alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Players Network (the “Company”) on Form
      10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark Bradley, in my
      capacity as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
              May 20,
              2008/s/ Mark
              BradleyMark
                BradleyPrincipal
                Executive and Principal
              Accounting
                Officer
From: bcflan@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:08:45 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Barbara Flanigan

Phoenix, AZ 85022
From: waynemackert@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:22:47 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Wayne Mackert

Gloucester, MA 01930
From: killmar@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:51:49 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kurt Killmar6

Overland Park, KS 66223
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Booth Creek Ski Holdings,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 2, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  as the Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  hereby  certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

    1.  The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
        Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operations  of the
        Company.


September 13, 2002


                                      By:            /s/ GEORGE N. GILLETT, JR.
                                      -----------------------------------------
                                                         George N. Gillett, Jr.
                                                        Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32(a)

| | CERTIFICATION |  | OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
| | ------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB of WWA Group, Inc. (Registrant) for the quarterly period
ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (Report), I, Eric Montandon, chief executive officer, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) | This Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Registrant.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Eric Montandon

Eric MontandonChief Executive
Officer

August 18, 2005

This certification accompanies this
Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to
the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for
the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This
certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made
before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation
language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written
statement required by §906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained
by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

---
No. 69813.

protests 62/15290, etc. (New York).

#### The A. C. Gilbert Co. and Gehrig, Hoban & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

*884Opinion by

Oliver, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items in question consist of HO equipment similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *Polk’s Model Craft Hobbies, Inc., et al.*(47 CCPA 137, C.A.D. 746), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: The items marked “A” at the appropriate rate, depending upon the date of entry, under the provision in paragraph 397, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 51802), or by the Sixth Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 54108), for manufactures in chief value of base metal; the items marked “B” at 22% percent under the provision in said paragraph 397, as modified by T.D. 51802, for articles in chief value of plastic, which most resemble in use manufactures of base metal, by similitude under paragraph 1559, as amended; the items marked “C” at 13% percent under the provision in paragraph 353, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 52739), for metal articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device; and the items marked “D” at 15 percent under the provision in said paragraph 353, as modified by T.D. 51802, for metal articles suitable for producing, rectifying, modifying, controlling, or distributing electrical energy.
From: bettybaldree@att.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:07:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Betty Baldree

Cleveland, TN 37311
Exhibit 10.3



 Exhibit 10.3 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE CONTRACT 
 THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE
CONTRACT (“First Amendment”) is made effective as of July 26, 2012, by and between TWIN CITY CROSSING, LLC (“Seller”) and WHEELER INTERESTS, INC. (“Purchaser”). 

RECITALS: 

WHEREAS, Seller and Purchaser previously entered into that certain Purchase Contract, dated June 11, 2012 (the
“Agreement”) for the sale of the Property as defined in the Agreement, including, without limitation, certain real property and improvements located in the Town of Batesburg-Leesville, County of Lexington, South Carolina; 

WHEREAS, Purchaser and Seller desire to amend the Agreement as set forth herein; 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
Purchaser and Seller hereby undertake and agree as follows: 
 1. Defined Terms. Terms defined in the Agreement shall
have the same meanings in this First Amendment unless specifically modified herein. 
 2. Inspection Period Agreements.
Purchaser and Seller agree that the Review Period, as defined in Section 3(A) of the Agreement, is extended to and including August 9, 2012. 
 3. Execution by Facsimile/Counterparts. Execution of this instrument may be evidenced by facsimile signature which shall be deemed an original for all purposes. To facilitate execution, this First
Amendment may be executed in as many counterparts as may be required; and it shall not be necessary that the signature of, or on behalf of, each party, or that the signatures of the persons required to bind any party, appear on one or more such
counterparts. All counterparts shall collectively constitute a single agreement 
 4. Agreement Remains in Effect.
Subject to the specific amendments and agreements set forth in this First Amendment, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect without modification. 
 [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Seller and Purchaser have caused this First Amendment to be signed as of
the date first above written. 
  

									
	SELLER:	 		 	TWIN CITY CROSSING, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company
				
		 		 	By:	 	Du Rhone Group, Ltd., its Manager
					
		 		 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Neil R. Smith

		 		 		 		 	Neil R. Smith
		 		 		 		 	Executive Vice President
			
	PURCHASER:	 		 	WHEELER INTERESTS, INC.
				
		 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Jon S. Wheeler

		 		 	Name:	 	 JON S. WHEELER

		 		 	Its:	 	 PRESIDENT/CEO



  
 2
No. 60967.

protests 944478-G, etc. (New York).

#### China Man Way Fur Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of kidskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Kung Chen Fur Corpn.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480) or *Prime Fur Corp.*v. *United States*(37 Cust. Ct. 83, C. D. 1802) and lambskin plates similar to those the subject of *A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643) or C. D. 1802, *supra,*the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Mollison, J.,

dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinions in C. D, 1480 and C. D. 1643, *supra.*
Exhibit 32.1 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 of Secure Window Blinds, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), I, Anthony Pizzacalla, Chairman, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section            1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1. The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2. The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

 

/s/ Anthony Pizzacalla

Anthony Pizzacalla

President, Secretary Treasurer, Principal Executive Officer, 

Principal Financial Officer and Director

 

Date: March 23, 2010
Searched for **https://www.macpac.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.macpac.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 01194

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 01194\01194_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

01194\01194_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

01194\01194_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 01194\01194_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01194\01194_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01194\01194_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01194\01194_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01194\01194_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01194\Supplemental Documents\01194_A5-2_EPA_ICR_Aerial_Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 01194\Supplemental Documents\01194_A5-3_EPA_ICR_2010_Water_Balance.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 01194\Supplemental Documents\01194_Part D 4.1 SPD-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 01194\Supplemental Documents\01194_Part D 4.1 SPD-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

01194_Property Of - Please Return.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

01194_Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
AMENDED AND RESTATED
 3COM CORPORATION
 1984 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
 Amended & Restated June 18, 2008; share addition subject to Stockholder Approval at the 2008
Annual Stockholders Meeting
 Purpose
  Share Reserve
 Administration




---



##### 



Eligibility
   Offering Periods
 Offering Periods Beginning On or After October 1, 2003
 Governmental Approval; Shareholder Approval
 Participation in the Plan
 Initial Participation
 -2-




---



##### 



Automatic Participation in Subsequent Offering Periods
 Purchase Price and Purchase Date
 Payment of Purchase Price; Payroll Deductions
 Accumulation of Payroll Deductions
  -3-




---



##### 



Election to Change Payroll Deduction Rate
 Participant Accounts
 Purchase of Shares
 Purchase
 Share Limitation
 Fair Market Value Limitation
 Pro Rata Allocation
 -4-




---



##### 



Rights as a Shareholder and Employee
 Registration of Shares
 Permitted Adjustments
 Delivery
 Withdrawal
 Withdrawal From the Plan
 Return of Payroll Deductions
 -5-




---



##### 



Termination of Employment
 Repayment of Payroll Deductions Without Interest
 Capital Changes
 Designation of Beneficiary
    Nonassignability
 -6-




---



##### 



Use of Funds
 Reports
 Plan Term
 Amendment or Termination of the Plan
 Clawback
 Data Privacy
 -7-




---



##### 



Merger or Change in Control
     Notices
 -8-