alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: clorino@aollc.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:22:18 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Cynthia Lorino

Montgomery, AL 36111
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION Pursuant to
the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, or Exchange Act, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18
of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. ss.1350), James P. Panek, Chief Executive
Officer of VaxGen, Inc., or the Company, and Matthew J. Pfeffer, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certify that, to the best of
their knowledge: 1.
The
 Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006,
 to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1, or the Report, fully
 complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and2.
The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. In Witness
Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 29th
day of August, 2007. /s/ James P. Panek

/s/ Matthew J. PfefferChief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer This certification accompanies
the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing
of VaxGen, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the
Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in
such filing. End of
Filing 1
Steven J. Combs 05/13/2015

Droneview LLC 13550 Donop Road Elmendorf TX 78112 (208) 610

- 6285 sccombs@earthlink.net U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Wa shington, DC 20590 Filed with www.regulations.gov Re: Request fo r modification of Exemption No.11403, Regulatory Docket No. FAA
- 2015
- 0148. Dear Sir or Madam, Droneview LLC requests a modification of the above exemption number in the respect of adding an additional UAV to the business

. The UAV is the DJI Phantom 3 Professional which in all practical aspects of the flight characteristics is the same as the Phantom 2 Vision + in which Droneview was granted its exemption. The differences from the Phantom 2 Vision + and the Phantom 3 professional is mainly the camera s ystem and the camera system software. All of the previous safety standards and features from the Phantom 2 Vision + are incorporated into the Phantom 3 Professional as well as some easier to use and more intuitive remote control functions. Droneview LLC w ill incorporate the Phantom 3 Professional into its business using the same pilot training and rigorous inspection procedures outlined in the original documents submitted under the Regulatory Docket FAA
- 2015
- 0148 with separate and serial number specific ch ecklists and maintenance records. The operator’s manual for the DJI Phantom 3 Professional as well as the quick start manual are available online at http://www.dji.com/product/phantom
- 3/download

. The file size is 13.2 Mb and will not upload to the Regulations.gov website as it’s too large. If you have any questions please contact me at the information above. Sincerely, Steven J. Combs
Exhibit 31.1





SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION





I, John Jenkins certify that:





1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Nasus Consulting, Inc.





2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.  I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:





(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;





(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.







Date:  April 16, 2010
/s/ John JenkinsJohn JenkinsChief Executive and Financial Officer
No. 119.

No. 142.

#### Murray et al. *v.*Curlett et al., constituting the Board of School Commissioners of Baltimore City. School District of Abington Township, Pennsylvania, et al. *v.*Schempp et al.

*Herbert A. Wolff*and *Leo Rosen*on the motion.

Certiorari, *ante,*p. 809, to the Court of Appeals of Maryland; and

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. (Probable jurisdiction noted, *ante,*p. 807.) The motion of the American Ethical Union for leave to file a brief, as *amicus curiae,*is granted.
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 11

Peapod, Inc.
Statement Regarding Computation of Net Loss per Share

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 


                                                               Three months ended Sept. 30      Nine months ended Sept. 30,
                                                                  1996            1997               1996          1997
                                                                  ----            ----               ----          ----
<S>                                                           <C>              <C>              <C>             <C> 
Net Loss                                                      $(2,284,000)     $(2,814,000)     $(6,172,000)    $(8,792,000)
                                                              ============     ============     ============    ============
Weighted average
  Common Shares
  outstanding                                                   9,645,928       16,583,315        9,645,928      14,196,126

Additional Shares
  pursuant to SAB 83
  computation                                                   3,160,866                -        3,160,866         215,649
                                                              ------------     ------------     ------------    ------------
Shares used in computing
  pro forma net loss
  per share                                                    12,806,794       16,583,315       12,806,794      14,411,775
                                                              ============     ============     ============    ============

Pro forma net loss
  per share                                                   $     (0.18)     $     (0.17)     $     (0.48)    $     (0.61)
                                                              ============     ============     ============    ============
</TABLE> 

Note: The pro forma net loss per share is computed assuming the Conversion
      occurred at January 1, 1996.
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of VaxGen, Inc.
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I am responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on my most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ James P. PanekPrincipal Executive andFinancial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MIDDLE DISTRICT

**IN RE: CONSOLIDATED REPORTS AND**
**RETURN BY THE TAX CLAIMS BUREAU**
**OF NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY OF**
**PROPERTIES EXPOSED FOR SCHEDULED SALE SEPTEMBER 19,** 
**2012 UNDER THE REAL ESTATE TAX SALE LAW OF JULY 7, 1947, ACT** 
**NUMBER 542**

**PETITION OF: SHARI NEFF :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 141 MAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from**
**the Order of the Commonwealth Court**

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 12th day of July, 2016, the Petition for Allow ance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**
No. P67/26.

#### Craig Panorama, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 63/20178, etc. (Los Angeles).

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of radio earphones similar in all material respects to those the subject of Motorola, *Inc., and International*Expediters, *Inc.*v. *United States*(54 Cust. Ct. 303, Abstract 69019), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc. (the company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 28, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark S. Frey, Chief Financial Officer of the company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Mark S. Frey       
|Mark S. Frey           
|Chief Financial Officer
|May 7, 2010
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1476 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 23, 2008.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 5244) to amend the Truth in Lending Act to 
establish fair and transparent practices relating to the extension of credit 
under an open end consumer credit plan, and for other purposes. All points of 
order against consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under 
clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The amendment in the nature of a substitute 
recommended by the Committee on Financial Services now printed in the bill shall 
be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. All 
points of order against provisions of the bill, as amended, are waived. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, to 
final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally 
divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on Financial Services; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
    Sec. 2.  During consideration of H.R. 5244 pursuant to this resolution, 
notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the Chair may postpone 
further consideration of the bill to such time as may be designated by the 
Speaker.
    Sec. 3.  The chairman of the Committee on Armed Services may insert in the 
Congressional Record at any time during the remainder of the second session of 
the 110th Congress such material as he may deem explanatory of defense 
authorization measures for the fiscal year 2009.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.1

Statement





Pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. §1350, the undersigned officer of Luxemburg Bancshares, Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that to the knowledge of the undersigned:



(1)

the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2)

the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  May 11, 2004





/s/ John A. Slatky

John A. Slatky

Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Luxemburg Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by Luxemburg Bancshares, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.  This statement accompanies the periodic report to which it relates and shall not be deemed as filed as part of the report or otherwise for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Petition to Amend Existing 333 Exemption

Current Exemption: No. 14905

Exemption Holder: Casey Lewiston

This letter is being written with the purpose of adding two authorized aircraft to the existing

exemption number 14905. The exemption currently allows only for the operation of the custom

built AP­1 multirotor.

I would like to request the following aircraft be added as authorized equipment:

DJI Inspire

DJI Phantom 4

The proposed aircraft have been used in video production since their first sales, and have a great

track record of safety and reliability. In addition, the DJI aircraft are much smaller and lighter

weight than our existing Copterra AP­1. This will allow for an increase in safety when the larger

aircraft is not necessary.

The two aircraft named are currently available through the pilots associated with the petitioner.

They will be registered with proper N­numbers before any flights take place, and will operate

under the same guidelines as are listed in the original exemption request.

Thank you for your time,

Casey Lewiston

casey@agafilm.com

5675 Old Redwood Hwy Apt 4

Penngrove, CA, 94951

707.601.2637
No. 336, Misc.

#### Basham *v.*Pennsylvania Railroad Co.

*Ira Gammerman*for petitioner.

*David J. Mountan, Jr,*for respondent.

Motion for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*and petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York granted. Case transferred to the appellate docket.
No. 69782.

protests 64/24989, etc. (New York).

#### Magnesium Elektron, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Eao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of magnesium alloys similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Magnesium Electron, Inc.*v. *United States*(50 Cust. Ct. 71, C.D. 2391), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned, Asher Zwebner, the Chief Financial Officer of Dynamic Applications,
Corp. (the “Company”), certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for
the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form
10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Dated:
January 26 , 2009





By:
              /s/ Asher ZwebnerName:
      Asher ZwebnerTitle:
      Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting
    Officer)
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Orbit/FR, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Israel
Adan, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

November 14, 2005


/s/ Israel Adan
----------------------------------------
Israel Adan
President and Chief Executive Officer


                                                                              21
July 3, 2012

ELECTRONICALLY FILED

Dennis DeVany

Chief, EAS & Domestic Analysis Division

Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E.

Washington, DC 20590

RE: Spirit Airlines – DCA-FLL Service

Docket DOT-OST-2000-7182

Dear Mr. DeVany: 

By Order 2008-2-28 Spirit Airlines was granted two slot exemptions to provide service from 

Reagan National Airport to Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Effective August 11, 2012 Spirit is 

terminating all DCA service, including service to Fort Lauderdale, and returns these slots to the 

Department for reallocation.

Due to the access constraints at DCA, Spirit has found it difficult to operate its limited DCA slots 

profitably. Accordingly, it is moving all of its Washington, DC area service to Baltimore 

Washington International Thurgood Marshall Airport. Spirit is committed to providing robust, 

low fare service to the D.C. Metropolitan area from its new location at BWI. 

Sincerely,

Joanne Young

Counsel for Spirit Airlines, Inc.

cc: Brian Meehan

Docket OST-2000-7182
No. 284, Misc.

#### Clark *v.*Pepersack, Warden.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.