alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 185 (Tuesday, September 26, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 66120]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20785]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD

[Docket No. EP 519 (Sub-No. 5)]


Renewal of National Grain Car Council

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board.

ACTION: Notice of intent to renew charter.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice 
is hereby given that the Surface Transportation Board (Board) intends 
to renew the charter of the National Grain Car Council (NGCC).

ADDRESSES: A copy of the charter will be available on the Board's 
website at https://www.stb.gov/resources/stakeholder-committees/grain-car-council/.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Cassiday, Designated Federal 
Officer, at (202) 245-0308. If you require an accommodation under the 
Americans with Disabilities Act, please call (202) 245-0245.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The NGCC functions as a continuing working 
group to facilitate private-sector solutions and recommendations to the 
Board on matters affecting grain transportation. The NGCC functions 
solely as an advisory body and complies with the provisions of the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. 10, and its 
implementing regulations.
    The NGCC consists of approximately 40 voting members, excluding 
governmental representatives. The membership comprises a balanced 
representation of individuals knowledgeable in the transportation of 
grain, including no fewer than 12 members from the Class I railroads 
(one marketing and one car management representative from each Class 
I), seven representatives from Class II and III carriers, 14 
representatives from grain shippers and receivers, and seven 
representatives from private car owners and car manufacturers. All 
voting members of NGCC serve on the Council in a representative 
capacity on behalf of their respective industry or stakeholder group. 
The members of the Board are ex officio (non-voting) members of the 
NGCC, and the Vice Chair of the Board is designated as Co-Chair of the 
NGCC. Representatives from the U.S. Departments of Agriculture and 
Transportation may be invited to serve on the Council in an advisory 
capacity as ex officio (non-voting) members. Non-voting members of NGCC 
may consist of regular government employees, and, in some 
circumstances, special government employees.
    The NGCC meets at least annually, and meetings are open to the 
public, consistent with the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 
94-409 (1976).
    Further information about the NGCC is available on the Board's 
website (https://www.stb.gov/resources/stakeholder-committees/grain-car-council/) and at the General Services Administration's FACA 
database (https://facadatabase.gov/).

    Decided: September 20, 2023.

    By the Board, Scott M. Zimmerman, Acting Director, Office of 
Proceedings.
Tammy Lowery,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2023-20785 Filed 9-25-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
MATERIALS NOT INCLUDED IN

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (AD) DOCKET

FAA-2011-0596

Docket Number

2008-SW-37-AD

Directorate Identifier

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained 

in the Supplemental AD Docket

Eurocopter Canada ASB No. BO 105LS A-3

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel,

Southwest Region

Rules Docket

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663

Fort Worth, Texas 76137

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 168 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Education and 

Labor in the One Hundred Tenth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2007 

Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California (for himself and Mr. MCKEON) submitted 

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House 

Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

Education and Labor in the One Hundred Tenth Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Education and 

4 Labor (hereafter in this resolution referred to as the 

5 ‘‘Committee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries, 

6 there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the 

7 House of Representatives for committee salaries and ex8 penses, not more than $16,334,250 for the One Hundred 

9 Tenth Congress. 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 168 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $8,025,500 shall be available 

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

5 noon on January 3, 2007, and ending immediately 

6 before noon on January 3, 2008; and 

7 (2) not more than $8,308,750 shall be available 

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

9 noon on January 3, 2008, and ending immediately 

10 before noon on January 3, 2009. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
From: scott@fbctaft.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:05:05 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest possible way that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course, I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections to

abortifacients as killing human life. I strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on

Americans especially for drugs and devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion

(such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services. Thank you.

Sincerely,

Scott Pearson

Taft, CA 93268
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Digital Insight Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, John Dorman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|/s/ John Dorman                                                           
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|John Dorman Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer August 4, 2003



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of this report or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

RULE 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

AS AMENDED

I, Ronald K.
Shelton, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of GigOptix, Inc. (the registrant)
for the year ended December 31, 2009.

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|Date: June 10, 2010                  
|                                     
|/s/    Ronald K. Shelton             
|Ronald K. Shelton                    
|Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
From: annabananajoe@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:44:00 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ann Alexander

Englewood, CO 80113
EXHIBIT 11.2


                              McGLADREY & PULLEN L.L.P.
                   Certified Public Accountants & Consultants


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We hereby  consent to the use of our report dated February 26, 1998, on the
financial  statements referred to therein in Post-Effective  Amendment No. 23 to
the Registration  Statement on Form N-1A, File No. 2-96456 of Connecticut  Daily
Tax  Free  Income  Fund,  Inc.,  as  filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission.

     We also consent to the  reference to our Firm in the  Prospectus  under the
caption  "Financial  Highlights" and in the Statement of Additional  Information
under the caption "Counsel and Auditors."




                                             /s/McGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP
                                                McGladrey & Pullen, LLP




New York, New York
May 20, 1998
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that
the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009 of
Flurida Group, Inc. (the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Dated:
      12/02/2010
              By:
              /s/ Yaru HangYaru
      HangChief
      Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Flurida Group, Inc. and will
be retained by Flurida Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

Statement





Pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of Luxemburg Bancshares, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that to the knowledge of the undersigned:



(1)

the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2)

the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  May 11, 2004





/s/ Sheri L. Knope

Sheri L. Knope

Chief Financial Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Luxemburg Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by Luxemburg Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.  This statement accompanies the periodic report to which it relates and shall not be deemed as filed as part of the report or otherwise for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>                              1,000

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              APR-01-2000
<CASH>                                          3,015
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  80,750
<ALLOWANCES>                                   18,097
<INVENTORY>                                    86,289
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              162,913
<PP&E>                                         31,336
<DEPRECIATION>                                  9,968
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                354,970
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          40,060
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           68
<OTHER-SE>                                    120,604
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  354,970
<SALES>                                       107,589
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              111,168
<CGS>                                          73,640
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  28,019
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  826
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              5,838
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 2,845
<INCOME-TAX>                                    1,195
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             1,650
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    1,650
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.24


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

          - [OMB Control No. 2900-0829]

# AGENCY:

 Veterans Benefits Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs.

# ACTION:

Notice; withdrawal.

# SUMMARY:

                        On Friday, September 15, 2023, the Veterans Benefits Administration (VA), published a notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         announcing an opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection Income and Asset Statement in Support of Claim for Pension or Parents' (VA Form 21P-0969). This notice was published in error; therefore, this document corrects that error by withdrawing this FR notice, document number 2023-20001.                    

      ( print page 64983)    

# DATES:

As of Friday, September 15, 2023, the FR notice published at 88 FR 178, page 63677 on September 15, 2023, is withdrawn.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Maribel Aponte, Office of Enterprise and Integration, Data Governance Analytics (008), 810 Vermont Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20006, (202) 266-4688 or email                         *maribel.aponte@va.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

FR Doc. 2023-20001, published on Friday, September 15, 2023 (88 FR 178, page 63677), is withdrawn by this notice.

By direction of the Secretary.

Maribel Aponte,

VA PRA Clearance Officer, Office of Enterprise and Integration/Data Governance Analytics, Department of Veterans Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2023-20331 Filed 9-19-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
No. 67489.

#### Firmenich, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 62/9121 and 62/13794 (New York).

*229Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issue herein is the same as that involved in *United States*v. *Dodge & Olcott, Inc.*(47 CCPA *100, C.A.D.*737), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 8.1

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF GLOBAL SHIP LEASE, INC.



|                                   |  |                                 
|---------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------
|Name                               |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation   
|Global Ship Lease Services Limited |  | United Kingdom                  
|Global Ship Lease 1 Limited        |  | Cyprus                          
|Global Ship Lease 2 Limited        |  | Cyprus                          
|Global Ship Lease 3 Limited        |  | Cyprus                          
|Global Ship Lease 4 Limited        |  | Cyprus                          
|Global Ship Lease 5 Limited        |  | Cyprus                          
|Global Ship Lease 6 Limited        |  | Cyprus                          
|Global Ship Lease 7 Limited        |  | Cyprus                          
|Global Ship Lease 8 Limited        |  | Cyprus                          
|Global Ship Lease 9 Limited        |  | Cyprus                          
|Global Ship Lease 10 Limited       |  | Cyprus                          
|Global Ship Lease 11 Limited       |  | Cyprus                          
|Global Ship Lease 12 Limited       |  | Cyprus                          
|Global Ship Lease 13 Limited       |  | Cyprus                          
|Global Ship Lease 14 Limited       |  | Cyprus                          
|Global Ship Lease 15 Limited       |  | Cyprus                          
|Global Ship Lease 16 Limited       |  | Cyprus                          
|Global Ship Lease 17 Limited       |  | Cyprus                          
|GSL Alcazar Inc.                   |  | Republic of the Marshall Islands
|GSL Château dIf Inc.              |  | Republic of the Marshall Islands
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Baker, Bray and Overton Argued at Norfolk, Virginia

DAVID S. HUDSON v. Record No. 1012-94-1 OPINION BY JUDGE NELSON T. OVERTON COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA OCTOBER 24, 1995

FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF GLOUCESTER COUNTY Fred W. Bateman, Judge Designate R. Bruce Long for appellant. H. Elizabeth Shaffer, Assistant Attorney General (James S. Gilmore, III, Attorney General, on brief), for appellee.

David Hudson was convicted in a bench trial of operating a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol based on the results of a blood test. Hudson claims that the blood test as administered did not meet the statutory procedural requirements and therefore the results should be inadmissible. We agree with this contention and for the following reasons reverse the conviction. Hudson was observed driving erratically and was stopped by a police officer. Being advised of Virginia's implied consent law, Hudson elected a blood test and was driven to a nearby hospital. The arresting officer testified that the nurse cleaned Hudson's arm with a "benadine solution." The Code requires that when the Commonwealth draws blood for the purposes of an alcohol or drug test, the part of the body from which the blood is taken must be cleansed with "soap and- 2 - water, polyvinylpyrrolidone iodine or benzalkonium chloride." Code § 18.2-268.5. The record in this case states that "benadine" was used to clean appellant's arm. Substantial compliance with the statutory requirement is sufficient to render test results admissible. Code § 18.2-268.11. However, nothing in the record supports the argument that using "benadine" substantially complies with the statute. Benadine is an unknown solution. No evidence was presented as to the chemical properties of benadine. The Commonwealth never addressed the possibility that "benadine" was anything else, or that the appellation was made in error. Absent such evidence, a finding of substantial compliance cannot be supported. When the Commonwealth fails to meet its statutory requirements concerning blood tests, the results of those blood tests cannot be admitted at trial. Thurston v. City of Lynchburg , 15 Va. App. 475, 481, 424 S.E.2d 701, 704 (1992). Without the results of the blood test, the conviction must be reversed. Reversed and dismissed

.