alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
J,,00 srAT

~

s 

~ yo UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY _ 

g ~~~/J Q WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

z ~11ft► 0 

PROj,G~`

2 

NQV 10 2,910 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

Mr. J.R. Stroble 

Director, National TRU Program 

Carlsbad Field Office 

Department of Energy 

P.O. Box 3090 

Carlsbad, NM 88221 

IDear Mr. Stroble: 

We received your letter dated November 10, 2010, requesting the U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency's (EPA's) concurrence on the draft re-certification memo the Carlsbad Field 

Office (CBFO) plans to issue to the Central Characterization Project (CCP) at the Idaho National 

Laboratory (INL). We concur with CBFO's draft re-certification memo allowing INL CCP to 

expand INL certification to include two debris waste streams -- ID-RTC-S3000 solids waste, and 

IN-ID-NRF-153. 

In accordance with EPA regulations at 40 CFR 194.8 (69 FR 42571-42583), on 

January 16, 2007, EPA approved the RH TRU waste characterization program at INL (See EPA 

Air pocket No. A-98-49,1I-A4-72). 

The EPA limitations applicable to the characterization of RH TRU waste are 

appropriately included in Attachment 4 of the draft re-certification memo. The waste 

characterization equipment, procedures and processes included in the ANL draft re-certification 

memo are consistent with EPA's existing approvals at the site. 

Thank you for providing us with an opportunity to review the draft re-certification memo 

for INL CCP. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at 202-343-9422 or 

Rajani Joglekar at 202-343-9462. 

Sincerely, 

Edward Feltcorn 

Center for Waste Management and Regulations 

Intemet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

RecycledlRecyclable o Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Poetconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper 
cc: (Electronic Distribution) 

Christine Gelles, DOE HQ 

Alton Harris, DOE HQ 

Ed Ziemianski, CBFO 

Ava Holland, CBFO QA 

Nonma Castaneda, CBFO NTP 

Court Fesmire, CBFO NTP 

Martin Navarrete, CBFO QA 

Dennis Miehls, CBFO QA 

Jonathan Edwards, EPA 

Tom Peake, EPA 

Raymond Lee, EPA 

Steve Zappe, NMED
EXHIBIT 31.2
 SELECT MEDICAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION
AND
SELECT MEDICAL CORPORATION
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Select Medical Holdings Corporation and
Select Medical Corporation;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 (c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 (d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Dated: November 12, 2010
    /s/ Martin F. JacksonMartin F. JacksonExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                                 5
<MULTIPLIER>                                          1,000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                         6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                    JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                              129,708
<SECURITIES>                                         81,693
<RECEIVABLES>                                       314,096
<ALLOWANCES>                                         40,389
<INVENTORY>                                          14,424
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    651,820
<PP&E>                                              647,260
<DEPRECIATION>                                      173,752
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1,852,398
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               454,446
<BONDS>                                           1,486,224
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                         115,000
<COMMON>                                                583
<OTHER-SE>                                         (290,415)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1,852,398
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    766,430
<CGS>                                               534,216
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       947,920
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      4,159
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   78,825
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (243,358)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          1,314
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (244,672)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (244,672)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (4.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (4.37)



</TABLE>
CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue


Registration No.  333-35460
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (2)
PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  059				                           Trade Date: 03/23/01
(To Prospectus Supplement & Prospectus dated
  September 8, 2000)						                                Issue Date:  03/27/01
The Date of this Pricing Supplement March 23, 2001

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION
OR REPAYMENT
Date and terms of redeption or repayment
(including any applicable regular or special record dates)

CUSIP
 or	   Stated				                                    Interest
Common	Interest		        Price to	    Discounts &    Payment	    Survivor's
Code   Rate (1)	Maturity	Public (2)	  Commissions    Frequency	  Option	Yes/No

14911QCL3	   5.05%	03/15/04	100%	        0.625%    Monthly	      YES	    NO



Original Issue Discount Note:					Total Amount of OID:
____  Yes	  X   No						N/A



(1) The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar
Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not
affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the
effective date of the change.

(2) Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to
Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the
time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned, Asher Zwebner, the Chief Financial Officer of Dynamic Applications,
Corp. (the “Company”), certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for
the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form
10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Dated:
January 28, 2010





By:
                /s/ Asher ZwebnerName:
      Asher ZwebnerTitle:
      Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial and Accounting
Officer)
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 25, 2017

a0717 

# Order

Clerk July 25, 2017

154111 & (27)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 154111

COA: 330207

Berrien CC: 2011

- 003033

- FC

MICHAEL EUGENE BARNER,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_____________________________________/

By order of April 4, 2017, the prosecuting attorney was directed to answer the

application for leave to appeal the June 17, 2016 order of the Court of Appeals. On order

of the Court, the answer having been received, the application for leave to appeal is again

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented

should be reviewed by this Court. For purposes of MCR 6.502(G)(1), the Court notes

that, although the defendant’s motion has been styled as a motion for relief from

judgment by the courts below, it should not be regarded as a motion for relief from

judgment in any future case. The defendant actually filed a motion to correct an invalid

sentence under MCR 6.429, which was properly denied by the trial court for lack of

merit. It was also untimely. MCR 6.429(B) . The application for leave to appeal to the

Court of Appeals was properly denied, but due t o the lack of merit in the grounds

presented, not under the rules of MCR 6.501, et seq . The motion for relief is DENIED as

moot.
Consent of Independent Accountants

We hereby  consent  to the  inclusion  in the  Current  Report on Form  8-K/A of
Phar-Mor,  Inc. dated May 10, 1999 of our report dated April 9, 1999 relating to
the financial  statements of Pharmhouse Corp. as of January 30, 1999 and January
30, 1998 and for each of the three years in the period ended January 30, 1999.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

May 10, 1999
New York, New York
From: grow0441@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:47:47 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that ll "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance with

no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for any

organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Geary Rowell

Mayo, FL 32066
From: won7dthree@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:29:49 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Wm. Norman Rogers

Fort Myers, FL 33905
Before the Second Division,

June 30, 1966

No. P66/137. —

#### Radio Wire Television, Inc. *v.*United States, protests 60/11602, 60/11604, and 60/11606 (New York).

Bao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of multitesters and meters similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *G. L.*Electronics, Inc., *Arrow*Sales, *Inc.*(49 CCPA 111, C.A.D. 804), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
-  Home 
-  Reports and Publications 
-  All Reports and Publications 
-  2000 
-  Child Support Enforcement State Disbursement Units: Sharing the Experiences of Six States 

#                     Child Support Enforcement State Disbursement Units: Sharing the Experiences of Six States                

08/11/200008/11/2000

##                         Report Materials                    

        -    Full Report (PDF, 277.9 KB) 

----

            Report Type

Evaluation

            HHS Agencies

Administration for Children and Families

            Issue Areas

 - 

            Target Groups

 - 

            Financial Groups

 - 

### Notice

This report may be subject to section 5274 of the National Defense Authorization Act Fiscal Year 2023, 117 Pub. L. 263.
From: grace54cl@peoplepc.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:46:03 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Carolyn Morgan

Vancouver, WA 98661
EXHIBIT 31.1

                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
          PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Peter Porath, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Marwich II,
Ltd.

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this annual report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

     4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and we have:

          a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
prepared;

          b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such valuation; and

          c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

     5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors:

          a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

          b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting.

Dated:  May 4, 2005

/s/ Peter Porath
Peter Porath
Vice President, Chief Executive Officer