alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsCrash Test of Three Cessna 172 Aircraft at NASA Langley Research Center's Landing and Impact Research FacilityDuring the summer of 2015, three Cessna 172 aircraft were crash tested at the Landing and Impact Research Facility (LandIR) at NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC). The three tests simulated three different crash scenarios. The first simulated a flare-to-stall emergency or hard landing onto a rigid surface such as a road or runway, the second simulated a controlled flight into terrain with a nose down pitch on the aircraft, and the third simulated a controlled flight into terrain with an attempt to unsuccessfully recover the aircraft immediately prior to impact, resulting in a tail strike condition. An on-board data acquisition system captured 64 channels of airframe acceleration, along with acceleration and load in two onboard Hybrid II 50th percentile Anthropomorphic Test Devices, representing the pilot and co-pilot. Each test contained different airframe loading conditions and results show large differences in airframe performance. This paper presents test methods used to conduct the crash tests and will summarize the airframe results from the test series.Document ID20160001629Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsLittell, Justin D.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredFebruary 5, 2016Publication DateNovember 1, 2015Subject CategoryAircraft Design, Testing And PerformanceAir Transportation And SafetyReport/Patent NumberL-20622NF1676L-22910NASA/TM-2015-218987Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 736466.01.08.07.55.01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20160001629.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
From: mnansen@alsco.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:02:17 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ramona Kanahele

Waianae, HI 96792
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 172 (Thursday, September 7, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 61606]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19264]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the 
Fellowships in Diabetes Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, October 
12, 2023, 10:00 a.m. to October 12, 2023, 07:00 p.m., NIH, 2 Dem, 6707 
Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the Federal 
Register on August 21, 2023, 56848.
    The meeting notice is amended to change the start date of the 
meeting from 10/12/2023 to 10/11/2023. The meeting is closed to the 
public.

    Dated: August 31, 2023.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-19264 Filed 9-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Annual
Statement of Compliance
 
 VIA:
EMAIL
 
 Structured
Asset Securities Corporation II
 745
Seventh Avenue
 New York,
NewYork 10019
 
 Wachovia
Bank, National Association
 201 South
College Street, 9th Floor, NC 1075
 Charlotte,
North Carolina 28244-1075
 
 Re:
                    LB-UBS
      Commercial Mortgage Trust 2008-C1
 Commercial
Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2008-C1
 
 Reference
is made to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April 11, 2008 (the
“Agreement”), among Structured Asset Securities Corporation II, as Depositor,
Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, CWCapital Asset
Management LLC, as Special Servicer, and LaSalle Bank National Association, as
Trustee.
 
 I, James
A. Jendra, a Senior Vice President of Bank, of America National Association as
successor by merger to LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee hereby
certify that:
 
 1.
                    A
      review of the activities of the Trustee during the preceding calendar year
      and of the performance of the Trustee under the Agreement has been made
      under my supervision; and
 
 2.
                    To
      the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled
      all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
      throughout such year.
 
 Date: 3/10/09
 Bank of
America, National Association as successor by merger to LaSalle Bank National
Association, as Trustee
 
 
 /s/
James A.
Jendra
 James A.
Jendra
 Senior
Vice President
 Americas
Executive


Tel:
312.904.1671


IL4 -
135-17-16


135 S. LaSalle St.,
Chicago, IL 60603




Recycled Paper
Dismiss and Opinion Filed July 21, 2015 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-15-00511-CV
IN THE INTEREST OF S.S., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-14-14735



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Lang, and Schenck Opinion by Justice Bridges The Court has before it appellant’s July 15, 2015 motion to dismiss the appeal. We grant
the motion and dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(a).

150511F.P05 /David L. Bridges/ DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

IN THE INTEREST OF S.S., A CHILD

No. 05-15-00511-CV On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-14-14735. Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges, Justices Lang and Schenck participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal. Subject to any agreement between the parties, we ORDER that appellee Aimee Sexton recover her costs of this appeal from appellant Bobby Wayne Sexton.

Judgment entered July 21, 2015.
From: mslowe30@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:33:11 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Marjorie Lowe

Sedona, AZ 86339
From: csmithdesign@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:31:51 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. At minimum, I ask you to expand conscience protections for any

organizations that provide individual and group insurance and to individual purchasers who have moral

and/or religious objections. I strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on

Americans especially for drugs and devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion

(such as ella and Plan B). Being sexually active, and being pregnant are not illnesses. Individuals are

responsible for their behaviors and their expenses, the way this is written is an encouragement to

further irresponsible behavior and beliefs.

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance, which of course they are being required to do. So in effect you force law abiding,

tender hearted individuals to violate the law.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children and the young women who take

them. I again urge you to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of

mandatory "preventive" services.

Sincerely,

claire smith

Sharon, CT 06069
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of VaxGen, Inc.
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I am responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on my most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ James P. Panek
Principal Executive and
Financial Officer
Search all of Utah.gov »

Skip to Main Content

1. Advisories

2. Health Risks

3. Map

4. FAQ

5. Resources

6. Contacts

The Environmental Epidemiology Program (EEP) completed a health consultation recommending that a

consumption advisory for waterfowl harvested from the Great Salt Lake marshes be issued because of the elevated

levels of mercury detected.

Common Goldeneye

Adults should eat no more than one 8-ounce meal per month, and children, pregnant women and women who may

become pregnant should not eat Common Goldeneye from Great Salt Lake marshes.

Cinnamon Teal

Utah Waterfowl Advisories - Consumption Advisories http://waterfowladvisories.utah.gov/advisories.htm

1 of 3 10/18/2012 3:24 PM
Adults should eat no more than two 8-ounce meals per month, and children, pregnant women and women who may

become pregnant should eat no more than one 4-ounce meal per month of Cinnamon Teal from Great Salt Lake

marshes.

Northern Shoveler

Adults should eat no more than two 8-ounce meals per month, and children, pregnant women and women who may

become pregnant should eat no more than one 4-ounce meal per month of Northern Shoveler from Great Salt Lake

marshes.

This web site sponsored by:

Photographs by: Tom Grey

1. Advisories

2. Health Risks

Utah Waterfowl Advisories - Consumption Advisories http://waterfowladvisories.utah.gov/advisories.htm

2 of 3 10/18/2012 3:24 PM
3. Map

4. FAQ

5. Resources

6. Contacts

7. Top

Utah.gov Home | Utah.gov Terms of Use | Utah.gov Privacy Policy | Utah.gov Accessibility Policy | Translate Utah.gov

Copyright © 2012 State of Utah - All rights reserved.

Utah Waterfowl Advisories - Consumption Advisories http://waterfowladvisories.utah.gov/advisories.htm

3 of 3 10/18/2012 3:24 PM
ex102.htm


EXHIBIT 10.2


 


MUTUAL TERMINATION 


OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This Mutual Termination of Employment Agreement is entered into by and between Vidaroo Corp. and Mark Argenti effective as of January 1, 2013.


 



	
1.  

	
Mr. Argenti is the current Chairman and CEO of Vidaroo based on an employment agreement dated as of May 1, 2008 with subsequent amendments dated November 6, 2008, November 8, 2009 and May 16, 2012.







 



	
2.  

	
The parties hereby wish to, and do hereby, mutually terminate the Agreement.







 



	
3.  

	
Mr. Argenti will resign his position as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, but continue in his role as a Director of the Board.







 



	
4.  

	
In consideration of the mutual termination Mr. Argenti agrees to forgo any post employment compensation as stated in the agreement.







 



	
5.  

	
In consideration of the mutual termination, Vidaroo agrees to forgo any rights that previously existed in Section 10 “Restrictive Covenants” of the Employment Agreement and further agrees to indemnify Mr. Argenti for any and all possible ramifications related to the release of the “Restrictive Covenants”.







 



	
6.  

	
In consideration for his ongoing involvement on the Board of Directors, all Stock Options previously issued shall remain in full force and effect.  In further consideration for his ongoing leadership as a Director, Vidaroo agrees to adjust the Exercise price of those Stock Options to Fair Market Value Fair Market Value at the time of the execution of this agreement.  Fair Market Value shall be defined as the average closing price of Vidaroo’s Common Stock for the 30 calendar days prior to the execution of this agreement, as further indicated in separately executed Vidaroo Corporation Non-Statutory Stock Option Agreement.














	

Vidaroo Corp.

	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	 	 	 	 	 
	 	
Thomas Moreland, Incoming Chairman  

	 	 	
Mark Argenti, Outgoing

	 
	 	
And CEO 

	 	 	
Chairman and CEO
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 18, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-10810

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL LAWRENCE MILLER,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(4:03-CR-226-ALL-A)

--------------------

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Defendant-Appellant Michael Lawrence Miller, a correctional

officer with the Bureau of Prisons, was convicted by a jury of

aggravated sexual abuse, sexual abuse of a ward, and abusive sexual

contact. He was sentenced to a total of 150 months in prison and

four years of supervised release. 

Counsel has not adequately briefed the claim that the evidence

was insufficient to support Miller’s conviction. He was convicted

of committing the above-listed crimes, but counsel has failed even
2

to recite the elements of each offense and how the evidence

purportedly failed to support each element. Counsel’s argument

contains no citation to the record and no substantive “argument” on

the issue of the insufficiency of the evidence; rather, it consists

of nothing more than conclusional assertions. See Brinkmann v.

Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir.

1987). Thus, Miller’s challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence

to support his convictions is deemed abandoned on appeal. See

Yohey v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993).

Miller claims that his legal representation was ineffective at

trial because his counsel suffered from a serious medical

disability that interfered with his ability to conduct

comprehensive, thorough cross-examination of the witnesses. As

this is not one of those rare cases in which the record is

sufficiently developed to allow this court to evaluate the merits

of Miller’s ineffectiveness claim, we decline to address it here.

See United States v. Navejar, 963 F.2d 732, 735 (5th Cir. 1992).

Miller may pursue his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in

a collateral proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. 

The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
From: mothernet@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:39:03 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Marilyn Self

Everett, WA 98208
|   | (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated. |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                        |   |                           |
|-----------------------------|--------|--------------------------------|
|                        |   |                           |   |
| Date:  August 13, 2009 | By:    | /s/ Toni M. Perazzo       |   |
|                        |   | Name: Toni M. Perazzo          |   |
|                        |   | Title: Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                        |   |                           |   |