alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350
of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of UCI Medical Affiliates, Inc. (UCI), that, to his knowledge, the Annual
Report of UCI on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of UCI. This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-K. A signed original of this statement has been provided to
UCI and will be retained by UCI and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                        |  |  |  |                                                     
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: December 28, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ D. Michael Stout, M.D.                          
|                        |  |  |  | D. Michael Stout, M.D.                              
|                        |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer               
|                        |  | 
|                        |  |  |  | /s/ Joseph A. Boyle, CPA                            
|                        |  |  |  | Joseph A. Boyle, CPA                                
|                        |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
No. 60477.

#### Louis Weinberg Associates, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 289249-K and 292987-K (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of hoods the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *United States*v. *Accurate Millinery Co., Roberts, Reilly & Sons, et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 229, C. A. D. 599), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
In The Matter Of: JETTECH, LLC Respondent 

### SERVED: May 10, 2016
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC
) ) ) ) ) DocketNo. FAA-2013-1079 Case No. 2012NM030058 ' - .. -.

**~**

ORDER SETTING DISCOVERY DEADLINE AND PREHEARING CONFERENCE

On April 4, 2016, the undersignedjudge issued an OrderDirecting the Parties to Meet and Confer Regarding Litigation and Scheduling Issues inthe above captioned case. On May 4, 2016, the parties submitted ajointreport to the undersignedjudge reporting on the results oftheir meeting. In the report, the parties proposed discoverybe completedby July 5, 2016, and that a telephonic prehearing conference be held on July 20, 2016.
Pursuantto 

### 14 C.P.R.§ 13.205(a)(l), (7), and (8), 

### itis hereby ORDERED: 1. The parties shall conClude all discovery by

### July 5, 2016. 2. Theparties shall appear by telephone for a prehearing conference withthe undersigned judge on

### July 20,2016 at 1pm Eastern time. 3. The parties shall access the conference by dialing telephone number 888-204-5984 and then inputting access code 6392406 whenprompted. 4. During the conference, the parties shall be prepared to discuss the issues in dispute, the litigation schedule, the status ofany settlement negotiations, and any otherrelated matters.



# :;~RAWALD Administrative LawJudge

Attachment: Service ListSERVICE LIST 

### DocketNo. FAA-2013-1079 (Civil Penalty Action)

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001



### John R. "Rob" Irwin, President 

### JETTECH, LLC, Respondent 

### 11757 W. Ken Caryl Avenue, F-503 Littleton, CO 80127 TEL: 303-697-4262 FAX: 303-697-8080 ONE COPY



### Michael L. 

### Poindexter, Respondent's Counsel 

### Law Offices ofMichael L. 

### Poindexter 2132 Montane Drive E. Golden, CO 80401 TEL: 303-526-1980 FAX: 303-526-1981 Kyle E. Lomazow, Complainant's Counsel 

### Office ofRegional Counsel, Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. Renton, WA 98057 TEL: 425-227-1847 FAX: 425-227-1007 The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald,Administrative LawJudge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
P. 1 

# OAR Box 1802 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# 34 ) IV-E-2

9 Docket Number: 

# A-90-3 7

Printed 11/4/200811:57:59 AM

Sheet 34 of 117P. 2

Date : 12/8/9 8 A n __ To : Ai r an d Radiatio n Docke

t #A-90-3 7 / /

) //( / /

TT

T —^ " _

"2^ ^ From : David Solomon , EPA' s Offic e o f Ai r Qualit y plannin g an

d Standard s (MD-12 ) Re : Cal l wit h Henr y Nicke l O n 12/8/9 8 ther

e wa s aconferenc e call betwee n Mr . Henr

y Nicke l representin g th e Utilit y Ai r Regulator y Group , Jo n Devine o f

EPA' s Offic

e o f Genera l Counsel an

d myself . Henr y Nicke l ha

d calle d wit

h th e utilities ' reactio n t

o th e pape r tha t EP A ha d sen t to UAR G o n 12/4/9 8 which attempte d t o summariz e the kind s o f "efficiency " improvement s utilitie s migh t make , an d to se t out wha t informatio n EP

A fel t wa s lackin g to bette

r demonstrat

e th e environmenta

l impact s o f

suc h projects . M

r Nicke l fel t tha t most , i f no t all , change s a

t autilit y unit would i n som e wa y increas e th e unit' s overall efficienc y an d tha t an y chang e which restore d los t efficiency , regardles s o f

it s effec t o n actua l emissions , shoul d b e exclude d fro mNSR , possibl y a s aroutin e change . However , h e als o pointe d ou

t tha t i t woul d b e virtually impossibl e to identify , quantif

y o r enforc e expecte d systemi c environmenta l effects ~ to th e exten

t tha t the y exis t - - o f individua l change s to utilit

y units . Th

e call conclude d wit

h Mr . Nicke l indicatin g tha t h e wil l ge t bac k to EP A on whethe

r th e issue s discusse d would b e better_addressed-as-par t o f a pendin g effor

t t o reevaluat

e th e basi c NS R program . cc : Pa mSmith , (MD-12 ) Jon Devine , OG

C -H, s AI R DOCKE T
Before the Second Division,

November 17, 1965

No. 69616.

#### Stone & Downer Co. *v.*United States,

protest 61/21145 (Boston).

Opinion by

Rao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of machines for making paper or paper pulp and parts thereof, which parts are dedicated to use on or for the foregoing machines, and are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Bird Machine Company*v. *United States*(51 CCPA 42, C.A.D. 835), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IV 

House Calendar No. 276 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1501 

[Report No. 110–884] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 7060) to amend the Internal 

Revenue Code of 1986 to provide incentives for energy production and 

conservation, to extend certain expiring provisions, to provide individual 

income tax relief, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2008 

Mr. ARCURI, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 7060) to amend 

the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide incentives 

for energy production and conservation, to extend certain 

expiring provisions, to provide individual income tax relief, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

3 7060) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 

4 provide incentives for energy production and conservation, 

5 to extend certain expiring provisions, to provide individual 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1501 RH 

1 income tax relief, and for other purposes. All points of 

2 order against consideration of the bill are waived except 

3 those arising under clause 10 of rule XXI. The bill shall 

4 be considered as read. All points of order against the bill 

5 are waived. The previous question shall be considered as 

6 ordered on the bill to final passage without intervening 

7 motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and 

8 controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member 

9 of the Committee on Ways and Means; and (2) one motion 

10 to recommit. 

11 SEC. 2. During consideration of H.R. 7060 pursuant 

12 to this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the 

13 previous question, the Chair may postpone further consid14 eration of the bill to such time as may be designated by 

15 the Speaker. 

16 SEC. 3. House Resolution 1489 is laid on the table. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS

hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 276 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1501 

[Report No. 110–884] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 7060) 

other purposes. to provide individual income tax relief, and for servation, to extend certain expiring provisions, provide incentives for energy production and conto amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2008 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
No. 63770.

protest 58/10165 (Los Angeles).

#### De Luca Importing Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the facts and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(31 C.C.P.A. 112, C.A.D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited, it was held that duty and internal revenue tax are not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protest was sustained to this extent.
July 28, 1959

No. 63273.

protests 58/15868 and 58/15869.

#### Servicised Products Corporation *v.*United States,

Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
#            

# CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (R)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

Registration No.  333-109182

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  529                                                                   Trade Date:  01/24/05

(To Prospectus Supplement dated November 6, 2003 &

  Prospectus dated October 15,2003)                                                              Issue Date:   01/27/05

The Date of this Pricing SupplementJanuary 24, 2005

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

 CUSIP                                                                                                                                   Date and terms of redemption or

     or       Stated                                                                   Interest                                       repayment (includingany

Common  Interest                      Price to  Discounts &        Payment     Survivors                  applicable regular or special

  Code      Rate (1)   Maturity  Public (2) Commissions       Frequency       Option  Yes/No     record dates)

14911QYA3  4.00%         07/15/10        100%                1.10%              Semi-Annually               YES         NO                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               

                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

Principal                                                                                 1st Payment             Day         

Amount                  Proceeds                  Dealer                           Date                   Count

$1,823,000.00         $1,802,947.00         ABN AMRO Inc.        07/15/05               30/360    

Original Issue DiscountNote:                                                                          Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes                X   No                                                                                  N/A

The interest rates on the PowerNotes (R) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (R) offered prior to the effective date of the change.  Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $288.417 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (R) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (R) will be made under the Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated October 15,2003.

Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
Before the Second Division,

September 24, 1962

No. 67064.

protests 61/20748, etc. (New York).

#### Manca, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of barix batteries which are, in fact, lead-acid type storage batteries, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 169 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require that the 

lists of earmarks be made available to the general public on the Internet. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2007 

Mr. MOORE of Kansas (for himself, Mr. BACHUS, Mrs. BOYDA of Kansas, Mr. 

CLEAVER, Mr. LINCOLN DAVIS of Tennessee, Mr. DOGGETT, Mrs. 

GILLIBRAND, Mr. GILLMOR, Ms. HERSETH, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, 

Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Mr. KIND, Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York, Mr. 

MEEK of Florida, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mrs. MYRICK, Mr. RAMSTAD, 

Mr. SALAZAR, Mr. SHAYS, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, and Mr. PATRICK J. MURPHY of Pennsylvania) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to 

require that the lists of earmarks be made available 

to the general public on the Internet. 

1 Resolved, That clause 9 of rule XXI of the Rules of 

2 the House of Representatives is amended as follows: 

3 (1) in paragraph (a)(1), by inserting ‘‘, which 

4 shall be made available on the Internet in a search5 able format to the general public for at least 48 

6 hours before consideration,’’ after ‘‘a list’’; 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HRES 169 IH 

1 (2) in paragraph (a)(2), by inserting ‘‘, which 

2 shall be made available on the Internet in a search3 able format to the general public for at least 48 

4 hours before consideration,’’ after ‘‘a list’’; and 

5 (3) in paragraph (a)(4), by inserting ‘‘, which 

6 shall be made available on the Internet in a search7 able format to the general public for at least 48 

8 hours before consideration,’’ after ‘‘a list’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
From: mprybyla@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:18:04 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Marianne Prybyla

Round Rock, TX 78665
From: turtleday55@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:07:10 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Roberta Metzger

Columbia City, IN 46725
MEMORANDUM

DATE: 7/29/15

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Do cket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: Matt Clouse, EPA

SUBJECT: 7/27/15, SEIA Call Regarding Proposed Clea n Power Plan for Existing Power

Plants

SUMMARY

A call was held between EPA and the attendees liste d below on 8/1/14 to discuss the proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plant s. The Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014.

ATTENDEES

Matt Clouse, OAP, EPA Howard Hoffman, OGC EPA Rick Umoff, SEIA Justin Baca, SEIA
From: pawhite@satx.rr.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:26:34 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Patricia What

, 78266-2060