alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I,  Andre Benard the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Calibert Explorations Ltd.. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: (i)the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company, for the Year  ended November 30, 2008, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  By:/s/  Andre BenardName:Andre BenardTitle:Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial OfficerDate:March 17, 2009 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K ), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
From: dianep1748@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:44:41 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Diane Potemski

Enfield, CT 06082
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MIGUEL AVILA; BARBARA AVILA,

Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

v.

SPOKANE SCHOOL DISTRICT 81,

Defendant

- Appellee. No. 18

- 35148

D.C. Nos. 2:10

- cv

- 00408

- EFS

2:11

- cv

- 00165

- EFS

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Washington

Edward F. Shea, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 27, 2018 **

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Miguel Avila and Barbara Avila, parents of a student in Spokane School

District 81, appeal pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing their action

alleging violations of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act ( “ IDEA ” ).

We have jurisdict ion under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal on

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The Avilas ’ request for oral

argument, set forth in the opening brief, is denied. 

# FILED

DEC 5 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 18

- 35148

the basis of the applicable statute of limitations. Butler v. Nat’l Cmty.

Renaissance , 766 F.3d 1191, 1194 (9th Cir. 2014). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed the Avilas’ claims that defendant failed

to identify their child’s disability or assess their child for autism in 2006 and 2007

because the Avilas filed their request for a due process hearing after the applicable

statute of limitations had run, and the Avilas did not estab lish that an exception to

the statute of limitations applied. See 20 U.S.C. § 1415(f)(3)(C)

- (D) ( setting forth

a two

- year limitations period for IDEA claims and exceptions to the statute of

limitations); Avila v. Spokane Sch. Dist. 81 , 852 F.3d 936, 937 ( 9th Cir. 2017)

(holding that the discovery rule applies to IDEA claims and the statute of

limitations begins to run when the parent “knew or should have known about the

alleged action that forms the basis of the complaint” ).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

We reject as meritless the Avilas’ contention s regarding the harmless error

doctrine and that the district court improperly narrowed the scope of review.

AFFIRMED.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSupercooled Liquid Water Content Instrument Analysis and Winter 2014 Data with Comparisons to the NASA Icing Remote Sensing System and Pilot ReportsThe National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has developed a system for remotely detecting the hazardous conditions leading to aircraft icing in flight, the NASA Icing Remote Sensing System (NIRSS). Newly developed, weather balloon-borne instruments have been used to obtain in-situ measurements of supercooled liquid water during March 2014 to validate the algorithms used in the NIRSS. A mathematical model and a processing method were developed to analyze the data obtained from the weather balloon soundings. The data from soundings obtained in March 2014 were analyzed and compared to the output from the NIRSS and pilot reports.Document ID20160006885Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsKing, Michael C.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredJune 1, 2016Publication DateApril 1, 2016Subject CategoryEarth Resources And Remote SensingAir Transportation And SafetyReport/Patent NumberGRC-E-DAA-TN30355NASA/TM-2016-219092E-19220Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 533127.02.02.03.02Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Keywordsaviation meterologyballoon-borne instrumentsicingAvailable DownloadsNameType20160006885.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-21-1998               
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1998    
<CASH>                                         2,314,399   
<SECURITIES>                                           0        
<RECEIVABLES>                                  7,014,062   
<ALLOWANCES>                                       3,000    
<INVENTORY>                                            0        
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               9,759,899   
<PP&E>                                           225,085    
<DEPRECIATION>                                    98,267   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                13,459,589   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5,009,543   
<BONDS>                                                0        
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0        
<PREFERRED>                                       29,588     
<COMMON>                                          40,210     
<OTHER-SE>                                             0        
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  13,459,589   
<SALES>                                        4,500,043  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4,500,043  
<CGS>                                                  0        
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          0        
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               4,266,080  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0        
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                94,773   
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  233,963    
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0        
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              233,963    
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0        
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0        
<CHANGES>                                              0       
<NET-INCOME>                                     165,763    
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0.04     
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.04     
                            



</TABLE>
April 14, 2015 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. 

Washington D.C. 20590 

Re: Essential Mail Service via Island Air 

To whom it may concern 

:~...:' ..... ' ") ."1 ;~. -., r· .-.. ·-~ :; ~. 

This letter is to express strong support for the selection of Island Air to continue to, 

provide essential air service to our community. Island Air has been providin~ servfces to ' 

Port Bailey and Dry Spruce Bay community for many years and we depend on the service 

to operate our business as well as allowing for our basic survival. 

Island Air's service connects us and allows us ·to operate a business from ou~rural 

location on Kodiak Island. They provide freight, cargo and mail year round to our 

location and without the service we simply would not be able to continue to operate our 

business or sustain life at Port Bailey. Island Air's dispatchers and pilots are. reliable and 

always in communication assuring we have what we need. · 

Simply put, Island Airs' service is critical to the economic well being of Port Bailey and 

the Dry Spruce Bay community and we support their application to provide Essential Air 

Service to Kodiak Isla d. 

/ 

Sim;~=-----... · .". (/' --~ 

RobertS. Shane n{J\r (f,~~ Anita A. Shane 

Port Bailey (KPY)
WELLS
      FARGO Logo
                
                Corporate Trust
      Services
                  MAC N2702-011
                  9062 Old Annapolis Road
                  Columbia, MD 21045
                  410 884-2000
                  410 715-2380 Fax
                  
                  Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A.
 ASSESSMENT
OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA
 Corporate
Trust Services division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the
"Company") is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria
set forth in item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgatedby the Securities and
Exchange Commission. The Company has determined that the servicing criteria are
applicable in regards to the servicing platformas of and for the period
as follows:
 Platform:  Publicly-issued
(i.e.,transaction-level reporting required under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed securities and commercial
mortgage-backed securities issued on or after January 1, 2006for which the Company
provides document custody services, excluding any publicly issued transactions
issued by any government sponsored entity (the "Platform").
 Applicable Servicing
Criteria: The servicing criteria set forth in item 1122(d)(1)(iv),
1122(d)(4)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(ii), in regard to the activities performed by
the Company with respect to the Platform (the ''Applicable Servicing
Criteria").  Management of the Company has determined that all other
servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) are not applicable to the
Platform.
 Period: As of and for
the twelve months ended December 31, 2008 (the "Period").
 With
respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company provides the following
assessment of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing
Criteria:
 1.  The
Company is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria.
 2.  The
Company has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. In
performing this assessment,
the Company used the criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange
Commission in paragraph (d) of
Item 1122 of Regulation AB.
 3.  Based on
suchassessment, as
of and for the Period, the Company has complied, in all material respects with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria.
 KPMGLLP, a registeredpublic accounting firm,
has issued an attestation report withrespect to the Company's
assessment of compliance as of and for the Period.
 WELLS
      FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONBy:
      /s/
      Shari GillundIts:
      Senior Vice PresidentDated:
      February 11, 2009
From: jrsessions@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:41:26 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

John Sessions

Augusta, GA 30907
From: jamnt2000@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:01:53 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Audrey Teshima

San Diego, CA 92130
From: mary.ervasti@ervasti.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:36:10 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as Ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mary Ervasti

Chanhassen, MN 55317
Resignation Letter


 Exhibit 10.1 
 January 8, 2013 
 Dune Energy 
 Robert A. Schmitz 
 Chairman of the Board 
 777 Walker Street 
 Houston, TX 77002 
 Mr. Chairman: 
 I hereby confirm I am resigning from the Board of Dune Energy, Inc., and all
committees thereof upon which I serve. I further confirm this resignation is not related to any disagreement with the Company regarding its operations, policies or practices. 

Best Regards, 
  





 
 Stephen P. Kovacs 

 

			
	 Cc:
	  	James Watt
		  	Frank Smith
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           5
<CIK>                                               0001037189
<NAME>                                   Smith Barney Westport Futures Fund L.P.

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                      JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                        SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                     113,727,849
<SECURITIES>                                                 3,007,959
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  346,134
<ALLOWANCES>                                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           117,081,942
<PP&E>                                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             117,081,942
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        1,201,494
<BONDS>                                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                                 115,880,448
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               117,081,942
<SALES>                                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             1,289,261
<CGS>                                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             4,629,051
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             (3,339,790)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                (3,339,790)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                   (30.90)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                        0


</TABLE>