alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: whitehouse-5147@peoplepc.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:05:09 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Doreen White

Summerfield, FL 34491
Exhibit 10.4
 VAXGEN, INC.
 AMENDED AND RESTATED
1996 STOCK OPTION PLAN
Amended and Restated Effective May 29, 2002
Amended by the Board of Directors December 16, 2002
Amended by the Board of Directors August 5, 2008
   1. PURPOSES.
  2. ADMINISTRATION.




---



##### 



3. ELIGIBILITY.
   4. STOCK.
   2




---



##### 



5. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF OPTIONS.
  (a) Number of Shares and Type of Option.
 (b) Date of Grant.
 (c) Exercise Price.
 (i)
 (ii)
  3




---



##### 



(d) Duration of Options.
 (e) Vesting Schedule.
 VESTEDRATIOOn the first anniversary of the Date of Grant
    
    
    1/4Plus:For each full month of the Optionees continuous service from the
first anniversary of the Date of Grant until the Vested Ratio is
1/1, an additional
    
    
    1/48
  (f) Acceleration of Vesting.
  4




---



##### 



(g) Term of Option.
  (h) Exercise of Options.
  5




---



##### 



(i) Payment upon Exercise of Option.
 (1)
 (2)
 (3)
 (4)
 (j) Net Issue Exercise.
 X
    
    =
    
    Y (A-B)

     A
  6




---



##### 



Where
    
    X =
    
    the number of shares of Common Stock to
be issued to the Holder pursuant to
election under this Section 5(j)Y =
    
    the number of shares of Common Stock
purchasable under the Option or, if only
a portion of the Option is being
exercised, the portion of the Option
being converted and canceled (at the
date of such calculation)A =
    
    the fair market value of one share of Common Stock (at the date of such calculation)B =
    
    the exercise price (as adjusted to the date of such calculation).
  (i)
 (ii) The Wall Street Journal
 (iii)
 (k) Rights as a Stockholder.
 (l) Transfer of Option.
  7




---



##### 



(m) Securities Regulation and Tax Withholding.
 (1)
   (2)
 (A)
  8




---



##### 



(B)
 (3)
 (n) Stock Dividend, Reorganization or Liquidation.
 (1)
 (2)
 (3)
  9




---



##### 



(4)
 (5)
 (o) Change in Control.
 (1)
 (A)
 (B)
 (C)
  10




---



##### 



(D)
 (2)
 (3)
 6. EFFECTIVE DATE; TERM.
   11




---



##### 



7. NO OBLIGATIONS TO EXERCISE OPTION.
  8. NO RIGHT TO OPTIONS OR TO EMPLOYMENT.
  9. APPLICATION OF FUNDS.
  10. INDEMNIFICATION OF THE BOARD.
  11. AMENDMENT OF PLAN
   12
Exhibit 10.4(a)

 


	
MINISTRY OF MINES AND GEOLOGY
    	
 
    	
REPUBLIC OF GUINEA
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
LABOR-JUSTICE-SOLIDARITY
    




 

ARRETE N° 10629 /MMG/SGG

PROVIDING FOR AUTHORIZATION OF THE ASSIGNMENT OF A PARTICIPATING INTEREST BETWEEN SCS CORPORATION AND TULLOW GUIUNEA, LTD.

 

THE MINISTER

 

In view of the Constitution;

In View of Ordinance N° 119/PRG/86 of September 23, 1986, concerning the Petroleum Code of the Republic of Guinea;

In View of Decree N° 168/PRG/86 dated September 23, 1986, concerning the Petroleum Code of the Republic of Guinea;

In view of Decree/2010/071/PRG/CNDD/SGG dated May 10, 2010, concerning approval of the Hydrocarbon Production Sharing Contract, as amended, signed by the Republic of Guinea and SCS Corporation;

In view of D/2012/109/PRG/SGG/dated October 5, 2012, D/2012/121/PRG/SGG dated November 8, 2012, and D/2012/127/PRG/SGG dated November 28, 2012, concerning the nomination of Ministers;

In view of Decree N° 339/SGG/MNREE/87 dated June 24, 1987, concerning Approval of the Hydrogen Production Sharing Contract model;

In view of Arrete/2010/0925/MMG/SGG dated April 12, 2010, authorizing an assignment of a participating interest, relative to a 23% share of SCS Corporation in Dana Petroleum;

In View of the Hydrocarbon Production Sharing Contract signed on September 22, 2006, between the Guinean Government and the company SCS Corporation/Hyperdynamics, as amended to this date;

 

RESOLVES

 

Article 1: The Republic of Guinea authorizes the assignment to Tullow Guinea Ltd., a corporation under English law whose main office is located at 9 Chiswick Park, 566 Chiswick High Road, London, W4 5XT, England, amounting to a 40% Participating Interest in the hydrocarbon production sharing contract signed on September 22, 2006, between CSC [sic] Corporation and the Republic of Guinea, as amended to-date;

 











 

The 40% assigned to Tullow Guinea Ltd. is issued from the portion held by SCS Corporation within said production sharing contract.

 

Article 2: The assignment of the Participating Interest cited in Article 1, above, is preferred in conformity with the provisions of Articles 13 and 17 of the Petroleum Code and of the Deed of Assignment signed by SCS Corporation and Tullow Guinea Ltd.

 

Article 3: This Arrete takes effect as of the date it is signed, will be recorded and published in the official journal of the Republic.

 

	
 
    	
Conakry,   December 27, 2012
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	

    


 

	
Distribution:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
RGP
    	
2
    
	
Office   of the Prime Minister
    	
1
    
	
SGG
    	
1
    
	
SG   MMG
    	
1
    
	
MMG   chief of staff
    	
1
    
	
OGRPP
    	
1
    
	
SCS   Corporation
    	
1
    
	
Tullow   Guinea Ltd.
    	
1
    
	
Archives
    	
2/13
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Nasus Consulting, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”), I, John Jenkins, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)             The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)             The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period covered by this report.








Date:  April 16, 2010
/s/ John JenkinsJohn JenkinsChief Executive and Financial Officer
From: mnkx2@tds.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:18:17 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kerry Johnson

Monticello, MN 55362
From: tomandamy4jc@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:25:49 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Amelia Simpson

Noblesville, IN 46060
Exhibit










SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“Amendment”), between Taylor Morrison, Inc. (together with any successor thereto, the “Company”) and Sheryl Palmer (“Executive”), is entered into on February 26, 2016.


RECITALS:


WHEREAS, the parties entered into an Employment Agreement, dated as of July 13, 2011, as amended by that certain Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated May 17, 2012 (collectively, the “Employment Agreement”);


WHEREAS, Executive and the Company have agreed to amend and modify certain terms of the Employment Agreement, with the understanding that all other provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain unchanged.


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth, and other good and valuable consideration, the adequacy and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Company and Executive agree as follows:


1.     The second sentence of Section 6(a)(iii) of the Employment Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


“For purposes of this Agreement, ‘Change in Control’ shall have the meaning ascribed to such term as set forth in the Taylor Morrison Home Corporation 2013 Omnibus Equity Award Plan, as amended from time to time, or any successor plan thereto.”


2.     Affirmation.     Except as specifically modified herein, all remaining provisions, terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that the Employment Agreement, including all exhibits thereto, and this Amendment shall constitute the entire agreement among the parties hereto with respect to Executive’s employment thereunder, and supersedes and is in full substitution for any and all prior understandings or agreements with respect to the Executive’s employment.


3.     Miscellaneous.     This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.




*    *    *























































IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment, or caused this Amendment to be duly executed on their respective behalf by their respective duly authorized officers, all effective as of the date and year first written above.


TAYLOR MORRISON, INC.                        EXECUTIVE


By: /s/ Darrell Sherman                            /s/ Sheryl Palmer
Darrell Sherman                                 Sheryl Palmer
Executive Vice President, 
Chief Legal Officer and Secretary










 














































































[Signature Page to Second Amendment to Employment Agreement]
From: dcards@nettally.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:06:39 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dana Sheedy

Tallahassee, FL 32308
From: pksemina@fresno.edu

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:26:10 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Paula Seminario

Fresno, CA 93704
EX-10.19



 Exhibit 10.19 
 Promissory Note 
  

			
	$37,500	  	December 20, 2012

 FOR
VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Xenonics Holdings, Inc. (“Maker”) hereby promises to pay to the order of                     , the
principal amount of Thirty Seven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($37,500), together with interest thereon. 
 Interest shall
accrue on the outstanding principal balance of this Note at the rate of 13% per annum. 
 The entire principal of this Note
together with any accrued interest shall be due and payable on January 15, 2013. This Note may be voluntarily prepaid from time to time, in whole or in part, without notice and without premium or penalty. All amounts owing by Maker hereunder
shall be secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company. 
 If this Note is not paid in accordance with the terms
hereof, Maker agrees to pay all costs and expenses of collection when incurred, including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses and court costs. 
 Principal and interest shall be payable in lawful money of the United States and shall be made at such place as the holder hereof shall have designated to Maker in writing for such purpose. 

This Note is being delivered and is intended to be performed in the State of California, and shall be governed by and construed and
enforced in accordance with the laws of California. 
  

			
	XENONICS HOLDINGS, INC.
		
	By:	 	 
		 	Alan P. Magerman, Chairman
From: psi34@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Concerns about “religious refusal”

Date: Monday, August 15, 2011 9:01:59 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the recommendations of the Institute

of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for

“religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women

better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to contraceptive services, others, driven

by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed,

some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If

granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the

proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

 Thank You,

 CJ Gold