alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Hughes, 137 Ohio St.3d 1204, 2013-Ohio-4355.]

D ISCIPLINARY C OUNSEL v . H UGHES . [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Hughes, 137 Ohio St.3d 1204, 2013-Ohio-4355.] (No. 2005-1156

— Submitted September 30, 2013

— Decided October 2, 2013.)
O N A PPLICATION FOR R EINSTATEMENT

.

____________________ {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respond ent, Jennifer Krieger Hughes, Attorney Registration No. 0063961, last known busin ess address in Miamisburg, Ohio. {¶ 2} The court, coming now to cons ider its order of March 22, 2006, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of two years, with one year stay ed on conditions, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). {¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this cour t that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. {¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.
O’C ONNOR , C.J., and P FEIFER , O’D ONNELL , L ANZINGER , K ENNEDY , F RENCH , and O’N EILL , JJ., concur.

________________________
Before the First Division,

November 12, 1968

No. P68/482.

protests 64/25080, etc. (New York).

#### Rhodia, Inc. *v.*United States,

Watson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of Ambrene Extra Concentrate, an absolute of labdanum, extracted from labdanum by the volatile solvent process, containing nothing that was not in the original crude material from which made, and that the issues involved herein are analogous to those in *Ungerer and Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 152, C.D. 1647), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: chris@dealcastr.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:19:56 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Chris Rader

Falls Church, VA 22042
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR QUARTER ENDED 07/01/2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                       1,000

<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                APR-2-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUL-1-2000
<CASH>                                             2,995
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     49,174
<ALLOWANCES>                                      18,184
<INVENTORY>                                      114,727
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 163,915
<PP&E>                                            32,391
<DEPRECIATION>                                    11,003
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   354,236
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             50,248
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                              68
<OTHER-SE>                                       115,811
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     354,236
<SALES>                                           76,897
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  80,155
<CGS>                                             55,578
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     25,885
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     815
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 5,894
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (8,017)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (3,367)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (4,651)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (4,651)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.68)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Insight Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paul J. Pucino, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operation of the Company.



|                                                    
|----------------------------------------------------
|                                                    
|/s/ Paul J. Pucino                                  
|Paul J. Pucino                                      
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|May 9, 2006                                         

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Digital Insight and will be retained by Digital Insight and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 231 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 231

   Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require all 
committees post record votes on their Web sites within 48 hours of such 
                                 votes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 2007

Mr. Sessions (for himself, Mr. Sensenbrenner, Mr. Feeney, Mr. Kirk, Mr. 
 Hensarling, Mr. Pearce, Mr. Shays, Mr. Brady of Texas, Mr. Alexander, 
  Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Bonner, Mr. Boustany, Mr. Burgess, Mr. Deal of 
 Georgia, Mr. Lincoln Diaz-Balart of Florida, Mr. Mario Diaz-Balart of 
Florida, Mr. Dreier, Mr. Goodlatte, Ms. Granger, Mr. Hall of Texas, Mr. 
 Hayes, Mr. Issa, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Mr. Keller of Florida, Mr. 
King of Iowa, Mr. Kingston, Mr. Linder, Mr. McCarthy of California, Mr. 
   McCaul of Texas, Mr. McCotter, Mr. Moran of Kansas, Mr. Price of 
   Georgia, Mr. Renzi, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mr. Royce, Mrs. Schmidt, Mr. 
Terry, and Mr. Westmoreland) submitted the following resolution; which 
                 was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require all 
committees post record votes on their Web sites within 48 hours of such 
                                 votes.

    Resolved,  That clause 2(e)(1)(B)(i) of rule XI of the Rules of the 
House of Representatives is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence, by inserting ``and within 48 
        hours of such record vote on its Web site on the Internet'' 
        before the period at the end thereof; and
            (2) in the second sentence, by inserting ``and information 
        so available on its Web site'' before ``shall''.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Peter S. Garcia, Chief Financial Officer of MDRNA, Inc. (“MDRNA”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of MDRNA on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of MDRNA. 

 

Date: April 30, 2010

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to MDRNA and will be retained byMDRNA and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

This certification accompanies eachperiodic report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by MDRNA for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended.
Exhibit
32



CERTIFICATIONS
UNDER SECTION 906



Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States
Code), each of the undersigned officers of OWC Pharmaceutical Research Corp., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),
does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:



The
Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2017 (the “Form 10-K/A”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date:
    April 30, 2018  | /s/
    Mordechi Bignitz                                          
|------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------
|                          | Mordechi
    Bignitz                                              
|                          | Chief
    Executive Officer                                       
|                          | (principal
    executive officer)                                 
|                          |                                                                   
|Dated:
    April 30, 2018 | /s/
    Yossi Dagan                                               
|                          | Yossi
    Dagan                                                   
|                          | Chief
    Financial Officer                                       
|                          | (principal
    financial officer and principal accounting officer)



A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to OWC Pharmaceutical Research Corp. and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63
OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of GigOptix, Inc. (the
Company), does hereby certify that to the undersigneds knowledge:

1) the
Companys Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2) the information contained in the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/    Ronald K. Shelton             
|Ronald K. Shelton                    
|Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Dated:
March 31, 2010
#### In the Matter of Mary J. Plunkett et al., Petitioners-Respondents, v Terrence R. Flynn, Sr., Appellant, et al., Respondent.

[632 NYS2d 645]

—In a proceeding to invalidate a certificate nominating Terrence R. Flynn, Sr., a candidate of the Independence Party for the public office of Judge of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Fifth Municipal Court District, Queens County, in the general election to be held on November 7, 1995, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Garry, J.), dated October 11, 1995, which granted the petition.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the proceeding is dismissed, and the Board of Elections of the City of New York is directed to restore the name of Terrence R. Flynn, Sr., to the appropriate ballot.

The trial court erred in finding that the certificate of nomination, which nominated the candidate for the office of "Judge of *672the Civil Court of the City of New York, Assigned Vacancy Number 8, Queens County”, did not accurately describe the title of the public office being sought *(see,*Election Law § 6-128). There was no impairment of the ability of the Board of Elections to ascertain the correct vacancy in office to which the certificate of nomination pertained *(see, Matter of Donnelly v McNab,*83 AD2d 896). Copertino, Goldstein and Florio, JJ., concur.

Thompson, J. P., dissents and votes to affirm the judgment appealed from, with the following memorandum: The office in question was that of Judge of the Civil Court, Fifth Municipal Court District, Queens County. However, the certificate of nomination described the office as "Judge of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Assigned Vacancy Number 8, Queens County”. Under these circumstances, the trial court’s holding that the certificate of nomination failed to properly describe the title of the office sought was correct *(cf., Matter of Korman v Strohm,*145 Misc 2d 34, 36, *affd*153 AD2d 539).
Exhibit32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Smith Barney Westport Futures Fund L.P. (the"Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the periodending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr., Chief Financial Officer and Director ofCitigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

(2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Partnership.

/s/ Daniel R. McAuliffe,Jr.

|  |
|--|
|  |  |
|  |

Daniel R. McAuliffe,Jr.Citigroup Managed Futures LLC Chief Financial Officer andDirector     Date: August 9,2005

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                            Exhibit 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 State of Incorporation
                                                                 ----------------------

            Name                                                 Incorporation
-----------------------------------------------                  ----------------------
<S>                                                              <C>    
Cellcom Telephone Company, Inc.                                  Delaware
Car-Tel Systems Corp.                                            New Jersey
Cellcom Cellular Corp.                                           Delaware
Cellular Dynamics Telephone Company of Connecticut               Connecticut
Cellular Dynamics Telephone Company of Boston, Inc.              Delaware
Cellular Dynamics Telephone Company of Los Angeles, Inc.         California
Cellular Dynamics Telephone Company of San Francisco, Inc.       California
Cellular Dynamics Telephone Company of Maryland, Inc.            Maryland
Cellular Dynamics Telephone Company, Inc.                        Nevada
Racehorse Cell-Fone Corp.                                        Delaware
Cellular Dynamics Telephone Company of San Diego, Inc.           California
Cellcom Management Company, Inc.                                 Delaware
</TABLE>




                                       19
No. 213, Misc.

#### Byrnes *v.*Walker, Warden.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Jack P. F. Gremillion,*Attorney General of Louisiana, *M. E. Culligan, John E. Jackson, Jr.*and *Scallan E. Walsh,*Assistant Attorneys General, and *Albin P. Lassiter*for respondent.

Motion for leave to file an application for a writ of habeas corpus is hereby transferred “for hearing and determination” to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. 28 U. S. C. § 2241 (b); Rule 31 (5), Revised Rules of the Supreme Court of the United States (1954).
#### HONEYWOOD et al. *v.*ROCKEFELLER, GOVERNOR OF NEW YORK, et al.

No. 177.

Decided October 8, 1962.

*Moses M. Falk*for appellants.

*Louis J. Lefkowitz,*Attorney General of New York,

*Samuel A. Hirshowitz,*First Assistant Attorney General,

*Irving Galt,*Assistant Solicitor General, and *Sheldon*

*Raab,*Deputy Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

Per Curiam.

Since we agree with the District Court, from our examination of the record, “that no good cause has been shown for the granting of a preliminary injunction in advance of a trial upon which the facts necessary for a determination of the merits of this action can be fully developed,” the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of First Robinson Financial
Corporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Rick L. Catt, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


By: /s/ Rick L. Catt
    ----------------
Name:  Rick L. Catt
Chief Executive Officer
February 12, 2003








                                       27
From: ronald.miller@wmich.edu

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:29:30 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ronald A. Miller

Plainwell, MI 49080