alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: joyceschaeffer@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:18:05 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Joyce Schaeffer

Lees Summit, MO 64081
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION
No. 121, 45 2

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS

S TATE OF K ANSAS , Appellee
,

v.

A NDREIA R ENEE B RONNENBERG ,

Appellant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appeal from Montgomery District Court; F. W ILLIAM C ULLINS , judge. Opinion filed April 24 , 2020

. Affirmed

.

Submitted for summary disposition pursuant to K.S.A. 2019 Supp. 21

- 6820(g) and (h).

Before A RNOLD

- B URGER , C.J., L EBEN , J., and M C A NANY , S.J.

P ER C URIAM : While she was on probation for felony attempted burglary
, the State alleged that Andreia Bronnenberg had violated her probation by committing several new
crimes

. At a hearing to address Bronnenberg ' s probation and the new charges
, Bronnenberg pleaded no contest to burglary of a non dwelling, a felony . B ased on that new crime, the court revoked her probation and imposed her underlying 10

- month prison

sentence

. See K.S.A. 2019 Supp. 22

- 3716(c)(7)(C) (giving the district court the discretion to revoke probation if the defendant commits a new felon y or misdemeanor while on probation).

Bronnenberg has now appeal ed the district court ' s decision to revoke her probation

. On appeal, she does not challenge the district court ' s finding that she2

committed a new crime . Nor does she contest that a statute, K.S.A. 2019 Supp. 22

- 3716(c)(7)(C), gave the court discretion to revoke her probation upon such a finding. Instead, she argues that the district court abused its discretion.

Unless the district court has made a legal or factual error (which isn ' t claimed here), we will set aside its discretionary decision only if no reasonable person could agree
with the court ' s decision. State v. Jones , 306 Kan. 948, Syl. ¶ 7, 398 P.3d 856 (2017). Bronnenberg committed felony burglary while she was already on pr obation for an attempted felony burglary. Based on that, a reasonable person could conclude that probation had not changed Bronnenberg ' s behavior and that she wasn ' t a good candidate
to continue on it.

On Bronnenberg ' s motion, we accepted this appeal for summary disposition under K.S.A. 2019 Supp. 21

- 6820(g) and (h) and Supreme Court Rule 7.041A (2019 Kan. S. Ct. R. 47). After reviewing the record available to the sentenc ing court, we find no error
in the sentence the i t imposed.

We therefore affirm its decision.
exhibit102.htm


 


Addendum to the existing contract of employment


 


Between


 


Eastman Kodak Sàrl, Rte de Pre-Bois 29, 1215 Geneva, Switzerland (Hereafter “The Employer”)


 


and


 


Philip Cullimore (Hereafter “The Employee”)


 


This addendum to the original employment contract only modifies the specific terms described below. All unchanged terms and conditions from the original contract remain in full force and effect.


 


The following has been mutually agreed between parties:


 


Change of registered office and place of work


As of 1st January 2013, The Employer changes its registered office to Route des Avouillons 30, 1196 Gland, Switzerland and closes its office at Route de Pre-Bois 29, 1215 Geneva, Switzerland. Consequently the Employer’s new office is located at Route des Avouillons 30, 1196 Gland, Switzerland. This implies the following amendments to the employment contract as of 1st January 2013:








	
•  

	
Place of work: the Employee’s place of work will be at the registered office in Gland (Route des Avouillons 30, 1196 Gland, Switzerland).


 








	
•  

	
Public holidays: public holidays applicable are of the Canton of Vaud.


 








	
•  

	
Social Security: compulsory social security contributions (AVS/Al/AF/APG) applicable are of the Canton of Vaud; the Employer will no compensate for any loss of social security benefits and/or deductions.


 








	
•  

	
Tax at source: compulsory application of the tax at source rules between France and the Canton of Vaud will be implemented.


 








	
•  

	
Parking places for employees: the Employer can no longer guarantee a parking place for all employees; however a plan to minimize impacts is in place (see Mobility plan).


 








	
•  

	
Work permit: the Employee’s work permit will be updated to comply with the local law of the Canton of Vaud when appropriate.












In addition, the Employer makes the following amendment to the employment contract:


 


Payment of salary


As of 1st January 2013, the Employee’s annual base salary will be paid in 12 installments (instead of 13) at the end of each calendar month.


 


Any other element mentioned in the initial contract will remain unchanged.


 


Changes are effective 1st January 2013.


 


Done in 2 copies; Geneva, 17th December 2012


 


For the Employer:                                                                                     The Employee:


 


/s/ Cendrine Saugy                                                                                     /s/  Philip Cullimore


HR Manager                                                                                          Philip Cullimore






  





1
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThe Stratway Program for Strategic Conflict Resolution: User's GuideStratway is a strategic conflict detection and resolution program. It provides both intent-based conflict detection and conflict resolution for a single ownship in the presence of multiple traffic aircraft and weather cells defined by moving polygons. It relies on a set of heuristic search strategies to solve conflicts. These strategies are user configurable through multiple parameters. The program can be called from other programs through an application program interface (API) and can also be executed from a command line.Document ID20160006523Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsHagen, George E.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Butler, Ricky W.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Maddalon, Jeffrey M.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredMay 24, 2016Publication DateMay 1, 2016Subject CategoryAir Transportation And SafetyComputer Programming And SoftwareReport/Patent NumberNF1676L-24233NASA/TM-2016-219196L-20698Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 154692.02.40.07.01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20160006523.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 159 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     February 14, 2007.
    Resolved, That the House has heard with profound sorrow of the death of the 
Honorable Charlie Norwood, a Representative from the State of Georgia.
    Resolved, That a committee of such Members of the House as the Speaker may 
designate, together with such Members of the Senate as may be joined, be 
appointed to attend the funeral.
    Resolved, That the Sergeant-at-Arms of the House be authorized and directed 
to take such steps as may be necessary for carrying out the provisions of these 
resolutions and that the necessary expenses in connection therewith be paid out 
of applicable accounts of the House.
    Resolved, That the Clerk communicate these resolutions to the Senate and 
transmit a copy thereof to the family of the deceased.
    Resolved, That when the House adjourns today, it adjourn as a further mark 
of respect to the memory of the deceased.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
No. 59684.

#### Houbigant, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 182831-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of essential oils the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Ungerer & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*.(33 Cust. Ct. 152, C. D. 1647), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<PAGE>

                                                          Exhibit 21.1
                     3COM CORPORATION SUBSIDIARIES

3Com Asia Limited (Hong Kong)
3Com Asia Pacific Rim PTE Limited (Singapore)
3Com Australia Pty. Ltd. (Australia)
3Com (Austria) GesmbH (Austria)
3Com Benelux B.V. (The Netherlands)
3Com Bilgisayer Ticaret A.S. (Turkey)
3Com Bulgaria EOOD (Bulgaria)
3Com Canada Inc. (Toronto)
3Com Corporation Zagreb (Croatia)
3Com Costa Rica S.A. (Costa Rica)
3Com Credit Corporation (California, U.S.A.)
3Com do Brasil Servicos Ltda. (Brazil)
3Com de Chile S.A. (Chile)
3Com de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (Mexico)
3Com Denmark AS (Denmark)
3Com Development Corporation (California, U.S.A.)
3Com Engineering Limited (United Kingdom)
3Com Europe Limited (United Kingdom)
3Com Far East Limited (Cayman Islands)
3Com GmbH (Germany)
3Com Holdings Limited (Cayman Islands)
3Com Hungary Kft (Hungary)
3Com Iberia S.A. (Spain)
3Com International, Inc. (Delaware, U.S.A.)
3Com International (New Zealand) Limited (New Zealand)
3Com IFSC (Ireland) (Ireland)
3Com India Pte. Ltd. (India)
3Com Ireland Technology Limited (Cayman Islands)
3Com Israel Limited (Israel)
3Com Japan K.K. (Japan)
3Com Korea Limited (Korea)
3Com Limited (United Kingdom)
3Com Mediteraneo S.r.l. (Italy)
3Com Nordic AB (Sweden)
3Com Pension Scheme (1996) Trustees Limited (United Kingdom)
3Com Philippines Inc. (Philippines)
3Com Polska sp. z.o.o. (Poland)
3Com Russia OOO (Russia)
3Com S.A. (France)
3Com (Schweiz) A.G. (Switzerland)
3Com Slovakia s.r.o. (Slovakia)
3Com South Asia PTE. Ltd. (Singapore)
3Com Technologies (Cayman Islands)
3Com (Thailand) Co. Ltd. (Thailand)
3Com U.K. Holdings Limited (United Kingdom)
3Com (U.K.) Limited (United Kingdom)
3Com Ventures, Inc. (Delaware, U.S.A.)
3Com World Trade, Inc. (Barbados)
Information Systems Group, Inc. (Utah, U.S.A.)
Lanworks Technologies Company (Canada)
Palm Computing Inc. (California, U.S.A.)
P.N.B., s.a. (France)
Smartcode Technologies (France)
U.S. Robotics Holdings Europe B.V. (Netherlands)
U.S. Robotics Logistics SARL (France)
U.S. Robotics Middle East Holdings, Inc. (Delaware, U.S.A)
U.S. Robotics s.a. (France/Delaware, U.S.A.)
U.S. Robotics Services Limited (Ireland)
H. Res. 254

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

March 20, 2007.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 1227) to assist in the provision of affordable 

housing to low-income families affected by Hurricane 

Katrina. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. 

All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived 

except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed 

one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 

ranking minority member of the Committee on Financial 

Services. After general debate the bill shall be considered for 

amendment under the five-minute rule. The amendment in 

the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on 

Financial Services now printed in the bill, modified by the 

amendment printed in part A of the report of the Committee 

on Rules accompanying this resolution, shall be considered as 
2

•HRES 254 EH 

adopted in the House and in the Committee of the Whole. 

The bill, as amended, shall be considered as the original bill 

for the purpose of further amendment under the five-minute 

rule and shall be considered as read. All points of order 

against provisions in the bill, as amended, are waived. Notwithstanding clause 11 of rule XVIII, no further amendment 

to the bill, as amended, shall be in order except those printed 

in part B of the report of the Committee on Rules. Each further amendment may be offered only in the order printed in 

the report, may be offered only by a Member designated in 

the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for 

the time specified in the report equally divided and controlled 

by the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to 

amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division 

of the question in the House or in the Committee of the 

Whole. All points of order against such further amendments 

are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule 

XXI. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill, as amended, to the House with such further amendments as may have 

been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as 

ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage 

without intervening motion except one motion to recommit 

with or without instructions. 
3

•HRES 254 EH 

SEC. 2. During consideration in the House of H.R. 1227 

pursuant to this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of 

the previous question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the bill to a time designated by the Speaker. 

Attest:

Clerk.
No. 65110.

#### Lacy Falk *v.*United States,

protests 60/15795 and 60/7926 (New York).

*324Opinion by

Ford, *3:*

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic filaments similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Empire Brushes, Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(42 Cust. Ct. 145, C.D. 2078), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                     CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                               MARWICH II, LTD.
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     In connection with the Annual Report of Marwich II, Ltd. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael L. Schumacher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Michael Schumacher
Michael Schumacher
President, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer
May 4, 2005
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

 

          I, Robert E. Matthiessen, certify that: 

          1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of inTEST Corporation; 

          2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

          3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

          4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

        (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

        (b)  [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]; 

        (c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

        (d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

          5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors: 

        (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

        (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: August 15, 2005/s/ Robert E. Matthiessen
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          12,530
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,514
<ALLOWANCES>                                       794
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,368
<PP&E>                                           9,836
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,715
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  64,947
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,101
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           176
<OTHER-SE>                                      47,106
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    64,947
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,974
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,192
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,708
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    72
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 151
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,686)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,686)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,686)<F1>
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.27)
<FN>
<F1>Net loss includes $6.4 million gain on sale of YachtWorld
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1

Statement





Pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of Luxemburg Bancshares, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that to the knowledge of the undersigned:



(1)

the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2)

the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  May 7, 2003





/s/ John A. Slatky______________________________

John A. Slatky

Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Luxemburg Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by Luxemburg Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.  This statement accompanies the periodic report to which it relates and shall not be deemed as filed as part of the report or otherwise for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.