alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OSWER/OSRTI

Washington, DC 20460

NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST (NPL) 

***Proposed Site*** September 2015 

LEA AND WEST SECOND STREET Roswell, New Mexico

Chaves County

 Site Location:

The site is located near the intersection of Lea Street and West Second Street in Roswell, New Mexico. 

 Site History:

The Lea and West Second Street site consists of a ground water plume of chlorinated solvents originating from known 

and unknown sources in Roswell, New Mexico. The four sources include two areas of contaminated soil associated 

with former dry cleaning operations, contamination associated with an in-ground concrete separator tank previously 

removed and a contaminated ground water plume. 

 Site Contamination/Contaminants:

Soil and ground water is contaminated with tetrachloroethylene, trichloroethylene, cis-1,2-dichloroethene and trans1,2-dichloroethene. These contaminants were found at concentrations greater than the Safe Drinking Water Act’s 

Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs). 

 Potential Impacts on Surrounding Community/Environment: 

An estimated 48,611 residents in Roswell receive drinking water from ground water. This population is potentially 

affected by the contaminants found as a result of historical industrial operations which occurred at the site. 

 Response Activities (to date):

In 2009 the New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) removed an in-ground tank connected to the sanitary 

sewer system from one of the former dry cleaners tenant spaces. 

 Need for NPL Listing:

The NMED referred the site to the EPA due to the chlorinated solvent plume, use of ground water for drinking and the 

presence of geologic conditions favorable for migration of contaminants. Without identification and investigation of 

the source of ground water contamination and remediation of the contaminated ground water plume additional public 

and private wells may be threatened. Other federal and state cleanup programs were evaluated, but are not viable at 

this time. The EPA received a letter of support for placing this site on the NPL from the state of New Mexico. 

[The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was evaluated with the HRS. The description may 

change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. See 56 FR 5600, February 11, 1991, or subsequent 

FR notices.]

For more information about the hazardous substances identified in this narrative summary, including general information regarding the effects of exposure to 

these substances on human health, please see the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) ToxFAQs. ATSDR ToxFAQs can be found on 

the Internet at http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaqs/index.asp or by telephone at 1-888-42-ATSDR or 1-888-422-8737.
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1395

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to make a technical correction

in the definition of outpatient speech-language pathology services.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 4, 2001

Mr. ENSIGN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to make

a technical correction in the definition of outpatient

speech-language pathology services.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTION IN THE DEFINITION

4 OF OUTPATIENT SPEECH-LANGUAGE PA5 THOLOGY SERVICES.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1861(ll) of the Social Se7 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(ll)) is amended—

8 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (2) and (3) as

9 paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively; and
2

•S 1395 IS

1 (2) by inserting after paragraph (1) the fol2 lowing new paragraph:

3 ‘‘(2) The term ‘outpatient speech-language pa4 thology services’ has the meaning given the term

5 ‘outpatient physical therapy services’ in subsection

6 (p), except that in applying such subsection—

7 ‘‘(A) ‘speech-language pathology’ shall be

8 substituted for ‘physical therapy’ each place it

9 appears; and

10 ‘‘(B) ‘speech-language pathologist’ shall be

11 substituted for ‘physical therapist’ each place it

12 appears.’’.

13 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—(1) Section

14 1861(p) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(p))

15 is amended by striking the fourth sentence.

16 (2) Section 1833(a)(8)(A) of the Social Security Act

17 (42 U.S.C. 1395l(a)(8)(A)) is amended by striking ‘‘out18 patient physical therapy services (which includes out19 patient speech-language pathology services) and out20 patient occupational therapy services’’ and inserting ‘‘out21 patient physical therapy services, outpatient speech-lan22 guage pathology services, and outpatient occupational

23 therapy services’’.

24 (3) Section 1833(a)(8)(B) of the Social Security Act

25 (42 U.S.C. 1395l(a)(8)(B)) is amended by striking ‘‘out-
3

•S 1395 IS

1 patient physical therapy services (which includes out2 patient speech-language pathology services) and out3 patient occupational therapy services’’ and inserting ‘‘out4 patient physical therapy services, outpatient speech-lan5 guage pathology services, and outpatient occupational

6 therapy services’’.

7 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

8 this section shall apply to services provided on or after

9 the date that is 6 months after the date of enactment of

10 this Act.

Æ
From: oh2serve@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 4:03:55 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Geoffrey Donatelli

Tucson, AZ 85750
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 145 

Recognizing the public service of Archbishop Patrick Flores. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2007 

Mr. GONZALEZ (for himself, Mr. BACA, Mr. CUELLAR, Mr. AL GREEN of 

Texas, Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. MARSHALL, Ms. 

MCCOLLUM of Minnesota, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, Mr. ORTIZ, Mr. PASTOR, Mr. PAUL, Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California, Mr. SERRANO, 

Mr. STUPAK, Mr. GRIJALVA, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Mr. GENE

GREEN of Texas, Mr. SMITH of Texas, and Mr. RODRIGUEZ) submitted 

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the public service of Archbishop Patrick Flores. 

Whereas Archbishop Patrick Flores became the first Mexican-American bishop in the United States on Cinco de 

Mayo, May 5, 1970; 

Whereas Archbishop Flores was only the second Hispanic 

Archbishop in the United States; 

Whereas Archbishop Flores served over 34 years in the Archdiocese of San Antonio; 

Whereas Archbishop Flores retired in December 2004 with 

the longest active service of any Hispanic bishop in the 

United States; 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 145 IH 

Whereas Archbishop Flores has been a leader in developing 

the next generation of Hispanic leadership and in promoting multi-cultural understanding with the creation of 

the Mexican-American Cultural Center; 

Whereas Archbishop Flores has been a leader in the foundation and growth of the Hispanic Scholarship Fund, which 

has provided over 78,000 scholarships in excess of $195 

million to Hispanics across the United States; 

Whereas Archbishop Flores has been a leader in the restoration of the historic San Fernando Cathedral; 

Whereas Archbishop Flores has been a leader in promoting 

the economic development of long neglected neighborhoods in his Archdiocese; 

Whereas Archbishop Flores has been a leader in the areas of 

civil rights, immigrant rights, public housing, public 

health, education, and the rights and welfare of the poor 

and the vulnerable; and 

Whereas Archbishop Flores has been a leader in the effort to 

engage more young Catholics in service to their community, their country, and their Church: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes Archbishop Patrick Flores for his 

3 leadership in improving the opportunities of His4 panics in the United States; 

5 (2) praises Archbishop Flores for his 34 years 

6 of serving the diverse and growing needs of the 

7 Archdiocese of San Antonio as bishop; and 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 145 IH 

1 (3) thanks Archbishop Flores for a life of public 

2 service in the areas of civil rights, health, and edu3 cation. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
From: helenkennedy1@triad.rr.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:48:53 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Helen H Kennedy

Winston Salem, NC 27106
From: eugenewalinski@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:38:54 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Gene Walinski

Simi Valley, CA 93065
Before the First Division,

January 17, 1967

No. P67/18.

#### Chadwick Miller Importers, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 62/14286 (Boston).

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise (spring clothespins) and issues covered by the foregoing protest are similar in all material respects to those involved in *Falcon Sales Company*and *J. J. Murphy & Co.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 129, C.D. 2292), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001037115
<NAME> ORBIT/FR, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           5,659
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,731
<ALLOWANCES>                                       245
<INVENTORY>                                      2,022
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,133
<PP&E>                                           2,869
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,807
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,320
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,426
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            61
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,833
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,320
<SALES>                                          4,199
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,199
<CGS>                                            2,803
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,803
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (7)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        41
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (48)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (48)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1449 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 268
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1449

                          [Report No. 110-859]

   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6604) to amend the 
Commodity Exchange Act to bring greater transparency and accountability 
             to commodity markets, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 17, 2008

    Ms. Sutton, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6604) to amend the 
Commodity Exchange Act to bring greater transparency and accountability 
             to commodity markets, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 6604) to amend the 
Commodity Exchange Act to bring greater transparency and accountability 
to commodity markets, and for other purposes. All points of order 
against consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under 
clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The amendment in the nature of a substitute 
printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this 
resolution shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall 
be considered as read. All points of order against the bill, as 
amended, are waived. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the bill, as amended, to final passage without intervening 
motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by 
the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Agriculture; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
    Sec. 2.  During consideration of H.R. 6604 pursuant to this 
resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the 
Chair may postpone further consideration of the bill to such time as 
may be designated by the Speaker.
                                                 House Calendar No. 268

110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 1449

                          [Report No. 110-859]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6604) to amend the 
Commodity Exchange Act to bring greater transparency and accountability 
             to commodity markets, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 17, 2008

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
From: BMOORE@HBECORP.COM

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:01:52 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

BILL MOORE

Hartford, IL 62048
**Docket Number FAA -**  **2014 -**  **0449**
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Orbit/FR, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dave Lubbe,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

August 14, 2003

/s/ Dave Lubbe
------------------------
Dave Lubbe
Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Orbit/FR, Inc. and will be retained by Orbit/FR, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.