1

**[ICR No. 1240.08] 1830 -**  **0569 -**  **Consolidated Annual Report (CAR) for the Carl D. Perkins** 

**Career and Technical Education Act of 2006 SUPPORTING STATEMENT**  **FOR PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT SUBMISSION [ICR No. 1240.08] 1830**  **- 0569**  **- Consolidated Annual Report (CAR) for the Carl D. Perkins** 

**Career and Technical Education Act of 2006**  

### A. Justification **1. Explain the circumstances that make the collection of information necessary.**  **Identify any legal or administrative requirements that necessitate the collection. Attach a**  **hard copy of the appropriate section of each statute and regul**  **ation mandating or authorizing the collection of information**  **, or**  **you may provide a valid**  **URL link or paste the applicable section**  **. Please limit pasted text to no longer than 3**  **pages. Specify the review type of the collection (new, revision, extension,**  **rein statement with change, reinstatement without change)**  **. If revised, briefly specify the changes. If a rulemaking is involved, make note of the sections or changed**  **sections, if applicable.** The extension of the collection instrument is submitted due to the Ju ly 2014 expiration date. The purpose of this information collection package, the Consolidated Annual Report (CAR),is to gather narrative, financial, and performance data as required by the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006 (Perkins IV ). Section 113(c) of Perkins IV requires each eligible agency that receives an allotment under section 111 of Title Iof the Act (State basic grant) to annuall y prepare and submit, to the Secretary, a report regarding the progress of the State in achiev ing the State adjusted levels of performance on the core indicators of performance and additional indicators of performance. This includes the levels of performance for special population categories described in section 3(29) of Perkins IV and other student categories described in section 1111(h)(1)C)(i) of the Elementary and Secondary

Education Act of 1965, as amended by the No Child L eft Behind Act (NCLB) of 2001. Finally , section 205 of Perkins IV requires each eligible agency that receives a tech prep allotment under section 201 of Title II of the Act (tech prep grant) to annuall y prepare and submit, to the Secretary, a report on the effectiveness of these programs, including a description of how tech prep grants were awarded within the State. The CAR i s a single reporting instrument that combines the requirements referenced above with the required annual interim and final financial status reports pursuant to the Education Department General Education Regulations (EDGAR) in 34 CFR §80.41. Perkins IV, si gned into law on August 12, 2006, represents nearl y three ye ars of work on the part of Congress and the Department, in cooperation with other Federal agencies, the State, and local agencies affected b y its policies. It provides Federal support for rigorou s career and technical education (CTE) programs that provide students with knowledge and skills to keep the United States competitive. The Department distributes approximately one billion dollars annually in Perkins funding to the 50 States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the outlying areas, such as Guam, Palau, and the Virgin Islands (collectivel y referred to as the “States”). Each State distributes funds to eligible2

**[ICR No. 1240.08] 1830 -**  **0569 -**  **Consolidated Annual Report (CAR) for the Carl D. Perkins** 

**Career and Technical Education Act of 2006** recipients, such as local educational agencies (LEAs) and postsecondary institutions, in order to develop the academic, career, and technical education knowledge and skills of secondary and postsecondary

education students who elect to enroll in career and technical education programs. Perkins IV indicates that one of its purpose s is to build on the work of States’ efforts to assist CTE students in achieving challenging academic and technical standards, and preparing them for high skill, high wage, or high demand occupations in current or emerging professions. Perkins IV provides increased focus on the academic achievement of CTE students, improvement in State and local accountability , and strengthened connections between secondary and postsecondary education delivery

s ys tems. These themes serve as the general framework for the revised CAR instrument. **2. Indicate how, by whom, and for what purpose the information is to be used. Except**  **for a new collection, indicate the actual use the agency has made of the information received from the current collection.**  The information gathered through this package will be used in a variety of way s. First, narrative and financial information will be reviewed by the Office of Career and Technical Adult Education (O CT AE), Division of Academic and Technical Education (DATE), to determine each State’s compliance with basic provisions of Perkins IV and the Education Department General Administrative Regulations (34 CFR Part 80.40 [Annual Performance Report] and Part 80.41 [Financial Status Report]). For example, States are required to implement specific leadership activities in their State as well as to spend certain percentages of their funding to meet the academic and technical skill needs of various student populations (i.e. individuals preparing for nontraditional careers and individuals in State institutions). Second, DATE staff will review performance data to determine whether, and to what extent, each State has met its State adjusted levels of performance for the core indicators described in section 113(b)(4) of Perkins IV. A State that did not meet at least 90 percent of the adjusted levels of performance for any of the core indicators described in section 113(b)(4) of Perkins IV is required to develop and sub mit, as part of its CAR report, a program improvement plan with special consideration to the performance gaps identified under section 113(c)(2) of Perkins IV. The improvement plan must address each core indicator(s) that a State failed to meet; disaggreg ated categories of students for which there were quantifiable disparities or gaps in performance compared to all students or any other category

of students; steps that will be implemented, beginning in the current program ye ar; staff members in the State who are responsible for each action step; and the timeline for completing each action step. DATE staff will review these plans in order to determine whether they are thorough and appropriate in addressing the indicator(s) that were not met at the 90 percent level. Third, section 113(c)(3)(C) of Perkins IV requires the Secretary to provide the appropriate committees of Congress copies of annual reports received b y the department from each eligible agency that receives funds under the Act. Section 113(c)(3 )(A) further requires the Secretary

to make the information contained in such reports available to the3

**[ICR No. 1240.08] 1830 -**  **0569 -**  **Consolidated Annual Report (CAR) for the Carl D. Perkins** 

**Career and Technical Education Act of 2006** general public. To meet this obligation, DATE compiles the CAR data into an annual report to Congress and makes the data available to the public online through the Peer Collaborative Resource Network at http://cte.ed.gov

. Fourth, DATE charts its own progress in helping States to improve the educational and employ ment outcomes for students who pursue career and technical education by setting annual performance targets for each of the core indicators of performance in section 113(b). Targets and performance data are entered annually into the Department’s Program and Performance Management Database (PPMD) Finally , DATE staff uses annual CAR information to determine which States will be monitored for an upcoming ye ar or which States could benefit from technical assistance in particular areas. Annual CAR reviews have resulted in the identification of topics for annual Dat a Quality

Institutes (DQIs), as well as the decision to offer customized technical assistance to States on accountability issues. This strategy

has been well

received b y the States and is deemed b y OCTAE, effective in improving the reliability and validity of the Perkins data. **3. Describe whether, and to what extent, the collection of information involves the use**  **of automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or forms of information technology, e.g. permitting electronic su**  **bmission of responses, and the basis for the decision of adopting this means of collection. Also describe any**  **consideration given to using technology to reduce burden.** Each State has several options in submitting its CAR report. A State submits its report electronically

via the Department’s Program Information Management Sy stem Web site at https://perkins.ed.gov/Account/LogOn?ReturnUrl=%2f . This Web site allows a State to complete its CAR report using Web

- based forms and to certify to the accuracy

and completeness of its submission using electronic Personal Identification Numbers (PINs). The State CTE director must then use one PIN to certify and sign the entire CAR submission. The auth orized State official responsible to certify and sign Financial Status Reports (FSR) must use another PIN. It is important to note that the use of the PI Ns to certify and sign the CAR and FSRs is the same as certifying the documents with a hand

written si gnature b y the State official. State officials are responsible for protecting the confidentiality

of their PIN and for any

use of their PI

N b y another individual. **4. Describe ef** 

**forts to identify duplication. Show specifically why any similar**  **information alrea dy available cannot be used or modified for use for the purposes**  **described in Question**  **2 above.**  This information gathered as part of this collection is not required to be submitted to any other office within the Department of Education. **5. If the collection o**  **f information impacts small businesses or other small entities, describe any methods used to minimize burden. A small entity may be (1) a small**  **business which is deemed to be one that is independently owned and operated and that is not dominant in its fiel**  **d of operation; (2) a small organization that is any not**   ** for** **- profit enterprise that is independently owned and operated and is not dominant** 4

**[ICR No. 1240.08] 1830 -**  **0569 -**  **Consolidated Annual Report (CAR) for the Carl D. Perkins** 

**Career and Technical Education Act of 2006 in its field; or (3) a small government jurisdiction, which is a government of a city,**  **county, town, township, schoo l district, or special district with a population of less**  **than 50,000.** This collection does not impact small business. **6. Describe the consequences to Federal program or policy activities if the collection is**  **not conducted or is conducted less frequently, as well as any technical or legal**  **obstacles to reducing burden.** Without the information gathered through the CAR, the Department would be unable to determine whether, and to what extent, States were complying with the Perkins IV legislation or other applicabl e federal regulations. The Department would be unable to sufficiently

review each State’s progress in meeting its adjusted levels of performance, much less determine its own effectiveness in helping States to achieve the purposes of the Act. The statute dictates the frequency of collection and the ty

pes of information that must be collected. **7. Explain any special circumstances that would cause an information collection to be**  **conducted in a manner:**
 **requiring respondents to report information to the agency mo re often than**  **quarterly;**
 **requiring respondents to prepare a written response to a collection of information in fewer than 30 days after receipt of it;** 
 **requiring respondents to submit more than an original and two copies of any document;** 
 **requiring respondents to retain records, other than health, medical, government**  **contract, grant -**  **in -**  **aid, or tax records for more than three years;**
 **in connection with a statistical survey, that is not designed to produce valid and reliable results than can be generali** **zed to the universe of study;**
 **requiring the use of a statistical data classification that has not been reviewed and approved by OMB;** 
 **that includes a pledge of confidentiality that is not supported by authority established in statute or regulation, that is**  **not supported by disclosure and data security policies that are consistent with the pledge, or that unnecessarily**  **impedes sharing of data with other agencies for compatible confidential use; or**
 **requiring respondents to submit proprietary trade secrets, or other confidential**  **information unless the agency can demonstrate that it has instituted procedures to protect the information’s confidentiality to the extent permitted by law.**  There are no special circumstances that require the collection to be conducted i n a manner inconsistent with the guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.6.5

**[ICR No. 1240.08] 1830 -**  **0569 -**  **Consolidated Annual Report (CAR) for the Carl D. Perkins** 

**Career and Technical Education Act of 2006 8.**  **As applicable,**  **state that the Department has published the 60 and 30 Federal Register notices as**  **required by 5 CFR 1320.8(d), soliciting comments on the information collection prior to submissio**  **n to OMB. Summarize public comments received in response to that notice and describe actions taken by the agency in**  **response to these comments. Specifically address comments received on cost and hour burden.**  **Describe efforts to consult with persons outsi de the agency to obtain their views on**  **the availability of data, frequency of collection, the clarity of instruction and record keeping, disclosure, or reporting format (if any), and on the data elements to be**  **recorded, disclosed, or reported. Consultation**  **with representatives of those from whom information is to be obtained or those who must compile records should occur at least once every 3 years** 

**– even if**  **the collection of information activity is the same as in prior periods. There may be circumstances**  **that may preclude consultation in a specific situation. These circumstances should be explained.**  A 60
- Day and 30

- Day

Federal Re gister Notice published for CAR. **9. Explain any decision to provide any payment or gift to respondents, other than**  **remuneration of contractors or grantees**  **with meaningful justification .**  The respondents will not receive any paym ent or gift for completing the information collection. **10. Describe any assurance of confidentiality provided to respondents and the basis for**  **the assurance in sta tute, regulation, or agency policy. If personally identifiable**  **information (PII) is being collected, a Privacy Act statement should be included on the instrument. Please provide a citation for the Systems of Record Notice and the**  **date a Privacy Impact Asse ssment was completed**  **as indicated on the ICRAS’ Part 2 IC form**  **. A confidentiality statement with a legal citation that authorizes the pledge**  **of confidentiality**  **should be provided. Requests for this information are in**  **accordance with the following ED and OM B policies: Privacy Act of 1974, OMB**  **Circular A -**  **108**

**– Privacy Act Implementation** 

**– Guidelines and Responsibilities,**  **OMB Circular A -**  **130 Appendix I**

**– Federal Agency Responsibilities for Maintaining**  **Records About Individuals, OMB M -**  **03 -**  **22**

**– OMB Guidance for Im**  **plementing the Privacy Provisions of the E**  **- Government Act of 2002, OMB M**  **- 06**  **- 15** 

**– Safeguarding**  **Personally Identifiable Information, OM:6 -**  **104**

**– Privacy Act of 1974 (Collection,**  **Use and Protection of Personally Identifiable Information) .**  **If the collection is subject to the Privacy Act, the Privacy Act statement is deemed sufficient with**  **respect to confidentiality. If there is no expectation of confidentiality, simply state that the Department make**  **s no pledge about the confidentially of the data.**  There are no a ssurances of confidentiality. **11. Provide additional justification for any questions of a sensitive nature, such as**  **sexual behavior and attitudes, religious beliefs, and other matters that are commonly considered private. The justification should include the**  **reasons why the agency considers the questions necessary, the specific uses to be made of the** 6

**[ICR No. 1240.08] 1830 -**  **0569 -**  **Consolidated Annual Report (CAR) for the Carl D. Perkins** 

**Career and Technical Education Act of 2006 information, the explanation to be given to persons from whom the information is**  **requested, and any steps to be taken to obtain their consent.** There are no questions of a sensitive nature. **12. Provide estimates of the hour burden of the collection of information. The**  **statement should:**
 **Indicate the number of respondents by affected public type (federal government, individuals or households, private sector** 

**– busin**  **esses or other for -**  **profit, private sector** 

**– not**  **- for**  **- profit institutions, farms, state, local or tribal governments),**  **frequency of response, annual hour burden, and an explanation of how the burden was estimated, including identification of burden type: rec**  **ordkeeping, reporting or third party disclosure. All narrative should be included in**  **Question 12. Unless directed to do so, agencies should not conduct special surveys to**  **obtain information on which to base hour burden estimates. Consultation with a samp**  **le (fewer than 10) of potential respondents is desirable. If the hour burden on respondents is expected to vary widely because of differences in activity, size,**  **or complexity, show the range of estimated hour burden, and explain the reasons for the varian**  **ce. Generally, estimates should not include burden hours for customary and usual business practices.** 
 **If this request for approval covers more than one form, provide separate hour burden estimates for each form**  **. (The table should at**  **minimum include**  **Respon dent types,**  **Number of Respondent**  **s and Responses, Hours/Response, and**  **Total Hours)**
 **Provide estimates of annualized cost to respondents of the hour burdens for collections of information, identifying and using appropriate wage rate**  **categories. The cost of c ontracting out or paying outside parties for information**  **collection activities should not be included here. Instead, this cost should be included in**  **Question 14.**  With both Professional and Clerical staff completing the CAR, total annual burden hours for this extension are 9,570 hours. **Program Year**  **Estimated**

**Number of Responses**  **Type of Staff Estimated**  **Number of Burden Hours**  **Per Response Total** 

**Estimated Number of**  **Burden Hours**  2013
- 2014 55 Professional Clerical TOTAL 102 72 5,610

3,960
**ANNUAL AVERAGE**  **55 174**  **9,570**7

**[ICR No. 1240.08] 1830 -**  **0569 -**  **Consolidated Annual Report (CAR) for the Carl D. Perkins** 

**Career and Technical Education Act of 2006**
**13. Provide an estimate of the total annual cost burden to respondents or record**  **keepers resulting from the collection of information. (Do not include the cost of any hour burden shown in**  **Question s 12 and 14.)** 
 **The cost estimate should be split into two components: (a) a total capital and**  **start -**  **up cost component (annualized over its expected useful life); and (b) a total operation and maintenance and purchase of services component. The estimates**  **should take into account costs associated wi th generating, maintaining, and**  **disclosing or providing the information. Include descriptions of methods used to estimate major cost factors including system and technology acquisition,**  **expected useful life of capital equipment, the discount rate(s), and the time**  **period over which costs will be incurred. Capital and start -**  **up costs include, among other items, preparations for collecting information such as purchasing**  **computers and software; monitoring, sampling, drilling and testing equipment; and acquirin**  **g and maintaining record storage facilities.**
 **If cost estimates are expected to vary widely, agencies should present ranges of cost burdens and explain the reasons for the variance. The cost of contracting**  **out information collection services should be a pa rt of this cost burden estimate.**  **In developing cost burden estimates, agencies may consult with a sample of respondents (fewer than 10), utilize the 60**  **- day pre**  **- OMB submission public**  **comment process and use existing economic or regulatory impact analysis a**  **ssociated with the rulemaking containing the information collection, as appropriate.** 
 **Generally, estimates should not include purchases of equipment or services, or portions thereof, made: (1) prior to October 1, 1995, (2) to achieve regulatory**  **compliance w ith requirements not associated with the information collection, (3)**  **for reasons other than to provide information or keep records for the government**  **or (4) as part of customary and usual business or private practices. Also, these estimates should not incl**  **ude the hourly costs (i.e., the monetization of the hours) captured above in**  **Question 12**  **.** Total Annualized Capital/Startup Cost : $ .00 Total Annual Costs (O&M) : $ .00 Total Annualized Costs Requested : $ .00
**14. Provide estimates of annualized cost to the Federal government. Also, provide a**  **description of the method used to estimate cost, wh ich should include quantification**  **of hours, operational expenses (such as equipment, overhead, printing, and support staff), and any other expense that would not have been incurred without this**  **collection of information. Agencies also may aggregate cost e stimates from**  **Questions 12, 13, and 14 in a single table.**  The annual cost to the Federal government to implement this information co llection is estimated at $44,521 . This includes contractor beta testing and web site maintenance,8

**[ICR No. 1240.08] 1830 -**  **0569 -**  **Consolidated Annual Report (CAR) for the Carl D. Perkins** 

**Career and Technical Education Act of 2006** and the salaries and expe nses of DATE program staff who manage the process and review the CAR data. The method used to estimate the annual cost is as follows: Program Office Staff: 1 GS
- 12 X 220 hours = $ 7,700 1 GS
- 15 X 100 hours = $ 4,821 Total Program Offic e Staff: = $12,521 Contractor Staff: = $32,000 ESTIMAT ED FEDERAL COST = $44,521
**15. Explain the reasons for any program changes or adjustments. Generally,**  **adjustments in burden result from re -**  **estimating burden and/or from economic phenomenon outside of an agency’s control (e.g., correcting a burden estimate or an**  **organic increase in the size of the reporting universe). Program changes result from a deliberate action that materially changes a collection of information and generally**  **are result of new statute or an agency action (e.g., changing a form, revising regulations, redefining the respondent universe, etc.). Burden changes should be**  **disaggregated by type of change (i.e., adjustment, program change due to new statute, and/or pro**  **gram change due to agency discretion), type of collection (new, revision, extension, reinstatement with change, reinstatement without change) and**  **include totals for**  **changes in burden hours , responses**  **and cost s**  **(if applicable) .**  There is a program change reduction of

- 1130 burden hours, the burden hours decreased due to the elimination of the option to complete and submit Microsoft Excel reporting forms to the website and mailing a hard paper copy of the entire package to the Department
. **16. For collections of**  **information whose results will be published, outline plans for tabulation and publication. Address any complex analytical techniques that will be**  **used.** An annual report to Congress is prepared and published using the information collected in the CAR instrument.
**17. Provide the time schedule for the entire project, including beginning and ending**  **dates of the collection of information, completion of report, publication dates, and other actions.**  Below is the general schedule for production:

**Task Timeline**  States submit CAR data December 31 (deadline for reporting each ye ar)9

**[ICR No. 1240.08] 1830 -**  **0569 -**  **Consolidated Annual Report (CAR) for the Carl D. Perkins** 

**Career and Technical Education Act of 2006** DATE staff review State’s CAR submissions January 1

– March 15 States receive notification on the approval of their CAR submissions March 15 DATE staff, in collaboration with contract ors, tabulate data and prepare individual State profiles March 15

– April 15
DATE staff develops draft report May 15 DATE staff submits final draft report for Department clearance June 1 DATE staff submits final report for Office of Communications and O utreach for final editing and printing June 30
DATE staff submits final report to Congress July 15
**18. If seeking approval to not display the expiration date for OMB approval of the**  **information collection, explain the reasons that display would be inappropriate.**  We are not seeking approval. **19. Explain each exception to the certification statement identified in the Certification**  **of Paperwork Reduction Act.** This request is in compliance with 5 CFR 1320.9.