alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 26 (Thursday, February 7, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9050-9051]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-02732]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS EXAMINATION COUNCIL

[Docket No. AS13-03]

Appraisal Subcommittee Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions 
Examination Council.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Description: In accordance with Section 1104(b) of Title XI of the 
Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, 
as amended, notice is hereby given that the Appraisal Subcommittee 
(ASC) will meet in open session for its regular meeting:
    Location: OCC--400 7th Street SW., Washington, DC 20024.
    Date: February 13, 2013.
    Time: 10:30 a.m.
    Status: Open.

Matters To Be Considered

Summary Agenda

    January 23, 2013 minutes--Open Session.
    (No substantive discussion of the above items is anticipated. These 
matters will be resolved with a single vote unless a member of the ASC 
requests that an item be moved to the discussion agenda.)

Discussion Agenda

    Appraisal Complaint National Hotline.
    Missouri Compliance Review.

How To Attend and Observe an ASC Meeting

    Email your name, organization and contact information to 
meetings@asc.gov.
    You may also send a written request via U.S. Mail, fax or 
commercial carrier to the Executive Director of the ASC, 1401 H Street 
NW., Ste 760, Washington, DC 20005. The fax number is 202-289-4101. 
Your request must be received no later than 4:30 p.m., ET, on the 
Monday prior to the meeting. Attendees must have a valid government-
issued photo ID and must

[[Page 9051]]

agree to submit to reasonable security measures. The meeting space is 
intended to accommodate public attendees. However, if the space will 
not accommodate all requests, the ASC may refuse attendance on that 
reasonable basis. The use of any video or audio tape recording device, 
photographing device, or any other electronic or mechanical device 
designed for similar purposes is prohibited at ASC meetings.

    Dated: February 1, 2013.
James R. Park,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2013-02732 Filed 2-6-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

The National Science Board's (NSB) NSB-NSF Commission on Merit Review hereby gives notice of the scheduling of a videoconference meeting for the transaction of National Science Board business pursuant to the National Science Foundation Act and the Government in the Sunshine Act.

# TIME AND DATE: 

Wednesday, September 27, 2023, from 12:00 p.m.-1:00 p.m. EDT.

# PLACE: 

This meeting will be held by videoconference through the National Science Foundation.

# STATUS: 

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

The agenda of the meeting is: Commission Chair's opening remarks; Presentation and discussion of the potential for additional Merit Review criteria; Commission Chair's closing remarks.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

                        Point of contact for this meeting is: (Chris Blair,                         *cblair@nsf.gov*), 703/292-7000. Members of the public can observe this meeting through a YouTube livestream. The YouTube link will be available from the NSB web page.                    

Christopher Blair,

Executive Assistant to the National Science Board Office.

[FR Doc. 2023-20824 Filed 9-21-23; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Orbit/FR, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Israel Adan, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

November 14, 2003

/s/ Israel Adan
-------------------------
Israel Adan
President and Chief Executive Officer
No. 59706.

#### D. P. Bushnell *&*Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 243908-K, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *John P. Herher & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 193, C. D. 1519), the protests were dismissed, and the matters were remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided *bylaw*(28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)).
From: melindasfabrics@mtida.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:44:56 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sue Kinner

Grangeville, ID 83530
From: jrcutbirth@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:53:00 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

John Cutbirth

Cypress, TX 77429
# Front side BMS board S S **C1 IC6**  **IC5**

**IC4 IC9**  **IC2 IC3 IC14** 

**IC16 IC17**  IC19 **C2 C3** 

**IC1 IC7**  **IC4**

**IC7 IC8** 

**IC10**
**IC10 IC11**  **T1 IC12**  **IC13**

**IC15 IC16**  IC19

**IC18**IC 2,3,4 -AQW210 623 IC1 - MC9S12DG128MPV - ND C1 - PCE3155TR- ND

C2 - PCE3155TR- ND C3 - PCE3155TR- ND IC5 - IC6 - 495 - 1868 -2 - ND IC7 - TLE42754D - ND C3 - PCE3155TR- ND

IC8 - 497 - 1548 - 1 - ND IC10 - 160 - 1305 - 5 - ND IC9 - IPS041L - ND

IC1 1 - 516 - 1731 - 1 - NDIC13 - 631 - 101 1 - 6 - ND IC12 - 601636 T1 - 81 1 - 1556 - 5 - ND IC18, IC19 - MM74HC14SJX- ND

IC14 - 606 SS 21 IC13 - 631 - 101 1 - 6 - ND

IC15 - 497 - 11 70 -2 - ND IC16, IC17 - OP

A343UA/2K5 - ND

# Other side of the board

**IC20 IC21**
**IC22 IC23 IC24**  **IC25 IC26 IC27**  **IC28 IC29 IC30**  **IC31**IC20, IC21, IC22, IC23 - 296 - 17563 -2 - ND IC28, IC29, IC30 - 255 -2130 -2 - ND IC32 - MM74HC14SJX- ND IC31 - IPS041L - ND
From: jsmit145@juno.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:32:37 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

James Smith

Sterling Heights, MI 48312
Exhibit 32.01

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Players Network (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (“Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: 

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Dated: November			21, 2005 | /s/ Mark Bradley                              |
|----------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       | Mark Bradley                                                                                                                                                                                   |  
 

Chief Executive Officer

 
 

Principal Accounting Officer

  |
From: david.ward@xo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:58:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

David Ward

Kirkwood, PA 17536
#### Troy R. SUTTON, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Commonwealth of VIRGINIA; Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia; Mark L. Early, Esq., Respondents-Appellees.

No. 01-6531.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 31, 2001.

Decided June 11, 2001.

Troy R. Sutton, pro se.

Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Troy Sutton appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *Sutton v. Virginia,*No. CA-01-176-2 (E.D.Va. Mar. 16, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 177 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 177

   Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Financial 
              Services in the One Hundred Tenth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 16, 2007

 Mr. Frank of Massachusetts (for himself and Mr. Bachus) submitted the 
  following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Financial 
              Services in the One Hundred Tenth Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on Financial Services (hereafter 
in this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including the 
expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the 
applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for committee 
salaries and expenses, not more than $16,575,710.00 for the One Hundred 
Tenth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $8,029,517.00 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2007, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2008; and
            (2) not more than $8,546,193.00 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2008, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2009.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
Joint Filing Agreement



 Exhibit 10.2 
 JOINT FILING AGREEMENT 
 We, the signatories of the statement to which this Joint
Filing Agreement is attached, hereby agree that such statement is filed, and any amendments thereto filed by any or all of us will be filed on behalf of each of us. 
  

			
	Dated: January 4, 2013	 	DEEP WATER HOLDINGS, LLC
		
		 	/s/ Lawrence R. Simkins
		
		 	Lawrence R. Simkins, Manager

  

			
		
	Dated: January 4, 2013	 	THE ROY DENNIS WASHINGTON REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST UNDER AGREEMENT DATED NOVEMBER 16, 1987, INCLUDING ALL SUBSEQUENT AMENDMENTS, MODIFICATION AND RESTATEMENTS
		
		 	/s/ Dennis R. Washington
		
		 	Dennis R. Washington, Trustee

  

			
		
	Dated: January 4, 2013	 	DENNIS R. WASHINGTON
		
		 	/s/ Dennis R. Washington
		
		 	Dennis R. Washington

  

			
		
	Dated: January 4, 2013	 	THE KYLE ROY WASHINGTON 1999 TRUST II
		
		 	/s/ Christopher Hawks
		
		 	Christopher Hawks, President, Copper Lion, Inc., Trustee









			
		
	Dated: January 4, 2013	 	THE KEVIN LEE WASHINGTON 1999 TRUST II
		
		 	/s/ Christopher Hawks
		
		 	Christopher Hawks, President, Copper Lion, Inc., Trustee

  

			
		
	Dated: January 4, 2013	 	KYLE ROY WASHINGTON 2005 IRREVOCABLE TRUST CREATED UNDER AGREEMENT DATED JULY 15, 2005, INCLUDING ALL SUBSEQUENT AMENDMENTS, MODIFICATIONS AND RESTATEMENTS
		
		 	/s/ Christopher Hawks
		
		 	Christopher Hawks, President, Copper Lion, Inc., Trustee

  

			
		
	Dated: January 4, 2013	 	COPPER LION, INC.
		
		 	/s/ Christopher Hawks
		
		 	Christopher Hawks, President, Copper Lion, Inc.

  

			
		
	Dated: January 4, 2013	 	KYLE R. WASHINGTON.
		
		 	/s/ Kyle R. Washington
		
		 	Kyle R. Washington


  
 -2-