alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

**REQUIRED BY RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14 UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE**

**ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED**

I, J. Michael French, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of MDRNA, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting tobe designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; 

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date:March 23, 2010
SERVED: DECEMBER 26, 2013 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

ENDLESS MOUNTAINS AIR, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO: [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA- 2013-0848 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2012EA50008) has been assigned to 

Administrative Law Judge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other 

persons on the attached Service List. 

~e~~~ by~~ ,Mt·y AJv•r 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence A venue, S. W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

William J. Dobitsch, Jr 

Endless Mountains Air, Inc., Respondent 

Seamans Airport 

727 Windsock Lane 

Factoryville, P A 18419 

ONE COPY 

Zachary M. Berman, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of Regional Counsel 

Eastern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

. TE:C: 718-553-3258. 

FAX: 718-995-5699 

Hon. J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. F AA-2013-0848 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-
From: ritabaker@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:21:14 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Rita Baker

Hastings, MN 55033
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                     304,389,000
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         502,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                           170,185,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                             9,766,000
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                623,133,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                     798,705,000
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                       802,627,000
<LOANS>                                  1,477,472,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                 19,779,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           2,897,635,000
<DEPOSITS>                               2,383,784,000
<SHORT-TERM>                               202,119,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         31,481,000
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        95,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 280,156,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>           2,897,635,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                            122,445,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                           52,290,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                             9,793,000
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                           184,528,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          82,097,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          92,677,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       91,851,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                9,565,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                           2,693,000
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                            111,455,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             32,098,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                  27,662,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                27,662,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    2.790
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    2.790
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.92
<LOANS-NON>                                  6,811,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                 4,415,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               628,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 13,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                            16,483,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                7,252,000
<RECOVERIES>                                   983,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                           19,779,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                        19,779,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
From: j.l.buechley@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:29:57 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jerri Lynn Buechley

Glide, OR 97443
From: thompde@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:10:59 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

David Thompson

Lafayette, LA 70503
Exhibit 32.1 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted), James P. Panek,
Chief Executive Officer of VaxGen, Inc. (the Company), and Matthew J.
Pfeffer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certify that, to
the best of their knowledge: 1. The Companys Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005, to which this
Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, and 2. The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company. In Witness Whereof, the undersigned
have set their hands hereto as of the 30th day of May, 2007. /s/ James
  P. Panek

/s/ Matthew J. PfefferChief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer This certification accompanies the
Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing
of VaxGen, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the
Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in
such filing. End of Filing 1
Before the First Division,

August 17, 1959

No. 63299.

protest 299193-K (San Francisco).

#### Harry H. Behrendt and Harper, Robinson & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that merchandise identified as “Kiel spratts” is the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Arnold Sorensin Co., Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 199, C.D. 1862), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Case No. 8,774.

#### McDONNELL v. RAILROAD CO.

[Cited in Hopkins v. St. Paul & P. R. Co., Case No. 6.(190. Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible.]
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

38 40 42



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 07/07 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 07 Jul 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.81 N 76.74 WMeters AGL
EHIBIT 23.1


                           CHANG G. PARK, CPA, PH. D.
      2667 CAMINO DEL RIO SOUTH PLAZA B, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92108-3707O
         TELEPHONE (858) 722-5953 FAX (858) 761-0341 FAX (858) 433-2979
                           E-MAIL changgpark@gmail.com
________________________________________________________________________________



September 17, 2009





TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:


The firm of Chang G.  Park,  CPA  consents  to the  inclusion  of our  report of
September 4, 2009 on the audited financial statements of Lifestyle Choice Meals,
Inc. as of June 30, 2009 and 2008 in any filings  that are  necessary  now or in
the near future with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.











Very truly yours,


/s/ CHANG G. PARK
__________________
Chang G. Park, CPA



        MEMBER OF THE CALIFORNIA SOCIETY OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
          REGISTERED WITH THE PUBLIC COMPANY ACCOUNTING OVERSIGHT BOARD
From: jbuschman@ipapilot.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:55:02 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jeff Buschman

, 40056-9181
#### Frederick Turner, Appellant, v. The Chateaugay Ore Company, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Fish, J.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 13, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 62770]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19694]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 176 / Wednesday, September 13, 2023 / 
Notices

[[Page 62770]]



AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT


Background Investigator Quality Control Survey

AGENCY: Agency for International Development (USAID).

ACTION: Availability of survey.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Quality control survey to allow the USAID Office of Security 
Field Investigations program to obtain feedback on its background 
investigator workforce from members of the general public who are 
interviewed by USAID background investigators.

DATES: Comments are due within 60 days after date of publication in the 
Federal Register.

ADDRESSES: USAID, SEC/FI, 1300 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, 4th Floor, 
Washington, DC 20523.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Shemonsky, (202) 712-1734, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a4c6d7ccc1c9cbcad7cfdde4d1d7c5cdc08ac3cbd2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6b0918030e0604051800122b1e180a020f450c041d">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: USAID currently conducts this quality 
control process via U.S. Mail and telephone calls. The agency is 
seeking to both modernize and simplify this process.

Brian Shemonsky,
Background Investigations Program Manager.
[FR Doc. 2023-19694 Filed 9-12-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6116-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 [Nos. 333-02567, 333-44119 and 333-86616] pertaining to the 1995
Employee Stock Option Plan and the 1994 Stock Option Plan for Independent
Directors, all as amended, and in the related Prospectus of Cover-All
Technologies Inc. and subsidiary of our report dated March 27, 2007, with
respect to the 2006, 2005 and 2004 consolidated financial statements and
schedule of Cover-All Technologies Inc. and subsidiary included in its Annual
Report [Form 10-K] for the year ended December 31, 2006.








                                                    /s/ Moore Stephens, P.C.
                                                    ------------------------
                                                    MOORE STEPHENS, P. C.
                                                    Certified Public Accountants

New York, New York
April 2, 2007
No. 65968.

#### Firmenich, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/22775, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issue herein is the same as that involved in *United States*v. *Dodge & Olcott, Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 100, C.A.D. 737), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 62724.

#### Manca, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 326955-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of machines for determining the strength of articles or materials in compression, shear, tension, or torsion, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.