alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### NUMBER 13

- 1 6

- 00 403

- C R



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

JEREMY THAD NORTHCUT T , Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee.

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

of Bell County, Texas.



## O R D E R Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Longoria

Order Per Curiam

Appellant, Jeremy Thad Northcutt

, appeals a conviction for assault. 1 The c ourt

r eporter, Terry Johnston

, filed exhibit volume 9 with this Court on October 7, 2016. Upon

1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Third Court of Appeals in Austin pursuant to a docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Cou rt of Texas. See T EX . G OV ' T C ODE A NN . § 73.001 (West , Westlaw through 2015 R.S. ).2

receiving the exhibit volume, the reporter was notified that the exhibit volume was not in

compliance with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. On October 24, 2016, the

Clerk of the Court notif ied the reporter that the exhibit volume was marked received and

directed the reporter to file an amended exhibit volume.

Appendix C of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 2(e) requires that in

exhibit volumes, the court reporter must create bookm arks to mark the first page of each

exhibit document. Rule 2(f) provides that in the event of a material violation of this rule

in the preparation of a reporter’s record, on motion of a party or on the court’s own

initiative, the appellate court may requi re the court reporter to amend the reporter’s record

or to prepare a new reporter’s record in proper form.

The reporter has failed to file an exhibit volume containing bookmarks as required

by Appendix C of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 2(e )

. Accordingly, the

reporter, Terry Johnston, is hereby ORDERED to file exhibit volume 9 with bookmarks on

or before January 13, 201 7

.
PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed th e 4th day of January , 20 1 7

.
##### 



LNB Bancorp, Inc. Exhibit to Form 10 - K (For the twelve months ended December 31, 2003) Exhibit Number (32(a)) CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of LNB Bancorp, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James
F. Kidd, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ James F. Kidd James F. Kidd
President and
Chief Executive Officer
March 10, 2004
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Maven Media Holdings Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Adrienne Humphreys, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
26th day of May, 2009.


/s/ Adrienne Humphreys
-------------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
Before the First Division,

January 15, 1958

No. 61462.

#### D. C. Andrews & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 295184-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of photo enlargers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Manca, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 271, C. D. 1874), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: seevers@conpoint.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:08:45 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Marlin Seevers

Norfolk, NE 68701
From: dwalenga@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:29:49 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Tanya Walenga

Bowling Green, KY 42101
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit  Fund VI,  L.P.,  Series 6 (the  "Partnership")  for the  quarters  ended
December  31,  2005,  September  30,  2005 and June 30,  2005 as filed  with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  and
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.,  section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, I, Thomas J. Riha, Senior  Vice-President and Chief
Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership,
hereby certify that:

1.        The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  except that the Report
          is a cumulative  report  covering each of the quarters  ended December
          31, September 30 and June 30, 2005; and

2.        The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Partnership.



/s/Thomas J. Riha
-----------------
Thomas J. Riha
Senior Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
February 15, 2008
From: wkrieg@blairflorida.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:22:55 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Wilfried Krieg

Haines City, FL 33844
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA Simple Engineering Analysis of Solar Particle Event High Energy Tails and Their Impact on Vehicle DesignThe mathematical models for Solar Particle Event (SPE) high energy tails are constructed with several di erent algorithms. Since limited measured data exist above energies around 400 MeV, this paper arbitrarily de nes the high energy tail as any proton with an energy above 400 MeV. In order to better understand the importance of accurately modeling the high energy tail for SPE spectra, the contribution to astronaut whole body e ective dose equivalent of the high energy portions of three di erent SPE models has been evaluated. To ensure completeness of this analysis, simple and complex geometries were used. This analysis showed that the high energy tail of certain SPEs can be relevant to astronaut exposure and hence safety. Therefore, models of high energy tails for SPEs should be well analyzed and based on data if possible.Document ID20160006409Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsSingleterry, Robert C., Jr.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Walker, Steven A.*(Old Dominion Univ. Norfolk, VA, United States)*Clowdsley, Martha S.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredMay 19, 2016Publication DateApril 1, 2016Subject CategorySpace RadiationSpacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNF1676L-23809L-20679NASA/TM-2016-219183Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 651549.02.07.01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20160006409.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
This .zip file contains graphic files (in .png format) of each chart and graph in the Economic Research Service report "Understanding the Rise in Rural Child Poverty, 2003-2014", ERR-208, published in May 2016. The content and context of these files is as of the publication date of the report. After time, the material may not reflect the current ERS program of work, may be outdated, and/or superseded, so please visit the website to obtain the latest information: www.ers.usda.gov. Any reuse of these images should include attribution to "Economic Research Service/USDA."

The following inventory lists each of the files in this folder.


File name		Description
(Fig-01.png)		Figure 1 - Official and alternative estimates of child poverty rates by urban/rural status, 1990-2014
(Fig-02.png)		Figure 2 - Changes in average real family income explain little of the rise in child poverty between 2003 and 2014
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 14

- 00371

- CV

OLMOS EQUIPMENT, INC.

, Appellant

v.

Tina M. ROMANE and Estate of Richard F. Romane,

Appellees

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011

- CI

- 12364

Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE BARNARD

, JUSTICE MARTINEZ , AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR

WANT OF PROSECUTION.

We order that app ellant Olmos Equipment, Inc. bear all costs of this appeal.

SIGNED June 25, 2014.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice
EPA, 2009e. Email Communication From: Hoffman.Wendy@epamail.epa.gov Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 4:39 PM To: Kristina Watts; Kimberly Wilson; john_bovay@abtassoc.com Subject: Fw: Clarifying question on IUR data you sent me on Tues.

Hi -- This is what I got from Darry. Kristina was right, that there are a lot CAS #s with no reports -- Wendy ----- Forwarded by Wendy Hoffman/DC/USEPA/US on 05/14/2009 04:37 PM

-----

Re: Clarifying question on IUR data you sent me on Tues. (Document link: Wendy Hoffman)

Darryl Ballard

to: Wendy Hoffman

05/14/2009 03:32 PM

88 CASRNs with reports, 652 with no reports (Total = 740 CASRNs)

From: Wendy Hoffman/DC/USEPA/US

To: Darryl Ballard/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 05/14/2009 01:24 PM

Subject: Re: Clarifying question on IUR data you sent me on Tues.

Can you give me the counts pretty quickly? I take it then that were CAS #s for which you got no reports?

Thanks.

From: Darryl Ballard/DC/USEPA/US

Page 1EPA, 2009e. Email Communication

To: Wendy Hoffman/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 05/14/2009 01:02 PM

Subject: Re: Clarifying question on IUR data you sent me on Tues.

Both. Do you need counts on those?

Darryl

From: Wendy Hoffman/DC/USEPA/US

To: Darryl Ballard/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 05/14/2009 09:30 AM

Subject: Clarifying question on IUR data you sent me on Tues.

HI, Darryl -- I have a clarification to ask about the data you sent me (below). For

the question about the IUR Chems Subject to Orders, you gave me a list of 7 CAS #s and 1 accession # that reported PV of less than 25,000 lbs. Does that mean I can assume that all the others had reported

submitted that had volumes of 25,000 lbs or greater, or were there any/many that had no reports at all?
Thanks very much - - Wendy

From: Darryl Ballard/DC/USEPA/US

Page 2EPA, 2009e. Email Communication

To: Wendy Hoffman/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 05/12/2009 07:10 PM

Subject: Re: Fw: one more query on IUR database......

I believe the numbers you are looking for are in the attached document.

If you have any questions or need anything else, please let me know.

Darryl Ballard Acting Branch Chief, RDMB (202) 564-8958

[attachment "One More Query On IUR Database.doc" deleted by Darryl

Ballard/DC/USEPA/US]

Page 3
No. 65985.

#### R. J. Saunders & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 59/23643 (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of photofiash lamps the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 64250, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 21

- 00032

- CV

IN RE RHONDA LEE COUGOT

Original Proceeding

_____________

From the County Court at Law

Walker County, Texas

Trial Court No. 9276PR

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator ’ s Petition for Writ of Mandamus is denied.

MATT JOHNSON

Justi ce

B efore Chief J usti ce Gray,

Justice Neill

, an d

Justice Johnson

Petition denied

O pi nio n d elivered and f iled March 10

, 2021

[ OT 06]
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1508 

Honoring the 40th anniversary of the incorporation of the city of Carson, 

California, and recognizing the city for its rich contributions to California 

history. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 26, 2008 

Ms. RICHARDSON submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the 40th anniversary of the incorporation of the 

city of Carson, California, and recognizing the city for 

its rich contributions to California history. 

Whereas the area that is now the city of Carson, California, 

was inhabited by Native Americans, including the 

Gabrielino and Suangna, more than 6,000 years ago; 

Whereas the very first Spanish land grant in California encompassed today’s cities of Carson, Lomita, Redondo 

Beach, Torrance, Wilmington, and parts of San Pedro; 

Whereas the center of this land grant was the Dominguez 

Rancho homestead, which is currently Dominguez Hills, 

located in the eastern portion of the city of Carson; 

Whereas the Battle of Dominguez Rancho was fought during 

the Mexican-American War in 1846; 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1508 IH 

Whereas land was donated from the Dominguez Rancho 

homestead for the railroad built between Los Angeles and 

the San Pedro Harbor in 1869; 

Whereas nearly 10,000 registered voters cast their vote to incorporate the city of Carson in 1968; 

Whereas the city of Carson was named after John Manuel 

Carson, the grandson of one of the area’s first settlers; 

Whereas the city of Carson now has more than 120 acres of 

park land, is home to California State University 

Dominguez Hills, Carson Regional Library, the Juanita 

Millender-McDonald Community Center, and the Home 

Depot National Training Center; 

Whereas the city of Carson is now the 8th largest city in the 

county of Los Angeles and a leading center for international trade and commerce; and 

Whereas the fathers of the city of Carson coined the motto, 

‘‘Future Unlimited,’’ which is fitting for this great city: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That Congress honors the 40th anniversary 

2 of the incorporation of the city of Carson, California, and 

3 recognizes the city for its rich contributions to California 

4 history. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
IMPROVE Home Page is available at:

http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/improve/Default.htm
Exhibit 32.01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc. (the company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark S. Thompson, Chief Executive Officer of the company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Mark S. Thompson   
|Mark S. Thompson       
|Chief Executive Officer
|November 8, 2007
----

# Planetary Fact Sheets

----

**Sun** Fact Sheet
**Mercury** Fact Sheet**Venus** Fact Sheet**Earth** Fact Sheet**Moon** Fact Sheet**Near Earth Object** Fact Sheet**Mars** Fact Sheet**Asteroid** Fact Sheet**Jupiter** Fact Sheet-  **- Jovian Satellite** Fact Sheet      **- Galilean Satellite** Fact Table
  -  **- Jovian Rings** Fact Sheet     **Saturn** Fact Sheet      -  **- Saturnian Satellite** Fact Sheet          **- Saturnian Rings** Fact Sheet
      **Uranus** Fact Sheet
      **- Uranian Satellite** Fact Sheet
-  **- Uranian Rings** Fact Sheet     **Neptune** Fact Sheet      -  **- Neptunian Satellite** Fact Sheet        **- Neptunian Rings** Fact Sheet
    **Pluto** Fact Sheet
    **Comet** Fact Sheet
**Chiron** Fact Sheet
 Notes on the factsheets - definitions of parameters, units, notes on sub- and superscripts, etc.
**Table of Planetary Facts** - Metric Units**Table of Planetary Facts** - U.S. Units**Table of Planetary Facts** - Earth Ratio
 NSSDC Planetary Home PageAuthor/Curator:Dr. David R. Williams, dwilliam@nssdc.gsfc.nasa.govNSSDC, Mail Code 633NASA Goddard Space Flight CenterGreenbelt, MD 20771+1-301-286-1258NASA Official: Ed Grayzeck, edwin.j.grayzeck@nasa.govLast Updated: 22 January 2001, DRW