alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc. (the company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 28, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark S. Thompson, Chief Executive Officer of the company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Mark S. Thompson   
|Mark S. Thompson       
|Chief Executive Officer
|May 7, 2010
From: jmlandxtwriter@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:42:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients." If you do not reverse course, I ask you to expand conscience protections

for any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections.

I strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans - especially for drugs

and devices that I oppose - because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jeanette Land

North Palm Beach, FL 33408
***EXHIBIT32.1***

** **

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

** **

In connection with the reporton Form 10-Q/A of WWA Group, Inc. for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, EricMontandon, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuantto §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledgeand belief:

 

(1)  This report fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

(2)  The information contained in thisreport fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition ofthe registrant at the end of the period covered by this report and results ofoperations of the registrant for the period covered by this report.

 

 

Date: November 14, 2011

 

 

/s/ Eric Montandon

Eric Montandon

Chief Executive Officer 

 

 

This certification accompaniesthis report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemedfiled by the registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by referenceinto any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of thisreport), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in suchfiling.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by §906 has been provided to the registrant and willbe retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 17 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 17

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that there should 
  be established a National Inflammatory Skin Disease Awareness Month.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2007

Mrs. Jo Ann Davis of Virginia submitted the following resolution; which 
    was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that there should 
  be established a National Inflammatory Skin Disease Awareness Month.

Whereas inflammatory skin diseases affect men, women, and children of all ages 
        and races;
Whereas these diseases can be very distressing to those who have them, causing 
        great discomfort and emotional stress;
Whereas inflammatory skin diseases include a wide range of symptoms and a broad 
        category of skin conditions, including eczema, acne, poison ivy, contact 
        dermatitis, and psoriasis, among others;
Whereas inflammatory skin disease affects citizens across the United States;
Whereas it is essential to educate the public on the symptoms, treatments, and 
        cures related to inflammatory skin diseases; and
Whereas December would be an appropriate month to establish a National 
        Inflammatory Skin Disease Awareness Month: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that there should be established a National Inflammatory Skin Disease 
Awareness Month.
                                 <all>
```
# GULFPORT ENERGY CORP

FORM 10-K (Annual Report)



## Filed 03/01/13 for the Period Ending 12/31/12

Address 14313 NORTH MAY AVENUE SUITE 100 OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73134 Telephone 4058488807 CIK 0000874499 Symbol GPOR SIC Code 1311 - Crude Petroleum and Natural Gas Industry Oil & Gas Operations Sector Energy Fiscal Year 12/31

http://www.edgar-online.com © Copyright 2013, EDGAR Online, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Distribution and use of this document restricted under EDGAR Online, Inc. Terms of Use.
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE 

OF MARYLAND * COURT OF APPEALS

* OF MARYLAND

*

v. *

* Misc. Docket AG 

* No. 47

JAMES KEVIN REED * September Term, 2019

 

ORDER

UPON CONSIDERATION of the Joint Petition for Disbarment by Consent filed 

pursuant to Maryland Rule 19-736 by the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland 

and the Respondent, James Kevin Reed, wherein the Respondent acknowledges that 

sufficient evidence exists to establish he violated Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of 

Professional Conduct (MARPC) 1.4 (Md. Rule 19-301.4), 1.15(a) & (d) (Md. Rule 19-

301.15), 8.1(a) & (b) (Md. Rule 19-308.1) and 8.4(a)(b)(c) & (d) (Md. Rule 19-308.4), 

Maryland Rules 19-407(a) and 19-410, and § 10-306 of the Business Occupations and 

Professions Article of the Maryland Code, it is this 24th day of October, 2019,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that James Kevin Reed, is hereby 

disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Maryland, effective immediately; and it 

is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of James Kevin Reed 

from the register of attorneys in this Court, notify the Respondent of such action, and 

comply with the notice provisions of Maryland Rule 19-761(b).

/s/ Robert N. McDonald

Senior Judge
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2011-NM-120-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
No. 66463.

#### Florea & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 61/13879 (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issue is the same in all material respects as that the subject of *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), and the record showing that the merchandise consists of nylon gloves similar in use to silk gloves, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Smith Barney Westport Futures Fund L.P. (the ‘‘Partnership’’) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Jennifer Magro, Chief Financial Officer and Director of Citigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

/s/ Jennifer MagroJennifer MagroCitigroup Managed Futures LLCChief Financial Officer and Director


Date: May 15, 2008

---
1 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont 

____________________ 

NO. 09-17-00478-CV 

____________________ 

IN THE ESTATE OF ALMA S. MARTIN 

________________________________________________________________________ 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law 

Polk County, Texas 

Trial Cause No. 09783

________________________________________________________________________ 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

The appellants, Neal Eichelman, as Independent Administrator of the Estate 

of Alma S. Martin, Jessie Eichelman, and Phillip Joseph Martin, filed a motion to 

dismiss this appeal. The motion is voluntarily made by the appellants prior to any 

decision of this Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). No other party filed a notice 

of appeal. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. 

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

 

_________________________________ 

 CHARLES KREGER 

 Justice 
2 

Submitted on June 13, 2018 

Opinion Delivered June 14, 2018 

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
u.s. Deportment of Transportallon Federal AvloHon Admlnls1TaHon 

### MAY 2 6 2010
Mr. Charles E. Bannister Chairman Airport Compliance and Field Operations

Owinnett County Board ofCommissioners 75 Langley Drive Lawrenceville, GA 30046 Dear Mr. Bannister: 800 Independence Ave., SIN. Washington, DC 20591

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is pleased to infonn you that your preliminary application for Gwinnett County Airport Briscoe Field's (LZU) participation in the Airport Privatization Pilot Program is accepted for further review. The application is designated as FAA Docket Number 2010-0473 . and it can be viewed at www.regulations.gov.Gwinnett County (the County) may select a private operator, negotiate an agreement and submit a final application. April 26, 2010 is noted as the filing date ofthis preliminary application. This was the FAA's date of receipt ofthe preliminary application. Our acceptance ofthis preliminary application for review is contingent on the County's continued compliance with the procedural requirements ofTitle 49 U.S.C
. § 47134. The final application, when submitted, must include a title search ofall federally obligated property and all financial terms ofthe transaction identified in the FAA 's Notice of.final applicalionprocedures for lhe Airport PriValization 

### Pilot Program, Application Procedures, 62 Federal Register 48693

-48708 (September 16, 1997) (Notice) (as modified, 62 FR 63211, November 26,1997). Ifthe FAA approves the final application for Gwinnett County Airport Briscoe Field's participation in the Pilot Program, Owinnett County Airport Briscoe Field will qualify as the Pilot Program 's general aviation airport required by Title 49 U
.S
.C
. §47134. Ifyou have any questions, please contact Kevin Willis, Airport Compliance Officer at 202-267

-8741. Thank you. Sincerely,

Randall S
. Fiertz Director ofAirport Compliance

and Field Operations
cc: Emory Geiger, Gwinnett County Airport Authority
UNITEDSTATESENVIRONMENTALPROTECTIONAGENCYREGIONIXAIRDIVISIONTechnicalSupportDocumentforEPA’sDirectFinalRulemakingfortheCaliforniaStateImplementationPlanSantaBarbaraCountyAirPollutionControlDistrictRule102,DefinitionsPreparedby:CynthiaG.AllenReviewedby:AndrewSteckelOctober31,2012-2-AGENCY:SantaBarbaraCountyAirPollutionControlDistrict(SBCAPCD)SIPApprovedRule:Rule102—DefinitionsAdopted—01/20/11Submitted—06/21/11EPAApproved—May4,2012(77FR26448)SubjectofthisTSD:Rule102—DefinitionsAmended—June21,2012Submitted—September21,2012RULESUMMARY-SBCAPCDRule102,Definitions,definestermsusedintheirdistrictrulebook.Rule102submittedonJune21,2011,isamendedbyaddingandrevisingdefinitionstoimproveruleclarity.TheDistrictaddedandmodifiedseveralsolvent-relatedandsurface-coatingdefinitionsthatareusedinvariouspartsoftherulebook.Thedefinitionofreactiveorganiccomoundwasupdatedtoincludemostoftheexemptcompoundslistedin40CFR50.100(s)andanexemptcompounddefinitionwasadded.Rule102,submittedSeptember21,2012,wasamendedbyaddingand/ormodifyingseveraldefinitionsthatareusedinvariouspartsoftherulebooktoimproveruleclarity.Reviseddefinitionsincludethefollowing:•ReactiveOrganicCompound-Newdefinitionsincludethefollowing:•AerosolProduct•AvionicEquipment•CaptureEfficiency•CarbonAdsorber•CatalyticIncinerator•ControlDevice•ControlDeviceEfficiency•ElectronicComponents•ElectrostaticSpray•EnclosedCleaningSystem•ExemptCompound•FluidSystem•FluorinatedGases•GramsofReactiveOrganicCompoundPerLiterofMaterial•High-PrecisionOptics•NaturalDraftOpening•OperatingParameterValue•OverallEfficiency•PhotoresistCoating•ReactiveOrganicCompoundCompositePartialPressure•ScientificInstrument•SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrictMethod303-91,DeterminationofExemptCompounds,August1996•SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrictMethod313-91,DeterminationofVolatileOrganicCompoundsbyGasChromatography-MassSpectrométry,June1993•SpaceVehicle•TemporaryTotalEnclosure•ThermalIncinerator•TotalEnclosure•TransferEfficiency•WasteSolventResidueTheSantaBarbaraCountyAPCDdoesnotanticipateanyemissionchangesoranysignificantimpactstoregulatedsourcesortheAPCDresultingfromtheamendmentstoRule102.EPAEvaluationTherewillbenoeffectonairpollutionemissionsfromRule102sincethechangesaremostlyadministrative.EPAisrecommendingapprovalofSantaBarbaraCountyAPCDRule102undersection110(k)asmeetingtherequirementsofsection110(a)andPartDoftheCleanAirAct,asamendedin1990.Attachments1.SubmittedRule102,Definitions(amendedJune21,2012).2.SIPApprovedRule102(adoptedJanuary20,2011).3.Strikeout/underlineversionofRule102(amendedJune21,2012).
January 9, 1958

No. 61461.

#### General Systems Service, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 263497-K.—

Plaintiff’s application for rehearing denied.
From: duffisr@auburn.edu

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:15:42 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sheila Duffield

Dadeville, AL 36853
From: mszos@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:00:07 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Michael & Anne Szostak

Lansing, MI 48917
|  |   |
|--|--------|

| For                the Period: 2/11/2008 to 2/19/2008 |
|-------------------------------------------------------|

| Coupon | Interest                           | Maturity | Callable   | Survivor'sOption | Price1 | Yield2 | Moody's | S&P | CUSIP     |
|--------|------------------------------------|----------|------------|------------------|--------|--------|---------|---------|-----------|
| 4.000% | Semi-Annual(†††) | 8/15/13  | NO         | YES§        | 100.00 | 4.000% | A2      | A       | 14912HJG6 |
| 5.000% | Semi-Annual(†††) | 2/15/18  | 2/15/10*** | YES§        | 100.00 | 5.000% | A2      | A       | 14912HJH4 |
| 5.400% | Semi-Annual(†††) | 2/15/23  | 2/15/11*** | YES§        | 100.00 | 5.400% | A2      | A       | 14912HJJ0 |
| 5.550% | Monthly(†)                   | 2/15/28  | 2/15/12*   | YES§        | 100.00 | 5.615% | A2      | A       | 14912HJK7 |
Exhibit
      32.1


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
      connection with the quarterly report of Cybertel Capital Corp. (the
      "Registrant") on
      Form
      10-QSB for the year ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
      A.
      Wheeler, CEO, President and director of the Registrant, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.




Cybertel
                Capital Corp.Date: August
                21, 2006
            By:
            /s/ James
                A. WheelerPresident,
                CEO and director
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that
the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 of
Flurida Group, Inc. (the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Flurida
      Group, Inc.Dated:4/7/2009
              By:
              /s/ Jianfeng
      DingJianfeng
      DingChief
      Executive Officer





A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to Flurida Group, Inc. and will be retained
by Flurida Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.