alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2:  Section 906 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer





CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company") certifies that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date:  March 8, 2011
By
/s/WILLIAM M. FOSHEEChief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 23.1** **CONSENT    OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     The Board of Directors Nastech    Pharmaceutical Company Inc.:     We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration    statements    (No. 333-16507    and    No. 333-45264)    on    Forms S-2,(No. 333-44035,No. 333-59472,No. 333-62800,No. 333-72742,No. 333-108845,No. 333-111324,No. 333-119429,No. 333-127831    and    No. 333-138088)    on    Forms S-3    and    (No. 333-28785,No. 333-46214,No. 333-49514,No. 333-92206,No. 333-92222,No. 333-118206,No. 333-126905    and    No. 333-135724)    on    Forms S-8    of Nastech Pharmaceutical Company Inc. and subsidiaries of our    reports dated March 7, 2007, with respect to the    consolidated balance sheets of Nastech Pharmaceutical Company    Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2006, and    the related consolidated statements of operations,    stockholders’ equity and comprehensive loss, and cash flows    for each of the years in the three-year period ended    December 31, 2006, management’s assessment of the    effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of    December 31, 2006 and the effectiveness of internal control    over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, which    reports appear in the December 31, 2006, annual report on    Form 10-K    of Nastech Pharmaceutical Company Inc. Our report refers to a    change in the method of accounting for all stock-based awards    made to employees and directors effective January 1, 2006. /s/  KPMG    LLP     Seattle, Washington    March 7, 2007
Exhibit 32.1

                             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the annual report of H & H Imports, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Francis A. Rebello, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: May 28, 2009                      By: /s/ Francis A. Rebello
                                            ----------------------
                                        Francis A. Rebello, President
                                        (Principal Executive and Financial
                                        and Accounting Officer)
Before the First Division,

February 1, 1961

No. 65131.

#### American Import Co. and Wheeler & Miller *v.*United States,

protest 59/18900 (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Oliver, O. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beads the same in all material respects as those the subject of *United States*v. *S. H. Kress & Co.*(46 C.C.P.A. 135, C.A.D. 716), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Dean Witter
Cornerstone Fund II and is qualified in its entirety by references to such
financial instruments.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                      28,057,189
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  133,010
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              31,558,306<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                31,558,306<F2>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,604,765<F3>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,722,106
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,882,659
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,882,659
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,882,659
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net unrealized
gain on open contracts of $3,368,107.
<F2>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $134,889, accrued incentive
fees of $307,567, accrued management fees of $104,238 and common
administrative expenses payable of $81,314.
<F3>Total revenues includes realized trading revenue of $104,238, net change in
unrealized of ($947,973) and interest income of $1,471,022.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc. (the company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 29, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark S. Thompson, Chief Executive Officer of the company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/    Mark S.
Thompson

Mark S. Thompson

Chief Executive Officer

May 8, 2009
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 28, 2010

d0621 

# Order

June 28, 2010

140921 & (63) (64)(65)(66)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee/ Cross-Appellant,

v SC: 140921 COA: 287859 Branch CC: 06-108611-FH TIMOTHY ALLEN MILLER, Defendant-Appellant/ Cross-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration and the motion to
withdraw the motion to withdr aw the application are GRANTE D. The application for leave to appeal the Februa ry 16, 2010 judgment of th e Court of Appeals and the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant are cons idered. The application for leave to appeal is DENIED, because we ar e not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. It appearing to this Court that the case of People v
Smith (Docket No. 140371) is pending on appeal be fore this Court and that the decision in that case may resolve an issu e raised in the present applic ation for leave to appeal as cross-appellant, we ORDER that the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant be held in ABEYANCE pending th e decision in that case.
EXHIBIT 23.3



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE


To the Board of Directors of Chipcom Corporation

Our  audit of the  consolidated  financial  statements  of  Chipcom  Corporation
referred to in our report  dated  February 7, 1995 (which  report is included in
this  Annual  Report  on Form  10-K)  also  included  an audit of the  Financial
Statement Schedule (not presented separately herein) listed in Item 14(a) of the
Form 10-K of Chipcom  Corporation  for the year ended  December 31, 1994. In our
opinion,  this Financial  Statement  Schedule  presents fairly,  in all material
respects,  the information  set forth therein when read in conjunction  with the
related consolidated financial statements.


/s/ Price Waterhouse, LLP
-------------------------
PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
February 7, 1995
Exhibit 32.1

      Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,  Klaus  Eckhof,  President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer  of  Aurora  Gold
Corporation  (the  "Company"),  certify,  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that  to  my  knowledge:

1.   The Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-QSB of the Company for the period ended
     June  30, 2006 which this certification accompanies fully complies with the
     requirements  of  section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
     1934:  and

2.   The information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  July  24,  2006                BY:  /s/  Klaus  Eckhof
       ---------------                     ------------------
                                           Klaus  Eckhof
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer


This  certification  accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002  and  shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes  of  Section  18  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A
signed  original  of  this  written  statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears  in  typed  form within the electronic version of this written statement
required  by  Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by  the  Company  and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff  upon  request.
From: GrandmaMarlow@for-him.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:11:04 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Nancy Marlow

York, PA 17406
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16A1416. LEMONS v. THE STATE.

Appellant Robert Lemons, appearing pro se, originally was required to have

filed an enumeration of errors and brief in this Court by April 28, 2016. OCGA § 5-6-

40 and Court of Appeals Rule 23 (a). Appellant was granted an extension of time to

file his enumeration of errors and brief no later than May 9, 2016. No filing has been

made as of the date of this order. Therefore, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Rowland v. State, 264 Ga. 872 (452 SE2d 756) (1995); Whittle v. State, 210 Ga. App.

841, 842 (437 SE2d 842) (1993).

Mr. Lemons, your appeal has been DISMISSED because you failed to file a

brief and enumeration of errors. If you have decided you do not want to appeal, you

need not do anything more. If, however, you do still want to appeal, you may have

the right to an OUT-OF-TIME APPEAL -- but YOU MUST TAKE ACTION to

exercise that right by moving for an out-of-time appeal in the trial court. If your

motion for an out-of-time appeal is granted, the trial courtshould appoint an attorney

for you if you want one and cannot pay for one. If your motion for an out-of-time

appeal is denied, you may appeal that denial to this Court within thirty (30) days of

the trial court’s decision.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

07/05/2016

July 05, 2016
From: mBailey@BaileyIns.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:56:17 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

Please rescind the unjust and coercive mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be

covered by private health insurance. I object to this morally, religously, financially and constitutionally.

No Americans should be forced by the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object

to. I again urge you in the strongest way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and

sterilizations from the list of mandatory preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mike Bailey

Knoxville, TN 37922
From: huntons@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:14:31 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Luz Hunton

Vernon, NJ 07462
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001037120
<NAME> LOOMIS, FARGO & CO.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           2,962
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,958
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,107
<INVENTORY>                                        874
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,301
<PP&E>                                         110,438
<DEPRECIATION>                                  59,663
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 189,512
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,257
<BONDS>                                        133,771
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                         563
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   189,512
<SALES>                                        283,516
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               283,516
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  267,316
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,238
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,962
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,189
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,773
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,773
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
From: bigfamily@cableone.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:33:33 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kristin Girard

Bartlesville, OK 74006
No. 67505.

#### Jermi Silk, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 59/30590 (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of nylon fabrics similar in use to silk woven fabrics, bleached, not Jacquard-figured, and exceeding 30 inches in width, and the record establishing that the merchandise was withdrawn from warehouse prior to the enactment of Public Law 85-645 (T.D. 54676), effective 'September 13, 1958, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 CCP A 47, C.A.D. 727), followed.