alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 35.2**

 

**Servicer Compliance Statement ofDeere Credit Services, Inc.**

 

I, James A. Israel,President of Deere Credit Services, Inc., state:

 

A review of Deere CreditServices, Inc.’s activities for the period from April 16, 2008 (thedate of issuance of the John Deere Owner Trust 2008 transaction subject to therequirements of Regulation AB) through October 31, 2008 (the “ReportingPeriod”) and of Deere Credit Services, Inc.’s performance under the Saleand Servicing Agreement dated as of April 15, 2008 among John DeereCapital Corporation, John Deere Receivables, Inc. and John Deere OwnerTrust 2008 has been made under my supervision, and to the best of my knowledgebased on such review, Deere Credit Services, Inc. has fulfilled all itsobligations under all relevant agreements in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

 

 
| Date:  January 15, 2009 | Deere Credit Services, Inc. |
|------------------------------|----------------------------------|
|                         |                             |
|                         |                             |
|                         | By                               | /s/ James A. Israel |
|                         | James A. Israel                  |
|                         | President                        |
From: hwollman@bikerider.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:38:42 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Henry Wollman

Rocky, OK 73661
From: tfgiroir54@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:31:42 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Thomas Giroir

, 70748-3102
From: normjones@knology.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:40:17 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Norm Jones

Knoxville, TN 37923
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1500 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 26, 2008.
    Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time through the calendar day of 
September 28, 2008, for the Speaker to entertain motions that the House suspend 
the rules. The Speaker or her designee shall consult with the Minority Leader or 
his designee on the designation of any matter for consideration pursuant to this 
resolution.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
From: 9Jackie.s@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:35:12 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jackie Sullivan

Gilbert, AZ 85233
From: alt_rph@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:18:29 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

The whole "pro-choice" agenda says we women should have the right to choose. AS a woman, a small

business owner, and a human, i should have the right to "CHOOSE" NOT to pay for abortions,

contraceptives, etc. Where's MY right to choose in this whole issue?

Sincerely,

Angela Thomas

Barboursville, WV 25504
No. 69615.

#### Langfelder, Homma & Carroll, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 63/19736 (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of “vinyl Santa heads,” items 802/169 and 802/719, returned at a total weight of 306 pounds, and that said item) 802/169, in fact, weighed 1% ounces each and item 802/719 weighed one-eighth of 1 ounce each, or a total weight of 1181:%o pounds for both items, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF PIERCY, BOWLER, TAYLOR & KERN

We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated January 30,
2006, on our audit of the financial statements of Cellcom I Corp. as of
September 30, 2003 and 2002, and for the years then ended, included in this
annual 10-KSB, in the Company's registration statement on Form S-8 (File No.
33-30985).


/s/ PIERCY, BOWLER, TAYLOR & KERN
------------------------------------
Piercy Bowler Taylor & Kern
Certified Public Accountants and
Business Advisors
Las Vegas, Nevada

December 26, 2006


                                       22
Copper Compounds Subjectto Registration Review:This table lists the copper pesticidessubject to all registration review andongoing product reregistration actions, as wellas the chemical properties and uses ofthese copper compounds. This table includesupdated chemical property information listedin Table 3 and 4 of the Revised RED for Coppers (May 2009). The formulas forindividual products may vary slightly from those shown depending on manufacturing processes, molecular weight, and percent coppercalculated. Molecular weights were calculated from atomic weights as stated in the 90thedition of theCRC Press Handbook ofChemistry and Physics.RegistrationReview CaseCommon name EPA PCCodeFormula C.A.S.NumberMolecularweight(g/mol)PercentCopperConventionalUseAntimicrobialUseBasic copper sulfate 008101 3Cu(OH)2· CuSO41344-73-6 452.29 56.2% XCopperSulfates0636Copper sulfate pentahydrate 024401 CuSO4· 5H2O 7758-99-8 249.6825.45%X XBasic copper chloride008001 3 Cu(OH)2· CuCl21332-40-7 427.1359.5%XBasic copper carbonate 022901 Cu(OH)2CuCO312069-69-1 221.12 57.5 X XCopper ammonium carbonatecomplex022703 CuNH3(HCO3)233113-08-5 202.61 31.4%XCopper hydroxide 023401 Cu(OH)220427-59-2 97.56 65.1% X XCopper oxychloride or copperchloride hydroxide023501 Cu2Cl(OH)31332-65-6 213.57 59.5%XCopper oxychloride sulfate023503 Cu2Cl(OH)3+3Cu(OH)2· CuSO48012-69-9 665.8657.3%XCopper ammonium complex 022702 Cu(NH3)42+16828-95-8 131.6748.3%X024405 (C6H6O7)-2· Cu+210402-15-0 253.67 25.1% X XGroup IICopperCompounds0649Chelates of copper citrateChelates of copper gluconate024405 2(C6H11O7)-1· Cu+2527-09-3453.838 14.0% X XCuprous oxide or Copper (I)oxide025601 Cu2O 1317-39-1 143.0988.8%X XCupric oxide or Copper (II)oxide042401CuO 1317-38-0 79.545 79.9%XCopper andOxides4025Copper 022501 Cu 7440-50-8 63.546 100% XCopper salts of fatty androsin acids023104 Mixture ofcompounds9007-39-0 NA[dependson acid]% Cu;[dependson acid]XCopper ethylenediaminecomplex024407 2(C2H8N2)-1· Cu+213426-91-0 181.74 34.9%XCopper Salts4026Copper triethanolaminecomplex or Copper, ((2,2',2''-024403 (C6H13O3N)-2· Cu+282027-59-6210.71 30.2%X XRegistrationReview CaseCommon name EPA PCCodeFormula C.A.S.NumberMolecularweight(g/mol)PercentCopperConventionalUseAntimicrobialUsenitrilotris(ethanolato))(2-)-N,O,O',O'')Copperethylenediaminetetraacetate(EDTA)039105 Cu · EDTA 12276-01-6 353.7 18.0%XCopper thiocyanate 025602 N≡C–S-1Cu+11111-67-7 121.63 52.2%XCopper octanoate 023306 2(C8H15O2)-1· Cu+220543-04-8 349.95518.2%XCopper, bis(acetatoO)diamine or Copperdiammonia diacetate complex036011 Cu+2· 2(NH3) ·2(CH3CO(O-))13822-80-5 215.695 29.5%XOtherCopperCompoundsCopper ethanolaminecomplex; or Copper, bis(2-aminoethanolato-N,O)0244092(C2H6ON)-1· Cu+214215-52-2183.69634.6%XCopper Compounds with Separate Registration Review DocketsCopper HDO5106Copper HDO; or Copper,bis[1-cyclohexyl-1,2-di(hydroxyl-kappaO)diazeniumato(2-)]235500 C12H22CuN4O4312600-89-8 365.5 17.4%XCopperNaphthenate0455Copper naphthenate023102 naphthoate· Cu+2·naphthoate1338-02-9 405.89 15.6%XCopper 8-quinolinolate0454Copper 8-quinolinolate 024002C18H12CuN2O210380-28-6 351.846 18.1%X
From: edcape59@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:12:03 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

James Capers

Hartshorne, OK 74547
EX-10.75



 Exhibit 10.75 
 AMENDMENT 2 TO PROMISSORY NOTE 
 This Amendment to Promissory Note (the
“Amendment”) is entered into as of January 7, 2013 by and between eDiets.com, Inc. (“Maker”) and Kevin N. McGrath (“Holder”). 
 WHEREAS, Maker executed and delivered to Holder that certain promissory note dated November 12, 2010 (the “Original Note”), payable to the order of Holder in the original principal amount
of Two Hundred Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($200,000.00), which Original Note evidences a loan in such original principal amount made by Holder to Maker; 
 WHEREAS, by Amendment dated December 1, 2011, Maker and Holder extended the maturity date of the Original Note to December 31, 2012; and 

WHEREAS, Maker and Holder again wish to amend the Original Note to extend the maturity date thereunder, 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are
hereby acknowledged, Maker and Holder hereby agree as follows: 
 1. All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall
have the respective meanings set forth in the Original Note. 
 2. The entire outstanding principal balance of the Original
Note, together with all accrued and unpaid interest and charges thereon, shall be due and payable on June 30, 2013. 
 3.
Except as otherwise provided in this Amendment, all terms and provisions of the Original Note shall remain in full force and effect. 
 4. This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Illinois. 
 5. This Amendment shall bind and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and to their respective successors and assigns. 
 6. This Amendment may not be changed orally. 
 7. This Amendment may be executed
in multiple counterparts, and may be delivered by facsimile or other form of electronic transmission. Each counterpart, when so executed and delivered, shall be deemed an original, and all counterparts shall together constitute one and the same
instrument. 
 [REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Maker and Holder have duly executed this Amendment as of the day and year first above
written. 
  

									
	HOLDER:	 		 	MAKER:
			
		 		 	EDIETS.COM, INC.
				
	 /s/ Kevin N. McGrath
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Kevin A Richardson, II

	KEVIN N. MCGRATH	 		 		 	Name:	 	Kevin A. Richardson, II
		 		 		 	Title:	 	Chairman
| **U.S.         Department of Labor****Employment         & Training Administration*****www.doleta.gov*****Search:** |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
No. 60472.

#### Gallagher & Ascher Company *v.*United States,

protest 292517-K/ 8334 (Chicago).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of vellum the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstracts 57385 and 58987, the claim for free entry under paragraph 1736 was sustained.
#### John Mullin, Respondent, v. Belle Van Dyke, Appellant.

Judgment of the County Court of Oneida county affirmed, with costs. Opinion hy

Hardin, P. J.
EXHIBIT 32.2



inTEST CORPORATION



In connection with the Quarterly Report of inTEST Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Hugh T. Regan, Jr., Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date:	November 14, 2007

/s/ Hugh T. Regan, Jr.
Hugh T. Regan, Jr.
Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of




Rampart Studios

, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, G.J. de Klerk, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ G.J. de KlerkG.J. de Klerk
Principal Financial Officer 


April 19, 2013