alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: save_the_children@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:21:37 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jim Best

Levittown, PA 19056
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. James Edward CLAY, Appellant.

No. 00-4017.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted May 15, 2001.

Decided June 19, 2001.

Before BOWMAN, Circuit Judge, BOGUE,1 and MAGNUSON,2 District Judges.3

1

. The Honorable Andrew W. Bogue, Senior United States District Judge for the District of South Dakota, sitting by designation.

2

. The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, sitting by designation.

3

. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(b), the Chief Judge certified the existence of a judicial emergency necessitating the designation of a panel consisting of fewer than two members of the Court of Appeals.

*449PER CURIAM.

James Edward Clay appeals his convictions for the transportation of stolen vehicles, sale or receipt of stolen vehicles as well as conspiracy to commit the same. Clay argues there was insufficient evidence to convict him. Further, he asserts the trial court erred when it did not declare a mistrial after an improper question by the prosecution and commentary by the court.

This Court has scrutinized the record thoroughly and has determined that Clay’s arguments are without merit. There was clearly sufficient evidence to support the verdict and the trial court properly gave a curative instruction after the improper question by government counsel. Under Eighth Circuit Rule 47B, no further commentary is necessary.

Accordingly, we affirm.
From: bossnasstn@juno.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:33:55 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jerry Nass

Clarksville, TN 37043
No. 565, Misc.

#### Lever Brothers Co. *v.*United States et al.

*Abe Fortos, William L. McGovern, Abe Krash*and *Dennis G. Lyons*for movant.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger*and *Lionel Kestenbaum*for the United States.

Motion for leave to file petition for writ of certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Stewart took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
EXHIBIT 4.29


 


3rd AMENDMENT TO 6% SECURED PROMISSORY
NOTE


PRINCIPAL AMOUNT $960,000DATED AUGUST
31, 2010


 


WHEREAS, on August
31, 2010 Eagleford Energy, Inc., an Ontario corporation (the “Obligor”), issued a 6% Secured Promissory Note
(the “Note”) due December 31, 2011 (the “Original Maturity Date”) in the principal amount
of $960,000 in favor of Benchmark Enterprises LLC, a Nevis limited liability corporation (the “Payee”); and


 


WHEREAS, on the 31st
day of December, 2011, the Obligor and the Payee amended the terms of the Note, to extend the Original Maturity Date
by six months and to provide for the continued accrual of interest on the outstanding principal amount of the Note during such
extension at the new rate of 10% per annum such that interest is accrued at 6% during the period from August 31, 2010 through and
including December 31, 2011 and at 10% during the period from January 1, 2012 through November 30, 2012, and as such may be accelerated
under the terms of the Note.


 


WHEREAS, on June 30,
2012, the Obligor and the Payee again amended the terms of the Note, to extend the New Maturity Date by four months
and to provide for the continued accrual of interest on the outstanding principal amount of the Note during such extension at the
amended rate of 10% per annum through the New Amended Maturity Date of November 30, 2012, and as such may be accelerated under
the terms of the Note.


 


WHEREAS the Obligor and the
Payee wish to again amend the terms of the Note, to extend the Maturity Date by another three months and to
provide for the continued accrual of interest on the outstanding principal amount of the Note during such extension at the rate
of 10% per annum through the Re Amended Maturity Date, as such term is defined below and as such may be accelerated under the terms
of the Note.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration
of the mutual promises set forth herein, the Obligor and the Payee hereby agree that: (i) the unpaid principal balance of
the Note shall be due and payable on March 1, 2013 (the “Re Amended Maturity Date”), and (ii) interest shall
continue to accrue on the unpaid principal balance of the Note at an annual rate of 10%, and shall be paid in full, together with
all previously accrued interest, on the Re Amended Maturity Date. All other terms and conditions of the Note remain unchanged.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
this Amendment has been duly executed by the Obligor and acknowledged by the Payee as of the 23rd day of November, 2012.


 


	 	EAGLEFORD ENERGY, INC.
	 	 
	 	/s/  James Cassina
	 	 	 
	 	By:	 
	 	Name:   James Cassina,   President
	 	 	 
	 	BENCHMARK ENTERPRISES LLC
	 	 
	 	/s/  Andrew Godfrey
	 	 	 
	 	By:	 
	 	Name:   Andrew Godfrey
	 	Title:     President
From: dl-spencer@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:39:28 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dean Spencer

Ankeny, IA 50021
Exhibit
      32.1





Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I,
      Lars
      Pearl, President and Chief Executive Officer of Aurora Gold Corporation (the
      “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that to my knowledge:





1.
            The
                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended
                September 30, 2007 which this certification accompanies fully complies
                with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                Exchange
                Act of 1934: and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








Date:
            November
                16, 2007
            
            BY:
            */s/
                Lars Pearl*Lars
                PearlPresident
                and Chief Executive Officer







This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
      A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
      document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
      that
      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
      required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
      by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff upon request.
No. 68887.

#### Polk’s Model Craft Hobbies, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 63/1104 and 63/9659 (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of miniature motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 66961, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<PAGE>   1


                                                            EXHIBIT 11


                           D&N CAPITAL CORPORATION
                     COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                                 (Unaudited)



Net income for primary earnings per share are computed by subtracting from the
applicable earnings the dividend requirements on preferred stock to arrive at
earnings applicable to common stock and dividing this amount by the weighted
average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    Quarter Ended             
                                                  September 30, 1997           
                                       ---------------------------------------
                                       (In thousands,except per share amounts)
<S>                                                     <C>     
                                                                
EARNINGS                                                        
Net income                                              $      861
Less: preferred stock dividend requirements                    537
Net income applicable to common stock                   $      324
                                                                
                                                                
SHARES                                                          
Weighted average number of common shares                        
 outstanding                                                31,781 
                                                                
                                                                
NET INCOME PER SHARE                                    $    10.19 
</TABLE>
Searched for **http://www.mymoney.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.mymoney.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                                           11,852
<SECURITIES>                                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                    36,652
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        668
<INVENTORY>                                                      30,026
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 84,260
<PP&E>                                                           34,080
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   15,970
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                  141,018
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            52,158
<BONDS>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                            137
<OTHER-SE>                                                     (111,428)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                    141,018
<SALES>                                                          48,556
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                 48,556
<CGS>                                                            22,842
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    22,842
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 20,965
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                4,927
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                   1,995
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        773
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                               1,222
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                      1,222
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       .14
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 34.1

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors

Genworth Life and Annuity Insurance Company:

We have examined
managements assessment, included in the accompanying Management Assessment, that Genworth Life and Annuity Insurance Company (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange
Commissions Regulation AB for the Genworth Global Funding Trusts 2005-A, 2008-1, 2008-2, 2008-3, 2008-4, 2008-5, 2008-6, 2008-7, 2008-8, 2008-9, 2008-10, 2008-11, 2008-12, 2008-13, 2008-14, 2008-15, 2008-16, 2008-17, 2008-18, 2008-19, 2008-20,
2008-21, 2008-22, 2008-23, 2008-24, 2008-25, 2008-26, 2008-27, 2008-28, 2008-29, 2008-30, 2008-31, 2008-32, 2008-33, 2008-34, 2008-35, 2008-36, 2008-37, 2008-38, 2008-39, 2008-40, 2008-41, 2008-42, 2008-43, 2008-44, 2008-45, 2008-46, 2008-47,
2008-48, and 2008-49 (collectively, the Platform), except for servicing criteria 1, 2, 3(ii), 3(iii), 3(iv), and 4, which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform, as of and
for the year ended December 31, 2008. Management is responsible for the Companys compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assessment about the Companys compliance
based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)
and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination
included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed
those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures
were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected
transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, managements assessment that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008 is
fairly stated, in all material respects.



|                  
|------------------
|/s/ KPMG LLP      
|                  
|Richmond, Virginia
|March 30, 2009
From: linjete@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:14:33 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Linda Sills

Oceanside, CA 92058