alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

I, Michael L. Paxton, Chief Financial Officer of Intrusion Inc., certifythat:

(1)                          I have reviewed this annual report on Form10-KSB of Intrusion Inc.:

(2)                          Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

(3)                          Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4)                          The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

(a)              Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

(b)             Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)              Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

(5)                          The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

(a)              All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(c)              Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: March 29, 2007 |   | /s/ Michael L. Paxton   |   |   |
|----------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|--------|
|                 |   | Michael L. Paxton       |   |   |
|                 |   | Chief Financial Officer |   |   |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998             MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          40,671                  30,256
<SECURITIES>                                    19,485                  16,985
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,875                  28,007
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               110,276                  83,562
<PP&E>                                          16,954                  14,675
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 135,269                 104,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,104                  30,977
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        91,455                  72,356
<OTHER-SE>                                       (366)                   1,265
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   135,269                 104,700
<SALES>                                         97,132                  58,124
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                97,132                  58,124
<CGS>                                           16,612                   9,428
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,612                   9,428
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                76,368                  42,556
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,220                   7,305
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,898                   2,386
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,678)                   4,916
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.07)                     .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)                     .18
        

</TABLE>
From: nkstanley@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:20:06 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Nathan Stanley

Drexel Hill, PA 19026
From: jskimes@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:03:12 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Joe Kimes

Huntington Beach, CA 92648
No. 65112.

#### Beer Stern Import Corp. et al *v.*United States,

protests 258658-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issue is the same in all material respects as that the subject of *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), and the record showing that the merchandise consists of nylon ribbons similar in use to fabrics with fast edges, wholly or in chief value of silk, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K of First China Pharmaceutical Group, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to her knowledge:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date: July 14, 2011By:
/s/ Yi Jia LiName:  Yi Jia LiTitle:  Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officerand Principal Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 21.1

Subsidiaries of LNB Bancorp, Inc.
December 31, 2007

| |                          |  | Jurisdiction
      of                               
| | ------------------------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------
| | Entity Name and Location |  |                                                     
| | A.                       |  | Bank and Bank-owned Subsidiaries of the
      Issuer
| |                          |  | The Lorain National Bank                            
| |                          |  | 457 Broadway                                        
| |                          |  | Lorain, Ohio 44052                                  
| |                          |  | North Coast Community Development
      Corporation 
| |                          |  | 457 Broadway                                        
| |                          |  | Lorain. Ohio 44052                                  
| | B.                       |  | Financial Services Subsidiaries of the Issuer       
| |                          |  | None                                                

---
From: milld786@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:07:39 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Debbie Miller

Orem, UT 84057
From: sbflora2@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:50:44 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Barbara Flora

New Paris, IN 46553
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: 7/29/15 

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602 

FROM: Matt Clouse, EPA 

SUBJECT: 7/27/15, SEIA Call Regarding Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power 

Plants 

SUMMARY 

A call was held between EPA and the attendees listed below on 8/1/14 to discuss the 

proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants. The Carbon Power Plan for Existing 

Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014. 

ATTENDEES 

Matt Clouse, OAP, EPA 

Howard Hoffman, OGC EPA 

Rick Umoff, SEIA 

Justin Baca, SEIA
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 4, 2023

NO. 03-22-00269-CR

Zachariah Joshua Holm, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES TRIANA AND THEOFANIS

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE THEOFANIS

This is an appeal from the judgments of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgments of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgments of 

conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs 

is made.
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Innovative Wireless Technologies, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Pavel Alpatov, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Pavel AlpatovPavel
      Alpatov
                              Principal
      Financial Officer
                              February
      8,
2011
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

NICHOLAS A. HERNANDEZ, )

DOC #T74165, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-1648

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed March 22, 2019. 

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Kimberly K. 

Fernandez, Judge.

Nicholas A. Hernandez, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Michael Schaub, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

NORTHCUTT, SLEET, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
Case No. 10,169.

#### In re NEWLAND.

[Affirming Case No. 10,171. Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible.]
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 174 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 174

 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Armed Services 
                   in the One Hundred Tenth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 16, 2007

   Mr. Skelton (for himself and Mr. Hunter) submitted the following 
resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Armed Services 
                   in the One Hundred Tenth Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on Armed Services (hereafter in 
this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including the 
expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the 
applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for committee 
salaries and expenses, not more than $15,469,004 for the One Hundred 
Tenth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $6,883,959 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2007, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2008; and
            (2) not more than $8,585,045 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2008, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2009.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Bruce L. Claflin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of 3Com Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 3, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of 3Com Corporation.





|Date: | August 5, 2005 | By:/s/ | BRUCE L. CLAFLIN
|----- | -------------- | ------ | ----------------

Name:  Bruce L. Claflin

Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer



I, Donald M. Halsted III, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of 3Com Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 3, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of 3Com Corporation.





|Date: | August 5, 2005 | By:/s/ | DONALD M. HALSTED, III
|----- | -------------- | ------ | ----------------------

Name:  Donald M. Halsted, III

Title:   Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer