alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

|CERTIFICATION OF                                   
|---------------------------------------------------
|CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
|PURSUANT TO                                        
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                            
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                             
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002      

I, Daniel B. Hunter, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Encore Clean Energy, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company,
        for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005, and to which this certification
        is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with
        the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.                                                                                                                                                             

| | By:    | /s/ Daniel B. Hunter             
| | ------ | ---------------------------------
| |        |                                  
| | Name:  | DANIEL B. HUNTER                 
| |        |                                  
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and Chief
| |        | Financial Officer                
| |        |                                  
| | Date:  | September 6, 2005                

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001036180
<NAME>                        GFSI Holdings, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-29-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         230
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  33,930
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    38,304
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               74,929
<PP&E>                                         40,819
<DEPRECIATION>                                 22,017
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 99,874
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          24,071
<BONDS>                                        228,203
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          5,013
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (159,006)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   99,874
<SALES>                                        52,450
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               52,450
<CGS>                                          32,327
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  44,922
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (50)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             6,115
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,463
<INCOME-TAX>                                   571
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            892
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   892
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Players Network (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (“Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: 

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Dated: September 18, 2006 |
|---------------------------|

|   | /s/ Mark Bradley                                 			

Mark Bradley |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Chief Executive Officer |
|--------|-------------------------|

|   | Principal Accounting Officer |
|--------|------------------------------|
From: michelle.thorn@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:16:44 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

mICHELLE Thorn

Chino, CA 91710
Utah Code Sections 54-15-101 through 54-15-106, is

available at: http://le.utah.gov/~code/TITLE54/54_1 5.htm
Docket No: FAA-2015-3628 Dir ID: 2015-NM-025-AD
No. 128, Misc.

#### Sherwood *v.*United States.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg*and *Robert G. Maysack*for the United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:   | /s/ Kin Sun Sze-To            |
|-----------------|-------------------------------|
|            | Kin Sun Sze-To                |
|            | Chief Executive Officer       |
|            | (Principal Executive Officer) |

| By:   | /s/ Ho Leung Ning                 |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------|
|            | Ho Leung Ning                     |
|            | Chief Financial Officer           |
|            | (Principal Accounting Officer and |
|            | Principal Financial Officer)      |

----
From: tcarfagno@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:42:43 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Teresa Carfagno

Slingerlands, NY 12159
* The Honorable Jerome Farris, Circuit Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation. NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 05a0377n.06 Filed: May 11, 2005 No. 02-4149 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT MYKOBI L’BERT, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. WILLIAM MONTAGUE, et al., Defendants-Appellees. / * * * * * * * * * * * ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

O R D E R

BEFORE: KEITH, CLAY, and FARRIS * PER CURIAM. The district court dismissed Plainti ff Mykobi L’Bert’s tort lawsuit against Defendants William Montague, Robert Goldberg, Daniel Tilman, Charles Franks, Patricia Gheen, Brenda McCombs, and Theresa O’Malley, officials at the Ohio hospital where L’Bert worked, for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. 28 U.S.C. § 2675(a). The hospital is administered by the Department of Veterans Affair s (VA). L’Bert originally brought this lawsuit in state court; the defendants removed the case to federal district court upon certification by th e Attorney General that the defendants were acting within the scope of their employment at the VA. See 28 U.S.C. § 2679(d)(1). The district court accordingly accepted the case and substituted the United States as Defendant. See id

.No. 02-4149

1 R. James Nicholson is substituted for his predecessor, Anthony Principi, pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2). 2 The district court also dismissed another lawsuit brought by L’Bert, this one against Defendant R. James Nichols on, the Secretary of the VA, 1 see 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16(c), involving claims of discriminatory and retaliatory discharge in violation of Title V II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq ., on the grounds that the Title VII claims are barred by res judicata . These claims were raised and fully litigated in a lawsuit L’Bert brought in 1999; in that case, the district court granted summary judgmen t to the defendants and this Court affirmed. L’Bert v. West , 2001 WL 1450734 (6th Cir. Oct. 30, 2001) (unpublished order). L’Bert appeals the substitution of the United States as Defendant in th e tort lawsuit and the di smissal of the tort and Title VII lawsuits. We have carefully reviewed the record supplied to us on appeal, the parties’ briefs, and the decision below. Because the district court (Oliver , J.) fully addressed L’Bert’s claims and correctly disposed of them in a thorough written opinion, we conclude that the issuance of an opinion by this Court would be duplicative and serve no useful purpos e. We therefore affirm on the basis of the district court’s opinion.
From: pastorbl@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:00:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Bert Lorentz

Snellville, GA 30078
From: sheilacavalet@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:58:00 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sheila Cavalet

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33322
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, J. Michael French., President and ChiefExecutive Officer of MDRNA, Inc. (“MDRNA”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of MDRNA on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in allmaterial respects the financial condition and results of operations of MDRNA. 

 

Date: April 8, 2009 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to MDRNA and will be retained by MDRNA and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies each periodic report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, exceptto the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by MDRNA for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 184 (Monday, September 25, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 65665]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20728]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2970-004]


The Village of Argyle, Wisconsin; Notice of Effectiveness of 
Withdrawal of Application for Surrender of Exemption From Licensing

    On October 6, 2021, the Village of Argyle, Wisconsin (exemptee) 
filed an application to surrender its exemption from licensing for the 
50-kilowatt Argyle Hydroelectric Project No. 2970. On July 5, 2023, the 
licensee filed a notice of withdrawal of the surrender application. The 
project is located on the East Branch Pecatonica River, in Argyle, 
Lafayette County, Wisconsin.
    No motion in opposition to the notice of withdrawal has been filed, 
and the Commission has taken no action to disallow the withdrawal. 
Pursuant to Rule 216(b) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure,\1\ the withdrawal of the application became effective on 
July 20, 2023, and this proceeding is hereby terminated.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 18 CFR 385.216(b) (2022).

    Dated: September 19, 2023.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-20728 Filed 9-22-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,818,513
<SECURITIES>                                78,262,729
<RECEIVABLES>                               40,316,244
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,805,039)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            81,119,148
<PP&E>                                     210,541,037
<DEPRECIATION>                            (42,662,076)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,666,365,804
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       97,261,075
<BONDS>                                  1,104,505,561
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      388,217,101
<PREFERRED>                                    314,286
<COMMON>                                           573
<OTHER-SE>                               (204,959,047)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,666,365,804
<SALES>                                      2,845,179
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            68,438,351
<CGS>                                      (5,817,001)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             (76,116,401)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,608,563
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        (28,359,880)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (34,985,083)
<INCOME-TAX>                                13,293,965
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (21,691,118)
<DISCONTINUED>                            (12,053,673)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (33,744,791)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (97.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>