alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           3,930
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,133
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (846)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,800
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,907
<PP&E>                                         266,101
<DEPRECIATION>                                  92,399
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 292,819
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,850
<BONDS>                                        169,125
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        46,521
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,285
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   292,819
<SALES>                                         62,247
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                62,247
<CGS>                                           38,438
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   56,057
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,061
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,195
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,280
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,915
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.14


</TABLE>
From: wade.mobley@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:23:49 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Wade Mobley

Sioux Falls, SD 57106
No. 472.

#### Ove Gustavsson Contracting Co., Inc., *v.*Browne & Bryan Lumber Co., Inc., et al.

*Anthony B. Cataldo*for petitioner.

*Philip G. Fits*and *William V. Homans*for Browne & Bryan Lumber Co., Inc., respondent.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-13-0563 SAT Date: 6/28/2013 Print Date: 8/2/2013

Related cases : Health related cases : Ecotox related cases:

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 2 1

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 1 1 1 PMN 3 1 1 Hyd Pdt

Exposure Based Review : Health: N o Ecotox: N o Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Inhalation Ecotox: N o releases to water Fate: ; PMN negl; Hyd Pdt negl Keywords : Keywords: LUNG; ONCO; MUTA; SENS-L,S; IRR-L,MM,S,E Summary of Assessment :
Fate : Fate Summary: P-13-0563 FATE: Liquid with MP < 25 C (E) S = Reacts Hydrolysis half-life = hr VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E) BP > 400 C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E) POTW removal (%) = PMN 99 via hydrolysis; then Hyd Pdt 90 via sorption Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = Hyd Pdt >moSorption to soils/sediments = PMN V.strong; Hyd Pdt v.strong PBT Potential: PMN P1B1; Hyd Pdt P3B1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = PMN negl; Hyd Pdt negl

Health : Health Summary: Absorption of low molecular weight fraction is expected to be poor all routes ( p che m ); expected to react, especially in the lung. Concern for oncogenicity based on mutagenicity based on espiratory and dermal sensitization and lung and mucous membrane irritation based on the isocyanate moiety. Also concern for lung toxicity and irritation to all tissues from the

. Ecotox : Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 * daphnid 48-h LC50 * green algal 96-h EC50 * fish

_ chronic value * daphnid

_ chronic value *
algal

_ chronic value *
Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for nonionic polymers; SAR chemical class = p olyme r -nonionic- N CO; solid with unknown mp (P); S = reacts with water at 25 C (P); p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and nominal concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) *

SARs nonionic polyemrs SAR Class p olyme r -nonionic- N CO Ecotox Category N onionic Polymers
Ecotox Factors Comments:
SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 195 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     February 28, 2007.
    Resolved,  That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the 
Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved 
into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for 
consideration of the bill (H.R. 556) to ensure national security while promoting 
foreign investment and the creation and maintenance of jobs, to reform the 
process by which such investments are examined for any effect they may have on 
national security, to establish the Committee on Foreign Investment in the 
United States, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be 
dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived 
except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. General debate shall be 
confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Financial Services. After general debate the bill shall be considered for 
amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be in order to consider as an 
original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the 
amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on 
Financial Services now printed in the bill. Each section of the committee 
amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. 
Notwithstanding clause 11 of rule XVIII, no amendment to the committee amendment 
in the nature of a substitute shall be in order except those printed in the 
portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of 
rule XVIII and except pro forma amendments for the purpose of debate. Each 
amendment so printed may be offered only by the Member who caused it to be 
printed or his designee and shall be considered as read. At the conclusion of 
consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the 
bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member may 
demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of 
the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the nature of a 
substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 
amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion 
to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 184 (Monday, September 25, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 65763]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20683]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD

[Docket No. EP 290 (Sub-No. 5) (2023-4)]


Quarterly Rail Cost Adjustment Factor

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.

ACTION: Approval of rail cost adjustment factor.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Board has approved the fourth quarter 2023 Rail Cost 
Adjustment Factor (RCAF) and cost index filed by the Association of 
American Railroads. The fourth quarter 2023 RCAF (Unadjusted) is 1.012. 
The fourth quarter 2023 RCAF (Adjusted) is 0.401. The fourth quarter 
2023 RCAF-5 is 0.384.

DATES: Applicability Date: October 1, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pedro Ramirez at (202) 245-0333. If 
you require an accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 
please call (202) 245-0245.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Board's decision, which is available at www.stb.gov.

    Decided: September 18, 2023.

    By the Board, Board Members Fuchs, Hedlund, Oberman, Primus, and 
Schultz.
Tammy Lowery,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2023-20683 Filed 9-22-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
No. 63295.

protest 313757-K (Milwaukee).

#### Aldrich Chemical Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

Wilson, Judge:

The merchandise in the ease at bar, invoiced as “2-Ethyl-3-methyl-4-carbethoxy-2-cyclohexene-l-one” was assessed for duty under paragraph 27(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T.D. 52739, supplemented by T.D. 52820, at the rate of 3% cents per pound and 25 per centum ad valorem as a coal-tar product. Plaintiff claims the merchandise properly classifiable under paragraph 5 of said act, as amended by the Sixth Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T.D. 54108.

Dr. Alfred Bader, the only witness in the case, testified on behalf of the plaintiff substantially as follows: That he holds, among others, a degree in chemical engineering from Queen’s University, Canada, as well as a master of science degree in organic chemistry from the same institution; that, from 1950 *321to 1954, lie was research chemist and group leader in charge of organic chemistry with the Pittsburgh Plate Glass Go., Milwaukee, Wis., and is presently chief chemist with and part owner of the plaintiff corporation. His relevant testimony was to the effect that the product in question is not of coal-tar origin, in that the ingredients employed to make the imported material are not of coal-tar origin.

The aforesaid conclusion of plaintiff’s witness as to the composition of the importation at bar was supported by a report (plaintiff’s collective exhibit 1) from the manufacturer of the product outlining in detail its method of production and wherein it is further stated:

None of the starting materials in this preparation is of coal-tar origin.

Government counsel, at the trial, stated in the above connection that “there was no analysis made of this merchandise by the Government chemist. We didn’t have a sample and that is the reason for it.” (R. 6.)

On the basis of the record here presented, we are of opinion and hold that the merchandise in question is not a coal-tar product as classified but that it is properly classifiable under paragraph 5 of the tariff act, as amended, *supra,*at the rate of 11% per centum ad valorem, as a chemical compound, not specially provided for, as claimed.

The protest is sustained. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
From: stringerfamily4@cox.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:00:00 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Judy Stringer

Oklahoma City, OK 73132
From: gilbertm@njit.edu

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:03:36 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sharon Gilbert

Summit, NJ 07901
```

[Federal Register: September 22, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 183)]
[Notices]               
[Page 57740]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr22se10-27]                         

[[Page 57740]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

 
Sunshine Act Meetings

    The following notice of meeting is published pursuant to the 
provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, 5 
U.S.C. 552b.

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:  Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE:  9:30 a.m. to 11 a.m., October 1, 2010.

PLACE: Three Lafayette Center, 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 
Lobby Level Hearing Room (Room 1000).

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
     Issuance of an interim final rule relating to the time 
frame for reporting pre-enactment unexpired swaps to a swap data 
repository or to the Commission;
     Issuance of proposed rules that would prescribe (i) 
certain risk management standards for those derivatives clearing 
organizations designated as systemically important (``SIDCOs'') by the 
Financial Stability Oversight Council under Title VIII of the Dodd-
Frank Act and (ii) standards requiring sixty (60) days advance notice 
of changes in SIDCO rules, procedures, or operations that materially 
affect the nature or level of risks presented by the SIDCO; and
     Issuance of proposed rules specifying requirements for 
derivatives clearing organizations, designated contract markets, and 
swap execution facilities on governance arrangements and mitigation of 
conflicts of interest.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: David A. Stawick, Secretary of the 
Commission, 202-418-5071.

David A. Stawick,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-23821 Filed 9-20-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
H. Res. 189 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 25, 2007. 

Whereas the Vietnam War was fought in Vietnam from 1961 

to 1975, and involved North Vietnam and the Viet Cong 

in conflict with United States Armed Forces and South 

Vietnam; 

Whereas the United States became involved in Vietnam because policy-makers in the United States believed that if 

South Vietnam fell to a Communist government then 

Communism would spread throughout the rest of Southeast Asia; 

Whereas members of the United States Armed Forces began 

serving in an advisory role to the South Vietnamese in 

1961; 

Whereas as a result of the Gulf of Tonkin incidents on August 2 and 4, 1964, Congress overwhelmingly passed the 

Gulf of Tonkin Resolution (Public Law 88–408), on August 7, 1964, which effectively handed over war-making 

powers to President Johnson until such time as ‘‘peace 

and security’’ had returned to Vietnam; 

Whereas, in 1965, United States Armed Forces ground combat units arrived in Vietnam; 
2 

•HRES 189 EH 

Whereas, by the end of 1965, there were 80,000 United 

States troops in Vietnam, and by 1969 a peak of approximately 543,000 troops was reached; 

Whereas, on January 27, 1973, the Treaty of Paris was 

signed, which required the release of all United States 

prisoners-of-war held in North Vietnam and the withdrawal of all United States Armed Forces from South 

Vietnam; 

Whereas, on March 30, 1973, the United States Armed 

Forces completed the withdrawal of combat troops from 

Vietnam; 

Whereas more than 58,000 members of the United States 

Armed Forces lost their lives in Vietnam and more than 

300,000 members of the Armed Forces were wounded; 

Whereas, in 1982, the Vietnam Veterans Memorial was dedicated in the District of Columbia to commemorate those 

members of the United States Armed Forces who died or 

were declared missing-in-action in Vietnam; 

Whereas the Vietnam War was an extremely divisive issue 

among the people of the United States; 

Whereas members of the United States Armed Forces who 

served bravely and faithfully for the United States during 

the Vietnam War were caught upon their return home in 

the crossfire of public debate about the involvement of 

the United States in the Vietnam War; 

Whereas the establishment of a ‘‘Welcome Home Vietnam 

Veterans Day’’ would be an appropriate way to honor 

those members of the United States Armed Forces who 

served in Vietnam during the Vietnam War; and 
3 

•HRES 189 EH 

Whereas March 30 would be an appropriate day to establish 

as ‘‘Welcome Home Vietnam Veterans Day’’: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that there should be established a ‘‘Welcome Home 

Vietnam Veterans Day’’ to honor those members of the 

United States Armed Forces who served in Vietnam. 

Attest: 

Clerk.