alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

          - [Docket No. DHS-2023-0017]

# AGENCY:

United States Secret Service, Homeland Security (DHS).

# ACTION:

30-Day Notice and request for comments; Correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         on August 31, 2023, regarding the Generic Information Collection: USSS Customer Satisfaction Surveys. The document listed incorrect instructions to address comments regarding the inquiry and an incorrect comment closing date.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Haley Tacogue, Management and                               ( print page 66034)                            Program Analyst, USSS, Department of Homeland Security,                         *ETP-PRA@usss.dhs.gov,*                         202-997-3594.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Correction

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of August 31, 2023, at FR Doc 2023-18829, on page 60221, in the third column, correct the                     **ADDRESSES**                     to read “Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice to                     *www.reginfo.gov/​public/​do/​PRAMain.*                     Find this particular information collection by selecting “Currently under 30-day Review—Open for Public Comments” or by using the search function.” Additionally, in the                     **Federal Register**                     of August 31, 2023, at FR Doc 2023-18829, on page 60221, in the third column, correct the                     **DATES**                     caption to read “Comments are encouraged and will be accepted until September 30, 2023. This process is conducted in accordance with 5 CFR 1320.1.”                

Frances Humphrey,

Information Technology Program Manager, Office of the Chief Information Officer.

[FR Doc. 2023-20151 Filed 9-25-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-18-P
Case No. 13,472.

#### STODDERT et al. v. WATERS et al.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 483.] 1

(Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

June Term, 1808.

Injunctions — Motion to Dissolve — Notice— When to be Given.

Notice to dissolve an injunction must be given ten days before the term; if given in term, a term's notice is required.

[This was an action by Stoddert & Mason against Waters & Griffith and others.]

Mr. Jones, for the defendants,

having filed answers on the first day of the term, and then entered notice of motion for dissolution on the docket, and ten days having expired since the entry, he now moved the court to dissolve the injunction.

The bar generally stated the construction of the rule to have been that there must be ten days’ notice before term, or if the notice be given in term, a term’s notice is required.

THE COURT (nem. con.) said it was the construction which had always been given to the rule.

Mr. Jones then moved to have the rule amended.

But

THE COURT

declined, thinking the construction of the rule reasonable.
From: cjpray@cox.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:38:54 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Carlita Johnson

Oklahoma City, OK 73162
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION



I, John Slatky, certify that:



I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Luxemburg Bancshares, Inc.;

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

I am
 responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a -15(e) and 15d -15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my
 supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuers, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me
 by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my
 conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report on such evaluation; and

c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

I have disclosed, based on my
 most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



Date:

August 12, 2005



/s/ John Slatky

John Slatky

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
OFFICE OF THE AITORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

% AUSTIN -c.Ilrsn(
--

Honorable Rouer P. Ralney, Realdent The Unltarsity

of Texas Austin,Texas
Eear Sir8 opinion No. o-2962 Re: Ume of umxponded balance in total salaries



### l pprcpr i a t e 4 l t o supplement

itea appropriated for purchase

**of** equipmeat.
Your letterof Deoeuber 6, 19-M, requestr **the** opinion

**of** this mtwnt upon the question vhethr an tutexpended balaaooof $6.600.00 la the total appropriation

**for** salaries

uade by the Forty-sixth Legislature

to the Unitersityof Texas,**Medioal** Bmauoh,for the ffsoaLyeu 1939-1880, vaa available

for use during that **fisoal year**  **to** supplement **the** $12+00~~ itea provided for the **fiscal** pm? 1939-1940 fo% *Clido **and** lrb&oy **for** cencu rerearch.
. .~.ealarie8. operating

eepeaees.

**and** equiWeat, aad expended for additional eqnlpaant for the oamer allnio end laboaabow. The fixnotion of an approprirrtioa ie **to** met apart a **eutdn** qm oi noaey to ..~bo.expe&ea .for

;. outah purpore. /.:. .a .a& :a~c.,.of.:~a~JPUIO*ltti:;;-:-; ’ umeyt apprcpriated for one parpow maynot be upeaded for amthe? .oad different purpose. Vs flnd no sathorlty ooaferred a-pea the Unirurdty apt Terae to expend ncneye **appropriated** for ssluiu to myplmsnt or WgBWt the aaouutappropriated for nuppliss

or equipaent. ft is true that authority is given to supplomeat ra3artes

under eortaiaolrcumtancea, vith certain limita,and from certainfundr: but the authority

to supplement

Wier is not involved

in your laquiry,

aad we therefore

do not dlscum it, for ycW lettermakes it clear thatyou wore not confronted vith the question **of** supplermnting

a salary,~but

with the question **of** aupplementinp:

the auouutappropriated

**for** the purchase **of** equlpueut

and mpplies. The fact that the Couptroller oarriedthe $12,000item PII one MWt%nt upon hii bookn,**or** the faot that the item 18 listed in the appropriation bill. tith the other spsclflo salary items.does not affect the question. I You do not ask, and we therefore axprers

no opinion

upon, the queetion whether the $6.600.00 unexpended

balancein the totalappropriation made for salaries

to the Medioal

Branch of the Onirersity of TexasVas available for uee duringthe fisoal year 1939-40to supnleuent a salarypaid from the 1:12,000.00

itenproridedfor EClinlc and 1nboratox’Y

for canoarresearoh.

. . t~lariea,

operating expenses, and eqnlment.N
Yours very truly ATTOW RTVW, OF TEKM RMFS,ov AX'ROVVD

DRC 14, 1940 BY (signed) Richardv. Fairchild. (si,laed)

&ala C. vc,, Assistant
tTTORREYGVR?VRAL

OFTRXAS
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MARY DEROVANESIAN,

Appellant,

v.

REFLECTIONS IN GOLD, INC., ET AL.,

Appellees.

No. 4D22-1376

[January 5, 2023]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Carol Lisa Phillips, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE16-21648.

Bart T. Heffernan, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

No brief filed on behalf of appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, DAMOORGIAN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134703 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134703 

 COA: 278440 

Oakland CC: 2005-205132-FH 

JOAN FLORENCE MUHAMMAD, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 3, 2007 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l1024 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2007 

 Clerk
### Geology of the lower Marias River area, Chouteau, Hill, and Liberty Counties, Montana

By: J. Fred Smith Jr.Irving Jerome WitkindDonald E. Trimble

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b1071E

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (2886 pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 3**                            (pdf) 
- Superseded Publications:
                                        Preliminary geologic map of the Goose Mountain No. 1 quadrangle, Montana(1955)                                    

                                        Preliminary geologic map of the Goose Mountain No. 2 quadrangle, Montana(1955)                                    

                                        Preliminary geologic map of the Lothair quadrangle, Montana(1955)                                    

                                        Preliminary geologic map of the Lonesome Lake No. 2 quadrangle, Montana(1955)                                    

- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
From: chuckvizthum@juno.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:55:30 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Chuck Vizthum

Sturgis, MI 49091
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, Agriculture (USDA).

# ACTION:

Notice; withdrawal.

# SUMMARY:

The Mendocino National Forest is withdrawing its draft environmental impact statement (DEIS) for the Pine Mountain Late-Successional Reserve Habitat Protection and Enhancement Project on the Upper Lake Ranger District. The Mendocino National Forest's decision to withdraw the DEIS is due to major changes to the landscape after the 2018 Ranch Fire. Multiple challenges delayed the publication of this notification including the government furlough in 2019, Covid pandemic starting in 2020, the 2020 1-million-acre August Complex wildfire and a shift in forest priorities to recover the acres burned in the August Complex.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Questions concerning this notice should be directed to Upper Lake District Ranger Frank Aebly at                         *frank.aebly@usda.gov*                         or 707-275-1401. Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf or hard-of-hearing (TDD) may call the Federal Relay Service at 800-877-8339, 24 hours a day, every day of the year, including holidays.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Mendocino National Forest is withdrawing its DEIS for the Pine Mountain Late-Successional Reserve Habitat Protection and Enhancement Project. The original Notice of Intent was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on May 20, 2014 (79 FR 28883), and the Notice of Availability was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on May 5, 2017 (82 FR 21228).                

Dated: September 15, 2023.

Troy Heithecker,

Associate Deputy Chief, National Forest System.

[FR Doc. 2023-20593 Filed 9-21-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3411-15-P
From: kballard@charter.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:31:59 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kevin Ballard

Newnan, GA 30263
Silberstein Ungar, PLLCCPAs and Business Advisors




Phone (248) 203-0080


Fax (248) 281-0940


30600 Telegraph Road, Suite 2175


Bingham Farms, MI 48025-4586


www.sucpas.com





March 30, 2011








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





Board of Directors


Bergio International, Inc.


Fairfield, New Jersey





To Whom It May Concern:





Silberstein Ungar, PLLC hereby consents to the use in the Form 10-K,Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, filed by Bergio International, Inc. of our report dated March 28, 2011, relating to the financial statements of Bergio International, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, as of and for the years ending December 31, 2010 and 2009.





Sincerely,





/s/ Silberstein Ungar, PLLC





Silberstein Ungar, PLLC





Bingham Farms, Michigan