alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: jdegrote@olive-branch.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:55:32 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Janelle DeGrote

Corona, CA 92881
Page 1 of 1

Meeting Summary: EPA/Agriphar 

October 13, 2011, 1:00 PM to 2:00 PM 

Room S-8671, 2777 S. Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA 22202 

Participants

Non-EPA 

Agriphar: Bert Volger, Eric Andreas 

EPA

Office of Pesticide Programs: Tim Leighton, Nader Elkassabany, Michelle Centra, Najm 

Shamim, Lance Wormell, Rebecca von dem Hagen 

Office of General Council: Mark Dyner 

Summary

On Thursday October 13, 2011, members of EPA’s DGH reregistration team hosted a 

meeting with Agriphar, a technical registrant for DGH and Dodine, to discuss data 

compensation for studies that EPA used to support the DGH and Dodine reregistration 

eligibility decisions. The meeting was held at Agriphar’s request and included the 

registrant’s overview/history of the DGH/Dodine data compensation issue and its 

rationale for why Agriphar believes it may be entitled to data compensation. Agriphar 

also requested during the meeting that EPA provide data evaluation records for several 

Agriphar studies. 

Next Steps

The Agency will review Agriphar’s rationale and continue to explore options for 

addressing the registrant’s concerns.
U.S. Department of 

Transportation 

Office of the Secretary 

Of Transportation 

The Honorable Troy Fraser 

Texas Senator 

Austin, TX 78711 

Dear Mr. Fraser: 

·. 

JUL 5 2012 

.·, .... ··-·. 

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Thank you for your letter supporting the proposal submitted by the Abilene Regional Airport for 

a grant under the U.S. Department of Transportation's Small Community Air Service 

Development Program. 

~·· .. -· . . .. . . . -. 

The Small Community Program was established to _help smaller communities address air service 

deficiencies, particularly issues related to high airfares or insufficient service. Under the statute, 

the Department may make a maximum or 40 grant <l'vvards each year, although no more than 4 

awards may be to communities il1 the sar11c State. Ill order to provide communities with latitude 

in developing solutions to their air service deficiencies, the statute provides flexibility in the 

types of projects that can be funded. 

On May 15, the Department issued an order I'equesting that comnwnities interested in receiving a 

grant this year file their applications by .Tunc 11. As these grant requests are pending before the 

Department, I cannot comment on the merits of any particular proposal. I assure you that the 

Department will give full and fair consideration to all proposals that have been properly filed. 

As is our normal prac'tice. I am placing a copy of your letter and this response in Docket 

DOT-OST-2012-0069 as a contact outside the recor.J ,)r this mattc1". I appreciate your interest in 

this program. 

Sinccrl.'ly yours, 

( ('(:.;~----:-1 ;---rrf5t:;(/ k!)/ 

Aloha Ley U 

Associate Director. S::dl Community 

Air Service Development Program 
.· ... :,._..,..,_; • . ... ...... "! 

.TRQY FRASER 

May 25,2012 

Ms. Aloha Ley 

Office of Aviation Analysis ·" . . . 

1200 New Jef._sey Aye., SE;_ W86-31 o· 

Washingtqn, DC 20590 

Dear Ms.-Ley: . 

I fully suppoti the City of Abilene's·request for a Small Community Air Service Development 

.. ·.Grant t,a improve air s.efvice·at Abilene Regiorial:Airpoti.(A)3I). As an under-served airport, 

ABI is requesting funding to subsidize new service with an additional airline. 

Your approval of the grant proposal, resulting in additional air service for our region, would 

J?rOvide: 

• In~re~sed c~stom~r choices by adding non-stop ~ervice from ABI to an additional airline 

hub airport 

im:rea::;eJ route opponunities and capacity 

• Reduced average fares paid by passengers using ABl 

• Reduced leakage to other airports in the region 

I n!spectfully request your favorable action on Abilene Regional Airport's grant application. 

P. . Box 12068 * .'\t.:Sl'l:-1, TF-X.\S n71 J * (512) -163-0124 * DIAL 7: I FGR RELAY CALLS 

....... ,""' ·"": ·.·: ·: "";.
PQ BOX 257 

Stor eville. MISSISSipp i 

38776·0 257 

Phone r662 i 686-3350 

Fax (662i 686·3378 

May 8, 2012 

Mr. Dennis DeVany 

ChieL Essential Air Service Division 

Ofticc of Aviation Analysis 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey A venue SE, 

Washington. D.C. 20590 

' r · ' --- I'"• . ~ 

: ;-. . \ ; ' ~ : 

·: .· 

' \.' 

Reference: DOT-OST-2008-0209, 200 1-l 0685. 2009-0305, 2000-7856 

Greenville, MS, Laurel/Hattiesburg, MS, Tupelo, MS and Muscle 

Shoals. AL EAS 

Dear Mr. DeVany, 

Delta Council, a regional economic development organization in Northwest 

Mississippi, wishes to lend iis support to the proposal of Silver Airways to 

provide essential air service at Mid-Delta Greenville (GLH) as replacement for 

current Delta Air Lines service. 

Local air service that provides an effective connection to the national and 

international air tf<d11sportation system is critical to the economic well being of the 

Delta region. The public and the business community of the region rely on our 

local air service for both business and leisure travel. 

The Silver Ainvays proposals offer us a modem 34-seat turboprop aircraft and 

flights to Atlanta, which is not only the largest hub airport in the world but also a 

popular business and leisure travel destination. 

We believe the Silver air service proposals represent the best option for retaini.ng 

our local air service long term and building up enplanements. 

We urge the Department ofTransportation to award Silver Airways the 

designation to provide Greenville's essential air service. 

Best regards, 

Tom Gresham, Chairman 

Delta Council Development Department 

Bowen Flowers. Clarl<sdale 

President 

Vice Presidents 

Bil1 Kennedy, Chairma 

Transportation Committee 

Witho SoUoy, Oro-vnville 

Oiedre Barret, Belzoni 

Rob Coker, Yazoo City 

Pnul Dei!:~ , Ui!lano 

Russell Stewart, Anguilfa. Troasurar Mark KimmeL l!1a Bena 

Chip Morgan, eJCecutive VICe President Michael Sanders. Cleveland
<PAGE>

  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Cover-All Technologies Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Ann F. Massey, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial
officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:

        (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:    March 25, 2005

/s/Ann F. Massey
-------------------------------
Name:  Ann F. Massey
Title: Chief Financial Officer
From: mrhuehls@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:09:44 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mark Huehls

, 46237-9623
EX-4.6



 Exhibit 4.6 
 THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE PROGRESSIVE CORPORATION 
 EXECUTIVE DEFERRED
COMPENSATION PLAN 
 (2003 Amendment and Restatement) 

WHEREAS, The Progressive Corporation Executive Deferred Compensation Plan is currently maintained pursuant to a 2003 Amendment and
Restatement and the First and Second Amendments thereto (“Plan”); and 
 WHEREAS, it is deemed desirable to
amend the Plan further; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended in the respects hereinafter set forth: 

 

	1.	Effective March 17, 2005, Section 4.2 of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to provide as follows: 


“4.2 Investment of Accounts. 
 All credits to a Deferral Account of a Participant shall be deemed to be invested in such Investment Fund or Funds as the Participant shall elect from time to time in accordance with Article 5. The number
of shares of Stock to be credited to a Participant’s Account by virtue of a Participant’s initial election to invest a portion of a Deferral in the Company Stock Fund shall be determined on the date of the Deferral in accordance with such
procedures as the Committee shall establish, based on the weighted average price paid for all shares of Stock purchased by the Trustee and deposited in the Trust on that date pursuant to Article 6. Notwithstanding the preceding provisions of this
Section 4.2, (i) all credits to a Deferral Account of a Participant relating to a deferred Restricted Stock Award granted prior to March 17, 2005, shall be deemed to be invested in the Company Stock Fund until six (6) months and
one (1) day following the expiration of the restrictions applicable to such Award, unless otherwise determined by the Committee at or after the deferral of such Award, and, thereafter, the preceding provisions of this Section 4.2 shall
apply, and (ii) all credits to a Deferral Account of a Participant relating to a deferred Restricted Stock Award granted on or after March 17, 2005, shall be deemed to be invested in the Company Stock Fund until the balance of such
Deferral Account has been distributed or withdrawn in accordance with Article 3.” 
  

	2.	Effective March 17, 2005, the following is hereby added to the end of Section 5.4 of the Plan: 


“Notwithstanding the preceding provisions of this Section 5.4, each Deferral of a Restricted Stock Award granted on or after
March 17, 2005 shall be deemed to be invested in the Company Stock Fund until the Deferral Account to which such Deferral has been credited has been distributed or withdrawn in accordance with Article 3 of this Plan.” 

 

	3.	Except as expressly provided in this Amendment, the terms and provisions of the Plan shall remain entirely unchanged and continue in full force and effect.


 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly
authorized representative effective as of the date set forth above. 
  

			
	THE PROGRESSIVE CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	/s/ Charles E. Jarrett
		
	Title:	 	Vice President & Secretary
Case No. 12,882.

#### SIMPSON v. LASSALLE et al.

[4 McLean, 352.] 1

Circuit Court, D. Indiana.

May Term, 1848.

Limitations — Judgment—How Pleaded.

Where the statute of limitations has run against a judgment, it may be pleaded to a sci. fa. to revive the judgment.

[This was an action at law by Simpson against Lassalle, Merrill, and others.]

Morrison & Major, for plaintiff.

Smith & Ketehum, for defendants.

OPINION OF

THE COURT.

This is a sci. fa. to revive a judgment The first writ was returned served on one of the defendants, and not found as to the others. An alias was issued against defendants, which was not served, returned nihil. Merrill, one of the defendants, pleaded to the judgment the statute of limitations, to which the plaintiff demurred. And it appearing that the limitation of the judgment lien had expired as to Merrill, before the service of the writ, the demurrer is overruled, and the plea as to him is sustained. His real estate is, therefore, released from the judgment. The Revised Statutes of 1843, § 92, provides for an alias sci. fa., and authorizes a judgment on its being returned nihil. The judgment is revived, and execution against the lauds may issue against the defendants, etc., except Merrill. 3 Blackf. 334; Walker v. Hood, 5 Blackf. 266.
No. 347.

#### Fair et al. *v.*Meredith.

*Joe T. Patterson,*Attorney General of Mississippi, *Dugas Shands,*Assistant Attorney General, and *Peter M. Stockett, Jr.*and *Charles Clark,*Special Assistant Attorneys General, for petitioners.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### In re MEYER.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

October 16, 1903.)

No. 1,005.

George D. Collins, for petitioner.

Motion for leave to file petition granted, and petition filed. Thereupon the petition was denied. Further appeal allowed to the Supreme Court.
No. 60153.

protests 234318-K, 240033-K, 245483-K, and 265535-K (San Francisco).

#### W. A. Ballinger & Co. and Joseph A. Paredes & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that 20 percent of the merchandise consists of rags used chiefly for papermaking, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained with respect to said 20 percent of the merchandise.
From: benjamin.kreider@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:36:45 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Benjamin Kreider

Alma, MI 48801
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-14-0012 SAT Date: 11/1/2013 Print Date: 12/3/2013

Related cases : Health related cases: Ecotox related cases :

.
Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1-2 2

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 1 11

Exposure Based Review : Health: N o Ecotox: Yes
Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Inhalation Ecotox: All releases to water Fate: ; Keywords : Keywords: LUNG; IRR-E,S,MM,L; AQUATOX Summary of Assessment :
Fate : Fate Summary: P-14-0012-3/5-6 FATE: Estimations for typical Liquid with MP < 25 C (E) log Kow = 4.21 (E) S = Dispersible / 6.57 mg/L at 25 C (ICB / E) VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E) BP > 400 C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E) log Koc = 5.66 (E) log Fish BCF = 0.50 (E) log Fish BAF = 2.55 (E)POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption and biodeg Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong PBT Potential: P1B1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

Health : Health Summary: Absorption is poor from the skin, moderate from the GI tract, and good from the lung (analog). Concern for surfactant effects on the lung; irritation to eye, skin (chronic), mucous membranes and lung based on surfactant properties of the compound.

Ecotox : Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 * daphnid 48-h LC50 11.3 green algal 96-h EC50 6.3 fish

_ chronic value 2.5 daphnid

_ chronic value 1.1
algal

_ chronic value 2.4
Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for Aliphatic Amines-Acids; SAR chemical class = Aliphatic Amines; MW 527; S = dispersible (P); liquid with unknown mp (P); p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; DW hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and DW TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 110

SARs Aliphatic Amines SAR Class Aliphatic Amines Ecotox Category Aliphatic Amines
Ecotox Factors Comments:
SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1997 for May Limited  Partnership  1983-2 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000735552
<NAME>                        May Limited Partnership 1983-2
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000                    
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1997              
<CASH>                                         217
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  207
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               424
<PP&E>                                         16,652
<DEPRECIATION>                                 16,162
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 914
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          24
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     890
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   914
<SALES>                                        818
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               827
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  283
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                544
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            544
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   544
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  27.94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  27.94
        


</TABLE>