alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                    |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                    |  |  |  |  |
| Delaware                                                           |   | 001-11241 |   | 37-1105865 |
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)                     |   | (Commission File Number) |   | (IRS Employer Identification Number) |
|                                                               |   |   |   |   |
| 2120 West End Avenue, Nashville, Tennessee                         |   |   |  37203-0001 |
| (Address of principal executive offices)                           |   |   |   | (Zip Code) |
|                                                               |   |   |   |   |
| Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (615) 341-1000 |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | o | Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
|   |   |   |
|   | o | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
|   |   |   |
|   | o | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
|   |   |   |
|   | o | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |

|                                                             |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                             |  |  |
| Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: |
| Title of each class                                         | Trading Symbol(s) | Name of each exchange on which registered |
| Medium-Term Notes, Series H,3.300% Notes Due 2024           | CAT/24 | New York Stock Exchange |

----

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |
| d)     | Exhibits: |   |
|   | The following is furnished as an exhibit to this report: |
|   |   |   |   |
|   |   | 99.1 | Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation press release dated April 28, 2020 |
|   |   |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |

----

|                                 |
|---------------------------------|
|                                 |  |
| Date:  April 28, 2020 |           By:  /s/ Michael G. Sposato |
|                            |                       Michael G. Sposato |
|                            |                       Secretary |
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 138 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 138

 Recognizing the importance of Hot Springs National Park on its 175th 
                              anniversary.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2007

    Mr. Ross (for himself, Mr. Snyder, Mr. Berry, and Mr. Boozman) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                          on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing the importance of Hot Springs National Park on its 175th 
                              anniversary.

Whereas the concept in the United States of setting aside a nationally 
        significant place for the future enjoyment of its citizens was first 
        implemented 175 years ago in Hot Springs, Arkansas, with the creation of 
        the Hot Springs Reservation, which protected 47 area hot springs;
Whereas the Act that created the Hot Springs Reservation, entitled ``An Act 
        authorizing the governor of the territory of Arkansas to lease the salt 
        springs, in said territory, and for other purposes'', approved April 20, 
        1832 (4 Stat. 505), required that ``the hot springs in said territory, 
        together with four sections of land, including said springs, as near the 
        centre thereof as may be, shall be reserved for the future disposal of 
        the United States, and shall not be entered, located, or appropriated, 
        for any other purpose whatever'';
Whereas the Hot Springs Reservation was the first protected area in the Nation;
Whereas the Act creating the Hot Springs Reservation preceded both the 
        establishment of the Department of the Interior in 1849 and the 
        establishment of Yellowstone National Park as the first national park in 
        1872;
Whereas the Hot Springs Reservation was renamed Hot Springs National Park in 
        1921 and became America's 18th national park; and
Whereas the tradition of preservation and conservation that developed into the 
        National Park System, which now includes 390 units, began with the Act 
        that created the Hot Springs Reservation: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That on this 175th anniversary of the Act of Congress 
that created the Hot Springs Reservation, the House of Representatives 
recognizes the important contribution of the Hot Springs Reservation 
and Hot Springs National Park to the history of conservation in the 
United States.
                                 <all>
```
From: richross@embarqmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:29:25 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Richard Ross

Malta, OH 43758
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Robert Porter, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 205]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Cowhey, J.), rendered July 26, 1994, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

At sentencing, the defendant moved to have assigned counsel relieved on the ground that she had participated in his prosecution in two prior unrelated cases and that her current representation of him would accordingly constitute a conflict of *541interest on her part. The defendant claims on appeal that the court erred in denying the motion. We disagree.

The facts cited by the defendant do not indicate the existence of irreconcilable conflict with his assigned counsel in regard to the instant matter *(of., People v Sides,*75 NY2d 822). Moreover, the defendant’s claim is belied by his statement at the plea proceeding that he had no objection to his assigned counsel representing him in the instant matter notwithstanding her limited participation in prosecuting him on two occasions in the past. Therefore, the defendant’s representation by his assigned counsel at sentencing did not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel.

The remaining claims which the defendant raises on appeal were either waived by the general waiver of appeal rights which he executed *(see, People v Callahan,*80 NY2d 273; *People v Seaberg,*74 NY2d 1) or are unpreserved for appellate review *(see, People v Pellegrino,*60 NY2d 636). Mangano, P. J., Miller, Santucci and Hart, JJ., concur.
From: vespa@wildblue.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:49:29 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Carole Hansen

Paso Robles, CA 93446
Revised draft of Toxics Rule preamble Bill Maxwell to: Cortney_Higgins 03/15/2011 09:20 PM Bcc: Kevin Culligan, RobertJ Wayland

Cortney --

Here is a revised Toxics Rule preamble and redline vs. the 03/10/2011 version.

Thanks.

E.O.12866TheToxicsRule2060-AP-52Proposal031511. doc Redline 031511 vs. 031011.doc

Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt

Bill Maxwell Energy Strategies Group Sector Policies and Programs Division U.S. EPA Mail Code D243-01 109 T.W. Alexander Drive Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Phone: 919-541-5430 FAX: 919-541-5450
#### Arthur Young, Respondent, v. Eli Harcourt and another, Appellants.

Judgment reversed, new trim granted, and referee discharged, costs to abide event. Opinion by Learned, P. J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0001037156
<NAME>                        WNC HOUSING TAX CREDIT FUND VI L.P., SERIES 6
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                           1,290,449
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,568,449
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,638,159
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,525,165
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,638,159
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     1,808
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        3,772
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (1,964)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (1,964)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (1,964)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (1.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
No. 190.

#### Kovac *v.*Kovac.

*Walter C. Wellman*for petitioner.

Supreme Court of Illinois. Certiorari denied.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1423 

Congratulating Master Wan Ko Yee, a permanent resident of the United 

States, on the publication of his teachings and accomplishments in the 

book titled, ‘‘H.H. Dorje Chang Buddha III: A Treasury of True Buddha-Dharma’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 10, 2008 

Ms. CORRINE BROWN of Florida (for herself and Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating Master Wan Ko Yee, a permanent resident 

of the United States, on the publication of his teachings 

and accomplishments in the book titled, ‘‘H.H. Dorje 

Chang Buddha III: A Treasury of True BuddhaDharma’’. 

Whereas approximately 6,000,000 of the more than 

360,000,000 adherents of Buddhism worldwide reside in 

the United States; 

Whereas Buddhist leaders have affirmed through written 

proclamation that Master Wan Ko Yee is both an honored leader of Buddhism and the true incarnation of 

Buddha on earth; 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1423 IH 

Whereas the book ‘‘H.H. Dorje Chang Buddha III: A Treasury of True Buddha-Dharma’’, published by the International Buddhism Sangha Association, presents testimonies, recognitions, and congratulations from great 

Dharma Kings and Rinpoches around the world who proclaim Master Wan Ko Yee as the primordial Buddha, 

namely H.H. Dorje Chang Buddha III. 

Whereas copies of ‘‘H.H. Dorje Chang Buddha III: A Treasury of True Buddha-Dharma’’ have been presented to the 

Library of Congress and are being placed in Buddhist 

temples and public libraries in the United States as a reference book on Buddhism; 

Whereas in October 2003, Congress honored Master Wan Ko 

Yee by hosting an exhibition of his Yun sculpture in the 

Capitol; and 

Whereas Master Wan Ko Yee has for many years selflessly 

contributed to relieving the suffering of human beings, 

furthering world peace, and promoting spiritual enlightenment through his teachings of Buddhism: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes Master Wan Ko Yee as the true 

3 incarnation of the primordial Buddha, namely H.H. 

4 Dorje Chang Buddha III; and 

5 (2) commends him for his outstanding contribu6 tions to his community, his new country, his reli7 gion, and all human beings throughout the world. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
February 9, 1962

No. 66448.

#### Ottavia, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 304474-K, etc.

Protests abandoned January 12, 1962. (Not published.) (Initial No. 248613-K.) Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Andres FLORES-MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-51434.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Aug. 17, 2005.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr, Assistant U.S. Attorney, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Donna F. Coltharp, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

*364Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Andres Flores-Martinez (“Flores”) appeals from his 30-month prison sentence, following his guilty-plea conviction of illegally reentering the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b). Flores raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. Flores also concedes that his unpreserved challenge to his sentence under *United States v. Booker,*— U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), is meritless, because he cannot show that his “substantial rights” were affected under the standard set forth in *United States v. Mares,*402 F.3d 511, 520-21 (5th Cir.2005), *petition for cert. filed*(Mar. 31, 2005) (No. 04-9517).

The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
|                             |   | 2009 |   |   | 2008   |   |   | CHANGE |
|----------------------------------|--------|------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| Revenues*                        |   | $    | 681    |   |   | $      | 786    |   |   |   | (13 | %) |
| Profit      Before Income Taxes* |   | $    | 71     |   |   | $      | 188    |   |   |   | (62 | %) |
| Profit      After Tax            |   | $    | 51     |   |   | $      | 124    |   |   |   | (59 | %) |
| New      Retail Financing        |   | $    | 1,579  |   |   | $      | 3,474  |   |   |   | (55 | %) |
| Total      Assets                |   | $    | 32,459 |   |   | $      | 30,733 |   |   |   | 6 | %  |
No. 63281.

protest 300433-K (Philadelphia).

#### Chas. Kurz Co. *v.*United States,

*312Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk waste noils under 2-inch lengths, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER I, Matthew J. Pfeffer, certify that:1.
I have
  reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of VaxGen, Inc.2.
Based on my
  knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
  fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
  in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
  misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
Based on my
  knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
  in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
  condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
  for, the periods presented in this report;4.
The
  registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
  and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
  Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed
  such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
  and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
  information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
  subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
  particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
  [Reserved];(c)
  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
  procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
  of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
  covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d)
  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
  financial reporting that occurred during registrants most recent fiscal
  quarter (the registrants fourth quarter in the case of an annual report)
  that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
  the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and5.
The
  registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
  recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
  registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of
  directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All
  significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
  of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
  adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
  report financial information; and(b) Any
  fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
  who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
  financial reporting. February 6, 2007 /s/ Matthew J. PfefferChief Financial Officer - 1 -