alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: vanditos@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:44:15 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

We are writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course we ask you to expand conscience protections

for any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections.

We strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs

and devices that we oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

We also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like us who object to being forced

by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially when

some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by the

federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. We again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely, Mr. & Mrs. S. R. Vanderford

Sincerely,

Stephen Vanderford

, 92704-0915
Before the Second Division,

August 3, 1959

No. 63280.

protest 58/6916 (New York).

#### M. Pressner & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Pord, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that tbe merchandise consists of monofilament fishing lines tbe same in all material respects as those tbe subject of Abstract 60183, tbe claim of tbe plaintiff was sustained.
~- ; 

National Aviation 

January 6, 2015 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building ground floor 

Room W12-140 

1200 new Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

ACADEMY 

Subject: Extension of Exemption from 14 CFR Part 65.75(a) to allow the Aviation 

Mechanic General (AMG), Aviation Mechanic Airframe (AMA), and Aviation Mechanic 

Powerplant (AMP) written tests to be administered after completing the corresponding 

portion of the curriculum. 

Exemption Number: 10211 Docket Number: FAA-2010-1256 

Dear Sir or Madam, 

National Aviation Academy-New England operates an FAA Approved Aviation 

Maintenance Technician School (AMTS), in Bedford, MAunder Air Agency Certificate 

number EC6T068K. 

Petition: 

National Aviation Academy-New England is requesting an extension of Exemption 

Number 10211 relating to 14 CFR Part 65.75(a) to allow the Aviation Mechanic written 

tests (AMG, AMA, AMP) to be administered after completing the corresponding portion 

of the approved curriculum. 

Relief Sought: 

National Aviation Academy-New England is seeking an extension from 14 CFR Part 

65.75(a) to allow students enrolled in its FAA Approved 14 CFR Part 147 Aviation 

Maintenance Technician School (AMTS) to take the Aviation Mechanic written tests 

(AMG, 1\MA, AMP) after completing the corresponding portion of the curriculum, prior to 

meetiJlg the experience requirements of §65.77. 

Tampa Bay: 6225 Ulmerton R~ .• Clearwater Fl33760 

Toll Free: 800.659.2080 : 

Main: 727.531.2080 • Fax: 727.535.8727 I 

New England: 150 Hanscom Dr., Bedford MA 01730 

Toll Free: 800.292.3228 

Main: 781.274.8448 • Fax: 781.274.8490 

NAA 

EDU 
National Aviation 

ACADEMY 

Persons to be covered by the exemption: 

National Aviation Academy-New England, Air Agency Certificate Number EC6T068K and 

students enrolled in its AMTS program in the Airframe, Powerplant or Airframe and 

Powerplant curricula. 

Information, views or arguments to support the action sought: 

There has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and 

safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. The requested extension 

of the exemption would not set a precedent and any delay in acting on this petition 

would be detrimental to National Aviation Academy-New England and the students 

served by it. 

Sincerely, 

Alan Hay 

Director of Education 

National Aviation Academy-New England 

CC: Thomas MacMurtry 

Flight Standards 

Eastern Region 

12 New England Executive Park 

Burlington, MA 01803 

I 

I 

Tampa Bay: 6225 Ulmerton J. Clearwater FL 33760 

Toll Free: 800.659.2080 I 

Main: 727.531.2080 ·Fax: 7

1 

7.535.8727 

New England: 150 Hanscom Dr., Bedford MA 01730 

Toll Free: 800.292.3228 

Main: 781.274.8448 ·Fax: 781.274.8490 

NAA 

EDU
<PAGE>
 
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10(gg)

                         FIRST AMENDMENT TO TERM NOTE


     This is an amendment to that certain Term Note dated February 12, 1997 in
the original principal amount of $1,181,250.00 payable by Edward R. Anderson to
the order of CompuCom Systems, Inc. (the ANote=).  The parties agree that
Section 3.3(a) of the Note is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

     Aa.  The principal amount outstanding under this Note (currently $900,000)
          shall be due and payable on October 22, 2001.  Accrued interest shall
          be payable at the same time as the payment of principal on this Note,
          and upon payment of this Note in full.=

     The parties hereby acknowledge and agree that except as amended as provided
above, all other terms and provisions of the Note remain in full force and
effect.

     Agreed to as of this 19th day of February, 1999.

                                    CompuCom Systems, Inc.



/s/ Edward R. Anderson              By:  /s/ M.L. SMITH
------------------------------          -----------------------------
Edward R. Anderson                  Its: SVP/CFO
                                        -----------------------------
No. 68076.

#### California Floral Mfg. Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/16733, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of rice paper similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Florad Arts Studios et al.*v. *United States*(49 Cust. Ct. 43, C.D. 2359), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: sparememom@mchsi.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:18:21 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Christine Lyon

Des Moines, IA 50317
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 198 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        March 12, 2007.
Whereas the first African Americans were brought forcibly to the shores of 
        America as early as the 17th century;
Whereas African Americans were enslaved in the United States and subsequently 
        faced the injustices of lynch mobs, segregation, and denial of basic, 
        fundamental rights;
Whereas despite this enslavement, early Black Americans made significant 
        contributions to the economic, educational, political, artistic, 
        literary, religious, scientific, and technological advancement of the 
        United States;
Whereas in the face of these injustices, United States citizens of all races 
        distinguished themselves in their commitment to ideals of which the 
        United States was founded and fought for the rights and freedom of 
        African Americans;
Whereas the United States was conceived, as stated in the Declaration of 
        Independence, as a new country dedicated to the proposition that ``all 
        Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with 
        certain inalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the 
        Pursuit of Happiness'';
Whereas since its founding, the United States has been an imperfect work in 
        making progress towards those noble goals;
Whereas the history of the United States is the story of a people regularly 
        affirming high ideals, striving to reach them but often failing, and 
        then struggling to come to terms with the disappointment of that failure 
        before committing themselves to trying again; and
Whereas the month of February is officially celebrated as Black History Month, 
        which dates back to 1926, when Dr. Carter G. Woodson set aside a special 
        period of time in February to recognize the heritage and achievement of 
        Black Americans: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the significance of Black History Month as an 
        important time to recognize the contributions of Black Americans in the 
        Nation's history, and encourages the continued celebration of this month 
        to provide an opportunity for all people of the United States to learn 
        more about the past and to better understand the experiences that have 
        shaped the Nation; and
            (2) affirms that--
                    (A) the contributions of Black Americans are a significant 
                part of the history, progress, and heritage of the United 
                States; and
                    (B) the ethnic and racial diversity of the United States 
                enriches and strengthens the Nation.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
From: Cynthiabutler@cfl.rr.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:29:41 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Cynthia Butler

Winter Park, FL 32789
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 179 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 179

         Expressing support for a National Foster Parents Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 16, 2007

Mrs. Boyda of Kansas (for herself, Mr. Gilchrest, Mr. Moore of Kansas, 
 Ms. Millender-McDonald, Ms. DeLauro, Mr. Cardoza, Mr. McDermott, Mr. 
  Kirk, and Mr. Cooper) submitted the following resolution; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
         Expressing support for a National Foster Parents Day.

Whereas the family, serving as the primary source of love, identity, self-
        esteem, and support, is the very foundation of our communities, and our 
        United States;
Whereas foster families, who open their homes and hearts to children whose 
        families are in crisis, play a vital role in helping children heal and 
        reconnect and in launching those children into successful adulthood;
Whereas over 500,000 youth are in foster care with at least 380,000 in a family-
        home setting;
Whereas numerous individuals and public and private organizations work to 
        increase public awareness of the needs of children in foster care and 
        leaving foster care as well as of the enduring and valuable 
        contributions of foster parents; and
Whereas those families who are able to serve a role as foster parents should be 
        wholeheartedly encouraged to do so: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that--
            (1) a National Foster Parents Day should be established to 
        recognize the contributions of foster parents across the 
        Nation; and
            (2) the President should issue a proclamation calling on 
        the people of the United States and interested groups to 
        conduct appropriate ceremonies, activities, and programs to 
        demonstrate support for foster parents across the Nation.
                                 <all>
```
From: jangstadt@embarqmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:18:51 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am a Family Practice physician. I am very concerned that the freedom of conscience provisions in

health care are threatened by provisions in the new health care law.

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

JoAnn Angstadt

, 17257-9709
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal
Procedures) of the United States Code and shall not be relied on by any person for any other purpose.



The undersigned, who are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Liberty National Bancshares, Inc. (the
Company), hereby each certify as follows:



The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company (the Report), which accompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



This 12th day of November 2003.



| |  |                                                                        
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 
| |  | /s/ William L. Daniel                                                  
| | 
| |  | William L. Daniel Chief Executive
Officer (Principal Executive Officer)



| |  |                                                                                            
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 
| |  | /s/ Jesse R. Cheatham, Jr.                                                                 
| | 
| |  | Jesse R. Cheatham, Jr. Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Liberty National Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



- 17 -
Exhibit 32.1

      Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


I,  Lars Pearl, President and Chief Executive Officer of Aurora Gold Corporation
(the  "Company"),  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002,  that  to  my  knowledge:

1.   The Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-QSB of the Company for the period ended
     June  30, 2007 which this certification accompanies fully complies with the
     requirements  of  section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
     1934:  and

2.   The information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  August  17,  2007                           BY:  /s/  Lars  Pearl
       -----------------                                ----------------
                                                        Lars  Pearl
                                                        President and Chief
                                                        Executive Officer




This  certification  accompanies  this  Report  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002  and  shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes  of  Section  18  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A
signed  original  of  this  written  statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears  in  typed  form within the electronic version of this written statement
required  by  Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by  the  Company  and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff  upon  request.