22             $0.14              0.42           $0.30
                                                        =======           =======           =======         =======

</TABLE>
1 

### Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2015 3:20 PM

To: 'Joshua@weddingsinroanoke.com'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA); Pearson, Lakisha (FAA); C ooper, Thuy (FAA); Ferritto, Michelle (FAA) Subject: Request for Additional Informatio n: Olde Dominion Services, Inc.



### January 7, 2015

Mr. Joshua Gabrielson Olde Dominion Services, Inc.

63 Jubals Pass Rocky Mount, VA 24151

Dear Mr. Gabrielson:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2014-0946). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration to process your petition. Please submit the additional information to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headqua rters or electronically via e-mail to nia.daniels@faa.gov

.

 Describe the aircraft make and model for the prop osed UAS operation. The description should include the following: size and whether the ai rcraft is fixed wing or rotorcraft.

 List the aircraft’s cruise speed.

 Provide information regarding the radio frequency sp ectrum. This information can be located in the

aircraft manual.

 Your petition references a pre-fli ght inspection. Describe the process used to determine if the UAS is airworthy and in safe conditi on for operation in the NAS.

 Your petition references a flight manual and ope rating handbook, however they were not submitted for the record. Please provide a copy of the manuals.

Please provide the additional information by January 21, 2015.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-7626.

Sincerely,2 

### Nia Daniels Program Analyst

Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075 nia.daniels@faa.gov
From: rwilley@myflooringsolutions.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:01:22 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Rick Willey

Hendersonville, TN 37075
From: patmackey@txcyber.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:29:52 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Pat Mackey

Franklin, TX 77856