alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION

I, Ori Goore, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report of Dynamic Applications Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the  issuer as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

4. The  issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as 4efined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the  issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the  issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or causedsuch internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the  issuer's disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the periodcovered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the  issuer's internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the  issuer's most recentfiscal quarter (the  issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the  issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The  issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the  issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the  issuer's board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the  issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether r not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the  issuer's internal control overfinancial reporting.

Date: April 15, 2013

/s/ Ori GooreCEO
No. 182, Misc.

#### Sneed *v.*Texas.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. Certiorari denied.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsComparison of NACA 0012 Laminar Flow Solutions: Structured and Unstructured Grid MethodsIn this paper we consider the solution of the compressible Navier-Stokes equations for a class of laminar airfoil flows. The principal objective of this paper is to demonstrate that members of this class of laminar flows have steady-state solutions. These laminar airfoil flow cases are often used to evaluate accuracy, stability and convergence of numerical solution algorithms for the Navier-Stokes equations. In recent years, such flows have also been used as test cases for high-order numerical schemes. While generally consistent steady-state solutions have been obtained for these flows using higher order schemes, a number of results have been published with various solutions, including unsteady ones. We demonstrate with two different numerical methods and a range of meshes with a maximum density that exceeds 8 × 106 grid points that steady-state solutions are obtained. Furthermore, numerical evidence is presented that even when solving the equations with an unsteady algorithm, one obtains steady-state solutions.Document ID20160003623Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsSwanson, R. C.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Langer, S.*(Deutsches Zentrum fuer Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. Cologne, Germany)*Date AcquiredMarch 22, 2016Publication DateJanuary 1, 2016Subject CategoryNumerical AnalysisFluid Mechanics And ThermodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNF1676L-21405NASA/TM-2016-219003L-20560Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 109492.02.07.01.03.01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20160003623.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
LOGO

Management Assessment

Management of Bankers Trust Company (the Company) is responsible for assessing compliance with the applicable servicing criteria set forth in Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation AB
Item 1122(d) relating to its document custodian responsibilities for the Principal Life Insurance Company Secured Notes Program (the Program) as defined in its Custodial Agreement dated November 21, 2007 (the Platform) as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2012. Accordingly, Item 1122(d) (4) (ii) is applicable to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform covered by this report. The remaining servicing criteria set forth in
Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform covered by this report.

The Companys management has assessed the effectiveness of its compliance with the applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2012. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.

Based on such assessment, the Companys management believes that, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company has complied in all material respects with the servicing criteria
set forth in Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation AB Item 1122(d)(4)(ii) relating to the servicing of the Platform.

KPMG LLP, a
registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report with respect to managements assessment of compliance with the applicable servicing criterion as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Dated this 6thday of February, 2013



|                      |  |                                                                
|--------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|BANKERS TRUST COMPANY
|                      | 
|By:                   |  | LOGO                                                           
|                      |  | Scott Eltjes                                                   
|                      |  | Senior Vice President Investment Management & Wealth Management



LOGO



453 7th Street
         P.O. Box 897          Des Moines, Iowa 50304-0897          800-362-1688     
    www.bankerstrust.com
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
Pursuant

To Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Intelsat Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies that to such officers
knowledge, the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |                                      
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|                   | 
|Date: May 15, 2008 |  | /s/ DAVID
MCGLADE                    
|                   |  | David McGlade Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of General Medical Sciences Initial Review Group; Training and Workforce Development Study Section—D.                    

*Date:*                         October 12, 2023.                    

*Time:*                         9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, Natcher Building, 45 Center Drive, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Marc Rigas, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review, National Institutes of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health,  45 Center Drive, Room 3AN18C, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, 301-827-0648,                         *marc.rigas@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.859, Biomedical Research and Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 14, 2023.

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-20244 Filed 9-18-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Source: Bureau of Land Management Corporate
Data revised for WOPR Analysis. No warranty is
made by the Bureau of Land Management as to the
accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data
for individual or aggregate use with other data.

Western Oregon Plan Revisions

Draft Environmental

’ impact Statement

LANE CO

DOUGLAS CO~

a MAP 12

Western Oregon Plan Revisions

5 0 10 15 20 25 Miles
3 os ap 25iiomete Coos Bay and Roseburg Districts
non Aatean Datu a 186 Klamath Falls Resource Area

Alternative 3
Land Use Allocations

cou Forest Excluded from
5
Oo Harvest Land Base
vu
D
Z Forest Included in
Harvest Land Base
_-_ LANE CO
DOUGLAS CO
iol)
a
5
Q
Vv
D
i}
ia
D>
oC
[aa]
sz) —
°
°
O

Land Use Allocations

Coos Bay

from Harvest
Land Base

| Forest Included

in Harvest
Land Base

Forest Excluded

COOS BAY/AND ROSEBURG
DISTRICTS MAP AREA

OREGON
CALIFORNIA

re

CURRY CO

JACKSON CO
KLAMATH CO

ae

eo
-

eo

toed
/

ro
!
rs
D4
STE
no iss
s i<
zs !o#
—£€ 1s o
& igh
<1 ©
x Ww
~
=
a
t. -: .
ws)
ovo \\
Ne TN
wo.
\,
‘,
a
ao
!
\
‘.
\,
.
a
r
!
| i}
a i
!
!
'
BF
!
!

National Land Conservation System

BLM Management Area Adjacent
to Coquille Tribal Forest Land

Administratively Withdrawn*

Riparian Management Area

General Landscape Area

BLM Office

BLM Administrative Boundary
Wild and Scenic River
Eligible Wild and Scenic River

a

i

KLAMATH FALLS
RESOURCE AREA
MAP AREA

OREGON

Klamath SYU

<t L
a4
2)
—_=
=
tyr}
jan
Forest Excluded xa}

from Harvest FE W749)

Land Base
o
vw,

| Forest Included
in Harvest
Land Base

*Includes Non-Forest in Klamath Falls Resource Area

{g7)

we - NER
vi h a or ‘ we
Falls OO
RES Q@UR CE A REA
#. : 1 ve
‘ia ve
: . .
”
. . 4
OREGON ;
CALIFORNIA

bets, s
1: “tk . rr
: ; r
a a
a X
.

KLANMBAT Bi FALLS

MO06-12-02
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0001036848
<NAME>                                         AEROCENTURY CORP.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                        1
<CASH>                                         8,603,820
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    432,850
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              64,198,130
<PP&E>                                        73,316,060
<DEPRECIATION>                                18,693,740
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                64,198,130
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         47,748,270
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           1,610
<OTHER-SE>                                    16,952,320
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  64,198,130
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               5,400,230
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3,919,880
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,496,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,480,350
<INCOME-TAX>                                     521,830
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              958,520
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     958,520
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.62



</TABLE>
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 173 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

in the One Hundred Tenth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2007 

Mr. LANTOS (for himself and Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

Foreign Affairs in the One Hundred Tenth Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Foreign Af4 fairs (hereafter in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Com5 mittee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries, there 

6 shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the House 

7 of Representatives for committee salaries and expenses, 

8 not more than $17,953,805 for the One Hundred Tenth 

9 Congress. 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HRES 173 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $8,762,228 shall be available 

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

5 noon on January 3, 2007, and ending immediately 

6 before noon on January 3, 2008; and 

7 (2) not more than $9,191,577 shall be available 

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

9 noon on January 3, 2008, and ending immediately 

10 before noon on January 3, 2009. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
EXHIBIT 12
            CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION
                                 
         COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF  PROFIT TO FIXED CHARGES
                            (Unaudited)
                       (Millions of Dollars)
                                   Three Months       Six Months
                                      Ended              Ended
                                  June     June     June     June
                                   30,      30,      30,      30,
                                  1998     1997     1998     1997
                                                                   
Net Income                        $ 25.5   $ 21.9   $ 49.3   $ 48.9
                                                                   
Add:                                                               
  Provision for income taxes        14.9     12.4     28.4     27.0
                                                                   
Deduct:                                                            
  Equity in profit of              (1.5)     (.7)    (2.2)    (1.2)
partnerships
                                                                   
Profit before taxes               $ 38.9   $ 33.6   $ 75.5   $ 74.7
                                                                   
Fixed charges:                                                     
  Interest on borrowed funds      $125.1   $ 87.8   $230.6   $167.3
  Rentals at computed interest*      1.0       .7      1.9      1.3
                                                                   
Total fixed charges                126.1   $ 88.5    232.5   $168.6
                                                                   
Profit before taxes plus fixed     165.0   $122.1    308.0   $243.3
charges
                                                                   
Ratio of profit before taxes                                       
plus                                1.31     1.38     1.32     1.44
  fixed charges to fixed charges
     
*Those portions of rent expense that are representative of interest
cost.
Exhibit 10.1  (W0558689.DOC;1)


Exhibit 10.1




Wausau Paper Corp.

2013 Equity Incentive Compensation Plan







A portion of each individual officer’s grant, referred to below as the “Retention Award,” will vest upon meeting certain criteria relating to continued employment with the Company.  The remaining portion of the grant, referred to below as the “Performance Incentive,” will vest upon meeting both performance and continued employment criteria.  The maximum potential award for the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and each of the other executive officers with segment operating responsibility is described in the “Total Opportunity” column below.





							
	 
	Performance Units Granted


	 
	Retention

Award*

	Maximum

Performance Incentive**

	Total

Opportunity


	 
	 
	 
	 

	Chief Executive Officer

	18,036

	 
	54,107

	 
	72,143

	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Chief Financial Officer

	4,995

	 
	16,649

	 
	21,644

	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Senior Vice President, Operations

	5,145

	 
	17,148

	 
	22,293

	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Senior Vice President, Paper

	5,528

	 
	18,424

	 
	23,952

	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Senior Vice President, Tissue

	4,995

	 
	16,649

	 
	21,644

	 






      *The Retention Award is a grant of performance units equal to a specified percentage of base salary, which vests and is converted to a right to receive common stock (or, in the Compensation Committee’s discretion, cash with an equivalent value) based on continuous employment with the Company (in the same position or in a position with greater authority) through January 2, 2015.

   **The Performance Incentive is a grant of performance units equal to a specified percentage of base salary.  These performance units may vest and be converted to a right to receive common stock (or, in the Compensation Committee’s discretion, cash with an equivalent value) based on (1) continuous employment with the Company (in the same position or in a position with greater authority) through January 2, 2015; and (2) the Company’s achieving levels of Return on Capital Employed (“ROCE”) ranging from 5% ROCE to 14% ROCE for the year ended December 31, 2013.  For purposes of this plan, ROCE is determined by adjusting for extraordinary items, which may include, for example, facility closure charges, one-time or incremental expenses associated with certain major capital projects, or other similar items.  ROCE is calculated after incentive compensation expenses have been included.  No shares of common stock or cash will be awarded if earnings are at the bottom of the targeted range of ROCE, and the number of shares of common stock or cash awarded will increase on a pro rata basis to the maximum potential award if ROCE is at the top of the targeted range.