alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: clarkj@katewwdb.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:59:17 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jacalyn Clark

Killeen, TX 76549
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1285 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 240
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1285

                          [Report No. 110-721]

   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6304) to amend the 
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 to establish a procedure 
 for authorizing certain acquisitions of foreign intelligence, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 19, 2008

    Mr. Arcuri, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6304) to amend the 
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 to establish a procedure 
 for authorizing certain acquisitions of foreign intelligence, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 6304) to amend the 
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 to establish a procedure 
for authorizing certain acquisitions of foreign intelligence, and for 
other purposes. All points of order against consideration of the bill 
are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The 
bill shall be considered as read. All points of order against 
provisions of the bill are waived. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the bill to final passage without intervening 
motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided among and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee 
on the Judiciary and the chairman and ranking minority member of the 
Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence; and (2) one motion to 
recommit.
    Sec. 2.  During consideration of H.R. 6304 pursuant to this 
resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the 
Chair may postpone further consideration of the bill to such time as 
may be designated by the Speaker.
                                                 House Calendar No. 240

110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 1285

                          [Report No. 110-721]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6304) to amend the 
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 to establish a procedure 
 for authorizing certain acquisitions of foreign intelligence, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 19, 2008

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
From: thealhorns@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:50:46 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dean Alhorn

Huntsville, AL 35802
From: katauna@core.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:25:04 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Katauna Lucas

Farmington, NM 87401
Page 1 of 1 4 / 28 / 201 4 file:///C:/Users/dmedina/A pp Data/Local/Temp /notesA79CA3/~1908627. g if
From: ckk12458@insightbb.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:26:01 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Christa Klauss

Evansville, IN 47712
Before ti-ie Third Division,

July 21, 1966

No. P66/165. —

#### Park & Tilford Distillers Corp. *v.*United States, protest 65/5142 (New York).

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise (Scotch whisky and gin) and issue involved in the instant protest are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 CCPA 130, C.A.D. 508); *United States*v. *Brown Vintners*& *Co., Inc.*(34 CCPA 112, G.A.D. 351); *Austin Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. *7971155) ; and *The Lansdowne Distillery*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 451, Abstract 61245), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: allen_baldwin@fca.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:00:47 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Allen Baldwin

Peachtree City, GA 30269
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5



<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         66,159
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  8,399,743
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,482,522
<INVENTORY>                                    590,318
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               9,804,687
<PP&E>                                         4,796,643
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4,921,458
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 23,354,085
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          12,094,167
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       482,526
<OTHER-SE>                                     5,890,957
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   23,354,085
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               40,470,462
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  33,685,868
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,113,785
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               2,289,187
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,471,864
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                909,758
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   909,758
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .11




</TABLE>
From Goldberg Seth SGoldberg@steptoe.com

Sent Thursday November 13 2008 409 PM GMT

To Boucher Michael mbouchermckennalong.com

Cc Wersinger Kate kwersingersteptoe.com

Subject RE Nalco Response to Buckman

Sorry for the sending my response to you on incomplete letterhead It was mistake by my substitute assistant noticed that after

the letter went out but felt it was not critical to send corrected letter as you know where to find me If its important will send new

page one with the correct letterhead

My apologies for the oversight

Seth

From Boucher Michael mbouchermckennalong.com

Sent Thursday November 13 2008 1057 AM

To Goldberg Seth

Subject RE Nalco Response to Buckman

Seth are you aware that your letterhead has no contact mformation for you Is this mtentional

Michael Boucher

McKenna Long Aldridge LLP 1900 Street NW Suite 100

Washington DC 20006-1110 202 496-7729 -7756 fax

e-mail mboucher@mckennalong.com

From Wersinger Kate On Behalf Of Goldberg Seth

Sent Tuesday November 11 2008 459 PM

To Boucher Michael

Subject Nalco Response to Buckman

Attached is letter responding to letter on behalf of Nalco responding to your November email on behalf of Buckman

Best regards

Seth Goldberg

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE

This email and any attachments contain information from

the law firm of McKenna Long Aldridge LLP and are

intended solely for the use of the named recipient or

recipients This e-mail may contain privileged

attorney/client communications or work product Any

dissemination of this email by anyone other than an

intended recipient is strictly prohibited If you are not

named recipient you are prohibited from any further

viewing of the email or any attachments or from making any

use of the email or attachments If you believe you have

received this email in error notify the sender

immediately and permanently delete the e-mail any

attachments and all copies thereof from any drives or

storage media and destroy any printouts of the email or

attachments
|                                                                         |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                         |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|                                                                    | Three Months EndedJune 30, |   | Six Months EndedJune 30, |
|                                                                    | 2013 |   | 2012 |   | 2013 |   | 2012 |
|                                                                    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Profit                                                                  | $ | 111 |  |   | $ | 104 |  |   | $ | 252 |  |   | $ | 224 |  |
|                                                                    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Add:                                                                    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Provision for income taxes                                              | 44 |  |   | 39 |  |   | 87 |  |   | 85 |  |
|                                                                    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Profit before income taxes                                              | $ | 155 |  |   | $ | 143 |  |   | $ | 339 |  |   | $ | 309 |  |
|                                                                    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Fixed charges:                                                          |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Interest expense                                                        | $ | 187 |  |   | $ | 198 |  |   | $ | 378 |  |   | $ | 402 |  |
| Rentals at computed interest*                                           | 2 |  |   | 2 |  |   | 3 |  |   | 3 |  |
|                                                                    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Total fixed charges                                                     | $ | 189 |  |   | $ | 200 |  |   | $ | 381 |  |   | $ | 405 |  |
|                                                                    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Profit before income taxes plus fixed charges                           | $ | 344 |  |   | $ | 343 |  |   | $ | 720 |  |   | $ | 714 |  |
|                                                                    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Ratio of profit before income taxes plus fixed charges to fixed charges | 1.82 |  |   | 1.72 |  |   | 1.89 |  |   | 1.76 |  |
|                                                                    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
Exhibit 99.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Smith Barney  Westport  Futures  Fund
L.P.    (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period  ending June 30, 2002 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, David J. Vogel, President of Smith Barney Futures Management LLC,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Partnership.


/s/ David J.Vogel
David J. Vogel
Smith Barney Futures Management LLC
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2002



<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Fairchild Semiconductor International,
Inc. (the company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 27, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark S. Thompson, Chief Executive Officer of the company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Mark S. Thompson   
|Mark S. Thompson       
|Chief Executive Officer
|November 6, 2009