alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office

Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800

Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001

86–487 PDF 2016

[ERRATA] 

OSHA’S REGULATORY AGENDA: 

CHANGING LONG–STANDING POLICIES 

OUTSIDE THE PUBLIC RULEMAKING PROCESS 

HEARING 

BEFORE THE

SUBCOMMITTEE ON WORKFORCE 

PROTECTIONS 

COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION 

AND THE WORKFORCE 

U.S. House of Representatives 

ONE HUNDRED THIRTEENTH CONGRESS 

SECOND SESSION 

HEARING HELD IN WASHINGTON, DC, FEBRUARY 4, 2014 

Serial No. 113–43 

Printed for the use of the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

( 

Available via the World Wide Web: 

www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/committee.action?chamber=house&committee=education 

or 

Committee address: http://edworkforce.house.gov 

CEWDOCROOM with DISTILLER

ERRATA 

The referenced hearing held before the Committee on Education 

and the Workforce was inadvertently printed with the incorrect 

staffer’s name as James Martin on page 1. The correct name is 

John Martin. 

CEWDOCROOM with DISTILLER
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BJs Wholesale Club, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended November 1, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, Herbert J Zarkin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the undersigneds knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                              
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Dated: December 3, 2008 |  | /S/ HERBERT J ZARKIN         
|                        |  | Herbert J Zarkin             
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer and  
|                        |  | Chairman of the Board        
|                        |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
No. 597, Misc.

#### Jackson *v.*Illinois.

Supreme Court of Illinois. Certiorari denied.
From: daooms1@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:33:32 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Debra Ooms

San Jacinto, CA 92583
Form of Termination of Letter Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
 January     2013 
 Via Hand Delivery 

[Senior Executive Officer] 
 Dear [Senior
Executive Officer], 
 As you are aware, HopFed Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with the
United States Department of Treasury (the “Treasury”) on December 12, 2008 that provided for the Company’s participation in the Treasury’s TARP Capital Purchase Program (the “CPP”). As a condition to the
Company’s participation in the CPP, you entered into a Letter Agreement with the Company on December 12, 2008 in which you consented to amendments to certain compensation-related plans, programs and arrangements in which you participated.
The amendments in your Letter Agreement restrict certain compensation payments to you from the Company and apply during the period in which any obligation arising from financial assistance provided under the CPP remains outstanding. This restricted
period does not, however, include any period during which the Federal Government only holds a warrant to purchase common stock of the Company. 

Effective December 19, 2012, the Company repaid the Federal Government the financial assistance it received under the CPP. At such time, the Federal
Government only holds a warrant to purchase common stock of the Company. Accordingly, the limitations contained in your Letter Agreement are no longer applicable, and your Letter Agreement is hereby terminated effective as of December 19, 2012.
The Company’s Board of Directors appreciates the concessions you have made and looks forward to your continued leadership during these financially turbulent times. 

 

			
	Yours sincerely,
	
	HOPFED Bancorp, Inc.
		
	By:	 	  

	Name:	 	Thomas I. Miller
	Title:	 	Compensation Committee Chairman
Before the Second Division,

October 30, 1963

No. 68068.

#### Titus Pacific Corp. and Arthur J. Fritz et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/23409, etc. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Kao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of vacuum brushes similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Bruce Duncan Company, a/c Sims-Worms*v. *United States*(45 Cust. Ct. 85, C.D. 2202), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PanAmSat Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph R. Wright, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



|Date: November 15, 2004 | /s/JOSEPH R. WRIGHTJoseph R. Wright
President and Chief Executive Officer
|----------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Mayquest Ventures, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Roman Zherdytskyi, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

|                                                                     |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ Roman Zherdytskyi                                                    |
|                                                                          |
| Roman Zherdytskyi       Principal Financial Officer       March 31, 2010 |
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of diaDexus, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Patrick Plewman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:



| |  |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |  |  |                                      
|------------------ |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 13, 2011 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Patrick Plewman                  
|                   |  |  |  |  |  | Patrick Plewman                      
|                   |  |  |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
From: twelch2007@windstream.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:52:58 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance. If

you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for religious objections. I strongly

oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and devices

that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Cecelia Welch

Hilliard, FL 32046
From: dolphintrainers@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:13:33 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Bazzel Baz

Redondo Beach, CA 90277
From: sueluvscats@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:47:22 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Susan Church

San Francisco, CA 94112
From: klp98c@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:04:37 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kera Gardner

Abilene, TX 79603
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-02-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,359
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,188
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (782)
<INVENTORY>                                     29,518
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                50,732
<PP&E>                                          24,642
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (8,404)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  99,175
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,212
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        78,391
<OTHER-SE>                                    (15,491)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    99,175
<SALES>                                         20,416
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,416
<CGS>                                           15,277
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,277
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,078
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 519
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (458)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (134)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (324)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (324)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BJs Wholesale Club, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended August 1, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, Laura J. Sen, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the undersigneds knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |                                      
|------------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: September 2, 2009 |  | /S/ LAURA J. SEN                     
|                         |  | Laura J. Sen                         
|                         |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                         |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
#### Leon LAMAR, Appellant, v. U.S. CONGRESS, et al., Appellees.

No. 00-5465.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

July 2, 2001.

Before EDWARDS, Chief Judge; WILLIAMS and GINSBURG, Circuit Judges.

*8
      *JUDGMENT*

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. *See*D.C.Cir. Rule 36(b). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s orders filed July 25, 2000 and October 23, 2000, be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated therein.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
H. Res. 216

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

May 14, 2007.

Whereas the Juniata College volleyball team is one of the 

great little-known dynasties in college sports; 

Whereas the Juniata College volleyball program has a remarkable 1,100 win and 172 loss record over 30 seasons; 

Whereas Head Coach Larry Bock has the most wins of any 

coach in the history of NCAA women’s volleyball; 

Whereas during this past season, senior Stephanie Kines was 

named the Division III Women’s Volleyball Player of the 

Year, just the second Juniata player to earn that honor; 

Whereas Juniata College did not lose a match in 2006 to a 

Division III opponent all season, and the team’s only 

2006 loss was to Division I Princeton University; 

Whereas Juniata College’s 41 win and 1 loss record during 

2006 tied the program record for the fewest losses in a 

season, and was the team’s first 40-win season since 

1997; and 

Whereas Juniata defeated long-time rival Washington University-St. Louis in a thrilling five-game championship 

match that many described as the best championship 

match in the history of Division III volleyball: Now, 

therefore, be it 
2

•HRES 216 EH 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) commends the Juniata College volleyball team 

for winning the 2006 NCAA Division III Women’s 

Volleyball National Championship; and 

(2) recognizes the achievements of the players, 

coaches, students, and staff whose hard work and dedication made the Championship possible. 

Attest:

Clerk.