alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

|   | (1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| August 9, 2010 |   | /s/Phillip E. Becker                  |
|----------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
| Date           |   | Phillip E. Becker                     |
|           |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|           |   |                                  |
|           |   |                                  |
| August 9, 2010 |   | /s/H. Stewart Fitz Gibbon III         |
| Date           |   | H. Stewart Fitz Gibbon III            |
|           |   | Executive Vice President and          |
|           |   | Chief Financial Officer               |

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Troy Sutton, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 122]

—Judgments, Supreme Court, New York County (Leslie Crocker Snyder, J.), rendered October 30, 1991, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of conspiracy in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 81/3 to 25 years, and November 14, 1991, convicting him of violation of probation, and sentencing him to a consecutive term of l1/s to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court should have conducted a hearing to determine whether defendant, accused of running a drug ring, was aware of the potential risks arising out of his attorney’s past representation of one of his operatives who testified against him at trial *(see, People v Gomberg,*38 NY2d 307). However, in view of the witness’s cooperation agreement with the prosecution *(People v Lombardo,*61 NY2d 97, 102-103), and the absence of any indication that counsel felt constrained in any manner in cross-examining his former client or failed to explore a relevant line of inquiry *(compare, supra, with People v McDonald,*68 NY2d 1), there is no basis for a finding of actual conflict, and the error, therefore, does not require reversal. Defendant’s claim that ineffective assistance of counsel inheres in counsel’s failure to adequately advise him of the consequences of the *352continued representation was never raised pursuant to CPL article 440, and cannot adequately be addressed on the present record.

Defendant was not prejudiced by the testimony of a police officer that the body of one of defendant’s associates had been found in a car in which items were recovered that linked defendant to a nearby drug operation, corroborating certain coconspirator statements. The court’s instructions, which the jury is presumed to have followed *(People v*Davis, 58 NY2d 1102), the People’s stipulation, and the officer’s testimony itself made clear that defendant was not responsible for the killing.

We find no abuse of sentencing discretion. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Ellerin, Kupferman, Asch and Mazzarelli, JJ.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NOS. WR-81,625-01 AND 81,625-02

EX P ARTE GILBERTO DEL AHOYA, Applicant

ON AP P LICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NOS. C-297-009365-1019361- A AND C -297-009366- 1053170-A IN THE 297T H DISTRICT COURT FROM TARRANT COUNTY

Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of th e T ex as C o de of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court t ra n s m i t t ed t o t his Court these applications for writs of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Cr i m . Ap p . 1 967). Applicant was convicted under plea ag ree ments of possession of a controll ed substance and esca pe. Prison sentenc es wer e imposed. There wer e no dire ct appe als. Applicant conte n ds that his g uilty pleas wer e involuntary beca use the plea agree ments cannot be followe d. The trial court ha s determined that Applicant pled guilty pursuant to ag ree ments that the prison sentenc es imposed would run concur rently with a fede ral sentenc e. The fede ral judgme nt, howeve r, require s the fede ral sentenc e to beg in when the state sentenc es expire. Applicant is entitled to relief. Ex parte Hue rta , 692 S.W .2d 681 (Tex. Crim. App. 1985).-2-

Relief is g rante d. The judgme nts in C au s e No s. 1019361D and 1053170D in the 297th District Court of Tarr ant County are set aside, and Applicant is rema nded to the custody of the Sheriff of Tarr ant County

to a nswer the char g es as set out in the indictments. The trial c ourt shall issue any nece ssary

bench w arr ant within 10 day s after the mandate of this Court issues. Copies of this opinion shall be sent to th e T e xa s D e p a r tm e nt o f Cr iminal J ustice–Corre ctional I nstitut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division. Deliver ed: August 20, 2014 Do not publish
No. 65979.

#### Florea & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 299983-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issue is the same in all material respects as that the subject of *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), and the record showing that the merchandise consists of knit nylon gloves similar in use to silk gloves, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: greg@ct-palestine.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:53:45 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Gregory Rose

Palestine, TX 75803
# Uradni list C 53/2015

| | ISSN 1977-1045 |
| --- | --- |
| Uradni list
  Evropske unije | C 53 |
| | |
| Slovenska izdaja | Informacije in objave | Zvezek 5813. februar 2015 |

ISSN 1977-1045

Uradni list

Evropske unije

C 53

Slovenska izdaja

Informacije in objave

Zvezek 5813. februar 2015

---

| Obvestilo št. | Vsebina | Stran |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Objave |
| | UPRAVNI POSTOPKI |
| | Evropski parlament |
| 2015/C 053/01 | Sklep | 1 |

Obvestilo št.

Vsebina

Stran

V   Objave

UPRAVNI POSTOPKI

Evropski parlament

2015/C 053/01

Sklep

1

---

| SL | |
| --- | --- |

SL

---

V Objave

UPRAVNI POSTOPKI

Evropski parlament

| 13.2.2015 | SL | Uradni list Evropske unije | C 53/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2015

SL

Uradni list Evropske unije

C 53/1

---

SKLEP

(2015/C 53/01)

GENERALNI SEKRETAR EVROPSKEGA PARLAMENTA,

ob upoštevanju Uredbe Sveta (EGS, Euratom, ESPJ) št. 259/68 (1), spremenjene z Uredbo (ES, Euratom) št. 723/2004 (2) ter nazadnje z Uredbo Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (EU, Euratom) št. 1023/2013 z dne 22. novembra 2013, ki spreminja Kadrovske predpise za uradnike Evropske unije in pogoje za zaposlovanje drugih uslužbencev Evropske unije (3), in zlasti člena 30 teh predpisov,

ob upoštevanju sklepa predsedstva Evropskega parlamenta z dne 13. januarja 2014 o prenosu pooblastil organa za imenovanje in organa, ki je pooblaščen za sklepanje pogodb o zaposlitvi,

ob upoštevanju dejstva, da je 31. decembra 2014 potekla veljavnost naslednjim rezervnim seznamom Evropskega parlamenta:

AD/4/08, AD/1/10, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/106/S, PE/107/S, PE/117/S, PE/118/S, PE/124/S, AST/4/11, AST/5/11, PE/96/S, PE/119/S, PE/110/S,

ob upoštevanju mnenja skupnega odbora, sprejetega na seji 22. oktobra 2014,

SKLENE:

Člen 1

Veljavnost rezervnih seznamov

| | AD/4/08, PE/106/S, PE/117/S, PE/118/S, PE/124/S, AST/4/11, AST/5/11, PE/96/S, PE/110/S |
| --- | --- |

AD/4/08, PE/106/S, PE/117/S, PE/118/S, PE/124/S, AST/4/11, AST/5/11, PE/96/S, PE/110/S

se podaljša do 31. decembra 2015.

Člen 2

Veljavnost rezervnih seznamov

| | AD/1/10, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/107/S, PE/119/S |
| --- | --- |

AD/1/10, PE/103/S, PE/104/S, PE/107/S, PE/119/S

se ne podaljša.

Luxembourg, 12. december 2014

Klaus WELLE

Generalni sekretar

---

(1)  UL L 56, 4.3.1968, str. 1.

1

(2)  UL L 124, 27.4.2004, str. 1.

2

(3)  UL L 287, 29.10.2013, str. 15.

3

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, William C. Yip, Chief Financial Officer, Vice President and Director
of the managing general partner, Prudential-Bache Properties, Inc. (the Managing General Partner), of Prudential-Bache/Watson & Taylor, Ltd.-2 (the Partnership), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Partnerships Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                  |  |  |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | 
|/s/ WILLIAM C. YIP                                                                                                |  |  |  | 
|                                                                                                                  |  |  |  | 
|William C. Yip Chief Financial Officer, Vice President and Directorof the Managing General Partner March 26, 2004 |  |
No. 112, Misc.

#### Pittore *v.*Warden, Maryland Penitentiary.

Court of Appeals of Maryland. Certiorari denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

David L. Calloway,

Petitioner,

v. Civil Action No. 10-0279 (JDB)

Parole Board,

 Respondent.

MEMORANDUM

In response to the Order directing respondents to show cause why the writ of habeas

corpus should not issue, the United States has documented why the writ should not issue. See

United States’ Opposition to Petitioner’s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus [Dkt. 8]. By

Order of August 9, 2010, petitioner was given until September 10, 2010, to reply to the United

States’ opposition, but the order was returned to the Court as undelivered with an indication that

petitioner has been released from his incarceration. See Dkt. No. 12. It appearing that the habeas

petition is moot, the Court will summarily deny the petition and dismiss the case. A separate

Order accompanies this Memorandum.

 s/ 

 JOHN D. BATES

 United States District Judge

DATE: October 4, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                    JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          2,767
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,230
<PP&E>                                          160,071
<DEPRECIATION>                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  205,805
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           368,628
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                        12,874
<OTHER-SE>                                      (175,697)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    205,805
<SALES>                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                0
<CGS>                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   146,279
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (146,279)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (146,279)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (146,279)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)



</TABLE>
No. 62739.

#### J. W. Hampton, Jr., *&*Co. of Phila. *v.*United States,

protest 320827-K (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that item 70972, “Bead Santa w/chenille Stem,” consists of a “manufactured article in chief value of glass beads, not ornamented with beads, not in imitation of precious or semiprecious stones, nor in chief value of synthetic resin,” the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: johnnyhiott@att.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:11:57 PM

To Whom It Does Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

This mandate directly interferes with peoples religious beliefs.

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Johnny Hiott

, 28677-2428
UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

**FORM 8-K**

 

CURRENT REPORT

 

Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): June 21, 2007

 

 

**FIRST NATIONAL LINCOLN CORPORATION**

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in charter)

 

MAINE

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)

 

0-26589 01-0404322

(Commission file number) (IRS employer identification no.)

 

Main Street, Damariscotta, Maine 04853

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

 

(207) 563-3195

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

 

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is

intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligations

of the registrant under any of the following provisions:

 

[_] Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

 

[_] Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

 

[_] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

 

[_] Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4 (c))

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

| Item 8.01 Other Events | Page 1 |
|------------------------|--------|

 

| Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits. | Page 1 |
|----------------------------------------------|--------|

 

| Signatures | Page 2 |
|------------|--------|

 

| Exhibit Index | Page 3 |
|---------------|--------|

Section 8 - Other Events

 

Item 8.01 Other Events.

 

On June 21, 2007, the Registrant issued the press release filed herewith as Exhibit 99.1 

announcing the declaration of a cash dividend.

 

Section 9 - Financial Statements and Exhibits

 

Item 9.01 Financial Statements, Pro Forma Financial Information and Exhibits.

 

(c) Exhibits.

--------

 

The following Exhibits are being furnished herewith:

 

99.1 Registrant's Press Release dated June 21, 2007.

 

SIGNATURE

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the

Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the

undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

 

 

FIRST NATIONAL LINCOLN CORPORATION

 

By: /s/ F. STEPHEN WARD

---------------------

F. Stephen Ward

Executive Vice President & 

Chief Financial Officer

 

Dated: June 21, 2007

 

Exhibit Index

-------------

 

Exhibit

Number Description of Exhibit

------ ----------------------

 

99.1 Registrant's Press Release dated June 21, 2007.
No. P69/24.

protest 60/20481 (New York).

#### Laufer Shipping Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Maletz, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of electric motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Gamble Vargish &*Co., *dba Seabury & Co.*v. *United States*(57 Cust. Ct. 448, C.D. 2834), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PAMECO CORPORATION FOR THE YEAR ENDED AUGUST 31, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1999
<CASH>                                             137
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,258
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,202
<INVENTORY>                                    128,736
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               164,881
<PP&E>                                          26,121
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,537
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 242,556
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           86,883
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   242,556
<SALES>                                        207,724
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               207,724
<CGS>                                          163,740
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  205,902
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,163
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,792
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,133)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (546)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (587)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.06)


</TABLE>
July 26, 1956

No. 60139.

Suit 4846.

#### Albert F. Maurer Co. *v.*United States.

Abstract 58777 affirmed April 3, 1956. C. A. D. 613.