alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: juanitadotson@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:36:43 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Juanita Dotson

Stafford, VA 22554
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Report of Players Network (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for
the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark Bradley, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: May
19, 2009





/s/Mark
      BradleyPrincipal
      Executive and Principal
                Accounting
      Officer
From: lfkchanning@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:29:39 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

I have been very proud of my civil service as an HHS employee for 32 years thus far. I would be

extremely disappointed and embarrassed to work for an agency that disrespects the conscience rights of

American citizens by force.

Sincerely,

Michael Channing

Annapolis, MD 21401
Before the Second Division,

October 31, 1968

No. P68/463.

protests 66/7813, etc. (New York).

#### Seedman International Corp. *v.*United States,

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of inner tubes similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Seedman International Corp. et al.*v. *United States*(60 Cust. Ct. 127, C.D. 3285), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

 

 ) 

Application of ) 

 ) 

 KaiserAir, Inc. ) Docket OST-2009-0208 

 ) 

for a certificate of public convenience ) 

and necessity pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 41102 ) 

(interstate charter air transportation) ) 

 )

SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 

TO APPLICATION OF KAISERAIR, INC.

Communications with respect to this document should be addressed to: 

 Mark W. Atwood 

 Elizabeth J. Wadsworth 

 Sher & Blackwell LLP

 1850 M Street, N.W., Suite 900 

 Washington, D.C. 20036 

 (202) 463-2513 

 Attorneys for KaiserAir, Inc. 

 

January 19, 2010
11.      Computation of Earnings per Share
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                              For the three months ending            For the nine months ending
                                              9/30/01             9/30/01            9/30/01             9/30/01
<S>                                        <C>                  <C>                 <C>               <C>
Net Loss                                       $(1,543,042)        $ (430,964)        $(5,135,808)       $(3,570,712)

Net Loss per Share - Basic                       $   (0.17)      $      (0.04)          $   (0.55)         $   (0.35)

Weighted Average Number of Common
Shares Outstanding                                9,485,722         10,279,964           9,485,722         10,279,964


</TABLE>
Before the Second Division,

September 26, 1962

No. 67075.

protest 329815-K (Ogdensburg).

#### E. Dillingham, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cobalt therapy units similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 66644, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
February 9, 1966

No. 69788.

Appeal 5214.

#### Gitkin Co. *v.*United States.

Appeal dismissed December 13, 1965.
Exhibit 35.2
 Servicer Compliance Statement
      /s/ John F. RemondiJohn F. RemondiVice Chairman and Chief Financial OfficerSallie Mae, Inc.




---



##### 



Exhibit 35.2
 Appendix A
 Trust Name:
    
    Date of Issuance:SLM Student Loan Trust 2006-1
    
    January 26, 2006SLM Student Loan Trust 2006-2
    
    February 23, 2006SLM Student Loan Trust 2006-3
    
    March 9, 2006SLM Student Loan Trust 2006-4
    
    April 20, 2006SLM Student Loan Trust 2006-5
    
    June 21, 2006SLM Student Loan Trust 2006-6
    
    July 20, 2006SLM Student Loan Trust 2006-7
    
    August 10, 2006SLM Student Loan Trust 2006-8
    
    September 14, 2006SLM Student Loan Trust 2006-9
    
    October 12, 2006SLM Student Loan Trust 2006-10
    
    November 30, 2006SLM Private Credit Student Loan Trust 2006-A
    
    April 6, 2006SLM Private Credit Student Loan Trust 2006-B
    
    June 8, 2006SLM Private Credit Student Loan Trust 2006-C
    
    September 28, 2006SLM Student Loan Trust 2007-1
    
    January 25, 2007SLM Student Loan Trust 2007-2
    
    February 22, 2007SLM Student Loan Trust 2007-3
    
    March 15, 2007SLM Student Loan Trust 2007-4
    
    April 5, 2007SLM Student Loan Trust 2007-5
    
    July 19, 2007SLM Student Loan Trust 2007-6
    
    October 23, 2007SLM Student Loan Trust 2007-7
    
    November 8, 2007SLM Student Loan Trust 2007-8
    
    December 6, 2007SLM Private Credit Student Loan Trust 2007-A
    
    March 29, 2007SLM Student Loan Trust 2008-1
    
    January 17, 2008SLM Student Loan Trust 2008-2
    
    February 7, 2008SLM Student Loan Trust 2008-3
    
    February 28, 2008SLM Student Loan Trust 2008-6
    
    June 12, 2008SLM Student Loan Trust 2008-7
    
    July 2, 2008SLM Student Loan Trust 2008-8
    
    August 5, 2008SLM Student Loan Trust 2008-9
    
    August 28, 2008
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed July 29, 2015

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D15-490

Lower Tribunal Nos. 11-641 K & 11-642 K

________________



### Eli M. Friedman,

Appellant,

vs.



### The State of Florida

, Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the

Circuit Court for Monroe County, Wayne M. Miller

, Judge.

Eli M. Friedman

, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman, Assistant Attorney

General, for appellee.

Before LAGOA, EMAS, and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

LAGOA, J.The Defendant, Eli M. Friedman (“Friedman”), appeals from the trial court’s

February 3, 2015 order denying his Motion to Correct Award of Prior Prison

Credit.

Friedman argues that he is entitled to an additional 20 days of credit for time

served, 1 from September 13, 2012 through October 3, 2012. This time period,

however, concerns the dates he spent in jail awaiting to be transported to prison

after being sentenced on September 13, 2012. The State is correct that Friedman

must first raise this issue with the Department of Corrections and “may only

request judicial relief after exhausting administrative remedies.” Hidalgo v. State

,

729 So. 2d 984, 987 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (“The Department of Corrections is

responsible for computing [an inmate's] credit for time spent in county jail after

sentencing, while awaiting transfers to a drug program or a state prison. If the

postsentence credit is incorrect, [the inmate] should pursue his administrative

remedies, and then seek a writ of mandamus against the department in the circuit

court, if dissatisfied with the outcome.” (quoting Washington v. State

, 662 So. 2d

1027, 1028 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995) (citation omitted))).

Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s order. Our affirmance in this case is

without prejudice to pursue such an administrative remedy.

1 Previously, Friedman filed a motion to correct sentence. On August 4, 2014, the

trial court granted the motion and ordered that Friedman be granted an additional

225 days credit for time served to the 504 days credit already appearing on his

judgment and sentence.

2AFFIRMED.

3
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 21 - 0474 IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: ROGER L. ROWE,

Petit io ner and Appellant, and MARI E. ROWE,

Respondent and Appellee. ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT

This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parti es having failed to j oint ly and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c), IT IS ORDERED THAT **Brenda L. Wahler,** whose name appears next on the list of attorneys desiring appo int me nt a s medi ators fo r Domesti c Relat io ns appeals which is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appo int ed to co nduct th e mediat io n process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED th at th e time peri ods set fo rth in M.R.App.P., 7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appoint me nt . A true copy

of this order is being mailed to counsel of record f or the parti es, or to th e parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof. DATED thi s October 12, 2021.

Bow en Greenwood , Cl erk of the Supreme Court c: Joseph Connors, Jr., Sean Paul Bracken, Brenda L. Wahler 10/12/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0474
## RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY

ACT

SIXTH PROGRAM REVISION APPLICATION

FOR THE STATE OF



## NEBRASKA

SUBMITTED BY THE



## NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

FOR THE

U.S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION VII

LENEXA, KS

September 1 6 , 2016
No. 60992.

protests 266654-K, etc. (New York).

#### Accurate Millinery Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of hoods the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *United States*v. *Accurate Millinery Co., Roberts, Reilly & Sons, et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 229, C. A. D. 599), the claim of plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 65981.

#### Associated Dry Goods Corp. (Lord & Taylor Div.) et al. *v.*United States,

protests 241748-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of nylon knit outerwear similar in use to silk knit outerwear and following *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: L. Eleanor Finney

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: IOM"s Recommendations

Date: Saturday, August 27, 2011 4:32:53 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to

accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of

preventive care under the new health care law,

and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a

critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access

to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive

services, are pushing

the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for

the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt

from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and

ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women

just because of where they work.

Only the woman, and anyone else she specifies, and her doctor should be making

decisions about her health care, not “religious employers.” 

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

L Eleanor Finney

29571 Via Alto Cerro

Laguna Niguel, CA 92677-1811

lefinney@cox.net
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

AS AMENDED

I,
Dr. Avishay S. Katz, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of GigOptix, Inc. (the
registrant) for the year ended December 31, 2009.

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report.



|                          
|--------------------------
|Date: June 10, 2010       
|                          
|/s/    Dr. Avishay S. Katz
|Dr. Avishay S. Katz       
|Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 99.02

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of The  Players  Network  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

August 15, 2003                  By: Seth Horn
                                    -----------------------
                                    Seth Horn,
                                    Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2




Certificationof


Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350


as Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




I, Ronald D. Mambu, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of John Bean Technologies Corporation (the “Company”), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(a) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: March 3, 2011/s/ RONALD D. MAMBURonald D. MambuVice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
From: vicki_barbalias@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:22:36 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Vicki Barbalias

Bangor, ME 04402
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 12185]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for temporary display in the exhibition “Going Dark: The Contemporary Figure at the Edge of Visibility” at the Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, New York, New York, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.                

Nicole L. Elkon,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2023-20431 Filed 9-20-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P