alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exh_101.htm



Exhibit 10.1




 


WAIVER OF REGISTRATION REQUIREMENT







This Waiver of Registration Requirement (this “Waiver”), dated as of December _____, 2012, is being provided pursuant to Section 6(f) of the Registration Rights Agreement dated as of November 7, 2012 (the “RRA”) between Spherix Incorporated (the “Company”) and the purchasers (the “Purchasers”) of common stock and warrants from the Company in its November 7, 2012 private placement transaction (the “Private Placement”).  All undefined capitalized terms contained herein shall have the meanings set forth in the RRA.







The RRA requires the filing of an the Initial Registration Statement in order to register the resale of the securities sold in the Private Placement on or before the Filing Date and to cause such Initial Registration Statement to be declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on or before the Effectiveness Date (as such terms are defined in the RRA).  The Company has prepared a draft of the Initial Registration Statement and has presented the draft to the Purchasers, as required by the RRA.  The undersigned, constituting the Holders of at least 51% of the Registrable Securities, have determined to (i) waive the registration requirement, subject to the new filing obligations set forth below and (ii) waive any and all damages, penalties and defaults related to the Company not filing the Initial Registration Statement on or before the Filing Date and causing such Initial Registration Statement being declared effective by the SEC on or before the Effectiveness Date in accordance with the original terms of the RRA.  Additionally, the undersigned Purchasers  further agree that:








	
·  

	
The Company will be obligated to file the Initial Registration Statement within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of written notice to make such filing signed by holders of at least 51% of the Registration Securities(the “Filing Notification”);  and













	
·  

	
The Effectiveness Date will hereinafter be defined as ”the ninetieth (90th) calendar day following the date the Company receives the Filing Notification (or in the event of a “full review” by the Commission, the one hundred twentieth (120th) calendar day following the date the Company receives the Filing Notification);  and













	
·  

	
All other relevant dates/deadlines set forth in the RRA shall be adjusted consistent with the foregoing.












Except as set forth herein, the RRA and the related transaction documents remain unmodified and in full force and effect.  In the event of any inconsistency between the provisions of the RRA or any related transaction document, any or all of which as may have been previously amended, and the provisions of this Waiver, the provisions hereof shall prevail







The undersigned have executed counterpart signature pages to this Waiver.









  





i











  






 



	 	

PURCHASER:


	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	By:	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	No. Shares Held:	 
	 	No. of Warrants Held:	 





 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 ii
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit  Fund  VI,  L.P.,  Series 6 (the  "Partnership")  for the  quarter  ended
December 31, 2007 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"),  and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Wilfred N. Cooper,
Jr.,  President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates,  Inc.,  general
partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

1.        The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  except to the extent
          that  such  provisions  require  the  audit  report  of Local  Limited
          Partnership financial statements to refer to the auditing standards of
          the Public Company  Accounting  Oversight Board for the  Partnership's
          annual financial statements; and

2.        The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Partnership.




/s/Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
-------------------------
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
February 15, 2008
From: resumr3j@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:50:42 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Robert Marlett

Solvang, CA 93463
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit  Fund VI,  L.P.,  Series 6 (the  "Partnership")  for the  quarters  ended
December  31,  2005,  September  30,  2005 and June 30,  2005 as filed  with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  and
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.,  section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  I, Wilfred N.  Cooper,  Jr.,  President  and Chief
Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership,
hereby certify that:

1.        The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  except that the Report
          is a cumulative  report  covering each of the quarters  ended December
          31, September 30 and June 30, 2005; and

2.        The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Partnership.




/s/Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
-------------------------
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
February 15, 2008
PUBLIC LAW 114–138—MAR. 18, 2016 130 STAT. 313 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 1826: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: 

Vol. 161 (2015): Aug. 5, considered and passed Senate. 

Vol. 162 (2016): Mar. 1, 3, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 114–138 

114th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 99 West 

2nd Street in Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, as the Lieutenant Colonel James ‘‘Maggie’’ 

Megellas Post Office. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. LIEUTENANT COLONEL JAMES ‘‘MAGGIE’’ MEGELLAS POST 

OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 99 West 2nd Street in Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Lieutenant Colonel James 

‘Maggie’ Megellas Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Lieutenant Colonel James ‘Maggie’ Megellas Post Office’’. 

Approved March 18, 2016. 

Mar. 18, 2016 

[S. 1826] 


kgrant on DSKB33CYQ1 with PUBLAW
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30,
2009 of Lifestyle Choice Meals, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Annual Report"), I, Andrea Worsley, Chairman, President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Annual  Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
          13(a) or15(d) of the  Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
          and

     2.   The information  contained in this Annual Report fairly  presents,  in
          all  material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
          operation of the Company.


Date: September 18, 2009


/s/ ANDREA WORSLEY
________________________________________
Andrea Worsley
President, Secretary Treasurer,
Principal Executive Officer,
Principal Financial Officer and Director
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPharmaceuticals Exposed to the Space Environment: Problems and ProspectsThe NASA Human Research Program (HRP) Health Countermeasures Element maintains ongoing efforts to inform detailed risks, gaps, and further questions associated with the use of pharmaceuticals in space. Most recently, the Pharmacology Risk Report, released in 2010, illustrates the problems associated with maintaining pharmaceutical efficacy. Since the report, one key publication includes evaluation of pharmaceutical products stored on the International Space Station (ISS). This study shows that selected pharmaceuticals on ISS have a shorter shelf-life in space than corresponding terrestrial controls. The HRP Human Research Roadmap for planetary exploration identifies the risk of ineffective or toxic medications due to long-term storage during missions to Mars. The roadmap also identifies the need to understand and predict how pharmaceuticals will behave when exposed to radiation for long durations. Terrestrial studies of returned samples offer a start for predictive modeling. This paper shows that pharmaceuticals returned to Earth for post-flight analyses are amenable to a Weibull distribution analysis in order to support probabilistic risk assessment modeling. The paper also considers the prospect of passive payloads of key pharmaceuticals on sample return missions outside of Earth's magnetic field to gather additional statistics. Ongoing work in radiation chemistry suggests possible mitigation strategies where future work could be done at cryogenic temperatures to explore methods for preserving the strength of pharmaceuticals in the space radiation environment, perhaps one day leading to an architecture where pharmaceuticals are cached on the Martian surface and preserved cryogenically.Document ID20160003684Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsJaworske, Donald A.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Myers, Jerry G.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredMarch 23, 2016Publication DateMarch 1, 2016Subject CategoryAerospace MedicineChemistry And Materials (General)Report/Patent NumberE-19193NASA/TM-2016-218949GRC-E-DAA-TN28851Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 444543.01.02.12Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.KeywordspharmacologyAvailable DownloadsNameType20160003684.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0645

IN THE MATTER OF THE

MENTAL HEALTH OF

T.W.,

Respondent and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including October 13, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

September 6 2023

09/06/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0645
Before the Second Division,

January 31, 1961

No. 65127.

#### D. Hauser, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 328201-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Hoed, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of meat holders similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 63928, except that they are in chief value of other base metal, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: levalleybc@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:25:49 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Cindy Taylor

Ionia, MI 48846
No. 63762.

protests 59/14281 (B), etc. (New York, Los Angeles, and Cleveland).

#### Criterion Bead & Novelty Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

The protests were dismissed.
, c·,

r~Y&'i'REGIONALOFFICEoj

SUSTAINABLE TOURISM

LJ~KEP .ACiD(VB

October 28, 2013

Bob Bevilacqua, Town Supervisor

Town of Harrietstown

39 Main Street

Saranac Lake, NY 12983

Dear Supervisor Bevilacqua,

I am writing in strong support of maintaining essential air service from the Adirondack

Regional Airport to Boston while requesting an expansion of essential air service to the

New York Metropolitan area.

As president of the Regional Office of Sustainable Tourism (ROOST),I know that the

New York metropolitan area represents a major feeder market for our tourismdependent region. Opening another transportation link will not only provide increased,

convenient air access to the Adirondacks from this important population base, it will

also provide another marketing outlet, and provide a business travel component to

support our regional businesses.

Since 2010 our incumbent airline, Cape Air, has been operating increased flights in

summer on their Boston - Saranac Lake route. We request that this summer-seasonal

increase in frequency be codified in the RFP's frequency specification. Frequency and

schedule convenience is key to the success of our airport and local economy. At the

same time, we are most eager to connect our airport with the New York metropolitan

area, in addition to the thriving hub connectivity we have at Boston. We do not want to

divert to New York one of our just three daily authorized frequencies (leaving only two

flights to the hub at Boston) as that would undermine the critical mass of frequencies

necessary for a vibrant connection with the national air transportation system. An RFP

soliciting four daily flights in summer would allow an airline like Cape Air to retain

critical mass of frequency to the Boston hub (at least 3 daily non-stop flights) and

using a 4th EASfrequency add incremental service to the New York City market, which

is our primary source market for visitors. We note with admiration the success of Cape

Air's Lebanon - New York City service in the EASprogram, and understand that Cape

Air is eager to add flights between Saranac Lake and New York City under the auspices

of the EASprogram.

2608 MAIN STREET. LAKE PLACID, NY 129~6 518-523-2'i'i5 WWW.lAKEPLACID.COM
ROOST is the accredited destination marketing organization responsible for promoting

the Saranac Lake, Lake Placid, Lake Champlain, Schroon Lake, and Whiteface regions of

the Adirondacks. As a primarily drive-to destination, increased visitor and business air

access to our Adirondack region has the potential to drive significant economic impact

for our tourism-dependent communities.

On behalf of ROOST,I write to request that DOT carefully consider the increased

ridership at our airport over the last six years and request DOT explicitly solicit in the

forthcoming EASRFPa summer-season increase in capacity in accord with our summer

influx of passengers.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

James B. McKenna, president/CEO

2608 IvIAIN STREET. LAKE PLACID, NY 129<;6 518-523-2'i'i5 WWW.LAKEPLACID.(OM
No. 62726.

#### Moscahlades Bros., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 148408-K/13013, etc. (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of olives in brine similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Moscahlades Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 127, C.D. 1917), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

O'BRIAN OAKLEY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-1800

[October 30, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit; 

Broward County, Edward Harold Merrigan, Judge; L.T. Case No. 12-

011456CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender and Erika Follmer, Assistant Public 

Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allan R. Geesey,

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

DAMOORGIAN, J.

This appeal arises out of proceedings on remand following this Court’s 

decision in Oakley v. State, 237 So. 3d 396 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018). Appellant, 

O’Brian Oakley, argues that on remand the trial court erred in failing to

resentence him on the charge of aggravated fleeing and eluding using a 

correctly scored and calculated scoresheet. We affirm in all aspects 

without further comment. We write only to address the scoresheet error. 

Following this Court’s instruction in Oakley, the trial court vacated the 

two counts of vehicular homicide/failure to render aid but left the victim 

injury points attributable to those offenses on Appellant’s new scoresheet. 

All other non-capital counts and sentences remained in effect. As the trial 

court did not rely on the scoresheet when it originally sentenced Appellant 

but instead imposed the statutory maximum, Appellant was not 

resentenced on the remaining non-capital counts using a new scoresheet. 

See Zelaya v. State, 257 So. 3d 493, 497 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018) (holding that 

a defendant is not entitled to resentencing with a corrected scoresheet 

when “the record conclusively shows that the trial court would have 
2

imposed the same sentence using a correct scoresheet” (quoting Brooks v. 

State, 969 So. 2d 238, 241 (Fla. 2007))); see also Moreno v. State, 266 So. 

3d 1246, 1247 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019) (same). For much of the same reason, 

the trial court’s failure to enter a correctly calculated scoresheet on 

remand is harmless. See Zelaya, 257 So. 3d at 497. Recognizing there is

a scoresheet error, Appellant is entitled to have that error corrected and 

the victim injury points removed from the scoresheet. Accordingly, we 

affirm Appellant’s sentence, but remand for the entry of a corrected 

scoresheet.

Affirmed and remanded.

CIKLIN and GERBER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.