alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Brian J. Martin,
Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer of the managing general partner, Prudential-Bache Properties, Inc. (the Managing General Partner), of Prudential-Bache/Watson & Taylor, Ltd.-2 (the
Partnership), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Partnerships Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/         Brian J. Martin                                                                                                             
|Brian J. Martin Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Managing General Partner March 26, 2004



1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
COMPANY'S  UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH
31,  1998  AND  IS  QUALIFIED  IN  ITS  ENTIRETY  BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>   1000
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       28369 
<SECURITIES>                                     0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                39288 
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0 
<INVENTORY>                                      0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             67657 
<PP&E>                                      211572 
<DEPRECIATION>                             (117043)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              287436 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       262830 
<BONDS>                                          0 
<COMMON>                                      8277 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0 
<PREFERRED>                                 150000 
<OTHER-SE>                                 (351671)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     0 
<SALES>                                          0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             96744 
<CGS>                                            0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               128813 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            5683 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (32069)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (32069)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0 
<CHANGES>                                        0 
<NET-INCOME>                                (32069)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (0.00)
        

</TABLE>
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 220 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 511) to pledge the faithful 

support of Congress to members of the United States Armed Forces 

serving in harm’s way. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 7, 2007 

Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 511) to pledge 

the faithful support of Congress to members of the 

United States Armed Forces serving in harm’s way. 

1 Resolved, That immediately after the adoption of this 

2 resolution the Speaker shall, pursuant to clause 2(b) of 

3 rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee 

4 of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consider5 ation of the bill (H.R. 511) to pledge the faithful support 

6 of Congress to members of the United States Armed 

7 Forces serving in harm’s way. The first reading of the 

8 bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against 

9 consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

HRES 220 IH 

1 be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equal2 ly divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking mi3 nority member of the Committee on Armed Services. After 

4 general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment 

5 under the five-minute rule. During consideration of the bill 

6 for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the 

7 Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of 

8 whether the Member offering an amendment has caused 

9 it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record 

10 designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. 

11 Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. At 

12 the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment 

13 the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House 

14 with such amendments as may have been adopted. The 

15 previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 

16 bill and amendments thereto to final passage without in17 tervening motion except one motion to recommit with or 

18 without instructions. 

19 SEC. 2. If the Committee of the Whole rises and re20 ports that it has come to no resolution on the bill, then 

21 on the next legislative day the House shall, immediately 

22 after the third daily order of business under clause 1 of 

23 rule XIV, resolve into the Committee of the Whole for fur24 ther consideration of the bill. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
Before the Second Division,

July 22, 1958

No. 62201.

#### Salzman & Klinger, Inc., and Stern & Stern Textiles, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 34043-K and 141188-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *E. C. Carter & Son, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 368, C. D. 1889), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Data & Research                
                    Reports                

# Financial literacy annual report

Improving financial literacy requires more than simply providing consumers with more information. Being able to manage one’s financial life and make the financial decisions that will serve one’s life goals requires a combination of knowledge, skills, and action. For that reason, we’re pursuing a strategy that focuses on identifying how, where, when, and through whom we can provide assistance to consumers for maximum benefit. We’re focusing on assisting consumers with the financial aspects of big life decisions, such as going to college, retiring, or buying a home; and on smaller decisions that can have big life consequences, such as starting a habit of savings, managing debt, and passing along financial life skills to one’s children.

We’ve undertaken a broad array of education initiatives in the last two years to implement our financial literacy strategy. This report highlights some of these initiatives.

##### Full report

Read the report here

##             Related reports        

###                 Topics            

              -  •Financial education 
              -  •Financial Literacy Annual Report 
              -  •Financial well-being 
              -  •Mortgages 
              -  •Saving 
              -  •Student loans 

##               Further reading          

###                       Blog                  

            -                          High Interest Rates Set to Increase the Cost of Student Loans in 2024                      SEP 13, 2024 
            -                          Junk fees are driving up housing costs. The CFPB wants to hear from you.                      MAR 08, 2024 
            -                          Office of Research blog: A look at cash-out refinance mortgages and their borrowers between 2013 to 2023                      DEC 18, 2023 

###                       Newsroom                  

            -                          Prepared Remarks of CFPB Director Rohit Chopra at the Center for American Progress Housing Summit                      SEP 19, 2024 
            -                          Prepared Remarks of CFPB Director Rohit Chopra at the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation's 53rd Annual Legislative Conference                      SEP 13, 2024 
            -                          CFPB Bans Navient from Federal Student Loan Servicing and Orders the Company to Pay $120 Million for Wide-Ranging Student Lending Failures                      SEP 12, 2024 

###                       Events                  

            -                          National Town Hall on Scams and Older Adults                      OCT 30, 2024 
            -                          CFPB Field Hearing on contract for deed in the Twin Cities                      AUG 13, 2024 
            -                          Public Service Loan Forgiveness Demystified                      NOV 12, 2021 

              View more
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 16, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-40469 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ROGELIO DE LA CRUZ-GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:03-CR-1644-ALL

-------------------- Before KING, Chief Judge, and DeMOSS and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Rogelio de la Cruz-Gonzalez has appealed his guilty-plea conviction of attempting to enter the United States illegally following deportation. De la Cruz-Gonzalez contends that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). De la Cruz-Gonzalez contends also that his sentence was imposed illegally in light of Blakely v. Washington , 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004). He concedes that theseNo. 04-40469 -2- arguments are foreclosed. See Almendarez-Torres v. United
States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998); United States v. Pineiro , 377 F.3d 464, 465–66 (5th Cir. 2004), petition for cert. filed (U.S. July 14, 2004) (No. 04-5263); United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). He asserts that Almendarez-Torres has been called into doubt by Apprendi and Blakely . He seeks to preserve the issues for possible Supreme Court review. De la Cruz-Gonzalez contends, and the Government concedes, that the judgment recites incorrectly that de la Cruz-Gonzalez was convicted of illegal reentry following deportation, instead of an attempt to commit that offense. The case must be remanded to the district court so that the judgment may be reformed to reflect the correct offense of conviction. See United States v. Powell , 354 F.3d 362, 371-72 (5th Cir. 2003); F ED . R. C RIM . P. 36. AFFIRMED and REMANDED.
EXHIBIT 31.1

302
CERTIFICATION FOR FORM 10-Q

CERTIFICATIONS

|I, Gary S.
  Judd, certify that:
|--------------------------------
|                                
|1.                              
|                                
|2.                              
|                                
|3.                              
|                                
|4.                              
|                                
|                                
|                                
|                                
|                                
|                                
|                                
|5.                              
|                                
|                                
|                                
|                                

|Date:  November 15, 2004 |                                        
|------------------------ | ---------------------------------------
|                         |                                        
|                         |                                        
|                         | /s/ Gary S.
  Judd                     
|                         |                                        
|                         | Gary S. Judd                           
|                         | Chief
  Executive Officer and President
From: paintgirl@sc.rr.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:08:14 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Lynn Bethle

Myrtle Beach, SC 29579
MOORE
& ASSOCIATES, CHARTERED
 ACCOUNTANTS AND
ADVISORS
 PCAOB
REGISTERED
 
 
 
 
 
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 
 We
consent to the use, in the statement on Form 10-K of Nasus Consulting, Inc. of
our report dated April 6, 2009 on our audit of the financial statements of Nasus
Consulting, Inc. as of December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, and the related
statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years
ended December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, and the reference to us under the
caption “Experts.”
 
 
 
 
 
 /s/ Moore & Associates,
Chartered
 Moore
& Associates Chartered
 Las
Vegas, Nevada
 April 8,
2009
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 6490 West Desert Inn
Rd,Las
Vegas,NV89146(702) 253-7499 Fax (702)
253-7501
No. 60988.

protests 310156-K and 310277-K (New York).

#### William Shaland and Louis Greenberg & Son, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” and “B” consist of dime savings banks similar in all material respects to those the subject of *M. Pressner & Co.*v. *United States*(36 Cust. Ct. 262, C. D. 1784), the items marked “A” were held dutiable at 12 percent under the provision in paragraph 397, as modified by the Torquay *345Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52739), for articles, not specially provided for, wholly or in chief value of tin or tin plate, and the items marked “B” were held dutiable at 22)4 percent under the provision in said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 51802, for manufactures of metal, not specially provided for.
From: travelers@elberton.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:25:33 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Tommy Rousey

Elberton, GA 30635
From: gnkrasmussen@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:44:45 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Greg Rasmussen

Redding, CA 96003
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.57 April 9, 2004 Food Investors Corporation
C/O Jean Louis Vilgrain
40368 Tamworth Farm Lane
Aldie, VA 20105 Dear Mr. Vilgrain, This letter is written to extend maturity date of the October 22, 2003 Loan
Agreement between Food Investor Corporation (FIC) and Cuisine Solutions, Inc
(CSI). The current maturity date of the loan is April 22, 2004, but it can be
extended per Article 3 of the Agreement to October 22, 2004 upon written notice
by CSI to FIC. This letter is notice that the new effective date of the loan is October 22,
2004. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, /s/ Stanislas Vilgrain
    
    /s/ Jean-Louis VilgrainStanislas Vilgrain
CEO (CSI)
    
    Jean Louis Vilgrain
President (FIC)/s/ Yuyun Tristan KuoY. Tristan KuoSecretary & Treasurer (CSI)