alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: suzanna.post@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:34:54 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Suzanna Post

Peoria, IL 61614
From: cdavis@stradishealthcare.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:47:49 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Courtney Davis

Lawrenceville, GA 30043
#### THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. EDWARD M. COLE, Respondent, *v.*FREDERICK HILL, County Treasurer of Greene County, Appellant.

*Publication of the terms of court*— *the court cannot order it*— *nor direct payment of the expense thereof.*

The Supreme Court has not power to order the publication, in a newspaper, of the appointment of the terms to be held by that court, or to direct payment of the expense of such publication.

Appeal from an order of April 18,1885, made by Hon. Theodoric R. Westbrook, ordering that a peremptory *mandamus*issue against the county treasurer of Greene county, compelling him to pay for certain publications in the Windham Journal, directed by an order made by Hon. A. Melvin Osborn, November 6, 1878, at a Special Term in Greene county, by which it was “ ordered that the terms of the General Term of the Supreme Court, appointed to be held in the Third Judicial Department of this State, and of the Special Terms of said court, and of the Circuit Courts and Courts of Oyer and Terminer, appointed to be held in the Third Judicial District of this State for the years 1878 and 1879, *i. e.,*from November 1, 1878, to November 1, 1879, and thereafter until further order of this court, be published in a newspaper published in Windham, N. Y., weekly during the said time, known as the Windham Journal, and that as often as once in each year the clerk of Greene county give, on due proof of such publication., a certificate to the publisher of said paper, of the amount due to them therefor, which on presentation to the county treasurer of said county of Greene, shall be paid by him out of the moneys raised in said county for court expenses.”

*620Landon, J.:

This order should be reversed because its effect is to enlarge the terms of the statute which provides for the publication of the appointments of the terms of courts. (Code of Civil Pro., § 3317.) What publication should be given to these appointments is a prudential or administrative matter, and properly comes within the scope of the legislative power and not within the judicial power. No case is here presented involving the inherent power of the court, when -in session, to incur such expense as may be necessary in certain exigencies to maintain its authority, punish offenders and prevent the miscarriage of justice.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements.

Learned, P. J., and Bocees, J., concurred.

Order reversed, with costs and printing disbursements.
MOORE
& ASSOCIATES, CHARTERED


ACCOUNTANTS AND
ADVISORS


PCAOB
REGISTERED

















CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM











We
consent to the use, in the statement on Form 10-K of Alba Mineral Exploration,
Inc. of our report dated March 26, 2009 on our audit of the financial statements
of Alba Mineral Exploration, Inc. as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the
related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows
for the years then ended and since inception on July 24, 2007 through December
31, 2007 and 2008, and the reference to us under the caption
“Experts.”










/s/ Moore & Associates,
Chartered


Moore
& Associates Chartered


Las
Vegas, Nevada


March 31,
2009




















































2675 S. Jones Blvd. Suite
109, Las Vegas, NV 89146 (702)253-7499 Fax
(702)253-7501
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the annual report of Millstream Ventures, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned chief executive officer and principal financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:  September 1, 2011   /s/ William C. Gibbs William C. Gibbs, President (Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
From: Lincalderon@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:42:32 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Linda Calderon

Oxnard, CA 93034
From: misterzee@myfairpoint.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:40:59 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Paul Zierk

Blue Hill, ME 04614
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

March 25, 2008

Before

FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge

TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge

ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge

No. 04

‐ 3478

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appeal from the United States District

Plaintiff

‐ Appellee, Court for the Northern District of Illinois,

Eastern Division.

v.

No. 01 CR 326

RICHARD S. CONNORS,

Defendant

‐ Appellant. Ronald A. Guzman, Judge

.

O R D E R

This case, unfortunately, fell through the cracks, but this order, finally, closes it.

On March 21, 2006, we issued an opinion affirming the conviction of Richard

Connors. United States v. Connors

, 441 F.3d 527 (7th Cir. 2006). But we also ordered a

limited remand pursuant to United States v. Paladino

, 401 F.3d 471 (7th Cir. 2005), so

the district court could tell us if the sentence Connors received would be different in

light of United States v. Booker

, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). On February 20, 2007, the district NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1No. 04-3478 2

court responded to our order and concluded that it would have imposed the same

sentence had it known that the sentencing guidelines were advisory, rather than

mandatory. On February 27, 2007, we invited the parties, if they wished, to respond to

the district court’s order. Mr. Connors responded with a “Statement of Position” on

March 6, 2007. The government did not respond, and we didn’t act promptly on the

matter. But today we act on the matter, albeit not very promptly.

Having considered the matter, we conclude that Mr. Connors received a

reasonable sentence. Accordingly, the sentence imposed by the district court is

AFFIRMED.
From: jscroggs@cpmgrp.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:41:29 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

James Scroggs

Rockford, MI 49341
# 

# CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

Registration No.  333-97047

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  332                                                               Trade Date: 9/02/03

(To Prospectus Supplement dated August 15, 2002 &

  Prospectus dated August  8, 2002)                                                                     Issue Date:  9/05/03

The Date of this Pricing SupplementSeptember  2, 2003

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

  CUSIP                                                                                                                                Date and terms of redemption or

     or        Stated                                                                  Interest                                    repayment (including any

Common  Interest                      Price to  Discounts &        Payment  Survivors                  applicable regular or special

  Code      Rate (1)               Maturity                Public (2)                Commissions      Frequency      Option     Yes/No                record dates)

14911QPV7     5.5%                       09/15/15           100%                    1.8%                  Quarterly           YES           YES               Callable at 100% beginning 09/15/05

                                                                                                                                                                                                                    and quarterly thereafter.                                                         

                          

Principal                                                                                1st Payment Day         

Amount                   Proceeds                 Dealer                            Date                  Count

$3,073,000.00                $3,017,686.00         ABN AMROInc.                 12/15/03                 30/360    

Original Issue Discount Note:                                                                   Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes                X   No                                                                                   N/A

The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the effective date of the change.  Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $255.830 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (SM) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (SM) will be made under the Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated August 8,2002.

Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION


OF


PERIODIC REPORT





I, Alessandro Sodi, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1)        the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)        the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: March 22, 2011





/s/ Alessandro SodiAlessandro Sodi,President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)





[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Diligent Board Member Services, Inc. and will be retained by Diligent Board Member Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.]
From: elainexgo@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:47:52 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Elaine Van Auken

Advance, NC 27006