alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D to be
filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ford Credit Auto
Owner Trust 2008-B (Exchange Act periodic reports);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information
required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is
included in the Exchange Act period reports;4.
    
    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and
based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer
compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and
except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled
its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and5.
    
    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of
compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included
in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.
   /s/ David M. BrandiDavid M. BrandiVice President and Assistant Treasurer
Ford Motor Credit Company LLC, as Servicer
(senior officer in charge of servicing function)
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 135 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that a National 

Historically Black Colleges and Universities Week should be established. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2007 

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas (for herself, Mr. HALL of Texas, Mr. 

WILSON of South Carolina, Ms. KILPATRICK, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mr. 

HOLT, Mr. SPRATT, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Ms. CARSON, Mr. CLEAVER, 

Mr. JEFFERSON, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. CUMMINGS, Ms. CORRINE

BROWN of Florida, Ms. MOORE of Wisconsin, Mr. BISHOP of Georgia, 

Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania, Mrs. JONES of Ohio, Mr. RUSH, Mr. 

BUTTERFIELD, Mr. SESTAK, Mrs. DRAKE, Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi, 

Mr. FILNER, Mr. MEEK of Florida, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, and Mr. 

HASTINGS of Florida) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

a National Historically Black Colleges and Universities 

Week should be established. 

Whereas there are 103 historically Black colleges and universities in the United States; 

Whereas historically Black colleges and universities provide 

the quality education essential to full participation in a 

complex, highly technological society; 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 135 IH 

Whereas historically Black colleges and universities have a 

rich heritage and have played a prominent role in the history of the United States; 

Whereas historically Black colleges and universities have allowed many underprivileged students to attain their full 

potential through higher education; and 

Whereas the achievements and goals of historically Black colleges and universities are deserving of national recognition: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the achievements and goals of 

3 historically Black colleges and universities in the 

4 United States; 

5 (2) supports the designation of an appropriate 

6 week as ‘‘National Historically Black Colleges and 

7 Universities Week’’; and 

8 (3) requests the President to issue a proclama9 tion designating such a week, and calling on the peo10 ple of the United States and interested groups to ob11 serve such week with appropriate ceremonies, activi12 ties, and programs to demonstrate support for his13 torically Black colleges and universities. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-12-0274

SAT Date: 4/10/2012

Related cases:

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 2 1

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

1 1 2 PMN

3 1 Hyd Pdt

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Drinking Water Inhalation 

Ecotox: No releases to water

Fate: ; PMN negl; Hyd Pdt moderate

P2Rec Comments:

Comment: No Comment

Keywords:

 Keywords: 

SEVER IRR-E,S,L,MM

SENS-S,L

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-12-0274

FATE: Estimations for low weight hydrolysis product 

log Kow = -0.30 (E)

log Koc = 3.48 (E)

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 3
log Fish BCF = 0.50 (E)

log Fish BAF = -0.04 (E)

PMN Substance: with MP < 25 C (E)

S = Reacts

Hydrolysis Half-life ≤ min

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

POTW removal (%) = PMN 90-99 via hydrolysis; then Hyd Pdt 90 via sorption 

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = Hyd Pdt >mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = Hyd Pdt moderate

PBT Potential: PMN P1B1; Hyd Pdt P3B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = PMN negl; Hyd Pdt moderate

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is moderate with reaction all routes, based on 

physical/chemical properties. There is concern for severe irritation to the eye, skin, lung, and 

mucous membranes, based on isocyanates, and information in the PMN MSDS. 

There also is concern for dermal and respiratory sensitization, based on isocyanates and 

information in the PMN MSDS.

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 *

daphnid 48-h LC50 *

green algal 96-h EC50 *

fish _ chronic value *

daphnid _ chronic 

value

*

algal _ chronic 

value

*

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SAR for : SAR chemical 

class = isocyanate, MW = 444; S = reacts with water at 20 C (P); pH7; 

effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; 

hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern *

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 3
(ppb)

SARs

SAR Class

Ecotox Category 

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: J. Kwiat

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 23


     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
     _______________________________________________________



BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND STOCKHOLDERS OF FIRST KEYSTONE
CORPORATION:


     We consent to the use of our reports dated February 28,
2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of First
Keystone Corporation and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2006, and
2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes
in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in
the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, management's
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, and the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2006, which reports are included herein.




                           /s/ J. H. Williams & Co., LLP
                           _____________________________
                           J. H. Williams & Co., LLP



February 28, 2007
Kingston, Pennsylvania



                               69
From: randjwarner@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:30:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Robert Lee Warner

Wenham, MA 01984
From: HecarysMe@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:13:46 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sonja Ellison

Deridder, LA 70634
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 97 (Friday, May 18, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 29747]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-12133]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7890]

Determination Under the Foreign Assistance Act and the Department 
of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Acts

    Pursuant to Section 654(c) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, 
as amended (FAA), notice is hereby given that the Deputy Secretary of 
State has made a determination pursuant to Section 620H of the FAA, and 
Section 7021 of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and 
Related Programs Appropriations, 2012 (Div. F, Pub. L. 112-174), and 
similar provisions in prior-year appropriations acts, and has concluded 
that publication of the determination would be harmful to the national 
security of the United States.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: April 27, 2012.
William J. Burns,
Deputy Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-12133 Filed 5-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-27-P
```
No. 62193.

#### Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 281873-K and 283370-K (New York).

*329Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of paperweights in chief value of polystyrene similar in all material respects to those the subject of *B. Shackman & Company et al.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 30, C. D. 1839), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Booth Creek Ski Holdings,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 2, 2003 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  as the Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  hereby  certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


June 16, 2003


                                          By:      /s/ GEORGE N. GILLETT, JR.
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                       George N. Gillett, Jr.
                                                      Chief Executive Officer
NUMBER 13-15-00531-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

JUAN DAVID ORTIZ, INDIVIDUALLY,

AND MARIA ACIANA SAENZ,

INDIVIDUALLY, Appellants,

v.

RICARDO ORTIZ AND

YOLANDA ORTIZ ALANIZ, Appellees.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 93rd District Court 

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, Juan David Ortiz, Individually, and Maria Aciana Saenz, Individually, 

attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 93rd District Court of 
2

Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C-6421-13-B. We dismiss for want of 

jurisdiction.

Judgment in this cause was signed on August 3, 2015. A motion for new trial was 

filed on September 3, 2015, and notice of appeal was filed on October 28, 2015. On 

November 10, 2015, the Clerk of this Court notified appellants that it appeared that the 

notice of appeal was not timely perfected. Appellants were advised that, if the defect 

was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court’s letter, the appeal 

would be dismissed. Appellants have not filed a response to the Court’s notice. On 

November 19, 2015, appellees filed a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. 

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1 provides that an appeal is perfected when 

notice of appeal is filed within thirty days after the judgment is signed, unless a motion for 

new trial is timely filed. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a)(1). Where a timely motion for new trial 

has been filed, notice of appeal shall be filed within ninety days after the judgment is 

signed. Id. Appellants’ deadline for filing the motion for new trial was September 2, 

2015. The motion for new trial was untimely because it was filed on September 3, 2015. 

Accordingly, appellants’ notice of appeal was due to have been filed on or before

September 2, 2015. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a). 

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, 

appellants’ failure to timely perfect their appeal, and appellants’ failure to respond to this 

Court’s notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of 
3

jurisdiction. Appellees’ motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction is GRANTED. 

Accordingly, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a)(c).

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

10th day of December, 2015.
Case No. 6,457.

#### In re HICKS.

[See 2 Fed. 851.]
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Financial literacy annualreport.**
 
2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017
 
SuDoc:FR 2.1/3:
Item Number:0443-G-11 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000983699
 
November 28, 2017
**Exhibit 32.1**

**STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906****OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned is the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Material Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"). This Certificate is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the "10-Q Report").

The undersigned certifies that the 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company on the dates and for the periods presented therein.

Date: September 27, 2005                                /s/ ROBERT M. BERNSTEIN                                                                                       Robert M. Bernstein                                                                        Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Material Technologies, Inc. and will be retained by Material Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MAY 2, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-02-1998
<CASH>                                           5,513
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,502
<ALLOWANCES>                                       295
<INVENTORY>                                     21,075
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                52,423
<PP&E>                                          40,749
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,295
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 222,827
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,188
<BONDS>                                        143,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      54,498
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   222,827
<SALES>                                         38,943
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,943
<CGS>                                           22,540
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,540
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     4
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,612
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    826
<INCOME-TAX>                                       354
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                472
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       472
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>