alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 183 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United States 

Postal Service should issue a postage stamp commemorating the Fisk 

Jubilee Singers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2007 

Mr. HASTINGS of Florida (for himself, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mr. SCOTT of 

Virginia, Ms. KILPATRICK, Mr. LINCOLN DAVIS of Tennessee, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. WATT, Ms. CARSON, Mrs. CHRISTENSEN, Mr. WYNN, Mr. GORDON of Tennessee, Mr. JACKSON of Illinois, Mr. FATTAH, Ms. EDDIE

BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. COOPER, Mr. COHEN, Ms. CLARKE, 

Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, and Mr. AL GREEN of Texas) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight 

and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

the United States Postal Service should issue a postage 

stamp commemorating the Fisk Jubilee Singers. 

Whereas 6 months after the end of the Civil War, the Fisk 

School was established in Nashville, Tennessee; 

Whereas the Fisk School was designed by its founders to be 

an educational institution open to all, regardless of race 

or age; 

Whereas the Fisk School was incorporated as Fisk University 

in 1867; 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 183 IH 

Whereas funding for the opening of the school was secured 

through the sale of slave paraphernalia; 

Whereas in 1871, a group of students at Fisk University 

formed a choral group, the Fisk Jubilee Singers, with the 

goal of raising money to finance the institution; 

Whereas in that same year, the Fisk Jubilee Singers took all 

the funds in the University treasury with them for travel 

expenses and set off on a tour of the United States and 

Europe; 

Whereas during their first tour, the Jubilee Singers raised 

enough money to preserve their university and pay for 

the construction of Jubilee Hall, the South’s first permanent structure built for the education of black students; 

Whereas the Jubilee Singers introduced the world to the spiritual as a musical genre, emerging as the first internationally recognized group of African American musicians; and 

Whereas the Fisk Jubilee Singers continue to tour and perform and have received countless awards and honors: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that— 

3 (1) the United States Postal Service should 

4 issue a postage stamp commemorating the Fisk Ju5 bilee Singers; and 

6 (2) the Citizens’ Stamp Advisory Committee 

7 should recommend to the Postmaster General that 

8 such a stamp be issued. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1


                                  CERTIFICATION


     In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Booth Creek Ski Holdings,  Inc.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 1, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  as the Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  hereby  certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

September 15, 2003


                                        By:/s/ GEORGE N. GILLETT, JR.
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                               George N. Gillett, Jr.
                                              Chief Executive Officer
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsComputerized Design and Generation of Gear Drives With a Localized Bearing Contact and a Low Level of Transmission ErrorsA general approach developed for the computerized simulation of loaded gear drives is presented. In this paper the methodology used to localize the bearing contact, provide a parabolic function of transmission errors, and simulate meshing and contact of unloaded gear drives is developed. The approach developed is applied to spur and helical gears, spiral bevel gears, face-gear drives, and worm-gear drives with cylindrical worms.Document ID19970012935Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsLitvin, F.*(Illinois Univ. Chicago, IL United States)*Chen, J.*(Illinois Univ. Chicago, IL United States)*Seol, I.*(Illinois Univ. Chicago, IL United States)*Kim, D.*(Illinois Univ. Chicago, IL United States)*Lu, J.*(Illinois Univ. Chicago, IL United States)*Zhao, X.*(Illinois Univ. Chicago, IL United States)*Handschuh, R.*(Army Research Lab. Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1996Subject CategoryMechanical EngineeringReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-107250AD-A310191NAS 1.15:107250ARL-TR-1086Meeting InformationMeeting: GearsLocation: Dresden, GermanyCountry: GermanyStart Date: April 22, 1996End Date: April 24, 1996Accession Number97N17056Funding Number(s)PROJECT: DA Proj. 1L1-62211-A-47-ADistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970012935.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
(R.D. 11488)

#### J. Gerber & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 972394.

*783(Decided February 6, 1968)

*Siegel, Mandell <& Davidson*for tbe plaintiff.

*Bdioin L. Weisl, Jr,,*Assistant Attorney General, for tbe defendant.

Beckworth, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement is before me on the following- stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, as to the merchandise covered by the appeal for reappraisement enumerated above:

> That on the dates of exportation thereof to the United States, the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or, in the absence of sales, offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Japan, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed, ready for shipment to the United States, -were the appraised values, less the buying commission, as stated on the invoices.

> That all of the merchandise covered by the appeal for reappraisement, the subject of this stipulation, was entered subsequent to February 27,1958, and none of the merchandise is identified in the Final List published by the Secretary of the Treasury, T.D. 54521.

> That the appeal for reappraisement enumerated above may be deemed submitted upon this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold that export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956,70 Stat. 943, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise involved herein and that said value is represented by the appraised values, less the buying commission, as stated on the invoices.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
(R.D. 11499)

#### Aimcee Wholesale Corp. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 21166; 19342.

(Decided March 7, 1968)

*Barnes, Richardson <£ Colburn*for the plaintiff.

*Edwin L. Weisl, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

*795Rao, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed above have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, as follows:

> 1. That the involved merchandise consists of woolen sweaters exported from Italy during 1964; that the said merchandise does not appear on the Final List published by the Secretary of the Treasury (T.D. 54521) pursuant to the Customs Simplification Act of 1956; that the merchandise was entered for consumption after the effective date of Section 6(a) of the said Simplification Act; that the merchandise was appraised under statutory export value (Section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended) ; that neither party challenges the said basis of appraisement.

> 2. That on or about the dates of exportation, the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or offered for sale in the principal markets in the country of exportation in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, was the invoice price for each item, f.o.b.

> 3. That the above-entitled appeals may be submitted upon this stipulation.

Upon the agreed facts, I find export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise covered by said appeals for re-appraisement and that such value is the invoice price for each item, f.o.b.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S  UNAUDITED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          22
<SECURITIES>                                  8219
<RECEIVABLES>                                92998
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             99520
<PP&E>                                      121957
<DEPRECIATION>                             (121420)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              143343
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       337532
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                     13677
<OTHER-SE>                                 (517633)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                143343
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            405304
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               629968
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           37924
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (219791)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (800)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (220591)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (220591)
<EPS-BASIC>                                 (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0


</TABLE>
January 29, 1959

No. 62721.

Suit 4941.

#### United States *v.*Curley-Bates Co.

C.D. 1916 affirmed November 5, 1958. C.A.D. 688.
From: travelers@elberton.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:24:34 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Vivian Rousey

Elberton, GA 30635
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                        5
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                            2,104,882
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    14,567,675
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (821,000)
<INVENTORY>                                       1,255,496
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 18,148,746
<PP&E>                                          112,432,850
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (59,374,336)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   98,218,427
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            14,927,212
<BONDS>                                          41,196,119
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                         23,246,093
<OTHER-SE>                                       13,741,003
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     98,218,427
<SALES>                                          83,835,085
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 83,835,085
<CGS>                                            52,727,124
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    75,119,772
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2,006,097
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   7,143,405
<INCOME-TAX>                                      2,765,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                      4,378,405
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          0.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0.41
        

</TABLE>
(R.D. 11425)

#### Parsons & Whittemore, Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided December 18, 1967)

*Sharp, Soltor £ Hutchison*for tbe plaintiff.

*Edwin L. Weisl, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Kao, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court:

1. That the subject merchandise consists of hardboard exported from Sweden as to which the Secretary of the Treasury issued a finding of dumping, published in 89 TD 197, TD 53567, made pursuant to the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C., 160, et seq.).

2. That pursuant to Section 168 of said Antidumping Act, the appraiser reported the purchase price (Sec. 162) and the foreign market value (Sec. 164) as to the merchandise listed on Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof.

*8063. That pursuant to Sections 500 and 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, the appraiser appraised all of tlie merchandise in the appeals for appraisement enumerated on Schedule A for regular duty purposes.

4. That the plaintiff duly filed appeals for reappraisement as to the values referred to in the above paragraphs Nos. 2 and 3.

5. That at the time relevant herein the purchase price and the foreign market value under the said Antidumping Act are as specified in the aforesaid Schedule A attached hereto.

6. That as to all other items of merchandise not identified on Schedule A, the appraiser’s reports of purchase price and of foreign market value are correct.

7. That the appraiser’s findings of value under the provisions of Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, are correct.

8. That said appeals are submitted for decision upon this stipulation and said Schedule A.

Upon the agreed facts, I find foreign market value, as defined in section 164 of the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C. § 164), for the merchandise described in schedule A, annexed to this decision and made a part hereof, and the purchase price thereof, within- section 162 of said act (19 U.S.C. § 162), to be as indicated in said schedule. As to all other items of merchandise not identified in schedule A, I find the foreign market values and the purchase prices to be as reported by the appraiser. In all other respects, the values of all merchandise are as returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Before the Second Division,

August 15, 1966

No. P66/186. —

#### Elmay Importing Co. et al. *v.*United States, protests 65/17362, etc. (New York).

Bao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of pole ends similar in all material respects to those the subject of *J. C. DeJong & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(52 CCPA 26, C.A.D. 852), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained,
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Cyber Supply Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended February 28, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Maria Shostak, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 14th day of June, 2010.



| | MARIA SHOSTAK                                      
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Maria Shostak,                                     
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

















A signed original of these written statements required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Cyber Supply Inc. and will be retained by Cyber Supply Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
No. 151, Misc.

#### Turner *v.*Illinois.

Supreme Court of Illinois. Certiorari denied.
From: warbride@ymail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:21:07 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Eleanor Evans

Washington, DC 20017