alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: ccconsu1@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:33:09 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

P Conroy

, 56508
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 201 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 201

     Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on House 
           Administration in the One Hundred Tenth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 28, 2007

   Ms. Millender-McDonald (for herself and Mr. Ehlers) submitted the 
  following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on House 
           Administration in the One Hundred Tenth Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on House Administration hereafter 
in this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including the 
expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the 
applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for committee 
salaries and expenses, not more than $10,214,461 for the One Hundred 
Tenth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $5,033,242 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2007, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2008; and
            (2) not more than $5,181,219 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2008, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2009.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
|   | (1) | Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                 |   |                                                  |   |
|----------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date: March 31, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Berge Abajian                                     |   |
|                 |   | Berge Abajian                                         |   |
|                 |   | Principal Accounting OfficerBergio International Inc. |   |
|                 |   |                                                  |   |
Exhibit 10.5

 

THIRD AMENDMENT TO
 FOREST OIL CORPORATION
 EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
 (AS AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 1, 2008)

 

WHEREAS, Forest Oil Corporation (the “Company”) has heretofore adopted and currently maintains the Forest Oil Corporation Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”);

 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 10.4 of the Plan, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Committee”) may terminate the Plan, in whole or in part, at any time;

 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 10.4 of the Plan, Plan Accounts shall be distributed at the time specified by the Committee in a single lump sum after termination of the Plan, provided however, that the Plan termination shall not give rise to an impermissible acceleration of the time or form of a payment of a Plan benefit under Internal Revenue Code Section 409A; and

 

WHEREAS, the Company desires to terminate the Plan in accordance with Treasury Regulation § 1.409A-3(j)(4)(ix)(C).

 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan shall be, and hereby is, terminated as follows:

 

1.              The Plan is terminated as of December 18, 2012 (the “Termination Date”).

 

2.              All deferrals of compensation and contributions to the Plan shall cease as of the Termination Date.

 

3.              All Plan Accounts shall be distributed in a single lump sum payment within 12 months after the first anniversary of the Termination Date (the “Liquidation”), with the actual date of distribution to be determined by the Committee.  Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, if distribution upon Plan termination is not permitted by Internal Revenue Code Section 409A, the distribution of Account balances shall be made only after the Plan benefits otherwise become due under the terms of the Plan.

 

4.              Plan Accounts that are payable under the terms of the Plan prior to the Liquidation shall continue to be paid in accordance with the terms of the Plan as if the action to terminate the Plan had not occurred.

 

5.              Nothing in this amendment shall prohibit the continued investment of Plan Accounts in accordance with the terms of the Plan until such date as it is necessary to liquidate the Plan Accounts in anticipation of the Liquidation, with such date to be determined by the Committee.

 











 

EXECUTED this 19th day of December, 2012.

 

	
 
    	
FOREST   OIL CORPORATION
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Cyrus D. Marter IV
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Name:
    	
Cyrus   D. Marter IV
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Title:
    	
Senior   Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
No. 300, Misc.

#### D'Agostino *v.*Massachusetts.

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. Certiorari denied.
BEFORE THE SECOND Division,

January 18, 1967

No. P67/23.

#### Cragstan Corporation et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/28542, etc. (New York).

Bao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of bicycle horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Sherwin International, Inc.*v. *United States*(54 Cust. Ct. 466, Abstract 69382), and that the items of merchandise marked “B” covered by the foregoing protests consist of bicycle horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of *G. Joannou Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(46 Cust. Ct. 172, C.D. 2253), the claims of the plaintiffs were sustained.
From: jarod.boldt@peterson.af.mil

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:10:36 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jarod Boldt

Colorado Springs, CO 80916
• O<(AlPHA AVIATION 

SERVICE BULLETIN 

AA-SB-71-007 

ENGINE AIR INTAKE BOX AND DUCTING - INSPECTION 

1 Planning Information 

1.1 EFFECTIVITY 

R2000 Series Aircraft S/N 001 to 378 

HR200 Series Aircraft S/N 001 to 378 

Excluding R2160i 

1.2 CONCURRENT REQUIREMENTS 

Nil 

1.3 REASON 

Possible paint adherence defects inside tlhe engine air intake box and cohesion defects inside the 

laminated ducting from the filter to the air intake box. 

1.4 DESCRIPTION 

This service bulletin provides instructions for inspection of air intake box and associated ducting. 

1.5 COMPLIANCE 

Within the next 1 00 hours TIS and then at each subsequent 1 00 hours TIS. 

1.6 APPROVAL 

By delegated authority (Alpha Aviation Concept Ltd, 0075990). Refer COA AA/60/1139 

1.7 WEIGHT AND BALANCE 

No effect on aircraft weight and balance. 

1.8 REFERENCES 

R2000 and HR200 Illustrated Parts Catalogue 

APEX R2000 Service Manual 

APEX HR200 Service Manual 

1.9 OTHER PUBLICATIONS AFFECTED 

Nil 

DES 16 Ver 1: 1.06.05 Revision 0, August 2014 M-SB-71-007 

Page 1 of3 
,. 

~AlPHA AVIATION 

SERVICE BULLETIN 

2 Material Information 

Air intake boxes with part numbers listed below are known to be fitted to French (APR) 

manufactured HR2001R2000 Robin aircraft. 

r-··~--·- -·-- -· ---- -. --·----.. -·- .. --·----·r ........... -...... -... -·-·-· .. -· .... -....... ......... -.. r .. ---·-·-.................... -........... -............... _ ..... , 

Part Number Description · Quantity Model 

r-·- i .. -·--·---.. -·-· .. ---··-·---1.· ···-·············-·······-··-··-···-···-··-·······-··-··- ··1.·-·-·······-······-·······-·-··-······-··--·····-.. -········-),. 

, 56.26.16.010 Intake Box I 1 i HR200 I R2112 i i--·-- ...,._.. . ·----·-·--.. - .. --.. --.. L.-................... - ................. _ ....... j 

! 56.40.62.000 ! Intake Box ! 1 ! R2120U · 

~-- ~s:46 1o:ooo ·--:--~-=~-!!1~~~~~~~--- ~==r=·~ ~:~· --=:~ ~=::=~::~:~:-J.: :: __ .. :~::~::~~? ~~: ..... _ .. _·-.. -·· 

2.1 OTHER PUBLICATIONS AFFECTED 

Nil 

2.2 SPECIAL TOOLING 

Nil 

3 Accomplishment Instructions 

3.1 Inspection 

Visually inspect all painted areas in the engine intake box (including the deflection flap) and in the 

engine air dueling (including the area located downstream of the filter) for paint adherence 

defects such as peeling, blistering or bubbling. 

If any defects are found with these PIN air intake boxes, the air intake box must be replaced by a 

new unpainted stainless steel assembly before further flight. 

Contact Alpha Aviation for sourcing of replacement parts. 

DES 16 Ver 1 : 1.06.05 Revision 0, August 2014 AA-SB-71 -007 

Page 2ot 3 
DES 16 Ver 1: 1.06.05 

. CX'AlPHA AVIATION 

SERVICE BULLETIN 

Contact Information: 

-I 

O(ALPHA AVIATION 

59 Hautapu Road 

RD 1 

Cambridge 3493 

NEW ZEALAND 

Phone:+ 64 7 827 0528 Fax:+ 64 7 929 2878 

Web: www.alphaaviation.co.nz 

Revision 0, August 2014 AA·SB-71-007 

Page3of3
Adams, Kevin (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Dear Mr. Strobel, 

Chuck Howell [chowell@flygreatlakes.com] 

Monday, August 22, 2011 4:09 PM 

'Ken Strobel' 

'Doug Voss'; Adams, Kevin (OST); Devany, Dennis (OST) 

EAS Agreement-DOC letter 

Thanks for your call today. 

l P 2: l~O 

As discussed in our conversations with you, Great Lakes agrees to provide 1680 annual non-stop 

departures between Dodge City & Denver for $1,688,598, 

that would reflect the balance of monies available to DOT for payment to Great Lakes by DOT, per 

our understandings of your calculations. 

If this reflects your understanding of this matter, please acknowledge by return email. 

Regards, 

Chuck Howell 

1
<PAGE>

Schedule of Similar Warrants to Exhibit 4.2

Common Stock Purchase Warrant Agreements, dated June 26, 2000, between The
Cobalt Group, Inc. and the holders identified below:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                             No. of
Holder                                       Warrant Shares    PurchasePrice     Period to Exercise
------                                       --------------    -------------     ------------------

<S>                                          <C>               <C>               <C>
Riverside Partnership                        138,797           $6.8578           06/26/00-06/26/05
Third Point Partners, L.P.                   70,879            $6.8578           06/26/00-06/26/05
Third Point Offshore Fund, Ltd.              55,102            $6.8578           06/26/00-06/26/05
Points West International Investments, Ltd.  12,816            $6.8578           06/26/00-06/26/05
</TABLE>
CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

 

Registration No.  333-59540

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  221				Trade Date: 09/12/02
(To Prospectus Supplement & Prospectus dated

  June 1, 2001)							Issue Date:  09/17/02
The Date of this Pricing Supplement September 13, 2002
SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

  CUSIP									Date and terms of redemption or

     or	Stated				             Interest			repayment (including any

Common	Interest		  Price to	 Discounts &         Payment	Survivors		applicable regular or special

  Code	Rate (1)	Maturity	Public (2)	Commissions       Frequency	  Option	Yes/No	record dates)

14911QKE0   3.65%	09/15/07	     100%	        1.0%                Semi-Annually 	     YES	    NO	

Principal						1st Payment	Day	

Amount		Proceeds		Dealer		      Date		Count

$945,000.00	$935,550.00	ABN AMRO Inc.	   03/15/03		30/360	
 

Original Issue Discount Note:					Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes	  X   No						N/A

 

 
- The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the effective date of the change.   Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $711.049 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (SM) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (SM) will be made under a Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated June 1, 2001.
Additionally, the total principal amount of PowerNotes(SM) offered by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation pursuant to its Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated June 1, 2001 has been increased from $500.0mm to $750.0mm.  $250.0mm principal amount of debt securities registered pursuant to Registration Statement No. 333-59540 originally offered by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation pursuant to its Prospectus Supplement dated June 15, 2001 and related Prospectus dated May 25, 2001 are being offered as PowerNotes(SM) by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation pursuant to its Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated June 1, 2001.
- Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
From: mercersan@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:07:11 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Wayne MacClure

Antioch, TN 37013
#### Charles H. Southworth, Respondent, v. Meiggs Howd, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Follett, J.
No. 61465.

#### J. C. Andresen et al. *v.*United States,

protests 135049-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of goatskins and sheepskins the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Nawi Noonoo & Co. et al.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 57, C. D. 1904), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 62181.

#### Morganite, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 322301-K and 325091-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of carbon powder similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Morganite, Inc.*v. *United States*(42 C. C. P. A. 207, C. A. D. 595), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

May 30, 2006

Before

 Hon. RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

 Hon. DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge

 Hon. TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge

No. 03-4291

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL J. MURPHY, 

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States

District Court for the Northern

District of Illinois, Eastern Division

No. 03 CR 138

James F. Holderman, 

Judge.

O R D E R

On August 25, 2005, we affirmed the district court’s calculation of Michael

Murphy’s sentence, but ordered a limited remand under United States v. Paladino,

401 F.3d 471 (7th Cir. 2005), directing the sentencing judge to consider whether he

would impose the same sentence if he had known the guidelines were advisory. The

district court judge examined the record along with statements submitted by

counsel, and concluded that he would have reimposed the original sentence. Noting

the many victims Murphy defrauded for large sums and the irreparable harm he

caused, the district court cited to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(2)(A), and concluded that 

UNPUBLISHED ORDER

Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53
No. 03-4291 Page 2

his “365-month sentence properly ‘reflects the seriousness of the offense, promotes

respect for the law and provides just punishment for the offense.’”

Both parties submitted arguments on the appropriate disposition of this

appeal in light of the district court’s decision. We have considered those

submissions and affirm because we conclude that Murphy’s sentence was

reasonable. 

AFFIRMED.
No. P66/161. —

#### The Buhler Corp. *v.*United States, protests 65/13528, 65/13788, and 65/15338 (New York).

Kao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of parts essential to and dedicated to use with food preparing machinery similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Standard Milling Co.*v. *United States*(50 Cust. Ct. 53, C.D. 2388), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.