alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1


 


IceWEB, Inc.


AMENDMENT NO. 1


TO


ICEWEB, INC.


2012 EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN


 


WHEREAS, On
August 28, 2012, IceWEB, Inc. (the “Company”), adopted the 2012 Equity Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) covering
20,000,000 shares of Common Stock;


 


WHEREAS, the
Company desires to amend the Plan to further increase the authorized number of shares of Common Stock included within the Plan;


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
the Company hereby amends the Plan as follows:


 


		1.	Section 4 of the Plan entitled “Shares Subject
to Plan” is hereby amended so that the maximum aggregate number of shares which may be issued under the Plan shall be 75,000,000
shares of Common Stock.



 


	 	2.  	Except as modified herein, the terms and conditions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.


 


Executed this 17th
day of January, 2013.


 





	 	ICEWEB, INC.	 
	 	 	 	 
		By:	/s/ Robert M. Howe III	 
	 		Robert M. Howe III, CEO	 
	 	 		 
	 	 	 	 


 





Notary:


 


Subscribed and sworn before me this 17th day
of January, 2013.


 


/s/ My Le Phuong


Notary Public


 


My Commission Expires May 31, 2013 








 


 






    	1
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Wayne T. Byrne, Chief Financial Officer of AGY Holding Corp., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of AGY Holding Corp. (the Registrant);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of
Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                             
|-----------------------------
|Date: March 25, 2009         
|                             
|/s/ Wayne T. Byrne           
|Wayne T. Byrne               
|Chief Financial Officer      
|(Principal Financial Officer)
From: Jeremy Martin <JMartin@ucsusa.org>

To: Dallas Burkholder/AA/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 09/03/2012 10:40 AM

Subject: Extension request on EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0632

Dear Mr. Burkholder,

I would like to request an extension to the public comment period for the waiver request (EPA–HQ–

OAR–2012–0632). I need more time to develop analysis and comments on this matter. Please let me 

know if any additional information is requested. 

Regards,

Jeremy

Jeremy I. Martin, Ph.D., Senior Scientist

Clean Vehicles Program, Union of Concerned Scientists

1825 K Street NW, Suite 800, Washington DC 20006-1232

(202) 331-6946
(R.D. 11412)

#### Parsons & Whittemore, Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided December 5, 1967)

*Sharp, Bolter & Hutchison*for the plaintiff.

*Edwin L. Weisl, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court:

1. That the subject merchandise consists of hardboard exported from Sweden as to which the Secretary of the Treasury issued a finding of dumping, published in 89 TD 197, TD 53567, made pursuant to the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C., 160, et seq.).

2. That pursuant to Section 168 of said Antidumping Act, the appraiser reported the purchase price (Sec. 162) and the foreign market value (Sec. 164) as to the merchandise listed on Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof.

3. That pursuant to Sections 500 and 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, the appraiser appraised all of the merchandise in the appeals for appraisement enumerated on Schedule A for regular duty purposes.

*7834. That the plaintiff duly filed appeals for reappraisement as to the values referred to in the above paragraphs Nos. 2 and 3.

5. That at the times relevant herein the purchase price and the foreign market value under said Antidumping Act are as specified in the aforesaid Schedule A attached hereto.

6. That as to all other items of merchandise not identified on Schedule A, the appraiser’s reports of purchase price and of foreign market value are correct.

7. That the appraiser’s findings of value under the provisions of Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, are correct.

8. That said appeals are submitted for decision upon this stipulation and said Schedule A.

Upon the agreed facts, I find foreign market value, as defined in section 164 of the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C. § 164), for the merchandise described in schedule A, annexed to this decision and made a part hereof, and the purchase price thereof, within section 162 of said act (19 U.S.C. § 162), to be as indicated in said schedule. As to all other items of merchandise not identified in schedule A, I find the foreign market values and purchase prices to be as reported by the appraiser. In all other respects, the values of all merchandise are as returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
From: everestranch@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:15:32 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Judith Bigley

Riverside, CA 92503
No. 69195.

#### America-Asia Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 62/1875, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Hibachis similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 67238, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 245 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 27, 2008.
Whereas Diwali, a festival of great significance to Indian Americans and South 
        Asian Americans, is celebrated annually by Hindus, Sikhs, and Jains 
        throughout the United States;
Whereas there are nearly 2,000,000 Hindus in the United States, of which 
        approximately 1,250,000 are of Indian and South Asian origin;
Whereas the word ``Diwali'' is a shortened version of the Sanskrit term 
        ``Deepavali'', which means ``a row of lamps'';
Whereas Diwali is a festival of lights, during which celebrants light small oil 
        lamps, place them around the home, and pray for health, knowledge, and 
        peace;
Whereas celebrants of Diwali believe that the rows of lamps symbolize the light 
        within the individual that rids the soul of the darkness of ignorance;
Whereas Diwali, falling on the last day of the last month in the lunar calendar, 
        is celebrated as a day of thanksgiving and the beginning of the new year 
        for many Hindus;
Whereas for Hindus, Diwali is a celebration of the victory of good over evil;
Whereas for Sikhs, Diwali is feted as the day that the sixth founding Sikh Guru, 
        or revered teacher, Guru Hargobind, was released from captivity by the 
        Mughal Emperor Jehangir; and
Whereas for Jains, Diwali marks the anniversary of the attainment of moksha or 
        liberation by Mahavira, the last of the Tirthankaras, who were the great 
        teachers of Jain dharma, at the end of his life in 527 B.C.: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the religious and historical significance of the 
        festival of Diwali; and
            (2) requests the President to issue a proclamation recognizing 
        Diwali.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Insight Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul J. Pucino, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operation of the Company.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|                                                    
|/s/ Paul J. Pucino                                  
|Paul J. Pucino                                      
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|November 9, 2006                                    

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Digital Insight and will be retained by Digital Insight and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 181 (Wednesday, September 20, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 64902]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20358]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2639-028]


Northern States Power Company--Wisconsin; Notice of Waiver Period 
for Water Quality Certification Application

    On September 11, 2023, Northern States Power Company--Wisconsin 
submitted to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) a 
copy of its application for a Clean Water Act section 401(a)(1) water 
quality certification filed with the Wisconsin Department of Natural 
Resources (Wisconsin DNR), in conjunction with the above captioned 
project. Pursuant to section 401 of the Clean Water Act \1\ and section 
4.34(b)(5) of the Commission's regulations,\2\ a State certifying 
agency is deemed to have waived its certifying authority if it fails or 
refuses to act on a certification request within a reasonable period of 
time, which is one year after the date the certification request was 
received. Accordingly, we hereby notify Wisconsin DNR of the following:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 33 U.S.C. 1341(a)(1).
    \2\ 18 CFR 4.34(b)(5) (2022).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Date of Receipt of the Certification Request: September 11, 2023.
    Reasonable Period of Time to Act on the Certification Request: One 
year (September 11, 2024).
    If Wisconsin DNR fails or refuses to act on the water quality 
certification request on or before the above date, then the agency 
certifying authority is deemed waived pursuant to section 401(a)(1) of 
the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341(a)(1).

    Dated: September 14, 2023.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-20358 Filed 9-19-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS
13
- 19
- 00303
- CV El Pistolon II, Ltd. v. Levinson Alcoser Associates, L.P. and Levinson Associates, Inc. On Appeal from the 398th District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. C
- 1976
- 18
- I
JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appell ee s
. We further order this decision certified below for observance. May 13, 2021
Exhibit 32.3


                                  CERTIFICATION


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Booth Creek Ski Holdings, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 1, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, as the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

September 12, 2003


                                        By:/s/ ELIZABETH J. COLE
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                               Elizabeth J. Cole
                                          Executive Vice President and
                                           Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting: correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         that was originally published on September 13, 2023, the time for this meeting is being changed to 3:30 p.m. Eastern Time. All other meeting details remain unchanged. This meeting will be held via teleconference.                    

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, October 10, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ann Tabat at 1-888-912-1227 or (602) 636-9143.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app. (1988) that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Tax Forms and Publications Project Committee will be held Tuesday, October 10, 2023, at 3:30 p.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be made with Ann Tabat. For more information, please contact Ann Tabat at 1-888-912-1227 or (602) 636-9143, or write TAP Office, 4041 N Central Ave., Phoenix, AZ 85012 or contact us at the website:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*                     The agenda will include a committee discussion involving 57139 Digital Assets/Cryptocurrency; and 64919 Decedent and Trust forms and publications.                

Dated: September 19, 2023.

Kevin Brown,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2023-20609 Filed 9-21-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 172 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Transportation 

and Infrastructure in the One Hundred Tenth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2007 

Mr. OBERSTAR (for himself and Mr. MICA) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

Transportation and Infrastructure in the One Hundred 

Tenth Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Transportation 

4 and Infrastructure (hereafter in this resolution referred 

5 to as the ‘‘Committee’’), including the expenses of all staff 

6 salaries, there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts 

7 of the House of Representatives for committee salaries 

8 and expenses, not more than $19,724,511.24 for the One 

9 Hundred Tenth Congress. 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HRES 172 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $9,528,749.39 shall be avail4 able for expenses incurred during the period begin5 ning at noon on January 3, 2007, and ending imme6 diately before noon on January 3, 2008; and 

7 (2) not more than $10,195,761.85 shall be 

8 available for expenses incurred during the period be9 ginning at noon on January 3, 2008, and ending im10 mediately before noon on January 3, 2009. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
From: iamskid@cwi-va.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:38:32 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Karen Heatwole

Harrisonburg, VA 22801