alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: mjm1usa@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:36:07 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Michael McDermott

Dublin, CA 94568
No. P66/155. —

No. P66/156. —

#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States, protest 63/9421 (San Diego). L. Batlin & Son, Inc. *v.*United States, protest 65/3733 (New York).

LaNdis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *W. Kay Company, Inc.*v. *United States*(53 Cust. Ct. 130, C.D. 2484), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 99.3


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Booth Creek Ski Holdings,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 2, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned, as the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

    1.  The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
        Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operations  of the
        Company.


September 13, 2002


                                        By:          /s/ ELIZABETH J. COLE
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                                         Elizabeth J. Cole
                                                    Executive Vice President and
                                                      Chief Financial Officer
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Gregory Allen MILTON, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 05-6215.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 27, 2005.

Decided: July 28, 2005.

Gregory Allen Milton, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Jack Bondurant, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before LUTTIG, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

*107Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Gregory A. Milton seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying as successive his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion seeking reconsideration of the court’s order denying relief on his motion for post-conviction relief filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000), denying his motion to alter or amend judgment, and denying his motion for additional findings. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000); *Jones v. Braxton,*392 F.3d 683, 688 (4th Cir.2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find both that the district court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. *Miller-El v. Cockrell,*537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003); *Slack v. McDaniel,*529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); *Rose v. Lee,*252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir.2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Milton has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Milton’s motions to place his appeal in abeyance as moot, deny Milton’s motion requesting leave to file a supplemental informal brief, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal.

Additionally, we construe Milton’s notice of appeal and informal brief on appeal as an application to file a second or successive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. *United States v. Winestock,*340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir.2003). In order to obtain authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims based on either: (1) a new rule of constitutional law, previously unavailable, made retroactive by the Supreme Court to cases on collateral review; or (2) newly discovered evidence that would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that no reasonable factfinder would have found the petitioner guilty of the offense. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(2), 2255 (2000). Milton’s claims do not satisfy either of these conditions. Therefore, we deny authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThermal Expansion Behavior of Hot-Pressed Engineered MatricesAdvanced engineered matrix composites (EMCs) require that the coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) of the engineered matrix (EM) matches those of the fiber reinforcements as closely as possible in order to reduce thermal compatibility strains during heating and cooling of the composites. The present paper proposes a general concept for designing suitable matrices for long fiber reinforced composites using a rule of mixtures (ROM) approach to minimize the global differences in the thermal expansion mismatches between the fibers and the engineered matrix. Proof-of-concept studies were conducted to demonstrate the validity of the concept.Document ID20160001712Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsRaj, S. V.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredFebruary 10, 2016Publication DateFebruary 1, 2016Subject CategoryComposite MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2016-218953GRC-E-DAA-TN28720E-19195Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 10949.02.03.02.02.01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Keywordsengineered matrixcoefficient of thermal expansionsilicon carbidesilicon nitrideengineered matrix compositessilicidesAvailable DownloadsNameType20160001712.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 99.2

Statement





Pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of Luxemburg Bancshares, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that:



(1)

the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2)

the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  November 13, 2002





/s/ Sheri L. Knope

Sheri L. Knope

Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
No. 61464.

#### Robinson Import Export Corp. and Victory Shipping Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 283308-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of playpens which are, in fact, commonly and commercially known as furniture, other than chairs, composed wholly or in chief value of wood, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Before the First Division,

August 21, 1961

No. 65967.

#### A. & P. Import Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 58/1218, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of valances similar in all material respects to those the subject of *D. N. & E. Walter & Co. et al.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 26, C.D. 2098), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 59672.—Suit 4842.

#### United States *v.*Antonio Pompeo.

C. D. 1669 affirmed November 4, 1955. C. A. D. 602.
From: rlosdon@windstream.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:01:53 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Rhonda Logsdon

Sonora, KY 42776
From: jfonline03@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:17:17 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

John Finkell

Columbus, OH 43085
Rose

River Loop Trail

Rose

R vi er Fire Road

Observation

Point

*

* Horses are allowed only on yellow-blazed fire roads and trails.

Leave No Trace Preservation through education: building awareness, appreciation, and most of all, respect for our public recreation places.

Park Information recording: (540) 999-3500 

www.nps.gov/shen

National Park Service Shenandoah National Park U.S. Department of the Interior

01/13

Park Emergency Number (800) 732-0911

Big Meadows

Road and Trail Map

Dark Hollow Falls Trail – 1.4 miles round trip; very steep; 70' waterfall. 

Pets are not allowed.

Story of the Forest Trail – 1.8-mile easy circuit that passes through forest and 

connects with paved walkway. From the Byrd Visitor Center front exit: turn right, 

follow sidewalk to trail entrance. At paved walkway turn left to return to visitor 

center, or to avoid pavement, retrace steps. Pets are not allowed.

Lewis Falls Trail – 3.3-mile circuit from amphitheater to observation point, returning 

via Appalachian Trail, or 2 miles round trip from Skyline Drive. 81’ waterfall. 

Moderate with steep, rocky areas; one stream crossing. 

Rose River Loop Trail – 4-mile circuit from Fishers Gap. Moderate, shady trail with 

stream, cascades, waterfall.

Note: Round trip hikes proceed to a destination and return by the same route. Circuit 

hikes begin and end at the same point without retracing steps.

You’ll find these trail markers

at all trailheads and intersections. 

The metal bands are stamped 

with directional and mileage 

information.

You’ll find these trail markers

at all trailheads and intersections.

The metal bands are stamped

with directional and mileage 

information.
Second dump site reported in Divide County

APRIL 24, 2014 11:09 AM • BY LAUREN DONOVAN

BISMARCK, N.D. — Even as a contract company cleaned up an illegal filter sock dump site

in Noonan, county officials were investigating reports of another dump location revealed by

melted snow.

Divide County Emergency Manager Jody Gunlock said county personnel were contacted

Wednesday morning about a dump site three miles north of Crosby, where a dozen garbage

cans and about two dozen garbage bags containing the low-level radioactive filter socks

were discovered.

The socks are used to filter oil well fluids and concentrate naturally occurring radiation. They

are banned for disposal in North Dakota.

Gunlock said the cans and bags full of the socks were found at two locations on the same

rural site. He said the owner purchased the property at a sheriff's sale earlier this year and

didn't know of the socks until he went back to the property after the snow was gone.

Gunlock said the actual radioactive level is very low and the dumped filters do not present a

health hazard unless ingested or inhaled.

"It's still an environmental mess," he said.

Scott Radig, waste division manager for the North Dakota Health Department, said the state

will look into the situation and in absence of being able to find a responsible party, will take

over cleanup, like it did at Noonan.

He said the rural Crosby waste is a much smaller quantity than was discovered in late

February in an abandoned gas station in Noonan and cleaned up with state funds because

the building owner is a criminal fugitive from Wyoming. Radig said the rural Crosby waste

has a radioactive level of about five times normal background.

Radig said once the filter socks were removed, radiological surveys taken at the Noonan

gas station late Wednesday found one area of a slightly elevated radioactivity. He said

samples will be analyzed to see if soil at the building exceeds the state's 5 picocuries

threshold and whether any additional cleanup is required.
Exhibit 10.3(a)
 AMENDMENT TO MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
  1.
    
    Effective October 1, 2000, the text of Section 3(a) of the Agreement shall be deleted and the
following added in its place:In consideration of as and as compensation for all of the services to be rendered by the
Advisor to the Partnership under this Agreement, the Partnership shall pay the Advisor (i)
an incentive fee payable quarterly equal to 20% of New Trading Profits (as such term is
defined below) earned by the Advisor of the Partnership and (ii) a monthly fee for
professional management services equal to 1/6 of 1% (2% per year) of the month end Net
Assets of the Partnership allocated to the Advisor.
 2.
    
    Except as specifically amended hereby, all the terms of the Agreement shall remain unchanged.
All terms and conditions related to the services to be rendered by the Advisor as expressed
in the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect after adoption of this amendment and
shall apply in full measure to the provision of such services, the sole purpose of this
amendment being to institute the change in compensation described herein.
 SMITH BARNEY FUTURES MANAGEMENT, INC.
 By:
    
    /s/ David J. VogelIts:SMITH BARNEY WESTPORT FUTURES FUND, L.P.By: Smith Barney Futures Management, Inc.By:
    
    /s/ David J. VogelIts:JOHN W. HENRY & COMPANY, INC.By:
    
    /s/ John W. HenryIts:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           6,727
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           8,867
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 2,225
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     10,120
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          24,599
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            24,067
<LOANS>                                        236,150
<ALLOWANCE>                                        756
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 302,897
<DEPOSITS>                                     267,250
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,573
<LONG-TERM>                                      8,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,632
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,442
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 302,897
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 13,346
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,123
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   899
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                15,368
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               8,479
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,850
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,518
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       82
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,564
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,439
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         950
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       950
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .36
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.18
<LOANS-NON>                                        187
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   678
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       22
<RECOVERIES>                                        14
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  756
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            756



</TABLE>