alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: kj.mulhern@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:53:59 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Karen Mulhern

Nokesville, VA 20181
From: byrdflock@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:52:25 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

William Byrd

, 91360-2255
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 14

- 00696

- CV
Columbia Valley Healthcare System L.P. d/b/a Valley Regional Medical Center v. Maria Zamarripa, as Guardian of the Estates of Rey Francisco Ramirez and Rammy Justin Ramirez, Minors

On a ppeal from the 44 5th District Court of Cameron County , Texas Trial Cause No. 2014

- DCL

- 00910

- I

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgme nt of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant. We further order this decision certified below for observance. August 31 , 2015.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsMicromechanics for particulate reinforced compositesA set of micromechanics equations for the analysis of particulate reinforced composites is developed using the mechanics of materials approach. Simplified equations are used to compute homogenized or equivalent thermal and mechanical properties of particulate reinforced composites in terms of the properties of the constituent materials. The microstress equations are also presented here to decompose the applied stresses on the overall composite to the microstresses in the constituent materials. The properties of a 'generic' particulate composite as well as those of a particle reinforced metal matrix composite are predicted and compared with other theories as well as some experimental data. The micromechanics predictions are in excellent agreement with the measured values.Document ID19960048664Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsMurthy, Pappu L. N.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland,OH United States)*Goldberg, Robert K.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland,OH United States)*Mital, Subodh K.*(Toledo Univ. OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1996Subject CategoryComposite MaterialsReport/Patent NumberE-10344NASA-TM-107276NAS 1.15:107276Accession Number96N33885Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 243-30-0ACONTRACT_GRANT: NAG3-1264Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19960048664.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
**Exhibit 99**

 

**First National Lincoln Corporation Declares Dividend**

 

DAMARISCOTTA, Maine--(BUSINESS WIRE) -- June 17, 2005 -- The Board of Directors of First National Lincoln Corporation (NASDAQ NM: FNLC), yesterday declared a quarterly dividend of 13.0 cents per share. This second-quarter dividend, which is payable July 29, 2005, to shareholders of record as of July 8, 2005, represents an increase of 18.2% or 2.0 cents per share over the second-quarter dividend declared in 2004 of 11.0 cents per share.

"With this increase of 0.5 cents per share over this year's first-quarter dividend of 12.5 cents per share, the Company has now raised its dividend for 39 consecutive quarters," noted Daniel R. Daigneault, FNLC's President & Chief Executive Officer. "This translates into an annual dividend of 52.0 cents per share, and based on yesterday's closing price of $16.50 per share, our dividend yield is 3.15%.

"Sharing our profits in the form of cash dividends continues to be seen by our Board of Directors as important to our Shareholders," President Daigneault went on. "I am happy to report that the merger integration for our acquisition of FNB Bankshares in the first quarter of 2005 is going well, and with the strong operating results we posted in the first quarter, we have continued the trend of increasing our dividend each quarter. For these reasons, I continue to view First National Lincoln Corporation as an extremely attractive investment alternative."

 

First National Lincoln Corporation, headquartered in Damariscotta, Maine, is the bank holding company for The First, N.A. and First Advisors. The First is an independent community bank serving Midcoast and Downeast Maine with fourteen offices in Lincoln, Knox, Hancock and Washington Counties that provide consumer and commercial banking products and services. First Advisors provides investment advisory and trust services from four offices in Damariscotta, Bar Harbor, Boothbay Harbor and Brunswick, Maine.

 

 

 

Forward-looking and cautionary statements: except for the historical information and discussions contained herein, statements contained in this release may constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements involve a number of risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially, as discussed in the company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 

 

For additional information contact F. Stephen Ward, Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer, at 207.563.3272.
Exhibit 32.1











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the amended Annual Report of Calibert Explorations, Ltd.(the "Company") on Form 10-K/A-1 for the year ended November 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, David Saltrelli, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated this 20th day of May, 2010.





DAVID SALTRELLIDavid SaltrelliChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of First China Pharmaceutical Group, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date:  December 2, 2011By:
/s/ Zhen Jiang WangName:  Zhen Jiang WangTitle:  Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 of Secure Window Blinds, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), I, Anthony Pizzacalla, Chairman, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2. The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.   /s/ Anthony Pizzacalla ------------------------------- Anthony Pizzacalla President, Secretary Treasurer, Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Director  Date: February 18, 2009
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Peter A. Huthsteiner, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 689]

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Madison County (Hum*899phreys, J.), rendered April 12, 1994, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of rape in the second degree.

Defendant confessed to having sexual intercourse with an eight-year-old girl and subsequently pleaded guilty to the crime of rape in the second degree in satisfaction of a superior court information. He was sentenced to a term of 2 to 6 years in prison. We reject defendant’s claim that the sentence imposed is harsh and excessive. The crime was heinous in nature. Moreover, as part of the plea bargain allowing defendant to plead guilty to only one count of the information, defendant agreed to leave sentencing to the discretion of County Court. Under the circumstances presented here, we find no reason to disturb the sentence imposed.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Mercure, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Before the Third Division,

January 12, 1967

No. P67/13. No. P67/14.

#### F. B. Vandergrift & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 60/31243, etc. (Philadelphia).

#### F. B. Vandegrift & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 62/12949, etc. (Philadelphia).

*860Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of calcined clay, referred to as “Molochite,” similar in all material respects to those the subject of *F. B. Vandegrift &*Co., *Inc.*v. *United States*(54 Cust. Ct. 245, C.D. 2539), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: hull0413@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:52:45 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I do not want to pay in my insurance costs and Federal taxes for contraceptives and sterilization

procedures. This is totally against my beliefs as a Citizen of the United States.

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

David Hull

Phoenix, AZ 85029
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, John Slatky, certify that:



I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Luxemburg Bancshares, Inc.;

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report on such evaluation; and

c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



Date: March 1, 2005



/s/ John Slatky

John Slatky

Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sienna Resources, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Julie Carter, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
3rd day of June, 2009.


/s/ Julie Carter
------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

      We consent to the incorporation by reference in Amendment No. 1 to the
Registration Statement [Form S-3 No. 333-6131] and related Prospectus of
Cover-All Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries for the registration of 6,591,528
shares of its common stock of our report dated March 5, 2001, with respect to
the 2000, 1999, and 1998 consolidated financial statements and schedule of
Cover-All Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries included in its Annual Report
[Form 10-K] for the year ended December 31, 2000.

      We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement [Form S-8 No. 333-44119] pertaining to the 1995 Employee Stock Option
Plan, and in the related Prospectus of Cover-All Technologies, Inc. and
subsidiaries of our report dated March 5, 2001, with respect to the 2000, 1999,
and 1998 consolidated financial statements and schedule of Cover-All
Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries included in its Annual Report [Form 10-K]
for the year ended December 31, 2000.

                                                   MOORE STEPHENS, P. C.
                                                   Certified Public Accountants.

New York, New York
March 30, 2001
CONSENT OF COUNSEL

                  We consent to the reference to our Firm under the heading
"Counsel and Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" in Post-Effective
Amendment No. 30 to the Registration Statement on Form N-1A of California Daily
Tax Free Income Fund, Inc. as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on or about April 29, 2008.

/S/ PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP
PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP


New York, New York
April 29, 2008
#### Parviz Farahzad, Appellant, v Town Board of the Town of Riverhead, Respondent.

[631 NYS2d 895]

—In an action, *inter alia,*for a judgment declaring unconstitutional section 108-169 of the Code of the Town of Riverhead, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Cohalan, J.), entered April 21,1994, which, *inter alia,*declared that section 108-169 of the Code of the Town of Riverhead is constitutional and prevents the plaintiff from erecting rental apartments in the multifamily residential, professional office district of the Town of Riverhead.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Because zoning is a legislative act, zoning ordinances and amendments enjoy a strong presumption of constitutionality, and the burden rests on the party challenging them to overcome that presumption beyond a reasonable doubt *(see, Robert E. Kurzius, Inc. v Incorporated Vil. of Upper Brookville,*51 NY2d 338, 344; *see also, Asian Ams. for Equality v Koch,*72 NY2d 121, 131).

The plaintiff has not rebutted the presumption of constitutionality attributed to section 108-169 of the Code of the Town of Riverhead (hereinafter section 108-169). The plaintiff has not established that section 108-169 was enacted for an improper purpose or that it was enacted without giving proper regard to local and regional housing needs and that it has an exclusionary effect *(see, Robert E. Kurzius, Inc. v Incorporated*
      *380
      *Vil. of Upper Brookville, supra,*at 345). Additionally, the plaintiff has not demonstrated that section 108-169 was not enacted in accordance with a properly balanced and well-ordered plan for the community or that regional needs and requirements were not considered in enacting it *(see, Berenson v Town of New Castle,*38 NY2d 102). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Balletta and Hart, JJ., concur.