alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Calibert Explorations, Ltd.(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, David
Saltrelli, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated this 15th day of March, 2010.





DAVID SALTRELLIDavid SaltrelliChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Before the Second Division,

January 8, 1969

No. P69/9.

protests 63/7699 and 65/7350 (New York).

#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc., and Ross Products, Inc. *v.*United States,

Rao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of aluminum coffee percolators and tea pots, classified as entireties with electric cords and plugs, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Silvine*Importers, *Inc.*v. *United States*(57 Cust. Ct. 362, C.D. 2821), wherein said electric cords were held to be separately dutiable, the protest was dismissed and the matter remanded to a single judge to determine the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law. (28U.S.C.,section2636(d).)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>     0001037120
<NAME>     LOOMIS, FARGO & CO
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           5,483
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,018
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,409
<INVENTORY>                                      1,203
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                47,837
<PP&E>                                          80,904
<DEPRECIATION>                                  40,069
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 205,062
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           47,276
<BONDS>                                        159,442
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                     (8,781)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   205,062
<SALES>                                         94,418
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                94,418
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   91,687
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,039
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,308)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       105
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,413)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,413)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
From: jklocke@cableone.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:19:37 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

John Klocke

Fargo, ND 58103
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

August 6, 2009 

l0720 

Order 

 

August 6, 2009 

138032 

(49) 

 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138032 

 COA: 281690 

Wayne CC: 07-005498-FH 

CORTLAND ANTONIO MILLER, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's April 28, 

2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
## UNITED STATES ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Before
KERN, ALDYCIEWICZ, and MARTIN Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES, Appellee

v. Private First Class CERION R. ALLEN United States Army, Appellant

ARMY 201 20 742

Headquarters, 82d Airborne Division Tara A. Osborn and Stephen E. Castlen

, Military Judge s Lieutenant Colonel Paul J. Cucuzzella

, Staff Judge Advocate

For Appellant: Major Vincent T. Shuler, JA; Captain Robert H. Meek, JA

.

For Appellee: Major Elisabeth A. Claus, JA

.

19 February 20 1 4

---------------------------------- SUMMARY DISPOSITION

----------------------------------

Per curiam :

Upon review of the entire record pursuant to Article 66(c), UCMJ, we note that appellant was charged with and pleaded guilty to both attempted robbery and attempted larceny (Specifications 1 and 2 of Charge I, respectively). He was also charged with and pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit larceny and conspiracy to

commit robbery (Specifications 1 and 2 of Charge II, respectivel y). * “Robbery is a compound offense consisting of assault and larceny.” United States v. Cunningham

, 19 C.M.R. 232, 233, 6 U.S.C.M.A. 106, 107 (C.M.A. 1955). “Offenses are multiplicious if one is a lesser

- included offense of the other.” United States v. Palagar , 56 M.J. 294, 296 (C.A.A.F. 2002). As a matter of logic, both appellant’s

* On appeal, appellant personally challenged the attempted larceny and conspiracy to commit larceny as multiplicious with the attempted robbery and conspiracy to commit robbery, respectively. Appellant personally raised this issue pursuant to

United States v. Grostefon , 12 M.J. 431 (C.M.A. 1982). His other personal

submissions lack merit.ALLEN

— ARMY 20120742

2

attempt to commit robbery and his conspiracy to commit robbery necessarily include an attempt to commit larceny and a conspiracy to commit larceny , respectively

.

Accor dingly, the findings of guilty of Specification 2 of Charge I and Specification 1 of Charge II are set aside, and those specifications are dismissed

. The remaining findings of guilty are AFFIRMED. Although the military judge varyingly used the terms “multiplicious for the purposes of sentencing” and “unreasonable multiplication of charges for purposes of sentencing,” the record is clear that the military judge only sentenced appellant for the grea ter offense s

. Considering the modified findings

, we find the sentence as appro ved by the convening authority is appropriate and is AFFIRMED. All rights, privileges, and property, of which appellant has been deprived by virtue of that portion of the

findi ngs set aside by this decision, are hereby ordered restored.

FOR THE COURT:

MALCOLM H. SQUIRES, JR.

Clerk of Court FOR THE COURT:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Booth Creek Ski Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



September 13, 2004



By:

/s/ GEORGE N. GILLETT, JR.George N. Gillett, Jr.Chief Executive Officer
From: aviator08@live.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:01:46 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Tim Kelley

Flagstaff, AZ 86003
#### In re Claude G. SUGG, Jr. and John A. Edmond

No. 01-1338.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

June 14, 2001.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Upon consideration of Claude G. Sugg, Jr. and John A. Edmond’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss their appeal,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion to dismiss is granted.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED   UNAUDITED  INTERIM  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  OF  BOOTH  CREEK  SKI
HOLDINGS, INC. AS OF APRIL 28, 2000 AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS THEN ENDED AND THE
SIX MONTHS THEN ENDED,  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

<S>                                                <C>            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           OCT-27-2000   OCT-27-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              OCT-30-1999   JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                APR-28-2000   APR-28-2000
<CASH>                                            617             617
<SECURITIES>                                        0               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   1,950           1,950
<ALLOWANCES>                                       88              88
<INVENTORY>                                     2,029           2,029
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               12,481          12,481
<PP&E>                                        204,279         204,279
<DEPRECIATION>                                 51,975          51,975
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                214,927         214,927
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          38,237          38,237
<BONDS>                                       133,500         133,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           1,888           1,888
<PREFERRED>                                         0               0
<COMMON>                                            0               0
<OTHER-SE>                                     38,090          38,090
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  214,927         214,927
<SALES>                                             0               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              110,129          65,415
<CGS>                                               0               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  55,952          29,474
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               24,835          12,692
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              9,716           4,656
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                19,605          18,560
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            19,605          18,560
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0               0
<CHANGES>                                           0               0
<NET-INCOME>                                   19,506          18,508
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0               0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0               0



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BJs Wholesale Club, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended August 4, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, Frank D. Forward, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the undersigneds knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                          |  |  |  |                                                 
|------------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------
|Dated: September 12, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ FRANK D. FORWARD                            
|                          |  |  |  | Frank D. Forward                                
|                          |  |  |  | Executive Vice President Chief Financial
Officer
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 183 (Friday, September 22, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 65370]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20706]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 9:00 a.m. EDT, Friday, September 29, 2023.

PLACE: Virtual meeting.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Enforcement matters. In the event that the 
time, date, or location of this meeting changes, an announcement of the 
change, along with the new time, date, and/or place of the meeting will 
be posted on the Commission's website at https://www.cftc.gov/.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Christopher Kirkpatrick, 202-418-
5964.

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

    Dated: September 20, 2023.
Robert Sidman,
Deputy Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2023-20706 Filed 9-20-23; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
From: fjanderson1@mchsi.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:37:15 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Laura Anderson

Bremen, IN 46506
# Exhibit 5

USCA Case #11-1131 Document #1330427 Filed: 09/19/2011 Page 1 of 6USCA Case #11-1131 Document #1330427 Filed: 09/19/2011 Page 2 of 6USCA Case #11-1131 Document #1330427 Filed: 09/19/2011 Page 3 of 6USCA Case #11-1131 Document #1330427 Filed: 09/19/2011 Page 4 of 6USCA Case #11-1131 Document #1330427 Filed: 09/19/2011 Page 5 of 6USCA Case #11-1131 Document #1330427 Filed: 09/19/2011 Page 6 of 6
Before the Second Division,

February 7, 1957

No. 60484.

#### Nyos, Inc. *v.*United States,

petition 7217-R (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

From the record, it appeared that the entry involved was selected for the purpose of making up a test case as to the proper value of the merchandise involved; that both the petitioner and its counsel had several conferences with the appraiser and, not being able to agree upon a value, they selected the entry herein for a test case; and that the petitioner cooperated fully with the customs officials, giving them all the information it was able to secure. Based upon the facts in the case, it was held that there was no intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was, therefore, granted.
From: bhwoods7@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:08:44 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Barbara Woods

, 38901-8011
Before the Second Division,

March 29, 1965

No. 69187.

#### B. & W. Wholesale Supply Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 63/9258 (Galveston).

Opinión by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the locks involved in this case measure 1%6 inches in width, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.