alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: lisastech@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:36:45 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Lisa Stechschulte

Owosso, MI 48867
Exhibit 32.1

      Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
           Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,  Klaus  Eckhof,  President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer  of  Aurora  Gold
Corporation  (the  "Company"),  certify,  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that  to  my  knowledge:

1.   The Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-QSB of the Company for the period ended
     September 30, 2006 which this certification accompanies fully complies with
     the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
     of  1934:  and

2.   The information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  November  10,  2006                   BY:  /s/  Klaus  Eckhof
       -------------------                        ------------------
                                                  Klaus Eckhof
                                                  President and Chief Executive
                                                  Officer


This  certification  accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002  and  shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes  of  Section  18  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A
signed  original  of  this  written  statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears  in  typed  form within the electronic version of this written statement
required  by  Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by  the  Company  and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff  upon  request.
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Material Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert M. Bernstein, Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

- The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and		    - The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.		        /s/ Robert M. Bernstein                     Robert M. Bernstein,   			Chief Executive Officer, President, and			Chief Financial OfficerAugust 14, 2007
Before the Second Division,

January 21, 1958

No. 61485.

#### Keuffel & Esser Co. *v.*United States,

protests 312957-K, 315487-K, and 320130-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of drawing instrument cases similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 59557, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: ericeshank@embarqmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:48:36 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Eric Shank

Waynesboro, PA 17268
No. P66/144. —

#### E. Miltenberg, Inc. *v.*United States, protests 64/4723, 64/6060, and 64/22683 (New York).

Nao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of stethoscopes similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Empire Findings Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(51 Cust. Ct. 262, Abstract 68126), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**Docket No. FAA -**  **2015 -**  **6547 Dir. ID 2014 -**  **NM -**  **129 -**  **AD**
Exhibit 11

                             WASTE INDUSTRIES, INC.
                       COMPUTATION RE: EARNINGS PER SHARE


                                                           Pro forma (1)
                                                   ----------------------------
                                                    Three Months Ended March 31
                                                   ----------------------------
                                                       1997            1998
                                                   ------------    ------------

Net income                                         $  1,144,451    $  2,108,269
                                                   ============    ============

Weighted average number of common shares
  issued and outstanding - basic                      9,890,270      11,881,604
Common stock equivalents -
  Options for common stock                              526,000         526,000
                                                   ------------    ------------
Weighted average common stock equivalents            10,416,270      12,407,604
Less treasury shares to be repurchased                 (198,685)       (140,020)
                                                   ------------    ------------

Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted        10,217,585      12,267,584
                                                   ------------    ------------


Basic earnings per share                           $       0.12    $       0.18
                                                   ============    ============

Diluted earnings per share                         $       0.11    $       0.17
                                                   ============    ============


(1) Pro forma basic and diluted earnings per share computations are based on the
weighted-average  common stock  outstanding  and include the dilutive  effect of
stock options using the treasury stock method (using the initial  offering price
of $13.50 per share for periods  prior to the initial  public  offering.  Common
stock outstanding used to compute the weighted-average  shares was retroactively
adjusted for the 1996 exchange of shares resulting from the merger of affiliated
companies,  for the 1997  conversion of nonvoting to voting stock,  for the 1997
1-for-2.5  reverse stock split and for the  acquisition of entities under common
control during the quarter ending March 31, 1998.

The  Company's  S  Corporation  status  was  terminated  on  May  8,  1997  and,
accordingly,  the Company became fully subject to federal and state income taxes
on May 9, 1997.  Pro forma net income and earnings  per share  amounts have been
computed  as if the Company  was  subject to federal  and all  applicable  state
corporate income taxes for the three months ended March 31, 1998.


                                       14
No. 68394.

protests 61/23627, etc. (New York).

#### Apex Coated Fabrics Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of rayon labels similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Bruce Duncan Co., Inc., a/c Standard Commodities Import & Export Corp.*v. *United States*(51 Cust. Ct. 27, C.D. 2409), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
**EXHIBIT 31(b)**

I, Digamber Naswa, chief financial officer of WWA Group, Inc. (“Registrant”) certify that: 

1.     I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (“Report”) of Registrant; 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report; 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this Report; 

4.     I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: 

a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared; 

b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and 

c)     Disclosed in this Report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.     I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

Date: August 15, 2006 

/s/ Digamber Naswa

Digamber Naswa

Chief Financial Officer 

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 65 (Monday, April 6, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 18402]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06876]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9925-22-OA]

Notice of Meeting of the EPA's Children's Health Protection 
Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given that the next meeting of 
the Children's Health Protection Advisory Committee (CHPAC) will be 
held April 21 and 22, 2015 at the Sheraton Silver Spring, 8777 Georgia 
Avenue, Silver Spring, Maryland 20910. The CHPAC was created to advise 
the Environmental Protection Agency on science, regulations, and other 
issues relating to children's environmental health.

DATES: The CHPAC will meet April 21 and 22, 2015.

ADDRESSES: 8777 Georgia Avenue, Silver Spring, Maryland, 20910.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Martha Berger, Office of Children's 
Health Protection, USEPA, MC 1107A, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20460, (202) 564-2191 or berger.martha@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meetings of the CHPAC are open to the 
public. The CHPAC will meet on April 21 from 12:30 p.m. to 5:00 p.m., 
and April 22 from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. at the Sheraton Silver Spring, 
8777 Georgia Avenue, Silver Spring, Maryland 20910. An agenda will be 
posted at epa.gov/children.
    Access and Accommodations: For information on access or services 
for individuals with disabilities, please contact Martha Berger at 202-
564-2191 or berger.martha@epa.gov.

    Dated: March 12, 2015.
Martha Berger,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 2015-06876 Filed 4-3-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
No. 333, Misc.

#### Stanislowski *v.*New York.

Court of Appeals of New York. Certiorari denied.
From: msfink@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:07:25 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mike Fink

Duncansville, PA 16635
From: Montie.m@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:33:24 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Montie Montgomery

Lacey, WA 98503
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit VI, L.P., Series 6 (the "Partnership") for the period ended June 30, 2003
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  and  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.,  section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  I,  Wilfred N.  Cooper,  Sr.,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates,  Inc., general partner
of the Partnership, hereby certify that to my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Partnership.


/s/WILFRED N. COOPER, SR.
-------------------------
Wilfred N. Cooper, Sr.
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
August 11, 2003
From: kathymillard@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:24:34 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kathleen Millard

Brattleboro, VT 05301
No. P66/152. —

#### United China & Glass Co. *v.*United States, protest 65/16059-17031 (New Orleans).

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of 6-inch bowls similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Copeland & Thompson, Inc.*v. *United States*(12 Cust. Ct. 85. C.D. 833), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT FOR 

10 CFR 431 

ENERGY CONSERVATION PROGRAM FOR 

COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT: 

PACKAGED TERMINAL AIR CONDITIONER AND 

PACKAGED TERMINAL HEAT PUMP ENERGY 

CONSERVATION STANDARDS; FINAL RULE 

November 7, 2008 

DOE/EA-1637