alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004-2595  p202 624-2500  f202 628-5116

Marc L. Warren

(202) 624-2531

mwarren@crowell.com

December 16, 2015

VIA FDMS

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140

Attn: FAA Dockets

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Infinigy – Petition to Amend Exemption No. 13386 (Docket No. FAA-2015-1953)

Dear Sir or Madam:

On October 28, 2015, the FAA granted Infinigy Engineering & Surveying PLLC (“Infinigy”)

an exemption pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012

authorizing Infinigy to operate the Aerialtronics Altura Zenith, Vulcan Black Widow and Sci.Aero

cyberQuad unmanned aircraft systems (“UAS”) to conduct aerial photography, cinematography,

inspections, and surveying (“Exemption No. 13386”).1Pursuant to Operating Condition and

Limitation No. 1 indicated therein, Infinigy petitions the FAA to amend its Section 333

exemption authority to enable Infinigy to operate the Delta Drone Delta-H UAS (8.8 lbs., multirotor) under the same operating conditions and limitations as specified in Exemption No.

13386.

The Delta Drone Delta-H UAS meets all of the relevant criteria described in Exemption

No. 13386, and Infinigy’s operations with this UAS will comply with all conditions and

limitations specified therein. Infinigy will maintain and update the technical manuals for this

UAS as necessary.2 The same public interest and safety factors that supported the FAA’s

issuance of Exemption No. 13386 exist here. Moreover, granting this amendment request

would be consistent with the amendment relief the FAA has provided to over 200 other UAS

operators already operating under Section 333. 

Should you have any questions or require any additional information, please do not

hesitate to contact me at mwarren@crowell.com or (202) 624-2531. 

 

1

In the Matter of the Petition of Infinigy Engineering & Surveying PLLC, Grant of Exemption No. 

13386 (Oct. 28, 2015), Docket No. FAA-2015-1953. 

2 Manuals for the Delta Drone Delta-H UAS will be provided to FAA upon request. 
FAA Dockets

December 16, 2015

Page 2 of 2

Crowell & Moring LLP  www.crowell.com  Washington, DC  New York  San Francisco  Los Angeles  Orange County  Anchorage  London  Brussels

Respectfully submitted,

Marc L. Warren

Counsel for 

Infinigy Engineering & Surveying PLLC
Before the First Division,

January 18, 1967

No. P67/21.

#### Border Brokerage Co. *v.*United States,

protest 60/13828 (Seattle).

Bao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of cedar shorts similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Border Brokerage Co. et al.*v. *United States*(52 Cust. Ct. 204, C.D. 2461), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 577

# Acronyms and Abbreviations

----

#### 
Home | Acronyms | Figures | Navigation | Equipment and Processing | Images | Logs | Metadata | Download

 

----

#### Home | Acronyms | Figures | Navigation | Equipment and Processing | Images | Logs | Metadata | Download

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior |U.S. Geological Survey		URL: http://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/577/html/acronyms.htmlPage Contact Information: William R. PfeifferPage Last Modified: Monday, 18-Apr-2011 12:44:12 EDT
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION





Washington, D.C. 20549


_______________





FORM 8-K


_______________





CURRENT REPORT





Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of


The Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): March 5, 2015


_______________





COMMUNITYONE BANCORP


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





North Carolina000-1382356-1456589


(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)(Commission File Number)(IRS Employer Identification Number)





1017 East Morehead Street, Charlotte North Carolina 28204


(Address of principal executive offices)





Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (336) 626-8300





N/A


(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





[]Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)[]Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)[]Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))[]Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

















---







Item 7.01.    Regulation FD Disclosure.


Robert L. Reid, President/Chief Executive Officer, David L. Nielsen, Chief Financial Officer, Neil W. Machovec, Chief Credit Officer, and Beth S. DeSimone, General Counsel of CommunityOne Bancorp (the "Company") are scheduled to provide certain investor presentations beginning on March 5, 2015.





A copy of the slide presentation prepared for use by the Company for these presentations is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this report. The information in the presentation is presented as of the date of this Report on Form 8-K, and the Company does not assume any obligation to update the information in the future.





The information in this Report, including Exhibit 99.1, shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 nor shall it be deemed incorporated by referenced in filings under the Securities Act of 1933.


Item 9.01.     Financial Statements and Exhibits.


(d) Exhibits


Exhibit No.     Description


99.1         CommunityOne Bancorp Investor Presentation, dated March 2015.

















---




SIGNATURE


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


March 5, 2015COMMUNITYONE BANCORP(Date)(Registrant)/s/ David L. NielsenDavid L. NielsenChief Financial Officer
No. 60135.

protest 268100-K (New York).

#### D. C. Andrews & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues are similar to those involved in Abstract 57104,' the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                      15,718,234
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,461,595
<ALLOWANCES>                                   395,076
<INVENTORY>                                  7,622,764
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            37,130,070
<PP&E>                                       8,985,729
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,652,419
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              57,725,646
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,262,029
<BONDS>                                     10,665,658
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       807,873
<OTHER-SE>                                  40,412,995
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                57,725,646
<SALES>                                     35,653,617
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            35,653,617
<CGS>                                       15,055,254
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,055,254
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            17,621,531
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             366,525
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,142,204
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,302,290
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,839,914
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,839,914
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .22
        

</TABLE>
#### Henry Kozane, Respondent, *v.*Sun Insurance Office, Appellant.

*Kozane*v. *Sun Insurance Office,*142 App. Div. 926, affirmed.

(Submitted December 13, 1912;

decided December 31, 1912.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered January 17, 1911, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action upon a policy of fire insurance.

*George H. Bond*for appellant.

*Jerome L. Cheney*and *Clinton S. Carr*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase and Collin, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------


                   STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                   -------------------------------------------
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                        ---------------------------------




The  undersigned  is the Chief Executive Officer  and Chief Financial Officer of
Material Technologies, Inc. (the "Company").  This  Certificate is made pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of  the Company  for the quarter ended March
31, 2005 (the "10-Q Report").


The  undersigned  certifies  that  the  10-Q  Report  fully  complies  with  the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
as  amended,  and that the  information  contained  in the  10-Q  Report  fairly
presents,  in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of
operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.




Date:  September 27, 2005                       /s/ ROBERT M. BERNSTEIN
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Robert M. Bernstein
                                                Chief Executive Officer and
                                                Chief Financial Officer


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Material  Technologies,  Inc.  and will be  retained  by  Material
Technologies,  Inc. and furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or
its staff upon request.
From: cindysue34@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:26:01 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Cynthia Montgomery

Arlington, TX 76017
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 143 

Urging the President to appoint a Special Envoy for Middle East Peace. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2007 

Mrs. DAVIS of California (for herself, Mr. PATRICK J. MURPHY of Pennsylvania, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Ms. MCCOLLUM of Minnesota, Mr. SNYDER, 

Ms. MOORE of Wisconsin, Mr. ELLISON, Mr. PRICE of North Carolina, 

Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. KLEIN of Florida, and Ms. SCHWARTZ) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Urging the President to appoint a Special Envoy for Middle 

East Peace. 

Whereas peace and stability inside the Middle East have a direct and immediate impact on the national security of the 

United States and our allies around the world; 

Whereas diplomacy must be made a central component of 

United States policy in the Middle East; 

Whereas the situation in Israel and the Palestinian territories 

has substantially deteriorated since 2000; 

Whereas it is directly in the national interest of the United 

States to reengage both sides of this dispute in an urgent 

manner; 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 143 IH 

Whereas the creation of a lasting peace between Israelis and 

Palestinians will reduce tension in the region and help repair America’s image in the international community; 

Whereas a resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian dispute will 

have a positive influence on the overall Arab-Israeli conflict and help reduce Iranian influence in the region; 

Whereas if the United States is unwilling to take a lead in 

facilitating real sustained negotiations, powers hostile to 

the United States and our interests may seek to fill the 

leadership vacuum; and 

Whereas the United States must be proactive in this endeavor: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the President should appoint a Special 

3 Envoy for Middle East Peace. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal
Procedures) of the United States Code and shall not be relied on by any person for any other purpose.



The undersigned, who are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Liberty National Bancshares, Inc. (the
Company), hereby each certify as follows:



The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company (the Report), which accompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





| |  |                                             
| |  | --------------------------------------------
| |  | This 11th day of November 2004.             
| | 
| |  | /s/ William L. Daniel                       
| |  | William L. Daniel                           
| |  | Chief Executive Officer                     
| |  | (Principal Executive Officer)               
| | 
| |  | /s/ Jesse R. Cheatham                       
| |  | Jesse R. Cheatham                           
| |  | Chief Financial Officer                     
| |  | (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Liberty National Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32-1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit  Fund  VI,  L.P.,  Series 6 (the  "Partnership")  for the  quarter  ended
December 31, 2003 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"),  and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Wilfred N. Cooper,
Jr.,  President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates,  Inc.,  general
partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Partnership.




/s/WILFRED N. COOPER, JR.
-------------------------
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
December 5, 2005
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Christopher Williams, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 346]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Beerman, J.), rendered September 10, 1990, convicting him of criminal possession of marijuana in the second degree and criminally using drug paraphernalia in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant’s speedy trial motion to dismiss the indictment pursuant to CPL 30.30. The defendant failed to challenge, either in his motion papers or at the CPL 30.30 hearings, the time period between December 12, 1985, the date a bench warrant for his arrest *788was issued, and August 6, 1987, the date the People first learned of the defendant’s apprehension in Maryland. Therefore, this issue is both unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Tutt,*38 NY2d 1011; *People v Manuli,*156 AD2d 388), and beyond our review since the Supreme Court specifically did not address its merits *(see, People v Noland,*189 AD2d 829).

The Supreme Court properly excluded the period between July 15, 1988, and October 14, 1988. Upon being informed of the defendant’s detention and prosecution in Maryland for unrelated criminal charges, the People made diligent and reasonable efforts to secure the defendant’s presence at trial by complying with the procedures set forth in the Interstate Agreement on Detainers *(see,*CPL 580.20; *see also, People v Reilly, 136*AD2d 355). Accordingly, the period between July 15, 1988, when the People first learned of the defendant’s permanent place of incarceration in Maryland, and October 14, 1988, when he was ultimately extradited to New York, was not chargeable to the People (see, *People v Wojciechowski,*143 AD2d 164; *People v Gilbert,*142 AD2d 686; *People v Brown,*136 AD2d 715; *People v Leftwich,*126 AD2d 748; *People v Lowman,*102 AD2d 896).

Finally, as the hearing court correctly determined, the time period between July 15, 1988, and January 3, 1989, the date the defendant was ultimately brought to trial, even if chargeable to the People, did not exceed the 180 day requirement of CPL 30.30.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review, or without merit. Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.
No. 533.

#### Dyer *v.*Murray, Trustee, et al.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Robinson Verrill*and *John A. Kendrick*for respondents.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Certiorari denied.
From: rkless@providence.edu

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:06:42 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Richard F Kless

Smithfield, RI 02917