alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: skrogers@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:21:04 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Monica Rogers

Queen Creek, AZ 85142
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Collins & Aikman Floorcoverings, Inc. (the Corporation) for the quarterly period ended July 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Edgar M. (Mac) BridgerEdgar M. (Mac) BridgerChief Executive Officer/s/ Leonard F. FerroLeonard F. FerroVice-President andChief Financial Officer
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPassive Rocket Diffuser Theory: A Re-Examination of Minimum Second Throat SizeSecond-throat diffusers serve to isolate rocket engines from the effects of ambient back pressure during testing without using active control systems. Among the most critical design parameters is the relative area of the diffuser throat to that of the nozzle throat. A smaller second throat is generally desirable because it decreases the stagnation-to-ambient pressure ratio the diffuser requires for nominal operation. There is a limit, however. Below a certain size, the second throat can cause pressure buildup within the diffuser and prevent it from reaching the start condition that protects the nozzle from side-load damage. This paper presents a method for improved estimation of the minimum second throat area which enables diffuser start. The new 3-zone model uses traditional quasi-one-dimensional compressible flow theory to approximate the structure of two distinct diffuser flow fields observed in Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations and combines them to provide a less-conservative estimate of the second throat size limit. It is unique among second throat sizing methods in that it accounts for all major conical nozzle and second throat diffuser design parameters within its limits of application. The performance of the 3-zone method is compared to the historical normal shock and force balance methods, and verified against a large number of CFD simulations at specific heat ratios of 1.4 and 1.25. Validation is left as future work, and the model is currently intended to function only as a first-order design tool.Document ID20160005164Acquisition SourceStennis Space CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsJones, Daniel R.*(NASA Stennis Space Center Stennis Space Center, MS, United States)*Date AcquiredApril 19, 2016Publication DateMarch 1, 2016Subject CategorySpacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2016-219219SADM-8076-0002Funding Number(s)OTHER: NASA RS-25Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20160005164.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
No. 64510.

#### Cornet Stores and Frank P. Dow Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/10515, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Mollison, J-.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of valances similar in all material respects to those the subject of *D. N. & E. Walter & Co. et al.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 26, C.D. 2098), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: osgfx@osgfx.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:12:42 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Scott Adie

Palm Coast, FL 32137
Exhibit 4.16



 Exhibit 4.16 
 CONSENT OF ENGINEER 
 Ladies and Gentlemen: 

The undersigned hereby consents to (1) the references to the undersigned’s name included or incorporated by reference in the registration
statement on Form F-80 of Denison Mines Corp. in connection with the report entitled “Technical Report on the Midwest A Uranium Deposit of Saskatchewan, Canada” dated January 31, 2008, and (2) all other references to the
undersigned included or incorporated by reference in the registration statement on Form F-80 of Denison Mines Corp. 
  

					
	Dated: January 7, 2013	 		 	
			
	/s/ Michel Dagbert	 		 	 
	 Michel Dagbert, P.Eng.
 SGS
Geostat Ltd.
From: patmullen8@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:51:14 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Patricia Mullen

West Chester, PA 19380
Case No. 8,762.

#### McDONALD v. MOORE.

[Reversing Case No. 8.703, so far as that decree directed the payment of the judgment of M., T. & Co., and the costs of the sheriff on the execution, and affirming it in all other respects. Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible.]
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
BJs Wholesale Club, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended October 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Frank D. Forward, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |                        
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Dated: November 16, 2004 |  | /S/ FRANK D. FORWARD   
|                         |  | Frank D. Forward       
|                         |  | Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 By: 
Name:
    
    /s/ Freddie M. Kotek

Freddie M. KotekTitle:
    
    Chief Executive Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
    
    March 30, 2011
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Booth Creek Ski Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 28, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, as the President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



March 18, 2005

By:

/s/ CHRISTOPHER P. RYMANChristopher P. RymanPresident and Chief Operating Officer
From: cdp48@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:15:58 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Charles Porter

Conyers, GA 30013
Before the Second Division,

March 7, 1966

No. 69818.

protest 65/5209 (New York).

#### Sol Tool Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of steel bandsaws similar in all material respects to those the subject of J. *E. Bernard & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(50 Cust. Ct. 41, C.D. 2386), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: cornerstone62@centurylink.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:28:54 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Scott Cobler

Meriden, KS 66512
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the interim
condensed consolidated financial statements of Dental-Medical Diagnostic
Systems, Inc. as of the twelve months ended December 31, 1997 included in this
report on Form 10-KSB and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY>                                U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       3,981,062
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,967,614
<ALLOWANCES>                                    20,975
<INVENTORY>                                  2,896,270
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,234,007
<PP&E>                                         748,985
<DEPRECIATION>                                 195,866
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,492,026
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,650,966
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        51,157
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,738,993
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,492,026
<SALES>                                     16,087,208
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,087,208
<CGS>                                       10,234,206
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,501,082
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             138,576
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,657,269)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (153,311)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,810,580)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (234,149)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,044,729)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.47)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.47)


</TABLE>
Docket No. FAA-2015-6547 Dir. ID 2014-NM-129-AD
Exhibit 32.2

      Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, A. Cameron Richardson, Chief Financial Officer of Aurora Gold Corporation
(the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

1.   The Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-QSB of the Company for the period ended
     March 31, 2007 which this certification accompanies fully complies with the
     requirements  of  section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
     1934:  and

2.   The information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  May  18,  2007                   BY:  /s/  A.  Cameron  Richardson
       --------------                        ----------------------------
                                             A.  Cameron  Richardson
                                             Chief Financial Officer


This  certification  accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002  and  shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes  of  Section  18  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A
signed  original  of  this  written  statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears  in  typed  form within the electronic version of this written statement
required  by  Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by  the  Company  and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff  upon  request.