alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#            

# CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (R)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

Registration No.  333-109182

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  513                                                                   Trade Date:  11/29/04

(To Prospectus Supplement dated November 6, 2003 &

  Prospectus dated October 15,2003)                                                              Issue Date:   12/02/04

The Date of this Pricing SupplementNovember 29, 2004

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

 CUSIP                                                                                                                                   Date and terms of redemption or

     or       Stated                                                                   Interest                                       repayment (includingany

Common  Interest                      Price to  Discounts &        Payment     Survivors                  applicable regular or special

  Code      Rate (1)   Maturity  Public (2) Commissions       Frequency       Option  Yes/No     record dates)

14911QXJ5  4.25%           06/15/12        100%                1.29%             Semi-Annually               YES         NO                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               

                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

Principal                                                                                 1st Payment             Day         

Amount                  Proceeds                  Dealer                           Date                   Count

$808,000.00            $797,576.80            ABN AMROInc.        06/15/05               30/360    

Original Issue DiscountNote:                                                                          Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes                X   No                                                                                  N/A

The interest rates on the PowerNotes (R) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (R) offered prior to the effective date of the change.  Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $245.790 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (R) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (R) will be made under the Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated October 15,2003.

Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
From: dandblondie@q.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:24:05 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Damon Lander

Billings, MT 59105
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk September 4, 2012

p0827 

# Order

September 4, 2012

145080

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145080

COA: 301192

Oakland CC: 2010

- 231056

- FC

DONTE GREGORY LEONARD,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 22, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
No. 62196.

#### Manca, Inc., and E. Leitz, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 294792-K and 310240-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Manca, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 271, C. D. 1874), the merchandise was dutiable as follows: The items marked “A” at 20 percent under paragraph 1551 as parts of photographic cameras, not specially provided for, and the items marked “B” at 25 percent under the provision in paragraph 228, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 51802), for photographic cameras.
From: boudreau11850@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:02:17 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Vicki Boudreau

Battle Ground, WA 98604
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Gino Nathan Trevino, * From the 106th District

 Court of Dawson County,

 Trial Court No. 14-7363.

Vs. No. 11-15-00299-CR * April 14, 2016

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

 This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the 

appeal should be dismissed. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Global Ship
Lease, Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 20-F), I Susan J. Cook, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Form 20-F fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: December 9, 2009



|    |  |                                             
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Susan J. Cook                           
|    |  | Susan J. Cook                               
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer                     
|    |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
No. 68060.

#### New York Merchandise Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 63/1191 (Portland, Oreg.).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of glass paperweights similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 64185, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Order filed November 3, 2016

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals 

____________

No. 11-16-00242-CV

____________

FRANKLIN P. SHACKELFORD, Appellant

V.

STEPHENS COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT AND 

STEPHENS COUNTY, TEXAS, Appellees

On Appeal from the 90th District Court

Stephens County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CV-31184

O R D E R

Franklin P. Shackelford, the appellant in this cause, has filed in this court an 

unopposed motion to abate the appeal. In the motion, Shackelford states that the 

parties have reached a tentative settlement agreement and that an abatement is sought 

“to provide the parties time to negotiate, draft, and enter into a final agreement.” 

Shackelford also states that the motion is not opposed and that one month should be 

sufficient time to resolve the matter. 
2

The motion is granted, and the appeal is abated. The parties are instructed to 

notify this court immediately if they enter into a final settlement agreement and to 

file an appropriate motion in this court based upon any such agreement. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1. If the parties have not notified this court that a final settlement 

agreement has been reached on or before December 2, 2016, we may reinstate the 

appeal. 

PER CURIAM

November 3, 2016

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.
From: lindydimeo@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:42:11 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Lynn Dimeo

Culpeper, VA 22701
No. 68396.

protests 63/970, etc. (Philadelphia).

#### Lanston Industries, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of monophoto machines or parts thereof similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Lanston Industries, Inc.*v. *United States*(49 CCPA 123, C.A.D. 807), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
UNITE D STATE S O FAMERIC A DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N OFFIC E O FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C

TRAVE LGROUP , INC. , D/B/ A REPUBLI C AI RTRAVE L AN D SCO T SPENCE R AIRLIF T GROUP , INC
. AN D RICHAR D BERNAR D Unauthorize dAi r

Transportation , Unfai r an dDeceptiv e Practice s an dUnfai r

Method s o f

Competition , an d Violation s o f

Publi c Charte r

Rule s EXPRES S ON E INTERNATIONAL , INC
. Unfai r an dDeceptiv e Practice s an dUnfai r Method s o f Competition , an dViolation s o f Publi c Charte r

Rule s Enforcemen t

Proceedin g DOT-OST-1995-27 2
formerl y Docke t 4923 3

STATU S REPOR T
Th e Offic e of

th e Assistan t

Genera l Counse l fo r

Aviatio n Enforcemen t

an d Proceeding s ("Enforcemen t Office") , pursuan t

t o You r Honor' s Marc h22 , 2006 , Orde r stayin g thi s proceeding , file s thi s report detailin g th e curren t

statu s of thi s proceedin g an d settlemen t

negotiations
. Th e Departmen t

ha s no t rule do n th e outstandin g motion s file db y Respondent s
an doppose db y th e Enforcemen t Offic e i n Ascen dAviatio n Group , Docke t OST-2004

- 17486
.Ther e hav e bee n n o furthe r settlemen t

discussions
. Date : Jun e 25 , 2010
. Respectfull y submitted ,
Samuel Podberesky Assistan t Genera l Counse l for Aviatio n Enforcemen t

an dProceeding s Dayto n Lehman , Jr
. Deput y Assistan t

Genera l Counse l fo r Aviatio n Enforcemen t

an dProceeding s

Willia mJ
. Wagne r

y Senio r Tria l ^SHomey Unite dState s Departmen t of Transportatio n Offic e o f Aviatio n Enforcemen t

an dProceeding s 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Roo m96-42 9 Washington , D.C
. 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-934 2 FAX : 202-366-715 2Docke t No
. DOT-OST-1995-27 2 I hereb y certif

y that o n thi s 25thday of

June , 2010 , atru e an dcorrec t cop y of th e foregoin g Statu s Report

was serve di n th e followin g manne r t o th e following : Origina l U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Docke t Operations , M-3 0 Wes t Buildin g Groun dFloo r Roo mW12-14 0 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Washington , D.C
. 2059 0 B y Persona l Servic e Th e Honorabl e Ronnie A Yode r Chie f Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S
. Departmen t

of Transportatio n Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloo r Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D.C
. 2059 0 TEL : (202 ) 366-214 2 FAX : (202 ) 366-753 6 B y Firs t Clas s Mai l Sco t Spence r SB D Aircraf

t Service s 25 5 S Lelan dNorto n Wa y SamBernardino , C A 9240 8
Before the First Division,

November 4, 1963

No. 68072.

#### Irving R. Boody & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 62/14675 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of lauric acid, which was maunfactured or produced from coconut oil, produced from copra, the growth of the Philippine Islands, and that the documents required to be filed under regulations issued by the Secretary of the Treasury have been filed, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 62184.

#### Century Jewelry Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 326814-K and 327384-K (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of mother-of-pearl disks similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Paramount Export Co. et al.*v. *United States*(45 C. C. P. A. 82, C. A. D. 677), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: jeanworl@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:27:51 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Francis Worl

Lewisville, TX 75067
From: brightfame63@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:33:09 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Robert McGinnis

Haleyville, AL 35565
**AD Economic Evaluation**



### Docket No . FAA - 2013 - 0514 Directorate ID : 20 12 - SW - 068 - AD Helicopter Model: Sikorsky Model S - 76A, B, and C Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 181 Helicopters in the US Registry . Rea son : The actions of this AD are intended to prevent failure of a spindle cuff assembly or blade fold cuff assembly , loss of a rotor blade, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. Costs : Parts per Helicopter

– If it is necessary to replace a spin dle or blade cuff assembly, it would take 2.5 work hours at $85/work-hour and an estimated $54,000 for a part. $ 54,212

Labor per Helicopter ( 2.5 work-hour s to do a nondestructive test inspection, 2 work hours to apply the white paint x 

### $ 8 5 /work -hour) $ 3 83

Other Cost to apply white paint $15 Total Cost per Helicopter $ 398 Total US Fleet Cost $ 72,038 Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is th e AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : Nicoholas Faust