alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Louis DAVIS, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER; Shirley Schlessinger, also known as Unknown Schlessincer; Unknown Wilson; Unknown Fairball; Unknown Schaan, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 04-60854.

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided June 24, 2005.

Louis Davis, Jr., Parchman, MS, pro se.

Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Louis Davis, Jr., Mississippi prisoner # 16425, seeks to appeal the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, alleging the denial of adequate medical care. The district court dismissed the suit after a *Spears*hearing for failure to state a cognizable claim. More than 10 days after entry of the judgment of dismissal, Davis filed a motion for “summary judgment,” which is properly construed as a motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). *See Harcon Barge Co., Inc. v. D & G Boat Rentals, Inc.,*784 F.2d 665, 668-69 (5th Cir.1986)(en banc). Davis filed a notice of appeal less than 30 days after the denial of the Rule 60(b) motion, but more than 30 days after the judgment dismissing the underlying action. His notice of appeal, therefore, is effective only as to the denial of the Rule 60(b) motion; the underlying judgment is not before us. *See*Fed. *254R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), 4(a)(4)(A); *Edwards v. City of Houston,*78 F.3d 983, 995 (5th Cir.1996)(en banc).

Davis argues that the defendants acted in excess of their authority by performing surgery without first consulting him, thereby subjecting him to cruel and unusual punishment. He also argues that he was denied his liberty interest under the Due Process Clause in refusing unwanted medical treatment, that the surgery performed on him was an assault and battery, and that the district court failed to give him and opportunity to present evidence on his claims. To the extent that Davis’s arguments attack the underlying judgment, we do not consider them because the underlying judgment is not before us. *See Edwards,*78 F.3d at 995. To the extent that Davis’s arguments implicate the denial of Rule 60(b) relief, Davis fails to show that the district court abused its discretion by denying his post-judgment motion. *See Seven Elves, Inc. v. Eskenazi,*635 F.2d 396, 402 (5th Cir.1981)(appellant from denial of Rule 60(b) motion must show that denial was “so *unwarranted*as to constitute an abuse of discretion”). Davis also moves for the appointment of counsel, which is DENIED.

The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. MOTION DENIED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
From: rrbambenek@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:34:09 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Randall Bambenek

Arcadia, WI 54612
Mon Aug 24 10:08:14 EDT 2015

Leavy.Jacqueline@epamail.epa.gov

FW: Strengthen fuel standards for commercial trucks

To: CMS.OEX@epamail.epa.gov

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

From: Robert E. Rutkowski [mailto:r_e_rutkowski@att.net]

Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2015 10:33 AM

To: Mccarthy, Gina

Subject: Strengthen fuel standards for commercial trucks

Gina McCarthy, Administrator 

USEPA Headquarters

Ariel Rios Building

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W.

Mail Code: 1101A

Washington, DC 20460

202-564-4700

E: mccarthy.gina@epa.gov

Re: Strengthen fuel standards for commercial trucks

Dear Administrator McCarthy,

The Obama administration made big news last month when it released new fuel efficiency standards aimed at the heavy duty trucks that dominate America’s

highways and are used for commercial transportation of goods.

Meaningfully cutting America’s carbon emissions will be impossible if we don’t address fuel consumption by these trucks, which are among the biggest sources of

carbon pollution in the country.

Industry should not get in the way of implementing these new rules and the EPA needs to do even better if it wants to seriously cut carbon and address climate

change.

Today, heavy trucks are the single fastest growing source of carbon pollution in the U.S. While large trucks account for just 7 percent of all vehicles on the

road, they use 25 percent of all fuel.

And while the fuel efficiency of smaller vehicles has significantly improved in recent years, truck fuel efficiency has not. That comes at a cost not only to the

climate, but our economy. It’s estimated that the average household spends an extra $1,100 per year on goods and services as a result of inefficient

trucks. Stronger standards could save households up to $250 a year. Those savings would also extend to truck drivers and operators themselves, with an

estimated $30,000 in annual savings for the average truck, with new fuel technology paying for itself in just over a year.

The EPA’s proposed standards are a strong and important step to addressing this problem. But according to experts, the EPA is aiming too low and stands to

make these standards even stronger. While the EPA’s proposed rule aims to cut fuel consumption by 36 percent by the year 2027, it’s been estimated that proven,

tested, and readily available technologies would allow for a 40 percent cut in consumption two years earlier.And when it comes to the devastating impact of climate

change from carbon emissions, every year counts.

Sure these new rules don’t just take effect, but do so with the strongest standards possible. Set a standard that achieves a 40 percent reduction in fuel

consumption by 2025.

Thank you for the opportunity to bring these remarks to your attention.

Yours sincerely,

Robert E. Rutkowski

cc: House Minority Leadership

2527 Faxon Court

Topeka, Kansas 66605-2086

P/F: 1 785 379-9671

E-mail: r_e_rutkowski@att.net
From: henson333@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:42:27 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Elaine Henson

Wright City, MO 63390
# General James Mattis Departs Pakistan

/ Published April 17, 2012

ISLAMABAD (March 29, 2012) — General James Mattis, Commander of U.S. Central Command, departed Pakistan today after a series of meetings with senior Pakistani leaders.   While here, he and General John Allen, Commander of NATO’s International Security Assistance Force, discussed with Chief of Army Staff General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani and other senior military officials a wide range of common security issues, to include militant network activities and improving cross-border cooperation. General Mattis acknowledged the sacrifices made by the Pakistani military in their fight against violent extremists, and offered his condolences for Pakistani military personnel who have fallen in support of that cause.  This was the first visit by a senior U.S. military official since last winter. General Mattis and General Allen were grateful for the time afforded them by their Pakistani counterparts and reaffirmed the importance of the U.S.-Pakistani security relationship – not only to ongoing operations in Afghanistan but also to regional stability.
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A)/15D-14(A)
       (A)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(B)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;(C)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(D)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (A)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(B)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 /s/ Daniel E. KlimasDaniel E. KlimasPresident and Chief Executive Officer
DSC/APRIL 2004/661/2012A 5 OF 7

0 5 10 miles

NORTH

25

40

Albuquerque 40

Kirtland

Air Force

Base

Bernalillo County

Valencia County

Valencia County

Torrance County

Manzano

Wilderness

Socorro County

New Mexico

R oi a Gr nde

New Mexico

Mexico

Texas

Santa Fe

Albuquerque

El Paso Ciudad

Juarez

47

304

47

47

60

25

R oi

B Grande lvd.

Auto Tour Route

High-Potential Historic Site

Old Town

Albuquerque

Atrisco

Pajarito

Los Padillas

Isleta Pueblo

Bosque de Pinos

Peralta

Los Lunas

Valencia

Tome Hill Los Chaves

Belen

Jarales

Las Barrancas

Casa

Colorado

Sabinal

Las Nutrias

Section 5 of 7

United States Department of the Interior

National Park Service

Bureau of Land Management

Auto Tour Route

High-Potential Historic Sites

El Camino Real de Tierra Adentro

National Historic Trail

El Camino Real de Tierra Adentro

National Historic Trail

Map 3E

Albuquerque BLM Field Office

Socorro BLM Field Office
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Cover-All Technologies Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the Company), on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December
31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, John W. Roblin, Chief Executive Officer (principal
executive officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
my knowledge:

(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                    |                          |  | 
|------------------- | ------------------------ |  | 
|Date:               | December 22,
 2010       |  | 
|                    |                          | 
|/s/ John W.
 Roblin |                          | 
|                    |                          | 
|Name:               | John W.
 Roblin          |  | 
|Title:              | Chief
 Executive Officer |  | 

---
Exhibit 4.17



 Exhibit 4.17 
 CONSENT OF ENGINEER 
 Ladies and Gentlemen: 

The undersigned company hereby consents to (1) the references to the undersigned company’s name included or incorporated by reference in the
registration statement on Form F-80 of Denison Mines Corp. in connection with the report entitled “The NI 43-101 Technical Report Mutanga Project, Located in Southern Province, Republic of Zambia” dated March 19, 2009 and (2) all
other references to the undersigned company included or incorporated by reference in the registration statement on Form F-80 of Denison Mines Corp. 
 Dated: January 7, 2013 
  

			
	CSA GLOBAL (UK) LTD.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Malcolm Titley
	Name: Malcolm Titley
	Title: Director/Principal
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

 38

 39

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

07/16

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 16 Jul 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.81 N 76.74 W Meters AGL
EXHIBIT 15
September 7, 2000


To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Signature Eyewear, Inc.

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
Signature Eyewear, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 33-48109) of our report dated
September 7, 2000 relating to the unaudited consolidated interim financial
statements of Signature Eyewear, Inc. which are included in its Form 10-Q for
the nine-month period ended July 31, 2000.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) of the Securities Act of 1933, our report is not a part
of the registration statement prepared or certified by accountants within the
meaning of Section 7 or 11 of the Securities Act of 1933.



/S/ ALTSCHULER, MELVOIN AND GLASSER LLP

Los Angeles, California


                                    Page 38
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit Fund VI, L.P., Series 5 (the "Partnership") for the quarters ended
December 31, 2005, September 30, 2005 and June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), and
pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr., President and Chief
Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership,
hereby certify that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except
                  to the extent that such provisions require the audit report of
                  Local Limited Partnership financial statements to refer to the
                  auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
                  Board for the Partnership's annual financial statements and
                  except that the Report is a cumulative report covering each of
                  the quarters ended December 31, September 30 and June 30, 2005
                  and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Partnership.




/s/Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
-------------------------
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
May 16, 2008
No. 67482.

#### Quon Quon Company *v.*United States,

protest 60/19302 (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of rattancore flower cages the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Quon Quon Company*v. *United States*(41 Cust. Ct. 181, C.D. 2039), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 65975.

#### Florea & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 302124-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issue is the same in all material respects as that the subject of *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), the items marked “A” were held dutiable at 30 percent under paragraph 915, as modified, *supra,*as knit nylon gloves similar in use to cotton gloves, and the items marked “B” at 30 percent under paragraph 1208, as modified, *supra,*as knit nylon gloves similar in use to silk gloves.
From: johncopeland@sc.rr.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:43:54 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you NOT expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance.

I also ask you NOT to reconsider your definition of religious employer and NOT offer an authentic

conscience protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to

providing such insurance to their employees. Religious and moral objection has no place in health care!

Sincerely,

John Copeland

, 29205-2876
MusclePharm Corporation

CORPORATE STOCK TRANSFER, INC.


TRANSFER FEE: AS REQUIRED




     The
following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written
out in full according to applicable laws or regulations:


 


	TEN COM -	as tenants in common	 	 	 
	TEN ENT -	as tenants by the entireties 	 	UNIF GIFT MIN ACT - 	Custodian
	JT TEN -	as joint tenants with right 

of survivorship and not as 
 tenants in common	 	 	(Cust)                                          (Minor)

under Uniform Gifts to Minors 
	 	 	 	 	Act _________________________________
	 	 	 	 	                                         (State)


 





Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the
above list. _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


 





	PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER	 
	IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE	 
	 	 
	 	 
	 	 


 


 







 


      FOR VALUE RECEIVED, _________________________________________________________
hereby sell, assign and transfer unto


 


___________________________________________________________________________________________________________


 


PLEASE PRINTOR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP
CO DE OF ASSIGNEE


 


___________________________________________________________________________________________________________



___________________________________________________________________________________________________________



___________________________________________________________________________________________________________


 


_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Shares of 

the Common Stock represented by the within Certificate and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint


 


___________________________________________________________________________________________Attorney to 

transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation, with full power of substitution in the premises.


 


Dated:___________________ 20________ ,


 





		Signature:
    X___________________________________________________________
	Signature(s) Guaranteed:	 
	 	Signature:
    X___________________________________________________________


 


 







 


THE SIGNATURE(S) TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE
NAME(S) AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.
THE SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (Banks, Stockbrokers, Savings and Loan Associations
and Credit Unions) WITH MEMBERSHIPIN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM, PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
No. 65123.

#### M. S. Cowen *&*Co. *v.*United States,

protests 270889-K/7189, etc. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *The Best Foods, Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 163, C.A.D. 751), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
#### Isaac Weeks, Respondent, v. John G. Alport and others, Appellants.

Judgment ana order denying new trial affirmed, with costs, and motion to dismiss appeal denied. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J. ;

Cullen, J., not sitting.