alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: daddysmyhero@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:31:39 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

The following is a "suggested comment", and is likely to be the same or similar to many comments on

this regulation. However, I read it through and decided it voiced my position exactly. I urge you to read

it in its entirety:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Alan Barker

Alma, AR 72921
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
consolidated financial statements for the three months ended September 30, 2000
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           6,651,490
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                         26,730
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,689,736
<PP&E>                                             174,408
<DEPRECIATION>                                      71,824
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,792,320
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              787,997
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             1,233
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,003,090
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,792,320
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    83,663
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,851,830
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,768,167)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,768,167)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,284,267)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.15)


</TABLE>
From: alan.weaver@cedrs.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:25:39 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Alan Weaver

Noblesville, IN 46062
From: unruh@cableone.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:59:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Debby James

Emporia, KS 66801
Exhibit 32.2


                                  CERTIFICATION


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Booth Creek Ski Holdings, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 1, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, as the President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

September 12, 2003


                                        By:/s/ CHRISTOPHER P. RYMAN
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                               Christopher P. Ryman
                                          President and Chief Operating Officer
Searched for **https://eliminatechildabusefatalities.sites.usa.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://eliminatechildabusefatalities.sites.usa.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906****OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of Material Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert M. Bernstein, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:				          (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and				          (2)        Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| Dated:  November 13, 2006 | /s/ Robert M. Bernstein                                 |
|--------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                | By:  Robert M. Bernstein                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|                                | Its:  President                                                                                                                                                                                                    |

----
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 12, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133566 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 133566 

 COA: 274838 

Eaton CC: 04-020148-FH 

MELISSA FLETCHER, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 6, 2007 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for 

consideration as on leave granted. 

p0905 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 12, 2007 

 Clerk
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors
Nastech Pharmaceutical Company Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-16507 and No. 333-45264) on Form S-2, (No. 333-44035, No. 333-59472, No.
333-62800, No. 333-72742, No. 333-108845, No. 333-111324, No. 333-119429, and
No. 333-127831) on Forms S-3 and (No. 333-28785, No. 333-46214, No. 333-49514,
No. 333-92206, No. 333-92222, No. 333-118206 and No. 333-126905) on Forms S-8 of
Nastech Pharmaceutical Company Inc. and subsidiary of our reports dated March
15, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Nastech
Pharmaceutical Company Inc. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and
the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity and
comprehensive loss, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2005, management's assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005 and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2005, which reports appear in the December 31, 2005, annual report on Form 10-K
of Nastech Pharmaceutical Company Inc.


/s/ KPMG LLP
------------



Seattle, Washington
March 15, 2006
From: mataylor@otelco.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:26:33 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Marge Taylor

Guntersville, AL 35976
From: ff.durr@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:20:02 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Fran Durr

Springfield, MO 65810
Exhibit 21.1

                          3COM CORPORATION SUBSIDIARIES

3Com Asia Limited (Hong Kong)
3Com Asia Pacific Rim PTE Limited (Singapore)
3Com Australia Pty. Ltd. (Australia)
3Com Benelux B.V. (The Netherlands)
3Com Bilgisayer Ticaret A.S. (Turkey)
3Com Bulgaria EOOD (Bulgaria)
3Com Canada Inc. (Toronto)
3Com Corporation Zagreb (Croatia)
3Com Costa Rica S.A. (Costa Rica)
3Com Credit Corporation (California, U.S.A.)
3Com do Brasil Servicos Ltda. (Brazil)
3Com de Chile S.A. (Chile)
3Com de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. (Mexico)
3Com Development Corporation (California, U.S.A.)
3Com Engineering Limited (United Kingdom)
3Com Europe Limited (United Kingdom)
3Com Far East Limited (Cayman Islands)
3Com GmbH (Germany)
3Com Holdings Limited (Cayman Islands)
3Com Hungary Kft (Hungary)
3Com Iberia S.A. (Spain)
3Com International, Inc. (Delaware, U.S.A.)
3Com International (New Zealand) Limited (New Zealand)
3Com IFSC (Ireland) (Ireland)
3Com India Pte. Ltd. (India)
3Com Israel Limited (Israel)
3Com Japan K.K. (Japan)
3Com Korea Limited (Korea)
3Com Limited (United Kingdom)
3Com Mediteraneo S.r.l. (Italy)
3Com Network Management Ltd. (Israel)
3Com Nordic AB (Sweden)
3Com Pension Scheme (1996) Trustees Limited (United Kingdom)
3Com Philippines Inc. (Philippines)
3Com Russia OOO (Russia)
3Com S.A. (France)
3Com South Asia PTE. Ltd. (Singapore)
3Com Technologies (Cayman Islands)
3Com (Thailand) Co. Ltd. (Thailand)
3Com U.K. Holdings Limited (United Kingdom)
3Com (U.K.) Limited (United Kingdom)
3Com Ventures, Inc. (Delaware, U.S.A.)
3Com World Trade, Inc. (Barbados)
Information Systems Group, Inc. (Utah, U.S.A.)
Lanworks Technologies Company (Canada)
P.N.B., s.a. (France)
U.S. Robotics Korea, Ltd. (Korea)
U.S. Robotics Logistics SARL (France)
U.S. Robotics Limited (United Kingdom)
U.S. Robotics s.a. (France/Delaware, U.S.A.)
U.S. Robotics Services Limited (Ireland)
Palm Computing Inc. (California, U.S.A.)
Before the Second Division,

February 15, 1966

No. 69789.

protests 64/4220, etc. (New York).

#### J. C. DeJong & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Bao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of brass pole rings similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Kroder Reubel Co., Inc., Alltransport, Inc.*v. *United States*(44 Cust. Ct. 274, C.D. 2186), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: rssadmin@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:18:19 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Rupert Annis

Rowley, MA 01969