alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: hlabosier@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:19:18 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Helen Labosier

Charlton, MA 01507
From: mewolff11@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:00:47 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Marian Wolff

Tucson, AZ 85711
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
consolidated financial statements for the nine months ended March 31, 2000 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         176,667
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     22,805
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,913,602
<PP&E>                                         174,408
<DEPRECIATION>                                  61,971
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,731,808
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          553,274
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,862
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,543,612
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,731,808
<SALES>                                        170,590
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               170,590
<CGS>                                           56,902
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   56,902
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,905,550
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,791,338)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,791,338)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.26)



</TABLE>
Before The Third Division,

November 9, 1965

No. 69614.

#### Gimbel Bros., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 64/5145, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 CCPA 15, C.A.D. 458), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 10.4


 


 



PROMISSORY
NOTE


 


August
2, 2012$ 35,000.00


 


 


Whereas
Charles M. Basner, (“Lender”), having an address of 10 Orchard Blossom Rd., Windham, NH 03087, has loaned $ 35,000.00
to Kenergy Scientific, Inc., formerly SpeechSwitch, Inc. (“Borrower”), a New Jersey corporation, having an address
of 6 Minneakoning Rd., Flemington, NJ 08822 on this 2nd day of August, 2012, receipt of which is acknowledged;


 


Now,
Therefore, the parties agree as follows:


 


Borrower
shall pay Lender the full sum of $ 35,000.00, plus 7 % per annum interest on or before February 2, 2013. In the event that Borrower
fails to make payment in full on that date, then this Note shall automatically become a default instrument and Lender may take
whatever action he may elect to recover his loss, including legal action, with continuing accrual of 7 % per annum interest, and
attorney’s fees.






 













	Date:Auguat
  2, 2012	Kenergy Scientific, Inc.(formerly
SpeechSwitch, Inc.)
	 	By: /s/ Kenneth Glynn
	 	Kenneth Glynn
Chief
Executive Officer
Memorandum· 

U.S. Department of 

Transportation 

Office of the Secretary 

of Transportation 

Subject: 

From: 

To: 

Notice of Communication in Docket: Date: 

DOT-OST-OST-2013-0072 

2013/2014 U.S.-Brazil Combination Frequency 

·Proceeding 

Secretary Ray LaHood 

Chief, Dockets 

In accordance with D artment rules (14 CF Part 300), I am reporting the following 

communication. 

On April19, 2013, during a telephone conversation with Mayor Antonio 

Villaraigosa of Los Angeles, the Mayor raised the subject of the Department's 

proceeding to allocate new frequencies between the U.S. and Brazil. The Mayor 

expressed his support for American Airlines' application to provide daily service 

between Los Angeles and Sao Paulo beginning in November, 2013. 

I informed the Mayor that, while I appreciated his interest in this case, I could not 

comment on its merits because the proceeding was under active consideration by 

the Department. 

Please place this memorandum in the appropriate Docket. 

cc: Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa
Exhibit 31.1
                                                                    ------------


                  CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                  ---------------------------------------------


I, Robert M. Bernstein,  the Chief Executive  Officer of Material  Technologies,
Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Material  Technologies,
Inc.;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of,
and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for  establishing  and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
procedures  (as defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and  15d-15(e)) for the
issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating  to  the  issuer,   including  its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)  Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  issuer's  disclosure  controls  and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures,  as of a date within 90 days prior to
the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

(c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of
the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based upon my  evaluation  as of the
evaluation date;

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial  reporting,  to the  issuer's  auditors  and the  audit  committee  of
issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All  significant  deficiencies  or  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely to adversely  affect the issuer's ability to record,  process,  summarize
and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees  who have a  significant  role in the issuer's  internal  control over
financial reporting.



Date:  May 9, 2005                                /s/ ROBERT M. BERNSTEIN
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Material Technologies, Inc.
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATION



I, Sheri Knope, certify that:



I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Luxemburg Bancshares, Inc.;

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report on such evaluation; and

c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.



Date:

March 1, 2005





/s/ Sheri Knope

Sheri Knope

Chief Financial Officer
Order entered January 12, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00297-CR

KIRK STEVEN JACKSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F13-70153-Y

ORDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s 

brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and 

recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether 

appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the 

trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 

(Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is 

ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which 

may include appointment of new counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include 

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this 

order.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The 

appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are 

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE
COMPANY'S 1995 10K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          43,600
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,876,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                    57,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                         650,600
<DEPRECIATION>                                 213,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,422,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                      2,727,100<F2>
<COMMON>                                       325,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     278,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,422,100
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               611,800
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  163,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,800
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                42,800
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             298,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                103,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                    38,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             65,200
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    65,200
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>THE COMPANY IS A CAPTIVE FINANCE SUBSIDIARY WHICH DOES NOT
HAVE A CLASSIFIED
BALANCE SHEET.
<F2>INCLUDES CURRENT AND NONCURRENT MATURITIES OF LONG-TERM DEBT.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
I would like to amend the Conditions and Limitations of my Airworthiness Certification.

1. Please add my new UAV (DJI Inspire 1, as noted in previous comment)
13. Requesting that the PIC is required to pass the written exam only of either sport, recreational, private, commercial, or airline transport license. The PIC will not be in the UA during flight. To make up the flying portion of the license, the PIC will undergo 20 hours of flight time during dedicated training sessions with a UAV in accord ance with 14 CFR § 91.119. I have attached the flight test.
26. Requesting that we are able to operate within the 500 feet of moving cars. We may operate the UAV by a road with moving cars and it is not feasible to obtain permission from them. To make up for this we will have property and liability insurance. Also we will edit any cars/people out of the photo/video if they are in it. If we see anything unsafe or potential problems we will immediately cease all operations until they can be rectified.
From: sharondickerson01@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:17:15 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sharon Dickerson

Telford, PA 18969