alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: gary@rushcreekbiblechurch.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:52:30 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am thoroughly disappointed with the way the current administration has run rough-shod over the

wishes and moral convictions of many Americans. I hope you will listen to the comments from people

in the religious community who are asking for a degree of fairness toward moral and spiritual

convictions which guide many of us. Those same convictions have motivated many churches and

denominations to be in the forefront of health care and relief for those who are suffering.

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Gary Leyendecker

Byron Center, MI 49315
EXHIBIT 32.2



inTEST CORPORATION



In connection with the Quarterly Report of inTEST Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Hugh T. Regan, Jr., Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
Date:	November 15, 2004

/s/ Hugh T. Regan, Jr.
Hugh T. Regan, Jr.
Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 4.41

 

Summary in English of the TVI Merger Agreement

 

Corporativo Vasco de Quiroga, S.A. de C.V. (“CVQ”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Grupo Televisa, S.A.B., entered into a merger agreement with Grupo TVI Telecom, S.A. de C.V. (“GTVI”), owner of 38.77% of the equity interest of Televisión Internacional, S.A. de C.V. (“TVI”) (the “Merger Agreement”), notarized pursuant to public deed number 56,102 dated March 4, 2016, granted before Patricio Garza Bandala, notary public number 18 of Mexico City.

 

A.            Merger

 

Upon effectiveness of the merger, GTVI merged into CVQ and ceased to exist; CVQ assumed all the assets, liabilities and equity of GTVI, including any and all rights and obligations of GTVI. The merger was approved based on the financial statements of both CVQ and GTVI as of January 31, 2016, which were approved by the shareholders of both companies.

 

B.            Effectiveness of the merger

 

Given that CVQ agreed to pay any liability by any of the creditors of GTVI, pursuant to article 225 of the General Companies Law the merger is fully effective (i) between CVQ and GTVI and for any fiscal, accounting and financial matter, on the date of the Merger Agreement, and (ii) with respect to third-parties, once the merger is registered in the Public Registry of Commerce of Monterrey and Mexico City, respectively.

 

C.            Liabilities of Merged Companies

 

CVQ assumed all liabilities of GTVI at the time of the merger. Such liabilities will be paid by CVQ pursuant to their original terms.

 

D.            Effects of the Merger

 

As a result of the merger:

 

a)             GTVI ceased to exist and all of its assets, including 38.77% of the equity interest of TVI, are now owned by CVQ.

 

b)             CVQ acknowledged all agreements, of any nature, executed by GTVI, and has assumed all the obligations therewith.

 

c)              Each of the shareholders of GTVI became minority shareholders of CVQ. The shareholders of GTVI received Series “B” shares of the capital stock of CVQ.

 

After the merger, the shareholders of TVI are CVQ and Cable TV Internacional, S.A. de C.V.
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|   | Title of Each Class of | Maximum Aggregate | Amount of |   |   |
|   | Securities Offered | Offering Price(1) | Registration Fee(2) |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | 1.400% PowerNotes® | Due June 15, 2020 | $2,099,000 | $211.37 |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | 1.700% PowerNotes® | Due June 15, 2022 | $1,985,000 | $199.89 |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | TOTAL |   |   | $411.26 |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |

|     |                                    |
|-----|------------------------------------|
| (1) | Excludes accrued interest, if any. |

|     |                                                                             |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | Calculated in accordance with Rule 457(r) under the Securities Act of 1933. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | CUSIP | Aggregate |   | Selling | Gross |   | Net | Coupon | Coupon |   | Coupon |   | Maturity |   | 1st Coupon |   | 1st | Survivor's | Product |   |   |
|   | Number | Principal |   | Price | Concession |   | Proceeds | Type | Rate |   | Frequency |   | Date |   | Date |   | Coupon | Option | Ranking |   |   |
|   |   | Amount |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Amount |   |   |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | 14912HSC5 | $2,099,000.00 |   | 100% | 0.950% |   | $2,079,059.50 | Fixed | 1.400% |   | Semi- |   | 06/15/2020 |   | 12/15/2016 |   | $6.69 | Yes | Senior Unsecured |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Annual |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Notes |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | CUSIP |   | Aggregate | Selling |   | Gross | Net | Coupon |   | Coupon | Coupon | Maturity | 1st Coupon |   | 1st |   | Survivor's |   | Product |   |   |
|   | Number |   | Principal | Price |   | Concession | Proceeds | Type |   | Rate | Frequency | Date | Date |   | Coupon |   | Option |   | Ranking |   |   |
|   |   |   | Amount |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Amount |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | 14912HSD3 |   | $1,985,000.00 | 100% |   | 1.350% | $1,958,202.50 | Fixed |   | 1.700% | Semi- | 06/15/2022 | 12/15/2016 |   | $8.12 |   | Yes |   | Senior Unsecured |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Annual |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Notes |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0001036500
<NAME>                        WNC Housing Tax Credit Fund VI, L.P., Series 5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Apr-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Jun-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                           2,560,603
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       38,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,599,203
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  27,253,806
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,404,611
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    27,253,806
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    47,112
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      166,077
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   118,965
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (278,267)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (278,267)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (278,267)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0




</TABLE>
H. Res. 1490 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 25, 2008. 

Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule 

XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to the House 

is waived with respect to any resolution reported on any legislative day through September 27, 2008, providing for consideration or disposition of a measure to provide incentives for 

energy production and conservation, to extend certain expiring provisions, to provide individual income tax relief, and for 

other purposes. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
### 1



### Assessing	the	Effect	of	Five	Gasoline	Properties	on	Exhaust	Emissions	from	Light ****

**Duty	Vehicles	certified	to	Tier -**  **2	Standards Analysis**  **of	Data	from	EPA	Phase	3 (EPAct/V2/E**  **- 89)**  

## Appendix **N .4**  **Model	Fitting	Information	for** 

## Ethan **ol (Bag	2)** 

This appendix summarizes model fitting for Bag-2 Ethanol . Model - fitting techniques and approaches summarized in Section 8 .7. Features of the data and modeling for this compound are listed below. Fuel -parameter matrix: REDUCED Media contamination: NO No. measurements: 6 3 No. censored values: 24 Modeling approach: TOBIT REGRESSION Estimated Dependent Variable model: YES

### 2 **Models fit for Ethanol, Bag 2**  **(all models include an intercept term)** Model term Notation Model Full (Main Effects) MM1 MM3 Null mo del etOH Z

e ● ● ● Arom Z

a ● ● × RVP Z

r T50 Z

5 ● × T90 Z

9 ● ● × 

### Model Fitting History for Ethanol, **Bag 2 (** **MM3) selected as best** **- fit model).**  

### Fit Parameters Test with respect to Full Test with respect to Previous Model 

### Model p -2 ln

L BIC 1 

### Dev. 1 

### d Pr>χ 2 

### Dev. d Pr>χ 2 Full 4 79.744 MM1 3 79.749 0.00610 1 0.94 MM3 1 83.475 3.731 3 0.29 3.725 2 0.16 Null mo del 0 92.339 12.595 4 0.01 8.864 1 0.0029 1 A lower value indicates a better fit. 1 The deviation is the difference in the - 2loglik statistics for the nested and reference models, respectively, per 

### Error! Reference source not **found.**

. 

### Coefficients and Tests of Effect for the **Full and Best** **- Fit Models**  **– Ethanol (** **Bag 2 ).**  Effect Full Model Best-Fit Model (M M3 ) Estimate Std.Err. d.f. t-value Pr> t Estimate Std.Err . d.f. t-value Pr> t Intercept 1

- 9. 30 72 0.6333 5 - 15.45 0.000021 - 9. 5 634 0.6703 5 - 14.64 0.00002 Z e 0.9233 0.2824 5 3.27 0.022 0.8163 0.2805 5 2.91 0.033 Z a - 0.3772 0.28499 5 - 1.32 0.24 Z 5 - .01910 0.2091 5 - 0.091 0.93 Z 9 - 0.3017 0.2416 5 - 1.25 0.27 2 veh 

###  1 0.3707 0. 4634 2  

###  1.0889 1.1682 1 Not fit by the model, but manually recalculated from intercepts for individual vehicles.
Before the Third Division,

January 27, 1959

No. 62709.

#### R. U. Delapenha & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 121359-K (Tampa).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

An examination of the collector’s report, received in evidence at the trial, shows that no allowance was made for duty or internal revenue tax for certain shortage, nor was an allowance made for duty to cover breakage, for the reason that the importer failed to file an affidavit of short shipment. Following *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C.C.P.A. 112, C.A.D. 351), *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 69783.

protests 299583-K, etc. (New York).

#### Kroder Reubel Co., Inc., and Alltransport, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of pole ends similar in all material respects to those the subject of *J. C. De Jong & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(52 CCPA 26, C.A.D. 852), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED   UNAUDITED  INTERIM  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  OF  BOOTH  CREEK  SKI
HOLDINGS,  INC.  AS OF JANUARY  28,  2000 AND FOR THE THREE  MONTHS THEN ENDED,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-27-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-28-2000
<CASH>                                           1,796
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,944
<ALLOWANCES>                                        66
<INVENTORY>                                      3,714
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,068
<PP&E>                                         202,413
<DEPRECIATION>                                  46,922
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 221,754
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           62,494
<BONDS>                                        133,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            2,007
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,582
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   221,754
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                44,714
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,478
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,143
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,060
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,045
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,045
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       998
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 170 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 170

   Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to clarify the 
treatment of reimbursements to Members for the use of personally owned 
      airplanes in the performance of official or campaign travel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 15, 2007

Mr. Peterson of Minnesota submitted the following resolution; which was 
       referred to the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to clarify the 
treatment of reimbursements to Members for the use of personally owned 
      airplanes in the performance of official or campaign travel.

    Resolved,  That clause 15(a) of rule XXIII of the Rules of the 
House of Representatives is amended by inserting before the period at 
the end thereof the following: ``, except that when a Member, Delegate, 
or Resident Commissioner uses his personally owned airplane in the 
performance of official or campaign travel, he may be reimbursed on a 
rate per mile basis for the cost of the use of the airplane from 
official or campaign funds, respectively''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 65980.

#### Florea & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 307648-K, 308173-K, and 311227-K (New York).

*287Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issue is the same in all material respects as that the subject of *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), and the record showing that the merchandise consists of knit nylon gloves similar in use to silk gloves, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 117, Misc.

#### Eldard *v.*LaVallee, Warden.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Louis J. Lefkowits,*Attorney General of New York, *Paxton Blair,*Solicitor General, and *Winifred C. Stanley,*Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Third Judicial Department. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of diaDexus, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Patrick Plewman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| |  |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 15, 2010 |  | /s/ Patrick Plewman                  
|                        |  | Patrick Plewman                      
|                        |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
No. 65121.

#### C. S. Emery & Company *v.*United States,

protest 266224-K (St. Albans).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *327
      *United States*v. *The Best Foods, Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 163, C.A.D. 751), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: rtanner@ktgenterprises.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:45:47 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ronald Tanner

Mobile, AL 36695