alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Searched for **https://www.fmcs.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.fmcs.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
No. P67/12.

protests 61/13542, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### Kayson’s Import Corp. *v.*United States,

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of earphones similar in all material respects to those the subject of Motorola, *Inc., and International*Expediters, *Inc.*v. *United States*(54 Cust. Ct. 303, Abstract 69019), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: paterc@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:13:15 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Howard T Clark

Essington, PA 19029
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 208 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 16, 2007.
Whereas Operation Smile is a private, not-for-profit volunteer medical services 
        organization providing reconstructive surgery and related health care to 
        indigent children and young adults in developing countries and the 
        United States;
Whereas in 1982, Dr. William P. Magee Jr., a plastic surgeon, and his wife, 
        Kathleen S. Magee, a nurse and clinical social worker, traveled to the 
        Philippines with a group of medical volunteers to repair children's 
        cleft lips and cleft palates;
Whereas there they discovered hundreds of children ravaged by deformities, and 
        although they helped many children, the volunteers were forced to turn 
        away the majority of those who sought help;
Whereas Operation Smile headquartered in Norfolk, Virginia, was founded in 1982 
        by Dr. William Magee Jr. and his wife Kathleen S. Magee to address this 
        need;
Whereas since 1982, Operation Smile's volunteers have provided free 
        reconstructive surgery to more than 100,000 children and young adults 
        with facial deformities in 25 countries;
Whereas Operation Smile provides education and training to thousands of 
        healthcare professionals globally, and is implementing a plan for a 
        Global Standard of Care to ensure that every child treated will receive 
        the same high standard of care every time;
Whereas Operation Smile provides a network of resources to assist families in 
        the United States with children born with facial deformities;
Whereas more than 450 Operation Smile Student Associations in the United States 
        and around the world build awareness, raise funds, and educate students 
        about values of commitment, leadership, and volunteerism; and
Whereas in 2007, in commemoration of its 25th anniversary, Operation Smile has 
        announced a year-long series of initiatives to include implementing 
        global standards of care for all its medical programs, opening 
        comprehensive care centers in seven countries, hosting international 
        forums on medical diplomacy, and launching the World Journey of Smiles, 
        which consists of 40 simultaneous missions in 25 countries with the goal 
        of treating an estimated 5,000 children living with facial deformities: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes the 25th anniversary 
of the founding of Operation Smile as its volunteer medical professionals 
continue to travel around the world to treat children suffering from facial 
deformities.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 12186]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for temporary display in the exhibition “Transatlantic Bridges: Corrado Cagli, 1938-1948” at the Center for Italian Modern Art, New York, New York, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.                

Nicole L. Elkon,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2023-20433 Filed 9-20-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Lars
Pearl, President and Chief Executive Officer of Aurora Gold Corporation (the
“Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to my knowledge:





1.
            The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended June
      30, 2007 which this certification accompanies fully complies with the
      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934: and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








Date:  February 13,
      2008
            BY:
            /s/ Lars
      PearlLars
      PearlPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer











This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
From: neu333@cox.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:49:33 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Diane Neu

Avondale, AZ 85392
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1464 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 22, 2008.
Whereas AARP is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization with over 40 million 
        members that is dedicated to improving the quality of life of people 50 
        and over as they age;
Whereas AARP was founded in 1958 by Ethel Percy Andrus, a retired educator from 
        California, around the principles of promoting independence, dignity and 
        purpose for older Americans and encouraging current and future 
        generations ``To Serve, not to be served'';
Whereas AARP's vision is ``A society in which everyone ages with dignity and 
        purpose and in which AARP helps people fulfill their goals and dreams'';
Whereas AARP's mission is dedicated to enhancing the quality of life for all as 
        we age, leading positive social change and delivering value to members 
        through information, advocacy, and service;
Whereas AARP's nonpartisan advocacy activities help millions of individuals 
        participate in the Nation's legislative, judicial, and administrative 
        processes;
Whereas AARP is a trusted source of reliable information on health, financial 
        security, and other important issues of the 50+ population;
Whereas AARP provides an opportunity for volunteerism and service for its 
        millions of members to better their families, communities, and the 
        Nation;
Whereas AARP Services is a leader in the marketplace by being a force 
        influencing companies to offer new and better services for AARP's 
        members;
Whereas AARP Foundation, its philanthropic arm, delivers information, education, 
        and direct service program to the most vulnerable age 50+ Americans;
Whereas AARP Foundation's Tax Aide, the Nation's largest, free, volunteer-run 
        tax preparation program has helped over 40 million low- and middle-
        income taxpayers;
Whereas AARP Foundation's job placement program has helped over 400,000 low-
        income older Americans find jobs, giving them purpose and dignity;
Whereas AARP's Driver Safety Program has helped over 10 million old drivers 
        sharpen their driving skills; and
Whereas, in 2008, its 50th anniversary, AARP renews its commitment to improving 
        the quality of life for all older Americans and helping people of all 
        generations fulfill their goals and dreams: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes and commends AARP for 
50 years of outstanding service, promoting the lives and retirement security of 
older persons age 50 and older, and to future generations for aging Americans.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
**Exhibit 31.2**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER				PURSUANT TO THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,				RULES 13a-14 AND 15d-14				AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO				SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Material Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert M. Bernstein, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Rules 13a-14 and 15-d14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to §302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:				1.       I have reviewed the Report;				2.       Based upon my knowledge, the Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading;				3.       Based upon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in the Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report;				4.       I and the other certifying officers of the Company:

are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures for the Company;
- have designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information is made known to us, particularly during the period in which the Report is being prepared;     have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures within 90 days of the date of the Report; andhave presented in the Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on the required evaluation.			
		5.       I and the other certifying officers have disclosed to the Company’s auditors and to the audit committee of the board of directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent function):
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls (a pre-existing term relating to internal controls regarding financial reporting) which could adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Company's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and		
 
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls.		
		6.       I and the other certifying officers have indicated in the Report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Dated: May 19, 2008
/s/ Robert M. Bernstein       
		Robert M. Bernstein,   
		Chief Financial Officer
#### LABARRE v. CITIZENS’ NAT. BANK.†

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

January 30, 1912.)

No. 2,212.

Bills and Notes (§ 534*) — Action Against Indorser — Attorney’s Pees.

Plaintiff brought suit against an indorser of a note secured by a mortgage which provided, in the event the note was not paid at maturity and foreclosure was resorted to, that the holder was entitled to collect attorney’s fees to the amount of 10 per cent, on the amount involved. .The indorser was no party to the mortgage, and no proceedings had been instituted to foreclose the same. *Bold,*that a judgment in favor of plaintiff, in so far as it awarded attorney’s fees, was erroneous.

[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Bills and Notes, Cent. Dig. § 1946; Dec. Dig. § 534.*]

In Error to the Circuit Court of the -United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana.

*649'Action by the Citizens’ National Bank against Gustave J. La-barre. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

Modified and affirmed.

H. E. Upton, John R. Upton, and Edward N. Pugh (Pugh & Lemann, on the brief), for plaintiff in error.

R. E. Milling and I. R. Saal (Foster, Milling, Brian & Saal, on the brief), for defendant in error.

Before McCORMICK and SHELBY, Circuit Judges, and MAX-EY, District Judge.

*

For other cases see same topic & § number in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, *&*Rep’r Indexes

†

 Rehearing denied March 5, 1912.

PER CURIAM.

This is an action at law to collect a promissory note. The note is secured by a mortgage which provides that, in the event the note is “not paid at maturity and foreclosure on same for want of payment is resorted to,” the holder of the note is entitled to collect attorney’s fees to the amount of 10 per cent, on the amount involved. Labarre, the plaintiff in error, was an indorser of the note, and was not a party to the mortgage. The right to collect attorney’s fees docs not appear to exist, inasmuch as the foreclosure of the mortgage “for want of payment” has not yet been resorted to. The trial court rendered judgment for the plaintiff for .$2,407.50, and “an additional sum of 10 per cent, on said amount of principal and interest as attorney’s fees.”

The judgment of the Circuit Court is amended, by striking out'the part thereof allowing attorney’s fees. The defendant in error will be taxed with the costs in this court.

The judgment, as amended, is affirmed.
No. 61474.

#### Hudson Shipping Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 301993-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
No. 59699.

#### Paul A. Straub & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 211803-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp,*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: songinthenight@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:00:30 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Gwen Warren

Snohomish, WA 98291