alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(R.D. 11490)

#### Kurt Orban Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 28142.

*785(Decided February 14, 1968)

*Shari-etts, Paley, Carter & Blauvelt*for the plaintiff.

*Edwin L. Weisl, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Landis, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States that the merchandise covered by the above enumerated apjieal consists of steel wire rods exported from Japan on or about February 23, 1966, and that said merchandise is not on the list of products published in T.D. 54521 from which the application of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (P.L. 927, 84th Congress, 2nd Session), is withheld.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the price at the time of exportation to the United States of the instant merchandise at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold, or in the absence of sales offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities, and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, was $88 per metric ton, net packed.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the instant appeal is submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

Accepting this stipulation as a statement of facts, I find and hold that export value, as defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (T.D. 54165), is the proper basis for determining value of the steel wire rods, described on the invoice of the entry in this appeal for reappraisement, and that such value is $88 per metric ton, net packed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Terry J. Heimes, certify that:

1.         I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K, of Nelnet Student Loan Trust 2008-3 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

2.         Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.         Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report has been included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.         Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

5.         All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

| Date:  March 31, 2009 | /s/ TERRY J. HEIMES |
|-----------------------|---------------------|

Terry J. Heimes

Vice President

Nelnet Student Loan Funding Management Corporation,

Manager and Special Member of the Depositor
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       6,187,938
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               49,055,657
<ALLOWANCES>                                (2,599,444)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         694,733
<DEPRECIATION>                                  55,123
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              76,577,639
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  5,122,864
<COMMON>                                    28,752,686
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                76,577,639
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,231,458
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,643,764
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,062,835
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (412,306)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (412,306)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.06)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Annual Report of Acorn Holding Corp.  (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended  December  31, 2003 as filed with the  Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on the  date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Larry  V.
Unterbrink,  Treasurer  (Principal  Financial  and  Accounting  Officer)  of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

      (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
           15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)  The  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
           material respects,  the financial  condition and result of operations
           of the Company.


                                        /s/ Larry V. Unterbrink
                                        -----------------------------------
                                        Larry V. Unterbrink
                                        Treasurer (Principal Financial
                                        and Accounting Officer)
February 4, 2005
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

November 21, 2011 

h1114 

Order 

 

November 21, 2011 

143480 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 143480 

 COA: 294561 

MARTEZ CEDRICK WILLIAMS, Oakland CC: 2009-225795-FC 

Defendant-Appellant. 

____________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 16, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Before the First Division,

November 4, 1968

No. P68/465.

protests 60/20321, etc. (New York).

No. P68/466.

protests 64/16108, etc. (New York).

#### Organon, Inc. *v.*United States, Organon, Inc. *v.*United States,

Watson, J.

In accordance with, stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of adreno-corticotrophic hormones (ACTH) the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Organon, Inc.*v. *United States*(59 Cust. Ct. 363, C.D. 3170), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: donnaone@toast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:44:55 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Donna Kirk

Toledo, OH 43606
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                             7
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          1,539,679
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                 0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                   0
<EQUITIES>                                            0
<MORTGAGE>                                            0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                         0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                1,539,679
<CASH>                                          996,360
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                    0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                3,786,123
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 939,688
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             629,872
<POLICY-OTHER>                                        0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                 0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                   8,689
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                        503,384
<OTHER-SE>                                    1,438,983
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  3,786,123
<PREMIUMS>                                      350,544
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              65,466
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                    0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  203,229
<BENEFITS>                                      118,072
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      24,538
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (148,465)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (57,901)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (90,564)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (90,564)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (.17)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                        0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                   0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                     0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                      0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                       0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                               0
        

</TABLE>
From: nancy.k.long@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:56:03 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Nancy Long

Florissant, MO 63031
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
BJs Wholesale Club, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended May 3, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Michael T. Wedge, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated: |  | June 13, 2003 |  |  |  |  |  | /S/    MICHAEL T.
WEDGE                 
|------ |  | ------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------
|       |  |               |  |  |  |  |  | Michael T. Wedge Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to BJs Wholesale Club, Inc. and will be retained by BJs Wholesale Club, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
BJs Wholesale Club, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended May 3, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Frank D. Forward, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated: |  | June 13, 2003 |  |  |  |  |  | /S/    FRANK D.
FORWARD                 
|------ |  | ------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------
|       |  |               |  |  |  |  |  | Frank D. Forward Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to BJs Wholesale Club, Inc. and will be retained by BJs Wholesale Club, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATE OF
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
OF
DOBSON COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION I, Bruce R. Knooihuizen, Chief Financial Officer of Dobson Communications
Corporation (the Company), hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge,
the quarterly report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2004, (the Report):  a.
    
    complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and thatb.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition of the Company at June 30,
2004, and the results of the Companys operations for the period ended
June 30, 2004. August 9, 2004
    
    /S/ BRUCE R. KNOOIHUIZENBruce R. KnooihuizenExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
From: treasure@backroads.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:58:10 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Lynn Smith

Laurens, SC 29360