alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Lars
Pearl, President and Chief Executive Officer of Aurora Gold Corporation (the
“Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to my knowledge:





1.
            The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March
      31, 2008 which this certification accompanies fully complies with the
      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934: and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








Date:
            May 30,
      2008
            BY:
            /s/ Lars
      PearlLars
      PearlPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer











This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
From: jsoileau@lcmh.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:41:26 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Earl Soileau

Lake Charles, LA 70611
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Booth Creek Ski Holdings,  Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  as the Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  hereby  certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


March 17, 2003


                                          By:      /s/ GEORGE N. GILLETT, JR.
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                       George N. Gillett, Jr.
                                                      Chief Executive Officer
From: nanaanderson@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:41:03 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sylvia Anderson

Opelika, AL 36804
From: andersonmail@cox.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:02:00 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Karen Anderson

Council Bluffs, IA 51503
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OFTHE EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Intrusion Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, G.Ward Paxton, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| March 29, 2005 | /s/ G. Ward Paxton      |   |
|----------------|-------------------------|--------|
|           | G. Ward Paxton          |
|           | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

This Certificate is being deliveredpursuant to the requirements of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of the United States Code and shall not be relied on by any person for any other purpose.

The undersigned, who are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Liberty National Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby each certify as follows:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company (the “Report”), which accompanies this Certificate, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| This 8th day of August 2003.                                                      |   |   |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ WILLIAM L. DANIEL                                                             |   |   |        |
|                                                                                   |   |   |   |
| **William L. Daniel****Chief Executive Officer****(Principal Executive Officer)** |   |   |   |

 

|                                                                                                  |   |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ JESSE R. CHEATHAM, JR.                                                                            |   |   |        |
|                                                                                                       |   |   |   |
| **Jesse R. Cheatham, Jr.****Chief Financial Officer****(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)** |   |   |   |

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Liberty National Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by the Companyand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

-18-
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 19

- 00039

- CR

Darrell Wayne MOFFETT

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. B1779

Honorable Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

N o. 04

- 19

- 00040

- CR

Teresa Jo BRUFFETT

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. B1780

Honorable Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE MARTINEZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgments of the trial court are

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED September 4, 2019.

_____________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
| **Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity (Parenthetical) (USD $)In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified** | 12 Months Ended |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|
||
| Preferred Stock, Dividends, Per Share, Cash Paid                                                                                           | $ 0.06          | $ 12.50 |
| Issuance of Common Stock, Cost                                                                                                             | $ 20,429        |   |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Issuance of common stock, cost.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**fnbn_IssuanceOfCommonStockCost**Namespace Prefix:**fnbn_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**debit**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Aggregate dividends paid during the period for each share of preferred stock outstanding.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_PreferredStockDividendsPerShareCashPaid**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**num:perShareItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr., United States District Judge for th e 1 Western District of Missouri, sitting by designation.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-1177

___________ In re: Doran Scott Wegner, also known * as Doran & Denise Wegner, * * Debtor. * * * * Kip M. Kaler, as Bankruptcy Trustee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the District Appellee, * of North Dakota. * v. * [UNPUBLISHED] * Elroy Letcher, * * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: June 10, 1998 Filed: July 1, 1998

___________ Before BOWMAN, Chief Judge, BEAM, Circuit Judge, and GAITAN, District Judge. 1

___________ PER CURIAM.-2-

Elroy Letcher appeals the decision of the di strict court affirming the order of the Bankruptcy Court of the District of North Dakota in this adversary bankruptc y proceeding.
The facts are set forth in deta il in the memorandum and order of the bankruptcy court dated and filed on July 10, 1997. They need not be repeated here.
We are con vinced that the well reasoned opinion of the bankruptcy court a s affirme d by the district court correctly discusses and decides the issues in dispute i n this case. Accordingly, no error of law or fact being evident, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. ATTEST: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 244 (Wednesday, December 19, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75253-75254]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-30541]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8027]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Wait, Later This Will Be Nothing: Editions by Dieter 
Roth''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Wait, Later This Will Be Nothing: Editions 
by Dieter Roth,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within 
the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are 
imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or 
custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the 
exhibit objects at the Museum of Modern Art, New York, New York, from 
on or about February 13, 2013, until on or about June 24, 2013, and at 
possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in 
the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

[[Page 75254]]

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: December 10, 2012.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-30541 Filed 12-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Briefing on Operation Independence

              																	United States. Congress. House. Committee on Banking, Finance, and Urban Affairs. Subcommittee on International Trade, Investment, and Monetary Policy, 1985-1989					 and 	Ninety-Fourth Congress, 1975-1977. 						*Briefing on Operation Independence : Hearing Before the Subcommittee on International Trade, Investment and Monetary Policy of the Committee on Banking, Currency and Housing, House of Representatives, Ninety-Fourth Congress, First Session, March 12, 1975*,												Washington: 								U.S. Government Printing Office, 										March 12, 1975,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/221,			accessed on September 22, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
From: Alice Tinkley

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 6:21:28 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Alice Tinkley

2373 WoodCreek Court

Tucker, GA 30084
No. 73, Misc.

#### Holiday *v.*United States.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg*and *J. F. Bishop*for the United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.