alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0001037156
<NAME>                        WNC HOUSING TAX CREDIT FUND VI, L.P., SERIES 6
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                           7,473,012
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,473,012
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  21,424,124
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,853,350
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    21,424,124
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   114,954
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      105,932
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    31,309
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (22,287)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (22,287)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (22,287)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (1)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0




</TABLE>
From: Suegirvan@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:31:05 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as Ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Susan Salles

Daytona Beach, FL 32114
**
**Exhibit 12.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a) AS ADOPTED**

**UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**

I, John Peter Rodgerson, certify that: 

 
1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Azul S.A.(the “company”); and 

 
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. 

Dated: July 18, 2019 

 

By:
 
/s/John Peter Rodgerson
 
 
Name: 
John Peter Rodgerson
Title: 
Chief Executive Officer
**
No. 65992.

#### Algemeene Kunstzijde Unie, N. V. *v.*United States,

protests 294453-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of nylon yarn similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 65138 and following the principles set forth in *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 12.2
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of MS&AD Insurance Group Holdings, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the company and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b)
    
    [omitted in accordance with the guidance of SEC Release 33-8760];c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; andd)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the
audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.
  By:
    /s/ Takayoshi UmemuraName:
    Takayoshi UmemuraTitle:
    Managing Executive Officer
From: debbie.chavarria1@mhshealth.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:31:39 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Debbie Chavarria

Boerne, TX 78006
October 18, 1962.

No. 348, Misc.

#### Bizup *v.*Colorado.

Supreme Court of' Colorado. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 261 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 29
110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 261

                          [Report No. 110-64]

 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1591) making emergency 
 supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
                     2007, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

               March 22 (legislative day, March 21), 2007

  Ms. Slaughter, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1591) making emergency 
 supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
                     2007, and for other purposes.

    Resolved,  That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 1591) making emergency 
supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
2007, and for other purposes. All points of order against consideration 
of the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of 
rule XXI. The amendment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules 
accompanying this resolution shall be considered as adopted. The bill, 
as amended, shall be considered as read. All points of order against 
the bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, to final passage without 
intervening motion except: (1) four hours of debate equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee 
on Appropriations; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
    Sec. 2. During consideration of H.R. 1591 pursuant to this 
resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the 
Chair may postpone further consideration of the bill to a time 
designated by the Speaker.
                                                  House Calendar No. 29

110th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 261

                          [Report No. 110-64]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1591) making emergency 
 supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 
                     2007, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

               March 22 (legislative day, March 21), 2007

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         302,927
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  6,958,745
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,549,048
<INVENTORY>                                    623,497
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               8,818,299
<PP&E>                                         4,326,093
<DEPRECIATION>                                 6,035,106
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 17,781,582
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          15,047,546
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       482,526
<OTHER-SE>                                     211,524
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   17,781,582
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               39,953,311
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  35,318,084
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,808,486
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,995,319
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,102,481)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,102,481)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.63)



</TABLE>
From: dodiebriskey@Comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:11:37 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dolores Briskey

Naples, FL 34110
#### James A. WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. FIRST DATA RESOURCES, INC.; Timothy Rosenthal; Theodore Henkenius; Ronald Doty; Pamela S. Wallman; Dianne M. Blum, Appellees.

No. 00-3187.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted June 29, 2001.

Filed July 9, 2001.

Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

James A. Washington appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment on his claims brought under the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA), 29 U.S.C.. §§ 2601-2654, against his former *485employer, First Data Resources, Inc. (First Data).

After de novo review, we conclude the district court correctly granted judgment to First Data. *See*29 C.F.R. §§ 825.214 (2000) (eligible employee is entitled to total of 12 workweeks of leave during any 12-month period when he cannot perform job due to serious health condition), § 825.802(d) (2000) (employer may require employee to comply with employer’s usual and customary notice and procedural requirements for requesting FMLA-qualifying leave), 825.303 (2000) (where need for FMLA leave is not foreseeable, employee should provide notice to employer as soon as practicable; employer will be expected to obtain any additional required information through informal means, and employee or spokesperson will be expected to provide more information when it can readily be accomplished); *Ragsdale v. Wolverine Worldwide, Inc.,*218 F.3d 933, 936-40 (8th Cir.2000) (standard of review; joining Eleventh Circuit in striking down 29 C.F.R. §§ 825.208(c) and 825.700(a) as improperly converting FMLA into statute providing additional 12 weeks of leave unless employer specifically notifies employee prospectively that he is using FMLA leave), *cert. granted in part by*— U.S. -, 121 S.Ct. 2548, 150 L.Ed.2d 716 (2001) .

Accordingly, we affirm. *See*8th Cir. R 47B. Washington’s motion to amend his complaint is denied.

1

. The Honorable Thomas M. Shanahan, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.
From: rfettig@fuse.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:02:11 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ron Fettig

Cincinnati, OH 45231
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          18,033
<SECURITIES>                                    41,685
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                61,812
<PP&E>                                           3,083
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  65,064
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,996
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           136
<OTHER-SE>                                     109,710
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    65,064
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,221
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   6
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,186)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,186)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.75)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.75)


</TABLE>