alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

 

Registration No.  333-59540

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  212				Trade Date: 08/22/02
(To Prospectus Supplement & Prospectus dated

  June 1, 2001)							Issue Date:  08/27/02
The Date of this Pricing Supplement August 26, 2002
SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

  CUSIP									Date and terms of redemption or

     or	Stated				             Interest			repayment (including any

Common	Interest		  Price to	 Discounts &         Payment	Survivors		applicable regular or special

  Code	Rate (1)	Maturity	Public (2)	Commissions       Frequency	  Option	Yes/No	record dates)

14911QJV4	   3.30%	08/15/05	     100%	       0.625%                Quarterly	     YES	    NO	

Principal						1st Payment	Day	

Amount		Proceeds		Dealer		      Date		Count

$2,539,000.00	$2,523,131.25	ABN AMRO Inc.	   11/15/02		30/360	
 

Original Issue Discount Note:					Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes	  X   No						N/A

 

 
- The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the effective date of the change.   Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $684.885 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (SM) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (SM) will be made under a Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated June 1, 2001.
Additionally, the total principal amount of PowerNotes(SM) offered by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation pursuant to its Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated June 1, 2001 has been increased from $500.0mm to $750.0mm.  $250.0mm principal amount of debt securities registered pursuant to Registration Statement No. 333-59540 originally offered by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation pursuant to its Prospectus Supplement dated June 15, 2001 and related Prospectus dated May 25, 2001 are being offered as PowerNotes(SM) by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation pursuant to its Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated June 1, 2001.
- Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**JACOB MATTHEW CHRISTINE,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 135 MAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 10th day of May, 2016, the Petition for Allow ance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8) pertaining to the Bergio International, Inc. 2011 Stock Incentive and Reward Plan of our report dated August 20, 2019, with respect to the financial statements of Bergio International, Inc. included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2018, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

 

 

 

*/s/ Tama, Budaj and Raab, LLP*

Farmington Hills, Michigan

August 20, 2019
From: fayechancytaylor@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:36:43 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Faye Taylor

Greenville, FL 32331
From: nowhere.man4@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:41:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you maintain the mandate that all

"contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance with no co-pay to

patients. I strongly oppose religious groups and other organizations hiding behind religious exemptions

making demands that affect all Americans.

I also urge you to maintain your definition of religious employer This legal mandate clearly supports a

person's right to health care coverage, as is prevalent in many other Western democratic countries. The

definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include churches. Good! I

would prefer NO religious organizations getting any special treatment under the law.

Please protect the rights of Americans, to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services. No

Americans should be without health care coverage as needed! 

Sincerely,

Robert Jakubiec

Fox Lake, IL 60020
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit  Fund VI,  L.P.,  Series 6 (the  "Partnership")  for the  quarters  ended
December  31,  2004,  September  30,  2004 and June 30,  2004 as filed  with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  and
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.,  section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  I, Wilfred N.  Cooper,  Jr.,  President  and Chief
Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership,
hereby certify that:

1.        The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  except to the extent
          that  such  provisions  require  the  audit  report  of Local  Limited
          Partnership financial statements to refer to the auditing standards of
          the Public Company  Accounting  Oversight Board for the  Partnership's
          annual financial statements and except that the Report is a cumulative
          report  covering each of the quarters ended December 31,  September 30
          and June 30, 2004; and

2.        The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Partnership.




/s/Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
-------------------------
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
February 15, 2008
From: boggsr1@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:13:13 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Russell Boggs

Corinth, NY 12822
From: rsallerton@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:22:34 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ron Allerton

, 43081-2638
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

The Board of Directors 

Marina Biotech, Inc. 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-44035, 333-59472, 333-62800, 333-72742, 333-108845,333-148771, 333-164326, 333-168447, 333-169254, and 333-169882) on Form S-3 and (Nos. 333-46214, 333-49514, 333-92206, 333-92222, 333-118206, 333-126905, 333-135724, 333-146183, 333-153594 and 333-170071) on Form S-8 of Marina Biotech,Inc. of our report dated March 23, 2011, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Marina Biotech, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2010, which report appears in the December 31, 2010 annual report on Form 10-K of Marina Biotech, Inc. Our report dated March 23, 2011contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the Company has incurred recurring losses and has an accumulated deficit, and has had recurring negative cash flows from operations, that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as agoing concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Seattle, Washington 

March 23, 2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PAMECO CORPORATION FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MAY 31,
1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001036283
<NAME> PAMECO CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                             152
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,231
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,489
<INVENTORY>                                    134,286
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               170,496
<PP&E>                                          17,640
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,630
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 224,705
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           91,784
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            88
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   224,705
<SALES>                                        145,194
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               145,194
<CGS>                                          111,146
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  140,563
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   760
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,022
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,849
<INCOME-TAX>                                       965
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,884
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,884
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350**

** **

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

** **

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form10-K of FSP 303 East Wacker Drive Corp. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Barbara J. Fournier, Chief Operating Officerand principal financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to her knowledge:

 

(1) the Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

 

| Date: March 11, 2011 | /s/ Barbara J. Fournier                               |
|----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                 | Barbara J. Fournier                                   |
|                 | Chief Operating Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
Exhibit 32.1
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with the Annual Report of Innovative Wireless Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Pavel Alpatov, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/ Pavel AlpatovPavel Alpatov

Principal Executive Officer

April 15, 2011
Before the First Division,

November 9, 1964

No. 68873.

#### Polk’s Model Craft Hobbies, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 58/10649, 60/6258(B), and 60/926(B) (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of miniature figures of people or pieces of equipment and other HO gauge railroad accessories the same in all material respects as those the subject of *United States*v. *Polk’s Model Craft Hobbies, Inc., et al.*(47 CCPA 137, C.A.D. 746), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before the Second Division,

July 27, 1966

No. P66/170. —

#### Ataka California, Ltd., and Winter, Wolff & Co., Inc. *v.*United States, protests 63/12057 and 62/5685 (Galveston).

Bao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issue involved in the foregoing protests is similar in all material respects to that in *Amerlux Steel Products Corp. et al.*v. *United States*(52 Cust. Ct. 83, C.D. 2441), and that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to the galvanized butt-welded steel tubes, pipes, etc., the subject of Winter, *Wolf & Co.*v. *United States*(54 Cust. Ct. 342, Abstract 69132), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: bklutch@inbox.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:36:24 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Carl Klotzsche

Colorado Springs, CO 80923