alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and in connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Collins & Aikman Floorcoverings, Inc. (the Corporation) for the quarterly period ended April 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certifies that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Edgar M. (Mac) BridgerEdgar M. (Mac) BridgerChief Executive Officer
ANNUAL
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
  American
Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.
  BANC
OF AMERICA FUNDING 2008-1 TRUST,
 MORTGAGE
PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2008-1
 
 I, David M. Friedman, a duly authorized
officer of the Servicer (as hereinafter defined),pursuant to the Master
Bulk Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2007, among Bank of
America, National Association,American Home Mortgage Corp. and the Servicer (the "Agreement"), hereby
certify that:
 
 1.
              Areview of the Servicer's activities during
      the period from and includingJanuary 1, 2008 through and including
      December 31, 2008 (the "Reporting Period") and of the Servicer's
      performance under the Agreement and any applicable agreement in connection
      with a Reconstitution (as such term isdefined in the Agreement)
      has been made under my supervision.
 
 2.
              To thebest of myknowledge, based on
      such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the
      Agreement and any applicable agreement in connection with aReconstitution (as such
      term is defined in the Agreement) in all material respects throughout the
      Reporting Period.
 
 For
purposes of this Certificate, "Servicer" refers to (i) for the period beginning
January 1,2008 through
April 10, 2008, American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc. (currently known as AHM
SV, Inc.), a
Maryland corporation ("AHSV"), and (ii) for the period beginning April 11, 2008
through December 31, 2008, American Home Mortgage Servicing, lnc. (formerly
known asAH Mortgage Acquisition
Co., Inc.), a Delaware corporation ("AHMS"), as successor to AHSV with respect
to the Agreement (and any applicable Reconstitution Agreement). The undersigned
officer has been an authorized servicing officer of each or AHSV and AHMS
throughout the applicable portion of the Reporting Period during which each such
company acted as Servicer under the Agreement (and any applicable agreement in
connection with a Reconstitution) as set forth in clauses (i)and (ii)
above.
 
 
 [Signature
Page Follows]
   
 
   IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 9th day of
March, 2009.
 
 
 /s/
David M. Friedman
 David M.
Friedman
 
 President
 American Home Mortgage
Servicing, Inc. (formerlyknown as AH Mortgage
Acquisition Co., Inc.)
 April 11, 2008 through
December 31, 2008
 
 Executive
Vice President and Director of Servicing
 American Home Mortgage
Servicing, Inc. (currently known as AHM SV, Inc.)
 January 1, 2008 through
April 10, 2008
BAJO EN GRASA

¡Hora de merendar!

A los chicos de MiPlato, Nate y Kate, les gustan las meriendas saludables. En sus 

meriendas incluyen alimentos de los cinco grupos alimenticios. Ellos eligen meriendas que 

no tengan demasiado azúcar, grasa o sal añadidos. Sólo meriendan galletitas, pasteles y 

dulces a veces, y en poca cantidad. De esta forma ingieren los alimentos que necesitan para 

sentirse bien y estar saludables. 

Dibuja tu merienda saludable favorita en el plato vacío.

Padres

¿Envía meriendas a la escuela?

Pruebe estas alternativas populares 

y saludables: 

• compota de manzana sin endulzar

• copitas de frutas elaboradas con 

jugo 100% natural 

• pasas

• galletas saladas de grano integral

• palomitas de maíz bajas en grasa

• cereales integrales bajos en azúcar

Mayo 2014 • FNS-471-E-S • USDA es un proveedor y empleador que ofrece oportunidad igual para todos. 

http://teamnutrition.usda.gov
El agua puede ser la mejor bebida cuando sientes sed luego de corretear y jugar. 

Prueba estas maneras de hacer que el agua sea divertida y deliciosa. ¿Qué manera te 

gusta más? Pregúnta a tu familia y amigos qué prefieren. Debajo de cada imagen, 

coloca una marca por cada persona que elija esa opción.

¡El agua es maravillosa!

Añade una rebanada de fruta 

por ejemplo, fresa o limón 

Toma agua con un 

sorbeto divertido

Usa una botella deportiva 

moderna y colorida

Añade un poquito de jugo 

100% natural al agua con gas. 

Padres: Las bebidas pueden estar repletas de azúcares añadidos y calorías. Los niños pueden llenarse de 

bebidas dulces sin obtener la nutrición que necesitan de alimentos más saludables. Tomar bebidas dulces también puede 

provocar caries. Utilice esta guía para ayudar a su familia a elegir bebidas más saludables.*

*Fuente: MiPlato SuperTracker https://www.supertracker.usda.gov.

Bebida (Porción de 8 oz. líquidas) Cucharaditas de azúcares añadidos Calorías

Agua 0 cucharaditas 0

Jugo de naranja 100% natural 0 cucharaditas 122

Leche descremada 0 cucharaditas 83

Leche chocolateada descremada 3 cucharaditas 140

Bebida deportiva 3 cucharaditas 65

Refresco (soda) 5 1⁄4 cucharaditas 91

Mezcla en polvo de bebida con sabor a fruta (con azúcar) 5 1⁄2 cucharaditas 88

Limonada 5 1⁄2 cucharaditas 114

Cerveza de raíz 6 1⁄4 cucharaditas 101

Bebida de fruta (alta en vitamina C) 7 1⁄4 cucharaditas 128
No. 67470.

#### Distributors Import Company and Maher & Company *v.*United States,

protests 62/9177-16555 and 61/18053-16385 (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *Falcon Sales Company*and *J. J. Murphy & Co.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 129, C.D. 2292), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: garycox@wcfs.edu

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:12:00 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Gary Cox

Taneytown, MD 21787
No. 60976.

protest 276312-K (New York).

#### Air Clearance Assn., Inc. *v.*United States,

*342Opinion by

Wilson, J.

At the trial, the memorandum to accompany invoice was received in evidence as exhibit 1, wherein the examiner of the involved merchandise reported that the articles in question are properly dutiable, as claimed. On the record presented, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before the Second Division,

March 2, 1966

No. 69815.

protest 65/8672-15115 (Chicago).

#### Gosho Trading Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Bao, C.J.

It appearing from the official papers that the protest was filed more that 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
130 STAT. 326 PUBLIC LAW 114–142—MAR. 31, 2016 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 2393: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: 

Vol. 161 (2015): Dec. 10, considered and passed Senate. 

Vol. 162 (2016): Mar. 21, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 114–142 

114th Congress 

An Act 

To extend temporarily the extended period of protection for members of uniformed 

services relating to mortgages, mortgage foreclosure, and eviction, and for other 

purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Foreclosure Relief and Extension 

for Servicemembers Act of 2015’’. 

SEC. 2. TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF EXTENDED PERIOD OF PROTECTIONS FOR MEMBERS OF UNIFORMED SERVICES RELATING 

TO MORTGAGES, MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE, AND EVICTION. 

Section 710(d) of the Honoring America’s Veterans and Caring 

for Camp Lejeune Families Act of 2012 (Public Law 112–154; 50 

U.S.C. 3953 note) is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘December 31, 2015’’ and 

inserting ‘‘December 31, 2017’’; and 

(2) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘January 1, 2016’’ and 

inserting ‘‘January 1, 2018’’. 

Approved March 31, 2016. 

50 USC 3901 

note. 

Foreclosure 

Relief and 

Extension for 

Servicemembers 

Act of 2015. 

Mar. 31, 2016 

[S. 2393] 


kgrant on DSKB33CYQ1 with PUBLAW
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2016-0459 Directorate Identifier: 2015-NM-081-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Inspection 11.0 $ 935.00 $ 935.00 95 $88,825.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance: 0

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $88,825

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $0

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

Replacement 12.0 $1,020.00 $0 $1,020.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
Exhibit 23.2


                          CONSENT OF GRANT THORNTON LLP


We  have  issued  our  report  dated  November  4,  1996  with  respect  to  the
consolidated  financial statements and schedule of U.S. Robotics Corporation and
Subsidiaries,  included  in  Annual  Report  on Form  10-K  for the  year  ended
September 29, 1996. We consent to the  incorporation by reference of said report
in the  Registration  Statements  Nos. on Form S-8 (2-92053,  33-2171,  33-17848
(Post-Effective  Amendment  No.  1),  33-33803,  33-33807,  33-39323,  33-36911,
33-45176,   33-45231,   33-45233,   33-56952,   33-58708,   33-72158,  033-55265
(Post-Effective Amendment No. 1), 033-60379,  033-63547,  333-11639,  333-15923,
and 333-29099).



/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Grant Thornton LLP


Chicago, Illinois
August 7, 1998
From: DavidL.Parker@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:49:13 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

David Parker

Gadsden, AL 35903
From: bhoran@peopleservice.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:33:18 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Barb Horan

Council Bluffs, IA 51503
GE Energy Services NetDAHS© Average Values Report

Version 59.0 Generated: 8/26/2010 10:50

Company: Detroit Edison Company Period Start: 6/2/2010 00:00

Plant: 3500 E. Front St. Period End: 7/1/2010 23:59 City/St: Monroe, MI 48161 Validation Type: 60/60 min Source: BOILER3 Averaging Perio d: 24 hr Type: Block Avg

Average Average Average Average Average Average Average 3Load_M 3FGDLqFl oM 3FGDPrsInM 3FGDPrsOuM 3StackPrsM 3Stk_TempM 3CO2_M _Period Start _ MW _ GPM _ inH2O _ inH2O _ "Hg _ degF _ % _ 06/02/2010 00:00 740.1 140.2 9.9 0.1 28.81 127.6 11.0 06/03/2010 00:00 765.3 102.7 10.1 0.2 28.86 126.7 11.1 06/04/2010 00:00 765.1 91.3 10.0 0.1 28.85 127.5 11.1 06/05/2010 00:00 718.6 83.2 9.3 0.1 28.79 128 .3 11.1 06/06/2010 00:00 719.6 75.9 9.5 0.0 28.77 127.7 11.1 06/07/2010 00:00 760.6 99.6 9.9 0.0 29.10 127.0 11.3 06/08/2010 00:00 765.3 90.4 10.0 0.0 29.18 127.4 11.3 06/09/2010 00:00 765.1 88.9 10.0 0.1 28.89 128.0 11.2 06/10/2010 00:00 692.7 88.3 9.1 0.1 29.02 126.8 10.6 06/11/2010 00:00 748.2 84.4 9.7 0.1 29.12 128.5 11.2 06/12/2010 00:00 757.7 86.7 10.2 0.2 28.99 130.1 11.1 06/13/2010 00:00 729.2 84.6 9.9 0.1 29.04 130.1 11.2

0 6/14/2010 00:00 764.6 87.2 10.0 0.2 28.99 130.5 11.2 06/15/2010 00:00 741.5 84.5 9.7 0.0 29.08 129.8 11.1 06/16/2010 00:00 759.9 89.6 10.1 0.1 29.0 1 129.9 11.1 06/17/2010 00:00 790.5 99.1 10.2 0.1 29.15 129.2 11.3 06/18/2010 00:00 725.2 86.1 9.6 0.1 29.08 129.8 11.0 06/19/2010 00:00 664.4 85.2 9.0 0.1 29.00 129.6 10.9 06/20/2010 00:00 668.1 95.5 8.9 0.1 29.12 129.2 10.7 06/21/2010 00:00 759.5 98.2 10.1 0.1 29. 14 130.9 10.0 06/22/2010 00:00 743.9 94.4 10.5 0.3 29.06 130.3 10.3 06/23/2010 00:00 765.3 99.0 11.0 0.3 29.06 130.6 11.1 06/24/2010 00:00 765.3 92.7 10.7 0.2 28.99 129.8 11.1 06/25/2010 00:00 765.1 107.4 10.5 0.2 29.13 129.5 11.2 06/26/2010 00:00 765.4 101.7 11.0 0.2 28.92 130.8 11.1 06/27/2010 00:00 540.6 68.3 7.7

- 0.1 28.77 129.0 10.0 06/28/2010 00:00 710.3 87.5 9.4 0.2 28.78 128.0 10.8 06/29/2010 00:00 778.3 91.4 10.0 0.1 29.08 125.2 11.3 06/30/2010 00:00 787.6 107.8 10.0 0.0 29.24 127.3 11.3 07/01/2010 00:00 784.9_ 111.4_ 10.0_ 0.0_ 29.26_ 123.6_ 11.0_

Final Average * 740.3 93.4 9.9 0. 1 29.01 128.6 11.0

Maximum * 790.5 140.2 11.0 0.3 29.26 130.9 11.3

Minimum * 540.6 68.3 7.7

- 0.1 28.77 123.6 10.0

* Does not include Invalid Av eraging Periods ("N/A")
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
Pursuant

To Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Intelsat Corporation (the Company) hereby certifies that to such officers
knowledge, the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |                                      
|------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 13, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ DAVID MCGLADE                    
|                   |  |  |  | David McGlade Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-31241 Summary Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus S. PATRICK PHILLIPS, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 92-CR-50017-ALL - - - - - - - - - - June 21, 1996 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * S. Patrick Phillips, #2106-077, appeals the denial of his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Phillips argues that Amendment 484 precluded the district court from basing his sentence on the seized amount of phenylacetic acid, a precursor chemical to the manufacture of methamphetamine. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the districtNo. 95-31241 -2- court. See United States v. Phillips , No. 92-CR-50017-ALL (W.D. La. Nov. 20, 1995). AFFIRMED.