alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 68061.

#### Engis Equipment Company *v.*United States,

protests 252354-K/6725, etc. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Sheffield micro-form grinders similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 67391, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: tghenry001@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:43:49 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Todd Henry

Columbus, OH 43228
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Cruisecam International, Inc., a Florida
corporation, (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending September 30,
2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, D. Scott Watkins, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:

1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


/s/ D. Scott Watkins
--------------------
D. Scott Watkins
Chief Financial Officer
June 5, 2006
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Orbit/FR, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the three months ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dave
Lubbe, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

May 15, 2006


/s/ Dave Lubbe
-------------------------------------
Dave Lubbe
Chief Financial Officer


                                       21
302 CERTIFICATION

I, Betty Soumekh, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K of Excel
Global, Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;

         4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
12a-14) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and
have:

      a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing
date of this report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c)  presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

         5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: March 30, 2010               /s/Betty Soumekh
                                   ----------------------------
                                   Betty Soumekh
                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                   Chief Financial Officer
From: rhaustin@altelco.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:12:05 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Robert Austin

Allendale, MI 49401
From: pastorbrad@northridgebaptistchurch.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:56:31 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Brad Smith

Northport, AL 35473
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           8,591
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,060
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (5,122)
<INVENTORY>                                      2,014
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                52,529
<PP&E>                                          72,909
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,947
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 209,822
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,276
<BONDS>                                        163,883
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,827)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   209,822
<SALES>                                         79,892
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                79,892
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   80,004
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,078
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,190)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        25
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,215)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (124)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,339)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.38)
        

</TABLE>
From: kathrynleonard@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:58:45 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kathryn Leonard

Glen Burnie, MD 21060
Before the Second Division,

January 30, 1957

No. 60462.

#### Hedaya Mercantile Corp. and Dorel Co. *v.*United States,

protests 253896-K and 199629-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk scarves or squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
breslow101912.htm






  





  











  













 


DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE


 


 



Exhibit 10.81









 







 


 







 


 


$250,000                                                                           Date:  October 19, 2012


 


 







 


 


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned jointly and severally promise to pay to the order of Warren Breslow, the sum of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars and no/100 ($250,000.00), together with interest of 10% per annum on the unpaid balance.


 


 


The entire principal and any accrued interest shall be fully and immediately payable UPON DEMAND of any holder thereof.


 


 







 


 


 

 


 


 


”Borrower”


 


Aura Systems, Inc.

















____________________


Melvin Gagerman


Chief Executive Officer







 


Dated: October 19, 2012
From: bnschaible@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:56:37 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Beth Schaible

Fargo, ND 58103
130 STAT. 358 PUBLIC LAW 114–147—APR. 29, 2016 

Public Law 114–147 

114th Congress 

An Act 

To direct the Architect of the Capitol to place in the United States Capitol a 

chair honoring American Prisoners of War/Missing in Action. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National POW/MIA Remembrance 

Act of 2015’’. 

SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

Congress finds the following: 

(1) In recent years, commemorative chairs honoring American Prisoners of War/Missing in Action have been placed in 

prominent locations across the United States. 

(2) The United States Capitol is an appropriate location 

to place a commemorative chair honoring American Prisoners 

of War/Missing in Action. 

SEC. 3. PLACEMENT OF A CHAIR IN UNITED STATES CAPITOL HONORING AMERICAN PRISONERS OF WAR/MISSING IN ACTION. 

(a) OBTAINING CHAIR.—The Architect of the Capitol shall enter 

into an agreement to obtain a chair featuring the logo of the 

National League of POW/MIA Families under such terms and conditions as the Architect considers appropriate and consistent with 

applicable law. 

(b) PLACEMENT.—Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act, the Architect shall place the chair obtained under 

subsection (a) in a suitable permanent location in the United States 

Capitol. 

SEC. 4. FUNDING. 

(a) DONATIONS.—The Architect of the Capitol may— 

(1) enter into an agreement with any organization described 

in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 that 

is exempt from taxation under section 501(a) of that Code 

to solicit private donations to carry out the purposes of this 

Act; and 

(2) accept donations of funds, property, and services to 

carry out the purposes of this Act. 

Deadline. 

Contracts. 

National 

POW/MIA 

Remembrance 

Act of 2015. 

Apr. 29, 2016 

[H.R. 1670] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS
PUBLIC LAW 114–147—APR. 29, 2016 130 STAT. 359 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1670: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 114–410 (Comm. on House Administration). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 162 (2016): 

Mar. 21, considered and passed House. 

Apr. 14, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

(b) COSTS.—All costs incurred in carrying out the purposes 

of this Act shall be paid for with private donations received under 

subsection (a). 

Approved April 29, 2016. 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLAWS