alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SEAVON PIERCE,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

DONALD J. TRUMP, President,

Defendant

- Appellee. No. 16

- 16523

D.C. No. 1:16

- cv

- 01083

- LJO

- SAB

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Lawrence J. O’Neill, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 18 , 2017 **

Before: WALLACE, SILVERMAN

, and BYBEE , Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Seavon Pi erce appeals pro se from the district

court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to pay the filing

fee

, after denying Pierce’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) on the

basis that Pierce has three strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). We have jurisdiction

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously conclud es this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

DEC 28 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 16523

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Washington v. L.A. Cty. Sheriff’s

Dep’t , 833 F.3d 1048, 1054 (9th Cir. 2016). We affirm.

The district court properly denied Pierce’s motion to proceed IFP because at

the time Pierce filed the complaint, he had filed t hree actions that qualified as

strikes

, and he did not plausibly allege that he was “under imminent danger of

serious physical injury” at the time he lodged the complaint. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g);

Andrews v. Cervante s , 493 F.3d 1047, 1053 , 1055

- 56 (9th Cir. 2007) (discussing

the imminent danger exception to § 1915(g)).

We do not consider documents and facts not presented to the district court.

See United States v. Elias , 92 1 F.2d 870, 874 (9th Cir. 1990) (“Document s or facts

not presented to the district court are not part of the record on appeal.”).

Pierce’s request s for judicial notice , set forth in his opening brief and Docket

Entry Nos. 8 and 17, are denied.

AFFIRMED.
Page 1 of 1

file:///C:/Users/dmedina/AppData/Local/Temp/notesA79CA3/~1908627.gif 4/28/2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          15,410
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,418
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,930)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,135
<PP&E>                                          13,472
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,320
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  61,425
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,861
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,564
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    61,425
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                48,647
<CGS>                                           29,773
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,479
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (493)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,098)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,304)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,794)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   1,010
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,784)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.46)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Collins & Aikman Floorcoverings, Inc. (the Corporation) for the
quarterly period ended October 26, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certifies that:



| | (1)    The |  | Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | ---------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2)    The |  | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
| | ---------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

operations of the Corporation.



| |  |  |  |                                                                            
| |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| |  |  |  | /s/    EDGAR M. (MAC) BRIDGEREdgar M. (Mac) Bridger Chief Executive Officer
From: Alysia Spivey

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Access to Preventive Care and Contraception

Date: Thursday, August 18, 2011 11:06:04 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you

to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.
UNITEDSTATESENVIRONMENTALPROTECTIONAGENCYREGION4Ms.ElizabethA.DieckDirectorEnvironmentalAffairsSouthCarolinaDepartmentofHealthandEnvironmentalControl2600BullStreetColumbus,SouthCarolina29201DearMs.Dieck:ATLANTAFEDERALCENTER61FORSYTHSTREETATLANTA,GEORGIA30303-8960JUN192014OnMay7,2014,wereceivedarevisiontotheSouthCarolinaStateImplementationPlansubmittedbyyouragencyonApril30,2014.ThatrevisionpertainstoCleanAirAct(CAA)requirementsforsectionIIO(a)(2)(A-C),D(i)(II),D(ii),(E-H),and(J-M)forthe2010nitrogendioxidestandards.Wehavecompletedourreviewofthissubmissionandhavedetermined thatalloftherequiredadministrativeandtechnicalcomponentsfortheseaforementionedelementsarepresent.ConsistentwithCAAtimeframes,wewillreviewthesubmissionforapprovabilitypriortopreparingarulemakingnoticetotakeactionontherevision.Ifyouhavequestionsaboutthisletter,contactmeorLynoraeBenjamin,ChiefoftheRegulatoryDevelopmentSection,at(404)562-9040.cc:MyraReece,SCDHECMaeveMason,SCDHECSincerely,r]-<rflDirector0Air,PesticidesandTaxiesManagementDivisionInternetAddress(URL)•http://www.epagovRecycledll'lecyclable•PrintedwHhVegetableOilBasedInksonRecycledPaper(Minimum30%Pos1consumer)
I 

I 

I 

rNovember 18, 2016 

Federal Aviation Administration 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Exemption No. 10482 A 

Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2000-8190 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

Atlas Air, Inc. 

2000 Westchester Avenue 

Purchase, New Yor1< 10577-2543 

Atlas Air, Inc respectfully requests an extension to Exemption No. 10482 A. This exemption will 

expire on 31 March 2017. This exemption will allow us to substitute a qualified and authorized 

check airman in place of an FAA Inspector to observe a qualifying PIC as specified in FAR 

121.4234(c)(1 )(ii), subject to certain conditions and limitations. We respectfully request that the 

same conditions and limitations remain unchanged. 

Thank you for your consideration of this request. 

Sincerely, 

~0#---J- Michael A Giordano 

Sr. Manager Regulatory Administration 

Atlas Air, Inc. 

5600 NW 36th Street, 2nd Floor 

Miami, FL 33166 

Mike. Giordano@Atlasair.com 

Phone:786-265-5827 

02009.AiasMWOI1dwide Holdings, Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Dean
Witter Cornerstone Fund II and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      25,804,088
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  106,479<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,066,982<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,066,982<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,381,603<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,979,454
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,597,851)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,597,851)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,597,851)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include interest receivable of $94,764 and
receivable from DWR of $11,715.
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net
unrealized gain on open contracts of $1,156,415.
<F3>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $225,282, accrued
management fees of $89,781 and accrued administrative expenses of
$42,938.
<F4>Total revenue includes realized trading revenue of $1,169,107, net
change in unrealized of $(899,737) and interest income of $1,112,233.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



This certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and accompanies the Transition Report on Form 10-KT/A (the “Form 10-KT/A”)
for the six months ended June 30, 2012 of InspireMD, Inc. (the “Company”).  I, Ofir Paz, the Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify that, based on my knowledge:





|(1) | The Form 10-KT/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|(2) | The information contained in the Form 10-KT/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in this report.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Date: January 3, 2013



| |        |                                                      
| | ------ | -----------------------------------------------------
| | By:    | /s/ Ofir Paz                                         
| | Name:  | Ofir Paz                                             
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)





The foregoing certification is being
furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-K pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-KT/A for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 04017 Removed from Public (Non-CBI) Docket 1 Copyright

Flag2 File Name Description x 04017\04017_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

04017\04017_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 04017\04017_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 04017\04017_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04017\04017_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04017\04017_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04017\04017_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04017\04017_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

04017\Certification Statement Plant ID 04017.pdf Plant certification statement x 04017\Supplemental Documents\04017_Water Balance OWS JTD.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

04017\Supplemental Documents\final calaveras site map 8-2010.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04017\Telecon Documents\EPA water ICR follow-up data-questions final-1-21-2011.doc Plant submitted survey file x 04017\Telecon Documents\JT Deely - Part C-updated 1-21-2011.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04017\Telecon Documents\RE EPA Steam Questionnaire Followup 4017.rtf Plant submitted survey file x 04017\Telecon Documents\RE EPA Steam Questionnaire Followup 4017_1.rtf Plant submitted survey file

04017\04017 (00493)_Cover Letter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Exhibit 32.1 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Annual Report of Atlas Resources Public #18-2008 (A) L.P. (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Freddie M. Kotek, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|                                                                                       |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ FREDDIE M. KOTEK                                                                  |
| Freddie M. Kotek                                                                      |
| Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the General Partner |
| September 11, 2015                                                                    |
From: pgthomas8@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:39:41 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

William (and spouse) Thomas

Blytheville, AR 72315
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7953

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DAVID GARFIELD STEWART,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District

Judge. (CR-90-23-A, CA-95-1204-A)

Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: April 29, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Garfield Stewart, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Louis

Cardani, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria,

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.

Stewart, Nos. CR-90-23-A; CA-95-1204-A (E.D. Va. Oct. 24, 1995). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 23, 2020

No. 04-20-00018-CV

DICEX INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

Appellant

v.

AMIGO STAFFING, INC.,

Appellee

From the 111th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CVT001668-D2

Honorable Monica Z. Notzon, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The Appellant’s Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby 

GRANTED. The appellant’s brief is due on or before April 24, 2020.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 23rd day of March, 2020.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz,

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies that, to the best of my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 29, 2006, of Collins & Aikman Floorcoverings, Inc. (the
Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Edgar M. BridgerEdgar M. BridgerPresident and Chief Executive OfficerJune 13, 2006




/s/ Leonard F. FerroLeonard F. FerroVice President, Secretary, Treasurer &Chief Financial OfficerJune 13, 2006
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION Pursuant to
the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, or Exchange Act, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18
of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. ss.1350), James P. Panek, Chief Executive
Officer of VaxGen, Inc., or the Company, and Matthew J. Pfeffer, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certify that, to the best of
their knowledge: 1.
The
 Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
 2007, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1, or the Report,
 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and2.
The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. In Witness
Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 8th day of
November, 2007. /s/
 James P. Panek
/s/ Matthew J. PfefferChief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer This
certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated
by reference into any filing of VaxGen, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing. End
of Filing 1