alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                                AEROCENTURY CORP.

                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
                  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted
            pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with this quarterly report of AeroCentury Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report"), I, Neal D.
Crispin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date
hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United
States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

              (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
              13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
              1934, and

              (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
              all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and
              results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the
              periods indicated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to AeroCentury Corp. and will be
retained by AeroCentury Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.


Date: November 13, 2003                /s/  Neal D. Crispin
                                    --------------------------
                                    Neal D. Crispin
                                    Chief Executive Officer
From: areinberg@aggiecatholic.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:15:43 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Annelle Reinberg

College Station, TX 77840
No. 588.

#### Zimmerman *v.*Board of Education of Newark et al.

*Daniel H. Pollitt*and *Nicholas J. LaRocca*for petitioner.

*Jacob Fox*for respondents.

Supreme Court of New Jersey. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.

Mr. Justice Brennan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
#### Henry T. Trevett and others, Respondents, v. Wesley Barnes and Edward Butler, Jr., Appellants.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Landon, J.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1418 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                    September 24 (legislative day, September 23), 2008.
Whereas Michael Phelps swam in 17 races over the course of 9 days in the 2008 
        Beijing Summer Olympic Games and surpassed Olympic icon Mark Spitz by 
        becoming the only athlete to win 8 gold medals in a single Olympics;
Whereas Michael Phelps set 7 world records and 8 Olympic records in 8 events in 
        those Olympic Games;
Whereas Michael Phelps is one of the most highly decorated Olympians ever, with 
        14 gold medals and 2 bronze medals over his Olympic career;
Whereas as a member of the United States men's relay swim teams, Michael Phelps 
        helped set world records and win 3 gold medals for the United States 
        2008 Olympic swim team; and
Whereas Michael Phelps epitomized the Olympic spirit by demonstrating 
        patriotism, strength, and humility throughout the 2008 Beijing Summer 
        Olympic Games: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) congratulates Michael Phelps of Baltimore, Maryland, for his 
        outstanding athletic achievements during the 2008 Beijing Summer Olympic 
        Games, achievements that set him apart as one of the most highly 
        decorated and accomplished Olympic athletes in world history;
            (2) recognizes the achievements of Michael Phelps and all the 
        members of the United States 2008 Olympic swim team; and
            (3) directs the Clerk of the House of Representatives to transmit a 
        copy of this resolution to Michael Phelps; Mark Schubert, head coach of 
        the United States 2008 Olympic swim team; and Bob Bowman, chief 
        executive officer of the North Baltimore Aquatic Club and assistant 
        coach of the United States 2008 Olympic swim team for appropriate 
        display.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 180 (Tuesday, September 19, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 64446]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20239]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Interorgan signal.
    Date: October 19-20, 2023.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Nijaguna Prasad, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institutes of Health, 
National Institute on Aging, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Gateway 
Building, Suite 2W200, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-9667, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#443436253725202a26042a2d256a2a2d2c6a232b32"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7b0b091a081a1f15193b15121a55151213551c140d">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 14, 2023.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-20239 Filed 9-18-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, Chief Judge, United States 1 

### District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable Mary Ann L. Medler, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. ___________ No. 95-3010

___________ Allen Coo, * *

Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. United States of America, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: March 15, 1996 Filed: March 19, 1996

___________ Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Allen Coo appeals the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 1 2255 motion. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties' briefs , we conclude that no error of law or fact appears and that an opinion would lack precedential value. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

### -2- A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). N E D / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T AH ME D Z Z I Z I NG A MUY I NG O, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 71763 A ge nc yN o. A 070- 367- 287 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d J anuary11, 2010 ** B efo re: B E E Z E R , T R O T T , an dB Y B E E , C i rcu i tJu d g es. A hm e d Z z i z i ngaM uy i ngo, ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of U ganda , pe t i t i ons f

or r e v ie w o f

an o r d e ro f

th e B o ar do f

I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls ( “B I A ” ) d e n y in g h is se cond m ot i on t o reopen rem ov alproceedi ng s t o app l y f or deferra l of re m ov al 

# FI LED JAN 20 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSN ED / Res ea r ch 07- 71763 2 u n d e rth e Co n v e n t i o n A g a i n s tTo rtu r e . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r8 U . S. C. § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w f

o rab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n th e d e n ia l o f am o tio n to r e o p e n , M

a lty v . A s h c r o ft , 3 8 1 F . 3 d9 4 2 , 9 4 5 ( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 4 ) , an dwe d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T h e B I A d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g M u y in g o ’s s e c o n dm o tio n to r e o p e n b e c au s e h e f

a ile dto d e m o n s tr a te c h an g e dc ir c u m s tan c e s in U g an d ato qua l i f yf orthe r e gul a t orye xc e pt i on t o the t i m e and num e r i c a l l i m i t a t i ons on m o tio n s to r e o p e n , se e 8 C .F .R . § 1 0 0 3 .2 ( c ) ( 3 ) ( ii) ; s e e a ls o M a lty , 381 F . 3d a t945 (9th C i r. 20 04 ) ( cr i t i ca l qu es t i on i s w hether c i rc um st ance s have c hang ed s uf f i c i e nt l ytha tape t i t i one rw ho pr e vi ous l ydi d notha ve al e gi t i m a t e c l a i m now do es ). W e r e

j e c tM uy i ngo’ s c ont e nt i on tha tthe B I A abus e d i t s di s c r e t i on byf a i l i ng to c o n s id e rth e e v id e n c e s ub m itte dw ith th e m o tio n to r e o p e n . See Ferna ndezv. G on zales , 4 3 9 F .3 d5 9 2 , 6 0 3 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 6 ) . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
1

Brown, Kelly

From: Sasser, Erika

Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 6:14 PM

To: Frey, Nathan J.

Cc: Wesson, Karen; Brown, Kelly; Scavo, Kimber; Mathias, Scott; Hemby, James; Elman, Barry; 

Cooperstein, Sharon

Subject: EPA Responses to Summary of Interagency Comments Under EO 12866 and 13563 --Ozone 

NAAQs NPRM 

Attachments: EPA Response to 11-17-2014 Summary of Interagency Comments on O3 NAAQS NPRM 

(11-21-2014).docx; EPA Response to 11-19-2014 Summary of Interagency Comments on O3 

NAAQS NPRM (11 21 14).docx

Nathan— 

Attached please find EPA’s responses to two sets of interagency comments on the O3 NAAQS NPRM. Please let me 

know if there are any questions about these materials. 

Thanks, 

Erika
From: tvdesign@dcwisp.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:27:11 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Troy I Vanderhoof

Camas Valley, OR 97416
ex10-2.htm


Exhibit 10.2


 


RUBY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY


P.O. Box 1241


Grass Valley, CA  95945







December 12, 2012







Perry Leopold, CEO


North Bay Resources Inc.


P.O. Box 162


Skippack, PA  19474












Payment Adjustment and Extension Agreement












Dear Perry,







This letter is to formalize our agreement that, as per discussion between our companies, Ruby Development Company ("RDC") hereby authorizes North Bay Resources ("NBRI") to pay reduced monthly mortgage payments of TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS ($10,000.00) principal and interest for each of the three mortgage payments due and payable on January 1, 2013, February 1, 2013, and March 1, 2013.







Additionally, as the EB-5 funding process has still not concluded, RDC hereby agrees to extend the due date on the note payable for the Ruby Mine to the sooner of June 30, 2013, or until NBRI has adequate funds to pay the note in full.  In consideration for such extension, NBRI hereby agrees as follows:







1. NBRI shall pay RDC a "Note Extension Payment" in the amount of FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($50,000.00) on or before December 30, 2012.  Said payment shall be deductible from the note payable for the Ruby Mine;







2.The parties hereto acknowledge that tax law changes for the 2013 Tax Year are being considered that could have substantial negative tax implications on RDC's receipts from the payment of the Ruby Mine note, so NBRI agrees to "make RDC whole" for any loss in value RDC might suffer if NBRI does not pay the Ruby Mine note in full during the 2012 Tax Year.












[Signatures on following page]


 




  





  











  






 


Yours truly,












RUBY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY












By:  /s/ W.R. Frederking                                               


W. R. “Rick” Frederking, Partner












Acknowledged and Agreed this 12th day of December, 2012,







North Bay Resources Inc.












By:  /s/ Perry Leopold                                                  


Perry Leopold, President and CEO
From: mreed@udsinc.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:57:14 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Melanie Reed

Frisco, TX 75034
From: familyharris09@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:25:00 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Randall Harris

Oblong, IL 62449
From: mleblanc50@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:24:49 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Maya Murphy

Navarre, FL 32566