alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.30

[*] Certain information in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions.

Addendum No. 2 to the Distribution
Agreement

This Addendum No. 2 to the Distribution Agreement (the Addendum) is made and entered
into as of this 15th day of June, 2007, by and between diaDexus, Inc. (DIADEXUS), and The Binding Site (BINDING SITE).

WHEREAS, BINDING SITE and DIADEXUS are parties to a Distribution Agreement effective January 30, 2007 and modified it with Addendum No. 1 on February 1, 2007 (collectively, the
Agreement);

WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend such Agreement as follows:

[*]

Please insert the following into
Exhibit A.

[*]



|                               |  |                              |  |           |  |          
|------------------------------ |  | ---------------------------- |  | --------- |  | ---------
|Description                    |  | Unit                         |  | Catalog # |  | Lab Price
|[*] PLAC® Test Kit for Lp-PLA2 |  | 96-well microplate ELISA kit |  | 90106     |  | [*]      

BINDING SITE recognizes the importance to
DIADEXUS that BINDING SITE make best efforts to expedite the rate at which customers go live with commercial sales and new customers are enabled. Accordingly both DIADEXUS and BINDING SITE will review this Addendum No. 2 [*] and if
BINDING SITE is making solid commercial efforts to advance Product sales, DIADEXUS will [*].

In addition, all BINDING SITE sales
reporting pursuant to Section 3 (c) provided to DIADEXUS shall be certified for financial accuracy by a financial officer of BINDING SITE.



---



IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties hereto have caused this Addendum to be executed by their fully authorized representatives.



|                         |  |                |  |                               |  |     |  |                    
|------------------------ |  | -------------- |  | ----------------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------
|BINDING SITE             |  |                |  | DIADEXUS                     
|                         |  |                |  |                              
|BY:                      |  | /s/ R. Rowland |  |                               |  | BY: |  | /s/ Patrick Plewman
|Printed Name: R. Rowland |  |                |  | Printed Name: Patrick Plewman
|                         |  |               
|Title: CEO               |  |                |  | Title: President & CEO       
|                         |  |               
|Date: 6/15/07            |  |                |  | Date: 6/19/07
EX-10.10



 Exhibit 10.10 
 [*]: THE CONFIDENTIAL PORTION HAS BEEN OMITTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT AND THE OMITTED MATERIAL HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION. 

ADDENDUM NO. 2 

TO THE SHIPBUILDING CONTRACT 
 HULL NO. [*] 
 DATED 14 SEPTEMBER 2012 

between 
 MEYER WERFT GMBH, a
company organized and existing under the laws of Germany, and having its principal office at Industriegebiet Süd, D-26871 Papenburg, Germany (the “Builder”); and 

BREAKAWAY THREE, LTD., a company incorporated in Bermuda and having its registered office at Cumberland House, 9th Floor, 1 Victoria Street, Hamilton HM11, Bermuda (the
“Buyer”); and 
 NCL CORPORATION LTD., a company incorporated in Bermuda having its registered office at
Cumberland House, 9th Floor, 1 Victoria Street, Hamilton
HM11, Bermuda (“NCLC”). 
 Whereas, Article 14, Clause 11.2 states: “If this Contract has not come into effect by midnight in
Miami on October 15, 2012 either party may, by written notice given to the other by midnight in Miami on October 31, 2012 cancel this Contract.” 
 Whereas the parties desire to amend a date within Article 14, Clause 11.2 states: “If this Contract has not come into effect by midnight in Miami on October 15, 2012 either party may, by written
notice given to the other by midnight in Miami on October 31, 2012 cancel this Contract.” 
 Now, therefore, in consideration of the
premises, and for other good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency and receipt of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Article 14, Clause 11.2 of the Contract is herewith amended as follows: 

 If this Contract has not come into effect by midnight in Miami on October 17, 2012 either party may, by written notice given to the other by midnight in Miami on October 31, 2012 cancel this Contract.

 If this Contract has not come into effect by midnight in Miami on October 17, 2012 either party may, by written notice given
to the other by midnight in Miami on October 31, 2012 cancel this Contract. 
  

	 	2.	Words and expressions defined in the Contract shall have the same meanings when used herein. 









	 	3.	Except as set forth in this Addendum No. 2, the Contract shall remain unchanged and this Addendum No. 2 shall be treated as an integral part of the Contract.


 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Builder, the Buyer and NCLC have duly executed this Addendum No. 2 

 

					
	 /s/ signature illegible
	 		 	
			
	For and on behalf of MEYER WERFT GmbH	 		 	
	October 15, 2012	 		 	/s/ signature illegible
			
	 /s/ Wendy Beck
	 		 	
			
	For and on behalf of Breakaway Three, Ltd.	 		 	
	October 15, 2012	 		 	
			
	 /s/ Wendy Beck
	 		 	
			
	For and on behalf of NCL Corporation Ltd.	 		 	
	October 15, 2012
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Exemption # 9531B
No. 723, Misc. No. 724, Misc.

#### Pike *v.*California; and Ceniceros *v.*California.

*Russell E. Parsons*for petitioners.

Supreme Court of California. Certiorari denied.
Assignment of Purchase and Sale Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
 ASSIGNMENT OF PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT 
 THIS ASSIGNMENT OF REAL
ESTATE PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT dated December 14, 2012, is made by and between HPA-1, LLC a Virginia limited liability company, (“HPA-1”), and WHLR-HPA-1, a Virginia limited liability company (“WHLR-HPA-1”). 

Background: 
 A. HPA-1
and Harps Food Stores, Inc., and Arkansas corporation (“Seller”) previously entered into a Real Estate Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated August 30, 2012 (the “Agreement”), with respect to the purchase of a grocery store
site located at Grove, Oklahoma; 
 B. HPA-1 desires to assign the Agreement to WHLR-HPA-1. 

Agreement: 
 For and in
consideration for the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) cash in hand paid and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are acknowledged, HPA-1 hereby assigns all of its rights and delegates all of its obligations under the
Agreement to WHLR-HPA-1, including all rights to any earnest money deposit or other payment, and WHLR-HPA-1 hereby accepts the assignment of the rights of HPA-1 under the Agreement and assumes all of the obligations and liabilities of HPA-1 under
the Agreement. 
 (Signature Page Follows) 







 In Witness Whereof, the parties have executed this Assignment as of the 14th day of
December, 2012. 
  

					
	ASSIGNOR:
	
	 HPA-1, LLC
 a
Virginia limited liability company

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Jon S. Wheeler

		 	Jon S. Wheeler, its Manager

  

							
	ASSIGNEE:
	
	WHLR-HPA-1, a Virginia limited liability company
			
		 	By:	 	Sooner Capital, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company, its Manager
			
		 		 	 /s/ Jon S. Wheeler

		 		 	By Jon S. Wheeler, its Managing Member
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
     CommScope, Inc. condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for
     the three months ended March 31, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety
     by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001035884
<NAME>                        CommScope, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              Mar-01-1999
<CASH>                                          9,476
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 104,206
<ALLOWANCES>                                    4,313
<INVENTORY>                                    37,058
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              165,760 
<PP&E>                                        235,449
<DEPRECIATION>                                 85,767
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                502,835
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          69,030
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                          505
<OTHER-SE>                                    216,336
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  502,835
<SALES>                                       148,071
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              148,071
<CGS>                                         111,236
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 111,236 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              2,798
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                16,881
<INCOME-TAX>                                    6,121
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            10,760
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   10,760
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .21
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 15.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 No. 333-156454 of Global Ship Lease, Inc. of our
reports dated May 10, 2010 relating to the combined financial statements of Global Ship Lease, Inc., and its Predecessor, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 20-F.



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers
|PricewaterhouseCoopers    

Neuilly-sur-Seine, France

May 18, 2010

PricewaterhouseCoopers is represented by PricewaterhouseCoopers Audit, 63 rue de Villiers92200 Neuilly-sur-Seine, France
From: mytriniity03@earthlink.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:01:55 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Virginia Hoyns

, 11367-2815
No. 233.

#### Kaakinen et al. *v.*Peelers Company.

*Robert W. Beach*and *Paul L. O’Brien*for petitioners. *Ford E. Smith*and *A. Robert Theibault*for respondent.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
From: albertson999@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: albertson999@comcast.net

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:05:42 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

eric albertson

Knoxville, TN 37914
No. 67477.

#### — American Map Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 271423-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of map measures similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Kaufman & Vinson Co.*v. *United States*(44 Cust. Ct. 238, C.D. 2180), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 320, Misc.

#### Pellon *v.*United States.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg*and *Julia P. Cooper*for the United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-2016 In Re: STEVEN C. STERLING, Debtor.

---------------------------------- STEVEN C. STERLING; LAURA M. STERLING, Appellants,
v. LAWRENCE L. ROSEN, Appellee, and HERBERT BESKINS, Trustee-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (3:07-cv-00039-nkm) Submitted: April 24, 2008 Decided: April 28, 2008- 2 - Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Steven C. Sterling, Laura M. Sterling, Appellants Pro Se. Charles Albert Price, CREGGER & LAZARUS, Annandale, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 3 - PER CURIAM: Steven C. Sterling and Laura M. Sterling appeal from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order lifting the automatic stay with respect to his residence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sterling v. Beskins , No. 3:07-cr-00039-nkm (W.D. Va. Oct. 4, 2007). We deny the Appellants’ motion for preparation of a transcript at government expense, and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
From: soulsamurai@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:22:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Brently Keen

Colorado Springs, CO 80918
#### Charles Leon LEWIS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ronald J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 01-6206.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 21, 2001.

Decided June 28, 2001.

Charles Leon Lewis, pro se.

Christopher Garrett Hill, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for appellee.

Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit J.

PER CURIAM.

Charles Leon Lewis seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *See Lewis v. Angelone,*No. CA-99-1549-2 (E.D.Va. Jan. 25, 2001). We deny Lewis’ motion to authorize preparation of a transcript at the Government’s expense and deny Lewis leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
|   | (1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of HQ Global Education Inc. for the year ended August 31, 2011 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of HQ Global Education Inc. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated: December 14, 2011 |                             |   |
|--------------------------|----------------------------------|--------|
|                     | /s/ Yunjie Fang                  |   |
|                     | Chief Financial Officer          |   |
|                     | (Principal Financial Officer and |   |
|                     | Principal Accounting Officer)    |   |

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6149

MICKEY L. PHILLIPS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DARNELY R. HODGE, Superintendent; WALTER J.

MINTON, Assistant Superintendent; CHARLES

DAVIS, Captain,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior

District Judge. (CA-01-569)

Submitted: April 11, 2002 Decided: May 10, 2002

Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mickey L. Phillips, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Mickey L. Phillips appeals from the district court’s order

dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.

2001) complaint. The district court assessed an initial partial

filing fee in accordance with 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(b)(1) (West Supp.

2001), and directed that Phillips submit evidence that he exhausted

his administrative remedies, and either pay the fee or submit a

statement under penalty of perjury that he had insufficient assets

to pay the fee. When Phillips failed to respond to this order, the

district court dismissed the case without prejudice. Finding no

abuse of discretion, we affirm the district court’s order. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
1

Ogulei, David

From: David Moore <DavidM@cooperenvironmental.com>

Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 2:13 PM

To: Ogulei, David

Subject: Cooper Environmental

Hello David, 

I just wanted to follow up to see if you were able to communicate with Dr. Fine at South Coast AQMD regarding our Xact 

systems in stack applications. Do you require any additional information from us? 

Best regards, 

David Moore 

Director of Sales and Marketing 

Cooper Environmental Services LLC 

10180 SW Nimbus Ave. Suite J6 

Portland, OR 97223 

Phone #: 503-608-4444 

Mobile #: 503-970-8190 

Fax #: 503-624-2120 

Email: DavidM@cooperenvironmental.com

Website: www.cooperenvironmental.com