alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 181 (Wednesday, September 20, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 64966]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20341]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Highway Administration

[Docket No. FHWA-2023-0026]


Agency Information Collection Activities: Request for Comments 
for a New Information Collection; Withdrawal

AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FHWA is withdrawing the notice, ``Agency Information 
Collection Activities: Request for Comments for a New Information 
Collection,'' published in the Federal Register on September 15, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jason Broehm, Office of Safety, 202-
366-2201, Federal Highway Administration, Department of Transportation, 
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. Office hours are from 
9 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., from Monday through Friday, except Federal 
holidays.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FHWA is withdrawing the notice published 
in the Federal Register on September 15, 2023, at 88 FR 63643 (FR Doc. 
2023-20042).

    Issued on: September 15, 2023.
Jazmyne Lewis,
Information Collection Officer.
[FR Doc. 2023-20341 Filed 9-19-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Andres ROMERO-DERAS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 04-41071.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Aug. 17, 2005.

James Lee Turner, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Marjorie A. Meyers, Federal Public Defender, Molly E. Odom, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Houston, TX, for Defendant>-Appellant.

Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Jose Andres Romero-Deras (“Romero”) appeals his conviction and sentence for illegal reentry after deportation.

Romero argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Romero’s argument concerning the constitutionality of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) is, as he concedes, foreclosed. *See Almendarez-Torres v. United States,*523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998); *United States v. Izaguirre-Flores,*405 F.3d 270, 277-78 (5th Cir.2005), *petition for cert. filed*(July 22, 2005) (No. 05-5469).

Romero also contends that his sentence is improper under *Blakely v. Washington,*542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), and *United States v. Booker,*— U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). He concedes that the plain-error standard of review applies. Romero has not shown that the district court would have imposed a different sentence under an advisory sentencing scheme. Thus, Romero has not shown plain error in connection with his sentence. *See United States v. Martinez-Lugo,*411 F.3d 597, 600-01 (5th Cir.2005).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
# COORDINACION DE VIROLOGIA **FIEBRE AFTOSA**
**DEPA RTA**  **MENTO DE DIA GNOSTICO SEROLOGICO**  **AÑ O 2008** 

**AN TICUERPOS**  **SELECCIÓN TIPIFICA** **CION CONTROL DE**  **MES F.A**  **FTOSA BOVINOS**  **F.Aftosa y E. Vesicular**  **VA CUNA** **S**

**Vacuna Antiaftosa Deteccion de antígeno vacunal**  

## (*) **(*)** **(*)**
**ENERO** 7035 199 5 8 **FEBRERO** 5691 177 6 12 **MA RZO**  471 145 7 11 **AB RIL**  3079 72 10 6 **MA YO**  7574 227 12 3 **JUNIO** 3422 188 10 3 **JULIO** 1843 41 6 4 **AG OSTO**  248 33 4 5 **SEPTIEMBRE** 70 ---- 5 7 **OCTUBRE** 44 162 8 9 **NOVIEMBRE** 1084 203 8 2 **DICIEMBRE** 1404 59 2 5 **TOTA L DE**  **MUESTRA S**  31965 1506 85 75 **TOTA L DE**  **AN ÁL**  **ISIS** 95895 6024 425 5100

**(*)** **Elisa fase liquida para**  **detección de anticuerpos**  **estructurales**
#### Donald James MEYER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Miles LONG, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 00-15781.

D.C. No. CV-00-00081-PMP.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 11, 2001.*

Decided June 25, 2001.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, Philip M. Pro, District Judge, Presiding.

Before O’SCANNLAIN, SILVERMAN, and RONALD M. GOULD, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Donald James Meyer appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition as successive pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

The district court dismissed Meyer’s section 2254 petition as successive based on the fact that Meyer’s previous habeas petition was denied on the merits. We agree. *See 28*U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2).

Accordingly, before Meyer can file a successive petition in the district court, section 2244(b)(3) requires that he make a prima facie showing to this court that his petition would satisfy section 2244(b)(2). We therefore construe Meyer’s appeal as a request for permission to file a successive petition and conclude that Meyer has not made such a showing. *See 28*U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2)(B)(i); *see also Woratzeck v. Stewart,*118 F.3d 648, 652 (9th Cir.1997) (concluding that appellant had not made prima facie showing that he could not have uncovered evidence through previous due diligence).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Before the First Division,

April 1, 1965

No. 69212.

#### Charles Bruning Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 61/13393-12360, etc. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise are, in fact, Azo salts, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: schumom@earthlink.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:58:17 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Bethany Schumann

Sandy, UT 84094
No. 60491.

#### Glensder Textile Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 256917-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk scarves or squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 68086.

#### The Durst Mfg. Co., Inc., *v.*United States,

protest 61/16066 (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of brass aerators similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 65882, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
```

[Federal Register: April 22, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 77)]
[Notices]               
[Page 20986-20987]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr22ap10-38]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

 
Sunshine Act Meetings

Time and Date:  Wednesday, April 28, 2010; 2 p.m.-4 p.m.

Place:  Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East-West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

Status:  Closed to the public.

Matters To Be Considered

Compliance Weekly Report--Commission Briefing

    The Commission staff will brief the Commission on the status of 
compliance matters.

[[Page 20987]]

    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

Contact Person for More Information:  Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East-West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: April 20, 2010.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-9464 Filed 4-20-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
EXHIBIT 10.1


 


 


AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO


PROMISSORY NOTE AND BUSINESS LOAN AGREEMENT


 


	 	 	 	 
	BORROWER:	
        CarePayment Technologies, Inc.

        5300 Meadows Road, Suite 400

        Lake Oswego, OR 97035

        Telephone: (503) 419-3530
	LENDER:	
        Aequitas Commercial Finance, LLC 5300 Meadows
        Road, Suite 400

        Lake Oswego, OR 97035

        Telephone: (503) 419-3500

	 	 	 	 


 


Principal Amount (As Amended): $8,000,000


 


Date of Note and Loan Agreement: September 29, 2011 Date
of Amendment: December 20, 2012


 


CarePayment Technologies, Inc. ("Borrower”)
and Aequitas Commercial Finance, LLC (“Lender”) hereby agree to execute this Amendment No. 4 (this "Amendment")
dated effective December 20, 2012 (the “Effective Date”) to that certain Promissory Note dated September 29,
2011 (as amended, the "Note") and that certain Business Loan Agreement dated September 29, 2011 (as amended, the
“Loan Agreement”) (collectively, the “Loan”). As of the Effective Date, the maximum principal
balance of the Loan was $6,000,000 and the current principal balance as drawn is $5,931,000.00.


 


1.DEFINITIONS.
All capitalized terms not specifically defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Loan Agreement.


 


2.PRINCIPAL AMOUNT.
Section 1 of the Note is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:


 


"PROMISE
TO PAY. CarePayment Technologies, Inc., an Oregon corporation (“Borrower”), promises to pay to the order
of Aequitas Commercial Finance, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company (“Lender”), in lawful money of the
United States of America, the principal amount of up to Eight Million and 00/100 Dollars ($8,000,000.00), or so much thereof as
has been borrowed and is outstanding, together with interest on the unpaid principal balance from the date of disbursement until
paid in full. Borrower will pay Lender at Lender’s address shown above or at such other place as Lender may designate in
writing."


 


3.LOAN AGREEMENT.
All references in the Loan Agreement to the maximum principal balance of $6,000,000.00 are hereby changed to read as the maximum
principal balance of $8,000,000.00.


 


4.INTEREST RATE.
Effective as of January 1, 2013, the interest rate referenced in Section 2(a) of the Loan Agreement and Section 4 is hereby
decreased from 12.5% to 11.5%.


 


5.NO OTHER CHANGES.
All other terms and conditions of the Loan not specifically amended by this Amendment shall remain unchanged and in full force
and effect.


 


[Signature page follows] 






    	 



    	 	



    





IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above.


 





	BORROWER:	LENDER:
	 	 
	CAREPAYMENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.	AEQUITAS COMMERCIAL FINANCE, LLC
	 	By: Aequitas Capital Management, Inc., its Manager
	 	 
	By:
    /s/ Patricia J. Brown	By:
    /s/ Olaf Janke
	Name:
     Patricia J. Brown	Name:
    Olaf Janke
	Title: Chief
    Financial Officer	Title:
    Senior Vice President, Finance
1 

### Kelly, Shaheerah

From: Kelly, Shaheerah
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2015 1:59 PM

To: Dwight Mallory Subject: Navajo Nation Historic Preservation Office

Hi Dwight,

The website for the Navajo Nation Historic Preservation Office provides (928) 871

‐ 7198 as the general phone number.

http://www.hpd.navajo-nsn.gov/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=86&Itemid=491

************************************ Shaheerah Kelly Permits Office, Air Division (AIR-3)
U.S. Environmental Protec tion Agency, Region 9 San Francisco, CA 94105 Phone: 415-947-4156
Fax: 415-947-3579 Email: kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov
Exhibit 10.2 Q1 FY2013






THIRTIETH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




This Thirtieth Amendment to Employment Agreement is made and entered into as of October 1, 2012, by and between PriceSmart, Inc., a Delaware Corporation (“Employer”) and Robert M. Gans (“Executive”).


Recitals


		
	A)
	On September 20, 1994 an Employment Agreement was made and entered into by and between Executive and Price Enterprises, Inc.




		
	B)
	Said Employment Agreement has been assigned to Employer and amended on twenty-nine prior occasions;




		
	C)
	Employer and Executive now desire to further amend the Employment Agreement, as set forth hereinbelow:




Agreement


		
	1.
	Section 3.1 of the Employment Agreement, which currently provides: 




3.1    Term.  The term of Executive's employment hereunder shall commence on October 17, 1994 and shall continue until October 16, 2012 unless sooner terminated or extended as hereinafter provided (the "Employment Term").


is hereby amended, to provide as follows:


3.1    Term.  The term of Executive's employment hereunder shall commence on October 17, 1994 and shall continue until October 16, 2013 unless sooner terminated or extended as hereinafter provided (the “Employment Term”).


2. All other terms of the Employment Agreement, as amended, shall remain unaltered and fully effective.


Executed in San Diego, California, as of the date first written above.




EXECUTIVE                        EMPLOYER
PriceSmart, INC.


Robert M. Gans                    By:                 


______________________                Name:     Jose Luis Laparte    


Its:     CEO and President
|  | WITNESS my hand and official seal of the Department of State, at the City of Albany, on May     5, 2014.   ANTHONY GIARDINA   Anthony GiardinaExecutive Deputy Secretary of State |
|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

| FIRST: | The name of the corporation is: |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|

| SECOND: | This corporation is formed to engage in any lawful act or activity for which a corporation may be organized under the Business Corporation Law, provided that it is not formed to engage in any act or activity requiring the consent or approval of any state official, department, board, agency or other body without such consent or approval first being obtained. |
|---------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| THIRD: | The county, within this state, in which the office of the corporation is to be located is |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| FOURTH: | The total number and value of shares of common stock which the corporation shall have authority to issue is: 200 SHARES WITH NO PAR VALUE. |
|---------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| FIFTH: | The Secretary of State is designated as agent of the corporation upon whom process against it may be served. The address within or without this state to which the Secretary of State shall mail a copy of any process against the corporation served upon him or her is: |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
**UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD DRIVE ANN ARBOR, MI 48105 - 2498 OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION September 20 , 2013 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Meeting with Shell Oil Products U.S. FROM: Joe Sopata, Chemist

USEPA/ OAR/OTAQ/CD/FCC TO: EPA Docket # EPA - HQ - OAR - 2012 - 0401 This me mo documents a meeting held on September 11, 2013 between representatives of Shell Oil Products U.S. (Shell) an d the United States Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA ) to discuss EPA’s Pathways II Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) entitled, “ Regulations of Fuels and Fuel Additives: RFS Pathway s II and Technical Amendments to the RFS2 Standards” . The meeting attendees from Shell included , John Reese, Cath y Davis, Ryan Cassens and Olivia Adams, and from EPA included Mary Manners, John Weihrauch and Joe Sopata . The purpose of this meeting was for Shell to further communicate their July 15, 2013 comments to the Pathway s II NPRM that the proposed revisions in 40 CFR 80.1466 concerning segregation and bonding for foreign renewable fuel producers and renewable fuel importers are overl y complex, unworkable from a logistics perspective and unreasonabl y retroactive. EPA will take their comment s and concerns into consideration in promulgating the Pathway s II Final Rulemaking .
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 177 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Financial Services 

in the One Hundred Tenth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2007 

Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts (for himself and Mr. BACHUS) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

Financial Services in the One Hundred Tenth Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Financial 

4 Services (hereafter in this resolution referred to as the 

5 ‘‘Committee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries, 

6 there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the 

7 House of Representatives for committee salaries and ex8 penses, not more than $16,575,710.00 for the One Hun9 dred Tenth Congress. 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HRES 177 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $8,029,517.00 shall be avail4 able for expenses incurred during the period begin5 ning at noon on January 3, 2007, and ending imme6 diately before noon on January 3, 2008; and 

7 (2) not more than $8,546,193.00 shall be avail8 able for expenses incurred during the period begin9 ning at noon on January 3, 2008, and ending imme10 diately before noon on January 3, 2009. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        5
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     5
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       5
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               49
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            16
<OTHER-SE>                                        (60)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         5
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       45
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (53)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      8
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  8
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         8
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

March 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
130134 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly EERON M. CAUGHN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,

v SC: 130134 Justices
COA: 264059 WCAC: 04-000013 BOSCH BRAKING SYSTEM CORP. and AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants-Appellants,

and

TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 8, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

s0320 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 27, 2006

Clerk