alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  In connection with the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-K of Liverpool Group, Inc. for the period ending March 31, 2009, I, Daniel K. Leonard, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of Liverpool Group, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:  1.Such annual report of Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.The information contained in such annual report of Form 10-K for the year ending March 31, 2009, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Liverpool Group, Inc.  Date:  October 25, 2010Liverpool Group, Inc.By: /s/   Daniel K. LeonardDaniel K. Leonard
President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer,
Principal Accounting Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors
From: jimnjune_pitts@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:36:55 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services. This is against person right s of women and against the betterment of humanity.

STOP this constitutionally illegal and faulted with SO MANY CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS - it is

communistic and sociaisticly nazisitic .

Send Obama packing and all his violaltions and his illegal butt out of the white house now. along with

every sinle criminal illegal mexican and muslim and send them all including obamaback to their own

countries mexicao and kenya and their muslim countries. NOW NOW NOW!!!!!!

+++++please cancle subscription if it is NOT free can not afford at this time

Sincerely,

James June Pitts

Oak Forest, IL 60452
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Melendez, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 989]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), rendered December 8, 1993, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second degree, grand larceny in the third degree, and grand larceny in the fourth degree (three counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

There is no merit to the defendant’s contention that certain discrepancies between the complainant’s description of her attacker and the defendant’s actual appearance necessarily render the jury verdict against the weight of the evidence. Resolution of issues of credibility and the weight to be accorded the evidence presented are questions to be determined by the jury which saw and heard the witnesses *(see, People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94). Its determination should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(see, People v Garafolo,*44 AD2d 86, 88). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence *(see,*CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant has failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that certain remarks made by the prosecutor during his summation regarding the defendant’s alibi defense were improper *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Elliot,*216 AD2d 577). In any event, the remarks in question amounted to fair comment on the evidence adduced at trial, were in response to the defense counsel’s summation, or were related to matters fairly *778inferable from the evidence *(see, People v Carpenter,*216 AD2d 313). Bracken, J. P., Santucci, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,842
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,886
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,704
<INVENTORY>                                      5,905
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,611
<PP&E>                                           9,617
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,472
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,009
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,136
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            78
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,235
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,009
<SALES>                                          3,477
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,488
<CGS>                                            2,793
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,832
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,542
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   5
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,891)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,891)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,891)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  $(0.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  $(0.24)
        

</TABLE>
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 201 3

- NM

- 0 1 7

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20 - 003 4 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JUSTIN LEE LONGTINE ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including November 13 , 2020, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 1 2020

10/01/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0034
302 CERTIFICATION

I, Betty Soumekh, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K of Excel
Global, Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;

         4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
12a-14) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and
have:

      a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing
date of this report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c)  presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

         5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: April 15, 2009             /s/Betty Soumekh
                                   ----------------------------
                                   Betty Soumekh
                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                   Chief Financial Officer
From: sportznut1@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:51:33 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Elizabeth Bartholomew

Portland, OR 97267
<PAGE>
                             LNB Bancorp, Inc.

                           Exhibit to Form 10 - K

                (for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002)

                        S - K Reference Number (21)




                      Corporate Organization Structure

                    ..............................
                    .     LNB Bancorp, Inc.      .
                    . Financial Holding Company  .
                    .    an Ohio Corporation (1) .
                    ..............................
                                  .
       .....................................................
       .                          .                        .
...................  .............................  ......................
..Charleston Title.  . The Lorain National Bank  .  .Charleston Insurance.
.. Agency, LLC.   .  . Wholly-Owned Subsidiary   ....    Agency, Inc.    .
.. 49% Owned      .  .   an Ohio Corporation (1) .  .   Wholly-owned     .
.. Ohio LLC (2)   .  .............................  .    Subsidiary      .
...................    .                       .    .Ohio Corporation(1) .
                      .                       .    ......................
                      .                       .
..................................      .................................
.. LNB Financial Services, Inc.  .      .    North Coast Community      .
..   Wholly-Owned Subsidiary     .      .   Development Corporation     .
..     an Ohio Corporation  (1)  .      .   Wholly-Owned Subsidiary     .
..         (dormant)             .      .    an Ohio Corporation   (1)  .
..................................      .................................




              (1) The physical location and legal mailing address is:

                  457 Broadway
                  Lorain, Ohio  44052

              (2) The physical location and legal mailing address is:

                  424 Middle Avenue
                  Elyria, Ohio  44035
No. 544.

#### Foti *v.*Immigration and Naturalization Service.

*James J. Catty*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Cox*for respondent.

The petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition which reads as follows:

“(1) Whether or not the Circuit Court of Appeals has jurisdiction to review the final orders of the Special Inquiry Officer authorized by the Attorney-General to be made during the course of deportation proceedings?”
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001037115
<NAME> ORBIT/FR, INC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          15,241
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,256
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,887
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                26,080
<PP&E>                                           2,651
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,364
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  28,507
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,947
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            60
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,571
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    28,507
<SALES>                                          6,298
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,298
<CGS>                                            3,437
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,437
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,838
<INCOME-TAX>                                       645
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,193
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19
        

</TABLE>
From: fhawkins@dbiservices.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:21:17 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ella Hawkins

Madison, GA 30650
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             851
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,254
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,597
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,714
<PP&E>                                           5,435
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,417
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,873
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,990
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,247)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,873
<SALES>                                         16,739
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,599
<CGS>                                            8,716
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,988
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     1
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 426
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,958)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,250)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,708)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,708)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.26)
        

</TABLE>