alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1997
<CASH>                                             128
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,650
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,778
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,778
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           62,179
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,213
<OTHER-SE>                                    (65,613)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,778
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,623
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (2)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,621)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       374
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,995)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,995)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .000
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .000
        

</TABLE>
No. 61478.

#### E. S. Dean *v.*United States,

protest 238720-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of klystron tubes the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Marconi Instruments, Ltd.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 311, C. D. 1880), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# Indian Navy Carries Out First Drug Interdiction as CMF Member

/ Published April 16, 2024
MANAMA, Bahrain , 
The Indian Navy Ship INS Talwar, operating in support of the Canadian-led Combined Task Force (CTF) 150, conducted its first interdiction of illicit narcotics as a member of Combined Maritime Forces, seizing 940 kg of drugs in the Arabian Sea, April 13.

Talwar, a Talwar-class frigate, seized 453 kg of methamphetamines, 416 kg of hash and 71 kg of heroin from a dhow as part of Focused Operation Crimson Barracuda.

The Indian Navy joined CMF last November.

“I commend the crew of INS Talwar for their efforts throughout this Focused Operation and their hard work has paid off with this seizure of 940 kg of drugs,” said Royal Canadian Navy Capt. Colin Matthews, Commander, Combined Task Force 150. “This seizure, the fourth of this Focused Operation, demonstrates the effectiveness and professionalism of CMF, and of the Indian Navy, in deterring and disrupting criminal and terrorist activities at sea.”

Crimson Barracuda, which concluded on April 15, focused on countering terrorist and criminal organizations’ use of the high seas to conduct smuggling operations in the Western Indian Ocean region.

CTF 150 is one of five task forces under Combined Maritime Forces, the world’s largest international naval partnership. CTF 150’s mission is to deter and disrupt the ability of non-state actors to move weapons, drugs and other illicit substances in the Indian Ocean, the Arabian Sea and the Gulf of Oman.

Combined Maritime Forces is a 42-nation naval partnership upholding the international rules-based order by promoting security and stability across 3.2 million square miles of water encompassing some of the world’s most important shipping lanes.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001037115
<NAME> ORBIT/FR, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          14,788
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,919
<ALLOWANCES>                                       116
<INVENTORY>                                      2,243
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,354
<PP&E>                                           1,999
<DEPRECIATION>                                     942
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  27,482
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,531
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            61
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,168
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    27,482
<SALES>                                          4,315
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,315
<CGS>                                            2,349
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,349
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    822
<INCOME-TAX>                                       288
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       534
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09
        

</TABLE>
No. 67059.

protests 60/1153, etc. (New York).

#### Paul A. Straub & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In 'accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 C.C.P.A. 15, C.A.D. 458), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
TRANSITIONAL PERIOD FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DATED April 30, 1998 for year ended
12/31/97 - of Michael B. Johnson & Co., P.C.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          59,147
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  137,454
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (53,325)
<INVENTORY>                                    162,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               305,276
<PP&E>                                          17,905
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,653)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 362,316
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,413,737
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,030
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,066,451)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   362,316
<SALES>                                        826,446
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                          485,767
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  485,767
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,072,261
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (731,582)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (731,582)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (238,254)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (986,502)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)
        

</TABLE>
From: mcmahontw@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:11:34 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

This letter is to urge you strongly to rescind the unjust and coercive mandate that all "contraceptives"

and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance with no co-pay to patients. If you do

not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for any organizations that provide

individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I strongly oppose the

government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and devices that I

oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Thomas McMahon

Davidsonville, MD 21035
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rolando Gonzales, Also Known as Alberto Gonzales, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 858]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jay Gold, J.), rendered October 20, 1992, convicting defendant, after a nonjury trial, of robbery in the second degree and two counts of robbery in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to concurrent terms of 4 to 8 years, 31/2 to 7 years and 2 to 4 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s guilt was proven beyond a reasonable doubt by legally sufficient evidence and the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence *(see, People v Guidice,*83 NY2d 630, 636). Defendant’s claims of prosecutorial misconduct are unpreserved for appellate review as a matter of law (CPL 470.05 [2]; *see, People v Balls,*69 NY2d 641, 642), and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. If we were to review them, we would find that the prosecutor did not "overcharge” defendant and that defendant did not have a right to plead to a lesser included offense in full satisfaction of the indictment *(see, People v Esajerre,*35 NY2d 463, 466-467). As defendant was sentenced to the minimum term allowable for robbery in the second degree, the victim of which was an 81-year-old woman, his argument that he is being punished for going to trial is wholly without merit. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Ellerin, Kupferman, Asch and Mazzarelli, JJ.
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) UNDER

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED

I, Dr. Avishay Katz, Chief Executive Officer of Gigoptix Inc, (the Company), certify that:

1) I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company; and

2) based on my knowledge this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



/s/    Dr. Avishay
KatzDr. Avi (Avishay) KatzChief Executive Officer


Dated: April 30, 2009
No. 60997.

protests 974974-G, etc. (New York).

#### Dmitrovsky Bros., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of kidskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Kung Chen Fur Corpn.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480) or *Prime Fur Corp.*v. *United States*(37 Cust. Ct. 83, C. D. 1802) and lambskin plates similar to those the subject of *A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643) or C. D. 1802, *supra,*the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Mollison, J.,

dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinions in C. D. 1480 and C. D. 1643, *supra.*
From: janetabe@live.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:35:51 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Janet Abraham

Middletown, RI 02842
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         403,394
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       9,602,971
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    670,356
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    107,562,240
<ALLOWANCE>                                    226,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             124,706,937
<DEPOSITS>                                  83,370,045
<SHORT-TERM>                                20,013,302
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,611,051
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        15,704
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,696,835
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             124,706,937
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              6,419,724
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               80,682
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               316,933
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             6,817,339
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           3,179,019
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,857,112
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        2,960,227
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   40,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,770,456
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,187,246
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     741,746
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   741,746
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.50
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.94
<LOANS-NON>                                    580,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                    63,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               265,000
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               186,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              226,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           226,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        109,500
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of American Energy Fields, Inc., (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-K/A for year ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Joshua Bleak, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: February 16, 2011




/s/ Joshua BleakJoshua Bleak

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
From: blondeemum@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:16:53 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Christine Musich

Gilbert, AZ 85233
|   | I, Neal D. Crispin, certify that: |
|--------|-----------------------------------|

|   | 1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q/A of AeroCentury Corp.; and |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                               |   |                                           |
|------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------|
|                               |   |                                           |   |
| Date:  February 14, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Neal D. Crispin                       |   |
|                               |   | Name: Neal D. Crispin                          |   |
|                               |   | Title: President & Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                               |   |                                           |   |
No. 61484.

#### Richter Bros., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 265884-K (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fried herring similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Richter Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(44 C. C. P. A. 128, C, A. D. 649), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained,