alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[114th Congress Public Law 149]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

[[Page 130 STAT. 365]]

Public Law 114-149
114th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To rename the Armed Forces Reserve Center in Great Falls, Montana, the 
   Captain John E. Moran and Captain William Wylie Galt Armed Forces 
          Reserve Center. <<NOTE: Apr. 29, 2016 -  [S. 719]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. RENAMING OF THE ARMED FORCES RESERVE CENTER IN GREAT 
                              FALLS, MONTANA, AS THE CAPTAIN JOHN 
                              E. MORAN AND CAPTAIN WILLIAM WYLIE 
                              GALT ARMED FORCES RESERVE CENTER.

    (a) Renaming.--The Armed Forces Reserve Center in Great Falls, 
Montana, shall hereafter be known and designated as the ``Captain John 
E. Moran and Captain William Wylie Galt Armed Forces Reserve Center''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in any law, map, regulation, map, 
document, paper, other record of the United States to the facility 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be considered to be a reference to 
the Captain John E. Moran and Captain William Wylie Galt Armed Forces 
Reserve Center.

    Approved April 29, 2016.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 719:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016):
            Mar. 16, considered and passed Senate.
            Apr. 18, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7009
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JAMES NEAL GREEN, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge. (CR-95-72, CA-96-1787-3-19) Submitted: December 23, 1997 Decided: April 20, 1998 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Neal Green, Appellant Pro Se. Sean Kittrell, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Green , Nos. CR-95-72; CA-96-1787-3-19 (D.S.C. May 27, 1997). We deny Appellant's motion for transcripts at government expense and his request for leave to file a supplemental informal brief based on such trans cripts. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. P67/34.

#### Lipper & Mann, Inc. *v.*United States, protests 64/4944, etc. (New York).

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of tea cups and saucers and after-dinner cups and saucers similar in all material re*865spects to those the subject of *W. Kay Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(53 Cust. Ct. 130, C.D. 2484) and *United States*v. *The Baltimore*& *Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United China*& *Glass Company*(47 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 719), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
(R.D. 11414)

#### Parsons & Whittemore, Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided December 5, 1967)

*Sharp, Solter & Hutchison for*the plaintiff.

*Edwin L. Weisl, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

_ IT IS HEREBY STIPUEATED AND AGREED by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court:

1. That the subject merchandise consists of hardboard exported from Sweden as to which the Secretary of the Treasury issued a find*785ing of dumping, published in 89 TD 197, TD 53567, made pursuant to the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C., 160, et seq.).

2. That pursuant to Section 168 of said Antidumping Act, the appraiser reported the purchase price (Sec. 162) and the foreign market value (Sec. 164) as to the merchandise listed on Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof.

3. That pursuant to Sections 500 and 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, the appraiser appraised all of the merchandise in the appeals for appraisement enumerated on Schedule A for regular duty purposes.

4. That the plaintiff duly filed appeals for reappraisement as to the values referred to in the above paragraphs Nos. 2 and 3.

5. That at the times relevant herein the purchase price and the foreign market value under the said Antidumping Act are as specified in the aforesaid Schedule A attached hereto.

6. That as to all other items of merchandise not identified on Schedule A, the appraiser’s reports of purchase price and of foreign market value are correct.

7. _ That the appraiser’s findings of value under the provisions of Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, are correct.

_ 8. That said appeals are submitted for decision upon this stipulation and said Schedule A.

Upon the agreed facts, I find foreign market value, as defined in section 164 of the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C. § 164), for-the merchandise described in schedule A, annexed to this decision and made a part hereof, and the purchase price thereof, within section 162 of said act (19 U.S.C. § 162), to be as indicated in said schedule. As to all other items of merchandise not identified in schedule A, I find the foreign market values and purchase prices to be as reported by the appraiser. In all other respects, the values of all merchandise are as returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Mark Bradley, Chief Executive Officer andPrincipal Financial Officer of Players Network, a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The report on Form 10-Q of Players Network.(the "Registrant") for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 (the "Report") which this statement accompanies fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date: May 20, 2014

 

/s/ Mark Bradley 

Name: Mark Bradley

Title: Chief Executive Officer and

Principal Financial Officer
To: Reid Rosnick

From: Neal S. Nelson Subject: Comparison of CAP88 calculations from SC&A and the EPA web version of CAP88 As a cross check to assure that the version of CAP88 being used by SC&A is the same as the one which is downloaded from the EPA radiation website, a couple of the input data sets were obtained from SC&A. Initially I was unable to duplicate SC&A results. Investigation of the problem revealed I had a copy of ‘CAP88 ver3’ which had an executable dated 02/24/07. I had downloaded it fr om the EPA website at some time in the past. The out put had scrambled the dose conversion files somehow. After discussing the question with SC&A, I discovered that the current version of ‘CAP88 ver3’ has an executable dated 12/09/07. After I downloaded a nd installed a new copy of the current ‘CAP88 ver3’, I was able to run and duplicate the SC&A calculations. Since the EPA website lists only ‘CAP88 ver3’ for downloading, and does not indicate that different builds of the program have different executable s, the only way to identify different builds is to compare the executables for size and date. Also, I was unable to run the program on a computer that had been off line for a couple of years. The error report showed that Active X was unable to do somethi ng. It would appear that the Windows program must be up to date, so the computer must be on line to get the automatic updates to Windows. Anyway, it seems that we are running the same version of ‘ CAP88 ver3 ’ as SC&A and can duplicate or extend any report s we get from them.
No. 60981.

protest 276554-K (New York).

#### Lo Curto & Funk *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Harold A. Sothern*v. *United States*(32 Cust. Ct. 216, C. D. 1605), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
December 3, 1962.

No. 654, Misc.

#### Wilson *v.*MacBride, U. S. District Judge.

Motion for leave to file petition for writ of prohibition denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FOR (A) 2ND
QUARTER 10-Q UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) FORM 10-Q
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           4,498
<SECURITIES>                                    26,497
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,837
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,115
<PP&E>                                          19,810
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  74,420
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,164
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            78
<OTHER-SE>                                      52,161
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    74,420
<SALES>                                         24,648
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,648
<CGS>                                           13,757
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,757
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,437
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 232
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,871
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,547
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,324
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,324
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .28
        

</TABLE>
No. 61491.

#### Porath & Magneheim, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 302858-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
#### John S. Stubbs and another, Respondents, v. Charles L. Guilleaume, Appellant, Impleaded, etc.

Order appointing receiver affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Daniels, J.
From: njprice4christ@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:56:46 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Joan Price

Parker, CO 80134
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Joel Ramirez, * From the 35th District

 Court of Brown County,

 Trial Court No. CR20713.

Vs. No. 11-11-00077-CR * February 7, 2013

State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by McCall, J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 McCall, J., and Willson, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no error in 

the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the judgment of the 

trial court is in all things affirmed.
CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

 

Registration No. 333-35460

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (2)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO. 079				Trade Date: 05/24/01
(To Prospectus Supplement & Prospectus dated

September 8, 2000)						Issue Date: 05/30/01
The Date of this Pricing Supplement May 24, 2001
SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

CUSIP									Date and terms of redemption or

or	Stated				 Interest			repayment (including any

Common	Interest		 Price to	 Discounts & Payment	Survivors		applicable regular or special

Code	Rate (1)	Maturity	Public (2)	Commissions Frequency	 Option	Yes/No	record dates)

14911QDG3 5.25%	05/15/04	100%	 0.8% Semi-Annually	 YES	 NO	

 

 

Original Issue Discount Note:					Total Amount of OID:

____ Yes	 X No						N/A

 

 
- The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the effective date of the change.
- Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount. Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
No. 61468.

#### Iceland Products, Inc., and D. J. Ambrosio et al. *v.*United States,

protests 238916-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fish bits similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 60817, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Steven C. Quay, M.D., Ph.D., Chairman of the Board, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Nastech Pharmaceutical Company Inc. ("Nastech"), certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Nastech on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that
information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Nastech.

Date:  March 15, 2006

                                       By:      /s/ Steven C. Quay
                                                ------------------
                                       Name:    Steven C. Quay, M.D., Ph.D.
                                       Title:   Chairman of the Board, President
                                                and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Nastech and will be retained by Nastech and furnished to the
Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


This certification accompanies each periodic report pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Nastech for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit
32.2


Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
 Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 I, A.
Cameron Richardson, Chief Financial Officer of Aurora Gold Corporation (the
“Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to my knowledge:
 
 1.
              The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended
      September 30, 2007 which this certification accompanies fully complies
      with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934: and
 
 2.
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 Date:  February 13,
      2008
              BY:
              /s/ A. Cameron
      RichardsonA.
      Cameron RichardsonChief
      Financial Officer
 
    This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

      Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


I,  A.  Cameron  Richardson,  Chief Financial Officer of Aurora Gold Corporation
(the  "Company"),  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002,  that  to  my  knowledge:

1.   The Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-QSB of the Company for the period ended
     June  30, 2007 which this certification accompanies fully complies with the
     requirements  of  section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
     1934:  and

2.   The information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  August  17,  2007                     BY:  /s/  A.  Cameron  Richardson
       -----------------                          ----------------------------
                                                  A.  Cameron  Richardson
                                                  Chief Financial Officer




This  certification  accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002  and  shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes  of  Section  18  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A
signed  original  of  this  written  statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears  in  typed  form within the electronic version of this written statement
required  by  Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by  the  Company  and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff  upon  request.
Amendment No. 2012-2 to the Sunoco Partners LLC Executive Involuntary Severance


 Exhibit 10.2 
 SUNOCO PARTNERS LLC 
 EXECUTIVE INVOLUNTARY SEVERANCE PLAN 

Amendment No. 2012-2 

Section 3.1 of the Plan is amended in its entirety effective October 5, 2012: 

“Section 3.1 General Eligibility Requirement. In order to receive a Benefit under this Plan, a Participant must have been
employed by the Company on October 5, 2012 and his employment must be terminated by the Company on or after October 5, 2012 other than for Just Cause, death or Disability; provided, however, that any Participant who is
receiving benefits under the Sunoco Partners LLC Special Executive Severance Plan shall not also be eligible to receive any Benefit under this Plan.”
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsTether-Based Investigation of the Ionosphere and Lower Thermosphere Concept Definition Study ReportUnderstanding the plasma and atmosphere around the Earth in the lower altitude regions of the mesosphere, lower thermosphere, and ionosphere is important in the global electric system. An upper atmosphere tether has been proposed to NASA that would collect much-needed data to further our knowledge of the regions. The mission is proposed as a shuttle experiment that would lower a tethered probe into certain regions of Earth's atmosphere, collecting data over a 6-day period. This report is a summary of the results of a concept definition study to design engineering system that will achieve the scientific objectives of this mission.Document ID19970034863Acquisition SourceMarshall Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsJohnson, L.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL United States)*Herrmann, M.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 1997Subject CategoryGeophysicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:108543NASA-TM-108543Accession Number97N30086Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 116-10-02Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970034863.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
No. 308, Misc.

#### Hutchins *v.*Cunningham, Penitentiary Superintendent.

Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia. Certiorari denied.