alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>         12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>     DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>          DEC-31-1996

<CASH>                       18,069,904 
<SECURITIES>                       0    
<RECEIVABLES>                   438,763 
<ALLOWANCES>                       0    
<INVENTORY>                        0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>             18,508,667 
<PP&E>                       33,602,388 
<DEPRECIATION>                     0    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               60,002,966 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         4,376,799 
<BONDS>                      47,736,328 
<COMMON>                           0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0    
<PREFERRED>                        0    
<OTHER-SE>                  (13,813,018)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 60,002,966 
<SALES>                      10,544,285 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>             11,830,330 
<CGS>                              0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 7,119,863 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              7,517,045 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            5,971,389 
<INCOME-PRETAX>              (8,777,967)
<INCOME-TAX>                       0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>         152,923,409 
<DISCONTINUED>                2,928,068 
<EXTRAORDINARY>              23,622,011 
<CHANGES>                   (16,000,000)
<NET-INCOME>                163,473,488 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    393.43 
<EPS-DILUTED>                    393.43 

        



</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 182 (Thursday, September 21, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65180-65181]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20438]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

[[Page 65181]]

    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Review of Institutional 
Training Grants (T32) in Digestive Diseases and Nutrition.
    Date: October 17, 2023.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, NIDDK, Democracy II, Suite 
7000A, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual 
Meeting).
    Contact Person: Tori Stone, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
NIDDK/Scientific Review Branch, National Institutes of Health, 6707 
Democracy Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 827-0994, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7d09120f14530e091213183d131415531a120b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2a5e45584304595e45444f6a444342044d455c">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 15, 2023.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-20438 Filed 9-20-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Bergio International, Inc(the “*Company*”), on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “*Report”*), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, each hereby certify, pursuant to and solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of their knowledge:

1.  

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

2.  

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By:  /s/ Berge Abajian

Berge Abajian

Principal Executive Officer

 

 

April 24, 2018

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Bergio International, Inc. and will be retained by Bergio International, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1 

### Brown, Kelly

From: Sasser, Erika Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 6:14 PM To: Frey, Nathan J. Cc: Wesson, Karen; Brown, Kelly; Scavo, Kimber; Mathias , Scott; Hemby, James; Elman, Barry; Cooperstein, Sharon Subject: EPA Responses to Summary of Interagency Comments Un der EO 12866 and 13563 --Ozone NAAQs NPRM Attachments: EPA Response to 11-17-2014 Summary of Interagency C omments on O3 NAAQS NPRM (11-21-2014).docx; EPA Response to 11-19-2014 Summa ry of Interagency Comments on O3 NAAQS NPRM (11 21 14).docx



### Nathan—

Attached please find EPA’s responses to two sets of interagency comments on the O3 NAAQS NPRM. Please let me know if there are any questions about these materia ls.

Thanks, Erika
From: deleath@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:32:13 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

dee ludwig

El Dorado, AR 71730
EXHIBIT 31.1
SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, James S. Beard, certify that:
- I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation;
- Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
- Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
- The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
- Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
- Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 
- Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
- The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
- All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
- Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
**Date:  October 31, 2003******By: /s/    James S. Beard******James S. Beard, President**********
No. 66453.

#### Heads and Threads, Inc., and Eastern Heads and Threads, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 60/9477 and 60/6795 (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protests were dismissed.
|   | (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated. |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: August 10, 2018 | /s/ Michael G. Magnusson    |
|-----------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                  | Michael G. Magnusson                  |
|                  | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                  |                                  |
San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District 

FINAL STAFF REPORT 

DRAFT AMENDMENTS TO RULE 3170 

(FEDERALLY MANDATED OZONE NONATTAINMENT FEE) 

May 19, 2011 

Appendix A: 

EPA’s Final Rule partially approving and partially disapproving 

District Rule 3170 

(8 pages) 
 

San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District 

FINAL STAFF REPORT 

DRAFT AMENDMENTS TO RULE 3170 

(FEDERALLY MANDATED OZONE NONATTAINMENT FEE) 

May 19, 2011 

Appendix B: 

EPA’s “Guidance on Developing Fee Programs Required by 

Clean Air Act Section 185...” 

(17 pages) 
 

San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District 

FINAL STAFF REPORT 

DRAFT AMENDMENTS TO RULE 3170 

(FEDERALLY MANDATED OZONE NONATTAINMENT FEE) 

May 19, 2011 

Appendix C: 

District Staff’s Report, October 21, 2010 

(58 pages) 
 

San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District 

FINAL STAFF REPORT 

DRAFT AMENDMENTS TO RULE 3170 

(FEDERALLY MANDATED OZONE NONATTAINMENT FEE) 

May 19, 2011 

Appendix D: 

District’s ARB Findings Request, November 10, 2010, and 

Signed Board Resolution from October 21, 2010 

(6 pages) 
 

San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District 

FINAL STAFF REPORT 

DRAFT AMENDMENTS TO RULE 3170 

(FEDERALLY MANDATED OZONE NONATTAINMENT FEE) 

May 19, 2011 

Appendix E: 

Assembly Bill 2522 

(3 pages) 
 

San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District 

FINAL STAFF REPORT 

DRAFT AMENDMENTS TO RULE 3170 

(FEDERALLY MANDATED OZONE NONATTAINMENT FEE) 

May 19, 2011 

Appendix F: 

ARB’s Executive Order G-10-126, making findings 

required by AB 2522 

(5 pages) 
 

San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District 

FINAL STAFF REPORT 

DRAFT AMENDMENTS TO RULE 3170 

(FEDERALLY MANDATED OZONE NONATTAINMENT FEE) 

May 19, 2011 

Appendix G: 

ARB’s request to the California Department of Motor Vehicles 

 (2 pages) 
 

San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District 

FINAL STAFF REPORT 

DRAFT AMENDMENTS TO RULE 3170 

(FEDERALLY MANDATED OZONE NONATTAINMENT FEE) 

May 19, 2011 

Appendix H: 

District’s Response to Comments on the 

3/8/11 version of Rule 3170 

(9 pages) 

Note: In the Notice of Public Hearing for the proposed 

amendments to Rule 3170, there was a request for additional 

public comments. No comments were received during this 

period which ended on May 2, 2011. 
 

San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District 

FINAL STAFF REPORT 

DRAFT AMENDMENTS TO RULE 3170 

(FEDERALLY MANDATED OZONE NONATTAINMENT FEE) 

May 19, 2011 

Appendix I: 

Sample Facility Fee Calculation Worksheet 

(1 page)
IV 

House Calendar No. 257 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1389 

[Report No. 110–808] 

Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the bill 

(H.R. 4137) to amend and extend the Higher Education Act of 1965, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 30, 2008 

Ms. MATSUI, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 4137) to amend and extend the 

Higher Education Act of 1965, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (H.R. 4137) to amend and extend the 

4 Higher Education Act of 1965, and for other purposes. 

5 All points of order against the conference report and 

6 against its consideration are waived. The conference re7 port shall be considered as read. 


PWALKER on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 257 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1389 

[Report No. 110

–808] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the conference report 

for other purposes. extend the Higher Education Act of 1965, and to accompany the bill (H.R. 4137) to amend and 

JULY 30, 2008 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


PWALKER on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
From: refotv@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:58:08 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

J Williams

Long Beach, CA 90808
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 12, 2019

No. 04-19-00017-CR

John Ray THATCHER,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR0442

Honorable Jefferson Moore, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement with the State, appellant John Ray Thatcher pled 

nolo contendere to the offense of evading arrest. As part of his plea agreement, appellant signed 

a separate “Waiver of Appeal.” The trial court imposed sentence and signed a certificate stating 

that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal” and “the defendant 

has waived the right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). This court gave appellant notice 

that the appeal would be dismissed unless an amended trial court certification showing he has the 

right to appeal was made part of the appellate record. See id. R. 25.2(d), id. R. 37.1; see also

Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order), disp. on merits, No. 

04-03-00176-CR, 2003 WL 21508347 (July 2, 2003, pet. ref’d) (not designated for publication). 

Appellant’s appointed appellate counsel filed a written response stating he reviewed the record 

and could find no right of appeal. After reviewing the record and counsel’s notice, we rendered 

an opinion and judgment on February 13, 2019, dismissing the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.

25.2(d). 

Despite appointed counsel’s prior response, on February 12, 2019, he filed an Anders

brief and a motion to withdraw. However, as counsel agreed in his response to our order, 

appellant has no right to appeal. See id. R. 25.2(a)(2). Accordingly, we ORDER STRICKEN

the Anders brief filed by counsel in this court on February 12, 2019, and DENY AS MOOT the 

motion to withdraw filed that same date. 

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on appellant and all counsel. 
_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 12th day of March, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAPHAEL RUSSELL,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant

- Appellee. No. 16

- 35381

D.C. No. 2:15

- cv

- 00328

- JLR

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington

James L. Robart, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 23, 2017 **

Before: McKEOWN, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Raphael Russell appeals pro se from t he district court’s judgment dismissing

his diversity action alleging claims related to his home insurance policy. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We re view for an abuse of discretion the

district court’s dismissal for failure to comply with court orders

, Malone v. U.S.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

OCT 31 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 35381

Postal Serv. , 833 F.3d 128, 130 (9th Cir. 1987) , and we affirm.

The district cou rt did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Russell’s action

after Russell failed to comply with court orders and meet discovery deadlines,

despite being given multiple extensions of time to comply and being warned that

failure to comply would result in dismissal. See id . ( discussing the five factors the

district court must weigh b efore dismissing a case for failure to comply with a

court order).

We do not consider documents and facts not presented to the district court.

See United States v. Elias , 921 F.2d 870, 874 (9th Cir. 1990) (“Documents or facts

not presented to the district court are not part of the record on appeal.”).

AFFIRMED.
HUNTSMAN CORPORATION HUNGARY 

ANALYTICAL LABORATORY 

SANITIZED 

UV/VIS REPORT