# Patent

## Title
System and method of a requirement, compliance and resource management

## Abstract

A system and/or a method based on a scalable requirement, compliance and resource management methodology for designing a product/service, optimizing relevant processes and enhancing real time and/or near real time collaboration between many users. The requirement, compliance and resource management methodology is further integrated with a fuzzy/neuro-fuzzy logic algorithm module and/or statistical algorithm module and/or weighting logic algorithm module and enhanced with a graphical user interface.

## Background
CROSS REFERENCE OF RELATED APPLICATIONS
The present application claims priority to: U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/848,015 entitled, “SYSTEM AND METHOD OF A REQUIREMENT, COMPLIANCE AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT METHODOLOGY” filed on Dec. 19, 2012.
The present application is a continuation-in-part (CIP) of and claims priority to: U.S. Non-Provisional patent application Ser. No. 13/573,634 entitled, “SYSTEM AND METHOD OF A REQUIREMENT, COMPLIANCE AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT METHODOLOGY” filed on Sep. 28, 2012.


FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is related to a system and/or a method based on a scalable requirement, compliance and resource management methodology.
The requirement, compliance and resource management methodology of the present invention is intended for (a) designing a product/service, (b) scoping end-to-end process steps, which are required for designing the product/service, (c) identifying critical constrains for designing the product/service, (d) optimizing relevant processes for designing the product/service, (e) evaluating requirement specifications of each process step for designing the product/service, (f) allocating resources (human capital and/or investment capital) for each process step for designing the product/service and (g) enhancing near real time and/or real time collaboration between users.
DESCRIPTION OF PRIOR ART
One currently available product IBM Rational DOORS® software program enables to capture, trace, analyze and manage changes to requirements.
IBM Rational DOORS® can demonstrate compliance to regulations and standards.
IBM Rational DOORS® software allows all stakeholders to actively participate in the requirements process. It has ability to manage changing requirements with scalability. Its life cycle traceability can help teams align the methods and processes and also measure the impact of such methods and processes.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
In sharp contrast to IBM Rational DOORS®, the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology of the present invention is uniquely enhanced with mathematical algorithms (e.g., fuzzy logic, statistics and weighting logic) to account for any inherent approximation, variability and uncertainty in a process step and/or all cumulative process steps.
Above is a significant innovation compared to IBM Rational DOORS®.
Furthermore, the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology of the present invention synthesizes optimization of relevant process steps, requirements, resources and critical constrains for near real time and/or real time collaboration.



BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
FIG. 1 (schematic diagram) describes various applications of the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology.
FIG. 2 (schematic diagram) describes the connectivity (both one-way and two-way connectivity) of the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology (located at an enterprise server) with other external systems and/or devices.
FIG. 3 (schematic diagram) describes the connectivity (both one-way and two-way connectivity) of the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology (located at a cloud server) with other external systems and/or devices.
FIG. 4 (schematic diagram) describes the connectivity (two-way connectivity) of the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology with users for (a) near real time and/or real time collaboration between users, (b) product development, (c) procurement, system/test/QA engineering, (d) legal/compliance requirement/management, (e) product management, (f) product marketing, (g) technical support, (h) financial management and (i) executive management.
FIG. 5A (block diagram) describes one embodiment of the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology 100.
FIG. 5B (schematic chart), 5C (schematic chart), 5D (schematic chart), 5E (schematic chart) and 5F (schematic chart) describe outputs of key components of the embodiment of the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology 100 in FIG. 5A.
Tables 6A, 6B, 6C, 6D and 6E describe the features and benefits of the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology 100, as described in FIG. 5A.
FIG. 7A (block diagram) describes another embodiment of the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology 120, further enhanced by a question/answer format of a requirement input module and a fuzzy logic algorithm module.
FIGS. 7B (schematic diagram) and 7C (schematic diagram) describe an application of the fuzzy logic module of the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology 120, as described in FIG. 7A.
FIG. 7D describes a fuzzy logic membership function.
FIG. 7E describes a decision flow chart of the fuzzy logic module of the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology 120, as described in FIG. 7A.
Tables 8A, 8B, 8C, 8D and 8E describe the features and benefits of the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology 120, as described in FIG. 7A.
FIG. 9A (block diagram) describes another embodiment of the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology 140, further enhanced by a question/answer format of requirement input, a fuzzy logic algorithm module, a statistical algorithm module and a weighting logic algorithm module.
FIG. 9B describes an application of the statistical module of the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology 140, as described in FIG. 9A.
FIGS. 9C (statistical distribution plot), 9D (statistical distribution plot), 9E (statistical distribution plot) and 9F (statistical distribution plot) describe an application of a Monte Carlo simulation of the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology 140, as described in FIG. 9A.
FIGS. 9G, 9H and 9I describe an application of the weighting logic module of the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology 140, as described in FIG. 9A.
Tables 10A, 10B, 10C, 10D, 10E and 10F describe the features and benefits of the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology 140, as described in FIG. 9A.
FIGS. 11A (schematic chart), 11B (schematic chart), 11C (schematic chart), 11D (schematic chart), 11E (schematic chart), 11F (schematic chart) and 11G (schematic chart) describe details of a typical process implementation.
FIGS. 12A and 12B describe a process flowchart for a requirement specification within a project setup.
FIG. 13 describes a process flowchart for a requirement of a parent/child (also known as master/slave) relationship within a project setup.
FIG. 14 describes a process flowchart for a requirement category within a project setup.
FIG. 15 describes a process flowchart for a requirement verification event within a project setup.
FIG. 16 describes a process flowchart for a resource allocation process within a project setup.



DETAIL DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT OF THE INVENTION
FIG. 1 (schematic diagram) describes the various applications of the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology 100 (as described in FIG. 5A) or 120 (as described in FIG. 7A) or 140 (as described in FIG. 9A) in many industries (e.g., manufacturing, agriculture, pharmaceuticals, healthcare, energy, aerospace, defense and finance (including banking)).
Furthermore, the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology 100 or 120 or 140 can be customized to fit any product/service in any industry.
The requirement, compliance and resource management methodology 100 (as described in FIG. 5A) configured/enhanced with the question/answer format of a requirement input module and the fuzzy logic algorithm module can be designated as the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology 120 (as described in FIG. 7A).
Fuzzy means not clear (blurred). Fuzzy logic is a form of approximate reasoning, that can represent variation or imprecision in logic by making use of natural language (NL) in logic.
Approximation is inherent and inevitable in any process step and approximation can be modeled and managed explicitly. A fuzzy logic algorithm module can represent approximations for inputs and outputs in the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology 120.
The requirement, compliance and resource management methodology 120 (as described in FIG. 7A) further configured/enhanced with a statistical algorithm module and a weighting logic algorithm module can be designated as the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology 140 (as described in FIG. 9A).
Uncertainty/variation is inherent and inevitable in any process step and uncertainty/variation can be modeled and managed explicitly. A statistical algorithm module can represent uncertainty/variation for inputs and outputs in the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology 140.
The requirement, compliance and resource management methodology 100 or 120 or 140 can be integrated with an enterprise storage system (e.g., an enterprise server) and/or an enterprise device (e.g., a laptop and a mobile internet appliance).
Alternatively, the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology 100 or 120 or 140 can be located at a cloud storage system for software-as-a service (SaaS).
Furthermore, the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology 100 or 120 or 140 is scalable.
Many components of the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology 100 or 120 or 140 are modular to permit automating some functions, but not automating other functions.
Furthermore, the components of the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology 100 or 120 or 140 can include (a) transactional database, (b) management portal/dashboard, (c) business intelligence system, (d) customizable reporting, (e) external access via internet, (f) search, (g) document management, (h) messaging/chat and (i) workflow management.
Best practices can be incorporated in the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology 100 or 120 or 140. This means that the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology 100 or 120 or 140 can reflect a defined interpretation as the most effective way to perform a process step and a customer can also modify the best practices.
Furthermore, the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology 100 or 120 or 140 can be configured with an application programming interface (API) to integrate (e.g., direct integration and/or database integration) with other software programs (e.g., MS Word, MS Excel, MS Project and Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)).
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) is an integrated software program/system that operates in near real time and/or real time, without relying on periodic updates with a common database, which supports (a) finance/accounting (general ledger, payables, cash management, fixed assets, receivables, budgeting and consolidation), (b) human resources (payroll, training, benefits, 401K, recruiting and diversity management), (c) manufacturing (bill of materials, engineering, work orders, scheduling, capacity, workflow management, quality control, cost management, manufacturing process, manufacturing projects, manufacturing flow, activity based costing and product life cycle management), (d) supply chain management (order to cash, inventory, order entry, purchasing, product configurator, supply chain planning, supplier scheduling, inspection of goods, claim processing and commissions), (e) project management (costing, billing, time and expense, performance units and activity management) and (f) customer relationship management (sales and marketing, commissions, service, customer contact and call center support).
FIG. 2 (schematic diagram) describes two-way connection of the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology 100 or 120 or 140 (located at an enterprise storage system) to many systems (e.g., work station) and/or devices (e.g., personal computer, laptop and internet appliance). The internet appliance can be a mobile internet appliance (e.g., iPad).
FIG. 2 (schematic diagram) also describes one-way connection of the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology 100 or 120 or 140 (located at an enterprise storage system) to a mobile phone. The one way connection can illustrate only summary result (summary dash board) with a mobile phone, due to a limitation of the available display screen size.
FIG. 3 (schematic diagram) describes two-way connection of the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology 100 or 120 or 140 (located at a cloud storage system) to many systems (e.g., work station) and/or devices (e.g., personal computer, laptop and internet appliance). The internet appliance can be a mobile internet appliance (e.g., iPad).
FIG. 3 (schematic diagram) also describes one-way connection of the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology 100 or 120 or 140 (located at a cloud storage system) to a mobile phone. The one way connection can illustrate only summary result (summary dash board) with a mobile phone, due to a limitation of the available display screen size.
FIG. 4 (schematic diagram) describes two-way connection of the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology 100 or 120 or 140 to various functional modules.











Module No.
Description of Functional Modules







160
User


180
Algorithm Engineering


200
Hardware Engineering


220
System Engineering


240
Subcontracting


260
Procurement


280
Product Management


300
Product Marketing


320
Technical Support


340
Internal Legal


360
External Legal (Compliance)


380
Financial Management


400
Executive (General) Management









FIG. 5A (block diagram) describes the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology 100 and all relevant modules are described below:














Module No.
Description









100A
Requirement Processing Module



100B
Compliance & Legal Module



100C
Requirement Input Module



100D
Specifications and Matrices Module



100E
Resource Allocation Module



100F
Event Verification Module



100A1
Graphical User Interface Module










Event verification module 100F can be configured with an application programming interface (API) to integrate (e.g., direct integration and/or database integration) the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology 100 with other software programs (e.g., MS Word, MS Excel, MS Project and Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)).
Graphical user interface module 100A1 can be configured a search interface for input data, interpretation of input data, analysis, output data and interpretation of output data.
The requirement processing module 100A can include an embedded constraint analysis tool. It adopts the common idiom that a chain is no stronger than its weakest link.
Assuming the goal of a project utilizing the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology and its success/failure measurements are clearly defined, then the process steps of the embedded constraint analysis tool are:

    
    
        1. identifying all constraints
        2. deciding to exploit the constraints (how to get the most out of the constraints)
        3. making changes needed to break the first critical constraint
        4. If the first critical constraint has been broken, then to go to step 3 in order to break the second critical constrain, the third critical constrain and so on.
    
    


Buffer can be used to protect the constraint from varying in the entire the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology. Buffer can also allow for normal variation and the occasional upset before and behind the constraint.
FIGS. 5B (schematic chart), 5C (schematic chart), 5D (schematic chart), 5E (schematic chart) and 5F (schematic chart) describe some typical outputs of some components of the embodiment of the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology 100 (as described in FIG. 5A).
An event coordination matrix (ECM) is a tool that can enable cross-functional and cross-enterprise coordination for facilitating verification, validation, certification and accreditation (VVC&A) planning and execution.
The development of the ECM can be driving factor in verification planning activities. Typically ECM can be developed early in the verification planning process to drive an early adoption amongst key stakeholders and also to allow for an identification of potential discrepancies as early as possible.
The responsibility of the development of the ECM primarily relies on inputs from a test and verification (T&V) team, a system engineering (SE) team and an enterprise integration (EI) team, with additional inputs provided by specialty engineering, quality assurance/mission assurance, information assurance and logistics planning.
The development of the ECM is a cross-enterprise activity and is comprised of a four-part process:
1. identification of requirements,
2. identification of analysis, inspection, demonstration and test (AIDT) events,
3. allocation of requirements to specific events, and
4. allocation of events to timelines or key events within schedules.
The development, population and refinement of the ECM is coordinated both within the system engineering & integration (SE&I) organization and prime contractor organization by the EI team to ensure a thorough and balanced approach across the enterprise.
Once all requirements (both imposed and derived) have been addressed through VVC&A and identified by the SE team, then all activities or events where the VVC&A will occur have been identified by the T&V team, the requirements are then allocated to the set of specific events.
As depicted in FIG. 5F, the left side of the ECM includes the requirements information and the top of the ECM addresses the individual events that are planned to accomplish the VVC&A.
Within the ECM, all activities and events (where VVC&A to be performed) are documented and tracked. The objective of the ECM is to correlate all requirements to specific activities and events. By focusing on all VVC&A activities (as opposed to test only), it becomes possible to optimize the T&V approach across the entire breadth of the program, allowing the T&V team to factor in analysis, inspection and demonstration events into their verification planning. By analyzing the VVC&A activities across the program, the T&V team can act in a truly integrated fashion, optimizing the development and re-use of test data, scenarios, run conditions, truth models, environmental conditions and even the execution of entire events to allow for efficient planning.
By looking at the complete picture of all integrated verification activities, the SE&I organization truly has insight and oversight into the planned activities of the prime contractors and can identify areas of the program, where there is either not enough verification being planned (for example, mission critical requirements (MCRs), interoperability requirements and critical technical parameter (CTP) requirements) or too much verification being planned (redundant or extraneous events).
An added benefit of this integrated approach to verification planning is that it now becomes possible for the T&V organization to report confidence to the customer about when technical functionality will come on-board and also to understand the impact of changes to schedule, performance and budget, thereby facilitating more accurate trade analysis and higher confidence recommendations on how to solve both programmatic and technical problems as they arise.
A key consideration to note is the time-phase approach to the identification of Analysis, Inspection, Demonstration & Test (AIDT) events. Identifying events that only represent final acceptance tests (FAT) as the primary focus of an integrated T&V approach is short-sighted and will not allow the SE&I to truly act as a system integrator, thereby making it much more difficult to report incremental progress (and thus confidence) to the customer. As the program progresses, the SE&I organization has identified analysis events that will occur prior to FAT. These analysis events allow the SE&I organization to analyze the technical details of the prime contractor's exercises, rehearsals and even internal verification activities.
By scheduling analysis events that are centered on both technical capability delivery and reasonable time-phasing, the SE&I organization can more accurately predict when technical capabilities will be delivered and provide more accurate, actionable data upon which the customer can make decisions.
Another key consideration is the design versus acceptance verification. The design verification encompasses those things typically performed once for a system (induced environments, etc.) and, in many cases, by inspection. The acceptance verification can occur on a component-by-component or build-by-build basis. As the requirements are allocated to the events, the verification type (AIDT) is captured in the ECM to ensure that the validation and verification is addressed adequately.
Given the considerations defined above, in order to optimize the benefit of a truly integrated SE&I methodology, all aspects of VVC&A have to be addressed in one matrix ensuring the AIDT and VVC&A activities can be performed once and at the lowest cost, risk and most optimum time/venue.
Tables 6A, 6B, 6C, 6D and 6E describe the features and benefits of the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology 100, as described in FIG. 5A.
The key features and benefits of the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology 100 are listed below:
Requirement Processing Module (100A) Feature: Specification author “book boss” assignments. Requirement Processing Module (100A) Benefit: Provides ability to assign personnel with read/write access to specifications and requirements.
Compliance & Legal Module (100B) Feature: Import legal/regularity requirements (i.e., HIPPA). Compliance & Legal Module (100B) Benefit: Single source for legal/regulatory requirement in a true relational database.
Requirement Input Module (100C) Feature (1): Import customer requirements from MS Word/MS Excel/pdf into database. Requirement Input Module (100C) Benefit (1): Seamless import allows users to consolidate requirements into single, true relational database. Requirement Input Module (100C) Feature (2): Incorporates non-textual objects and images into database. Requirement Input Module (100C) Benefit (2): Allows non-textual objects to be associated with requirements objects.
Specifications and Matrices Module (100D) Feature (1): TPM, risk, critical issue tracking and control. Specifications and Matrices Module (100D) Benefit (1): Insightful reporting capability provides visibility to critical issues and unresolved actions, enabling efficient resource allocation. Specifications and Matrices Module (100D) Feature (2): Overall project completion status. Specifications and Matrices Module (100D) Benefit (2): Simple dashboard metrics which provide completion status at all levels of integration up to final end-item delivery. Specifications and Matrices Module (100D) Feature (3): Open action status. Specifications and Matrices Module (100D) Benefit (3): Quick and easy access to program action items and completion status. Specifications and Matrices Module (100D) Feature (4): Program usage statistics. Specifications and Matrices Module (100D) Benefit (4): Real-time metrics which display iris user statistics such as user frequency and duration.
Resource Allocation Module (100E) Feature (1): Hardware/software resource management. Resource Allocation Module (100E) Benefit (1): Allows for quick and easy reservation of hardware/software components needed to perform verification activities in specific facilities/locations. Flags, if there is a scheduling conflict in hardware/software resource allocation. Provides resource time and cost for each event. Resource Allocation Module (100E) Feature (2): Personnel resource management. Resource Allocation Module (100E) Benefit (2): Allows for quick and easy reservation of personnel and subject matter experts needed to perform verification activities in specific facilities/locations. Flags, if there is a scheduling conflict in hardware/software resource allocation. Provides resource time and cost for each event.
Event Verification Module (100F) Feature (1): Allocation of requirements to verification events. Event Verification Module (100F) Benefit (1): Provides real-time visibility to verification strategies, configuration and objectives thereby providing programs the ability to leverage verification activities in support of agile acquisition initiatives. Enables collaboration ensuring early identification of risks. Event Verification Module (100F) Feature (2): Customizable verification event coordination matrix. Event Verification Module (100F) Benefit (2): Customizable event coordination matrix (ECM) generator which allows users to organize and group events by end-item deliverables and engineering disciplines. Provides ability for users to see if they can move requirements to another event and the event in question may also eliminated thereby streamlining verification activities. Event Verification Module (100F) Feature (3): Event resource management. Event Verification Module (100F) Benefit (3): Tightly couples required verification event resources to integrated schedules to better coordinate resources. Event Verification Module (100F) Feature (4): Event configuration control and change history. Event Verification Module (100F) Benefit (4): Ensures verification baseline is under strict configuration control. Maintains a detailed history of all changes against specific verification activities. Event Verification Module (100F) Feature (5): Traceability from requirements to compliance data artifacts. Event Verification Module (100F) Benefit (5): Provides closed-loop automated hyperlinks which provide quick access to requirements compliance data and related artifacts. Event Verification Module (100F) Feature (6): Verification activity linkage to MS project schedules. Event Verification Module (100F) Benefit (6): Tightly couples verification activities with program milestones to ensure timely end-item delivery. Event Verification Module (100F) Feature (7): Electronic signature (event planning and completion). Event Verification Module (100F) Benefit (7): Electronic signature capability dramatically reduces test activity approval cycle. Event Verification Module (100F) Feature (8): Enterprise integration with external data sources. Event Verification Module (100F) Benefit (8): Allows for correlation of data elements across the enterprise dramatically improving collaboration, increasing work force efficiency and reducing cost.
Graphical User Interface Module (100A1) Feature (1): Simple and intuitive GUI user interface. Graphical User Interface Module (100A1) Benefit (1): Simple, intuitive interface provides powerful capabilities for importing, linking, analyzing, reporting and managing requirements, including traceability to associated project verification events and team assignments. Requires minimal user training. Graphical User Interface Module (100A1) Feature (2): Ready for use upon installation. Graphical User Interface Module (100A1) Benefit (2): No custom scripting required results in lower implementation cost, faster usage. May be tailored to support specific project processes.
A major challenge in the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology 100 (as described in FIG. 5A) is in qualitative and imprecise terms.
The use of soft functional requirements in a task-based specification methodology can capture the imprecise requirements and formulate soft functional requirements using a fuzzy logic algorithm module. More specifically, the soft functional requirements can be represented by canonical form in test-score semantics.
FIG. 7A (block diagram) describes another embodiment of the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology, further enhanced by a question and answer format of a requirement input module 100 C1 and a fuzzy logic algorithm module 100F1 and all relevant modules are described below:














Module No.
Description









100A
Requirement Processing Module



100B
Compliance & Legal Module



100C
Requirement Input Module



100D
Specifications and Matrices Module



100E
Resource Allocation Module



100F
Event Verification Module



100A1
Graphical User Interface Module



100C1
Question & Answer Format For 




Requirement Input Module



100F1
Fuzzy Logic Algorithm Module










FIGS. 7B (schematic diagram) and 7C (schematic diagram) describes the implementation of a fuzzy logic algorithm module 100F1.
A fuzzy logic algorithm module can be implemented as follows: (a) define linguistic variables and terms, (b) construct membership functions, (c) construct rule base, (d) convert crisp inputs into fuzzy values, utilizing membership functions (fuzzification), (e) evaluate rules in the rule base (inference), (f) combine the results of each rules (inference) and (g) convert outputs into non-fuzzy values (de-fuzzification).
Fuzzy logic is a relatively new technique for solving problems related to requirement, compliance and resource management methodology. The key idea of fuzzy logic is that it uses a simple/easy way to secure the output(s) from the input(s), wherein the outputs can be related to the inputs by using if-statements.
Effective management of requirement, compliance and resource management methodology is crucial in producing a new product and/or new system.
In a competitive world, organizations are forced to look for scientific tools in evaluation of effective management of requirement, compliance and resource management methodology. The management team is responsible for producing an output and hence the management team must be constantly aware of the goal, purpose and management efficiency. Furthermore, effectiveness in requirement, compliance and resource management methodology, which is a synonym of a project success, is measured or assessed in terms of the degree of achievement of project objectives.
For example, if project time delay (PTD) is low (L) and project time delay gradient (PTDG) is high (H), then according to a fuzzy decision, the project management efficiency (PME) is very high (VH).
However, the boundaries of very high, high, medium and low of any decision variable are determined by expert knowledge.
A fuzzy decision making system is a scientific tool that can be used to solve the problem. This means that information of expert knowledge and experience in a fuzzy decision making system is used for determining the project management efficiency.
The development of such a fuzzy decision making system can be implemented by utilizing the Mathworks software. Fuzzy Logic Toolbox from Mathworks Software is a menu driven software that can allow the implementation of fuzzy constructs like membership functions and a database of decision rules.
Fuzzy Logic Toolbox from Mathworks Software also provides Mathworks Software's MATLAB functions, graphical tools and Mathworks Software's Simulink blocks for analyzing, designing and simulating systems based on fuzzy logic.
Furthermore, Fuzzy Logic Toolbox from Mathworks Software enables (a) design fuzzy inference systems, including fuzzy clustering and neuro-fuzzy system.
A neural network can approximate a function, but it is impossible to interpret the result in terms of natural language. The fusion of neural networks and fuzzy logic in neuro-fuzzy system can provide both learning as well as readability. Neuro-fuzzy system is based on combinations of artificial neural networks and fuzzy logic.
Neuro-fuzzy system can use fuzzy inference engine with fuzzy rules for modeling the project uncertainties which is enhanced through learning the various situations with a radial basis function (RBF) neural network.
A radial basis function (RBF) neural network consists of an input layer, hidden layer and output layer with the activation function of the hidden units being radial basis functions. Normally, an RBF consists of a hidden layer and a linear output layer. One of the most common kinds of radial basis function is the Gaussian bell-shaped distribution. The response of the hidden layer unit is dependent on the distance of an input is from the centre represented by the radial basis function (Euclidean Distance). Each radial function has two parameters: a centre and a width. The width of the basis function determines the spread of the function and how quickly the activation of the hidden node decreases with the input being an increased distance from the centre. The output layer neurons are weighted linear combination of the RBF in the hidden layer. RBF network can be modeled by the following equations:




  
    
      y
      j
    
    ⁡
    
      (
      x
      )
    
  
  =
  
    
      
        ∑
        
          i
          =
          1
        
        n
      
      ⁢
      
        
      
      ⁢
      
        
          w
          ji
        
        ⁢
        
          
            ψ
            i
          
          ⁡
          
            (
            x
            )
          
        
      
    
    +
    
      b
      j
    
  




where yj(x) is the output at the jth node in the output layer, n is the number of hidden nodes, wji is the weight factor from the ith hidden node to the jth output node, Ψi(x) is the radial basis activation function of the hidden layer and bj is the bias parameter of the jth output node.





  
    
      ψ
      i
    
    ⁡
    
      (
      x
      )
    
  
  =
  
    exp
    ⁡
    
      (
      
        
          -
          
            
              
              
                X
                -
                
                  u
                  i
                
              
              
            
            2
          
        
        
          2
          ⁢
          
            
          
          ⁢
          
            σ
            i
            2
          
        
      
      )
    
  




where X is the input vector, ui is the center vector of ith hidden node and σ is the width of the basis function. There are two distinct types of Gaussian RBF architectures. The first type uses the exponential activation function, so the activation of the unit is a Gaussian bump as a function of the inputs. The second type of Gaussian RBF architecture uses the softmax activation function, so the activations of all the hidden units are normalized to sum to one. This type of network is often called a “normalized RBF” or NRBF network. An NRBF network with unequal widths and equal heights can be written as:





  
    
      
        ψ
        i
      
      ⁡
      
        (
        x
        )
      
    
    ⁢
    
      (
      
        soft
        ⁢
        
          
        
        ⁢
        max
      
      )
    
  
  =
  
    
      exp
      ⁡
      
        (
        
          h
          i
        
        )
      
    
    
      
        ∑
        
          i
          =
          1
        
        n
      
      ⁢
      
        
      
      ⁢
      
        exp
        ⁡
        
          (
          
            h
            i
          
          )
        
      
    
  








  
    h
    i
  
  =
  
    (
    
      -
      
        
          ∑
          
            l
            =
            1
          
          2
        
        ⁢
        
          
        
        ⁢
        
          
            
              (
              
                
                  X
                  l
                
                -
                
                  u
                  il
                
              
              )
            
            2
          
          
            2
            ⁢
            
              
            
            ⁢
            
              σ
              i
              2
            
          
        
      
    
    )
  




Again, X is the input vector, uil is the centre of the ith hidden node (i=1, . . . , 12) that is associated with the lth (l=1, 2) input vector, σi is a common width of the ith hidden node in the layer and softmax (hi) is the output vector of the ith hidden node. The radial basis activation function used in this study is the softmax activation function [15]. The NRBF neural network developed during this study consists of an input layer, a hidden layer and an output layer, which include 2, 12 and 1 node, respectively. At first, the input data is used to determine the centers and the widths of the basis functions for each hidden node. The second step includes the procedure, which is used to find the output layer weights that minimize the quadratic error between the predicted values and the target values. Mean square error (the average sum of squares error) can be defined as:





  MSE
  =
  
    
      1
      N
    
    ⁢
    
      
        ∑
        
          k
          =
          1
        
        N
      
      ⁢
      
        
      
      ⁢
      
        
          (
          
            
              
                (
                TE
                )
              
              k
              exp
            
            -
            
              
                (
                TE
                )
              
              k
              cal
            
          
          )
        
        2
      
    
  




For inherent uncertainties in the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology 120/140 due to external factors, shifting business objectives and poorly defined methods, a neuro-fuzzy system can be utilized for scenario planning.
FIG. 7B describes crisp inputs are fed into fuzzifier module to inference module. Inference module is based on rules. The inference module is fed into defuzzifier module then to crisp outputs.
FIG. 7C describes an application of fuzzy logic in a test design. The test design takes into account of (a) basic information, (b) customer special requirements, (c) knowledge rules and (d) mathematical modeling. Test design then creates a list of tests based fuzzy logic rules (fuzzy logic rules are based on graded performance database and weighting coefficients) with ranking.
Fuzzy set theory is a generalization of the ordinary set theory. A fuzzy set is a set whose elements belong to the set with some degree of membership μ. Let X be a collection of objects. It is called universe of discourse. A fuzzy set AX is characterized by membership function μA(x) represents the degree of membership, Degree of membership maps each element between 0 and 1. It is defined as: A={(x, μA(x)); xX}.
FIG. 7D illustrates the membership functions of three fuzzy sets viz. “small”, medium” and “large” for a fuzzy variable X. The universe of discourse is all possible values of Xs.
It is X=[15.25]. At X of 18.75, the fuzzy set is a “small” with membership value of 0.6. Hence, μsmall (18.75) is 0.6; μmedium (18.75) is 0.4 and μlarge (18.75) is 0.4.
Fuzzy inference system is a rule-based system. It is based on fuzzy set theory and fuzzy logic. Fuzzy inference system is mappings from an input space to an output space. Fuzzy inference system allows constructing structures which are used to generate responses (outputs) for certain stimulations (inputs). Response of fuzzy inference system is based on stored knowledge (relationships between responses and stimulations). Knowledge is stored in the form of a rule base. Rule base is a set of rules. Rule base expresses relations between inputs of system and its expected outputs. Knowledge is obtained by eliciting information from specialists. These systems are usually known as fuzzy expert systems. Another common denomination for fuzzy inference system is fuzzy knowledge-based systems. It is also called as data-driven fuzzy systems. A fuzzy decision making system is comprised of four main components: a fuzzification interface, a knowledge base, decision making logic, and a defuzzification interface. In essence, a fuzzy decision making system is a fuzzy expert system. A fuzzy expert system is oriented towards numerical processing where conventional expert systems are mainly symbolic reasoning engines.
FIG. 7E describes a decision flow chart of the fuzzy logic module of the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology 120, as described in FIG. 7A.
There are key four components in a decision flow chart of the fuzzy logic module: (a) The fuzzification interface: It measures the values of the input variables on their membership functions to determine the degree of truth for each rule premise, (b) The knowledge base: It comprises experts' knowledge of the application domain and the decision rules that govern the relationships between inputs and outputs. The membership functions of inputs and outputs are designed by experts based on their knowledge of the system and experience, (c) The decision making logic: It is similar to simulating human decision making in inferring fuzzy control actions based on the rules of inference in fuzzy logic. The evaluation of a rule is based on computing the truth value of its premise part and applying it to its conclusion part. This results in assigning one fuzzy subset to each output variable of the rule. In Min Inference the entire strength of the rule is considered as the minimum membership value of the input variables' membership values. A rule is said to be fire, if the degree of truth of the premise part of the rule is not zero, (d) The defuzzification interface: It converts a fuzzy control action (a fuzzy output) into a nonfuzzy control action (a crisp output). The most common used method in defuzzification is the center of area method (COA). The center of area method computes the crisp value as the weighted average of a fuzzy set.
Tables 8A, 8B, 8C, 8D and 8E describe the features and benefits of the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology 120, as described in FIG. 7A.
The key features and benefits of the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology 120 are listed below:
Requirement Processing Module (100A) Feature: Specification author “book boss” assignments. Requirement Processing Module (100A) Benefit: Provides ability to assign personnel with read/write access to specifications and requirements.
Compliance & Legal Module (100B) Feature: Import legal/regularity requirements (i.e., HIPPA). Compliance & Legal Module (100B) Benefit: Single source for legal/regulatory requirement in a true relational database.
Requirement Input Module (100C) Feature (1): Import customer requirements from MS Word/MS Excel/pdf into database. Requirement Input Module (100C) Benefit (1): Seamless import allows users to consolidate requirements into single, true relational database. Requirement Input Module (100C) Feature (2): Incorporates non-textual objects and images into database. Requirement Input Module (100C) Benefit (2): Allows non-textual objects to be associated with requirements objects.
Specifications and Matrices Module (100D) Feature (1): TPM, risk, critical issue tracking and control. Specifications and Matrices Module (100D) Benefit (1): Insightful reporting capability provides visibility to critical issues and unresolved actions, enabling efficient resource allocation. Specifications and Matrices Module (100D) Feature (2): Overall project completion status. Specifications and Matrices Module (100D) Benefit (2): Simple dashboard metrics which provide completion status at all levels of integration up to final end-item delivery. Specifications and Matrices Module (100D) Feature (3): Open action status. Specifications and Matrices Module (100D) Benefit (3): Quick and easy access to program action items and completion status. Specifications and Matrices Module (100D) Feature (4): Program usage statistics. Specifications and Matrices Module (100D) Benefit (4): Real-time metrics which display iris user statistics such as user frequency and duration.
Resource Allocation Module (100E) Feature (1): Hardware/software resource management. Resource Allocation Module (100E) Benefit (1): Allows for quick and easy reservation of hardware/software components needed to perform verification activities in specific facilities/locations. Flags, if there is a scheduling conflict in hardware/software resource allocation. Provides resource time and cost for each event. Resource Allocation Module (100E) Feature (2): Personnel resource management. Resource Allocation Module (100E) Benefit (2): Allows for quick and easy reservation of personnel and subject matter experts needed to perform verification activities in specific facilities/locations. Flags, if there is a scheduling conflict in hardware/software resource allocation. Provides resource time and cost for each event.
Event Verification Module (100F) Feature (1): Allocation of requirements to verification events. Event Verification Module (100F) Benefit (1): Provides real-time visibility to verification strategies, configuration and objectives thereby providing programs the ability to leverage verification activities in support of agile acquisition initiatives. Enables collaboration ensuring early identification of risks. Event Verification Module (100F) Feature (2): Customizable verification event coordination matrix. Event Verification Module (100F) Benefit (2): Customizable event coordination matrix (ECM) generator which allows users to organize and group events by end-item deliverables and engineering disciplines. Provides ability for users to see if they can move requirements to another event and the event in question may also eliminated thereby streamlining verification activities. Event Verification Module (100F) Feature (3): Event resource management. Event Verification Module (100F) Benefit (3): Tightly couples required verification event resources to integrated schedules to better coordinate resources. Event Verification Module (100F) Feature (4): Event configuration control and change history. Event Verification Module (100F) Benefit (4): Ensures verification baseline is under strict configuration control. Maintains a detailed history of all changes against specific verification activities. Event Verification Module (100F) Feature (5): Traceability from requirements to compliance data artifacts. Event Verification Module (100F) Benefit (5): Provides closed-loop automated hyperlinks which provide quick access to requirements compliance data and related artifacts. Event Verification Module (100F) Feature (6): Verification activity linkage to MS project schedules. Event Verification Module (100F) Benefit (6): Tightly couples verification activities with program milestones to ensure timely end-item delivery. Event Verification Module (100F) Feature (7): Electronic signature (event planning and completion). Event Verification Module (100F) Benefit (7): Electronic signature capability dramatically reduces test activity approval cycle. Event Verification Module (100F) Feature (8): Enterprise integration with external data sources. Event Verification Module (100F) Benefit (8): Allows for correlation of data elements across the enterprise dramatically improving collaboration, increasing work force efficiency and reducing cost.
Graphical User Interface Module (100A1) Feature (1): Simple and intuitive GUI user interface. Graphical User Interface Module (100A1) Benefit (1): Simple, intuitive interface provides powerful capabilities for importing, linking, analyzing, reporting and managing requirements, including traceability to associated project verification events and team assignments. Requires minimal user training. Graphical User Interface Module (100A1) Feature (2): Ready for use upon installation. Graphical User Interface Module (100A1) Benefit (2): No custom scripting required results in lower implementation cost, faster usage. May be tailored to support specific project processes.
Question & Answer Format For Requirement Input Module (100C1) Feature (1) Project setup question and answer. Question & Answer Format For Requirement Input Module (100C1) Benefit (1): Step-by-step question and answer that allows user to quickly and easily set up a new project.
Fuzzy Logic Algorithm Module 100F1 Feature (1): Verification completion decision (fuzzy logic). Fuzzy Logic Algorithm Module 100F1 Benefit (1): Enables program decision makers to assess when verification is good enough. Fuzzy Logic Algorithm Module 100F1 Feature (2): “Requirement goodness” estimation (fuzzy logic). Fuzzy Logic Algorithm Module 100F1 Benefit (2): Evaluates requirement goodness thereby reducing requirement rework and verification resource waste.
FIG. 9A (block diagram) describes another embodiment of the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology 140, further enhanced by a question and answer format of requirement input module 100C1, a fuzzy logic algorithm module 100F1, a statistical algorithm module 100F2 and a weighting logic algorithm module 100F3 and all relevant modules are described below:














Module No.
Description









100A
Requirement Processing Module



100B
Compliance & Legal Module



100C
Requirement Input Module



100D
Specifications and Matrices Module



100E
Resource Allocation Module



100F
Event Verification Module



100A1
Graphical User Interface Module



100C1
Question & Answer Format For 




Requirement Input Module



100F1
Fuzzy Logic Algorithm Module



100F2
Statistical Algorithm Module



100F3
Weighting Logic Algorithm Module










FIG. 9B (schematic chart) describes the implementation result of a statistical algorithm module 100F2.
Statistical Algorithm Module (100F2) Feature (1): Statistics variability. Statistical Algorithm Module (100F2) Benefit (1): Provides statistical estimating capability for empirical results that require statistical modeling to assess performance variability.
Furthermore the statistical algorithm module (100F2) can be also configured with a Monte Carlo simulation.
A Monte Carlo simulation can help solve problems that are too complicated to solve using equations or problems for which no equations exist. It is useful for problems which have lots of uncertainty in inputs.
In cost management, one can use Monte Carlo simulation to better understand project budget and estimate final budget at completion. Instead of assigning a probability distribution to the project task durations, project manager assigns the distribution to the project costs. These estimates are normally produced by a project cost expert, and the final product is a probability distribution of the final total project cost. Project managers often use this distribution to set aside a project budget reserve, to be used when contingency plans are necessary to respond to risk events. Monte Carlo simulation can also be used when making capital budgeting and investment decisions. Risk analysis is part of every decision made in the requirement, compliance and resource management.
The requirement, compliance and resource management is constantly faced with uncertainty, ambiguity and variability. And even though there may be an unprecedented access to information, one can't accurately model the future.
A Monte Carlo simulation allows seeing all the possible outcomes of decisions and assessing the impact of risk, allowing for better decision making under uncertainty for requirement, compliance and resource management.
A Monte Carlo simulation can be added utilizing add-ins such as @ Risk or Risk+ algorithm.
A Monte Carlo simulation encompasses a technique of statistical sampling to approximate a solution to a quantitative problem.
The requirement, compliance and resource management methodology contains many variables. However, each variable has many possible values represented by a probability distribution function p(x).
Probability distribution function p(x) of each variable is a realistic way of describing uncertainty in each variable in a risk analysis.
By contrast, a Monte Carlo simulation can sample probability distribution function for each variable to produce hundreds or thousands of possible outcomes. The results are analyzed to get probabilities of different outcomes occurring.
In contrast to a Monte Carlo simulation, a spreadsheet project cost model utilizes traditional “what if” scenarios, wherein “what if” analysis gives equal weight to all scenarios.
Common probability distribution functions p(x) are: Normal/“Bell Curve”—The user simply defines the mean or expected value and a standard deviation to describe the variation about the mean. Values in the middle near the mean are most likely to occur. Lognormal—Values are positively skewed, not symmetric like a normal distribution. It is used to represent values that don't go below zero but have unlimited positive potential. Uniform—All values have an equal chance of occurring, and the user simply defines the minimum and maximum. Triangular—The user defines the minimum, most likely, and maximum values. Values around the most likely are more likely to occur. Variables that could be described by a triangular distribution include past sales history per unit of time and inventory levels. PERT—The user defines the minimum, most likely, and maximum values, just like the triangular distribution. Values around the most likely are more likely to occur. However values between the most likely and extremes are more likely to occur than the triangular; that is, the extremes are not as emphasized. Discrete—The user defines specific values that may occur and the likelihood of each.
A Monte Carlo simulation performs a risk analysis by building models of possible results by substituting a range of values-a probability distribution p(x) for any variable/factor that has an inherent uncertainty. It then calculates results over and over, each time using a different set of random values from the probability function p(x). Depending on the number of uncertainties and the ranges specified for them, a Monte Carlo simulation could involve thousands or tens of thousands of recalculations before it is completed. A Monte Carlo simulation produces distributions of possible outcome values.
A Monte Carlo simulation simulates the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology many times (thousands or tens of thousands of recalculations) and each time selecting a value of each variable from its probability distribution function p(x).
The outcome is a probability distribution of overall compliance and resource management methodology 140 through iterations of the model.
A Monte Carlo simulation is a powerful tool to quantify the potential effects of uncertainties of many variables in the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology 140.
But it should be noted a Monte carol simulation is only as good as model it is simulating and data/information/probability distribution function p(x) of a variable is fed into.
Furthermore, open-ended distributions (e.g., lognormal distribution) can be preferable than closed-ended (e.g., triangular distribution) distributions in a Monte carol simulation.
A Monte Carlo simulation can generally answer to the questions e.g., what is the probability of meeting the project budget? or what is the probability of meeting the project time deadline? or what is an optimum value of a project cost?
A Monte Carlo simulation provides a number of advantages over deterministic or “single-point estimate” analysis.
For example: Probabilistic Results. Results show not only what could happen, but how likely each outcome is.
For example: Graphical Results. Because of the data a Monte Carlo simulation generates, it is easy to create graphs of different outcomes and their chances of occurrence. This is important for communicating findings to all stakeholders.
For example: Sensitivity Analysis. With just a few cases, deterministic analysis makes it difficult to see which variables impact the outcome the most. In a Monte Carlo simulation, it is easy to see which inputs had the biggest effect on bottom-line results.
For example: Scenario Analysis: In deterministic models, it is very difficult to model different combinations of values for different inputs to see the effects of truly different scenarios. Using a Monte Carlo simulation, analysts can see exactly which inputs had which values together when certain outcomes occurred. This is invaluable for pursuing further analysis.
For example: Correlation of Inputs. In a Monte Carlo simulation, it's possible to model interdependent relationships between input variables. It's important for accuracy to represent how, in reality, when some factors go up, others go up or down accordingly.
FIG. 9C (statistical distribution plot) describes an outcome/output distribution of a project cost based on a Monte Carlo simulation.
FIGS. 9D (statistical distribution plot), 9E (statistical distribution plot) and 9F (statistical distribution plot) are typical inputs of a Monte Carlo simulation.
FIGS. 9G (schematic chart), 9H (schematic chart) and 9I (schematic chart) describes an implementation of the weighting logic algorithm.
Top-level requirements are decomposed into lower level requirements in a tree format as shown in FIG. 9G.
In FIG. 9G the weighting logic algorithm module 100F3 provides a method of increasing confidence in the prediction of TPMs. Parametric values are vertically summed for each level of integration for a given system (i.e., System, Segment, Element and Assembly) and shown in the “Spec Sum” row. An arbitrary numeric scaling factor or weight is applied to each level of assembly, thereby increasing the influence that the summed value has on the overall system for that particular level of integration. Summed values are multiplied by respective scale factors to produce a scaled total which is then added to yield an overall verification amount, 485 in this example. The system level parametric value of 15 is then divided by 485 to yield 0.0309, an effective system-level scaling factor which can be applied to each measured value of the overall system.
In FIG. 9H the system level scaling factor (0.0309) is multiplied by each measured value in the “tree”, then multiplied by the Spec Scale factor from FIG. 9C. To obtain the “Scaled Total” values, the system level scaling factor (0.0309) is multiplies by the “Spec Sum” which is then multiplied by the scale factor for each level of integration. For example, the “Scaled Total” value for the “Segment” level of integration would be: system level scaling factor (0.0309)*Spec Scale Factor (2)*“Spec Sum” (21)=1.30.
In FIG. 9I to obtain the percent total that each level of integration's verification data contributes to the overall system-level TPM, the “Scaled Total” values from FIG. 9D is divided by the System-level requirement value (15). For example, the assembly level contribution would be 9.40/15 or 62.7%.
The requirement, compliance and resource management methodology can provide a method of predicting system performance parameters throughout the program development life cycle. As top-level system requirements or technical performance measurements (TPMs) are assessed, a statistical weighting algorithm gives users the ability to weight or influence the empirical data of some elements more than others in the same set.
As measurements are collected to verify lower level requirements, the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology can provide users with the ability to assign an arbitrary weighting coefficient to these measurements to increase their influence on the top-level performance prediction at a given point in time.
Lower level measurement weighting coefficients are typically greater than higher level coefficients, since there are a fewer system elements (variables) associated with the lower level measurement, thereby increasing measurement confidence.
Tables 10A, 10B, 10C, 10D, 10E and 10F describe the features/benefits of the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology 140, as described in FIG. 9A.
The key features and benefits of the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology 140 are listed below:
Requirement Processing Module (100A) Feature: Specification author “book boss” assignments. Requirement Processing Module (100A) Benefit: Provides ability to assign personnel with read/write access to specifications and requirements.
Compliance & Legal Module (100B) Feature: Import legal/regularity requirements (i.e., HIPPA). Compliance & Legal Module (100B) Benefit: Single source for legal/regulatory requirement in a true relational database.
Requirement Input Module (100C) Feature (1): Import customer requirements from MS Word/MS Excel/pdf into database. Requirement Input Module (100C) Benefit (1): Seamless import allows users to consolidate requirements into single, true relational database. Requirement Input Module (100C) Feature (2): Incorporates non-textual objects and images into database. Requirement Input Module (100C) Benefit (2): Allows non-textual objects to be associated with requirements objects.
Specifications and Matrices Module (100D) Feature (1): TPM, risk, critical issue tracking and control. Specifications and Matrices Module (100D) Benefit (1): Insightful reporting capability provides visibility to critical issues and unresolved actions, enabling efficient resource allocation. Specifications and Matrices Module (100D) Feature (2): Overall project completion status. Specifications and Matrices Module (100D) Benefit (2): Simple dashboard metrics which provide completion status at all levels of integration up to final end-item delivery. Specifications and Matrices Module (100D) Feature (3): Open action status. Specifications and Matrices Module (100D) Benefit (3): Quick and easy access to program action items and completion status. Specifications and Matrices Module (100D) Feature (4): Program usage statistics. Specifications and Matrices Module (100D) Benefit (4): Real-time metrics which display iris user statistics such as user frequency and duration.
Resource Allocation Module (100E) Feature (1): Hardware/software resource management. Resource Allocation Module (100E) Benefit (1): Allows for quick and easy reservation of hardware/software components needed to perform verification activities in specific facilities/locations. Flags, if there is a scheduling conflict in hardware/software resource allocation. Provides resource time and cost for each event. Resource Allocation Module (100E) Feature (2): Personnel resource management. Resource Allocation Module (100E) Benefit (2): Allows for quick and easy reservation of personnel and subject matter experts needed to perform verification activities in specific facilities/locations. Flags, if there is a scheduling conflict in hardware/software resource allocation. Provides resource time and cost for each event.
Event Verification Module (100F) Feature (1): Allocation of requirements to verification events. Event Verification Module (100F) Benefit (1): Provides real-time visibility to verification strategies, configuration and objectives thereby providing programs the ability to leverage verification activities in support of agile acquisition initiatives. Enables collaboration ensuring early identification of risks. Event Verification Module (100F) Feature (2): Customizable verification event coordination matrix. Event Verification Module (100F) Benefit (2): Customizable event coordination matrix (ECM) generator which allows users to organize and group events by end-item deliverables and engineering disciplines. Provides ability for users to see if they can move requirements to another event and the event in question may also eliminated thereby streamlining verification activities. Event Verification Module (100F) Feature (3): Event resource management. Event Verification Module (100F) Benefit (3): Tightly couples required verification event resources to integrated schedules to better coordinate resources. Event Verification Module (100F) Feature (4): Event configuration control and change history. Event Verification Module (100F) Benefit (4): Ensures verification baseline is under strict configuration control. Maintains a detailed history of all changes against specific verification activities. Event Verification Module (100F) Feature (5): Traceability from requirements to compliance data artifacts. Event Verification Module (100F) Benefit (5): Provides closed-loop automated hyperlinks which provide quick access to requirements compliance data and related artifacts. Event Verification Module (100F) Feature (6): Verification activity linkage to MS project schedules. Event Verification Module (100F) Benefit (6): Tightly couples verification activities with program milestones to ensure timely end-item delivery. Event Verification Module (100F) Feature (7): Electronic signature (event planning and completion). Event Verification Module (100F) Benefit (7): Electronic signature capability dramatically reduces test activity approval cycle. Event Verification Module (100F) Feature (8): Enterprise integration with external data sources. Event Verification Module (100F) Benefit (8): Allows for correlation of data elements across the enterprise dramatically improving collaboration, increasing work force efficiency and reducing cost.
Graphical User Interface Module (100A1) Feature (1): Simple and intuitive GUI user interface. Graphical User Interface Module (100A1) Benefit (1): Simple, intuitive interface provides powerful capabilities for importing, linking, analyzing, reporting and managing requirements, including traceability to associated project verification events and team assignments. Requires minimal user training. Graphical User Interface Module (100A1) Feature (2): Ready for use upon installation. Graphical User Interface Module (100A1) Benefit (2): No custom scripting required results in lower implementation cost, faster usage. May be tailored to support specific project processes.
Question & Answer Format For Requirement Input Module (100C1) Feature (1) Project setup question and answer. Question & Answer Format For Requirement Input Module (100C1) Benefit (1): Step-by-step question and answer that allows user to quickly and easily set up a new project.
Fuzzy Logic Algorithm Module 100F1 Feature (1): Verification completion decision (fuzzy logic). Fuzzy Logic Algorithm Module 100F1 Benefit (1): Enables program decision makers to assess when verification is good enough. Fuzzy Logic Algorithm Module 100F1 Feature (2):“Requirement goodness” estimation (fuzzy logic). Fuzzy Logic Algorithm Module 100F1 Benefit (2): Evaluates requirement goodness thereby reducing requirement rework and verification resource waste.
Weighting Logic Algorithm Module (100F3) Feature (1): TPM calculator (weighting logic). Weighting Logic Algorithm Module (100F3) Benefit (1): Allows program to calculate value of TPM throughout integration process.
FIGS. 11A (schematic chart) and 11 B (schematic chart), describe specification development of a process implementation.
FIG. 11C (schematic chart) describes a typical verification summary sheet of a process implementation.
FIG. 11D (schematic chart) describes interaction between summary sheet of a process implementation (as described in FIG. 11C), simulation plans, test plans, test procedures, data verification and data analysis (as described in FIG. 11D) and simulation specifications (as described in FIG. 11E).
FIG. 11E (schematic chart) describes a typical simulation specification of a process implementation.
FIG. 11F (schematic chart) describes a typical integrated master schedule of a process implementation.
FIG. 11G (schematic chart) describes a requirement verification schedule of a process implementation.
In FIGS. 11A-11B the development of the Event Coordination Sheets (ECS) starts with the baseline specifications. In section 4.0 of system specifications, verification methods are assigned to each requirement in accordance with applicable standards. Requirements are then mapped into verification events based on the event objectives. One approach to defining verification events and determining which requirements should be mapped into specific verification events is to develop a spreadsheet similar to that shown in FIGS. 11A and 11B. TPMs and Mission Critical requirements are then identified. A balanced VSS approach will carefully allocate requirements into appropriate venues such that redundant verification, or “double-booking”, is minimized.
In FIGS. 11C-11E once requirements have been allocated into verification venues, the ECS can now be created using the instructions below:
Description: A concise statement delineating the verification to be performed. If the verification has more than one sequence, break the sequence out here. Describe relationships among verification methods (e.g., where test output will be used to perform an analysis). If verification activities have been completed, type “Refer to referenced report(s).” If N/A, provide a brief explanation.
Objectives: Provide a concise overview of verification activity objectives. If the verification activity is conducted in several sequences, objectives may be written for each sequence, provided they address the requirements
Success Criteria: Provide a brief description of verification activity pass/fail criteria. This must include the specific data and the results of any analyses that may be required to interpret the data and conclude whether or not the requirement has been successfully verified.
Requirements: (Include requirement paragraph and/or requirement ID.): Provide a comprehensive list of all the requirements that have been allocated to a given verification activity.
Timeline/Schedule: Define the expected duration of the verification activity relative to program milestones. Includes the expected duration of the entire verification activity including verification activity preparation, execution, data acquisition and data post processing and data analysis.
Constraints: Identify limitations on the extent of the verification activity conducted. Identify any special conditions on the test setup, test article, environmental conditions etc.
Pre-Test Requirements: Identify any special test equipment or resources. Reference report number and title only. (Applies only if verification procedure has been completed and report written.) If not applicable (“N/A”), to provide a brief explanation.
Configuration: Identify the hardware or software configuration for use during this verification procedure(s).
Data Acquisition Requirements: List verification procedure data requirements and products. Reference report number and title only. (Applies only if verification procedure has been completed and report written.).
Evidence of Closure: Identify the document title and number of the referenced report that contains the data which verifies that this (these) requirement(s) have been met. Attach referenced material to verification event form.
Each event will be coordinated using the requirement, compliance and resource management methodology (100/120/140)′ dynamic schedule linking capability, which synchronizes events with the Integrated Master Schedule as shown in FIGS. 11F and 11G.
FIGS. 12A and 12B describe a process flowchart for requirement specification within a project setup.
In step 1020 one can create a user account, in step 1040 one can assign an access to a user and in step 1060 one can assign a level of access to the user.
In step 1080 the user can create a requirement specification tree, in step 1100 the user can name a requirement specification document, in step 1120 the user can describe the requirement specification document, in step 1140 the user can create the requirement specification document version number, in step 1160 the user can assign an access to other users, regarding the requirement specification document with a specific version, in step 1180 the user can create the requirement specification document directly, or otherwise in step 1220 the user can import the requirement specification document utilizing MS Excel program. In step 1240 if the imported requirement specification document is OK, then the user can stop in step 1280; otherwise the user can review the integrity of the imported requirement specification document in step 1260.
FIG. 13 describes a process flowchart for a requirement of parent/child (also known as master/slave) relationship within a project setup.
In step 1300 the user can define a requirement of importing parent/child relationship. In step 1320 the user can create the requirement of parent/child relationship directly and if this direct creation of the requirement of parent/child relationship is successful, then the user can stop in step 1340; otherwise, in step 1360 the user can import the parent/child relationship template by utilizing MS Excel program, in step 1380 the user can review the integrity of the imported parent/child relationship template. In step 1400 the user can import a requirement of parent/child relationship, in step 1420 the user can verify the integrity of the imported requirement of parent/child relationship utilizing a parent/child flow down report. In step 1440, if the imported requirement of parent/child relationship is OK, then the user can stop in step 1460; otherwise the user can reiterate to step 1380.
FIG. 14 describes a process flowchart for a requirement category within a project setup.
In step 1480 the user can define a requirement category. In step 1500 the user can create a requirement category directly. If the direct creation of the requirement category is successful, then the user can stop in step 1520; otherwise in step 1540 the user can import a requirement category template utilizing MS Excel program. In step 1560 the user can review the integrity of the imported requirement category template, in step 1580 the user can import a requirement category and in step 1600 the user can verify the integrity of the imported requirement category utilizing category filters. In step 1620 if the imported requirement category is OK, then the user can stop in step 1640; otherwise the user can reiterate to step 1560.
FIG. 15 describes process flowchart for a requirement verification event within a project setup. A verification event is a generic activity used to verify requirements by inspection, demonstration, analysis and test.
In step 1660 the user can define a requirement verification event within a project setup. In step 1680 the user can create a requirement verification event directly. If the direct creation of requirement verification event is successful, then the user can stop in step 1700; otherwise in step 1720 the user can import a requirement verification event template utilizing MS Excel program. In step 1740 the user can review the integrity of the imported requirement verification event template, in step 1760 the user can import a requirement verification event, in step 1780 the user can verify the integrity of the imported requirement verification event, utilizing a verification event report, in step 1800 if the imported requirement verification event is OK, then the user can stop in step 1820; otherwise the user can reiterate to step 1740.
FIG. 16 describes process flowchart for a resource allocation process within a project setup.
In step 1840 the user can ask a question if there are required resources to execute the event, if the answer is no, then the user can stop in step 1860. However, if the answer to the above question is yes, then the user can proceed to step 1880.
In step 1880 the user can ask a question if there are required software to execute the event, if the answer is no, then the user can proceed to step 2000. However, if the answer to the above question is yes, then the user can proceed to step 1900.
In step 1900 the user can input site location, where software will be used. In step 1920 the user can input lab/facility (within the site location) where the software will be used. In step 1940 the user can input required software component name and version. In step 1960 the user can input software start date and end date.
If the answer to the question (is there specific hardware to execute the event?) in step 2000 is yes then the user can proceed to step 2040; otherwise the user can stop at 2020. In step 2040 the user can input site location, where hardware will be used. In step 2060 the user can input lab/facility (within the site location) where the hardware will be used. In step 2080 the user can input required hardware component name and version. In step 2100 the user can input hardware start date and end date.
In the above disclosed specifications “/” has been used to indicate “or”. Any example in the above disclosed specifications is by way of an example and not by way of any limitation. All the terms in the above disclosed specifications have a plain meaning for a person ordinary skilled in the art/subject matter. The above disclosed specifications are the preferred embodiments of the present invention. However, they are not intended to be limiting only to the preferred embodiments of the present invention. Numerous variations and/or modifications are possible within the scope of the present invention.

## Claims

1. A computer system, wherein the computer system comprising: a premise based computer system or a cloud based computer system or a mobile computer, wherein the computer system comprising:
one or more hardware processors in communication with a non-transitory computer readable medium storing one or more software modules including instructions that are executable by one or more hardware processors,
wherein the non-transitory computer readable media comprises: all computer readable media with the sole exception of a transitory signal,
wherein the software module is a requirement, compliance and resource management software module for generating a requirement specification output based on requirement inputs and compliance inputs,
wherein the requirement, compliance and resource management software module comprising:
(a) a set of instructions for collecting requirement inputs from a data source or a physical input device;
(b) based at least on (a), a set of instructions for collecting compliance inputs from a data source or a physical input device;
(c) based at least on (a), a set of instructions for analyzing the requirement inputs;
(d) based at least on (b), a set of instructions for analyzing the compliance inputs;
(e) based at least on (a), (b), (c) and (d), a set of instructions for generating a requirement specification output;
(f) based at least on (a), (b), (c), (d) and (e), a set of instructions for estimating variation of the requirement inputs or the compliance inputs or the requirement specification output, wherein the set of instruction comprises: a set of statistical analytics based instructions and a set of neuro-fuzzy logic based instructions for calculating or estimating the requirement inputs or the compliance inputs or the requirement specification output, wherein the set of statistical analytics based instructions comprises: a set of Monte Carlo method based instructions;
(g) a set of instructions for tracing the requirement inputs or the compliance inputs or the requirement specification output;
(h) a set of instructions for verifying the requirement inputs or the compliance inputs or the requirement specification output;
(i) a set of instructions of a graphical user interface for searching for at least key words; and
(j) a set of instructions of an application programming for interfacing with another software program,
wherein the software module is an integration or an ordered integration of set of instructions as described in (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i) and (j).

2. The requirement, compliance and resource management software module according to claim 1, further comprises: a set of instructions for collecting the requirement inputs, in a question and answer format.

3. The requirement, compliance and resource management software module according to claim 1, further comprises: a set of instructions for allocating a resource, wherein the resource comprises: a hardware resource or a software resource.

4. The requirement, compliance and resource management software module according to claim 1, further comprises: a set of instructions for optimizing a resource, wherein the resource comprises: a hardware resource or a software resource.

5. The requirement, compliance and resource management software module according to claim 1, further comprises: a set of instructions for identifying risk of the requirement inputs or the compliance inputs or the requirement specification output.

6. The requirement, compliance and resource management software module according to claim 1, further comprises: a set of instructions for identifying a constraint of the requirement specification.

7. The requirement, compliance and resource management software module according to claim 1, further comprises: a set of fuzzy logic based instructions for identifying an imprecision of the requirement inputs or an imprecision of the compliance inputs or an imprecision of the requirement specification output.

8. The requirement, compliance and resource management software module according to claim 1, further comprises: a set of artificial intelligence based instructions for calculating or estimating the requirement inputs or the compliance inputs or the requirement specification output.

9. The requirement, compliance and resource management software module according to claim 1, further comprises: a set of machine learning based instructions for calculating or estimating the requirement inputs or the compliance inputs or the requirement specification output.

10. The requirement, compliance and resource management software module according to claim 1, further comprises: a set of Monte Carlo instructions for calculating or estimating the requirement inputs or the compliance inputs or the requirement specification output.

11. The requirement, compliance and resource management software module according to claim 1, further comprises: a set of instructions for calculating or estimating a weighting factor of the requirement inputs or the compliance inputs or the requirement specification output.

12. The requirement, compliance and resource management software module according to claim 1, further comprises: a set of instructions of a query based user interface for querying the requirement inputs or the compliance inputs or the requirement specification output.

13. The requirement, compliance and resource management software module according to claim 1, further comprises: a set of instructions of a search based user interface for searching key words of the requirement inputs or the compliance inputs or the requirement specification output.

14. A computer system, wherein the computer system comprising: a premise based computer system or a cloud based computer system or a mobile computer,
wherein the computer system comprising:
one or more hardware processors in communication with a non-transitory computer readable medium storing one or more software modules including instructions that are executable by one or more hardware processors, wherein the non-transitory computer readable media comprises: all computer readable media with the sole exception of a transitory signal,
wherein the software module is a requirement, compliance and resource management software module for generating a requirement specification output based on requirement inputs and compliance inputs,
wherein the requirement, compliance and resource management software module comprising:
(a) a set of instructions for collecting requirement inputs from a data source or a physical input device;
(b) based at least on (a), a set of instructions for collecting compliance inputs from a data source or a physical input device;
(c) based at least on (a), a set of instructions for analyzing the requirement inputs;
(d) based at least on (b), a set of instructions for analyzing the compliance inputs;
(c) based at least on (a), (b), (c) and (d), a set of instructions for calculating or estimating a weighting factor of the requirement inputs or the compliance inputs;
(f) based at least on (a), (b), (c), (d) and (e), a set of instructions for generating a requirement specification output;
(g) based at least on (a), (b), (c), (d), (c) and (f), a set of instructions for estimating variation of the requirement inputs or the compliance inputs or the requirement specification output, wherein the set of instruction comprises: a set of statistical analytics based instructions and a set of neuro-fizzy logic based instructions for calculating or estimating the requirement inputs or the compliance inputs of the requirement specification output, wherein the set of statistical analytics based instructions comprises: a set of Monte Carlo method based instructions;
(h) a set of instructions for tracing the requirement inputs or the compliance inputs or the requirement specification output;
(i) a set of instructions for verifying the requirement inputs or the compliance inputs or the requirement specification output;
(j) a set of instructions of a graphical user interface for searching for at least key words; and
(k) a set of instructions for an application programming for interfacing with another software program,
wherein the software module is an integration or an ordered integration of set of instructions as described in (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i), (j) and (k).

15. The requirement, compliance and resource management software module according to claim 14, further comprises: a set of instructions for collecting the requirement inputs, in a question and answer format.

16. The requirement, compliance and resource management software module according to claim 14, further comprises: a set of instructions for allocating a resource, wherein the resource comprises: a hardware resource or a software resource.

17. The requirement, compliance and resource management software module according to claim 14, further comprises: a set of instructions for optimizing a resource, wherein the resource comprises: a hardware resource or a software resource.

18. The requirement, compliance and resource management software module according to claim 14, further comprises: a set of instructions for identifying risk of the requirement inputs or the compliance inputs or the requirement specification output.

19. The requirement, compliance and resource management software module according to claim 14, further comprises: a set of instructions for identifying a constraint of the requirement specification.

20. The requirement, compliance and resource management software module according to claim 14, further comprises: a set of fuzzy logic based instructions for identifying an imprecision of the requirement inputs or an imprecision of the compliance inputs or an imprecision of the requirement specification output.

21. The requirement, compliance and resource management software module according to claim 14, further comprises: a set of artificial intelligence based instructions for calculating or estimating the requirement inputs or the compliance inputs or the requirement specification output.

22. The requirement, compliance and resource management software module according to claim 14, further comprises: a set of machine learning based instructions for calculating or estimating the requirement inputs or the compliance inputs or the requirement specification output.

23. The requirement, compliance and resource management software module according to claim 14, further comprises: a set of Monte Carlo based instructions for calculating or estimating the requirement inputs or the compliance inputs or the requirement specification output.

24. The requirement, compliance and resource management software module according to claim 14, further comprises: a set of instructions of a query based user interface for querying the requirement inputs or the compliance inputs or the requirement specification output.

25. The requirement, compliance and resource management software module according to claim 14, further comprises: a set of instructions of a search based user interface for searching key words of the requirement inputs or the compliance inputs or the requirement specification output.

26. A computer system, wherein the computer system comprising; a premise based computer system or a cloud based computer system or a mobile computer,
wherein the computer system comprising:
one or more hardware processors in communication with a non-transitory computer readable medium storing one or more software modules including instructions that are executable by one or more hardware processors, wherein the non-transitory computer readable media comprises: all computer readable media with the sole exception of a transitory signal,
wherein the software module is a requirement, compliance and resource management software module for generating a requirement specification output based on requirement inputs and compliance inputs,
wherein the requirement, compliance and resource management software module comprising:
(a) a set of instructions for collecting requirement inputs from a data source or a physical input device;
(b) based at least on (a), a set of instructions for collecting compliance inputs from a data source or a physical input device;
(c) based at least on (a), a set of instructions for analyzing the requirement inputs;
(d) based at least on (b), a set of instructions for analyzing the compliance inputs;
(e) based at least on (a), (b), (c) and (d), a set of instructions for generating a requirement specification output;
(f) based at least on (a), (b), (c), (d) and (e), a set of instructions for estimating variation of the requirement inputs or the compliance inputs or the requirement specification output, wherein the set of instruction comprises: a set of Monte Carlo method based instructions and a set of neuro-fuzzy logic based instructions for calculating or estimating the requirement inputs of the compliance inputs or the requirement specification output;
(g) a set of instructions for tracing the requirement inputs or the compliance inputs or the requirement specification output;
(h) a set of instructions for verifying the requirement inputs or the compliance inputs or the requirement specification output;
(i) a set of instructions of a graphical user interface for searching for at least key words; and
(j) a set of instructions of an application programming for interfacing with another software program,
wherein the software module is integration or an ordered integration of set of instructions as described in (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i) and (j).